Slashdot Mirror


Arma III Developers Arrested In Greece For 'Spying'

An anonymous reader writes "Kotaku reports that two employees of Bohemia Interactive have been arrested while on a photo-tour of the Greek island of Limnos, on charges of spying. The developers were taking reference photos for the upcoming military simulation game Arma III, which is to feature Limnos as it's primary setting, when they were arrested (Google translation of Greek original)."

162 comments

  1. Spying? Really? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    So if I was there as a tourist, would I get arrested?

    Or is somehow putting your island into a video game now sedition or something?

    TFA is pretty slim, but I'm having a hard time imagine what law was broken.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  2. wha why? by epyT-R · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What? So much for the 'free' western world. Since when is taking pictures of scenery 'espionage'? I know most people in the west mark the fall of the soviet union as a high point in history for freedom, but legislation/political action in various countries over the last 20 years or so makes it seem like the beginning of its decline.

    1. Re:wha why? by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      First you fight it, then you become it.

    2. Re:wha why? by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Informative

      You leave out the part where the 'scenery' they were taking pictures of happened to be a military installation. No granted, I think espionage charges for such a thing are more than a little ridiculous (and I doubt that is what they'll actually be charged for) but just about every nation on the planet has laws against photographing their military bases.

    3. Re:wha why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys were using infrared cameras and other standard tourist equipment...

    4. Re:wha why? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What? So much for the 'free' western world.

      Greece, and "free"? For a country so big on concentration camps, prison camps and the like, this is nothing terribly surprising.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:wha why? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Then why call it 'espionage' if that isn't what they'll be charged for? Are the charges ridiculous or are you justifying the arrests because the laws exist? The former I agree with, but the latter is circular reasoning (the law is just because the law exists because it is just because...).

      In free countries, the laws that do get passed make sense and the punishments fit, making charge stacking pointless and counterproductive.. In current trends, the states keep ramping up the punishments to the point of jaywalking = death to prop up political campaigns, and the prosecutors (or their equivalents) stack the charges as much as they can get away with. How long before cameras are covered as 'automatic weapons' under the law? Watch.. I'll bet it'll happen eventually.

    6. Re:wha why? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      So? Perhaps they wanted to see how infared equipment should behave under such conditions? If they're using the scenery for a campaign, they would need to know details like this because Arma is supposed to be a highly realistic military simulator.

    7. Re:wha why? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Then why call it 'espionage' if that isn't what they'll be charged for? Are the charges ridiculous or are you justifying the arrests because the laws exist? The former I agree with, but the latter is circular reasoning (the law is just because the law exists because it is just because...).

      In free countries, the laws that do get passed make sense and the punishments fit, making charge stacking pointless and counterproductive.. In current trends, the states keep ramping up the punishments to the point of jaywalking = death to prop up political campaigns, and the prosecutors (or their equivalents) stack the charges as much as they can get away with. How long before cameras are covered as 'automatic weapons' under the law? Watch.. I'll bet it'll happen eventually.

      they're greeks, why call anything something. they just want some of that game developer rockstar money.

      and maybe, just maybe the photos would have actually shown that they were skimming from the budget.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:wha why? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The guy who reviews all the evidence in detail and decides what a person could reasonable be convicted of is very often not the person making the arrest, or even the decision to arrest. Even in cases where it is the same person, that person could choose to make an argument for arrest based on the worst-possible charge, then downgrade it later. I expect this is especially true when there's a time limit to make the arrest (i.e. the tourists could leave).

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    9. Re:wha why? by dargaud · · Score: 0

      In free countries, the laws that do get passed make sense and the punishments fit

      Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    10. Re:wha why? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      haha.. maybe who knows.

    11. Re:wha why? by Incadenza · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think espionage charges for such a thing are more than a little ridiculous (and I doubt that is what they'll actually be charged for)

      You may doubt it, but I do not. I took over nearly two year for a group of tourist plane spotters to be acquitted of espionage charges in 2001. At the initial process 8 of that group were convicted to three years in jail.

    12. Re:wha why? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I wonder how quick these sorts of people would change that behavior if it was their reputations on the line instead of the arrested? After all, while this goes down, the names of the defendants are the ones being trashed in the media. Happens here in america all the time. Timelimits are not a good reason to shortchange justice.

      If it's alright for the state to take pictures of us in public, then I see no problem with us taking pictures of objects in that same public space, including military installations.. If they house something supersecret, then officials should have the brains to ensure it cannot be seen from outside.

    13. Re:wha why? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I never said america was a free country.. at least not these days.

    14. Re:wha why? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I think Britain does this better, as IIRC the names of those arrested aren't released to the public. This helps prevent the reputation damage caused by false arrest.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  3. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There have been similar incidents in the past in Greece involving people taking photos of military aircraft, air bases etc. It's illegal in Greece to photograph military property, and if you do so arrest is likely. With Arma being a military game, my guess is these guys were doing exactly this, and should have known better.

  4. Really? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    Really? Every Real Estate Developer does the same thing in Greece, so that they can deduct the vacation from their taxes.
    Usually they also invite local people to dinner to ask them how they like their own houses, then they can also deduct the restaurants.

    That's where the money comes from, Greeks, from us taxpayers!

    But I guess the military has a bit of a paranoiac streak everywhere.

    1. Re:Really? by vlm · · Score: 1

      But I guess the military has a bit of a paranoiac streak everywhere.

      Thats the part I don't get. Does Greece think the Persian Empire is going to invade again or is the Macedonians again?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must be joking. Turkey claims half the Aegean and illegally militarily occupies half of Cyprus, and you are poking fun at them
      for wanting to defend their land?

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From what i understand, they have something of an asymmetric rivalry with Turkey.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be joking if Greece actually thinks Turkey is a threat today, especially since both are part of NATO. Really, who are they afraid of? The only thing Greece is in danger from is their own economic incompetence and their horrible border control.

