Slashdot Mirror


Notch Won't Certify Minecraft For Windows 8

MojoKid writes "The backlash against Windows 8 from various developers continues, but this time a game's creator isn't just expressing discontent. Notch, the developer behind smash hit Minecraft, has declared that he won't be working with Microsoft to certify Minecraft for Windows 8. Note that this doesn't mean Minecraft won't run on Windows 8. The certification process in question is Microsoft's mandatory rules for submitting content to the Windows game store. In order to be listed there, an application must be Metro-compatible and conform to a laundry list of other conditions. The real problem with Windows 8 is that it locks ARM users into a second class experience. If you buy an x86 tablet, you can download programs from SourceForge, GitHub, or any file mirror. If you're an ARM user, you can download programs from the Microsoft store and that's it. The bifurcated permission structure is the problem, and it makes WinRT tablets categorically impossible to recommend for anyone who values the ability to install whatever software they please."

33 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by p0p0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Windows being Windows, I don't forsee any real future issues with getting your own apps on the ARM version. Just the nature of Windows will probably make it much easier to work around, and if the userbase grows enough it will move along that much faster. Microsoft is trying the walled garden technique the Apple has going, but I don't foresee it being as effective or foolproof as Apple's.

    Sometimes I feel like Microsoft si kind of flopping around like a fish on land when it comes to tablets. Even though they technically had a headstart, they've only just started their move to tablets and it feels rushed. The current release cycle of good > bad > good > bad will most likely continue and Windows 8 will flop. At least I hope it does and it will force them to rethink their stupid Start menu removal, amongst other things.

    1. Re:Well... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't type "shop" into the Windows 7 Start Menu and have it open Photoshop, although it does manage to offer me "Microsoft Visual C++ Express 2010" when I type "vi" in the hope of running Virtualdub. Having selected Virtualdub, it still puts VC++ at the top of the list next time I type "vi". Launchy, on the other hand, has already learned that "VC" means Visual C++, "V" means Vuze, and "vi" or "dub" means Virtualdub.

      I personally don't use Launchy to open Firefox - "f" shows me Filezilla. I have to type "fir" before Firefox even shows in Launchy's list, but once I've done that once, it then shows up in the list when I type "fi". If I then launch that, it will show up in the list when I type just "f", and after that it becomes the first choice for "f". But I don't want that, so I just type "f", select Filezilla before pressing enter, and I'm back to how I like it.

      Launchy's also a lot quicker than the Start Menu - on my machine anyway - because it's not trying to search through my Messenger conversations or stuff like that (or, potentially embarrassingly as I have just discovered, my recently opened files!)

      Launchy is also, thanks to its plugin support, a very convenient calculator.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Well... by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I agree Windows without the ability to run Windows programs is fucking POINTLESS what's sad is everybody getting their panties in a wad about "ZOMFG WinRT won't be able to download anywhere but the appstore....just like Apple, which everybody camps out around the block to buy ZOMFG!" oh the irony is thick and juicy when it comes to everyone having a fit over THAT.

      What I wanna ask this guy is "Where the FUCK were you man when Apple was pulling the very same shit? I was pointing out it was a walled garden and sucked ass and wouldn't have their products for free because of it, where are YOUR complaints and pledges not to buy Apple Notch?"

      Double standards are double standards and this is NO different than what Apple does, and considering that pretty much the entire Ballmer tenure as head of MSFT has been to see what Apple does and then copy it poorly (Zune,Kin,Sidekick) is this REALLY surprising that they would ape the living shit out of Apple? After all Apple is the biggest company in the world, people just throw money at them and their appstore, why shouldn't MSFT ape somebody that makes money?

      If you don't like the MSFT appstore please, join with me in not buying anything WinRT. But at least have the honor and decency of not being a hypocrite and boycott all Apple products that likewise use a locked down appstore as well. I hereby pledge that I Hairyfeet will NEVER own a WinPhone, WinTab,iPhone, or iPad. Not if you were to give it to me , not if I can buy one and get one free, I will not take them on a boat, I will not take them with a goat, I will not take appstores in a can, I will NOT take them Sam I am!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:Well... by Waccoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because you can hack around a policy doesn't mean that policy should be widely accepted. I don't want my support status, or even legal status, reduced to blind luck.

      You can crack a game to get it to run properly and hardly anyone will know, but if a business starts getting in involved with hacks and tricks just to get their damn software to function, they could be staring into a potential lawsuit... provided they're unlucky enough to get caught.

