Slashdot Mirror


Where Has All the Xenon Gone?

LucidBeast writes "Xenon, the second heaviest of the noble gasses, is only found in trace amounts in the atmosphere. Atmosphere contains less xenon than other lighter noble gasses. Missing xenon has perplexed scientists and it has been speculated that it is hiding in the Earth's mantle. Now, a group at the University of Bayreuth in Germany thinks it might have found the answer. It turns out that xenon does not dissolve easily into magnesium silicate perovskite, and thus it cannot hide there. Because it had no place to hide, it is now gone forever."

225 comments

  1. Fortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most slashdotters are net producers of gasses.

    1. Re:Fortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're thinking CO2 and methane. I'm quite sure I don't produce very much xenon.

    2. Re:Fortunately by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      most slashdotters are net producers of gasses.

      You're thinking CO2 and methane. I'm quite sure I don't produce very much xenon.

      I have a fission reactor in my garage. So I am a net producer of radioactive Xenon.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Fortunately by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I just have a Tesla Coil I run 24/7 as a security device. so all I generate is Ozone.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Fortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I got a pet rock. Whenever there is a sudden release of radon in the living room, I can blame it on the pet.

  2. Pandora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's some on Pandora, so if we need it we can always send in a mining company or something to extract it.

    http://aliens.wikia.com/wiki/Pandora

  3. Easy Answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask the bitmap brothers where it's at, they have ample..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2w-tiRnac2k

  4. It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's in all those funny looking headlights

    1. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by equex · · Score: 2, Informative

      which are a fucking hazard

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
    2. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      I thought it went into all those disco strobe lights in the '70s...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    3. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually pretty close. A bunch went into display/effects laser systems in the 1990s, before cheap diode lasers because available in a variety of colours. If you ever saw non-red/non-green lasers at shows in the 1990s, they were either YAG (different tech altogether), or Argon/Neon/Krypton/Xenon blends for different colours. Now they're pretty much all solid-state, and cost $500 instead of around $100k.

    4. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Xenon is in QUALITY headlights. the blue and purple crap the posers put on their cars is not Xenon but actually low grade halogen bulbs with a color coating on them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, even the real Xenon headlights are a hazard, especially to older drivers.

    6. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by demachina · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Xenon headlights are a hazard, especially to older drivers."

      ⦠because drivers can see seniors on sidewalks sooner and have a better chance of hitting them for points?

      --
      @de_machina
    7. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

      Improperly aimed, they're a hazard to everybody, but not any more than a driver with high beams on halogen bulbs.

    8. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by davolfman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the a-hat tailgating you in a lifted truck with xenon headlights ruins your nightvision.

    9. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      Actually, you can get really nice halogen headlight bulbs. Personally, I recommend the Sylvania SilverStar Ultra series. They're kinda pricy compared to other brands, but one of the best (if not the best) aftermarket bulbs on the market.

      https://www.sylvania.com/en-us/products/automotive/Pages/silverstar-ultra.aspx

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by berashith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is this issue really the bulbs, or is it the asshole, the truck, or the tailgating ? My preference if someone is really close and trying to blind me is to turn my lights off, and let them light the road for me. Of course, this wouldnt be safe, so I keep coasting to a slower and safer speed. Eventually the asshole figures it out.

    11. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by J'raxis · · Score: 0

      The problem is the asshole tailgating. But instead of dealing with one asshole's irresponsibility, we should just ban products left and right because a few assholes misuse them.

      ... so I keep coasting to a slower and safer speed. Eventually the asshole figures it out.

      Nah, dealing with a problem yourself is too difficult! Easier to just let the government take care of the problem by banning everything.

    12. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by omnichad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, if you like replacing your headlights 1-2 times a year. That makes them even more expensive by comparison.

    13. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the issue, at least for low height vehicles on level ground, is when the HID lights are aftermarket mods and installed on the cheap or incorrectly. I've seen plenty of vehicles where they are not aimed correctly, aimed way too high.

    14. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by sjames · · Score: 2

      It's also the perfectly reasonable driver in the opposing lane. Any aim that provides him with reasonable head lighting can place you in the focus of his headlights given the right road conditions. If his headlights are too intense you won't be able to see a thing after the encounter.

      When it comes to headlights, more is certainly not necessarily better.

    15. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by avandesande · · Score: 1

      The high temperature look is actually worse for the driver as shorter wavelengths scatter more easily in fog or dust. Not sure what you mean by 'QUALITY' but HID is poser all around.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    16. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they're aimed wrong. They're great if you live out in the middle of nowhere with no streetlights. Face it, Halogen lights just suck because they aren't bright enough.

    17. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My setup is only 5000K (3200 lumens per bulb) which is essentially true white with little or no blue. I got that because I do lots of night driving on pitch-black country roads and the extra light really helps.

    18. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by berashith · · Score: 2

      on a mostly related note... I spent some time driving around the desert in arizona and new mexico. Every car that drove by at night blinded me in the worst way. It took me several days to figure out that it wasnt just a common thing for all drivers to keep their high beams on all the time ( they werent ), but that the issue was the amount of darkness out there is so great that the contrast to what is needed by urban cars to light a road at night is just painful.

      The angle of the road can occur with any lights, and I will give you the point that when it happens with HIDs it is worse than with other bulbs. Many of the factory HID kits are self leveling, which at least reduces the issue as much as possible ( along with being REALLY cool to watch). The aftermarket kits dont do this, and make a mess by pointing all over the place.

    19. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by berashith · · Score: 1

      5 percent tint also works wonderfully when the problem is the car behind you.

    20. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Agree on slowing down for the scumbags.

      When they get closer to my ugly steel liftgate and tri-ball Reese hitch (always leave the hitch installed as a standoff) it reminds them of their mortality and they back off.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    21. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      It's the asshole with the bulbs. putting them in a crap car that does not have projector style headlamps that is designed to use 100+ watt bulbs. Reflector headlamps without a cutoff shutter, (2007-2012 civic has a properly designed reflector for example) simply blind the hell out of everyone. And 90% of all trucks have craptastic designed headlights to begin with, so those by default are bad, adding the bulbs makes it worse.

      I have 100 watt Xenon's in my Pontiac Fiero, but I also made a plate to replace the sealed beam with quad Hella 90mm projector headlamps that have a drastic cutoff. I can see better than ever, but oncoming traffic sees my marker lights as brighter than my headlights.

      And this is the problem most of the "assholes" buy $19.00 lenses off of ebay and $19.00 "purple HID like" bulbs. they then poorly install them in their rolling parts car truck, 1995 Civic or Kia junker that already has front end damage. and dont spent the 20 minutes aligning the lamps. They cant afford to even own their car let alone install the right parts, so you cant expect them to install them right.

      I had one kid flip out when I told him my headlight upgrade was $550.00 total. "MY CAR WAS LESS THAN THAT"

      The real stuff is expensive, you can not just stuff a bulb in and drive, yet these people do just that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No the answer to the asshole tailgaiting is a pipe bumper and standing on the brakes. It will make those light go out quickly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    23. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Try them in a motorcycle. I replace them 4 times a roding season. But they are worth it due to motorcycle makers being epic dumb on headlight design.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    24. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 2

      When that happens, I turn my rear-view mirror so it reflects their headlights back at them.