      "Illegal", not by Turkey's laws. Can't blame them for wanting to defend Turk Cypriots.

    5. Re:Really? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      It could be Germany and to a lesser extent Italy.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    6. Re:Really? by costas · · Score: 1

      Limnos is the most fortified Greek island and a huge military outpost. What did they expect exactly?

    7. Re:Really? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      To be honest, they've only been at war with Turkey since about the time Homer wrote about it.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    8. Re:Really? by Threni · · Score: 1

      They do this all the time in Greece though. Too stupid, poor or lazy to develop their own military planes, they buy them from the UK etc. Then, when people from the UK take pictures on holiday in Greece they get arrested for spying! Uh, we know all about your military planes - we sold them to you! You're not a major player - you're like Turkey level. You can have a little fight with Turkey about whatever 'fuck-all' people of shit you like to argue about, just leave regular people with a life out of it, okay?

    9. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After looking at this, I'm not sure there's anything to spy -on-. If you're going to "spy", at least go for a country that has something that's worth a shit.

    10. Re:Really? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Hm. And Greece occupies the other half, after sponsoring a military junta in 1974. Poor Cypriots for getting caught in the middle.

    11. Re:Really? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      We're trying to get RID of Greece, not take it.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    12. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turkey has a well trained and disciplined military that has been put to use in recent time, and Greece and Turkey aren't on completely friendly terms. They've also been known to start military engagements in north Iraq despite The U.S. urging them not to mess around in their playground. It would be silly for Greece NOT to think of Turkey as a potential threat.

      Not taking sides. I've spent a couples years between both countries and my conclusion is...They deserve eachother as enemies.

    13. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NATO? Big deal. They have both been in NATO since 1952 but fought a minor war and almost started a few major ones since then.

      Even as recently as 2004 Turkey announced if Greece chose to expand their territorial waters in the Aegean they would consider it an act of war.

    14. Re:Really? by giorgist · · Score: 1

      History is written by the victor ... hence a couple of million of evil Greeks thrown out of minor Asia. All the historical sights now being "Roman". The pogrom in the 50s against the Greeks in what is now Istanbul, The expulsion of the Greeks from Northern Cyprus, the Pontian genocide. That's only the Greeks. Check the Kurds, the Armenians and effectively most races in Turkey. Sure ... try calling the Armenian Genocide such in Turkey ... and off you go to the slammer. Where do you think all the Kurds in the slums (Gecekondu) around Istanbul came from. Try calling your self Kurdish a decade ago, or even naming your child a Kurdish name

      Turkish fighter jets fly low over Greek islands every other week. Tourists might find it funny, but the US or Russia or most countries would have shot it out of the sky had it happened to them and they have. Turks have often wanted to "liberate" Turks in Northern Greece and have the words largest invasion army on the coast of the Aegean for "training" purposes.

      There are many bizarre "rationalizations" performed by Turkey all the time ... but most of the above is just delusional :-)

    15. Re:Really? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Well, last time I checked you didn't really want it in WW2 either but the British decided they were going to support the Greeks and so you kind of had to take it.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    16. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I guess the military has a bit of a paranoiac streak everywhere.

      Thats the part I don't get. Does Greece think the Persian Empire is going to invade again or is the Macedonians again?

      Those slavomacedonians have nothing to do with our macedonians of Alexander the great. their history stert after ww2, and their nation was created based on yugoslavic and communist propaganda. Slavs came at 6th century ad. They are closer to Bulgarians and Serbs (same language, tranditions, culture.)

  5. Re:Spying? Really? by Night64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    If it was in the US, I would say the Patriot Act. There is a Patriotikoú Nómou in Greece?

    --
    Grey's Law: Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
  6. Re:Spying? Really? by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Greece often arrests people for taking photos of things which may have some public security interest. They arrest plane spotters from time to time and it sometimes reaches the British news.

    It's not really very interesting except to note that photography isn't really a fundamental human right and, outside the US and to a lesser extent the UK, you need to mind local law. If the business concerned didn't even do this little bit of research then I question how good the game is going to be - but the gap between reality and fantasy gets ever wider.

  7. They should have asked. by gigaherz · · Score: 1

    Specially before taking pictures and videos of military installations. It doesn't matter if it's for a video game, you just don't take pictures of military bases without the military getting paranoid about it.

    1. Re:They should have asked. by pspahn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Truly a lack of intuition.

      I spent an entire summer plotting out routes of houses to photograph based on an old database of the trees that were sold there 15+ years ago as I was building a photo library of mature trees and large shrubs.

      This has nothing to to do with any sort of military installation and I thought it was pretty straightforward that I would knock of the doors, identify myself (many times it was still the same owners from 15+ years ago and they were delighted to see me), and ask permission.

      Why the hell would you go to another country and take photographs of military facilities? That is just a complete lapse of judgement.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  8. As an original player/mission dev... by toadlife · · Score: 1

    ...on Operation Flashpoint, all I can say is....LET EM GO!!!!"

    Seriously, OFP was a groundbreaking game in that it was the first real attempt to simulate a real battlefield experience. Given the series' focus on realism, I have no doubt that these guys were simply doing prep work for the next version of Arma.

    Perhaps they should have called ahead...

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    1. Re:As an original player/mission dev... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no doubt that these guys were simply doing prep work for the next version of Arma.

      "Were" is the operative term here.... Don't count on another version of Arma anytime soon, unless there's a "Prison Break" map.

    2. Re:As an original player/mission dev... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Two photographers got arrested, that's not even remotely enough to stop the game's development.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  9. Not surprising by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Documenting military installations is illegal in every country.

    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    2. Re:Not surprising by Night64 · · Score: 1

      As my friends in Wikipedia would say, "Citation needed".

