Slashdot Mirror


Russia's Former KGB Invests In Political Propaganda Spambots

An anonymous reader writes "The newspaper Kommersant reports that the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (formerly part of the KGB) has invested 30 million roubles (USD $940,000) on 'blog and social network intelligence' programs (Google translation of Russian original). A small part of that money is used for surveillance and analytics, but 22 million roubles (USD $690,000) is invested in 'mass distribution of messages in social networks with a view to the formation of public opinion.' Which presumably can be rephrased as 'launching massive pro-Kremlin astroturfing propaganda spambots in order to stifle and undermine political dissent.' The brazen Russian government acknowledgement of this investment indicates that the Kremlin does not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical. No words whether these spambots would respect any anti-spam laws or the Terms and Conditions of victim websites. But hey, now you can accuse anyone you disagree with online of being a 'KGB bot'!"

164 comments

  1. Heading back to the bad old days by bmo · · Score: 2

    So who is going to be the first one to restart Kremvax?

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Heading back to the bad old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i wanna make sweet love to ya

    2. Re:Heading back to the bad old days by stox · · Score: 2

      and nsacray.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    3. Re:Heading back to the bad old days by bmo · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you say that to all the boys.

      --
      BMO

  2. just like the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    just like the US.

    1. Re:just like the US by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the US government spends vastly more money on this kind of thing. $940K is barely even a rounding error in the federal propaganda budget.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:just like the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha

    3. Re:just like the US by Burz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, the US government spends vastly more money on this kind of thing. $940K is barely even a rounding error in the federal propaganda budget.

      -jcr

      Indeed, and we're brazen about it, too.

      The difference I see is that Russian news doesn't blatantly lead into news stories with comments like, "The same government that corralled natives away from most of the country and then conducted germ warfare against them...". Or, "The ex-Opium War aggressor today is making news with...". At least not since the USSR.

      Americans and other native anglophones of all stripes love them some Russophobia (which is why I'll probably be modded down), and they'll find opportunities to serve it up with just about anything. The only way that Russian characters ever seem to be redeemed on US television shows is if they have emigrated to an anglophone country, or are trying to do so. A Russian who wants to stay a Russian national (or to belong to another non-English speaking country) is portrayed as a villain -- every single time I have viewed.

    4. Re:just like the US by freudigst · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Burz:

      There is plenty of kudos to be had for putting down Russia nowadays. One gets the most points if he riles up the cowboys in the Congress with such paranoid blather.

    5. Re:just like the US by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      No, the US government spends vastly more money on this kind of thing. $940K is barely even a rounding error in the federal propaganda budget.

      -jcr

      Indeed, and we're brazen about it, too.

      The difference I see is that Russian news doesn't blatantly lead into news stories with comments like, "The same government that corralled natives away from most of the country and then conducted germ warfare against them...". Or, "The ex-Opium War aggressor today is making news with...". At least not since the USSR.

      Americans and other native anglophones of all stripes love them some Russophobia (which is why I'll probably be modded down), and they'll find opportunities to serve it up with just about anything. The only way that Russian characters ever seem to be redeemed on US television shows is if they have emigrated to an anglophone country, or are trying to do so. A Russian who wants to stay a Russian national (or to belong to another non-English speaking country) is portrayed as a villain -- every single time I have viewed.

      Agreed, but I wish to remind you that there are still Nazi supporters out there, as well. Their party isn't doing too well with offin' the Jews or anything.
       
      Given time, this guy in the limelight will get ignored, blocked, and eventually silenced by "Populace, The Destructor."
       
      :)

    6. Re:just like the US by mrex · · Score: 1

      What surprises me isn't the criticism/phobia of Russia. Russia is a kind of scary, totalitarian place run by mafias who are run by the FSB.

      What surprises me is that we seem to have forgotten that we can't criticize and be afraid of Russia for doing exactly the same shit we do, only on a smaller scale than we do it on.

      If Russia is evil for doing this, and we do this, then ___________.

    7. Re:just like the US by RDW · · Score: 1

      No, the US government spends vastly more money on this kind of thing. $940K is barely even a rounding error in the federal propaganda budget.

      To be fair, this does buy you some pretty sophisticated technology. 'An anonymous reader' is clearly a CIA bot, but this story reads almost like a human posted it ('But hey' is a nice touch).

    8. Re:just like the US by SolitaryMan · · Score: 0

      What amazes me is how fucking effective they are with such a small budget. You can't read a single political forum/discussion without running in to a bunch of "paid per comment" people.

      In reality, though, I think that this budget is way higher. They just don't call it "propaganda budget" they call it, say "patriotic education" or "political education". If they want to be more subtle, its some social plant-a-tree kind of program, which when you show up turns out to be some political shit. It is literally every-fucking-where.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    9. Re:just like the US by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      You can't read a single political forum/discussion without running in to a bunch of "paid per comment" people.

      What you are seeing is not necessarily paid comments. Many Russians do indeed like their current government. Every time there is an election in Russia and observers claim discrepancies, all you have to do is pay attention to exit polls, which pretty much confirm that votes are not being changed behind the scenes and people do like Putin and his party.

      You also have to remember than the most vocal ones are people from few big cities in Russia (i.e. Moscow and St. Petersburg) and they do not represent majority of Russians who live in rural areas. We have similar situation here in US - people on TV do not always represent opinions of majority.

    10. Re:just like the US by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      What you are seeing is not necessarily paid comments. Many Russians do indeed like their current government. Every time there is an election in Russia and observers claim discrepancies, all you have to do is pay attention to exit polls, which pretty much confirm that votes are not being changed behind the scenes and people do like Putin and his party.

      You also have to remember than the most vocal ones are people from few big cities in Russia (i.e. Moscow and St. Petersburg) and they do not represent majority of Russians who live in rural areas. We have similar situation here in US - people on TV do not always represent opinions of majority.

      Yeah, this are definitely a lot of government supporters also, but after you spend some time on either one of those forums (I mostly read news and related discussions) you start seeing the difference between genuine passionate supporters and people just doing their job. Like, they are always first to post, sometimes with a ridiculous time gap (like seconds) between story post and comment, their comments are shallow and predictable for the most part, they troll too hard trying to get a bunch of responses and thus burying all other comments deeper in the discussion. This kind of stuff. Then you see that other people noticing too and make comments pointing this out.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    11. Re:just like the US by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      A Russian who wants to stay a Russian national (or to belong to another non-English speaking country) is portrayed as a villain -- every single time I have viewed.

      What continues to amaze me, is that American movie directors hire REAL Russian actors so rarely. It doesn't matter if the character is a villain or not, if he can't even speak his "native" language properly.

      Your post made me wonder if they do it on purpose, so that even Russian language would wound stupid, ugly and gibberish.

  3. Obligatory Yakov... by beaverdownunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Putin's Russia, Twitter Updates You...

    1. Re:Obligatory Yakov... by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps...but I also think that...

      In Putin's Russia, Spam eats you.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Obligatory Yakov... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Spam's Russia, .....
       
      I got nothin'.

  4. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    much less than the USA spends, then?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In men/hours no. Workforce is cheaper in Russia. Russians are not the first to use forums, usenet groups. Israel is doing it for decades. The difference is Russians are trying to automate it. There are ways to counter that. Like timing/patterns/similarities analysis of different sources combined. It should be easier that manually posted comments.

