Slashdot Mirror


iPhone 5 Teardown Shows Boost To Repairability

iFixit has posted a detailed teardown of the new iPhone 5. While the casing still uses Apple's proprietary pentalobe fasteners, the good news is that Apple has made the screen much easier to remove. Once the fasteners have been removed, the screen will lift out easily through the use of a suction cup. The screens are by far the most common parts of iPhones to break, and this change turns a complicated 38-step procedure that takes about 45 minutes at minimum into a quick, 5-10 minute job. The teardown also shows the iPhone 5 battery to be very similar to the iPhone 4S's, suggesting that the improvements to battery life come from other hardware and software changes. We get a look at the new A6 processor running the phone, which is a custom design based on ARMv7. iFixit also looks at the Lightning connector assembly; unfortunately, it includes the loudspeaker, bottom microphone, Wi-Fi antenna, and headphone jack as well, so fixing any one of those parts individually will be difficult. Whatever you think of Apple's decision to move to Lightning instead of micro-USB, it seems their switch away from the 30-pin connecter was necessitated by size constraints.

42 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Well there goes all my productivity for today by mozumder · · Score: 5, Funny

    was trying to concentrate here..

    And since when did girls get on the internet?

    1. Re:Well there goes all my productivity for today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And since when did girls get on the internet with their clothes on?

      I think this is what you meant.

  2. Summary fails to give final score (7/10) by Scowler · · Score: 4, Informative

    umm, kinda obvious fact to omit from the summary, that whole ifixit repairability score...

  3. F$^%$ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They did something for some reason that wasn't just to screw over the sheep. Now I can't hate them as much.

    1. Re:F$^%$ers by TimHunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So are you saying that nothing should ever change about the iPhone connector? Once god-awful 30-pin, always god-awful 30-pin? So that nobody ever has to buy new peripherals?

      Or are you saying that it's okay if they change it (and force everybody to buy new peripherals) but only if they change it to something "compatible"? Note that micro USB isn't doesn't support the functionality the iPhone needs. See http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-iphone-lightning-vs-micro-usb-2012-9

    2. Re:F$^%$ers by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's something extra to hate about them. They took away the god-awful proprietary 30 pin connector, and replaced it with a new god-awful smaller proprietary connector that remains incompatible with the rest of the world. Nobody's old apple-y devices, cables, or chargers will work with their new phones; and non-apple cables or devices will remain incompatible. Yay, Apple, your i5 adopters all get to replace a couple hundred dollars worth of peripherals each.

      Well, there comes time to change. The dock connector is nearly a decade old, and being called to do stuff it was never envisioned to do so pins are heavily multiplexed and you still need to have protection circuits (after all, someone could still plug in a +48V firewire cable to it, even if the pins ar eused elsewhere, it still needs ot handle it gracefully). And other stuff get obsolete - do you really need composite, s-video and component video outputs these days? And other stuff gets bodged in (VGA, HDMI, USB host) In the end, the connector's a mess.

      The new cable would at least be a bit more future-proof (the dock connector was designed for a time when iPods were king, and smartphones were a race between Blackberry, PalmOS, and WInMo, tablets were running Windows You can only expand it so much before it starts becoming a legacy maintainance nightmare.

      So a new connector is needed, and it should take in mind it will have to handle stuff that may be coming soon (e.g., 3D, 4K video formats) as well as stuff that no one's thought of yet (because changing connectors is painful). It should also support what made the old connector good - an easy way to get line-out and headphone audio, an easy way to control the iPod and an easy way to get video.

      So the best way to future proof it would be a connector that basically adapts some sort of bidirectional digital signalling system with adapters that produce the final output desired. If some fancy new way to hook up an iDevice to TVs comes out, a new adapter is all it takes (and supporting software), rather than having to figure out how to multiplex pins even more.

      It's probably also why the Lightning to dock adapters are so bloody expensive - they've got signalling chips that transform the digital into stndard analog audio, serial control , etc that the old connector has).

