Slashdot Mirror


Iranian Players Blocked From World of Warcraft Due To Trade Sanctions

cold fjord writes "Is this the end of the world . . . of Warcraft? Maybe for Iranian gamers who are undergoing a forced morale check due to tightening sanctions cutting access to their game of choice. From the article: 'Iranian players of "World of Warcraft" ... have found themselves frozen out by Blizzard Activision Inc., the American company behind the game. Iranian role playing enthusiasts have spent much of the past week peppering Blizzard's message board with complaints about how they weren't able to log on to the service — only to be told recently that U.S. law was to blame. "United States trade restrictions and economic sanction laws prohibit Blizzard from doing business with residents of certain nations, including Iran," the company said in an email sent to players last week...'" Thanks to the sanctions, they can't get refunds either.

475 comments

  1. When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember growing up during the Cold War, and being taught all the pro-U.S. propaganda: The Russian space program sucks. You don't need papers to travel in the U.S. unlike the USSR. U.S,. citizens were free to travel anywhere, unlike those poor Soviets. Only Poland cracked down on labor unions and dissedents. And so on.

    It was only after I grew up and learned to see through the bullshit that I realized that was all lies. We had been lied to just as much as the Soviets. The Russian space program is filled with firsts that American students never learned about (we only got the NASA stuff and a brief mention of Sputnik). You DAMN SURE DO need papers to travel in the U.S. (try getting pull over by a cop sometime and tell him you have no identification, driver's license, proof of insurance, and registration and just see what happens, or try coming here sometime to see if the cops accept "We don't need no papers, this is America!" in lieu of your passport/green card/visa). Polish labor unions weren't the only ones that got cracked down on in the 80's. And American are ABSOLUTELY NOT allowed to travel anywhere they wish (try joining your European friend on his vacation in Cuba sometime if you think so).

    And if you're American you are also prohibited from doing business with any country the American government doesn't like (which are usually the ones who dared overthrow one of the U.S.'s corrupt puppet regimes).

    Land of the free...not so much.

    1. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by masternerdguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Talk about a lack of perspective.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    2. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by masternerdguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely wrong statements don't need intelligent replies. We can travel anywhere, you only need "papers" if you are operating a piece of machinery called a car. If you did public transit you don't even need that. In the USSR you could be detained for moving between zones without a good reason and the completed travel papers. The OP has no idea what he is making a comparison to. USA != USSR.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    3. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      American fascists wear the velvet glove only because everybody complies. Resisters are jailed, just like over there in Russia, or any where else. Don't think those gloves won't come off, if they really feel threatened.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, here come the paranoid schizophrenics!

    5. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      That is not true actually. If the police ask for your identification and you do not provide it, they can hold you until your identity is verified to make sure you don't have any warrants issued against you.

    6. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      There are also state laws in many states requiring people to carry identification.

    7. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by masternerdguy · · Score: 0

      I recently crossed several state borders without being stopped by police for papers. So no, we are not the USSR.

      --
      To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    8. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Police can detain you for any reason for 24 hours.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    9. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by OriginHacker · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Wow talk about a completely bias comment that has nothing to do with the article. Great time to spout anti-american propaganda. Sadly, I think most people would disagree on your assessment that just because we require people to be licensed to drive motor vehicles that we're not the land of the free. That logic is kinda flawed to say the least. The Iranian Government is receiving sanctions for threatening parts of the world with destruction. We don't allow that this day and age. When gasoline/oil is so freaking cheap in Iran, there's no point in them building nuclear reactors... That's why the WORLD (not just USA, awwwww wanted to bash USA more? awwwww.....) is sanctioning Iran. They're threatening to wipe Israel off the face of this planet with any means of destruction they can get their hands on. Their own government shot and killed protesters openly in the streets. Remember the green movement? Yeah, it sucks that the Iranian people have to suffer like this... and I'm surprised that Iran even allows WoW through their national ISP that blocks pretty much everything else.... But your Anti USA comments have very little to do with the article and your bias'ness against the USA is pretty apparent. Let me guess, you live in the USA because you hate the country so much. .

    10. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Glarimore · · Score: 1

      If you're walking in a US neighborhood that a patrolling police officer thinks you look out of place in, he will stop and talk to you and he will likely demand identification. If you really want to you can try to explain to the officer why you don't need to, but you're most likely going to get into a drawn out argument with a police officer. this is how 'Merica works.

      "You don't need papers," my ass.

    11. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Here come the brainless drones!

    12. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Police can detain you for any reason for 24 hours.

      ... and strip search anyone and everyone they 'detain.'

      Nope, no police state to see here, move along Citizen...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    13. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn! Here come the paranoid schizophrenics who think anyone who doesn't agree with them is a brainless drone!

    14. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      ...until the police decide to hassle you and throw you in jail for not giving them ID. It happens. Particularly in the south to people with brown skin, but hell just the other day in Pennsylvania I had an office demand _multiple_ pieces of ID while I was walking into a restaurant.

    15. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      We had been lied to just as much as the Soviets. The Russian space program is filled with firsts that American students never learned about (we only got the NASA stuff and a brief mention of Sputnik).

      What kind of bullshit school did you GO to? I went to school in the US during the cold war, and they went over Yuri Gagarin, and while they glossed over most of the Soviet space program, they glossed over most of the American program too. Unless you think the real chain of events in the US program was Alan Shepard, then Apollo 1, then Apollo 11...

      You DAMN SURE DO need papers to travel in the U.S. (try getting pull over by a cop sometime and tell him you have no identification, driver's license, proof of insurance, and registration and just see what happens, or try coming here sometime to see if the cops accept "We don't need no papers, this is America!" in lieu of your passport/green card/visa).

      More bad education. You understand the difference between "travel" and "driving", yes? You can do one without the other. Try biking across the country, or backpacking, or hitchhiking, take a bus or train... nope. The only option is to drive yourself...

      FALSE EQUIVALENCY, HO!

    16. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by vlm · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you did public transit you don't even need that.

      TSA now "inspects" railroad passengers to prevent terrorists from hijacking a train and crashing it into a skyscraper. Most news reports about it were the usual frothing at the mouth stockholm syndrome request for them to start body cavity searches of bus passengers. Several states require if you're an adult on public land you must carry ID or you'll be charged. In practice across the entire country if you interact with any cop and have no ID it is assumed there's a warrant out for you and you'll sit in a cell until they figure out who you are via prints or... something.

      In the USSR you could be detained for moving between zones without a good reason

      In the USA we only do that to black people. As a white dude I'm free to travel, not so for my black ex-coworkers who have all kinds of stories. They're only allowed to drive on certain roads and shop in certain stores without suspicion. Admittedly I live in one of the most segregated metro areas in the country (and no, its not in the south). My cousin who went to Soweto (spelling?) township in South Africa during the apartheid years didn't feel race relations were all that different from home, but some of his fellow peace corps volunteers were pretty freaked out, so I guess it depends where you live in the USA.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    17. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does this relate at all to trade sanctions against another country? Seems to me the State Department just woke up to this and figured at was a good way to encourage Iranians to move their government towards a more open position

    18. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, the everlovin' anecdote! Ok I'll play. I was stopped more than once while walking down the street. I wasn't even crossing the city limits. Shall we keep going back and forth?

      As long as we comply we have nothing to fear. Ain't life grand? Now I will admit, nothing beats American TV, and some of the roads are billiard table smooth. Most buildings are straight and square. And the territory is some of the most beautiful on the planet. And the government appears to be more pragmatic, but please, don't try to tell me the system is any less corrupt.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nearly half of all states now require to you carry and show proof of identification whether you are driving a car or not to the police. In my state of Indiana for example up to 60 days in jail and $500 fine.

    20. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree whole heartily with your comments. There are many thousands, maybe millions, of Americans who haven't got a clue as to what is happening to their 'free' country. Best of luck to them, when the reality hits them!

    21. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The plural of anecdote is not evidence. I have never once been asked for identification other than when pulled over for speeding to verify I am licensed to drive and have insurance. If it's true that you have undergone the treatment you claim, but that is a huge outlier and not the norm.

    22. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UN Security Council agrees with these sanctions, so why does it bother you that the US enforces them?

    23. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Here come more brainless drones who believe our freedoms should be up for dicsussion, and also don't believe in physical evidence of systematic corruption. Lemme try some of that kool-aid of yours. I wanna go catatonic, just like you.

    24. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are a lot of factual problems with your statements. I'm not going to list all the Soviet space accomplishments I learned about in school, because that's likely a function of specific school one went to and how much detail on the space program one had. But let's look at your other claims.

      First of all, the US has not (until very recently in some states like Arizona) been a papers-please state, that is a state where the police can just stop you on the street and ask for your ID and other paperwork. The difference with cars is that you need a license to drive a car. Comparing that to what the USSR did is just not accurate.

      Second, it is possible to travel to Cuba and has been for over a decade, and in fact it just got easier about a year ago. http://travel.nytimes.com/2011/07/10/travel/at-long-last-legal-trips-to-cuba.html. Even in years where it has been difficult, a minimum of around 50,000 Americans traveled there has been around 50,000. Moreover, there's a very large difference between it being difficult to travel to a specific country and making it nearly impossible to travel to most of the planet. Remember the Berlin Wall at all? People were shot trying to flee as a regular occurrence. The US may do nasty things sometimes to keep people out, but they aren't threatening their own citizens to keep them in.

      None of this is to say that the US is perfect. There are serious problems with civil liberties. And in many ways they've gotten much worse in the last decade. But that doesn't mean it is at all like how things were in the Soviet Union.

    25. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by na1led · · Score: 0

      America may not have all the freedoms I'd like, but it sure as hell beats any other place on this planet!

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    26. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      That's the same reason terrorists attack civilians. So maybe suicide bombings are okay after all. Actually, depending on the target, the US government highly approves of them, and hired assassins, and all sorts of violence.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    27. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the court ruling was that they had to be arrested and sent to general population in order for the strip search to be allowed?

      Not "everyone they detain"...

    28. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driving_while_black

    29. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll raise it a level.

      What about the President's Kill list?

      What about indefinite detention by way of using the DSM against veterans who speak out politically.
      In other words, say you love Ron Paul and post that on Facebook, then you get disappeared miles away from your home and friends and committed to an asylum using a fuckin quack psychology doctor and their bible/law the DSM. A nefarious game being played here

    30. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 0

      NO! You cannot be detained in the U.S. just for not having ID. You are simply wrong.

      The U.S. also does not have any requirements for exit. Airlines will check that you have a passport so that you can get intothe country you arrive at. But the U.S. has no exit restrictions at our borders. You are free to leave.

    31. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I remember growing up during the Cold War, and being taught all the pro-U.S. propaganda: The Russian space program sucks.

      It does, or it did anyway. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_space_program#Incidents.2C_Failures.2C_and_Setbacks

    32. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Name one.

    33. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Evidence for this? Or are you just talking out of your ass. I suspect "ass".

    34. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      "Several states require if you're an adult on public land you must carry ID or you'll be charged."

      I think you need to back up this statement. Because it simply is not true.

    35. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "just because we require people to be licensed to drive motor vehicles that we're not the land of the free."

      If you don't drive and have no license,you won't vote for the next president in lots of states.

    36. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moronic. In my previous job I traveled across the southern border to Mexico on a weekly basis. I just drove on through every time; when going into Mexico I rolled down my window, talked to a MEXICAN official for all of 2 seconds, and drove on in. Coming back, yeah, you need a passport when in the past you did not, but every country requires that, especially in this day and age; every country has a right and an obligation to control and understand their borders, especially with all the cross border issues on the US Mexico border.

      You are a paranoid delusional idiot, and you have no idea what the USSR was like.

    37. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been stopped and made to produce ID for no good reason while walking down the street?

    38. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      If it's true that you have undergone the treatment you claim...

      See, there you are. Automatically dismissing out of hand any challenge to the propaganda. Eh, to be expected these days. Your 9/11 has you all cowering and on your knees.

      ...but that is a huge outlier and not the norm.

      based on what evidence, may I ask?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    39. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UN Security Council agrees with these sanctions, so why does it bother you that the US enforces them?

      I think you answered your own question. To a lot of people, the UN is just as big a boogeyman as the USSR used to be.

    40. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      America may not have all the freedoms I'd like, but it sure as hell beats any other place on this planet!

      Often quite literally!

    41. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arizona

    42. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by medv4380 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Idaho, but it requires that you're already a suspect in a crime, or that they have reasonable suspicion. If their was a reported robbery the Police do want to know that you are who you say you are. Stop and Identify laws are common but the supreme court has rulled on these kind of laws and their limits Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada

    43. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cdwiegand · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can be detained by police, if you are anywhere near (their definition) a crime. They can hold you for up to 48 hours with no explanation given, except that they want to hold you in case you committed a crime. It's sick what this country has come to.

      --
      . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
    44. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cdwiegand · · Score: 2
      --
      . Define sqrt(x) as something really evil like (x / rand()), and bury it deep. Watch your coworkers go nuts.
    45. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Mississippi.

    46. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've shown no evidence of the GP wanting our freedoms up for discussion, nor shown physical evidence of systematic corruption.

    47. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by vux984 · · Score: 1

      America may not have all the freedoms I'd like, but it sure as hell beats any other place on this planet!

      That must be why it is ranked #7 *

      Not that I think the precise rankings of any given country are indisputably correct; the important take away is that:

      a) The USA is undeniably a very good place to live on this planet.

      b) The USA does NOT "sure as hell beats any other place on this planet!" There are a number of other very good places to live on this planet; several of them arguably better than the USA.

      (* http://www.businessinsider.com/oecd-better-life-index-2011-5?op=1)

    48. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Uh... The veteran who got arrested/committed after posting on facebook was publicly making actual threats of violence.

    49. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Lucky you.. I guess I must 'fit a description'.

      The USSR is the conclusion of what the US is just starting. Slow boil. Enjoy your hot tub.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    50. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by citizenr · · Score: 1

      NO! You cannot be detained in the U.S. just for not having ID. You are simply wrong.

      You are so cute and naive. You can be detained for looking at a cop in a wrong way, or using camera in public.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    51. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      You can pretty clearly see the evaporation of the "freedoms" you are talking about over the last 50 years or so.

      Why do you need ID? Because there are a lot of criminals on the streets. Why are they there? It seems we have an economic system that divides people into winners and losers and if the losers aren't accepting of their role in life crime is the obvious solution. So we have somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of the people in the country stealing, robbing, defrauding and doing whatever they can to get by - at the expense usually of other "losers" in the system. Sounds cruel, doesn't it? The problem is when you come home to find every single item of value removed from your house or apartment you don't want to go quietly, you want revenge! You want to see someone punished. Well, that is how we got here.

      Why do you need to show registration and proof of insurance? Simple. People like me when I was younger. No insurance and I did get in accidents. Sucks to be the guy that gets hit, big time. Because I had nothing there was no point in suing me. So there was a strong move to prevent such people from driving. So today without insurance you aren't going anywhere and if stopped by the cops you will walk home.

      Why do you need to show some kind of proof that you belong in the US? Because a lot of people would like to come here and grab what is lying around waiting to be grabbed. Frankly, anyone that is still in a place like Nigeria is there because they can't get out. Everyone else left already or is running the place for their own benefit. So why do we want to keep them out? Because if we let them all in the US will be just like Nigeria (or Bangladesh, or Uganda or whatever) in a few years. Again, sounds cruel doesn't it? But the fact is there is only so much to go around and collectively humanity has spent the last 100 years or so spreading things thinner and thinner. There are a few places where it isn't spread quite so thin and people can live decently - but this all depends on not having a few extra millions of people with their hand out.

      I see you bought into the Cuba blockade in a big way. You want to go to Cuba, you do what the other 10,000 people that go there every year do and fly through Mexico City. Yes, there are no flights direct from Miami, partly because if there were there would be 100 people left in Cuba after a couple of years. A good part of Cuba's economy is keeping the people there bottled up so they cannot leave. I will say the Cuban blockade is somewhat silly, but the alternative is for the Cuban half of Miami to bring all their relatives over - which they have been trying to do since 1963. It also is difficult for anyone, including governments, to admit their policy is a failure and just drop it. Remind yourself of this when you figure out your son or daughter is found using drugs after the fifth time you warned them and "forbid it". Hard to give in an just say "Use all the drugs you want, I don't care." Well, it is pretty much the same for the US government and Cuba - and it would be like a really wild weekend if we opened the doors now - a wild weekend that lasted twenty or thirty years. And the "house" would look just like it would after that sort of party.

      Yes, there is less "freedom" but a lot of this is less freedom to be an asshole and these freedoms were abused by assholes in the past. The moral of the story is clear: if you let the assholes do as they want after a while they ruin it for everyone.

    52. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dmacleod808 · · Score: 4, Informative

      My fiance doesn't drive and doesn't have a license, just a state ID, and she can vote just fine.

      --
      There Can Be Only One...
    53. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, New Mexico, Ohio, and Vermont not only allow police to toss your ass in jail for not carrying ID, but also impose criminal penalties if just for that act alone.

    54. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The America of 2012 doesn't beat the America of 2100 if we wake-up and start demanding our rights be given back.

      There's really no excuse for a college student to be fined almost a million dollars for downloading 30 songs. There's no excuse for a facebook customer to be arrested by the FBI and indefinitely detained w/o charges just because he exercised his right of free speech online (the SCOTUS has ruled even "I'm going to kill you" is protected speech in a ruling of a black man who was arrested during a civil rights protest). There's no excuse for an American citizen and his teenage child to be executed by the president w/o their guaranteed right to a trial before a jury of their peers. There's no excuse for why elderly women are being strip-searched by SA agents at airports. There's no excuse why other SA agents are putting mothers in glass jails because they are carrying bottled milk for their children. There's no excuse for SA agents to make large-breasted women walk through a nude body scanner 3 times and then joke about it: "Don't topple over!"

      There's no excuse for why a pastor driving through California was pulled-over by DHS, ordered to get out of his car, had his windows smashed-in, and then beaten in the street. (The judge later acquited the pastor of all charges because he had done nothing wrong; did not have drugs; the dog had been kicked by the officer to make it bark.) (The judge also tried to prosecute the DHS agents too, but the president's administration has granted them immunity. Wonder why?) There's no excuse for why a man sitting in his home minding his own business suddenly has police ram down his door, and then shoot him dead. (Turns out they got the wrong house.) There's no excuse for why a granddaughter was shot and killed in a similar raid. There's no excuse for why a homeless man who was wittling wood & selling it on the street was told, "Drop your knife" and then shot a mere 1 second later.

      There's no excuse for why a black mother had her child taken from her, because she refused to give the kid Ritalin medicine (the judge found her innocent as well & is pressing charges against the CPS). There's no excuse for why an environmentalist living in the Arizona and "off the grid" had his brand-new house condemnded & demolished and replaced with a shopping mall. There's no excuse for why a WW2 vet living alone and miding his own business had police break into his house & demand to see the basement. They found a garden there with grow lights, declared the grow lights illegal (they aren't), and then kicked the guy out of his home. Followed by demolishing it. Followed by another new mall.

