Slashdot Mirror


Toys R Us Unveils Android Tablet For Kids

puddingebola writes "Can Toys R Us provide the iPad killer? The 'Tabeo' s a 7 inch Android tablet running ICS with a micro-SD card slot. From the article, 'Powered by a 1GHz processor, the multitouch device comes with 4GB of built-in storage but can handle up to 32GB with a micro SDHC card. The device comes with 50 preloaded games, books, and educational apps and offers access to 6,000 more apps through the Tabeo Store.'"

36 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Android is a toy by Mr.+Kinky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Boooya!

    1. Re:Android is a toy by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're just doing this now because manufacturers have found that the only people with the eyesight and dexterity to handle microSD cards are 7 year olds.

      QOTD: Only adults have difficulty with childproof caps.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Android is a toy by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also see the "Bicycles are toys" crowd, versus the people who have no car and don't pay insurance/gas/car payment and are happily bicycling to work, to school, grocery shopping, etc.

    3. Re:Android is a toy by Nadaka · · Score: 2

      My smartphone is a camera/flashlight/gps/map

      And I also have the option of writing html5 web apps on it and running a web server.

    4. Re:Android is a toy by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only thing I can use my Galaxy S for is word learning and some minimal email checking and messaging, other than that it's just games. Guess it is a toy or maybe I am getting old. Has anyone managed to use their smartphone/tablet/iphone for anything serious?

      I use my Droid X to troubleshoot issues with wireless networks, do a bit of mitm experimentation, keep track of website analytics, study various religious text, tune my guitar, chat via IRC, control my home theater system, send WoL packets, monitor police and emergency radios, test various media codecs/protocols, play and record electronic music, manage my business calendar/contacts/transactions...

      Oh, and of course, listen to Pandora whilst playing Nethack (most important use EVAR)!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Android is a toy by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot checking for IR output from various remote controls. TV remote not working? Point it at the phone camera and you should see the remotes IR LED ligjt up (on the phone camera screen) when you press a button on the remote.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    6. Re:Android is a toy by kelemvor4 · · Score: 2

      Corporate email, cell phone of course, I've attended WebEx meetings on my phone, and used some web interfaces at the office (that I wrote) to control servers from the phone (via vpn). At the end of the day, my favorite feature is wireless tethering.

      It gives me some freedom from sitting at the pc which I otherwise wouldn't have (at the expense of making me way too accessible after hours).

    7. Re:Android is a toy by kelemvor4 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The lack of a tactile keyboard is definitely one drawback to smartphones. I think the Tactus touchscreen stuff is going to solve that problem. Hopefully apple won't buy them out and refuse to license it to other companies. Link: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Touchscreen-Tactile-Feedback-Smartphones-buttons,16492.html

    8. Re:Android is a toy by olau · · Score: 2

      Have you used it for a phone call yet?

  2. Cost too much by na1led · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, why would anyone pay $150 for this cheap thing when you can get much better. I'd rather pay $150 for the kindle fire, or even the nook. Unless this tablet is childproof from breaking, its not going to sell.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:Cost too much by SomePgmr · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article says it comes in a "drop-proof bumper" and is preloaded with kids stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if it uses its own, curated, kid-safe market with some protection against inappropriate material or apps that include unguarded in-app purchasing.

    2. Re:Cost too much by idontgno · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless this tablet is childproof from breaking, its not going to sell.

      You didn't read TFA. That's OK, this is Slashdot; it would have been weird if you had.

      Yeah. It is, to some extent, childproofed. Its edge is a shock-absorbent soft-plastic bumper, so odds are somewhat better that if a kid drops it on the sidewalk, it won't shatter into a dozen pieces.

      I couldn't see any other obvious signs of child-proofing (which would require engineering beyond even military ruggedization), but at least that obvious contingency is covered.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Cost too much by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      I know that is the first thing that most kids want to play with on a tablet/smartphone is the fart app.

      And the sheer number of fart apps out there tells me that kids have correctly identified that farts are hilarious!! A friend's sister teaches elementary school, and she assures me that farts are the funniest thing ever.

      Though, I must confess, I deleted my fart apps within the first week; but I'm betting a fair few people still use theirs. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Cost too much by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      I couldn't see any other obvious signs of child-proofing (which would require engineering beyond even military ruggedization)

      The military internet use is under parental control?

      Yes; Uncle Sam knows best.

      That's why military personnell tend to set up alternative networks outside of milnet; that way they don't have the strict controls over what goes in/out.

    5. Re:Cost too much by Dan9999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      not everyone needs an app for it.

    6. Re:Cost too much by eyegone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is designed for children and it looks like it suits that group.
      No it isn't. It's designed for children's parents.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  3. Sure Toys R Us can provide the iPad killer. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

    All they need is for hipster to buy it ironically.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Sure Toys R Us can provide the iPad killer. by the_humeister · · Score: 2

      Well, why not? Put Cyanogenmod on it once it's been rooted and it'll work as well as any other 7" tablet.

    2. Re:Sure Toys R Us can provide the iPad killer. by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 2

      What's the point? i think it is a good idea even as is, crash proof and preloaded for kids?! it's great, "here kid have this now fuck off and dont mess with my stuff"

  4. Re:This helps Intel... by msauve · · Score: 2

    "now that my desktop is slower than an Android toy tablet, I finally have justification for an upgrade to Haswell next year."

    ... or maybe Hasbro?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  5. not an iPad killer by mbaGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    my first thought is of someone yelling "developers, developers, developers!" (the success of the platform will be directly related to the amount of useful work that can be accomplished using it)

    this has the potential to carve out a niche - but has zero chance of "killing" the iPad - i.e. fundamentally different markets...

    --
    It ain't what they call you. It's what you answer to. http://mylyceum.us/
    1. Re:not an iPad killer by Darth+Snowshoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This. Why is "iPad-killer" even a thing? People buy iPads because they want iPads. If you offer them something better, cheaper... they will continue to buy iPads.

    2. Re:not an iPad killer by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      My first thought was "The Taboo? A kid's toy?!"

  6. Stop Trying to be a Killer. by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do you thinks these products fail. Is because they are trying to kill the competition vs. Find their own niche where the competition fails to thrive.

    The iPad is here and it will stay as long as Apple Deems fit. Now that doesn't mean it need to be the only tablet on the block, but apple has left gaps for areas to success.
    1. Low End Market (The Kindle Fire area) Low end Tablet, for those who don't need the fancy iPad.
    2. Business Market. Businesses really don't care for the iPad closed nature. They need to do their own trusted tweaks to them.
    3. High End Market. (Microsoft?) We want a full featured PC but just an optional keyboard.

    Android had seemed to stay in the Me Too area. Its success in the phones wasn't as much as the success in the OS but because Apple stuck only on AT&T for too long and people didn't want to switch to AT&T for whatever reason (often good one), the tablets which had less success was because they are less tied to a carrier thus people make a choice. So you have an iPad or something else that is priced the same as an iPad and equal specs... You might as well go with the iPad.
    I am NOT saying Android is a bad OS or your tablet or phone is second par to the iPhone. But Apple got the image first, the rest are trying to takes its place in an area where Apple already has that place.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Stop Trying to be a Killer. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 4, Informative

      2. Business Market. Businesses really don't care for the iPad closed nature. They need to do their own trusted tweaks to them.

      I don't think you understand the business market or the iPad. The iPad can be managed centrally. You can control which apps may be installed. You can do remote wipes, and you can install apps outside of the App Store. From a business perspective, there's not all that much to dislike about the iPad. It can't join AD, but then, neither can any other mobile device that isn't a laptop.

    2. Re:Stop Trying to be a Killer. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We're rolling out an EHR (electronic health record). Although the vendor supports iPads and 'hopes' to support Android tablets in the near future, we're not going the iPad route. Not because of administration but precisely because they're too popular. We think it's just going to be too easy to walk off with them.

      Yes, you can lock it down so no patient info could be compromised, but the issue is a perception that it's an iPad and therefore desirable / fenceable. We're not in the financial position to be able to supply the town with iPads. I'm hoping that we can get a 7" generic Android tablet that runs the the data entry part of the application.

      So, there are other valid reasons for wanting something other than a nice, shiny iPad....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Stop Trying to be a Killer. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Android is a me too phone?

      Tell that the the android phones with physical keyboards, hdmi output, or sd card slots. These are things that the iPhone never did.

      In other words: "Our product is like theirs only we added a couple of features."

      That's the very definition of a me-too product.

      Like when Apple started adding hard drives to their desktops, after everyone else started doing it?

      Seriously, though, these fanboi pissing contests, while close to the dumbest shit I've ever encountered, do make for fairly entertaining reading.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  7. Why not just get a Kindle? by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you want to get something educational for your children, why not just buy the simplest Kindle and load it with books? Sure, you won't have a color screen and flashy games, but for younger children the various electronic features will probably be enough to satisfy their desire to explore. People often overestimate what it takes to keep a child staring at a screen for hours on end. Tthey could actually read something edifying and there wouldn't be quite the same distractions as an Android tablet.

  8. You're not thinking like Mom by LordNicholas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a nerd, but also as someone in the mobile games business, I'd say there's definitely potential here. All they need is a big sticker saying "No accidental app purchases!"

    Mobile games on an iPad run the risk of Junior buying $500 worth of virtual currency. The same moms who aren't tech-savvy enough to disable that feature are the same ones who'd more than happily spend $150 on a kid-proof Tabeo. There's also a dollar value on the fact that Mom doesn't need to spend any time or energy ensuring Junior doesn't download anything objectionable.

    Those are just two examples- there are plenty of others.

  9. It's Russian by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2
    If you look at their actual logo, the letter in the middle is a backwards R - the Cyrillic symbol for "Ya". It's obviously a Commie plot to destroy American competitiveness by addicting children to made-in-People's Republic of China plastic.

    Removes tinfoil hat

    On second thoughts, forget that.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  10. All well and good... by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Funny

    All well and good, until Tabio dies in a freak accident. Next thing you know, they're building a super-powerful robot made in Tabio's image with Tabio's memories.

  11. Good idea, excessive price point. by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a good idea, but $150 is too much. Generic 7 inch tablets are now down to $40-75 on Alibaba. This thing will probably drop below $100 on December 26th.

    The future of computing is $79.95 tablets in blister packs at the convenience store. Intel, Microsoft, and Apple are desperately trying to stop this.

  12. This is a rebranded Archos Child Pad by xybe · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Engadget this is a rebranded Archos Child Pad.

  13. Re:Toys(U+042F)us by fm6 · · Score: 2

    You mean Toys U+1D19 Us. This isn't Soviet Russia yet!

    The way Slashdot filters out most non-ASCII characters in posts is lame. It dates back to before they started used UTF8 encoding and long since stopped making sense.

  14. Already other products by microTodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's already other products on the market in this space. But I guess this one is interesting because it runs android?

    So I'm not a shill, but my kids both have a Leappad. http://www.leapfrog.com/leappad2/ They are very nice...run off 4 AAs for a week or two, and seem pretty indestructible. And its only $100. PRoprietary walled garden, I know, but the apps come either downloadable or via a dedicated SIM-like card. Works well enough for me.

    I guess my point is...I don't know what my point is. Maybe the Toysrus one is interesting because its Android? So it can run any android app? But although my kids prefer my iPad I much rather they use a kid-proofed tablet.

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  15. Re:Why can businesses do what users can't? by cdrguru · · Score: 2

    If a company writes an internal application, you can get a distribution license that allows it to be installed on devices for that company. It is part of the enterprise distribution. You basically need to identify and authorize each device individually, but it isn't that hard a job to do.

    Just as a developer you get to install your stuff on 100 devices without doing anything extra. I believe there are few restrictions on the enterprise distribution and that lets you distribute to a lot more than 100 devices. I believe the only restriction is that you cannot put your app on devices without some kind of business relationship. It is intended to prevent bypassing the Apple App Store for generic consumer applications.