Slashdot Mirror


Tata Intends To Sell Air-Powered Car In India

Diggester writes "Tata Motors (an Indian car manufacturer) is changing things up with the first car to run on air, the Airpod. The Airpod's technology was originally created in France at Motor Development International but has since been bought by Tata in hopes of bringing it to the Indian consumer car market. With virtually zero emissions and at the cost of about a penny per kilometer, it is definitely one of the most environmentally and economically friendly vehicles in the world. The tank holds about 175 liters of compressed air that can be filled at special stations or by activating the on-board electric motor to suck air in from the outside. Costing about $10,000, this car could beat out most smart cars from the market." If flying cars aren't available, sucking cars seem like a nice stop-gap.

398 comments

  1. This story comes up every now and then.. by otuz · · Score: 5, Informative

    ..so when are they going to do it, like, for real?

    1. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Informative

      They aren't, because the idea doesn't really work, though pneumatic hybrids could have some future in other forms (according to this paper).

    2. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are "problems"...

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    3. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      About the same time flying cars hit the streets

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by noh8rz7 · · Score: 0

      the problem is the technology doesn't work, and the people selling it are shysters. a related problem is there is not one single drivable prototype.

      Here's the problem:
      * compressed air is a horrible energy carrier, with energy density less than lead acid batteries. the entire storage tank holds less than a gallon of gasoline's worth.
      * they lie about the range, but in realistic driving scenarios it's less than 50km.

      who wants a car like that, especially for $10k? why not just get a real car?
      http://www.scribd.com/doc/24826820/Compressed-Air-Vehicles-A-Drive-Cycle-Analysis-of-Vehicle-Performance-Environmental-Impacts-and-Economic-Costs

    5. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      About the same time flying cars hit the streets

      Given that they're *flying* cars, if they're "hitting the streets", I suspect that they'll be taken off the market pretty quickly. ;)

      --
      Powell: "So, what are we doing?" Cheney: "Oh, crime." Powell: "Crime? Good, OK... crime..."
    6. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by noh8rz7 · · Score: 0

      in short, compressed air is a shitty energy carrier, a full "gas" tank holds less than a half gallon of fuel equivalent, and the range is less than 50km in city driving. for the money they want to charge, they better sell a real car.

    7. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait till the Chinese copy this and flood the US Market and also buy real estate to set up the air pumping stations. They will wait until Tata's develop the market and then the Chinese will take over. Not too long for them to bring one to US .

    8. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I remember people like you laughed and asked the same question, when they told about launching 2000$ car, and still cries that Nano is not safe and blah blah...

    9. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no problems. It's not fossil fuel and that fact trumps every conceivable `problem' one can offer. It's still better than anything based on oil even if coal is burned to compress the air.

      Get your mind right.

    10. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never, with only 175 liters you won't be going very far, a regular 3 liter diving cylinder can hold 600 liters, assuming that you wouldn't want to compress it much further for safeties sake then you could probably push a golf cart to the end of the road. Even worse, you take say 175 liters at ambient temperature and you compress it so the thermal energy is condensed into a tiny space and becomes much warmer than ambient temp, that cools back down to ambient temp and when expanded is freezing cold so you have already lost a great deal of the energy you put in. Efficiency and energy density would not be bywords here, there are reasons why this has never been done yet the technology has been available since George Stephenson won the Rainhill trials.

    11. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      At the end of this year, apparently. The article missed out both the product name and any links to content from from this decade, but once you know it's called the Tata MiniCat, then google finds quite a few slightly less vapourish links.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    12. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by tazan · · Score: 1

      I've always liked the idea. It's very similar to battery power. A lot of the negatives are the same, but you gain some things. Quick recharge, and you'd probably get free air conditioning.

      I think the real problem is there's no upside potential. It's all mechanical, so there's not really much chance of a big improvement like there is with batteries. They can keep tweaking the motors and compressors but realistically there's not much to gain. With electricity storage, who knows what the limit is?

    13. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      in short, compressed air is a shitty energy carrier, a full "gas" tank holds less than a half gallon of fuel equivalent, and the range is less than 50km in city driving. for the money they want to charge, they better sell a real car.

      The price is the problem. There's a way to make it attractive to people, though. You ban anything but ZEVs from city centers, done and done. The appeal of the air car as opposed to an EV is that it has super fast recharging. That assumes you can find a place to get extremely high pressure air, of course. It's good for air quality and, if you set things up right, good for national industry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      ..so when are they going to do it, like, for real?

      Judging by the picture in the article, it's going to be a while. Notice the vehicle in the article doesn't resemble a car as we know it. A car has a certain form factor for a variety of reasons. Until they get their heads out of the clouds and put this thing into a practical chassis, this thing is going nowhere.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    15. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by noh8rz7 · · Score: 0

      No, the range is the problem. I can ride farther on my bike than this car could drive. Also, if you ban everything but ZEVs (absurd), then people will prefer e-bikes, evs, etc.

      also, I wouldn't count the CAVs as zero emissions, becasue the air compressors will be very dirty if they run on diesel, and they will be located in the city at refill points.

    16. Re:This story comes up every now and then.. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I want one, PLEASE send it, I will pay for it. But I need some ability to run A/C and heating because of our weather.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Not the first air powered car! by WolphFang · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not an original concept! SEE: http://www.aircaraccess.com/history.htm Brief quote: For half a century the air-powered locomotive was a serious contender for the top spot in transportation because of its obvious advantages: simplicity, safety, economy, and cleanliness. Air engines were built first during a period of experimental daily use in metropolitan street transit during the 1880s and 1890s, by companies organized by inventors and air car advocates such as General Herman Haupt. In New York City a building-sized 1500 horsepower compressing station was constructed for the use of the transit locomotives that were being tested there on daily routes. Air-powered mining locomotives were manufactured routinely by steam locomotive companies. Until the 1930s and 1940s the air mule had no serious competition from electric or internal combustion engines in mining because the heat and spark made them unsafe in closed-in and gassy places. The term "air engine" disappeared from engineering textbooks between 1931 when William Lawrence Saunders died, and the end of the second world war. Gas engines had been perfected, the power of the oil industry was established, and gas was cheap.

    --
    leather-dog muksihs
    Blog: @muksihs
    1. Re:Not the first air powered car! by ThePeices · · Score: 0

      The article you linked to talks about trains, not cars.

    2. Re:Not the first air powered car! by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      And air pressure storage is notoriously inefficient. How does it compare to fuel cells though?

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    3. Re:Not the first air powered car! by WolphFang · · Score: 1

      Further down past the trains.

      --
      leather-dog muksihs
      Blog: @muksihs
    4. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfavourably.

    5. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both air storage and fuel cells compare unfavorably to lithium ion batteries in terms of energy density. Limitation of lithium ion batteries is "refueling" time, unless you swap out battery packs.

    6. Re:Not the first air powered car! by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And air pressure storage is notoriously inefficient. How does it compare to fuel cells though?

      And how can it be non-polluting when some external compressor is required to compress all this air?
      It seems that India is having troubles keeping the electricity flowing these days, so how do they propose to power the compressor plants?

      Is this another exercise in externalizing any environmental impact, and then pronouncing your product "Green" with great fanfare?

      Its a lot like electric cars in general, powered by something, just not something we sell. The pollution will be 3 states away. You don't need to worry about it.

      There is no way to compress air in the quantity needed other than by using fissile and fossil fuels or wind and solar.
      But we don't have enough of those to handle our houses and our factories as it is, especially in India.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Not the first air powered car! by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      And how can it be non-polluting when some external compressor is required to compress all this air?

      Car comes with a bicycle pump.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:Not the first air powered car! by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      I believe a similar argument was made against all-electric cars. Sure .. it's neat to be able to charge them overnight at the house, or all day at work. But for anything other than commuter driving, they won't work. The electricity supply system is not big enough for a 'charging station' that provides anything close to a 15 minute recharge good for a hundred miles or more. Short of a Shell station having their own nuclear or huge solar/wind array and a massive battery bank, it's just not possible to pump enough electricity down the lines for more than a few cars at a time.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    9. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Rei · · Score: 2

      Actually, the main limitations on most "automotive" style li-ions concerning charging time are not the batteries - it's predominantly how fast you can supply the power and how quickly you can cool the pack. Anyone who's seen the sort of crazy stuff cutting edge RC hobbyists are doing with rapid charging/discharging li-ion packs knows that these things can take some serious abuse!

      Can't do that with "laptop" style li-ions, though.

      Cooling the pack and cabling well, I don't think anyone seriously considers that a major long-term roadblock. Just basic engineering. Supplying the power that fast can be done (the cabling doesn't even need to be too fat to be unweildy, due to cable cooling), but to do it direct from the grid requires a crazy big feed and all the start-and-stop makes the power company unhappy with you ;) More practical approaches will involve a secondary battery buffer at the charging station, trickle-charging from the grid (or on-site generation if so desired). Ironically, one of the best buffers could be used EV battery packs, bought on the cheap because of their reduced capacity, and strung together.

      The possibility leads to options that gasoline vehicles can't match. For example, in theory with today's tech (aka, if anyone built such vehicles and systems), you could drive up a li-ion EV to a solar-powered charging station plunked down in the middle of a barren wasteland, hundreds or thousands of kilometers from civilization - and in 5-10 minutes have a full or nearly full charge and drive off. Technically it's *possible* to make fuel deliveries out to really remote locations - but between the cost to install the tanks and such for a gas station in the first place and the cost of deliveries, it wouldn't begin to compare.

      --
      Powell: "So, what are we doing?" Cheney: "Oh, crime." Powell: "Crime? Good, OK... crime..."
    10. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      Anyone who's seen the sort of crazy stuff cutting edge RC hobbyists are doing with rapid charging/discharging li-ion packs knows that these things can take some serious abuse!

      That's for their hobby though - an actual EV/Hybrid battery is big enough that economics take over; you can't abuse the battery and just eat the shortened life.

      Ironically, one of the best buffers could be used EV battery packs, bought on the cheap because of their reduced capacity, and strung together.

      Interesting.
      Assumptions:
      EV battery, new 53kwh (Using the Roadster as a model): Cost isn't good at $36k, but I've said 'there's nothing wrong with EVs that a battery that lasts twice as long for half the price wouldn't fix'. So let's say that 'futuretech' and economy of scale has reduced the price to $9k.
      Recycle value: 50%; Most car batteries are retired at 80% capacity(42 kwh).
      Power: 'Demand' is 20c/kwh. 'time of use' is 40c/kwh peak, 10c for lowest demand load balancing.
      Statistics: Average power usage per household is ~1k kwh/month. Average car miles 12k. Average of .25 kwh per mile for an EV. 2 cars per household(2.28, I'll round down).
      Charge efficiency: 90%

      At 20 cents a kwh(expensive, but green!) you're looking at $1333/year(it'd be $1200, but charging isn't 100% efficient) for your fuel bill(2 vehicles, 12k miles each). Compare this to an estimated $3,200/year for 30 mpg gasoline vehicles @$4/gallon. Savings: $1.9k/year. Not bad. If my thus far theoretical $9k battery lasts 5 years, its' worth it. Minus the battery, electric cars are as cheap/cheaper than an equivalent gasoline burner, and will probably last longer.

      If you're charging overnight, every night, on average you'll need to transfer 18 kwh to recharge from the average 66 miles driven that day(actual results WILL vary, these are household averages!). At 240V, that's 75 Amp-Hours needed. If we figure you need to do that in 5 hours(remember load balancing), that's 15A.

      On to the battery at home:
      Let's say that you drive DOUBLE the average(IE it's a good case). You'd need 30A for 5 hours to, or 15 for 10, and the power company isn't happy about it. You'd like to save more money as well. You use an average of 36kwh a night charging your cars.

      You buy a used 42kwh 80% battery for $7.2k and install it. Let's say the fancier system raises the total cost to $10k*. However, you sign up for the time of use charge system and thus, if you can shape your electricity use well enough they only charge you 10c/kwh. If all electricity for charging the car goes through it, it should drop your bill from $2666 to $1480($1333*2/(2*.9)). Remember the extra efficiency loss! Save $1.2k/year. Little over a 10 year payoff. At this point, not worth it.

      However, odds are that not ALL of the charge for your cars will come from the battery(saving some of that .9), and you bought the 'extra fancy' system. It also provides load balancing* and UPS protection for the house. Most HOMES only use 33kwh/day, so if you're not driving you can enjoy a full day with power even if the grid is down. That alone can cost $10k to get a generator, so it would make a huge difference.

      Conclusion: If we can get the batteries and other components cheap enough, it's certainly an interesting option.

      *IE it switches to battery when the power company sends the 'time of use' cost of electricity above 20c/kwh.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    11. Re:Not the first air powered car! by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      London had a full network of compressed air pipes for (static) power. Our underground garage had an air car-lift, but it had to be converted to electricity when the Telcos bought the pipe network for optical fibre. Uni had a small passenger lift ('elevator') with a huge air piston that went up 6 floors.

    12. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pollution will be 3 states away. You don't need to worry about it.

      There is no way to compress air in the quantity needed other than by using fissile and fossil fuels or wind and solar.

      Think that modern thermal installations are more efficient and produce much less pollution than new car engines. Also, all fuel transportation, control and maintenance is centralized so this lower costs. One single fossil fuel burning power station generating electricity only to be used by electric/air cars will produce almost none contamination compared with having thousands of mini power stations in the road with low quality maintenance, control and wasting more fossil fuels moving more fuel around the globe.

    13. Re:Not the first air powered car! by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      I know it was meant as a joke, but if you're really stuck somewhere in the middle of nowhere, your proposal is definitly more feasable than creating gasoline or electricity out of thin air... besides that: target market is India. labour is cheap there. How many rupees to pay a guy to stomp on a bellow 3 or 4 hours?

      --
      bickerdyke
    14. Re:Not the first air powered car! by azalin · · Score: 1

      So we're back to H2O and CO2 exhausts from the slob who has to do the pumping.

    15. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 10:45 in the morning in Germany, a bit clouded ( http://wolken.buienradar.nl/de ) and solar panels are already pumping 12 GW into the grid: http://www.sma.de/en/company/pv-electricity-produced-in-germany.html
      Note that these numbers don't include any solar panels installed after April, which should add another GW or even a bit more.
      (For comparison: total electricity usage of Germany is about 60 GW, The smallest nuclear power plants are about 0.4 GW)
      The majority of these solar panels are installed in the last few years, total installed capacity could easily double again in a couple of years. Now note that most of India has more sun-hours than Germany, and you will see that electricity production is technically solved. If the Electricity is used to fill compressed air tanks, then storage is not needed. The air tanks can be filled whenever there is plenty of sun.

