Slashdot Mirror
RIAA Admits SOPA Wouldn't Have Stopped Piracy
jfruh writes "One of the arguments against the now-dormant SOPA legislation was that, in addition to eroding Internet freedom, it would also be ineffective in stopping music piracy. Well, according to a leaked report, the RIAA agrees with the latter argument. The proposed laws would 'not likely to have been an effective tool for music,' according to the report. Another interesting revelation is that, despite the buzz and outrage over P2P sharing, most digital music piracy takes place via sneakernet, with music moving among young people on hard drives and ripped CDs."
Hindsight rationalization, anyone?
...duh?
I almost feel guilty every time I make a copy for someone. Almost.
Gotta upgrade to USB3. Copies take days.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Next up: Legislation requiring all hard drives, thumb drives and other storage devices to be registered with the government. You will need to transfer ownership of all devices and must submit monthly logs of any device your storage medium has been connected to regardless of whether or not it was accessed or even powered on.
Additional fees may apply for concealed carry SD cards.
Piracy only happens because hardware permits it...
We must out law sneakers.
The real 'sneakernet' is flash drives embedded in tennis shoes
Of course not. The point was NOT to endlessly funnel more money towards the RIAA, the MPAA and their respective legal teams, but to take the modest and humble earnings from lawsuits and return all of it to the artistssshhhahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaa.
Man I crack myself up sometimes.
Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
I get most of my music via free, legal downloads from artists and labels that offer them for promotional reasons. But I don't see this on the chart at all. Am I unusual, or was this deliberately left out of the RIAA's calculations?
"SOPA wouldn't have stopped piracy... It wasn't powerful enough! We'd need legislature that takes away even more internet freedom! The new bill we're going to be lobbying for will allow us to stop piracy once and for all. In addition, it'll stimulate the economy, create new jobs, and combat terrorism."
The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
RIAA dropped the SOPA?
Either they had really short hindsight, or they knew all along. Either way, these guys are asses.
I make hardware RNGs, which give 2.5849625 bits of entropy per use in theory (actual performance dependent on usage).
So we knew RIAA were assholes, but up until now i always thought they were just deluded idiots who bought research that supported their imagination. After seeing the percentage slide from that ITWorld article, I'm still brimming with viking rage.
Assholes, every one of them - they just lost my one last excuse to at least feel a tinge of sympathy for them. Sympathy for their illness, mind, but sympathy nonetheless.
"We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
That just means they'll try harder next time.
bah.
FTFY
From what I've heard, it was the MPAA that really pushed SOPA. The RIAA didn't think it would help them much, but, of course, weren't going to say no if given SOPA-powers. (Yes, I notice that looks like "super-powers." Does this make the MPAA a "SOPA-villain?")
Don't think for a second that the RIAA has gone all cuddly and pro-sharing, however. With SOPA defeated, the RIAA is making themselves busy pushing laws that they think would benefit them at the expense of customers.
My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
But in 2004-2005, a friend of mine and I discovered that you could mount the iPod Classic as a hard drive and bring the files over from Terminal.app or a Linux equivalent despite Apple's attempts to make it hard to access. Since the files all had ID3 tags, their attempts to obfuscate the file names were pointless if we wanted to share our collections.
The RIAA wants us to repurchase our media collection every few years to change formats so they can include DRM. It was bad enough that my 500+ cassette tape collection needed to be repurchased as CD audio. I was pissed, but the difference in audio quality really did matter to me for most of them. OTOH, my Judas Priest tapes weren't repurchased.
Around 1996, I converted my thousands of music CDs bought during the years of BMC Music club membership into MP3 files. It took me over a year doing about 5 CDs every day to finish. Usually 2 before work and 1-3 in the evenings. Computers were much slower back then, so doing a rip/lame was about 45 minutes per CD. It was like eating an elephant one bite at a time.
Every few years, I need to move those files to new storage media. Of course, they are backed up too - there's no chance that I'll be redoing all that time and effort again. When I need to move the data, I don't use a sneaker net. I have a real network, thank you.
I was unhappy with some of the prices of those CDs, but at least I "own" it. Clearly I was confused. I'm unhappy with current pricing for electronic music and don't believe I "own" anything afterwards. It isn't exactly "property". It feels imaginary. At least the question whether a music file will play on my systems today or in 50 yrs from now has finally been answered - no DRM.
SONY's attempt with a rootkit convinced me to never put a music CD into a mainstream OS again AND it proved to me never to trust big content companies AND never to buy software or hardware that is required to support their business failing DRM models.
I've tried a few different DRM-encumbered music files over the years through free samples.
The "Plays-for-Sure" stuff never played.
The Apple stuff never played.
Those failures convinced me to never buy music electronicly.