    3. Re:F$^%$ers by Cinder6 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I love all the angst over a cable. Isn't this the day and age of wireless syncing? Of online syncing? The only reason I've ever needed my iPhone cable in the past year is to charge it--and before iOS5, I only ever used it for software updates.

      Peripherals? People act as though every iPhone user is now going to have to spend hundreds of dollars buying new peripherals. This ignores two things:

      1. The obvious. There's an adapter you can buy. The Apple one is $30, but you can find them much cheaper on Amazon.
      2. Not every iPhone user will have to spend hundreds on new peripherals. Personally, I will have to spend exactly $0. Of people I know, only one friend will need to buy a $30 set of speakers (that is--if he still uses them).

      I've always found micro-USB a bit annoying to actually plug in. It's not an arduous task or anything, but it sometimes takes a couple tries if the cable manages to go in at an angle. That the new connector is reversible is pretty nifty.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    4. Re:F$^%$ers by Cinder6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, this article supposedly covers some of it: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-iphone-lightning-vs-micro-usb-2012-9

      However, not owning a phone with micro-USB, I'm not sure how accurate it is. Anyone care to chime in?

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    5. Re:F$^%$ers by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note that micro USB isn't doesn't support the functionality the iPhone needs. See http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-iphone-lightning-vs-micro-usb-2012-9

      Neither does the Lightning connector. No ipod controls. No analog audio out. No 12-volt charging.

      So why is it that we need this new connector again? One that does less than the previous one but will require all new cables and accessories?

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    6. Re:F$^%$ers by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      So are you saying that nothing should ever change about the iPhone connector? Once god-awful 30-pin, always god-awful 30-pin? So that nobody ever has to buy new peripherals?

      Or are you saying that it's okay if they change it (and force everybody to buy new peripherals) but only if they change it to something "compatible"? Note that micro USB isn't doesn't support the functionality the iPhone needs.

      Apple dropped analog video output so all they actually need is to put all the ports next to one another on the bottom of the phone; stereo mini or micro plug, uHDMI, and uUSB. "Docks" can implement as many connectors as necessary for their functionality. Done and done. Instead they have invented a new proprietary connector so that they can make more money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:F$^%$ers by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 2

      12V charging isn't a function of the connector, so I don't even know what you're talking about there.

      The 12-volt capability is part of the firewire support. There are two pins for 12V power, and two pins for 5V. Many car connectors and chargers used this for iPod and iPhone charging in the past, but Apple stopped supporting it in the iPhone as of the 3GS.

      You forgot one item on the new connector "feature" list:
      5. It's an all digital connector allowing Apple to add an authentication chip to the cable to restrict third party manufacturers from creating low cost compatible hardware, the same way that the iPod controls on the headsets work now.

      Yep, the primary reason Apple is changing to this connector rather than a standard one is so that they can screw you into buying their cables and only accessories that they've licensed. If they went with Thunderbolt they wouldn't have complete control the way they want.

      I have no problem embracing a change like this, if I'm getting something for my investment. Right now, I'd get less than what I have and I'd have to pay a premium for it. I'm not buying unicorn horns and pixie dust; if they want to sell me something, they are selling me what they have right now and not what they will have eventually. Seriously, they couldn't have made their flagship product compatible with Thunderbolt or USB 3 for launch?

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    8. Re:F$^%$ers by c++0xFF · · Score: 3, Informative

      That link is a summary of anouer summary of another summary, and is quite simply stupid and incorrect.

      Instead, look at the source link: http://brockerhoff.net/blog/2012/09/13/boom-2/

      and a follow-up post: http://brockerhoff.net/blog/2012/09/18/boom-a-follow-up/

      Lightning definitely has advantages over micro USB. And one big disadvantage: it's proprietary. Most manufacturers, thankfully, have to go with something standard, but Apple has the clout to ignore standards to their own (and, arguably, their customers') benefit.

    9. Re:F$^%$ers by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      Thanks for those articles. Some interesting reading.

