Slashdot Mirror


Jobs' Burglary Manhunt Yields Kenny the Clown

theodp writes "Even in death, Steve Jobs managed to get specialists from the Apple-friendly Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team (REACT) to team up again with Apple investigators and local police to track down the whereabouts of a stolen Apple device. Unlike a 2010 stolen iPhone prototype incident, which ended with a raid on a Gizmodo editor's home, this new investigation into the $60K burglary of the late Apple CEO's under-renovation Palo Alto home ended with the recapture of an iPad from Kenny the Clown, who accepted the device as payment of a debt owed to him by burglary suspect Kariem McFarlin. PCWorld has the details of how Palo Alto Police, REACT, and Apple investigators connected the dots to track down Jobs' stolen iPads, which may trouble some privacy advocates."

99 comments

  1. Nothing to see here by mwvdlee · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nothing to see here. Just another Apple "somebody style our prototype" marketing campaign.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Nothing to see here by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 0

      Nothing to see here. Just another Apple "somebody style our prototype" marketing campaign.

      Prototype? You think that in the house of a guy who has been dead for a year there was a prototype?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  2. money well spend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Cost of items lost: $60000
    Cost of replacing them with insurance: $1000 ish
    Cost of finding lost items: priceless

  3. Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dunno, I can't see any place where they went beyond the law this time. Based on the article, it seems as if they took pains to build a legal case, even to the extent of checking for open APs nearby.

    1. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Relayman · · Score: 0

      which may trouble some privacy advocates.

      Not me, I don't steal things. When you commit a crime, you have no standing to complain about a violation of your privacy except in court.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    2. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Because its Apple and they are Evil. Screw shades of gray. If someone is Evil, then everything they do is evil, if they do something good then that just have an Evil motive behind it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Not me, I don't steal things.

      Do you really believe that only criminals get arrested and/or persecuted by the government? You think that as long as you "don't steal things" you have nothing to worry about?

    4. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Holy Shit. I hope you haven't reached elementary school yet, because if you have passed grade 6 and still think this way your school has done the country a great dis-service by allowing you to continue on to junior high school.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Are you sure ?

      I heard recently on the radio that carrying lobsters in your car is illegal. There are so many laws, especially dumb and obsolete ones, that each and everyone of us is breaking laws every day.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    6. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So the privacy of a thief who steals my device trumps my right to have my device broadcast whatever (legal) information I want it to? Wow, interesting world you live in.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    7. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      React was involved because Gizmodo bragged about dealing in stolen goods and intentionally leaked trade secrets.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    8. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I heard recently on the radio that carrying lobsters in your car is illegal.

      As a general rule, if you hear something on the radio that doesn't make a whole lot of sense, that's probably because it isn't true.
      (N.B.: You can substitute quite a few other things for "the radio" and this principle will remain a good one. "The television",
      "the Internet", "Slashdot", and so on.)

    9. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      A quick google of this topic fails to provide any hits of relevance (your post is the top hit).

      sounds like an urban myth to me. Not that I am going to debate that there are some stupid laws still on the books in most jurisdictions - lets start with the ones about gay marriage and anything that goes on in the bedroom. I got a hit on carrying a horse in your car, but nothing about lobsters.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    10. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      The concern is that these techniques could be used by law enforcement agents against people who are not criminals in order to harass or intimidate them.

    11. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! Great job! Got the criminal, even recovered other stolen property.

      SCREW the privacy advocates.

    12. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Correct. Things that invade my privacy also give me alibis. If a red-light camera catches me 50 miles from the crime scene, it helps me, not hurts me.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    13. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by pnutjam · · Score: 1
    14. Re:Nothing like last time REACT was involved by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Toad-san is volunteering for a new policy of checking for bill of sale for everything in your home and possession. If you don't have a sales receipt then it will be assumed stolen and confiscated. More than $10,000 worth of stuff and you will be charged with a felony. The police will be there in a few hours.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  4. Clowns have always creeped me out. by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not sure why, but I've always felt that way. Maybe it has to do with when I was 5 and my father was killed by a clown.

