Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Excludes BlackBerry From Employee Smartphone List

Nerval's Lobster writes "Freshly minted Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer is promising the company's U.S. employees a new smartphone of their choice. There's just one catch: it can't be a BlackBerry. According to Business Insider, which posted significant portions of Mayer's memo, employees will have a choice of the Samsung Galaxy S3, HTC One X, HTC EVO 4G LTE, Nokia Lumia 920, or the upcoming iPhone 5. 'We'd like our employees to have devices similar to our users, so we can think and work as the majority of our users do,' she wrote, adding that Yahoo will shift away from BlackBerry as its corporate device of choice. Somewhere up in Waterloo, at least one Research In Motion executive could be screaming in frustration over this development. Not because Yahoo is a bellwether for corporate smartphone use; its U.S. employees shifting to an iOS, Windows Phone or Android device won't automatically drive other major companies will follow suit. But as a symbol of RIM's current issues, it's difficult to find a better one than a high-profile technology company dumping its collective BlackBerry stock in favor of pretty much any other platform."

192 comments

  1. Nokia Lumia 920 by RottenImp · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'm glad to see they chose Nokia Lumia 920 as a phone. It is very powerful, sleek and well-done smartphone with enterprise features from Microsoft. It's really much better business phone than iPhone or Android-based smart phones. On top of that Yahoo can use Visual Studio to develop their own apps - all with the maturity and familiarity of C# and Windows programming. Great choice!

    1. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You sound funny.

    2. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Alarash · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm also kind of tired of seeing C# being frowned upon just because it's tied to Microsoft. It's a kick ass language.

    3. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's Java again.

      Even the designer of C# has moved on, to Javascript of all places!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you could astropost when they'll actually ship, the rest of the world might care.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm glad to see they chose Nokia Lumia 920 as a phone. It is very powerful, sleek and well-done smartphone with enterprise features from Microsoft. It's really much better business phone than iPhone or Android-based smart phones. On top of that Yahoo can use Visual Studio to develop their own apps - all with the maturity and familiarity of C# and Windows programming. Great choice!

      Hum. You guys aren't up to the standard of the normal turfers from waggeneredstrom.com. They usually throw in some links:

      I'm glad to see they chose Nokia Lumia 920 as a phone. It is very powerful, sleek and well-done smartphone with enterprise features from Microsoft. It's really much better business phone than iPhone or Android-based smart phones. On top of that Yahoo can use Visual Studio to develop their own apps - all with the maturity and familiarity of C# and Windows programming. Great choice!

    6. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by RottenImp · · Score: 0

      C# is completely different than Java. Know what you speak of.

    7. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by RaceProUK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      C# is completely different than Java. Know what you speak of.

      C# developer here, and yes, C# shares a lot of similarities with Java, being as they are both C-family languages. However, I do agree that C# is sufficiently different to make it, on balance, a better and more flexible all-round language than Java.

      *waits for anti-MS Java worshippers*

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    8. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

      I like WinPhone/VS/C#, and I'm still calling shill.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    9. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you

    10. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 1

      As a recent convert from C# to Java, it's hard to deny the very obvious influence Java had on C#. I see C# basically as a port of Java in most instances.

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    11. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Interesting

      http://www.harding.edu/fmccown/java_csharp_comparison.html

      Weeee, look at how different it is.

      It's so different.

      It's clearly thinking different.

      It's sooooooo different.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    12. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You think that's bad, I'm a VB.Net developer. People rant endlessly about VB.Net. It's almost got the exact same feature set as C#, minus a few and plus a few features. For a long time, C# was missing simple things like optional parameters. Also, VB.Net has always had a much superior background compiler. A lot of what you hear about VB.Net is based on biases from the old VB, as well as complaints about syntax and verbosity. Neither of which really address it's merits.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by binarylarry · · Score: 0

      C# does have a few differences, but they're marginal at best.

      Overall, the language is just Java Again On A Microsoft Platform.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    14. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      No one worships Java. It's owned by Oracle, and the the only tech company to get more hate than M$ is Oracle.

    15. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by GoogleShill · · Score: 2

      C# was designed to be a Java replacement and shared nearly identical syntax as well as utilizing the intermediate language VM and garbage collection. Although MS have added numerous language features over the years, it is absolutely not "completely different than Java."

    16. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by SQLGuru · · Score: 2

      Ditto. I have the HTC Arrive and still tell people that I love WP7 (of course, I'm mad at Sprint for their lack of support for WP7 --- I just hope it corrects with WP8) and I code in C# all day long. But that post was a tad "blech" to me as well.

      But I was glad to see that WP8 made Yahoo's cut of "still relevant" phones.

    17. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by SQLGuru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you focus on just those items, sure. But that table didn't include all of the features of both languages. Where's LINQ? Lamda expressions? etc.?

      Run that same table to compare against any other language derived from C/C++.......there will be similar overlap. The point of that table looked like it was to get someone started on making the move from one language to the other.

    18. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a C# guy, I find VB syntax to be a major inefficiency when I'm using it. That's not because VB is necessarily any less efficient, it's just that I'm thinking in C# and translating on the fly. So there are some valid personal reasons to dislike VB. I'm sure the exact opposite is true for you.

      Then there's unsafe. That's the last thing VB still lacks that C# can do. It allows for all of the COM interop (ugh) to work. Without unsafe, there's no interop, or interop has to be coded directly in MSIL. Count your blessings on never having to work with unsafe code in a managed environment. If C is a gun that lets you shoot yourself in the foot, and C++ is a shotgun that will remove your leg with it, then C# with unsafe is a grenade with the pin pulled and you're wearing handcuffs.

      On the other hand, VB has With and C# doesn't. But that's just a typing shortcut.

      As for the background compiler, that hasn't been an issue, pretty much ever. Things that are compile-time checked will show up on a rebuild. Personally, I find VB's incessant bitching about errors caused by an incomplete line of code to be worse than C#'s lack of instant compilation checking.

    19. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No one worships Java. It's owned by Oracle, and the the only tech company to get more hate than M$ is Oracle.

      That's not true. Oracle is #3 on my list, just below Apple.

    20. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Tridus · · Score: 1

      It's remarkable how on every phone story there's a post made simultaneously with the article about how great the Lumia is.

      Microsoft really needs to hire less obvious shills.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    21. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I like both languages, and I think C# is better in some ways, but it's not like MS invented C# out of whole cloth. The whole concept of the .Net CLR was nicked from Java, and C# shares a great many language features and paradigms with Java.

      Given the choice between the two, I'm not sure which I would pick. It would depend on what features I need, I suppose, and what platforms I need to support.

    22. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by mystikkman · · Score: 4, Informative

      With a comparison like that, I guess there would no differences between C, C++, JavaScript, Objective C.

