Slashdot Mirror


New Credit Card Includes Display and Keypad

First time accepted submitter pev writes "A new credit card released in Singapore includes a screen and keyboard in order to generate one-time passwords for your online banking. From the article: 'The card has touch-sensitive buttons and the ability to create a "one-time password" - doing away with the need for a separate device sometimes needed to log in to online banking. Future versions of the card could display added information such as the remaining balance.' Lets hope they've put more thought into the implementation than with chip and pin."

83 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. What am i missing? by ArturoBandini77 · · Score: 2

    Don't one-time-pasword exists just in case you loose your card???
    With these cards, it's like writing your PIN in the back of the card itself...

    1. Re:What am i missing? by Fjandr · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they're to prevent the used of the information on the card without the card itself. These basically replace the CVV on the back of the card for determining that the user actually has it in their possession.

    2. Re:What am i missing? by ArturoBandini77 · · Score: 1

      That makes perfect sense...
      Cheers!

    3. Re:What am i missing? by Bomazi · · Score: 5, Informative

      What they did here is integrate a secure terminal like this one directly on the card.

      These terminals are used for online banking. Every time you log in, you receive a different challenge. You then insert the card into the terminal and enter both the pin and the challenge and get the response back. Then you enter the response in the browser.

      The goal of the system is to provide two-factors authentication. You need both something you have (the card) and something you know (the PIN).

      The reason you need a secure terminal is that typing the PIN directly on the computer would allow a keylogger to steal it.

      Overall it is a pretty solid system.

    4. Re:What am i missing? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's a one-time-password for getting access to your online banking, not (as I assume you mean) for getting cash out of the machines in emergencies.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:What am i missing? by TechMouse · · Score: 1

      You need to enter a passcode to get the OTP. Something you have (the card) plus something you know (the code).

    6. Re:What am i missing? by heypete · · Score: 2

      Indeed. PostFinance (a bank in Switzerland where I have an account as I'm a grad student there) has those exact same terminals. It's pretty slick.

      Only disadvantage: they only allow one card to be linked to one's account for online access, even if it's a joint account. In my case, my wife has access to it because she does most of the financial stuff, but it's annoying. Naturally, we both have bank cards and can access the account via ATMs and the like, but only her card can be used for logging into the website.

    7. Re:What am i missing? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Similar one used by my bank; Card + Pin + Reader = One time pad, presumably based upon a synchronised clock between the reader and the authentication server RSA-token style.

      I wish they implemented this for all transactions, not just using the bank website.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    8. Re:What am i missing? by davecb · · Score: 1

      Yes: we used to use RSA cards with numeric pads to do mutual authentication at (the late, lamented) Sun Microsystems. This is basically the minimum functionality one needs to be able to do financial transactions without having to maintain (and pay out!) huge reserves against fraud.

      --dave

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    9. Re:What am i missing? by DZign · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I saw these (or a similar type) last year here in Belgium when I was part of a test panel/opinion group.

      Basically it was all possible types of payment systems thrown together in one card.

      It had the debit card system we have here (Maestro / Bancontact), but at the same time you could use it as a credit card too (Visa / Mastercard). Most people in the group found this a good idea as all had multiple cards in their wallet.

      As you can see it has the keypad type thing for extra authentication on the internet so you don't need an extra device for it. Nice, but less useful. Not everyone had a need for it, and we didn't get technical details about how secure it was or how it worked.

      It also had some kind of contact-less system we don't have yet in Belgium but they said it was used in France. Small payments you could just make by holding your card above a reader, no need to enter a pin. As we don't know this, most found it insecure.

      It also wasn't known if you could deactivate certain things or always had all features - like only use the debit/credit card combination but not the touchless thing.

      I remember one disadvantage: the 'buttons' you had to push to generate the nr were difficult to operate. Had to push hard in exactly the right spot. Don't think elderly people could get along with it.

      Technically I was impressed with this card for having battery electronics and lcd in it, as it was very thin and still flexible.