      I could go on and on for the next HOUR of your time. There's no excuse for Any of these things to occur in the U.S.A. and if they do occur, then the mistake should be reversed and the police prosecuted. In some cases it is, but in 99% of the cases the police have immunity from their crimes. So much for the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, or the protection of law from abuses of power by agents of the government.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    55. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Evidence for this?

      All you want

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    56. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Travel Papers are not the same thing as a driver's license. Travel papers are a temporary license to travel to a specified location for a specified period of time for a specified purpose. Any deviation is prohibited. Plus. if you don't bribe your local communist party official, you don't get your travel papers. In the USA, driver's licenses are given out like candy for a pittance, and only people who are incapable of driving cannot receive one. But that doesn't preclude them from traveling. Buses, planes, cabs, trains, etc can all take someone to and fro without bribing corrupt govt officials.

    57. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >>>I recently crossed several state borders without being stopped by police for papers. So no, we are not the USSR.

      It all depends WHICH states and of course timing. A few years ago I was sightseeing the perimeter of this country. I had no problems in the north, no problems along the west coast, and no problems along the southern border until I decided to go see the Gulf of Mexico. On my way back the DHS pulled me over and demanded to search my car. No warrant. Just a demand. I refused. So they detained me for an hour in the hot summer sun, giving me a nice sunburn, and then finally said, "The judge refused to give us a warrant. You can go." And I'm not the only one..... there are lots of similar incidents documented, with video, on youtube. Including cases where people were drug from their car and beaten. There's no reason for the police to detain a tourist for an hour w/o cause. The Supreme Court has already ruled, again and again, that such detainments are a violation of the 4th amendment but the DHS and Executive Branch doesn't give a shit. ("The justices made their ruling. Now let's see them try to enforce it.")

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    58. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sshhh, you don't want to spoil their little USA bash fest! It's what's /. is best at.

    59. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      This is true anywhere. It's like saying "corrupt cops can choose to do bad things".
      I could also be stabbed in Uruguay . Does that make Uruguay bad?

    60. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      In the US you are required to carry ID if you go out in public.

      No, you are not.

      And they will detain you until it is verified.

      Maybe if you do something illegal and get arrested. Otherwise, they won't even check. I just ate lunch near a table of four cops yesterday. Not one of them stopped anyone in the restaurant for ID.

      And really, try traveling near the border without going a checkpoint.

      South of North? I've driven by (not through) the northern border and never gone through a checkpoint.

    61. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Here come the brainless drones who think that people who think that anyone who doesn't agree with them are brainless drones are paranoid schizophrenics!

    62. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That must explain why they have pretty much every "first" in space, save for putting a man on the moon, and haven't lost a single cosmonaut since the early 70's--because they suck so much.

      You've been propagandized, you fucking dumbass American.

    63. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough my nephew, a recovering addict, used to continually complain about the police stopping and searching him for no reason. Which often ended up with them finding something.
      Which stopped once he got off the drugs and started acting normal. And by normal I mean not looking and acting like a homeless guy sufferring from PTSD and yelling at everyone.

      Never happened to me, however.

    64. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep. Don't forget the pledge of allegiance, because if you don't sing it, we'll push you in a corner, badmouth you, and call you a communist.

      But but, I thought only Soviets did that!

    65. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I was stopped more than once while walking down the street. I wasn't even crossing the city limits. [...] some of the roads are billiard table smooth.

      I see what the problem is. You were stopped for looking too British. We call it pool on this side of the pond (unless it's straight-rail, but no one plays that).

    66. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm intrigued by the pastor story. Can you provide some more details so I can track it down?

    67. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      It happened to me on a college campus by a city officer. She said she heard complaints about some man in the studnet union building watching TV, and then demanded ID, so I said, "No I'll just leave the campus."

      She said, "Just give me you damn ID." And I said, "No. I was invited today by a professor as an alumni.... nus. I didn't need an ID to enter this private campus, and I don't need one to leave." She then insisted I HAVE to hand-over an ID when a police officer asks. I replied "I'm not behind the wheel of a car, so no I don't have to show you my drivers' license."

      She then trailed me all the way to my car, she tried to detain me and I said, "For what? My car was going 0 miles an hour so I wasn't speeding. I didn't drive through a red light, I haven't been drinking, and I didn't hit anybody. You have no cause to stop me from going home." She wrote down my license plate, and then I don't know what happened next since I drove off.

      It's about time we stop cowering to police. THEY are the servants of the People not the other way roung. They get their paychecks out of our pockets & from our labor to earn that money. We should obey the police if we've broken the law, but not when they are demanding illegal searches or detainments w/o cause or warrant.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    68. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by kaatochacha · · Score: 0

      Jeez, some people are heavy handed on the troll tag. Just cuz you don't like it, it's not a troll. mod it down, but troll?

    69. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by runeghost · · Score: 1

      How many have you actually lived in? What's your basis for comparison?

    70. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anecdote? I just drove through 4 states this weekend and back again without being asked for papers. I do it every few months. I've never, ever, been stopped. Hell, I didn't see a single cop in the entire state of Pennsylvania, and I drove for hours through it. Are you seriously suggesting that having a driver's license and maybe being pulled over for speeding is like Soviet travel restrictions?

      In the USSR, you simply could not travel between zones without an internal passport and and permission. It wasn't a matter of maybe being stopped, you would be arrested if you tried, and it you were really unlucky, you'd be talking to the KGB about what you were trying to do. There would be no "maybe" or having to be "caught" or "stopped". The police would be informed of your attempt as soon as you tried to buy a ticket or leave the local area and you'd be taken immediately into custody simply for trying to travel. No excuses about terrorism or contraband or anything. There was no "corruption" involved. It was simply illegal to travel without papers, full stop.

      That is not, and has never been the United States. Attempts to even suggest the cases are similar are hyperbole at best.

    71. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cornjones · · Score: 5, Interesting

      yeah, i remember hearing all that bullshit about russians having to wait in line for food, paying outlandish prices for western goods like jeans and vcr's b/c they weren't available there, being afraid to speak out b/c the police would throw them in jail and afraid their neighbors would turn them in as dissidents if they weren't seen vocally espousing their true loyalty.. I always assumed it was completely biased propaganda in a cold war US vs THEM style.

      Fast forward 20 years. I married a Russian woman and learned that what was happening was generally much _worse_ than what I had been taught. Just recently read Archipelago Gulag which again confirmed this for me. What I was hearing about russia wasn't nearly as bad as Russia really was.

      Now, I don;t like the direction American laws and politics are heading one bit, and I will continue to fight against the tide. But false equivalences like the parent post show nothing so much as a lack of perspective...

    72. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, the US has not (until very recently in some states like Arizona) been a papers-please state, that is a state where the police can just stop you on the street and ask for your ID and other paperwork. The difference with cars is that you need a license to drive a car. Comparing that to what the USSR did is just not accurate.

      So what was it that the USSR did exactly? I don't mean in Berlin near the wall, I mean in Moscow or Stalingrad or a Russian city with russian citizens, not conquered and occupied territory.

      Second, it is possible to travel to Cuba and has been for over a decade, and in fact it just got easier about a year ago.

      I remember seeing the Michael Moore movie about a few years ago, for being all free to go to Cuba, he had to do some weird things to get it in the movie.

      I'm perfectly fine with flying pretty much anywhere in the world, but I won't currently fly to the U.S..

    73. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cornjones · · Score: 1

      You've never been stopped and made to produce ID for no good reason while walking down the street?

      no, i haven't.

      That would be an interesting poll, how many people have?

    74. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Overturned.

    75. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by yurtinus · · Score: 0

      ...No, because that's illegal (unless you're Hispanic and living in Arizona).

      --
      +1 Disagree
    76. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>> by normal I mean not looking and acting like a homeless guy sufferring from PTSD

      The Supreme Court has ruled that "acting suspicious or strange" is not probable cause, and the police cannot detain or search said citizen. They declared any evidence found in such a case should be thrown out as inadmissable.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    77. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the evil Young Pioneer's and their pro-Soviet propaganda.

      Nothing like the noble Boy Scouts of America and their pro-American propaganda at all, of course.

    78. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by bipbop · · Score: 1

      Great! Now you just need 49 more fiancees to prove GP wrong!

      In all seriousness, a list of requirements by state are online here. Although many states do require ID, I didn't find any that required a driver's license.

    79. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      So what was it that the USSR did exactly? I don't mean in Berlin near the wall, I mean in Moscow or Stalingrad or a Russian city with russian citizens, not conquered and occupied territory.

      In the papers context, anyone authorized (police, KGB, GRU, etc.) could stop citizens at any time and ask for their papers, that included identification information, where they worked, etc. and could ask them why they were they were, what they were doing etc. Failure to cooperate was a crime. And this was frequently used and moreover was used to intimidate groups they didn't like. For a personal example, I know someone who grew up near Moscow in the 1970s who had become interested in Judaism. She joined a group of people who were reading and studying old texts. After a few months, it reached the attention of the government, and one time they went to their regular meeting, she was stopped by KGB people and asked where she was going, and told that it was an unwise thing to do. At the next meeting, they were raided and all arrested. She served a few months in jail and upon being released couldn't get any jobs. In the US, nor in most of the Western world do things like that happen. The USSR wasn't just bad compared to the US, it was bad compared to most civilized countries.

      I'm perfectly fine with flying pretty much anywhere in the world, but I won't currently fly to the U.S..

      Sure, the current restrictions on flying are stupid, petty and deeply inconvenient. If I were not a US citizen I'd probably not be that inclined to fly here either. But that goes to the "things aren't perfect and have gotten worse" matter, not to any sort of comparison with the USSR.

    80. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by tnk1 · · Score: 0

      Those statutes require you to identify yourself if there is a reasonable suspicion you have done something wrong. Additionally, if they happen to detain you and it comes out later that the detainment or arrest was illegal, you have recourse under the law.

      Further, having your ID may not be an issue if you can provide the information otherwise kept on those documents, such as your name and any ID number.

      In short, it is not illegal to not have documentation on public land, you are simply required to be able to identify yourself if there is probable cause to suggest that you were involved in a crime. You may be detained, but you will not be found guilty of anything. Thus, while it may be much more convenient to carry such ID around in the event of you being in the wrong place at the wrong time, it is not illegal for you to be without ID, you will simply have to submit to detention until you are identified. This differs from laws, such as those in the USSR, where it would be illegal for you to be without papers as a crime in and of itself.

      Now you could suggest that this could be used to harass you unfairly, and to that I say you are correct. However, that would be illegal and due to corruption, which is frankly a lot less prevalent in the US than in other countries, although there are definitely areas and situations where this is not the case. Either way, comparing this situation to a true tyranny is distorting the realities to the breaking point. In a true tyranny, this activity would be completely legal (or without any legal recourse) and would be applied uniformly to the entire population, not just mistrusted minorities.

    81. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      You've never been stopped and made to produce ID for no good reason while walking down the street?

      Why, yes, but I can't even recall how many times. It is a very ordinary for me, and I resent the colored people's claim to the service; My people have been passing since about 1650.
      Excellent poll idea, IMO.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    82. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      NO! You cannot be detained in the U.S. just for not having ID. You are simply wrong.

      The U.S. also does not have any requirements for exit. Airlines will check that you have a passport so that you can get intothe country you arrive at. But the U.S. has no exit restrictions at our borders. You are free to leave.

      Actually, there are currently 24 states (that's roughly half of the US) that have "Stop and Identify" laws.

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    83. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Here's one... frisked and everything... But don't believe me.. I obviously have an "agenda".

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    84. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      Looking at a cop the wrong way will get you a beating and an assault on a peace officer conviction in a lot of U.S. jurisdictions.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    85. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your anecdote is one of many. Not everyone gets the deluxe treatment, enjoy it while you can. Remember you are only out on your own recognizance, temporarily able-bodied, &c. Change happens.

    86. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by X.25 · · Score: 3

      The Iranian Government is receiving sanctions for threatening parts of the world with destruction. We don't allow that this day and age.

      Oh, I see. You don't allow such threats, but then you go and destroy other countries.

      Flawless.

    87. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You know, #7 out of like 153 or something is pretty damn good. And perhaps they don't want to have to live in Canada, which honestly, is not strange given the fact that it even farther north than places like New York and Minnesota. Or learn to speak Swedish.

      Point is, the US may very well objectively beat any other place on the planet, particularly for someone who is already an American. Averaging out a quality of life value is not going to take into account circumstances of individuals. If you can stand to live in Canada, usually though a lifetime acclimation to the conditions, you're probably going to be pretty happy there and there is no reason to move to the US. No argument there, but that is not going to translate into Canada being better for an outsider.

    88. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if YOU had read all about it, you'd realize it isn't what you think it is.

    89. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Yea, I rode from Colorado to Indiana, then to Oklahoma and back without being stopped once. I was stopped when walking around at GenCon when my badge wasn't facing the right way though. And I was waved at by a state cop sitting in the median (just a little hand wave when I looked over as I went by on my motorcycle; it really was cool) in east Kansas.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    90. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      [anecdote alert] I got a detained and a free handcuffed ride downtown so my identification could be verified. Long, hatless walk home @40 degrees centigrade? Priceless.
      Antioch, California, 1995. Lucky for me I had an F.B.I. jacket, or I might have stayed overnight, or forced them to link me to a crime.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    91. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The difference with cars is that you need a license to drive a car. Comparing that to what the USSR did is just not accurate.

      The problem is that the authorities can always come up with some bullshit legalistic explanation like that. Excuse, after excuse, after excuse, carving out holes in our rights until the constiution looks like swiss cheese.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    92. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget you had to formally declare the place of your residence and if you wanted to stay somewhere else for an extended period of time, you had to declare that as well, with local authorities and provide a reason for your stay. Secret police pretty much had access to any place at any time. I remember very well a group of bachelors thrown in jail because a local cop saw through a window them watching pr0n (a no no under communist rule at the time), called in a raid, raided the apartment and they all got sentences. It made news and the state media spun it as "see what happens if you don''t follow the rules? you end up in jail".
      Americans putting down America have yet a lot to learn. As they say, you think THIS is civil liberties violated? you ain't seen nothing yet.. :)

    93. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't show any evidence that the sky is blue. Do you need some?

      ...nor shown physical evidence of systematic corruption.

      Wall Street, the entertainment industry, the insurance industry, the weapons industry, the prison system, the drug war, the various shooting wars, the patriot act, ndaa, defense of marriage act, unequal protection under the law, 'the thin blue line'... Damn! Life's too short to list 'em all! You're just have to look up the rest yourself. These things are inherently corrupt. Their mere existence is proof, just like blue skies and wet water.

    94. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by vux984 · · Score: 1

      You know, #7 out of like 153 or something is pretty damn good.

      Which is why i said the US is undeniably a very nice place to live. Nothing on the top 10 is a hell hole.

      And perhaps they don't want to have to live in Canada, which honestly, is not strange given the fact that it even farther north than places like New York and Minnesota. Or learn to speak Swedish.

      Perhaps, but that doesn't really change anything. (And as an aside the weather on Canada's west coast is far nicer than that of new york and minnesota.)

      Point is, the US may very well objectively beat any other place on the planet, particularly for someone who is already an American.

      I suppose if you define your criteria narrowly and perversely enough. Sure. I mean a 1984 Datsun is the best car in the world if your criteria is "value for money" and you already own one vs any other car you would have to buy. Espcially if you add to the criteria that you don't want to learn how to adjust the seats in another car... while,hell! -- your Datsun is already set up for you. Man what a car!

      If you can stand to live in Canada, usually though a lifetime acclimation to the conditions.

      Which conditions are those? Living with the metric system? Seriously... what are you on about... ?

      Your fellow Americans are evacuating cities right now as Isaac bears down on them, while the interior is suffering one of the worst droughts on record.

      But hey, we get it, anything is better than living in Winnipeg, amirite?

    95. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a personal example, I know someone who grew up near Moscow in the 1970s who had become interested in Judaism. She joined a group of people who were reading and studying old texts. After a few months, it reached the attention of the government, and one time they went to their regular meeting, she was stopped by KGB people and asked where she was going, and told that it was an unwise thing to do. At the next meeting, they were raided and all arrested. She served a few months in jail and upon being released couldn't get any jobs. In the US, nor in most of the Western world do things like that happen.

      Except for communists, right?
      If you lived in the US and it became known that you were communist, it was pretty much the same result. You lost your job, lost your friends, everything.

      Yes, USSR was different, but the difference is almost only in details. Moreover, at the time in the USSR the government didn't have the technological capability of tracking people to the level governments currently have since such technology didn't exist or was not widely used (security cameras, license plate readers, facial recognition software, GPRS, mobile phones, etc.).

    96. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by GiMP · · Score: 1

      See: stop and frisk in Philadelphia and, more recently (and controversially), in New York City.

    97. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      So a police officer asked you for ID. When you refused......... nothing happened?

      Isn't that exactly how freedom works?

    98. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      But what were you doing when you were detained?

    99. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, the US has not (until very recently in some states like Arizona) been a papers-please state

      Actually, your statement is not entirely accurate. The TSA literally DID do repeated papers please actions against citizens on public property. Bush has to tell them to stop. As far as the TSA and Homeland security are concerned, they have legal authority to whatever they want in this regard. And if you read the current laws, they do. As far as Homeland Security and the TSA goes, you are under their thumb and they will do anything and everything they can to achieve the day they can once again stop travellers and demand, "papers please."

      Also, its worth mentioning Obama passed legislation which allows police to stop travelers for literally any reason so long as they are within 200 miles of a border. That means Obama believes "papers please" is allowed for 80% of the US population.

      So please, when you pretend we do not live in a world of "papers please", you are extremely deluded. The laws are already enacted. As a country, we are a tiny stones throw away from becoming the Soviet Union.

      Anyone who thinks America is Land of Free, is sick, sick, sick or ignorant, ignorant, ignorant.

    100. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Nevada Revised Statute  171.123(3), which allows an officer to detain a person to ascertain his identity when there are circumstances reasonably indicating that person has committed a crime

      In this case, a witnessto an assault, plus potential reckless driving. Also:

      "[a]s we understand it, the statute does not require a suspect to give the officer a driver's license or any other document. Provided that the suspect either states his name or communicates it to the office by other means -- a choice, we assume, that the suspect may make -- the statute is satisfied and no violation occurs." - Justice Kennedy

    101. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Except for communists, right? If you lived in the US and it became known that you were communist, it was pretty much the same result. You lost your job, lost your friends, everything.

      Yes, at times things sucked. But being a member of the Communist Party was never illegal (at least at a national level- some US states tried to make it illegal with varying degrees of success). And the set of things that were actually illegal has in the US always been a much smaller set. At most you have things like the Smith Act http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_Act which made penalties for advocating the overthrow of the US government. It isn't a similar situation.

