Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Hacking Urban Noise?

b1tbkt writes "I live at the corner of one of the busiest intersections in my city (pop. 350k). Although I've replaced all windows, insulated, and caulked every square inch of the place, the fire trucks and cars with obnoxious stereos still regularly intrude on my home office. Most of the noise comes in through the windows. I'm considering mounting an oblong parabolic reflector in the ceiling above the windows with a steady feed of white or brownian noise directed into it (e.g., via a small speaker placed within the reflector) to create a 'wall' of sound that would act as a buffer to the outside world. Active noise cancellation would be nice, too, but that's probably more than I want to take on. I don't see any products on the market for this sort of thing. Does anyone have any experiences to share with similar homebrew noise remediation efforts?"

93 of 474 comments (clear)

  1. Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Quit being a downtown hipster and move to a nice house on a quiet street.

    1. Re:Move by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (plus soundproofing increases the resale value)

      Unfortunately, I've discovered (to my annoyance) that practical home improvements like insulation, thermal windows, high efficiency HVAC and appliances, etc., etc. just don't impress the average buyer nearly as much as painting all the walls beige and replacing the hardware with something in brushed nickel or, my personal bete noire: "oil-rubbed bronze."

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Move by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      You mean the 5 bedroom 6.5 bath house with a 30 gallon electric min code water heater and the 30 gallon min code well tank but a few k in stone counter tops has is priorities wrong?

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  2. How about a shrubbery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the problem is that you've only focused on the building. It's more effective to stop it before it even gets to the building.

  3. George Bernard Shaw by Frankie70 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.

    1. Re:George Bernard Shaw by jhoegl · · Score: 5, Funny

      My adaption to fart mufflers and loud base was a sound detector and a machine gun. If the passing car got too loud, it would track and fire.
      I havent built it yet, but one day...
      I wouldnt shed a tear for these obnoxious people. They disturb hundreds of people daily, so fuck em.

    2. Re:George Bernard Shaw by fredprado · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, although it is generally good to the World to have many people attempting to accomplish highly unlikely deeds, because some of them may prevail, to most of the people in question it is an ungrateful road to pain with no rewards.

    3. Re:George Bernard Shaw by blue_teeth · · Score: 2

      In ancient times, there was a king who wanted a carpet rolled out for him wherever he went.  The cities, the jungles, the villages.  His wiseman advised --- wear velvet slippers.

    4. Re:George Bernard Shaw by joocemann · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've come to accept the loud bass ---- when you were a teen and you enjoyed it in your own car, or your friends' car, you basically asked for it.

      When I hear the loud annoying bass cars go by, I get frustrated, and then I reflect on the youth, including my youth, and I sympathize with their carelessness and then forgive.

      Reflect on your own foolish crap with honesty. You'll understand that you, too, used to piss off a lot of people doing something you thought was fun. And then maybe some tolerance and understanding can help...

    5. Re:George Bernard Shaw by Paracelcus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I lived in slums for the first twenty five years of my life and as a very quiet person (apparently the only one) in uptown Chicago, I had many altercations with assholes who thought that I wanted to listen to their bullshit music at top volume at one AM and later!

      I tried working two jobs to keep me away from it and finally moved into what should have been a quiet bldg, it wasn't down the hall was a drunk named Julio who owned a stereo with an automatic changer, and one 45 RPM record that he looped all night with his door open!

      The landlord, yelling, nothing helped! One night when Julio was passed out (with his door open) I walked in, oped his window and threw his stereo down six stories to the ally below!

      The best part was nobody saw me, and the little shit accused me and made the mistake of attacking me in front of witnesses! Oh joy! He had to move out after he was released from the hospital!

      I HATE noise makers!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    6. Re:George Bernard Shaw by markdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, I *NEVER* played music so loud it could be heard out of my car, nor at home. So forgive me for not forgiving people that annoy the crap out of me with such noise.

    7. Re:George Bernard Shaw by Paracelcus · · Score: 2

      If you actually had to work, night after night, day after day, with NO PEACE! Moving did NOT HELP, talking DID NOT HELP! I had moved for the LAST TIME! The noisy little rat fuck should be praising god that I did not rip him apart like a boiled chicken!

      When you choose to antagonize the 6'4" 250 lb crazy Vietnam vet with your little skinny ass & take a poke at him IN FRONT OF WITNESSES!
      If I had torn him in half it would have been natural selection!

      If you deprive a WORKING MAN of any quality of life you do so AT YOUR OWN RISK!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  4. Heavy drape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have curtains made from the kind of heavy drape they use in studios. Check out how people deal with acoustic treatment in home studio builds. For instance the gearslutz.com "studio building/acoustics" subforum has many threads to geek out on.

  5. It does not have to be far by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to live right on the A10 highway into London. I move about 400 yds away and the traffic noise was a distant hum. I know that for some /. readers 400yds is beyond the pale when it comes to walking but around here parking spaces were like gold dust so people walk to the top of the street and take the bus, another 200yds there was the train station. 5 mins on the bus took you to a Tube Station.
    Many of my neighbours at that time didn't have a car. They didn't need one.

