Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Hackable Portable Music Player For Helicopters?

First time accepted submitter mrhelio writes "I work for a medium-sized helicopter company; we mainly fly tourists around on sightseeing flights. My company needs help finding a hacker-friendly portable music player for our helicopters. We have a problem with our onboard music players — mostly because it is an obsolete terrible design. The manufacturer has made an updated model, but it's basically the same obsolete design with the same terrible software and user interface. We are worried about spending $1000 per unit on these because the manufacturer will eventually stop making replacement units and then we will be force to buy upgrades for our entire fleet again and get everything recertified. (Any piece of equipment hard mounted in a commercial aircraft has to be certified by the FAA and it takes a lot of paper work, time and money for that to happen.) So we have a new plan: get portable music players like iPods, and plug those into the aux input in the intercom system. We need something that has nine hours of battery life, can hold at least three hours of music, and has remote control options for start, stop, volume, and selecting tracks and playlists, and a display that is visible in bright and sunny as well as dark conditions. The remote control option is the toughest part to find. The pilots need to be able to control the music without taking their hands off the flight controls for safety reasons. There are buttons and toggle switches already designed into the flight controls for these kind of purposes and we have mechanics/ engineers that can wire it all together, but the music player has to support the remote interface in the first place. Our first choice would be to give each pilot an iPod, but Apple is notoriously anti-hacking and anti-open source, plus you have to pay them ridiculous licensing fees to get access to their USB interface. So we are looking for a manufacturer that is open source / hacker friendly and makes something that meets our needs. Do you know of anything that would work for us? Maybe something that runs Rockbox? Should we just break down and design something from scratch like the Butterfly MP3 player?"

158 comments

  1. don't forget another important requirement by sabri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't forget this requirement: whenever the airman presses the push-to-talk button, you want the music to stop. I'm pretty sure the ATC controller will not be interested in your playlist...

    Other than that: why don't you just use the auxiliary input of the 4-way intercom?

    --
    I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    1. Re:don't forget another important requirement by adolf · · Score: 1

      Don't forget this requirement: whenever the airman presses the push-to-talk button, you want the music to stop. I'm pretty sure the ATC controller will not be interested in your playlist...

      If this is important (and I'm not sure that it is), it is solved with a singular relay, perhaps with a diode across the coil.

      There's no reason for something such as a "hackable portable music player" to even be a part of this happening, let alone be relied upon...

    2. Re:don't forget another important requirement by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sabri, honestly, do you think ANYBODY would be stupid enough to install this otherwise? Please, if you have nothing intelligent to say, please don't say it!

      Or, to put it another way - when you are flying an airplane with 4 people say and the pilot pushes the PTT--does ATC hear the conversation of the other three? Of course not. The source pushing the PTT is isolated, obviously. Many panels also have an ISO (Isolate) setting so that the pilot doesnt hear the other chatter in the aircraft when he's talking to ATC.

      To make a long story short...

      here are basically three legal solutions: an portable intercom with a music input (say via 3.5mm jack) OR something installed by an avionics shop. if the latter option is anything other than installing a 3.5" input jack onto the panel into which an ipod can be plugged, then it will end up costing far more than $1000, though, given the exorbitant shop rates of avionics shops, even the installation of this $1 item will probably cost at least a few hundred bucks.

    3. Re:don't forget another important requirement by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      That is what the intercom system does.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:don't forget another important requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The intercom / audio interface already does that. When PTT is pushed music is cut off.

    5. Re:don't forget another important requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than that: why don't you just use the auxiliary input of the 4-way intercom?

      Did you bother to read the original posting? Of course not; this is Slashdot.

      To quote from the original: "So we have a new plan: get portable music players like iPods, and plug those into the aux input in the intercom system."

      The intercom system handles all of the audio switching duties (including both to the radios and pilot/passenger headsets).

    6. Re:don't forget another important requirement by sabri · · Score: 1

      Or, to put it another way - when you are flying an airplane with 4 people say and the pilot pushes the PTT--does ATC hear the conversation of the other three? Of course not.

      Not always true, especially on older systems. Especially on aircraft that are also used for flight training, and that comes from experience.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  2. This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Anytime you plug something to an airframe you have to have certification.

    Even if the device is "portable".

    Start with a list of already certified devices...

    1. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by mumblestheclown · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what utter nonsense. neither portable GPS nor intercoms nor timing devices nor "PCATD-lite" things nor any of the other portable gadgets that go in an aircraft have to be "certified" by the FAA.

      / 20 year flight instructor, owner of an aviation company / terrible slashdot karma for routinely calling out BS that others mark "insightful"

    2. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Yoda222 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last time I was in a plane as a passenger I plugged my regular earphone to the IFE. I'm almost certain that they are not specificaly certified.

    3. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is essentially correct. If the device interfaces with the aircraft interphone system (or any other aircraft system), it must be certified for use on YOUR aircraft model. On the other hand if the aircraft has a utility bus with a 115 volt AC outlet, you can more or less plug in anything within the limits of the associated circuit breaker's current rating. As an example, some airline crews are now using iPads and laptops within the flight deck.

      You may be able to engineer in a system separate from aircraft systems that is accessible to the flight crew. Such a system would still require approval of your local FAA inspector, but would not require the TSO approval (http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/design_approvals/tso/) of an off the shelf system purchased from your friendly avionics vendor.

      I would suggest discussing your desires with your local FAA inspector assigned to your operations. They will be able to point you down the right path.

       

    4. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You seem to have missed the "remote control" attachment and "...plug those into the aux input in the intercom system.. "

      Otherwise, the pilot should just say "turn the F* off".

      And plugging into the intercom could just short it out, causing other unknown power issues (though likely just a blown fuse).

    5. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what utter nonsense. neither portable GPS nor intercoms nor timing devices nor "PCATD-lite" things nor any of the other portable gadgets that go in an aircraft have to be "certified" by the FAA.

      / 20 year flight instructor, owner of an aviation company / terrible slashdot karma for routinely calling out BS that others mark "insightful"

      I'm not trying to call you out as wrong here (20 year commercial flight passenger, a.k.a. cattle), but it sure seems to me that based on the requirements to connect this "portable" device directly into the damn flight control "button and toggle switches" for the specific purpose of the pilot being allowed to fly the plane properly and not interfere with communications (voice interrrupt/overrride, reasonable volume limiters, etc.), it would need to be certified or regulated to some extent. If not, then you won't mind if I suggest they also install a 500-watt amp and a pair of 12" woofers in a sub box underneath the pilots seat. I hear some of them like the boom-boom, and I'm sure that the passengers and ATC will get used to it after a while.

      (Sorry, you're probably right in your analysis and the general FCC guidelines for Class B devices, but lack of certification/regulation in this case seems just silly.)

    6. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your absolutely right, utter BS original post.

    7. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what utter nonsense. neither portable GPS nor intercoms nor timing devices nor "PCATD-lite" things nor any of the other portable gadgets that go in an aircraft have to be "certified" by the FAA.

      / 20 year flight instructor, owner of an aviation company / terrible slashdot karma for routinely calling out BS that others mark "insightful"

      Well you would appear to have misread the summary as he clearly states that fixed devices are required to be certified, which is why he's looking for something portable.