    16. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After putting a man on the moon, I see little technical problems in beefing up the electricity supply system to locations with more than a few charging points. Financially it's also peanuts compared to transporting oil from the ocean floor to your car.

    17. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000 kWh/month for an average household is ridicules. Here in The Netherlands it's about 3600 kWh/year, with households switching to more efficient TV's, fridges and lighting getting close to 1000 kWh per _year_.

    18. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It seems that India is having troubles keeping the
      > electricity flowing these days, so how do they propose
      > to power the compressor plants?

      http://vimeo.com/34504342

    19. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      how do they propose to power the compressor plants?

      You've never eaten curry, have you?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple human psychology. It is non-polluting, because I'm not the one doing the polluting.

    21. Re:Not the first air powered car! by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Have you ever spent a summer in Texas? I use about that much in the summer months (A/C set at 79 degrees) and about 1/3 that in the other months (in line with usage that you see). Add a bit to that if you have a pool (we do not, but *very* common in TX) and for a larger home. Not ridicules at all, just different than what you are accustomed to.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    22. Re:Not the first air powered car! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Google "Average US electricity Use'. EIA reports the average as 11,496 kWh/year.

      Tennessee was highest at 16,716 kWh and Maine the lowest at 6,252 kWh, for state averages.

      From these two documents, it seems mostly a matter that you in the Netherlands use a huge amount less electricity for space heating and cooling, combined with fewer energy-intensive appliances such as dryers, and when you do have them, they're more efficient.

      The documents also showed that, on average, electricity use is tending up in the Netherlands, while it's tending downwards in the USA.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  3. Grab the popcorn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the patent lawsuits begin!

    1. Re:Grab the popcorn. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It's produced in India and not exported. I estimate 0 patent lawsuits.

  4. NEVER by sanman2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nobody's going to buy that piece of crap. It's a glorified golf cart.
    Even India's poor are already turning up their noses to the Tata Nano, preferring to buy established foreign models.

    I think the Nano is a great benefit to the poor, especially the upcoming diesel model, because it's designed specifically for 3rd world conditions. It even has better ground clearance because of India's pot-holed roads. The only other thing it needs to come with, is a bumper-sticker calling for ruling thug-ocracy to be thrown out.

    1. Re:NEVER by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      India's poor are too busy sleeping on the street or grazing their goat at the side of the freeway to turn their noses up at anything.

    2. Re:NEVER by tmosley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Half of India's population is now in the middle class.

      It's about time to throw out the old preconceptions about the rising powers of China and India. They simply aren't true any more.

    3. Re:NEVER by Nursie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Are you trying to tell me what I saw with my own eyes?

      I went to India late last year, to multiple cities. I directly observed these things, street sleepers in vast numbers, families living in makeshift shelters at the side of the road, people grazing animals in the central reservations.

      These may be cliches, they may even be preconceptions, but they are very true in modern India.

    4. Re:NEVER by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I believe what GP means is that there is a market for this car. India's middle class alone is larger than most first world countries population.

    5. Re:NEVER by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The not middle class half of India's population still makes for a lot of street sleepers.

      Also with a per capita GDP of about 1,500 USD your definition of middle class is pretty low-end.

    6. Re:NEVER by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      I think it is pretty relevant. It is not the poor, but the middle class that were turning their nose up at tata nano (the poor, I expect will continue with their two wheelers)

    7. Re:NEVER by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nobody's going to buy that piece of crap. It's a glorified golf cart.

      And you'd be wrong. At 100+ miles to a charge, you could use it anywhere you could use a scooter.

      A glorified golf cart would be all a lot of people would need. If it can go 45 mph, you can drive it on city streets.

      If they could bump the speed up to 55 and extend the range a bit, it would be a lot more useful, but they'll sell at the functionality they have now.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    8. Re:NEVER by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Half of India's population is now in the middle class.
      It's about time to throw out the old preconceptions about the rising powers of China and India. They simply aren't true any more.

      This is wishful thinking or tautological nonsense. India's average income is under $2k per person per year, and that's a dollar-averaged mean - the median earner makes far, far less. Maybe you're simply defining Indian middle class to be some arbitrary number like "between $500 and $5000 of annual income," but that's rather useless. Instead, let's compare this average income to the $10k cost of the car and see that the half of India's population you declare to be middle class won't be buying many of these.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    9. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to tell me what I saw with my own eyes?

      I went to India late last year, to multiple cities. I directly observed these things, street sleepers in vast numbers, families living in makeshift shelters at the side of the road, people grazing animals in the central reservations.

      These may be cliches, they may even be preconceptions, but they are very true in modern India.

      And I'm certain you can observe most (if not all) of those activities in just about every major city across the entire globe.

      I'm also fairly certain that even with your extensive travels across India that you observed a mere fraction of a percentage of the represented population, especially when you consider the population statistics in that country vs. the other 99% of the world. They aren't exactly shrinking.

    10. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India's poor are too busy sleeping on the street or grazing their goat at the side of the freeway to turn their noses up at anything.

      Actually the reason that Indians won't turn their noses up is because there's always a hand covering it.

    11. Re:NEVER by EdIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would probably buy one, and I live in the US. It would depend on how much it costs to run the pump and get a full tank.

      Back in 2000 I was driving a gas guzzling huge SUV. When gas was consistently cheap it was never a real consideration for me. That changed in a hurry with the gas prices. Bought several Priuses since then, and lately I have reorganized my life so that I have to travel dramatically less.

      In the last two years I walk to the grocery store. I buy less food (only what I can carry), have lost considerably weight, and eat better.

      My work commute is 5-8 minutes. No problems doing that in a little car like that, especially if it is zero emissions, good for the environment, and cheap to operate.

      I tend to stick close to home, ride a bike for long distances, and generally have changed my spending habits and how I relax. This kind of car actually fits to my lifestyle, and I don't think I would be the only one. Betting there is a market in the US as well.

    12. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wish people would stop perpetuating that myth. Middle class has nothing to do with USD anywhere that isn't in the US. Here in China you can lead what is basically an upper class lifestyle on less than $10k USD a year because the cost of living in much of China is that low. I don't get paid in USD and I don't buy things in USD so using that as some sort of measuring stick makes no sense.

      What's more in the US they've deliberately used inflation to pick the pockets of anybody not rich enough to have a sizable portion of their savings in investments.

    13. Re:NEVER by fredprado · · Score: 2

      His comment about the middle class is considerably more relevant than yours about the poor. Yes, there are many many poor people in India, but there are also many many middle class people capable of buying such cars.

    14. Re:NEVER by fredprado · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now compare this with the costs of conventional cars, which they currently buy and you will see the poster you are criticizing is right. Truth is, there is a huge market in India for conventional cars, despite the low average income of its citizens, and conventional cars are more expensive than this.

      The flaw in your analysis is that you forget India Population is just well above a billion people, so even a relatively small percentage of the population is still a lot of people.

    15. Re:NEVER by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The car (supposedly a "glorified golf cart") costs $10,000 (you can convert all the figures into rupees or euros or swiss francs if you want). If the average person makes $1500 / yr, they're probably not going to be able to afford that car, never mind a conventional one. In the west if you're in the "middle class" you usually make rather more than the price of a cheap car per year.

    16. Re:NEVER by jelizondo · · Score: 1

      "Well, who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?"

      Chico Marx

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    17. Re:NEVER by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A good point. People often ask me how my salary in Iceland compares to my last salary in the US, and my answer is usually, in short, "it's irrelevant on its own". The long answer is "it's complicated", followed by a long discussion of the different tax rates, the different compensation structures, the different benefits (company, union, and national), the different cost of living in different regards, and on and on. It's very hard to quantify. It's much easier to just say, "I live reasonably well and enjoy life" or soforth.

      --
      Powell: "So, what are we doing?" Cheney: "Oh, crime." Powell: "Crime? Good, OK... crime..."
    18. Re:NEVER by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      Half of India's population is now in the middle class.

      It's about time to throw out the old preconceptions about the rising powers of China and India. They simply aren't true any more.

      That doesn't appear to be true. Indeed, the trend appears to be in the opposite direction.

      India income inequality doubles in 20 years, says OECD

      The OECD says India has the highest number of poor in the world.

      Some 42% of its 1.21 billion people live on less than $1.25 a day.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    19. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well I hate to let reality get in the way of an angry rant but 68.7% of India lives on less than $2 / day and the middle class is 4% of the population.

    20. Re:NEVER by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The nerve of the guy, talking about the market for cars in comments about an article about the market for cars.

      --
      This space available.
    21. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accept it your country can't even make a glorified golf cart with 25 KMPL for 2000$ :)

    22. Re:NEVER by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      And I'm certain you can observe most (if not all) of those activities in just about every major city across the entire globe.

      I'm also fairly certain that even with your extensive travels across India that you observed a mere fraction of a percentage of the represented population, especially when you consider the population statistics in that country vs. the other 99% of the world. They aren't exactly shrinking.

      Is Chicago or Detroit a major city?

      If so, then you are wrong.

      If you really go looking under highways or viaducts, you'll find a few here and there. Even Detroit is turning into crap, and does not have the same problems you are describing.

      Granted, Detroit isn't a major city anymore, so I am curious about where you rate Chicago.

      I live about thirty miles from the Sears tower (and no, it's not a willis tower - and hold the willy penis jokes please).

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    23. Re:NEVER by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 0

      Hmm, so New York is on the top twenty?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's_largest_cities

      I know, I'm a loser, I did my own research - Guess Chi-town isn' as big as I thought it was.

      But that's ok, cause I wish we could give Chicago to canada.

      (and california to Mexico, and florida to cuba, and erase Washington DC - cause that would fix America :) )

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    24. Re:NEVER by fredprado · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In average Indians do have a low income in USD. Still if just 3% of then can afford this car that makes roughly 40 million people. Which is more than the whole population of Canada, for example. I am quite sure that more than 3% of its population can afford this price, especially considering that ontrary to your belief conventional cars already sell more than this there at considerably higher prices than this.

      And no, there isn't a huge market for Ferraris anywhere in the world. Ferrari doesn't need a huge market though, it is quite content with its very small market of very rich people.

    25. Re:NEVER by hajus · · Score: 3

      There's a lot of taxi cabs in the cities though, or at least there were 20 years ago when I visited. How do the cab drivers afford the more expensive regular cars if they can't afford the $10k ones?

    26. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so if half of India's population is now in the middle class, surely that still leaves hundreds of millions of destitute poor! It's not like the US where there are 50 million "poor" people, but even the poor people are fat. No, India's poor are actually poor.

      This car isn't aimed at those poor people. They can't even afford shoes, let alone a car of any sort. It's aimed at the middle class who have some money, but not enough to buy a "real" car.

      dom

    27. Re:NEVER by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just because a population is in the tens of millions does not make for an appreciable proportion of the total when dealing with China and India.

      Beijing (where I live), Shanghai and Shenzhen are rich and up to developed standards. What you would find in the heartland of Henan, Sichuan, Hunan, Hubei would be considered to be very poor. What you would find in the mountains of Tibet and Guizhou however would simply shock most westerners. I have not been to India, but it's HDI is far below China's.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    28. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maruti Swift one of the india's biggest sellers at around 90k in June costs more then 10k. Hence there is a huge market.

    29. Re:NEVER by byornski · · Score: 1

      You've bought several of these heavy expensive to make cars since 2000?

    30. Re:NEVER by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Half being middle class still means there is a huge number of people (India has about 1 bln population) that are lower class. And lower class there often means really low.

      On top of that, the climate is highly conductive for street sleeping: it's always warm, especially the southern part of the country.

    31. Re:NEVER by kryzx · · Score: 2

      Nobody's going to buy that piece of crap. It's a glorified golf cart.

      Well, you're right that it's not a car. But it also not a golf cart.
      No, it's an autorickshaw, and (if this is not vaporware) they will buy it because there are already probably a hundred million of them in India, home of Tata Motors.

      --
      "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    32. Re:NEVER by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Yes. I started with a 1st gen and traded up twice.

      They are only around ~3000 lbs, which hardly makes them heavy compared to other cars. Expensive? They are on the low end between $20 and $30k.

    33. Re:NEVER by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're keeping the Bible Belt and calling it a "fix"?

      --
      No sig today...
    34. Re:NEVER by wisty · · Score: 0

      > Here in China you can lead what is basically an upper class lifestyle on less than $10k USD a year because the cost of living in much of China is that low. I don't get paid in USD and I don't buy things in USD so using that as some sort of measuring stick makes no sense.

      No, you can't. You can eat upper-class food, and have lots of cheap beer and cigarettes. If you want a decent car, you'll need *more* than in the US. If you need to buy a computer, it's 1 month's salary, not 1 week's. If you want imported food, it's more expensive.

      You can live an upper class life in the US on $10k, as long as you are willing to make a few sacrifices. It's all about your point of view.

      And the middle-class Chinese are on ~$3500 a year, which is tough no matter where you live.

    35. Re:NEVER by TechMouse · · Score: 2

      Taxis? Not really. There are a few kicking around, mainly operated for hotels and corporate. Now auto-rickshaws are a different matter. You can get a decent used one for Rs 1 lakh (around $2K) and they run on LPG. I suspect that's not the market these guys are after.

    36. Re:NEVER by jlar · · Score: 1

      "I would probably buy one, and I live in the US. It would depend on how much it costs to run the pump and get a full tank."

      What about safety? It seems like your only criteria fuel costs.

      My guess is that safety for this car is terrible. The Tata Nano is for example without airbags and features only a single wing mirror. Personally I would be quite worried about the safety of such a car.

    37. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have several filters here at India that blur reality. Without those fitlers we can't look at the better side of life.

    38. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very true. I make just about $500 a month here in India. I enjoy pretty much the same lifestyle I did when I was in USA except I can not go out on a vacation outside of India.

    39. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A glorified golf cart would be a luxury item for most middle class people in India. Middle class people can afford to rent a car for going outside of the city.

    40. Re:NEVER by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      That's a bald-faced lie. Low but not too low inflation has been monetary policy of the civilised world for decades, with good results.

    41. Re:NEVER by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0

      Heavy, expensive and thirsty. They only get about 45mpg, which for a car that size is frankly pathetic.

    42. Re:NEVER by chienandalou · · Score: 1

      What's more in the US they've deliberately used inflation to pick the pockets of anybody not rich enough to have a sizable portion of their savings in investments.

      huh? U.S. inflation rates have been extremely low over the last couple of decades (ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt) (lower than in China). If anything the problem is that the Fed has held inflation too low and permitted too much unemployment.

    43. Re:NEVER by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Not half of India's population. India ranks #140 in the world in nominal GDP per capita, with a value of $1400 vs. about $50000 for the US. There is definitely a middle class in India, but it does not represent half of the population.