    More fool you for choosing to live where you do.

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    1. Re:It does not have to be far by BenoitRen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      400 yards? More like 365,76 metres.

    2. Re:It does not have to be far by citizenr · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're in London, after all.

      Yes, capital of a country which, except for miles and pints, went metric around 1970.

      Dont know about that, they still count money in pounds.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    3. Re:It does not have to be far by Loosifur · · Score: 3, Funny

      Really, cause I know a guy who tries to make pithy jabs at the US but can't manage to spell "imperial" or "Liberia" correctly.

      Oh, and if you love the TSA so much why don't you marry it, etc.

      --
      This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
  6. Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although there are dozens of vendors selling what sound like promising solutions, there is only one solution that really works: more mass. Think of it as a physics problem.. sound waves energy transmitted through the air that cause parts of the structure (including the structure above and below) and environment (e.g. the air around you) to vibrate at a particular resonance. The only way to stop the noise is to stop the vibration. A popular option is to use double drywall with something like rockwool insulation between the studs. You can get away with either 2 x 1/2" drywall or 2 x 5/8" drywall with a small furring strip in between without sacrificing too much living space. Look into Green Glue as an additional way to dampen vibrations in that setup. You can also go for a detached wall or "room within a room," but that starts to get expensive to do right.

    If you want to look at a "serious" solution ($$$$), you should try to find a sound mitigation contractor in your area. They can survey the room during different times of day and determine what the best solution is for your situation.

    1. Re:Mass by fermion · · Score: 2

      And because the issue appears to be the window, perhaps multipane windows will solve the problem. I have seen this work with friends that live near railroad tracks. This along with acoustic insulation should solve the problem. Of course, is the reason there is so much noise is because the window is open, then nothing is going to solve the problem.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Mass by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 2

      there is only one solution that really works: more mass

      Except that's not a solution that works. I think you mean, more sound dampening material. I could easily build a 12" thick concrete wall that would transmit sound better than a 4" cavity filled with old jeans. One of them has significantly more mass than the other...

    3. Re:Mass by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      Which would be why one particularly effective soundproofing product is called "Mass Loaded Vinyl". It's not the cheapest thing in the world, and it's heavy, but you can probably just drape it over the window like a blackout curtain and have it seal around the frame for a reasonable attenuation.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  7. Wait for rap and hip-hop to fall out of favor by elrous0 · · Score: 3

    It's the bass that really pisses me off. It's like legalized assault on my ears.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Wait for rap and hip-hop to fall out of favor by AmazingRuss · · Score: 2

      Dubstep is replacing them slowly...wub wub wub!

    2. Re:Wait for rap and hip-hop to fall out of favor by Natural+Join · · Score: 2

      Lower sound frequencies penetrate more easily than higher frequencies.

      I've done some studio tests. We built a sound chamber with two foot think CMU walls and ceiling. We embedded speakers with broad frequency response. We pumped 108 dB of pink noise out the speakers, and measured sound outside the chamber. You could just barely tell the sound was on. At higher frequencies, we saw 80 dB of reduction. At 16 Hz, there was *no reduction whatsoever.*

      The good news is that 16 Hz is below what you can hear. But the basic principle is that the lower the frequency, the more sound energy will penetrate a barrier.

  8. More details needed by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    How and what, exactly, have you insulated, and where is your domicile in relation to the street?

    Do you have sound dampening mats on the ceiling? If not, bear in mind that most houses and apartments are above street level, and most of the sound will be reflected off the ceiling. A layer of sound dampening material there should have the largest effect.

    If you live low to the ground, sound insulating the walls that can see the street, rather than just outside walls would have a similar effect.

    A few strategically placed plants or sound dividers - think cubicle walls but far less intrusive - can also help.

    If you must go with a noise generator (which I don't recommend), try pink noise instead of white. The sounds from the street you try to mask out are going to be mostly low frequency, and white noise will mainly add more sound energy in the higher end of the spectrum.

    1. Re:More details needed by BoRegardless · · Score: 2

      Indeed good windows and plants can help, but since it is the low frequencies and they are easier to reflect, a reflecting hard angled flange all around a full window width flower box will help bounce sound waves away before reaching the window. This works best assuming you are living on at least the 2nd floor or better, the 3rd floor.

      If a flower box is not allowed, an angled sheet of clear polycarbonate can be safely anchored and used to deflect low frequency sound waves effectively. You can mock it up with duct tape to try it for minimal cost.

    2. Re:More details needed by davegravy · · Score: 5, Informative

      How and what, exactly, have you insulated, and where is your domicile in relation to the street?

      Do you have sound dampening mats on the ceiling? If not, bear in mind that most houses and apartments are above street level, and most of the sound will be reflected off the ceiling. A layer of sound dampening material there should have the largest effect.

      If you live low to the ground, sound insulating the walls that can see the street, rather than just outside walls would have a similar effect.

