Slashdot Mirror


Radio Shack's TRS-80 Turns 35

harrymcc writes "On August 3, 1977, Radio Shack announced its TRS-80 microcomputer at an event in New York City. For the next several years, it was the world's most popular PC — but it never got the respect it deserved. (I still wince when I hear 'Trash-80.') Over at TIME.com, I'm celebrating the anniversary with some reflections on the machine and why it was so underappreciated."

231 comments

  1. TRS-80 - available in stores near you by cstec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Got that straight. The TRS-80 Model I was for sale in stores in August of '77 [I was when it arrived], available as a retail purchase when Apples were just kits.

    1. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the Apple ][ was in stores about two months before that, June 4 1977

    2. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My first computer. Figured out how to up the RAM from 16k to 48k (the max) myself. Figured out how to get lower case letters myself. Burned a ton of time on Scott Adams adventures.

      But the big thing was I taught myself to program. First BASIC, then when it proved too slow Z-80 assembler. For work I was a tech working on 8080-bases systems, so I used that assembler knowledge to write tests to exercise various circuitry. A co-worker and I wrote a Space Invaders clone, which turned out to be a hit at trade shows (prolly because marketing grabbed it before we gave the invaders missiles of their own. Engineering found out what I was doing and suddenly I was writing new software.

      Fast forward 35 years, I still write embedded software. And have my Trash-80 in the garage.

    3. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by cstec · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most people do. The Apple II didn't even have production tooling for the case until December 1977/early 78. Some early units were kits that were assembled and hand-sanded. Meanwhile the TRS-80 sold 10,000 units in the first month and a half.

      Don't get me wrong, the Apple rocked. But it wasn't really a production machine like the TRS-80 was. If you're going to call Apple the first consumer PC, then it's not. If you want to include Apple's kit days, then include all the kits like the Apple I (go Woz!) and the Ohio Scientific Challenger, the Exidy and of course the legendary Altair, which might truly be first.

    4. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by FloydTheDroid · · Score: 1

      Your dates are right, but your descriptions are wrong. The Apple ][ was sold as a fully assembled unit in June of '77. The cases has defects, the hand-sanding you mention, so they were retooled as of December of '77.

      Note the description in this story... the TRS-80 was introduced in August 1977. The machines weren't delivered until the end of December 1977. This would be half-a-year after the Apple ][ which was not a kit and therefor, the first consumer PC.

    5. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Artifex · · Score: 1

      Figured out how to up the RAM from 16k to 48k (the max) myself.

      Yup, my dad saved over $300 buying the modules for our Model I Level 2 himself over letting Rat Shack put them in -- my first lesson in vendor markup, as a kid.

      With both parents having done their dissertations on that machine, it's no wonder I'm used to being up all night -- that Daisy Wheel Printer II was loud enough to be heard across the house, and would go at all hours.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    6. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by MavenW · · Score: 1

      But the big thing was I taught myself to program. First BASIC, then when it proved too slow Z-80 assembler.

      This was also my experience. I saw the display model at the local Radio Shack and was fascinated. The owner let me take the programming manual home overnight. It was extremely well written. The next day when I brought it back, I could program in BASIC. I was breaking into the program and modifying it, and I was definitely hooked. I got a loan and bought one that day.

      BASIC was limited. But there was T-Bug, the program that allowed you to jailbreak the computer and modify memory in hex. Ultimate control!

      It was my introduction to the speed of machine language. Or maybe the slowness of interpreted BASIC. My first non-BASIC game was a version of Snake/Dominoes. After painstakingly writing the program in Hex on graph paper and typing it into the TBug hex editor, I hit the Run command and it flashed and was still. It took me a while to figure out that it worked perfectly, except that it was so blinkin' fast that the game was already over. I had to put wait loops inside of loops inside of loops to slow it down.

      I once wrote a brute force program to solve crypto-rhythms (math problems using letters instead of digits where you had to figure out which letter stood for which digit). In BASIC it took hours. In machine code, it took seconds.

      Ah, the speed of the 1 Mhz Z-80.

      Also, introduction to discrete logic hardware. I bought the technical reference manual, which included schematics of the entire thing. I accidentally fried one of the 74xx chips, but there were a couple of unused gates and with a few wires I was able to re-route the logic and bring it back up. Invaluable experience.

    7. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did not buy "modules". The 16k ram chips were soldered to the PCB. Extra ram was added by stacking 16k chips on top of the existing RAM (soldering) with an address pin lifted and connected to the PCB with a piece of wire. I very much doubt that Radio Shack staff were capable of doing that.

    8. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At work we had a 6 month shortage of 64k RAM. I know I, and a few of the guys I worked with, did the 5 finger discount to get the chip home.

      About the same time, we figured out the original Nintendo cartridge was a basic EPROM (2716?), with the read line inverted. So we all made boards that supported EEPROMs, and maintained a library of games at work.

      Good times that would now send us all to prison.

    9. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      But the big thing was I taught myself to program. First BASIC, then when it proved too slow Z-80 assembler.

      This was also my experience. I saw the display model at the local Radio Shack and was fascinated. The owner let me take the programming manual home overnight. It was extremely well written. The next day when I brought it back, I could program in BASIC. I was breaking into the program and modifying it, and I was definitely hooked. I got a loan and bought one that day.

      The first 'pc' I worked on (hardware-wise) was a Model 1. I did the upgrade to 48K for a buddy of mine and installed a 3rd party lowercase mod. That was back in the day when I could still solder for shit. Haven't picked up an iron in almost a decade.

      First 'pc' I owned was a CoCo 1. 16K RAM (until I got it home and voided the warrantee), the old Microsoft ROM BASIC. I learned Basic on it, then 6809 machine code. I got a 64K CoCo2, ran a COBBS board on it for about 6 months, a high speed board at 1200 baud! It taught me how to patch the Basic ROMs in RAM so you could do more with the system. Then, I got into OS9, going all the way up to a 256K CoCo3 before getting into an IBM.

      Fun times.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    10. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first computer as well! Actually I had the portable edition, and it wasn't very portable at all.

    11. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by scsirob · · Score: 1

      My TRS-80 was actually a clone, the Video Genie EG3003. With built-in cassette recorder no less. Got mine defective from a friend who had a lightning strike nearby. I clipped all TTL chips and replaced them. To my luck, the ROM, RAM and CPU were still intact!

      There were two ways to expand the memory. You could piggy-back 4116 DRAM chips on top of the original ones, or you could clip the original ones and insert 4164 DRAM chips for those. I believe if you went the second route, you had to remove capacitors and cut some traces, as one of the 4116 power pins had changed to an address line on the 4164..

      Ohh the memories ;-)

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    12. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Megane · · Score: 1

      The 16k ram chips were soldered to the PCB.

      RS never soldered RAM chips to the board. They were expensive and moderately fragile (in the electrical sense), and made it hard to upgrade from 4K to 16K. Instead, they used this high-tech invention called "sockets". And the stacking was specifically a Color Computer thing, because the SAM chip had a select line for a second bank of RAM.

      The Model I (which GP post specifically mentioned) required you to have an Expansion Interface for the other two rows of chips. (The Z-80 also never had the capability to refresh 64K chips directly.) I did this back in the day, and there was something strange about the chips: the values stored in them would wildly change randomly... until I cranked the power supply voltage to 4.5V or so. I still do not understand why this worked.

      The Expansion Interface was a tricky beast in itself. I was lucky to have one of the later ones which didn't require modifications to the main unit, or an ugly buffer box in the cable.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    13. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Megane · · Score: 1

      About the same time, we figured out the original Nintendo cartridge was a basic EPROM (2716?), with the read line inverted.

      That shows what 35 years does to the memory. The 2716 is a 2K ROM, way too small for Nintendo, which wasn't until 1986 anyhow. What you're describing is an Atari 2600 cartridge, which used 2516/2532 type chips. Not only was the chip select active-high, but the pinout had some pins swapped around compared to the 2716. (I've re-wired Pac-Man boards to make prototypes for my own code, but they weren't an option back in the day.)

      I've seen loads of home-pirate boards of various levels of circuit-board-fu on AtariAge, mostly people thinking they found a rare ($$$!!!) prototype. Many of them were clearly made by people who worked where they regularly had circuit boards made, so they send in their own custom order. This was back in the days before Gerber files, and you can see how they used the black-tape methods of laying down a photo-ready board, or just a cheap marker pen, for the board manufacturer. Some are very slick, some are completely clunky.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    14. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Megane · · Score: 1

      And good luck if you wanted one in '79 or so. They couldn't make them fast enough, and there was like a six month waiting period. I got one for my 14th birthday, and it was only because one got delivered to the wrong store, which wasn't about to send it to where it was supposed to go. (If that was you in Metarie, LA, I'm not even sorry.)

      The thing I remember most about first turning it on was that it started up with "MEMORY SIZE?" It took me half an hour to figure out that the correct response was to just hit the enter key.

      After I lucked into being able to buy a Z-80 reference card a few months later, I ended up disassembling all of Level II BASIC. There was a lot of code in there written by Bill Gates himself, and it was generally a good example of assembly language programming. Except that it was 8080 code, and only made use of the IX and IY registers in I/O driver code. But I can say I learned assembly language programming from Bill Gates.

      A few years ago I dumped all my floppy disks using a Catweasel board, but I still need to dump my old cassette tapes from 79 and 80. I got interested in that again last week, and found that nobody sells cassette players anymore. Except for the Shack, of course. They still sell an old familiar pre-Walkman cassette player. It was 50 bucks, but I quickly got a very nice waveform recorded with Audacity. Unfortunately, what little code I have for decoding the audio isn't working with it, so I'm going to have to hack at the code a bit.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    15. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      Today a introductory computer should have a 20 Gigabyte flash drive on the motherboard, a Terabyte hard drive and 8 Gigabytes of ram memory and still cost less than the Trs-80. It should have at least 4 cores, built in sound, built in Ethernet and a clock speed thousand of times faster. Even with all that speed and power, I am still disappointed with what we are doing with it as I expected that the computer should have been able to monitor both me and my house for any problems. If I were asked to give up either my phone or my computer, it would be the computer until the computer can inform someone of a fire in my house or if I were to have a medical emergency. I do not see why we do not have wireless speakers and microphones around the house so the computer can be expected to monitor it. I expect they will get faster in the future but I sill do not see any good applications in the near future.

    16. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I spent my first few months coding BASIC on a TRS-80 Model I, Level I at the local store, then realized it was too slow. So I bought the assembly language book, used graph paper to map out memory, and poked it all in. Who could afford an assembler in those days?

      The problems and challenges I solved in those days were ever so much simpler than the big enterprise scale issues I deal with today. But I have to admit -- I'm a little more productive with modern tools than I was back then. :D

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    17. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I misspoke. The Atari cartridge had the inverted read line, Nintendo didn't exist yet.

    18. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Have you ever run into such useful error messages.

      There is something about 'what', 'how' and 'sorry' that is almost poetic. Almost Klingon error messages.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got that straight. The TRS-80 Model I was for sale in stores in August of '77 [I was when it arrived], available as a retail purchase when Apples were just kits.