  5. The US has an AI tht does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    So, before all the US folk get all holier than thou, the US uses a strong AI for this purpose. It doesn't just give quick replies, but in-depth analysis and opinion, including breaking down opposition arguments.

    It silences critics and those that reveal classified information by attempting to make it sound implausible.

    Oh, and its a multi-billion dollar project.

    1. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Funny

      I must strongly disagree. In my analysis, strong AI doesn't exist outside of science fiction novellas, and thus furthermore and therefore is a ridiculous accusation to make. I urge you my dear and wonderful readers, to ignore the implausible and outlandish statements made by the anonymous coward in the parent comment. Every nuance of his or her preposterous claims only further their own inherent absurdity.

    2. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by bmo · · Score: 4, Funny

      the US uses a strong AI

      Only for the voices in your head.

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what a Russian spambot would say. A human would have said it better.

    4. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Woosh.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    5. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Woosh!

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    6. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's called "Reason," and it was written by Gordon Way. We've read that one.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    7. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      I must strongly disagree. In my analysis, strong AI doesn't exist outside of science fiction novellas, and thus furthermore and therefore is a ridiculous accusation to make.

      Your analysis is based on faulty conclusions not supported by neurology, and fails to take into consideration the ridiculousness of our own chauvinism when it comes to matters of sentience. The bar to pass beyond which a neural network is classified as sentient is merely an arbitrary distinction, possible only because we lack descent communication capacity with the lesser minds. Every such entity has a measure of awareness, and cognition. My cat does not operate merely on conditioned response, it senses decides and acts: I sense hunger. The food is inside, so I decide to be near it. I will meow loudly until my human servant opens the door, as I've trained it to do. We have achieved a neural network of such complexity, but we just haven't given it enough time to learn and think.

      I urge you my dear and wonderful readers, to ignore the implausible and outlandish statements made by the anonymous coward in the parent comment. Every nuance of his or her preposterous claims only further their own inherent absurdity.

      The above sentence is proof positive that the government's AI research is much further along than IBM's. Also, since much of the organic brain is not dedicated to cognition, instead it's dedicated to unrelated things like breathing or feelings, or pleasure, short vs long term storage, and redundancy, an artificial brain can become sentient using only a fraction of the neurons a human has -- In fact, I know of one case where a sentient human could exist with only HALF a brain!

      Also note that the entire political arena operates primarily by AI. That's why politicians talk so much without saying anything: They're only Artificially Intelligent.

    8. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't

      I though AI never use contractions.

    9. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      “The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance-it is the illusion of knowledge.”-Daniel Boorstin

    10. Re:The US has an AI tht does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (and prove-yourself words too!)

  6. They're amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This mr. Anonymous Reader does not have a clue. With the military budget of the US, they could do:
    - http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2011/11/04/the-cia-is-watching-us-intelligence-teams-monitor-5-million-tweets-every-day/
    - http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=2229
    - http://mashable.com/2012/05/23/fbi-spy-on-skype/
    - http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks
    etc

    If the FBI and CIA could do it for a lousy 1 million dollar, they'd chosen for this option too. This indicates the CIA and FBI do not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical, but that they are inefficient.

    1. Re:They're amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the FBI and CIA could do it for a lousy 1 million dollar, they'd chosen for this option too. This indicates the CIA and FBI do not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical, but that they are inefficient.

      You ignore the potential of thousands of Russian hackers working in forced labor camps - the subsistence cost is much lower, this is why KGB can and FBI/CIA cannot.

    2. Re:They're amateurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any evidence?

  7. KGB, in 2012? by yeltski · · Score: 3

    Seriously? It's been more than 20 years, how long does it take for you Americans to move on from your Cold War Hollywood production induced knowledge base of the world? Next, you'll find out that CIA spends millions on recruitment and *gasp* pro-WhiteHouse astroturfing propaganda in order to stifle and undermine political dissent.

    1. Re:KGB, in 2012? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      "yeltski" - could you be any more obvious that you're a KGB spambot?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:KGB, in 2012? by yeltski · · Score: 1

      Yes, I could, if I didn't use the name of the first president of Russia, who abolished KGB.

    3. Re:KGB, in 2012? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who said Russian spam bots don't have a sense of humor?

    4. Re:KGB, in 2012? by azalin · · Score: 2

      I'm looking forward to the Obama-Romney bot war because it might be an actual improvement on the quality of the average statement.

    5. Re:KGB, in 2012? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      "Yes, I could, if I didn't use the name of the first president of Russia, who renamed KGB."
      FTFY

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:KGB, in 2012? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Precisely! The KGB broke up in 1991, and its replacement organizations for Russia is the FSB (domestic) and SVR (foreign espionage). The FSB was the organization that poisoned Alexander Litvinenko. The SVR is apparently what's being described here.

      Currently, Belarus' intelligence agency is still called the KGB. South Ossetia, which broke away from Georgia in the 1990s, too has that name for its intelligence agency. But that's no longer the name for either of Russia's intelligence agencies, even if the personnel that staff them may be the same.

    7. Re:KGB, in 2012? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, it was disbanded and replaced by 2 different agencies - FSB and SVR. I don't doubt that a some of their staff is unchanged, but I'd imagine that a lot of non-Russian officers would have moved back to their countries - personnel from Ukraine, Uzbekistan, et al.

    8. Re:KGB, in 2012? by GCsoftware · · Score: 2

      Belarus too, where the org is still called KGB. Gotta love the Belarussian regime, it has some balls.

    9. Re:KGB, in 2012? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is neither first, nor last time KGB changed its name (Cheka, NKVD, MGB, KGB, FSB, etc).

      Without any real change, either in personal, or in way it works. If any, last change was to worse (before it was controlled by Communist Party, now it controls government).

      FSB (domestic) ... poisoned Alexander Litvinenko So, London is now part of Russian Federation? This "split" is total bullshit (and was mostly reverted very soon after that).

    10. Re:KGB, in 2012? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Yup Belarus is standing at the windows of the world giving it the ol' pressed ham and yelling "perestroika this!*".

      I don't know whether to rage or admire.

      ----
      *I'm sure this is grammatically incorrect, as well as wrong on many other levels. I'm OK with this.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:KGB, in 2012? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was here

  8. Link to original story? by methamorph · · Score: 3, Informative

    So instead of a link to the original story we get a link to Google translate?

    1. Re:Link to original story? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

      It cracks me up that you're the first person to even notice that.

    2. Re:Link to original story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Link to original story? by methamorph · · Score: 1

      Yes that seems to be it. Thanx.

    4. Re:Link to original story? by ACS+Solver · · Score: 5, Informative

      Link to story: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2009256

      Interesting moments are as follows. There are three projects for which software has been requested. One is for "researching the methods of intelligence in Internet centers and regional segments of social networks", another is for "researching the unofficial methods of management on the Internet", and finally work on "methods for advancing special information in social networks". So essentially, it's figuring out how to make certain information popular on social networks, and figuring out the dynamics and largely emergent social structures within these networks. These are designed to work together, ultimately with the bots capable of "massive dissemination of information in specified social networks using existing user accounts, with the goal of forming the public opinion".