      --
      Grey's Law: Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
    3. Re:Not surprising by pspahn · · Score: 2, Funny

      As my friends in Wikipedia

      Wikipedia has a friending feature now also? Please... make it stop... I am sick of having so many friends.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    4. Re:Not surprising by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Friendship is only confirmed when cited by an independent source.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  10. they were spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Government of Greece does not permit the photographing of military installations; violators are subject to arrest. So they were arrested. Not really surprising.

  11. No Cameras by neghvar1 · · Score: 1

    I'll remember not to take my camera if I do a tour of Greece for vacation.

    1. Re:No Cameras by Reverant · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disclaimer: I am a Greek citizen.

      Feel free to take cameras with you and take pictures of the beautiful scenery, monuments and people. When however, you go outside military facilities that have big "NO PHOTOGRAPHY ALLOWED" signs (in english and actual no camera icons in case you don't know english) and start taking detailed photographs with your DSLR and 70-300 lens, expect to be arrested if caught. The devs should absolutely have requested a license to do it, they didn't care to do it or got caught in the bureaucracy that is to be expected with these affairs, they got arrested for breaking the law. If they were caught doing that in the US (say, outside Nellis AFB), I wonder what would have happened to them.

    2. Re:No Cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were caught doing that in the US? No problem!-- there would be /no/ charges -- they'd be thrown /straight/ into abusive incarceration.

    3. Re:No Cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same thing applies in Sweden, and in many places. Photos of military areas are not allowed unless prior authorisation has been given. I don't think you will be arrested in normal circumstances, but the guards will confiscate your camera (I have been one, and this happens from time to time).

    4. Re:No Cameras by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Feel free to take cameras with you and take pictures of the beautiful scenery, monuments and people.

      Me, I would rather set up an international web site collecting and assorting recent photographs of as many Greek military installations as possible. You know, the Streisand Effect. And hand-help DSLRs are not very clandestine. You can do much better today. A Micro Four Thirds camera with a suitable lens peeking out of a hole on the side of your backpack, perhaps?

      :If they were caught doing that in the US (say, outside Nellis AFB), I wonder what would have happened to them.

      Uhm...nothing?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:No Cameras by neghvar1 · · Score: 1

      In the US, if average Joe citizen, if discovered and on public land, the process would probably be, detained, ID/background check, questioned, film/SD card removed from camera, harsh warning and be on your way. Not certain though. Different scenario if suspected spy

    6. Re:No Cameras by khallow · · Score: 1

      If they were caught doing that in the US (say, outside Nellis AFB), I wonder what would have happened to them.

      I gather it happens rather frequently around Area 51 which is near Nellis AFB. According to Wikipedia, typical punishments are a $600 fine and special attention from the FBI, but I imagine the punishment would be more severe, if you photographed Elvis and some Greys looking over the latest prototype aircraft.

    7. Re:No Cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know enough specifics on the ARMA case, but any country that throws people in jail for years for taking pictures of a, errrr, public airshow is not a safe place for a tourist to be.

      Throw in some social unrest due to the economy, and the fact that 7% of the country voted Nazis into power.... no thanks I'll vacation somewhere else.

      Still, it was pretty dumb. I can't imagine any government being happy that someone is trying to build a virtual model of one of their military bases that an opposing military could use to train on.

      What would have happened in the US? Well, if they were on public land someone would have grumbled and shaken their fist at them if anything at all.

      If they were in a restricted area: picked up, background checked, yelled at, gear confiscated, fingerprinted and placed on watchlists and sent on their way

      In a restricted area and actually photographed something seriously top secret (like, say the stealth bomber before it was unveiled): you probably will never hear from them again.

    8. Re:No Cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same thing applies in Sweden, and in many places. Photos of military areas are not allowed unless prior authorization has been given. I don't think you will be arrested in normal circumstances, but the guards will confiscate your camera (I have been one, and this happens from time to time).

      A friend of mine had a similar experience taking photos of some planes on a runway at MacDill AFB in the USA. MP's grabbed her, destroyed the camera and film, then a few hours later released her with a stern warning. You haven't lived till you've had a few M16's pointed at you.

      Maybe there was something in the background she didn't notice but the planes she photographed are often featured at air shows at the same base... not like anything you could discern from a photo of the planes is a secret to anybody. I believe she said they were F-15's or something like that.

    9. Re:No Cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has _ever_ claimed to have photographed Elvis or Grays at Area 51, or published such photos.

      Some people _have_ gone missing for periods of time and had odd changes in their behavior afterwards; however, according to some guys I talked to who had nifty black suits, that's completely coincidental.

    10. Re:No Cameras by khallow · · Score: 1

      Some people _have_ gone missing for periods of time and had odd changes in their behavior afterwards

      That's not useful information, unless their activities make them more likely to go missing for periods of time and experience odd changes in behavior than normal. For example, one could say the same of Slashdot, there's probably a number of Slashdotters who have done the above at one time or another.

  12. I know what the first mission will be by DrXym · · Score: 5, Funny

    Busting the developers out of jail

    1. Re:I know what the first mission will be by pspahn · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they don't add that as an Easter Egg, they should all be arrested.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:I know what the first mission will be by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Busting the developers out of jail

      If I were Bohemia Interactive, after this, I would change the player's side into Turks and adjust the missions accordingly. :o)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  13. Re:Spying? Really? by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

    They were taking photographs of a military installation that they intended to reproduce inside Arma III. That almost certainly means moderately detailed shots of buildings, security measures, and military personal, which is illegal in some (most? all?) countries.

    Note: in the US, you can take pictures of aircraft or historical buildings, but not restricted areas. The point is to prevent surveillance intended to find weaknesses in security that can be exploited, aka "casing the joint". Pretty standard practice in the military. They should have definitely have asked for permission first.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  14. Re:Spying? Really? by bakuun · · Score: 2

    So if I was there as a tourist, would I get arrested?

    Or is somehow putting your island into a video game now sedition or something?

    TFA is pretty slim, but I'm having a hard time imagine what law was broken.