    8. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you would appear to have misread the summary as he clearly states that fixed devices are required to be certified, which is why he's looking for something portable.

      That's exactly what the guy you're replying to said. Maybe you meant to reply to the guy he replied to that said the original post was a lie and portable things that plug in have to be certified?

    9. Re:This is the wrong forum for that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah and your grandma is Miles Davies ?

  3. Valhalla by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 2

    I'm no audio expert or pilot, but it seems an adequate setup was designed in the 1970's. I could see this schema working well in cases of mechanical malfunction or unusually feisty tourists, though I suspect you could always choose a different act for more conventional flights.

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  4. how would that be legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you need to mount something to the control of the pilot, like tge remote, wouldn't that require faa aproval?

  5. ... Don't? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a tourist who's been on one or two small, sightseeing aircraft - can I suggest going without the music?

    Especially on a helicopter where the background noise is already quite phenomenal, going without some barely-audible music warbling away over the headset is hardly going to impair my experience. I'd much rather be looking out the windows (or absence thereof) and listening to what the pilot has to say...

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    1. Re:... Don't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good sightseeing companies should be providing quality ANR headsets a la lightspeed zulu or bose a20 (yes, I know bose sucks, but they make a pretty damn good aviation headset.) Both provide a headphone jack for music and at least one provides bluetooth.

      Then you just need to run wire from your music player of choice.

    2. Re:... Don't? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      ...or not have music.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:... Don't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absoutely agree - I don't understand why the Youtube Generation thinks that there needs to be music constanly in the background of *everything*.

      If I was a tourist on this helicopter I would be leaning forward and asking the pilot to turn-off the irrelevant noise. I'm paying to enjoy the scenery, not some geek's choice of music.

    4. Re:... Don't? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, well, you'd be surprised. People out there get bitchy and moany when they have to go two seconds without listening to Nickelback or Maroon 5. I remember a sightseeing tour by car through magical China, stopping at hilltop monasteries and having tea at amazing teahouses with breathtaking views. Real Kung Fu movie stuff, live and in the flesh. My two co-tourists couldn't believe that the car didn't have any music other than a couple of crappy Chinese dance music CDs and didn't have a USB port to accept input from their music players. I was like, uh, these are amazing views and we're doing amazing things today, is it OK if we go without music for eight hours? You'd have thought I suggested we drink out of a bucket of warm spit, to judge by the disgusted reactions on their faces to this unwelcome suggestion. Seriously, I'm pretty sure it ruined the trip for them. I had an awesome time.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:... Don't? by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      WRONG. The Airwolf theme song would be PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE. :D

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIoSPevvsds

    6. Re:... Don't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they most certainly should provife.good ANr headsets to protect the guests hearing. Alsoo, some if them provide nararation, which is valuable.

    7. Re:... Don't? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      Same experience here. I took a *long* day trip to a remote village in Rajathstan, India, and as soon as we stepped out of the car, about two hundred villagers started this ridiculous choreographed dance to some over produced pop music heavy with violins. And so I was like, "Please, I'm here to see poor people and squalor, not for some absurd Vegas musical", and so they stopped and went back to being poor and squaloring until we left, at which time I'm sure they restarted that musical tomfoolery.

    8. Re:... Don't? by Phasma+Felis · · Score: 1

      Not sure how listening to music prevents one from also looking out the windows.

    9. Re:... Don't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's the iPod culture. People define themselves by "their" playlist. My playlist is bigger than your playlist.

  6. Time equals money by CaptQuark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you spend more than 20 hours to engineer something yourself, the $1000 starts to look like a bargain.

    1. Re:Time equals money by jamesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you spend more than 20 hours to engineer something yourself, the $1000 starts to look like a bargain.

      Depends on if a "medium sized helicopter company" has 5 helicopters or 50... and also if, after your 20 hours, you end up with something better than "terrible"

    2. Re:Time equals money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy wants something open-source. Don't overlook that requirement! It means he can deploy the solution on as many aircraft as he like - or even sell such solutions - without further licencing. Future costs will only be in hardware...

    3. Re:Time equals money by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder how much this company is scrimping on maintenance too.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    4. Re:Time equals money by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2

      Seriously, this post is the very definition of "penny-wise, pound foolish".

      $1000 is, what, like one flight's worth of fuel? It's like... maybe half of one month of one employee's health benefits? It's nothing.

      Your time is worth far, far more.

    5. Re:Time equals money by million_monkeys · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this post is the very definition of "penny-wise, pound foolish".

      $1000 is, what, like one flight's worth of fuel? It's like... maybe half of one month of one employee's health benefits? It's nothing.

      Your time is worth far, far more.

      $1000 per helicopter is more than nothing. But it's not just a money thing. You're also overlooking the time and paperwork to install it, plus any FAA paperwork (and time required for it) for certification in their operation. Once they have it, fixing/replacing it in the future requires all the hoops of a certified system. For that trouble they get a crappy, out of date product.

      He's looking for an alternative. There may not be a simple one out there. But if he happens to find one that meets his criteria, odds are it will not only be cheaper, but much better. It's also quite possible that it will ultimately require less time and hassle than the certified system. Depending on what's out there, he could come away with substantial savings of money AND time, while equipping his fleet with a superior product. It's at least worth looking into.

  7. RF interference - another crucial requirement by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    We are talking about a helicopter - something that flies

    It's important that whatever that gets played on board does not interfere with the RF sensitive equipment on board of the chopper

    Nowadays airplanes from Boeing and Airbus have re-designed their planes to better shield themselves from whatever interfering RF that may emit from consumer electronics - from cellphones to laptops to tablets

    I do not know if the choppers are similarly shielded from RF interference, though

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:RF interference - another crucial requirement by sabri · · Score: 2

      We are talking about a helicopter - something that flies

      Would it help if I'd let you know that I am in the proud possession of an Airman Certificate as well?

      The most important flight instruments are based on air pressure (speed, altitude, vertical speed) and gyroscopic systems (heading indicator, attitude indicator, artificial horizon). The only "RF sensitive equipment" on board of a chopper is limited to either a VOR/DME or a GPS receiver. None if which will be used for a sightseeing flight, since there is no fun sightseeing if you're flying IFR. And if you're not flying IFR, you'll be flying VFR on your basic six, so you won't need your navaids.

      And that's in the highly unlikely case that your navaids will receive interference from your mp3 player.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    2. Re:RF interference - another crucial requirement by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      You should be aware, the FAA does care an awful lot about anything that might be installed on an aircraft. Commercial aircraft? Very very concerned.

      You missed the obvious "RF" equipment. The radio and transponder.

      But, it's not just RF. What if the installer of the uncertified equipment were to make a subtle mistake? Like run an unfused wire from the battery, put through a hole that has no grommet? Or it uses a power connector that isn't FAA approved.. In case you can't see where I'm going, think dead short and electrical fire mid-flight.

      It's all fun and games, until the flaming wreckage comes crashing through the roof of a school, or something of that sort. Sometimes those pesky rules are made for a reason, even if we don't like them.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:RF interference - another crucial requirement by sabri · · Score: 1

      You missed the obvious "RF" equipment. The radio and transponder.

      Good point. In theory, an MP3 player could disturb the radio and transponder. My counterarguments would be that first of all chances of that happening are very low, and second of all, issues with radio and/or transponder are easier to detect than minor GPS/VOR-DME interference.

