Rare Photos: Gnu Crashing a Windows 8 Launch Event

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Rare Photos: Gnu Crashing a Windows 8 Launch Event

Posted by Soulskill on Saturday October 27, 2012 @05:40AM from the somebody-call-attenborough dept.

New submitter Atticus Rex writes "Reporters and security guards at the Windows 8 launch event weren't sure how to react when they were greeted by a real, live gnu. The gnu — which, on closer inspection, was an activist in a gnu suit — had come for some early trick-or-treating. But instead of candy, she had free software for the eager journalists. The gnu and the Free Software Foundation campaigns team handed out dozens of copies of Trisquel, a fully free GNU/Linux distribution, along with press releases and stickers. Once they got over their confusion, the reporters were happy to see us and hear our message — that Windows 8 is a downgrade, not an upgrade, because it steals users' freedom, security and privacy."

33 of 313 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Sounds like a plan by colinrichardday · 2012-10-27 05:43 · Score: 5, Informative

Way to spread the word!
1. Re:Sounds like a plan by Anonymous Coward · 2012-10-27 06:30 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  No {GNUs,news} is good {GNUs,news}.
2. Re:Sounds like a plan by jellomizer · 2012-10-27 10:21 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  The word has spread. The problem is people just don't care. It isn't like back in the 90's where people don't know about Linux and Open Source... They Do, they just don't care. They are willing to take the tradeoffs to get windows.
  The problem when you give people a choice, they will often choose something you don't like.
  
  --
  If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Crashing, huh? by Anonymous Coward · 2012-10-27 05:43 · Score: 5, Insightful

When I read the headline I was expecting something involving forcing their way into the event. This, however, turns out to be the kind of positive thing we want to present the community with. Also, that is a sweet head!
1. Re:Crashing, huh? by Intrepid+imaginaut · 2012-10-27 06:35 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  Good thing it wasn't dark, they would have been likely to have been eaten by the GNU.
It was funny in 1995 by Joe+U · 2012-10-27 05:50 · Score: 5, Insightful

It was funny in 1995 when the "protesters" were in front of CompUSA on 35th street in Manhattan. It was cute when they were outside PC Expo in 1996. Started to get kinda sad at the Windows 98 launch and went downhill after that.
Now they're just a sideshow attraction.
1. Re:It was funny in 1995 by fm6 · 2012-10-27 06:15 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  Especially when they're pushing a distro nobody's ever heard of and which does a terrible job of promoting itself. I looked on both Trisquel's home page and its Wikipedia entry, and the only justification I could find for its existence was that it had Gallician support. (Why they didn't just contribute Gallician localization to an existing distro is unclear.) Other than that, it appears to be a simple Ubuntu fork.
  Now that is ironic. Not just a fringe OS, but a fringe version of the OS. How fringe? The very existence of the Gallician language is controversial. It's spoken only in the northwest corner of Spain, which would be part of Portugal if borders were drawn by actual cultural boundaries. (The Portugese language originated there.) But it's unpatriotic to refer to Gallician as a dialect of Portugese, so they have to pretend have their own language, mainly distinguished by the fact that Gallicia refuses to participate in efforts to reform Portugese spelling.
  Do Linux zealots actually work at being marginal?
2. Re:It was funny in 1995 by Anonymous Coward · 2012-10-27 06:33 · Score: 5, Informative
  
  The reason for promoting Trisquel is that it is one of the few Linux distributions on the FSF's approved list of completely free distributions. It's basically Ubuntu with a free kernel and without the option of installing Flash. Trisquel is one of the few distributions on the FSF's approved list which is quite user friendly. Personally, I'd rather they hand out a distribution with all the Linux firmware and drivers to provide better hardware support, but the FSF isn't about being practical, they are focused on software freedom.
3. Re:It was funny in 1995 by JabberWokky · 2012-10-27 08:17 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  you imply that FSF actually matters.
  With not much enthusiasm, I simply note that two decades ago I couldn't run anywhere near the phenomenal library of free and Free software that I do today. Three decades ago, I was closer to being able to, so there was a very serious period of "you must license your software and only companies can own or alter it". I don't have much enthusiasm because it's a pretty non-notable fact these days. If you're coding something new, you first look for libraries or code that does much of what you need, and then use them for free. That's not surprising to say. Two decades ago, it would be.
  So the FSF pretty much won (as did the many many non-FSF coders who contributed). Maybe not in terms of global dominance, but in real terms of "I can use my system and do what I want because I have rights to the software and can alter it at whim". This state of things was not a certain outcome. Now it is simply part of the IT world we take for granted.
  
  --
  "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
4. Re:It was funny in 1995 by TraumaHound · 2012-10-27 08:26 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  the FSF's approved list of completely free distributions. It's basically Ubuntu with a free kernel and without the option of installing Flash.
  There goes my irony quota for the day.
5. Re:It was funny in 1995 by pnot · 2012-10-27 08:46 · Score: 5, Interesting
  
  Amen. I use Ubuntu and am happy (on a pragmatic level) to have a set-up that's maybe 98% free software. I would sooner punch myself in the nuts than switch to Trisquel, but I'm keenly aware that were it not for RMS's single-mindedness, I would probably be using a set-up that's 98% non-free (or, more likely, doing something entirely different because the world of computers wouldn't interest me as much).
6. Re:It was funny in 1995 by icebraining · 2012-10-27 14:19 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  My paycheck from developing AGPL licensed code must be an illusion, then.
  RMS' ideology just eliminates jobs that depending on rewriting the wheel. New code still has to be written, and there's plenty of work and money to those who are willing to write it.
  
