Slashdot Mirror


EVE Online CSM and Diplomat Killed in Libyan Consulate Attacks

New submitter overmoderated writes first with news of an attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya. From the article: "The U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other embassy staff were killed in a rocket attack on their car, a Libyan official said, as they were rushed from a consular building stormed by militants denouncing a U.S.-made film insulting the Prophet Mohammad." An anonymous reader adds: "Sean Smith, a.k.a. Vile Rat, an EVE Online CSM member, and diplomat for the GoonFleet corporation, was one of the four killed in the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya last night. He was 34. A fundraiser is being organized for his children by the Something Awful forums." Update: 09/12 21:28 GMT by U L : Ozma from Something Awful mailed in a link to the memorial thread on the SA forums (including details on the memorial fund).

48 of 680 comments (clear)

  1. Batshit Crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'Nuff said.

    1. Re:Batshit Crazy! by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Gotta love those "peace loving muslims" don't you?

      I mean...really? You go apeshit crazy, right and kill people over a fucking film?!?!

      I mean hell...the guys they murdered weren't even involved in the film.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Batshit Crazy! by morcego · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you realize that jews and christians are doing this same type of crap, right?

      No, you are wrong. Jews and Christians are doing EQUIVALENT crap, not the same type. They don't kill people over a film, just over some equally absurd nonsense.

      That's religion for you ...

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:Batshit Crazy! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Extremists feed of each other. A jewish extremist makes a film ripping on Muhammad, and islamic extremists go on rampage, thereby proving jewish extremists' point to the world, serving his propaganda purposes.

      Maybe we can found a new country, Extremistan, and put them all there to kill each other while the rest of the world enjoys peace and pluralism.

    4. Re:Batshit Crazy! by CubicleZombie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you realize that jews and christians are doing this same type of crap, right?

      You can say anything you want about Jesus and no Christian will kill you. In fact, Jesus specifically told us you would and that we should do nothing. So say anything you want about my religion. It's okay. I forgive you.

      --
      :wq
    5. Re:Batshit Crazy! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you realize that the atheists and politicians are doing this same type of crap, right?

      Actually, I don't. I have never seen an atheist kill anyone because of a film with Muhammad in it.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A theatre in Paris was firebombed for showing The Last Temptation of Christ.

    7. Re:Batshit Crazy! by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder if you love those "peace loving christians" when they plant bombs and shoot up a summer camp . Or do you make really weak generalizations just when it comes to muslims? The reality is that the muslim terrorists are a tiny minority of the billion+ muslims in the world. To label every muslim a terrorist on par with Al-Qaeda merely does three things:
      1) It legitimizes the terrorists as the only real muslims.
      2) It legitimizes and fuels their calls for a culture war by calling for a culture war yourself.
      3) It pisses off every muslim who just wants to get on with their lives, and turns them against you. Which, incidentally, is again what the terrorists are hoping for.

      So congratulations for doing exactly what the muslim terrorists want you to do. What a good little puppet you are.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    8. Re:Batshit Crazy! by jittles · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Cold War was peace and harmony compared to this Islamic fundamentalist shit. This is fucking terrifying.

      Why are you so terrified? You're not in the middle of it. And people die every day. To be afraid of death is just silly. Now I would not blame anyone for wanting to live as long as possible, but any one of us could die tomorrow of an infection from a cut, a car accident, an illness, an aneurism, or a thousand other things. You can't live your life in fear of every possible thing that could happen. Now if you're a soldier fighting against these people, then you would have to be crazy to not be scared. But all living things must die, and people need to learn to accept it, and not sacrifice all their rights, freedoms, and happiness in an ever illusory sense of safety.

    9. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are plenty of peace loving Muslims who are not batshit crazy.

      Apparently not enough to police the crazies though.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Batshit Crazy! by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to those killed in the crusades.. or by the inquisition, or dead because of a thousand other dumb fucking reasons.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    11. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and no Christian will kill you.

      Thus setting yourself up to play the "No True Scotsman" card. Meanwhile, a certain mosque in Tennessee keeps getting burned down because the folks who use it deny Jesus was the son of God.