        A few differences copied from a Stackoverflow post:

      Generics are completely different between the two; Java generics are just a compile-time "trick" (but a useful one at that). In C# and .NET generics are maintained at execution time too, and work for value types as well as reference types, keeping the appropriate efficiency (e.g. a List as a byte[] backing it, rather than an array of boxed bytes.)
      C# doesn't have checked exceptions
      Java doesn't allow the creation of user-defined value types
      Java doesn't have operator and conversion overloading
      Java doesn't have iterator blocks for simple implemetation of iterators
      Java doesn't have anything like LINQ
      Partly due to not having delegates, Java doesn't have anything quite like anonymous methods and lambda expressions. Anonymous inner classes usually fill these roles, but clunkily.
      Java doesn't have expression trees
      C# doesn't have anonymous inner classes
      C# doesn't have Java's inner classes at all, in fact - all nested classes in C# are like Java's static nested classes
      Java doesn't have static classes (which don't have any instance constructors, and can't be used for variables, parameters etc)
      Java doesn't have any equivalent to the C# 3.0 anonymous types
      Java doesn't have implicitly typed local variables
      Java doesn't have extension methods
      Java doesn't have object and collection initializer expressions
      The access modifiers are somewhat different - in Java there's (currently) no direct equivalent of an assembly, so no idea of "internal" visibility; in C# there's no equivalent to the "default" visibility in Java which takes account of namespace (and inheritance)
      The order of initialization in Java and C# is subtly different (C# executes variable initializers before the chained call to the base type's constructor)
      Java doesn't have an equivalent of the using statement for simplified try/finally handling of resources
      Java doesn't have properties as part of the language; they're a convention of get/set/is methods
      Java doesn't have the equivalent of "unsafe" code
      Interop is easier in C# (and .NET in general) than Java's JNI
      Java and C# have somewhat different ideas of enums. Java's are much more object-oriented.
      Java has no preprocessor directives (#define, #if etc in C#).
      Java has no equivalent of C#'s ref and out for passing parameters by reference
      Java has no equivalent of partial types
      C# interfaces cannot declare fields
      Java has no unsigned integer types
      Java has no language support for a decimal type. (java.math.BigDecimal provides something like System.Decimal - with differences - but there's no language support)
      Java has no equivalent of nullable value types
      Boxing in Java uses predefined (but "normal") reference types with particular operations on them. Boxing in C# and .NET is a more transparent affair, with a reference type being created for boxing by the CLR for any value type.

      This is not exhaustive, but it covers everything I can think of off-hand.

    23. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by mystikkman · · Score: 1

      I am calling troll trying to look like a shill.(a very successful one based on responses).

    24. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by prehistoricman5 · · Score: 2

      Poe's law may also apply here.

      --
      Fuck Beta
    25. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot a positive email is flagged as a troll.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    26. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by cbhacking · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, let's see.

      Proper anonymous functions, including lambdas.
      Proper function pointers (called delegates) without needing to write entire classes for them.
      Support for stack-allocated complex types (structs).
      Support for bi-directional and output parameters, even of types normally passed by value.
      Unsigned integer types.
      Object parameters (technically functions, but cleaner than a bunch of Get*and Set* function definitions and usages).
      Proper generics (try declaring an array of generic type in Java, for example).
      Easy interop with native code (P/Invoke, good marshaling capabilities, support for ordered structs and unsigned types, etc.).
      Support for direct memory access (if you want/need it; use the unsafe keyword and byte* or similar types).
      LINQ.
      Tuples.
      No one-public-class-per-source-file restriction, or the associated restriction on file name.
      No restriction on project directory structure.
      Partial classes (allows separating parts of the same class, such as autogenerated code from developer code, into different files).
      The using keyword (in both of its uses).
      Conditional compilation (similar to C preprocessor) to do things like exclude debug code without any overhead at all.

      These are the ones that came to mind in just a few minutes of thinking about it, based on personal experiences, I'm sure there's a ton more. C# is a vastly more advanced language than Java. I don't deny that MS learned heavily from Java, but half of that learning was "let's not repeat their mistakes" and the other half was "what is it really lame that this language lacks? Let's do better."

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    27. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by oji-sama · · Score: 2

      It's remarkable how on every phone story there's a post made simultaneously with the article about how great the Lumia is.

      Microsoft really needs to hire less obvious shills.

      Six first posts from six most recent phone stories. Based on stats, 0 were hidden. The first 'shilly' looking one (the last one on the list) does not mention Lumia and may be a troll or a fanboy. I think same applies here. If only for the reason that I don't see why someone would pay for posting crap that gets modded to oblivion. Much more efficient would be for example get a ton of articles about your phone published. Then again, I guess if Apple is what Slashdotters want to read about, Apple articles we get.

      Anyway, do you want to qualify that 'every phone story' or are you just bashing?

      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3123189&cid=41361797
      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3121629&cid=41360879
      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3121469&cid=41356895
      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3120581&cid=41350393
      http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3118973&cid=41345035
      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3119907&cid=41345619

      Actually. I double checked. And Lumia is mentioned at all only in comments of ONE of those articles. And that was going for funny with grip gloves

      At the moment 3 out of 4 of your most recent comments bash Microsoft, Lumia, WP. So I guess I'll just conclude that you must be the one with an agenda. I guess thre's just no relying on UID. And before you ask, I own a Symbian phone and did not even consider buying WP 7.5 one. WP8 I am considering. Would buy a Meego phone if new ones were released.

      --
      It is what it is.
    28. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having dealt with them all, I'd say that IBM is far worse than either M$ or Oracle.

    29. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I think I'm starting to get what's your problem. It's that you still remember how MS tried to to use its well-known embrace, extend & extinguish tactic on Java. However, still running that meme ignores a couple of important details:

      1. Despite being a "clone" of Java (using a pretty lax definition, see other replies for details on how much of a clone it is), C# doesn't CLAIM to be Java or even in any way compatible. Why is this important? Well, perhaps because no-one had an issue with "borrowing" stuff back then. It was all about misrepresenting it as the "real thing".
      2. Sun is no more. There's no honest, skilled yet underappreciated underdog to help here. Oracle is more evil than MS, Apple and Zynga combined (Vatican could come close though). Heck, I might even appreciate Java being flushed down the toilet for this reason alone.

    30. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by StingyJack · · Score: 1

      I also find the c# IDE experience "lags" more than VB.NET. This is especially apparent with navigation commands (Go to definition, nav back/forward, etc) - executing them causes a pause/hiccup and then you are taken to the place you requested, but is also present in the background compiler (so slow to remove that syntax error). It was bad in 2008, and better in 2010 but still not enough in 2012..

    31. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Not familiar with that one...

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    32. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      When C# was at 1.0, it was basically Java with a touch of Delphi (properties, events), and a couple keywords swapped ("sealed" vs "final").

      However, C# has developed much faster than Java since then. For example, it had function literals (lambdas) in 2005 in C# 2.0, and the same with type inference for arguments in 2008. For comparison, Java will only have the same next year in v8.

    33. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You're showing the table that shows the difference roughly as it was as of C# 1.0 and Java 1.4 - i.e. 2002, 10 years ago. Heck, it doesn't even have generics.

      It's completely worthless when comparing the two languages today, because they have both evolved since then, but C# did so at a rate much faster than Java.

    34. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I work on VS, and I still cringe every time I see one of those. My rough estimate is that it takes probably about a dozen of polite. meaningful and truthful forum posts to counter the negative publicity effect of one such post.

      Which is why I think it's likely someone trolling. Given how many angry replies they get every time this kind of post makes it a first post in a story, it's a pretty good way to troll, too.

    35. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No one worships Java. It's owned by Oracle, and the the only tech company to get more hate than M$ is Oracle.

      That's not true. Oracle is #3 on my list, just below Apple.

      Don't you count Sony as a tech company? I thought they were the current favourites for the Slashdot daily Two Minute Hate?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    36. Re:Nokia Lumia 920 by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Not familiar with that one...

      Poe's law states that, on the internet, the most obvious troll, parody or piece of satire will be taken deadly seriously by some fanboy/anti-fanboy somewhere. It derives from po-faced, which itself comes from poker-faced, i.e. looking as though someone has just shoved a red hot poker up your arse.