      There are two components to the noise intrusion - the direct field and the reverberant field. Adding absorptive finishes to the room will help reduce the reverberant field, which in a best case scenario will buy you 3dB (i.e a barely noticeable improvement). Short improving the isolation (i.e windows and exterior partition construction) there isn't anything you can do about the direct field.

      A few strategically placed plants or sound dividers - think cubicle walls but far less intrusive - can also help.

      Massive barriers can help in outdoor noise propagation scenarios. In this type of situation, the outdoor noise is impacting the exterior facade, causing it to vibrate, and is re-radiating sound in the interior of the OP's space. This means that the source of sound is a large area, not a point source. The sound is effectively coming from "everywhere", and so you don't get the same kind of path length difference attenuation from barriers like you do when you have a point source that is far from the receiver. This is exascerbated by the fact that the intrusion is low frequency which diffracts around corners far more than higher frequency sound.

      Plants are not massive enough to be of any significant help. To put things into perspective, a dense forest that's 100m in depth will only attenuate sound 2-3dB, and that's mostly a high frequency reduction.

      If you must go with a noise generator (which I don't recommend), try pink noise instead of white. The sounds from the street you try to mask out are going to be mostly low frequency, and white noise will mainly add more sound energy in the higher end of the spectrum.

      White noise will add equal sound energy across the spectrum. Pink noise will add more energy in the lower frequencies. We don't typically recommend noise masking for low frequency intrusions into offices and other facilities we consult on because the masking is generally perceived to be more annoying than the original problem. It's best used when there is a speech privacy problem in large open offices because there isn't ENOUGH background noise.

      Upgrading your window would typically be recommended, but will only do a little for low frequency. Note that in glazed assemblies, the framing is the weak point. STC 35 is where most frames will top out (even though the glazing will advertise higher STCs into the 50s). If you want a really solid window construction you need an isolated frame assembly which is two frames in series that do not touch each other and which are isolated from the surrounding structure using 3mm thick neoprene gaskets. Each frame supports a separate pane of glass. The inside perimeter should be lined with glass-fibre to prevent standing waves in the cavity.
      Overall thickness of the glazing might be 2-3"

  9. Obligatory XKCD by whennegan · · Score: 5, Funny
  10. What, specifically, did you do? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although I've replaced all windows, insulated, and caulked every square inch of the place,

    I've been in houses on a busy streets where the street noise stops at the walls and windows. So, possibly, you did not go far enough. For example, there are windows and there are sound-reducing windows.

    Maybe you need to re-evaluate what you did to keep the noise out before you embark upon a project to reduce or mask the noise inside the room.

  11. Build another wall by microcars · · Score: 4, Informative

    inside with a window that is separated from the "real" outside wall by a few inches.
    You will be surprised at how effective this is while leaving the original "look and feel" of the room.

    --
    I like microcars
    1. Re:Build another wall by bmo · · Score: 2

      This is the actual solution right here.

      Most construction handbooks will recommend a double wall between the sections of a duplex, for example.

      --
      BMO

  12. move by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "I live at the corner of one of the busiest intersections in my city "

    Why? If you value peace and quiet and fresh air, move to the countryside and you won't have to insulate yourself from your surroundings. A city of 350,000 can't be that big that you would have a long commute when you needed to get into the city.

  13. Can't recommend noise canceling headphones by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 3, Informative

    One of the last things I've ever bought from Sony were their ultra-expensive MDR-NC500D digital noise canceling headphones. I can't speak for other noice canceling headphones, but can definitely not recommend the ones by Sony. Don't get fooled by the advertisements, the actual noise canceling is pretty weak, does not have any effect on car noise, and is only noticable when you listen to music. (You can't use them just for canceling outside noise.) Moreover, they need power all the time in order to work at all. In my opinion, they are definitely not worth the money.

    1. Re:Can't recommend noise canceling headphones by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

      Noise cancelling headphones suck. I have a pair of the Shure SE530s in-ear headphones and find that they're an almost impervious wall against outside sounds. I loooove them. They don't do noise cancellation at all, they're simple a good pair of earplugs with really, really good speakers in them. I've never been remotely impressed with over the ear solutions as far as noise isolation goes.

  14. Noise cancelling won't work by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You won't be able to cancel out road noise for an entire room. Noise cancelling basically only works with headphones and in certain controlled industrial environments. For a room with road noise coming from different directions from moving sources with a moving listener it just won't work.

    I'm afraid you are basically screwed. The only option is to move.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. Better Physics Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What you need are multiple layers of different acoustical impedance; that is, hard and soft materials layered. Whenever there's an impedance mismatch, radiation gets reflected. An optical analog is a dielectric mirror. However, the really low frequencies are always a problem, and that's where more mass will help.

  16. Wall of sound won't work by Chalnoth · · Score: 5, Informative

    It will do literally nothing. Sound waves simply add. You can't get rid of sound waves by adding a bunch of random sound waves. The sound waves you don't want will pass right through. Now, if you simply have a white noise generator in your house, so that the ambient volume is higher, that may make it so that your ears have a harder time picking out specific sounds, which will, in turn, make it easier to ignore them.