      Your point about technology is a very valid one. Technology is a two edged sword for freedom. It can help people coordinate resistance movements even as governments can use it to more effectively construct police states. So the level of danger does grow as technology improves.

    102. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Nothing on there about showing ID. That case is about someone who refused to answer the question "what is your name".

      The Arizona statute is about police confirming immigration status. It's being upheld had essentially nothing to do with "papers please" aspect of the law. Even then, police will need some reason to believe you might not be a citizen in order to ask for papers -- a provision just screaming for racial profiling problems, btw. Also, the court expressed skepticism about this aspect of the law, in a way that implies they will be very willing to review that aspect later, once actual cases start occuring.

    103. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment is well received - could I provide some constructive feedback, though?

      Please, for the love of all things holy! Don't use obscure initial-isms without defining them for your readers at least once.

      CPS? OK, I just figured this one out but it took me a minute - Child Protective Services. Different states use different initial-isms for the same services.

      SA? Still haven't figured this one out.
      South American? Search Agent? Southwest Airlines?
      And, no. Google is not your friend for 2 letter initial-isms.

      Now, just let me suit up in this asbestos coverall.....(ziiiiiiiiiiip)...There we go. OK. I think I'm ready to press 'Preview' and 'Submit'.

    104. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between having to show ID, and having to answer the question "what is your name".

      YOU are therefore the retard, retard.

    105. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Your first example is an example where a specific government agency tried to engage in overreach and the rest of the government said no. Not exactly a great exampe. As to your claim about 200 miles of the border requiring ID, I'm not aware of such and a quick Google search doesn't turn it up. Do you have a citation?

    106. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

      I have been stopped more times than I can count, and I am white. I suppose to the officer, maybe knowing that I smoked tobacco as a teen, was 'good reason' enough to stop and frisk me as I walked down the street.

      I've also been stopped by the police a couple years ago, for jaywalking. Yes, jaywalking. It was a Sunday morning, raining, with no traffic on the roads (well, one car several blocks away). I crossed while the light was red. After walking about a block, an officer (the only vehicle out) pulls onto the opposite side of the road, facing traffic, and threatens from the driver's seat, that he can put me in jail for up to 3 days. For jaywalking.

    107. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 3, Informative

      And the limits are generally that actual physical ID is not required. It is only required that you answer the question "what is your name". Police can also ask other questions related to their investigations, but that is outside the topic of "are you required to carry ID in the U.S."

    108. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Not true. Try again.

    109. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      No. They have to have suspicion of your involvement. Their definition of "suspicion" may differ from yours, but that's what courts are for.

    110. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really make it legal to detain you.

      Corrupt cops are corrupt? True. Their corruption may be hard to prove? True. Their corruption is legal? False.

    111. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Identify" in that case means "say your name", not "produce documentation", retard. So you reply with "John Smith. Am I being detained for any crime? Okay, bye."

    112. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by admdrew · · Score: 1

      I was stopped more than once while walking down the street. I wasn't even crossing the city limits.

      Out of genuine curiosity, what were the circumstances in which you were stopped?

    113. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the papers context, anyone authorized (police, KGB, GRU, etc.) could stop citizens at any time and ask for their papers, that included identification information, where they worked, etc. and could ask them why they were they were, what they were doing etc. Failure to cooperate was a crime.

      I'm going to (cheekily) ask for a cite on this - I looked for a counter-citation for all of 2 minutes, but don't have time to look further.

      My education and personal experience of this differs however. I have many colleagues from the ex-Soviet States and the way they tell it, the 'paper please' meme only contains a hint of truth. There were certain cities that were predominately military assets - mainly containing factories or R&D facilities. These cities were effectively walled off, ostensibly for security purposes, requiring authorisation even for entering them. It was only within these cities that 'citizens' could be asked for their papers and arrested if they failed to do so. In effect, the entire city was a military base/zone and required authorization to be there. However this practice was apparently not carried out in the major population zones.

      However, with an authority like the KGB going about, pretty much doing what they want, I would be extremely surprised if similar events didn't happen to citizens out-with these cities. This is unfortunately exactly the problem that is arising in the old 'bastions of freedom' like the US and (laughably) the UK. Police and other 'security agencies' being granted more authority, more autonomy and seemingly immunity from prosecution in many areas; political elites that don't have to follow the same rules as the populace etc.

      Don't worry if you can't (or don't want to) manage the cite by the way - I highly doubt there are many verifiable first-hand accounts that aren't open to serious doubt, for either side.

    114. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by admdrew · · Score: 1

      Automatically dismissing out of hand any challenge to the propaganda

      Well, you *are* replying to an AC, and you haven't mentioned why you got stopped (which I believe, but am also interested to hear why).

    115. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, some one brought some efficiency to the process of stupid argument. 90% of the comments in such arguments about whether the US is a police state look like this to me, just using a whole lot more words. Both sides saying essentially the same stupid thing about the other side, or many linking "evidence" that doesn't say what they are saying, etc. At least this sub-thread gets to the point about it.

    116. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Nadaka · · Score: 0

      Provide evidence to the contrary.

    117. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by camperdave · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is not crossing a state border, but it is "crossing" the 100 mile thick country border.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    118. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a bullshit. Yes, the KGB harassed *political* opponents, but not the regular folks. Until the dissolution of the USSR you would not be arrested for being without the documents. *Now* you will. The milicia (apart from Russian version of Highway Patrol which was completely corrupt) was actually protecting people. It is incomparable how much more corrupt and reactionary the current Russian government is.
      As for Solzhenicyn - he got the perfect last name from the Russian word "to lie". Do not read his monstrously bad and incorrect books. If you want to know about Gulag read Varlam Shalamov instead.

    119. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We call it pool on this side too - it's just a different game than 'US Pool' as we call it. Billiards is something different again.

    120. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bla, bla, bla, bla....

    121. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by davydagger · · Score: 1

      America has some beautiful lands, but I don't wanna hear shit about "billiard table smooth" roads.

      Our roads are on par with Iraq, which still have craters from bombs.

    122. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you lived in the US and it became known that you were communist, it was pretty much the same result. You lost your job, lost your friends, everything.

      So you are saying your former friends and employers should not have the freedom to work and relax with whom they choose? Those are horrible examples compared to actions by the government, which included stuff the US did in the past too. Although those US examples are poor examples, as they those policies haven't been around for some time now.

    123. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      Walking on a sidewalk.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    124. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, I live in Europe and in the shopping malls here Levi's cost 99 Euro F*ing 99 Euro that is about 110 U.S. dollars for jeans so don't tell me things are not expensive here. And if you are going to tell me you pay 100 bucks in the U.S. for levi's then I say your an idiot and don't know how to shop!

    125. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      LOL... you made the claim. There's no evidence anywhere I've looked that it's true.

    126. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      All I have to go on are the words of police officers and judges in Mississippi.

      II don't know the magic words to google for it one way or the other.

      If you expect to outweigh that first hand account, you are the one who needs to show some evidence.

    127. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by micromoog · · Score: 1

      > pro-U.S. propaganda: The Russian space program sucks.

      I remember when I learned (well into adulthood) that the Russians had landed probes on Venus, and even sent photographs back from the surface. I was obsessed with space travel as a kid in the 80s, and really feel like that was kept hidden from me as an American student.

    128. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by br00tus · · Score: 1

      The difference with cars is that you need a license to drive a car. Comparing that to what the USSR did is just not accurate.

      As you said, if you're driving a car in the US the police can stop you and ask for ID. You also need ID nowadays to travel on an Amtrak train. The police can and do ask people to show ID and can arrest them if they do not, Google "stop and identify statutes". The police can also stop and search someone and arrest them if they are carrying a nickle bag of marijuana and whatnot, Google "stop and frisk". Why is "comparing that to what the USSR did is just not accurate"? It is the exact same thing.

      Remember the Berlin Wall at all? People were shot trying to flee as a regular occurrence. The US may do nasty things sometimes to keep people out, but they aren't threatening their own citizens to keep them in.

      The hostile west had its military within half of a city in the DDR (and not saying "west" as assuming the west was entirely anti-communist, which is not true, the majority of continential western Europe's working class were communist into the 1970s, just look at election results). It would be like Iran or North Korea's military controlling half of Chicago. You don't think the US would build a wall around that? As far as the regular occurence of people getting shot, between 1976 and 1989, 18 people were killed at the Berlin wall - and I know of know academic peer reviewed paper which says higher. "People" weren't trying to flee to the west, as many moved to the west without problem. It defies reason that the DDR feared several thousand janitors and garbage men and such leaving, the DDR did not. The people who had a lot of red tape were those who got a free college education, free medical school, and upon graduation, immediately wanted to move to West Germany and make a bigger salary as a doctor over there. In east-west talks, the DDR proposed that the west could import such people if someone paid their debts off first, the west refused and wanted the MD's etc. for free. Now you can make of all of this what you will, but most people certainly were not prevented from leaving before they got their free advanced degrees. And as for these regular shootings at the Berlin wall...1976 none, 1977 two, 1978 none, 1979 none. The advanced degree people wanting to leave certainly was a problem in the east, and you can think of it as you want, but you're making the whole thing a lot more hyperbolic than it is. I know many, many, many people in Warsaw Pact countries. who moved to the west or vacationed in Western Europe during the cold war.

      None of this is to say that the US is perfect. There are serious problems with civil liberties. And in many ways they've gotten much worse in the last decade. But that doesn't mean it is at all like how things were in the Soviet Union.

      We hear a lot about how the DDR and Stasi monitored phone calls and alike. The US government monitors domestic phone calls WAY more then Stasi does, in a much more sophisticated and enveloping form. There have been articles here on the new NSA supercenter in Utah, or the exposures from the San Francisco Room 641A NSA monitoring and so forth. We also know what Nixon and pre and post Nixon monitoring has watched - the civil rights movement and Martin Luther King, the anti-Vietnam war movement - the political police, trying to such down opposition. I know some who was a database administrator at an Ivy League college until he retired recently. He was against the Vietnam war and the boss at his company used to get anonymous letters addressed to him, in an attempt to get him fired. Luckily for him, his boss was cool and said he looked down on anonymous mud-slinging. Lawsuits (by others) and FOIA requests later revealed it was the FBI anonymously trying to get him fired from his job. Now in the USSR, Sakharov was harassed for his peacenik stance, yes, but plenty of Americans were as well.

      The bottom lin

    129. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by toriver · · Score: 1

      Wrong Skin Color, perhaps? Unsure what the numeric code is for that but they probably have one.

    130. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dwillden · · Score: 1

      And did you take the police to court for violating your 4th amendment rights? If not then you are part of the problem by letting it happen. But for most of this country we are free to travel without having to present papers, the major exceptions being you need a license to operate a motor vehicle on the roads and the TSA demands your papers to fly.

      Otherwise there is no obligation at all to even carry ID, let alone have to present it frequently.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    131. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Bob Dylan was detained by the police. His crime: going for a walk without any ID.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    132. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dwillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank you for not buckling under and defending our rights. It was inconvenient, but only by standing up to them are we going to get the judges pissed enough to order them to stop these illegal detentions.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    133. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dwillden · · Score: 1

      They have to have RAS (Reasonable articulable suspicion) of your involvement in a crime, and the detaining officer isn't the one who gets to decide what is reasonable. Oh he can detain you but it's the judge who will determine if he was right or wrong.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    134. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Again, you've made the claim. Burden's on you to support it. There's no evidence anywhere else that it's true.

    135. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by toriver · · Score: 1

      Really? Usain Bolt won the 100m dash in the Olympics, can you tell me the name of the person who finished #7? No, because he ended up not mattering. Then again, I live in #5...

    136. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dwillden · · Score: 3, Informative

      See Wikipedia for a list of the Stop and Identify states and links to their relevant code. Mississippi is NOT on the list.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    137. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by admdrew · · Score: 1

      I mean, DWB, sure, but he wasn't driving.

    138. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1
      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    139. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't have any citation other than persona anecdote of it happening, and my impression is moreover similar to yours in that outside cities containing major military assets, such checks were in practice not that common.

    140. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dwillden · · Score: 1
      I suggest you read your own state laws.

      IC 34-28-5-3 Detention Sec. 3. Whenever a law enforcement officer believes in good faith that a person has committed an infraction or ordinance violation, the law enforcement officer may detain that person for a time sufficient to: (1) inform the person of the allegation; (2) obtain the person's: (A) name, address, and date of birth; or (B) driver's license, if in the person's possession; and (3) allow the person to execute a notice to appear. As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.24.

      and

      IC 34-28-5-3.5 Refusal to identify self Sec. 3.5. A person who knowingly or intentionally refuses to provide either the person's: (1) name, address, and date of birth; or (2) driver's license, if in the person's possession; to a law enforcement officer who has stopped the person for an infraction or ordinance violation commits a Class C misdemeanor.

      There are two options and the DL isn't required, it's just an option, if it's in the person's possession.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    141. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by br00tus · · Score: 1

      In the papers context, anyone authorized (police, KGB, GRU, etc.) could stop citizens at any time and ask for their papers, that included identification information, where they worked, etc. and could ask them why they were they were, what they were doing etc. Failure to cooperate was a crime.

      And this is different than the USA how? Stop and identify statutues, stop and frisk? There is no difference.

      And this was frequently used and moreover was used to intimidate groups they didn't like. For a personal example, I know someone who grew up near Moscow in the 1970s who had become interested in Judaism. She joined a group of people who were reading and studying old texts. After a few months, it reached the attention of the government, and one time they went to their regular meeting, she was stopped by KGB people and asked where she was going, and told that it was an unwise thing to do. At the next meeting, they were raided and all arrested. She served a few months in jail and upon being released couldn't get any jobs. In the US, nor in most of the Western world do things like that happen.

      Of course it happens. I know people who have been harrassed from at their jobs, arrested and so forth for being against the Vietnam war. The NAACP was illegal in Alabama in the 1950s. Three people were killed (two white, one black) in 1964 in Mississippi for registering voters, with all signs pointing to the sherriff, who had arrested and harrassed them. I know anti-Vietnam war people who were arrested, harrassed at their jobs and so forth. This went from the 1960s to 1970s to 1980s with people against funding the Contras trying to overthrow the elected Nicaraguan government - which turned out to be the majority of Americans.

      As far as someone practicing "Judaism" as you call it being harassed, I have to say I take that with a grain of salt. There were and are hundreds of thousands of Jews in Russia, and harassing people who want to go to temple and whatnot - there is no motive to do so, and it is impractical on all fronts. Now the USSR was certainly concerned with Zionist groups, or groups that some might worry put Israel over Russia, just like the US was concerned with groups that they felt put Russia over the US. In fact, the US made the communist party illegal in the 1950s with that as a reason. There is a mountain of evidence for the USSR monitoring Zionist groups. The evidence of Jews who just wanted to go to temple and observe Rosh Hashanah and such being harassed is much more thin. In fact, I'm sure they're harassed in Russia more nowadays, with neo-nazism on the rise with the fall of communism there.

    142. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Every State has a state Issued ID card (usually available for free) that is fully sufficient for voting. A DL isn't required, just a gov issued photo ID (Military ID's and Passport cards also work).

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    143. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2

      Don't you mean "disturbing the peace" and "resisting arrest"? (sarcasm)

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    144. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your statement is generally true, as long as you keep your head down and avoid government jobs. If you leave a DOD position you can expect employment irregularities. If you say anything negative about the president or the US in a public way, you can expect a raid. Same problem, different time, place, and people.

    145. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Pool story bro.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    146. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      They're threatening to wipe Israel off the face of this planet with any means of destruction they can get their hands on.

      Never happened.

      The Iranian Government is receiving sanctions for threatening parts of the world with destruction.

      Another lie, and maybe you shouldn't throw stones in a glass house.

    147. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fool. Violent resistors are jailed. But there are many forms of resistance that are allowed and accepted. The ACLU is a perfect example; they often fight against the US government on all sorts of issues. In Iran, in the USSR, or many other despotic countries, organizations like the ACLU are jailed.

    148. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Ohreaaaaly? If today's voter suppression laws had been in effect in the 80's, St. Ronnie might not have been able to cast a vote in either of the elections that put him in office. Because he was born at home and had no birth certificate until 1991.

    149. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      The claim being made there seems to be substantially weaker than a 200 mile requirement. First, even the ACLU is making a claim about 100 miles, and that's talking about search and seizure. In the primary case in context, the government is agreeing that probable cause is still necessary. And no one is claiming in that article that not carrying an idea within that zone would be criminal. This is an example of something that's really bad and should be fought against. But it doesn't support the original claim much at all.

    150. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      What, you want a damn report? I (white guy, since that still counts in today's world, and removes another pretext for some people to apologize for the damn cop) was walking on the sidewalk. cop pulls up, puts me against the car, frisks me, searches my wallet, hands it back, and 'bye'. We, demanding our civil liberties, seem to make you a bit uncomfortable. And we shouldn't have to fight a war to take them back. Now, since you seem to believe I'm trolling (yes, I saw your post in the JE), you can be off, and go put on some brown lipstick. The TSA has plenty. *sheesh!*

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    151. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Bob+C.+Cock · · Score: 1

      I read Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago and Cancer Ward about 10 years ago and I remember first being shocked at the brutality and callousness a government could have for their own people, and second astounded that the US was ever afraid of the USSR. The society depicted by Solzhenitsyn seemed to me to be so dysfunctional and unworkable it could inevitably only result in collapse.

    152. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      My fiance doesn't drive and doesn't have a license, just a state ID, and she can vote just fine.

      Apparently she doesn't live in Pennsylvania.

    153. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely doubt you typed all that in 1 minute.

    154. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by admdrew · · Score: 1

      What else did the cop say? Did you, at the very least, get his information?

    155. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have to have RAS (Reasonable articulable suspicion) of your involvement in a crime, and the detaining officer isn't the one who gets to decide what is reasonable. Oh he can detain you but it's the judge who will determine if he was right or wrong.

      And how much is it going to cost you for the lawyer to get the judge to decide that? And how likely is the judge to actually decide in your favor? And what exactly are the consequences to the officer for being wrong?

      If an officer can detain you, makes you pay for a lawyer to defend yourself in court, only for you to be told, "Yeah, he was wrong. Too bad, that," what exactly is the difference from him just being allowed to detain you?

    156. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by aevan · · Score: 1
    157. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yes, tell it to the dead how much better the US is. And try to do it without playing the numbers game. Official misconduct is widely tolerated if not encouraged in all but a very few countries.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    158. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Isn't that exactly how freedom works?

      "Freedom" = stress, intimidation and loss of time at minimum?

    159. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that? I can't hear you over the sound of all my freedom.

    160. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I was a kid, I lived in a country called USSR. It being the last years of its existence, we also thought that America was free, and we shall soon be like them in that respect, as soon as we get rid of those pesky commies.