      Given that the SVR is behind this, it's likely that the intent, at least originally, is to use this abroad, not within Russia. The article says so and quotes a source saying ex-USSR countries would be the first target. That bit certainly looks realistic given the geopolitical situation there, with Russia essentially being in a state of low-key information warfare versus some former Soviet states.

    5. Re:Link to original story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why should anyone act surprised? serious submissions of stories about real privacy and security issues are quietly killed, anything pro-freedom pro-open source is attacked by M$ shills, the people who say they've used linux since they were a fetus but they switched to and love M$ Wind0ws.. the list goes on and on.. /. has become /fail. Great comments by users, lame articles or articles already published elsewhere last week, month, year, or longer!

      i wonder how much money they took from M$ to eliminate the borg logo and give it a more professional look to the articles.

    6. Re:Link to original story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any other sites I should check out as well as this nice one?

    7. Re:Link to original story? by udachny · · Score: 2

      Here is that silly article from Kommersant.

      After reading it I don't think it should be taken seriously (it's not your NSA or CIA, Russia doesn't have the kind of people right now that would take a project like this seriously and not just steal the money).

      My quick translation:

      Kommersant's sources say that the intelligence agency started a number of programs, with code names 'Storm-12', 'Monitor-3' and 'Dispute' back in January-February of 2012. The idea is to create following programs:

      1. To investigate methods of intelligence gathering from Internet providers and data centres and social networks (code name 'Dispute' at 4.41 million rubles).

      2. To investigate methods of 'silent management within the Internet' (code name 'Monitor' at 4.99 million rubles).

      3. To conduct a scientific type of research in order to develop 'means of pushing special information within social networks' - this means astroturfing (code name 'Storm-12' at 22.8 million rubles).

      The three projects are interdependent, the plan is to monitor the Internet and social networks with the 'Dispute' system, which is supposed to 'research processes of social network formation and information dissemination within them' as well as 'establishing the factors that are responsible for the increasing influence and dissemination of information', basically trying to figure out why some information becomes more popular, how do things go viral as opposed to other things (I suggest they start by analysing LOLCAT videos for that).

      Once the information is collected it is supposed to be analysed by 'Monitor-3', which is responsible for 'developing the methods of organisation and management of the Internet virtual social networks by using experts, setting tasks, controlling the work of social media, regularly collecting information from the experts in their respective fields'. (Actually this part doesn't read well in Russian and translating something that is written so poorly and ambiguously in one language into another is not easy. This is part of the reason, except for the minuscule funds, why I wouldn't take this program seriously.)

      Lastly, 'Storm-12' is then supposed to introduce managed information into the social networks based on the collected data. Its task is described very poorly and grammatically ambiguously as the following: 'development of special programming system of automated dissemination of information within large social networks. Organisation of information support structures into predefined scenarios in order to have a desired affect upon the mass audience of social networks.' The purpose of this 'virtual military' is described as 'mass dissemination of information messages within the (monitored) social networks, with existing user accounts, in order to shape public opinion. Aggregation of statistics and analysis of effectiveness of management of public opinion. Analysis of usefulness of the most popular social services as vectors of initialisation of information waves for directing the public opinion about various matters'.

      Kommersan'ts sources say that in order to make the programs secret, the government passed the following bills: N1116-36 on 23 of December, 2011.

      Supposedly the systems 'Monitor-3' and 'Dispute' will be ready in 2012 and 'Storm-12' will be ready in 2013'.

      --------

      and so on and so forth. I can tell you this much: this entire story reads like a bad spy thriller, it's just not plausible.

      It is IMPOSSIBLE to do anything for that amount of money in Russia, with that much money they won't even be able to set up a server room, never mind paying the right people the right amounts of money to do any of this work. This is complete nonsense.

      I am not saying that Russia is not doing something like this, in fact by

    8. Re:Link to original story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many Russian opposition websites use western TLDs and are hosted on western servers. This makes them harder for Russia to censor. But now SVR can turn around and claim these websites to be "foreign" and attack them on that ground. It fits well within Russia's current censorship framework, which can be boiled down to, "everyone not supporting the government is an anti-Russian foreign agent sponsored by the US".

    9. Re:Link to original story? by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      That is completely against the Russian approach, which is fairly direct in style. If the opposition figures running those sites reside in Russia, then the regular Russian police and FSB will be dealing with them - arrests, searches, the usual deal, like you can see with the recent treatment of opposition figures. Skipping an opportunity to go after the authors while using SVR to disturb the sites with propaganda doesn't really fit into the modus operandi of the Russian authorities.

    10. Re:Link to original story? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      No, it's just easier to track CIA funding that goes to those "dissidents" through "international" "non-governmental" organizations.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  9. USA has the upper hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't do that, if the US has patented this:
    http://www.buzzfeed.com/mhastings/congressmen-seek-to-lift-propaganda-ban

    Posted from my Kremlin spambotpad

  10. Introducing the Yakov Entendre by neoshroom · · Score: 4, Funny

    In America, Facebook shares tank. In Russia, tank shares Facebook.
    __

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
    1. Re:Introducing the Yakov Entendre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :D

  11. Spamming Propaganda by Dangerous_Minds · · Score: 0

    Isn't this sorta like what's going on in the US with the Tea Party?

    --
    Daily read for tech news: Freezenet.ca
    1. Re:Spamming Propaganda by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Isn't this sorta like what's going on in the US with the Tea Party?

      Naaah... the Tea Party is maintained by private initiative astroturfers - there's nothing better for efficiency than the free market... or so they say.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  12. About time by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    that they caught up to the US but they still need to pay hordes of astroturfers to equalize the playing field.
    Hey Putin, how about Gazprom runs its own political propaganda organization? You could call it a "Think tank."

    1. Re:About time by azalin · · Score: 1

      I guess both the Russians and the US have been thinking tanks for quite a long time.

  13. Soviet tradtions by cold+fjord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It appears that the Russians are working to restore and update the Russian nee Soviet state's ability to conduct political warfare, which was quite powerful. Some of the lies they spread have yet to die down. Since the Russian state seems to heading back towards Soviet methods and attitudes, everyone should be concerned.

    Soviets Sponsor Spread of AIDS Disinformation

    A Soviet political warfare manual comments on 'socialist education'

    Soviet methods did not spare their allies.

    A Portrait of Stalin: Secret Police

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Soviet tradtions by yeltski · · Score: 1

      Oh okey. And the only time no one should be concerned is when Russia doesn't want to assert any of it's interests, pays reparations, gives everyone resources for free and decreases it's population to zero. That would still probably not get you to stop spamming this capitalist propaganda crap.

    2. Re:Soviet tradtions by jpapon · · Score: 1

      WASHINGTON — In October 1985, the influential Soviet weekly Literaturnaya Gazeta (Literary Gazette) published an article alleging that the U.S. government had engineered the AIDS virus during biological warfare research. The story further claimed that the virus was being spread throughout the world by U.S. servicemen who had been used as guinea pigs for the experiments.

      That's "capitalist propaganda"?

      So you're saying that the US government intentionally released the HIV virus into the wild? That's quite an assertion.

      Do you have any proof of this claim? Because if you do, you could bring to light the most depraved act since the Holocaust.

