Slashdot Mirror


Notch Won't Certify Minecraft For Windows 8

MojoKid writes "The backlash against Windows 8 from various developers continues, but this time a game's creator isn't just expressing discontent. Notch, the developer behind smash hit Minecraft, has declared that he won't be working with Microsoft to certify Minecraft for Windows 8. Note that this doesn't mean Minecraft won't run on Windows 8. The certification process in question is Microsoft's mandatory rules for submitting content to the Windows game store. In order to be listed there, an application must be Metro-compatible and conform to a laundry list of other conditions. The real problem with Windows 8 is that it locks ARM users into a second class experience. If you buy an x86 tablet, you can download programs from SourceForge, GitHub, or any file mirror. If you're an ARM user, you can download programs from the Microsoft store and that's it. The bifurcated permission structure is the problem, and it makes WinRT tablets categorically impossible to recommend for anyone who values the ability to install whatever software they please."

64 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by p0p0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Windows being Windows, I don't forsee any real future issues with getting your own apps on the ARM version. Just the nature of Windows will probably make it much easier to work around, and if the userbase grows enough it will move along that much faster. Microsoft is trying the walled garden technique the Apple has going, but I don't foresee it being as effective or foolproof as Apple's.

    Sometimes I feel like Microsoft si kind of flopping around like a fish on land when it comes to tablets. Even though they technically had a headstart, they've only just started their move to tablets and it feels rushed. The current release cycle of good > bad > good > bad will most likely continue and Windows 8 will flop. At least I hope it does and it will force them to rethink their stupid Start menu removal, amongst other things.

    1. Re:Well... by ravenknight · · Score: 2

      At least I hope it does and it will force them to rethink their stupid Start menu removal, amongst other things.

      Yes, I agree that It's a bit pissy of microsoft to drop the friggin start menu after all these years without any kind of transition period -- or with anything that has an ounce of useability in it.

      There is a 3rd party program that adds the start menu back to the taskbar, http://www.stardock.com/products/start8/

      Just a happy user (note: it's a tad buggy when it comes to opening files from jump lists, but I hear that might be fixed internally).

    2. Re:Well... by arisvega · · Score: 2

      Microsoft is trying the walled garden technique the Apple has going, but I don't foresee it being as effective or foolproof as Apple's.

      That. I like it when I read a story's description, go to the comments, and the first post is almost exactly what I had in mind: that's the insightful Slashdot I enjoy.

      So this is what I believe this news is about: Microsoft wanting in on some of that Apple-flavoured enchantment of which the necessary ingredient is simultaneous control (or at least influence during the making of) on both software and hardware. I believe Notch is merely a catalyst here (albeit a potent one), since Minecraft's enormous success with essentially zero advertizing through mainstream channels, the innovative way Mojang is run and his 33 years of age has made him one of the most closely monitored players in the field.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    3. Re:Well... by JanneM · · Score: 2

      "I don't forsee any real future issues with getting your own apps on the ARM version. "

      Why would a developer bother with an ARM version, though? With all the restrictions and the high likelihood that most users will be on X86, it doesn't look like a good way to spend your resources.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Well... by Threni · · Score: 2

      > since Minecraft's enormous success with essentially zero advertizing through mainstream channels, the
      > innovative way Mojang is run and his 33 years of age has made him one of the most closely monitored players
      > in the field.

      No, it's just the success of the game that matters. If it had been as successful bu thad advertising, was run differently and the guy was older/younger and there'd be no difference. If the game had bombed then all that other stuff wouldn't have made it any more interesting.

    5. Re:Well... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't type "shop" into the Windows 7 Start Menu and have it open Photoshop, although it does manage to offer me "Microsoft Visual C++ Express 2010" when I type "vi" in the hope of running Virtualdub. Having selected Virtualdub, it still puts VC++ at the top of the list next time I type "vi". Launchy, on the other hand, has already learned that "VC" means Visual C++, "V" means Vuze, and "vi" or "dub" means Virtualdub.