    Barring that, noise cancelling headphones or double-pane windows, as others have mentioned, are going to be your best bets. And double-pane windows are good for heating/cooling anyway.

    As an aside, I'm also rather skeptical that noise cancellation for the entire apartment could ever be practical. The problem is the waveform bouncing off the various walls and other features of the apartment is going to be too complex to accurately measure or cancel. And then what about the sounds you do want to hear?

  17. Re:are the windows.. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless you can read, in which case he said that most of the sound is coming through the windows. I'm not really surprised, since the vast majority of problems I have ever dealt with are related to windows.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  18. Re:Get a Pair of Headphones by __aasdno7518 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Headphones don't block noise and turning them up to block noise will damage your hearing. Amazon.com has ear protectors and they will help.

  19. And the motorcycles .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My adaption to fart mufflers and loud base was a sound detector and a machine gun. If the passing car got too loud, it would track and fire.

    I havent built it yet, but one day...

    I wouldnt shed a tear for these obnoxious people. They disturb hundreds of people daily, so fuck em.

    And the motorcycles.

    It's all about our narcissistic society. "Hey look at me! I'm special!"

    1. Re:And the motorcycles .... by realityimpaired · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Motorcycles aren't about narcissism, they're about freedom. With the exception of Harley Davidson bikes, which are deliberately tuned badly to make noise, most of the good bikes (think Honda orr BMW) are actually pretty quiet, and, especially among older motorcycle drivers, they are far and above the most courteous drivers on the road, which seems kind of counter to the notion that they're narcissistic.

    2. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the motorcycles.

      It's all about our narcissistic society. "Hey look at me! I'm special!"

      Yep. South Park did an episode on it, and nailed it as usual.

    3. Re:And the motorcycles .... by element-o.p. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I ride too, and you're full of crap.

      A loud pipe isn't going to keep an idiot driver from cutting you off. I've been cut off by idiot drivers more than once, and generally speaking, it's by a young kid with a ten thousand watt stereo cranked up to 11. Your loud pipe isn't going to phase him in the least, but it will piss off everyone else around you, leading to onerous restrictions about what can and cannot be installed on a bike, where bikes can go, etc. As far as only being excessively loud under extreme acceleration, yeah, I call B.S. on that, too. If you're running a straight pipe with no muffler, it will be loud even at idle. It's only ear-splitting at high manifold pressure settings (i.e., acceleration). Regarding "it is the driver...not the bike itself..." well, yeah, but that's a tautology since the rider is the one who has to remove the stock muffler to install the obnoxious one, it is the rider who has to thumb the starter button, and it's the rider who has to twist the throttle to get the bike to accelerate.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:And the motorcycles .... by WGFCrafty · · Score: 3, Funny

      Motorcycles aren't about narcissism, they're about freedom. With the exception of Harley Davidson bikes, which are deliberately tuned badly to make noise, most of the good bikes (think Honda orr BMW) are actually pretty quiet, and, especially among older motorcycle drivers, they are far and above the most courteous drivers on the road, which seems kind of counter to the notion that they're narcissistic.

      If Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is anything to go on, they're not narcissistic, they're philosophers who go insane when they come to the conclusion that quality is synonymous with the Tao.

    5. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I disagree. I ride, and standing next to a harley with loud pipes is crazy. They're ridiculous, such that you can't even talk over them at a stop light. "Hey, you wanna turn left up there or keep going?" has to get done half with hand signals. And yes, the "loud pipes save lives" thing is total bullshit. Anywhere over 25mph, everyone merges into you anyway... they just don't hear you.

      Quick experiment, next time you see a cruiser coming up behind you, certainly keep your eye on them, but turn your stereo off and see if you can hear them. You'll see.

      That said, half mile away, you can only hear squids. I live near two highways, and that awful, high pitched whine they make travels right into your living room. It does not help that those kids travel in packs.

      So if your neighbor has a loud cruiser and regularly comes home at 1am every night, that could be annoying. If you live anywhere near a busy street, you learn to hate sport bike riders. The good part is they ride like morons, so over the course of a riding season it's an ever-diminishing population.

    6. Re:And the motorcycles .... by pspahn · · Score: 2

      rrobbbbllleee rrrrobbbblllleee rrrroobbbbllleeee

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    7. Re:And the motorcycles .... by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess the Founding Fathers were all motorcycle riders then.

      I think we can safely assume that most of them rode carts and wagons instead of ponies.
      Much like most people today prefer the freedom from the elements and the freedom to bring a bag or two.

      In the past, there were motorbikes that offered freedom - you could drive them on paths where no car could go. Modern motorbikes, however, tend to demand more of the pavement than cars do.

      By all means, I can see reasons why some people want a motorbike, but freedom is not one of them, no matter how often repeated.

    8. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Motorcycles aren't about narcissism, they're about freedom.

      Bullshit. I don't need to hear your "freedom" in a residential neighborhood at 3am on a Saturday morning from five miles away.

    9. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. I ride, and standing next to a harley with loud pipes is crazy. They're ridiculous, such that you can't even talk over them at a stop light.