    10. Re:What am i missing? by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      They're also used to "sign" online transactions, like money transfers and paying bills.

    11. Re:What am i missing? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Don't one-time-pasword exists just in case you loose your card???

      I assume by "loose" you mean "set your card free," as in giving it to your girlfriend. Seems a one time password would work if you only wanted to let her use it once. Nice idea, I like it!

    12. Re:What am i missing? by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      The problem is that this is just for on specific card. An open standard would really be nice so that you didn't need to carry multiple cards, but the card companies consider that against their interests. Something like Google Authenticator on a smartphone would also be a nice solution.

    13. Re:What am i missing? by xelah · · Score: 2

      There are tighter rules concerning the CVV. Merchants are never allowed to store, and don't need it to process refunds or continuing payments. Possibly it's not on the swipe, either, I'm not sure. So you could obtain the 16 digits from a stolen merchant database/backup or a sneaky swipe under the table, but not the CVV. That's the theory, anyway. It's never seemed like the strongest security measure on earth....

    14. Re:What am i missing? by Golddess · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, some places don't seem to require the CVV number ever.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    15. Re:What am i missing? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's security theater at it's finest. The one time password on the new card is at least an improvement over that.

    16. Re:What am i missing? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      It's not required in order to make the transaction (nor, technically, is anything other than the account number; however, your interchange costs increase and your ability to fight chargebacks decrease by providing less information).

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    17. Re:What am i missing? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's simply because it's against PCI regulation to store the CVN.

      Most companies don't realize that asking for it on subsequent transactions is pointless so long as you ask for it the first time: you can still prove (with reasonable certainty) the customer had the card in-hand at some point; i.e. it wasn't bought from a Russian warez site.

      In practice that's not true at all, but since when do theory and practice ever overlap?

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    18. Re:What am i missing? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Magnetic strip data contains different information than what's read off the card; it effectively replaces the CVN for swiped card-present transactions. The issuing bank goes through a different (though functionally equivalent) routine to authorize the payment when they're sent PAN/CVN/exp instead of the raw track data.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    19. Re:What am i missing? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Yes, because you can't enter it if you've never seen the card. The CVV was introduced when machines still physically imprinted receipts and prior to the laws banning the display of more than 4 or 5 digits of the number on any printed receipt. It isn't embossed, it's not on the front in the cases where an image is taken of the card, and any merchant found to be storing the code has their payment contract invalidated.

      It was to combat the relative ease with which people could gather the name, number, and expiration date from the trash or an electronic receipt or database. You had to have at least been in the presence of the card in order to get the number. No, it's not a great mechanism on its own, but it drastically cuts down on certain classes of fraud.

  2. similar to Sweden, where all banking is electronic by acidfast7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No personal checks in Sweden, so all person-to-person transfers are done in cash. However, banks won't take huge piles of money ... say anything over €500 ... so all of the those transfers are done electronically. When I sold my used bike, we met and did the transfer electronically at a cafe via mobile phones. The biggest difference was that you had to the put the credit card into a device that looks like a calculator and enter a number from the banking website into the card-inserted device. The number returned is that entered into the web to authenticate the transfer. This just does it all on one credit card, which is GREAT.

  3. Flashback by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    It's been a good 20 years since I've used a device like that for authentication. Maybe 19. Used it to log into telco switches. The token generator was a little device about the size of a small calculator, securely attached to a desk next to a laminated sheet of paper (taped to the desk) with step by step authentication instructions including username/password. The desk was in a secluded corner right next to an unlocked door that opened onto the building's loading dock. :facepalms:

  4. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by acidfast7 · · Score: 2

    Looks like this for those interested ...

  5. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    "No personal checks in Sweden, so all person-to-person transfers are done in cash"

    Did they get rid of cheques or did they never have them? I always thought sweden was an advanced country , but it doesn't sound like it. Personal cheques are damn useful in situations where electronic banking can be a PITA and cash isn't feasible - eg paying a builder.