    44. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the inflation rates have been artificially raised by the fed in an effort to discourage people from savings. If you compare the rates of inflation with the rates at which wages have risen, you'll find that the inflation has been the larger figure.

      What's more it's been used as a method of paying back government debt at reduced prices as a means of avoiding having to either cut spending or raise taxes, both of which are politically unpopular.

      As for your line about the Fed holding inflation too low, the fed hasn't been holding inflation low, the fed has been deliberately raising it above where it would be by setting the carry rate too low and printing a hell of a lot of money. That's been Greenspan's method and now Bernankes method for the last couple decades. A period of time during which the largest transfer of wealth in the history of the US has happened.

      We won't see the inflation that's been created in the last 4 or so years until the banks start to feel a bit more comfortable loaning money and the surplus cash in the system starts to leave the mattresses. Until then it's anybody's guess what the inflationary situation is going to look like.

      That happened in the post WWII period as well which is how Eisenhower was able to pay off the US war debt without raising taxes. He just printed new money to cover the debt and hid it with the newfound productivity from the WWII industrialization which had left the US with a surplus of manufacturing facilities.

    45. Re:NEVER by eharvill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, things are getting much better here in Georgia. We can actually buy beer/wine in select locations on a Sunday now. That's progress!

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    46. Re:NEVER by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Not with anything like that prevalence anywhere in the western world.

      I'm sure it's commonplace in developing nations, but if so then please stop trying to tell me it doesn't happen! Or that I'm working from preconceptions or prejudice! There are vast, vast numbers of people in India for whom the question 'is the tata nano good enough?' is so far off the radar as to be ridiculous.

    47. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen people on the streets in large numbers in Edinburgh and Greece! And yes these are true in modern India. But why cant poverty and innovation co-exist? Why does it always have to be - let us see no cows on the highways - then we will believe.

    48. Re:NEVER by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Wow one sentence to insult a quarter of the worlds population.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    49. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, I can't buy it in my town, but I cross an imaginary line into the next town I can buy all I can carry. Ain't progress wonderful?

    50. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      It is a perpetual misconception by SOME Americans to think their country is the world and therefore their perception and way of life applies to everyone.

      Some fall short of invoking the 4th amendment on a legal debate relating to a different country, with different communities, cultures, beliefs and histories.

      Their Media and Hollywood doesn't help either

    51. Re:NEVER by tibit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To me, inflation is defined by the buying power of my money. As far as I'm concerned, the dollar has lost 50% of its buying power since 1999, averaged across what I personally buy (groceries, gas, household items, furniture, some building materials). That "low" inflation is someone's joke.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    52. Re:NEVER by darkstar019 · · Score: 1

      "you could use it anywhere you could use a scooter. " Try riding this car in a bazaar (typical Indian streets) 45 mph = 72kmph; which is much more than typical Indian street traffic (its somewhere around 50kmph). $10k = Too much for an average Indian, Tata nano costs around 3K and other budget sized cars cost around 5k, so this is definitely overpriced from Indian market's POV.

      --
      Fuck Beta
    53. Re:NEVER by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      You can live an upper class life in the US on $10k, as long as you are willing to make a few sacrifices. It's all about your point of view.

      I'd like to find the part of the US where $10,000/year would cover rent, utilities (heat/electricity/water), and food... much of the country, that's not even enough for rent.

      Economies elsewhere in the world are different. You can make a reasonable comparison between Canada and the US, because they're very similar: most costs are about the same, and they've been trading between which country has the higher per capita income for a little while now... right now, Canada has a slightly higher per capita than the US. Here, if you don't have a monthly car payment you can live quite comfortably on $40,000/year without sacrificing too much, whereas in China, $40k is an enormous amount of money. The prices on just about every consumer good under the sun are completely different in China. Heck, you can't even compare it to Australia, which is another wealthy former colony with a mostly European population, because pricing on some things is completely out of whack between the different regions (just ask somebody who's bought consumer electronics in Australia).

    54. Re:NEVER by Sique · · Score: 1

      Since 1999, 13 years are gone. 50% inflation in 13 years boils down to an average of 3.2% p.a.. While this is not a record low, it's still not galopping hyperinflation.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    55. Re:NEVER by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's a fix for all the other bits!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    56. Re:NEVER by realityimpaired · · Score: 3

      They are only around ~3000 lbs, which hardly makes them heavy compared to other cars. Expensive? They are on the low end between $20 and $30k.

      What kind of real world mileage do you get out of that, if you don't mind my asking?

      I drive a 2011 Subaru Impreza... a car that's in no way designed for efficiency (it's designed to drive around corners really fast), and I don't make any effort to try to conserve fuel, and I get about 35-40mpg real world out of it (with a manual transmission). It cost $10,000 less than a similarly-equipped Prius. If, over the lifetime of the Prius, you have not saved $10,000 in gas, then I'm coming out ahead on the cost scale.

      And the reason I'm putting this to you is this: you can buy a turbodiesel VW for less than the Impreza cost, and reasonably expect 70mpg out of it in real world driving conditions. And, around here at least, diesel is less expensive than gasoline.

    57. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Official figures put it around 30% lost, which isn't as much as you said but isn't off by an order of magnitude either.

    58. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. The cab drivers don't own those taxis. They rent them from someone else. A lot of transport, down to the rickshaw, often works this way.

    59. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a Bible Belt made like a Chastity Belt. Once you're in, leaving seems rather complicated. You know you need to get out, but its just not so simple. I hate being here, but if I pull out, I may as well forget about what I have!

      - Posted from Gatlinburg, Tennessee

    60. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "And I'm certain you can observe most (if not all) of those activities in just about every major city across the entire globe."

      LOL! Yeah, sure I can. In Oxford, only the other day, I saw "street sleepers in VAST numbers" "Families living in makeshift shelters at the side of the road" and "people GRAZING ANIMALS in the central reservations" - of OXFORD, I tell you!

      What a fucking moron. Have you never been to a WHITE country before? "Just about every major city across the ENTIRE GLOBE". How about NO city, major or otherwise, in any white country on Earth?

      Why do people come on here and even bother writing things which are just so LAUGHABLY untrue?

    61. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can not go out on a vacation outside of India."

      Christ, that must REALLY suck!

    62. Re:NEVER by Zubinix · · Score: 1

      Also with a per capita GDP of about 1,500 USD your definition of middle class is pretty low-end.

      Have you heard of "Purchasing Power Parity"? If not then hit up Wikipedia and learn about it so I don't have to waste precious seconds of my life correcting your ignorance.

    63. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with all of these "green solutions" is that they're NOT green.

      Where do you get the power to compress the air?

    64. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sanman2 said "India's poor" are "turning their noses up" at cheap cars. As 32.7% of Indians live in poverty -- Nursie pointed out that "India's poor" are unlikely to be turning their nose up at cheap cars. If sanman2 had have said "India's lower middle class" there would be no argument here.

    65. Re:NEVER by asylumx · · Score: 2

      I live about thirty miles from the Sears tower (and no, it's not a willis tower - and hold the willy penis jokes please).

      As much as I want to agree with you on this, if you refuse to call it by its rightful name you are undermining your own ability to accept facts and perform reasoning based on those facts.

    66. Re:NEVER by emm-tee · · Score: 2

      I don't disagree with your comment per se, but I think you missed the point of Nursie's comment.

      sanman2 said "India's poor" are "turning their noses up" at the Nano.

      However, 32.7% of Indians live in poverty. Because of this, Nursie rightly pointed out that "India's poor" probably have bigger concerns than which car to buy.

      If sanman2 had said "members of India's lower middle class are already turning their noses up at the Nano" there would be no argument here.

      I have been to India several times in the last 10 years and seen huge numbers of people sleeping on the streets and in shanty towns.

    67. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem with all of these "green solutions" is that they're NOT green.

      Where do you get the power to compress the air?

      Lentils. And children with a hand crank.

    68. Re:NEVER by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Hey, things are getting much better here in Georgia. We can actually buy beer/wine in select locations on a Sunday now. That's progress!

      I guess progress has come even to areas outside Tbilisi, then?

    69. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience real world driving conditions usually mean less MPG than the manufacturer advertises and I drive about 80% highway. I'm not sure how you are calculating your MPG but 35-40mpg in an impreza does not sound accurate.

    70. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow one sentence to insult a quarter of the worlds population.

      That's not that impressive. Last week, a Missouri congressman managed to insult half the world's population with even fewer words.

    71. Re:NEVER by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The same way long haul truckers and farmers here buy quarter of a million dollar + vehicles that are critical to their livelihood. They borrow heavily.

    72. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dream of Aztlan reunited again...

    73. Re:NEVER by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Except that he wasn't claiming 50% inflation over 13 years -- he was talking about 100% inflation. (Think about it -- if one dollar is half its previous value, that means it takes twice as much to buy anything.) So that's ... 13th root of 2... -1... *100... 5.5% p.a.

      I don't know about the USA, but here in the UK, the official inflation figures use an index that doesn't truly match the individual's outgoings. Also, a lot of places have frozen pay over the last few years, which means that there's not even an inflation-linked pay increase, so inflation is a far bigger problem than the figures would imply...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    74. Re:NEVER by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      That doesn't appear to be true. Indeed, the trend appears to be in the opposite direction.

      India income inequality doubles in 20 years, says OECD

      The OECD says India has the highest number of poor in the world.

      Some 42% of its 1.21 billion people live on less than $1.25 a day.

      And there we have proof that India is joining western civilisation -- the poverty gap is increasing in most developed countries too....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    75. Re:NEVER by eharvill · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize Tbilisi was considered part of the Bible Belt. How times (and perceptions) have changed...

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    76. Re:NEVER by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that insight, it's nice to see the other side, or the other-other side.
      I also love how people use the term poor, middle-class, and upper-class. (not that you've misused it, just in general)
      Especially when it's relative to the entire population's income, or just perspective.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    77. Re:NEVER by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Stop being so chech!

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    78. Re:NEVER by kgskgs · · Score: 1

      If the average person makes $1500, then half of the people are making more than that. Don't want to get in discussion about mean and median, but you know what I mean. Basically that's a lot of people, almost 600 million, that's almost the populations of USA and Canada combined.

      The average gets twisted a lot by the low end figures. And don't forget a lot of black money that never gets accounted for. That adds to income of lot of people.

      So the point is there are a lot of people who can buy a $10,000 car. And if enough people buy it, the next generation of the car will be cheaper and then more people will buy it.

    79. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone can easily beat the estimated MPG the manufacturer posts.

      1. Accelerate moderately, keeping your RPM below 2500.
      2. Coast to stop lights. It's a stop light... what's your hurry?
      3. Don't drive 80 mph on the highway, this is killing your efficiency. Try driving 60 mph on the highways for a tank and you'll find your MPG jump significantly.

    80. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because your wage is not adjusted up to compensate, thanks to neutered unions.

    81. Re:NEVER by assertation · · Score: 1

      America's future if overpopulation keeps going up and if we keep electing Republicans to savage the middle class

    82. Re:NEVER by assertation · · Score: 1

      I wish I would have read your comment before I posted one of my own and forfeited my temporary rights to moderate this thread.

      I would have liked to mod this comment up.

      Well done!

      +1

    83. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Owned by the company they work for perhaps?

    84. Re:NEVER by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      And in China-- specifically Shanghai-- getting a license plate costs ~$10k IIRC. I believe car itself tends to be a bit more expensive than it would be in the US.

    85. Re:NEVER by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Jesus, you've got it in for the Americans, don't you? What is is with you (insert nationality here) and all your multiple exclamation points?!
      And what does Shirley have to do with this discussion?

    86. Re:NEVER by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, you could probably give the amount in USD and we would immediately see that you do not live in abject poverty.

    87. Re:NEVER by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      The fact that you don't consider 30K to be expensive says a lot about you. Because to me, that's a freakin' boatload! Which says a lot about me, too...

    88. Re:NEVER by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Detroit is disintegrating, but Wiki says:

      16% of Chinese are in poverty, 33% of Indians, which is hundreds of millions of people. (Measured by the international poverty line, $1.25/day).

      Just because a country has hundreds of millions of middle class or huge cities doesn't mean it doesn't also have huge numbers of poor (not just a few under the bridge).

      Take Africa. The most expensive city in the world in 2011 was Luanda, Angola. Yet Africa has a poverty rate of 47%.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_People's_Republic_of_China
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_India
      http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/capitalism-will-eliminate-poverty-africa
      http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-worlds-50-most-expensive-cities-20120612-207lr.html

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    89. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead, you wasted precious seconds of your life being a jackass.

    90. Re:NEVER by EdIII · · Score: 1

      You're reading into it way too much then.

      Poster said expensive, as in expensive compared to other cars.

      Sure, a Prius may cost way more than a head of lettuce, but for a car? Just about right.

    91. Re:NEVER by EdIII · · Score: 1

      If I am driving aggressively I can routinely get 45-50. That's flooring it.

      Taking it easy and approaching it like a game I find I can easily get 55-60. I know somebody who is so damn good at it she gets 72.

    92. Re:NEVER by tibit · · Score: 1

      And what the heck has that got to do with anything?! Gasoline in Ohio costs about 4x as much now as it did back then. If most of my spending was on gasoline, dollar to me would have lost 75% of its value. I obviously spend much less than all my money on gasoline, and with my spending mix, I know that dollar has lost 50% of its value. And that's not an approximation, I keep a fairly good track. That's 50% +/- 0.5% at most. It's a coincidence it's a round number like that, just two months ago it was still 49%, for example.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    93. Re:NEVER by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand... I'm not saying Tata won't be successful with this car, if it works as advertised. I was just responding to the poster who claimed that the mean or median income has nothing to do with whether or not you're in the middle class (except in the US), and that half of India's population is "middle class."

      If you suppose that what most westerners think of as "middle class" is making a couple of low end cars' worth of money a year (say $30-$40k in the US) that would still put the line at around $20k in India. The mean per capita GDP in India is apparently $1500. The average usually gets skewed UPWARDS in things like salary - the lowest salary you can make is zero, while the highest is essentially unbounded. So the median is most likely lower than $1500. It's almost certain that "more than half" of the people in India aren't in circumstances comparable to "middle class" in a western nation.

      That still leaves a LOT of people, in absolute terms, on the high end of course.

    94. Re:NEVER by tibit · · Score: 1

      Even then, the 5.5% figure is deceptively low IMHO -- it's hard to make predictions on it without pulling out the calculator. It's a virtually useless number, in that respect. Also, giving it out in % doesn't make much sense, since there's no cap on the 100%. To me, that sort of throws % out of the window right away. % only make sense when the values are between 0 and 100, or perhaps -100 and +100.