      And, yes, a lot of that turned out to be BS. But, having lived in USA for a few years now, I can assure you that it's definitely much more free than the USSR or Russia ever was. I'm not going to claim that USA is the "most free" country in the world or some such. But it's definitely reasonable to broadly call it "free", alongside a few others.

    161. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For a personal example, I know someone who grew up near Moscow in the 1970s who had become interested in Judaism. She joined a group of people who were reading and studying old texts. After a few months, it reached the attention of the government, and one time they went to their regular meeting, she was stopped by KGB people and asked where she was going, and told that it was an unwise thing to do. At the next meeting, they were raided and all arrested.

      On an unrelated note, I recall reading on one of Russian Jewish websites covering religious obligations and such that they had problems studying Torah in the USSR partly because they knew that the KGB would likely be recording them, and this (the use of a recording device) is prohibited on Saturdays - and their rabbis disagreed on whether they were affected by this or not, given that they knew that they were recorded, and that the recording was enabled explicitly because of them being there (i.e. they were the "trigger", so to speak). Go figure.

    162. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The cops can't arrest you for not having ID. However they can detain you if they need to verify your ID for the reason you were stopped in the first place. If you are detained falsely for not having ID you can sue over it. Ie, if you ware pulled over for speeding they will not let you just drive away again without getting a ticket, though perhaps they may impound your auto and let you walk. No one has checked by ID in ages, except the rare times that I get a traffic ticket. This was true even when I was in San Diego near the Mexican border.

      On the other hand if you listen to people who lived in communist countries you find out that they weren't nearly as locked down and subjugated as we were taught. If they showed their papers and put up with some inconvenience then they could travel. Huge inconvenience if travel was to countries outside of Soviet influence though.

    163. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You try living in one of the countries that are in the lower bottom for, say, a year, then you understand why it does actually matter.

    164. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Nadaka · · Score: 0

      And you have no evidence it is false either.

      All I have to go on the "authority" of a guy calling himself Chuckster, vs a number of police officers and a judge.

      If you want me to believe you, you have to back that up.

    165. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Just recently read Archipelago Gulag which again confirmed this for me.

      One thing you should keep in mind is that this book is not exactly a trustworthy source of information outside of that which directly pertains to Solzhenitsyn's experience (and even then only if you trust him - and I suggest you read on his life and political opinions after the gulag on Wikipedia to make an opinion of that). Many of the numbers he quotes there as estimates are off by an order of magnitude, which we now know because all those secret archives are public.

      Also, it may well be that your wife is just bullshitting you on some of those things. My mom was born in 1964, and she certainly doesn't recall living in an atmosphere of fear "being afraid to speak out b/c the police would throw them in jail and afraid their neighbors would turn them in as dissidents if they weren't seen vocally espousing their true loyalty". My grandmother does, though, but she did live in Stalin's time, and that was a lot different from 60s on. Not to say the regime wasn't oppressive even later, but it wasn't the "knock at your door at night and drag you away screaming" oppressive.

    166. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Which stopped once he got off the drugs and started acting normal. And by normal I mean not looking and acting like a homeless guy sufferring from PTSD and yelling at everyone.

      So what you're saying, is, your nephew isn't black or latino.

    167. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not illegal, it's called a terry stop and is commonly used by NYPC on muslims and blacks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisking it comes from Terry vs Ohio http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop .
       
       

      In the United States, a law enforcement officer may briefly detain a person upon reasonable suspicion of involvement in a crime but short of probable cause to arrest; such a detention is known as a Terry stop.[1]

      The laws around a Terry Stop allows them to frisk you and empty your pockets.

    168. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      It is also illegal to pull someone over for "driving while black". You can not point to this as official policy of US or its states, though possibly it is unofficial policy in some areas. Police can be and are sued over this. You can't really compare this to Soviet style systems where national laws were created to require papers.

      In many places in the US you don't even need to carry a form of ID to vote (which personally I think is a good thing). There are no standardized forms of identification in the US, no national identity card, no such thing as official papers.

    169. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And if whites went back to Europe we'd solve all the problems.

    170. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read your link:

      Justice Kennedy's majority opinion noted, however, "[a]s we understand it, the statute does not require a suspect to give the officer a driver's license or any other document. Provided that the suspect either states his name or communicates it to the office by other means -- a choice, we assume, that the suspect may make -- the statute is satisfied and no violation occurs."

      You may have to (depending on your state's laws) provide your name - but you don't have to provide ID (unless of course, you're driving a vehicle).

    171. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think courts here said that this required you to provide your name but no requirement was in the law to present identification.

    172. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And this is a problem that needs fixing (and it's mostly a current problem because of a crop of current new laws). However it is unrelated to the original implication that the US is similarly restrictive as the USSR was.

      In California (a liberal hippie lala-land that many conservatives might consider even more radical than the Soviets) you do not need to how picture ID to vote. You do need to provide ID but a picture ID is not required. It can be a pay stub, utility bill, etc. If this is provided when registering to vote then you don't even have to provide any identification when you actually vote, and this is done only once when you register in a new county.

    173. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      If there is such a state law, it should be in the statutes. All you have to do is show me the statute. What do you want me to do, quote the entirety of Mississippi statutory law in a Slashdot post to prove it's not there? I've never posted anything that long, I wonder if Slashdot posts have a length limit.

    174. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Chuckstar · · Score: 2

      Freedom doesn't mean no one who works for the government will ever ask you to do something you don't want to do. Freedom just means you have the right to say "no" if they ask you to do it.

    175. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And while all states will accept that form of ID, many states will accept less than that. Though the Federal Help America Vote Act (Bush Jr.) does set out a minimum which would allow just a current utility bill with your name on it, or a recent pay stub, etc. Some states will accept just your driver's license number without the actual license being presented.

      The states that currently are requiring picture ID or special voter IDs are doing this precisely to make voting _harder_. Voter identification fraud is exceedingly rare in the US, more people win the lottery than have been shown to commit voter fraud. Yet these laws will prevent or discourage many people from voting.

    176. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      What else did the cop say?

      Well first, he mentioned that he had a little pain in his right knee, but then he started droning on and on about the gout in his big toe, and that he was thinking of just cutting the damn thing off. He thinks his youngest kid might be a bit colicky. His wife just came back from the dentist, who did a root canal on one her bicuspids. So, she's too drugged out to make supper, and he'll have to settle for frozen TV dinner. Let's see... oh yeah, he asked me if it looked like he's starting to go a little bald on the crown of his head. I really didn't think much of it, until he asked me if I wanted to join him for some drinks at The Manhole. I told him I really have to go, and that I'd have to take a rain check.

      What the hell is the matter with you?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    177. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cffrost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Usain Bolt won the 100m dash in the Olympics, can you tell me the name of the person who finished #7? No, because he ended up not mattering.

      Give me a break, anyone with half a brain knows that 27-year-old Richard Thompson of Trinidad and Tobago came in 7th place in lane 2 with a time of 9.98s, following a 160ms reaction time.

      What next, "What's the 9th most populous city in Turkmenistan?" Come on man, everybody knows this.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    178. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by admdrew · · Score: 1

      Wait - so you weren't able to get more information from him?

    179. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      He wasn't my type.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    180. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      You've never been stopped and made to produce ID for no good reason while walking down the street?

      LE can ask, but you are not legally required to produce ID just walking down the street and without probable cause and/or suspicion of that individual having just committed a crime or you are suspected of being about to commit a crime by the "reasonable person" test. If asked, you are required to tell them your name & home address, but that's all. You are not legally required to produce ID or tell them anything else, period.

      In states that allow the open-carry of a firearm, it's been ruled that even then you are not required to provide ID if you are on foot and otherwise not suspected of just committing a crime or engaging in actions that would lead a reasonable person to believe you are about to commit crime.

      Just search YT for "cops/police illegally demand ID" "OC" and "open carry". There are hundreds of videos of LEOs demanding ID, but being told by the subject that they refuse to produce ID, and are confronted with the laws by informed citizens.

      IANAL, YMMV, etc etc

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    181. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

      Don't forget New York City's wonderful stop and frisk policy.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    182. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      And American are ABSOLUTELY NOT allowed to travel anywhere they wish (try joining your European friend on his vacation in Cuba sometime if you think so).

      And if you're American you are also prohibited from doing business with any country the American government doesn't like (which are usually the ones who dared overthrow one of the U.S.'s corrupt puppet regimes).

      Land of the free...not so much.

      I realize you are American, but I don't know if you realize that America does not encompass the entire world. Just because you are American does not mean you have free reign over the rest of the world. Yes there are some places you can't go, like Cuba (actually you can go there, it is just difficult) But you know, it is CUBA. The Cuban's decide who can enter their country. As for trade with other countries, yeah, just because you have free speech doesn't mean you can trade with any country you want. You might want to reread your Constitution sometime.

    183. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      In the US you are required to carry ID if you go out in public.

      Citation needed

      And yes, they do check people who are leaving the country now.

      Its always been required to go through a checkpoint when you leave the country. You know, you are LEAVING the country and entering someone else's jurisdiction.

    184. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      "The judge refused to give us a warrant. You can go."

      So what you are saying is, the previous poster is right, you don't need papers. Just because some ahat stopped you, doesn't mean it is legal. Ohh and look a judge agreed that it wasn't legal.

    185. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by admdrew · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't understand. What else did he say while you were detained?

    186. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Actually the only thing rare about voter fraud is convictions because it's nearly impossible to catch in the act, unless a poll worker happens to know the person the fraudulent voter is claiming to be. So yes it's true that convictions and even just arrests for vote fraud are rare, such fraud has a long and storied history in this country and needs to be limited.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    187. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by readin · · Score: 1

      I remember growing up during the Cold War, and being taught all the pro-U.S. propaganda: The Russian space program sucks.

      Who taught you THAT? Growing up in one of those midwest redneck areas people on slashdot like to bash, I was never taught that the Russian space program sucks.

      You don't need papers to travel in the U.S. unlike the USSR. U.S,. citizens were free to travel anywhere, unlike those poor Soviets.

      It was true at the time. You could travel around without papers. It used to be you could even get a job without papers. Of course that has changed for various reasons (illegal immigration, social security, federal withholding, etc.) - as best I can tell most put in place by Democrats - but it would be wrong to compare Democrats to communists.

      Only Poland cracked down on labor unions and dissedents. And so on.

      Wow your education was bad. I learned that communists countries all over the world cracked down on dissidents, and it was true.

      It was only after I grew up and learned to see through the bullshit that I realized that was all lies. We had been lied to just as much as the Soviets. The Russian space program is filled with firsts that American students never learned about (we only got the NASA stuff and a brief mention of Sputnik).

      Cool, you got something right. American education focussed more on American achievements in space than it did on Russian achievements. Pretty much ever country does that - put more focus on its own achievements than on the achievements of others.

      You DAMN SURE DO need papers to travel in the U.S. (try getting pull over by a cop sometime and tell him you have no identification, driver's license, proof of insurance, and registration and just see what happens, or try coming here sometime to see if the cops accept "We don't need no papers, this is America!" in lieu of your passport/green card/visa).

      When you learned this stuff, you didn't need papers to take a train or a bus. You could travel from coast to coast that way. Or you just ride in friends car. There were no checkpoints between New York and LA or between Miami and Seattle.

      Polish labor unions weren't the only ones that got cracked down on in the 80's.

      I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. There were of course disputes with labor unions and the unions didn't always win - the point of unions is after all to make the fight fair, not to make the unions all-powerful. And unions of government workers in public safety areas are a special case (like air-traffic controllers) but even the air-traffic controllers merely had to find other jobs - they weren't beaten or imprisoned.

      And American are ABSOLUTELY NOT allowed to travel anywhere they wish (try joining your European friend on his vacation in Cuba sometime if you think so).

      So there is one small island in the Caribbean where Americans can't go. You do understand the difference between that and not being allowed to leave your country at all, don't you?

      And if you're American you are also prohibited from doing business with any country the American government doesn't like (which are usually the ones who dared overthrow one of the U.S.'s corrupt puppet regimes).

      Land of the free...not so much.

      There are a few countries you can't do business with. In Soviet Russia you couldn't even do business.

      Every once in a while I see people who haven't been anywhere talk about how America is just as bad as anyplace else in the world. I know better because I saw one example of the difference. It wasn't a communist country, but it was a country that had recently been authoritarian. I was teaching English and the school had a small library. In it I found a set of encyclopedias of a brand I had become very familiar with as a child. Curious

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    188. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      It helps if you read the WHOLE post before replying. "The Supreme Court has already ruled, again and again, that such detainments are a violation of the 4th amendment". In other words police are not allowed to detain your car's travel down the road for even one single minute. The DHS were acting like members of the East German Stazi, except this is not supposed to be happening in our land (the DHS swore an oath to obey the 4th amendment... no warrant or probable cause == no searches or detainments).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    189. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      You left-out "fear".
      I admit that I was afraid of how this cop might act, but decided I'd rather exert my right to be free, than submit to illegal demands for an ID.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    190. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Why do you need to show some kind of proof that you belong in the US? Because a lot of people would like to come here and grab what is lying around waiting to be grabbed.

      Sounds a bit like manifest destiny. ;)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    191. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You make the claim, you provide the evidence. That's how it works. Jesus is in my left testicle. Prove me wrong.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    192. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Knave75 · · Score: 2

      Actually, GenCon asked to see my ID every single time I walked through the door. It is easier to walk into a casino.

    193. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Maritz · · Score: 1

      All whose problems? Not ours (Europe)..!

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    194. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Pool and billiards are different. I've never played billiards in my life, but pool is common here (UK/Ireland). More the 9 ball than the 8 ball.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    195. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      See: http://www.brennancenter.org/content/resource/policy_brief_on_the_truth_about_voter_fraud/

      The justice department could not find a single verified case of voter fraud during the G.W.Bush administration, so one can only conclude that it is very rare. On the other hand putting an extra roadblock in the way of voters will cause some voters to decide to stay home. No matter that the IDs will be provided for free (as required by 24th amendment), even a small burden will cause some voters to not vote.

      So given that voter fraud is rare, and that the people most likely to find these new ID laws a hassle will be poor people, and poor people tend to lean towards Democrats, and because Republicans are so gung-ho over getting these laws passed and seem ecstatic when another one passes, and because Pennsylvania state senator Mike Turzai stated that the voter id law was going to help Romney win in Pennsylvania... I can only conclude that the primary reason for these laws is to disenfranchise voters. Turzai goofed by revealing one of the motives for this bill.

      Of course another big motive is that so many Republicans firmly believe the myth that the elections keep being stolen by Democrats, that illegal immigrants are voting, etc, that any reasonably smart politician knows that they can get make conservative voters happy by supporting these sorts of bills. Even if the politicians think the bills will do neither harm nor good they will support them in order to get votes even though they end up being a big expense to the states.

      And I am not a democrat or a republican, I am not a member of any political party. But I can not help but be cynical here.

    196. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      In the papers context, anyone authorized (police, KGB, GRU, etc.) could stop citizens at any time and ask for their papers

      What do you mean, could?

      I've been to Russia many times and many times I've seen police demand ID from random people on the street. These people weren't doing anything suspicious either, just walking around. I was asked, in Russian at first, to show my passport while I was simply browsing in a gift shop.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    197. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by readin · · Score: 1

      But you know, it is CUBA. The Cuban's decide who can enter their country.

      Awwwww no fair! Why do the Cubans get to decide who can enter THEIR country, but Americans don't get to decide who will enter OURS??

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    198. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Clsid · · Score: 1

      I disagree, we do have papers, just not standardized. At the most basic level you have the driver's license, which acts very much like a national id card. Try to get into a domestic commercial flight without one.

    199. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Even wealthy Canadians try to buy property overseas when they get old so they don't have to endure the crude winter. So no, Canada is not better than the US by far.

    200. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Well the Soviet Union was just different. True, living in the US was better, but they had good schools and a good system overall for law abiding citizens, which is more than could be said about a lot of countries. I have friends that moved to the Soviet Union willingly and they were fairly impressed by what they saw even if they did have the bad things you mentioned. Ask yourself the following question, as a human being is it more important for you to find cheap Western goods or receive a top-notch education? Civil liberties vs economic, social and cultural rights? Both of those rights are enshrined into the universal declaration of human rights, but "capitalist" countries chose to follow civil and political rights while "communist" states tend to respect more economic, social and cultural rights. The reason I use quotes is because there are no countries that can be classified as truly capitalist or communist.

    201. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by citizenr · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really make it legal to detain you.

      Corrupt cops are corrupt? True. Their corruption may be hard to prove? True. Their corruption is legal? False.

      It doesnt have to be legal if its systematic, tolerated and goes unpunished.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    202. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Except airlines are private entities.

      But even with governments, of course you need IDs now and then or someway to prove who you are when this is necessary. But we don't need papers by law to travel, though it's a good idea to have some with you just in case (in case of accident, medical emergency, ability to consult with police if you are robbed, etc). Granted there are some localities that want to take this further than many people would like and it remains what limits the courts might place on things like stop-and-frisk. (even then if you don't have ID you're just detained temporarily while they figure out who you are, but you're not charged with a crime for not having papers)

    203. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not bullshit legalese, you just don't understand what the fuck you're talking about. The USSR required you to have a permit to travel, regardless of how you planned on getting there. You only have to have a license in the US in order to operate a motor vehicle, and only if you're using it on public roads. You do NOT have to carry ID, and the police can NOT stop you just to ask for it, in the USSR you HAD to have ID on you, and you could be stopped any where at any time and questioned about your activities.

    204. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have. I got stopped, and frisked/searched. They even got me to pull off my socks and shoes...

    205. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by psiclops · · Score: 1

      This Law would require ID/papers at all times (you would either need to prove you had the required papers or that you didn't need them)
      have fun travelling with these rules that may even prevent you leaving the country.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    206. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by psiclops · · Score: 1

      laws and reality are two different things

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    207. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      laws and reality are two different things

      Which is precisely why people are recording police stops and posting them online. They are trying to make the LE real-world reality for those they interact with more closely resemble the world of limited powers granted LE by the laws and citizen's constitutional rights LE are legally bound by.

      That said, I wouldn't advise trying any of the things those in the videos get away with without video recording and witnesses. It's far too easy for things to end badly even with video rolling and witnesses on the scene. Even multiple witnesses and video recording rolling is no guarantee against police abuse or even being killed.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    208. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by dywolf · · Score: 1

      so the AC parent is Insightful cause he's full of shit and hates america, but the guy who points out this stupidity, and lack of relevance to TFA, is flamebait?

      Way to go mods. I wish I could say I was a surprised.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    209. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not trying to prove my statement to you. You are the one who must convince me that you words have more weight if you are going to convince me that i am wrong. Someone somewhere asked this question before. I did, and i have my answer. I just have no way to link to an unrecorded verbal conversation.