    12. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe we can found a new country, Extremistan, and put them all there to kill each other while the rest of the world enjoys peace and pluralism.

      I think the country you were thinking of was Ethniklashistan.

    13. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Yosho · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you read Leviticus, Deuteronomy, or Exodus? Those books are filled with various reasons for which you should kill people (see here), among others.

      Of course, most modern Christians choose to ignore those parts of the bible, aside from the occasional abortion clinic bomber. The only real difference is that there are a significant number of Muslims who haven't figured out that they should ignore the parts of their holy text that say to kill people.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    14. Re:Batshit Crazy! by jmottram08 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry guy, but making a movie and killing an innocent person are two very different forms of "extremism".

    15. Re:Batshit Crazy! by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try insulting the Party in China.

    16. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Cold War was peace and harmony compared to this Islamic fundamentalist shit. This is fucking terrifying.

      Oh please. The Cold War had the potential to destroy human life on this planet. Islamic fundamentalists killed 3000 people with one extremely lucky attack 10 years ago, and a handful here and there ever since.

      You're more likely to die on the road because you're too afraid of terrorists (or the TSA, as the case may be) to fly than you are to die from terrorists. Grow a pair.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    17. Re:Batshit Crazy! by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Every other greatest Scientist, Musician, Author... Is a Jew".

      So they're like "Ubermenschen"?

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    18. Re:Batshit Crazy! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *were* doing. Islam today seems to be in many respects much like medieval Christianity - holy wars, oppressive governments, execution of heretics, and so on. Christianity changed. Sure, there are a number of crazies and extremists left - but when was the last time you saw an angry mob of Christians storming a British embassy and murdering diplomats because Dawkins insulted them? When it comes to modern religiously-inspired angry mobs, Islam leads with ease.

    19. Re:Batshit Crazy! by kryliss · · Score: 4, Informative

      Planned Parenthood bombings? Abortion doctor killings? These are pretty recent and by religious pro-lifers.... Hmmm Pro life... kill a doctor.... Yep, that's going to lead people to your cause.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    20. Re:Batshit Crazy! by rho180 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When has an atheist ever committed an act of terrorism in the name of atheism? Or murdered?

      I think you'd be hard pressed to dispute that religious persecution (including state sponsored terrorism and murder) occurred in atheist states governed by Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il, etc.

    21. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Informative

      Neither Breivik nor McVeigh was a Christian by any rational definition of the term. McVeigh was an avowed agnostic. While Breivik called himself a Christian, he explicitly said that he did not believe in the religion.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    22. Re:Batshit Crazy! by tibit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Feynman would have nothing to do with his origins/ethnicity. He refused being included in a book about "great Jewish men" (I paraphrase), and he'd be probably quite offended by you using his name in this fashion. Yes, what you cite is a fact, but the argument is charged, and he'd want nothing to do with it I bet.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    23. Re:Batshit Crazy! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Informative

      it portrays Mohammed as a... pedophile...

      ... and the implication is that makes Mohammed (and apparently, by association, every Muslim who ever has or ever will live) a horrible person not worthy of attention, right? That's funny.

      Why, you may ask? Because it's a silly double standard - for example, it's a well known fact that Edgar Allen Poe, considered one of the greatest poets of all time, married his 13-year-old cousin less than 2 centuries ago, yet nobody calls him a(n inbred) pedophile, nor do they accuse his readership of supporting pedophilia.

      Lewis Carroll wrote "Alice in Wonderland" and "Through the Looking Glass" in order to convince an 11-year-old to let him fuck her, but nobody calls Lewis Carroll a pedophile (well, almost nobody - myself being an obvious exception).

      Shit, a few thousand years ago, the Greeks made a career out of fucking kids, but nobody I've ever met thinks that all Greeks are disgusting perverts.

      But then some non-Muslim makes a movie portraying the Muslim prophet as a filthy child-buggerer, and all of a sudden it's proof positive that every Muslim in the world agrees with pedophilia.

