Slashdot Mirror


How To Steal a Space Shuttle

An anonymous reader tips a piece by Jason Torchinsky at Jalopnik, who attended the California Science Center's press conference about moving Space Shuttle Endeavour through Los Angeles to its final resting place. While he was there, he noticed that security for the event was focused less on the shuttle than on keeping the city itself safe. So, after a helpful LAPD officer suggested it would be impossible for a supervillain to make off with OV-105, Torchinsky went ahead and made a plan to do just that. All he needs is a submarine, a score of Sikorsky CH-53E heavy-lift helicopters, a salvaged and disguised Buran spaceplane, and the assistance of Switzerland.

130 comments

  1. Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by stillnotelf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely they wouldn't follow him into space, and it's kind of a supervillian thing to do!

    1. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then you need to steal launch infrastructure which would be even less practical than stealing teh space shuttle. Indeed, if you can steal that, then you can probably just build your own space ships.

      That said, I live in LA. Ahat's the return policy on heavy lift helicopters? Can I get them from Amazon?

    2. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs a launch platform when you have a perfectly good runway and 'borrow' some extra boosters? If my time on Kerbal has tought me anything, it is that one can never have enough boosters.

    3. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      No...all he has to do is work wit the gangs in the surrounding neighborhoods.

      Open the gate to give them access and the Shuttle will be completely dismantled in a matter of hours. Of course he'll have to pay the going rate for stolen merchandise.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by ravenknight · · Score: 1

      It can't go into space again -- it's been gutted from the inside out.

    5. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by daremonai · · Score: 1

      [W]hat's the return policy on heavy lift helicopters?

      Dude, they're helicopters. Just fly them back when you're done.

    6. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in LA

      I don't believe you. Evidence below:

      ..which would be even less practical...

    7. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Then you need to steal launch infrastructure which would be even less practical than stealing teh space shuttle.

      Actually, that part is pretty easy. Just cut off the State of Florida at the place where the neck is at its narrowest, and quickly sail away.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Nah, you don’t need your own launch facility. Just file off the serial number and have Switzerland issue a fake title. Then you can use NASA’s facilities with a straight face.

    9. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by LifesABeach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. No, no, no, no. Why return anything? Name one super villan that returned an ocean liner. Super Villians leave their discarded toys all over the crime scene.



      "Anybody can kick a sleeping Tiger in the rear. But they had better have a plan for the claws, and teeth." - T.Clancy

    10. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by davester666 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure, just cut off the penis of America.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    11. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Looking at the map of North America, I can't but wonder what you think of Mexico.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    12. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if fl is the penis of usa, then ga must be the left testicle? and since the left is usually larger, the state has a distinction.

    13. Re:Maybe it would be easier to just re-launch it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd like to rent your helicopter." "Sorry, we don't rent them anymore. But it is for sale." "How much?" "Two million dollars." "Hmm. My pilot and I would need to take it for a test flight first." "Certainly - all you have to do is leave a deposit." "How much would that be?" "Two million dollars." "Would you take a company check?" :P
      (CAPD)

  2. So we're posting speculative FICTION now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shouldn't this be in the "book reviews" section of Slashdot instead of "science"?

    1. Re:So we're posting speculative FICTION now? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Also, this is not about space. The only connection to space is that the object that would be stolen has previously been in space, and possibly would be able to go there again.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:So we're posting speculative FICTION now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely this submission deserves to be nowhere other than the "idle" section.

    3. Re:So we're posting speculative FICTION now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we're posting speculative FICTION now?
      No, it would seem to be conspiracy to acquire a very large "space collectable".

  3. High danger of being labeled a terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Haven't people learned? In this day and age, even joking about stealing/damaging US gov't property can be considered an act of terrorism.

    1. Re:High danger of being labeled a terrorist act by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Doesn't mean it's not funny!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:High danger of being labeled a terrorist act by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      But if I've learned anything from the Die Hard movies, it's that posing as terrorists is the ideal way of hiding an elaborate theft.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  4. Oh, is that all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All he needs is a submarine, a score of Sikorsky CH-53E heavy-lift helicopters, a salvaged and disguised Buran spaceplane, and the assistance of Switzerland.