      It'd make more sense to give out inflations as "years to doubling of the prices", and, as you correctly state, it'd have averaged 13y over the last 13 years. Most people don't realize that x% inflation means prices will "double" in y years. I put double in quotes since inflation got nothing to do with other things that may influence prices.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    95. Re:NEVER by tibit · · Score: 1

      From what I recall, dropping union dues would give lowest-paid workers a very nice income boost. The unions do the neutering, not the other way round...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    96. Re:NEVER by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      I already read someone saying India's middle class was half of the population, and now this AC saying that it is 4% (and getting +2 insightful, oh /. y u disappoint me?).

      Wikipedia[1] says it is around 25%, with 300 million people, backed by a report from Deutsche Bank.

      [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_living_in_India

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    97. Re:NEVER by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      OK, so how can they afford to pay the rent? It must cost more than owning them, or the guy who owns them wouldn't be making a profit.

      Of course the correct answer is that the original question is stupid. I couldn't afford a load of high end power tools. But a carpenter who uses them to earn a living could, because he doesn't really have the choice; it's a cost of doing business.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    98. Re:NEVER by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      And the reason I'm putting this to you is this: you can buy a turbodiesel VW for less than the Impreza cost, and reasonably expect 70mpg out of it in real world driving conditions. And, around here at least, diesel is less expensive than gasoline.

      I guess you need to define where 'around here' is. Are you talking Imperial gallons? None of VW's US TDI cars are rated at 70mpg. My Jetta does a consistent 37mpg. It dropped to 35 during the unusually hot weather we have had recently. Athough I could improve it to around 40 or 41mpg by lowering my speed to 60 mph, I primarily drive it on the interstate on my daily commute where driving less than 70mph encourages hard core tailgaters.

      I would also point out that only for a brief period this summer diesel was less than gasoline. Probably for the first time in over a decade in middle US. That's not to say more diesel cars shouldn't be available in the US. If for no other reason than soy-diesel is a much better alternative fuel than ethanol. Personally I think US car retailers have completely missed to boat by not offering small diesel pickups like the Ranger, S10, or Tacoma equipped with an engine like VW's 1.9 TDI.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    99. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is Canada a huge car market?
      Even given the average Canadians probably have 100X the purchasing power of the average Indian (that's why Canada is among hot destinations for all the Indians jumping ship from the so called "huge Indian market". Curiously no Canadian is doing the reverse journey for some reasons).

      You can play with statistics until your blue in the face, the bottom line is that a US$2,000 Tata Nano can't sell well in India says it all.

      And it appears that you really can't add 1+1.
      The Ferrari is used as an analogy regarding income and purchase.
      It's exactly the point that Ferrari don't sell in high volumes.

    100. Re:NEVER by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "Ron Whites big old fuck'n building?"

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    101. Re:NEVER by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      "I would probably buy one, and I live in the US. It would depend on how much it costs to run the pump and get a full tank."

      What about safety? It seems like your only criteria fuel costs.

      My guess is that safety for this car is terrible. The Tata Nano is for example without airbags and features only a single wing mirror. Personally I would be quite worried about the safety of such a car.

      What specifically, are your safety concerns? It is likely safer than a motorcycle. Additional mirrors could easily be added (and would probably be mandated as standard equipment).

      My biggest concern would be getting obliterated by someone else's oversized, overpowered and overweight vehicle. But I have that concern when walking or cycling.

      It is also a problem that is easily solved, e.g. by kicking oil companies off of welfare and forcing them to pass the real cost of their product on to consumers.

    102. Re:NEVER by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      $10K is 7 times more than $1.5K.

    103. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It even has better ground clearance because of India's pot-holed roads

      How do potholes give better ground clearance?

    104. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the average person makes $1500, then half of the people are making more than that

      George Carlin was a great comedian, but you really shouldn't have let him teach you about how averages work.

    105. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some parts of China, true.

      Just finding nice affordable lodging in Shanghi or Bejing will be impossible at 10k USD a year.

    106. Re:NEVER by fredprado · · Score: 1

      You do not have a point. Your math makes exactly the same sense as your Ferrari analogy: none. No, the average Canadian does not have 100x the purchasing power of the average Indian. Not even close. You are off by a factor of 10.

      And yes, 40 million people is a huge car market by any standard, at a price of 10K USD that equates to 350 billion dollars of potential sells. If just a tenth of those people buy a car each year you will have 35 billion dollars of annual income to the seller.

    107. Re:NEVER by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Who said they can't coexist?

      I'm simply saying that in India they do exist, and in large numbers, much larger than in the west. It's not prejudice or preconception, it's fact.

    108. Re:NEVER by tlambert · · Score: 1

      You can live an upper class life in the US on $10k, as long as you are willing to make a few sacrifices. It's all about your point of view.

      I'd like to find the part of the US where $10,000/year would cover rent, utilities (heat/electricity/water), and food...

      Look for off-base housing near military bases and student housing near college campuses.

      You can get a 4 bedroom 2 bath apartment in Auburn Alabama for $275/month half a mile from the campus. That includes pool, tennis courts, spa, etc., right next to public transit. That leaves you $6700/year for the other stuff.

      If you're willing to live in San Antonio, TX, you can get a 1 bedroom at budget suites for $199/month or $2338 a year. If you bump that up to $292/month or $3504 a year, you get a professionally staffed learning center with computers and net access with after school and adult programs.

      If you insist on living in Silicon Valley, where recently all the apartments have raised their rent because they think everyone who works at Facebook is suddenly flush with cash (which is still in lockout, so they are trying to cash in on wishful thinking), yeah, you're not going to get by on $10K a year.

      Generally, you wouldn't be paying any rent at this income level anyway, since you'd qualify for HUD housing, and the Section 8 program under HUD would give you a rent voucher and you could live where you wanted within the voucher amount. For San Mateo County in California, for example, a two person household bringing in $71,050/year is considered low enough income for subsidized housing, and under $44,400 is enough for a complete subsidy.

      By the way, a 40 hour a week minimum wage job will net you $15,080 and the only thing you won't be getting back on your taxes is SSI and medicare contributions. Or you could get a higher than minimum wage job at McDonalds and get medical insurance, prescription coverage, dental, AD&D short and long term disability, dependent life insurance, paid educational assistance, and management training.

      You'd be hard put to earn less, unless you are already on partial disability and can't work a full 40 hour work week. Even at this level, you're eligible for SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), which is the renamed Food Stamps which uses a debit card in an attempt to prevent fraud.

    109. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With sort of a rickshaw motorcycle. Fits three Indians in back (or two Americans). Either dirty disel or LP gas engine. Smaller than a gloried golf cart.

      Take the same number of cars as here (in a given space). Triple that number of motor cycles. Sprinkle in an odd bus or truck or three. In the same given space. And in that most of the traffic rules consist of a giant game of chicken. Thats India traffic most days!

      Oh and if you want to cross MG road (or some such), just wait for a gap in traffic. And walk right out. The vehicles will go around you (mostly). Pause as needed. Reminds me kind of the way some young Arab drivers drive really fast on lonely roads at night without headlights on - God's will be done.

    110. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from a guy who can't add 1+1 that's a compliment.

      US$10K?
      The fucking Indians can't fucking afford a US$2K car!!!
      Which part of the above FACT do you find difficult to comprehend?

    111. Re:NEVER by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you were in India and not Portland, Oregon?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    112. Re:NEVER by fredprado · · Score: 1

      There are Indians that can afford Ferraris, my dear troll. Because most of them can't afford 2K cars doesn't mean none can. And "just a few" Indians is still a hell lot of people as I showed. Now be a nice troll and go back to your cave.

    113. Re:NEVER by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Have you been shipping your homeless to Oregon? All of these sights are pretty common in Portland

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    114. Re:NEVER by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I've seen all of the above in Portland, Oregon, USA.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    115. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some doubts over your numbers.

      A new 2012 Impreza list starts around $18.5k and claims 25/34 mpg.

      A new 2012 Prius list starts aroudn $23k and claims 51/48 mpg.

      You may get better or worse MPG on an individual basis for either car.

      All the price quotes I saw for the VW diesels were closer to the Prius than the Impreza.

      So, the break even time is not nearly so long as your post would suggest.

    116. Re:NEVER by lasvegasseo · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised how often the poor turn their noses up at stuff, sadly.

    117. Re:NEVER by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      4% of 1.2 billion people is still a large market.

    118. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your own edification, idiots like yourself who can't add 1+1 and call FACTS trolling ought to seriously consider cutting back on masturbating at One Direction videos (hey I think Zaym Malik is a handsome guy but....).
      Just saying...

    119. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to tell me what I saw with my own eyes?

      I went to India late last year, to multiple cities. I directly observed these things, street sleepers in vast numbers, families living in makeshift shelters at the side of the road, people grazing animals in the central reservations.

      These may be cliches, they may even be preconceptions, but they are very true in modern India.

      Modern anywhere is loaded with dichotomies. You just have to do what you can to improve the sector you are working in. If we all do that we will advance.

    120. Re:NEVER by rinka · · Score: 1

      I had to scroll right down to the last quarter of the page before I came across this (relevant) comment on the Car (apart from the two or three comments right on top). The entire discussion has been about:
      - How India is poor and the poor can't afford the car
      - How India is a hell hole/shit hole/insert-your-favourite-expletive

      I've yet to complete reading the whole thing but I bet I'm going to see some comments about:
      - outsourcing
      - corruption
      - Fix poverty first and then raise your head
      - and more

      Everytime I see a reference to India, that's most of the conversation. Makes me feel sad!!!!

      As an Indian (engineer), let me get on my soap-box just the one time:
      * As with any new product version 1.0 will always have gaps. Version 2.0 will be better and so on. So should we not invent, create? Yes, there will be mistakes. But screw ups are part of creating.

      * Yes we care about our poor and do work at improving our society's lot. We have a roadmap and have achieved quite a bit since Independence and will continue to progress along that roadmap. Raving and ranting about it will not change how we invest in these initiatives. But yes, we will continue to progress.

      * We care about this world we live in. For many years we've taken. We also would like to contribute. Is that such a crime?

      * Finally (:-) as one who's been part of the whole IT/Software outsourcing evolution for a while), let me weigh in with our take on outsourcing - and I've heard these from quite a few friends of mine.
      For many years we've seen how jobs coming to India have resulted in loss of jobs in the west - how families, careers have been impacted. There's not much we can do to change the course of how this movement has happened but we do care and have tried to help in our own way - by asking for people to be held back, by attempting to grow the size of the program/product so that more people would be required. A lot of small things. Yes I know we have not been very successful but we continue to try in our own ways.

    121. Re:NEVER by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you replied to me. I was replying to a thread insisting that half of India's population is middle class (by western standards). It's demonstrably not.

    122. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, I arrived in China in 2000 with a wife and two school age daughters. My first year I was getting paid 375 US dollars a month. We made it, in style as well.

    123. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Ever been to Tbilisi? They're so proud of all their churches and much of the population is strongly orthodox christian - to the extent of observing all the holidays and festivals which us agnostics or people who were merely born in to predominantly christian societies just don't bother with.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    124. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      You're both right in some respect. I don't know what the exact figures are this week, but in recent years middle-class incomes have risen pretty sharply - I think about 6 lakhs a year is "normal" now, whereas 3-4 years ago 3-4 lakhs was about average, and they reckon 10 lakhs isn't far off.

      (For you non-Indians, 1 lakh = 100,000 rupees which is about US$1,800 at the current exchange rate).

      It also depends on who you believe - recently the Indian government tried to cheat the poor out of being considered poor by attempting to redefine the poverty rate at something like Rs34/day - about half of the International poverty line as I recall... for what purpose I can't quite ascertain, but maybe just to make the country look better or give the appearance of growth or poverty problems magically being solved.

      Anyway, there are a lot of middle class. There are a lot of poor. There are quite a lot of rich. And the divides between the 3 are far more significant than most other countries.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    125. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of false maths going on here - the GDP per capita might be $1500 but that's not the average salary - my maid probably makes about the same as the guy who shines my shoes at the railway station but my employees make more than that - $10-12k a year isn't out of the question in many cities, especially Mumbai, which means that a car costing $10k is in the realms of affordability BUT Indians are not credit-whores like us Westerners - the younger generation is becoming that way a little bit but many Indians will scrimp and save for 2, 3, 4, 5 years so that he has enough money to buy what he wants.

      All this is difficult to calculate in a place like India because it's largely a cash society PLUS people don't pay a lot of the taxes they would technically owe PLUS being that many people (such as maids and whatnot) get paid in cash their incomes probably don't even get counted towards GDP.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    126. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      $20k? Dream on. Forgetting the domestically produced el-cheapo boxes, your average entry-level Toyota starts at around 3.5 lakhs or US$6k-ish... double that and you've got US$12k which sounds about right for urban areas - the middle classes are easily earning this kind of money and there are large numbers of people who fall right in to that category.

      India is vast. It has vast differences in lifestyles, standards of living and yes, incomes. It is very unequal in all of these things - and as I have already alluded to, there is a huge Urban-Rural divide as well. One might earn $1000 a year and another $10,000 and another might earn $100,000 but they're all being counted in terms of their GDP contribution - and with so much of India's population being rural, the appearance of $1500 being a "median income" is actually pretty misleading.

      I don't pay my maid enough to buy a car (and if I did I would be lynched by my neighbours because she'd tell everyone what a great salary I'm paying and then they'd all demand it too) so the chances of her owning a car are kind of slim, but furthermore, US$1500 is a lot in some rural area where they don't have electricity or running water or broadband to pay for and the latest luxury is a $50 cellphone - compare that to us urbanites who could spend that much every year just on morning coffees. I don't expect some farmer in the foothills of the Himalayas to know about, want or be able to afford this car at this price, but my friends in any of the major centres? Definitely.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    127. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Yet another person comparing the average income of a billion people with the actual potential market size.

      In some states $2k means you're flush while in others, you're broke. Same as America - I'm sure you can live in the backwaters of some US states for next to nothing but you couldn't survive in any of the major centres.

      The market for this car is most likely to have an urban base, so why don't we look at the average income in urban areas instead, which is, in many of them, hovering somewhere around the $10-12k mark for many.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    128. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Damn, I appear to have run out of mod points. Mod up.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    129. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      In most major metros in India it doesn't need to do 45mph (or to use the proper civilized measurements, 72km/h)... it merely needs to be able to sit in traffic idling and provide decent A/C to the inhabitants. At most times of the day, you'd be lucky to hit 15mph on many streets.

