Slashdot Mirror


James Bond Film Skyfall Inspired By Stuxnet Virus

Velcroman1 writes "No smartphones. No exploding pens. No ejector seats. No rocket-powered submarines. 'It's a brave new world,' gadget-maker Q tells James Bond in the new film Skyfall. The new film, released on the 50th anniversary of the storied franchise, presents a gadget-free Bond fighting with both brains and brawn against a high-tech villain with computer prowess Bill Gates would be envious of. What inspired such a villain? 'Stuxnet,' producer Michael G. Wilson said. 'There is a cyberwar that has been going on for some time, and we thought we'd bring that into the fore and let people see how it could be going on.'"

9 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. Re:BIND movies by NotTheNickIWanted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agent BIND, it is imperative that you contact MX immediately. It would seem that the DNSSEC has been found dead.

    --

    unsigned int question = 0x2B | ~(0x2B)
  2. Re:No wonder it sucks! by acid_andy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...and it's fun unless you expect a James Bond movie.

    FTFY.

    To give an explanation, I think Craig is so far from the Fleming character and when introducting him they shouldn't have thrown out the good bits of the existing film canon.

    --
    Your ad here.
  3. Re:No wonder it sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes it is so boring and not even funny. Whatever, it should not be funny.
    The IT stuff are so laughable.
    - Q (with all the Geek-chic aparel) : "Oh my god, we have been hacked !" (And splash !, a animated 3D representation of the "thing" in your face.
            Ok, go back to school, assholes)
    - James Bond (Looking at the hex representation) : "Ok, Let's try that password" (Yes, every "Virus" have a password to decypher it)
    - Q : How, what is it ?
    - JB : It's map !

    There not a single gram of Ian Fleming novel' spirit in that movie, such a shame. This is just a giant advertising for Omega® and Sony® for zombie audience eating pop-corn.

    You can leave it.

  4. Re:Bill Gates? by Empiric · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He could code (and in multiple languages), in contrast to, say, Steve Jobs.

    From what I've read of the experiences of other coders/designers/architects, he had the in-depth technical acumen to make a one-on-one development review a very detailed and rather harrowing experience, as well.

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
  5. New Bond? by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is Vladimir Putin still playing James Bond?

    We need a Bond that looks more like Bond and less like a Bond Villian.

    1. Re:New Bond? by WankersRevenge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had the pleasure of reading through all the Ian Flemming books last summer. They were really fun reads that hold up nicely (well, some of them do). I think it was The Spy Who Loved Me that really drives home the point about Bond And it's this -

      Bond is a villain. The only difference with him is that he's our villain.

      In such light, I think Daniel Craig looks perfect for the part. Just my two cents.

  6. Re:Bill Gates? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last time I checked, Bill Gates wasn't a computer genius at all, unlike Steve Wozniak.

    Check again.

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates

    In his sophomore year, Gates devised an algorithm for pancake sorting as a solution to one of a series of unsolved problems presented in a combinatorics class by Harry Lewis, one of his professors. Gates's solution held the record as the fastest version for over thirty years; its successor is faster by only one percent. His solution was later formalized in a published paper in collaboration with Harvard computer scientist Christos Papadimitriou.

    and

    During Microsoft's early years, all employees had broad responsibility for the company's business. Gates oversaw the business details, but continued to write code as well. In the first five years, Gates personally reviewed every line of code the company shipped, and often rewrote parts of it as he saw fit

  7. Re:No wonder it sucks! by CodeheadUK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't forget:

    Q: "We're under attack! Strip the headers and find the source!"

    Bad Guy: "Good luck, I'm behind seven proxies!".

  8. Re:No wonder it sucks! by HPHatecraft · · Score: 5, Informative

    There not a single gram of Ian Fleming novel' spirit in that movie, such a shame. This is just a giant advertising for Omega® and Sony® for zombie audience eating pop-corn.

    You can leave it.

    I'd be curious to know if you think any of the Bond movies have featured a portrayal of 007 that is true to the novels. Outside of Sean Connery, Daniel Craig's Bond is fairly close to the source material. Where Craig excels is in his physical portrayal of Bond: not only does he have the physique, but he moves like Bond: an operator, an athletic pugilist, with just a hint of the street; he looks and acts like a hard case.

    The fact is, the Bond portrayed in the books is a thug, and at least initially, he lacks sophistication. He is provincial, and somewhat racist (though not consistently so, and actually irrelevant). So if you think that earlier portrayals of Bond (Connery excluded, of course) are somehow more accurate... I don't know what to tell you. Methinks you protest too much (and that you don't know of what you speak).