      Something like that, anyway.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. One failing company dropping another's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's next, RIM employees stop using Yahoo for search and tell their employees to use Google or Bing?

  3. Oh Yahoo... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Oww, that has to hurt.

    Yeah, we all knew that RIM was on the outs; but getting cut from the running for 'stodgy corporate issued device' by the somewhat-less-than-vibrant players over at yahoo? Ice burn, man, Ice Burn.

    1. Re:Oh Yahoo... by rgbrenner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's one way of interpreting it.

      So here's an ex-google exec saying Yahoo employees can use a bunch of android phones or a currently-unavailable iphone. Didn't a certain Nokia exec do something similar recently.. hmm

      So Yahoo thinks it should discard RIM... When was the last time Yahoo got much of anything right? How do we know this isn't yet another miss-step? Aren't there some BB users that use Yahoo? Wouldn't it be better if Yahoo employees used ALL of the common smartphones?

    2. Re:Oh Yahoo... by somersault · · Score: 1

      1% is "common" now?

      Admittedly I think they're higher than 1% here in the UK, but I've wanted them to die for about 8 years now. I'm happy to see them go. Steam is due out on Linux soon-ish, and MS look like they're going to pull a Vista with Windows 8. All in all, things in the world of technology seem to be heading in a good direction :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Oh Yahoo... by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      % of mobile traffic != % of smartphone marketshare

    4. Re:Oh Yahoo... by John+Napkintosh · · Score: 1

      Yahoo is little more than AOL at this point. I see them as struggling to find a place among other better and more useful brands like Bing and Google. You'd think they would want to BOND with a brand becoming such as RIM who is also becoming less and less relevant by the hour.

      --

      Long signatures suck.
    5. Re:Oh Yahoo... by sirambrose · · Score: 1

      Buying an iphone 4S would be a waste of money because the 5 will be usable for at least one year longer than the 4S. I am sure that any employees that want an iphone will be glad to wait a week to get the better phone.

    6. Re:Oh Yahoo... by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      Right.. and I'm sure there are no Yahoo employees that already own a 4S.

    7. Re:Oh Yahoo... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      With(unfortunately for their shareholders) one crucial difference.

      Somehow, I don't know how they did it, AOL took a formerly-high-flying and now rotten from the inside company and somehow conned Time Warner to a merger of almost equals, with AOL on top. Damn. Now, of course, their business consists largely of confused old people who can't figure out how to cancel; but that was their moment.

      Yahoo, by contrast, turned to a rather generous buyout bid and has been slipping fairly steadily in value since....

    8. Re:Oh Yahoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are saying BB users don't do [most] anything internet related? Hmmm...

      While I find your statement true, you have to admit that there is a large correlation of those two. The BB folks I know typically don't hop around with a browser like the Android folks I know. And yes, I do know BB users... and yes, they have penis envy. ;)

    9. Re:Oh Yahoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The policy is for new phones Yahoo! buys for employees, it's not 'bring your own device'.

    10. Re:Oh Yahoo... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Admittedly I think they're higher than 1% here in the UK, but I've wanted them to die for about 8 years now.

      That pretty much tells me that you either dont get much work email, or that youre always at your desk. Name me a phone that does better for corp email / calendaring / phonecalls.

    11. Re:Oh Yahoo... by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

      iPhone accounts for the majority of mobile internet traffic. But it's marketshare is ~25%

    12. Re:Oh Yahoo... by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend was doing promo work for Blackberry during a large sporting event (Rugby World Cup). I don't know what blackberry targeted that audience, but no-one knew what a Blackberry was, and everyone said "oh, it's like an iPhone". She wasn't allowed to mention the iPhone to explain what it was.

    13. Re:Oh Yahoo... by neonmonk · · Score: 1

      Android with Swype + Touchdown beats BlackBerry, physical keyboard or not.

      There's a reason BlackBerry is dying, and that's because it's not even the best at its core niche anymore.

    14. Re:Oh Yahoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam is due out on Linux soon-ish

      Thereby creating an incredibly good reason to abandon Linux and use something more grown up instead. Seriously, I know everyone here loves Steam, but I would rather have sex with a syphilitic crocodile than try to use that crap ever again.

    15. Re:Oh Yahoo... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So, you are saying BB users don't do [most] anything internet related? Hmmm...

      While I find your statement true, you have to admit that there is a large correlation of those two. The BB folks I know typically don't hop around with a browser like the Android folks I know. And yes, I do know BB users... and yes, they have penis envy. ;)

      You can only have penis envy over what fucking phone you use if you have micro-genitalia to start with.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Oh Yahoo... by somersault · · Score: 1

      And your superior alternative is... what, exactly? There's nothing else that makes it so easy to manage your game content, especially if you have more than one PC.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Oh Yahoo... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Android with Swype + Touchdown beats BlackBerry, physical keyboard or not.

      Having to devote full time attention to a touch screen to make a phone call is superior to 4 button calling for basically any contact? (phone - first initial - last initial - phone)? An utter lack of any keyboard shortcuts or physical button remapping is somehow better than what blackberry has? No full contact search, terrible phone extension support in contacts (only supports semicolon, when most programs use "###-###-#### x###"), no hardware call start and end buttons (great when the UI lags and you cant answer your call), terrible text editing (touch screen is vastly inferior to trackpad for precision)....

      As for swype, Ill bet that anyone reasonably familiar with a Blackberry could be competitive without having to look down at the keyboard or screen; Id like to see you do ANYTHING on your android without looking at it.

    18. Re:Oh Yahoo... by chidorex · · Score: 1

      Android with Swype + Touchdown beats BlackBerry, physical keyboard or not.

      Having to devote full time attention to a touch screen to make a phone call is superior to 4 button calling for basically any contact? (phone - first initial - last initial - phone)? An utter lack of any keyboard shortcuts or physical button remapping is somehow better than what blackberry has? No full contact search, terrible phone extension support in contacts (only supports semicolon, when most programs use "###-###-#### x###"), no hardware call start and end buttons (great when the UI lags and you cant answer your call), terrible text editing (touch screen is vastly inferior to trackpad for precision)....

      As for swype, Ill bet that anyone reasonably familiar with a Blackberry could be competitive without having to look down at the keyboard or screen; Id like to see you do ANYTHING on your android without looking at it.

      I've had a Samsung Galaxy S II for about a year now and love most of it. However, from a phone and email functionality standpoint I miss my Blackberry keyboard, one-key memory dialing, key-remapping, and several other features you can only do with a physical keyboard.

      If BB ever makes the Wifi-hotspot functionality available, I'm switching back without a second thought. I would then get a wifi pad for maps, flipboard and the like (Nexus 7 or Transformer Prime. I would even consider an iPad...). A phone should remain a phone, smart or not.

      If BB never offers wifi sharing, I'll probably get a Motorola or Samsung Android phone with a physical qwerty keyboard. Wifi sharing is a must.

      --
      "On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero." - Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
    19. Re:Oh Yahoo... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Physical qwerty keyboards seem to be afterthoughts on Android-- be warned. Things like thumbs brushing and activating the touchscreen while typing, and keys failing to register come to mind. Another big gripe-- a lot of the keyboards have the numbers across the top rather than arranged as a dialer. They really do want you dialing with the touchscreen, which is as awful as youd expect.

    20. Re:Oh Yahoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. My Android phone has a touchscreen and full keyboard, but I been finding more and more use for the touchscreen then sliding out the keyboard for a lot of things.