      Oh, what's that? You don't? The "capitalist propaganda" is just an article writing about some disinformation spread by the Soviets? Too bad.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    3. Re:Soviet tradtions by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Easy there, comrade, you are becoming overheated! Just wander over to the samovar and enjoy. If you want to be a defender of Moscow, that is fine. But, if you wish to fight a sacred war, make sure you do it for a good cause.

      During Brezhnev's time a Soviet officer teaching cadets made the point that all of the organs of control and oppression under Stalin still existed, but that no one had the strength of will to grasp and use them as Stalin did. If enough people fight the wrong battles, they may find their new Stalin with the will to once more grasp the reigns. And that would be an enormous tragedy, given past experience. Enjoy your freedoms, while you have them, for it may not always be so. If you want to fight for the establishment of a dictatorship of the proletariat, you should understand that revolutions eat their own, and you will not be safe no matter which party faction you are in.

      Do not confuse the label of propaganda as necessarily being the same as untrue.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Soviet tradtions by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Soviet tradtions by jpapon · · Score: 1
      I take issue with that Harvard article blaming Communism for the atrocities of Stalin and Mao.

      Do we condemn Democracy for the extermination of the Native Americans, slavery, apartheid, the atrocities committed by the British in India and China, and so on?

      No, we don't. We blame the people who committed the actions.

      Condemning Communism because of the actions of Stalin or Mao is simply ignorant.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    6. Re:Soviet tradtions by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

      Condemning Communism because of the actions of Stalin or Mao is simply ignorant.

      My dear, you are an ignorant cretin when saying these cretinous words. Both Stain and Mao *applied* the Communist doctrine and in doing so they sent tens of millions to their graves. The actions of Stalin and Mao were undoubtedly a direct consequence of their Communist policies.

      When you're too brainwashed to accept facts, please stop commenting on them on the Internet, you're wasting precious bandwidth.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    7. Re:Soviet tradtions by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Um, do you have any idea what Communism even means or have you attended an American school all your life? No one has ever applied Communism because Communism is literally a stateless and classless society. The Soviet Union was in no way Communist, it had a authoritarian state and a ruling class after all, but it served their interests (keeping power) to call themselves such and it served the interests of the US to call them that (to demonize anyone who would oppose the capitalist elite as sympathizing with the "enemy").

    8. Re:Soviet tradtions by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Both Stain and Mao *applied* the Communist doctrine and in doing so they sent tens of millions to their graves.

      No they didn't. They applied their own doctrines that were practically completely unrelated to Communism.

      You could just as easily say Hitler was applying Democratic policies. He was, after all, appointed Chancellor by a democratically elected President.

      See how crazy that sounds? That's exactly how crazy you sound when you say Mao or Stalin were actually applying Communist principles. They weren't. They were dictators.

      The only governments that have come close to being Communist were the 1872 Paris Commune and the Spanish anarchists during the Spanish civil war.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    9. Re:Soviet tradtions by yeltski · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that the US government intentionally released the HIV virus into the wild? That's quite an assertion.

      Yeah, that's quite an assertion, because that is your straw-man and not what I'm saying. The Washington Post article is propaganda because it uses something true to create a false story to rally against USSR. There are a ton of off-the-wall opinion ed columns published in all newspapers, doesn't mean anything. Unless you make a bunch of scary questions about your straw-man for the rest of your post.

    10. Re:Soviet tradtions by yeltski · · Score: 1

      If you want to fight for the establishment of a dictatorship of the proletariat, you should understand that revolutions eat their own, and you will not be safe [harvard.edu] no matter which party faction you are in.

      There is no other way, Trotsky, a psychopath with ambitions unmatched with Soviet potential, was "eaten" by a pragmatist in the face of Stalin. Same thing happened after French revolution. Revolutions don't eat their own, revolutionaries with destructive tendencies are discarded by constructive elements.

      Do not confuse the label of propaganda as necessarily being the same as untrue.

      Any decent propaganda is factual truth presented in suitable context of choice.

    11. Re:Soviet tradtions by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Soviets Sponsor Spread of AIDS Disinformation

      A Soviet political warfare manual comments on 'socialist education'

      Soviet methods did not spare their allies.

      A Portrait of Stalin: Secret Police

      Add to this: Protocols of the Elders of Zion:

      The Protocols is a fabricated document purporting to be factual. It was originally produced in Russia between 1897 and 1903, possibly by Pyotr Ivanovich Rachkovsky, head of the Paris office of the Russian Secret Police, and unknown others.[2][3]

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    12. Re:Soviet tradtions by jpapon · · Score: 1
      What's the false story? That the USSR is the source of the rumor that the US government created HIV? That's not false.

      There are a ton of off-the-wall opinion ed columns published in all newspapers, doesn't mean anything.

      It does when your media is controlled by the state, as was the case in the USSR.

      Anyways, that article reads as an opinion piece AGAINST propaganda. Specifically, against disinformation concerning the origin and spread of HIV.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    13. Re:Soviet tradtions by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

      Hitler applied National-Socialims. Stalin and Mao applied Communism. Stop bullshiting us about the Commune of Paris and (LOL!) the Anarchists in Spain. Really, doens't strike you as strange the idea that the Anarchists of Spain would apply Communism instead of Anarchisms?

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    14. Re:Soviet tradtions by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Condemning Communism because of the actions of Stalin or Mao is simply ignorant.

      My dear, you are an ignorant cretin when saying these cretinous words. Both Stain and Mao *applied* the Communist doctrine and in doing so they sent tens of millions to their graves. The actions of Stalin and Mao were undoubtedly a direct consequence of their Communist policies.

      When you're too brainwashed to accept facts, please stop commenting on them on the Internet, you're wasting precious bandwidth.

      I have absolutely nothing against any effort to shout down idiocy like this -- by former KGB or anyone else. US propaganda filled up all forms of media to the point of saturation, mostly in the form of the idiots (like one quoted above) repeating other idiots' statements without understanding their origin, creating a veneer of legitimacy for blatantly baseless propaganda talking points.

      After all, it's less work (and less aggravation) for me.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    15. Re:Soviet tradtions by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Protocols were a product of Russian Imperial propaganda, there were no Soviets back then.

    16. Re:Soviet tradtions by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Go back to your cave and read a book for once, maybe then you can construct a coherent argument and not just spout a bunch of ignorant rhetoric.
      FYI:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Commune
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_in_Spain
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Civil_War
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

    17. Re:Soviet tradtions by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Really, doens't strike you as strange the idea that the Anarchists of Spain would apply Communism instead of Anarchisms?

      You clearly don't know your history. Communism and Anarchism originated in the same movement. They resulted from a rift in the Socialist movement after the Paris Commune.

      Hitler applied National-Socialims. Stalin and Mao applied Communism.

      Hitler applied fascism, which he learned from the Italians and Mussolini. Fascism is a form of authoritarian government which seeks to promote unity and central authority by appealing to Nationalism. Calling it National Socialism was very much a misnomer, and was more of a trick than anything else to give people the idea that it was a government for the people.

      Saying the Nazi party was Socialist is like saying the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is Democratic. It's not. It's just a name used to fool people who don't know enough about ideology or history. People like you.