    Oh yeah, no problem, that space shuttle is going to be up and gone.

    1. Re:Oh, is that all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dont forget the obligatory Bond antagonistic music in the background.

    2. Re:Oh, is that all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pft, I have all of that sitting in my back yard.
      Including Switzerland.

      What? It's a big yard!

    3. Re:Oh, is that all? by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Don't forget...

      (holding pinkie to mouth)
      One MILLION dollars...

    4. Re:Oh, is that all? by poity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. Acquire Buran
      2. Call off plan since you already have a shuttle

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    5. Re:Oh, is that all? by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Meanwhile some feller with the ludicrously unlikely name of Elon Musk is building ICBMs right in plain sight.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    6. Re:Oh, is that all? by Talderas · · Score: 2

      It would be easier to steal the USS Missouri from Pearl Harbor.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    7. Re:Oh, is that all? by titanium93 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But then you have to worry about the cook.

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    8. Re:Oh, is that all? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      No thanks. Leave Switzerland out of your business proposal. We want nothing to do with you.

      Ernst Schmidt

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    9. Re:Oh, is that all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not enough orbital death rays in this plan.

    10. Re:Oh, is that all? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "How to steal a spaceshuttle"?!
      How to Kill a Mockingbird seems more plausible.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  5. CRAP! by gurps_npc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I have to come up with a new plan.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  6. Trivial by DeeEff · · Score: 5, Funny

    It becomes almost trivial to steal a spaceship once you're President of the Galaxy.

    These are the types of two faced men we should watch out for.

    1. Re:Trivial by tom17 · · Score: 1

      STOLEN?

    2. Re:Trivial by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      It becomes almost trivial to steal a spaceship once you're President of the Galaxy.

      These are the types of two faced men we should watch out for.

      No, that would be highly improbable. Next you'll say that the space ship will pick up people from space all by itself.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:Trivial by cultiv8 · · Score: 1

      exactly. First a spaceship, then a shrink ray gun, and BAM, someone has stolen the moon.

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    4. Re:Trivial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assemble the minions!

    5. Re:Trivial by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Yup, you're right. Never, ever, trust a president of anything.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:Trivial by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you use a warehouse with lots of growth potential!

  7. It would be cheaper to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...buy the space shuttle from the museum than to execute the plan to steal it.

    1. Re:It would be cheaper to... by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Yes, but it wouldn't be as fun!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  8. These guys could pull it off... by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    So, after a helpful LAPD officer suggested it would be impossible for a supervillain to make off with OV-105, Torchinsky went ahead and made a plan to do just that. All he needs is a submarine, a score of Sikorsky CH-53E heavy-lift helicopters, a salvaged and disguised Buran spaceplane, and the assistance of Switzerland.

    Bet'cha the crew from Leverage could do it. They probably wouldn't even need the Swiss, although they might borrow a minister or two for misdirection

    They did 'steal' the Spruce Goose, after all... :o)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  9. PR genius by paiute · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is obviously viral marketing for Ocean's Fourteen.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:PR genius by Terry+Pearson · · Score: 2

      This is obviously viral marketing for Ocean's Fourteen.

      Exactly what I was thinking. Sounds like an Ocean's plot. If they simplify the plot a little, it could be a stunt for Fast and Furious 6 as well... Attach two Dodge Chargers to spaceship and drive through LA like mad.

  10. Always that Switzerland! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason I couldn't pull it off. Darn those Swiss!

  11. Leaked James Bond Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what he's saying is that Skyfall is yet another rehash of Thunderball.

    1. Re:Leaked James Bond Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And/or Moonraker.

  12. Next Season, on Breaking Bad by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next Season, on Breaking Bad

    Jessie: Oh come on, Mr. White! We have $480,000,000! Each! I'm out!

    Walt: Really Jessie? This is about money to you?