      Such that you can't even talk over them at a stop light? Dude, you can't even talk over them from a mile away in your own home. These mother fuckers are so god damn fucking loud that, even in the comfort of your own quiet home, you have to pause the conversation for 30+ seconds while they finish arriving from a mile or two away and then get a mile or two away to the other side and out of ear-shot. This shit is so ungodly loud that it should not only be a fucking ticketable (and patrolled-for) offense, but a fucking jailable one.

    10. Re:And the motorcycles .... by paulatz · · Score: 2

      1) The noise cannot be heard by the driver until AFTER the bike is alongside or past the car.

      Only if you are going faster than the speed of sound

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    11. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2

      Fuck you, I ride harley's and I made them louder to prevent idiot drivers from cutting me off because they failed to look before changing lanes. The only time when my bikes are excessivly loud is under extreme acceleration. It is the driver of the bike that causes them to be loud, not the bike itself.

      Well done, I congratulate you on a very successful troll. Of course, that's not really something to be proud of...

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    12. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      I guess the Founding Fathers were all motorcycle riders then.

      I think we can safely assume that most of them rode carts and wagons instead of ponies.
      Much like most people today prefer the freedom from the elements and the freedom to bring a bag or two.

      In the past, there were motorbikes that offered freedom - you could drive them on paths where no car could go. Modern motorbikes, however, tend to demand more of the pavement than cars do.

      By all means, I can see reasons why some people want a motorbike, but freedom is not one of them, no matter how often repeated.

      Get a horse!

    13. Re:And the motorcycles .... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I ride, and always hated the "loud Pipes save lives" saying.. Unless you bend the pipes completely around to face forward, they aren't easily heard by people in front of you.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    14. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That omission should have been fixed long ago. Assholes like you really disturb hundreds of people.

      And actually there ARE laws in most of the states regulating the noise. If your vehicle is too noisy then it can't be certified.

    15. Re:And the motorcycles .... by fluffy99 · · Score: 2

      Fuck you, I ride harley's and I made them louder to prevent idiot drivers from cutting me off because they failed to look before changing lanes. The only time when my bikes are excessivly loud is under extreme acceleration. It is the driver of the bike that causes them to be loud, not the bike itself.

      You've obviously missed out on the studies that show Harley riders are more likely to be involved in accidents, despite being generally louder. Although those studies cited the root causes as poor riding skills and a high propensity for riding while under the influence. As for the noise, MCN did a study that showed the bulk of the added noise from straight pipes or louder mufflers was direct behind the motorcycle. It also showed little or no added benefit for people in front of the motorcycle noticing them sooner. The best was to be noticed is to wear bright colors and ride proactively. In my experience though, Harley riders like the image and usually wear a dark leather jacket and tend to be inexperienced weekend riders.

      The #1 accident for motorcyles is having someone turn left in front of you. You can avoid getting cutoff by trying not to be i peoples blind spots. Loud pipes just piss off everyone else, while the rider thinks they sound cool. Just like the twats with loud thumps radios.

    16. Re:And the motorcycles .... by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am a rider, and I have been through the MSF course, I recommend it.

      No he is right, loud pipes most certainly do NOT save lives. Read some of the other comments, they are spot on. The majority of sound is heard right next to or behind the bike, not in front. Also, insulated cars and loud stereos, as you point out, can mostly cancel out bike noise.

      Also... the noise is easily loud enough to damage hearing. In fact, motorcycle riders on the highway are advised to wear ear plugs, because even the sound of the wind will damage your ears over time in a full face helmet above 40-50 mph or so (never mind 80 mph :) ... thats loud)

      What a motorcyclist has however is vision. A riders head rides almost as high as an SUV. He is also small. He has a lot of ability to avoid accidents, using his vision, size, and ability to accelerate.

      I mean yes, there is a blind spot.... a good rider stays the fuck out of them and is very mindful of them when it can't be avoided. A good portion of being a good rider in traffic is assuming cars might not see you and riding specifically to increase visibility.

      Good riders learn to use lane position to make sure they are seen and keep cars in their space, and make space for escapes. (sometimes you want to practically hug the lines)

      Then... they practice evasive moves. A bike is a very agile device, but, if you don't intuitively know what to do, you will do the wrong thing. A lot of riders (a stunning number) don't even know that the bike counter-steers.

      The vast majority of motorcycle accidents can be avoided by smart riding and avoiding the situations where a driver not seeing them means they die. That's never a smart bet. Assume they can't see you, make them see you.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    17. Re:And the motorcycles .... by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      They should build bikes with a switch for that shit, then, so that it only activates when they're on the road. I don't need to hear it for an hour while my neighbor is tuning and revving his engine across the street from me before he goes out for a ride.

    18. Re:And the motorcycles .... by highphilosopher · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: I ride regularly.

      Riding a motorcycle isn't a sign you're a man. Taking care of your responsibilities is.

  20. Make your own noise by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

    When I was young I used to drive a car that made an annoying sound. I would simply crank up the radio, and the problem went away!