  4. Why a Microsoft phone? by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No one buys Microsoft phones.

    They're in the same boat as RIM but they get a pass for some reason.

    I can only assume Microsoft is paying them to stay somehow? Maybe free phones?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because RIM is on the decline and there is a fair amount of momentum behind MS. Even if the device doesn't make sales it's not likely to disappear from the market as soon as Blackberry.
       
      But I know you're just being a hateful twat. Must suck to get your sense of self-worth from a device, eh?

    2. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No one buys Microsoft phones.

      Not true. This is posted from a Windows 7 Phone. They work just fine. I'm happy with mine. You don't know what you're talking about.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Walterk · · Score: 1

      Is that because those happy customers got their phones for free, courtesy of being Microsoft/Nokia employees?

    4. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because RIM is on the decline and there is a fair amount of momentum behind MS.

      I think you misspelled the word "money". The first two letters were right, but then you went right off the tracks.

    5. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US military still insists on Blackberries over iPhone / Andoid. So just like with the US government's use of Iridium sat phones kept that company afloat, until the US military stops using Blackberries, the company will be "around".

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by localman57 · · Score: 2

      Don't respond to RottenImp. He's an astroturfer. Look at his post history.

    7. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Nimey · · Score: 2

      They /are/ using Bing for searches these days, so that's probably something to do with it.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by X0563511 · · Score: 1
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because people used to buy RIM phones but no longer do, and no one ever bought MS phone, and still don't.

    10. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      They do? I could've sworn I heard about some field tests involving iPhone, Android, and Windows Phone 7, which later resulted in Android being selected. Granted, they cited a lack of secure encryption as a problem, but the nice thing about Android is that you can just put it in yourself. Plus, RIM's services all go through a central point of failure that has proven less-than-resilient in the last year or two.

    11. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they just don't want to continue the proprietary BES-Servers, every crapphone today can do ActiveSync or at least imap (and no, the Blackberry's can't, you need BIS for that).

    12. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by vlm · · Score: 2

      The US military still insists on Blackberries over iPhone / Andoid. So just like with the US government's use of Iridium sat phones kept that company afloat, until the US military stops using Blackberries, the company will be "around".

      Yeah, I was admining a database running under BTOS on a unisys ruggedized "mini" in the early 90s in the US Army. That sure worked out well. Probably no one on /. has even heard of either the company or the OS. That's where Blackberries are inevitably headed. Grunt gets issued a "blackberry", asks WTF is this?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    13. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      android is now approved for in theater operation...
      sorry for the anonymous post...

    14. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one buys Microsoft phones.

      There are some people out there that like Microsoft and will buy anything that Microsoft throws out there. You may have heard of some Apple fans like this.

      There is actually a growing number of (Xbox 360) gamers maoving to WP7. This is because it is completely integrated with your Xbox Live account and its achievements and friends. I bought a WP7 for this purpose. I was going to use it as Wifi-only, but I like the interface so much that I moved the SIM card from my Android phone to WP7. I mainly just swap the SIM card back to my Android phone whenever I want to use it as a Wifi hot spot.

      For the record, my corporate phone is an iPhone (we didn't get a choice). So, I carry around all three phones.

    15. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      No one buys Microsoft phones.

      That's because MS doesn't make phones. Oh wait, you mean the WinPhones make by LG/HTC/Samsung/Nokia et al. They seem to be doing alright collectively.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    16. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIM requires you to run the Blackberry Enterprise Server to get the full set of features. Microsoft phones use active sync, same as Android and iOS and does not require any special infrastructure.

    17. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Interesting, that could be the difference. Thanks!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    18. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by WiiVault · · Score: 2

      He should have said almost nobody, which is pretty true. But I'm quite happy with my LG Quantum first gen WP7.5 phone even if others aren't going WP in droves.

    19. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Microlith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey look! You found him!

    20. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Plasmoid2000ad · · Score: 2

      Troll much? It's not exactly a best seller, but you can hardly claim no one buys them.

    21. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      Actually, the DOD swooped in and bought the iridium network at the 11th hour right before the sats were to be given the command to thrust and burn up in the atmosphere. And they bought the entire network for pennies of what it cost to launch the birds in the first place (or what it would cost to launch their own similar network)

      My understanding it was purchased primarily for non-secure military communications i.e. soldiers half a world away getting to call or video conference back home.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    22. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Probably no one on /. has even heard of either the company or the OS.

      You seem to be forgetting that a number of us /.ers are old farts of the deepest dye. I cut my programming teeth on the Burroughs B3700 which by the 1990s had a lot in common with the Newcomen steam engine.

      Incidentally, Burroughs later became a component of Unisys, along with Sperry/Univac, another heavy horse of which I have fond memories...

    23. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Windows Phone - #1 in astroturfing!

      It's funny because the carriers don't seem to like Windows Phone very much. You think they know something about actual user satisfaction that the astroturfer boy here doesn't?

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    24. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by mystikkman · · Score: 1

      No one buys Microsoft phones.

      They're in the same boat as RIM but they get a pass for some reason.

      I can only assume Microsoft is paying them to stay somehow? Maybe free phones?

      Why support desktop Linux for anything? It has much less market share than Windows Phone. Does that make any sense? Perhaps Yahoo thinks it's good platform showing good promise in the future

      Just Nokia sold 7 million Windows Phones in the last two quarters and the Lumia 920 is looking promising compared to others. While it may not seem like much compared to iPhone and Android it's not negligible.

      Look at this comparison of phones and the poll underneath.

      http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/09/iphone5-spec-showdown/

      Which smartphone are you going to buy?
      Apple iPhone 5 22% (8152)
      Nokia Lumia 920 56% (21263)
      Samsung Galaxy S III 12% (4557)
      Samsung Galaxy Nexus 4% (1375)
      Other 3% (1170)
      I don't plan to buy a smartphone. 3% (1207)
      Total votes: 37724

      I think I know why you think no one uses Windows Phone though, you get your news from Slashdot.

    25. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      They're in the same boat as RIM but they get a pass for some reason.

      Oh no, Microsoft is in far better shape than RIM. One of the devices supports ActiveSync (like every other smartphone in the last 3-4 years) and one of them requires layers upon layers of provisioned services and dedicated servers.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    26. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      No one buys Microsoft phones.

      Not true. This is posted from a Windows 7 Phone. They work just fine. I'm happy with mine. You don't know what you're talking about.

      The above post is useless with out pictures.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    27. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Wow, +5 for that? OBVIOUSLY he didn't truly mean "not one single person on Earth." As of December 2011, Windows Phone was at 1% of the market. Double that--hell, quadruple it if you want--and it's still not that much.

      Android - 190 M - 31%
      Symbian - 190 M - 31%
      iOS - 114 M - 17%
      Blackberry - 93 M - 14%
      Windows Mobile - 17 M - 3%
      bada - 8 M - 1%
      Windows Phone - 5 M - 1%

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    28. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      So what? What's your point? The number of users has nothing to do with the quality of the product, or the effectiveness. By that logic, Windows is the best OS in the world, and Linux is the worst. Windows Phones may not be popular, but they do everything that the other phones do, and they do it well, regardless of popularity. Windows Phone and Blackberry are only alike in terms of popularity, not functionality.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    29. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      I did. I'm leaving Sprint for greener pastures when my contract is up next March - maybe sooner. All because they're in neck-deep with the iPhone. They based Windows Phone interest on a brick of a slider phone and wonder why the common folk didn't buy it.