    1. Re:Clowns have always creeped me out. by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

      Not only is it a joke but one I lifted from a comedian who was popular in the 1980s.

    2. Re:Clowns have always creeped me out. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 0

      Not sure why, but I've always felt that way. Maybe it has to do with when I was 5 and my father was killed by a clown.

      Is that you, Bruce?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    3. Re:Clowns have always creeped me out. by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

      I stand in the spot where it happened...and it feels like it could be yesterday...

    4. Re:Clowns have always creeped me out. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Electronic devices that take the liberty of ratting out their users have always freaked me out. Sure, this time the result was recovery of stolen property. Next time the result might be capture, torture and execution of a politcal dissident.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  5. network admins keep access logs by alen · · Score: 2

    news at 11

    apple audits network traffic that hit their servers. isn't this taught in MCSE class?

    1. Re:network admins keep access logs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      news at 11

      apple audits network traffic that hit their servers. isn't this taught in MCSE class?

      Cue 1980s sitcom audience sound effects:

      Woooooooooooooooo! Woof! Woof! Woof! Woof! Woof!

  6. Can we have some real content, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You're spot on. This isn't newsworthy in any way. I seriously wish that Slashdot wouldn't waste time publishing irrelevant crap like this. There are much more important things to be reporting on.

    An example of a far more important topic is the ongoing implosion of the GNOME community. Right now there's just one topic about it on the front page. Don't forget that GNOME was, for well over a decade, one of the cornerstones of the open source movement. It's one of the major projects, up there with the Linux kernel, X.org, and GCC. The GNOME collapse is something that Slashdot should be following on an hourly-by-hourly basis. I'd expect at least three to four articles about it per day, until it's resolved. It's something all of us need to discuss, even those of us who may not use GNOME.

    1. Re:Can we have some real content, Slashdot? by 2.7182 · · Score: 3

      True, but your post is a classic "slashdot is has gone to the dogs." I am sure you can find a many posts from 2002 saying something like "I can't believe slashdot posted another stupid article about Theo and all the dumbass BSD flaming politics. Can we get on with the real news, or do I just need to go over to Ars for good?"

    2. Re:Can we have some real content, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but your post is a classic "slashdot is has gone to the dogs." I am sure you can find a many posts from 2002 saying something like "I can't believe slashdot posted another stupid article about Theo and all the dumbass BSD flaming politics. Can we get on with the real news, or do I just need to go over to Ars for good?"

      As soon as netcraft confirms the irrelevancy of Apple prototype theft, I'm sure /. will move on...

    3. Re:Can we have some real content, Slashdot? by icebraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can you post the links to your story submissions, please?

    4. Re:Can we have some real content, Slashdot? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Back in 2000 there was a fad where people would say "This is not news!" and poo-poo whatever announcement was made. One time there was a story about a CD burner that reached speeds of 55x. I jokingly posted "All you have to do is use your old CD burner and just wait longer. This is not news! " It was taken seriously and modded insightful.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Can we have some real content, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Can we have some real content, Slashdot? by tgd · · Score: 2

      True, but your post is a classic "slashdot is has gone to the dogs." I am sure you can find a many posts from 2002 saying something like "I can't believe slashdot posted another stupid article about Theo and all the dumbass BSD flaming politics. Can we get on with the real news, or do I just need to go over to Ars for good?"

      As someone who has been on this site since well before you could even get a user account, its absolutely gone down hill steadily for a decade now. Its really dropped off enormously in the last two years. Slashdot, and its community, like to act like they're so intellectual, but Slashdot is driven by ad revenue, and it hit on the exact same solution to driving ad views that Fox News did -- identify an overzealous market and carefully pick the stories that market wants to hear. Keep them whipped up in a frenzy, because a frenzy drives views. Slashdot is as guilty of driving and profiting from polarization as any of the far left or far right media outlets in the political space.

      In that context, this story makes perfect sense. Its Apple, its got the opportunity for a "zomg, our privacy!" jab.