      I get really pissed when people say walled gardens aren't a big deal because it's wicked easy to get around them. Of course they're a big deal... to certain types of people. Some people are unlucky enough to get slapped with million dollar lawsuits because they got caught downloading a file. If 99.9% of people don't get caught, does that mean it's not a big deal if that small percentage practically have their lives destroyed by chance? Will the majority still stick up for the rights of the minority, or is it every person for himself?

      How to get around the policy is not the problem. The policy is the problem, and people certainly should be more vocal about it.

  2. You would think by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That Ballmer would understand that a large portion of windows past success was due in part to the fact that software for the system was available anywhere. Now upon porting to a new platform, he wants to emulate apples walled garden, which only worked because of vendor lock in and the desirbility of the device. It won't work. Android is proving that an open market gains more market share. With at least 3 other options (iOS, Android, and regular windows), users will likely stick with those platforms unless tricked or forced, and MS doesnt have the power in the mobile market to force.
    So now there are at least 2 aspects of Win8 that should fail, the interface, and the locked down ARM version
    Disclaimer: Sent from android phone.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:You would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm an indie game developer. I'll compile and test on Win XP, Vista, Win7 (besides Mac, Linux & Android -- hell, I've got an experimental BSD branch), but I am boycotting Windows 8, including the x86 version expressly because of the ARM version.

      I'd rather only release on Android and other Linux boxen (and go back to construction laborer part time) than encourage anyone, especially MS, that a locked down operating system is OK. (Note: iOS isn't up there -- It's dead to me)

    2. Re:You would think by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This, 100 times this.
      Regardles of what gui you perfer or if you think Linux is a pile of crap or amazing, the main reason to use windows is because it has all the software and an OS is primarilly just a tool to run software.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:You would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Great less competition!

      As an indie developer, Windows 8's app store is a boon.

    4. Re:You would think by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm an indie game developer. I am boycotting Windows 8, including the x86 version expressly because of the ARM version.

      iOS isn't up there -- It's dead to me.

      I'll be blunt here and say that this isn't how the professional developer --- the for-profit enterprise --- looks at their potential markets.

      The Linux developer who touts the convenience and safety of his distro's repository isn't in a position to complain when other operating systems move in the same direction.

      The trusted OS-branded app store has become the norm in mobile.

      The geek may side-load from other sources, but you are not going to pay the light bill and the rent serving that crowd. The numbers just aren't there.

    5. Re:You would think by MattJD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Linux developer who touts the convenience and safety of his distro's repository isn't in a position to complain when other operating systems move in the same direction.

      I have absolutely no problem with app stores having a curated listing of items. Its when that stores is the only method I can get software I have an issue. That's why I don't mind Google's Play Store (for apps), while its the default on my phone I can easily enable side-loading of apps on to it.

      And that's exactly how my Linux distro's work as well ...

  3. Re:Shut up Notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Notch developed most of the game by himself in the beginning. Then when he started hiring people Jeb eventually took over development and Notch doesn't do any code for minecraft anymore. So yes, he did develop the main base game by himself, but anything that's happened in the past year(?) has been all Jeb and the other developers.

    Also I'd say it's more the press taking his tweets and blowing them up rather than him being some kind of PR supergod, almost every single one of his tweets ends up on some news site somewhere, even the inane ones. What's he supposed to do about that, stop tweeting altogether?

    Not to mention he's just saying what we're all thinking. ;)

  4. Re:Shut up Notch by ClaraBow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regardless of the fact that he may be whoring for attention, he does make a valid point. How are you going to explain to consumers that Windows RT and Windows x86 aren't' the same when they are being marketed under the same brand? It's going to be very confusing.

  5. At the end of the day... by gravyface · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft Windows native/legacy applications -- a massive massive software ecosystem unparalleled by any other OS/platform (besides the Web perhaps?) -- is the reason why they can never turn their backs on it. Its the key to their power, but with power comes a great responsibilit^H^H^H burden.

    They will try, but at the end of the day, the Microsoft walled garden will always have the gate left open.

    --
    body massage!
  6. WinRT is dead in the water by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say Microsoft shot itself in the foot here, not by enacting the walled garden (which is bad), but by not releasing a compat layer to run WinRT executables on earlier versions of i386/amd64 Windows.

