Slashdot Mirror


Ecuador To Grant Assange Political Asylum

NSN A392-99-964-5927 writes with news that Ecaudor will grant Julian Assange's request for political asylum. An Ecuador official told The Guardian that the country's president, who earlier indicated his decision would arrive after the Olympic Games, will approve the request Assange made in June. "Government sources in Quito confirmed that despite the outstanding legal issues Correa would grant Assange asylum – a move which would annoy Britain, the US and Sweden. They added that the offer was made to Assange several months ago, well before he sought refuge in the embassy, and following confidential negotiations with senior London embassy staff. The official with knowledge of the discussions said the embassy had discussed Assange's asylum request. The British government, however, 'discouraged the idea,' the offical said. The Swedish government was also 'not very collaborative,' the official said. The official added: 'We see Assange's request as a humanitarian issue. The contact between the Ecuadorean government and WikiLeaks goes back to May 2011, when we became the first country to see the leaked US embassy cables completely declassified ... It is clear that when Julian entered the embassy there was already some sort of deal. We see in his work a parallel with our struggle for national sovereignty and the democratisation of international relations.'"

52 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. Good by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good for Assange and good for Ecuador.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Good by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ya but if I Assange I'd be absurdly paranoid for the rest of my life. Drone strikes are so easy to do and for the USA to deploy a military asset to Ecuador cannot be that difficult.

    2. Re:Good by crawling_chaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Drones? More like hand over some unmarked Benjamins for a quick car accident and some planted cocaine.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    3. Re:Good by Desler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You confuse 'the American public' with 'internet nerds'. The American public is overwhelmingly anti-Wikileaks.

    4. Re:Good by pnot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quite apart from any supposed CIA attacks, Assange had better make sure he only says nice things about President Correa. From the Human Rights Watch Report:

      Those involved in protests in which there are outbreaks of violence may be prosecuted on inflated and inappropriate terrorism charges. Criminal defamation laws that restrict freedom of expression remain in force and Correa has used them repeatedly against his critics... Impunity for police abuses is widespread... Ecuador’s Criminal Code still has provisions criminalizing desacato (“lack of respect”), under which anyone who offends a government official may receive a prison sentence up to three months and up to two years for offending the president... journalists face prison sentences and crippling damages for this offense... In a draft decree announced in December 2010, domestic NGOs, including those working on human rights, would have to re-register and submit to continuous government monitoring. The decree would give the government broad powers to dissolve groups for “political activism,”

      Then again, Assange also said that Sweden was a great place where he felt totally safe, right up until the whole rape thing happened, at which point Sweden was suddenly declared a notorious US lackey...

    5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and one which the US won't miss if an imperial fuckton of bombs happened to vaporize it!

      Re-read what you just wrote, and ask yourself if you are on the good side or the bad side.

    6. Re:Good by moeinvt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Such statements have no relationship to reality..."

      Interesting perspective. I think there is very real evidence to demonstrate that the USA has a habit of bombing other countries and actively overthrowing governments (even elected ones) which refuse to toe the USA line. I wonder how many governments in Central and South America alone have been targeted for "regime change" because the USA didn't like their behavior?

      I think the OP has a good point. Ecuador should be watching out for armed rebel groups even if they don't need to be dodging hellfire missiles and smart bombs at the moment.

    7. Re:Good by moeinvt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It beats GITMO or some secret CIA prison in the Middle East.

    8. Re:Good by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Armed Robbery: Strike 1 Assault :Strike 2 Steal loaf of bread: Strike 3 and we are fucking done with you. Goodby for the rest of your miserable life.

      I see nothing wrong with this.

      Right, because every theft of leavened baked goods involves armed criminal action and assault, without exception.

      Jackass.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:Good by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Informative

      source?

      http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/south-america/ecuador/

      Express kidnappings are a common crime in Ecuador and are on the increase, particularly in Quito and Guayaquil. Both Ecuadorians and foreign visitors are targets. The kidnappings involve short-term opportunistic abductions aimed at extracting cash from victims who are selected at random. They are held while criminals empty their bank accounts using the victims bank cards. Once the money has been taken the victim is usually released in an isolated area. However, criminals have started to force victims to take them to their homes once they have withdrawn the cash, and violence is becoming more common. This type of crime can involve illegitimate taxis and complicit taxi drivers. In some recent cases in January, March and April 2012, the passengers were pepper sprayed. In 2009 a British tourist was express-kidnapped from a hotel in the north of Quito.