    TFA is not thin at all. It states that the men were caught with photographs of military installations. I would wager that most countries have laws against photographic military bases, and I'm not surprised that Greece do. This was just a really stupid thing to do.

  15. This reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of a news story I read last year. The commuter railroad line in lower New York that commutes from the burbs to the city has an annual contest for most interesting photo taken of their trains and/or stations. Last years competition saw a guy arrested for taking photos of the train by the railroad's own police force.

    Now, unless these guys were taking pictures of military bases or locations, then its most likely a huge miscommunication such as the railroad contest.

    1. Re:This reminds me... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Seems they were taking pictures of the military bases. They're trying to recreate the island as a whole for a military simulator, not just grab some iconic pictures to slot into the decorated corridor of your average military shooter game.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  16. Not really the first time in Greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They tend to be jumpy about photographers near military installations. (they still seem to anticipate a Turkish invasion at any moment)
    Like the plane-spotters they arrested 11 years ago.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1953654.stm

  17. Can I get freedom fries with my gyro? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, with all the austerity going on there, they must be really bored, sort of how the computers on Magrathea take potshots at passing spacecraft. I mean, c'mon, like actual spies are going to stand there obviously taking snapshots. Have they not see a James Bond film? Spies have cameras hidden in their hats and genitals.

    And, besides, if a photo of your installation renders it vulnerable, yer doin' it wrong. Unless the military base has a soul... maybe the camera is stealing the military base's soul?

    1. Re:Can I get freedom fries with my gyro? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Well, with all the austerity going on there, they must be really bored, sort of how the computers on Magrathea...

      Magrathea? Magrathea! -- Zaphod

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  18. Not much data in the article, but maybe not crazy by Intropy · · Score: 1

    The article claims they were photographing military installations. That could be anything from a snapshot that happens to include a military base to skirting the border of the thing and taking photos from every conceivable angle to get pictures of things clearly meant not to be public to actually wandering around the installation photographic everything in sight.

    The first one shouldn't cause anyone any concern. The second one I could see as being something a government could legitimately seek to limit, but I'd hope that the penalty would be limited to confiscating the images. The third could reasonably be treated as criminal if the installation isn't meant to be public. I have a feeling that if details come out they're going to be uncomfortably between one and two.

  19. Re:Spying? Really? by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely if it were dissolved then it would turn into an EU solution.

  20. Greece has a military? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    I mean c'mon, I can't imagine there are a lot of big secrets they are trying to protect.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  21. I'll remember not to take my camera by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easier (and safer) just to remember not to go to Greece?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:I'll remember not to take my camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure.
      Remenber to learn to read the same sign placed each and every a 100 meters, anywhere you go...
      Concerned about safety, try staying home, than in jail for 20 years.

  22. stupid and disrespectful people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am a Greek - those 2 people are stupid!
    They don't know Greek ... They don't know English, German, French, or all the other languages in the signs with the "NO PHOTOS" ... the fucking picture of the camera in the circle with the X how they can't understand it ... (OR RESPECT IT).
    The Greek police arrested them for taking photos of military installations, and they confessed that they had the photos (claiming it was for enhancing the next version of the game !!!).
    This island, in case of war with our beloved neighbor (yes ... Turkey!), is one of the first, if not the first, target.
    It is not the first time this happens - many tourists (but even some Greeks) find interesting all that military staff on the island, and every year some of them get "arrested", only to be left few hours later.
    They will be OK.

  23. Free publicity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter if the laws of a country make sense to you or not you have to obey them or you know.. you will get arrested! Actually I am Greek and that's one of the reasons why I left Greece.

    On the bright side they got free publicity. If I were them I would put the project to kickstater to cash out the publicity now.

    1. Re:Free publicity! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Greece supposedly has corruption problems, do the laws properly catch people who can pay the policeman? The govt has even stated that without all the tax evasion they wouldn't be in debt right now.

      Anyway, I don't think they need this as a publicity boost because that whole DayZ craze gave them waaaaaaaay more of a boost.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  24. Where is the base? by Valor958 · · Score: 2

    I figured I'd take a lookie at what all you can get from sat imagery commercially on Google Maps. Now, it says Myrina Police were involved on the island of Lemnos. Looking nearby there, I don't see anything screaming military installation. If you look, 'maybe, at : 39.867707,25.066209 (copy paste into google maps) is the base? It's close enough to town that local Police would have possibly been involved faster than MPs. If they were just looking for topography, layout, etc, than what I just took 3 minutes to do, and a little creativity can go a LONG way. Like others have said... perhaps calling ahead would have been a wise move.

    1. Re:Where is the base? by Valor958 · · Score: 1

      Found references to an old base at Moudros (Mudros). Moudros, Limnos, Greece will get you straight to the town on Google Maps. Since there is a Greek commenting in here as well, maybe he can enlighten us? Like has been said numerous times, there were much better ways for them to go about this, and not even attempting to acclimate themselves to local law, or apparently read blatantly obvious signs... was folly on their part.

    2. Re:Where is the base? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are numerous of military units stationed on the island. See http://tinyurl.com/d432wdm (88th Military Command) for a list - not including air or naval forces.

      And yes, there are signs around every military installtion in Greece that forbid photography. Ignoring them and then crying foul is just stupid. Especially when you claim (http://www.arma3.com/limnos-researching-the-area-of-operation/) that:
              Transferring the real-life Limnos to your monitors is not just a part of development; it’s an entire development inside the development. It’s the big story itself. Limnos (or Lemnos) is the next step in our effort to create the most authentic environment a milsim gamer could get.

  25. This has happened before by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 1

    This has happened before. A group of British plane spotters were convicted of spying and sentenced to 3 years in jail. It doesn't seem to have occured to the Greek military that real spies will be a little more discrete in their methods.

    BBC news article

    1. Re:This has happened before by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      It's not about spies, it's about espionage -- if a game company correctly models a military base, than ANYONE who buys that game can simulate attacking/exploring that base and use that training against the real thing.