      Umm, no. The Apple II was announced in April of 77 and went on sale in June. And the II was the first Apple sold in a Steve Jobs designed plastic case, fully assembled. (though it was also made available in kit form for the geeks.)

      Thanks for playing the Apple Fanboy Pissing Match game; you lose. Better luck next time. Hint: try mentioning Xerox.

    20. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people do. The Apple II didn't even have production tooling for the case until December 1977/early 78. Some early units were kits that were assembled and hand-sanded. Meanwhile the TRS-80 sold 10,000 units in the first month and a half.

      The Apple II was designed from day 1 to be sold as a fully assembled system. Steve Jobs demanded a plastic consumer-friendly case, and demanded that it be ready to show off at introduction at the West Coast Computer Faire. It was, and it was part of the package when sales began in June.

      I suppose you might be trying to make a distinction between computers that were assembled largely by hand by a small start-up and those made with "production tooling" on a large-scale assembly line by a big company, but for the actual buyer, there was no difference. Even then, Steve Jobs focused on industrial design and packaging. You could walk into a store and walk out with a complete, boxed machine. There may have been some literal rough edges on the early models, but they were built and sold as complete units.

    21. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My roommate in college had one, MASSIVE 4k of memory! Eventually he spent several hundred dollars upgrading it to 16K. We ported a mainframe version of SUPER STAR TREK to it. It played fine but occasionally would "lock-up" for no apparent reason. We left it on overnight, and discovered that the "lock-up"
      would eventually clear up, and there was nothing wrong with the code. It was "MicroSlop" BASIC doing a garbage collection using a linear search algorithm that took several hours to complete. (Even back then they were the NON-cutting edge of computer development...) We simply altered the game description to state that a Klingon spy was aboard your ship trying to destroy your computer be for you could complete your mission....

    22. Re:TRS-80 - available in stores near you by cavebison · · Score: 1

      My second computer. First one was an IMB 5110 my brother brought home (he worked at IBM at the time). Had hours (and hours) of fun *typing in programs* from books. You couldn't buy games, you had to type em in. Kids have it too easy these days. :)

      That's how I got into programming of course. When I got the TRS-80, I'd get up in the middle of the night to turn it on and see the red LED light up. :) I tell you, using a computer back then felt like being part of the space program or something. You felt part of something profound; a new era... it was right out of science fiction. God I miss that feeling!

      Of course it's great they're now so ubiquitous and accessible... except that now they feel so ubiquitous and accessible. :)

  2. Still rocking one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still have my TRS-80 CoCo. Haven't plugged it in about six years, but hey.

    1. Re:Still rocking one! by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      Still have my TRS-80 CoCo. Haven't plugged it in about six years, but hey.

      Apparently the TRS-80 CoCo is a totally different (and incompatible) machine to the original TRS-80 being discussed here. They're not even based on the same processor...

      While I appreciate that they probably wanted to keep the brand recognition, it's slightly confusing that they reused the exact same model number on incompatible machines with entirely different architecture. You'd have thought (e.g.) "TRS-100" would be similar enough without the obvious- and incorrect- implication that both lines were part of the same family.

      For what it's worth, the Dragon 32- a very close relative of the CoCo- celebrated its 30th anniversary this week.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:Still rocking one! by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      True. The TRS-80 models I and III were Z80 based, whereas the CoCo had a Motorola 6809 CPU.

      I believe I still have a "Rev D" original CoCo (albiet with upgraded memory and keyboard) as well as a CoCo 2 in my mom's basement, along with printer that probably no longer works, 300 baud modem and dual floppy drives.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  3. Re:vintage computers by xevioso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The TRS-80 model II was my very first computer, and I learned basic coding on it. I can't remember the language, but there was a way to create your own games, like Snake and Pong, by using a cartridge, that only loaded the language and a basic compiler.

    I suspect that you could teach folks how to do some basic coding by using one of these old machines as an example. I have fond memories.

  4. My first computer by atheos · · Score: 2

    nothing but good memories for the TRS-80.

    1. Re:My first computer by bigwheel · · Score: 1

      I still remember some of the hacks.
      - Drill a hole in the cassette player above the head, so that you can insert a screwdriver and adjust for differences in tapes
      - Make a template, and use a paper punch on floppies to use both sides. "flippy drive"
      - Hard solder the modem connections, because the ribbon connector was always corroded
      - Add a dial switch to the back of the printer, so that you didn't have to guess at font size with a POT.
      - Using the cassette's on/off switch to generate telephone pulses for an "auto dial"
      - A capacitor and a latch relay to detect ring pulse and auto-answer the phone
      - Adding a speaker to the cassette's on/off switch for audio output.
      - Running the disassembler on the 4k ROM and the DOS, and then hand commenting every line of code.
      - Hacking the DOS keyboard handler, so that the shift key shortcuts typing of BASIC commands
      Those are good memories.

  5. Those were the days. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They had a room full of Trash 80s in the local Boys and Girls Club when I was growing up. While other kids were playing fooseball I was getting into the BASIC code for the bowling game and hard coding myself as the all time scorer on the high score board. They caught on when I started having scores higher than 300. 1,000,000 just sounded better.

    Good times.

  6. Re:vintage computers by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    Well, if you've got a bunch of 'em...

  7. Re:vintage computers by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What can you really do with a TRS-80 these days?

    As much as you could ever do with one, I'd say.

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  8. The Thing - Cheating Bitch! by RapidEye · · Score: 2

    Wasn't it a TRS-80 that Kurt Russell was playing chess against at the beginning of "The Thing"?
    That totally cracked me up: "Cheating Bitch!" then poured his scotch into the case - I wanted to do that so many times when playing chess against that damn computer! Granted, at that time I was drinking Koolaid, but the sentiment was the same.

    --
    "Murderer? Well, that's a harsh word. I prefer to think of myself as a Mortality Technician."
  9. the respect it "deserved" by hawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I owned a model 1.

    calling it "Trash-80" is exactly what that hack deserved; it was significantly behind what most hobbiests at the time would have cobbled together on the same parts budget.

    It's tough to choose a favorite design flaw, whether saving four bits by only using 7 video chips instead of 8, even though the character generator had lower case . . . Running the processor bizarrely slow, the same rate as characters appeared on screen, but yanking control away and creating a glitch on the screen with each read or write . . .

    My choice, though, is using the same connector for the power supply and video output, toasting the board for those who unwittingly just reached behind to plug them in . . .

    hawk

    1. Re:the respect it "deserved" by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2

      I had a lot of fun with the BASIC with only two string variables: A$ and B$. Of course I had no clue what I was doing at the time.

      "Trash-80" always seemed more like a term of endearment.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    2. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      calling it "Trash-80" is exactly what that hack deserved; it was significantly behind what most hobbiests at the time would have cobbled together on the same parts budget

      I agree that the Model I was nobody's idea of an awesome hardware design, but for $595, could anyone else have done better, at either a hobbyist or professional/corporate level? That was what really got my attention. Even as an 8-year-old, I knew $595 wasn't that much money for a real computer.

      The Apple II was about $1500. Sure, it was a better machine, but in those days the difference between $600 and $1500 was a much bigger deal than it is now. A lot of people got their start in computing on the Trash-80... many of whom would have spent the next few years on the sidelines if the Apple II had been the only alternative.

    3. Re:the respect it "deserved" by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I agree that the Model I was nobody's idea of an awesome hardware design, but for $595, could anyone else have done better, at either a hobbyist or professional/corporate level?

      Commodore could, and did... At first with the PET, then with the Commodore 64, which debuted in Jan 1982 with 64K memory for $595.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      LOBBY -> LOBBYIST

      HOBBY -> HOBBYIST

      You don't write lobbiest, do you? DO YOU?

    5. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Sique · · Score: 1

      If this gets any hobbier, it might reach the point, where it becomes the hobbiest thing of them all.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    6. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same price 4 years later? Hardly puts them in the same ballpark.

    7. Re:the respect it "deserved" by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      You missed the important step of the VIC-20 in 1980. I always felt the PET was not really a consumer computer (more for business), but the VIC-20 certainly was. The only computer in 1980-81 which had more sales was the Atari 800. (Due to brand recognition from the #1 selling Atari console.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    8. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      And only one dimensional arrays. Doing 3 dimensional graphics required some creativity.

    9. Re:the respect it "deserved" by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      but for $595, could anyone else have done better

      I think that's what they call a "leading question". Here's an unusual answer - the UK magazine Electronics Today International published plans in 197(?) for a home-build hobby computer that had similar specs, ran BASIC and could be assembled from parts you sourced yourself, using their PCB design. They even had off-the-shelf case, keyboard and so on. It would definitely have been in this price range or less. I bet nobody can remember it now - I believe it was called the "Triton". I think it may have been Z80 based, but possibly was 6502 - I don't recall. I remember reading the articles with great interest, but then could think of no earthly purpose for the thing - but perhaps that was in some ways the point. Give a geek something cool and they'll figure out what to do with it.

    10. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      That "(?)" in the date makes all the difference in the world.

    11. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Megane · · Score: 1

      even though the character generator had lower case

      It may have, but apparently they got a good deal on character generator chips with the lowercase 'a' two pixels higher than it should be. When someone got a LC mod, it (IIRC) involved replacing the old chargen with a socket or header, then a board with a "good" one would plug into that. But I never cared for that. I modded it myself such that if you didn't have a patched display driver, it would show the strange 0x00-0x1F characters instead of uppercase alpha.

      I eventually made my own circuit using a 7483 adder and a few diodes for decode logic that would subtract two from the row number for "agjpqy,;" (the 'a' was from one diode that could be removed) The awesome part was that the 7483 ran a little warm.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    12. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I was five when the TRS-80 came out; all I remember is that it looked thirty years old after only a decade and it may have been the slowest computer I ever used until Vista... but the Tandy 1000EX my dad made the mistake of buying when I was in middle school: holy shit, what a piece of dung!

    13. Re:the respect it "deserved" by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's been a long time. IIRC for $1500 you would get an Apple with a floppy drive and at least sockets for 48K of RAM. Apples to apples comparisons would be a Trash-80 level 2 with expansion interface vs bare Crapple ][+. Again it's been a long time. IIRC the expensive interface was about the same time as the +.

      Granting the Crapple was designed to hook to TV and the Trash came complete with a truly horrid monitor. Exact comparisons are tough.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:the respect it "deserved" by CityZen · · Score: 1

      As a kid, I disliked the TRS-80 mostly because it looked so awfully ugly! On the one hand, it was neat that they fit the basic unit into a compact form factor. On the other, the black & gray color scheme and the partly-rounded, partly-squared corners seemed to suggest an utter lack of care for aesthetic principles. And then, of course, you had to have the expansion unit to really get anywhere, negating the advantage of the small form factor.

      I can't think of another computer from that era that looked more repulsive. And I did scour the Byte & Creative Computing magazines back then to see all that I could.

    15. Re:the respect it "deserved" by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you are talking about.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean 'LOBSTER'?