      So, to summarize: Real white people who like to fuck kids == no worries; Possibly imaginary prophet of one of the worlds largest religions is speculated to be a pedo == ALL MUSLIMS MUST DIE IN FIRE!!!

      I guess that's not funny; It's stupid. Really, really stupid.





      Note that this post should not be taken as being supportive of pedophilia; quite the opposite. Rather, it is a condemnation of bullshit double standards and the egocentric asshats who perpetuate them.

      In any case, no matter how detestable the content of the film, it's just speech. The responsibility for the deaths here lies entirely on the heads of the people who meet speech with violence.

      Couldn't agree with you more.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    24. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In some ways, yes, it is. The mujaheddin in Afghanistan were groups of groups. Some of them were friendly to the West, some at least as hostile as the Soviet hardliners. Their unifying principle was the fight against the Soviets. Eventually, they turned on each other until the Taliban came along, then they chose sides again.

      Libya is similar, though with a population that is generally more metropolitan. Afghanistan's people are generally insular, focused on very local or regional activity. Libya has long been used to working with the world and as such, have a better grasp of how important it is to settle down.

      The problem is that Gaddafi never trusted his military and so kept it weak so that it couldn't mount a coup, and the remaining institutions are similarly weak for the moment. He relied on family members running hand-picked units and on mercenary groups from around Africa such as the Tuaregs that have caused problems recently in Niger, Mali, and Algeria. These groups now have nothing to do but fight and/or sell weapons to try to earn or steal money. A few long-oppressed groups and former Gaddafi loyalists have also armed up, and groups like the Salafists that dream of instituting worldwide Sharia are doing the same. The Salafists are causing their own set of problems in Tunisia and Egypt as well, and have turned up in Syria where the Free Syrian Army (or the group formerly known as such) is trying to figure out how to distance them without alienating them.

      Most of Libya is happy and wants a quiet life with a return of international trade. Until national institutions like the military and police are strengthened appropriately, there will be groups that do as they will and cause mayhem and death. This has been happening for the last year, but it's only now that the US has been caught up in it.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    25. Re:Batshit Crazy! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You can say anything you want about Jesus and no Christian will kill you.

      "But since our discourse has now turned to the subject of blasphemy, I desire to ask one favor of you all, in return for this my address, and speaking with you; which is, that you will correct on my behalf the blasphemers of this city. And should you hear any one in the public thoroughfare, or in the midst of the forum, blaspheming God; go up to him and rebuke him; and should it be necessary to inflict blows, spare not to do so. Smite him on the face; strike his mouth; sanctify your hand with the blow, and if any should accuse you, and drag you to the place of justice, follow them thither; and when the judge on the bench calls you to account, say boldly that the man blasphemed the King of angels! For if it be necessary to punish those who blaspheme an earthly king, much more so those who insult God."

      - St John Chrysostom, one of the Church Fathers, and recognized as a saint by Catholics, Orthodox, Anglicans, and many Lutherans.

    26. Re:Batshit Crazy! by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why should we not have two standards for two different things? Authors of fiction are not moral leaders.

      Ever heard of that Bible thingy?

    27. Re:Batshit Crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We Jews compose 0.3% of this planet's population, yet we won over 30% of Nobel Prizes, Field Medals, Chess Masters, Wrote the best and most renowned and thought provoking books...

      Unless you personally are a Nobel prize or a Fields (not "Field") Medal laureate, a chess master or wrote any of the best and most renowned and thought provoking books, you have no right to use the word "we" in that sentence.

      After all, this is why you hate us, because when you look into the mirror... you know that you'll never reach our level... it's not in your genes.

      Where is the list of your personal achievements? What have you done with what's "in your genes"?
      No, they hate us because of useless assholes like you. And frankly, the rest of us Jews don't like you and your ilk either.

    28. Re:Batshit Crazy! by drkim · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do tell when the Jews ever killed anyone over silly shit like this...

      They killed Jesus Christ for preaching peace, non-violence, and the rejection of greed.

      I believe:

      1. The Romans actually killed Jesus.

      2. Jesus was actually a Jew.

  2. vr by masternerdguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    rip vile rat.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
    1. Re:vr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why the hell was this modded flamebait? Its the dude's eve character name!