      Military bases are national secrets, even though they're usually left out in plain sight. Aliens recording details about such places are illegally leaking state secrets.

      Not saying it's right or wrong, but it's the way things are.

    2. Re:This has happened before by ledow · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem to have occurred to you that real spies would be likely to have a plausible explanation for what they are doing and sometimes get caught.

      There might be "James Bonds" running around that are infallible and undetectable, but the majority of "spies" would actually be cannon fodder - send enough of them and eventually a few would get caught. And then, of course, they have to protest their innocence (never admit to being a spy if you don't want to spend your WHOLE LIFE in prison, if you're that lucky - the rules don't apply in the same way to such people), have a plausible back-story, etc. etc. etc.

      Just because you're a "spy" doesn't mean you're not in a group of plane-spotters that plan a trip to Greece. Hell, sounds like a perfect persona to assume to me.

      That said, they are a little harsh for what is basically a totally pointless exercise. If someone really cared about knowing the layout of a military base, there are myriad easier ways to find out, or they could just plan for "not knowing" and thus just make an operation that takes account of that fact. And, if you are a spy, you would be visibly taking visible photos of it even if only to provide better plausibility than a video camera transmitting to a remote storage or a hidden camera of some kind.

      I know someone who delivers beer to military establishments in London. It's not hard to get through the front-door and past armed guards, even with someone "new" working alongside you who you don't really know, especially when you are carrying their beer. Hell, once they were stopped for the usual checks, and then when they were asked to explain what they were carrying were in immense detail (while troops scanned the underside of the delivery truck, etc.) it was mentioned that the checks were fine but they just delay the people inside getting their beer and who would explain it to them? Literally, checks stopped, truck waved through.

      If you want this sort of information, it's easy to get, so its pointless to push so hard on potentially innocent people. And, hell, if a spy taking a photo of your plane / base is enough to worry you, maybe you should lay them out or design them a bit better or plan your military on the enemy knowing the layout. But, that said, a spy would look like anyone else and probably have a pretty plausible explanation and happily do only a few years in prison if caught compared to the alternative of revealing themselves as spies.

    3. Re:This has happened before by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 1

      Just because you're a "spy" doesn't mean you're not in a group of plane-spotters that plan a trip to Greece. Hell, sounds like a perfect persona to assume to me.

      Put yourself in the shoes of the spy. Your choices are

      Plan A: be conspicuous. Run a high risk of being stopped, but have a story and hope you can bluff your way out.
      Plan B: be discrete. Try to avoid being stopped, although if you are caught you are doomed.

      Opting for Plan A means you have to infiltrate a plane-spotting group. Then you have to persuade the group to go to the base you're interested in. When you get there you can only take pictures consistent with being a plane spotter, or your cover story is blown. And when you are stopped (which is certain, because photography is forbidden), you have to hope that none of your friends mention your recent membership of the group, or your curious interest in this particular base. That takes a lot of time and work, the information you can gather is constrained, and the risk is substantial.

      Plan B is far easier, doesn't suffer from the limitations of Plan A, and if you do a good job of hiding your camera the risk of being caught is low. And yes, I have read too many spy novels.

  26. Re:Spying? Really? by cynop · · Score: 5, Informative

    being greek, i've read some of the original articles. The problem is, they were taking photographs and videotaping active military bases. I'm pretty sure, the guys are not spies but gathering intelligence on foreign military installations constitutes spying in most of the countries i know

  27. Re:Spying? Really? by gman003 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or rather, it would be a solution of Greece in EU.

    Although I have to wonder about how well the EU works as a solvent... they don't seem particularly solvent to me...

  28. Re:Spying? Really? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    This was just a really stupid thing to do.

    No, the really (and only) stupid thing was getting caught.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  29. Normal reaction by cynop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of the commentators here are speaking out of their asses. Let me tell you somethings, being greek and all.

    First of all ,Limnos is one of the Greek islands that is very close to Turkey. There have been a lot of incidents in the past there. Maybe the whole point of the clashes were moot, maybe not, but i can't blame the officials for being extra carefull.

    Secondly, personally i believe that the guys did not mean harm. But, they were photographing and videotaping active military camps. Sure there's satellite photos of everything on the island on google maps, but gathering intelligence on military installations is one of the most basic espionage actions. If that's not spying, i don't know what is.

    Finally, for all those talking about tourists and tourist activities, that's a whole lot of hors*shit. Next time you decide to come for vacations, try to stay at the beach. The military bases are off limits.

  30. Long Island by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    If this were Long Island, they would be in Gitmo by now.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  31. Yep... by TheHarriedTourist · · Score: 1

    Greek Island lover here (to the point my wife and I were married on Santorini two and a half weeks after 9/11/01 but that's another story). We haven't been back in 4 years but every time beforehand we were greeted with signs at the Santorini airport telling one that photography wasn't much of a welcome activity. Seems that portions of it doubles as a military base... Same thing near any communications arrays or radio towers (which were fenced off); BIG signs, stern language warning against photography. The locals would take it a step further and inform you that it wasn't all that smart to loiter in those areas, unless one had a penchant for confrontation with guards that liked to make tourists frown and scamper quickly in other directions. Slightly overkill of a response in my opinion...but that's just me.

    1. Re:Yep... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Slightly overkill of a response in my opinion...but that's just me.

      If your security is so bad that people standing in a public place can photograph something That Which Must Not Be Seen then your country should really be sold to the highest bidder, who presumably will be a little more competent.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. Re:Spying? Really? by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 2

    Greece bonds are weak but slow-moving - in economic jargon, "slippery".

    And, contrary to Art.3(3) TEU, everyone else has a low rate of interest.