    17. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commodore 64, which debuted in Jan 1982 with 64K memory for $595

      To be fair, for a machine launching 4 years later, 4x the memory and a processor that ran about 50% faster[1] for the same money is actually a pretty poor upgrade. Moore's law held then just the same as it does now.

      [1]: TRS80: 1.72Mhz Z80 with ~ 0.15 instructions per cycle on average = 0.26MIPS; C64: ~1MHz 6510 with ~ 0.4 instructions per cycle on average = 0.4MIPS (using a loose definition of MIPS that allows for the 8-bit nature of these processors). It is interesting to note that both machines had CPUs that were capable of significantly faster performance, but were slowed down by the other circuitry. The TRS80's Z80 was capable of running at 4MHz (c. 0.5MIPS), while the C64's 6510 could run at up to 3MHz (c. 1.2MIPS). A C64 running at 3MHz would have absolutely ruled over all the other microcomputers released for years afterwards.

    18. Re:the respect it "deserved" by Meski · · Score: 1

      Using a tinned rather than gold edge-connector...

  10. Re:vintage computers by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    The TRS-80 model II was my very first computer, and I learned basic coding on it. I can't remember the language

    Yes you can.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  11. Re:vintage computers by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have fun with them?

    Entertainment is one of those ageless things if you find something you like. People like old movies, music, books, etc, why is it difficult to think about people enjoying old computers? Some like the games, some like poking at software some like hacking hardware, heck some like me like it all.

  12. Great documentation!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never had a TRS-80, but I had the technical manual. I learned how a computer was made from that manual.

  13. I don't believe this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that computers only exist because of space exploration. This article makes it sound like history is far more complex than that, I don't believe it. As we all know, nothing existed before 1969 and all people were stupid. As soon as test pilots landed on the Moon, we got computers, Tang, Teflon and the wheel.

  14. respect by confused+one · · Score: 1

    I remember them being terribly slow (895 kHz), glitchy, having poor video quality and the storage being very unreliable. The Apple ][ was vastly superior. But that's just my memory...

    1. Re:respect by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And it had only two string variables: $A and $B I think.

    2. Re:respect by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cassette tapes unreliable storage? That's one of the kinder ways to describe it. :) But seriously, I taught myself programming with the Z-80 assembler/debugger and would make multiple backups to tape to counter the occasional read glitch that rendered the tape contents lost for all practical purposes. (Although in a pinch attempting to read it in over and over with fingers crossed hoping that one time it would work was occasionally successful, at which point you wrote it out to a new backup tape.)

      Wrote Double Deck Pinochle as my first program, later rewrote for DOS (is freeware out there somewhere), rewrote it in Java a few years ago (seriously proper OO architecture, but an interesting experience to rewrite 8086 to Java), and just so happens am now rewriting from Java to RPG for my IBM i (iseries AS/400) web server. Again an interesting experience. :)

      For those who might wander about RPG looks like these days, I have open sourced a couple of projects:

      http://code.google.com/p/rdwrites/downloads/list

      (the ascii source downloads can be viewed in a text editor.)

      And I have the TRS-80 to thank for it all. So happy 35th, TRS-80.

    3. Re:respect by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      I found it to be very sensitive to the output level of the cassette recorder. I built an LED VU meter into the body of the case and got pretty good reliability that way.

    4. Re:respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hit play now!"

    5. Re:respect by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Cassette tapes unreliable storage? That's one of the kinder ways to describe it

      I never used cassette with TRS-80's (our school had an early LAN), but with other cassette-based computers, I used to save the program 3 times. I'd say the failure rate was about 30% to 40% per attempt. Thus, saving it 3 times gave one about a 97% chance of one copy working.

    6. Re:respect by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      In a pinch you could also mess with the volume and pitch knobs on your cassette player, and try a different player.

      Always make sure you have a hard copy. Worst case you retype it.

      Ah, the good old days.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  15. Re:vintage computers by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

    >>>What can you really do with a TRS-80 these days?

    Not much. While loyal Commodore=64 owners have continued upgrading their machines to do internet web browsing, and of course gaming as if it was a classic NES console, the TRS-80 has been neglected. It's really just a tool to practice some BASIC programming (like I did in my high school class). Same with the Apple II and Atari 400/800 machines from the early 1977-82 era.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  16. Model 100 by pdawson · · Score: 4, Informative

    The model 100 was a great machine. Got me through HS and college in the 90's. Lightweight, runs forever on 4 AA batteries, stores 32k text worth of class notes. And the key for me, no distractions like sol.exe, no network access. Transfer the notes to PC vis serial port at home and you've got room for the next day's notes.

    And its even still available and supported at www.club100.org

    1. Re:Model 100 by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Fun story: When Empire Strikes Back came out, a friend of mine went and bought a Model 100 just so that he could work on a term paper while sitting in line. Worked great.

    2. Re:Model 100 by lobotomy · · Score: 1

      I was visiting San Luis Obispo, CA last week and saw a guy sitting in a coffee shop typing on a Model 100. I still have one in my garage. I need to see if it works (my dad left batteries in and they leaked). I new reporters who loved them: instant on, compact, quiet typing.

    3. Re:Model 100 by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly. I get a kick reading the poseurs knocking the TRS-80.

      The thing was mass-produced and worked. You could hack it. My Model 100 still works after almost 30 years of use. Four AA batteries runs the thing for weeks. I could and did access CompuServe with its built in 300baud modem. Just a few years ago I found a mod that allowed me to solder a Blusmirf Bluetooth chip to the ancient UART allowing me to pair to my desktop and even telnet to a RS6000 we were using.

      The thing is slow, clunky (but with an absolutely great keyboard) and I still use it for note taking... because, as a tool, it works.

    4. Re:Model 100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used it, loved it, and the Model 100 is /not/ what this thread is about.

      RS just called it "TRS-80 Model 100" for marketing reasons. It's unrelated, and it was released in 1983.

      And yeah sure, probably you know that, but an unhealthy number of people reading this thread weren't around and don't know. Let's not confuse them further.

    5. Re:Model 100 by lolcutusofbong · · Score: 1

      Is there any clone manufacturer out there still selling them? That sounds pretty damn awesome.

    6. Re:Model 100 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If you're into vintage hardware, why not just buy the real thing?

    7. Re:Model 100 by pdawson · · Score: 1

      Reconditioned units are about $150-$250 on club100.org (102 is $250, 100 is $150, each with the full 32k) Or you can spin the wheel on cheaper ones on ebay that probably work and might have 8, 16, 24, or 32k memory

  17. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The TRS-80 model II was my very first computer, and I learned basic coding on it. I can't remember the language

    Yes you can.

    Oh God! Someone please PLEASE Mod Parent up!

    It's obvious he's referring to the "LEARNED" programming language!

  18. Visicalc changed everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The fascinating thing about this period of time is how close Apple came to disappearing altogether.
    While early sales of all personal computers were slow - sales were measured in thousands - it looked like the battle was always Commodore vs Radio Shack. Some magazines ignored Apple because they sold so few machines.
    What changed everything was the development of Visicalc. According to Brian Bagnall's "The rise and fall of Commodore", Dan Bricklin wanted to develop Visicalc on a Commodore PET but they were too popular for him to get any time on them. He used an Apple II because no-one else wanted to write software for it and so it was always available.
    Visicalc went on to be the application that changed personal computing forever - business' bought Apples by the bucketload to run visicalc- and elevated Apple from being insignificant to being the dominant selling machine.
    While Visicalc saved Apple, Dan Bricklin has always denied that Visicalc had any effect on Commodore or the TRS 80, and that they were responsible for their own demise.
    Having read the Commodore story (Bagnall) and Apple's story (too many books to mention) I look forward to reading the book mentioned in the article - 'Priming the pump' and getting another perspective on that period of time.

    1. Re:Visicalc changed everything by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>>visicalc- and elevated Apple from being insignificant to being the dominant selling machine.

      Interesting revisionist history. Here are the top selling ("dominant") consumer machines according to ars technica:
      1977 TRS-80
      1978 TRS-80
      1979 TRS-80
      1980 Atari 800
      1981 Atari 800
      1982 Atari 800
      1983 Commodore 64
      ...
      1987 Commodore 64
      1988 IBM PC + clones
      and so on.

      Now do you see any place where Apple II was dominant? No. It was always 3rd place behind the other brands. (Mainly because the pricetag on the Apples and Macs was too high for average people.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Visicalc changed everything by HonkyLips · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Apple II was dominant in terms of income, if not sales units. If you're referring to Jeremy Reimer's article you'll read that in 1980 Apple's turnover was $200 million, Radio Shacks was $175 million and Commodore's was $40 million. It might not have sold as many individual units but they made Apple a lot more money.

      Sales figures for the PET weren't kept, but it is interesting that in 1982 Commodore sold more Vic 20s in 6 months than Apple sold Apple IIs in 5 years.

      Figures are here: http://jeremyreimer.com/postman/node/329

      --
      Putting syrup in coffee is some form of blasphemy.
    3. Re:Visicalc changed everything by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2

      To be honest, until Reimer published those figures, I'd always believed Apple's claim of being the "best-selling personal computer", and it still seems to be a widely-held misconception. From where I was sitting (school), it sure looked like it too.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    4. Re:Visicalc changed everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It might not have sold as many individual units but they made Apple a lot more money."

      So nothing really changed.

    5. Re:Visicalc changed everything by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      From where I was sitting (school), it sure looked like it too.

      IIRC, Apple gave special pricing to schools; so students and teacher got a distorted view.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:Visicalc changed everything by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Apple gave my 'inner city' school some free computers, and in return got national press with a picture of some of my classmates in Newsweek. I've since paid them back many times over for that favor.

      They're doing the same thing with the iPad right now BTW.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    7. Re:Visicalc changed everything by Soluzar · · Score: 1

      The BBC Microcomputer (by Acorn) had much the same advantage in UK schools. It didn't really seem to help them out as much in the home market as it apparently did Apple, but it must have been nice to have a captive audience.

    8. Re:Visicalc changed everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      By that measure, the Cray-1 was the dominant computer of that age, if they sold *5* to the NSA for $100m each!

    9. Re:Visicalc changed everything by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>in 1980 Apple's turnover was $200 million, Radio Shacks was $175 million and Commodore's was $40 million.

      Well Lexus also has higher turnover then Honda or Dodge. That's how luxury models operate: Few sales made but a higher price & higher profits.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    10. Re:Visicalc changed everything by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That includes "home" and "game" sales. The spreadsheet sparked Apple II business sales, and it indeed may have outsold Tandy and Commodore in the business arena due to VisiCalc in the early 80's.

    11. Re:Visicalc changed everything by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I remember the Apple II just "felt nicer" in the early 80's compared to the others. It's hard to explain; it was the sound of the keyboard clicking, the look of the case, the sound of the speaker beeps, etc. Steve Job's design magic just gave it an edge such that Apple could charge more even though it had mediocre tech specs.

      By the way, that chart doesn't directly reflect "business sales", so it's difficult to use it ascertain VisiCalc's influence on the "first 3" from it.

