Slashdot Mirror
OS X Mountain Lion Out Tomorrow
Apple revealed in its third quarter earnings release today that OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion will be released tomorrow, July 25th. "As a quick recap, the $19.99 software update brings a handful of iOS features to Macs, including the notes and reminders apps. It adds a few other things, like Twitter integration, Apple's Game Center and iMessage services. There's also a new security feature called Gatekeeper, designed to fend off malware by controlling what applications can and cannot be installed." The release also noted that iOS 6 will be coming out this fall, and that the company sold 17 million iPads in the third quarter, up 84% from sales in the third quarter of last year.
Will they finally fix their WiFi woes?? My brand new macbook pro drops connections more than I drop the end of
We keep replacing our desktop environment every once in a while, now recently with Unity/GNOME3. Have we actually gone anywhere? At the same time OS X is in many ways very similar to the original Mac interface almost 30 years ago.
Can the Linux desktop survive that long?
designed to fend off malware
Why would you need this on a Mac?
to um...fend off the malware?
Seriously dude, did you even read what you just wrote?
Sounds like the beginning of the iOS walled garden for OSX
There's a simple lock and unlock function for system preferences panes. So, for instance, you could have GateKeeper turned on for the family Mac, which would give the kids the freedom to install any software that is signed, but you would need the admin password to install unsigned software. It's a step up from the admin-only software install approach.
What will they name releases when they run out of cats? I mean, "10.10 Housecat" just doesn't sound like a product people would be enthusiastic about...
By the time Mountain Lion launches, it will have been a few days over a year since the previous major release. Hardly 10 minute updates. Plus, it's rare that you meet someone who is aware and legitimately cares about a difference between Chrome version X and Chrome version X+1. In contrast, Apple added a few hundred new features, a few of which people have been requesting for years.
Yeah, it's so restrictive to have the choice of what sources you want to trust for installing software.
No, it will be called "The New OS X".
Assuming regularly distributed birthdays, since AFAIK technical prowess isn't linked to birth date.
AFAIK technical prowess isn't linked to slashdot readership either...
Huh? Optionally restricting the OS to running only signed binaries, and checking certificates haven't been revoked is ridiculous? What fantasy land do you live in?
I didn't even suspect it had teh gay!
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Is this anything like Gatekeeper from The Net?
If so, stay away! ;)
"A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
In other words, Apple will control what third party software you're allowed to install on your own machine.
If you don't like it, uncheck the box and install anything you wish. That's what I'll be doing.
For the typical home user, though, I think it's a reasonable limitation that's not likely to impact what they can do *at all*.
#DeleteChrome
I "upgraded" from Snow Leopard to Lion at the urging of a friend who had it already and
that upgrade has been an unmitigated disaster. I then spent many hours getting things
which had "just worked" working again. The loss of productivity which resulted was significant.
Snow Leopard was stable, and did everything I needed to do.
Lion includes a bunch of iOS mimicry which is a stupid mistake and which makes me
regret being an Apple user because it feels like I have been duped into thinking I was
buying great design when I have been hoodwinked into buying consumer-level crap.
Apple's attempt at forcing the merging of iOS device and laptop interface design is
beyond merely annoying ; it has degraded the usefulness of my machine in a permanent
manner and there is no fix short of going back to Snow Leopard.
There will be no further "upgrades" for me, not when reduced functionality at the expense
of satisfying the idiotic design decision which makes my high-end laptop act like an
iPad.
I may be a bit premature but I think this is the beginning of the end of Apple's run of
making great operating systems and great laptops ( glued-in battery ? No thanks ! )
Tim Cook is going to be famous for leading Apple into the abyss.
Mark my words.
The machine is 64 bit but some components aren't.
SL is great, but ML is leaps ahead of Lion. After running the GM since its release I can say it's noticeably faster on my early 2009 mac mini.
See, here's the thing you're missing. You have a fully functional machine which is running an OS more than 5 years newer than it, and it's doing it just fine. Lion will continue to work on it and be patched for the foreseeable future, and most software will run on it as well. What obligation does Apple have towards you? Did they sell you a machine that promised more than 5 years of updates? Or did they promise EFI64, which is what's needed to boot ML? (hint: they didn't). They sold you a 64-bit workstation, and you got a 64-bit workstation, and you've had no trouble upgrading the OS twice.
Via hacks and other messy stuff, you might be able to get it to work, and I expect directions will be available shortly and relatively straightforward, but it's hard to blame Apple for not wanting to mess up the experience. They seem happy to allow "hacks" to extend their product's functionality, but they're not really the kind of company to give you enough rope to hang yourself with, which is how they keep their reputation that anything "Apple-sanctioned" "just works"
I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
That's quite an attitude. What have you done for me lately?
Not a damned thing. Which is why I don't feel bad about you not doing anything for me.
Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
There is a checkbox in System Prefs to turn it off. Or if you control click on the app and select open it will launch (and white list for future launches).
It is really so people don't double click an app that has an icon that looks like a MP3. Or maybe they won't launch what looks like PhotoShop, but isn't. If it gets enough adoption from 3rd parties I can see it being a huge help to the average user. If it gets low adoption it'll be more useful for folks that really know what is going on.
I see a lot of comments asking "Why upgrade?" or not to bother if what you are currently running is working for you. What about security patches and support? I've searched all over the place and, so far, haven't been able to find any clear statement about when Apple stops support for a particular version of OS X. The "word of mouth" answer seems to be only the current release and one version prior are supported with patches and security fixes. It seems a bit irresponsible to drop support for an OS without letting your customers know that they're system is no longer being updated to protect against the various vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....