      I suspect for a lot of us who were around back then, the only reason we're still here is 15 years of habit, and some sad desire to somehow find a way to bring back the community as it used to be.

  7. Worried about privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I'm worried about privacy and I do what I can to limit the exposure of my personal information.

    But I'd like to point out that the Apple investigators (Apple Cops) did all of the work.

    This was a very high profile case.

    Normally the cops wouldn't give a shit unless you have kiddie porn, threatened the President or some other terrorist threat.

    And one last thing:

    Finding only secured Wi-Fi signals, investigators could argue it was being used by the person paying the bill or those with permission.

    Gee Mr. Persecutor, I know the router is locked down now, but it was insecure before my brother-in-law pointed it out to me.

    1. Re:Worried about privacy by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Finding only secured Wi-Fi signals, investigators could argue it was being used by the person paying the bill or those with permission.

      Gee Mr. Persecutor, I know the router is locked down now, but it was insecure before my brother-in-law pointed it out to me.

      That's probably an argument you'd make to a judge to invalidate the search; though I think you'd have a hard time arguing they didn't have probable cause for a search since the router was secured when they checked. That would provide, IMH-nonlawyerO, reasonable justification for a warrant.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:Worried about privacy by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Gee Mr. Persecutor, I know the router is locked down now, but it was insecure before my brother-in-law pointed it out to me."

      That argument only comes up at trial or in a motion to suppress, and requires a brother-in-law willing to commit purgery. Since they actually found the device, no such motion would be allowed and you would lose. On the plus side, if you attempted this and your purgering brother-in-law participated in the foolishness, you would both get a free place to live for a period of time paid for by the government.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Worried about privacy by icebraining · · Score: 1

      It's spelled perjury.

    4. Re:Worried about privacy by mellyra · · Score: 1

      That argument only comes up at trial or in a motion to suppress, and requires a brother-in-law willing to commit purgery.

      "purgery" sounds interesting but the word you are looking for is "perjury"

    5. Re:Worried about privacy by PPH · · Score: 1

      Gee Mr. Persecutor, I know the router is locked down now, but it was insecure before my brother-in-law pointed it out to me.

      And then the prosecutor enters Google Street View WiFi logs (date stamped) into evidence revealing the secured status of the AP at the time in question.

      Do you really want to risk a perjury charge?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Worried about privacy by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I'm dislexyc you insinsetive clod!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  8. burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by alen · · Score: 2

    news at 11

    Steve Jobs' home was just the most high profile. isnt this what police supposed to do? catch criminals who rob lots of homes?

    1. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yeah but if the US is anything like where I live, a solved burglary is actually newsworthy because they only solve about 2% of all burglaries.

    2. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by M1FCJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When you look at the typical response the police gives to a typical house/office break for the rest of us (a shrug and you never hear from the pigs ever again), this only shows how corrupt the US police are and what lengths they will go to keep their masters happy.

    3. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suppose the reason REACT was involved is the same reason it was was involved last time: Trade secrets. Last time a prototype was the trade secret. This time the computers might have held trade secrets. If you lived in the area and REACT failed to respond to your trade secret case, please let the world know about it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Larryish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Was living in NW Florida around 10 or so years ago in a duplex apartment.

      The other apartment in the duplex got a window busted out and somebody stole a lot of collectibles and some electronics, including a fairly valuable comic book collection and a laptop computer.

      The police showed up, took a statement, and left. That's it. No pictures of the damage, no fingerprinting, nothing.

      Just 2 lazy overweight assholes with badges wishing they were at the doughnut shop.

    5. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by mbone · · Score: 1

      Since the average burglar is doing it for a living, on a regular basis, even a 2% clearance rate means that any given burglar will be caught soon enough.

    6. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      post to undo bad mod

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    7. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trade secrets or not there's no excuse for letting Apple employees hang in with feds in suspects home.

    8. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lived in the area and REACT failed to respond to your trade secret case, please let the world know about it.

      Uh, like, to let the world know your trade secrets are gone, and stolen by somebody on the run?