  19. Never had one by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I had a different (6502 based) system but my dad bought me the TRS80 BASIC programming book. It was the only BASIC reference I had so I effectively learnt programming from it. Six months later I had exhausted the possibilities of BASIC and got into machine code.

  20. TRS-80 Mod 1 L1 was my first by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    And I quickly outgrew it. Had to upgrade it to 16K L2 - then the EI, modem, speech input, disk drives. I had the whole 9 yards.

    And yes, the lowercase mod was simply a chip piggyback - did it myself.

    With Level 2 BASIC I learned to poke short routines into memory so they'd run faster.

    1. Re:TRS-80 Mod 1 L1 was my first by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      I'd forgotten about the speech synthesizer. Someone had dumped a fully-loaded Model I system on my school, so the 'computer club' quickly dug into to see if there were any good games. We were playing a "Star Trek" style game when all of a sudden a giant ASCII alien appeared and started yelling - everyone jumped out of their seats.

      There was also a neat drawing/animation program where you could create blocky movies. However, by the the system seemed so out of date, we spent most of our time trading Apple disks.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    2. Re:TRS-80 Mod 1 L1 was my first by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the speech synth could be set to read off the screen. The speech recognition was pretty interesting too. Not to mention you could control X-10 style outlets with the cassette port.

      And I used that computer to figure out Sprint's pass codes for their dial through long distance service.

    3. Re:TRS-80 Mod 1 L1 was my first by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      But, sadly, the F word came out as futch.

    4. Re:TRS-80 Mod 1 L1 was my first by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we spent a few hours giggling at it anyway.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  21. Most popular? Debatable.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    It was more popular than the Commodore PET, which was also available in the late 70's, but I don't think it ever matched the popularity that the Apple ][+ (and later, 2e) achieved in the early 1980's.

  22. Re:vintage computers by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    you can browse the web on an apple II tyvm

  23. Math Class by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

    We had 8 of them in my Jr. High math class. Not content playing Oregon Trail, I started learning BASIC and transferred over to my dad's IBM PC. That was my beginning of a wonderful career in IT.

  24. The Last TRS-80 fanboys by michaelmalak · · Score: 2

    Written by the last of the TRS-80 fanboys. And why did it not get the "respect it deserved"? From the authori's own article:

    A bevy of games were available, too, despite the fact that the computer did only black-and-white graphics at 128-by-48, which was bare-bones even back then.

    Now I must admit when it appeared in the fall 1977 Radio Shack catalog, I was excited at the prospect of being able to purchase a pre-built computer. But then as an owner of an Atari 2600, and while waiting to save the money for a TRS-80, brochures for the Atari 800 came out, and I of course waited for that. 8x the resolution, color, hardware scrolling, hardware sprites, four-channel sound, and (gasp) pixel addressing (as opposed to 2x3 "pixel" blocks of character graphics on the TRS-80).

  25. Re:vintage computers by Nkwe · · Score: 3, Informative

    The TRS-80 model II was my very first computer, and I learned basic coding on it. I can't remember the language, but there was a way to create your own games, like Snake and Pong, by using a cartridge, that only loaded the language and a basic compiler.

    If it took a cartridge, you probably had a TRS-80 Color Computer and not a TRS-80 Model II, which was the version targeted at businesses. I had great fun learning programming on the Model III and 4.

  26. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My first computer was the TRS-80 Model II bought in December 1979. I lugged that heavy son of a bitch home from the office at night so that I could learn how to program. It had one "8 floppy drive that stored 300K. And I felt very lucky. I used it until 1984 when Compaq came out with their luggable.

  27. Re:vintage computers by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What can you really do with a TRS-80 these days?

    Learn to appreciate the value of abstraction.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  28. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The TRS-80 model II was my very first computer, and I learned basic coding on it. I can't remember the language, but there was a way to create your own games, like Snake and Pong, by using a cartridge, that only loaded the language and a basic compiler.

    I suspect that you could teach folks how to do some basic coding by using one of these old machines as an example. I have fond memories.

    OK dude, either you are really screwing with us or you need to be screened for Alzheimer's disease or your enjoying your third or so Scotch - which I can really respect.

  29. Re:vintage computers by Abreu · · Score: 1

    10 PRINT "I just learned that mine (I was using it in the late eighties) was just one of the many models of 'TRS-80 Color Computer II'"
    20 PRINT "It was this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TRS-80_Color_Computer_2-64K.jpg"

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  30. TRS-80 Model III by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually have a TRS-80 Model III (the one with the built in monitor) setup in my game room. The graphics aren't much (they're actually quite blocky), but they really did put a lot of love into those games. The TRS-80 version of Zaxxon is particularly impressive, and plays better than some of the versions on more capable systems (do a youtube search for it, it's worth checking out).

    I found my TRS-80 on the side of the road in a garbage pile in the middle of nowhere Ohio while on a camping trip. I picked it up and took it home (over the wife's objections) and found that it still worked perfectly (initially it looked like it didn't work, but it turns out that the brightness dial had just been turned down all the way and was frozen in place). I guess my TRS-80 really IS a Trash-80.

    1. Re:TRS-80 Model III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a used Model III (48K w/2 floppy drives) in the late 80s and have a lot of fond memories of it. I owned a couple of CoCo 2 machines as well.

    2. Re:TRS-80 Model III by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Tempest, that is an awesome story.

    3. Re:TRS-80 Model III by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You've got ZAXXON?!

      I'm coming over to your house right now.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  31. why it was so underappreciated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Woz is a tech genius while Jobs was a kind of Prometheus who could mesmerize people so they perceived how so much better the Apple ][+ was.

    But then, why people created software for the TRS-80?

    Because Woz is a tech genius while Jobs was a kind of Prometheus who could mesmerize people so they perceived how so much better the Apple ][+ was.

    No, you're not drunk or suddenly gained doubled vision: people back then wanted a computer to do serious work -- which implied the Apple one was unfit, because it was so incredible it would look like a toy amid the dumb terminals we had back then. That was another era, people, early adopters were a rare kind then.

    Also, Woz is even more of a genius because he used a joke of a processor, the el-cheapo 6502... a frustratingly elementary calculator. Real developers were crazy about the Intel 8080/8085 and the much superior Zilog Z-80: it was the Darth Vader of the processors. Mind you, I love simple, but that was not the case of the 6502. It was darn braindamaged. Of course, for guys like Woz this wasn't much of a problem...

    Living that age was great.

    1. Re:why it was so underappreciated... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      And speaking of the Z-80 processor: I lusted after the Commodore Portable for the ability to drop in a Z-80 board to run CPM, but never had enough cash to make it happen. But to me the Big Iron holy grail was the Altair, with a Z-80 processor & S-100 buss.

      Instead, I had a Timex Sinclair with a 2k memory expansion module & tape drive storage. I used it's built-in BASIC to solve sparse matrix calculations for rudimentary circuit analysis. By the time I got out of community college, the Zenith Z-150 (IBM-PC clone) was available -- loved the built-in debugger.

    2. Re:why it was so underappreciated... by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      Every new issue of Byte was an adventure.

    3. Re:why it was so underappreciated... by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      Oh God yes!! True geek porn in every issue. I miss that magazine.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:why it was so underappreciated... by Megane · · Score: 1

      The Apple I was specifically designed for hobbyists who wanted to tinker, not for people who wanted to do serious work. The same could be said for the Apple II. But that's because Woz hung around with tinkering hobbyists, and there were plenty of them in the Bay Area who wanted just that. (I'm going to have to agree with the earlier post about Visicalc.)

      And if you think the 6502 is a joke, I recently got a Heathkit ET-3400 working. Then I tried to write some code for it. Now, I've done 6809 code (I bought a 4K CoCo back in '84 specifically because 6809 assembly language was so cool, and you could do a FORTH inner loop in two instructions). But when I was trying to make a sample program not be self-modifying (because I had wired up a 2864 EEPROM to the ET-3400), I was constantly hitting a wall of some addressing mode or another not being there. I mean, I wasn't trying for position-independent code, just ROM-able code. Even an ABX instruction (which was in later 6800 variants) would have been welcome. Straight 6800 code was much worse than I was expecting.

      As for Byte magazine mentioned below, I've got most of the first few years in PDF format now, and I think all of them from before I first subscribed.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:why it was so underappreciated... by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      My dad went into the local Apple retailer first when looking for a computer for his business. He was "in uniform" - dressed as an auto mechanic. He owned and operated a muffler shop and it was the appropriate attire for his job.

      Honestly, he probably smelled like a mechanic too - sweat, grease and a little beer - and his hair was probably a little long and going in all directions.

      Apparently they were rude and dismissive - after all, what does a dirty mechanic want with a computer? He probably couldn't afford it anyway.

      So he drove across town to Radio Shack, where they treated him well, and over the years he and my uncle spent quite a lot on TRS-80 equipment.

      Model I, Model III (several), 2 color computers, 3+ printers, modems, even an early semi-IBM-compatible Tandy 1000.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    6. Re:why it was so underappreciated... by cusco · · Score: 1

      So the Apple culture hasn't changed at all in the last three decades, I guess.

      Haven't seen a thread in a long time with so many 6-digit and less UIDs posting. It's been a great read.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  32. The computer that kept giving by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1

    It must have been the best investment in history. I learned to write code on that machine (including assembly). It led to a still continuing history of nearly seamless gainful employment.

    Thank you Tandy!

    I still have it, In the garage, in a box.

  33. First consumer PC? PET was before it by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Informative

    I never thought the Apple ][ was first. But the TRS-80 wasn't either. The PET was available before either of them.

    Why would you mention Exidy (the Sorcerer)? It came after all these computers. Where I was you could get an Apple ][+ before you could get a Sorcerer.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:First consumer PC? PET was before it by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      The TRS-80 was the first serious, widely adopted business computer, period.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re:First consumer PC? PET was before it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The PET was available before either of them."

      Naw, that was 2001.

    3. Re:First consumer PC? PET was before it by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      business computer? What? How? Sorry?

      We were all hobbiests. They became business computers with the introduction of Visicalc. Which first shipped for the Apple.

      In any case mainframes were widely adopted business computers decades earlier. (for the right definition of 'widely adopted')

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:First consumer PC? PET was before it by Ritchie70 · · Score: 2

      I clearly remember my dad running his small business using Radio Shack accounting software, first on a Model I then later a Model III. This would have been starting in the late 70's.

      Daily reports and employee commission calculations were done with a BASIC program that my uncle wrote.

      In fact, the Model III ran payroll, receivables and general ledger until 1996 or so.

      Tax/withholding rates in the payroll program were changed by editing a DATA statement in the program. The user manual provided clear instruction on how to do this.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  34. Re:vintage computers by wierd_w · · Score: 0

    Oh, I fully appreciate hardware abstraction at the OS level, protected memory access, and the whole slew of modern improvements.

    I even appreciate how programmers did so much with so little.

    That wasn't really the question though.

    (Also, "offtopic"? Really? Remember kids, "-1 offtopic", and "-1 troll" are not substitutes for the missing "-1 don't like" moderation. :D)

    The question is if the celebration of this hardware's 30th aniversary of hitting store shelves really deserves more than just a small bit of nostalgia, and some idle curiosity, such as one gets from a museum.