    30. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The number of users has nothing to do with the quality of the product, or the effectiveness

      Isn't it lucky, then, that all anyone was arguing that there aren't many users?

    31. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by vux984 · · Score: 2

      I think maybe yahoo just doesn't want to run a BES anymore. :p

    32. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      but the nice thing about Android is that you can just put it in yourself.

      Baloney, unless you mean that all the devices need to be rooted first.

      And the thing about encryption is, its almost never more secure to roll your own.

    33. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      None of the people ragging on Blackberry know what theyre talking about either. It seems like noone can consider that there is a market segment that loves what RIM has to offer, just as there is a segment for iPhone and android and WinPhone devices.

    34. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Might be posted by a Windows 7 phone but you probably got it for free because you work for Microsoft.

      He said nobody buys Windows phones. He didn't say that Microsofties don't use them.

    35. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... you just love being deliberately dense, don't you? The OP that you responded to ALSO said nothing about the quality of product or effectiveness.

      He said nobody buys Windows phones, because for all intents and purposes NOBODY GODDAMN BUYS WINDOWS PHONES! 1% of the market = BASICALLY NOBODY'S FUCKING BUYING THEM!

      Stop being deliberately stupid... there's too much of that in the world as is.

    36. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm talking about making your own version of the OS, and then, yes, rooting the phones and installing it.

      Otherwise, yep, you are correct in the general case, but this is the military we're talking about, so I'm guessing they may have some experience in rolling their own already. ;)

    37. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      By Dec 2011, WP7 had been out for just over a year. 5M in one year isn't very good for a smartphone, true. Now, consider that Nokia has sold 7M Lumia devices this year alone - putting them on track for at least 10M and probably more (consider the holiday season). That's just the Nokia WP7 devices; there are a lot of other manufacturers.

      15M by the end of this year, even if we discount everything except the Lumia sales for this year, is 3% market share (possibly a bit less, since the market is growing) and 200% growth in a year. The Lumia 920 has garnered a *lot* of interest too; I expect that the sales rate of WinPhone will continue increasing.

      Yeah, it'll take it quite a while to be a serious competitor to the established players... but then, Android launched with aalmost insignificant blip and relatively little growth until the release of the Droid and the huge amount of marketing that went into promoting it. Android surpassed iOS some time ago and has gone on growing since, but they're not unassailable.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    38. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude Crawl out from underneath the rock. Microsoft OWNS Yahoo - DUH!

    39. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I got it for free because I signed a 2 year contract with Sprint.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    40. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my phone: http://www.casiogzone.com/commando/

      an android phone of course, it already meets certain military standards - I'm not in the military, but nonetheless your links confuse me a bit.

    41. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I'm sure your phone is very nice (I'm not waiting for that Flash whatever thing to finish loading), but all I was saying was that RIM devices were not the only smartphones being used by the military, and I cited the fact that the military was doing tests with the other major brands of OS and had then selected Android to use. That you claim yours meets certain standards of the military merely reinforces the idea that other phones can be used in place of Blackberries, which was my entire point in that post.

    42. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know (excluding nerds) prefers Windows to Linux. I quite like Windows 7 myself.

      I haven't used linux in years.

    43. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the sales of the Lumia 920 820 are going to shock a lot of Android users. I'ts a pretty impressive phone/OS.

    44. Re:Why a Microsoft phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not used Linux myself, tho really everything I need to do is windows and some is windows only (*cough*gaming*cough*)

  5. What does this mean for Yahoo? by NixieBunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sounds like a ploy to retain employees by tempting them with shiny objects.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:What does this mean for Yahoo? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Or maybe she just want to make sure employees have good mobile devices since they're, you know, the future.* Maybe she recognizes how horribly Flickr missed their opportunity on mobile and doesn't want that to happen again.

      * and the present.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    2. Re:What does this mean for Yahoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AAAAHAHAHAHA! An exec giving even the slightest of two shits about the actual workers at the bottom of the ladder. That's a good one.

      Please, it's 2012. Employees are a consumable, meant to be used up and thrown away like an ink cartridge.

    3. Re:What does this mean for Yahoo? by Macrat · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a ploy to retain employees by tempting them with shiny objects.

      Along with free coffee shops in most of the buildings and free lunch.

  6. That's gotta hurt by baalzebub · · Score: 1

    If RIM wasn't worried before (though I don't know how that'd be possible), they definitely should be now. If other companies follow Yahoo's footsteps, this may start a new trend, which would be the end of RIM (as in, it'd expedite the process of what's inevitable).

    1. Re:That's gotta hurt by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Clueful IT departments will still favor blackberry as it still is far more manageable and secure than the other options. The only real issue is that your coworkers will probably hate you.

  7. Interesting rationale by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Interesting

    CEO Marissa Mayer: "so we can think and work as the majority of our users do".

    That makes sense on the surface, but it doesn't exactly sound like the attitude of a company that wants to be an innovator or technology leader. It might not be the attitude of a market leader, either. At the risk of sounding like a fanboy of another big tech firm, "Think Same" may not be the motto to live by. But then I'm CEO of nothing.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Interesting rationale by vlm · · Score: 5, Funny

      My WTF was different than yours.

      CEO Marissa Mayer: "so we can think and work as the majority of our users do".

      VLM questions "Yahoo still has users?" Who?

      But then I'm CEO of nothing.

      Patience young grasshopper. Yahoo will achieve nothingness soon enough. Then you can be its CEO.

      I've occasionally wondered how much it would cost to start collecting companies as a hobby. For example, mint condition dotcom 1.0 corporations. How much would it cost me to buy flooz or drkoop.com or whatever it was called? I would imagine there's some ongoing accounting/tax costs. I do know people who collected paper stock certificates, for example Disney's paper stock certs used to be really cool and artistic, and I've always thought a collection of dotcom stock certs would be funny... but why collect a paper printout of a millionth of the dotcom when I could own the whole thing? My budget for this amusement would be on the scale of three digits, four is really pushing it. Is this a realistic collecting hobby for me? I'm not going to be one of those old people collecting a houseful of ceramic frogs... no not me... I'm gonna collect mint condition dotcom 1.0 companies. That sounds like fun.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Interesting rationale by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Sure, but Yahoo doesn't make hardware or consumable software. They provide services on platforms created by other people which are used by their customers. You have to know your customers' experience before you can improve it.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    3. Re:Interesting rationale by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't do anything with the company, then it's just maintenance of the registrations and filing of very short annual reports. Your stockholder's meetings could take place in your bathroom.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    4. Re:Interesting rationale by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      Yahoo's customers are advertisers, and viewers are their product, just the same as any television or radio station.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    5. Re:Interesting rationale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it for a moment. Are you more likely to have an idea to improve your user's experience when doing things your users do, or when everything you do is different to what your users do. To make a good product you need to understand what your users need, and the best way to do that is to put yourself in their place.

      Doing what your users do may not lead to innovation in itself, but it does put you in a good position for it.

    6. Re:Interesting rationale by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      At least they intend to think as their CUSTOMERS do and figure out what they want and do daily instead of trying to think as their competitors do.

      That at least, makes sense.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    7. Re:Interesting rationale by rastoboy29 · · Score: 2

      You need to understand what people really do in order to innovate.

      Otherwise, how else do you know what needs improvement?

    8. Re:Interesting rationale by chrish · · Score: 1

      Apparently all of Yahoo!'s users only use the latest top-of-the-line smartphones. Even some that aren't available yet.