      The primary bonus to this car for India is it's cleanliness and if we get ride of some of the junk that's on Indian roads maybe we can venture out in to the city without inhaling air that's so polluted it's like smoking 2 packs a day - and if it can get me to nearby places (the outskirts of Mumbai, Pune, Nashik etc) then that's 2 bonuses.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    130. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that the average Prius gets worse mileage than many European cars - I've managed to outdo a Prius fuel efficiency in both a Mercedes *and* a BMW and I believe some of the smaller Volkswagens and even some large Jaguars kick the Prius' ass in the same respect.

      Some studies are suggesting that the Prius is *worse* (environmentally) than many SUVs and at the end of the day will do more damage, considering all the stuff that's required for it's batteries before it even reaches you.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    131. Re:NEVER by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I was not aware that cars got that much better gas mileage in Europe.

      As for the Prius being worse... I don't know about all that. I understand your point about the construction of the car, but I had really not heard that before.

      I bought them because they were relatively cheap, zero or partial zero emissions, and were much cheaper to operate than a normal car or SUV. Still are.

      Would still have rather bought them instead of any Flex Fuel car that does far more damage to the environment producing corn, when they could be using other biofuels. That's money and politics though.

      I still think voting with my wallet ultimately helped because it showed a willingness to embrace alternative technologies. I'm still willing to give an air car, or all electric vehicle a go too.

      Do you have any links or citations about the production of the Prius being more damaging to the environment than the operation of an SUV?

    132. Re:NEVER by eharvill · · Score: 1

      Apparently my attempt at humor has failed. I was referring to the state of Georgia and not the country of Georgia. I have not made it to that part of Europe (Asia?) in my travels. And this was the Bible Belt I was referencing - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_belt. I suppose I should be more aware of the international audience in future posts. :-)

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    133. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purchasing Power Parity adjusted GDP is $3694.

    134. Re:NEVER by tmosley · · Score: 1

      *Republicans and Democrats

      FTFY.

    135. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of the Bible Belt and the Mason-Dixon line and all of that other nonsense you United Statians have, but I just pointing out that Georgia etc could very well be considered the "Bible Belt" of Europe (or Asia, depending on whether you want to go by race or geography) :)

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    136. Re:NEVER by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Someone else may be more of an expert by if I'm not mistaken, European standards are more strict than US standards, so, yes, probably some cars do get better mileage in Europe.

      As for citations, this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmxUsGiGp3w may be of interest to you.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    137. Re:NEVER by EdIII · · Score: 1

      The production of the batteries is interesting, but I have to be a little incredulous on the mpg.

      High mpg on the Prius is only achieved overall. The combustion engine on its own is probably not that efficient. Driving the Prius balls to the wall only ensures you are using the combustion engine and never on the electric. No surprise there. However, I have been in many rushes over the last decade (some cases just driving aggressive), and never saw mpg under 30. 17 mpg is astoundingly low.

      The fact you get such better gas mileage in Europe proves it is possible and the US only lags behind due the politics, which is sad.

      Pollution as a byproduct of producing the batteries is one reason why I would look into alternatives like air powered cars, or hydrogen cars with point source hydrogen production. I would love to see aluminum/gallium hydrogen cars on the market, but until then I can only work with the existing market for alternative cars.

      We are passing legislation requiring increased mpg in the next couple of years as a standard, so we are making some progress I guess. Don't be too hard on us Prius owners. We are trying and not all of us are douchy self-righteous people, I promise :)

    138. Re:NEVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing they ferry tourists around all day at rates the average Indian would never be able to afford.

  5. I read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    but I don't see where the range of the car is..?

    a penny a kilometer is nice and all, but I would like to see range and top speed, etc. Is there anyplace I can find this?

    1. Re:I read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The embedded youtube video claimed 150 - 200 km

    2. Re:I read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have links, but there are plenty of sources for the efficiency of pneumatic engines and storage tanks. If you compare them with combustion engines and tanks you will quickly see that compressed air is not a viable replacement for what we know as cars.

      I figured it up awhile back and guesstimated that a range of 15 miles @ a speed of 20 mph is probably doable in a light (but midsize owing to huge air tank) car.

      Somehow Tata keeps coming up with outrageous efficiency. I expect they are getting such results in the lab and for some reason (publicity?) extrapolating that data into unobtainable fantasies.

      Pneumatic engines are good and worth investing in, but there will not be a magic advance in efficiency. They should be used in smaller capacity applications like regenerative braking.

    3. Re:I read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, just based on the efficiency numbers, Compressed air is a non-starter. There are however places where it can be used. Just not as a conventional car.

      1. Places requiring ZERO noise and ZERO emission, like inside buildings, golf courses, generally anything where a golf cart would be used now, except charges much faster (3 min.)
      2. Cheap forms of railed-cars in places where electrified tracks are too dangerous for maintenance, particularly hot and/or wet places. Think Gondola's or monorails where the alternative is cable-car systems.
      3. Elevators/inclinators.

      Basically anything that would be too expensive to build proprietary vehicle systems, but chemical battery/fuels are too dangerous. A good example is the floor polisher, highstack/forklift tools used inside warehouses and big box stores. Ever been inside one of these places at 1am while they polish the floors with propane polishers, or the forklifts have dangerous exposed electrical parts?

  6. Recycled CNN content by michaelmalak · · Score: 5, Informative

    All this is is a blogger recycling a CNN YouTube from 2010 to get some clicks (worked astoundingly well!). And according to Wikipedia, it's been vapor since 2000.

    1. Re:Recycled CNN content by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's been vapor a lot longer than that...Besides the obvious pun I saw a guy demonstrate a compressed air motor on "That's Incredible" in the 70's. I've tried to find it but it looks like nobody wants to be reminded that show ever existed.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Recycled CNN content by michaelmalak · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually That's Incredible aired in the 80's, not the 70's. And I see that you made the same comment in 2000!

    3. Re:Recycled CNN content by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you try to tell me anything prick. I remember it being from the 70's and now you're going to call me a liar?

      Yes, we are.

      Also, LOL to posting as Anonymous Coward but identifying yourself as the original poster: ArhcAngel.

    4. Re:Recycled CNN content by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeap, that was me. I consider 1980 part of the 70's. I also consider "Real People" and "That's Incredible" to be the same show despite them being on different networks ;).

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    5. Re:Recycled CNN content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might want to look at imdb before you make such claims http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080291/

    6. Re:Recycled CNN content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, as us young turks on the interwebs like to say, PWND!

    7. Re:Recycled CNN content by fredprado · · Score: 1

      And we consider you wrong in both assumptions. ;)

    8. Re:Recycled CNN content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol yea that's pretty weird dude.

    9. Re:Recycled CNN content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no interest in defending anyone in this, but I find it funny that you're so quick to jump the gun and believe the anonymous poster is arhcangel. I could reply to a comment you made with some ridiculously inflammatory language, and I wonder how quick people would be to believe something negative about you.

    10. Re:Recycled CNN content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not an assumptions. He made a statement, and it is implied as an opinion, so while his facts are wrong, his opinion still is what it is.

    11. Re:Recycled CNN content by fredprado · · Score: 1

      An opinion is nothing more than an assumption. If you consider A=B you are assuming A=B.

    12. Re:Recycled CNN content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How do you know it's him and not just some Slashdot troll trying to make him out to be some sort of crazy person?

      (If it is him, holy shit he's crazy)

    13. Re:Recycled CNN content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's... (wait for it) Incredible!

    14. Re:Recycled CNN content by asylumx · · Score: 1

      He probably posted AC because he knew that comment in particular would get modded troll and didn't want to lose his karma, not because he thought it'd actually give him anonymity.

    15. Re:Recycled CNN content by Vreejack · · Score: 1

      SRSLY people. This is not the same person. The message sounds entirely tongue-in-cheek. And way too over the top to be taken seriously.

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
    16. Re:Recycled CNN content by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Since there was no year 0 the end of the first decade was at the start of 11ce.

      Similar to how the 21st century started with 2011... I think I've found a great new way to annoy people. Thanks! :-)

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    17. Re:Recycled CNN content by 0xG · · Score: 1

      Since there was no year 0 the end of the first decade was at the start of 11ce.

      Oh, you were there?

      --
      A pox on web designers who feel that window.innerWidth == screen.availWidth
    18. Re:Recycled CNN content by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Okay technically it was backdated so nobody celebrated it.

      But yeah there was no year 0 and our year numbering system started in what we now call 525ce.

      The wikipedia page shows how this century started at Jan 1st 2001 making the year 2000 part of the 19th century, so considering the year 1980 as part of the 70's as the OP did is at least sensible though odd as it would make 1970 NOT part of the 70's.

      As I said, the argument could be made and refuting it is not immediately obvious so clearly it'll be a hit at parties.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  7. Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy now limited offer for the following features:

    Unlimited range (only down smooth slopes)
    Easy to maintain (requires only spare tires, made out of wood otherwise)
    No driving license required, even a child could drive it (watch out for real roads though)
    Extras buyable, like pedals and brakes. ... ...

    1. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      From 0 to 100 in 10 seconds (free-fall only)

    2. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, a car in free fall would only require about 4.6 seconds to reach 100 miles per hour. !00 miles per hour is about 147 feet per second. As acceleration due to gravity at the earth's surface is 32 feet per second squared, it would only require 147/32=4.6 seconds. Of course, this ignores air resistance.

    3. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by Immerman · · Score: 1

      And yet it works out perfectly if you assume 100m/s instead of miles/hour

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You have a strange idea of "perfectly." To me your "perfectly" sounds like "within a couple of percent, assuming a vacuum."

    5. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Which, let's be honest, is a lot more accurate than most casual discussions get.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      I use meters per second, as everybody should. (But air resistance and 9.8110 are valid points.)

    7. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      That was 10>9.81.

    8. Re:Car powered by gravity soon to be sold by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Do car commercials in "metric" countries use meters per second or kilometers per hour for 0 to n?

  8. of course! by korgitser · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... everybody loves inflatable tatas!

    --
    FCKGW 09F9 42
    1. Re:of course! by J4 · · Score: 1

      Bravo

    2. Re:of course! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      So if an attractive woman is driving one of their cars, do guys nudge each other and say things like "Look at the tatas in that Tata"?

      I believe this company has the funniest name on the planet Earth.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:of course! by SteveFoerster · · Score: 3

      Might they also say, "I hope she's an escort!"

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    4. Re:of course! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Well played, sir! Well played!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:of course! by azalin · · Score: 1

      Might they also say, "I hope she's an escort!"

      If you can a ford it...

  9. And they're going to compress the air with?? by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that electricity (or petrol) has to be used to compress the air. And 65% of the electricity in India is generated by burning coal or natural gas. So, yeah, let's burn fossil fuel to run an inefficient air compressor to run an inefficient vehicle. The *only* way that compressed air motors make sense in cars is if you want to reduce local emission levels in a densely populated urban area.

    1. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by ClioCJS · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If I pay $3.50 in gas, I get to go 20 miles. About 50 kilometers (VERY roughly, but gas prices fluctuate so much, the cost is close enough).

      If this thing is a penny a kilometer, that would be 50 cents.

      What's worse: Burning a gallon of gasoline -- which also has to be electrically pumped -- or just the electricity to pump. 50 cents worth of electricity, if that. (Some of that money would be filling station overhead, and not just electricity.)

      Or maybe we should just give up progress until someone comes up with free unlimited energy?

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    2. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by anubi · · Score: 1

      I think anyone who has used pneumatic power tools can vouch for the insight of your post. It takes a pretty powerful air compressor to run the tool, but the inefficiency is tolerated in exchange for the convenience of having a very small and lightweight power release at the tool.

      Its not unusual for me to run a 2HP compressor to run a hand sander.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    3. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by vaccum+pony · · Score: 2

      Actually, by concentrating the pollution to a "choke point" (ha ha) you make it easier to provide clean power to the process.

    4. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Consider, however, in centralized facilities, it can be easier to implement stricter emission controls, and possibly even produce energy more efficiently than it is in an inherently mobile platform such as an automobile. You're probably right that they'd be using fossil fuels of some kind to compress the air, but that doesn't mean there wouldn't be advantages to centralizing that aspect of things. Plus, of course... there's no inherent requirement that fossil fuel must be used to generate the necessary energy. Other energy sources, including hydro or nuclear, could just as easily be used as well, requiring only an upgrade of the facilities that compress the air, while the overall automobile infrastructure itself remains entirely unaffected.

    5. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      The problem is not electricity or petrol. The problem is something capable of rotating an air compressor with sufficient torque. A windmill could do it... A steam engine could do it... a man in a treadmill could do it...

      Spec your problems more carefully in future.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    6. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by shentino · · Score: 1

      You mean like sunlight?

      We literally have more solar input than we know what to do with.

    7. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      'Tis a shame. But you can't run a car on that yet.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    8. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by shentino · · Score: 1

      Not directly, but you can farm algae in pools of water and use that to make biodiesel.

      Energy is still energy even if you lose parts of it converting from one form to another.

    9. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And they're going to compress the air with??" - With the weight of plebs.

    10. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2

      I think the point is cheap rather than "green" (and really, cheap matters a heck of a lot more than "green").

      With gas at 3.50 per gallon and 20 MPG (about 32 KM/G) you end up with a cost of about 10 cents per kilometer. If you can make a reliable car that will go a kilometer on a penny that is a significant savings. Especially if the car itself is cheap like most Indian cars.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    11. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, this has always been why electric vehicles have been the ideal. You can generate electricity from many different sources and the plants that generate them are easier to replace than a similar capacity worth of vehicles. Back home they're ceasing emissions testing after nearly 40 years as it's gotten to the point where so few vehicles fail that it's not worth it. Had technology allowed all those vehicles to be electric it probably would have taken a half or a third the time to fix the pollution problem.

    12. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      'Tis a shame. But you can't run a car on that yet.

      Yes, but you can run golf carts on it: http://www.ezgo.com/powerfilm_solar_technology.html

    13. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Except that it costs way too much, and I really doubt it'll hit price parity any time soon (there have been so many companies trying and failing, and the practical barriers look quite difficult if not impossible to overcome in the near term)

      --
      Powell: "So, what are we doing?" Cheney: "Oh, crime." Powell: "Crime? Good, OK... crime..."
    14. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Cimexus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, 50 km is an extremely poor rough conversion of 20 miles. It's only 1.6 km to the mile remember, whereas you've multiplied by 2.5.

      20 miles is ~32 km. Making your journey roughly 32 cents in this car, not 50 cents.

    15. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by c0lo · · Score: 2

      And they're going to compress the air with??