      I personally don't use Launchy to open Firefox - "f" shows me Filezilla. I have to type "fir" before Firefox even shows in Launchy's list, but once I've done that once, it then shows up in the list when I type "fi". If I then launch that, it will show up in the list when I type just "f", and after that it becomes the first choice for "f". But I don't want that, so I just type "f", select Filezilla before pressing enter, and I'm back to how I like it.

      Launchy's also a lot quicker than the Start Menu - on my machine anyway - because it's not trying to search through my Messenger conversations or stuff like that (or, potentially embarrassingly as I have just discovered, my recently opened files!)

      Launchy is also, thanks to its plugin support, a very convenient calculator.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:Well... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      There might be far more consumers with the ARM version as it is cheaper. Businesses may get the x86 version for compatibility but some apps like games are bought by more consumers.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    7. Re:Well... by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I agree Windows without the ability to run Windows programs is fucking POINTLESS what's sad is everybody getting their panties in a wad about "ZOMFG WinRT won't be able to download anywhere but the appstore....just like Apple, which everybody camps out around the block to buy ZOMFG!" oh the irony is thick and juicy when it comes to everyone having a fit over THAT.

      What I wanna ask this guy is "Where the FUCK were you man when Apple was pulling the very same shit? I was pointing out it was a walled garden and sucked ass and wouldn't have their products for free because of it, where are YOUR complaints and pledges not to buy Apple Notch?"

      Double standards are double standards and this is NO different than what Apple does, and considering that pretty much the entire Ballmer tenure as head of MSFT has been to see what Apple does and then copy it poorly (Zune,Kin,Sidekick) is this REALLY surprising that they would ape the living shit out of Apple? After all Apple is the biggest company in the world, people just throw money at them and their appstore, why shouldn't MSFT ape somebody that makes money?

      If you don't like the MSFT appstore please, join with me in not buying anything WinRT. But at least have the honor and decency of not being a hypocrite and boycott all Apple products that likewise use a locked down appstore as well. I hereby pledge that I Hairyfeet will NEVER own a WinPhone, WinTab,iPhone, or iPad. Not if you were to give it to me , not if I can buy one and get one free, I will not take them on a boat, I will not take them with a goat, I will not take appstores in a can, I will NOT take them Sam I am!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Well... by Waccoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because you can hack around a policy doesn't mean that policy should be widely accepted. I don't want my support status, or even legal status, reduced to blind luck.

      You can crack a game to get it to run properly and hardly anyone will know, but if a business starts getting in involved with hacks and tricks just to get their damn software to function, they could be staring into a potential lawsuit... provided they're unlucky enough to get caught.

      I get really pissed when people say walled gardens aren't a big deal because it's wicked easy to get around them. Of course they're a big deal... to certain types of people. Some people are unlucky enough to get slapped with million dollar lawsuits because they got caught downloading a file. If 99.9% of people don't get caught, does that mean it's not a big deal if that small percentage practically have their lives destroyed by chance? Will the majority still stick up for the rights of the minority, or is it every person for himself?

      How to get around the policy is not the problem. The policy is the problem, and people certainly should be more vocal about it.

    9. Re:Well... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Exactly I didn't hear Notch say a fucking peep, not a single peep, about Minecraft on iOS, even though it is EXACTLY THE SAME as what MSFT is doing with WinRT.