      But, it's not just RF. What if the installer of the uncertified equipment were to make a subtle mistake? Like run an unfused wire from the battery, put through a hole that has no grommet? Or it uses a power connector that isn't FAA approved.. In case you can't see where I'm going, think dead short and electrical fire mid-flight.

      This would apply to any installation of chassis-mounted equipment. I don't think this would apply to a plugged-in Ipod.

      (but yes, you are right, an electrical fire would be nasty)

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  8. just buy a tablet? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    and mount it somewhere. instantly superior to commercial airline entertainment systems. and cheaper.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:just buy a tablet? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      If I'm a tourist going on a charter helicopter flight the last thing I want is an in flight entertainment system.

      No, I don't even want music.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:just buy a tablet? by another+random+user · · Score: 4, Informative
      Really? Nobody mentioned music? Let me check in the summary:

      We have a problem with our onboard music players

      and

      So we have a new plan: get portable music players like iPods, and plug those into the aux input in the intercom system. We need something that has nine hours of battery life, can hold at least three hours of music, and has remote control options for start, stop, volume, and selecting tracks and playlists, and a display that is visible in bright and sunny as well as dark conditions. The remote control option is the toughest part to find. The pilots need to be able to control the music without taking their hands off the flight controls for safety reasons.

      Maybe I'm mistaken, but I'm pretty sure that music was indeed mentioned.

      --
      -1 troll is not supposed to be used simply because you don't agree
    3. Re:just buy a tablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm a tourist going on a charter helicopter flight the last thing I want is an in flight entertainment system.

      No, I don't even want music.

      So just say you don't want music then. It is a helicopter, there won't be many on board. Chances are good they turn the music off when guest don't want it - and on for guests who cannot live without.

    4. Re:just buy a tablet? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Nobody mentioned music, you moron. This is for the sightseeing record, so that people know what to look for.

      I'm not sure what a "sightseeing record" is but music was definitely mentioned.

      People would know what to look for because the pilot has a voice.

      --
      No sig today...
  9. Apple isn't anti-open source by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know where you got this from. Apple has no problems putting open source software on the App Store, for example. Some open source software developers however have a problem with that.

    To put your own code onto an iPod Touch, what you need is a Mac, $99 for a developer account, and you can install any software you write on up to 200 iOS devices of your choice. No need for hacking at all. No restrictions on what your code does.

    1. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, they don't need to do any hacking to control the iDevices. They just need to built an interface the same way a car maker would. Plug in the iPod/iPhone, control via the helicopter audio controls.

    2. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a great example of the distinction between Open Source and Free (as in Freedom) Software

      Sure Apple has Open Source embraces from time to time, but they will never embrace Free Software because that would mean offering liberty to their products, er, consumers.

      Oh and only $99 US dollars to be able to put your code onto something you own? HOW GENEROUS OF THEM
      *pukes*

      Free Software allows people from ALL walks of life to do as they want with the code (run, learn, modify, redistribute) regardless of their status in life, not just those who can pay money in order to buy a Apple dev-'indulgence' that can purify/wash themselves clean of their ignorance.

    3. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you stopped reading before you got to the remote custom hardware interface hardwired into the flight controls part.

    4. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Either an iOS device is the best solution or it isn't. If it is, and $99 will stop you from doing it, or running your own code isn't free enough for you, then you're letting your idealism get in the way of the best solution.

      Solve the right problem. The insistence on solving problems we want to solve rather than problems we're asked to solve is one reason IT is seen as a thorn rather than an asset.

    5. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by zill · · Score: 1

      $99 per year.

    6. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by Ptur · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Apple went into extreme efforts to encrypt the ipod so that it becomes near impossible to have it run your own firmware. Apple will allow you to write apps, as long as they agree with your app and it doesn't duplicate functionality. Try writing a replacement music player app for your ipod. Good luck.

    7. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Apple went into extreme efforts to encrypt the ipod so that it becomes near impossible to have it run your own firmware. Apple will allow you to write apps, as long as they agree with your app and it doesn't duplicate functionality. Try writing a replacement music player app for your ipod. Good luck.

      Only a madman would want to create their own firmware for an iPod. And $99 for the developer license gives you complete freedom to put any code you want on up to 200 iDevices. Apple doesn't look at it whatsoever. So if the guy wants to write a replacement music player app for 200 iPods there is nothing and nobody stopping him.

    8. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't know what you can do with a $99 developer licence, but we're talking about open-source, so it's beside the point.
      What I know is that they are going to great length to prevent anyone from putting songs on an ipod, they even encrypt their f* database. If that doesn't count as anti-open-source, I don't know what you need.

    9. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by dissy · · Score: 2

      You don't even need a developer account or software on the iPod to do this.

      Buy a dock connector breakout board: https://www.sparkfun.com/products/8295?

      Wire up a micro controller to the serial port. Use it to send Apple Accessory commands: http://www.adriangame.co.uk/ipod-acc-pro.html

      No license or developer account needed.

      Some other posts have brought up a few good points not in the summary, which if actually needed might require additional hardware, such as to ensure the audio is cut off while using the radio to talk to your controller or whatnot. But some relays controlled by the same micro controller above should be able to handle that.

    10. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by wytten · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Last time I looked into this, you could write the software using an emulator but the only way to actually get it onto any device (including your own) was via the app store approval process.

    11. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by wytten · · Score: 2

      To answer my own question, it appears that you can install on real devices provided you pay the $99/year fee. Still rubs me the wrong way as it seems like an artificial restriction that I can't run what I wrote on what I bought without giving apple more cash.

    12. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by mjwx · · Score: 2

      To put your own code onto an iPod Touch, what you need is a Mac, $99 for a developer account

      Let me get this straight,

      In order to put my own code onto my own device I need to buy a A$2,000 machine as well as $99 per year (yep, you forgot it was a yearly fee) just to put it on a device I already own.

      Say I buy that for a second, what if I wanted to put the same code onto my sister's Iphone or my boss's Ipad? Lets assume we can guarantee the code will not pass Apple's censors (duplication of functionality... but adds a bit more functionality Apple never bothered to include). How do I do that?

      That is where he got it from. The fact you think it's OK to have to pay A$2,099 just to run my own code on my own device (but not on anyone elses).

      Also there's a chance Apple may revoke my Dev license at their whim if they dont like what I'm doing.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      In order to put my own code onto my own device I need to buy a A$2,000 machine as well as $99 per year (yep, you forgot it was a yearly fee) just to put it on a device I already own.

      This gets boring. You can get a Mac for under A$1,000, and then you can't just develop code for iDevices, you also have a Mac. If you get upset about $99 per year, are we adults here? Metrowerks Codewarrior would have killed you (usually 3 release per year, $400 each).

    14. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh and only $99 US dollars to be able to put your code onto something you own? HOW GENEROUS OF THEM
      *pukes*

      I feel the same way whenever the DMV wants me to pay them to put my car on a road paid for by my taxes.

    15. Re:Apple isn't anti-open source by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      I swear I'm going to put your last sentence in huge letter on my wall. This, this, a million times this!