    210. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by noh8rz8 · · Score: 1

      He has a reasonable point about travel. You need. Drivers license to drive. You. Need dl or passport to fly. I suppose being a passenger or riding a bus or train is ok. But for all practical purposes, if you want to travel in US, then you have to be prepared to show id to cops and expect to be put into a database.

      --
      You want to upvote/downvote? Go back to Reddit! Here we mod up/mod down.
    211. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Dracophile · · Score: 1
      OK, let's have any doofus and his beetroot drive a 1000kg car at 50km/h-plus without any form of certification. What can possibly go wrong?

      Absolute libertarianism is nearly as bad as absolute totalitarianism.

      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
    212. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      What else did the cop say? Did you, at the very least, get his information?

      <snip sarcasm> What the hell is the matter with you?

      So are you refusing to answer the question? You claim to have been stopped for no reason, searched for no reason, and had your civil liberties violated for no reason on multiple occasions. I don't think it's unreasonable for others to be curious about additional details, particularly since from your descriptions of the events, you have good cause for a formal complaint against these officers.

      You got a badge number, right? Did you file a complaint? Were there extenuating circumstances (eg, you matched the description of the perpetrator of a recently committed crime)? What you're saying is so incredibly at odds with most people's experience, and you claim it happened multiple times (discounting the fluke aspect), but refuse to corroborate your story even far enough to describe any aspect of it in greater detail.

      To be honest, it makes the story sound made up. It sounds like you have some beef with law enforcement in general, and are trying to make up a story to support your cynical view, but you overstepped, and realize that you can't reveal additional details without either taking your story farther into the realm of implausibility or exposing your story as a farce.

      If you legitimately had your rights violated, then you should want to see the perpetrators of that crime punished, both for your own sake, as well as the sake of any potential future victims of theirs. Which means you should be providing as accurate, truthful, and thorough a description of the events as possible, including the location, date, time, officer's badge number, and as much additional detail as you can reasonably recall, such as the nature of the verbal interactions. Unless and until you're willing to do that, your story just sounds like you got caught out on a bullshit response, and are taking the offensive to protect your pride.

      I'd love to be proven wrong. Note, I'm taking this path of confronting you over the other path available to me of spending all 5 of my mod points marking you as a troll, which I believe you most likely are. However I'll foe you for now so that I'm not baited into believing an uncorroborated story of yours some time in the future.

    213. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by serialband · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you and others like you keep saying that the US is still freer than the USSR or Russia, all while new restrictions keep getting applied. It's almost as if you're saying, not a big deal, we lose a few freedoms, but it's freer than what it could be.

      We, who have lived here all this time have seen our freedom slowly erode. I hate the start of slippery slopes. I miss my previous freedoms.

    214. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      It is people like you, who so quickly come to the aid of the authorities, that make freedom such a difficult fight. Just like blaming the rape victim, because, obviously, she did something to provoke it. Fucking sickening!

      The cop didn't speak to me until he told me, "You are free to go"... Gee! Thanks officer Obie! You're such a nobleman.

      I'm discovering that the problem isn't with the authorities. It's with you people that are so quick to defend them. You fail to see the corruption because it is such a large part of your own being, and base whole systems on those corrupt practices that bring you all your little conveniences that you can't live without. You don't see the air you breath. However I'll friend you just because... I feel like it

      Peace!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    215. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Can you find anything in my post that says that it's "not a big deal"?

      These are two completely different things. Yes, USA has clearly lost a considerable number of freedoms that its citizens have enjoyed, and yes, this is a bad thing, and you as a citizen should be concerned about it. Just don't go and say that your freedoms are eroded anywhere near as badly as USSR had; it is such an obvious bullshit that it devalues your argument and make people less likely to listen to other things that you might want to say.

    216. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Ah, the everlovin' anecdote! Ok I'll play. I was stopped more than once while walking down the street. I wasn't even crossing the city limits. Shall we keep going back and forth?

      As long as we comply we have nothing to fear. Ain't life grand? ... please, don't try to tell me the system is any less corrupt.

      Where is the "corruption" in your example? Were you shaken down by the police for money, or something?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    217. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by smithmc · · Score: 1

      My fiance doesn't drive and doesn't have a license, just a state ID, and she can vote just fine.

      But she has the state ID. What if she didn't?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    218. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by smithmc · · Score: 1

      My fiance doesn't drive and doesn't have a license, just a state ID, and she can vote just fine.

      Apparently she doesn't live in Pennsylvania.

      Apparently you don't know the law as well as you think you do. Pennsylvania does not require a driver's license, nor does any other US state.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    219. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Americans putting down America have yet a lot to learn. As they say, you think THIS is civil liberties violated? you ain't seen nothing yet.. :)

      What are you saying? We'd better keep our mouths shut, or else? Doesn't that sound familiar? We "Americans putting down America" are doing so because we don't want to see things get worse... do you?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    220. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      The cop didn't speak to me until he told me, "You are free to go"... Gee! Thanks officer Obie! You're such a nobleman

      What was his badge number, what city were you in and what was the date? Did you ask any questions of him while he was searching you and he refused to answer them? If the very first words he spoke were "you are free to go," how did he communicate to you that he was detaining you for search?

      From the new 15 words of information you were so graciously willing to part with, you describe a single event, while earlier you said:

      I was stopped more than once while walking down the street.

      Or did both incidents played out exactly the same?

      There are bad cops who overstep their authority and deserve to get called out for it, for example, read Carlos Miller's blog. I'm not convinced you were ever truly wronged by a cop though, your story is too light on details, too heavily peppered with unsubstantiated criticisms and insults, and even what little detail you're willing to part with is internally inconsistent.

    221. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I immediately stop reading anything that starts with "When I was a kid". First of all you were a kid, which means you were clueless. Your perspective has "hopefully" evolved/matured since then. So you can't compare the two.

      In any event, your not a kid anymore, let it go.

    222. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Whenever it's anthem time now, for me it goes: "the land that was once free; it was the home of the brave."

    223. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by garbut · · Score: 1

      Your 9/11 has you all cowering and on your knees.

      As it was designed to.

      --
      Oh, should I have sugar-coated that?
    224. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I suspect they were looking for drugs. The things I've seen none of you will believe. I don't see much sense in carrying on with this.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    225. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced you were ever truly wronged by a cop...

      That's why this is my last response to you. Your mind is already made up. Have a nice day

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    226. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      I, and others here, have given you several opportunities to corroborate your story with substantiating details, including offering specific questions you could answer to strengthen your case. Each time you ignore, redirect, or outright refuse to answer the questions. You have something to hide here, and the most likely thing that you're hiding is that your story is a lie. You have given me and others no reason to think otherwise.

      If you refuse to corroborate, then yes, the only reasonable assumption is that you're a liar. I've welcomed you to demonstrate otherwise and you won't even make a superficial effort but once again take the offensive - attacking the questions rather than defending the premise.

    227. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Gee, I guess I lied about the previous being the last response.

      What you and the others have done is presumed me to be guilty. That is unacceptable.

      Over and out...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    228. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On an unrelated note, I recall reading on one of Russian Jewish websites covering religious obligations and such that they had problems studying Torah in the USSR partly because they knew that the KGB would likely be recording them, and this (the use of a recording device) is prohibited on Saturdays - and their rabbis disagreed on whether they were affected by this or not, given that they knew that they were recorded, and that the recording was enabled explicitly because of them being there (i.e. they were the "trigger", so to speak). Go figure.

      And now they ask you to come in and turn on the light for them, or push the elevator button, or a hundred other things that they're the 'trigger' for. Go figure.

    229. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And now they ask you to come in and turn on the light for them, or push the elevator button, or a hundred other things that they're the 'trigger' for. Go figure.

      Actually, they're not supposed to ask you, at least not directly. The way that shabbos goy arrangement works, the non-Jewish person in question is supposed to perform the work for their own benefit and of their own free will, and Jews are merely permitted to enjoy the fruits of that labor insofar as they're a "free ride" for both sides (i.e. the labor would have happened even if it was not for their sake - so it's not done for them).

      In this particular case, while they obviously didn't ask to be recorded, the recording was certainly done "for their sake" - it wouldn't have happened if they weren't there. Hence some reasoned that this did not fit the bill of what's permitted.

    230. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Strange. I did exactly the same in the Russian Federation a couple of years ago. We actually crossed an oblast border by canoeing down a river gorge. Are you sure that you're not in Russia? (Asking the natives isn't reliable ; so many Russians speak American-accented English, and have such a bizarre sense of humour that you couldn't be sure from their answers.

      Your evidence is not sufficient to decide the case, in itself.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    231. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Is Amtrak a private entity too?

    232. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cornjones · · Score: 1

      apparently a vcr cost the equivalent of a small house. once again, you lack perspective

    233. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by cornjones · · Score: 1

      true, i get he impression that most of my mother-in-laws direct fears were hold overs from her mothers experiences. But i also get the feeling that there was serious chilling effect from the stalinist polices that was just starting to thaw in the 80s (when people started admitting they were not part of the communist party in mixed company). During my mother in laws time it was more about lines and scarcity.

      Also, to say it is in any way equivalent to what is going on in the us is what i was arguing against. Even now (though It feels like putin is working on reviving the good old days) US is a far cry from where russia is. The recent example of pussy riot for example but more chilling, imho, is the arrest/discrediting of 3 political opponents that I know of, and I don't follow this at all.

    234. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      when people started admitting they were not part of the communist party in mixed company

      It wasn't actually particularly notable to not be a member of the communist party. Membership was effectively obligatory to pursue certain degrees, some career paths in the government or the party itself, or high-visibility positions anywhere; but otherwise not everyone was expected to join. And you had to pay some nominal membership dues, which some people resented... So anyway, by mid-80s, just before perestroika and the decline in membership, the party had about 20 million members, in a country of 290 million.

    235. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      They didn't actually stop you unless you weren't showing your badge or it got turned around. So yea, you couldn't get in without the badge.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    236. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What next, "What's the 9th most populous city in Turkmenistan?" Come on man, everybody knows this.

      Abadan. Next question please?

    237. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    238. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdotal, but this happened to me once. I was walking up the large hill near my house and a cop questioned me for no reason. I had to show him my ID and explain that I was just on an evening walk. At first I was like, "I'm just walking around, leave me alone." But it quickly became apparent that I was going to waste a lot of time and deal with a lot of bullshit if I kept arguing.

    239. Re:When I was a kid we thought America was free by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Funny, I often wish that the Ron Paul supporters would be carted off to an island prison somewhere where they could establish their happy 18th century utopia paying for goods and services with chickens; yet, everywhere I look, there's a Ron Paul supporter happily screaming in tongues about FEMA camps, the gold standard, and the evils of medical licenses, so I'm waiting AC, let's see that disappearing act.

  2. Meh theres always private servers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    So they move to private servers.

  3. Careful Blizzard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful with that Blizzard. You're acting like you've never heard the phase "Somebody set up us the bomb."

    1. Re:Careful Blizzard by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      But they're totally familiar with "Nuclear launch detected."

      Can't be letting iranians build ghosts!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  4. Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because obviously there's nothing more likely to inspire outrage and violence than nerds denied their gaming habits.

    This will be the straw that breaks the camel's back, and returns Democracy and Freedom to Iran, decades after the CIA took it away.

    1. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by Nadaka · · Score: 1, Troll

      I think this will actually break the back of the islamist militants.

      If the guys who spend all day playing WoW actually go outside and live life, they might lose their virginity. And then there won't be enough virgins to supply the suicide bombers with their 72.

    2. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by pclminion · · Score: 1

      So, your theory is that suicide bombers are rewarded after death with 72 MALE virgins? I think I like this theory.

    3. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Funny

      The koran never said they were female virgins.

    4. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by BanHammor · · Score: 1

      Not only male, but male living virgins, which is kind of... Unusual.

    5. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by dwye · · Score: 1

      "Houris" are always female, just like cumhals (female slaves of breeding age) in Ireland. Not specifying the sex of a slave is stupid when they are actual units of commerce. It would be like referring to silver pieces and not specifying whether it was a denarius, a solidus, or a sesterce (or for that matter, not specifying which state issued the coins).

    6. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your theory is that suicide bombers are rewarded after death with 72 MALE virgins? I think I like this theory.

      No, they're female alright, but they are Catholic school nuns. The old-school kind. With hickory rulers. If they even think that you're thinking about sex, it will hurt. Bad. If they think that you're thinking about sex with them they will make you wish you were dead somewhere else.

    7. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democracy and Freedom

      So they can be more like the US? The government that's responsible for them being unable to play?

    8. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You turn off WoW for 72 virgins, and where are they going to congregate? The cemetery, naturally, with a shovel and a vat of lube.

    9. Re:Now this, this will surely inspire a Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The koran never said they were female virgins.

      Actually it does (Arabic is one of those languages that have gender-discriminated adjectives, verbs, pronouns, even plural forms, numbers, you name it.) Ahhh... who the hell cares?!

  5. I dunno about that by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Thanks to the sanctions, they can't get refunds either.

    I think that last part is just Blizzard actually, lol. I would think that receiving $50 or whatever from services provided to an Iranian then getting told that's not allowed would mean you have to undo the trade by giving that $50 back.

    1. Re:I dunno about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing it's the same sanctions preventing the Iranian people playing WoW that are preventing the Iranians getting their refunds. Will this cause a sudden burst in 3rd party server development?

    2. Re:I dunno about that by GCsoftware · · Score: 1

      No.

    3. Re:I dunno about that by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you register with Blizzard, part of the information that's required is the country you reside in. The question in my mind is whether "Iran" was ever on the list and - if it was - whether you were able to register an account and purchase games if you set that as your answer.

      If - as is quite possible - the only way to register an account in Iran was to pretend to be from somewhere else, then even in the absence of sanctions, Blizzard could probably just shrug, say "TOS violation" and refuse a refund.

    4. Re:I dunno about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blizzard would be breaking the law by depositing money to an Iranian Bank or wiring money intent in going to Iran.

      I don't know the details of U.S. law and when the sanctions took place but some accounts are paid for in a year at a time or longer.

    5. Re:I dunno about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. The issue for Activision Blizzard would also include HOW to send the money back to players. US sanctions include doing business / transactions with Iranian banks and banks that have connections with them. .Where do you send the money?

    6. Re:I dunno about that by tgd · · Score: 1

      I would think

      Strangely, there's no relationship between what you think and US law. Weird, huh?

    7. Re:I dunno about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something just rubs me the wrong way about this. It may be a violation of sanctions, but it just doesn't seem right. Is the game really causing significant harm? What's next, banning access to those coming from an Iranian IP address to free services such as Hotmail or any generic website?

    8. Re:I dunno about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of sanctions is not to reduce harm, it's to put pressure on the populace who in turn (ideally) cause policy or regime change. Oddly enough typically the opposite happens; the black market provides those products/services and the populace looks at the sanctioning nations as the aggressor and support their own regime more. But that is the purpose.

    9. Re:I dunno about that by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      I distinctly remember that when I started my current job over a decade ago, part of our introductory training dealt with prohibited countries where we were not allowed to do business. There were 8-10 countries on that list, and I remember three of them being Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. I don't remember the rest of the list. These restrictions are nothing new; my guess is that Blizzard recently stepped up enforcement from "Where did you say you were from? India? Sure, we trust you." to "Let's automatically try to detect where you're from. Iran? Sorry, we can't do business with you."

    10. Re:I dunno about that by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So in order to NOT rip off a customer you have to break a law?

      Gotta love free market economy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:I dunno about that by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. If I sell illegal drugs and get $1 mil, I have to give that $1 mil back. They don't just say stop doing it and I keep the money. Federal law states that if money is gained illegally, it has to be undone. They're not depositing money into an Iranian account, they're un-receiving money from Iran, which sounds a hell of a lot more legal.

    12. Re:I dunno about that by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough I seem to recall Halliburton and a pile of other US based companies publicly announced they would be attending an oil industry trade show in Tehran about the same time SuperMicro got in deep shit for selling motherboards to somebody in Iran. The sanctions are stupid and irrelevant since large enough companies can find perfectly legal loopholes to just go around them, and I doubt they have any real impact on the people they are supposed to influence.

    13. Re:I dunno about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is trade that is blocked by a government regulation a "free market economy"?

    14. Re:I dunno about that by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I'd say maybe... except Iran isn't exactly a hotbed of community open source development.

    15. Re:I dunno about that by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But ... but ... the US ... always get told they're so free market ...

      So... free market is like free global trade? Only good when it allows companies to rip off customers?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:I dunno about that by tnk1 · · Score: 0

      So in order to NOT rip off a customer you have to break a law?

      Gotta love free market economy.

      I'd say that a government has a right to embargo an enemy state. It's not really a legitimate criticism of an otherwise free market system, unless you insist that free market also means completely free of all government control, which not even most of the libertarians are stating.

    17. Re:I dunno about that by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      So in order to NOT rip off a customer you have to break a law?

      Gotta love free market economy.

      Those sorts of laws don't come under "free market". They come under Government Regulation of the Market, which pretty much means "NOT Free Market".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  6. It was even available to begin with? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given the hardline stance in Iran, I would think all western games would be banned for being un islamic in the first place.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:It was even available to begin with? by jkflying · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps it's not quite as bad there as you've been led to believe?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    2. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Gee, you don't think the American media might have distorted the truth about Iranian society do you?!?!?

    3. Re:It was even available to begin with? by biochozo · · Score: 2

      Impossible! Iran IS the desolate wasteland we've been led to believe. My friend who frequents lies to me about how awesome the shopping is, how friendly the people are, and how it's really not so bad... or different. It would also be a lie to believe that if you were to go over there... the people would be just as frustrated with their government and their media shows off only the weirdest and skewed stories from the us. Like someone eating another man's face off, people getting massacred in movie theaters, and the highest incarceration rates of any other country in the world!

    4. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Iran is not run by the taliban. They have their own issues, but they are not the worst of the worst.

    5. Re:It was even available to begin with? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Given the hardline stance in Iran, I would think all western games would be banned for being un islamic in the first place.

      Probably not all of them, but some of them, yeah. There's a wiki page for everything:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_video_games_by_genre

      Computerized chess game, yeah I think that'll be OK.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The position of clerics and politicians in Iran does not necessarily match that of many (most?) Iranians. If you ever get a chance to meet someone who grew up there you will probably find that their interests and activities are not wildly different from much of Europe or North America.

    7. Re:It was even available to begin with? by bug1 · · Score: 1

      Iran is not run by the taliban. They have their own issues, but they are not the worst of the worst.

      World has been safe since "the worst of the worst" are locked up in guantanamo, thankyou GWB.

      (sarcasm)

    8. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you think is apparently wildly disconnected from reality. I'll make a mental note to remember this in future discussions.
      Thank you.