      I may hate appstores and walled gardens but 1 thing I hate 1000 times worse is a damned hypocrite and that is EXACTLY what Notch is. He doesn't have the balls to say boo to Apple for fear of losing his iChecks yet he'll scream about the WinRT appstore. Notch you are a hypocrite and an asshole, please go fuck off now.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. You would think by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That Ballmer would understand that a large portion of windows past success was due in part to the fact that software for the system was available anywhere. Now upon porting to a new platform, he wants to emulate apples walled garden, which only worked because of vendor lock in and the desirbility of the device. It won't work. Android is proving that an open market gains more market share. With at least 3 other options (iOS, Android, and regular windows), users will likely stick with those platforms unless tricked or forced, and MS doesnt have the power in the mobile market to force.
    So now there are at least 2 aspects of Win8 that should fail, the interface, and the locked down ARM version
    Disclaimer: Sent from android phone.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:You would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm an indie game developer. I'll compile and test on Win XP, Vista, Win7 (besides Mac, Linux & Android -- hell, I've got an experimental BSD branch), but I am boycotting Windows 8, including the x86 version expressly because of the ARM version.

      I'd rather only release on Android and other Linux boxen (and go back to construction laborer part time) than encourage anyone, especially MS, that a locked down operating system is OK. (Note: iOS isn't up there -- It's dead to me)

    2. Re:You would think by wisnoskij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This, 100 times this.
      Regardles of what gui you perfer or if you think Linux is a pile of crap or amazing, the main reason to use windows is because it has all the software and an OS is primarilly just a tool to run software.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:You would think by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Yes, Microsoft seems to forget that they absolutely destroyed Apple in the 90s... and that's because of the features Windows shared with Linux, not the features it shared with Apple. They are going in the exact wrong direction and will lose out big time. It's funny that it seems like the entire world knows what Microsoft should do, and yet Microsoft seems hell bent on not doing it.

    4. Re:You would think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Great less competition!

      As an indie developer, Windows 8's app store is a boon.

    5. Re:You would think by westlake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm an indie game developer. I am boycotting Windows 8, including the x86 version expressly because of the ARM version.

      iOS isn't up there -- It's dead to me.

      I'll be blunt here and say that this isn't how the professional developer --- the for-profit enterprise --- looks at their potential markets.

      The Linux developer who touts the convenience and safety of his distro's repository isn't in a position to complain when other operating systems move in the same direction.

      The trusted OS-branded app store has become the norm in mobile.

      The geek may side-load from other sources, but you are not going to pay the light bill and the rent serving that crowd. The numbers just aren't there.

    6. Re:You would think by MattJD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Linux developer who touts the convenience and safety of his distro's repository isn't in a position to complain when other operating systems move in the same direction.

      I have absolutely no problem with app stores having a curated listing of items. Its when that stores is the only method I can get software I have an issue. That's why I don't mind Google's Play Store (for apps), while its the default on my phone I can easily enable side-loading of apps on to it.

      And that's exactly how my Linux distro's work as well ...

    7. Re:You would think by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Windows was never a big money maker in the home market and, objectively, was never very successful.

      Yikes, I have to disagree with you there. They got a piece of nearly every PC sold over 20 years. Every single PC. The home PC market is large enough that this has been a stunning amount of money. It's been successful enough that I can say "Every home in the US has a Windows machine" and only be off by single-digit percentage numbers. The only reason they aren't still lighting cigars with hundred dollar bills is simply that the PC market stopped growing.

      I mostly agree with the rest of your post.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:You would think by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      There are actually ways to sideload apps on Win8, they're just not as straightforward and prominent as "Allow other app sources" checkbox on Android.

      See, Win8 is somewhat different from iOS/Android in that to write apps for it, you have to run your developer tools on it - at least for the time being. Which in turn means that there has to be a way to deploy and run a freshly compiled app when you're developing one. And sure it is - the OS will let you do just that when you have a developer license activated on that machine.

      The good part is that Win8 developer licenses are free (there is also license to publish to the Store which isn't free, but it's separate). Furthermore, you don't need any developer tools to obtain one - the command line tool that does it ships with the OS.

      The bad part is that it's an online activation scheme, so it phones home when you ask for it. The worse part is that it expires after a while (seems to be a month for most people), at which point you have to renew it to re-enable the ability to run all those apps. It's still free, but it's certainly not very convenient.

