Slashdot Mirror


Debian Changes Default Desktop From GNOME To XFCE

An anonymous reader writes "The default desktop within Debian 7.0 'Wheezy' has changed from GNOME to Xfce. GNOME, KDE, and LXDE will continue to be available, but the decision was made to default to Xfce. The reported reasoning comes down to size constraints in fitting GNOME on a single CD."

13 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. The what? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a "default desktop" in Debian? I thought everyone just installed the netinst and used apt-get to install whatever desktop they wanted.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:The what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      apt-get? LUXURY! Us Slackware users use tar -zxf && ./configure && make install!

    2. Re:The what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Command length != penis length

  2. Excellent news by killmenow · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am okay with this. I've used XFCE on most linux server boxes for years anyway (if any graphical environment at all). Way more lightweight than Gnome or KDE and works great.

  3. I've been uxing Xubuntu by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...and enjoying it. XFCE works pretty well and is easy to use. This actually makes Debian more attractive to me.

    However... there are definitely some issues that bespeak a need for more polish. E.g. this one, or this one. Hopefully a bit more focused attention will lead to quicker fixes.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:I've been uxing Xubuntu by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Hopefully a bit more focused attention will lead to quicker fixes.

      Exactly. Nothing focuses attention like becoming the default desktop environment. Fedora probably won't abandon the GNOMEs anytime soon but can anyone see GNOME3 being the default for RHEL7? Ubuntu has went their own zany way with Unity but if the alternate (XFCE, KDE, Mint, etc) spins/forks aren't already accounting for more installs than the base Ubuntu it is only a matter of time because a broken desktop isn't going to fly. And no matter how many users leave neither the Unity or Gnome Shell devs will admit they are leading in a direction few care to follow.

      The difference is we get a choice, we don't have to accept what they create. Pity the poor fools on Windows, they are about to get Metro whether they want it or not and they aren't going to have many options. Heard the latest? The prereleases have been hacked to default to a normal desktop but the RTM has 'fixed' those hacks so they won't work. They aren't going to allow em to escape. Of course corporate types will be able to stay on Win7 for years; end users won't be able to buy a new PC without 8 after the new year.

      And when OS X gets the iOS makeover they won't have any choice either; but of course they will all suddenly decide it is insanely great and exactly what they wanted all along.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  4. I'm delighted.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whatever the reason is for the change, I will say "Thank god, thank you thank you thank you Debian developers".

  5. Bloody brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Debian sounds a voice of reason within the community.

    I wondered how they would tackle the infamous UI "situation", and this was the outcome I hoped everyone involved would have the guts to go forth with.

    Rejoice for a surge of development activity for Xfce - a much more fruitful use of developer time than some other currently available UI sinks.

  6. And the real reason... by kthreadd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    GNOME 3

  7. Gnome 3 doesn't have too many power users by nssy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Torvalds said "I'm using Xfce. I think it's a step down from gnome2, but it's a huge step up from gnome3. Really"

    --
    Some of us learn from other people's mistakes and the rest of us have to be other people. -- Zig Ziglar
  8. Re:Of all the priorities... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why is a CD's capacity the deciding factor for a component with such broad repercussions throughout the OS? It's 2012, folks. How many new installations are really made or broken on what works from a 700MB CD when a 4.7GB DVD is an incredibly common substitute?

    I'm not ridiculing this decision, despite my surprised tone. I'm actually interested in learning more about the reasoning behind it, if anyone has some more background.

    Believe it or not, not all of us have ultra-high speed Internet connections. Or a desire to install the world at one go, for that matter.

  9. Re:What is a CD? by Michalson · · Score: 5, Funny

    A CD or 'compact disc' was an ancient precursor to the DVDs that you can still find in some stores today. During their heyday CDs where mainly used to store a primitive type of mp3 called '16bit uncompressed PCM' but could also store regular data. A typical CD could hold between 650 and 700 'megabytes' worth of small files. A 'megabyte' was an older unit of storage; One megabyte was just 1/1000 of a gigabyte!

  10. Happy With XFCE by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used XFCE for a while years ago, after one of the bloatenings of Gnome. Switched back and had been pretty happy with Gnome until they started turning it into WebTV. Still struggled along with classic mode for a while, but they've been dumbing that as well. Switched back to XFCE and very pleased.

    If you want a thin client for the cloud, Gnome/Windows 8/Mountain Lion/ChromeOS are all fine. If you want a computer, XFCE/Debian may be the best option.

    I tend to think a divergence is inevitable. The masses don't want a computer and never did. They grudgingly used them because it was where all the good stuff was. Now that the oligarchs are offering convenience as an alternative to liberty, most people are lining up. The hardware manufacturers are falling right in line with UEFI, the network providers are pushing to cripple the nasty peer-to-peer design of the Internet, and everyone with an IQ below 120 (and a surprising percentage of those above) can easily be convinced they are happier this way. It's called progress.

    Ummm, which is why I like XFCE... OK, bit of a digression there. But maybe that suggests a motto: "XFCE: Don't shuffle blandly into the decline."