    I was asking if you could really do useful work on a TRS-80 model 1 these days.

    As far as I know, you really can't.

  35. Ah the good ol days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ScarfMan and Super Nova were pretty sweet.

    1. Re:Ah the good ol days by Megane · · Score: 1

      I learned the controls for Asteroids by playing Super Nova. (my favorite Asteroids descendant is still Gravitar) I also managed to hack sound into Super Nova by hand-patching the code, and later added high score saving to disk. (Starting up emulator real quick.) Yep, it still works. Considering there's just a 1-bit sound output, I'm still amazed that I got it working with just a few patches.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  36. Re:vintage computers by MrKaos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The TRS-80 model II was my very first computer, and I learned basic coding on it. I can't remember the language

    Yes you can.

    Absolutely friggin priceless sir!

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  37. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good to see that Commode users are upholding their fine 30 year tradition of trolling every unrelated computer discussion.

  38. Tool shed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leininger created a prototype of the computer, wire-wrapping it himself on six Radio Shack breadboards (he described this construction stage as a “one-man show”). The prototype used a modified television for the display and a standalone keyboard for input.

    One of the benefits of working for a company that sold electronic parts.

  39. Re:vintage computers by Larryish · · Score: 1

    I use it to control my robot arm.

    http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lv3lq4fCmT1qhpy7q.jpg

    It helps to pass the time.

  40. Nostalgia... by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    I don't like nostalgia unless it's mine. Lou Reed

    That said, I was born in 75. My first two computers where the TRS-80 Model 1 Level 2 (it was about 8-9 years old when I got it), and a Mattel Aquarius my grandmother won at bingo or some such.
    My Tandy had just the monitor and cassette drive, and I did not have the game expansion for the Aquarius. Using both I taught myself basic programming, and I even had some programs on tape for the Tandy that had C-64, Pet, and Apple versions on the same cassette, I became adept at telling the difference by ear to find the my version.
    I still remember the two asterisks in the corner, one solid, the other blinking when you were loading a program, and having to adjust the volume and tone (and once or twice the tape head..early hardware hacking), to get it to read correctly.

    Sigh...now I click a button on my web browser, and since my phone is also logged into our Google overlords, the app pushes through the ether and magically appears on my phone, which is at least an order of magnitude more powerful. And the phone is made of such small components, I cannot replace a fried cap or resolder a lose port. Where did the fun go?

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  41. Re:vintage computers by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    You should always have a pre-1985 computer laying around somewhere to show your kids. Computers have turned into magic, indecipherable boxes. The first home-computers were great, precisely because they were so god-damned slow. They were so slow, you could actually watch them run and understand what was happening.

  42. My First Computer by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    My very first computer was a TRS-80 Model II. It weighed in at a whopping 70 pounds with those huge diskettes. I even had the early SCSI HD which required you to load drivers via the TRS-DOS before you could access it. I also had the floppy disk expander - that huge unit with four or five floppy disk drives in it. Ah the memories .... I learned to write really simple programs in BASIC on it. My dad gave away the Model II, HD, and Floppy expansion units to the Smithsonian after being in storage for many years. The amazing thing is that after 24 years in storage, it booted into TRS-DOS and the hard drive was accessible. They don't make technology like they used to.

  43. Re:vintage computers by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    actually you can. It's called accounting, word processing, printing, hell you can even run a spreadsheet. Of course keep in mind that the documentation that came with the TRS-80 m4 included all of the internal circuit designs. This wasn't the PCB design but the electronic circuit themselve including the chip functions. We used one for busienss purposes for over a decade (got in 1982) before we finally moved to a Tandy 1000 (IBM AT compatible).

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  44. Radio Shack Pocket Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first ever computer was a Radio Shack Pocket Computer, back in 1980. It taught me a lot about programming, and it actually had a decent (for the time) implementation of BASIC, in some ways superior to that on larger PC's (indirect addressing for instance).

    That thing taught me a lot about writing spare programs too. It had 2K of total memory, 1.9K of which was available after the system took it's chunk. But I actually used the thing quite successfully in my job as a Taco Bell manager, it was awesome for running the calculations we had to do during these big store inventories. It cut at least 2 hours out of my long nights.

    I look back fondly on all those old systems I had: an old strange Wang thing that programmed only in assembly, a couple of Timex-Sinclairs that I learned to do some Z80 assembly on also (you had to embed the assembly inside of long text strings). I had 3 different TI-99 4A's (which I did some pretty advanced graphics on, I will have you know), and every iteration of intel: PC, PC-XT, PC-AT, Went straight to the what, 480SX or something like that, ran all the DOS variants from 3.1 to 4.0, then Win 95, 98, etc. I never had a PET or a Commodore, always wished I had.

    They sure got better fast, didn't they?

    1. Re:Radio Shack Pocket Computer by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      I always coveted the Radio Shack pocket computer... Imagine having a computer that you would take with you on the go! Yeah, that's a bit of a joke now, but back then it was almost the stuff of science fiction. I finally managed to get ahold of one on clearance well past its end of retail shelf life, and found it to be extremely useful. A few months ago, I was cleaning up and found it again! A new battery and it worked like new! Whoot! It's still a pretty impressive machine, considering how old it is.

    2. Re:Radio Shack Pocket Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big drawback to the Pocket Computer is that you have to run on battery, no way to plug them in. And when the batteries die, everything in memory goes with it.

    3. Re:Radio Shack Pocket Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pocket computer was the only thing that got me through high school. Small enough to look like a TI calculator of the time, but so much more fun. I filled a notebook with various programs and calculations. The PC-7 looked like a calculator, had the binary and octal and hexadecimal modes, and the built-in statistics functions. The PC-6 had 8K of memory (I bought the extra 8K for mine), and with ten program areas, and a memo area. For history classes, the memo area was terribly handy.
      I did write a labyrinth program, and a very lame rogue-like game (in 15K of BASIC space). I suppose having to fit all that functionality into such limited space is why I still write tight, multi-purpose subroutines, and string parsing algorithms.
      Now, if I could remember my password for this site...

    4. Re:Radio Shack Pocket Computer by ps_inkling · · Score: 1

      The Pocket Computer 7, yes. Which is why I wrote all my programs down on paper. Hated when the battery needed to be replaced, it meant that I would soon be retyping in my programs. The PC-6 had a backup battery, a CR2016, so replacing the main batteries did not make it forget your programs or data. It also had a specialty printer port, so you could print data or programs.

  45. Re:vintage computers by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Budgets and financial statements in Visicalc, address labels, frogger, W2's, payroll, sniff them......they smell so goood!

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  46. Re:vintage computers by zenasprime · · Score: 1

    Why does it need to do anything related to "work" for it to be "useful"?

  47. A Long Lost TRS-80 Tale Unearthed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As evidenced here, this mythical box survives in the heart & souls of those drawn to it's call. For yours truly I picture as yesterday, this artifact sitting alone, unused for months, in a small northern California valley the feds stole from the Yukis about the time of the first .com boom circa 1851. My super krusty 8 fingered (for reals) typingteacher was it's protector. Or was it seven?

    In any case, it was imperative I find a crack in the security to learn it's secrets. Thusly I hid under a desk as the bottle glassed grump instinctively scanned the
    perimeter. The lights went off, I slipped in my floppy, & the green glow lit up my eyes late into each night as I harvested it's promises. Do, you, want, to, play, a, game?

    Isolated from the greater Arpanet on this abject island of a single node net, I ended up writing an early trash80 three.bs port. These many many lines of basic were designed, amongst other things I've since forgotten, to take down an ascii airliner with an ascii lightening bolt for the zorkesque flight sim. I left this easter egg for whomever might finally access this box should the faculty ever find the means to deploy it. The beast was officially powned.

    With this covert training worthy of the Mossad's finest, the d&d dm.lib on my friend's Atari400 was an inevitable fate to be fulfilled. It is rumored that Crunch
    picked up the machine for 20 bucks at a Foothill college Ham meet & Easywriter was subsequently ported to Radio Shack's bastard child. This much is most certainly a lie. The valley is now cratered with single wide generic Adderal plantations supplying regiments of grad students in the city states to the south. The fate of the this mystery machine, however, will forever remain unknown.

    1. Re:A Long Lost TRS-80 Tale Unearthed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What

    2. Re:A Long Lost TRS-80 Tale Unearthed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get it. This post captures perfectly the time & place! You'd have to be there to understand.

  48. Re:vintage computers by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    I remember my Model III fondly as well, I was so jazzed to get a Model 4. My family used them for our tax and bookkeeping business with great success. The Tandy 1000 was my first "compatible." It had a 32MB HD inserted in one of the expansion slots, GAWD that was awesome.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  49. Ah, memories by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    My first job was working at a music store - basically I was their (very low paid) in-house programmer, except during the start-of-school crunch time when I helped sell instruments like every other person in the store. I wrote stuff like payroll and inventory software that ran on their TRS-80, and had to serve as the data entry clerk as well. That beast had dual floppy drives... good times, good times.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Ah, memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is:

      Blood, guts, twisted metal. Yuck what a mess!

  50. Re:vintage computers by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Agreed.

    I suppose that since it has all the circuits defined in the manual, and has serial ports, a TRS-80 could be used to programmatically control lights, the air conditioner, house fans and a few other neat things like that.

    But then again, you could do all that with a raspberry pi using a usb serial cable at a fraction the size, heat, and power...

    I do consider entertainment to be a "useful" application, so I suppose that designing a system of homebrew upgrades and other fun things for nerds would make the TRS-80 a useful platform for entertainment... (I did a thought experiment on how to implement an LIM-EMS addon for a PC-Jr using the cartridge slot once, and it was fun. Hardware limitations make things more interesting.)

    So, I guess there are some useful things you could still do on one, but I still don't see the need for fanfare.

    *shrug*

  51. It really is beautiful by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't hesitate to make it a center-piece in my home. Reminds me of a time I -- as a lifeform -- entered the final moments of, where things were built by people who knew damned well how to build things. That's all I have to say, other than it's the first time I've seen one.

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  52. Opinion of an 12 year old by Dan+East · · Score: 2

    Back in 8th grade (1985) I was introduced to the TRS-80 CoCo II. Our school had a lab full of them (two students per computer), and we were taught keyboarding and some basic programming. Now, up to that point, my computer experience was already pretty extensive. I owned a TI-99/4A, and the highlight of each month was receiving the next edition of Compute! so I could type in the BASIC / Extended BASIC programs. I had already written thousands of lines of BASIC code from scratch (from the time I was 10). I had a lot of experience on the Apple II and the C-64 as well.

    Now, 30 years later, I can't remember enough specifics to state the technical reasons, but as a 12 year old, I absolutely hated the CoCo II. I was not a TI-99 fanatic (I had great appreciation for the C-64, for example), so I didn't dislike the TRS-80 because of some external factor- I didn't like it simply because of what it was.

    Odds and ends I remember is that the performance was laggy and sluggish (even in the day, compared to the machines I mentioned already). BASIC syntax had some convoluted stuff going on (probably related to graphics and sound) and code editing was a chore. The hardware felt cheap.