    Jessie: Wasn't that the whole point? To leave your family money, and then to make an empire because you're mad you made a bad decision with Gray Matter? Why do you need a space shuttle? Bitch?!

    Walt: Jessie, Hank is on to us. We need to get out of his jurisdiction. Out of everyone's jurisdiction! And that shuttle is our ride.

    1. Re:Next Season, on Breaking Bad by realsilly · · Score: 1

      I have to say, you've got the conversation pretty close to dead on. /clapclapclap

      --
      Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    2. Re:Next Season, on Breaking Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With the path of idiocy the series has walked in the past, I fully expect this to happen. ^^

  13. too late by badford · · Score: 5, Funny

    What makes you think that is the real shuttle?...mwuhuhahahaha [evil laughter trails off]

    --
    -badford
  14. first the maple syrup by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    now the space shuttle. when will the evil stop?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:first the maple syrup by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      I suspect the space shuttle was the original extraction method for the maple syrup, hence the need to steal it.

      Of course, since the maple syrup was recovered, there's not much point in stealing the shuttle, unless the maple syrup was just a distraction for the theft of somethign even more valuable!

    2. Re:first the maple syrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The genius was figuring out how to use maple syrup as the fuel for the stolen shuttle.

    3. Re:first the maple syrup by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      How many barrels of maple syrup could you hide in a space shuttle?

    4. Re:first the maple syrup by neminem · · Score: 1

      Never. Presumably eventually they'll start stealing major landmarks, then they'll graduate from that and start stealing entire planets. Then at some point they'll invent a time machine and start stealing bits of the past, too. Better catch her quick!

    5. Re:first the maple syrup by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      The terrorists have definately won

    6. Re:first the maple syrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Here's the plan. We get the shuttle, and we hold the Science Center ransomed for.....One MILLION DOLLARS!!"

    7. Re:first the maple syrup by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Duh! Bacon!!
      !

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:first the maple syrup by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      No, crazy american. CANADIAN bacon.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109370/

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    9. Re:first the maple syrup by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      It all started when the Underpants Gnomes escaped from their Rocky Mountains hideaway. To save the world, we must all learn their song, and sing it at midnight CET on 17 November simultaneously across four timezones. Don't forget, EVERYBODY must sing it, or it won't work!

  15. Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to the Peter Copter!

  16. Moonraker anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously the easiest way to steal one is to fly it right off the back of the 747 while in flight, because everyone knows they keep the shuttle fully fueled while being transported piggy-back.

  17. Horrible plan. by drkim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Horrible plan.

    First, if you already have a Buran, what would you need the shuttle for?

    You're going to put a giant, top-opening cargo hold in a submarine?

    And then you're going to bring it to flight-readiness? Couldn't you just buy the Buran and bring that to flight-readiness?

    1. Re:Horrible plan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only working buran was destroyed when the dome of the cosmodome in kazakstan collapsed on it. there is 1 skeletal protype in a junkyard in dubai, one in a space museum in germany and the final one is.. well i dont remember. PLus the only operational Buran was not capable of supporting human powered flight. it was soley computer controlled.

    2. Re:Horrible plan. by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      "And by the way, it's not about making [a space shuttle], it's about taking [a space shuttle]. Destroying the status quo because the status is not quo. The world is a mess and I just... need to rule it." ~ Dr. Horrible

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    3. Re:Horrible plan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the orbiters have been safed. They're no longer capable of flying at all.

    4. Re:Horrible plan. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      You're going to put a giant, top-opening cargo hold in a submarine?

      I'm a former submariner, and trying to maneuver something underwater like that giant cargo hold gives me the squirming heebie-jeebies. Depth control would be somewhat... interesting. (To put it mildly.)

    5. Re:Horrible plan. by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      It's a horrible plan because it's far too complicated (I know he's trying to be funny, but it should at least be realistic). As soon as I read the headline my first thought was to hijack the 747 with the shuttle onboard. Once you have hostages it shouldn't be too hard to fill up and fly to the sympathetic anti-american country of your choice. Surely 100 fully armed guerillas to storm the airport would be a lot easier to assemble than dozens of heavy lift helicopters and customised submarines?