      (translation: stop believing everything you see on Fox news, sheep)

    9. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. Iran is a real paradise to live, especially thanks to Shariah. For example, if a woman is wearing anything other than the Hijab and has anything but her eyes exposed, she is subject to 60-70 lashes. Also, homosexuals do not exist there (per Ahmadinejad's comments), which is true, because they execute you for being a homosexual. Also, in the efforts of continuous improvements, the Iranian government issued a moratorium on stoning as a form of punishment in 2002; great for them!

      It's good that such an enlightened, wonderful, caring and moderate society is around. They are also excellent at spreading peace in the world! Once their terrorist proxies Hezbollah succeed in sending enough suicide bombers to Israel to "wipe them off the map", their long quest for peace and happiness for all mankind will be assured. Fortunately that's being sped up through the development of nuclear weapons and increasing nuclear proliferation. That'll bring peace!

      And by the way, none of this came from the evil Western media; this is from Iranian state controlled and censored media.

    10. Re:It was even available to begin with? by cdrguru · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course it is possible.

      But then again it is pretty easy to believe the worst of a country that punishes female infidelity by stoning.

    11. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the US Christian fundies say that games like D&D and books like Harry Potter are the tools of Satan

    12. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm waiting for the Wii version of Bust A Move: Sodom and Gomorrah Extended Edition.

    13. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feminist cuckold are you?

    14. Re:It was even available to begin with? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      There was a special the other night on PBS about a woman who moved her family there to do a documentary, very low key. All was well, everyone was friendly, nice insights into Iranian life. Suddenly the gov't gave her 48 hours to get out and everyone but one family stopped talking to her.
      Since it was generally positive about the people, I have to assume this wasn't blind propaganda.

    15. Re:It was even available to begin with? by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Hey, I never said it was an amazing place. However, I suspect it also isn't as bad as we've been led to believe.

      (Yes, I know, don't feed the A/C blah blah blah)

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    16. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the hardline stance in Iran, I would think all western games would be banned for being un islamic in the first place.

      Well, the ones where you blow up kaffir women and children, or decapitate infidels, would be OK.

    17. Re:It was even available to begin with? by biochozo · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it... she was approached and told that her shorts were too short... then the public safety dudes lost interest and just kinda wandered away. Boy... I should trust their Iranian state controlled media over an American friend with personal pics and videos. I was getting at the idea that the government doesn't always represent the people and the people shouldn't be represented by the few crazies that stand out. I am also aware of all of those things you mentioned. I'd never claim Iran is a better place to live because those things do happen and the area has many issues I wouldn't want to deal with.

    18. Re:It was even available to begin with? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's not quite as bad there as you've been led to believe?

      Only if his major problem with Iran is that it didn't allow playing of MMOs. Otherwise, it's just as shitty as he would expect.

    19. Re:It was even available to begin with? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Trade Sanctions, from the US is partially due to unpredictable government (Who gives mixed messages about nuclear weapons). And the fact that US doesn't seem to work harder to keep Israel to play nice with its neighbors. We tend to look the other way when Israel takes a very aggressive stance.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re:It was even available to begin with? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The issue is Iran signed the Nuclear nonproliferation act. But they are proliferating nuclear stuff. Pakistan and India didn't sign the act and they got nuke, the US didn't do much about it.

      All this stuff in the world is half about counties fighting for what they see is best in their own self interests. The Other half is defending the all the rules and treaties they signed onto in the past. A lot of these treaties may conflict with their own self interests so we get more issues...

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    21. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that different from male infidelity punishment?

    22. Re:It was even available to begin with? by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      I get hours of enjoyment reading the latest scoops at presstv.ir, how could I have missed all that? or did you actually read that on their U.S. counterpart, foxnews.com?

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    23. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Satanic crap got me to read the Rowling books, whereas that would never have happened otherwise.

    24. Re:It was even available to begin with? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Except actually not.

      Also, 99% of the hits you will get googling this issue are for a particular case in which most of the reports fail to mention, the woman confessed and was convicted of murdering her husband. Although I won't even try to weigh in on the reliability of that conviction.

    25. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on what was said by various Iranian people I've hung out with over the years, most of the Iranian people are pretty nice people like most places. They also think a lot of the stuff the Iranian government says and does is BS, but otherwise just try to get on with their lives. It isn't an absolute horrible place... as long as you don't draw too much attention from the wrong people. While both the US and Iran have assholes with too much power that can make life hell for various people, there is a definite sense a difference in proportion. For all of the exceptionally bad treatments you hear in the news of Americans that get screwed over by a bad cop, many Iranians will have stories of people they knew personally getting screwed over in such ways (and not just having a hellish day or two in jail to be set free when the judge sees there is nothing that can stick...).

    26. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of being partially buried and having all the flesh ripped from your face by hurled stones over the course of an hour, is not bad?

    27. Re:It was even available to begin with? by toriver · · Score: 1

      Ah, ye olde "20% increased sales from the Parental Advisory sticker" irony, married to the Streisand Effect.

    28. Re:It was even available to begin with? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's because religion demands it. On the other hand women are allowed to practice with automatic weapons because the Koran doesn't say anything about that.

      As usual the situation is too complex to easily sum up or understand without study.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:It was even available to begin with? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      For example, if a woman is wearing anything other than the Hijab and has anything but her eyes exposed, she is subject to 60-70 lashes.

      The requirement is actually to cover the hair (though that is not strictly enforced, which is why you see many young women in the photos wearing hijab such that their hair is not concealed in front) and legs. A lot of them do the latter part by wearing skinny jeans. End result looks like this.

      More generally speaking, GP didn't say that Iran "is a real paradise to live in". He said that it's not some kind of gulag, either, at least for the majority of its population. And, yes, they do play WoW there.

    30. Re:It was even available to begin with? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Much like USSR, you won't have all that much problems in Iran unless you're labelled an "undesirable" or belong to a category which is implicitly considered such (e.g. openly homosexual). So most people don't actually give much thought to it, but they know when to dodge the bullet when it looks like it may be headed their way. Most likely, when that woman was told to leave the country in 48 hours, the implied threat was that they'll treat her as an American spy. Needless to say, anyone who she'd be contacting would then also be under a similar suspicion. People in the USSR dodged foreign tourists for similar reasons.

    31. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sick and tired of people like you, so you know a little bit about something, but obviously you don't know enough to
      keep your damm mouth shut. If you cant go along with what we are feeding the public then SHUT THE FUCK UP
      and stay out of the way if you are so damm smart.

      How many fingers am I holding up for you right now, Winston? Iran is a dirty 3rd world shithole, the population loves their goverment of crazed
      islamic fanatics, people dont shop they stand in line for bread and are hoping to be liberated by US troops. It doesn't
      have to make sense, asshole if that just confused you that only means you were thinking. Stop thinking and start reacting!!

    32. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Of course it is possible.

      But then again it is pretty easy to believe the worst of a country that punishes female infidelity by stoning.

      They get them stoned? Sounds like a reward, not a punishment.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    33. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Clsid · · Score: 1

      What a bunch of nonsense. Women in Iran are allowed to show their faces. I think the country you are referring to is Saudi Arabia, which the US doesn't seem to have a problem with. The Islamic revolution that swept Iran hasn't been good for women's rights, but to say that it is the worst Middle East country regarding women treatment just shows a total lack of objectivity on your part.

    34. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      development of nuclear weapons

      this is from Iranian state controlled and censored media.

      Citation please.

    35. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it's not quite as bad there as you've been led to believe?

      Of course it is possible.

      But then again it is pretty easy to believe the worst of a country that punishes female infidelity by stoning.

      There have been a few cases of stoning (maybe tens, I don't know exactly) for adultery in Iran. Each one is tragic, savage, shameful and inexcusable. But do you really think that number even scratches the surface of the number of acts of adultery committed? So this is hardly a standard punishment.

      Also, on more cheerful note... It's not exclusive to women! It's for men too!

    36. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Meski · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. The Draenai are *clearly* Islamic.

    37. Re:It was even available to begin with? by Meski · · Score: 1

      It's wrong of me, but I always get the flashback to the Monty Python 'stoning' episode.

  7. Stupid by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm always shocked at just how much American culture has spread world wide. And the thing is - it often works in our favor. Iranian kids playing WoW can't in any way benefit Iran that I can think of, but has multiple benefits for the U.S. Someone from the gov should be on the horn right now getting those accounts reactiviated.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Stupid by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree completely. If you want to undermine a theocracy, trade sanctions that hurt the people and not the leaders aren't the way to do so. The best way is to give their people tools to share information. Spend 1% of the current US 'defense' budget on FTTH for Iran, and not only will those seeking to overthrow the government have better tools at their disposal, but it's harder to convince someone to kill themselves for a spiritual cause when tons of HD porn is just seconds away.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm always shocked at just how much American culture has spread world wide. And the thing is - it often works in our favor. Iranian kids playing WoW can't in any way benefit Iran that I can think of, but has multiple benefits for the U.S. Someone from the gov should be on the horn right now getting those accounts reactiviated.

      I wonder if there is a tax benefit for Iran that Blizzard has to pay from their Iranian players.

    3. Re:Stupid by Ryanrule · · Score: 2
    4. Re:Stupid by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I doubt that Blizzard's actions are related to any recent change of policy by the US Government. Rather, it's about companies looking differently at how current policies might be applied in the wake of the HSBC case that's running at the moment (which may or may not be a piece of Wall Street protectionism).

      I can't prove it, because obviously they'll have updated their registration systems now, but I'd be prepared to bet that Blizzard have never allowed the registration of accounts (or at least the purchase of games or subscriptions on accounts) where the customer identified themselves as being from Iran. They - and quite a lot of other companies - would have been operating on the principle that this was enough to get them legally in the clear against charges of dealing with regimes subject to sanctions.

      The HSBC case has shown (among other things) that getting customers to tick a box certifying that they aren't from such a country is not, in fact, enough to prevent you from having to answer some fairly scary questions. I suspect Blizzard have just looked at their legal risk register and decided that they need to move to an IP-blocking system. So it's not actually a change of policy by either the US Government or Blizzard - but rather a change in approach and methodology.

    5. Re:Stupid by Xest · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe Barrack's level 60 wizard got killed by Ahmadinejad's level 60 warrior or whatever the fuck you get in these games nowadays?

    6. Re:Stupid by malv · · Score: 1

      "Iranian kids playing WoW can't in any way benefit Iran that I can think of"

      And I can't see how it is any threat to Iran either. It's not like their regime has declared a war on fun.

    7. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will we keep terrorists out of our raids though? Think of the elf children!

    8. Re:Stupid by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      I'm always shocked at just how much American culture has spread world wide. And the thing is - it often works in our favor. Iranian kids playing WoW can't in any way benefit Iran that I can think of, but has multiple benefits for the U.S. Someone from the gov should be on the horn right now getting those accounts reactiviated.

      No, because if they are playing WoW they aren't protesting against their government. Now they can't play WoW, they are likely wondering why, and "because their leaders want nukes" might not sit well with them. That's the idea behind sanctions.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    9. Re:Stupid by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      how about we we spend that money on FTTH to US residents first. Oh wait that would be socialism

    10. Re:Stupid by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Are you nuts? Now that Georgy was dumb enough to kill Saddam, we needed a new whipping boy. You know, the kind of guy we can pull out of the closet whenever something goes wrong at home, be it that the secretary finds cum on her shirt, an economy that doesn't want to restart or other kinds of unrest that stir the population, pull out the punching bag and start pummeling it, give the population someone else but the prez to hate.

      Now, as stated above, Georgy dropped the ball here and actually killed the whipping boy. You can't do that, ok? So we needed a new target for our daily 10 minute hate. And Ahmedingbats was a great successor.

      And now you suggest we should HOPE that he gets overthrown? Are you nuts? I can see Assad already shaking in his boots, 'cause I guess he'd be the next one for the closet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking exactly the same thing. If we really wanted to fk up their future generations we should just let all the iranian kids play til their heart is content. It's got to be the most useless waste of time known to mankind.

    12. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea that makes sense....

      Except they're gonna blame Blizzard who is the one renegging on the "contract". And Blizzard saying "Sorry, won't give you back your money either sucker" is really gonna make them feel like Blizzard are the good guys.

    13. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised Iran hadn't blocked WoW sooner for Trade Chat alone...

    14. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at US Congress and notice the number of extremist religious nutjobs there.
      Now all of a sudden expression "theocracy" hits a lot closer to home, doesn't it?

    15. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they can't play WoW, they are likely wondering why, and "because USA hates us" might not sit well with them.

      FTFY. This is what they are more likely to understand.

    16. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but it's harder to convince someone to kill themselves for a spiritual cause"

      Iranians don't have tradition of suicide terrorism.

    17. Re:Stupid by garbut · · Score: 1

      We did. The telcos squandered it in the 90s.

      --
      Oh, should I have sugar-coated that?
    18. Re:Stupid by Meski · · Score: 1

      Barrack plays Topper McNabb (an NPC beggar in Stormwind)

      Topper McNabb says: I will gladly pay you on Tuesday for a hamburger today.

      Says it all.

    19. Re:Stupid by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I still remember when the German rock band Scorpions played Moscow along with Bon Jovi and a slew of American hard rock and heavy metal bands. Not long after, the wall was coming down and many of us celebrated. The Eastern Bloc was destined to collapse. It was going to happen because of the inefficiencies in the system, isolation, and government crippling of technology. But aging military equipment and aging infrastructure is only one prong. That doesn't just take down a country over night. Winning the masses made the difference in the Cold War. For years, American culture trickled into East Germany and USSR (and I'm sure the rest of the Bloc). You could get bootlegs of American rock albums printed on discarded medical x-ray film. But when western hard rock and heavy metal bands began playing in Moscow, it became a catalyst for a rush of imported American culture. Not to be over-simplistic, East Germans began flooding out of the GDR for reasons other than music, chiefly Honecker's cheating and his crackdowns. But before all of this, many people in the Eastern Bloc were unaware of what they were missing, and once they saw it, the desire to have better became overwhelming. Embracing Persians, Syrians, and Cuban might create that same catalyst. And, if you're a free marketer, that's three new markets.

  8. The straw that breaks the camel's back? by phil_aychio · · Score: 1

    Could this force Iran to stop enriching uranium? What if Steam followed suit...what would happen then?

    --
    obvious redundancy is obvious
    1. Re:The straw that breaks the camel's back? by Megane · · Score: 2

      But how would we sneak in SCADA viruses to break their centrifuges, if not through games downloaded from Steam?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:The straw that breaks the camel's back? by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      But clearly they need those nuclear power plants to power all of those computers.

    3. Re:The straw that breaks the camel's back? by Sparticus789 · · Score: 0

      Should give them game access, it's called a back door. NSA is going to be knocking on Blizzard's door anytime now.

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
    4. Re:The straw that breaks the camel's back? by dwye · · Score: 1

      Let them steal USB drives labelled "Truly Sick Porn" just like we did the last time.

  9. Oh great by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The US has just pissed off a few hundred more Iranians. Ahmadinejad couldn't be more happy.

    1. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has just pissed off a few hundred more Iranians.

      Not just Iranians. Wanna bet which country US will attack next?

    2. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand productivity for a few hundred Iranians just increased by at least 500%

    3. Re:Oh great by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Not just Iranians. Wanna bet which country US will attack next?

      Azeroth?

    4. Re:Oh great by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Indeed. That's why, as with most things with Reagan, crediting the Gipper with the fall of the Soviet Union is a joke. Because every time we'd rattle our sabres, their citizens would naturally rally and patriotism would increase.

      It's no different with Iran. Every time we talk about bombing them, the mullahs should send us a thank you card for extending their rule.

    5. Re:Oh great by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2

      They were never legally allowed to buy or play WOW in the first place. Blizzard's just changing the enforcement to be more proactive.

  10. Wait a sec... by biochozo · · Score: 2

    I have a feeling that bored Iranian computer savvy individuals, newly irritated with United States foreign policy, could backfire.

    1. Re:Wait a sec... by Hentes · · Score: 4, Informative

      WOW-player and computer-savvy are two different things.

    2. Re:Wait a sec... by biochozo · · Score: 1

      Obviously, but point being that the WoW group is more likely within the range of computer savvy individuals.

    3. Re:Wait a sec... by Glothar · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced.

      I'd almost say that playing WoW would decrease the chances of being computer savvy, once you exclude people without computers. Maybe if one of the Eastern European hacking groups released a "Attack the US" bot (with instructions), I would be afraid of Iranian WoW players, but until then... nope.

    4. Re:Wait a sec... by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Usually, WoW is a good way to be someone who uses a computer every day, but who still manages to know almost nothing about how it works. Sort of like Fantasy Football players.

    5. Re:Wait a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The union of the two sets is probably not zero.

    6. Re:Wait a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're computer savvy, couldn't they just use a VPN or something of that regard?

      The following meant as a joke: Couldn't Blizzard change gameplay so all enemies in the game have a picture of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's face on the character?

    7. Re:Wait a sec... by Meski · · Score: 1

      WOW-player and computer-savvy can be two different things.

      FTFY

    8. Re:Wait a sec... by Dracophile · · Score: 1

      WOW-player and computer-savvy are two different things.

      But not necessarily mutually exclusive...

      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
  11. Lists to check by dtmos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Bureau of Industry and Security, US Department of Commerce, is the place to go to see the appropriate regulations. See, especially, the Export Administration Regulations, the Commerce Control List (especially), and the Lists to Check list. (Yes, there are so many lists that the lists themselves have a list.)

    1. Re:Lists to check by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 1

      These lists are all posted in the list room. YES, the US goverment has a list room. Very similar to the chart room. If you have any questions please reffer to this list so you can find the appropriate room.

      --
      Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
    2. Re:Lists to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These rooms are located in the room of rooms.

    3. Re:Lists to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the list of parent rooms is located in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'.

    4. Re:Lists to check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just STFU. Oh, an excuse to quote a book enjoyed by millions to show how unique and clever I am!

      Seriously, just STFU. People like you are turning this place into the next Reddit.

  12. WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by BMOC · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't F2P solve this situation since there is no business transaction?

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    1. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

      Sort of. F2P up to level 20. When max level is 85, that's pretty worthless.

    2. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by Obsi · · Score: 1

      I would think not; I would think it to be handled by export admins as a business transaction for $0.

    3. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.molten-wow.com/

      that's F2P

    4. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As sourceforge isn't available in Iran either, I don't think that this could solve anything

    5. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by Desler · · Score: 1

      Why would they forgo their entire revenue stream to pander to a tiny sliver of their total user population?

    6. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by BMOC · · Score: 1

      Can you purchase quest packs to 85? (i.e., freemium model) If so, then all Blizzard has to do is accept bitcoin or some other location-masking payment option and the problem is solved, right?

      --
      I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
    7. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trial to level 20 is time limited. And Blizzard accepting BitCoin? Please. I'm all for it, but I doubt it will ever happen.