    10. Re:Good by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're right if he was going to get killed by a professional group it would not be something so obvious as a drone strike.

      Agreed. They'd probably start by framing the guy in some kind of sex scandal, as is traditional for the US. Oh wait...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    11. Re:Good by fredprado · · Score: 5, Insightful

      South America has gone a long way from the time it was easily manipulated by US. If anything it is getting more hostile to US as time goes, and if US decides to push it too hard it may end losing a lot more than it can possibly win.

    12. Re:Good by fredprado · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't worry. From there he can easily come to Brazil. We have never extradited anyone to US and won't start anytime soon. South America is probably the best place in the world for him to run. Nobody here likes US (and that includes most governments)

    13. Re:Good by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The American public in general is overwhelmingly authoritarian.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Good by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gentlemen, i give you, American geography.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:Good by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 5, Insightful

      South America has gone a long way from the time it was easily manipulated by US. If anything it is getting more hostile to US as time goes, and if US decides to push it too hard it may end losing a lot more than it can possibly win.

      Especially with the rise of Brazil as a regional regional economic powerhouse there may be less need to South American countries in general to put up with perceived U.S. bullying.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
    16. Re:Good by rmstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steal loaf of bread: Strike 3 and we are fucking done with you. Goodby for the rest of your miserable life.

      I see nothing wrong with this.

      Nothing? Well, that makes you a cruel and evil person. That you can't understand this makes you also a very stupid person. Congratulations. You are a real liability and a net minus to anyone around you.

    17. Re:Good by Lord+Balto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being on the equator, and with a healthy supply of mountains, coasts, and jungles, you can pretty much have whatever climate you like year round. The guy could have done worse.

    18. Re:Good by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Less than 1 for every 8 Mexicans and less than the number of Asians?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_impact_of_illegal_immigrants_in_the_United_States#Geographic_Origins_of_Undocumented_Immigrants

      Something you would know if you checked your data instead of slinging childish ad-hominems.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    19. Re:Good by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, care to show me the sources that estimate those millions of South Americans crossing the US border every year? Because I did look at the numbers from more than one source, and they were nowhere near those.

    20. Re:Good by icebraining · · Score: 5, Funny

      So millions turn into less than 200k? I was wrong, your problems are in basic math, not geography.

    21. Re:Good by bobbutts · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're America, to our north is North America and to our south is South America. I don't need some school to explain that to me!!

    22. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The American public in general is also exceedingly stupid.

    23. Re:Good by mspohr · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US keeps trying, though.
      Attempted coup in Ecuador in 2010 and successful coup in Paraguay in June this year.
      They usually do this by funding local right wing groups so it's difficult to trace the US origins but most people know how the system works.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    24. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It beats GITMO or some secret CIA prison in the Middle East.

      There are no CIA prisons in the Middle East

      We have always been at war with EastAsia

    25. Re:Good by RivenAleem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The American public think the TSA is doing a good job.

  2. What a turning point in American History by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A Latin American country is providing safe harbor for a journalist who dared to expose top-secret documents on the military. Someone needs to rework the "In Soviet Russia..." meme for juntas.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:What a turning point in American History by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Funny

      Someone needs to rework the "In Soviet Russia..." meme for juntas.

      In Ecuador ... asylum seeks you, senor.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:What a turning point in American History by gagol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In Democratic Ecuador the government saves you???

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    3. Re:What a turning point in American History by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, that's the yarn which has circled in the fanboy echo chamber. Which has essentially no correlation with reality. Do you really think that two separate British courts, including the high court, reviewed the charges against him and confirmed that they met the definition of rape even in the UK, if that was the case?

      Here's a brief summary of what was actually alleged. And here's the court's more detailed fact-finding (you should definitely read the latter). There's nothing "suspicious" about how the case was handled unless you don't actually know how the case was handled (which, of course, has been the main goal of Assange's backers).