    To compare to the other machines I was familiar with, the TI-99/4A felt very professional and refined throughout. Both the hardware, and the software. It felt more engineered and like something a scientist would use or something. lol As a 10 year old, I felt I was using a machine intended for real adults to use. It was serious and real. It had a certain rigidity that was authoritative. The CoCo felt like a toy or a gimmick in some way.

    The Apple II was similar. The hardware felt very high quality, and the OS was refined and consistent.

    The C-64 gave the impression there was always something deeper and lower-level, just waiting to be exploited. It was complicated (just loading a program off of the disc required these weird, non-intuitive parameters that neither I nor my 10 year old friends understood, like "why do you have to put ,8 after the filename?"). Compute! listings had all these pokes and peeks, directly manipulating memory. You could change the color of text using these weird keyboard combos - no other computer of the day had nearly the flexibility or flashy pizazz of the C-64.

    So as a 12 year old, there simply weren't any redeeming factors to the TRS-80. I knew that other computers of the era did various things better and were more fun to program and use than the TRS-80, and I complained often to my classmates, lamenting that we couldn't have TIs or C64s because they were better computers.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Opinion of an 12 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in 8th grade (1985) I was introduced to the TRS-80 CoCo II. Our school had a lab full of them (two students per computer)...

      Paired programming in 1985. Your school was ahead of its time. ;-)

  53. TRS-80 with NewDOS-80 was awsome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TRS-DOS was written by Microsoft so was buggy and lame. NewDOS-80 gave us much more power and control. I had a EPROM burner for my Model I that I used even after the IBM PC came along. The Model I was the first in the series. The Model 4 (and 4P) could be loaded up with 128K of RAM and bank switched in 32K chunks, allowing you to put any chunk in any position. Great for disassembling copy protected games. Also the ROM could be switched out giving you 128K of pure RAM, thus allowing it to run CP/M and all the software that was developed for that, and at 4MHz too. The Model 3, 4 and 4p could display 80 x 24 text simultaneously with graphics and the graphics board RAM could be increased as well. Anyone calling the TRS-80 a Trash-80 never discovered how much power these computers really had. Even the Model I would run Pascal with almost all the features of the IBM 360 version. All the languages of the day were available; Forth, Prolog, Lisp, Pascal, C, Fortran and, of course BASIC. The Model I with the expansion interface had a RS-232 port with a serial interface. Mine ran a BBS. Crude sound was possible by cycling the cassette port. Although a RTC wasn't built in, there were plenty of after-market choices. The diskette drive interface was industry standard so it was easy to connect up 4 double-sided, double-density diskette drives. All that and a Z-80 processor with an alternate register set made it a good piece of gear for the time.

  54. Re:vintage computers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    I learned Pascal on one.

    No reason why someone couldn't do the same today.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  55. Re:vintage computers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 0

    Guess what? This story is not about you, or your attention-seeking behaviour.

    Please go die in a fire. (Or at least grow the fuck up.)

    Thank you.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  56. Re:vintage computers by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    I'm younger, but still in the "old" generation.

    My first computer was dad's IBM PcJr. Lack of ISA, bizzare IRQ scheme, freakish sidecar bus, chicklet keyboard and all.

    But hey, it had EGA graphics, dad's had the rare Racore second disk drive, memory and DMA controller upgrade, and it had a primitive synthesizer for multichannel audio instead of just a tweeting internal speaker.

    I spent many hours playing with ROM basic on it. I have very fond memories of that old fishtank. I fully understand where computers have come from, and recognize the pioneering from the altair days, as well as the nostalgia people have for old computers.

    But would I whip out JrPaint on cartridge to make pixel art? Certainly not!

  57. My first computer! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    In high school this was my first computer. The Apple 1 wasn't available for me at the time and so I grew up on the TRS-80 models as they evolved, eventually, into the Model III with built in screen all looking very slick for the time. By the time my school had built a computing lab and filled it with Apple II's I had my own machines at home. When the Model IV arrived I'd moved on to other machines and was looking to my first PC (with help).

    I remember when I had to write lines (the teachers chosen method for entry level discipline - before detention and the cane) I learned the Agile approach to software by asking them things like "would you like the lines numbered?". I then created a short three or four lines of BASIC code and let it print for the selected amount of lines. So to me the TRS-80 was an incredible time saver.

    It also made me money, whilst all the other kids were tooling around trying to figure out if they'd be mechanics carpenters or hairdressers my choice of computing career (my geek fate was sealed!!) let me do other things, like charge the other kids money to do their computing homework.

    So thank you TRS-80 and happy birthday!

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  58. Critical Business App on TRS-80 by raftpeople · · Score: 2

    > You are inside a pyramid, there are openings to the N, S, E and W
    > _

    1. Re:Critical Business App on TRS-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You are inside a pyramid, there are openings to the N, S, E and W

      >N

      > You have entered through the concealed door. A torch mounted on the wall to the left flickers as the door closes behind you.
      &gt_

    2. Re:Critical Business App on TRS-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was 14 years old , I became the proud owner of a "Dick Smith System 80" one of the first TRS-80 clones. It differed in having an internal cassette unit and provision for a second external one. I wrote a program in basic, that read a list of items from cassette 1, let the user supply quantities, then wrote out the data in the same format to cassette 2. When all the items had been processed, the tape was rewound and a different option was selected and it would print the items to a dot matrix printer, the output was then given to the supply company (stevedore purchase order). This was used for four years, until they upgraded to visicalc on apple. The reason it was done this way : Floppy drive controllers and disks were prohibitively expensive and only 16K of memory to handle over 1800 stocklines. Made $120 for that one, which was a lot at the time for a 14 year old.

    3. Re:Critical Business App on TRS-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God to think how much time of my life I wasted on that damn game, always to get frustrated and lost & eventually give up.

      If Dante was a geek that would be a ring of hell for bad gamers.

  59. Re:vintage computers by electron+sponge · · Score: 3, Funny

    10 PRINT "I just learned that mine (I was using it in the late eighties) was just one of the many models of 'TRS-80 Color Computer II'" 20 PRINT "It was this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TRS-80_Color_Computer_2-64K.jpg"

    It's not complete without

    30 PRINT "PENIS"

    40 GOTO 30

    because that's what all of us preteens did when we first learned BASIC. I learned BASIC on a CoCo, and although I have never coded in BASIC since the 1980's, I still feel it was a very formative learning experience. Thanks, Radio Shack.

  60. Re:vintage computers by vistic · · Score: 1

    I can still fire up the ol' Tandy Color Computer 2 and put those 64Ks through their paces with a rousing game of Pooyan, Demon Attack, or Dragonfire.

  61. Re:vintage computers by vistic · · Score: 1

    Many models of Color Computer II?

    I think there was just one, with maybe a few different options for how much RAM you got.

    There were two different looking versions of the original Color Computer though, as I recall, one silver and one beige, with maybe different keyboards. But the Color Computer 2 (roman numerals were for the Apple) looked pretty much like the Color Computer 3.

  62. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think the biggest application that I saw for them were the MTABBS BBS program that was written for the model 4. They worked pretty well for what they were. I think they even had hard drives hooked for them. I think it was only on a handful of BBSs around the St. Louis area.

    They played mugwump pretty well too.

  63. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Get yourself some mod points and use them as you see fit.
    2) Metamoderate more often.
    3) STFU

  64. You mean Rat Shack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They tried to sell me a 8 GB USB stick for $80 USD.

    1. Re:You mean Rat Shack? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you were elsewhere, not at the Tandy Radio Shack, stay sober the next time you go shopping, The clerk at the Candy Jack Shack repeatedly told you that vibrating butt plug was for in house use only and not for sale

    2. Re:You mean Rat Shack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny when I was in the shack yesterday they sold a 32 gig to a guy for 40 bucks + tax

      shadap lamer

    3. Re:You mean Rat Shack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I WAS in Radio Shack. Fuck off.

    4. Re:You mean Rat Shack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the lamer idiot, have fun getting your ass scammed in Rat Shack.

      It's not hard to find evidence of what I say:

      https://www.google.com/search?q=radioshack+scam+ripoff

      The lamer/moron/idiot must be yourself.

  65. I still remember..... by zoid.com · · Score: 2

    I can still remember how the Model I smelled.

    1. Re:I still remember..... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Mmm, I think I remember now... it was the ozone from the monitor's high voltage stuff.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  66. My first store-bought computer by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The TRS80 model 1 was my first store-bought computer -- I'd built my own "microcomputers" up until that stage.

    Compared to the Apple it had some real strengths: A BASIC with double-precision math, a Z80 processor (the 6502 is wicked-good but once Page 0 is used up you lose so many of those cool addressing modes so the Z80 works better in a "store-bought" machine with ROM firmware), plenty of support in magazines, and later, a brilliant disk OS in the form of NewDOS80

    I had most of the Tandy micros: The Model 1, the Model 2 (with 8" drives and later, CP/M), the Tandy 100, the Model III and later, the seldom mentioned Tandy 2000 with its Intel 80186 processor at 8MHz. That thing just blitzed all the 4.77MHz 8088-based PC clones that were around at the time.

    But those were different days.

    Before the advent of the IBM PC, every machine was wildly different and exciting. Once the "PC-compatible" virus hit, hardware became rather undistinctive and "samey".

    Good days!

  67. 35 years ago?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OMG, I'm so f'ing old!!!

  68. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While they are cool from a history point of view, and many did very clever hardware hacks and tricks to increase performance with less silicon, really they aren't much more than museum pieces.

    What can you really do with a TRS-80 these days?

    This is not off-topic. I really am sick of how badly people use their mod-points these days.

    1) Get yourself some mod points and use them as you see fit.
    2) Metamoderate more often.
    3) STFU

    While Slashdot's current moderation system deals with trolls and flamebait ok, it also misses on too many interesting posts that would otherwise have spawned a truly enjoyable read.

    WTH is wrong with a little nostalgia? People who were there, taking their time to write about and share first-hand personal experiences, often with obvious fondness, of bygone eras - is basically worthless? This "forum" would be less interesting and dry without such pieces.

  69. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what you could do with it before? Yeah, pretty much the same deal. Unless it's broken.

  70. Re:vintage computers by swell · · Score: 1

    "What can you really do with a TRS-80 these days?"

    Run a business. As it happens I have a complete TRS-80 payroll system on audio cassettes still in shrink wrap and ready for someone's brilliant startup plans.

    As Farmer Tim says, they'll still do what they did then, but people change and have less patience. Nostalgia can only carry you for a short time.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  71. Re:vintage computers by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Troll

    Oh great... NOW the mods learn how to properly mod an off-topic post.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  72. In the Computer Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I was in High School, I was in the computer club (yes, we had computer clubs back in 1980; lol). Our school had just one computer; it was a TRS-80. lol

    Amazing at that time. A year later, Dad got me a CoCo and 2 years later a CoCo3. Fantastic computers they both were for the time. Learned some Basic and had fun learning. The exploration is probably what keeps the hackers interested now, but the personal computer was still more then in it's infancy when I was in High School. Fun time; now we have to worry about things that folks back then didn't even have a clue about. Oh well. :)

  73. Forever ago by tranquilidad · · Score: 1

    I did my first programming on an HP-67 handheld calculator when they first came out around 1972 when I was 12. My dad brought one home from work (NASA) to show it to me and I had fun with it on the weekends - even got to write some programs he would use in the office. That first exposure to programming got me excited but I could never afford a machine of my own.