    25. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I've noticed this... It seems headlight design is an afterthought for motorcycle makers. Low beams about as effective as a flashlight, high beams that have reasonable throw but zero spread. Only bike I've ridden with a decent light (...and I haven't ridden many) is the big round H4 on my BMW R100R. Strange though to be going through so many in a season, do those bulbs just put off too much heat?

      --
      +1 Disagree
    26. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my previous car, which was a relatively short sedan, I had a mirror in the back window positioned to reflect back at the driver of a tailgating, taller vehicle. It seemed moderately effective, in that such vehicles didn't seem to tailgate for very long when the mirror was properly positioned. A little windshield wiper fluid usually makes them back off if other techniques don't work.

    27. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Any aim that provides him with reasonable head lighting can place you in the focus of his headlights given the right road conditions. If his headlights are too intense you won't be able to see a thing after the encounter.

      How about switching to red headlights? They wouldn't interfere with your night vision nearly as much, and would also scatter less in fog.

      Or a high-tech solution: an LCD windshield that tracks the position of your eyes, calculates the positions where the line between them and bright light sources crosses the shield, and dims itself at those exact locations. Perhaps with some kind of failsafe that keeps larger than, say, 10% of the glass from being darkened any one time (make the power supply inadequate for anything larger), to avoid unfortunate malfunctions.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    28. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With red headlights, anything that doesn't reflect much red will appear dark, increasing the number of dark things that may not have any contrast against a night background, e.g. green stuff like plants.

    29. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Vibration. high revving sportbikes will literally create a resonance in the bulb filament. I end up having to ride a few days with bright only aimed back down until I get a replacement.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    30. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by sjames · · Score: 1

      The red headlights could be an idea. The LED windscreen seems like a very expensive high tech solution to a very simple low tech problem, especially if a rock flies up. It also seems like if it works just slightly too well it might obscure the one thing you absolutely must see while on a curve.

    31. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I had an older minivan that the rear wiper failed, so I re aimed the squirter to shoot straight back and drilled it out so it was a stream. That one works awesome for tailgaiters. Help them clean their windshield! Only had one redneck try to have words with me by pulling along side and laying on his horn. At that time I worked security so I would hold my badge in it's wallet with id against the window, suddenly he stopped being a redneck and slowed down.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    32. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not true at all. I drive a bimmer with HID's, and have never had this problem you speak of (driving in heavy fog, mind you). There is a reason why they're called "high intensity discharge" headlights. The light emitted is largely coherent and semi-monochromatic, meaning the photons travel farther in the fog, due to the air molecules having a low cross-sectional area in interference, permitting the photons to travel further in the gas, without absorption. Lower wavelength light emitted by argon lamps will scatter more readily due to the their higher wavelengths/lower frequencies. Drive in a HID-equipped vehicle sometime, and you'll see the difference in the way the road clears up; there's simply no comparison. What you pay is what you get.

    33. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there are quite a few people who would believe stuff like this and take it seriously, especially in the car mod community. It makes it really difficult to find the right circle of people to get results based advice instead of someone who acts like they can tell the difference because they talked to someone who read a joke like this. And that isn't getting into the crowd that you can convince to buy headlight fluid.

    34. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by avandesande · · Score: 1

      That's complete bologna. Infrared passes through impenetrable haze and even dark clothing. I race with several people that race Baja and they prefer halogens for this reason- the hids create a white wall in the dust. If you go to Baja Designs they sell amber filters for their hids.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    35. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      When that happens, I turn my rear-view mirror so it reflects their headlights back at them.

      So then you've got a guy, temporarily blinded, right behind you, who wants to go faster than you. What could possibly go wrong

    36. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by rant64 · · Score: 2

      Aimed wrong? Write to your representative about this, from WP:

      European vehicle regulations require such headlamps to be equipped with lens cleaners and an automatic self-leveling system to keep the beams aimed correctly regardless of vehicle load and attitude, but no such devices are required on motorcycles, or where ECE regulations are inapplicable.

      For that reason alone, xenon headlights are a blessing. At least around here. Not a single xenon-lit car blinds me, as opposed to those with halogen lights that don't even bloody know that they have a damn wheel/knob to adjust the headlights. Or some drive around with full beam because they can't actually tell the difference from within the car (I assure you, you can with xenon).

      On motorcycles it's not ubiquitous enough, yet. That fake glaring blue crap you see on cars? That's just plain stupid and as explained below has nothing to do with xenon.

    37. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      The advantage is that I'm no longer blinded. I'll take it.

    38. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      The issue is lights being aimed forward instead of at the road.

    39. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I don not know how old you are or how much night time driving experience you have but this is what I have found in Australia. Twenty or more years ago it was a rare occurrence to get high beamed by another driver. In the past without fail when approaching a curve or crest in the road both drivers approaching each other would dip their lights prior to being able to see the other car. Now most drivers do not dip their headlights until treating you to a few seconds of it. I am sorry it is unrelated to Xenon but it is something that seems to be occurring (at least here) all the time. Do you find that where you are too?

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    40. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      An EMP pointing out the back would work too. I would install one in a minute.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    41. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      At the moment I am driving what is without doubt the most reliable car I have ever had (and yes I have owned new cars). I paid $800 for my Nissan Micra about five years ago. Have spent around $600 on it for maintenance (not including tyres) and have travelled just over 230,000km and I still get around 16km/litre. I love it.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    42. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by berashith · · Score: 1

      heh, i am plenty old :) , and I have seen the behavior you talk about. I have family that lives in very rural areas, and you need to use high beams at night. Everyone is polite in all aspects of life there, and the low beams are used when they are needed. You also dont encounter many cars, and when you do you can see them from miles away, so it is easy to be prepared. I currently live in such an urban environment that I never use my high beams, and I maybe turn on the fog lights 2 or 3 times a year. I have no sample size to comment on the proper high beam/low beam useage as no one where I drive needs them, and the few idiots that do turn them on are just part of the general level of idiocy that you have to tolerate while living in close proximity to a lot of people.

    43. Re:It's in all those funny looking headlights by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I live in Adelaide, South Australia. Twenty years ago it was uncommon to be high beamed by an oncoming car after a curve or crest. These days it would be around 80% of oncoming drivers spray you with it liberally before dipping. Not exaggerating either. It shocks me.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  5. Obligatory by Legion303 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Found it! It was in the couch.

    1. Re:Obligatory by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      95% of lost items are just stuck under the pillow.

    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's this? It was in my hand the whole time!

    3. Re:Obligatory by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Xenon R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

  6. Strategic Xenon Reserve by EmagGeek · · Score: 2

    There is probably a massive government Xenon reserve somewhere, like there is for almost everything else; oil, corn, wheat, your private information, and so on...

    1. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by WillAdams · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Problem is, the U.S. is getting out of the rare gas business:

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/11/AR2010101104496.html

      So one can't even convincingly joke about it.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US Government has been selling off assets to buy land for years now, actually. In fact, the US Federal Government is the fastest-growing land owner in the country.

      The objective is mainly to lock away minerals to prevent mining and other economic use of land, and partly to consolidate more power. The more land the Federal government owns, the more they can inject themselves into everyones' business.

    3. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Look everyone, it's another Rand Conspiracy nutjob...