  --
  Dilbert RSS feed
So it wasn't a real, live Gnu... by BrownLeopard · 2012-10-27 05:51 · Score: 5, Insightful

...but someone in a Gnu suit? Kind of misleading, yeah? I do have to agree with the other posters though. It does seem like trolling an event. If Microsoft came into a Gnu event it would be bashed as them crashing a party. Same kind of thing here.
1. Re:So it wasn't a real, live Gnu... by Zocalo · 2012-10-27 06:29 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  If Microsoft came into a Gnu event it would be bashed as them crashing a party.
  Of course it would. Chances are it would also be csh'ed, ksh'ed and zsh'ed (amongst others) as well.
  
  --
  UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
2. Re:So it wasn't a real, live Gnu... by icebraining · 2012-10-27 07:07 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  normal computer users will go "Well that was rude!" and "What is Linux?"
  Getting people to ask the latter question is already a goal achieved.
  
  --
  Dilbert RSS feed
3. Re:So it wasn't a real, live Gnu... by artor3 · 2012-10-27 07:26 · Score: 4, Insightful
  
  Not if the answer they come to is "a fringe OS pushed by weirdos dressed as wildebeests".
Powell's colon by Tablizer · 2012-10-27 06:01 · Score: 5, Funny

John SuGnuGnu said only a Gnu could love a Gnu.

--
Table-ized A.I.
Activist is an old Indian word.... by Anonymous Coward · 2012-10-27 06:03 · Score: 4, Funny

...that translates roughly to "Doesn't have a real job.'
Windows 8 downgrades security? by Wrath0fb0b · 2012-10-27 06:09 · Score: 4, Insightful

Citation needed.
Now, it's quite possible that Windows 7 is not secure enough for your needs and 8 doesn't improve upon that significantly, but I'm skeptical that 8 is a step backwards in security.
1. Re:Windows 8 downgrades security? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · 2012-10-27 06:19 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Citation needed.
  You must be gnu here...
only Windows 8? by mschaffer · 2012-10-27 06:16 · Score: 4, Insightful

Really? Only Windows 8? OSX/iOS steals users' freedom, security and privacy quite a bit.
Re:Worthless by larry+bagina · 2012-10-27 06:17 · Score: 5, Insightful

Look, she can't help it if she's not pretty. Or if she's too poor to afford nice clothes.
FREE software is like people -- what's on the inside matters more than the external appearance.

--
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
Re:Real live gnu? Seriously? by PPH · 2012-10-27 06:18 · Score: 4, Insightful

I don't know about that. A new UI on top of Windows 7 seems to have fooled them.

--
Have gnu, will travel.
Nice beard. by Haxagon · 2012-10-27 06:20 · Score: 4, Funny

"The gnu — which, on closer inspection, was an activist in a gnu suit"
It's hard to tell the two apart sans suit, sometimes.
Said as a GNU/Linux enthusiast.
Re:Worthless by VAElynx · 2012-10-27 06:21 · Score: 5, Funny

If you think the purpose of a demonstration/event is "nude tits for the onlookers", you're a moron whose thought centre has moved from cranium to crotch.
Not a gnu by Anonymous Coward · 2012-10-27 06:32 · Score: 4, Funny

Richard Stallman just hasn't shaved in awhile.
Re:I'd like to add a small change by Anonymous Coward · 2012-10-27 06:56 · Score: 4, Informative

It's still there, albeit hard to find. Just use size:>10mb in the search bar
Re:Worthless by VAElynx · 2012-10-27 07:15 · Score: 4, Funny

I don't think a reasonable person's choice of operating system is determined by the presence of human mammary glands. Otherwise Apple would be selling the iTit.
Re:Worthless by wonkey_monkey · 2012-10-27 07:56 · Score: 4, Funny

What truly pathetic depths Slashdot has sank to.
They let you in for a start.

--
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Re:OS/2 crashing by icebraining · 2012-10-27 08:14 · Score: 5, Funny

That's nothing. Windows 98 crashed its own show.

--
Dilbert RSS feed
Re:Worthless by sumdumass · 2012-10-27 08:20 · Score: 4, Interesting

Actually, I think they are. A protest is not necessarily selling a product, it's selling the idea that there is support for the product. The product is generally being sold to whatever they are protesting against but by selling sex, it increases the appearance of support for their cause by the inclusion of morons thinking with their dicks.
Imagine if you will, 20 prudently dresses women holding a rally to support $insertcause. Now imagine 10 scantly dressed 21 year old hotties and 10 muscle bound shirtless men doing the same for the same cause. You will have a base showing for the prudent women because the cause is what is there. But you will have added women and men interested in looking at the hot bodies of the people involved so there will likely be an above base showing for the event. In the end, the people thinking with their primitive instincts lend the appearance of wider spread support increasing the power for the cause. So using sex to sell a concept is a powerful tool for a cause and I think that the sale of sex (metaphorically) is actually intended to some of not a large degree.
Re:Worthless by SuperMooCow · 2012-10-27 08:34 · Score: 5, Funny

Use a 3D printer to print bitcoins to pay for Windows 8, you say? What a great idea!
Re:Worthless by Fjandr · 2012-10-27 12:05 · Score: 4, Funny

Only people who already support their cause are supposed to look at them naked in public. It's in the EULA somewhere.