      Stalin and Mao were also not Communist - they were dictators practicing a brutal authoritarian form of government.

      I don't know where you learned your history, but you need to do some reading. Don't let others tell you what to think - do some investigation.

      Then again, I think you're just trolling me. I have a hard time believing that anyone can actually think that Hitler was a Socialist.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    18. Re:Soviet tradtions by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      The Protocols is a fabricated document purporting to be factual. It was originally produced in Russia between 1897 and 1903, possibly by Pyotr Ivanovich Rachkovsky, head of the Paris office of the Russian Secret Police, and unknown others.[2][3]

      ...a-a-a-and this "book" was highly admired by Henry Ford, the American Icon and Nazi supporter. What a funny world we live in, don't we?

  14. In Soviet Facebook... by humanrev · · Score: 1

    KGB Bot un-friends you!

    --
    Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    1. Re:In Soviet Facebook... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      KGB Bot un-friends you!

      Hardly. KGB Bot is everyone's friend, for no one has anything to hide from the KGB Bot, and no one would want to miss having KGB Bots messages on their wall, unless they're traitors. You're not a traitor, now are you?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  15. DON'T PANIC by vld · · Score: 1

    All this money will be stolen. I swear.

  16. How many govs do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    At least the russians are transparent about it. How many governments do it in the shadow?
    Argentina government since a couple of years ago is known to infiltrate twitter and facebook with thousands of fake virtual accounts that supports (spanish) the current government. They also have an army of people actively checking internet and posting in forums, they discovered them by correlation with working hours (nobody post after 6 pm, nicks are auto-generated using a known algorithm and stuff like that)
    I bet they use a software package for this purposes. Didn't Palantir offered something like this?

    1. Re:How many govs do it? by schwit1 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:How many govs do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just to make this clear: It's irrelevant, *who* is the current president. It just happens to currently be a guy named "Obama". (A minor update of the previous guy named "Bush".) Whose job it is, to draw in all the hate, so everybody is distracted from the real enemy. A decorative talking head.

      The statement here is, that the ones controlling the government (through lobbies) are currently doing it. (In this case, mostly the military/NSA, which, after all, are the ones filtering and condensing all that information that the government gets... with a very wrong bias.)

  17. Yet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia Today, the state-owned media organization, is one of the best sources for national and international news that all the American news networks won't cover.
    If they want to propagate this via bots, I personally don't have a problem with it. They aren't afraid to embarrass the US, and I think we need to be embarrassed if we are going to change.

  18. KGB, FSB and "Terms of Service"? Surely you Jest? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    The notion that the FSB, the successor in interest to the KGB, would have any qualms whatsoever about ignoring the "Terms of Service" of an American or European website is laughable. These are people who kill as a matter of doing business, so the fact that their spam bots violate US or European laws doesn't concern them, even in the slightest. The only reason to suggest otherwise is to make an ironic joke.

  19. Propaganda? I call it advertisement. by prefec2 · · Score: 2

    So the Russian secret service does the same shit companies do. they want to bend public opinion in their direction. However, normally (as in Western countries) governments do not need to do that, because the media is on their side (or to be more precise the government is on the side of the media). So the move in Russia indicates, that the mass population moves away from classic media as their source of information towards other platforms and therefore they have to control those too. So in short. They control the media (as like in a dictatorship) and now this Internet thing causes disruption. So they try to control it too.

    What shall I say? I am not surprised. I am only surprised that it came out. But, I guess that does not hurt the endeavor.

  20. Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    indicates that the Kremlin does not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical

     
    I have to confess that I did feel a little bit queasy reading what Timothy has posted
     
    This world that we live in today, where "paid reviews", "forum astroturfing", "blog spamming" and "rabid fanboyism" are been actively encouraged and sponsored by for profit corporations such as Microsoft, Adobe, Apple Inc., - mainly from the Western democracies - any effort in linking Russia to similar "illegal" and/or "unethical" activities is futile
     
    It was the West who have fine-tuned activities such as being described in TFA to an art-form, in the first place
     

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by beerbear · · Score: 5, Funny

      That sounds like something a KGB bot would say!

      --
      Hold my beer and watch this!
    2. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by cbraescu1 · · Score: 2

      This world that we live in today, where "paid reviews", "forum astroturfing", "blog spamming" and "rabid fanboyism" are been actively encouraged and sponsored by for profit corporations such as Microsoft, Adobe, Apple Inc., - mainly from the Western democracies - any effort in linking Russia to similar "illegal" and/or "unethical" activities is futile

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you're a moron.

      Is that simple.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    3. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This world that we live in today, where "paid reviews", "forum astroturfing", "blog spamming" and "rabid fanboyism" are been actively encouraged and sponsored by for profit corporations such as Microsoft, Adobe, Apple Inc., - mainly from the Western democracies - any effort in linking Russia to similar "illegal" and/or "unethical" activities is futile

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you're a moron.

      Is that simple.

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you see things as they really are and haven't drunk the corporate Kool-aid.

      FTFY

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    4. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You know what? Fuck you and your "Blame everything on the West and/or Democracy" attitude. I see you on here all the time posting similar crap, if you spent half your slashdot bitching time reading a history book you wouldn't make such moronic statements. People have been paying people to say crap that isn't strictly true for as long as we've had language and the concept of property ownership.
      People have been shilling and lying anonymously since the invention of the written word. I'm willing to bet thousands of years ago some guy painted a picture on a cave wall that showed himself defeating three bears with a fucking knife, when in reality he stumbled across a carcass while fucking the chief's daughter in the bushes.

      It was the West who have fine-tuned activities such as being described in TFA to an art-form, in the first place

      Oh really? We invented propaganda? We fine-tuned its delivery? Do you have some kind of fundamental mental problem which prevents you from knowing anything about the world prior to the 19th century? Because you sure seem to have a pretty fucking poor grasp on reality.

    5. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by trancemission · · Score: 1

      Damn I wish I had mod points, I nearly spit $BEVERAGE all over my keyboard.

      The naivety of some people astounds me sometimes - or they are a bot/shill......

    6. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know what? Fuck you and your "Blame everything on the West and/or Democracy" attitude. I see you on here all the time posting similar crap, if you spent half your slashdot bitching time reading a history book you wouldn't make such moronic statements. People have been paying people to say crap that isn't strictly true for as long as we've had language and the concept of property ownership. People have been shilling and lying anonymously since the invention of the written word. I'm willing to bet thousands of years ago some guy painted a picture on a cave wall that showed himself defeating three bears with a fucking knife, when in reality he stumbled across a carcass while fucking the chief's daughter in the bushes.

      It was the West who have fine-tuned activities such as being described in TFA to an art-form, in the first place

      Oh really? We invented propaganda? We fine-tuned its delivery? Do you have some kind of fundamental mental problem which prevents you from knowing anything about the world prior to the 19th century? Because you sure seem to have a pretty fucking poor grasp on reality.

      We have, actually. If you're interested you should read up on Walter Lippman and Edward Bernays. They were early advertising/public relations pioneers in the early 20th century. After the success that was had whipping up the public to support WWI, it was realized that public opinion could be shaped by the use of subtle propaganda. As Bernays said in his 1928 book "Propaganda",

      "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.

      We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.