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  21. Use your stero by RNLockwood · · Score: 3, Funny

    Crank up the sound level on your stereo to really high levels and use it constantly to mask street noises. Magically, after a while, you won't need it any more.

    --
    Nate
    1. Re:Use your stero by cdp0 · · Score: 2

      Crank up the sound level on your stereo to really high levels and use it constantly to mask street noises. Magically, after a while, you won't need it any more.

      There is nothing magical about (partial) deafness.

  22. Re:are the windows.. by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    We put all triple-pane in our house (Winnipeg, Canada) 5 years ago. We noticed the street noise almost disappear. (Not to mention the winter heating bills dropped by ~30%+)
    Cost a pretty penny, about $13K for the whole house, but man was it worth it.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  23. It's not legal by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    but 30 years of tax cuts and underfunded police departments means the cops have better things to be doing. That's why you don't see these guys in wealthy parts of town.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  24. Add weight by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    Basically, all soundproofing is about weight. More weight=less noise gets through. To reduce the noise coming in through the windows you need to increase the thickness of the panes or their number. Double or triple glazing, or even two double-glazed panes in series with an air gap of ~15 cm in between. You'll also need to look at the window frames. Old steel or aluminium frames are excellent sound conductors.

    You can go pretty far with this; my father did some consulting on a housing project near an air force base. They managed to get sufficient soundproofing that living next to F-16s taking off wasn't aggravating any more, but they spent as much on the soundproofing as the houses had cost to build.

  25. If Windows are still the problem add Storm windows by sys_mast · · Score: 2

    A friend lived near the airport. His house was upgraded from double pane with storms to some better double/triple pane without storms. The new windows where supposed to be better at blocking the sound of the planes.

    Summary of the story, the new "better" windows didn't work as good as the old windows with storm windows at blocking noise.

    So if' you've already upgraded the windows, add storms to the outside. It's an easy thing to install, and they typically are under $100 a window. Install can be as easy as hold it up, and put a few screws in.

    Added bonus, it can help reduce heating/cooling costs. (not enough savings to pay for them, but it won't hurt!)

    If windows aren't the problem add more/better insulation, there aren't any limits if you don't need to see through it.

    --
    Those who can, do.
  26. Disclose, Disclose, Disclose by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

    Did you buy the place?
    Did you know it was noisy?
    Are we a little sensitive?
    Is this your homework assignment?
    Why do you find yourself living at that place?
    Have you considered other places?
    With a population of 350K,(try 5M people for noise), what city is it?

    Do you know of the personal impact of living in an area under constant noise generation?

  27. Re:Get a Pair of Headphones by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

    Combine them with wax earplugs. I had the same problem there for a couple of years, and it was bliss to be able to just turn off all outside noise. Cheap too! I recommend Quies pure wax.

  28. Re:Get a Pair of Headphones by tsa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Headphones don't block noise and turning them up to block noise will damage your hearing.

    So they do help :).

    --

    -- Cheers!

  29. Soundproof drywall by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    Soundproof drywall - 1 sheet is equal to between 8 and 16 sheets of regular drywall. Put it up, 2 sheets thick and no noise will come through your walls at all. Then build yourself a picture frame larger than your window. Back it with the soundproof drywall, put some random picture you like in it, and hang it over the window. If you want to move it to see out the window on occasion, hang it from tracks so it can slide back and forth, or put it on hinges.

    Sirens and the like, are specifically designed to pierce through background noise. White noise works when blocking out conversations and other ambient noise... but sirens are a whole other animal.

  30. Re:are the windows.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So you're saying he should try replacing his windows with linux? It might just work, I've certainly seen installations where I couldn't get any sound to come through linux.

  31. Re:Earplugs by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Cheap and works every time. After a few minutes, you'll forget you have them in."

    I'd suggest the same. I work shifts and needed them to be able to sleep during the day. Now I can't live without them.
    Not only sleeping, but programming, reading and other stuff is great with plugs.

    But you can't forget them after a few minutes in the beginning.
    I tested 2 dozen of them and still I needed 3 weeks until they didn't hurt anymore. If you wear them 8-10 hours, your ears need to adapt.
    It _will_ hurt for some time, but then it's heaven.

  32. Do a measurement first!!! by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 4, Informative

    First you must measure how many decibel of attenuation you need. For this you need a sound level meter: If you don't have one at hand, a microphone + PC sound card + Audacity can be used as well (many apps for Android/Ipad are also available for this). Measure two sound spectra at your location: the first one with traffic noise present, the second one when you feel that background noise level is comfortable for you. The difference between the two spectra will tell you how much attenuation you need, and which frequencies need to be attenuated more.

    Next compare the attenuation offered by each possible solutions (noise attenuationg windows, wall insulation, etc.) against the attenuation you need to achieve. If it isn't enough, move away, otherwise try installing the best solution you can afford.

    Noise should be stopped before it enters the walls of your home: Once it is there, it can follow unsuspected paths to reach your ears (pipes, wall joints, etc.). The best way to stop it is to increase the acoustic impedance of external walls and windows.

    Attenuation could be increased using viscoelastic materials like rubber: however they are best for attenuating high frequencies.