      --
      - chrish
  8. what about spamcop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    once they are done with eliminating bb, could really spend some time on getting their smtp servers removed from spamcop.

    Vajk

    1. Re:what about spamcop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they're willing to negotiate with terrorists.

  9. Too much privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Too much privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart people use fast. http://dilbert.com/fast/2011-05-27/ it's the same but better.

    2. Re:Too much privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The picture is smaller on the fast page.

  10. No real keyboards? by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    choice of the Samsung Galaxy S3, HTC One X, HTC EVO 4G LTE, Nokia Lumia 920, or the upcoming iPhone 5

    None of these phones have real keyboards. To those of us with large fingers, that's a deal-breaker when selecting a phone; on-screen keyboards are simply unusable with a screen that small. As much as it sucks in other ways, the BlackBerry at least did offer a hardware keyboard. Yahoo should offer at least one Android phone with an actual keyboard (maybe the Samsung Epic 4G?)

    1. Re:No real keyboards? by mungtor · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't need it. The article ridiculously claims that focusing on physical keyboards and long battery life was a "failure" on RIMs part. Somehow they manage to overlook several multi-day network outages as a factor...

    2. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you don't realize, but the physical keys are roughly the same size as the on-screen ones.

      If you go with a Note, they're like 40% larger.

    3. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happens on all phones and people are just picking on RIM. Get over it already, they will be back.

      Nobody seems to ever mention that iGadgets didn't have copy and paste for two years.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_version_history

      RIM is surely hurting bad but they are by no means broken completely.

    4. Re:No real keyboards? by JDG1980 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps you don't realize, but the physical keys are roughly the same size as the on-screen ones.

      Being able to feel the keys (and press down on only the one you want) is a huge difference. Maybe when touch screens get haptic feedback, they'll catch up. But until then, on devices smaller than tablet size, a physical keyboard is the only good option for me.

    5. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of these phones have real keyboards. To those of us with large fingers, that's a deal-breaker when selecting a phone...Yahoo should offer at least one Android phone with an actual keyboard.

      Or a gym membership.

    6. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *types on Android device* Yep, feels like haptic feedback to me.

    7. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't listed but there *are* Android based devices with physical keyboards. It's probably better from a support standpoint to get one of those than it is to support another platform entirely. Also, it's a corporate phone and the goal is to familiarize yourself with the experience of your target market. If you have fat-finger issues with your phone you're much more likely to design UIs that mitigate fat-finger-ness as an issue. So if *ANYONE* should be forced to use the touch screen devices, it's people like you who have troubles with them. Your experience is invaluable.

    8. Re:No real keyboards? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      None of these phones have real keyboards. .. on-screen keyboards are simply unusable with a screen that small.

      That may be a reason for a tech company to give developers (particularly big-fingered ones) keyboardless smartphones.

      "Here, have a difficult constraint. Figure out a way to make it work anyway."

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    9. Re:No real keyboards? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      choice of the Samsung Galaxy S3, HTC One X, HTC EVO 4G LTE, Nokia Lumia 920, or the upcoming iPhone 5

      None of these phones have real keyboards. To those of us with large fingers, that's a deal-breaker when selecting a phone; on-screen keyboards are simply unusable with a screen that small. As much as it sucks in other ways, the BlackBerry at least did offer a hardware keyboard. Yahoo should offer at least one Android phone with an actual keyboard (maybe the Samsung Epic 4G?)

      I believe those are the top-end flagship phones on each platform. Which until quite recently stopped coming with hardware keyboards and settled in on the slate formfactor for whatever reason.

      Which is where I'm wondering where the innovation is - back when the Droid/Milestone was the kickass Android to get, it had a hardware keyboard. Can't they not come up with some innovative mechanicals and layout to produce a decent phone with a keyboard in the same formfactor? Hell, build in a battery like the iPhone!

      Just like bigger screens - there's very few top end phones with screens smaller than 4". If you have smaller hands, it can be a pain to use these top end phones single-handedly (which can include the iPhone 5).

    10. Re:No real keyboards? by jittles · · Score: 2

      Are you serious? I have large fingers and I can't use those tiny excuse of plastic they call keys on blackberries. Whereas, I can use the keyboards on android and iOS devices just fine. Why? Because I can keep typing on the soft keyboards and they eventually correct my mistakes. Not so on the blackberry. Its easier for me to thread a needle than to use a blackberry keyboard. Ugh I have hated those things since the beginning, and it is one reason why I never had a blackberry for work. I refused to have one.

    11. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently bought a Samsung Galaxy S3 with similar concerns. I hated my old original iPhone's keyboard, and I had an HTC Touch Pro 2 (WinMo 6.5 phone!) with the largest slide-out keyboard I've ever seen (no, that doesn't mean anything dirty).

      The S3's keyboard is quite large, even in "portrait" mode. No complaints about that.

      The battery life is a little lower than I'm used to, though. That TP2 sipped at a large battery for days before it needed a charge. The S3 can go about a day.

    12. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have the same issue. Try using swype.

    13. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know if swype could fill that gap. I can't say i have the same issue but, i almost never type anything like a traditional keyboard anymore. it's more about aim than dexterity.

    14. Re:No real keyboards? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      focusing on physical keyboards and long battery life was a "failure" on RIMs part

      A couple of years ago I mistakenly bought a Sony/Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro on the strength of its physical keyboard, but I found it such a struggle to use with my ageing eyesight that it was actually a relief when the machine died and I was able to justify replacing it with a Samsung device.

    15. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this guy is just too fat and poor to get anything besides the blackberry.

    16. Re:No real keyboards? by radtea · · Score: 1

      Are you serious?

      Yeah, believe it or not there are people who have preferences that are not only different from yours, but diametrically opposed to yours. Incredible, isn't it? (Not incredible that people have different preferences, but that you've reached an age where you're posting on /. and apparently are still shocked by this.)

      I have a Blackberry precisely because I have strong personal preference for a physical keyboard, and because they're remarkably robust. I upgraded my phone recently (and ditched the most hideous third-rate carrier in the world, the Canadian company Rogers Wireless) and was strongly temped by an Android phone with touchscreen, but there was no way it was going to stand up to the routine rough handling my phones get (I've had years where I went through three phones before I got a BB.)

      They aren't for everyone, but for some of us they are just the right thing, and it's unfortunate the company is likely to go the way of Nortel and other Canadian tech greats, run into the ground by poor marketing and bad management decisions.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    17. Re:No real keyboards? by jittles · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a matter of him stating that he preferred a real keyboard for the tactile feel of it, but because he had large fingers. But I can tell you from experience that the keys on a blackberry are tiny indeed, especially for someone with large fingers. It doesn't make any sense that you would chose a tiny little keyboard when you fat finger 3+ keys every time you hit a button. Maybe he has a different definition for large fingers, I don't know.

      I can respect someone preferring a real keyboard, certainly the bumps representing the home row are very nice, but that does no good when you have to be very careful typing so that you do not press multiple keys. So I guess you could say that my incredulity lies with the fact that this person believes they have large fingers, and is not due to his preference for a keyboard. That or perhaps he prefers Homer Simpson's dialing wand.

    18. Re:No real keyboards? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Other than perhaps the Palm Pre, I have not seen any non-RIM phones with a decent keyboard. Motorola Admiral comes kinda close, but keys are wobbly and the software sucks at registering them.