      With that said, I still don't understand the hangup with the cable being proprietary. In six years of owning iPods and iPhones, as well as random devices that use micro-USB, I've never been annoyed at having to use two different cables. Honestly, the Lightning connector, despite the silly name, looks to be a better cable than micro-USB--namely, that should be easier to insert and is reversible. Is it really that big a deal, or are people looking for reasons to get upset?

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    10. Re:F$^%$ers by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      How does that work for iPod / iPhone docks where the idea is that the device fits snugly in the dock? Or for hi fis and car sound systems with the same thing? A lot of people have been shafted by this. Just because you and your friends haven't is pretending that the vast market for 3rd party peripherals is irrelevant.

    11. Re:F$^%$ers by c++0xFF · · Score: 2

      To me, at least, it's a matter of getting along and playing nicely. It's a matter of how Apple treats me as their customer and as a potential customer of their partners.

      Moving beyond the 30-pin dock is a good thing. It outlived its usefulness, and making a change is a necessary evil. Let's take all of that as a given.

      So, Apple has three choices here:

      1) Do what all other major manufacturers have done and move to micro USB. Add on MHL for video. This has the huge advantage of being standard and inexpensive, but maybe it lacks a feature that Apple wants (a cynic would point to royalties and vendor lock-in as Apple's most desired feature, but a more fair viewpoint would be features that make accessories easier to make). Micro USB is certainly not the best, but it works quite well for other phone and tablets. If you want to be fancy, move to USB 3.0.

      2) Work with other industry partners to establish a new standard. Actually work with Samsung, Motorola, LG, and HTC for once. This shows that Apple can actually play nice in the field of electronics and has the interests of the consumer in mind. This would (eventually) rid the world of micro USB and it's problems while still giving Apple the features it might want. Accessories are less expensive and work with all devices. Everybody wins! Well, except maybe for Apple since it doesn't have control over the connector anymore.

      3) Develop your own proprietary connection. Still has to be compatible with micro USB chargers. Screws over loyal customers by making their accessories obsolete unless they pay for expensive adapters, which might not even work anyway. Makes all accessories more expensive due to royalties on the new connector (rumor is $4 to $10 per connector or 10% of accessory price, whichever is greater). Makes all accessories more expensive since you can't take advantage of economies of scale. And so on and so on. But at least we get a reversible connector now, right?

      Basically, Apple could have gone with something standard. Or they could have been a partner in the industry and worked to develop a new standard that makes everyone happy. If you're going to change connectors anyway, why not do the right thing? Instead, they show disdain for their own customers and future potential customers.

      And this is what they do as they lose market share? Well, I'm sure not going to switch to an iPhone because of Lightning, but I might never buy an Apple device again because of it. I don't like how they're treating me as a potential customer, and I really, really like having a standard charger in every room of the house. (If other electronics manufacturers started using Lightning, my tune might change a bit. Let's be realistic, though ... that will never happen.)

  4. Perhaps a better screw by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    Pentalobe fasteners are not a big deal. New and different screws, nuts and bolts are all the rage. It's been happening for, what, the last century? More? Sometimes they're actually an improvement and stick in the industry as the next great thing. The tools become available very quickly, or some of us make our own...

    1. Re:Perhaps a better screw by pubwvj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're thinking about it the wrong way. The new screw in each case is a challenge, a hurdle, an intelligence test. If you haven't got what it takes to figure out how to open the device then perhaps you shouldn't.

  5. Pentalobe is not proprietary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've had pentalobe drivers since before Jobs went back to apple and at least 15 years before the iPhone ever existed.

    Just because you aren't used to seeing them on all the crap you buy designed to be as cheap as possible.

    Pentalobe bolts are about a thousand times more reliable than Phillips heads, which are DESIGNED TO STRIP WHEN CRAPPY FACTORY WORKERS OVER TORQUE the screw/bolt during assembly.

    Every time you call pentalobe proprietary you just make your ignorance and inner fanboy obvious.

    1. Re:Pentalobe is not proprietary by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      Torx fulfills that need and is far more common.

      Like you said, with phillips heads the bit jumping the grooves is a design feature not a flaw.