    9. Re:You would think by westlake · · Score: 2

      And that's exactly how my Linux distro's work as well ...

      If a program isn't packaged for your distribution, how easy will be for anyone but the true blue Linux geek to install it --- or even to discover that it exists?

      Ubuntu developers set as a goal:

      "...there should be one obvious mechanism for installing, removing, and updating software in Ubuntu, with a self-evident name and an interface anyone can use. There should be a coordinated system for developers and enthusiasts to improve the usefulness of descriptions and other metadata for software packages. The software updates interface should be honed to maximize the voluntary installation of updates across the millions of computers on which Ubuntu is installed. And projects and vendors whose software is packaged for Ubuntu should be encouraged to provide links to their software's presence in the Software Store, instead of command-line installation instructions.

      Ubuntu Software Center

      This reads equally well as a mission statement for the the Kindle, Android smartphone, Win 8 tablet, and the iOS mobile device.

      It is only a half-step away from an admission that the "obvious" mechanism --- the increasingly familiar, easy to use and trusted app store --- is about to become the most significant --- perhaps the only significant --- distribution channel for computer software and services.

  3. certification = protection racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    nice software you have, shame if something was to happen to it (like scary warning dialogs)

    how anti-trust regulators are not all over this is a mystery

  4. Re:Transformer Infinity looks better and better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keep Ballmer. He makes software news funny.

  5. How is this different than any other tablet? by gravyface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple has a walled garden. That's it. Android does too. Microsoft has a walled garden, but if you have an x86 tablet, you can plant petunias and begonias if you want in there. That seems like an improvement to me. And it's likely a technical reason too: all those Windows-native calls/hooks that your typical Windows-compatible applications require likely do not exist on the ARM version of Windows 8 (I'm not a Windows programmer/guru, so I'm speculating here, but seems likely no?).

    --
    body massage!
    1. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by Wattos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please explain how Android has a walled garden? Last time I checked I can install applications without using google play/market

    2. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apple has a walled garden.

      Yes.

      Android does too.

      No

      Microsoft has a walled garden, but if you have an x86 tablet, you can plant petunias and begonias

      WTF?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    3. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by gravyface · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slashdot needs an edit feature. You're right. My bad. Had a different train of thought originally.

      --
      body massage!
    4. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by Blymie · · Score: 2

      OK, that's it.

      If you people want to win the PR war, stop using the enemy's PR terms!

      It isn't a walled garden. NO WAY.

      That implies something wonderful and pleasant and beautiful and...

      Walled garden? Nope, it is a JAIL. Designed so you CAN NOT escape, and your free will is negated.

      Stop using their PR terms!

      (note: Wattos.. you just happened to be the dude I replied to. Nothing personal, everyone seems to be using the enemy's PR terms)

    5. Re:How is this different than any other tablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're talking about "sideloading" Metro apps, you can only do that in the Enterprise version.

  6. Re:Shut up Notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Notch developed most of the game by himself in the beginning. Then when he started hiring people Jeb eventually took over development and Notch doesn't do any code for minecraft anymore. So yes, he did develop the main base game by himself, but anything that's happened in the past year(?) has been all Jeb and the other developers.

    Also I'd say it's more the press taking his tweets and blowing them up rather than him being some kind of PR supergod, almost every single one of his tweets ends up on some news site somewhere, even the inane ones. What's he supposed to do about that, stop tweeting altogether?

    Not to mention he's just saying what we're all thinking. ;)

  7. Re:Shut up Notch by ClaraBow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regardless of the fact that he may be whoring for attention, he does make a valid point. How are you going to explain to consumers that Windows RT and Windows x86 aren't' the same when they are being marketed under the same brand? It's going to be very confusing.

  8. At the end of the day... by gravyface · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft Windows native/legacy applications -- a massive massive software ecosystem unparalleled by any other OS/platform (besides the Web perhaps?) -- is the reason why they can never turn their backs on it. Its the key to their power, but with power comes a great responsibilit^H^H^H burden.