      I miss the days when the nutballs were easily identified by the tinfoil skull caps and end is near signs.... No they had to find a horribly written book by a incredibly untalented author that was universally panned as horrible in her time and all time after that and start their new religion on that piece of Science fiction..

      You guys know that is how Scientology started right?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Must be the Democrats doing that since the Republicans are planning on reducing the debt by selling off Federal land.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey, be nice. In Scientology, everyone can get 'better'.
      In Randology, you start as an arrogant prick and stay that way. Or get killed.

    6. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't want the federal government messing with your stuff or in your business, not selling your land to them would be a pretty good first step.

    7. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be nice if either party would cut the debt by actually cutting spending.

      Like cutting the military in half. We'd still be the largest spending military in the world.

    8. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      Few people still remember when National Lampoon broke the story about the massive leak in the Daylight Savings Reserve.

    9. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      If they want it, how do you not sell your land to the government?

    10. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by J'raxis · · Score: 2

      Sure you can. That the government created the National Helium Reserve and its attendant bureaucracy for dirigibles and is still holding onto it in 2012 is ludicrous, whether or not they're finally getting rid of it. It's an exemplary case of how government bureaucracies always far outlive their original mandate and purpose.

    11. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I miss the days when the nutballs were easily identified by the tinfoil skull caps and end is near signs.... No they had to find a horribly written book by a incredibly untalented author that was universally panned as horrible in her time and all time after that and start their new religion on that piece of Science fiction..

      I'm actually trying to figure out what you meant here. Are you trying to suggest that Objectivists are a religion along the lines of Scientology? The book may be five times too long and the Objectivists silly, but 'universally panned' is different than bestseller and we see few Objectivists engaging in coordinated thuggish behavior. They're the "leave us alone" types, aren't they?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whether or not they're finally getting rid of it.

      Actually getting rid of it is a bad thing. If the government weren't flooding the market with its reserve of helium, helium prices would rise. If the prices rose, then it would become profitable to capture helium from natural gas facilities that currently just let it vent to the atmosphere.

      Once helium's in the atmosphere, it's on its way out into space where it'll be gone forever. I dunno about you, but if we ever get fusion working it'd be nice to have a supply of helium on Earth before having to go to the moon or further to get more.

    13. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward for President!

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    14. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, by insisting on getting out of it ASAP, they're driving prices down so they don't get a return on the investment and they are driving wasteful use of a finite resource. The only way they could be any dumber about their market exit would be if they just opened the valves and walked away.

    15. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just say no? Yes, they can use eminent domain, although that is much less common for the federal government than other levels. If the original claim is true that they are the fastest-growing land owner at the moment, the vast majority of that is not going to be from eminent domain.

    16. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by bmo · · Score: 1

      >Sure you can. That the government created the National Helium Reserve and its attendant bureaucracy for dirigibles and is still holding onto it in 2012 is ludicrous,

      It's like you totally missed the story about the helium shortage affecting MRI scanning.

      http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/08/23/theres-a-helium-shortage-on-and-its-affecting-more-than-just-balloons/#the-government

      --
      BMO

    17. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      But, doesn't the fact that they can use eminent domain if they really want your property, mean that saying "no" is kind of pointless? Just because people are apparently agreeing to sell their property without forcing the gov't to resort to eminent domain, doesn't mean that in any particular case the strategy will be worthwhile.

    18. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the government created the National Helium Reserve and its attendant bureaucracy for dirigibles

      It was originally created for that purpose, but the major expansions happened because of the space race. There are other uses for helium beyond dirigibles and the space race, and at least in this case, the bureaucracy was pretty aware and up to date on that. To say it stuck around because someone wasn't aware of the waning era of the airship, as if ran by Mr. Burns, is wrong and/or deceptive.

    19. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Wait a second; wouldn't fusion create a new supply of helium, not use it?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because some people get raped, does that mean saying no to offers of sex is pointless? Even with the abuses of eminent domain, there are still restrictions on when it can be used, more so for the federal government where it is not used that frequently. I'm too lazy to look up the numbers at the moment, but if some other energetic person wants to continue to the thread, they are free to do so.

    21. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right next to the strategic Maple Syrup reserve.

    22. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the long, long run we might replace D-T reaction with D-He3 reaction. Both produce He4, but the latter requires He3. There are also some important science and imaging uses for He3 that don't work with He4.

      While everyone talk about about a general helium shortage, there is also a specific He3 shortage at the moment because of a sudden demand from the DHS to use it in neutron detectors at any cost. Prices have jumped by a factor of 20, and there is limited supply as most of it comes from decayed tritium from nuclear weapons.

    23. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Apologies to /. readers for going off on a tangent here ... )

      Yes, the government can use eminent domain to seize your property, for nickels on the dollar by way of compensation. You can decline to accept, and they might even back off temporarily. After all, they do have other methods that are even cheaper, but may involve more paperwork. They can fly over your property and claim that you have been caught growing some illegal plant material on some remote corner of your property. When the government lawyers leave, the tactical assault team might just be the next government visitors, kicking in your door instead of knocking politely. If you are lucky, you will survive the experience, if you are not .. well, you will have no more worries. It's called asset forfeiture (criminal or civil), and local, state and federal governments all get a piece of your pie. Sometimes mistakes are made, and witnesses are left alive, as the following story reveals:

      This happens far more often than you might imagine, and as the economy craters, this criminal behavior by government will only get worse, far worse. You can thank the War OF Drugs for the start of this activity, and with today's police state under the War OF Terror, there might not even be a police missing persons report filed by a concerned neighbor. Stuff happens.

    24. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, link hosed:

      http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/forfeit-your-money-and-your-life-donald-scott-was-an-innocent-man-with-a-very-desirable-ranch-now-hes-dead--shot-by-la-law-phil-reeves-reports-1482549.html

    25. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The objective is mainly to lock away minerals to prevent mining and other economic use of land, and partly to consolidate more power. The more land the Federal government owns, the more they can inject themselves into everyones' business.

      The Federal Government can invoke eminent domain on any land it pleases, thus it effectively owns all of it already. Thus your conspiracy theory is silly, or at the very least implying that the Feds is a very honorable and responsible conspiracy that plays nice, thinks long-term and avoids abusing its power. Does that sound like the Federal Government to you?

      Besides, owning land basically means that the government has a record of you being its owner. You can't own land - or, really, anything - without it being the government's business, since it's them who you're going to call for backup the second someone bigger than you disputes that ownership. And it gets even more thorny if they aren't directly stealing from you but, say, buying a centimeter-thick area of land that completely surround your hourse, then blackmailing you by refusing you the right to cross unless you agree to some unconscionable terms - at that point simple ownership records are no longer sufficient to resolve the situation fairly.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any evidence that happens a lot? There is a big difference between it happening to a few people, and it happening frequently to many people all the time. It is easy to find a few cases of the former and no one is denying that it happens, but it a lot harder to find anything that supports the latter.

    27. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. There is evidence all over the MSM, particularly in local newspapers. Focus on the war on drugs, and particularly the joint local/fed raids on medical marijuana dispensaries in states where medical marijuana is state-legal. These raids happen all the time. They specifically target well establish successful dispensaries that have been in business for many years, paying all the local, state, and federal taxes. The biggest "piggy banks" get the most attention. There are also local/fed raids on medical marijuana growers that supply smaller dispensaries and cooperative operations.