  3. link to fundraiser in SA forums by Qubit · · Score: 4, Informative

    is here.

    (how did story get posted w/o a link?)

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  4. Re:They're thieves and war criminals by Valor958 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, an EVE Online CSM 'got what he deserved'... how exactly? You have some major rage issues against EVE? Read the article, Sean Smith was the EVE CSM... Chris Stevens was the ambassador. Even then, how would an AMBASSADOR at a consulate deserve to die over anything? Did he set policy? Did he do ANYTHING to these people? Again with a lack of reading... this was in response to a bunch of insecure religious extremists going, as quoted above, 'bat shit crazy' over a movie they didn't like regarding their reverred Prophet Mohammad. So, here's your reasoning in a nutshell. Because a Libyan Christian living in California made a movie supporting his belief that the Muslim faith is a dangerous cancer (his words), these men deserved to die. Hopefully these same folks never see any of these movies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_about_Muhammad Or we may just have WW3 on our hands....

  5. Re:Fundraiser? by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Informative

    He wasn't a diplomat he was a tech guy working in the consulate. I can understand the confusion, Sean Smith aka Vile Rat was a diplomat for the eve online alliance Goonswarm and a former member of the CSM.

    He leaves behind two kids so presumably it would go towards them and any funeral costs.

  6. Re:Fundraiser? by heypete · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was a "diplomat" in EVE Online. In real life, he did IT work for the consulate -- he wasn't a diplomat nor any particularly wealthy, privileged person. He's just an ordinary guy doing IT work.

  7. Listen to what his friends say about him... by Qubit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...sounds like he was pretty involved in the game.

    It also sounds like he was well-loved. Choice notes from the forum thread:

    • He had some kind of horrible tattoo. A lot of people remember ribbing him for that :-)
    • Gently caress
    • Digital Ebola: "He died doing the job that he loved. He is missed."
    • Arkhamina: "I remember mailing him music in the Green Zone. Friends sent him a headset mic when his was broken. Hard things to find in a war zone."

    And probably my favorite:

    Supercar Gautier:

    Many goons have died, but few goons are destined to have their deaths fiercely politicized by the American media during an election year.

    Through the bullshit media circus, we will know "That was Vilerat, and he was actually way awesome."

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Listen to what his friends say about him... by Digital+Ebola · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wow... I haven' logged into /. in years.

      Sean was a very patient man. You have to be patient to play Eve, especially to play the meta-game of diplomacy. He built a great legacy for in-game diplomacy and it's no stretch to say that he's responsible for alot of the way things are aligned politically in the game. He loved the diplomacy game in Eve because it was a sandbox that oftentimes mirrors real life. He loved people and he was often the voice of reason, not just for game matters, but for lots of real life things.

      Sean made every attempt to be the best person he could be and that rubbed off on alot of us. If I was having a bad day and I needed to vent, he would be there and he would have sane advice. I was really sad when he left the Montreal duty station to move to the Hague, because that meant a timezone difference that's hard to deal with. He managed to keep up with everyone though. He cared about his friends and there aren't many goons that would refuse his advice or insight.

      He wasn't just a IT guy in the FSIMS. He once told me that you can do many things outside of your job description when working for State. He always said that if you were motivated and eager to learn, you could go far there and have a very challenging and worthy career. Naturally, there were lots of things that he couldn't tell us but to say that he was simply a IMS guy is not completely accurate. He lived for it and I have no doubt in my mind that there was not any occasion that he would not rise to.

      I cannot even begin to tell you how hard this has been on all of us. When you talk to someone everyday and share the little things of your day to day life and you share your trials and tribulations and successes, you really miss that person when they are gone. It's surreal, even the possibility of him dying was sort of a standing joke, like it would never happen to him. I guess you think that way about anyone that's deployed in a government or military post because if you stop to dwell on the risks, you break down.

      There's not enough thanks in the world for the guys that work for state or the guys in our military. It's easy to be dispassionate until you know someone that is lost or know someone that has lost. Eve not only lost a great player but a great friend.