    They will try, but at the end of the day, the Microsoft walled garden will always have the gate left open.

    --
    body massage!
  9. WinRT is dead in the water by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say Microsoft shot itself in the foot here, not by enacting the walled garden (which is bad), but by not releasing a compat layer to run WinRT executables on earlier versions of i386/amd64 Windows.

    No one is really going to port stuff just for porting sake, and the API is quite different, with no obvious upsides. As for users, there are three groups:
    * Windows Phone 8: laughed at, and without software it's a chicken-and-egg problem
    * Windows 8 for business: no sane business is going to migrate for 5 or so years
    * Windows 8 for home users: they don't upgrade for the (non-existing) coolness factor but by getting Windows with replacement hardware

    Thus, the only real way to get actual users for WinRT software in the short term would be making it possible to run it on Windows 7 (and if they really cared, even XP). With no users, there will be no serious developers.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:WinRT is dead in the water by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "the API is quite different, with no obvious upsides". Or not:

      obvious upsides to dropping some backward compatibility:
      - less OS bloat
      - faster OS
      - more battery life
      - fewer security holes
      - no significant loss of features aside from backward compatibility itself

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    2. Re:WinRT is dead in the water by bertok · · Score: 5, Informative

      no significant loss of features aside from backward compatibility itself

      That's a common misconception perpetuated by clever marketing, but it's flat out wrong.

      Metro/WinRT is not Win32 modernized, instead it is Silverlight 6 Tablet Edition.

      It's severely sandboxed, even more in some ways than Silverlight 5 was, which means that really important things that a lot of common applications require just Don't Work At All, and can't be made to work unless Microsoft relents and releases Windows 9 with a newer, more permissive API.

      To give you an idea of just how restricted Metro/WinRT apps are, they're prevented from communicating with Desktop apps and traditional local services. That means that there's no shared memory, no named pipes, no Windows event passing, not even "localhost" sockets! Really major things can't be done, like runtime code generation (JIT), which directly impacts applications like Firefox and Chrome. Statically compiling Java code may work for some apps, but not if dynamic class loading is required.

      Put yourself in the shoes of an Enterprise developer: Message Queues? Missing. LDAP? Nope. Background services? Blocked. Oracle client? Hah! Local database? Can't connect. Group Policy? Unavailable. PowerShell Integration? Desktop only.

      Try this from a games developer's perspective: OpenCL? No JIT. PhysX? Can't talk to the driver. OpenGL? Over Ballmer's dead body.

    3. Re:WinRT is dead in the water by tepples · · Score: 2

      Try this from a games developer's perspective: OpenCL? No JIT. PhysX? Can't talk to the driver. OpenGL? Over Ballmer's dead body.

      But how is the situation on Windows RT devices worse than that on the Xbox 360?

  10. Re:Transformer Infinity looks better and better by ZosX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have the Transformer Tablet with keyboard and, while yes it is very, very useful it really still isn't a general purpose computing device. You can run linux on it in a chroot, but that only gives you X over VNC. Its possible to evetually dual boot it since it boots linux already anyways. People have been doing this one the prime. In that context it is actually fairly impressive and had 3d acceleration...though I don't think sound works yet. From the videos I've seen it performs much like a netbook running linux. Like a 2nd generation netbook. Most of the apps for android are optimized for phones, so that is a downside. There aren't a huge number of productivity apps for android on tablets. There are some nice apps though. Honestly I use this more than my notebook now. The screen has the same resolution roughly and is smaller so it looks better. For internet communication and web browsing this thing is pretty awesome. Also I am photographer and I can just plug in an external usb powered mini drive and dump my sd cards straight to the drive pretty quickly. Ghost commander works well as a file manager too. I have the bootloader unlocked and I'm running the hydro jellybean rom atm. Its still a little buggy and the i/o is awful right now, but its still a very fast and usable tablet. Some of the games rock too.