    6. Re:Horrible plan. by drkim · · Score: 1

      ...my first thought was to hijack the 747 with the shuttle onboard.

      That's a much better plan. Hijack it early in the flight. Put up a Lear with avionics spoofing gear to fly along the filed flight path. Turn off avionics on the 747 and fly it up to some remote area of Canada and land it. Lock the crew in a basement with the fembots.

      Continue the Lear spoofing the 747 over the Nevada desert somewhere. Once the shuttle is safe in Canada, flip off the Lear spoofing gear, land it and bury it somewhere.

  18. Too bad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad that Swissair went bankrupt many years ago. It's spiritual successor "Swiss" belongs to the "Deutsche Lufthansa AG", a german airline.

  19. Cue the James Bond theme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come back Ernst Stavro Blofeld, all is forgiven.

  20. The author's first mistake may be his last. by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    >> "While Bond supervillans tend to have these sorts of facilities and liquidity, they don't really exist..."

    Well that exactly what Blofeld wants you to think.

  21. It's easier if it's fully fueled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you just fire up the engines on the fully-fueled Shuttle while they're flying it on the back of the 747 carrier, because one of your twelve other Shuttles is broken and stealing one is somehow easier than fixing the one you have? (Or am I the only one who hasn't wiped all memory of that movie from his brain?)

  22. Nice by Fuzzums · · Score: 2

    Especially the part where the Swiss submarine is docking in those Swiss harbours is interesting.

    But while you did this, I used all that confusion to replace the Mona Lisa with a fake one :)

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  23. Or, to paraphrase the piano enthusiasts by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase the piano enthusiasts, it's not a shuttle but rather a shuttle-shaped piece of furniture.

  24. Submarine and Sikorsky CH-53E not needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should have stolen it while is was still piggy back on NASA 747 and flown it directly to Switzerland.

  25. Switzerland?? by Max_W · · Score: 1

    International Committee of the Red Cross was created in Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.icrc.org/ by Henry Dunant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Dunant and other nice people.

    Geneva Conventions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions were accepted, well, in Geneva.

    It is sort of a good serious place.

    1. Re:Switzerland?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it is the home of the Jura Federation, the Anarchist International which was founded when Marx & the marxists kicked Bakunin and the other anarchists (libertarian communists) out of the First International in 1872.

  26. Then what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then what? to launch the space shuttle cost a lot of money. Then the insurance doesn't want to cover, because the shuttle is known to have launch problem
    as in the skin could be puncture by ice and blow up during re-entry.

    So if he could even steal, what could he use it for ?

  27. Just don't forget the monster truck tires by arielCo · · Score: 1
    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  28. Buy Buran cheaply In Moscow? by Max_W · · Score: 1

    You have not been in Moscow for a while. Here it is: http://www.moninoaviation.com/g6a.html

    1. Re:Buy Buran cheaply In Moscow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering there are only 2 left that still actually look like the buran, id say they cost about $3.50. although thtere is apparently one rusting in a junk yard in dubai

  29. Fanfic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So /. has finally turned into a fanfic site...

    One assumes that NASA will now threaten to sue the author for copyright infringement, the shuttle will get re-cast as a nymphomaniac off-white shark and a hastily-assembled book will be released as 50 Scales of Grey.

  30. Is that all we need? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I'll just make a few calls...

  31. I could do it with less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Large Crane

    2) Large semi-truck transport

    3) Crane at docks

    4) Cargo ship

    5) ??(you fill it in)

    6) Profit

  32. Live in New York or L.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Dayton, Ohio the birthplace of aviation and the home of the National Museum of the United States Air Force. We kinda thought that we were a shoe in for one of the Space Shuttles, but instead we got shafted. Our museum has its own runway and most of the airplanes stored there for display simply flew in and landed there. We wouldn't have had to cut down 400 trees, kill habitats, or slaughter virgins to get the damn thing into the display hanger, but of course no one thought about that when they petitioned to get a hold of it now did they?