      Why... pedaling of course. It makes a good business case for using the lower class to power the cars of the middle class (the upper class will continue to use oil powered cars) .
      And also a boon for fast-food joints: cheap and rich "fuel" for the "pedallers" - I tell ye, US should try it instead of marching on the "trickle economy". Just imagine to get paid for actually exercising at the gym.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    16. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The windmill sounds like a good option for this, as compressing air is something where the unreliable nature of wind isn't an issue. So long as you get enough wind over a long period (How long depending on the size of the tank), it doesn't matter how variable the windspeed is.

    17. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Considering the quoted cost of $0,01 per km, this car has an exceptionally good energy efficiency.

      After all this compressed air needs energy (fuel) to be compressed - and the less energy it needs to move, the less fuel it uses. Of course it's a small car for starters, that helps a lot, I still have my doubts it can really be made so efficient that it's a small fraction of the cost of running a small gasoline engine to power it.

    18. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but he also used a car that only gets 20mpg. Starting from a more reasonable number like 35 mpg, then converting to kilometers, will get you pretty close to 50. Once again: offsetting errors lead to the right conclusion for the wrong reason.

    19. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> 3.50 per gallon and 20 MPG (about 32 KM/G)

      kilometers per gallon. Very funny.
      More seriously, in the metric rest of the world, we calculate in liters/100km ...

    20. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      You try getting 35 mpg on a pot-hole filled road.

      Can't be done.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    21. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell in our state if they'd just let more people modify their cars with newer engines, then require them to pass nothing more than a tailpipe and gas cap test, they'd have solved most of the emissions problems in cali, while also allowing a larger percentage of older cars to not be crushed. (Bad for the car companies but good for both the people and posterity, since the number of vintage cars ending up in the junkyards here in cali is a TRAVESTY. Even ones that are pre-smog to begin with.

    22. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In _India_ its a penny a kilometer, but thats about what gas cost/km in India too. (in an equivalent transport)

    23. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      If I pay $3.50 in gas, I get to go 20 miles. About 50 kilometers (VERY roughly, but gas prices fluctuate so much, the cost is close enough).

      Yes, very roughly. 20 miles is closer to 30km (divide by 5, multiply by 8 = 32km). You'd have been closer saying if you bought $7 of gas, and go 40 miles that's about 50km (VERY roughly).

      That being said, 20mpg isn't that good - plenty of cars which aren't dinky toys hit double that (my Integra type r averages almost 30, and I drive like an idiot).

    24. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      I get 25mpg on highways, but when I go yardsaleing, it's more like 12mpg. Really depends on the type of drive -- it's a 50% difference in just my one vehicle (car computer is helpful). For a car with only a 40 mile range, I'd think the driving would not be as much highway driving, but maybe that's a silly way to mentally model the situation. I dunno how India works :)

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    25. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I've done it...

      ...but only on my motorbike.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    26. Re:And they're going to compress the air with?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that electricity (or petrol) has to be used to compress the air. And 65% of the electricity in India is generated by burning coal or natural gas. So, yeah, let's burn fossil fuel to run an inefficient air compressor to run an inefficient vehicle. The *only* way that compressed air motors make sense in cars is if you want to reduce local emission levels in a densely populated urban area.

      not very many coal powered cars on the market

  10. Nothing about the range by slimjim8094 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's an interesting idea, but they don't say anything about what that 175 liters gets you in terms of distance or power. The onboard pump is interesting (and necessary IMHO) but India's power infrastructure may not be up for the task of hundreds of thousands of cars all pumping away... if they're targeting cities, or they can get these filling stations everywhere, it might be alright.

    The real problem with all these compressed air vehicles is the diabatic nature of compressing air. When you compress it, you generate a huge amount of heat that's hard to use and slows down the filling process (since the pressures are higher than normal, which will be problematic for the service station idea), but when you expand it (for power) you need to re-heat the air or else your efficiency goes way down since super-cold air doesn't have much volume. That's why they immerse SCUBA tanks in water while filling. If they figured out how to minimize that problem (maybe they use it slowly enough that it's not an issue?), they should sell a lot of them. TFA doesn't have anything suggesting that they have, though... so I'm skeptical.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Nothing about the range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why don't they make an engine use air in this way, but then have a 2nd part of it that uses the heat generated to also power it. Surely that's a win-win?

      By the sounds of it you should build one

    2. Re:Nothing about the range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick google search shows the top speed as 28 mph and range of 137 miles
      Like someone else said, a glorified golf cart.

      Yawn, next idea please.

    3. Re:Nothing about the range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the linked video, the range is around 100-200KM on a single tank and 80KM/h top speed.

    4. Re:Nothing about the range by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because the heat is created by the fueling (compression) process, and reabsorbed from the environment during the use (expansion) process, the exact opposite of when you'd want to recover the heat.

      On the up side, you get free pollutionless air conditioning every time you hit the 'gas' pedal.

    5. Re:Nothing about the range by qbitslayer · · Score: 1

      The range is to the corner store and back. A mule would be more practical. Besides, you can make fertilizer from the exhaust.

    6. Re:Nothing about the range by Triv · · Score: 4, Informative

      the video gives it an 50mph top speed and a 90-125 mile range.

    7. Re:Nothing about the range by sortadan · · Score: 1

      Thanks, if I had mod points I'd mod you up, this is what I was looking for.

    8. Re:Nothing about the range by only_human · · Score: 1

      That tells me that there is a possibility to use this in hybrid engines. The compressed air could be used to give power for passing cars. The resulting cooling could be used to cool a main gasoline engine. In other cases it could be used in conjunction with electric engines because those have problems when high torque is needed. If compressed air could be when extra torque is needed, maybe this could reduce the need for rare earth magnets.

    9. Re:Nothing about the range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for those whose other option is walking or who don't need to go faster for longer distances, I'm sure this is a great idea. It astonishes me how many people are quick to turn on an idea because it isn't yet perfect.

      That's not to say that I think this will work, but it has other more pressing issues than speed or range.

    10. Re:Nothing about the range by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      You should be able to extract energy from any temperature gradient, be it from a local hot-spot or a local cold-spot.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:Nothing about the range by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Which, for pottering around crowded inner city Indian streets, sounds perfectly adequate...

    12. Re:Nothing about the range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Theory, yes. But you need aditionnal macinery, which translates to obvious cost, size and weight problems...

    13. Re:Nothing about the range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what's wrong with fueling the car with a couple of percentage of the tank volume with liquid air? Just let the Indian cold? weather re-energize the supercool air PLUS you'll get a free ice-cream and superpure soda water maker with every Tata :)

    14. Re:Nothing about the range by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The real problem with all these compressed air vehicles is the diabatic nature of compressing air. When you compress it, you generate a huge amount of heat that's hard to use and slows down the filling process (since the pressures are higher than normal, which will be problematic for the service station idea)

      From what I've seen the filling station compresses air into a big tank, you connect your tank to theirs and the air is transferred to your car very quickly with no heat problems (the air was pre-compressed, remember...). Maybe the garage can use the heat for something useful like compressing more air. On the plus side the car gets free aircon (a good thing in India!). Maybe future cars could use the cold air to compress more air in a cycle and get more efficiency.

      --
      No sig today...
    15. Re:Nothing about the range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem with all these compressed air vehicles is the diabatic nature of compressing air. When you compress it, you generate a huge amount of heat that's hard to use and slows down the filling process (since the pressures are higher than normal, which will be problematic for the service station idea), but when you expand it (for power) you need to re-heat the air or else your efficiency goes way down since super-cold air doesn't have much volume. That's why they immerse SCUBA tanks in water while filling.

      No, they immerse diving cylinders (SCUBA tanks) to absorb energy from the resulting explosion should one of them rupture while filling. These cylinders hold pressures of 3,000 to 4,000 psi. This is substantially more than a home air compressor at around 125 psi.

      -PADI certified open water diver

  11. Air battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An "air powered car" is actually an electric car with the energy stored in a a high pressure air tank as potential energy. Air pumps happen to be fairly efficient and air power impellers also, so this is a good idea if a bit range limited. Probably about the same as more common electric cars, 40 miles or less.

    One very cool thing is a solar powered pump can recharge the car to some degree as you go bringing the range to almost 40 miles and when parked it can recharge continuously.

    Another fairly cool ting is even a fairly large air tank is light, so one can exchange car volume for range in engineering. If you happen to have an air recharge station, the tank can be first filled from a holding tank and topped off with a high volume pump.

    Overall a better than average idea and no EOL pollution of note like batteries.

    Wouldn't it be better to just have a small diesel?

    JJ

    1. Re:Air battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be better to just have a small diesel?

      Yes.

  12. more than 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if I own 2 then I have a pair of Tata's?

  13. Oh, so it sucks by udachny · · Score: 1

    The tank holds about 175 liters of compressed air that can be filled at special stations or by activating the on-board electric motor to suck air in from the outside. Costing about $10,000, this car could beat out most smart cars from the market.

    - so if this needs 'special stations', why does it have an on-board electric motor at all? Don't make this car suck twice, first with the on-board electrical engine and the second time with the price-tag ($10,000 for the Indian market?)

  14. Thermodynamics and outdoor temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this car has been in and out of the news for some years now what I wonder is about the thermodynamic efficiency against outdoor temperatures. Does power drop when it gets cold, as in freezing temperatures?

    1. Re:Thermodynamics and outdoor temperature by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      How much of India has freezing temperaturs? Delhi is in the northern part of India, and its lowest recorded temperature ever was -0.6 C/30.9 F

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhi#Climate

      Calcutta and Mumbai are warmer:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcutta#Climate
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumbai#Climate

  15. Very strange by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your search - airpod site:tata.com - did not match any documents.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Very strange by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

      should try tatamotors.com, but still not airpod, but close http://www.tatamotors.com/media/press-releases.php?id=750

      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    2. Re:Very strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be written in Punjab or something?

  16. $10,000 by OldSport · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hindi for "far more money than 95% of the population will see in their lifetime".

  17. Running on fumes! by ewg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Neat, a car that can run on fumes--indefinitely!

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  18. Battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like an alternative to a battery, with many of the advatages and disadvantages. How about a comparison...range, cost, safety?

    1. Re:Battery by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The reason you can't buy Tata vehicles outside of India is because they don't pass the required safety standards of other countries. Airbags, ABS, side/frontal impact... The ones that can be bought are usually imported and registered as motorcycles.

  19. You'd think they'd learn from the Segway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who designed this thing? A joystick for control? Seriously...

    Engineers really need to start realizing that aesthetic (among other thigs) design is very important to the success of a product. No matter how revolutionary.

    People were talking about how Segway was going to be the biggest thing since the internet. What happened to it? Only mall cops are seen riding them.

    Nobody wants to ride something that makes them look completely ridiculous and this vehicle just looks stupid.

    1. Re:You'd think they'd learn from the Segway... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I think a bigger problem for the Segway was that it's a solution in search of a problem. It's too slow to use on the roads, and its size makes it less maneuverable than walking on the sidewalk (and no faster assuming there's pedestrians present) while also being unable to handle curbs, stairs, etc. Essentially it's a slow, highly maneuverable electric scooter at an exorbitant price - it really only makes sense for people like mall cops, warehouse workers, etc that have to travel large cumulative distances over perfectly flat terrain.

      As a people-mover I think something like the Solowheel is in a better position to catch on, especially if they brought the price down. Though it does have a learning curve not present on the Segway, it also has the advantage of being easy to carry which makes it far more stair, bus, etc. friendly.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:You'd think they'd learn from the Segway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Segways are really popular with parking enforcement officers that would otherwise be walking all day. I forget what the figure was, but they end up covering a much larger distance and can see over crowds when they need to.

      But for the general population, I'm not sure what the point is.

  20. Even "dirty" electricity can be a win ... by perpenso · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem is that electricity (or petrol) has to be used to compress the air. And 65% of the electricity in India is generated by burning coal or natural gas.

    To be fair you need to consider the energy used to refine and deliver the gasoline/diesel, and any emissions in the process.

    One nice thing about electricity is that even when "dirty" sources are used for generation the emissions are centralized so that there is more opportunity for capture and sequestration.

    1. Re:Even "dirty" electricity can be a win ... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Nice try but I would bet what comes out of the tailpipe of a car is cleaner than a coal plant emissions. You can't even kill yourself with a car anymore.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Even "dirty" electricity can be a win ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Nice try but I would bet what comes out of the tailpipe of a car is cleaner than a coal plant emissions. You can't even kill yourself with a car anymore.

      Did you read the post or just the subject line? At the coal fired electrical generation plant the pollution is centralized in one industrial location. There is more opportunity for filtering, capture, sequestration, etc.

    3. Re:Even "dirty" electricity can be a win ... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Who cares about opportunity? The fact is the car is cleaner now, and until there is a real effort to sequester Co2 it seems pretty ridiculous to make engineering decisions based on this.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    4. Re:Even "dirty" electricity can be a win ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Who cares about opportunity? The fact is the car is cleaner now, and until there is a real effort to sequester Co2 it seems pretty ridiculous to make engineering decisions based on this.

      Did you miss the original post where someone mentioned the need to build additional power generation plants to support the new demand? The poster pointed out these new plants will probably be coal fired. So the opportunity to introduce filtering, capture, sequestration is quite relevant. Also making engineering decisions before building such new plants would seem quite relevant.

  21. Not zero emissions, not even close by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    These are not zero emissions, not even close. They burn petroleum, coal, use nuclear or something else to compress the air. The air is merely a storage medium for the energy. This is all a marketing lie.

    1. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not zero emissions, not even close. They burn petroleum, coal, use nuclear or something else to compress the air. The air is merely a storage medium for the energy. This is all a marketing lie.

      So, if they use solar, wind and hydroelectric power, then it's zero emissions. Depending on your perspective, nuclear is also close to zero emissions.

      So, what the hell is your point exactly?

    2. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Depends how you look at it - as with electric the car itself is zero emission, where you get the energy originally is a separate question. And if you get the energy from nuclear or renewable sources then the "total system" is in fact zero-emission as well. Even if the source is fossil fuels, a single centralized power plant can be operated far more cleanly and efficiently than thousands of ICEs, though you have to factor in energy transfer efficiency as well in that case.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the original statement. The compressed air in the pressure cylinders is acting exactly like any other storage medium, such as the charge on a battery. Compressed air is a storage medium, and the energy used to compress it comes from somewhere else. I agree than centralized generation plants run more efficiently than an internal combustion engine. However to claim “Zero” emission is an outright lie. All you are really doing is moving the tail pipe from the car to the electricity plant which is probably burning coal. Sure, *IF* you ran the thing on solar it would be emission free. Dare I say it I’m not “Holding my breath” to wait for that to happen.

    4. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all a marketing lie.