      --
      "Network penetration is network engineering, in reverse."
  8. Radicals: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "they believe innocent individuals need to suffer "

    Often, radicals believe there are no innocents.

    They feel that either you must be as militant as they are, or you're just a tool/ally of those they feel are opposing/oppressing them.

    In the former case, you're a fighter for their cause and thus a martyr if killed.

    In the latter case, you are a part of the problem that needs to be disposed of.

  9. Will you guys ever learn? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First it was Afghanistan. You thought that everyone fighting against authoritarian Soviets was automatically pro-democracy and pro-human rights; and what's wrong if they speak of Islam and jihad occasionally? Clearly it's only against the bad guys. And so you gave them money and guns and trained them, and the end result was a country where most schools (build by those very Soviets) were demolished and replaced by madrassas, and secular if authoritarian government replaced by fanatics who were stoning women on football stadiums for adultery after they were raped.

    (Oh, and don't say that you didn't support Taliban. This guy was no better, and most of his troops ended up in Taliban anyway.)

    And what do you get for it in the end? A whole country turned into a giant terrorist training camp that's now working against you, and using those very weapons that you've supplied them to kill your soldiers, and workers that you send to try to rebuild the country. The training camp that produced those people who committed the biggest terrorist act ever in the history of this planet, against the USA.

    Then there was Kosovo. Again, "freedom fighters" against a totalitarian regime and all that. Again, a decade afterwards it's slowly growing to be another place where Wahhabism spreads, only this time in the middle of Europe (and also a major drug transit center to boot, to finance the operation). And, again, the chickens are coming home to roost.

    Now there's Libya. It's only been a year since the downfall of the regime - thanks largely to heavy NATO military backing of the rebel "freedom fighters" - and we've already seen genocide of the black population, widespread persecuting of Christians, and now this act of outright hostility towards USA and the murder of its citizens and representatives. You can go on at length about how the real, democratically elected government of Libya is liberal and all about human rights and such, but what this incident clearly shows is that they're not a government. They're simply not in control of the country. And people that are in control, because they have guns (that you gave them) and troops and determination - people like this - hate democracy and human rights with a passion, and hate you because you are representative of that. And you can't even say that they haven't warned you if you were only willing to see and listen...

    But, hey, that's still not quite enough jihadis, right? Let's create another breeding ground for them in Syria as well?

    1. Re:Will you guys ever learn? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, none of the real-world stuff is as simple as you portray it. Libya started as a very real effort by the general population to overthrow a pretty scummy dictator. There were three options: support the government (thank god we learned our lesson on supporting dictators for some very fuzzy "strategic" goal), do nothing, or support the people fighting the government. We did pretty much the best thing we could have: even the fight by taking out heavy armor and artillery, remove the threat of aerial assault, and let the Libyans sort out the rest. We're seeing the results of the do-nothing approach in Syria: a prolonged war that is getting more violent as time goes on, with more extremist elements joining the fight on both sides.

      Libya is a pip-squeak compared to what we're getting in Syria.

      I hate to break it to you, but sometimes the best we can do results in a situation that is only somewhat of an improvement over a total catastrophe. And yet, it is still better than to just sit on your ass. What is it with people who think that if something's not perfect, nothing should be done?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:Will you guys ever learn? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      The revolts happened without US influence, yes. And they were nearly crushed when the West decided to intervene.

      And, yes, US was not the main player there (which is why I referred to NATO and not US), but it certainly supported the whole affair big time.

      Also, the UN resolution only established a no-fly zone, and allowed the use of military force against anyone (whether loyalists or rebels) targeting civilians. In practice, the way it was implemented by NATO countries, they only ever targeted loyalists - despite the rebels engaging in open genocide of black Libyans during and after the campaign - and they targeted loyalist targets indiscriminately, even when they were engaging rebel fighters and not civilians. It had actually got to the point where there was coordination established between rebel militias and NATO strike forces such that the rebels would be alerted of the upcoming air strike against loyalist armor & artillery, and time their assaults so that they happen immediately after those strikes. In other words, it was direct military support for one side in a civil war, under the guise of protecting civilian population.