      Pentalobe is just a little less common, but not hard to get either.

    2. Re:Pentalobe is not proprietary by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've had pentalobe drivers since before Jobs went back to apple and at least 15 years before the iPhone ever existed.

      Just because you aren't used to seeing them on all the crap you buy designed to be as cheap as possible.

      I call BS on this, everything I've googled is stating that Pentalobe is a new design that Apple came up with. It is very similar to the Torx screw, but incompatible by design. Unless you have some link to prove that pentalobe is not a new design, I'm gonna say you are shilling or mistaken.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    3. Re:Pentalobe is not proprietary by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      "Five-Point Tamper-Resistant Torx-Plus" =/= Pentalobe, the shape is very definitely different (Torx-Plus is pentagonal with straight side, pentalobe has... lobular sides). See Wikipedia for a picture. Note that this is probably the source of the confusion: it looks almost, but not quite, like a Torx.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:Pentalobe is not proprietary by FreeFire · · Score: 3

      I looked at Google stuff too, and found nowhere that claimed the Pentalobular is a NEW design by Apple. Torx has a Pentalobular in various sizes; I'd presume they've been around for a while, especially since they come in sizes not used by Apple.

    5. Re:Pentalobe is not proprietary by CaptBubba · · Score: 2

      That is a different design/layout, missing the indentations between the points of the screw driver. Here's the one used on the iPhone: http://twitpic.com/3rt9sa

      You might be able to drive the Apple screw with the torx bit,but the bumps in the screw head look like they would block it. That's assuming you could get one small enough. Nobody is saying that there were not 5-spline screw heads before the iPhone 4, just that this particular head is new and apparently chosen as it was esoteric enough that existing 5-spline bits wouldn't fit.

    6. Re:Pentalobe is not proprietary by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Pentalobe bolts are about a thousand times more reliable than Phillips heads, which are DESIGNED TO STRIP WHEN CRAPPY FACTORY WORKERS OVER TORQUE the screw/bolt during assembly.

      Uh no. Philips was invented to eliminate cam-out, which it all but does when the screwdriver is lined up perfectly with the screw. Since it doesn't actually eliminate cam-out, we got torx, which does. And since Torx is more expensive to make than philips (especially the fasteners themselves) we also got ACR, or "anti cam-out ridges". These little ridges ground into the tips of screwdrivers are usually found on tools with snazzy names including "bite" and such, and they provide the same function for the tip of the tool that knurling provides for your fingers: grip.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Pentalobe is not proprietary by Tastecicles · · Score: 3

      According to this the Pentalobe is an Apple invention. I'm not gonna go do a patent search, I'll leave that to some other genius.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  6. Data comm speed - guess LTW means nothing... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not considering the above mention of score, data comm speed are the same and multimedia roughly the same.

    The inclusion of LTE alone marks that statement wrong.

    Oh and playing music and sound quality? Hasn't changed much since the 3S

    Which is why some people buy better headphones.

    It's a phone, not a movie theater. The built in speakers are always worse than better headphone options.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Data comm speed - guess LTW means nothing... by immaterial · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm surprised you didn't catch this. There HAS been a significant upgrade to the speakers and microphones in the iPhone 5 (and to top it off, Apple is working with carriers to improve audio quality during calls as well).

      http://www.idownloadblog.com/2012/09/12/iphone-5-three-mics/

  7. Complies with spirit by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real point behind the directive is that over time people just have USB chargers they can use with anything, right?

    Well the iPhone ships with a USB charger. Sure the port at the other end is different but in the end you can have one charger for many devices, with just a few cables.

    An important point to consider is that if you just stick yourself with pure USB end to end, you cannot get as much power through the system to charge quickly.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Complies with spirit by Megane · · Score: 3, Informative

      5 amps at 5 volts is 25 watts. 5 amps at 110 volts is 550 watts. That's 22 times the power. Lrn2electricity.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  8. Fractured glass + vacuum by sayno2quat · · Score: 2

    So you need to remove fractured glass with a suction cup? Let me know how that works out for you...