      To briefly summarize the *actual* accusations, they're that Assange quickly began trying to make out with the first woman, which she initially went along with, only to have him try to force her legs apart and pin her down trying to force sex without a condom, to wherein she consented to sex with a condom to prevent it from happening to her without a condom, only to find out later that the condom was "broken". That night she told a friend about the "violent" (her words) sex with assange, and then moved out of her *own apartment* to get away from him. Concerning the other girl, he had tried to sleep with her without a condom over and over, something which she had never done in her life, even with her previous long-term boyfriend. She kept refusing. He stayed up while she fell asleep, and she woke up to him having sex with her without a condom (if you don't think that having sex with a sleeping person is rape, imho, you're a sick bastard). And yes, she understandably freaked out after it and tried to force him to get an STD test, which he refused.

      As for the whole "they didn't decide it was rape until talking together" thing, that's the most offfensive part to me. Do you know how hard it is to admit to even yourself, let alone others, that you were raped? I called mine "an unwanted sexual experience" and whatever other weasel words I could get out of to avoid using that term for myself. It took three months of denial and trying just to move on with my life before I could accept what happened to me. There's a reason most rapes are never reported. You just want to put it in the past and forget about it; the last thing you want to do is have to relive it, to face the person again, to have all sorts of vile allegations leveled against *you*, etc. But if I had found out shortly afterwards that the next day that the guy who attacked me had done the same sort of thing to another girl? I don't know how I would have reacted, but it certainly would have changed the picture.

      As for the CPT, they criticize everyone. That's their job. The report on Sweden is no worse than on any other state, and a lot better than a number. And as for giving suspects to the US, Assange felt so comfortable with Sweden that he was *applying for residency* when he was charged with rape. And then fled to the UK from there, which is ten times the US lackey Sweden ever was.

      --
      We're practicing our labials.
  3. Re:OK, this is senseless by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ya because no covert intelligence agency anywhere has ever used a Honey trap.....

  4. And to think... by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And to think most in the US view South America as some backwards "third world" with no freedom and the US is the freest country in the world.

    Interesting how quickly things change.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:And to think... by Desler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering the long history of dictators and military juntas they would be correct. Go to Venezuela and start some demonstrations to speak out against Hugo Chavez and see how much 'freedom' he affords you.

    2. Re:And to think... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah. I live in Latin America. I've lived in the US. Have you traveled outside your country? You would be surprised at the non universality of your "freedom".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:And to think... by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Great. How does that make Chavez any less of a dictator that jails people for speaking out against him?

    4. Re:And to think... by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

      America? Free?

      In the US, you are free to:

      Work a drudgy job
      Pay taxes, deducted weekly from your pay, and levied higher if they think you didn't pay enough over the course of the year.
      Pay taxes at the fuel pump
      Pay taxes at the grocery store
      Pay taxes when you buy alcohol or tobacco
      Pay taxes when you somehow manage to buy a luxury item
      Pay taxes on your property anually
      Pay taxes on your vehicle
      Pay levies for public scools
      Be assaulted by police, who illegally confiscate any recording devices you have.
      Speak publicly and exercise your right to assemble and address grievances in authorised "free speech zones"
      Be subjected to brutal beatings if you exercise those rights anywere else
      Be subjected to brutal beatings if you exercise those rights in the designated areas, if the message is controvertial or inconvenient
      Be innundated in outright lies and yellow journalism 24/7 during election years
      Choose which political dick you want up your ass for the next 4, 8, or 10 years (depending on level of govt)
      Buy legal immunity if you are wealthy enough
      Get totally shafted in the legal system if you aren't
      Get enjoined as a spurrious "john doe" in a copyright case with flimsy evidence
      Have your internet unplugged through mere allegations.
      Get presumed guilty until proven innocent in matters involving copyright via the DMCA
      Be arrested for spurrious offences only tangentally related to interstate commerce
      Be detained indefinately without evidence or council if even suspected of engaging in terrorism

      And so much more!

      Just look at all those freedoms! The USA is a GREAT place to live!

    5. Re:And to think... by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hello captain obvious.

      Paying taxes *is* a requirement for a healthy state. No question. The issue is just what percentage of personal income should be extracted as taxation, before the system becomes onerous. The point of listing so many as to point out that not only does the US have taxes, we just about have taxes for *everything*.