  33. Re:Spying? Really? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    killing mod slip of the fingers....

  34. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know someone who does scientific work on Limnos. The island is right on the border with Turkey. Let's just say the Greeks are *very* sensitive about activities there, and it can be a huge hassle in seemingly innocuous, rural parts of the island when doing fieldwork. If they're hassling well-documented scientists doing non-military-interest work in rural parts of the island, then, yes, they're going to hassle tourists taking pictures of the wrong places too, especially if you happen to be taking pictures of anything directly military-related.

  35. Re:Spying? Really? by tarellel · · Score: 0

    If this were in the US, they'd surely being be detained and become permanent residents of guantanamo bay. Seeing as how their Czechs and getting footage of a military base, they'd sure be instantly classified as terrorists.

    --
    http://theworkaround.com/
  36. Re:Spying? Really? by erroneus · · Score: 2

    I'm going to go with "this should be common sense NOT to do this without local government approval and fore knowledge in today's charged political climate."

    It should be ESPECIALLY obvious since this is a war/battle/fighting simulation where the setting is a specific (not imaginary/fantasy) location being simulated.

    I feel sorry for the people who were arrested -- they were probably not the decision makers. If they were the decision makers, they deserve what they got. If they are not the decision makers, whatever trouble they experience should be the basis of a law suit against the decision makers for being stupid and negligent.

  37. Re:Spying? Really? by geoffaus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its not just Greece - I remember hearing similar things when travelling around South America. It kinda seems funny since these countries dont exactly have cutting edge military equipment. Im surprised that Greece can even afford a military!

    --
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  38. Just maybe.... by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    They actually are spies. Because that's what they do, make plausible cover stories for what they are doing.

    1. Re:Just maybe.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  39. New Revenue Streams: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold tourists hostage; collect the ransom.

  40. Re:Spying? Really? by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

    >>>photography isn't really a fundamental human right

    Sunlight is a gift from Nature to all living things. It belongs to everyone, and the government has no authority to ban the People from using that which nature has given freely. Furthermore: Capturing that sunlight with your eye is another fundamental right given by nature.

    It matters not that the recording has evolved from using your brain, or an artistic sketch on paper, to capturing photons on a sensitive film. A photographer has the same right to capture sunlight as the artist or tourist did in the 1800s.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  41. So stupid.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    This is where you see the level of ingenuity....being that they are developers, they forgot that they could have saved a whole lot of time and effort and traveling expenses, and just used google's streetview!

  42. Re:Spying? Really? by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Illegal eh? Hey Greece: ever hear of Google?

    What's that? No, we will not spot you airfare to come over here and arrest Larry and Sergei. And don't even try to mail that wooden horse to Mountain View.

  43. Re:Spying? Really? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

    In any case, they now have a reference for goon behavior they can also include in the game.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  44. Re:Spying? Really? by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 2

    Nature is not a sentient being and it does not gift anything to anyone.

  45. Re:Spying? Really? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0

    whatever trouble they experience should be the basis of a law suit against the decision makers for being stupid and negligent.

    They are not Americans, mind you.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  46. Re:Spying? Really? by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

    >>>Note: in the US, you can take pictures of aircraft or historical buildings, but not restricted areas. The point is to prevent surveillance intended to find weaknesses in security that can be exploited, aka "casing the joint". Pretty standard practice in the military.

    In the U.S. the courts have ruled again-and-again that people may not be forbidden from recording that which is in public view. ("Per the first amendment citizens have a right to record the activities of their government officials in public areas." and "There is no expectation of privacy when in public view.") It is why places like Area 51 are surrounded by miles and miles of "buffer zone" so nobody can get close enough to see the place.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  47. Re:Spying? Really? by xquercus · · Score: 4, Informative

    So if I was there as a tourist, would I get arrested?

    Or is somehow putting your island into a video game now sedition or something?

    TFA is pretty slim, but I'm having a hard time imagine what law was broken.

    This shouldn't be all that surprising. I'm not familiar with Greek law but in the US one can only be certain that photographing a military installation is legal if one has written authorization from the base commander. See here. Speaking from personal experience, if one were to stop on US Route 2 heading through North Dakota, photograph one of the Minuteman nuclear missile launch facilities just a few yards off the road, a visit from Minot Airforce Base security is quite likely. Again, speaking from personal experience, these security personnel have brand new shiny M-4s (not those beat up ones from the sandbox) and a .30 cal machine gun mounted on their HUMVEE. If one were to continue photographing, this is once again from personal experience, they will call the sheriff's deputy (who happens to be a serious hottie) and she will threaten arrest for disorderly conduct.

    My guess is that the Minuteman launch facilities are considered off limits. They have signs which say "Restricted Area" and federal statute considers these areas off limits in terms of photography. According to statute, it seems that even photographing these area from a distance, such as while standing on a publicly traveled way such as US Route 2, is likely prohibited. The signs on the nuclear launch facilities say they will shoot you if you actually climb the fence. There are hundreds of these facilities across northwest North Dakota. It seems to me that the sheer number of launch facilities would make it difficult for a tourist to photographically document their vacation to beautiful North Dakota.

    I don't see why it's surprising that other countries have similar laws in place

  48. Re:Spying? Really? by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

    I think suspending Greece would make more sense.

  49. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's illegal in every country. If you don't get arrested in other countries, then they're either incompetent or idiots.

  50. Try taking picture in this area of Greek territory by neghvar1 · · Score: 1

    Take a few pictures deep underwater W to SW of Santorini and see what happens if/when you are caught.

  51. Re:Spying? Really? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Greece has fairly high military spending compared to the size of its economy even pre-collapse. They were doing an arms race with Turkey but I have no idea how that's developing with the country's current financial problems.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  52. Re:Spying? Really? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 0

    It's not really very interesting except to note that photography isn't really a fundamental human right

    Howso?

    It is a fundamental human write to write whatever I wish. It is a fundamental human right to draw whatever I wish. It is a fundamental human right to remember whatever I wish.

    Consider a hypothetical photo-realistic artist with extraordinary visual recall. He can stand at some location, and then go home a draw what he remembers seeing with great accuracy. No state can legitimately outlaw him from doing so.