      The DEA used to have an administrative policy that they prosecuted growers who had more than 99 marijuana plants growing at one time. California even had state law limits of 99 plants for their medical marijuana licensed growers. Well, times have changed. If the licensed grower has a fat bank account, or an especially nice home, they now use a multi-year aggregate of more than 99 plants (eg. in operation for 5 years, caught with 25 plants == ergo, bust the grower for 125 plants). Assets are always seized -- bank accounts, cars, houses, businesses, everything. OTOH, gang-based street distribution of cannabis and other illicit drugs are rarely touched, because medical marijuana is the low-hanging fruit. The police have little problem in finding the legal distributors -- they are state-licensed.

      This is going on in every state where medical marijuana has been made state-legal, either by voter referendum or by the state's legislatures. Again, assets are always seized. This is in spite of the USA's 9th & 10th Amendments regarding States' Rights, in violation of limits on federal interference in intrastate versus interstate commerce statutes, and promises by USA AG Holder not to interfere in state-legal medical marijuana operations.

      Now, factor in such public knowledge as:

      (1) Obama/Holder DEA/BATF "Fast & Furious" operation, which passed thousands of firearms to favored Mexican drug cartels, while their illicit drugs went unhindered to the USA. Where did the drug money go? To Wall Street banks for laundering. The favored drug cartels got a free pass, while competitive Mexican drug cartels were prosecuted;

      (2) the heroin situation in Afghanistan -- the Taliban reduced Afghani heroin to less than 5% of world consumption, but since the NATO invasion Afghani heroin production peaked at 95% of total world consumption. There are news photos & videos of US Marines guarding Afghani poppy plantations from Taliban destruction;

      (3) the Wells Fargo/Wachovia civil (CIVIL) prosecution for laundering $378.4 Billion over 2 or 3 years, and only fined $160 Million, an almost insignificant "cost of doing business" -- no seized assets, no prison terms;

      (4) the Iran-Contra Scandal involved cut-rate war materials delivered to Iran (already under USA sanctions) through Israel, the proceeds of which were used to purchase weapons on the black market to supply the Contras. But when the Contras needed more weapons and operating funds, the CIA funneled Columbian cocaine into the USA to street dealers (google Freeway Ricky); and

      (5) a USA DEA agent (Kiki Camerena) in Mexico was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered after helping to bust multiple 500 hectare cannabis plantations. The (corrupt) Mexican government resisted any USA investigation. Reagan ordered the entire USA-Mexico border sealed. Eventually, Camerena's body was recovered. But the border closure ended after only a few days, because the Mexican government threatened to withhold interest payments to their Wall Street bank creditors, and those creditors leaned on the Reagan administration, who relented.

      I could go on for another 2k words or so, but you get the idea. The USA "War on Drugs" is really the USA "War OF Drugs", designed to control the source, distribution, and profits from illegal drugs, rather than curtail their production and distribution. The USA government caters to the illicit drug trade only so long as it has control of the trade a

    28. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look everyone, a far-right-wing republican fascist...

      I miss the days when nutballs were easily identified by the dark suit, red tie, and KKK Members-Only card... No they had to find a radio show hosted by an incredibly untalented moron who is universally panned as an idiot in his time (and now) and start a new religion based on his wacky fictional beliefs.

      You guys know that is how the two-party system got started, right?

    29. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      The following may be of interest to you http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/felkins11.html

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    30. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, still doesn't discuss the frequency of federal purchasing of land via eminent domain. Not that I think the seizure thing is good and I've definitely ranted against that, but it is not what was being discussed previously in the thread that was trying to be called out as baseless.

    31. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Maybe I replied to the wrong thread (my net is so slow today it would take an hour to trawl back through the threads) and for that, if so, then I apologise

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    32. Re:Strategic Xenon Reserve by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      And when a private company does something like that, people whine about "price fixing" and demand the government Do Something(TM) to stop it. Apropos to this is today's Slashdot story about China artificially restricting its rare-earth supply specifically in order to drive up prices.

  7. It was blown away in a Megablast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This will make the Xenonphobes happy.

    1. Re:It was blown away in a Megablast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was blown away in a Megablast.

      This will make the Xenonphobes happy.

      The reference should certainly make the Bitmap Brothers happy.

    2. Re:It was blown away in a Megablast. by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      "The reference should certainly make the Bitmap Brothers happy."

      Daft Punk is lightly amused...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:It was blown away in a Megablast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will make the Xenonphobes happy.

      But is a big setback for Xenophilia research.

    4. Re:It was blown away in a Megablast. by Briareos · · Score: 1

      Them, and Bomb the Bass...

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  8. Xenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know what happened to it. It was overthrown by the Sludge Vohaul virus, presumably in Space Quest XI.

    1. Re:Xenon by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      This looks like a Job for Roger Wilco Space Guy!

      Sigh I wish there were more comments. We need Space Quest VII the return to roman numerals!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Xenon by sjames · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure confused Scientologists are responsible.

  9. Canadians Reserves by Dareth · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Canadians Reserves by dexotaku · · Score: 5, Funny

      ..but somehow we lack a strategic bacon reserve. I think bacon really should have the priority there.

    2. Re:Canadians Reserves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..but somehow we lack a strategic bacon reserve.

      Speak for yourself buddy.

    3. Re:Canadians Reserves by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      ..but somehow we lack a strategic bacon reserve. I think bacon really should have the priority there.

      What strategies are based on bacon?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Canadians Reserves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If somehow Maple Syrup coated Bacon could trap the Xenon we would have all these needs covered.

    5. Re:Canadians Reserves by dexotaku · · Score: 2

      What strategies are based on bacon?

      Dunno.. the only ones that immediately spring to mind involve things like suicide or murder via, say, bear attack.

    6. Re:Canadians Reserves by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      You might be funny.... but make some Brownies but replace the cooking oil with Bacon fat. ZOMG far better than the "healthy" crap.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Canadians Reserves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bacon sandwich strategy of course. I'd reveal more but then I'd get hungry.

    8. Re:Canadians Reserves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please no! Have you ever tasted Canadian bacon?

    9. Re:Canadians Reserves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or area denial, for certain religions where it is not kosher.

      Bacon bombs. Like a dirty bomb, except it'll smell better. Mmm... weaponized bacon...

    10. Re:Canadians Reserves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ..but somehow we lack a strategic bacon reserve. I think bacon really should have the priority there.

      Fat ass Americans are the bacon reserve.

      captcha:devours

    11. Re:Canadians Reserves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bacon bomb serves two purposes, not only does it take certain religious extremist, but can also supply our own troops via friendly fire (assuming they are also not of those religions... or at least not practicing...). Development work continues on the beef bomb and the gay porn bomb in case we need to go up against other religions. That last one might be able to supersede the others, fulfilling the two primary purposes, but at the cost of no longer being effective against vegan hippies.

    12. Re:Canadians Reserves by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      We do have one, Its called "Iowa".

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    13. Re:Canadians Reserves by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      What strategies AREN'T?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    14. Re:Canadians Reserves by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Canada has a Strategic Maple Syrup Reserve.

      They are known for preventing sticky problems.
         

  10. Where it'll be found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'll be found in a country that by coincidence is in need of liberating.

  11. "gone"? did it ever exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm confused: did it go out into upper atmosphere or space like helium (seems unlikely @~10x weight of nitrogen & oxygen), did alchemists turn it into gold or did we overestimate the amount there initially was? not seeing how the "conservation of mass" loop is being closed here...