    --
    Sure I sold you robot insurance. But you were attacked by a cyborg. Not covered.
    1. Re:Fractured glass + vacuum by blueg3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, you only need to remove it with a suction cup if you want the thing to stay in one piece. Not a problem if it's already broken.

  9. Re:Sooo... by Cinder6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's perfectly logical: Making it easier to repair makes it cheaper (for the tech) to repair.

    1. They sell more iPhones than they do MacBooks.
    2. iPhones break more than MacBooks--there's #1, and also the fact that people carry their phones everywhere.
    3. The most common breaking point of an iPhone is the screen.
    4. Making the screen easier to remove makes it cheaper to replace.

    MacBooks don't have nearly the number of accidents, so they can lock it down a bit more in their quest for nicely fitting and ultra-thin hardware.

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
  10. Flavors of Spinal Tap by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 5, Informative

    The gist of that article is "Lightning is better because it has 8 pins! 8 is more than 5!"

    And 11 is louder than 10...

    It's nonsense. You can put audio and video over micro-USB (see: MHL), and the standard specifically allows for sending more power over the cable when a device is using its own charger, so the argument "You couldn't charge the iPad!" is BS. The Nexus 7, Kindle, Galaxy Tab, Transformer, etc. all charge fine over micro-USB based chargers.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:Flavors of Spinal Tap by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Lightning connector is much easier to insert into the phone versus the micro-USB. Eyesight isn't improving for some of us here.

      Then again it's just a connector, get over it and move on.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    2. Re:Flavors of Spinal Tap by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe it can also be inserted either way. Micro USB is a horrible design. (And USB as a whole). Someone completely failed Poka Yoke design when designing it. Micro-USB is just slightly different when flipped upside down. Sometimes with MicroUSB I can't tell if the connection is just snug or if it's being inserted backwards. I often have to double check visually. Something my parents wouldn't be able to do because of their eye sight.

    3. Re:Flavors of Spinal Tap by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      Ironically, the page you linked explicitly gives this example: 'Most computer manufacturers “Poka-Yoke” their cables so the plugs only fit in one way. This prevents damage to the system.'

      I suppose a plug that works fine either way is even MORE "Poka-Yoke" tho. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    4. Re:Flavors of Spinal Tap by maccodemonkey · · Score: 2

      It's nonsense. You can put audio and video over micro-USB (see: MHL)

      Sure, you could add MHL which would result in more space being used on the board, higher device cost, and higher accessory cost, or you could come up with something that does the same functionality at a cheaper cost in a more efficient manner. After all, the higher cost is why the Nexus 7 doesn't ship with MHL.

      But hey, let's stick with something that's broken, expensive, and not really part of the USB standard anyway. That sounds like a good plan.

  11. Re:Most things still work by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    This is simply not true. Only one end of the chargers Apple uses is USB.

    It is true because ANY USB charger will work with that Apple cable to charge an iPhone 5.

    If they would have made their new connector compatible with micro usb by taking the form factor and adding proprietary features they desired

    Then we would have a cable with a worse connector at one end. To me it's absurd to settle for a USB micro connector, in the future that connector will limit speed of transfer and other things devices can do even if you attach proprietary meanings to some pins... the connectors are simple smaller than on the new Apple connector.

    You'll find there are two classes or chargers; chargers that charge everything and chargers that charge everything but idevices.

    This is not an iPhone problem.

    And further shows why USB SUCKS as a standard for anything.

    Generally though, iPhones will charge with ANY USB charger. It's iPads that have more issues as they need more power.

    Apple having these proprietary connectors is all about milking their captive market out of every last dime they have.

    And has nothing at all do to with having a more capable connector with the capacity for much higher data transfer speeds, of course. It's purely to screw YOU even though it represents a tremendous amount of extra work for them.

    Mission accomplished Apple! Toadlife considers himself screwed.