    9. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      OTOH, who in their right mind would leave diamonds and easily fenced electronic gizmos at a house that is unoccupied while undergoing extensive renovations?

      Sounds, and FSM forgive me, like a sting. Nobody could be that dumb.

      Right?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Statement 1: Florida should not be held up as an example of anything except possibly the advantages of global warming and the subsequent rise in ocean levels.

      Statement 2: Anecdote is not data. Some Police do a lousy job. So do some doctors, nurses, astronauts, politicians (well, they always do a lousy job) and pedicurists.

      Statement 3: Your neighbors are not, and never have been, Stephen P. Jobs. It does make a difference.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you look at the typical response the police gives to a typical house/office break for the rest of us (a shrug and you never hear from the pigs ever again), this only shows how corrupt the US police are and what lengths they will go to keep their masters happy.

      Nope, it's not that. Just you wait, you keep talking about how corrupt the police are in this case, and you keep wondering how it got this bad, but one day, that iPhone in your pocket will receive secret instructions on a frequency nobody knew before. Then, the last thing you'll feel is a disorienting tingle directly in your brain, right before you get an uncontrollable urge to join the teeming mass of OTHER people staring blankly off to the distance, awaiting orders and willing to sacrifice your life if it means destroying Android.

    12. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I see a lot of this type of complaint. Why do you people think it is the police that are lazy? Don't you think it is the voters who won't fund the police department to have enough people to - you know - actually go after non-violent criminals? They spend most of their time on gang and homicide and stuff like that. The fact that they have no time to work on simple burglary is a symptom of their staffing levels and not a due to their dreams of donuts. We see constant reports near where I live of how the police are down 40% from their levels 4 years ago and are having a hard time even working all of the violent crime cases. Wake up and realize that the police would like to work on the other cases but they can't.

    13. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yet there are something like 5 million people in prison for simple possession of the wrong kind of drugs. Seems to me that the cops aren't prioritizing crimes with actual victims.

    14. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by alen · · Score: 1

      that's because addicts are more likely to commit crime to steal money to get their fix. some of us city folk figured this out in the 1980's.

    15. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by vux984 · · Score: 1

      that's because addicts are more likely to commit crime to steal money to get their fix. some of us city folk figured this out in the 1980's.

      So that's why my car is always being broken into by cigarette smokers and alcohol drinkers?

      Get real.

      The average pot smoker doesn't commit crime to buy weed either. And what few do would be even less likely to if they could get it legally for the same price as a pack of cigarettes.

      Heroine is maybe a different scenario, but then people addicted to heroine ought to be treated as sick not criminals.

    16. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      You like pot, we get it.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    17. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like....

      Negro burgles home

      news at 11

    18. Re:burglar robs lots of homes, police catch him by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I and 48 other people would rather our stuff wasn't stolen in the first place.

  9. So when do *I* get this type of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So when do *I* get this type of service when my iPad is stolen? Since it is so easy for Apple to cooperate and cough up the info needed to locate the device, why the HELL won't they do it for Joe Consumer? If Apple did this for every stolen iDevice, they would become worthless as theft targets.... hell, they would be come a liability to steal them and try to sell/reuse them.

    1. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      So when do *I* get this type of service when my iPad is stolen?

      Apparently when it's stolen in Minnesota.

    2. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Informative

      Police found the iPads using the same method every iPad owner has with Find my iPad. Of course, because it's Apple and Steve Jobs, it's easier to just get rant about without any information. You can google many cases where iPad/iPhone owners retrieved their devices.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

      When you turn on Find My iPad.

    4. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by hol · · Score: 1

      Some animals are more equal than others.

      --
      - - - Non Caffeine Drink or Drink Error
    5. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... no. If they wipe it, Find My iPad (or iPhone) no longer workie.

    6. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Or Canada

    7. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when the perps wipe the device. Once that happens the ONLY people who can do jack shit are at Apple, using the serial number and seeing when that device connects to their servers.

    8. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just get down to the meat of all this. It's because he had a lot of MONEY. That makes him more IMPORTANT that you.