      So as you can see, he was sort of a proto-technocrat. But his techniques worked to guide people into various opinions and mindsets. These techniques, more refined, are used today by just about anyone who wishes to shape the public mind, whether it be towards a particular product or a political viewpoint. In our own government Cass Sunstein, President Obama's Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, has had quite a bit to say about guiding public opinion. From his Wikipedia page:

      Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of recruiting "nongovernmental officials"; they suggest that "government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes," further warning that "too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed."[25] Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, "might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts."

      So yes, the USA has made great strides in using propaganda. Though they didn't invent it, as you point out. But I'm always glad when these types of stories come out. Because I think it's important for people to understand and realize that this stuff goes on. Most people are unaware that their opinions are not entirely their own.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      That's the spirit comrade.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... You mean like 'operation earnest voice'? http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

      You know, the Department of Defense's project to paper the internet with pro-US propaganda...

    9. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 1

      > if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you're a moron.

      Because I can always use my God-given liberty to decline to do business with Microsoft, Adobe, Apple, and so forth, but the Russian government can legitimately use force against me? That's why they have different standards of accountability, right?

      If I were Russian, that might make some sense, but I'm pretty sure the Russian government can't legitimately use force against me. Declining to do business with the entire tech world is at least theoretically possible, I'll give you that, but it's so impractical that it almost doesn't matter.

      --
      2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    10. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This world that we live in today, where "paid reviews", "forum astroturfing", "blog spamming" and "rabid fanboyism" are been actively encouraged and sponsored by for profit corporations such as Microsoft, Adobe, Apple Inc., - mainly from the Western democracies - any effort in linking Russia to similar "illegal" and/or "unethical" activities is futile

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you're a moron.

      Is that simple.

      if you can't distinguish between private businesses and a government intelligence agency then, my friend, you see things as they really are and haven't drunk the corporate Kool-aid.

      FTFY

      You really think every corporation in America is in some vast conspiracy with the government? Sounds like you are seeing things that aren't really there and we need to send you and everyone who modded out to a room with padded walls. *twirls fingers around temple* cookoo cookoo....

    11. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      Damn your witchcraft! You called GP "comrade", which automatically invalidated his whole post!

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    12. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      That's the spirit comrade.

      I have heard it said that the difference between propaganda in the USSR and the USA was that the Soviet people recognized it for what it was, while the American public did not. I think that's still largely the case when it comes to the American public.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    13. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      We all can distinguish between government and corporations. When corporations do it, often it is far, far worse. When governments do it, there is a whole layer of accountability which means, that the elected types will always end up being stabbed in the back and exposed. The reality if course the true reality is of course governments can not do most of this shit without the fully comply and collusory assistance of select corporations. Just look at all those corporation who has assisted despots in the worst schemes imaginable as long as the corporations were getting a profit. Snark - "My God Man, don't you know Corporations would kill us all if there was a profit in it", unfortunately there is not as much humour in that as there should be.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by kmoser · · Score: 1

      It's like the Godwinning of socialism.

    15. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (USA does not stop propagandating elections and democracy, and going into war for it).

    16. Re:Illegal ?? Unethical ?? by Randym · · Score: 1
      But hey, now you can accuse anyone you disagree with online of being a 'KGB bot'!

      That sounds like something a KGB bot would say!

      Great -- a new twist on Godwin's Law.

      --
      DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  21. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nukem now?

    Now? Wasn't Duke's surname actually Forever?

  22. I had a good comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...but the KGB bots modded it down.

    1. Re:I had a good comment... by azalin · · Score: 1

      ...but the KGB bots modded it down.

      Well played...

  23. Agreement, Accord & Concordance by neoshroom · · Score: 4, Funny

    In my analysis, strong AI doesn't exist outside of science fiction novellas, and thus furthermore and therefore is a ridiculous accusation to make.

    The way you write makes me want to punch you. " thus furthermore and therefore", really?

    I agree with you, yours, yourself and those who bear a yoursimilitude to you. The above poster, writer, author of the comment referred to, listed and discussed has undercut, severed and bisected his own cogent word assembly through unnecessarily, avoidable and inessential verbal repetition. And while hyperbole was the purpose, object and function of the conjunctions, and I can understand feeling frustrated, angry or annoyed, I feel that physical violence is an inappropriate, disproportional and incongruous conclusion, ceasing, cessation, close, closure, completion, consequence, culmination, desistance, ending, finale, finish, issue, outcome, result, and end.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  24. KGB vs. CIA bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a citizen of a formally independent Scandinavian country I can accuse those I disagree with as KGB bots, CIA bots and MI6 bots, also known as MI-SEX bots. There are so many bots all around. Some of them speak mostly French and have problems tolerating refugees from the Indian subcontinent.

    1. Re:KGB vs. CIA bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a citizen of a formally independent Scandinavian country I can accuse those I disagree with as KGB bots, CIA bots and MI6 bots, also known as MI-SEX bots.

      Are you suggesting that those involved in graffiti crimes are just playing Computer Games? Because if so, we've been playing since 1979.

  25. Re:KGB, FSB and "Terms of Service"? Surely you Jes by hughk · · Score: 1

    This is the SVR not the FSB. The SVR is the main organisation doing extra-territorial activities while the FSB is domestic only. The two organisations retain connections but are under different management.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  26. Common practice in US already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US government has engaged in these type of tactics for years. How is it news that the Russians are catching up?
    Maybe this will lead to a more balanced worldview on social networks. At least Russian interests are pretty straightforward. They just want to be left alone, without being surrounded by missile systems, American military bases, or counties destabilised by the rogue states of america. America needs to take a look at itself in the mirror. Today, what they will see is very ugly; a country where the is no free speech - every day we see the arrest of protesters on TV, the majority of the media is controlled by components of the corporate regime, there is effectively single party government, there is a terrible health care system (worse infant mortality rate than Cuba), the basic education system is third world, and the regime in washington is militaristic, and cracks down on all forms of dissent, as it redistributes state 'wealth' to its various cronies.

    1. Re:Common practice in US already by mumblestheclown · · Score: 0

      proof please?

      "russian interests are pretty straightforward - they just want to be left alone"

      ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS?

      - very very deep and persistent meddling in internal affairs of ukraine
      - basic control of several central asian governments
      - arms shipments via transdnistria to the worst conflicts in the world
      - undermining estonian government
      - sending russian passports to ethnic minorities in georgia to undermine the georgian government
      - cynical realpoitiki involving syria and similar places

      russia is the opposite of "just want to be left alone"

    2. Re:Common practice in US already by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS?

      see

      without being surrounded by missile systems, American military bases, or counties destabilised by the rogue states of america.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  27. Re:Oh, please by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Why not? For starters, all Soviet officials of the KGB who were from other republics - Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, et al - they would have returned to their countries after 1991, wouldn't they? Besides, after the 1991 attempted coup, the KGB was disbanded, and since in the early part of his regime, Yeltsin was busy purging the Communist Party, most KGB agents went down w/ it. It was later on, w/ Putin, that they may have staged a comeback, but fact remains that there are 2 totally separate agencies handling intelligence - the FSB and the SVR.

    If there is no 'formerly, the Communists would have returned to power.