    When the TRS-80 was announced I was excited and had to save my money up to be able to afford it. I remember putting $100 down to reserve my machine and then had to wait eight weeks for it to show up.

    The "computer stores" at the time were very interesting to me. The ones where I grew up near Annapolis usually looked like a hoarder's den with electronics, parts and manuals spread all over the place. Most of the people I knew who had home computers back then were quite comfortable opening them up and "fixing" them. That was just part of the experience.

  74. Re:vintage computers by beltsbear · · Score: 1

    There were pretty good games (good gameplay, bad graphics) for even the TRS-80 model I. There was a company called big-five that made low res clones of robotron, asteroids, space invaders and other games (with different titles of course).

  75. I lost my computing virginity to a TRS-80 by lord_mike · · Score: 2

    I wrote my first program ever on a TRS-80 color computer. It was a community computer programming course that they ran from a local school. We had to write out our programs at home on special graph paper and type it in during class. I was immediately hooked on computers and programming.

    I used to book programming time at the local library for their TRS-80 model III. It was a lousy machine compared to its contemporaries, but, it was the only reliable access I had to a microcomputer, so I cherished the few precious minutes I had available to program. I was only able to book one hour at a time, so I had to work fast and leave enough time to save the programs to tape. I remember programming some games from David H. Ahl's "More Basic Computer Games--TRS-80 Edition" which was modified to use the primitive TRS-80 graphics. I tried making a light cycle game, but failed at that attempt pretty badly. I never got it to work right. If only I had more time...

    In the early 90's, I stumbled upon an old Model III sitting on the clearance table at the local Radio Shack. They were asking 30 bucks for it. I really wanted to buy it, but my wife would have none of it. To this day, I still regret not acquiring that classic machine. Yeah, it wasn't great, but it still was an important piece of computing history... and my own.

    1. Re:I lost my computing virginity to a TRS-80 by Kiyyik · · Score: 1

      With me, it was a summer gifted class. I had a choice of acting or computer programming. I'd never played with computers all that much, and wanted to grow up to be an actress, but for some reason I cannot for the life of me went with the computer course. A room full of Model IIIs, learning about PRINT and INPUT and all that fancy stuff. Well, I was hooked. I've been a programmer ever since. TRS-80's were still a damn pain, though. Sooooo slow.

  76. Cassette drive roulette by TED+Vinson · · Score: 1

    Cassette drive roulette:
    >cload
    eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.........eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.........eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee........

  77. Re:vintage computers by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Not me. I set about using the semi-graphics mode of my TRS-80 MC-10, my first computer, to make my own version of Pacman. The resolution was insufficient for any kind of animation but I did get it to the point where you could move the man around a maze.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  78. Re:vintage computers by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Three words; Dungeons Of Dagorath. I wore out a keyboard on that game.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  79. Long live the coco! by CrAlt · · Score: 1

    My 1st computer was a TRS-80 Color computer 2. I still own it and its still in use hooked to a Tandy "Plug 'n Power" X10 controler. It runs some outside lights and the attic fans. As long as it keeps working i have no real reason to ever replace it. It just sits in the basement doing its job year after year.

    I also have another CoCo2 hooked up to my bigscreen and DriveWire4 in the living room. Every once in a while I'll fire it up and play some MicroChess or Bedlam.

    Believe it or not there is actually a small but active community of TRS-80 coco users. The Drivewire project is pretty active ( https://sites.google.com/site/drivewire4/ ) and so is the coco mailing list ( http://five.pairlist.net/pipermail/coco/ ). Cloud9 is still in business coming up with cool new hardware and support services. ( http://www.cloud9tech.com/ )

    --
    I have to return some videotapes...
  80. Re:vintage computers by eln · · Score: 1

    I also had a TRS-80 Color Computer as a young child. I mostly played games on it, but my father apparently did actual work on it as well. I can't imagine how much it cost him (he didn't make much money), but his willingness to spend that money fundamentally altered the course of my life. The TRS-80 was the first computer I ever used, and it sparked a passion for technology that's still with me today.

  81. Re:vintage computers by eln · · Score: 1

    I was too young to come up with that. I think my first BASIC program just repeated "hello" or something similar.

  82. III with double sided 80 track disk drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I modded mine with a double sided, 80 track disk drive, man, it was an awesome amount of storage, all for finding the 40s in the OS and changing them to 80. What fun.

  83. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any IBM prior to the late 80s pales in comparison to ANY of the early 80s computers as far as functionality goes, nevermind documentation on the design.

    PCs have always been 'blackboxish', many of the early hobbiest computers however were documented to the point where any amateur could in a week or two do something useful with them (hardware design-wise, software would take you an afternoon.)

  84. Clone - Video Genie EG3003 by scsirob · · Score: 1

    My TRS-80 was actually a clone, the Video Genie EG3003. With built-in cassette recorder no less. Got mine defective from a friend who had a lightning strike nearby. I clipped all TTL chips and replaced them. To my luck, the ROM, RAM and CPU were still intact! I later expanded the system with a floppy controller, ran NewDOS-80, LDOS and TRS-DOS on it.

    There were two ways to expand the memory. You could piggy-back 4116 DRAM chips on top of the original ones, or you could clip the original ones and insert 4164 DRAM chips for those. I believe if you went the second route, you had to remove capacitors and cut some traces, as one of the 4116 power pins had changed to an address line on the 4164..

    Ohh the memories ;-)

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  85. I had a TRS-80 III tape storage by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Lacking software I would type in programs from the magazine MICRO-80; taught me how to program, Basic and Assembly.

    6 hours typing in a program then run CLOAD (Before CSAVE) and lose everything, I did it
    so often I'd just chug a beer and start all over like nothing happened. Just one of those things.

    I still have mine, never use it again but it's a reminder of better times (being younger :}).

  86. Memories of Asylum and other games by davesag · · Score: 1

    When I was in high school my dad's office had a couple of TRS-80 model 2s (cassette tapes!) and a model 3 (8" floppies!) and after school I'd go to his office and spend ages playing The Asylum (see http://www.trs-80.org/asylum/) It was awesome. Even more so than the school's sole Apple ][, the "trash 80" introduced me to programming and I taught myself z80 assembler in an effort to write my own version of Scramble (see http://www.arcade-gameover.com/scramble.asp) as I quickly realised that BASIC was never going to cut it. I ended up nearly failing year 12 because I spend most of that year writing a text adventure game I called The Cave. I was forced to abandon it eventually and get my grades back up so as to get into university. I also spent a lot of time playing Taipan on the model 3. (see http://cymonsgames.com/taipan/)

    I moved on to the Apple ][ after that, and then, at uni, the PDP 11, and then the Mac in 1984. Messed about with BBCs, Acorns, Apricots, and a bunch of other machines I can't even remember the names of but never left the Mac since then. Friends had Vic-20s and Commodore 64s and Ataris but I never really got into those. Nice to see there are TRS-80 emulators for the Mac at http://sdltrs.sourceforge.net/

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    1. Re:Memories of Asylum and other games by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      The Model 2 could have had 8" floppies, but I don't believe the Model III ever had 8" floppies. It had internal and/or external 5.25" floppies. Or just a cassette interface.

      My dad owned several and my high school computer lab was made up of Model III and Model 4 computers. Not sure what technology but the lab was networked with 4 floppy drives on the "server" (just another Model III) along with the sole printer.

      I don't think the Model 4's were part of the network.

      I believe that printer contention was handled by standing up and saying loudly, "I'm printing."

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  87. Re:vintage computers by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    It's probably just as fast as an equivalent system running on a modern PC, too. The big problem is that as PCs have got more powerful, more crap has been added in that no-one ever uses.

    I'm prepared to bet that all bar a handful of Microsoft Word users don't do anything they couldn't have done with WordStar in CP/M.

  88. Re:vintage computers by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, I was talking about this to someone the other day. They wanted to demonstrate how TCP/IP works, but obviously everything happens so quickly all you see is a couple of lines in a wireshark window and it's done.

    So as a demonstration I set up soundmodem on two machines, and set up TCP/IP using AX.25 as the link layer - 1200bps audio tones, rather like the tape tones from early 80s home computers. You can even adjust them to sound slightly different while remaining in spec to give the two computers slightly different "voices". Instead of hooking them together using radios, I just used cables, and left the PC speakers hooked up to so you could hear what they were doing. Then ping from one to the other, and "BLEEEBLORP BLEEEBLIRP" - there goes the ARP request and response, "BLEEEBLURBLURBLURP BLEEEBLIP" - there goes the ping and response, and so on.

    Doing SSH over it is very, very slow to get going but tolerable once it's started.

  89. Some things never change by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    I certainly remember being wounded by it at the time when it was used by Apple II owners–those pompous, style-obsessed twits.

    Exchange "Apple II" by any current Apple product, and that line might be found as well on Slashdot today.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  90. Peek Poke by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    This is what I still remember ... commands like "Peek" and "Poke"
     
    Back in those old days, we used to comb through the user manual, from the first page, to the last, and to try out every-single-command there is to see what they do
     
    CP/M, Sinclair, Osborne, oh my, all those things do bring back sweet memory
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Peek Poke by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Poke (ADD=4AD4, Find = 18, Change=20)

      For some reason I still remember something like the above. We used to use it to strip any floppy protection, or to pick some random address to basically prevent someone else from doing this.

      We started with the old TRS-80 model one though. We had the old cassette tape storage, where you had to note on the tape with a pen as to what number to start 'playing' or 'recording' your program back.

      Those were the days..lol

    2. Re:Peek Poke by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Damn, i had forgotten most of that stuff, i do remember playing pong while my ashtray filled with butts, and asteroids and something else, i forget what.
      I remember getting a basic compiler and learning basic at a community college, along with pascal and fortran. Pascal was the only one i liked though, still do.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    3. Re:Peek Poke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were lucky. We had these in Jr. High. Same classes though. Basic, Pascal, and Fortran. Hated Fortran. The rest had me hooked ;)

  91. It was the Processor: Z80 vs 6502 by elkto · · Score: 2

    I recall the real fight was between the Z80 and 6502 camps; the original RISC vs CISC discussions. The 6502 was certainly simple to program with its I/O being memory mapped. But as things evolved CPM certainly shaped up to be more of an operating system than what Apple's Basic Language OS variant.

    I was routing for the 68000 to be the next step, but when Apple announced that the MAC was going to be a closed system (Pay for the SDK) I, as did many, jumped ship to the PC's 8088.

  92. If you had a color get off my yard by splatter · · Score: 1

    like so many others I got my first programming chops & computer knowledge from the TRS-80 my dad brought home. Did anyone else try copying the software from the back of the old compute magazines?