  33. Penn & Teller Already Did This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. It must be Chairboy. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I know he wants a NASA space shuttle. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  35. Yeah, but that's not the hard part by istartedi · · Score: 1

    How do you fence it?

    This is even more pointless than stealing "The Scream". At least you could just walk out with a painting so hot it sets your house on fire. With this spaceplane heist you're putting an awful lot of time and money in to acquire something with zero return.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Yeah, but that's not the hard part by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      With this spaceplane heist you're putting an awful lot of time and money in to acquire something with zero return.

      I don't think this guy is thinking that far ahead. His first mistake was writing up his entire plan and blogging about it...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  36. President of the Galaxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you're President of the Galaxy ... it's not illegal.

  37. Been there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...done that.

  38. Toll Science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds very much like a troll science comic

    Steal/Acquire Buran space plane. Bro-Tip use magnets for faster acquiring.

  39. He says only a country could do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet Apple also could. $100 billion can buy you quite a bit of stuff.

    1. Re:He says only a country could do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like 10 of those new Retina display Macbooks.

  40. Don't Overthink The Plumbing by wa2flq · · Score: 1

    Kirk - "Scotty, do you have the coordinates?"

    Scotty - "Aye Captain!"

    Kirk - "Good. Transport them directly into the shuttle bay. Start with the Enterprise."

    Spock - "Quite logical Captain!"

    Scotty - "Does this make us supervillians Captain?"

    Kirk - "We are just protecting them, Until NASA realizes they still need them"

    *boop* *beep* *whirrrrrlllll*

  41. Future interview question by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    How can I see this replacing "how would you move Mt Fuji" as a future interview question?

    /Proposed answer was horrible by the way.

  42. And if you could steal a Buran, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why would you want to use it to steal a Shuttle? Buran is rarer by far... much more valuable and collectible, right?

    Oh, yeah, it doesn't matter unless it's popular and famous. Never mind.

  43. Moonraker 2? by bagboy · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Moonraker 2? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. You can't just post an IMDB link to a cheesy spy move most of the young-uhns here have never heard of. You need to provide them with a teaser of sorts. Allow me to demonstrate ...

      The cited FA is far too complex, and is doomed to fail. If the wind is blowing the wrong way on the morning of the heist, all is lost. Rather, I would suggest that said supervillian employ a former astronaut (turned henchman) to sneak aboard the Shuttle while it is parked along Sepulveda Boulevard. The ATH could then ignite the engines on the fully-fueled and completely preflighted Shuttle at an opportune moment - there's a reasonably straight piece of Sepulveda just before it enters the LAX airport property. Since the ATH is also a pilot, he would simply fly the Shuttle to the nearest private airfield controlled by the super-villian (I hear Drax Industries has a number of facilities in Brazil.)

  44. Hrmmm by dead_user · · Score: 1

    He should call Franz Harary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Harary/

    1. Re:Hrmmm by dead_user · · Score: 1

      Not sure why it's appending a / to the end of the URL. Oh well.

    2. Re:Hrmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're a lazy cunt who can't be arsed to write his own <a> tags.

  45. Did anyone notice the next story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which of these 2 stories makes more sense, stealing a shuttle or Boeing has filed a patent application for a method of disposing of dead satellites and other debris orbiting the earth by hitting them with a puff of gas?

  46. In other words... by Livius · · Score: 1

    The LAPD was right, it's impossible (in practical, not necessarily absolute, terms).

  47. Sounds like a plan... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...but Roger Moore would have to play Bond...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  48. Adequate security by SLOGEN · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the security is adequate if that is the best plan.