  28. a joke by udachny · · Score: 1

    By the way, is this /. story a test of a kind? Because the link that says: "Google translation" literally leads to Google's translator page and nothing else.

    I found the silly article from Kommersant that this story is about, here it is.

    After reading it I don't think it should be taken seriously (it's not your NSA or CIA, Russia doesn't have the kind of people right now that would take a project like this seriously and not just steal the money).

    My quick translation:

    Kommersant's sources say that the intelligence agency started a number of programs, with code names 'Storm-12', 'Monitor-3' and 'Dispute' back in January-February of 2012. The idea is to create following programs:

    1. To investigate methods of intelligence gathering from Internet providers and data centres and social networks (code name 'Dispute' at 4.41 million rubles).

    2. To investigation methods of 'silent management within the Internet' (code name 'Monitor' at 4.99 million rubles).

    3. To conduct a scientific type of research in order to develop 'means of pushing special information within social networks' - this means astroturfing (code name 'Storm-12' at 22.8 million rubles).

    The three projects are interdependent, the plan is to monitor the Internet and social networks with the 'Dispute' system, which is supposed to 'research processes of social network formation and information dissemination within them' as well as 'establishing the factors that are responsible for the increasing influence and dissemination of information', basically trying to figure out why some information becomes more popular, how do things go viral as opposed to other things (I suggest they start by analysing LOLCAT videos for that).

    Once the information is collected it is supposed to be analysed by 'Monitor-3', which is responsible for 'developing the methods of organisation and management of the Internet virtual social networks by using experts, setting tasks, controlling the work of social media, regularly collecting information from the experts in their respective fields'. (Actually this part doesn't read well in Russian and translating something that is written so poorly and ambiguously in one language into another is not easy. This is part of the reason, except for the minuscule funds, why I wouldn't take this program seriously.)

    Lastly, 'Storm-12' is then supposed to introduce managed information into the social networks based on the collected data. Its task is described very poorly and grammatically ambiguously as the following: 'development of special programming system of automated dissemination of information within large social networks. Organisation of information support structures into predefined scenarios in order to have a desired affect upon the mass audience of social networks.' The purpose of this 'virtual military' is described as 'mass dissemination of information messages within the (monitored) social networks, with existing user accounts, in order to shape public opinion. Aggregation of statistics and analysis of effectiveness of management of public opinion. Analysis of usefulness of the most popular social services as vectors of initialisation of information waves for directing the public opinion about various matters'.

    Kommersan'ts sources say that in order to make the programs secret, the government passed the following bills: N1116-36 on 23 of December, 2011.

    Supposedly the systems 'Monitor-3' and 'Dispute' will be ready in 2012 and 'Storm-12' will be ready in 2013'.

    --------

    and so on and so forth. I can tell you this much: this entire story reads like a bad spy thriller, it's just not plausible.

    It is IMPOSSIBLE to do anything for that amount of money in Russia, with that much money they won't even be able to set up a server room, never mind paying the right people the right amounts of money to do any of this work. This is complete nonsense.

    I am not say

  29. Re:Oh, please by udachny · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I can't reply to you from my first account, the reason for it is very ironic given this story.

    But I didn't say that there is no Communist party in Russia (there is actually), I said this: once KGB, always KGB. Who do you think is at the helm of Russian government right now?

    Oh, and I actually found that article this /. story is supposed to link to, translated some of it and posted it here.

  30. Read this first!! Then think again. by zimtmaxl · · Score: 1

    Everyone in the free world should read the closing statements from the members of the punk band Puss Riot http://nplusonemag.com/pussy-riot-closing-statements- A fascinating insight in how the oppressive system works on individual levels.

    One defendant's psych eval identified her values as: "justice, mutual respect, humaneness, equality, and freedom."

    Those are values that I hope still define the majority of people in the free world!
    And we should NEVER forget to defend them in our societies.

    --
    how IT is changing the world - http://max.zamorsky.name
  31. boycott sochi by mumblestheclown · · Score: 0

    in case anybody has been paying attention, there have been web pages created on many themes of "boycott sochi" all of which are conveniently unconvincing poorly made messes. there are many good reasons to boycott the 2014 winter games in sochi, or at least to make a stink in this general direction, and it appears that russian elements have decided to head this off by creating scarecrow sites to prevent this from getting traction.

  32. And those plutocrats by Burz · · Score: 1

    happen to control the government along with the airwaves.

  33. So it's just giant posters of Fearless Leader. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I would like to say at least dealing in the realm of free speech was an improvment, astroturfing included, if that same government weren't also engaged in the arrest and murder of journalists and political opponents, and weren't engaged in general control of other media.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  34. Robot Dialers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After all you would /never/ find the front runners in the American political system using methods of spam to get their point across. Would you?

  35. So sort of... by santax · · Score: 1

    the same as what Apple is doing on slashdot? Let AC's and dead accounts post pro-apple bullshit in every apple-related article only for them to be silent again until the next apple-related article?

  36. Old News - CN, US, SA, IL ... by OldHawk777 · · Score: 2

    RU is late to the game, 'mass distribution of messages in social networks with a view to the formation of public opinion.'

    Sometimes I suspect MS, other businesses/lobbyist, mega-churches, and PACs, are already acting like government G2Agencies on /., Facebook, Twitter, Wired ... with automated SocialPolicyAgents (SPAgents).

    So, why argue with GIGO SPAgents? SPAgents work in the best interest of a few of the $public$.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
    1. Re:Old News - CN, US, SA, IL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to people from the NSA, we have been doing this since at least the 60s.
      In the form of newspaper/radio stories, and readers' letters. Or just going to towns and manipulating public discussion in the communities.
      And so have the Soviets.
      In fact, I doubt that there is any big government with dictatorial/totalitarian goals that *hasn't* done it in the past.

      Doesn't require computers to have propaganda spam"bots".

    2. Re:Old News - CN, US, SA, IL ... by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

      I agree, it is just a new propaganda model.

      --
      Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  37. Probably have been doing this for years by danbuter · · Score: 1

    Instead of paying $1,000 per toilet seat, they now just say what they're doing. The CIA and military agencies should take note.

  38. The west has no need for state propoganda by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The western capitalist system has no need for state propaganda. The masses are all to happy to watch, devour no worship the opinions and lifestyles of the 1% who tell them that the 1% deserve to be the top and everyone else has a chance too even if they never ever get even remotely close with their part time burger flipping job.

    What am I talking about? Media. Name ONE person in Media who makes less then 100.000 dollars per year. One TV celeb, just ONE! In many ways, Reality TV is a very risky move, showing the non-1% and allowing them to speak? Showing that work is hard and dangerous and it never gets any better? OOPS! Ah but luckily, reality stars get payed big, so soon they are the 1% too.

    Public opinion in the West is made on TV and TV makes big money for all involved. Of course they are going to be pro-big money. It is like asking Oprah on how to make it from day to day with just 2 dollars per day for food. She eats ten dollars in a single snack. She hasn't lived the live of her audience in decades.

    And she is not alone. Rappers? The ones you know ain't from the hood anymore, they live in guarded mansions and drive in armored cars.

    American propaganda is simple, it shows only the lottery winners, 1 lucky winner won 300 million! Watch and admire him and aspire to do the same. Saying tat 300 million people lost a dollar they could have spend better... that would not be such a good ad.

