Slashdot Mirror


The Downside of Warp Drives: Annihilating Whole Star Systems When You Arrive

MrSeb writes "The dream of faster-than-light travel has been on the mind of humanity for generations. Until recently, though, it was restricted to the realm of pure science fiction. Theoretical mechanisms for warp drives have been posited by science, some of which actually jive quite nicely with what we know of physics. Of course, that doesn't mean they're actually going to work, though. NASA researchers recently revisited the Alcubierre warp drive and concluded that its power requirements were not as impossible as once thought. However, a new analysis from the University of Sydney claims that using a warp drive of this design comes with a drawback. Specifically, it could cause cataclysmic explosions at your destination."

50 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Not the destination that matters by discord5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not the destination that matters, it's how you get there. Nothing stresses this as much as blowing up your destination when you get there.

    1. Re:Not the destination that matters by sycodon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Crap, now the Environmentalists are going to get involved. It will never be built now.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:Not the destination that matters by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not the destination that matters, it's how you get there. Nothing stresses this as much as blowing up your destination when you get there.

      Well, it would fit NASA's (unspoken) mission. Just like with the Moon - "to boldly go where no man will go henceforth".

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Not the destination that matters by mjwx · · Score: 2

      It's not the destination that matters, it's how you get there. Nothing stresses this as much as blowing up your destination when you get there.

      Lord Shoggoth the Destroyer views this a feature, not a bug.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system for interstellar conflict.

    1. Re:Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      The longer the journey lasts, the more of these dangerous particles build up. This doesn’t affect the ability of the warp drive to keep bending the laws of the universe — it’s the stopping that’s going to ruin your day.

      Somebody set us up the bomb!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So it really is the sudden stop at the end that gets you...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by PlastikMissle · · Score: 2

      Excellent! Now can get the military to spend money on researching FTL.

    4. Re:Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by hamburger+lady · · Score: 4, Funny

      now we know what really causes those gamma ray bursts we detect from time to time.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    5. Re:Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by Zephyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Somebody set us up the bomb!

      Actually, it reminded me of the Picard manoeuvre...

      Or the Samantha Carter maneuver...

      "You know, you blow up one sun and suddenly everyone expects you to walk on water."

    6. Re:Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like a perfect weapon system for interstellar conflict.

      Somewhere in the Milky Way galaxy, K'breel, Speaker of the Council, suddenly gets an idea....

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    7. Re:Downside? Sounds like a perfect weapon system by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is actually a completely viable means of travel, but returning would be a bit of a dick move.

  3. Dupe story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is old news, discussed in March:
    http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/03/02/1741252/warp-drives-may-come-with-a-killer-downside

    1. Re:Dupe story by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 4, Informative

      discussed in March

      Also discussed on Star Trek:

      http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Force_of_Nature_(episode)

    2. Re:Dupe story by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Informative

      While the parallels are amusing, the issue in Star Trek was that subspace itself got damaged because of warp engines. There doesn't seem to be word yet on whether or not Alcubierre drives make any equivalent damage to the fabric of the universe, such as leaving a permanent distortion in spacetime once they've passed. (But it might be hilarious if they did.)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Dupe story by elewton · · Score: 3, Interesting
  4. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's why you drop to impulse _before_ you go into the star system

    1. Re:Duh by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So why not stop off the ecliptic so your 'wave of doom' flies off into intergalactic space, then warp downwards and leave on the far side of the destination system, again throwing the 'wave of doom' off into intergalactic space?

      Or is the wave not directional?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  5. Theoritical fix for theoritical problem by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If we have enough tech to make a warp drive we can probably disperse energy on route as opposed to all of it at the end of the trip.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    1. Re:Theoritical fix for theoritical problem by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If we have the technology to make a negative gravitational gradient (which all the FTL theoretical engines require, incidentally) you can do a lot of neat stuff. Make a ball of negative mass matter and let go and watch it shoot straight up just for kicks. Of course, there's absolutely no reason to expect that such a material is possible; oh sure, the math works out if you assume it can exist, but that doesn't mean that it is physically possible.