    How can the state then legitimately outlaw me from using a tool to accomplish the same thing?

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  53. Re:Spying? Really? by currently_awake · · Score: 0

    In the USA they can arrest you for taking pictures of a courthouse. http://www.pixiq.com/article/cop-detains-man-for-photographing-federal-courthouse In the USA your rights are "god given", in the rest of the world they are given out by government or taken away as they want.

  54. Re:Spying? Really? by steelfood · · Score: 1

    they will call the sheriff's deputy (who happens to be a serious hottie) and she will threaten arrest for disorderly conduct.

    So what, you're encouraging us to go to North Dakota and photograph the missile launch facilities from US Route 2?

    Besides, we all know that's just for show, and the real missiles are underneath Manhattan.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  55. Re:Spying? Really? by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you really think they could afford THAT postage??

    --
    bickerdyke
  56. Get the ball rolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on the Free the Arma 2 Campaign!

  57. Let them go already! by pr1m35 · · Score: 0

    Hope they aren't in the critical path of getting that game finished - been waiting for it since last year

  58. Greece has secrets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knew?

  59. Re:Spying? Really? by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

    1) Hypothetically remembering something perfectly;
    2) Hypothetically making perfectly photorealistic drawings;
    3) Taking a photograph.

    It seems to me that only the first would be covered unconditionally by a fundamental human right as understood by international law. Consider:
    - ECHR Art.8: freedom of thought;
    - it wouldn't be admissible under Anglo-Saxon criminal law: there is no crime without actus reus, and there is "No punishment without law" (Art.7 ECHR).

    The second would be covered under freedom of expression with qualification. Consider Art.10(2) ECHR exceptions for, inter al., "national security, [...], the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence".

    The third may be covered by freedom of expression but includes operation of a recording device which may be treated separately.

  60. Re:Spying? Really? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Informative

    Czechs and getting footage of a military base, they'd sure be instantly classified as terrorists.

    Eh? The Czech Republic is an honored member of NATO. The U.S. has already sworn to shed its own blood and spend its own treasury to defend it. One NATO member spying on another is none of the U. S. 's business. Hell, one NATO member at war with another is almost none of the U. S.'s business, except for the diplomatic pressure to encourage them to stop.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  61. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Right. You can take photos of restricted areas, but only from outside said restricted areas.

    Nonetheless, I've seen scary "you can't photograph this" signs on military base entrances in the US, and I'm sure they'd still harass you if they saw you doing it.

  62. Re:Spying? Really? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    The German court will issue a ruling tomorrow that may "break the camels back" on the Greek issue of debt repayments.

  63. Greek point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to Greek media, the devs arrested had recordings of:

    * An MM-40 Exocet Block II installation (anti-ship missile)
    * The 130th Battle Squadron
    * A radar installation
    * Army base and barracks.

    Media report that the military authorities were particularly concerned that the data captured from the devs showed no only the position of these installations and the type of equipment they contained, but also things like access routes, alternative routes, fuel depots etc.

    It is also common knowledge that Greece's primary foe in the area, Turkey, uses spies who are never Turkish citizens. Most commonly, Turks use agents from the Netherlands.

  64. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It matters not that the recording has evolved from using your brain, or an artistic sketch on paper, to capturing photons on a sensitive film.

    Apparently, it does.

  65. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even read the article you linked to? The subject of the article did *not* get arrested. He was detained. That is more akin to being pulled over for speeding than being arrested for espionage.

  66. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they will call the sheriff's deputy (who happens to be a serious hottie) and she will threaten arrest for disorderly conduct.

    Are you prepared for a wave of lonely geeks photographing your silo, just to get rough handled by a hot deputy? You better be.

  67. Slam Dunk Coming! by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Bail was set at $1.98, more than the annual GDP of Greece!

    BAM! Aww take that Greece! It's funny because they're poor!

    Oh. Don't look like that. Here's a quarter, go buy a house in Greece!

    BAM! Oh! The crowd goes wild!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  68. Re:Spying? Really? by garyoa1 · · Score: 2

    Seriously hottie got my attention. Got an address?

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  69. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And every NATO country spies on every other NATO member.

  70. Re:Spying? Really? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    And any country that doesn't deserves the invasion it soon receives.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  71. Bohemia sent this statement to Gaming Press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello,

    we can confirm that two Bohemia Interactive employees, our colleagues and friends, were arrested during their holiday trip to Lemnos. They visited the island with the sole purpose of experiencing the island's beautiful surroundings.

    Since its establishment in 1999, Bohemia Interactive has created games based only upon publicly available information. We always respect the law and we've never instructed anybody to violate the laws of any country. The same is true for Arma 3.

    Currently, all our effort goes towards supporting the guys over there, as well as their friends and families affected by this difficult situation. We sincerely hope that this is an unfortunate misunderstanding of their passion as artists and creators of virtual worlds.

    On behalf of the Bohemia Interactive team,

    Marek Spanel, CEO

  72. What pure made up bull output. by gavron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >Eh?

    Yes, the OP is right.

    > The Czech Republic is an honored member of NATO.
    Czechosolovakia has won no honors in NATO. http://tinyurl.com/9v6ec6b

    > The U.S. has already sworn to shed its own blood and spend its own treasury to defend it.
    The U.S. has not sworn to shed its own blood or spend its own treasury to defend it. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm

    >One NATO member spying on another is none of the U.S.'s business,
    Then in that case your previous statement falls. Either it IS the U.S. and other NATO member states' business in which case it IS the U.S.'s business OR it's none of anyone else's business in which case the whole falacious comment about blood and treasury (false as it is) is inapplicable.

    >except for the diplomatic pressure...
    Yeah you made that up for your convenience. I've shown you the NATO charter. Please
    demonstrate where it says any of that.

    Such rabid conflictory justification of "The US Must Shed Blood and Treasury" but oh wait "It's none of the US business" but wait "The US should exert diplomatic pressure."