      This is like ethanol, an indirect fuel and thus inherently not effective or efficient. But compressed air does allow us to centralize the creation of pollution: Which would make eliminating air pollution an option (haha, haha, haha). Building some nuclear/thorium reactors will reduce air pollution and global warming. And a large scale nuclear industry, which has been in decline for 40 years, means building better technology to neutralizes the waste created, at a cost-effective price.

    5. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's differing types of pollution- and cleanly and efficiently is debatable as well.

      Keep deluding yourself. Cadmium and the like (which have to be stripped from the emissions of Coal plants for example...) is certainly more clean than CO and CO2 and way less polluting...NOT.

      Until everyone can get something approximating a clean nuke plant, this is actually LESS clean than the cars- you're just doing the it's clean where I am game.

    6. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by asylumx · · Score: 1

      All you are really doing is moving the tail pipe from the car to the electricity plant which is probably burning coal.

      The same electricity plants that are powering the refineries that are used to refine oil to gas so that your car can then burn it, and also the same electricity plants that are powering the gas pumps at the (also powered) gas station? Not to mention, your car itself also burning those refined fossil fuels...?

    7. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      "compressed air does allow us to centralize the creation of pollution: Which would make eliminating air pollution an option"

      No, sadly what they'll do is then move the air pollution out of the cities and dump it in the rural areas. This is what urbanites have been doing for millennia. It doesn't make them green. It just means their shitting in someone else's home. The dumping of garbage from cities in distant landfills is an example. The high smokestacks they use to send their pollution up, up and away where it falls down on us as acid rain is an example. Just moving the pollution is not zero emissions.

      "So, if they use solar, wind and hydroelectric power, then it's zero emissions. Depending on your perspective, nuclear is also close to zero emissions."

      " if you get the energy from nuclear or renewable sources then the "total system" is in fact zero-emission as well."

      No, that is a fallacy. The inflatable Tatas are in and of themselves not necessarily zero emissions. The source of compression must be considered. If they achieve that compression through, for example, wind energy, then that would be far better than fossil fuels which produces immediate pollution or nuclear which produces long term pollution issues. Even renewables though have effects on the environment and culture. Do you want the wind tower or nuclear power station or refinery right next to your house? Seems most people don't. Yet they want to take advantage of the resource created. This idea that moving the pollution or production away from your home makes it okay is a deceit.

    8. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      If by "lie" you mean "nice central place to put the anti-pollution equipment, rather than having every single passenger vehicle dragging it around with them", then yes, you are exactly right.

    9. Re:Not zero emissions, not even close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not zero emissions, not even close. They burn petroleum, coal, use nuclear or something else to compress the air. The air is merely a storage medium for the energy. This is all a marketing lie.

      Or solar. Or wind. I don't think it will be marketable - air power tech has been around since before 1900, and I know of no recent reasons it would suddenly become more economical, but you could build this 0 emissions.

  22. It's Tata by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    How are they going to make it spontaneously combust?

    1. Re:It's Tata by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Use compressed hydrogen?

  23. You thought running out of oil was a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until we run out of air.

  24. A couple of interesting points by el_flynn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some details on the specifications, range etc of the Airpod can be found here, but some of the stats are in French.

    Also, Tata originally signed the agreement in 2007. Five year old news?

    Lastly, from the MDI website about the Airpod: This latest version of AirPod... [has] a base consisting of a composite sandwich of fiberglass and polyurethane... [and a] a cast aluminium frame. More details from that link.

    --
    The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
  25. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by PerlHeadJax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bart Simpson: I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.

    Appropriately, from the episode "Screaming Yellow Honkers".

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Quote by darkstar019 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking on the lines of a perpetual fart cart

      --
      Fuck Beta
  26. There's this car, and it runs on WATER, man! by ehintz · · Score: 1

    The government doesn't want you to know about it. It runs on WATER, man!

    --
    ehintz
  27. Same comment 12 years later! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Omigosh it is the same guy! Amazing. And the people in that thread need to be alerted that Natalie Portman has had a baby.

    1. Re:Same comment 12 years later! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      I forgot how few comments got modded up way back when. Maybe Slashdot needs to cut back on the mod points they're giving out.

  28. For that market... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Tata Intends To Sell Air-Powered Car In India

    Those would do better in Mexico; for India you want one that'll run on body od... oh, that kind of air! :p

    (I'd better issue a disclaimer for those who would likely perceive my humor as nothing more than a blatantly disrespectful use of a worn-out cultural stereotype: I absolutely love Indian food and I could eat it all day long... and there certainly shouldn't be any shame in acknowledging that some of those spices are known for adding a certain quality to one's fragrance!).

    1. Re:For that market... by fferreres · · Score: 1

      Mexican food is high on black and brown beans, and these require bacteria to break the sugar. But Mexico City is a Valley (pollution stays there longer) and very poluted, and with huge traffic problems, so an air car would be a god send for air quality (as electricity is produced elsewhere).

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    2. Re:For that market... by fferreres · · Score: 1

      Also, average salary in Mexico is closer to $10,000 and in India $1,000. Kind of different while you may consider Mexico "like India" the moment you reread what I wrote should make you reconsider.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  29. Zero emissions by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Ya, by the CAR, but what about where you are getting the air?

    I suppose it would work in a small town commute, but i think id rather have a battery powered car instead.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Zero emissions by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      if the tanks can be made reasonably crash safe, manufacturing a pressure vessel would be much more sustainable than chemical batteries

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  30. Its Megamaid, Sir by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

    '... Shes gone all the way from Suck to Blow!'

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXOAc5yt218

    I find more and more often Slashdot technology emulates Spaceballs.

    --
    Do Something! They're getting all their air back!

  31. I have one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have a car that sucks.

  32. Water power by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If you have a large enough supply of moving water, you could build turbines and tie them directly to the compressors. Or i guess even wind turbines, or a bunch of people on a treadmill :)

    Even if you used electricity, you can generate that cleanly and not require coal or NG. Sure, clean is not as efficient, but just saying that they are not your ONLY option.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Water power by WolphFang · · Score: 1

      Stroms... not compressors!

      --
      leather-dog muksihs
      Blog: @muksihs
    2. Re:Water power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you CANNOT generate electricity cleanly. What do you think generates the electricity? How are your hydroelectric turbines made? How are they maintained? How does the power company bill you for the power you use? Do they have offices/computers?

  33. Manufacturer site by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    What makes me most skeptical is that there is no mention of this vehicle on the Tata web site. If they are making it one would expect it to be on their web site.

  34. SOCK PUPPET ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    the user udachny is a sock puppet of roman_mir.

  35. This car is sort of a deathtrap by FreakerSFX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airpod

    Let's assume that Wikipedia is accurate here...

    220kg of Poly-urethane and fiberglass - even with the range they claim (which is good) this vehicle will never be viable outside of 3rd world markets. It's never going to pass a safety test because it's a deathtrap. Still it may find a niche market and I am a fan of non-petroleum concepts.

    --
    This sig contains a manual self-destruct. Kindly please put your foot through your monitor in 8 seconds.
    1. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, for the Indian market -- I'm wondering how they're going to make that thing run an A/C.

    2. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by bussdriver · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I do not know if the old tanks were fiberglass ones it was sooo long ago when I looked into it - way before this new airpod "car" I never heard of that. I thought they'd get the cat car out the door by now.... Every few years it seems they started over again with a smaller car until this pod thing.

      Cheap tanks will do more harm when they blow - but we are STILL talking about a non-combustion non-flammable situation and relatively LOW potential energy. This is not a tank full of a chemical reaction waiting to happen; it is merely a pressure differential. Hauling a propane tank in your car is more dangerous (or having a propane converted car.)

      The MDI CAR (the wagon-like 1st car) was a deathtrap of compact car design; the tanks were not the issue, the car was GLUED together and they always had a loud engine problem. They likely will include a small fuel tank as a heater because you can get more from the air by heating it going into the engine.

      In 3rd world places without any laws of the roads I think car safety is probably not your biggest worry. If your tanks blow air toward the other driver you might become like the porcupine of the road.

      Actually I thought the technology was well suited for small boats where electrics are not so great of an idea. The noise in the water would help too, and air exhaust could be creatively used.

    3. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by ImSoConfused · · Score: 0

      population control my friend

    4. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      There's deathtraps and then deathtraps. Something that would be lethal going 60 mph on a highway could realistically never have the opportunity for a high speed collision if it is used on crowded streets. Depends on your market and conditions.

    5. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tell the deathtrap thing to 110s of 1000s of Indians going to work on motorbikes and mopeds on highways in traffic.

    6. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      That particular model would never be practical in India. It's too low to the ground and would get stuck everywhere. The roads in India are of questionable quality.

    7. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      My 2006 Toyota Corolla was hit on the highway this May by a semi, with me inside. Airbags didn't deploy, but I walked away from the incident without a scratch (well, some bruises). This would never happen in the Tata - you'd be a goner for sure.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    8. Re:This car is sort of a deathtrap by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      Fun fact, when you let out compressed gas, the canister gets cool. It's actually a design problem for compressed air engines. It wouldn't work so well in cold moist places. You need to keep the engine and fuel tank decently warm to avoid everything icing up.

      So, it's A/C is naturally built into the design.

  36. Indian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make me a goat curry and shove a pipe up my ass, I'll bet I can get that car to go 100KM/day easily.

  37. Sued by Apple by lophophore · · Score: 4, Funny

    They are so getting sued by Apple...

    They can't call it air* or *pod. Oh no.

    "One Billyon Dollars"

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:Sued by Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an insightful and original comment.

    2. Re:Sued by Apple by bakes · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's nothing. The real problem they have is with the round corners on the bumpers.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    3. Re:Sued by Apple by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I believe you meant to say "innovative".

  38. NOT Pollution Free by ATestR · · Score: 1

    The power to run those air compressors has to come from some place.

    --
    âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
  39. Not these clowns again... by NonFerrousBueller · · Score: 2

    Well, someone's been trolled. MDI is linked to IndraNet here in New Zealand, and these buffoons have been scamming investors for years by bringing out the Next Big Thing every couple of years. Mesh Networks, the nGen Engine (try to figure out how it works!), and air cars. Vapour central. As far as I know, they have never actually made a product or earned a dime, but that hasn't kept them from spewing PR crap and soliciting suc.. - I mean, investors. Run. Away.

  40. Zero Emissions? by ihop0 · · Score: 1

    Whoever has invented a perpetual motion air compressor has a Nobel in Physics coming their way soon.

    1. Re:Zero Emissions? by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Why do people assume that any car that requires power to run must also cause emissions? We already have many counterexamples: fission, hydro, solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, biomass...

      (granted, India may be unlikely to adopt those power sources anytime soon, but that's hardly the car's fault)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Zero Emissions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (granted, India may be unlikely to adopt those power sources anytime soon, but that's hardly the car's fault)

      From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_India#Generation:

      Indian Power Generation:
      Thermal (Coal/Gas): 57% of installed capacity, 65% of generation
      Hydroelectric: 21.53% of generation
      Nuclear: 3.75% of generation
      Renewable (mainly wind): 12% of generation

      Yes - the totals don't add up, but it's a complex calculation. However, having over 37% from non-fossil fuels is impressive.

  41. Again? by Grudge2012 · · Score: 1
    http://science.slashdot.org/story/07/03/19/2128249/the-air-car-nears-completion

    "According to an article on Gizmag, Tata, India's largest automotive manufacturer, has developed a car that runs on compressed air. It costs less than $3 USD to fill a tank on which it can run for 200 to 300km. The car will cost about USD $7,300 and has a top speed of 68mph. About once every 50,000 km you have to change the oil (1 liter of vegetable oil). Initial plans are to produce 3,000 cars per year."

  42. Demo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe i missed it but the last i heard an air powered car could barely run for a block or two. I'll need a demo of this car before I believe it.

  43. Overestimation... by bayankaran · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only about 20% of the Indian population is of anywhere near middle class status.

    The situation varies from state to state - in my state Kerala you can conclude 70% is middle class and Kerala population is on a long term decline (like Japan), health and development indexes are comparable to European nations etc.

    The situation is the opposite in rural Bihar and other big northern states.

    But the 20% officially middle class is a huge number - little less than the population of United States. Still if marketers and consultants conclude they are going to buy plastic crap from China in huge numbers they will be disappointed.

    Western corporations regularly make an entry to India. The first mistake they make - overprice their products and Indian competition kills them on a price point. The second mistake they make is in overestimating the consumption patterns and excess inventory gets piled up - example: original Reebok and NIke shoes end up sold on the footpath.

    But I have a fascination for the management and MBAs running these organizations. They are so clueless the errors they make are laughably stupid. Compared to them George Bush was a genius.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  44. Ugly by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    Why does every environmentally friendly car have to look like ass? Is there some reason they can't put a decent looking frame on it? This one is especially bad, reminding me of Steve Urkel's car (which, as you might remember, was intentionally ugly and cramped - that was the joke), but you also have a slew of hybrid cars that look like flamboyant space ships. If you want normal people to buy them, they have to look decent. It's gotten to the point that I actually think it might be a play by "big oil" to keep everyone using gas guzzlers until we've drained every drop of fossil fuel from the planet.

  45. Aircars are Last Place as Primary Movers by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While the use of a pneumatic air system to recover energy from braking for use in subsequent starts does have some merit in a hybrid configuration, the idea of a vehicle powered completely by compressed air has been very thoroughly discredited in the published research papers. Yes, it can be done but it's terribly inefficient; almost no other vehicle is less efficient than compressed air, even battery powered vehicles are better. The wiki article on compressed air cars has a comprehensive list of their rather substantial disadvantages. Really the only situations where air cars are even considered are those where sparks or burning of fuels make both internal combustion and electric too dangerous and where their limited range and power are not substantial disadvantages. As one might imagine, these circumstances occur rarely and only in specialized situations (most notably in underground coal mines). Bottom line: air cars are simply not competitive as general purpose vehicles and basically never will be due to the laws of thermodynamics and ideal gas among others. Those who buy an air car without understanding these things are likely to be very disappointed with their vehicle's performance. I predict many angry Indian air car owners complaining about how they were ripped off and lied to by the green marketeers who said whatever it took to make the sale.

    1. Re:Aircars are Last Place as Primary Movers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bottom line is you used a wikipedia reference for truth which invalidates ur entire claim.

    2. Re:Aircars are Last Place as Primary Movers by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      bottom line is you used a wikipedia reference for truth which invalidates ur entire claim.

      Well then, perhaps you'd be kind enough to take them all one-by-one and explain why they're not actually disadvantages? While you're at it, perhaps you can also debunk the research paper of the Berkley scientists, cited in note 13 of the article, which concluded that

      "Even under highly optimistic assumptions the compressed-air car is significantly less efficient than a battery electric vehicle and produces more greenhouse gas emissions than a conventional gas-powered car with a coal intensive power mix."