    2. Re:Theoritical fix for theoritical problem by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Failing that, you could make a collector that ships need to aim their build-up into. All it would take is a static warp bubble at the destination, which could then be relaxed under more controlled circumstances to recover the high-energy particles.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Theoritical fix for theoritical problem by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      If you manage to make a coherent beam, you've done something difficult and amazing. Modify anything to make it a cone. A cone will eventually spread quite wide, which reduces the energy-per-surface-area, making it less dangerous. A sphere is just a number of cones, for example. (An infinite number of cones, actually)

    4. Re:Theoritical fix for theoritical problem by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's probably theoretically possible to create interference patterns with gravity waves, but that doesn't mean you can make a negative gradient. Think about light, you can one light source interfere with and completely cancel out another (in principal anyway) but that doesn't mean that you can create negative brightness. You can reduce the brightness down to the base state, 0 but not below. Similarly, you can possibly, with enough energy and mass, create a region of space time with 0 curvature, that doesn't mean you can create a negative curvature, which is what stable wormholes and warp drives require.

    5. Re:Theoritical fix for theoritical problem by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      oh sure, the math works out if you assume it can exist, but that doesn't mean that it is physically possible

      If it can't actually exist, then the math is lacking. Some day we'll get this figured out.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  6. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    FTA:

    "Although we often think of space as empty, there are loads of high-energy particles shooting through the void. The University of Sydney research [PDF] indicates that these particles are liable to get swept up in the craft’s warp field and remain trapped in the stable bubble."

    And

    "All the energetic particles trapped during the journey have to go somewhere, and the researchers believe they would be blasted outward in a cone directly in front of the ship. Anyone or anything waiting for you at the other end of your trip would be destroyed."

    Looks like SOMEONES never heard of Bussard collectors....

  7. They figured out how to weaponize it... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    This will GUARANTEE it will be made. It is now a military project, warp cruise missle, set it to the destination via a nice long route and have it drop out of warp near the other planet or star...... KABOOM!...

    Freaking A, take that Omicron Persei 8!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:They figured out how to weaponize it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, this would be a very good thing.
      You know those killer asteroids they warn us about? Well, seems we finally have a way of dealing with them that does not involve Bruce Willis.
      Full steam ahead I say.

    2. Re:They figured out how to weaponize it... by Applekid · · Score: 2

      Can we shoot him into space anyway, though?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
  8. Re:"It’s the stopping that’s going to by danbert8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    BULLSHIT. Stop, I order you STOP!!!!

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  9. Maybe this is where OMG particles come from by istartedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Advanced civilizations might have this drive, and prevent too much particle buildup. It might not be perfect though, so every once in a while a handful of particles come along for the ride. How else do you explain a proton with the kinetic energy of a pitched baseball?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  10. "for generations" ? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Informative

    The dream of faster-than-light travel has been on the mind of humanity for generations

    I'm guessing that that's 1, 2, 3, or 4 generations, since we've only known that the speed of light is a problem for space travel for about 100 years.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  11. Re:Fucking Slashdot ruined my post! by X0563511 · · Score: 2

    That's why you should stop putting parts of your post in the subject. It's called the Subject field, not the body field, for a reason.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  12. What the hell?! by asmkm22 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I swear there was supposed to be a planet here...

  13. Follows the same rule as small scale by qvatch · · Score: 2

    It's not the fall that hurts, it is the sudden stop at the end.

  14. Outward gamma burst by cachimaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >All the energetic particles trapped during the journey have to go somewhere, and the researchers believe they would be blasted outward in a cone directly in front of the ship.

    At that energy levels particles will be converted to gamma radiation, expelled outward in a burst. Maybe sombody already invented those ships.

    1. Re:Outward gamma burst by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      And, of course, we all know what happens when people are exposed to gamma radiation...

      Planet Hulk!

      Maybe that's why the alien women are green.

  15. Warp Drives. pfffff by sarguin · · Score: 2

    ...it's nothing compared to Ludicrous Speed!

  16. Just another little bit of history repeating. by senorpoco · · Score: 2

    Man wonders what lies just beyond the horizon. Man develops ability to travel beyond horizon. Man annihilates whatever was over there.

  17. Time Fuse by Ambitwistor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is a short story by Randall Garrett. The crew of the first starship narrowly escape the supernova from their destination star by escaping back into warp. They realize that this isn't a coincidence: their warp drive blew it up on arrival. (They eventually realize that it blew up their origin star too: the Sun.)