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  10. Give Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Small world, I encountered the same project with our PA44 and Kingair fleet and we couldn't find a solution like what you were describing. Your requirements require mounting things inside the cockpit which require approval and also causes TEM issues, however, I don't operate under FAA jurisdiction. You may find in-line players attached to headsets to be more compliant.

  11. How about repurposed Android smartphones? by The+Brother+Grim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Grab a few old Android devices--maybe N1s--turn off their cellular and wifi radios, load them up with music, and use 3.5 mm audio cable converted to whatever your aux input is on your existing system. Some 3.5mm audio cable can be purchased with/cobbled together to include built-in play, pause, and track skip buttons... Also, there's the rooting factor for most Android devices as well as the fact that most non-Apple smartphones use some variant of microUSB for charging and syncing.

    1. Re:How about repurposed Android smartphones? by mimicoctopus · · Score: 1

      I was just going to post this myself.

      Since it'd be fully programmable, right down to the Linux kernel, and there's now a USB Host API (Android API 12+) you could easily integrate the phone with whatever control system you like.

      The sky's the limit!

    2. Re:How about repurposed Android smartphones? by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even have to be Android smartphones. There are other options (tablets, car stereos, desktops / laptops...). As far as the controls go, you hack the wires of a USB controller and remap the buttons in software if needed.

    3. Re:How about repurposed Android smartphones? by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Hell, why not use a Rasberry Pi? It has most of what's needed and sure as hell should be able to meet FAA Certification of the hardware for replacement of your built in players.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    4. Re:How about repurposed Android smartphones? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Or a raspberry pi with a custom case, lithium ion battery pack, and a small usb touchscreen (LCD or e-ink)? Seems another really hacker friendly option, very low power and printing a custom case means you could theme it anyway you want.
      Instead of a touchscreen you could use a LED alphanum display off the usb and hardware buttons off the gpio header. Only really needs a video display when it needs the audio/playlist changed, and a led display is much more visible in light than an LCD.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  12. hands up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hands up anyone who goes on a helicopter to listen to music. I'm sure they want to impart some sort of emotional response by giving others their interpretation of what the flight experience should be, but please.

    1. Re:hands up by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Only if they play Wagner exclusively and require you to bring a surfboard.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  13. Pandora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why don't you use Pandoras?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_pandora

    They have great battery life, are very hacker-friendly, and great audio.

    1. Re:Pandora by aglider · · Score: 1

      This seems to be the very first post to give a meaningful answer to the original question: which device?
      Everyone seems to be discussing about anything else!
      I don't have any mod points left to mod you up!

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
    2. Re:Pandora by froggymana · · Score: 1

      Why don't you use Pandoras?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_pandora

      They have great battery life, are very hacker-friendly, and great audio.

      Or he could even go with any Android tablet he wants. Don't like the music app available? Write your own. You could even get a Bluetooth remote for it.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    3. Re:Pandora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ordered one of these in 2008 and still don't have it.

      Maybe you're thinking long-term though.

  14. Cowon X7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Large library size (160gbs), loooong battery life and very friendly to RockBox

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowon#MP3_players

    1. Re:Cowon X7 by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      All in favour?

    2. Re:Cowon X7 by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Large library size (160gbs), ...

      We are talking about a device used by a legitimate company, so I would assume that all music would be properly licensed and paid for. I wouldn't think for one second that they would want to pay for 160 GB of music.

    3. Re:Cowon X7 by malakai · · Score: 1

      This.

      List of Supported Models
      I still have an old Toshiba Gigabeat, that has easily over 9 hours of life when just playing music. It also has a cable ( in-line headphone jack ) remote that supports volume, mute, next/prev track, pause, and play. Image of headphone remote. Also, the gigabeat dock has it's own USB host, power, and other things. The dock would be the only thing you need to certify, as it's the only thing mounted. The gigabeats you'd just bring with you and clip in each flight.

      Rockbox has open support for handling those remote buttons anyway you like.

    4. Re:Cowon X7 by Eezyville · · Score: 1

      I also recommend this.

  15. The line between added components and added wire.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are allowed to add wire / connectors / relays (without recertification), but not equipment?

    Incorrectly added wiring can bring down an aircraft.

    Relays can arc, producing RFI.

    Loose connectors can cause deafening hum if not worse.

  16. It's not about software by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is not about software, but about hardware. Apple requires you to buy a chip from them to "identify" your accessory as "runs with iphone" if you want it to do anything more than plain audio out. That is what the OP is talking about.

    Considering this, I'd be looking for some iphone/ipod dock that has all the buttons you want and is certified. Rip that out of it's enclosure, connect your own buttons to it and you'll have your interface. No need to reinvent the wheel here, just adjust the packaging to your needs.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:It's not about software by quetwo · · Score: 2

      Only if you sell the device in the market place. If you are looking to interface your own equipment to an iOS device, you can use a Redpark TTL cable. These are designed for hobbyists, and are designed to connect to Arduinos (among other prototype boards). They had them at MakerFaire for $50 -- http://www.makershed.com/Redpark_TTL_Cable_for_iOS_p/msrp03.htm

    2. Re:It's not about software by dissy · · Score: 1

      Nice find, I'll have to add that link to my collection!

      I've been using the dock breakout board to get access to the serial port as well as audio/video outputs and the ability to charge the device.

      The serial accessory protocol is well documented, for use with either of these products.

  17. You should think of this as 2 problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. 1 being the music player: Chose a decent android tablet (of the 5-7" flavour), throwing in some extension battery if necessary. This will cost you close to nothing, and it's upgradeable in software, later upgradeable by cheap replacement.

    No 2. being the remote control: I strongly suggest you create an USB keyboard emulation - either by taking apart a physical keyboard or by using something like an Arduino. This needs to be done only once, as it needs much more (and more professional) work - emulate the media keys from a typical keyboard and chances are, most things will work out of the box. If not, see 1. - you can do everything else in software on the device, without touching the helicopter.

    1. Re:You should think of this as 2 problems by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      There are interesting possibilities with Android, with a archos tablet i can remote control it with my samsung phone (with wifi). There are a number of options for a full remote option but most require rooted devices. It all depends what needs controlling bluetooth controls are possible its not like distance would be a problem in a helicopter.

      There are loads of dlna player and controller programs around for android too. your phone is the controller the other android device source and player.

  18. Pebble: E-Paper Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A while ago a friend found this: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/597507018/pebble-e-paper-watch-for-iphone-and-android
    I don't know where they are at in their development. It connects to the device of your choice via Bluetooth, which would mean that the actual player could be whatever. Battery life is listed as 7+days. And I do imagine that you could attach a watch to a lot of things besides your wrist.
    The other specs are listed in the kickstarter project.

  19. rasPi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get raspberry pi, attach some little display (kent displays?), install mpd and some ncurses client, program your keys with use of gpio.

  20. You cannot be remotely serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Can you please post for us what helicopter company you work for, so we can know to never, in our fucking lives, ever fucking ride in one of your helicopters?

    I'm sorry, but "hacker friendly" and "hacked together" systems have no business in a vehicle which, when it malfunctions, will likely kill or severely maim all of its occupants.

    If your company is too fucking cheap to buy properly certified gear - do without a music system. This "We need something portable to get around regulations" bullshit smacks of corner-cutting, and I have to wonder what other things you do to get around regulations. When the safety of your pilots, and your customers, is at stake, cutting corners is both foolish, and unfortunately for you, illegal.