  6. physical keys by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    Let's get it right... no cell phones have a physical keyboard anymore, yet it's credit cards that get (limited) keyboards and display? Something is amiss...

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:physical keys by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. The device as described sounds to me exactly like an app on a smartphone. Albeit it would have to be a pretty damn secure app, not the garbage most apps seem to be these days.

      Why would I want to carry one of these gadgets around when I already have a smartphone which can do the same job?

    2. Re:physical keys by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Is it? I don't see what's surprising here. The expensive device with more functionality has got the better input system. The cheap device that's distributed "freely" by banks to all their customers has the crappy input device that works less well but is significantly cheaper.

      What's amiss?

    3. Re:physical keys by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Why would I want to carry one of these gadgets around when I already have a smartphone which can do the same job?

      You answered this question in your first paragraph. A mobile phone application runs on a general purpose OS (which, unless its an iPhone or a Google-branded Android phone, probably has a load of old and buggy libraries and kernel because your carrier doesn't push out updates sufficiently competently). Even if the app itself is perfectly written, the TCB contains a whole load of other stuff that really shouldn't be trusted - you install one malicious app by mistake (or visit one malicious web page with a browser that has a known exploit that is fixed upstream but the fix never pushed to you) and your bank account is compromised.

      In contrast, the device on the card is running a simple OS, has no network communication, and is basically impossible to trojan without physical access and disassembly.

      By the way, we have the Singapore banking regulator to thank for a number of things, including two-factor authentication for online banking. They were the ones that insisted that it had to be provided by all banks doing business in Singapore, and the big banks decided that it was cheaper to roll it out worldwide than have a single system for Singapore. They also have very strict rules (and impose fines for violations) regarding security and disclosure.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:physical keys by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      The device as described sounds to me exactly like an app on a smartphone

      A smartphone would be useless here. The key here is something you have (the card) and something you know (the pin). The device, whether built into the card or separate, and the PIN leads to creating the OTP. Maybe I'm just dense, but I don't see how a smartphone (w/o a card reader) would be any use here.

    5. Re:physical keys by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Why can't the "Something I have" be the phone itself, rather than some ratty piece of plastic? After all, it's just the number on the card that's important. Why can't that number be inside the phone?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:physical keys by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      The whole point is to make sure the person making the transaction is in possession of the card. If "card possession" is not your concern, you're talking about a completely different system.

    7. Re:physical keys by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Actually, the whole point is to make sure the person making the transaction is authorized to make the transaction. "Card possession" is merely the mechanism used to accomplish that end. Theft and abuse have made it so that mere possession of the card is no longer sufficient to ensure that authority. The CVV number is an attempt to further ensure that the card possessor is the authorized user.

      A smartphone app could be more secure. You've got the link from your phone to your bank under your control, and the vendor has a link to the vendor's bank under the vendor's control. They both exchange one time pads via QR codes or something, and voila, transaction accomplished.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:physical keys by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      The CVV number is an attempt to further ensure that the card possessor is the authorized user.

      Seeing as the number is printed on the back of the card, the only thing that number really does is ensure that the "user" has both sides of the card...

    9. Re:physical keys by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Clumsy wording on my part. The card company equates possessing the card with being authorized to use the card. The CVV ensures that whoever is making the transaction has the card (and thus is authorized to use it).

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  7. Who pays for the improved card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is against the banks interest. In Australia, the banks actually MAKE money out of fraud by overcharging and charge-backs to the merchant.
    Only because the law says owner up to the first $50, the bank wears the cost for any fraud. So it is a no brainer to send a 50 cent mag stripe card, than an expensive unit that may actually harm their business model. Camera's and SMS messaging do the job nicely.

    Years ago, patents for laser stripe cards - replace mag strip with dvd like material, or high resolution mag stripe, were rejected - paying 5 cents per card more
    was just unacceptable. OK, say customer looses the card. Who pays the cost of the replacement? Same deal for 'smartcards' - the bank does not want to replace
    expensive to produce hard to crack smartcards.