    No one is really going to port stuff just for porting sake, and the API is quite different, with no obvious upsides. As for users, there are three groups:
    * Windows Phone 8: laughed at, and without software it's a chicken-and-egg problem
    * Windows 8 for business: no sane business is going to migrate for 5 or so years
    * Windows 8 for home users: they don't upgrade for the (non-existing) coolness factor but by getting Windows with replacement hardware

    Thus, the only real way to get actual users for WinRT software in the short term would be making it possible to run it on Windows 7 (and if they really cared, even XP). With no users, there will be no serious developers.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:WinRT is dead in the water by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "the API is quite different, with no obvious upsides". Or not:

      obvious upsides to dropping some backward compatibility:
      - less OS bloat
      - faster OS
      - more battery life
      - fewer security holes
      - no significant loss of features aside from backward compatibility itself

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    2. Re:WinRT is dead in the water by bertok · · Score: 5, Informative

      no significant loss of features aside from backward compatibility itself

      That's a common misconception perpetuated by clever marketing, but it's flat out wrong.

      Metro/WinRT is not Win32 modernized, instead it is Silverlight 6 Tablet Edition.

      It's severely sandboxed, even more in some ways than Silverlight 5 was, which means that really important things that a lot of common applications require just Don't Work At All, and can't be made to work unless Microsoft relents and releases Windows 9 with a newer, more permissive API.

      To give you an idea of just how restricted Metro/WinRT apps are, they're prevented from communicating with Desktop apps and traditional local services. That means that there's no shared memory, no named pipes, no Windows event passing, not even "localhost" sockets! Really major things can't be done, like runtime code generation (JIT), which directly impacts applications like Firefox and Chrome. Statically compiling Java code may work for some apps, but not if dynamic class loading is required.

      Put yourself in the shoes of an Enterprise developer: Message Queues? Missing. LDAP? Nope. Background services? Blocked. Oracle client? Hah! Local database? Can't connect. Group Policy? Unavailable. PowerShell Integration? Desktop only.

      Try this from a games developer's perspective: OpenCL? No JIT. PhysX? Can't talk to the driver. OpenGL? Over Ballmer's dead body.

  7. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by Wattos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please explain how Android has a walled garden? Last time I checked I can install applications without using google play/market

  8. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple has a walled garden.

    Yes.

    Android does too.

    No

    Microsoft has a walled garden, but if you have an x86 tablet, you can plant petunias and begonias

    WTF?

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  9. Re:Transformer Infinity looks better and better by ZosX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have the Transformer Tablet with keyboard and, while yes it is very, very useful it really still isn't a general purpose computing device. You can run linux on it in a chroot, but that only gives you X over VNC. Its possible to evetually dual boot it since it boots linux already anyways. People have been doing this one the prime. In that context it is actually fairly impressive and had 3d acceleration...though I don't think sound works yet. From the videos I've seen it performs much like a netbook running linux. Like a 2nd generation netbook. Most of the apps for android are optimized for phones, so that is a downside. There aren't a huge number of productivity apps for android on tablets. There are some nice apps though. Honestly I use this more than my notebook now. The screen has the same resolution roughly and is smaller so it looks better. For internet communication and web browsing this thing is pretty awesome. Also I am photographer and I can just plug in an external usb powered mini drive and dump my sd cards straight to the drive pretty quickly. Ghost commander works well as a file manager too. I have the bootloader unlocked and I'm running the hydro jellybean rom atm. Its still a little buggy and the i/o is awful right now, but its still a very fast and usable tablet. Some of the games rock too.

  10. Why is there an official Minecraft for iOS? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he isn't just trolling about Windows, and instead does want to make a point about the "value of being able to install your own software", why is there an official Minecraft client for iOS?

    Did he suddenly grow a pair because it's Microsoft?

    Or is he just more likely to take a stand using a platform which isn't likely to lose him any money if he stays away from it because of his views?

    I'm going to go with the last one...

    1. Re:Why is there an official Minecraft for iOS? by SilenceBE · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only way to distribute Metro apps (x86 or ARM) is via the Windows store. "Side loading" (with is just a funky name for installing Metro apps outside the windows store) is only available for Windows enterprise and server editions. See http://richfrombechtle.wordpress.com/tag/windows-8-sideloading/ or google for "sideloading windows 8"

      I don't know you guys that are talking about tablets got the memo that Windows 8 also (unfortunately) runs on the desktop.