    19. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am really curious as to how big your Neanderthal hands are. I have large hands and I can operate the keypad on a blackberry with no problems. For now I refuse to use the touch keypad as I cannot type on it quick enough without making huge mistakes. Guess everyone has their preference. If the day comes and RIM does not exist and we are stuck with touch only devices well guess that is the day I don't have a smartphone anymore. Back to the telegraph for me.

    20. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia N900, brilliant keyboard!

    21. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets see, oh yea you must have never used a BB. I have both a BB and an older iphone (I think it's a 3g). Anyway the iphone's KB is infinitely more useable than the BB's because I can turn it sideways and make the keys bigger. Try that with a BB. One more thing the BB uses it's own convoluted logic as to how is should work. I've had the damn thing a month and I'm still not sure I could reply to an email. In short the only reason I have a BB is because my employer (the Fed gov't) supplies me with one. It sucks and will likely continue to suck forever.

    22. Re:No real keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the Droid 4?

    23. Re:No real keyboards? by jittles · · Score: 1

      LOL well I used to be able to palm an NBA sized basketball with just my pinky and thumb. I don't have that kind of forearm strength anymore, but my hands are pretty big. I actually really liked when the Evo 4G came out because the phone felt like it fit in my hand, and wasn't tiny. Then I had to get an iPhone 4S for work. Part of me really wants the iPhone 5 for its size, but I think it would be silly to pay to upgrade at this time. In any event, I've never been able to hit just one key on the blackberry keyboard. As someone else suggested it has nothing to do with weight, I'm about right BMI-wise.

    24. Re:No real keyboards? by CTU · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but as there is a feedback from the buttons it makes it easier to type out a message, at least with me and how I type things out.

  11. History repeats itself by concealment · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Companies that both manufacture hardware and hand-roll their operating systems tend to collapse over time.

    There are too many decisions which must be made centrally, and these involve too many conflicting "business objectives." In other words, the two branches (hardware and OS) can't figure out how to work together to nudge consumers toward spending more money, time and effort on the product.

    Apple ducked this one by purchasing the core of its operating system from two sources, and allowing maintenance to be mostly driven by updates at least one of those OSes (BSD).

    Blackberry has been frozen in motion (like Yahoo), unable to develop new software or hardware at the pace of the market. The result is that the world has moved on and, by parallax motion, RIM has moved backward.

    1. Re:History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple ducked this one by purchasing the core of its operating system from two sources, and allowing maintenance to be mostly driven by updates at least one of those OSes (BSD).

      Blackberry has been frozen in motion (like Yahoo), unable to develop new software or hardware at the pace of the market. The result is that the world has moved on and, by parallax motion, RIM has moved backward.

      Wouldn't RIM's use of a QNX as it's operating system in BB10 effectively mirror Apple's strategy? Time will tell if they can survive, but on the surface it looks like a possibility.

    2. Re:History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and allowing maintenance to be mostly driven by updates at least one of those OSes (BSD).

      Yes, everyone is super excited about iOS 6 because it contains the latest BSD updates! (and thanks for that "only on slashdot" comment)

    3. Re:History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea how OS X or iOS work if you think that updates to BSD drive anything.

    4. Re:History repeats itself by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Most companies tend to collapse over time. Think of all the PC manufacturers who got their OS from MS but are now long gone.

      By contrast IBM has done pretty well designing both hardware and the OS that runs on them. Their mainframe business has been around for 60 years. Their PC business, - which followed your preferred model, was abandoned years ago.

    5. Re:History repeats itself by Macrat · · Score: 1

      By contrast IBM has done pretty well designing both hardware and the OS that runs on them.

      Just like those wonderful OS/2 computers.

    6. Re:History repeats itself by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Not sure exactly what your point is. OS/2 for many years was a joint and dysfunctional development effort between Microsoft and IBM. It eventually turned into a pretty decent OS and though technically superior to Windows (prior to NT at least), it never really caught on for a number reasons. By the time IBM took full control of OS/2 the mass market opportunity had already passed them by. It did take them awhile to accept that.

      Plenty of big hardware companies that got their OS from somewhere else have failed. Think of all the UNIX workstation and server manufacturers that have fallen by the wayside.

      Sony made some great PDAs but were hamstrung by Palm whose OS development stagnated.

      In short I don't think you can really make the argument that the only way to be successful as a hardware manufacturer is to get the OS from somebody else. All you can really say is that it's hard to stay on top as a technology company.

  12. Interesting by kiriath · · Score: 1

    I can see why, I would say the same thing I believe. Blackberry is dying, there is no use going out and spending a dime on a Blackberry... Even when BB10 comes out, it will be too little too late. Really RIM will just be clawing at Microsoft's market share, those few people who don't want an Android or an iPhone will have Windows Phone and BB 10 to choose from. If RIM can stay together long enough to get it finished that is... Otherwise Microsoft will have all 4 of those non apple-android market shares to themselves...

  13. Re:One failing company dropping another's technolo by vlm · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's next, RIM employees stop using Yahoo for search and tell their employees to use Google or Bing?

    I think the vast majority of them are already using monster.com and dice.com, etc. Oh wait, do you mean general internet searching, not looking for a new job after the downsizing?

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  14. Server side software by ERJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We run a small business and I can say that our IT group was quite happy when we moved away from blackberry devices. Not because of the phones themselves but instead because of the server side software. It is very likely things have changed since we stopped using their phones but I can tell you that we would be constantly losing device sync between the server side and the phones and would have to manually resync the connections. If that software is still in use I can see how companies the size of Yahoo would want to not have to support the additional infrastructure that is needed for the blackberry devices.

  15. Wow... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like being dumped by the dorkiest fat kid in school.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I know! I felt so bad for you what it happened.

      If it makes you feel any better, she's going with black guys now. To each their own I guess.

  16. Lumia 920? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2

    'We'd like our employees to have devices similar to our users, so we can think and work as the majority of our users do,' she wrote, adding that Yahoo will shift away from BlackBerry as its corporate device of choice.

    As much as I hate to say it, I don't think that moving people from BlackBerry to Windows Phone will solve the problem she's describing.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Lumia 920? by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate to say it, I don't think that moving people from BlackBerry to Windows Phone will solve the problem she's describing.

      What makes you "hate to say it", but then go on and do so?
      Moving to Windows Phone 8 will get them everything that Blackberry provides for the corporate-land and more. And it's looking increasingly like the #3 smartphone platform, with its share of loyal users at large. Whereas Blackberry is being pushed down to corporate holdouts and some local subcultures (cash-strapped UK teenagers?).

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    2. Re:Lumia 920? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      What makes you "hate to say it", but then go on and do so?

      It's a saying and means that you wish that what you're about to say wasn't true.

      Moving to Windows Phone 8 will get them everything that Blackberry provides for the corporate-land and more. And it's looking increasingly like the #3 smartphone platform, with its share of loyal users at large.

      It has 3.2% market share. However you spin it, that is not a lot of "loyal users".

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  17. Wait! Blackberry is still in business? by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    Or are they talking about the old ones still lying about?

    Damn, technology moves just too quickly for me to keep up with it.

  18. Bad for the employment picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has to result in fewer RIM jobs for everyone.

  19. But not the Nexus by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    It's a strange choice. Two HTCs, the Samsung that isn't as good in the USA as the equivalent South Korean version, a phone that may not be available for months and another one that the IT department won't have had time to check for compatibility and security. One small(ish) one and four big ones. It looks like a collection thrown together by someone in HR who had a quick read of gsmarena or bgr and then asked their usual supplier for their best prices.