  12. Wrong question by JazzHarper · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFS makes no sense at all; TFA is not much better. It seems that, rather than asking, "Why is there so little xenon in the atmosphere" and coming up with a purely speculative answer, the researchers might have questioned why anyone expected to find more.

    1. Re:Wrong question by Fubari · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems that, rather than asking, "Why is there so little xenon in the atmosphere" and coming up with a purely speculative answer, the researchers might have questioned why anyone expected to find more.

      I thought everyone (well, scientists anyway) expected more Xenon than we observe on Earth because of meteorite samples: apparently meteorites have more xenon than we see in our atmosphere.

      Unless... did you mean why didn't the Bayreuth researches test (e.g. question) any those theories? I thought they did test one of those theories by trying to saturate a mineral (perovskite) with xenon, said mineral being found in the Earth's mantel. (IANAGS, so perhaps an actual geo-scientist could comment on whether perovskite was a good choice for a test like this; I'm willing to give the Bayreuth researchers the benefit of the doubt, given that they are actual geoscientists and probably gave some thought to candidate minerals for their test).

      Interesting? Sure... I never knew about a "xenon discrepancy"; so mildly interesting.
      Informative? Sort of... I would have liked to see another paragraph on xenon comparing content for extra vs. terrestrial rocks. I'm willing to give the geo-scientist community the benefit of the doubt of having thoroughly considered the "xenon deficiency" to the point where they actually gave it a name.

      From TFA:

      “This model is enough to explain the whole xenon deficiency,” says Svyatoslav Shcheka, a geochemist at the University of Bayreuth in Germany. He and Hans Keppler, also of Bayreuth, report the finding online October 10 in Nature.

      Compared with meteorites that formed out of primordial solar system stuff, Earth and Mars have far less xenon in their atmospheres. Scientists have proposed many possible explanations, such as minerals that locked up xenon in the upper parts of Earth’s middle layer, the mantle.

    2. Re:Wrong question by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that there is some pretty solid theory of exactly what radio of material is created in stars and then expelled in when they die. So we know that teh universe is made up of xx% cardon, x% silicon, xx% xenon.
      So any mass as big as a planet would have that same percentage of Xenon unless something happened to it.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is sort of the gist, but the actual theories are much more involved and probably interesting to some. It isn't based just on the composition of stars, as that would get you something closer to the composition of the Sun. Instead, if you look at the composition of the planets and asteroids, you can see some pretty clear gradients in material with distance from the sun, that there were various stratification processes occurring throughout the solar system. Additionally, chemistry plays a big part in it. Elements that absorbs or binds with iron minerals tend to get pulled to the center of the Earth, while stuff that is attracted to silicates sticks with the stuff that floated to the surface.

      Where the real work gets done is looking at how this process effects radioactive materials and different isotopes. This allows geologists and physicists to work out timelines of when the Earth formed, stratified, and thickened essentially. Some elements decay, for example, from something that does not bind to iron to something that does. If this decayed before the iron sank to the center of the earth, the decay products would have sank to, if it decays after, we would see some portion of it on the surface where it didn't get a chance to sink. Knowing the half-life of many such examples leads to the timeline.

      Some of the models are getting pretty details and making verified, precise predictions of the ratios of various elements and isotopes. Although they only apply to some, and other elements are still being researched (as Xenon is in this case).

    4. Re:Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFS makes no sense at all; TFA is not much better.

      Neither of those is the article. I don't think it's fair to criticize these researchers without reading what they wrote. I'm too lazy to find a free preprint for you.

  13. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    I'm confused: did it go out into upper atmosphere or space like helium (seems unlikely @~10x weight of nitrogen & oxygen), did alchemists turn it into gold or did we overestimate the amount there initially was? not seeing how the "conservation of mass" loop is being closed here...

    it's assumed it was here after earth formed, by assumptions that the material which earth was formed from had x amount of it.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. If Earth itself by srussia · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is xenophobic, what hope does mankind have?

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:If Earth itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, the Earth is just Xenonphobic.

  15. Microsoft is to blame by rossdee · · Score: 2

    They used the Xenon to make XBox 360's

    1. Re:Microsoft is to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm only here because I thought this article was about microprocessors.

    2. Re:Microsoft is to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenon_%28processor%29

  16. Wanted: proof reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atmosphere contains less xenon...

    I turns out that...

  17. In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Seriously, all new cars come with HIDs now...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

      most new cars I've seen over the past 5-6 years have come with LED headlights. First thing I did when I got the electronics for my bike in 2007 was replace the HIDs with LEDs. They're far more efficient and far more rugged.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    2. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never seen LED headlights, and I don't even think they are legal here. Are you sure you aren't thinking of external indicator lights? (fog lights, signal lights, brake lights, etc.)

    3. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by dopaz · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken, LED headlights are just now becoming available from the factory. While aftermarket conversion kits may have been available (though I've never heard of anyone else replacing their HID headlights with LEDs) they certainly aren't common.

      One of the first new cars that was equipped from the factory with LED headlights was the 2008 Lexus LS600h. That's the Hybrid version of the flagship Lexus sedan. It is a $100,000+ vehicle and is pretty rare. Five years later, we are starting to see LED headlights trickle down into more common vehicles. The 2013 Honda Accord offers them, but only on the "Touring" (highest) trim level. Some Audis have them... I'm not talking about a bunch of white LEDs arranged around the headlight assembly, I mean the primary illumination source when driving at night is a LED. Some high-end BMWs have LED headlights.

      Overall, not a common headlight and certainly not even available on most cars made in the past 5 years.

    4. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by lexa1979 · · Score: 1

      look on new Audi car, I know they have... Citroen does also on its newer models...

    5. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Some high-end euro cars do have LED headlights (not just sidelights/indicators) but they're nowhere near as common as HIDs on new cars AFAIK...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most new cars I've seen over the past 5-6 years have come with LED headlights. "

      Wow everyone! It's the 1%! He only sees 7 series BMW and R8 Audi cars...

      Yet I can name 80,000 car models sold in the past 5-6 years that DONT come with LED headlights. Like 99% of all Ford, GM, Chrysler, Toyota,Honda,Suzuki, Kia, Subaru, BMW,Audi, Mercedes cars DONT have LED headlights but regular old halogen bulbs or HID bulbs... Incredibly few cars come with LED headlights.

      How is it driving in that Lamborgini Junker from 2011, How can you tolerate sitting in a car that has held your butt more than 12 times?

    7. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Audi R8 and S8 are the ONLY ones that have LED headlights as an OPTION. They are not standard.

      Or are you confused and think that the stylized strip of led's for DRL indicators are the headlights...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by bigtomrodney · · Score: 2

      No, Audi and Volkswagen's entire new line has LED headlights on all of their models this year and the A4/A5 have had them for 4-5 years now.

      But don't think I'm agreeing with Tastecicles, because they're almost wrong. They are only the dipped/low-beam headlights as LEDs are not yet legal in the USA or Europe for full or high-beam use. But as for this usage, even SEAT has them now on some of their models and that's one of VAG's "budget" brands.

      --
      I never get used to these constant resurrections
    9. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by mikestew · · Score: 1

      LED headlights in my Nissan Leaf, so they're apparently legal in the US. Though Nissan cheaped out and put halogens in for the high beams.