      This is a path that goes a lot further then Apple as I'm still able to install software freely on my Apple desktop. With Windows also, but not the new Metro apps they are trying to push or I should run the enterprise version.

  11. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by gravyface · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slashdot needs an edit feature. You're right. My bad. Had a different train of thought originally.

    --
    body massage!
  12. Re:Shut up Notch by arkhan_jg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to mention that he quite happily did minecraft pocket edition for the ipad, an ARM ecosystem that is just as restrictive as the Microsoft app store on windows RT.

    No hypocrisy there, no siree.

    Consumers went 'ohhh, walled garden, totally restricted to one vendor, apple decides what apps I'm allowed to install, awesome' and bought the things by the utter truckload.

    The most common complaint about android is that Google doesn't exercise ENOUGH control over the OEMs to prevent fragmentation

    Is it any surprise that Microsoft went 'seriously? A walled garden where we get to cream a big slice of profit on every bit of software is what customers want? Alrighty then!'

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  13. Re:Shut up Notch by epiphani · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously? He made two comments on twitter, of which he's an active user, and the media picked it up. I don't quite see how that's trolling for attention.

    You, on the other hand, seem to be doing quite well at it.

    --
    .
  14. Patent Infringement by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, I thought Apple held the patent on locking users into an app store? They should sue MicroSoft for patent infringement.

  15. Re:Shut up Notch by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what's your point? no secret that the failed game Infiniminer (discontinued commercially after one month in marketplace) inspired Notch to write MINECRAFT. So Notch made the winning sandbox game, and you bring up a loser. so what?

  16. Re:Shut up Notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow. You literally just claimed both that Notch did not create Minecraft, and that Windows RT on ARM will not be locked down to the Microsoft store!

    Care to prove either of those claims? Even just a teeny bit?

    And whoever modded your lies as insightful should be ashamed.

  17. He's griping about Windows 8 by gravyface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... and the impending death of Windows/PC as an open, general-computing platform by the hands of Microsoft. He didn't mention tablets once in his tweets.

    --
    body massage!
  18. Re:Shut up Notch by bluescrn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were earning millions and millions, would you want to give 30%+ away to MS or Valve, for very little beyond a billing system and content hosting?

    Not really greed, just good business sense, IMHO.

  19. Do two tweets define a straight line? by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he isn't just trolling about Windows, and instead does want to make a point about the "value of being able to install your own software", why is there an official Minecraft client for iOS?

    That did occur to me - but bear in mind that TFA consists of two tweets from Notch followed by an awful lot of extrapolation by HotHardware.com. His tweets don't mention ARM at all, just not wanting Microsoft to 'ruin the PC as an open platform'.

    I think the problem occures if you see devices like tablets, phones and consoles as 'media consumption' appliances rather than general purpose computers. It's no big deal if they are closed systems (consoles have been that way for years).

    The forthcoming ARM-based Windows machines may well be marketed as general purpose laptops and SFF computers.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  20. Notch/Slashdot misunderstanding? by strejf · · Score: 3, Informative

    So Rafael Rivera made a blog post about this, claiming that Notch might have misunderstood why Microsoft contacted him. According to him all they asked Notch to do was to certify Minecraft so that it could be listed in the Windows 8 Store. Listed as in only displaying a link to www.minecraft.net. Nothing more, no app hosted by Microsoft or anything. Not converting Minecraft to an Metroapp. Just a link. I guess we don't know until Notch clears this up, but if it is true then this news article is wrong and most comments are wrong as well. http://www.withinwindows.com/2012/09/28/notch-doesnt-hate-windows-8-hes-just-confused/

  21. Re:Shut up Notch by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You do realize the Surface and Surface Pro are rather similar from the outside? Plus, I have to say the name doesn't make me think "those are two entirely different products running on two entirely different platforms" like, say, iPad and MacBook do.

  22. Re:Shut up Notch by romiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Valve does not prevent a developer from distributing games through any other mean, and there is no lack of concurrence in the Digital Game Delivery market. Self-publication is very cheap, and platforms like Steam are intended for developers that are ready to invest money to respect Valve's conditions, in exchange for an improved revenue through a better exposition to gamers that are used to buy their games.

    This is quite different from the current Microsoft and Apple tactics of using their power as an OS provider to extract a "gatekeeper tax" on all programs sold for their platform.