    1. Re:You cannot be remotely serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:You cannot be remotely serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but "hacker friendly" and "hacked together" systems have no business in a vehicle which, when it malfunctions, will likely kill or severely maim all of its occupants.

      Are you sorry for making up quotes or for selectively choosing definitions to suite an argument?

      If your company is too fucking cheap to buy properly certified gear

      That's not how it works. The reason something is certified is so it can be directly connected to the aircraft systems. Separating the equipment when possible is the safest method.

    3. Re:You cannot be remotely serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you need is the Heli Linux distro with the Linux MP3 player for helicopters!

    4. Re:You cannot be remotely serious? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but "hacker friendly" and "hacked together" systems have no business in a vehicle which, when it malfunctions, will likely kill or severely maim all of its occupants.

      What, you mean like an automobile?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:You cannot be remotely serious? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck modded the poster insightful?

      It is safe and entirely *legal* to fly all sorts of hacked together stuff on a helicopter.

      The whole point is so that you don't gave to get every fart certified by the FAA, since otherwise it would kill pretty much anything except using helicopters for banal transportation tasks.

      I have, in fact, flown custom instrumentation mounted on a helicopter with custom mounts powered with a hacked up collection of marine lead-acid batteries and a Linux laptop. All legal and safe. It would have been imnpossible to get it certified within the budget.

      But heck, that's what those "not installed" rulkes are for.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:You cannot be remotely serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are wrong I think.

      The equiptment directly connected to the aircraft control system has to be certified as a malfunction could crash the aircraft.
      Now the equiptment only needs to be certified until the audio jack.

      This is a safer approach as the system runs on it's own battery and only sends music to the audio input. Whatever goes wrong with it cannot cause problems, as you can just unplug the cable.

    7. Re:You cannot be remotely serious? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      But what you described is "carrying" equipment on the craft. If something happens, there is nothing stopping you from pushing the stuff out the door.

      The issue is that a helicopter is vey noisy, you can't just put the music on speakers... everybody has to wear headsets just to be heard. This is where it gets sticky because you are piping the music into the WORKING comms. I would think most craft would have a toggle so the pilot can talk to air control without the passengers overhearing or interrupting. You would just need to find a system with one more toggle for a music player. That would be no different than turning a specific headset off.

      The poster said "tours" so they probably tour scenery, monuments, etc. I'd guess they want some dramatic music while they fly, and the pilot can narrate as needed. The problem with these operations is that they don't really have extra staff to talk to the customers... Pilots do it all. Which leads to the other issue, do you WANT the pilot worrying about in-flight entertainment versus flying ?

  21. Open source doesn't mean stable by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    Potentially open source/hackable standards change faster than established ones. The iTouch/iTunes format seems pretty stable and there's talk of a streaming service. The units are a couple of a hundred each and easy to upgrade. There's a limit to the number of devices that can fall under the same content but it still seems like an easy solution. You can go with an Android solution to fight the Apple standard but name one that will exist ten years from now with any certainty?

    1. Re:Open source doesn't mean stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm.. it's open source.. so Android will probably exist long after Apple's walled garden suffocates/changes.

      After all... Apple gave up on IOS9 and went with OpenBSD and a bunch of Gnu code, webkit, cups (then bought it) and other open source... the open source stuff is sticking around... and saved Apple's butt.

  22. RF interference - assisted on multiple fronts by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Informative

    One thing that I'd like to point out is that the RF problem has diminished by the user devices themselves. When you go from 12V switching to under 1V, you're looking at a lot less RF interference coming from the device anyways. Go from kilohertz to mega/gigahertz and you up the interference frequencies; lowering the range they can travel and the odds they'll interfere with the much slower switching electronics in the craft.

    Basically, at this point it's hard to tell the average portable consumer device from background noise, as long as it's not intentionally transmitting.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  23. How about a Raspberry PI running XBMC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and build a custom control set of buttons (programmable via Python) going through the GPIO port. Take a look at the following:

    http://www.raspbmc.com/about/

    1. Re:How about a Raspberry PI running XBMC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good idea.
      But, how about a piece of cardboard with gum stuck to it?

  24. The current controls are already sufficient. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are controls on the heli for the current (craptastic) system for playing music and controlling the player. These can be used for controlling the player and piping the music around correctly.

    Since these controls are already there, they don't need reapproval.

    An AUX jack is already isolated so anything added to that is not part of the system. And similarly (I hope, if not the engineers will have to build a shim and get that certified once) with the control panel connecting the stick media controls to the current media player. Just plug your jig into the isolated side of the control box and it too doesn't need recertification.

    As long as it doesn't have WiFi enabled.

  25. I wonder if you could modify... by jimicus · · Score: 2

    I wonder if you could modify something originally intended for a car?

    Newer aftermarket stereos often have aux input, a USB port for flash sticks and sometimes you'll find they've already paid Apple for iPod connectivity so you wouldn't have to. You can even find models with remote control support, though if you want to use existing remote controls I think you'll have to reverse engineer how the manufacturer's done it and make your own adaptor. This should be perfectly doable, however, as there's an existing industry that does exactly this so the steering-wheel remote controls you find built into many modern cars can be adapted to function with the aftermarket head unit. You might even be able to find a company that'll work with you to do the job just for the fun of it.

    They're dead easy to wire in - they come with a fairly straightforward loom already there and there's a range of plugs on the market so you could build your own loom, fit a standard plug to it and when the manufacturer discontinues the stereo, put in another one that's close enough with minimal extra modification. They're already in a steel case so I don't imagine shielding will be a big deal.

    They're also cheap enough that you should be able to pick something suitable up for a fifth, maybe even a tenth of the obsolete units you don't like.

    The only thing I'm not sure about is getting FAA certification...

  26. Several suggestions by subreality · · Score: 1

    You can control a smartphone over Bluetooth. Search for "a2dp receiver". First hit on ebay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/STEREO-BLUETOOTH-HEADSET-HEADPHONE-A2DP-MOBILE-WIRELESS-CORDLESS-/350596896980?pt=PDA_Accessories&hash=item51a13418d4 They're cheap and readily available, and they have hardware buttons for pause/play/next/prev. Anyone who knows which end of the soldering iron to hold can tap into the buttons.

    Or just get a MP3 player that has actual hardware buttons; again just solder yourself in instead of trying to figure out a control API.

    Alternatively, use an Android netbook, phone, or tablet. Cheap, easy to customize the firmware to your needs, USB ports so you can control it either by emulating a keyboard or using a serial dongle (you may have to hack the media player software), no Apple tax. 9h battery life is tough, but if you can get a DC port of some sort on the aircraft then you can use a DC-DC converter to run it as much as you need.

  27. Open source doesn't mean unstable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open standards remain the same because you don't have to change it by planned obsalescence. The USB Mass Storage Device standard is the same for Linux for the last however long the standard was written.

    iPad covers don't fit iPad2.

    Apple refuse to tell anyone what the next connector is going to be (therefore how can it be the same as the previous connector?).

    And the streaming service is ALREADY AVAILABLE if you get your FOSS-derived device.

    Why are you so certain Apple's *current* standard will remain for 10 years? How long did the current dock connector last?