    8. Re:WoW still hasn't gone F2P? by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

      Not that I know of. I suppose it's more of a free trial, since you still have to pay for game time in order to progress beyond 20.

  13. Blizzard is not telling the truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There have been no recent changes that would require them to no longer provide WOW in Iran.

    1. Re:Blizzard is not telling the truth. by vlm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There have been no recent changes that would require them to no longer provide WOW in Iran.

      Its a widely held, but completely wrong, belief that US companies can't do business with/in Iran. Totally false. We mostly export "bad stuff" to them like tobacco products, corn, soy... the kind of stuff we use to sicken and poison our own walmart-ian underclass. So thats kind of weird. We also export stereotypical medical stuff to Iran. No one wants TV stories about how the state dept slowly killed a cute little Iranian kid by denying export of some obscure medical pill. Well, maybe it would play at the republican convention but in general it would be bad PR.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-United_States_relations#Economic_relations

      It is, however, expensive with endless forms and licenses to fill out. All you need is a PHB to decide, "The paperwork isn't worth the profit" and its done. If there were a million profitable subscribers I'm sure they'd still be playing WOW right now, but if the legal compliance costs exceed gross revenue from just a couple gamers (which sounds extremely likely) then ....

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Blizzard is not telling the truth. by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      No recent changes in U.S. law but if Bliz was unaware they were violating existing law and got a friendly knock on the door from a U.S. agent to inform them what they were doing was a violation .. then Bliz would change their policies to comply.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    3. Re:Blizzard is not telling the truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "corn, soy... the kind of stuff we use to sicken and poison our own walmart-ian underclass."

      The assbergers is strong in this one.

    4. Re:Blizzard is not telling the truth. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      My experience with BIS and export regulations while not complete does indicate to me that trade with Iran, Syria, Cuba and North Korea is permitted from the US only with a license. An unobtainable license. Which is the same thing as being completely banned.

      I do not believe there is any company in the US that would put forth the effort to even inquire how someone gets such a license. So while there is no law specifically saying "Trade with Iran is banned" it is a case of de facto banning because the license is unobtainable.

      Buying a full auto machine gun is possible in the US, but you need a tax stamp on your license to do so. The stamp costs $3000 last time I heard. You need to be pretty committed if you want to own a MAC-10 legally. Having held one once where the owner was describing the hoops he had to go through to get it legally (he was a cop) was pretty interesting. I would consider the licensing required for trade with Iran to be somewhat more severe than the ban on full auto weapons.

    5. Re:Blizzard is not telling the truth. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Buying a full auto machine gun is possible in the US, but you need a tax stamp on your license to do so. The stamp costs $3000 last time I heard.

      The ATF tax stamp costs $200. $3000 is what you'll need to pony up for a full auto gun itself (though something like $10k is more likely), but that's because no new weapon can be made or imported for civilian ownership for the last 30 years or so - so the number of full auto guns in circulation is limited and goes down every year, and the price goes up accordingly.

  14. Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like the war mongering Republicans like Bush, McCain, and Graham, whom have wasted lots of money in Iraq, were Libya happy, and now want action in Syria. We should lift sanctions against Cuba, and be friendlier with nations that pursue alternate economic systems, like Venezuela.

    Still, if you want to travel across the country without identification, take a bus. A suicide bomber on an airplane can kill hundreds. On a bus... only tens of people, if lucky.

    Iran is ENRICHING URANIUM, the hardest step in the manufacturing of nuclear weapons. Iran could easily BUY nuclear fuel rods from other nations, such as France, Japan, in addition to RUSSIA and CHINA ie, the nations on the UN security council that have OPPOSED sanctions on Iran. Iran will have to develop and run an expensive nuclear infrastructure for a small number of nuclear reactors, unlike, France and Russia, whom already have decades of experience, and have economies of scale from large numbers of their own reactors, and sell too many other countries, including the United States. That's right, America gets most of its civilian fuel rods from other nations. In light of that, it seems illogical from Iran to operate an indigenous civilian nuclear power program, when it can buy for less from friendly nations, and avoid suspicion.

    1. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      By not buying rods (which was proposed in a UN resolution I believe) Iran is do a bunch of things. Iran looks to be strong by standing up to the US and not doing what it wants. That feeds Iran's propaganda. By making their own, they can up the enrichment to make weapons. The stuff they buy would not be that high. Even a dirty bomb of highly enriched uranium would be very bad. That is enough of for more propaganda.

      Iran knows that it will take a lot for some country to actually go to war with it. Iran has much to gain by doing what it wants. Even if it is attacked, it gains politically by that as well. Unless all the other Islam countries are going to do nothing which is very unlikely, Iran has nothing to lose by enriching uranium. If Iran was threatened with being nuclear bombed, it might rethink what it is doing. Iran knows that the US will not nuke it. I do not think and western country will nuke Iran. Who would nuke Iran? Russia maybe but unlikely. India again not likely.

    2. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now why would a nation that has been under economic sanctions of one form or another for almost fifty years want to avoid making its power plants completely dependant on trade with other countries?

    3. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Iran is committed to the extinction of the Jews.

      Not they're not. That's a bunch of horseshit propaganda that the U.S. and Israel have created to justify their shadow war against Iran, one that's been going on since their puppet totalitarian Shah got tossed out by the modern DEMOCRATIC government of Iran.

    4. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by dwye · · Score: 1

      Even a dirty bomb of highly enriched uranium would be very bad.

      A dirty bomb of any enrichment of uranium up to 100% U235 would be a silly waste of resources when one could make radioactive isotopes with shorter half-lives, thus more badness for the buck. The only thing sillier would be to use pure bismuth (say, in pepto-bismol), which would remain radioactive for (by the 7 half-lives rule of thumb) almost 2 trillion years (except at such a low level that its radioactivity was not realized until the 1960s).

      As to Iran having nothing to lose, convincing every one of their neighbors who can to buy or make their own nuke to keep Iran from trying anything cannot be in Iran's interest. Hell, the Sunni states in the area are even talking about not wiping out Israel until the Iranian threat is neutralized!

    5. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>Iran is committed to the extinction of the Jews. This is a publicly stated policy

      No there isn't. The comment you are referring to has been accurately translated as, "Someday the government in Jerusalem will fall and be wiped from the pages of history." It isn't the Jews that government hates, but the government. In fact there are many Jews living in Iran even as we speak, and they are not being round-up and exterminated. So stop spreading anti-Arab/Iranian hate speech and racism.

      As for the nuclear weapon Secretary of Defense Panetta has alread said, "No I don't think Iran is developing a nuclear weapon. The fuel they have is not anywhere pure enough for weapon use, and it is within compliance with the Nonproliferation Treaty."

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    6. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iran is committed to the extinction of the Jews. This is a publicly stated policy and one they have enshrined in their laws, along with a lot of other Middle East nations. Do not decide to put on a Star of David and visit Iran even as a joke. They will treat you just like the TSA does with people that joke about bombs.

      If this was true then why hasn't Iran exterminated the Jews that live in Iran or destroyed their shrines or synagogues? They are a lot closer than Israel.

    7. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ahmadinejad has made too many anti-Semitic remarks to mention here so here is a handy list by year: http://www.adl.org/main_International_Affairs/ahmadinejad_words.htm

      So no it is not just one "mistranslated" statement. And no, mentioning it has nothing to do with "spreading anti-Arab/Iranian hate speech and racism". Where the hell did you get that from?

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    8. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Kurrel · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they will still be fighting over Israel in 2 trillion years, even if it's a radioactive magma swamp.

    9. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I would argue Iran does not have a firm commitment to that policy, I wouldn't say it is US propaganda. If anything, a lot of it is Iranian propaganda, figure heads saying things that are not whole-heartily followed through, trying to appease more extreme religious types within the country while in the end being more concerned with just running the country and trying to deal with internal issues.

    10. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by toriver · · Score: 1

      Henry Ford also made anti-Semitic remarks, you still buy his cars...

    11. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by hajus · · Score: 2

      "Unless all the other Islam countries are going to do nothing which is very unlikely"

      The arab countries' governments would be quite ecstatic to see Iran taken down. 'Persia' and Arabia have had this power competition for centuries. Notice how the arab countries are trying to change the name of the Persian Gulf to just the Gulf in order to piss Iran off. There might be other countries to jump on Iran's side, but not their closest neighbors.

    12. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Uberbah · · Score: 2

      Ahmadinejad has made too many anti-Semitic remarks to mention here so here is a handy list by year

      Which starts with the well known sophistry of "wipe Israel off the map", a debunked lie. Between that and their support of the 'Ground Zero Mosque' ban, the ADL has zero credibility.

    13. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      For every anti-Semitic statement Ahmadinejad has made, we can probably find an equivalent statement coming from a politician in the US. Not to mention the anti-Arab statements coming out if the Israeli and US governments....

      It's called political rhetoric. Of course, Ahmadinejad may be anti-Semitic; it's a free-ish world, and he has a right to his own views, however misguided.

      This is the same argument I've heard against Islam based on Jihad, and the same argument I've heard against playing D&D. Focus on the outliers and a perfectly acceptable (if twisted) interpretation of what's going on, introduce the "slippery slope" rhetoric, and then appeal to public opinion on killing kittens/babies/etc.

      Personally, I'd be a lot happier with Iran having nuclear weapons than Pakistan and India having them... Iran is at least fairly self-sufficient and has a record of being able to defend itself from external and internal instability.

    14. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      While I would argue Iran does not have a firm commitment to that policy, I wouldn't say it is US propaganda.

      Of course it's propaganda. Guess which country in the Middle East has the highest Jewish population after Israel? That also has Jewish members of Parliament?

      The parent, cdrguru, is a lying liar.

    15. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Iran is committed to the extinction of the Jews.

      Not they're not. That's a bunch of horseshit propaganda that the U.S. and Israel have created to justify their shadow war against Iran, one that's been going on since their puppet totalitarian Shah got tossed out by the modern DEMOCRATIC government of Iran.

      I won't argue that the idea Iran wants to wipe out the Jews is complete nonsense.

      But calling the Iranian government democratic is an extreme stretch. The candidates are severely restricted, the voting is largely rigged, and the main authority resides with the Supreme Leader who is not elected (not the President who has limited authority), and the Guardian Council who is half appointed by the Supreme Leader and half by the parliament. It may become democratic one day, but right now it is mostly an autocracy.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    16. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      All the sophistry in the world can't magic up the list of anti-Semitic bullshit Ahmadinejad has promoted.

      Was his Holocaust-denial conference another Western media conspiracy?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    17. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      The first quote on your list is mistranslated, and I suspect the others are as well. When a list starts-off with a debunked lie, it holds zero credibility.

      Besides we all know the president of Iran is not the real source of power. It is the elected Parliament and the Supreme Leader (ayatollah) that hold the strings. I don't want to say the Iranian president is a "puppet" but he's pretty close to it. The Supreme Leader has stated several times he disavows any idea of exterminating the Jews (which is why we see them living in Iran and happy to be there).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    18. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Clsid · · Score: 1

      I can almost quote you on this: "But calling the US government democratic is an extreme stretch. The candidates are severely restricted, the voting is largely rigged, and the main authority resides with the media who is not elected (not the President who has limited authority), and the Pentagon who is half appointed by the president and half by congress. It may become democratic one day, but right now it is mostly a plutocracy."

    19. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Arabs (and Persians in this case) don't like Jews and Jews don't like Arabs. It has been like that for more than a thousand years. Now to invade a country because one of said groups perceive the other to cause them harm is just playing to their petty feuds.

    20. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Yeah but your substitutions make the statement nonsense.

      Besides, you're not convincing anyone the US political system is as bad as the Iranian system, people are familiar with the US system and you won't change their minds. What you are doing is telling them the Iranian government is as good as the US system, and I really doubt that's what you really intended.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    21. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a list starts-off with a debunked lie, it holds zero credibility.

      And yet you appear incapable of understanding why others distrust your own assertions. How interesting...

    22. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Henry Ford also made anti-Semitic remarks, you still buy his cars...

      Ford isn't a country, and it isn't trying to get its hands on nukes.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    23. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by smithmc · · Score: 1

      For every anti-Semitic statement Ahmadinejad has made, we can probably find an equivalent statement coming from a politician in the US.

      Ahmadinejad isn't "a politician", he's the President of Iran. Heard many anti-Semitic statements from Obama lately, or Bush or Clinton before him?

      Not to mention the anti-Arab statements coming out if the Israeli and US governments...

      I haven't heard anything about "wiping the Arab world off the map"; have you?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    24. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/07/benjamin-netanyahu-on-israel-mitt-romney
      http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25003
      http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/islamophobia_no_longer_even_questioned

      (everyone has a very slanted take on this, so I thought I'd post a cross-section)

      I haven't heard anything about "wiping the Jewish world off the map" either; The Iranian government wants the Israeli government gone as it is unabashadly anti-Islam; the Israeli government wants to nuke Iran because it sees the Iranian government as an anti-Zion threat.

      Both sides are high on rhetoric, and have been for hundreds of years. The US supports both sides, but is interested in keeping Jewish-controlled Israel in control of Jerusalem and Gaza. Tehran wants the state of Israel, as erected by the west, removed from the map. Literally. They're not talking about nuking Israel, they're talking about changing the political makeup and boundaries of the physical area. This is the politics of the situation, and has nothing to do with individual intolerance or hate -- those are a completely separate issue.

      Put a different way: Iran wants Israel off the map the same way that Yugoslavia is now off the map, and the same way that the colony of Hong Kong is now off the map (or the USSR for that matter).

      Of course, Iran dreams of being Persia again as well....

    25. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Clsid · · Score: 1

      Oh I'm not saying that the Iranian system is as good as the US, I'm just telling you that all countries have issues. To start pinpointing a specific country like that is just pure propaganda, and the same can be said about the US, but to you, as an American, you will see it for what it is, complete bullshit. That was the main idea of the argument.

    26. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not they're not. That's a bunch of horseshit propaganda that the U.S. and Israel have created to justify their shadow war against Iran, one that's been going on since their puppet totalitarian Shah got tossed out by the modern DEMOCRATIC government of Iran.

      Your definition of "DEMOCRATIC" must be a far cry from mine. Mine includes free and fair elections, free speech, and opponents who can leave their house and communicate with the rest of the world.

    27. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I'm actually a Canadian.

      And my opinion of Iranian politics comes from multiple sources, including conversations with Iranians where they generally had a more pessimistic view of their government than I did.

      The US government, while it has serious issues, is fundamentally democratic.

      The Iranian government, while it has democratic characteristics, is fundamentally a theocracy/autocracy.

      Its easy to obscure the truth with details, but when you start comparing the Iranian government to the US government on favourable terms, and calling Iran democratic, you need to take a step back and reconsider which details are really important.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    28. Re:Iran's nuke program seems illogical by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      All the sophistry in the world

      Yeah. All the sophistry in the world. Like leaving out the second half of Ahmadinejad's comments on the Holocaust:

      1) Did it happen
      2) If it happened, how does it justify taking land by force for a bunch of immigrants to create Israel, or justify Israel's treatment of the Palestinians.

  15. That's what you get for going rogue, Iran. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iran - the Leeroy Jenkins of nation states.

    1. Re:That's what you get for going rogue, Iran. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least they have chicken

  16. BOO FUCKING HOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw those guys!

  17. Blizzard sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, nothing but trouble from Blizzard, I learned my lesson the first time.
    Now I just remind people about that first time, people forget Blizzard's history and buy more crap from them.

    I look at this story and laugh, who couldn't see some stupid crap like this coming? Blizzard will always be blocking something alright-- it's users.

    As an aside, Why are there domains with .ir if we're blocking Iran?

    IR domain names can be freely registered but there are some restrictions for registering Second-level domains :

    ac.ir – academic (tertiary education and research establishments) and learned societies.
    co.ir – commercial/companies
    gov.ir – government (Islamic Republic of Iran)
    id.ir – personal, every one have National Number from Islamic Republic of Iran
    net.ir – ISPs and network companies approved by IRTCT
    org.ir – non-profit organizations
    sch.ir – schools, primary and secondary education

    Oh I see, "we're" not blocking Iran, Blizzard is.

    Someone's integrity is a shitpile anyway you look at it,

    The State Dept, NED, Freedom House or Blizzard

    All of em are shit, I say.

    go ahead and play your stupid fucking game. Oh wait, if your in IRAN you can't.
    Ya know, I don't really give a crap if they want to block Iran, but the question I wonder is why the fuck did they lay a cable to Iran to connect them up in the first place if they are so fucking hostile? Or is it like I say, one big fucking lie. State Dept - to sub pieces of shit like NED - to even sub sub like Freedom House or Freedom XYZ.. Pussy Riot, why not block Russia too Blizzard? China Too? Korea too?

    Hell I'll fuckin help ya with your IPTables..

    0.0.0.0/8
    1.1.1.1/8 ... repeat this pattern
    255.255.255.255/8

    Now ya don't have to worry about shit, no packets from Iran.

  18. Now they can become... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    productive members of their society.

  19. Re:WoW, a REAL idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have issues not to mention a bad grasp on the English language. Step away from the keyboard for a few minutes... things will get better.

  20. Re:WoW, a REAL idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please take an anger management course sometime soon. It would benefit us as much as it would benefit you.

  21. as the gamers get older by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should realize, just as in a country south of Florida, that there is a responsibility on their part as to whether they will be supporters of the status quo, or just complacent, or whether they have a responsibility to take their destiny in their hands and participate in making change happen.

    I have relatives that fled that country south of Florida and support in various ways the downfall of its current leader(s), and they in turn have relatives still in-country that support their position, and at the same time have relatives that have a devotion and reverence and fully support the current leader(s).

    You live in a situation where your leaders are antithetic to freedom, it is your responsibility to effect change. Whining over ability to play a game shows how effectively your/their leaders are able to distract certain parts of the populace.

  22. The Russian Program was So Great by medv4380 · · Score: 1

    Did NASA ever have a rocket explode and kill 48 of the Engineers? Don't get me wrong Russia has a functional space program, and is going to make mistakes just as we have, but I think blowing up a Large Number of engineers would shape the opinion of people during the Cold War that their space program sucks. That one little Vostok-2M rocket probably set them back a decade in talent.
    If a cop pulls over someone with no Drivers Licence and no Insurance they have proven that they shouldn't be driving. You need insurance because the risks while driving is high, and you need a licence so that you can actually prove you know how to drive. If you want to walk from LA to NY go ahead, but be sure not to go through Death Valley, I hear it's a pain this time of year. And AZ probably isn't a good pick if you're not white, but that's why their immigration laws were challenged, and challenged as being a little too much unamerican.
    And if you want to go to North Korea so Badly by all means go, no one will miss you. I'm sure they will be fine if you just walk in without an ID or Papers without telling them that you're coming. You'll have a job already lined up and ready to go.

    1. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a cop pulls over someone with no Drivers Licence and no Insurance they have proven that they shouldn't be driving. You need insurance because the risks while driving is high, and you need a licence so that you can actually prove you know how to drive.