    But this makes sense in Singapore .

  8. WTF? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Can someone please explain why, when I submitted this story yesterday, it was flagged as spam?

    http://slashdot.org/submission/2344885/credit-card-has-display-acts-as-security-token

  9. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by acidfast7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are advanced. Everything is electronic. All train tickets, most plane tickets, and most subway tickets can just be done with the mobile phone (no paper needed).

    They're REALLY pushing for a cashless society and making significant progress. Everyone is paid on the same day (25th of the month) after all.

    To be honest, it's much more of a hassle in Germany and a total nightmare in the US, compared to the simplicity in Stockholm. Once you get up and running, it's super easy.

  10. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

    Also, in Stockholm, I never saw a builder without a mobile phone? I never saw anyone with a mobile phone. And, don't say that the "government just wants it piece of the cake by not allowing cash." I like it because it really keeps things on the "up-and-up" as all personal tax records are publicly available.

  11. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by acidfast7 · · Score: 2

    You give him/her 400SEK in cash (€40) or he gives you an invoice with his/her banking info and you just transfer it. He'll just email/SMS you the invoice. Pretty simple. We ran into significant problems trying to deposit 25000SEK (€2500) in cash into an account after selling a few items. The police became involved because they thought it might be part of a money laundering scheme (the money can't be tracked once it's in the open.)

  12. I had one of these in the 1980s... by Aphrika · · Score: 2

    ...all the rage it was. I could do maths and stuff on it and everything. Fitted in my wallet and was credit card sized and 1mm thick...

    So why the big fanfare about sticking electronics in a card again, 30 years later?

    1. Re:I had one of these in the 1980s... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Because some people still think digital displays are a pretty neat idea.

    2. Re:I had one of these in the 1980s... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure about the one in TFA, but one of the big differences in the prototype that I saw was that it used eInk instead of a traditional LCD for the display. This means that the battery life is a whole lot better. That, combined with improvements in battery technology means that it's possible to create one that will last for longer than the lifetime of a credit card and be able to create cryptographic tokens for this entire time. Oh, and I think you're misremembering the thickness of the 'credit card sized' calculators in the '80s. They were at least 2-3 times the thickness of a normal card. This is exactly the same size, and so works with magnetic strip and chip-and-pin readers as well.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  13. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    "Hmm, why would electronic banking be a PITA when paying for a builder?"

    Hmm , let me think. Because he doesn't have a computer or card reader on site and he doesn't do electronic banking anyway.

    "I use online banking for person-to-person transfers (even the very small amounts) "

    Good for you. But not everyone loves technology so much that they find farting about with electronic payment simpler than spending 30 seconds writing a cheque.

  14. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

    Everyone in Sweden and all of Northern Europe does it this way. Germany is totally different and requires cash much more often, even moreso that the US. After living in Sweden, Germany and the US ... I can wholeheartedly say that Swedish system is the easiest, quickest and best. With a mobile phone and the bank's App, a transfer takes less than 1 minute and is complete ... try doing that with a check/cheque ... talk about archaic ... it's worse than cash.

  15. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Bogtha · · Score: 1

    Yes, we have the same thing here in the UK.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  16. Not replacing chip and pin by metamarmoset · · Score: 1
    > Lets hope they've put more thought into the implementation than with chip and pin

    The card displayed in TFA has a 'chip', and is presumably comptable with chip and pin systems.

    As far as I understand it, this is simply trying to integrate an authentication device into the card itself, not replace the current card system.

    1. Re:Not replacing chip and pin by Hrrrg · · Score: 1

      This is slightly offtopic, but I want to promote the use of two-factor authentication. I just ordered a Yubikey for $25. It reportedly is supported by gmail, fastmail, lastpass among others: http://www.yubico.com/

  17. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    "he gives you an invoice with his/her banking info and you just transfer it. He'll just email/SMS you the invoice. Pretty simple. "

    Considerably less simple than just handing him a cheque on the day he finishes.