  33. Re:That's nice by sycodon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You don't get $$$ by being lucky unless you inherit it or you hit the lottery.

    People are free to move and live where they want. I suppose you want them to stay and suffer the festering blight of poverty and crime? As far as "solving the problems", name one city that has ever solved the problem. You can't solve stupid and the people causing these problems are Stupid incarnate.

    I live outside a city and pay no city taxes. I pay county taxes for fire and police (County Sheriff), and a Hospital District and we have our own water district. I take no resources from the cities nearby, but I do spend my money there. When we pay off the bonds on our district, the city plans on annexing my neighborhood. So then I'll get to pay city taxes and get bum fucking nothing in return except a library card. That's when I move further away.

    You people who want everyone to live crammed together in some kind of supposed utopia of harmony and efficiency are nuts. City living has it's advantages and its drawbacks and people are free to choose city, suburban or county lifestyles. Who the hell are you to say anything about their choice?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  34. A few quick gunshots out the window... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 2

    ...might quiet things down out there.

  35. Re:Get a Pair of Headphones by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wrong. Headphones DO block noise, if they look like these.

    No, earbuds don't block noise, but those aren't "headphones".

  36. I used to live on the A41 by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I moved 110 miles away and the loudest noise was the surf on the beach. But most of the neighbors were near death...Too quiet. I now live a mere 120 miles from that apartment on the A41, in a village, and the loudest noise is the sparrows in the hedge that separates our drive from our neighbors. One day I might shoot the noisy little bastards.

    Back OT, however, the answer is triple glazing and lining the outside wall with Noisekiller - which is a polymer foam/lead/foam composite which can silence the sound of a marine Diesel engine in a steel enclosure.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  37. Pounds were metricated by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2

    The effort I had to put in at school in the 1950s learning to add, multiple and divide pounds, shillings and pence was totally wasted. We actually had a maths teacher who thought metrication was a Bad Thing because it would reduce the ability to do mental arithmetic. What he didn't see was that you only really need the ability to do mental arithmetic if you have to use a dysfunctional system of weights and measures.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  38. Arthur C Clarke: 'Silence Please' by t_ban · · Score: 2
    --
    First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. -Gandhi
  39. Not to beat a dead horse, but... by Loosifur · · Score: 2

    I mean, obviously, moving is your best option. Cities are loud places. Although a city with 350k is pretty small, if you're living in the center of the place, you're going to have to deal with noise. If you haven't gotten used to it yet (which is kind of surprising, really), your long-term solution is to save up some money until you can afford to move to the 'burbs, or out to the country. Or to a smaller town.

    That said, I lived in a bigger city (600k or so) in a bad neighborhood (so there were cars and sirens all night) for a little while. Heavy drapes help, with the added benefit that people can't see in your windows. Sirens are made to be heard, so you might have a hard time really insulating yourself from them, but as for just general road noise and city sounds, I'd move your office into an internal room, i.e. one that doesn't have any windows, and that preferably has rooms with doors between it and the outside. As others have said, you could certainly install double- or triple-pane windows, but at that point you're better off spending the money on a down payment on a house or condo somewhere other than the busiest part of the city. Plants, bookshelves, basically stuff to get in the way and create more surfaces between the windows and you seem to be somewhat effective in reducing sound. Also, since you won't be able to get rid of the sound, you might try doing stuff like leaving the tv or radio on in the background, just as a low-cost "white-noise" alternative.

    But, really, the core issue here is not how thick your windows need to be to live in the middle of an urban area and not hear anything. It's why you would locate yourself somewhere that you're not going to be able to work, or, the way it sounds, live comfortably. I don't know what you do for a living, but, if cost is an issue, a long-term solution might be to relocate to a cheaper area nearby, where you're still close enough to meet with clients in the city if need be, but you're not in a noisy area. Based on where you're posting and what you're posting, I'm assuming you're not a glass blower or a mime or anything, so I'd also point out that the wonder of telecommuting is that you can do it from quite far away...

    --
    This unbiased moderation brought to you by the Porcine Aviation Group!
  40. No parallel windows by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    Broadcast studios always have double windows, but the panes are at an angle to each other. Placing them parallel to each other makes them more likely to resonate with each other.

  41. buffering wall of sound by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm considering mounting an oblong parabolic reflector in the ceiling above the windows with a steady feed of white or brownian noise directed into it (e.g., via a small speaker placed within the reflector) to create a 'wall' of sound that would act as a buffer to the outside world.

    Wait... would that actually do anything?

    Are you saying that a curtain of sound (perhaps not even directed so that you can hear it) inhibits the passage of other sounds through it? I don't know anything about acoustics, but this seems untrue.

  42. Own or rent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    See, that's the thing with "owning". You own nothing except a pile of notarized papers and the right to pay taxes, essentially it owns you.

    I rent. Quiet street, no traffic. If I so choose, a 1 minute walk gets me to the nearest intersection, where I can listen to cars and radios, if I so choose.