  28. Battery life? by fm6 · · Score: 1

    The kind of device you';re talking about surely doesn't need any more juice than a common MP3 player. I keep a cigarette lighter to USB adapter in my car, and it supplies my phone with more power than it needs indefinitely. I don't suppose helicopters have cigarette lighters, but you must have some equivalent.

    Or maybe not. A little while back I watched Generation Kill, in which Recon Marines invading Iraq are always running short of batteries for their night vision goggles. Can anyone explain to me why HUMVs don't come with battery chargers?

    1. Re:Battery life? by russotto · · Score: 1

      The kind of device you';re talking about surely doesn't need any more juice than a common MP3 player. I keep a cigarette lighter to USB adapter in my car, and it supplies my phone with more power than it needs indefinitely. I don't suppose helicopters have cigarette lighters, but you must have some equivalent.

      I'd suggest just powering the music player itself from internal battery; avoids issues with ground loops and noise coming in the power system.

    2. Re:Battery life? by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      I have been patiently scrolling through this thread for the name of a device that has a 9 hour battery life, while playing music.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
  29. Nokia N900 would be perfect by loosescrews · · Score: 1

    I would recommend a Nokia N900. Availability would be the tough part, but it will do everything you need. It has a nice transflective screen that is legible in direct sunlight, and it is one of the most hackable devices around. Being a phone, it has several radios in it, but those can be disabled through software.

    The N9 would most likely also work, and those are still in production as far as I know. The screen is also legible in direct sunlight, but I think the N900 would suit your needs better.

  30. Rockbox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rockbox, the open source MP3 player firmware, and one of its supported devices.

    Cowon audio players also come with a remote, I believe. But why bother with a remote? If you're prepared to wire something in, make a small wiring harness for the device (connecting wires to the button contacts), slather the solder points on the device in hot glue for some stability, and plug it in before takeoff. You're plugging the 1/8 inch jack in anyway, right?

    But I like another commenter's suggestion: just skip the music. I find it annoying and distracting, if I recognize it's there at all (and I'd prefer to not recognize it at all).

  31. try cowon by hpsandwich · · Score: 1

    from personal experience i can vouch for a company named cowon. there media players have the best quality sound output on the market. the x7 and x9 have a week of battery life and there android variants can obviously use bluetooth remote technology. i own an x7, and you can set them to actually be a remote in themselves, when you lock the screen you can set the volume controls to be the skip track buttons, and the enter button becomes the pause button. when i drive i just set a playlist im in the mood for and carry on my marry way. i never have to look at the screen, i just put it in my lap and when something needs changing i hit a button. i never have to look most of the products have 32gb versions, though the x7 has a 160gb hard drive in it. only word of warning is there interfaces are known to be quirky, but you get used to them. give them time to... settle down, then they become as dependable as dogs.

  32. Tab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a Tablet PC, attach a hardware keyboard (which is easy to wire) and customize the software for your needs. Remove the wireless modules from the Tab to be on the safe side.

  33. Please test it first by fa2k · · Score: 1

    So we have a new plan: get portable music players like iPods, and plug those into the aux input in the intercom system.

    If you haven't already, please check that you get decent sound quality through the intercom.

  34. Wagner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Put giant speakers outside the helo (by the rocket pods) and blast Ride of the Valkries

    1. Re:Wagner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best laugh all week,

      i was going to suggest an 8-track player, lots speakers/sub woofers built into the seat.

      But the original poster wants people to be able play their own music right? must comments dont understand this, i'd think a pair of in the ear head phones and a Sennheiser headset would be fine, if they want to be able to hear the pilot they can turn there music down, even at full blast i think they would be able to hear the pilot enough to allow them to turn down their music.

  35. Infrared by Teun · · Score: 1
    The helicopters (mainly Eurocopters) I use often have a single player with an IR output, the passengers have headsets with an IR receiver.

    One advantage is that it's easy to inject the pilots messages into the system.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  36. MP3/wav playback systems by Daa · · Score: 1

    look at the Gilderfluke (https://www.gilderfluke.com) playback systems. they are designed for this type of application. the SD-10 may be enough if your requirements are simple enough or the SD-25 can handle almost any requirement. designed to run on 12-24 V power , use SD cards for storage, 2 external switch inputs, line level audio outs.

  37. An easy solution by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) Find three more helicopters
    2) Learn to play alltogether this
    3) ? ? ?
    4) Profit!

    Those who are curious to hear the piece can find it here. Please don't play it over my home, thanks.

  38. Raspberry Pi by networkz · · Score: 1

    How about a Raspberry Pi?

    Buy:

    - a Pi. (http://www.raspberrypi.org/)
    - Plastic Pi case (https://www.modmypi.com/shop/)
    - 32gb SD card
    - HDMI touchscreen (http://www.chinavasion.com/china/wholesale/Home_Audio_Video/LCD_Monitors_TV/8_Inch_LCD_Touchscreen_Monitor_AV_VGA_HDMI_Car_Kit)

    Install Xbian, a XMBC media player based Linux os (http://xbian.org/) and you've got everything you need.

    Cheap too!

    1. Re:Raspberry Pi by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Ha, ninja'd!

      As below, so above, I agree with this.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  39. Ditch the intercomm by zill · · Score: 1

    Why bother with the intercom at all? Just get a dozen cheap MP3 players and give each passenger one. Everyone pick their own song. The sound quality is better because they're all listening from the earphone instead of the intercom. Less distraction to the pilot as well.

    1. Re:Ditch the intercomm by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Because the pilot is also the guide and people may want to talk to one another.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  40. Could you adapt an in-car module? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would something like http://dx.com/p/mp3-player-module-with-remote-controller-fm-usb-sd-106197 be adaptable? The music would be transported on an SD card; the IR remote could be wired into the existing buttons on the controls.

    (Sorry this is posting as AC; once I start writing the post I can no longer see any option to log in. Peet McKimmie here...)

  41. Raspberry Pi by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    If you've got engineers who are happy running wires around and have a basic knowledge of a *NIX OS then go for a Raspberry Pi. Power it from the aircraft's aux supply, USB for remote, SD card/s for your music storage, set playlists etc on the ground by plugging in a monitor, mouse and keyboard. No lock-in, entirely open source, easy to integrate with the systems however you like and no wireless signal for the FAA/CAA etc to worry about.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  42. Best Buy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    What, you can't just put an automotive music player in a helicopter?

    I would think that would be kind of cool, some big bazooka speakers and a subwoofer. Blast you some Li'l Wayne until the windows shake. Get some grape incense. People would line up to fly with you.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Best Buy by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      You can't just "install" something in an aircraft. If it is your own private personal aircraft all you have to do is update your weight and balance and more then likely you will get away with it.

      This is not anyone's personal private helicopter. This is a helicopter operating under part 135 (?) rules. EVERYTHING that gets installed has to be approved, logged, certified, etc. etc.