RIAA - "You've Got Another Thing Comin'"
I'm not "breaking the law" here.
as we all know by now SOPA wasnt the legislation we needed. it would never pass because under analysis by our patrio-tastic legislators it didnt work, so therefore we at the RIAA havent failed in our mission. We've merely come to appreciate the system of checks and balances that our freely elected government sees fit to impose to ensure whats just, right, and proper is applied to society.
this upcoming legislation however is correct and will prevent download piracy, a form of terrorism used by iranian homicide bombers, from taking place by using digital locks and content protection to preserve freedom. please disregard its passage.
Good people go to bed earlier.
Call me paranoid, but sometimes I think that some of the anti-piracy proposals are not about stopping piracy. SOPA, for example, could have made it impossible for a site like YouTube to exist, which in turn would make it difficult to share user-generated content. Because it made it dangerous to host user content and content from independent sources, it would risk forcing sites to only allow content being distributed from major corporate sources who could be verified to own the content.
It's not certain, but it could have been viewed as pushing us back towards broadcast networks where ISPs and large media companies act as gatekeepers on what information and entertainment you have access to.
Around 1996, I converted my thousands of music CDs bought during the years of BMC Music club membership into MP3 files. It took me over a year doing about 5 CDs every day to finish. Usually 2 before work and 1-3 in the evenings. Computers were much slower back then, so doing a rip/lame was about 45 minutes per CD. It was like eating an elephant one bite at a time.
Every few years, I need to move those files to new storage media. Of course, they are backed up too - there's no chance that I'll be redoing all that time and effort again.
1996? Either you're off by a few years, or you were a very early adopter...and at an average of 50MB per CD, you would've needed at least 100GB for "thousands" of CDs (i.e. 2000 CDs minimum). Hard drives that large weren't commonly available for another five years.
Plus I'd imagine those encodings sound dramatically worse than what you could get five years later at the same bitrate. Moreover, 128k was the custom at the time (onion on belt, etc.), and the old 128k files I have from the late '90s sound truly horrible today. All the high frequency transients turn into jangling keyrings.
So, uh...are you sure that Clinton was in office when you started this project?
Exactly.
I haven't paid for a commercial OS license in years, use Linux instead. /. readers, we really could send a message. What message? "Support Linux or early tech adopters won't support you."
I haven't bought a Bluray player, Roku, a 3D HDTV or netflix device. My thoughts are that until these work without DRM on my systems, it would be bad to give them any more money. Alone, my sacrifice doesn't do anything, but together with all
I do take advantage of Amazon Free MP3 albums when they are available, but I'll never pay any money for audio files. I'm older now and current music isn't very important to me. With all those CDs ripped 15 yrs ago, I can go for months without hearing the same song twice.
If I were going to buy music, it would only be directly from the artist after a local show.
A big metal-band got me pissed about record companies. I was a big fan, but since they filed that lawsuit, I haven't bought ANYTHING with {that crap name} on it since. Again, I doubt my little boycot matters to the band.
I'm a man of principles on this stuff. Don't worry, I don't have any principles on many (most?) other things ... I did some work for SONY in Japan in the late 1990s, as an example.
Oh, and I don't have a bookface account either, so watch out! ;)
Outlaw young people, round them all up and put them in work camps. That will teach them and get them of my lawn too!
On a more serious note, Brein (dutch RIAA) knows its block on the piratebay is meaningless. It is just the first small baby step to get politicians to swallow the poisoned pill. They know what they want to achieve in the end, a completely locked down society where every bit of content is payed for repeatedly and all creation belongs to the 1% no matter who created it or when it was created or how free that person made it.
But you can't ask for total control at once because most politicians are not completely amoral yet. But every small step, readies the ground for the next step.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
It is a much much bigger problem as artists / musicians don't get paid and US Taxpayers are being cheated.
Is it really piracy if you copy music from friends? Isn't copying between friends and family members completely legal in most jurisdictions?
I wonder if when the RIAA or any other organisation that goes against the people and they win millions or some cash..do they really give it back to the artist like it's logically suppose too or they keep it ?
And if SOPA had passed, we'd be hearing from the MAFIAA all about how it was a decisive, history-making victory for artists.
Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
Check out Steve Albini's often-quoted piece on recording contracts and tell me otherwise...
At this point albums are promotional materials for concert tours, where most bands make their money.
At least until Ticketmaster and Live Nation get bought up, at which point musicians may as well go back to flipping burgers....
That was a couple of years ago. Now, i hate these greedy bastards so much that i would pay more for music just to bypass them.
Fortunately, as long as i can access mp3million.com, it's a non-issue.
That's a pretty good trick.
1. Take the "propaganda meme" (money to the artists)
2. pull in a slashdot story from a few days ago, http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/07/29/0555208/ifpi-wont-share-pirate-bay-damages-with-musicians
3. ??
4. Karma Profit!
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
You actually misspelled Justin Bieber's name!
You misspelled Bieber and now there is "Bieber" and "Beiber", you created a Bieber-fork.
Don't fork the Bieber!
It's so easy to remember: Just think of beaver and translate it into German.
Beaver fever!
My theory is that the US Government was using the RIAA/MPAA as a proxy to get this rammed through.
"Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"