    10. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by dbraden · · Score: 1

      Assuming bigtomrodney above is right, Nissan didn't cheap out, it's just that LED high beams aren't legal in the U.S., yet.

    11. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Cadillac has them on some models now, and Toyota switched the Prius from HID to LED recently. LED headlamps are becoming commonplace fairly quickly!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

      A lot of new cars (Audi A8 and TT to name two, also the new BMWs, Citroens, and the Ford compacts have nothing but LED lightgear) have LED running lights using Cree or Luxeon (most likely Luxeon as they're slightly cheaper) elements. LED indicators have been around for years, at least as long as CHMBL (Centre High Mounted Brake Lights) became mandatory on every new car sold in the UK a decade or some ago. Some EU directive.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    13. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      the Caetano coaches that National Express use have LED main beams. They're all at least ten years old, and while the chassis might be built by either Volvo or Renault, the coachwork is all Spain.

      Source: I rode in one yesterday and I'll be riding in one again tonight.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    14. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      eh? Last I checked Lamborghini don't make bikes. They started out making tractor units, went into sports cars, but never a bike AFAIK. ICBW.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    15. Re:In Xenon/HID headlight bulbs by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      No, Audi and Volkswagen's entire new line has LED headlights on all of their models this year and the A4/A5 have had them for 4-5 years now. But don't think I'm agreeing with Tastecicles, because they're almost wrong. They are only the dipped/low-beam headlights as LEDs are not yet legal in the USA or Europe for full or high-beam use. But as for this usage, even SEAT has them now on some of their models and that's one of VAG's "budget" brands.

      These are just Daytime Running Lights. They use a single bi-xenon headlamp for low/high beam.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
  18. Easy by Narishma · · Score: 0

    Microsoft put it in all those Xbox consoles.

    --
    Mada mada dane.
  19. Where? by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

    So, where did it go?

    1. Re:Where? by mellon · · Score: 1

      Ask the Lorax, dude. Ask the Lorax.

    2. Re:Where? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It was never there in the first place. The summary's not too hot. Try reading "come from" in place of "hide" for starters.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  20. Need some insight by Gerinych · · Score: 1

    Guys, I'm really stupid when it comes to chemistry and stuff... How would xenon escape into space if it's denser than any other (barring one) gases?

    1. Re:Need some insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The theory is that the entire atmosphere was wiped out by some event, perhaps a big collision or some sort. The atmosphere we have now is the result of gases released from within the core of the earth after that event.

  21. Don't Worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fukushima gave us tons of new xenon. Particularly lots of Xe-133 and Xe-136. Hooray!

    1. Re:Don't Worry! by GreenTom · · Score: 2

      According to this, 16.7EBq of Xenon was released by Fukushima, and plugging that into the forumla wikipedia gives to convert Bequerels to grams says that about 2.4kg of Xe-133 was released. Haven't seen anything that says Xe-136 was released, but I didn't look that hard.

  22. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    RTFA. It says that it was probably in the early earth's atmosphere, and the earth's atmosphere was probably blown away by some event, and then re-established itself xenon-free from gasses bubbling up from the molten landscape.

    They also wonder why Mars has no xenon.

  23. Wha?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And because it had no place to hide, it is now gone forever.
     
    I didn't read the article but this cannot be their conclusion. Because something cannot be found it must be gone forever? WTF is that suppose to mean? If there is a known quantity and it can't be found it just means it's somewhere else. If there is no known quanitity than maybe they're just talking out their asses.

    1. Re:Wha?? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was confused as hell, but here is what I've gleaned:

      1. Most noble gases were dissolved in/embedded in the early Earth's rock.
      2. Xenon due to a variety of factors, did not behave in a similar manner, and thus was free floating in the early atmosphere.
      3. A 'big event', like the event that caused Earth's moon to form also knocked the original atmosphere into space.
      4. Because almost all of the xenon was in the atmosphere at the time of the event, it was literally lost (from the perspective of the Earth) to space and was either acquired by the other planets or sun, or blown by the solar wind out to the edge of the solar system and beyond.
      5. Some small amounts of xenon were recaptured by Earth (like how the bits that formed the moon are still 'bound' to Earth) and those small amounts are what we measure in our current atmosphere.

      In short:

      Xenon exists in the atmosphere, not rocks. Impact event knocks off Earth's atmosphere (and the Xenon), Earth's atmosphere is replaced by outgassing from the previously saturated rock. The rock did not contain Xenon, so we have only trace amounts today.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:Wha?? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      I didn't read the article but this cannot be their conclusion. Because something cannot be found it must be gone forever?

      It's been dispersed into the near vacuum of interstellar space.

      As far as we're concerned, that's gone forever.

  24. Another terrible summary by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Informative
    (please note that this post is aimed more at the editor than the submitter, whose first language may not be English)

    "Xenon, the second heaviest of the noble gasses, is only found in trace amounts in the atmosphere.

    So far so good.

    [The] [a]tmosphere contains less xenon than other lighter noble gasses.

    Could be read as meaning that the other noble gasses contain more xenon than the atmosphere, but as a sentence it's passable.

    ...it is hiding in the earths mantle.

    It's called [the] Earth, and you forgot the possesive apostrophe.

    Now a group at the University of Bayreuth in Germany think that they might have found the answer.

    "The answer," given the context, can only seem to mean that they've found out where the xenon is hiding, but...

    I[t] turns out that xenon does not dissolve easily into magnesium silicate perovskite, thus it cannot hide there. And because it had no place to hide, it is now gone forever."

    Oh, okay, so "the answer" seems to be "we still don't know, but it's not where we thought it was"? Rather than "it is now gone forever" it seems (from reading one of articles, shock horror) that it was never actually there in the first place - perhaps substituting "come from" in place of "hide" would have made more sense.

    Yours sincerely,

    Captain Pedantic

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Another terrible summary by JoeRobe · · Score: 1

      the second heaviest of the noble gasses

      For what it's worth, actually it's "gases". "Gasses" is a present tense verb.

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
    2. Re:Another terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Captain Pedantic,

      I agree with all of your points except the last. The researchers are proposing that xenon was there when the Earth formed (which we expect due to the concentration of xenon in meteorites), but that it boiled off with the rest of our first atmosphere. As the Earth cooled, our atmosphere was replenished by elements that had been previously trapped (dissolved) in rock. Xenon was not replenished because it was not soluble in the rocks in the first place.

      So, the xenon was once present, and is now gone forever.

      Sincerely,
      Admiral Pedantic

    3. Re:Another terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we elect you as the /. Chief-in-Proofreading? I know they churn out a lot of stories, but their lack of aplomb for summarizing is appalling.

    4. Re:Another terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (from reading one of articles, shock horror)

      Should probably be: "(from reading one of [the] articles, shock horror)"

      But it could also be [many], [five], [my]... We will never know!

    5. Re:Another terrible summary by tapspace · · Score: 1

      I can agree with most of your pedantry, except the earth critique. The word "earth" is technically a proper noun, but is in such common usage that it almost makes sense not to capitalize it. On top of that, we DO say "the earth". No one says "the center of Earth" like we would for Jupiter or Mars. Rather, we would say "the center of the earth."