  11. Why is there an official Minecraft for iOS? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he isn't just trolling about Windows, and instead does want to make a point about the "value of being able to install your own software", why is there an official Minecraft client for iOS?

    Did he suddenly grow a pair because it's Microsoft?

    Or is he just more likely to take a stand using a platform which isn't likely to lose him any money if he stays away from it because of his views?

    I'm going to go with the last one...

    1. Re:Why is there an official Minecraft for iOS? by SilenceBE · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only way to distribute Metro apps (x86 or ARM) is via the Windows store. "Side loading" (with is just a funky name for installing Metro apps outside the windows store) is only available for Windows enterprise and server editions. See http://richfrombechtle.wordpress.com/tag/windows-8-sideloading/ or google for "sideloading windows 8"

      I don't know you guys that are talking about tablets got the memo that Windows 8 also (unfortunately) runs on the desktop.

      This is a path that goes a lot further then Apple as I'm still able to install software freely on my Apple desktop. With Windows also, but not the new Metro apps they are trying to push or I should run the enterprise version.

  12. Re:Shut up Notch by obarthelemy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    steam is far from being the anti MS. they both, like apple, want to lock their users into never really owning content, having to go though them to do anything with what they bought... Apple is wildly successful at it, Steam quite successfful, and MS not yet in the consumer space.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  13. Re:Shut up Notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    So yes, he did develop the main base game by himself

    INFINIMINER EXISTED
    Just thought you should know that... Educate yourself. That's all I have to say to you.

  14. Re:Shut up Notch by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That and I highly doubt this has anything to do with problems with the Windows 8 platform and much more to do with the fact that Minecraft is written in Java, and therefore would have to be ported to "something else" in order to meet the game store requirements.

    Of course, astute Minecraft fans would know that the game already has been ported to "something else" multiple times in order to make the Xbox 360 and iOS releases. So presumably, if Notch didn't want to be an ass, he could just make the Xbox 360 version the "official" version and port that back to Windows and - presto, he'd have a Windows 8 game store capable version, right there.

    But that would involve not being a drama whore. And would probably improve the game experience by not requiring his users to install a giant security hole just to play the game.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  15. Re:Shut up Notch by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 2

    Notch has made at least 17 games in addition to Minecraft.

    Funny Farm, Luxor, Carnival Shootout, MEG4kMAN, Left 4k Dead, t4kns, Miners4k, Hunters4k, Dungeon4k, Sonic Racer 4k, Dachon4k, l4krits, Blast Passage, Bunny Press, Breaking the Tower, Infinite Mario Bros, Minicraft.

    --
    +0 Meh
  16. Re:Shut up Notch by arkhan_jg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to mention that he quite happily did minecraft pocket edition for the ipad, an ARM ecosystem that is just as restrictive as the Microsoft app store on windows RT.

    No hypocrisy there, no siree.

    Consumers went 'ohhh, walled garden, totally restricted to one vendor, apple decides what apps I'm allowed to install, awesome' and bought the things by the utter truckload.

    The most common complaint about android is that Google doesn't exercise ENOUGH control over the OEMs to prevent fragmentation

    Is it any surprise that Microsoft went 'seriously? A walled garden where we get to cream a big slice of profit on every bit of software is what customers want? Alrighty then!'

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  17. Re:Shut up Notch by epiphani · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously? He made two comments on twitter, of which he's an active user, and the media picked it up. I don't quite see how that's trolling for attention.

    You, on the other hand, seem to be doing quite well at it.

    --
    .
  18. Re:Shut up Notch by ClaraBow · · Score: 2

    iOS and OSX look very different and run on different devices, whereas, Windows RT and Windows x86 look exactly the same and will run on identical hardware. Also, there isn't an OSX tablet to compete with an iOS tablet.