    Fortunately there isn't the slightest possibility that I would ever be recruited by Yahoo or, in the event that a stray high energy cosmic ray shower happened to hit their HR server in exactly the right way, that I would accept the resulting job offer. But this piece really does suggest that they don't have a sense of direction. A new shiny smartphone most of whose features you won't be allowed to use at work and which you won't use at home because you don't want them tracking you? The ability to annoy you 24/7 with irrelevant requests from managers?

    RIM may nor may not be dying. It may or may not be doing a pre-second-Jobs-incarnation Apple. I certainly wouldn't buy a BB 7 phone now because we all know it has as much future as a flea in a liquidiser. But being left of the Yahoo list - it's a list that many people might want to be left off.

    As another minor issue, I can't help feeling that some of RIM's bad press is because many user experiences are based on the locked down corporate market where all the good stuff is turned off, from the camera through the hotspot. How long will it be before the other manufacturer's products get locked down in the same way by IT, and the users perceive it as the phone's fault? Apple may be a "walled garden" now, but by the time some banks have finished with it, the iPhone 5 will be the fastest Nokia dumbphone on the market.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  20. RIM Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Panasonic BU that I work for is also change from the Blackberry to an Android phone. Which one is still a rumor.

  21. Re:One failing company dropping another's technolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No one uses Monster but some may use Dice--via Indeed.

    Seriously, who uses these sites directly anymore? RSS feeds from Indeed FTW.

  22. ActiveSync by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    BES stinks. BIS stinks. The whole Blackberry "dumbphone" concept stinks (the devices just don't work without RIM servers, billed to end users as an extra cost in your phone bill).

    Blackberry's failure to adopt ActiveSync - which became nearly ubiquitous among smartphones several years ago - is a big part of their downfall.

    Blackberry users have been paying more for less for far too long.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:ActiveSync by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's one of the main reasons I'm dumping my Bold for an iPhone. For the last 3 years I've been paying an additional £5/month for BIS that gives me zero benefits.

  23. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Good news. As someone whose IT department supports BlackBerries, this trend can't spread fast enough. No offense to RIM but blackberries should have died out many years ago - and not that I like apple or droid so much, but they should have killed the BB off for corporate use. BlackBerries are terrible phones with inconsistent UIs, no slide out keyboards, changing usb cords, and are overly secure, nor does anyone who has one know how to use it.

  24. Conspiracy against blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems like a conspiracy by the powers that be to push Blackberry out of business, in favor of the google/apple iOS's that track and data-mine it's users for commercial gain..

    Hmm!

    Blackberry is the new "little guy" that apple used to be, everyone who's "hip" and "free" should go blackberry! Everyone who wants to be a mental slave to advertisers and the corporate machine should go android/iphone!

    *ducks behind a wall*

  25. Re:One failing company dropping another's technolo by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Does *anyone* actually use Bing? I mean, other than on TV shows where they're paid to...

  26. Uh, Yahoo as a major technical bellwether? by swschrad · · Score: 2

    that's so 90s.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  27. Re:One failing company dropping another's technolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Within a month, Mayer's replacement will probably reverse this decision. Don't worry though, as their replacement will probably reinstate it. Yahoo goes through more CEOs in five years than I went through toilet rolls during a particularly memorable trip to Tunisia.

  28. As far as RIM by nighthawk243 · · Score: 1

    RIM is so behind in the smartphone business it isn't funny. Anyways, another issue for having BlackBerry devices is that you have to have a BES server to do what you need. Android and iOS require no such server; you can just sync them directly with Exchange.

  29. Yahoo wont be here much longer anyway.. by m_number4 · · Score: 1

    Better that RIM don't get to shoulder all that bad debt.

  30. Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wish I worked at a tech company that would do something like that for it's employees, although granted it is a work phone though... *shrugs*

    I think RIM seriously needs to rethink their strategy when it comes to users and business which to them have been one and the same. Except while their infrastructure might have been the "bees knees" 5-10 years ago, it's old and unreliable to most of what people use today. for instance my parents used blackberries (despite my constant objections) up until their last phone upgrade a little less than 1 year ago. The Blackberry storms or storm 2's or something like that I think they had. Always having problems, screen popping out of the device (well that's a unit defect, but it happened more than once, even on replacements). Emails and texts not appearing for hours or even a day+ later, despite having a perfect signal. That was I believe due to RIMS network and not the carriers. Rim kinda does their own thing with your emails and texts and then sends them over to your carrier who sends them to your phone.. or that's how I thought it was.

    That isn't much different from Google in a way, except Google actually works, and works very very well. If someone sends me a text or email and I have a usable data signal (doesn't need to be a perfect signal 3g or 4g) it will show up almost instantly on my phone or tablet or whatever I'm using. Rim.. I could text my parents and not get a response the entire day, go home and be like WTF didn't you respond and DING... there is my 12 hour old message finally arriving in their inbox, NOT COOL. and not a one off thing, this was a fairly common occurrence.

    Then if you needed to fix anything on those damned things, good luck. They had clunky awful interfaces and ui's (especially compared to android phones and even the Iphones we have now. Trying to find the setting for some trivial little thing ended up turning into a test of patience and deciding whether or not to throw it through a wall. Everytime I have to touch one and see that god awful clickable screen... not like most new phones where you tap it to click.. i mean the screen was a damn button literally.. I cringe. Add to that it's closed source and who knows what Rim does on their network with your data or information you send through it's network and the fact that it can't run the majority of things out there, unless you love the $$$ verizon apps you could buy (unless rim has some new app market? anything better than what we already have with Google or apple or any 3rd party app stores, like on android? )?

    I think this is something the company is doing right and I think a lot more companies need to take note and dump rim as well. RIM really needs to come out with something new and exciting instead of using the same old same old it always has.

  31. Re:One failing company dropping another's technolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jobs4point0, more likely....

  32. both of you should form user group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow 2 users!

  33. Re:One failing company dropping another's technolo by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    At least RIM makes a decent product, even if noone wants it. I cant think of the last time I willingly went to yahoo... I guess people use it for fantasy football?

  34. I don't get this - why bother with a policy? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    If Yahoo employees are like everyone else in the world, they won't be asking for Blackberries anyway.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  35. RIM has been walking with 2 crutches by na1led · · Score: 1

    ... and now they've been kicked in the groin!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  36. Sriramk posted this as an advice for Marissa by yuhong · · Score: 1
  37. Go Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm beginning to like this Marissa as CEO, perhaps there is hope for Yahoo yet. Notice she volunteers on several boards of ballet companies and at least one museum. A true geek with taste. They make great CEO's IMO (I would not hire most of the posters here if I was on the board).

  38. Re:One failing company dropping another's technolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next, RIM employees stop using Yahoo for search and tell their employees to use Google or Bing?

    Or maybe Marissa Mayer needs her minge mowing with a 42 ton semi right up the middle deader end of problem

  39. Impressive list... by DoctorBonzo · · Score: 1

    But is None an option?

  40. Non sequitur by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    ...RIM employees stop using Yahoo for search and tell their employees to use ... Bing?

    There is no such thing as "Yahoo search." The Yahoo search team was laid off years ago when the entire search function was outsourced to Microsoft (Bing).

    --
    Yeah, right.
  41. Signal Flags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Yahoo employees are taking training the former Navy signal corp members with signal flags. Yahoo is finding this much more efficient. RIM plans on having an app available of the next release (whenever that is) of the OS for their new phones for Yahoo employers can use them.