  18. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by rapiddescent · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, we have the same thing here in the UK.

    it's called CAP, Chip Authentication Programme. I was the designer of the system that used by a big UK bank. It requires a self powered sleeve reader (that looks alike a calulator) and it's an open standard so that all EMV cards can use any branded reader device (they don't tell you that). Some of the readers have a "MENU" button and you can read off the transaction counter etc on your card. A handy way to tell if someone close has been using the card while you're not looking. if you do muck around with your card, be careful. I changed my PIN to be 6 digits on some test gear and ended up having to get a new bank card because the UK ATM network is hard coded to 4 digits. EMV cards support 6 digits.

  19. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    >Did they get rid of cheques or did they never have them?
    In the UK they want to get rid of them and they were due to be phased out but got a last minute reprieve. They're old tech but no solution for sending gifts if you're a granny etc have been found yet.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  20. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    "Everyone in Sweden and all of Northern Europe does it this way"

    If by northern europe you don't include the UK, ireland or france then sure. If you mean just scandinavia then maybe , but scandinavia != the world and a lot of people in the rest of the world (myself included) find cheques quick and simple. I've done electronic payments for many things including my house and car and they are somewhat more hassle than just writing a cheque and handing it over.

    "With a mobile phone and the bank's App, a transfer takes less than 1 minute and is complete ... try doing that with a check/cheque"

    I can write a cheque in seconds. How long it takes for the workman to cash it is not my concern. And why the hell should I have to own a fucking smartphone to be able to pay someone??

    "it's worse than cash"

    Cash is anonymous. Rather useful if you want to avoid tax. And yes I have used it for that and no I don't give a damn if you disapprove so save your breath.

  21. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    "I changed my PIN to be 6 digits on some test gear and ended up having to get a new bank card because the UK ATM network is hard coded to 4 digits."

    Why couldn't you use the test gear to change it back to 4 digits , or once its set to 6 digits is it fixed at that and can't be reverted?

  22. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by oobayly · · Score: 1

    You could hand him cash - they still have that, they just don't have that out-dated form of transferring money. I can't see the benefit of cheques.

    * You still need a bank account, so they're still traceable, ie. You can't use them for hiding funds, unless you take them to some dodgy cheque cashing place, which will take a percentage. I suppose you bank off-shore, but the issuer will still be able to determine where the money has gone.
    * They take longer to clear, as the bank has to verify the issuer that there are cleared funds. The money also tends to "disappear" for a few days, so the bank doesn't have to pay interest on the money.

    I haven't had to write a cheque for years, not even when I bought my flat, and I can't wait for the day that they're no longer accepted in the UK - it's a pain in the arse for us to have to go the bank to lodge cheques from our customers (the motor trade are slow to catch up). I have even paid my car cleaning guy (£10) via bank transfer.

  23. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by oobayly · · Score: 1

    Why are cheques so much more secure? They can still bounce, or I could call up the bank and ask them to cancel my chequebook, and still write them out. Sure, it's fraudulent, but if I'm willing not to pay somebody, the I probably don't care about upsetting some lawn care guy.

    ... or an insignificant matter of money (although don't necessarily have that money cause you didn't stop at the bank) how do you pay some one?

    Easy, I log onto internet banking and queue the transfer for tomorrow. If you're relying on the cheque clearing delay as a free overdraft, I think you've got bigger worries.

  24. Includes display and leopard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thanks to XKCD, this appears to have awesome security features.

  25. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

    and all of that technology would have been useless in the past week here in the northeast. No electric = nightmare for cashless society. Even the places with electric were having trouble processing credit cards.

  26. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by oobayly · · Score: 1

    Cash is anonymous. Rather useful if you want to avoid tax. And yes I have used it for that and no I don't give a damn if you disapprove so save your breath.