    If you don't mind being nickle and dimed like that

    Nickel and dimed how? I have a cable, perhaps two that I use for the life of the device. For the new connector I have an adaptor I use when I need an adaptor, the need for which diminishes over time. This is not a "nickel and dime" recurring bleed, this is a one time charge to adapt to a connector that is is better and simpler - than either the older iPhone connector OR Micro-USB.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. Re:Most things still work by phayes · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only thing I have ever seen a micro-USB on is phones. The apple dock connector however has become common on clock radios, speakers & a plethora of docks. As micro-USB does not have enough pins for some dock functions, is not reversible, cannot furnish the wattage necessary to quick charge an iPad & should not need to be changed to accommodate USB3, it looks to me to be a good move. Change now, give an adapter for the old devices & do not need to change for another decade.

    Do you really believe that the current Micro-USB connector has much longer to live given that it cannot do USB3? Have you seen the abomination that is micro-USB3 with a dual socket structure wider than a USB type A? Have you never had problems with micro-USB being hard to insert the right way? Hell, I've seen a number of normal sockets where the shelf holding the contacts was snapped off & micro-USB damaged by people inserting them the wrong way. USB is not a great connector & within a few years most phones will have moved on to something else anyway.The only thing I have ever seen a micro-USB on is phones. The apple dock connector however has become common on clock radios, speakers & a plethora of docks. As micro-USB does not have enough pins for some dock functions, is not reversible, cannot furnish the wattage necessary to quick charge an iPad & should not need to be changed to accommodate USB3, it looks to me to be a good move. Change now, give an adapter for the old devices & do not need to change for another decade.

    Do you really believe that the current Micro-USB connector has much longer to live given that it cannot do USB3? Have you seen the abomination that is micro-USB3 with a dual socket structure wider than a USB type A? Have you never had problems with micro-USB being hard to insert the right way? Hell, I've seen a number of normal sockets where the shelf holding the contacts was snapped off & micro-USB damaged by people inserting them the wrong way. USB is not a great connector & within a few years most phones will have moved on to something else anyway.

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  13. Re:Most things still work by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, it doesn't.

    You're right, because it ALSO results in a connector you can insert without having to look to see if it's in the right way, vastly superior for real people.

    You honestly believe that inventing an entirely new connector takes less work that taking an existing standard form factor and adding pins to suit your needs?

    Obviously not since my point is that people who believe Apple invented the new connector just to screw people, do not realize the amount of work that goes into building a whole new connector vs. simply overlaying functionality on top of an existing connector.

    Apple would not go to extra work just to screw people over, as much as Apple haters would love us all to believe the opposite. Apple is doing what they have always done, taking people off an obsolete system (old iPhone cable, Micro-USB) before people have quite realized the old system is obsolete - as was the case for floppy drives or internal CD-ROM drives.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  14. Who repairs the most iPhones? by clonehappy · · Score: 2

    While this is most definitely great news for the DIY crowd and the independent repair shops, I don't think it was necessarily done to make things easier on us. Not trash-talking Apple at all for this move, but this is going to save them a metric shitton of money in the long run.

    Apple replaces/repairs so many devices with cracked screens that bringing the repair time down from 45 minutes to practically nothing will make the profit margins on their warranties and AppleCare coverage skyrocket. And makes those of us who do these things for fun and profit very happy. Smart business move from all standpoints.

  15. Re:Most things still work by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mini-USB is a set of standards.

    Being a set with more than one element means there's always room for one more.

    I actually meant micro-usb 5 pin. That as far as I can tell all android phones use.

    What about people that do not have any Android phones? It's just as weird for them to have to get the five-pin as it is for an Apple user to have to get an Apple cable. I didn't have ANY micro-usb five pin cables until my camera came with one; it went missing and I had to get another even though I had a slew of OTHER micro-usb cables from connecting hard drives and the like to my computer. I have a box downstairs with a huge number of orphan computer cables and for me the five-pin was the least common USB cable I had.

    Nothing about the Apple cable is any more annoying than the horrible USB situation for normal non-technical consumers. At least with the Apple cable you can tell which one is for the phone at a glance.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley