Suppose later I do receive an NSL or court order. Can the government legitimately force me to lie and publish statements saying I haven't? Is there any law that gives the executive branch the authority to order us to lie?
How has anybody not figured out that questions of legality and legitimacy are irrelevant?
Incarcerating more than 100,000 Japanese Americans wasn't legal or legitimate either, but won't somebody think of the children!
Google "Secure Electronic Transactions.". TL;DR: It got a bit of traction in Europe but basically none in the U.S. (presumably due to different credit card liability laws).
Until they start making phones that can survive in the real world without a case, a phone's material is pretty much irrelevant, since it's always hidden.
I keep hearing about this so called race to the bottom (most often espoused by self proclaimed communists) yet my computer equipment today is a lot better than that which I owned 10 years ago (around the time I first started hearing about this race to the bottom.)
You're clearly not a laptop user. I fondly remember the days of 16x10 screens, caps lock and num lock LEDs, standard and stable keyboard layouts, inaudible CPU fans, etc.
It may have taken them years, but persistance apparently pays off. I don't know of anyone who thinks current generation ThinkPads are anything but junk.
I'm pretty sure that $NAME and $NAME and $NAME don't want their spouses/partners/children/parents/etc. to be killed/tortured/Gitmo'ed/etc., so I fail to see how this is a problem for the National Security Asshats.
Imagine an ISP/television provider that uses their IP network to deliver both services. It sure sounds like this would prohibit them from prioritizing the IPTV traffic.
So much for watching that World Cup match; your neighbor has p0rn to torrent!
If I write down in my notebook 'Cowboy Neal has inappropriate sexual relations with his water bottle', and never tell anyone what I have written, and never publish it, than what exactly am I guilty of?
Slashdot Mirror
Also required to get a passport.
I categorically refuse to believe that any ISP/cable company is hated more than Frontier Communications.
Isn't all ketchup fancy?
I guess writing a new filesystem is easier than fixing the existing bugs in bcache itself.
Does it have an SELinux policy now?
Good to know. As a proud 'Murhkin, I like to think that we do racist thuggery as well as anyone.
Suppose later I do receive an NSL or court order. Can the government legitimately force me to lie and publish statements saying I haven't? Is there any law that gives the executive branch the authority to order us to lie?
How has anybody not figured out that questions of legality and legitimacy are irrelevant?
Incarcerating more than 100,000 Japanese Americans wasn't legal or legitimate either, but won't somebody think of the children!
How about we argue for an expansion on non-exempt status based on fairness and logic, rather than dubios macro-economics.
M'kay?
He may consider himself a citizen of the world, but the people with guns do not. I don't see this ending well.
So you're telling me that "security" people are self-important asshats? Who knew?
Google "Secure Electronic Transactions.". TL;DR: It got a bit of traction in Europe but basically none in the U.S. (presumably due to different credit card liability laws).
Which becomes difficult when a user in one shard and a user in another shard want to perform a transaction together.
Sounds like miscegenation to me.
It turns out that bash was JavaScript before JavaScript was cool.
He acted for the benefit of the people of the United States, so he is working for an enemy of the United States government.
Until they start making phones that can survive in the real world without a case, a phone's material is pretty much irrelevant, since it's always hidden.
Hopefully this will lead to an increased emphasis on endpoint security, rather than the current "we have firewalls" attitude that's far too pervasive.
(For people who actually care about real security, that is. I've got no sympathy for those who just want to control/censor/monitor Internet traffic.)
I don't care what they're supposed to be used for. They may be civilization's last hope of controlling my children.
There's one judge who will be getting audited every year from now on.
I keep hearing about this so called race to the bottom (most often espoused by self proclaimed communists) yet my computer equipment today is a lot better than that which I owned 10 years ago (around the time I first started hearing about this race to the bottom.)
You're clearly not a laptop user. I fondly remember the days of 16x10 screens, caps lock and num lock LEDs, standard and stable keyboard layouts, inaudible CPU fans, etc.
And I haven't figured out the magic incantation to associate one of the "bookmark" buttons with a radio station.
I keep hearing that iDrive has gotten better. I can't imagine how bad it must have been before.
It may have taken them years, but persistance apparently pays off. I don't know of anyone who thinks current generation ThinkPads are anything but junk.
I'm pretty sure that $NAME and $NAME and $NAME don't want their spouses/partners/children/parents/etc. to be killed/tortured/Gitmo'ed/etc., so I fail to see how this is a problem for the National Security Asshats.
Imagine an ISP/television provider that uses their IP network to deliver both services. It sure sounds like this would prohibit them from prioritizing the IPTV traffic.
So much for watching that World Cup match; your neighbor has p0rn to torrent!
If I write down in my notebook 'Cowboy Neal has inappropriate sexual relations with his water bottle', and never tell anyone what I have written, and never publish it, than what exactly am I guilty of?
Write-crime.
Now do this with JavaScript (at least when it comes from a different host than the page being viewed).