    Ah, we've now got to the nub of it. I was wondering who would seriously trust a piece of handwritten paper that hopefully will be worth the money. As far as I can see, the people that want to keep cheques going are exactly the one you should never trust a cheque from.

    Seeing as you seem to mention builders and workmen a lot, it would appear that you work in the building trade - there's a surprise - always looking for a loophole and a shortcut.

  27. Instant Failure. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Show me how durable that thing is by putting it in a overstuffed wallet that is then used by a construction worker who bends over and plops down 90 times a day.

    I remember the SecurID credit cards. I had to replace them 3 times a year from cracked LCD screens or cracked boards.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Instant Failure. by CharmElCheikh · · Score: 1

      Yes sir. Here it is bent in 2 with the screen and buttons still working (I did that many times):
      http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag67/tempforsd/WP_000647.jpg

      I'm not saying all brands are that good, but that one is.

      --
      My /. user ID is probably higher than yours
  28. SmartDisplayer by cocotoni · · Score: 3, Informative

    Basically we have "news" of a product by SmartDisplayer, that they have been producing for the last 7 years, already implemented by some 30 banks, used by Visa in some markets, which I have been using with the in-house TOATH authentication systems for the last four years. So where's the news? Slow news day?

    1. Re:SmartDisplayer by evilviper · · Score: 1

      So where's the news? Slow news day?

      On the new Slashdot... EVERY DAY is a slow news day!

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  29. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Wow, a real +5 insightful response there mate. Got no answers then?

    And no, I'm not whoever you seem to think I am.

  30. LCD? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    Why choose LCD over e-ink?

  31. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Sepodati · · Score: 1

    It's really not that hard to log in and transfer the money. And you'll never run out of transfers, they can't be lost and you don't force the person receiving the transfer to have to go to the bank or scan in a check to get their money. It's not as hard as you're making it out to be and there are benefits.

  32. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by compro01 · · Score: 2

    spending 30 seconds writing a cheque.

    Plus 5 minutes to deposit said cheque, then a few days waiting for said cheque to clear before your balance reflects reality again.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  33. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    As a serious question, what if someone doesn't have a phone?

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  34. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    Another serious question :)

    Here in the US, Credit Card payments siphon off a percentage to the CC company. Is that different in Sweden and other 'advanced' places? ;-)

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  35. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Anssi55 · · Score: 1

    Paper versions still exist, I'd assume.

  36. Saw that yesterday. by ChasmCoder · · Score: 1

    I thought it was pretty cool, for a gadget, I'm curious to see just how useful it really is. http://slashdot.org/submission/2345093/mastercards-get-a-facelift

  37. Only credit card with buttons and display I want by Jerom · · Score: 1

    can be found here http://www.rpn-calc.ch/

    Fully functional HP-15C clone - updatable firmware!

  38. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    Can't speak for Sweden, but honestly I'm surprised there are still places that have any measurable use of paper cheques still. I'm in my 30s and have never had a cheque account. Never written a cheque. Never received one. Hell, never even seen one other than vague recollections of my parents using them in the 80s when I was a kid.

    I'm in Australia and while they technically haven't abolished cheques here, virtually no one uses them. The need for them vanished due to the invention (and more importantly standardisation, so that they are ubiquitous) of electronic methods:

    - Paying paper bills: BPay - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BPAY
    - Paying in-person for services (i.e. builders, plumbers): they all have mobile EFT terminals ... seriously never found one that doesn't
    - Paying your friend back the money you owe him/sending your relatives some money etc: log onto bank's website, type their account and the amount, hit enter. Done instantly.

    Electronic methods are no more PITA than scrambling for a pen and writing out a cheque ... they take roughly the same amount of time. And they are processed straight away so your balance isn't in limbo until the cheque clears etc. While I agree that there are conceivable situations where a cheque would be useful, I'm yet to actually come across any of these situations in real life, so I'm fine with the way things are.