      If the reason is safety, then we wouldn't forbid undocumented people from getting licenses and insurance. The fact is politicians WANT undocumented immigrants not to have insurance or take driver safety tests so that they have another reason to scapegoat them.

    2. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Divide and conquer.

      Turn on each other! Blame yourselves! Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

    3. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the USSR ever loose 14 cosmonauts in just two accidents? Have they, in fact, lost ANY cosmonauts since the 70's?

    4. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14 In 2 < 48 in 1
      Also astronauts and cosmonauts know the risk. Losing the people who build the rocket is a bit of a problem.

    5. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by makomk · · Score: 2
    6. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

      Did NASA ever have a rocket explode and kill 48 of the Engineers?

      No, but we did lose 3 astronauts on the ground and 14 in the air in three separate events. We were not without our colossal failures either.

      You need insurance because the risks while driving is high, and you need a licence so that you can actually prove you know how to drive.

      You need proof of financial responsibility to drive. This can be in the form of insurance, OR a deposit left with the DMV. Insurance is just the easier way for the common man to afford this. The level of insurance required to satisfy the financial responsibility requirement (at least in CA) is usually a far cry short of the actual costs incurred in an injury collision. Most people do not carry enough insurance to completely cover themselves from all financial risk, because it's become too bloody expensive to do so.

      Also, a license DOES NOT IN ANY WAY PROVE THAT YOU KNOW HOW TO DRIVE. It only proves you were able to pass a basic written and behind the wheel test on a single day back when you were 16ish. Spend about an hour on the freeways around Los Angeles, and tell me with a straight face that all these licensed drivers have any clue how to actually operate their vehicles in a safe manner.

    7. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to count accidents on the ground, you also have to add another 3 to NASA's fatality list. Little safety tip: oxygen + sparks = bad news.

    8. Re:The Russian Program was So Great by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did NASA ever have a rocket explode and kill 48 of the Engineers?

      Not due to superior American-ism, but due to: 1) learning from Russian mistakes (they went first almost every time), 2) better luck.

      NASA killed plenty of people, in space and on the ground. Space exploration is dangerous-- in the 50s and 60s space exploration was insanely dangerous-- for every country attempting it. That's just a fact.

      You also have to remember that during pretty much the shuttle era, Russian space travel was on average far more safe than US space travel.

      I will say that the Russians seemed to lose a lot more automated probes due to stupid mistakes (giving bad instructions, bad change control, etc.) But those were just robots. And the US has lost probes due to stupid mistakes, too.

  23. Oracle Has Done This For Years by brningpyre · · Score: 1

    I remember reading the agreement for using an Oracle 10g client a few years back, and one section was that you can't have been born, or be a resident in a list of countries, which included Iran. Needless to say, my friend (who was born in Iran and held dual citizenship) just installed and ran it anyway.

  24. Re:WoW, a REAL idiot! by BMOC · · Score: 1

    Yeah, lets solve all Blizzard business troubles by making their entire business model to give their game and services away for free with no business transactions at all!

    F2P, we loose money on every gamer but make it up in bulk.

    What a moron. And if you comment on how F2P leads to cash sales... exactly how would those not be blocked by sanctions as business transactions? I had hoped I would not need to point this out on a tech forum but apparently I do.

    Please BMOC, nominate yourself for a Darwin award soon.

    Ah, WoW, afaik, still has the largest userbase of any MMO, or very near the largest. There's lots of smaller games that survive and even thrive on the freemium model. I don't think Blizzard has anything to fear from going F2P if they haven't already. As you said, they would be better suited to make it up in bulk.

    Oh, and, why you so angry?

    --
    I swear they give me mod points to shut me up.
  25. VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit whining and set up a fucking vpn.

  26. Finally, a sanction this will work... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    ...that's all Iran wants - a million pissed off teen/twenty-somethings will a whole lot o' anger and a newfound whole lot o' free time on their hands...

    --
    Loading...
  27. Oh please by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    Why is this an issue? Guess what, the online yarn store also can't sell to them, or puzzles R us, or any other businesses. This is why it's called sanctions. You aren't supposed to be doing business with them in an attempt to influence policy change.

    1. Re:Oh please by cffrost · · Score: 1

      You aren't supposed to be doing business with them in an attempt to influence policy change.

      Interesting hypothesis. Can you cite any instances of sanctions being credited with successfully influencing policy change? It is my observation that increased trade benefits both parties, and sanctions are a bullying tactic used to punish innocent foreign populations in weaker nations, as well as harm domestic workers and businesses with no tangible benefit or compensation.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  28. Shoot us both in the foot, hope it hurts them more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shoot us both in the foot, hope it hurts them more - is the thinking behind trade sanctions.

    In this case, it hurts the US more than it hurts the Iranian government. What does the Iranian government care if some kids can't play WoW, even better maybe they do something productive with their time as well as spend the subscription fee in Iran. The US government on the other hand loses tax revenue from Blizzard losing subscriber revenue. Win! Good job America.

    And in the larger case, the business that the US and Europe now won't do with Iran, has all gone to India and China. Win again!

  29. Re:WoW, a REAL idiot! by maugle · · Score: 1

    Ah, WoW, afaik, still has the largest userbase of any MMO, or very near the largest. There's lots of smaller games that survive and even thrive on the freemium model. I don't think Blizzard has anything to fear from going F2P if they haven't already. As you said, they would be better suited to make it up in bulk.

    I'd add "and talk to Valve about how Team Fortress 2 is doing if you're still not sure", but I don't think the folks at Valve would be able to hear you. Not over the sound of all that money pouring in.

  30. Big whoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iranians can't pay to play a bad game that feels more like a job.

  31. Has the US gone nuts? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone think of the implications, the consequences, of such a move? Iranian kids will no longer be able to play WoW, instead they might learn and study, and be better engineers than ours who are able to continue wasting their time. It seems the US is hell bent on trying to give other countries an edge in technology.

    And here I was thinking the US doesn't like the Iran. How wrong I was, they even help them increase their productivity!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. IP Blocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess this proves they can IP block a whole country. So now there excuse FOR NOT BLOCKING China is gone. DO IT YOU BITCHES!

  33. Re:Civics Class by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Lots of illegal stuff going on at all levels of government, and U.S. society, for that matter. Our Constitution prohibits almost everything noteworthy the government does these days.
    Nothing to see here, move along.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  34. Upon First Read of the Headline by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 2

    I thought it said that Iranian prayers were blocked.

  35. The great Iranian internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't they been threatening to build their own internet and cut it off from the world anyway? Then they wouldn't be able to connect, so it's just giving them a taste of that ahead of time.

    See [treasury.gov] for sanctions on Iran. I believe that Swift (the international wire system) recently removed all Iranian banks from their service making international wires into Iran all but impossible. linky [huffingtonpost]

    So while it may not be illegal to take money from Iran the US government doesn't look kindly on sending money to Iran.

  36. P.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW, it was a tweaker ghetto neighborhood, so my clean, white, sober, unarmed and sans contraband persona should not have been too menacing.
    My only crime was being new to the area, so I had to be personally rousted by four of the locals (three times by one of them, last time he gave me back my doobie) until they knew who I was. Some thing to do between calls, apparently, and they left me alone once they figured out I only do beer and weed.

  37. Don't forget... by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    There's simple ignorance, and willful ignorance, as well. Almost as common as brainless drones, and neck-and-neck with the paranoid schizophrenics.
    A verrry small minority are actually reasonable folks who've merely been duped into disagreeing with me.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  38. How convenient for Blizzard by RobertLTux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would require Blizzard set aside the funds so that if/when the sanctions get lifted they can either process the refunds or reinstate the accounts. Otherwise how much money has Blizzard "gained" by doing this??

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    1. Re:How convenient for Blizzard by wganz · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that Blizzard is going to get rich off of the funds that were in the accounts since those funds would be used within weeks but would make more money if there was a continual revenue flow.

      All in all, and this is from someone that is vehemently anti Mohammedite extremist; that this was a plum dumb move. Just WTF is suppose to accomplish?

    2. Re:How convenient for Blizzard by Meski · · Score: 1

      I would require Blizzard set aside the funds so that if/when the sanctions get lifted they can either process the refunds or reinstate the accounts. Otherwise how much money has Blizzard "gained" by doing this??

      How much do they 'gain' when they permanently ban players for breaching TOS? And this is a subset of that.

      I'm curious if this works against latency lowering services that use tunneling.

  39. That level of complexity by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Players that have mastered the game of WoW will most likely be able to use tools such as TOR to be able to proxy bypass any limitations they place....
    unless the fear is more if you are caught using TOR then you would go to jail for doing so...but this I am uncertain about in their laws right now...maybe someone from there may answer me, unless they blocked /. as well !?! ;)

  40. Re:Chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda funny how little impact Sharia would have on me, or even Communism.

  41. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ya.. you show 'em America.. ban them "terrorists" from playing a video game with other people in the world.... sigh... There is no hope left for America. period.

  42. And define reasonable suspicion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, that would have to be the court. So you get arrested and THEN you can argue the case that there was no reasonable suspicion.

    Except it's too late now.

  43. Iran's response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine! We will build our own internet! With blackjack and hookers!

  44. you ripped that off from South Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could very well be the end of the world...........of Warcraft!

  45. Breaking News by elloGov · · Score: 1

    Iranian productivity just doubled lol

  46. Undermining a theocracy by br00tus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Iran had a secular democracy in 1953. The CIA helped overthrow it and installed a dictatorship. Then the US puppet's security arm, Savak, worked with the CIA to kill off, imprison and exile the left. By the late 1970s, the only independent bodies in Iran were the mullahs, and the informal relationships bazaar merchants formed. Thus when the economy collapsed, and repression intensified, the mullahs and bazaar merchants were at the forefront of the revolution, they were the only independent bodies the CIA had not wrecked.

    Then Americans have the gall to stick up their nose and whine about theocracies. Of course, Iran is a secular paradise compared to somewhere like US puppet regime Saudi Arabia. In Saudi Arabia, women are not even allowed to drive cars. So why do we hear this theocracy stuff for Iran but not Saudi Arabia? Would it have something to do with the government (which has popular support, and some democratic forms - much, much more than Saudi Arabia) not asking "how high" whenever the powers that be in the US say "jump"? The gall and hypocrisy and rose-colored glasses of imperial-happy Americans seems unlimited, only planes flying into their war-planning pentagon buildings seem to wake them up from their stupor for a short bit.

    1. Re:Undermining a theocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post should be rated funny. Why? Let's see. I already know who you are: Some smartass guy who knows nothing about source criticism and blindliny accepts what media and wikipedia says.

      US and UK did not overthrow anyone in 1953. Fist of all, the government was not elected. Mossadegh was appointed to become PM by the Shah of Iran according to the Iranian constitution from 1906.

      Something wrong with you people is that you do not know ANYTHING about Iran, Iranian culture, Iranian history yet have to open that big mouth all the time. Typical western attitude.

      Now, let's get back. The origin of this whole story is from CIA. Since when does CIA count as a reliable source? Do you believe everything CIA says? Everytime there is article about governments, CIA, NSA or anything similiar on Slashdot the majority of the people who comment are against these and always write bad things about them. But suddenly, in this one case, CIA musy say the truth! I guess you are from US or UK and want to pretend that you are superiour.

      There are many books, articles, documents, audio that proves otherwise. Iranian and foreign historians say otherwise. You guys who frequently visit Slashdot should know that this is the age of Internet and lots of new information exists.

      Some goodies:

      Ardeshir Zahedi, whos father according to CIA played a huge role in this, wrote in his book "The CIA and IRAN - What Really Happened" : "My father never had any meetings with any CIA agents. One operative has claimed that he spoke to my father in German, ostensibly during secret meetings. The fact is that the only foreign languages my father ever spoke was Russian and Turkish, not German or English."

      Mossadegh was opposed by his own close friends, for example Hussein Makki and Mozzafar Baqai, who supported him a lot in the beginning. A leading member of the Majlis (parliament) Hassan Haeri-Zadeh, who had been one of Mossadeghâ(TM)s strongest supporters until then, even cabled the United nations secretary general to appeal for help against Mossadeghâ(TM)s increasingly despotic rule.

      Richard Helms, long time CIA director, told a BBC television program that '' the agency did not counter rumours of in Iran because the Iranian episode looked like a success. At the time, of course, agency needed some success, especially to counter fiascos as the Bay of Pigs.'''

      Donald Wilber, the CIA operative whose ''secret report'' has been given top billing by the New York Times makes it clear that whatever he and his CIA colleagues were up to in Tehran at the time simply failed.

      Barry Rubin writes âoeIt cannot be said that the United States overthrew Mussadeq and replaced him with the Shah⦠Overthrowing Mussadeq was like pushing an open door.â

      In closing, Mossadegh was an asshole. I can not remember exactly now, but he either closed the parliament or threatned to close the parliament if they did not give him dictatorial powers. He broke the economy of Iran. He forced women to wear hijabs again and so on. But that's another discussion.

      Take care.

    2. Re:Undermining a theocracy by br00tus · · Score: 2

      Fist of all, the government was not elected. Mossadegh was appointed to become PM by the Shah of Iran according to the Iranian constitution from 1906.

      Mossadegh was elected to parliament in 1944. The parliament voted him prime minister in 1951, and yes, the Shah appointed him such, just as the queen of England appoints the prime minister in the UK.

      Since when does CIA count as a reliable source? Do you believe everything CIA says?...There are many books, articles, documents, audio that proves otherwise. Iranian and foreign historians say otherwise.

      No I don't believe everything the CIA says. People can read all sides and all accounts and come to their own conclusions.

      Richard Helms, long time CIA director, told a BBC television program that '' the agency did not counter rumours of in Iran because the Iranian episode looked like a success. At the time, of course, agency needed some success, especially to counter fiascos as the Bay of Pigs.'''

      Donald Wilber, the CIA operative whose ''secret report'' has been given top billing by the New York Times makes it clear that whatever he and his CIA colleagues were up to in Tehran at the time simply failed.

      I think they neither had 100% failure nor 100% success. You're right, everything didn't go 100% as they wanted. But they did want Mossadegh out and the Shah in, and were successful in that respect.

      Barry Rubin writes âoeIt cannot be said that the United States overthrew Mussadeq and replaced him with the Shah⦠Overthrowing Mussadeq was like pushing an open door.â

      In closing, Mossadegh was an asshole. I can not remember exactly now, but he either closed the parliament or threatned to close the parliament if they did not give him dictatorial powers. He broke the economy of Iran. He forced women to wear hijabs again and so on. But that's another discussion.

      Take care.

      "I can not remember exactly now, but he either closed the parliament or threatned to close the parliament if they did not give him dictatorial powers." I have no idea what this refers to. The biggest internal struggle I recall was over appointment of chief of staff and war minister, should it be by the prime minister or the shah. Mossadegh did not threaten to close parliament, he threatened to resign, and in fact did resign for a few days until a compromise was hammered out. Parliament almost always backed Mossadegh, so I don't know why he would want it closed down.

      I am not sure what was reported in the 1950s, but I think the mainstream US reporting, literature, newspaper and magazine articles on what happened in 1953 are pretty good. This was about 60 years ago, and any motivation to cover up for the Shah started disappearing around 1979.

      As far as Mossadegh and dealing with radical Islamists and Feda'ian-e Islam, Mossadegh had so much trouble with radical Islamists they tried to kill him and his deputies, quite apart from any foreign schemes. In fact Hossein Fatemi was severely wounded by them. I also know Mossadegh initially resisted their desire for a hijab law. As far as I know, he resisted this until the coup - but I am not 100% familiar with the matter. If you say he eventually conceded to the law, I suppose it is possible, I don't know the details.

    3. Re:Undermining a theocracy by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I understand all that bad stuff that happened 50 years ago, and I don't blame the Iranians (some of them, not all of them are upset) for being upset about it.

      All the same, when a country has a national holiday devoted to hating my country, I don't want them to have nuclear weapons. I don't care whose fault it is, or how it started.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  47. Wish I had mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So true.

  48. Re:Weastern Canada by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    No way would I live somewhere as hellish as New York (hurricanes), or Minnesota (mosquitoes), on a year-round basis. (Or lots of Canada, either.)
    British Columbia has some nice temperate places, OTOH, so don't over-generalize. I hear there's nice places in NY, but I'm skeptical. The non-First Nations I've met seem like they may have hint of a Scottish accent, though maybe in some of the blizzardy parts they have ex-Swedes? As I said, I wouldn't live somewhere too difficult. I plan to upgrade from California to Oregon, and eventually on up to B.C. someday.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  49. Iranian Productivity Boom by artfulshrapnel · · Score: 1

    Estimated GNP up almost 200%. Experts remain mystified as to the reason behind this sudden surge in productivity.

  50. http://www.weddingorganizeryogyakarta.blogspot.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when most people think that the strength of a country's existing nuclear reserves, other people think it's all there on the acquisition of information

  51. I don't understand! by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    If we are trying to slow down Iran's nuke development, shouldn't we be encouraging them to play WoW? The US government should be sponsoring free WoW accounts for Iranians.

  52. When I was a kid America was and still is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowhere near bullshit. A driver's license is a license to drive. Without it, you are driving illegally, and are subject to various charges. With it, the ability to track your driving skills, along with the ability to revoke it if your skills deteriorate or you become a danger exists. And it has always, at least in the last 50 years or more, been used as an identity card, whether to identify you to a law enforcement officer, or to buy alcohol.

    What Russia/USSR did and possibly still does between the old USSR countries, is to require not only identity cards, but papers as well. Those papers include permission to be where you are, along with permission to be at your intended destination. Can't explain where your intended destination is? Wrong papers? Wrong date? Guess where your new destination was? It starts with a g, has five letters and ends with a g. And the top poster is correct, the poster he's commenting on is full of inaccuracies.

  53. Not smat bc they don't KNOW an IP is from Iran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no guarenteed way to determine where the computer is located or the user based on IP. It's just an educated guess as to where the use is and blocking a list is stupid. The company shouldn't be blocking a list of IP addresses. Unless they know or believe that a user behind an IP address is in Iran they shouldn't be blocked.

  54. Re:Weastern Canada by Talderas · · Score: 1

    Your problem with New York is hurricanes? I would have said my problem with New York is New Yorkers.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  55. BTC for account bill payment by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Send me the balance +50% Bitcoins and I'll pay your bill for you :-|

  56. Somewhere in the world... by w1z4rd · · Score: 1
    VPN sales just shot up.

    Iranians should roll a new president.

  57. And warrantless tapping was never legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, however, didn't stop the USA government doing it.

    Does it matter if there's a law or not against being a communist when you're going to be punished by the state for it either way?

    NO.

  58. No WoW for Iran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well NOW there is finally a good reason US should go to war against Iran! Those poor subjugated people need American democracy...