    Security is not about making absolutely sure, it's about:

    1. Lowering likelyhood: Making it reasonably hard to break, so that the bad guys will go somehere else.
    2. Spend wisely: Not spending more to defend that the likelyhood of loss times (value lost + value bad guys gain) (in general terms)

    BTW:

    a. Round up the likelyhood, the bad guys are better than you at getting ideas.
    b. Destroy sensitive and remove generally valuable parts to reduce the bad guys value
    c. The value lost is *not* the money spent on the lost property. Perhaps you wasted a small bit of effort making it? pehaps you can recreate new and better cheaper?

    I think the value of the space-shuttle is mainly sentimental and image-loss on theft, so you should probably not spend more than a simple escort -- mainly to prevent traffic-problems.

    --
    SLOGEN [ http://ungdomshus.nu : Sebastian cover music]
  49. He Forgot The Canoe Paddle . . . by tgeek · · Score: 1

    . . . for when he finds himself up shit's creek!

  50. Steal it?!?! Just buy it! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    It would be cheaper to buy it from the US as salvage. Have you seen that crappy old rustbucket lately? Sure they put a new coat of paint on it, but I wouldn't risk my life flying in that thing. Might make a cool ground-based home though.

  51. Orbiting methlab FTW! by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    Screw that old RV, and cooking in roach-infested houses.Imagine the crystals they can grow in microgravity!

    Just hope Jesse's funyun crumbs don't screw up the environmental control system...

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  52. That explains it! by T.E.D. · · Score: 1
  53. [slightly offtopic but..] Can we not have both? by midgetpoker · · Score: 1

    So.. nick a buran spaceplane. Wonderful though the shuttle was, given the technology at the time, a shuttle/spaceplane was the logical design for any spacefaring nation. I'd have loved to see Buran make more than test flights. Even then it had advantages over the shuttle as it could make automatic landings, something which wasn't added to the shuttle for decades. Buran was sadly brought to its knees due to Russian political in-fighting; crippled due to the economy dropping into the toilet and finally killed due to such poor funding its own shelter fell on; it crushing it. Flag-wave all you want, but I'm saddened by such technological beauty being neglected due to political "them -vs - us"squabbles. I've one of Buran's thermal tiles on a shelf and was really shocked by just how light they were, given the heat they could manage. RIP buran.

  54. also don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...some sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads.

  55. A few problems by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the chaos is at its climax, a fleet of 10 Sikorsky CH-53E heavy lift helicopters wearing NASA Emergency Rescue livery will show up, and heroically inform everyone that they're here to take the Shuttle to a more secure location, away from the fire, and all that, back at LAX.

    I don't think it would be possible for 10 choppers to coordinate to lift a load like that, the diameter of the rotors on the chopper is 80 feet, and the wingspan of the shuttle is 80 feet, so they would be pulling at an angle, which even if they could maintain the proper separation, would reduce their payload capacity. Worse, if one chopper loses or reduces power, the downward force would pull all of the choppers closer together, likely causing their rotors to collide. This coordination would be much harder to maintain when they fly into the smokescreen. To do this in real life, they'd need some kind of special bracket to allow the choppers to have enough horizontal separation to lift vertically.

    Meanwhile, the real Endeavour is being flown a few miles West, out to the Pacific. While in flight, a crack team of Swiss military aerialists will wrap the Shuttle in camouflaged and water-tight plastic wrap, like they use for boats and other heavy equipment when shipping.

    It seems highly unlikely that they'd be able to get a watertight seal around all of the tow ropes while airborne.... though they are a *crack* team, so maybe.

    Once wrapped, the tethers holding the Shuttle will be released, sending the plastic-coated orbiter plunging into the icy Pacific.

    This part is even harder - the picture in the article shows the shuttle sinking under the water to the special submarine, except that the shuttle wouldn't sink, it would float.

    The shuttle cargo bay alone is 18m x 4.5m x 2m (estimated), or 162 m^3, which would displace 162,000 kg or water, or around 178 US tons. Add in the rest of the volume of the shuttle, and it's probably closer to 250 tons of displacement. The sub would have to come snatch it from the surface. I assume that something like an 16,000 ton Ohio Class sub would be able to submerge even with a 200 ton buoyant chamber on it, but I don't know for sure - I don't know how close to neutrally buoyant a sub is.