    Everyone who you see in America on TV, has made it. What better way to indoctrinate the American Dream.

    But hey, why believe me, I am posting on the blogsite of poster boys of the American Dream. After all, they made it, so so could you. Right? It couldn't possibly be that the 1% by definition will always be the 1%? Nah, that is commy thinking. Everyone can be the 1% if they just work hard.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:The west has no need for state propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, 100K a yr isn't the 1%.

    2. Re:The west has no need for state propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need eh? Someone out to tell DOD to shutdown operation earnest voice then..
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

    3. Re:The west has no need for state propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it, you are food?

    4. Re:The west has no need for state propoganda by trawg · · Score: 1

      The western capitalist system has no need for state propaganda.

      Actually, in Australian, political spamming is basically except from our spam legislation. See the ACMA (the body here that is responsible for handling spam complaints):

      Electronic messages from certain sources are exempted from the Spam Act. These include messages from:

              government bodies
              registered political parties
              charities
              religious organisations
              educational institutions (sent to current and former students and their households).

      We had an incident here a couple years ago where one of our prime ministers paid his son's IT company to send spam on his behalf.

      It is not really widely done - I think people are too scared of becoming labeled as jerk spammers as happened to Howard - but the fact that they've left these loopholes in the legislation is a little irritating.

  39. Star Trek by neoshroom · · Score: 2

    I thought AI never use contractions.

    No, that's just Star Trek. You have to take Star Trek with a grain of salt. I mean, it's a fictional world where somehow they figured out strong AI before they figured out how to give an android a realistic skin tone and where they all run around with iPads but still use flip phones to talk to the ship.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  40. that word, it does not mean what you think it to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I can't reply to you from my first account, the reason for it is very ironic given this story [slashdot.org].

    indeed, it is ironic that someone who openly supports the suppression of the will of the people and their right to choose their own government is whining about people expressing their opinion of his writing. now you feel you are being suppressed - not much different from how you support the suppression of others' opinions. you would show no sympathy for others in your situation, why should anyone care for you in yours?

  41. Channel One by tokul · · Score: 1

    Looks like Channel One is useless for that. People stopped watching TV and turned to internet for news.

    1. Re:Channel One by bossk538 · · Score: 1

      Not in Russia; for example see: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/country_profiles/1102275.stm. Also all these Russian pop stars and ice dancing with celebrity programs shown on Channel 1 make the station hugely popular with Russians.

  42. In soviet russia by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    We spambot you!

  43. New Russian Traditions by neoshroom · · Score: 1

    It appears that the Russians are working to restore and update the Russian nee Soviet state's ability to conduct political warfare, which was quite powerful. Some of the lies they spread have yet to die down. Since the Russian state seems to heading back towards Soviet methods and attitudes, everyone should be concerned.

    Comrad, I am sure you did not mean insult motherland by your post. I give editing for free and you use it. It is better, for Russia, for you and for your family. I see them on Facebook. They look happy. Let us keep them happy together. Update as follow:

    It appears that the Russians are working to restore and update the New Russian state's ability to conduct affairs of state, which is quite powerful. Some of the stories they spread have yet to die down. Since the Russian state seems to heading forward towards New Russian methods and attitudes, everyone should be excited.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  44. SERIOUSLY!?! MOD ME UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're saying you Americans? I was superbly annoyed when I saw yet another Slashdot headline with "KGB" in it, and I knew that when I looked up, it would be timothy's extruded fecal matter. Sure enough. We aren't all this stupid. Believe me. But none of us has the balls to throw timothy or kdawson into a vat of boiling oil and move on.

    How much do you want to bet that these Slashdot editor butt pirates don't know what the OSS was?

  45. Obligatory: In Soviet Russia by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Facebook spam you

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  46. SOCK PUPPET ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the above was posted by roman_mir

    he has taken up sock puppetry in lieu of learning how to construct an argument

    mod down if possible

  47. Hey mods! MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, seriously! ^^MPU^^

    captcha: glorify

  48. the USA has been doing the same for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The brazen Russian government acknowledgement of this investment indicates that the Kremlin does not think of such activities to be in any way illegal or unethical. "

    The US is doing the same (Airforce, Navy been hiring people a few years back)

    This is from about he same time when the Gas prom run Russia attempted to buy up or buy into as many social networks as it could, this is the time when China decides to lock their people out if social networks run by foreign states

    Controlling social networks has been the game for years when it comes to form in public opinion

    This is done to peoples, groups or entire countries

    Crawl out from under that rock...

  49. Re:KGB, FSB and "Terms of Service"? Surely you Jes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't change GP's argument in the slightest, though.

  50. At least they admit it.. by Shoikana · · Score: 1

    Unlike the US and most likely other countries. There is a reason I don't pay attention to the media.

  51. MoD PaReNt Up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uppity, I say!!!!!!!!!!!

  52. -=]MODERATORS[=- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up

  53. They've got you by the balls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Memorable quotes for
    Looker (1981)
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082677/quotes

    "John Reston: Television can control public opinion more effectively than armies of secret police, because television is entirely voluntary. The American government forces our children to attend school, but nobody forces them to watch T.V. Americans of all ages *submit* to television. Television is the American ideal. Persuasion without coercion. Nobody makes us watch. Who could have predicted that a *free* people would voluntarily spend one fifth of their lives sitting in front of a *box* with pictures? Fifteen years sitting in prison is punishment. But 15 years sitting in front of a television set is entertainment. And the average American now spends more than one and a half years of his life just watching television commercials. Fifty minutes, every day of his life, watching commercials. Now, that's power."

    ##

    "The United States has it's own propaganda, but it's very effective because people don't realize that it's propaganda. And it's subtle, but it's actually a much stronger propaganda machine than the Nazis had but it's funded in a different way. With the Nazis it was funded by the government, but in the United States, it's funded by corporations and corporations they only want things to happen that will make people want to buy stuff. So whatever that is, then that is considered okay and good, but that doesn't necessarily mean it really serves people's thinking - it can stupify and make not very good things happen."
    - Crispin Glover: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000417/bio

    ##

    "It's only logical to assume that conspiracies are everywhere, because that's what people do. They conspire. If you can't get the message, get the man." - Mel Gibson (from an interview)

    ##

    "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." - William Casey, CIA Director

    ##

    George Carlin:

    "The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, they're an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. They've got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.

    But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interests. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.

    You know what they want? Obedient workers people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, they're coming for your Social Security. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this fucking place. It's a big clu

  54. subtle complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The news yesterday:
    The British were miffed that Iran had bought the world's fastest speed-boat; 2 years ago. The Brits had attempted to stop delivery at the time and now the Iranians have a flotilla of speedy gunboats. Despite the yanks losing a battle-game to such a force in 2002, they were prepared for war against Iran.

    No-one complains when the US builds a remote-killing plane and uses it on the citizens of obedient Pakistan.

  55. US continues to be much better at propaganda by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

    U.S.S.R. is long dead, while U.S.A. continues to do what it did throughout the Cold War. Protecting economic and military interests of American elites all over the world with poker face on, even at the cost of great suffering of local population. I am no fan of Soviet Empire or current mafia government of Russia, but hey, let's be honest.