  19. Patent Infringement by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, I thought Apple held the patent on locking users into an app store? They should sue MicroSoft for patent infringement.

  20. Re:Shut up Notch by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what's your point? no secret that the failed game Infiniminer (discontinued commercially after one month in marketplace) inspired Notch to write MINECRAFT. So Notch made the winning sandbox game, and you bring up a loser. so what?

  21. Re:Shut up Notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow. You literally just claimed both that Notch did not create Minecraft, and that Windows RT on ARM will not be locked down to the Microsoft store!

    Care to prove either of those claims? Even just a teeny bit?

    And whoever modded your lies as insightful should be ashamed.

  22. He's griping about Windows 8 by gravyface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... and the impending death of Windows/PC as an open, general-computing platform by the hands of Microsoft. He didn't mention tablets once in his tweets.

    --
    body massage!
  23. Re:Shut up Notch by bluescrn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were earning millions and millions, would you want to give 30%+ away to MS or Valve, for very little beyond a billing system and content hosting?

    Not really greed, just good business sense, IMHO.

  24. Re:Shut up Notch by bluescrn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This.

    You can't complain about Apple or MS whilst being a Valve fanboy. Yes, the Steam user experience is great. The developer experience isn't so good (Loads of developers aren't allowed in. Greenlight was a bit of a clusterfuck. And if you get in, it'll cost you a large chunk of your revenue)

    I really wish Valve would split up into two companies... the awesome company that makes amazing games, and the evil company that's just about managed to turn the PC into a closed platform when it comes to gaming. But their stroke of genius was keeping the 'awesome' attached to the 'evil', so no gamer could ever really dislike them!

  25. Another open platform will evolve then. by fireballrus · · Score: 2

    Another reason why this is a good news for ReactOS.

  26. Re:Transformer Infinity looks better and better by fast+turtle · · Score: 2

    Blanket Fail statememt. I have a desktop but am looking at getting a tablet to replace a notebook due to changes in usage. Simply put, I'm spending more and more time in god damn waiting rooms w/o tables or desks and the laptop just isn't as useful anymore while a tablet offers enough functionality to be useable while being smaller. In fact, based on the damn changes in usage, I may even be able to use the tablet to replace most of my desktop functionality while converting it to a home server. It's still useful but...

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  27. Do two tweets define a straight line? by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he isn't just trolling about Windows, and instead does want to make a point about the "value of being able to install your own software", why is there an official Minecraft client for iOS?

    That did occur to me - but bear in mind that TFA consists of two tweets from Notch followed by an awful lot of extrapolation by HotHardware.com. His tweets don't mention ARM at all, just not wanting Microsoft to 'ruin the PC as an open platform'.

    I think the problem occures if you see devices like tablets, phones and consoles as 'media consumption' appliances rather than general purpose computers. It's no big deal if they are closed systems (consoles have been that way for years).

    The forthcoming ARM-based Windows machines may well be marketed as general purpose laptops and SFF computers.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  28. Re:Shut up Notch by gallondr00nk · · Score: 2

    Not to mention that he quite happily did minecraft pocket edition for the ipad, an ARM ecosystem that is just as restrictive as the Microsoft app store on windows RT.

    No hypocrisy there, no siree.

    That's because of money. No such thing as hypocrisy as long as money is involved!

    Its cheap grandstanding and nothing more. MC will work fine on x86 Win8 without certification, and lets be honest, RT is probably going to bomb badly.

    Quite the example of an empty gesture.

  29. Re:Shut up Notch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and if you're Joe Q. Public who doesn't know what that means when they're looking at the price tag at Best Buy?

    YOU know, and I know, but there's a good chance that even otherwise well-informed nerds won't know or recall when they're shopping around. It happens.