    3. Re:Will you guys ever learn? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Islamic democracies" work quite nicely. Ask Turkey, Malaysia, Indonesia. Those are actually the only Islamic countries I can think of that have an actual functioning democracy. Not sure why you think that they are some backward shithole. Again, the differentiating factor here really seems to be governance, and not religion.

      But that's imperialism, and hence not politically correct. Not to mention, insanely expensive - more so than buying AKs for jihadi "freedom fighters" and dropping an occasional JDAM to support their advance.

      And that's why it's not done anymore - not because it's not PC, but because it's just so fucking expensive and long. Not to mention that it requires an actual exit strategy with a proper handover. In short, every thing the US as a country doesn't want to do anymore. So we have three options: do the right thing and pay for it, do nothing, or do the cheapest thing that still has a positive ROI. And do remember that doing nothing has always costs associated with it as well.

      What exactly was wrong about what I said about Kosovo?

      That it was worse now than what would have happened with non-intervention. I'm fully aware of the sorry state of Kosovo right now - and I'm ecstatic that the entire region isn't like that, which is what would have happened with a full-on war.

      The best thing that could be the outcome of the Libyan civil war as it actually went was Gaddafi staying in power but having to negotiate with other factions, and therefore the regime becoming less oppressive.

      And that would have never happened. That's right up there with Unicorns farting rainbows.

      "Hired goons from Africa" was mostly rebel propaganda they've used to justify their genocide against black Libyans.

      Actually, Ghaddafi did employ hired goons from Africa. The problem was that black Libyans were regularly assumed to be just hired goons. And since there were far more black Libyans than hired goons.... well, you do the math. And yes, persecution of black Libyans is a problem. I'm not arguing that Libya isn't a significant basket case right now. However, it's a better start than we're getting with Syria, and at least there's the opportunity there for something positive to happen. Syria basically is going to be a basket case for the next decades.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  10. Re:Fundraiser? by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Informative

    nah that wasn't his last chat transcript. That was just an example that was pretty common to hear from him when he was in Iraq . His lats words on jabber were "FUCK" and "GUNFIRE" and then he disappeared off Jabber.

  11. Re:Seriously, EVE Online? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It touches something everyone who plays online games wonders about.

    How deep is that connection with your friends you know only in a virtual way? Does their impact on the virtual world you played in matter in any sense? Is changing a game world that 300 000 people play in and enjoy a real accomplishment? If he coaches little league or his kids football people would talk about that, even though it impacts a lot less people and is not all that important in the grand scheme of things. Hundreds of thousands of people have been touched, in a small way, by this guy, he was part of their little special society.

    It's also strange, how our relationships with friends are changing. My friends who I play online with at least, are more likely to remember the far too many hours we spent trying to kill the first entrance trash in molten core, on the first night there were 40 people on our server who could even get in than some event where people went bar crawling and didn't quite make it home. We raided molten core, other people broke into an abandoned cement factory.

    I'm 32, 4 years ago a friend of mine from public school passed away due to brain cancer. I had known him for 23 or 24 years in total (from junior kindergarten until he passed away). We did lots of stuff as kids, riding around parks on a bike, trying to meet girls, failing miserably with girls, we sat around his house and played games, we went to universities, fell in a river at a yearly university party etc. That stuff, when people gave speeches about it at his funeral is something everyone could relate to and laugh about. Including that time we accidentally set fire to our old school, his father sold school equipment and after graduation he was working for his dad and someone botched an installation... Know one really knew (or was inclined to talk about) how he'd spent the last couple of years of his life trying to help organize a guild in a video game. He couldn't be around people IRL a lot of the time due to treatments, but he could log on and help organize 40 or 50 people to get their shit together and have fun. I guess that's important, insofar as having fun is important. But it's not something people in their 40's and 50's and older can really understand or relate to generally.

    Eve particularly makes this a story because it's a single world. Whatever my deceased friend accomplished was confined to one server of a cluster of servers of hundreds of thousands or millions of people all doing the same thing, in their own little instances walking past each other. But in Eve, one person can change the world for everyone, good or bad.