      Society likes to pretend everything is equal, and tries to enforce this equality mindset into everyone else. But if you haven't figured out by now that it comes down to money and connections, you haven't been paying attention.

      If you have money, you get to do pretty much whatever you want. People will bend over backwards for you. Yes, even the law.

      If you have no money, you might as well not exist. You are simply in the way of people that do have the money and power.

    9. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Police found the iPads using the same method every iPad owner has with Find my iPad

      Not true. Did you read the article? They looked at IP addresses and Apple IDs in Apple's DBs when the stolen devices synched to iTunes, then cross-referenced them with ISPs. Find your iPad is a useless toy that disappears with a factory reset.

    10. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the total dollar amount stolen has something to do with it. In California, when property like an iPad is stolen, the magic number of $950 is what delineates petty theft from grand theft. So when your iPad is stolen, the police quite rightly treat it differently from when an iPad is stolen along with another $59k worth of stuff.

      And I'd imagine that Apple would, eventually, cooperate with police if the police press the issue, regardless of whether they're investigating on behalf of their late CEO. The key in this case was that the thief took a ton of stuff and it was a major crime. Police put more effort into investigating major crimes. And police have more time to investigate in affluent neighborhoods like Jobs' where there is less crime and property taxes fully fund the local police department (i.e. the police don't have to be preoccupied with fundraising...err...traffic enforcement.)

      There's no conspiracy here...spend more in property taxes and have more than the statutory amount stolen and the police will care about your problems too. And if the police care, they'll convince Apple to care too. But short of that, you're stuck with the "Find My iPad" feature.

    11. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 0

      Not when the perps wipe the device. Once that happens the ONLY people who can do jack shit are at Apple, using the serial number and seeing when that device connects to their servers.

      So good thing the criminal didn't wipe the device in this case then. Well, not for your paranoid ramblings of course.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    12. Re:So when do *I* get this type of service? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 0

      Police found the iPads using the same method every iPad owner has with Find my iPad

      Not true. Did you read the article? They looked at IP addresses and Apple IDs in Apple's DBs when the stolen devices synched to iTunes, then cross-referenced them with ISPs. Find your iPad is a useless toy that disappears with a factory reset.

      Aahhh, so he used Jobs AppleID after he wiped the device. Yeah that makes sense.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  10. Recruitment / exam / result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://newanytime.net

  11. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is only two days behind the news. Usually it's 3-5 days. Good work boys!

    Seriously, what is the point of this site? If you can't aggregate news stories in a decent amount of time, you shouldn't be in business.

  12. Re:Fuck Steve Jobs by mcneely.mike · · Score: 0

    No, with Steve, anyways, I don't think 'it' is coming up ever again: he may be a stiff but....

    --
    soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
  13. Shucks by mbone · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I read the headline, my mental image was of course of Kenny the Clown moonlighting as a second story man. Now, that would be a surveillance tape I would like to see.

    1. Re:Shucks by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Police CSI units found a shoe print in the garden outside Jobs' mansion. A really big shoe print.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Shucks by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Was the get-away-car a mini minor driven by 17 of his closest accomplices?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  14. The Burglar is a Complete Idiot by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aside from the issue of allowing the iPad to connect to Apple's servers to wipe and reinstall the OS, he should have realized that the real value of an iPad or Mac from Jobs's home would have been the content of the device. If it turned out to be Jobs's personal device (as opposed to his family's), who knows what might have been on it... design plans for rounded hexagons, or seamless rounded translucent-aluminum dodecahedrons? His family, and the world, may have lost this brilliance forever... like burning Leonardo's notebooks for firewood. I hope they throw the MacBook at this barbarian.

    1. Re:The Burglar is a Complete Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it turned out to be Jobs's personal device (as opposed to his family's), who knows what might have been on it...

      Fuck burglary, as others have pointed out the police have very little time for most burglaries. The real crime is destroying the words of Jobs.