      Wanna get married? There's a tax for that!
      Inherit property? There's a tax for that too!

      Etc.

      It isn't that I am opposed to taxes. Far from it. I am opposed to onerous, continually compounding taxes.

      This "all or nothing" rhetoric that jumps straight to "move to somalia then!" As an argument is *NOT* acceptable.

    6. Re:And to think... by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't *NEED* to point to an alternative, to be justified in lampooning the faults of my own country.

      Amusingly, this is exactly why we have first amendment rights in the first place, which is a genuine good thing that many other countries DON'T have.

      I don't need to give examples of perfect, candycane and strawberry unicorn spooge gushing utopias in order to point out that there's knee deep bullshit in my back yard. The existence of the bullshit, and that it is in my back yard are self-sufficient in that deterimation.

      I don't require a bullshit free back yard to point to, as a source of comparison.

  5. Political refugee by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Assange is a political refugee, he needs a hide out because a large and a very powerful organisation (and more than one) are after him for disseminating information that those powerful organisations want to keep quiet.

    If Assange falls in the hands of American government, he is going to be made an example of, and it's going to be worse than Vietnam for him, sort of like what they did to Bradley Manning but maybe times 10.

    Isn't it amazing, 60 years ago people wouldn't have believed if somebody told them, that America could become this....

    1. Re:Political refugee by SilenceBE · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't it amazing, 60 years ago people wouldn't have believed if somebody told them, that America could become this....

      I don't think America is that different then sixty years ago. The difference is that in these days of globalization, Americans aren't limited anymore to input from news sources who are strongly biased. It becomes harder to hide the truth about some things.

      If you live in the rest of the world (even western) where you don't have "America #1" or "America the only free country" tagline which for me introduces a lot of ignorance by some Americans, you will rapidly see that America is quite a "normal" country as it has it faults and is certainly not perfect.

      For me as European it even have a lot in common in some aspects with Russia or even China, especially in being raised with certain believes tied to nationalism.

  6. Re:OK, this is senseless by mmell · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The overriding issue is that once incarcerated in Britain (or even Sweden), it would be a simple thing for the US to extradite him to face charges of espionage for leaking confidential US information via Wikileaks. And of course the government here would never bring the death penalty into such conversations (at least, not until we had him safely and cozily wrapped up in our own grubby meat-beaters), so those countries would blithely hand him over to our custody to suffer "death by bunda", despite the fact that both countries should refuse extradition on precisely those grounds.

    Ecuador is taking a startlingly appropriate and laudable position here, IMHO.

  7. Re:OK, this is senseless by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ya because no covert intelligence agency anywhere has ever used a Honey trap...

    And not at all suspicious that we have a known CIA operative - And a close friend of hers - as the women involved here.

    That doesn't mean he didn't do it, but when it comes to "benefit of the doubt", he definitely gets it in this case.

  8. Re:OK, this is senseless by Znork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sweden assisted the US in extrajudicial rendition and had police turn over two egyptian guys straight to the CIA for transport to torture. The Swedish minister of 'Justice' at the time, Thomas Bodström, who most likely knew about and ok'd the illegal rendition at the time coincidentally runs a law firm together with the representative of the women who brought the allegations.

    Not to say that it's a conspiracy, but one can understand why there's a certain reluctance to trust Sweden. It's become a banana republic complicit in torture run by a frat club of criminals.

  9. Re:OK, this is senseless by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a trumped up accusation of rape, disclaimed by the victims, dropped by the proscutor, and only reopened under political pressure from the US. He can't expect a fair trial any more than he could expect a fair indictment.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. Re:OK, this is senseless by Sprouticus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am not very tin foil hat-ish (Im abig believer is stupidity and selishness being the root of most issues), but even I think he is being setup. Maybe not setup in the traditional sense, but the US is pressuing Sweden to nial him to the cross if they can on any charge they can when the oppurtunity arose (thus the charge being reduced then reinstated).

