Slashdot Mirror


Could a Category 5 Hurricane Take Down East Coast Data Centers?

TheNextCorner writes "With more data moving into the cloud, there is an increasing danger of data loss when one of these cloud computing data centers fails. Hurricanes pose a real threat to infrastructure located in Virginia and North Carolina, where Google, Apple & Facebook have opened large data centers. 'Where would the most damaging hit be? It's debatable, but the most detrimental hit may be in Virginia. Amazon Web Services (AWS) has one of their major centers in Northern Virginia. ... In a study involving millions of people, a third of those surveyed reported visiting a website every day that used Amazon's infrastructure. In 2011, Amazon's S3 cloud stored 762 billion objects. It's possible that Amazon's cloud alone holds an entire 1% of the Internet.' Could a category 5 Hurricane become a problem for these cloud data centers and take down parts the Internet?"

9 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. Category 5 Hurricane by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could a category 5 Hurricane become a problem for these cloud data centers and take down parts the Internet?"

    Only if they haven't switched to Cat 6 cables yet.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  2. Priorities by Roachie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Cat 5 impacts the East Coast and we are worried that Facebook or Amazon might be down?

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    1. Re:Priorities by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 4, Informative

      Category 5 and F5 are very different beasts.

      An F5 tornado is going to level,or at least mostly demolish, most buildings short of a concrete bunker.

      A Category 5 hurricane is roughly equivalent to a low end F3 tornado - it will destroy weaker structures like prefab metal buildings and mobile homes, and perhaps de-roof and blow the windows out of more solid foundation-built structures. Still very bad news, but not on quite the same scale. Hurricanes do most the damage from flooding anyway, not the straightline winds.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Priorities by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      500000 deaths due to hurricanes...

      The original poster must have been using seasonal adjustments. Depending on the month, a category 5 hurricane can actually result in population growth.

    3. Re:Priorities by pillageplunder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, Typically a Hurricane leaves a larger footprint than a Tornado, in that a larger area is affected, and also the duration of a Hurricane is much longer than that of a Tornado. Yes, an F5 tornado is much more powerful and destructive than a Cat 5 Hurricane, but given how much longer a hurricane will be over a given area, it's likely that damage will be roughly equal.
      Bad news either way you slice it.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking class" Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Priorities by Zephyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Once an F5 tornado pulls the roof off the server building, you'll really see how data migrates into the cloud.

    5. Re:Priorities by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You forgot the part where a Cat 5 hurricane is HUNDREDS of miles wide, whereas a tornado is a hundred feet, if that. A hurricane also lasts for hours while a tornado lasts for a few seconds. Other than that, yeah, it's not nearly on the same scale. The tornado, I mean.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  3. A few bits of information by VoiceOfSanity · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, a Category 5 hurricane is highly unlikely striking that region of the country. Historically, there have been only three confirmed Category 5 landfalls, two of them in Florida and one in Mississippi (the 1935 Labor Day hurricane in Florida, Hurricane Camille in 1969 and Hurricane Andrew in 1992.) There has been Category 4 storms that have struck the Cape Hatteras area, and South Carolina did have Hurricane Hugo in 1989. But the odds of a Category 5 hitting that specific region of the US is extremely low.

    Additionally, these data centers are not located along the coastline, but a significant distance inland. Facebook's is west of Charlotte, while Amazon's located west of Washington DC. Of the list, the Amazon one that could... and I mean could be impacted by a hurricane, but there really hasn't been a good strike in the Chesapeake Bay area in a while. They were taken down by the derechos that rolled through last month, and a derecho could happen pretty much anywhere west of the Rockies.

    So while the chances of a hurricane taking down one of the datacenters is low, it could happen. It's one reason you don't see data centers built anywhere within 150 miles of the Gulf Coast or in Florida as a whole, the entire region is a target zone for Mother Nature. (Disclaimer: I've lived along the Gulf Coast now for over 30+ years and have been through a Category 5, two Category 4 and a host of other hurricanes over my time.)

  4. They already have by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few years back I belatedly discovered (the hard way) that my web hoster had located its servers in Hurricane Alley. My site was down for over a week as they trucked their server farm to a new location because the local utilities weren't going to be back until God knew when. I've since been paying attention to where things are located, physically, and anything that might be threatening to that area.