    2. Re:The Burglar is a Complete Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has to be modded funny for the Da Vinci / Jobs comparison

  15. Public Figure? by guttentag · · Score: 1

    According to Facebook, Kenny the Clown is a "public figure!" Like the mayor of Oakland? I don't know which is worse, the idea of Kenny the Clown as a public figure (see the "KTC in da house!" posting from Aug 5... what a nice guy... trying to take the rap for breaking into the Jobs house), or the idea of Facebook defining who is and is not a public figure.

    "To connect with Kenny the Clown, sign up for Facebook today." No need, I'm already signed up for iTunes, and I'm sure they could connect me with Kenny easily.

  16. they locked up Kenny you bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they locked up Kenny you bastards

  17. Wouldn't have been caught if he installed ReactOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Law enforcement needs compatibility for information. It's like when they inserted the 5¼" C64 formatted disks with pirated software on them into their MS-DOS systems and found nothing.

  18. You give Google and the prosecutor too much credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee Mr. Persecutor, I know the router is locked down now, but it was insecure before my brother-in-law pointed it out to me.

    And then the prosecutor enters Google Street View WiFi logs (date stamped) into evidence revealing the secured status of the AP at the time in question.

    Do you really want to risk a perjury charge?

    Hell yeah!

    More than likely Google didn't capture that data and if they did, they will be deleting it if they have not already.

    Of course that's assuming the local prosecutor (more than likely he's technically illiterate) knows anything about that.

  19. Wow by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

    Last time I lost an electronic device or had it stolen, the exact same people swung into action and recovered it for me.

    Oh wait...what? Nobody did anything at all?

    Awwwwww.... :(

  20. Bleah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck apple.

  21. Taxes too low on rich by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People whine about progressive taxation, but compare a lost iPhone from Apple with a phone stolen in a "regular" robbery. The poor person gets to give a statement, and if the right serial numbers are turned into the police, he may get a phone call 10 years later, after a trial in which the device was evidence. But Apple makes a phone call, and millions of dollars are spent tracking it.

    The rich get special treatment. The rich get protection perks the rest of us don't. Then the rich complain that a poor person in a high-crime area with no police patrols doesn't pay enough taxes, but the rich person in a low-crime area has constant patrols.

    The issue here isn't the privacy concerns of your iDevice, but that you are raped by taxes for programs that mainly benefit the rich, while being told that the rich get nothing from the programs because they opt out with private security (though I didn't see any mention of the Apple private security doing the recovery work, that was all government).

    1. Re:Taxes too low on rich by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Yup, the rich bitching about how they shoulder a disproportionate % of the "tax burden" seem to fail to neglect to mention that they also collect a disproportionate amount of the benefits of taxes paid.

    2. Re:Taxes too low on rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, Job's house was likely the multi-million dollar variety, although everything I've seen indicates that the one in question (the one in Palo Alto) was somewhat understated as billionaire residences go. As such, with Palo Alto's .25% cut of his property taxes, he was paying ~$2500/yr per million in home value in property taxes to the city. A pittance for someone like him, to be sure, but it's hard to argue that he wasn't contributing to the city.

      The argument that billionaires like Jobs should be paying higher taxes isn't that they get more in services than they pay in taxes...that's simply foolish. The argument is that the public infrastructure and services have enabled them to earn their fortune in the first place and the social contract dictates that they pay more in recognition of that role that society played in their success.

  22. Re:Fuck Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish that asshole was still alive so I could kick him in the balls, rip his head off, shit down his neck and shove a Zune up his ass.

  23. iPads - Nuke 'Em From Orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the only way to be sure they won't spy on you.

  24. And the fucking clowns... by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

    That, and every discussion is dominated by wannabe "comedians". Sure wish we could eliminate the Funny mod. Half of every discussion is a series of half-assed wisecracks...

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:And the fucking clowns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and every discussion is dominated by wannabe "comedians". Sure wish we could eliminate the Funny mod. Half of every discussion is a series of half-assed wisecracks...

      That's all anyone is here for...why do you think noone reads TFAs?

  25. Re:Fuck Steve Jobs by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    Calm down Mr. Ballmer...