    I rent. If I want, a simple phone call to one person ends my relationship and I can move. If you own, now what? Agents and notaries and taxes and blah blah blah... What a waste of time and energy.

    Also, architecturally, I've seen some buildings on busy streets in Montreal that have angled windows. I suspect that having two parallel rows of straight facades on either side of a street creates an echo chamber as sound reflects back and forth between two buildings.

    Look at this.

  43. Re:Get a Pair of Headphones by icebike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Headphones don't block noise and turning them up to block noise will damage your hearing.
      Amazon.com has ear protectors and they will help.

    Actually some headphones do block noise, by having a mic and playing the reverse sound (180 degrees out of phase).
    But in any event, living with headphones on is not an answer.

    The sound is coming thru the windows. Even dual pane windows won't help, they simply act as a drum.
    Three pane windows help some.

    What is needed is a dual pane window where the panes are not parallel. Tipping the top of the outer
    pane outward de-tunes the drum, and reduces sound transmission by quite a bit. The further you can tip it
    the better is works.

    It has the additional effect of cutting insolation, while actually increasing insulation.

    Any good galzier could do this for you and there are starting to be some commercial models available,
    but custom built is the best way to achieve this.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  44. Re:are the windows.. by Nimey · · Score: 2

    Did you come from single- or double-pane windows?

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  45. Re:are the windows.. by grub · · Score: 3

    Other than the large living room window which was double pane, everything was the original single pane from 1974.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  46. Re:are the windows.. by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Triple pane really doesn't do that much for sound deadening according to the Canadian Building Digest.
    Tripple panes with dissimilar glass thickness works better,

    But having a different type of glass on the inside works much better.

    Typically they use laminated glass for the soundproufing inner pane, with glas laminated to plastic pane which dampens transmitted vibration.
    There are commercial windows available for this. These solutions seldom work where you intend to open the window to let in a breeze.

    If you don't want to buy entirely new windows there are simple and less costly interior add-on panes. This preserves the ability to open the window.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  47. Re:Get a Pair of Headphones by robi5 · · Score: 2

    Never heard of this one and while it sounds plausible, I find its effectiveness limited, due to the typically very small angles achievable (if the window should be openable). What I read in a building acoustics book is that that glass panes of different thickness are helpful, because they act as mass-spring-mass systems and their pass-through filter frequency will be different. Ideally there is an air gap between the panes, but multiple panes are useful too. For example, 4mm glass + 10mm air + 2x3mm glass can be a good window choice.

    Also, insulation will be worse with planes that are not parallel; by necessity it means that on average you have a significantly larger air gap between the two planes, and the internal air (or noble gas mixture) is better able to circulate, reducing insulation. There is a reason why windows are the way they are, at least in Europe (I found the prevalence of single-glazed windows in the UK and the US appalling from an acoustic and environmental viewpoint, their insulation capability is a small fraction of that of double-glazed ones, often worsened by gaping holes).

  48. Small Peckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Admit it - You put loud exhausts on your cars and trucks because you have to compensate for your tiny penis. Why else? Or is it just that you like to annoy people? You want "raw power"? Try flying a military jet. As to "freedom", how about your understanding that others lose their freedom to peace and quiet because you're an asshole. You want loud noise? Put a stereo on your bike (undoubtedly a Harley piece of crap) and some ear phones. You get the "loud" you want without annoying other people.

  49. Re:The motorcycles are for lazy people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Across_America

    Less than two weeks, fat ass.

  50. Re:are the windows.. by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 2

    I did the same about 5 years ago. Triple pane, xenon(?) gas filled, with UV glass on the outside pane. Luckily I live on a relatively quiet road so noise isn't much of a problem to begin with, but times like now when the temperature is about 70F and I have all the doors and windows open reminds me of how it was before. With doors and windows closed I can rarely hear any outside noise. I did it for insulation reasons, but after it was done I was amazed at how much it eliminated outside noise.

  51. Re:are the windows.. by Cheech+Wizard · · Score: 2

    Gas filled triple panes made a *very* big difference for me. Several friends of mine did their windows and say the same thing. The difference is night and day. No doubt about it.

  52. Shutters? by cardpuncher · · Score: 2

    Although they're less effective against things like engine noise, I found shutters helpful for reducing the nighttime intrusion of city centre noise. If you've got some reasonably dense timber board, try covering your window openings with it (inside or outside depending on which is more suitable) and see what difference it makes (you get an additional air gap before the glazing plus the sound absorbency of the board). I don't suggest you board up your windows for good (though, this being Slashdot, I don't discount it as an option), but if it makes a substantial difference you can install something more permanently that hinges and folds to give you access to daylight when required.

    Also, if you live on the top floor, noise may be coming in through the roof so insulation above the ceiling may help.

  53. KISS: Try a fan by jbgeek · · Score: 2

    Keep It Simple Stupid :-)

    I'm fairly sensitive to outside noise, and my solution for years has been a simple electric fan. It generates plenty of local white noise which drowns out all the noise from outside.

    Works great with no need for parabolic reflectors or active noise cancellation or anything else that might require a DARPA research project. :-)