    I see the horns waggling and I'm not stepping in your words.

    E

  73. Re:Spying? Really? by Askmum · · Score: 1

    Greece has a long history of prosecuting planespotters for espionage. In 2002 there was a fairly high profile case of 12 British and 2 Dutch nationals, who were evenrually acquitted because they were just that: planespotters (and not spies).
    In any case, even in this day and age (or should I say: especially in this day and age) it is not a good idea to go to military bases and start photographing equipment. The authorities might take exception to that.
    Especially don't do it outside your own country where you don't know local laws and customs. These two guys are just plain stupid and should have known better.

  74. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You right to life can be taken away by the President of the United Fucking States, any time he wants. Wake up! You don't live in a nice country any more -- and it's your fault as a voter for allowing your country to degrade so much.

  75. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think the inside of military base counts as a 'public space'..

  76. Re:Spying? Really? by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

    Many who deserve blindness receive sunlight, and many who deserve sunlight are blind.

  77. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    photography isn't really a fundamental human right

    What if my memory is that good and when I return back to my office I make a drawing of what I saw? Are we going to prohibit *seeing* a military base or something else?

    I don't know if photography is a human right, but I know that photographers *have* rights.

  78. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know how it is in America, but in Portugal it is illegal to photograph with security cameras etc, buildings and property that are just on the other side of the street or right next to you (that has to be very carefully studied with surveillance cameras or their tape won't be valid in court).

    A tourist taking photos on a city street and getting a few houses on the background, wont be hearing anything from anyone. But someone taking photos of a private owned house with detail will be talked to.

    I've been also told to not photograph inside of commercial shops and shopping malls.

    Diplomat's homes, military buildings and similar buildings are even more protected.

    You have some human rights but those can't invade other people's rights, that's how we see it. And the right to security and privacy is one that cannot be invaded, as such if your actions seem to be to directly invading some of these rights, you will be noticed.

  79. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also Greece is a somewhat cold war with their neighbor Turkey. So espionage is taken very seriously by them.

  80. Re:Spying? Really? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

    It is the word after all.

    --
    "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
  81. Re:Spying? Really? by Raenex · · Score: 1

    Creep.

  82. Re:Spying? Really? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    "There is no such thing as bad publicity"
                                                                        - Brendan Behan

    Who says they didn't know better?

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  83. Re:Spying? Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    That's why cops are confiscating cameras in public places and forbid photographing and video recording in the U.S.

    You have a point, but it's still legal to take those pictures, and once you get to court, you at least don't get sent to prison for it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  84. Re:Not much data in the article, but maybe not cra by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If you can see critical stuff on a military base just by creeping around the perimeter then it's a pretty shity base. If someone can learn something by watching your changing of the guard that will permit them to penetrate your facility, then you are incompetent shitwads and don't deserve to be guarding a shoebox. Etc.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  85. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....so you shot the missile but you did not shoot the deputy?

  86. Re:Spying? Really? by shentino · · Score: 1

    Czech membership has nothing to do with it since the Czech government (probably) didn't sanction this "espionage"

    Without that backing you are just a rogue citizen, and thus qualify for labelling as a terrorist.

    If the Czech goverment WAS behind it, and not just Czech citzens, that would change things and it might be considered an act of war or something. But maverick citizens acting without state backing are not immune from being labelled as terrorists.

  87. Re:Spying? Really? by shentino · · Score: 0

    You see though, sunlight bouncing off of something else makes that imagery a derived work of the something else, so this is actually the Greeks slapping the cuffs on them for copyright infringement, and using "national security" as a cloak to hide their status as a mafiaa lap dog.

    In other news, temperatures in hell are on the rise again.

  88. OK, now answer this... by gef7 · · Score: 1

    Enough crap said by some so, can you post on flickr or such, the pictures *you* have taken of a protected military base in *your* own country with *your* legal name next to in bold letters? We will make sure you prove your case in due course. Then, you might be able to come around to comment laws of other countries. As regards Greece, these guys missed the scenery obviously, so bad luck for them.

    1. Re:OK, now answer this... by gef7 · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, the Arma 3 developers seem to only care for DirectX10/11; this being Slashdot, they should be put in jail temporarily and never released.

  89. Re:Spying? Really? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    >>>Nature is not a sentient being

    Didn't say it was. But nevertheless nature has given us many things. Such as our bodies. And sunlight.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  90. Re:Spying? Really? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    If this were in the US, they'd surely being be detained and become permanent residents of guantanamo bay. Seeing as how their Czechs and getting footage of a military base, they'd sure be instantly classified as terrorists.

    Yeah, because that's totally happened like a thousand times already. They're throwing peope into Guantanamo for just about anything these days. Or they aren't.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  91. Re:Not much data in the article, but maybe not cra by Intropy · · Score: 1

    Sure. I sympathize with the sentiment to some extent, but even idiots deserve some privacy.

  92. Re:Spying? Really? by xquercus · · Score: 1

    Address? Sure. South side of US Route 2 in front of Minuteman Launch Facility J-4.

  93. Re:Spying? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    English fail. What you said amounts to saying that "nature is a sentient being". I know you don't think so, but it does. Just accept that you do not understand the language as well as you think you do. Unless you enjoy all these misunderstandings.

  94. Re:Spying? Really? by spauldo · · Score: 1

    No it's not. You can photograph military property in the United States.

    You can't photograph certain objects or certain areas, but in general you wouldn't be allowed inside those areas or near those objects to begin with unless you had clearance to do so.

    I've got a photograph of what was the Network Control Center at Kadena Air Base hanging on the wall (it's a group shot of my coworkers when I was stationed there, presented to me by our shop superintendant, a Senior Master Sergeant). I've got several more I took around the base in a scrapbook somewhere. Just outside the base there are small platforms that camera crews can climb to film jets taking off.

    --
    Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.