  39. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    But in countries with ubiquitous electronic banking, he WOULD have a computer or card reader. It'd be a fundamental tool of the job, without which he simply couldn't run his business. They're not exactly expensive these days, especially the ones that just attach to an existing mobile phone. Your builder probably spent more on his last new hammer.

  40. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    You could hand him cash - they still have that, they just don't have that out-dated form of transferring money. I can't see the benefit of cheques.

    Checks make receipts unnecessary. With cash he'll have to write a reciept. The check will be proof of payment to a judge, a receipt maybe or maybe not.

  41. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    They can still bounce, or I could call up the bank and ask them to cancel my chequebook, and still write them out. Sure, it's fraudulent

    And you will go to jail for it, guranteed (at least in my state).

  42. seems more useful for face-to-face transactions by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    I'm not too worried about online. It seems to me that this technology would be far more useful for securing face-to-face transactions. Every time you hand your card over to a cashier or a waiter, you give them nearly unrestricted access to your account. If you just gave them a one-time password, that would be a huge increase in security.

  43. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by camperdave · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is how do I leave the lawn care guy $40 USD in an envelope.

    1. Get $40USD
    2. Get envelope
    3. Put cash in envelope
    4. Leave for lawn care guy

    It's really not all that difficult.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  44. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

    It's a shame the Swedish government mandated that all retailers that accept payments must have a 'black box' that tracks payments for the government. I develop software for (among others) the Swedish market. In Soviet Sweden my life is a pain in the arse!

  45. Nice by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    This comment was 100% insightful. Now it's 100% offtopic. Except, it's clearly 100% on topic.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  46. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by Indigo · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, did you just say the police got involved because you had to deposit a measly couple thou in cash?? That one thing pretty much negates any other advantage the Swedish system may have. No offense, but that's just insane.

  47. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't you use the test gear to change it back to 4 digits , or once its set to 6 digits is it fixed at that and can't be reverted?

    The obvious answer is that the system only accepts 4-digit PINs, so having a 6-digit PIN means you can never enter it as the system only allows 4 digits, which never validate against 6 digit PINs.

    "No personal checks in Sweden, so all person-to-person transfers are done in cash"

    Did they get rid of cheques or did they never have them? I always thought sweden was an advanced country , but it doesn't sound like it. Personal cheques are damn useful in situations where electronic banking can be a PITA and cash isn't feasible - eg paying a builder.

    Well, I'm guessing that the cellular infrastructure is such that electronic banking is possible anywhere. Of course, the main reason the builders love cheques is because it can be a "cash" transaction and thus kept off the books. In Sweden, I guess it's not possible since the transaction will be recorded somewhere and somehow, while cheques can be cashed pretty anonymously and kept off tax records.

    I'm guessing the real advance is getting people to use electronic transfers (that are traceable) so that the underground economy is extremely unusual, so builders just get transferred and bill electronically rather than try to do it under the table.

    (Case in point - during the darker parts of the recession, our government (Canada) had a home reno tax credit. This resulted in a shrinking of the underground economy because of the required paperwork - homeowners weren't willing to give up the tax credit, so builders etc. had to declare the income as the government would match those tax credits with business income).

  48. This is 20-year-old technology by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

    MasterCard were demo'ing this in the late 1980s under the name "Super Smart Card". The only difference was that back then the cards were gold-coloured, not silver as in the BBC photo. Since then this has been retried a number of times by different manufacturers, failing each time. So I wouldn't hold out much hope for this one succeeding. OTOH wait a few years and there'll be another press release from another vendor about it.

  49. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by sjames · · Score: 1

    Handing him the cheque isn't the completion of the transaction though. He then has to appear at the bank in person to deposit it and then there's a few days for it to clear while if you did it electronically, the transaction will actually be complete.

  50. Re:similar to Sweden, where all banking is electro by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

    in the UK, the CAP readers are totally standalone and powered by batteries - i.e. need no host computer. Given that i use Linux myself, there was no way I was building in OS restrictions.