      An mp3 device like he is talking about does not get "installed" it just gets plugged into the intercom and that you cannot get dinged for although they are really flirting with the edge of the rules by having it wired into the cyclic control buttons.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    2. Re:Best Buy by PPH · · Score: 1

      More on this idea: Your odds of finding a commercial unit for which some certification paperwork exists are better. Its possible that someone has gotten approval to install something like this in a private or charter aircraft. See what others are doing on some of the aviation bulletin boards.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Best Buy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      An mp3 device like he is talking about does not get "installed" it just gets plugged into the intercom

      So it's better to have an iPod bouncing around the cockpit than something installed in the panel?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  43. maybe this could help by AMLinc · · Score: 1

    I have been working on a wireless router solution for Satcoms. These are a carry-on solution this way you do not have to go through the certification requirements with permanently installed devices. We can loaded songs and media of your choice. We have been looking at the router as a carry-on low cost IFE system as well. Your application would not need the Satcom interface but we can help you if you are interested. http://www.aviationmodificationleaders.com/advrouter.php Email me if you are interested. Mark

  44. Power by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    Power for the HDMI touchscreen (9-15V) can be provided from a 4 cell LiPO RC battery. A standard cigarette lighter to USB adapter can likely be used to drop the 14.8V down to 5V for the raspberry pi.

  45. While you're at it... by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Find a way to quiet the noise of the rotors so your passengers can hear the music. I'm sure the people and animals on the ground would appreciate it too.

    (Don't say it can't be done, Seal team 6 has some pretty quiet helicopters.)

  46. Try Archos by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

    They have decent music players, are reasonably "pro hacker", they used to have a version of angstroem linux for the Gen7 Archos48 player
    (with a 500Gb disk and reasonable vibration resistance, obviously to be checked on an helicopter)

    the current models run Android ICS.

  47. Curious: When not portable? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    neither portable GPS nor intercoms nor timing devices nor "PCATD-lite" things nor any of the other portable gadgets that go in an aircraft have to be "certified" by the FAA.

    I'm curious but the article discusses wiring the "portable" device into buttons on the control stick. If so then at what point does this stop being a portable device? It seems a truly bizarre set of rules that requires certification of any permanently mounted device but will let a mechanic "hack" what is effectively a docking port into the aircraft. Doesn't the docking port need to be certified too because that is not portable and will be hard mounted to the aircraft.

    1. Re:Curious: When not portable? by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that if the system that he already has in place is certified. So, the 'docking port' is already in place. He simply needs to interface a portable device to his existing connectors.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  48. Remote control and human interface problems by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    The remote is going to be the difficult part, especially if you want to choose playlists.

    I've recently bought an iPod nano 6G and found it unusable in my car: the touch screen means you have to look at the device to operate it, and I'm not going to do that while driving.
    So I bought an iJet Nav remote with physical buttons for pause, next track, and previous track (also volume up and down, but those are not necessary in my setup). This gives me enough control for the things I want to do while driving, and the pysical buttons mean that I can operate them without looking.

    The Nano 6G will operate with the iJet Nav attached for about 5 hours on battery power.

    Choosing a different playlist is going to be way too distracting however you set it up. The only acceptable option I've seen is an iPod linked to a car stereo through the CD changer input. Dension (I think) makes a device that will do this, and it will map 6 playlists to the Disc 1-6 buttons on the car stereo, so choosing a new playlist is a matter of pressing one button.

    I think you'll have to plan ahead and have an appropriate playlist cued up before you take off.

  49. Try Qi Hardware's NanoNote by Rozzin · · Score: 2

    Have a look at Qi Hardware's NanoNote. It seems like it it fit the bill pretty well, especially if you pair it with TuxBrain's Universal Breakout Board (a small breakout board that plugs into the NanoNote's MicroSD port).

    I've bought two NanoNotes for use as portable music players (one for me, one for my wife). We've been running MPD + ncmpc on them (which makes it convenient to either browse or search for songs), along with smart auto-DJ (which means that you can just pick a song to start with, and it'll automatically keep the play-queue filled with appropriate-sounding songs), for the past two years or so.

    Running just on the commodity battery that fits inside, we've found that they'll run for at least 8 hours; but they also support the addition of small external battery that'll get you another ~30 hours.

    --
    -rozzin.
  50. If the dock connector's the problem, don't use it. by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    "Our first choice would be to give each pilot an iPod, but Apple is notoriously anti-hacking and anti-open source, plus you have to pay them ridiculous licensing fees to get access to their USB interface."

    If your first choice would otherwise be an iPod but you can't hack their USB... don't. You don't need to.

    Every time I ride my motorcycle, I control my iPhone playlists just fine without anything USB driven. The bike headset uses bluetooth and gives me play, pause, skipping in both directions, volume, controls.

    I'm guessing what's already on your flight controls is no more than that. So find someone else who's already done the work and piggyback off it. All you need to do is wire your controls to the controls on the pre-existing device and you're done.

    The iPod/iPhone connects in via aux so it's not hard wired. The controls themselves, you were always going to have to reconnect and get FAA approval anyway. If you want to save even more money and go with a pre bluetooth spec iPod, bluetooth receivers that mount in to their dock connectors are $50. Should be solveable in an afternoon and you get your first choice of player.

    Note: It's pretty much taken as a confirmed rumor that Apple's changing dock connectors with the new iPhone. That said, bluetooth means you're only replacing the charging cable anyway.

  51. Spend money on the cable by mattr · · Score: 1

    IANAP just googler but I guess the idea is that you don't buy a $1000-2500 unit like those from PS Engineering or Sarasota Avionics.
    http://www.gulfcoastavionics.com/products/537-pcd-7100.aspx
    http://www.ps-engineering.com/pav80.shtml
    http://sarasotaavionics.com/category/entertainment/cd_mp3_dvd-players
    http://sarasotaavionics.com/avionics/fdsdx6 (a $2800 unit that takes six 1GB sd cards, this is overkill but an example of what is out there.)

    Anyway I cannot be of much help but you should get something that doesn't rely on a touchscreen, and also take care about the adapter cable.

    There are a lot of sites selling adapter cables for helicopter intercom to mp3 players. But one had a comment that popped my ears up. This is about recording audio from the intercom, so maybe it is not related to your use case but thought I would mention it.
    http://www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/sep/3335

    Tuesday, August 03, 2010

    Caused radio communication problems when in use

    by william from newark CA USA

    Cons: May not work for all camcorders!

    Review: The problem was when I plugged the audio tap wire into a Contour HD video camera it cause so much interference with the radio transmission the control tower could not understand what I was saying. It also made my voice sound like it was in an echo chamber on my headset. Maybe the camcorder I was using was being over driven by the helicopters audio output (robbinson R22). Either way, it didn't work and I had to land and remove the cable from my system. Probably too late to return it.

  52. Sansa Clip + by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sansa Clip + runs rockbox, has 8GB of internal storage, and a microSD card slot. It's about $40-$50 and you just need to plug it into your computer and drop files into a folder on the device.

    It's also small, lightweight and has no moving parts, which may be an important consideration in a helicopter. I mean, conceivably, the vibrations could limit the life of an iPod HDD, but I'm not expert.

  53. Check Anythingbutipod by Eezyville · · Score: 1

    http://anythingbutipod.com/ You could find reviews for android powered media players and ask the community any specific questions about those players. I recommend this site to help you find what you need. P.S. I don't know how to linkify my texts or how to do basic formatting on this site. Could someone explain how?

  54. Try a Zipit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just get a zipit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr8ZQJnzyCY (Just like the nanonote except it already has rockbox and wifi).