    I cannot speak to the veracity, but I found several sources on Google that indicated that the 'rape' was having sex without a condom. That the sex was completely consensual (if foolish). Again, I dont have stats, but how many men go to jail is sweeden every year for doing a woman (or in this case 2 women) bareback. With their concent.

    It is possible I suppose that they withdrew consent as some sources claim, but that becomes a he-said she-said thing. Add to that the fact that neither woman seemed phased by the encounters until they talked to each other and it becomes even more fishy and sounds like sour grapes.

    Add to THAT the pressure the US government is surely putting on the Swedes, and you have a nice little setup.

    The entire thing has oddity written all over it, and frnakly as much as I think the guy is an arrogant douchebag, I would do the same thing in his situation.

  11. Re:He's in big trouble by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

    First, he'll have to learn to drive on the other side of the road. Then a crash course in Spanish won't hurt.

    Here's a starter: Alto! = Stop! Tus papeles por favor = Your papers please

    He's going to Ecuador, not Texas...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  12. Re:And..."I suppose it was only a matter of time." by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Besides the way Obama's dealt with this Wikileaks issue I otherwise like him

    So this bothers you, but his treatment of Thomas Drake doesn't? Or the fact that he considers legal medical marijuana dispensaries in California to be a higher priority target than the investment bankers who crashed the economy in 2008? Or his continued use of unconstitutional warrantless wiretaps? Or that he signed the blatantly unconstitutional 2012 NDAA? Or his unilateral assassination of American citizens abroad?

    The chief of the ACLU is "disgusted" with Obama. You should be too.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  13. Re:OK, this is senseless by moeinvt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Listen to Assange's side of the story.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9309000/9309320.stm

    He isn't wanted for a crime in Sweden, only for "questioning" by a prosecutor. He was in Sweden for 5 weeks following the alleged incidents so there was ample opportunity for this. When he left, he wasn't running from the Swedish authorities like a fugitive. He's also willing to speak with the Swedish prosecutor, but he didn't want to go back to Sweden to do it.

    I think this reeks of conspiracy.

  14. Re:OK, this is senseless by damienl451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, it's because of such simplistic stereotypes about how rape victims are supposed to behave that so many sexual assaults still go unreported. Once you know that most rapes are committed by people the victim knew, you can understand why not all victims immediately go to the police. It's perfectly understandable that, if they had already had consensual intercourse before, the alleged victim would feel bad about what happened afterward if she did not agree to having sex without a condom but did not immediately report it. It's a common reaction and victims often need the help of their family or friends to fully understand what has happened to them and realize that it was rape. The fact that they "didn't seem phased" doesn't mean much, as there are many cases of rape victims dating and having subsequent intercourse with their rapist (clear-cut example: all those who were victims of marital rape).

    See for references to published research: http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/pub_victim_responses_sexual_assault.pdf

  15. False report by bug1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently the story from the Guardian is false.

    https://rt.com/news/assange-granted-asylum-ecuador-298/

  16. Re:OK, this is senseless by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "covert CIA operative" line is the most "jumped the shark" accusation in this whole fiasco. Do you actually know where that comes from? It's because Ardin once wrote two anti-Castro articles for a magazine Revista de Asignaturas Cubanas, which is put out by a group, Misceláneas de Cuba, which according to some professor, is itself funded by a Swedish organization (unnamed), which is connected with Union Liberal Cubana, which is led by led by Carlos Alberto Montaner, which a Wordpress article says is connected with the CIA. Oh, and she met with a women's right group in Cuba who once had a parade in Florida wherein an accused plane bomber marched next to Maria Carey. Therefore, she's a CIA operative! I kid you not.

    Can you Assange fans please get back in touch with reality here and step out of the echo chamber for once? Start with the judgement.

    --
    We're practicing our labials.
  17. What accusations by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are aware that in the normal world (any place that is not Sweden) lying to get sex is not actually a crime? If it was, 99% of men would in jail. The remaining 1% are catholic priests and they would be in jail for raping kids.

    Assange played two women. That is what ALL this is about. There is NO way this would stand up in any court expect in Sweden and then only because the Americans told them to do something.

    Only right wing nutcases pretend the case against Assange has any merit whatsoever.

    Oh and the two women involved already knew each other. AND the case had already been dismissed before the Americans got involved.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.