    6. Re:Another terrible summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they were implying the Xenon sunk to the center of the Earth and was now out of reach forever. Had it been able to dissolve in silicate perovskite, we might have been able to get some back through mining.

      But I'm pretty sure my interpretation is completely wrong.

  25. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by Logger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I interpreted the poorly written article to mean. The forming rocks could absorb the other noble gases just fine, but not xenon. I infer this would have left an atmosphere (at the time) that was rich in xenon since very little of it was absorbed into the rock. The article speculated that some form of meteorite collision or solar event blew off the atmosphere. Leaving me to infer that the atmosphere we have today is the result of the rock releasing gas into the atmosphere. Since the rock was xenon poor, today's atmosphere is also xenon poor as a result.

  26. Car Headlights! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing else to see here.

  27. Ricermobiles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ricermobiles.

    Next question, please!

  28. but no!! by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Even if it doesn't dissolve in perovsky, it actually dissolves very well in Topatourbiolilepiquorthite !! So that is not a good reason!

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:but no!! by Bardez · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't some sort of citation that backs that claim up be more appropriate than a snarky "Let me Google that for you" link, especially since none of the top links in Google seem to immediately reveal any credit to your claim?

      --
      Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
  29. <obligatory Jimmy Hoffa reference> by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  30. XXEEEENUU!!! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 0

    Xenu and Xerxes decided one day to take it away.

  31. Xenon Rocks? by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Considering their web page hasn't been updated since 1997...
    xenononline.com
    ...I'm not surprised they're gone forever.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Xenon Rocks? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      So this is a heavy noble gas band?

      Interesting. Most of chemistry bands are metals.

  32. Xenophobia by idlehanz · · Score: 1

    If you're afraid of where, how, or why the Xenon disappeared.

    --
    Changing the world... one research project at a time.
  33. I thought xenon was most chemically active by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_gas_compound

    Yes, see the link: of all the noble gases we've studied, it is the most chemically active, we've created many more compounds with xenon than any other noble gas. It's the most reactive.

    Radon is heavier and has more complex electron shells and therefore is probably more reactive, theoretically. But it is also radioactive, so it isn't more chemically active when we take into account the concept the idea of sticking around and staying in the compound.

    So xenon is the most chemically active noble gas, period.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  34. The real question by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
    Long time passing.
    Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
    Long time ago.
    Where have all the Cowboy Neals gone?
    Mommas grounded them one by one.
    Oh, When will they ever learn?
    Oh, When will they ever learn?

  35. That explains this message I just saw. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    "Borno, gone relativistic. See you in a hundred years. Xenon."

    1. Re:That explains this message I just saw. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You win the article because you made a Starflight reference. The only thing more epic would have been to make a reference to the Xenon Laser Cannon death machines from Wasteland, encountered in Base Cochise.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  36. I forgot to add the inevitable conclusion: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the xenon could be trapped in the crust, unlike any other noble gas, CHEMICALLY

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenon#Compounds

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:I forgot to add the inevitable conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is kind of what they were testing here. Like any of the other elements, the chemistry determines what minerals the elements will have affinities for, and in some cases, they will not bind or dissolve in common minerals easily. Just being active is not enough, but it has to deal with the particular activity between major components of those minerals and the element in question. If it doesn't stick, you get something like oil and water. If the Xenon doesn't play nicely with iron related minerals, it won't sink easily, and if it doesn't play with other various minerals, it won't stick around in the mantle or crust easily. Short of finding some pocket of xenon related minerals, the amount of places it could be hiding shrinks pretty quickly.

  37. Rocks Rocks Rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean it's not in my basement?

    (Note: I live in the Rocky Mountains)

  38. Wha... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to say you can't make this up, but, apparently, you can.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  39. Twilight of the Xenon by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    O Noble Gas, We Hardly Knew Ye! :(

  40. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Which coincides nicely with the planetary impact hypothesis for the Moon's origin.

  41. First thing that popped into my mind by jitterman · · Score: 1

    after I read the article title:

    I need some Xenon!
    I'm holdin' out for some Xenon 'til the mornin' li-ight!
    ...

    Bad 80s movie? You're soaking in it!

    --
    For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  42. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a boundary in the atmosphere called the turbopause, where below this gases are well mixed from turbulence, and only above the boundary do gases start to stratify based on their mass. This occurs at an altitude of about 100 km. So while Xenon being heavy would be a big factor in how fast it leaves the atmosphere, there would still be quite a bit that works its way up there regardless. To some degree, chemistry and ionization effects will control how much leaves the atmosphere too, not just the mass.

  43. So long XeCl excimer laser by ChemGeek4501 · · Score: 1

    You were a good friend for many years....

  44. Been looking for years... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    ...But, I still don't Xenon.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  45. Used up in science demonstrations by mister_playboy · · Score: 2

    At 169 m/s, the speed of sound in xenon gas is slower than that in air due to the slower average speed of the heavy xenon atoms compared to nitrogen and oxygen molecules. Hence, xenon lowers the resonant frequencies of the vocal tract when inhaled. This produces a characteristic lowered voice timbre, an effect opposite to the high-timbred voice caused by inhalation of helium. Like helium, xenon does not satisfy the body's need for oxygen. Xenon is both a simple asphyxiant and an anesthetic more powerful than nitrous oxide; consequently, many universities no longer allow the voice stunt as a general chemistry demonstration. As xenon is expensive, the gas sulfur hexafluoride, which is similar to xenon in molecular weight (146 versus 131), is generally used in this stunt, and is an asphyxiant without being anesthetic.

    Fun times. :)

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  46. You do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I turns out that xenon does not dissolve easily into magnesium silicate perovskite

    Was it painful when you turned out?

  47. Seems unlikely to me by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I agree with the critics of this model.

    "Other scientists arenâ(TM)t so sure. ChrystÃle Sanloup, a geochemist at the University of Edinburgh, has studied other, shallower places in the Earth where xenon might be locked up. She says the new paper canâ(TM)t explain several aspects of xenon geochemistry, including how Mars could also be lacking xenon in its atmosphere when it has very little perovskite in its depths."

  48. Sorry by oGMo · · Score: 1

    possesive

    "Possessive," but then, Muphry's Law.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Sorry by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, I was wondering who'd spot that first. Well done. You've won, uh, this paperclip!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  49. many install HIDs without special lenses by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

    Actually, many tools install HID Xenon bulbs with additional hardware to supply the needed voltage, in their non-projected lenses, thus blinding everybody else.

  50. re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't consider those Sylvania SilverStar series of halogen bulbs "really nice". Not saying their light output isn't good. It is, but everyone I've known on 3 different car enthusiast message forums has encountered the same complaints with those. They burnt out far too quickly!

    On a lot of cars, changing out the bulbs is kind of a pain. The auto makers figured it wasn't a task you were going to do more than once every 4-5 years or so. But the Sylvania bulbs tend to last as little as 6 months in some cases, with them typically dying well before 2 years are up.

    Sadly, you're probably right that there aren't really any other aftermarket halogen replacements that perform as well as/better than these and would last much longer. It's just a downside of the technology, IMO -- and the reason you don't see these coming as standard equipment in any of the cars sold today.

  51. Re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by datapharmer · · Score: 2

    You are holding it wrong! Seriously though: people tend to handle the bulbs with a bare hand leaving oil residue on the bulb and thus causing it to fail prematurely. Use a rag or a glove when installing the new bulbs and this won't be an issue!