  55. iPod Touch + Remote Dock + Battery by mveloso · · Score: 1

    iPod Touch + external battery + dock with remote

    Problem solved.

    You could actually wire the dock connector into the onboard power, or just use a standard inverter/charger.

    The universal dock has a remote, and you can get an IR blaster or something to wire into your helicopter. The codes for the universal dock are out there, or you could just embed the remote that comes with the UD.

    You can put the text you want as the album art, and make sure the iPod Touch doesn't sleep. You now have a big 3" screen that's plenty bright.

    Why build some crappy open source thing that's hard to maintain? COTS is the way to go. Your time is too expensive to be farting around with this other stuff.

  56. Wasn't an ipad certified by FAA ? by stooo · · Score: 2

    I think there was news some time ago that ipads were certified by FAA as replacements of plane manuals. Why not use them as MP3 players ?

    --
    aaaaaaa
  57. FAA Approval by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You will not get.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  58. PS-Engineering intercoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own and fly a Vans RV-6 sportplane. It's noisy as heck inside and requires good ANR headsets. I have two Lightspeed Zulu headsets, and recently upgraded my intercom to a PS Engineering PM-3000 stereo intercom. I can plug in my portable MP3 player to the intercom now and both occupants can hear the music great now. The PM-3000 has a "karaoke mode" switch where you can enable or disable the auto-muting of the music with a pushbutton. I prefer to leave the auto-muting disabled and just keep the music down to a reasonable volume since having the music mute constantly every time a transmission comes over the COM radio is really annoying. With the music constantly playing, but at a reasonable volume, I can still hear the COM radio just fine and the music sounds really good thru this intercom and Zulu headsets. The PM-3000 is fully PMA'd and TSO'ed so it's good to go for installation into a certified aircraft. It only cost $420 and I installed it myself. In a certified aircraft, you'll have to get the installation done by an A&P to be legal.

  59. DROID phone using GPS position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a DROID phone load My Tracks onto it and activate it before a flight, stop it afterward. Give this data to a programer, have him set the DROID's music player to activate the desired files at the appropriate places in the flight based on GPS position. No pilot input needed.
    Plug it into the aux input of the intercom system and velcro it down on top of the dash.
    Easy and cheap!

  60. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    small bluetooth enable tablets? smartphones? something that people already know how to use and is already available?

    COMON PEOPLE!!!! You can switch SD cards and preload music people like, etc.......

  61. Doh! A modernAndroid phone will do fine by mauriceh · · Score: 1

    Galaxy Nexus, bluetooth.
    What is described sounds exactly what I have mounted in my truck: A 2012 model JVC stereo/bluetooth DVD deck, and my Galaxy Nexus.
    All this discussion of docking is irrelevant. Use Bluetooth.

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  62. Actually, don't try a Zipit/Rockbox by Rozzin · · Score: 1

    Maybe I should also mention: the reason I originally got my NanoNote was that I was in a situation where, like OP mrhelio, Wi-Fi was more of a liability than a feature. Not having to worry about RF interference/EMI was a feature. I knew other people who had bought devices with Wi-Fi and then solved the problem by opening-up said devices and diking out the radio components, but I didn't want to have to bother with that.

    That Zipit device also appears to have been out of production for a couple of years now.

    And, speaking as someone who's used, loved, and even loved hacking on Rockbox, this is one of the big problems I see with it: since it's mostly working `against the grain', it basically doesn't run on anything that's still in production. On the occasion that the Rockbox hackers are able to accelerate the reverse-engineering project enough to port it to something that is still in production, that gets fixed pretty quickly. This was the case with the iPod that I bought specifically to run Rockbox, for example. When that iPod died, I accepted that Rockbox has an ever-enriching past, but no future. It's a pretty fantastic retro-system..., but it's still a retro system.

    --
    -rozzin.
  63. The guys at ABT electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any competent high end car audio shop should be able to create a setup that works for you. If you are in the Midwest I would recommend ABT electronics.

  64. iPhone voice control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could just use the voice control on the iPhone, and get a headset that will attach to the iPhone via Bluetooth. There are several such headsets. I'm a helicopter pilot, and that's what I do.

  65. N900 + bluetooth by dfries · · Score: 1

    I'm using my Nokia N900 for in car entertainment, aka podcasts while I drive. Since the radio uses bluetooth I'm using its buttons to control it, but I also used to use a bluetooth mouse I use while on a walk to control it. The mouse could be solder up someway to trigger the three mouse buttons and scroll wheel to send inputs over bluetooth. I don't use a display while driving, and the daylight readable would be a problem for most portable players and cell phone systems. Still since I have it working that's the route I would be taking.

  66. There can be only one by MRe_nl · · Score: 1
    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  67. MP3s won't inspire fear though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you want is a reel-to-reel tape deck, some big horn speakers, and Wagner's Ride of the Valkyries.

  68. What about performance rights by OurDailyFred · · Score: 1

    No one seems to have thought about the acquisition of performance rights which can be a substantial amount based on the gross revenues of the sightseeing company.

    Look at it another way. You could easily end the problem by:

    1. Explaining the cost of performance rights for any music played during the flight would increase ticket costs, and it would be impossible to have enough channels to deal with everyone's music tastes. We do not have flights that last several hours like airliners.

    2. Explaining the rules under which we fly require that passengers be enabled to hear what the pilot is saying at all times. That is for YOUR safety. Our pilots are highly trained and can land this aircraft safely in nearly all emergencies. YOUR safety requires quick action and compliance with any instructions the pilot gives. (You may prefer to leave out descriptions of auto-rotation and the need to begin that process nearly immediately on flame-out.)

    Give each passenger a card explaining these issues, and perhaps have a map of the route on the card and urge the passengers to pick out certain landmarks from the route. Get them looking out the windows and watching the show there. Give statistics on the flight, tell people how the helicopter works, talk about the training required to be licensed to fly a rotary wing aircraft. Promote your other tours, promote a flying school that offers FAM flights.

    This is a classic case of someone misinterpreting the problem, not unusual with people who aren't used to critical thinking. Instead of complaints about preoccupied teenagers not being able to listen to their music, the question should more accurately be, "What can we do to make the flight more interesting for younger kids who are at the 'bored with everything' stage."

    A few good ideas might even come from asking kids after the flight what they would do differently. You might get some ideas that could actually work.

    But to go off on crusade to find music players overlooks a bunch of better solutions. Going on a search for music players is giving up in defeat and admitting our helicopter tours are so boring that kids would rather listen to music.

    --
    If your only tool is a hammer, you'll approach every problem as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
  69. My uncle works for Westland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and no you cannot be messing around with such crap

  70. Use a Windows phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a Windows Phone. Similar benefits to an iPhone but it uses a standard micro-usb connector and there are better tools available for programming it. Better yet the development tools run on a standard operating system on standard hardware.

  71. iPod remotes are all over the place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPod remotes that work through the dock connector are all over the place.

    Since you have engineers who can do some wiring, might as well crack open the official apple remote and wire that into your buttons.
    Or, you can find that the basic ipod protocol is already on the net. It's simpler than the iphone accessory protocol and doesn't require any authentication chips.

    Or, maybe this will work. I have one of these:
    http://www.brightonnet.co.jp/english/product/ipod/bi-re605b.html