    And of course, if the shuttle was submerged, it's unlikely that it could handle much pressure - it's designed to be under positive pressure in space, every 30 feet under water is one atmosphere of negative pressure, which the shuttle was never designed for.

    And then finally there's the problem of what to do with it once they get it, the article suggests:

    A country with a motive, like maybe a strange fixation on neutrality to the degree they've made their country a fortress and they may be interested in getting a spaceship for an off-world colony, fast.

    If they are building a space colony, they'd probably want to get higher than the 400 mile max orbit of the shuttle. And if they just want a launch vehicle, for the $600M they are spending on the 20 CH-53E's, they may as well pay the Russians to take them to space, since they Russians can launch them cheaper than the $450M/flight it costs for the shuttle. And, of course, the shuttles are no longer spaceworthy, and it's likely that no one (not even NASA) has the ability to take a mothballed shuttle that's been on an underwater journey and make it spaceworthy again.

    If I were a Mythbuster, I'd declare this myth "Busted", as I don't see any way it could work in real life.

  56. Oh Sure... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 1

    Make jokes about stealing a space shuttle, something capable of dropping orbital nukes, and everyone thinks it's the funniest thing. But make one remark at the airport about how you thought that great new movie was 'the bomb' and they hall you away...

    1. Re:Oh Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "haul," by the way.

  57. IDIOTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be a liberal thing, you do know its just the shell of the vehicle, If your in need of a shuttle shell the russian is sitting some where completely unguarded.

  58. It was already stolen by portforward · · Score: 1

    from the people in Washington state.

  59. -5, Idle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news, I could totally make it with your girlfriend/wife, all I need to do is take you out, then disguise my voice, facial features and body as yours, learn perfectly to emulate your mannerisms, dupe your smell, etc...

    You see how pointless this idea is? That's WHY they're not worried about it. It would be like someone stealing New Jersey. Too hard to do, and who the hell would want to?

  60. The Gawker Media Group sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, they often employ the most offensive, idiotic blowhard asswipes available.

    And for some unknown reason, their stupidest shit is usually their most offensive shit as well -- which is really weird, once you think about it. I mean, most stupidity survives a critical review through charisma. Their asswipe writers don't have much charisma.

      It's like, you might expect the prettiest girl at school to go out with a dumb jock. You would be pretty surprised, however, to see her making out with a developmentally disabled student with poopy pants. However, the morons in management at Gawker Media are in bed with ugly, smelly moron writers. I guess they feel like they can relate, or something....

  61. Swissair doesn't exist anymore since 2002 by Framboise · · Score: 1

    Swissair was liquidated in March 2002. Its successor, Swiss International Air Line, was taken over by the German airline Lufthansa in 2005.

    Also the choice of Switzerland government as main actor seems extremely bizarre to whoever knows a bit how Switzerland works. The private Swiss banks do cultivate secrecy, not the government (the Swiss secret services are rather amateurish). A highly decentralized and democratic state like Switzerland makes any coordinated, well prepared and secret operation of this kind very difficult. Further, the motivation for planning such an operation, to colonize space in case of emergency, is beyond ridiculous.

  62. The Swiss state-run airline, Swissair, ... by inflamez · · Score: 2

    ... is actually not run by the state and is not called Swissair. The company he's looking for is "Swiss International Air Lines" (since 2002) and is a subsidiary of the German airline Lufthansa (since 2005).

    Otherwise, the plan seems legit.

  63. Flight readiness? - No 80386 chips.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The villans would get caught when they have to purchase rad-hardened 80386 chips on the open market. That's the real reason the Shuttles were retired: No more 80386 replacement chips are available...

    http://www.cpushack.com/space-craft-cpu.html

  64. poilceman was correct! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And after going through the effort, he proved the LAPD policeman correct! Does he really think that some step of the plan would fail?

  65. Parking by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    Sure, but where would you park it?

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  66. And a steamroller by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    You'll need a steamroller as well.

    --
    I come here for the love