    Notice how there's no story about the other 3 people who were killed, 2 other staffers and the ambassador. The ambassador is getting lots of coverage on the MSM. That was his 'clique' so to speak, and that will be his mark on the world is as an ambassador trying to manage US business. This was an IT guy, who played games with his friends. There's nothing wrong with that, but how we think about peoples contribution to the world is changing, this poor guy has the unfortunate distinction of getting a lot of press for it, but he's certainly not the first.

    When George Lucas or Hironobu Sakaguchi, or Sid Meier pass away people on the outside of their properties (Star Wars/Indiana Jones, Final fantasy, Civilization) will understand them as the creators of those things, even if they never played the games or watched the movies. Game worlds are different, because the people who created the rules of the world, and the people who make the world aren't the same. This guy made part of the world that was created by the people at CCP, and that 300k other people play in. I don't think society has quite figured out how, if at all, it wants to try and recognize that.

  12. Re:Seriously, EVE Online? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

    Goonswarm Alliance is a superpower in eve. It's long been a mystery how such a collection of mismatched personalities manages to stay so perfectly organised. Now we know: They had a professionally trained diplomat.

  13. Re:Batshit Crazy? Movie was a cover... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The Attack on the US Consulate Was A Planned Terrorist Assault Against US and Libyan Interests

    The military assault against the US Consulate in Benghazi should not be seen as part of a protest against a low budget film which was insulting Islam â" there were just a few peaceful protesters present at the event. Indeed, there have been no other demonstrations regarding this film in Libya.

    We at Quilliam believe the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi was a well planned terrorist attack that would have occurred regardless of the demonstration, to serve another purpose. According to information obtained by Quilliam from foreign sources and from within Benghazi we have reason to believe that the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi came to avenge the death of Abu Yaya al-Libi, al-Qaedaâ(TM)s second in command killed a few months ago.

    The reasons for this are as follows:

    • 24 hours before this attack, none other than the leader of al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, released a video on Jihadist forums to mark the anniversary of 9/11. In this video, Zawahiri acknowledged the death of his second in command Abu Yahya and urged Libyans to avenge his killing.
    • According to our sources, the attack was the work of roughly 20 militants, prepared for a military assault â" it is rare that an RPG7 is present at a peaceful protest.
    • According to our sources, the attack against the Consulate had two waves. The first attack led to US officials being evacuated from the consulate by Libyan security forces, only for the second wave to be launched against US officials after they were kept in a secure location.

    The weak security environment in Libya including in Benghazi and the failure of the government to project its power outside of the capital have been used as a cover for the attack.

    The failure to rebuild the defence and security sector, in an accountable, professional and responsible manner will only further the likelihood of such attacks in the future. Attacks in Benghazi are not new â" the Red Cross has been attacked multiple times in previous months, as have the US consulate and also the UK Ambassador, and such security lapses encourage attacks. The International Community must take the challenge of not allowing extremist elements to hijack the Arab Uprisings very seriously, by renewing their focus on civic and governance responses to check the efforts of Islamist extremists attempting to exploit the inevitable security vacuum.

    Noman Benotman, President of Quilliam says:

    âoeThese are acts committed by uncontrollable jihadist groups. We hope Libya will seize this opportunity to revive its policy of Disarmament, Demobilisation and Re-integration (DDR) in order to facilitate an end to the spread of such attacks, with the help of the International Community. We hope that the International Community, including NATO member states and especially the US, will continue their excellent work in Libya which began with the overthrow of the dictator Gaddafi after 42 years in power.â

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  14. MOD parent up by digitalaudiorock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed. This is just one of those many threads that bring out all the folks that'll start quoting that Godless piece of bigotry that is www.thereligionofpeace.com, and get modded up by others who insist on believing that all 1.4 BILLION Muslims around the world are terrorists, which makes about as much sense as equating all Protestants with the Klan. I'll probably get modded down just for posting this, but I really don't care...that sort of crap makes me ashamed to be an American.

  15. Re:Batshit Crazy? Movie was a cover... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's blowback. From assets used to achieve para-political military aims, then discarded by the would-be puppet masters.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."