    --
    Get a web developer
  52. I've pondered this very question for decades by idontgno · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, Xenon was probably the best of the early wave of reactive/interactive (voice synthesis) pinball machines, and it seems impossible to find any around any more. Damn shame.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  53. Re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by khallow · · Score: 1

    This is a well known thing which holds for all headlight bulbs. I doubt it has anything to do with the lifespan of these bulbs.

  54. Re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    yeah, if car enthusiasts boards are complaining, finger oil isn't the cause.

    Frankly the whole thing seems silly - on my older Subaru (RIP) I needed to do something about the anemic headlights, and I wound up having to install a harness with a relay which powered heavier gauge cable which then powered special-order bulbs which could use the higher current.

    Everything in the stores is spec'ed to run at the same current to avoid burning through the stock wiring. There's not really much of a difference between a $5 bulb and a $20 bulb. Buy the $5 bulb, or upgrade your wiring to handle the $25 bulbs, and then there is a significant difference.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  55. It died due to people just by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    going with Core i3/i5/i7 for their servers, underestimating the advantage of Xeon (support for ECC memory and hence protection from cosmic rays).

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  56. Re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you try using one of the headlight restoration kits? (you can also buy the necessary things - mostly fine grain sandpapers - in non-kit form). Basically, it lets you sand the decayed and pitted surface off of the headlight. In older cars, this can be a significant cause of loss of headlight intensity.

  57. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 2

    Mars Needs Xenon.

  58. China is storing it in a different noble gas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, interestingly enough, I asked a Chinese researcher if he knew where the Xenon gas was hiding.

    He looked surprised and said... "Xenon gas? Werr, I hear it's Argon!"

  59. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Much more likely in my view is that as Xenon is the most reactive gas and is trapped in some kind of mineral or as a hydrate

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  60. Confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so there's not much Xenon, and apparently hasn't been much for a billion years.

    So, who cares?

  61. Misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should rename it Xenone.

  62. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only scientist had started to measure how much xenon could be trapped in different minerals. Or maybe they should have been measuring the properties of hydrates... maybe starting say in the 50s.

  63. You didn't look hard enough by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's right between the Wenon and the Yenon.

  64. Plenty of xenon.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... as a fission product. With LFTR, it can be collected as it bubbles out of the core.

    1. Re:Plenty of xenon.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem is most LFTR designs try pretty hard to remove Xe-135 from the fuel. If it stays in, it absorbs a neutrons really well, slowing down the reactor and impacting its efficiency, which is even more of an issue for a thorium reactor. If you remove it, it decays into the long term radioactive waste product Cs-135. You have to leave it in to get some fraction converted to Xe-136.

      If we look just at uranium reactors since they are easier to get some numbers on, if we consider the 50,000 t of uranium mined a year, I estimate you can get about 10 t of xenon from that, which is not that much smaller than the current xenon annual production of 30 t. However, spread out among all of the nuclear power plants, you are looking at something more like an average of 25 kg per plant per year. At the current price I can get small quantities for about $10/L (so even cheaper from the producer). That only works out to about $40k per year for a uranium plant that doesn't try too hard to remove the Xe-135. The yield would be much lower for an LFTR plant that removes the Xe-135. Unless prices change drastically, would a nuclear plant make a profit adding another component to their system for $40k/year ?

  65. Re:"gone"? did it ever exist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is fine. It's the slashdot summary that is crap.

  66. Re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by weiserfireman · · Score: 1

    I've used one of those kits on my car. In my case, it was road salt and hard water stains. Improved my headlights significantly though

  67. It's been captured in an iPad app by ccanucs · · Score: 1

    A groove(y) synth at that - and not half bad - and at a price that's affordable. So, now we know ;-) http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/xenon-groove-synthesizer/id385498073?mt=8 No connection, just like it among others.

  68. I know where it is by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    It's in all of the Xenon light bulbs ;)

  69. Speaking of hawt blue aliens... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

    Used to play a lot of Xenon pinball machine back in '82 (while avoiding EE classes my first year of college)

    http://www.ipdb.org/machine.cgi?gid=2821

    Just loved getting the multi-ball and making the machine 'climax' by winning games. Maybe it was the voice synth, the sexy graphics, or the speaker aimed at my groin, but I really did love that machine... *sniff*

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  70. That is not evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to not only avoid answering the question, but to use it to rant about something completely different. Yes, there is a crap ton of problems with the war on drugs. That is orthogonal to the question of there being any evidence of frequent use of eminent domain to seize land.

    1. Re:That is not evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question you posed was "Do you have any evidence that happens a lot?" without specifying what THAT that you were referring to, as if I were Mr.Wizard with ESP to KNOW you were directing a query about a subject that my comment WAS NOT addressing.

      If you spent as much as two minutes reading my comment, as well as the link I provided under that entry, you would have found that it was not "eminent domain" but "asset forfeiture" that is the bigger problem -- the problem that I was addressing, not "eminent domain".

      If you want to explore "eminent domain" cases explicitly, try using Google/NSA to scan aggregated links in the news to that specifically. Don't expect me to voluntarily do the leg-work for answers to a query I never expressed any particular interest in. IOW, don't be a lazy f***ing troll.

    2. Re:That is not evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not my fault you can't pay attention to the thread and want to go off on a tangent at the drop of a hat. I apologize for not realizing your previous post was not about eminent domain. In that case, it means the "Way to avoid the topic and use it to rant about something completely different" applies to two posts, instead of just one.

    3. Re:That is not evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not my fault you can't pay attention to the thread and want to go off on a tangent at the drop of a hat. I apologize for not realizing your previous post was not about eminent domain. In that case, it means the "Way to avoid the topic and use it to rant about something completely different" applies to two posts, instead of just one.

      My remarks were not so very tangental to the original subject:
      Xenon shortage --> forced to sell Xenon to government --> eminent domain
      versus
      Xenon shortage --> forced to sell Xenon to government --> asset forfeiture

      You don't read all the posts. You didn't even scan my post. You were too quick to attack me.
      Then you furnish an apology that isn't an apology, based upon your personal perception of how far from an original post subject may carry to. This is slashdot, not Whitehouse.gov. You ARE a f***ing troll.

  71. Re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Had a 99 Miata once with cataract headlights. The restoration kit got both of them shiny like new, but was still very yellow and cloudy. They would break down again after a few months which would require me to do the whole process all over again. Eventually, I replaced both of them with new ones. I managed to grind one of the old headlights to half thickness and buff it out again. Same effect! Throughout the entire plastic's thickness, they has suffered significant UV damage.

    IMHO, I can be a waste of time. Once the plastic molecules are cracked by UV radiation, no amount sanding and buffing will restore them back to original condition. You're just extending the useful life of them if only for a few more years. Basically, I prefer glass headlights again over plastic ones.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  72. Re: Sylvania SilverStar series bulbs by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

    I have always been anal about not touching the bulb... and I have gone through at least 5 silverstar ultra bulbs in 5 years. After my last spare goes, I'll try some other bulb manufacturer.

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  73. Re:I know where it is -- overpriced xenons? by lpq · · Score: 1

    Nah.... I think it's because Intel is overpricing their xenon processors, that the supply is drying up.... :-|
    (*str8face*)