    I remember soldering a speaker wire up to the unit since there was no computer speakers back in the day. I described that one day to my much younger sister, and realized how silly it sounded 30 years later were a pair of speakers are $10 and actually sound good.
    Best was when we got a disk drive instead of the tape which was such a hassle.

    My dad has it still in the closet and kids that it is part of my inheritance. Figures in another 10-20 years it will be worth something.

    God I feel old, Now get off my yard!!!!

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  93. Re:vintage computers by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    embedded /industrial controls.

    stuff that z80 is used for nowadays.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zilog_Z80

    you could for example us it to run elevator logic fairly easily. nobodys going to hack it over the internet at least.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  94. rs232 was a board that used 'fingerstock' by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    to connect it to the main board. 2 screws and pressure on some pcb contacts and springs kept it in contact.

    or not.

    "download errors again. damn. hang on, let me reseat my rs232 board again. can you call me back in originate mode in 5 minutes?"

    not sure if that was worse than the CLOAD audio front-end that needed extra wave-shaping. there were circuits (I built one) that rejected most of the cassette audio noise and created new clean 1/0 pulses for the CLOAD program reader to better detect. with such a box, you didn't need to keep the playback volume between 4.5 and 5.5; it had *much* more leeway and would still load the program without errors.

    hey, I got a good load. let me do some CSAVE's on different brand of tapes just to be sure.

    (sysadmin, and what we cared about back then)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  95. Re:Most popular? Debatable.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  96. Re:Most popular? Debatable.... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    >>>I don't think it ever matched the popularity that the Apple ][+ achieved in the early 1980's

    They meant the TRS-80 was the "most popular of the 70s". It was not the most popular after it had become old & replaced by newer machines. (See my other post.)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  97. Ah, nostalgia... by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    A TRS-80 Model 1 was my first computer. Of course that lead to a long history of gadgets and hacks. Back then, high-school teachers wouldn't accept a paper printed on a dot-matrix printer. So a fellow TRS-80 owner and I bought a nifty little gadget called a Dynatyper which was essentially a box of solenoids that you mounted over the keyboard of a regular typewriter. And of course, we couldn't afford a real floppy disk drive (5.25" true floppies, btw) so we bought this thing called a Stringy Floppy. it used these little cassette tapes that operated on a similar principle to 8-track tapes. And back then I was big into graphics so I bought this rather expensive hi-res graphics board. And we used to stick AM radios next to the machine to get "sound" out of our games.

  98. Re:Most popular? Debatable.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Your link only seems to refer to the point that the Apple ][+ was not the actual leader, and does not show its ranking relative to the TRS-80 after 1979.

  99. Re:Most popular? Debatable.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I certainly understand the importance of comparing only PC's of the same generation, but the Apple ][+ was actually introduced in 1979, and itself could reasonably be considered part of the same generation of desktop PC's as the TRS-80 itself. Nonetheless, for a number of years after the Apple was introduced, the TRS-80 continued to sell... and the Apple was not overly superior to the TRS-80 on a technological level such that the latter could have been considered replaced by the former. In fact, to the best of my knowledge, the TRS-80's declining desktop viability in the 1980's was much more affected by the increasing variety of choices that people were starting to get as various manufacturers came out with their own PC than it was because newer machines that came out during that same time period effectively replaced it.

  100. Re:vintage computers by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    >>>Guess what? This story is not about you, or your attention-seeking behaviour. Please go die in a fire. (Or at least grow the fuck up.)

    You first. Demonstrate how a grown-up acts, rather than lashing out like an immature college kid.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  101. Re:WHAT ABOUT ATARI!!!!! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    TRS-80 beat it by about 3 years.

  102. Re:vintage computers by Cito · · Score: 1

    Real programming nerds didn't use PRINT in basic :)

    we used ?

    5 ? "penis"
    10 goto 5

    ? did same as print and was less typing :P

    there were a lot of tricks like that you could do to substitute words for symbols even in early basic.

  103. My first Tandy was the 1000 EX by Cito · · Score: 1

    I didn't get a TRS-80 at first.

    my first pc was a Tandy 1000 EX, it had 256KB ram, 1 5 1/4" floppy drive, came with a RGB monitor, Dos 2.0 and Deskmate.
    I had a subscription to Home and Office computing that had basic programs on several pages for different flavors of basic from apple to gwbasic etc since some versions were slightly different.

    But I saw an article in the back for a floppy disk with a new compiler on it... I was so tired of writing basic, had wrote a program with tons of data lines to create a bouncing sphere on the screen which I won a contest at state FBLA competition... I ordered that new disk with this new compiler I had never heard of. Was $50 and came with a white book..

    I was so happy when that disk and book came in... the disk "Power C" and the book was the famous White Power C book which I still own to this day.

    being able to write C on a Tandy 1000 EX was awesome, compiling took forever for anything half complex, but I was so happy to have an EXE binary and finally done with line numbers, load/run/tron/troff :P

    I was given a TRS 80 as a gift but it was after the Tandy 1000 EX, I had a Commadore as well but my Tandy 1000 EX was my favorite and was used even after obsolete until my next pc was a IBM PS/2 then a 286.

  104. Re:vintage computers by hexagonc · · Score: 1

    They were so slow, you could actually watch them run and understand what was happening.

    Try this if you want a computer so slow that you could actually see it running.

  105. Underappreciated? by kc7cfk · · Score: 1

    The machine itself was not the problem-- it was the seller that led to its downfall.

    Fresh out of high school in 1978, I was hired by a local RS specifically to become an expert sales rep for the TRS-80, due primarily to my modest knowledge of computers and programming. But about the time I had to embarassingly ask for a customer's name and address for a 69-cent battery purchase for the umpteenth time, I realized it was a lost cause. Never sold a single computer. And I eventually quit pestering customers for their info and started filling in names and addresses selected randomly from the phone book after the customers left the store. Even that was not enough to contain my disgust and I quit. The upside was my experience with RS led directly to going to college. Never did retail again.

  106. Re:vintage computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but I fail to see how GP is "lashing out like an immature college kid". Maybe if you did not deserve to be treated that way, I could see it. But given your reputation, I am (not) sorry to say that you most certainly deserve such treatment.

  107. Re:vintage computers by silverspell · · Score: 1

    The TRS-80 model II was my very first computer, and I learned basic coding on it. I can't remember the language

    Yes you can.

    Somehow that's like a reverse-twist version of the panflute flowchart.

  108. I refuse to believe I'm really this old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    35 years ago? Crap, despite a decade of denial now I can't seem to keep getting reminded how old I really am.

  109. Re:WHAT ABOUT ATARI!!!!! by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

    Not three years - two and a quarter. The Trash-80 came out in August of 1977. The Atari 800 came out in November of 1979, and along with the 400 immediately dethroned the TRS-80 as the best selling computers. Radio Shack never regained their footing in the market, and for good reason. The Atari 8-bits made them look like junk, and while the CoCo at least sported decent processor performance when it came out in 1980, the graphics were crap. It couldn't even compete effectively with the VIC-20, let alone the Atari 8-bits or, later, the C64.

  110. I found a weird piece of retro tech today by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    So, I'm cleaning out my dad's workshop today *gasp* and I came across a 33 1/3 mini record produced by the Escort radar detector people.

  111. Readability! by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

    Not true, at all. I started out with an Altair 8080 that I built. It was programmed by stepping through the memory location one at a a time and setting the byte stored there with paddle switches. When I got a TRS-80, I could type just fine and really liked creating code that I could show anyone how to read. Yes, you could substitute symbols, but why do it. If you knew how to type, then it was better for readable code.

    1. Re:Readability! by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Let me guess, you code in Python now, do you?

      (just kidding, I love Python)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Readability! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Not true, at all. I started out with an Altair 8080 that I built. It was programmed by stepping through the memory location one at a a time and setting the byte stored there with paddle switches. When I got a TRS-80, I could type just fine and really liked creating code that I could show anyone how to read. Yes, you could substitute symbols, but why do it. If you knew how to type, then it was better for readable code.

      On the Apple II at least, ? got tokenized the same way as PRINT. When you listed the program you just entered, you'd get PRINT wherever you had entered ?. One character to type vs. five, for the same result.

      (The first computer I had at home was a TI-99/4A, followed by an Apple IIe a couple of years later. Before either of those, though, my grandfather had bought a TRS-80 Color Computer. I learned BASIC on that machine, and had started picking up 6809 assembly language before we moved overseas. Some of the concepts still were useful when I started learning 6502 assembly language.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Readability! by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with shortcuts to reduce typing keystrokes. I was responding to what I thought was a vote for cryptic symbolic languages that are not easily readable. To me, those types of setups are just a waste of time.

  112. Re:vintage computers by Abreu · · Score: 1

    Same here. My idea of fun was to make the computer print multiplication tables until it crashed

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  113. Re:vintage computers by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

    Three words; Dungeons Of Dagorath. I wore out a keyboard on that game.

    Which, incidentally, you can dig up and run on Linux in all its incredibly crappy old school goodness. It really takes you back.

  114. Fond memories of the TRS-80 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you all for the trip down memory lane -- so many things I had forgotten!

    The TRS-80 Model I was my first computer. I saved my money from working at summer camp to buy one during my freshman or sophomore year of high school.

    Typing in programs from Byte magazine! Dealing with that temperamental cassette recorder for storage.

    I took that thing with me to college. That's when I really started experimenting with it. I soldered the lowercase mod. Bought a used expansion box from another hobbyist, taking it up to 48K. Graduating from the 300 baud to the 1200 baud modem. Connecting to local BBSes to talk to other hobbyists in the area.

    Finally getting two floppy drives and using a hole punch to make them double sided.

    I played games and wrote school papers on it. I even bought custom carrying cases for it -- two black plastic attache cases, one for the monitor and the other for the keyboard and expansion box. I kept it running for years after college. And I am still kicking myself for abandoning it in the basement of my apartment building when I left Boston.

  115. We had a full LAN of TRS-80, remote storage/print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loved the TRS-80, where I learned to program in 1979 or so. But it got better:

    In my high school we had a full LAN of 10 or so Model III connected via serial cables to a Model 1 with 2 (count 'em 2) dual sided disk drives, so 4 full floppy dives, I think 0:, 1:, 2:, 3; (and fun with SuperZap !) plus shared printing. All via custom ROM someone had written.

    I lived through high school on this system - loaded up my reports from the shared storage disk (even had my own private disk as I was the senior computer student), edited with ScriptSit, printed, etc.

    Nothing real that a modern LAN doesn't do that we couldn't do decades ago - load/save files from any machine, print, and even some security as I recall. Was fast, usable, and fun. Plus programming; wrote my first commercial software, a dating system to match boys/girls from surveys (migrated to a Dec 100 for more power), a sports scoring and stats system that let us almost win the state championship that year with computerized per-athlete stats for any opposing team, etc.

    Ah, the old TRS-80 . . .

  116. Re:vintage computers by vistic · · Score: 1

    I have that cart... and I always wanted to get into it but never could. Maybe its because I didnt have the manual and I was always just guessing at what the commands / syntax could be.