  30. Notch/Slashdot misunderstanding? by strejf · · Score: 3, Informative

    So Rafael Rivera made a blog post about this, claiming that Notch might have misunderstood why Microsoft contacted him. According to him all they asked Notch to do was to certify Minecraft so that it could be listed in the Windows 8 Store. Listed as in only displaying a link to www.minecraft.net. Nothing more, no app hosted by Microsoft or anything. Not converting Minecraft to an Metroapp. Just a link. I guess we don't know until Notch clears this up, but if it is true then this news article is wrong and most comments are wrong as well. http://www.withinwindows.com/2012/09/28/notch-doesnt-hate-windows-8-hes-just-confused/

  31. Re:Shut up Notch by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You do realize the Surface and Surface Pro are rather similar from the outside? Plus, I have to say the name doesn't make me think "those are two entirely different products running on two entirely different platforms" like, say, iPad and MacBook do.

  32. and microsoft charges for certification by Dan667 · · Score: 2

    so win8 certification is also just a money making scheme.

  33. Re:Shut up Notch by romiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Valve does not prevent a developer from distributing games through any other mean, and there is no lack of concurrence in the Digital Game Delivery market. Self-publication is very cheap, and platforms like Steam are intended for developers that are ready to invest money to respect Valve's conditions, in exchange for an improved revenue through a better exposition to gamers that are used to buy their games.

    This is quite different from the current Microsoft and Apple tactics of using their power as an OS provider to extract a "gatekeeper tax" on all programs sold for their platform.

  34. Do these waiting rooms have public Wi-Fi? by tepples · · Score: 2

    I'm spending more and more time in god damn waiting rooms w/o tables or desks

    But do these waiting rooms have public Wi-Fi so that you can actually do something on a tablet, or is it locked and the key available to employees only? I have more than enough on my 10" laptop to survive a wait of at least a couple hours with no Internet.

    In fact, based on the damn changes in usage, I may even be able to use the tablet to replace most of my desktop functionality while converting it to a home server.

    So would you get onto the home server whenever you need to do a lot of typing or play games in genres not suited for touch input?

  35. Re:Shut up Notch by tepples · · Score: 2

    Two questions for you:

    First, what did Infiniminer clone? As far as I can tell, it's a 3D version of Motherload, and Motherload is heavily inspired by Boulder Dash.

    Second, should Linus Torvalds and the Free Software Foundation be looked down on for cloning UNIX?

  36. My theory.. by Junta · · Score: 2

    I see two possibliities:
    MS is sufficiently deluded that they genuinely think doubling down on Silverlight based technology while forcing tighter lockin to MS store and services is going to work and lead to rapid obsolecence of their existing software ecosystem without anything of significance lost. This seems to fly against all evidence and reason, but I wouldn't put it past them.

    The other possibility is that WindowsRT isn't *that* serious an endeavor. Enough invested to make it *real* and maybe even take off in the unlikely scenario described above. Not enough to actually enable the large third-party application base that remains MS' sole meaningful advantage nowadays. The hope may be to scare AMD and Intel to worry more and work harder to provide compelling x86 compatible solutions amenable to the same physical form factors that are being popularized in iOS and Android devices. The strongest evidence of this that I can see is how both AMD and Intel have pretty much explicitly come out and said their next big thing in the mobile space is very much designed exclusively for Windows usage. Linux (notably Android) have been de-emphasized by both Intel and AMD for those chips as they go out of their way to endorse Windows 8. This could either be due to pressure/threats from MS but it also might be explained by Intel's relative failure to attract real partnerships in the Android space despite an earnest effort to do so, which would drive both AMD and Intel to realize that they really need microsoft to retain competitive advantage over non-x86 architectures.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  37. Open Platforms by catchblue22 · · Score: 2

    Given the moves towards walled gardens by both MS and Apple, I am making my own moves towards open or more open platforms. Debian laptop. XBMC set-top box with linux. Android phone. Possibly a linux tablet. And I am encouraging the same from those around me. Open computing is too important to lose.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)