      Of course, they also suggested, as I did, that such a system when used as a secondary system in a hybrid car which was powered primarily by something else, probably either fossil fuel or electric, might make sense.

      a pneumatic–combustion hybrid is technologically feasible, inexpensive and could eventually compete with hybrid electric vehicles.

      HOWEVER, that is most definitely NOT what's being discussed in TFA linked in the summary. The car in that article is based upon work originally done by a French firm, Motor Development International, which has since been acquired by Tata. The vehicle is NOT a hybrid, it runs entirely on compressed air which brings into play all of the known disadvantages and inefficiencies of compressed air vehicles which are numerous and very unlikely to be outweighed by the potential advantages in most everyday circumstances.

      Now, a gasoline powered vehicle with a regenerative braking system that compresses air to be released later during the initial acceleration from stop to moving has been built into a concept truck by Ford some years back. The main drawback was that the truck sounded like a very loud jackhammer moving away from each stop. Obviously that's not acceptable in a vehicle designed for everyday use out in public. Another problem was the complexity and maintenance requirements of that pneumatic system which were too high to be feasible in a production car.

  46. Air powered cars are no big deal by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    Google "rubber powered airplanes" if you want to be really impressed!

  47. Is Tata announcing this? by Animats · · Score: 1

    Is Tata (a major company) announcing this, or is it that nut in France saying that Tata is announcing this?

    If this idea actually worked, it would be in wide use for indoor forklifts.

    1. Re:Is Tata announcing this? by les+lazar · · Score: 1

      The last forklift I used ran on compressed gas. Actually compressed "natural" gas. It must have been especially green. ;-D

  48. Airpod = Fancy rickshaw by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

    If your country has a rickshaw[1], it can have the airpod.

    Both have similar cons; noisy death traps[2] with limited speed, range and capacity. Yet if somehow the rickshaws are in business, they the air car can make sense too[*]. Infact I would actually prefer a rickshaw that runs on air, since it wouldn't pollute everywhere it went!

    If Tata will have any sense, the first thing they will do is strip that car of it's european body and crap that system into a typical indian rickshaw, and market it (and price it!) as *that*. Fuel points will prop up on their own (no really, where there is an opportunity to earn or save a rupee, there are a bazillion of us South Asians willing to take advantage of it).

    [*]: That's assuming the achievable speed range and capacity are at least 80% of those advertised in the video, I wouldn't blame them for *some* exaggeration in quoting the maximum achievable range, but it should at least match the autorickshaw, which already has modest specs. Also, we don't fear high pressure gas tanks, we routinely ride those around here in the form of CNG car tanks (albeit at 200 bar, IIRC) so it's match made in heaven as far as I am concerned. :P

    [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto_rickshaw

    [2]: Just look at them:
    http://images.google.com/search?num=10&hl=en&site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=679&q=auto+rickshaw&oq=auto+rickshaw&gs_l=img.3..0l10.2380.8441.0.9500.13.9.0.4.4.0.277.1480.4j1j4.9.0...0.0...1ac.MVX6QrmUXGA

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  49. 2007 by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    This was talked about in 2007 - http://www.citeman.com/1499-air-fuelled-car.html

    5 years down the line, they are still talking about it.

  50. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No 3D printing angle? How about private space orbital factories to build these? Perfectly reasonable.

  51. Does this defy the laws of physics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What powers the electric air compressor that can refill the car... compressed air?

  52. Practicality by TechMouse · · Score: 1

    They are going to have to massively increase the ground clearance on that for Indian cities.

  53. On a larger scale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Fireless Locomotive" was used in heavy industrial applications where the dangers of external ignition sources made it essential to provide motive power that wouldn't cause catastrophic explosions or pollution. Fireless locomotives were typically found in petrochemical plants and places where finely divided dusts were handled, or where the emissions of conventional steam locomotives might contaminate product or have to operate in enclosed spaces.

    As the mechanisms moved at slow speed, cylinder icing problems found in small high speed compressed air motors (various posts above) were not a concern.

  54. It's a scam. by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

    Energy Density MJ/Kg
    Gasoline 46.5
    Dried Cow Dung 15
    Compressed Air @ 300Bar (4410 PSI) 0.5

  55. The disadvantages. by leuk_he · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wikipedia already has a nice article about compressed air cars:

    -It is safe.
    -Exhaust from car is zero. Electricity for compressor can be made efficient.

    Disadvantage:
    -compressed air is a low energy storage compared to other.
    -Long storage times, you will need a compressor at home and load it for 4 hours or something like that.
    -Needs heat to expand air. Might run very inefficient in cold climate. (on the plus: free airco!)

    A hybrid compressed air car might be a very good option however. Notice that a traditional combustion engine is a good compressor. Maybe tata is even creating a hybrid, they licensed the tech (see wikipedia again).

    1. Re:The disadvantages. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Disadvantage:
      -compressed air is a low energy storage compared to other.
      -Long storage times, you will need a compressor at home and load it for 4 hours or something like that.
      -Needs heat to expand air. Might run very inefficient in cold climate. (on the plus: free airco!)

      Low energy storage is real, and a real drawback. It's shared with EVs, though, which have long storage times. Air cars do not have a long storage time, the appeal of the tech as opposed to EVs is that they recharge very quickly. You have a tank at home and it fills up when you're not looking (whenever energy is available/cheap.) Windmill-based storage stations out and about can fill themselves (with a tank in their center) when the wind blows and provide rapid refills. MDI even proposed using the technology on barges which could be stationed in a current.

      Does need heat to expand air, but the air is at very high pressure. Most people live where it will work, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The disadvantages. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Well, You do not "need" heat. But the expanding air results in a temperature drop. To keep the engine efficient you need to get that temperature from somewhere.

      A air-oil hybrid solution (tata licensed it from MDI) is an ideal solution.

      Rappid refills, no , you need big refill tanks or loose a lot of power when refilling.

    3. Re:The disadvantages. by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Where do you think you'd be refilling one of these things? If it's at a station I would expect them to keep large tanks on hand that they keep constantly filling from large compressors. If at home, which is a big benefit over most current cars, you'd just plug it in and let it's compressor run. The recharge at home would be slow, but still better than no recharging at home. At a station it would be fast to refill.

    4. Re:The disadvantages. by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      I scanned the wiki link. Doesn't seem to answer the grandparent (and my) question of "Cost per mile?"
      .

      I mean, there are really just 2 numbers that matter for a given car: (1) capital cost, (2) cost per mile. Why doesn't the summary, or wiki, answer the second?

      --
      I come here for the love
    5. Re:The disadvantages. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Neiter does it tell the cost per mile for The traditional car. Conclusion: wikipedia is utterly useless...

    6. Re:The disadvantages. by justthinkit · · Score: 1
      I am not sure why I am feeding the troll but...
      .

      Your link is to "car", as in any one of thousands. Such a general link would never list a specific mpg/cost per mile figure. Therefore your "reply" is useless.

      This story, on the other hand, is about a specific car, the Tata. Posting MPG (or MPG equivalent) for cars is the norm these days. I see countless ads on TV that list the MPG in massive letters. Anyone trying to promote a car will naturally talk about the MPG (or some other feature) in order to try to sell the car. Here such information is massively missing, making this entire thread pretty much content free, and a troll's paradise.

      --
      I come here for the love
    7. Re:The disadvantages. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Rappid refills, no , you need big refill tanks or loose a lot of power when refilling.

      I've been following this technology since MDI introduced it, and you are 100% wrong. This is a core benefit of the technology. If you can't be bothered to go read through MDI's materials on this subject, perhaps you should avoid leaving comments on it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Have you visited India? autorickshaw replacement by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Have you visited urban India? Lots of short taxi journeys are made in petrol driven autorickshaws: there are thousands of these around, you hop onto them at the train station for a ride a couple of miles away to meet your friend in a cafe. City planners have been struggling with the pollution they kick out. My suspicion is that Tata is targetting these as the vehicles to replace.

    Another posted has noted 137 miles range - how often do people take 100 mile taxi rides in cities? I think Tata is looking to get the massive and probably lucrative urban local taxi niche with these, sell them to city planners as pollution free (on the street level), clean air in cities. Most passengers are looking for ten to fifteen minute rides a few miles across town in the central areas. Set up refueling stations around all the main stations and transport hubs and you've got the taxi drivers covered: they can do ten to twenty runs then refill a couple of times a day. I can't comment on the practicalities you mention on how you operationalise a compressed air filling station - but Tata is a huge global multinational engineering company, so I'd guess if anybody can they could put resources/PhDs/finance into solving the problem.

  57. On-board electric motor by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    So really it's an electric car that inefficiently converts electric energy into air pressure before usage. That's nice.

  58. Unlimited fuel by Vladius · · Score: 1

    All they have to do is find a way to hook it up to the US Congress. That's an unlimited supply of hot air just waiting to be tapped.

  59. The Cars Are Not Air Powered by assertation · · Score: 1

    These cars are not air powered. The tanks of compressed air that drive the cars are really just batteries.....aka devices for storing energy. The air in the tanks, like the hydrogen in hydrogen powered cars, is not an energy source. The energy stored in the tanks of compressed air comes from the energy used to power the air compressing machines.

  60. Excited. by assertation · · Score: 1

    I've seen a few documentaries on youtube about cars powered by compressed air batteries. I'm disappointed that these cars are not coming to the U.S., but I am excited for the people in India who will be getting them.

  61. Waste Energy by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    What is done with all of the waste heat that is generated when the air is compressed?

  62. Emissions free? Not hardly... by sjbe · · Score: 2

    With virtually zero emissions...

    Bull. Compressing air requires power and lots of it. The emissions might not be coming from the car itself but there will be plenty of emissions. Plus this still has the infrastructure network problem. Even if the drive technology is feasible (and I have my doubts on that) you still need a sufficiently large network of pumping stations to make using the vehicles feasible. It can be done but I doubt it will be.

  63. No way to eliminate fossil fuels yet by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Why do people assume that any car that requires power to run must also cause emissions?

    Because they do. Outside of a few corner cases, virtually all power consumption uses at least some amount of fossil fuels and hence creates some emissions. Hopefully someday that will change but for now that is the reality we live in.

    We already have many counterexamples: fission, hydro, solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, biomass..

    None of which are sufficient to cover our energy consumption at present. Furthermore even in cases where those technologies operate emissions free, the manufacture of them is not emissions free. Use any steel? There is no such thing as an emissions free steel plant. Aluminum? Copper? Rubber? All those components generate emissions during manufacture. There is no present way to construct a solar panel in mass quantities without generating emissions in the process. In time it might become possible but right now it is not.

  64. the mileage numbers are a lie by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    The best air-powered card in the world can get something like 20 miles to a tank. If this one is claiming it's 100+, it's lying. That means running the onboard compressor a lot. That means horrible fuel to movement ratios because of one added layer between engine and moving. They're going to be loud, fuel guzzling pieces of crap.

    1. Re:the mileage numbers are a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They generally get 4 to 7 miles on a tank of air. Even in a best case scenario with batteries and compresser pushing it along the last 90+ miles this would indeed be a lie. The huge and dangerous high pressure tanks and batteries would take up all the cargo space.

  65. I knew the day would come.... by trancemission · · Score: 1

    I would probably buy one, and I live in the US. It would depend on how much it costs to run the pump and get a full tank.

    Wow - they have found a way to charge for air! [Yes I know it costs to get the air in the tank and compress it etc...]

    1. Re:I knew the day would come.... by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Somebody found a way to make a hell of a lot of money charging for drinking water...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    2. Re:I knew the day would come.... by trancemission · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that also astounds me ;)

  66. NOT virtually zero emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How retarded do you have to be, to think that this is "virtually zero emissions"? Seriously? Has the author been to school? Learnt some basics?

  67. good vs sharks by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    Well, it does offer more options for killing a giant shark than my internal combustion engine.

  68. Sucking Air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It gives a new meaning to the phrase... "That car sucks!"

  69. Technically... by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    All cars with perhaps the exception of an all electric car run on "air".

    Try running a car without air and see what happens. "But no, a car uses Petrol for fuel!" Actually a car uses more air for fuel than Petrol. A car uses combustion (for the most part) to generate kenetic energy, and your ain't going to get a whole lot of combustion without air.

    Yes I am just being pedantic, and if I bothered to read the article I realize they are probably talking about compressed air or something.

    Make it steam and huge flywheels to satisfy my steampunk craving and you have a deal!

  70. So we'll soon say... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 2

    Look at those nice tatas!

  71. Replace the canister? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    Would it be possible to treat this like the propane tanks people use for outdoor grills and such? Then the issues of refill time and heat during the refill become non-issues for the users. Swap out the empty tank for a full one.

    They would be a heck of a lot easier to fill in central locations and distribute to existing markets so that you don't have the "100 miles from a special station" problem. That would increase the practical usage of the vehicle.

    Obviously this doesn't address the problems with air powered cars but by taking the complicated problem of refilling out of the equation it could make manufacturers more interested in research.

  72. The nerd I am. by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Immediately remembered about Tata Motors.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  73. The inevitable next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, if this works, there's going to be a fart-powered car, one way or another.

    Possibly as a gag, possibly from those "co2 producing cows" that are causing global warming.

  74. Perfect. Now this query... by MossStan · · Score: 1

    ...is it an engineering rule that ecological cars must be butt ugly?

    --
    It is what it is.
  75. And In Unrealated Other News Today by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Tata Motors has filed a cliam with the S.E.C. that it will be buy several thousand shares of the franchise, "Green Burrito", ticker symbol BAD-GAS. Most analyist agree that Green Burrito is an "under the counter" stock.

  76. Just a lot of hot air? by zapyon · · Score: 1

    Let's wait and see.

    --
    I like my spaghetti with source.
  77. What a load of...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hot air!

  78. Really?!?!? by YourMom'sLover · · Score: 1

    Bark! Obama could power this thing forever, if it indeed ran off of hot air...

  79. air car ... a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an engineer i can tell you. you wont be driving one. its more efficient to use gasoline. using electricity to to run a car (or elec to compress air) uses more fossil fuels because you have to generate electricity in the first place. india however is using ALOT of nuclear power

  80. Car for the Amish! by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Of all the 364 comments loaded so far*, I am very surprised no one noticed this is a perfectly within religious bounds car for the Amish. Shunning electricity and internal combustion, they DO subscribe to compressed air appliances. Also shunning the internet, someone near their community should "walk" up and tell them.

    Also considering their locality names like "Bird in Hand" and "Intercourse" in Pennsylvania, a company name like Tata's should fit right in!

    * (Did a control-find for the word "Amish" so far.)

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  81. so you can motorboat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at tata motors?