    1. Re:Time Fuse by qwerty+shrdlu · · Score: 2

      The title is really "Time Fuze". Just a slight difference...

  18. jive vs jibe by jhsewell · · Score: 2

    The word you are looking for is jibe, not jive.

  19. Well.... by Ferretman · · Score: 2

    ......THAT's not very neighborly....

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  20. Re:That explains it by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now that's an interesting (and also disturbing) thought.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  21. Re:Obligatory xkcd by Jeng · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://what-if.xkcd.com/

    It talks about matter smacking into a planet at different energy levels.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  22. High energy particles by james_van · · Score: 2

    Not a physicist here, so maybe someone who is (or knows more than me could answer) - could we find a way to absorb the energy from these particles, and maybe pump that energy into the warp drive? one of those "the faster you go, the more energy you collect" kind of things?

  23. Meow by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    "Attention, Schrodinger's Cat is possibly arriving at gate 42 in five minutes..."

  24. Re:How about by wierd_w · · Score: 2

    A nice idea, but the physics does not work that way.

    Think about it this way:

    In front of the ship, you "compress" spacetime with an artificial gravity well. At the rear of the ship, you create an inverted gavity well. (Imagine, a gravity "hill"). The hill pushes the ship forwards, and the gravity well pulls it forwards. The two phenomena are perfectly cancelling. (Well is just as deep as the hill is "tall")

    The combinaton of these two fields creates the warp bubble.

    The warp bubble is necessary, because the ship simply cannot travel faster than light speed, using normal forms of propulsion. Special relativity makes it impossible to achieve lightspeed. (Requires infinite energy!)

    Instead, the "massless" bubble gets accellerated, while the ship stays stationary inside! The spacetime bubble has no imposed speed limit, and can easily go FTL.

    The problem cited here, is that any particle that comes into contact with the high velocity spacetime bubble will quantum tunnel inside the warpfield, and get carried along. This includes "virtual particles."

    Virtual particles are not really particles at all, in the literal sense. They have measurable effects, but cannot themselves be measured. They are really random energy anomalies that form and disapear out of the vacuum of space. (Another, more accurate term for them is "vacuum fluctuations") basically, these events occur as mutually exclusively charged waves, that exist for tiny fractions of a second before cancelling each other, giving spacetime a rough, or "foamy" texture at the quantum mechanical level.

    A curious effect of these virtual particles, is that if they can exist long enough to be directly observed (and not just their effects), they gain energy, and become real particles. (This is the basis behind hawking radiation)

    Much like the event horizon of a black hole, the edge of the warp field acts as a barrier for quantum tunneling. There is a nonzero chance that some of these quantum virtual particle pairs will have one of their members become trapped behind the bubble's edge as it zips by, preventing mutual annihilation, and forcing the captured particle to become real. The longer the bubble stays up, the more particles will get trapped.

    (Quantum tunnelling is what results from the "fuzzy" probability clouds of a particle wave intersecting a thin barrier. The more the fuzzy probability field intersects with the barrier, the greater the chances the particle will suddenly be on the other side. This phenomena is real, and has been scientifically verified. Quite literally, the sun would not shine without quantum tunneling, because nuclear fusion would be impossible without it.)

    When the warp bubble drops, those captured particles are released as a dangerous energy wave.

    Because the capture occurs as a direct result of the warp bubble's very existence, no amount of "aerodynamic shape" will prevent the steady accumulation of this radiation in the event shock.

    The effect would be greatly exacerbated by the ship flying through a nebula, or other gas cloud. The mass energy of those particles is immense, and even small traces like those of interstellar clouds, would result in unbelievable releases of energy when the bubble is turned off.

    "Deflectors" are not an option, because they would have to be projected from the starship. The warp bubble causes the starship to cease being causally connected to the outside spacetime, where the gas and dust particles exist. As such, it is impossible for any effect generated by the starship, other than the warpfield itself, to interact with those particles. The ship will simply have to plow through them.

    Once the captured particles are tunneled inside the warp field, it might be possible to capture some of it, but more than likely the particles become photons, which can't be herded that way, making en-route collection unlikely.

    This leaves the "deadly gamma ray flash" when the ship returns to being causally conncted with the rest of the universe.

  25. Military by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

    Crap, now the Environmentalists are going to get involved. It will never be built now.

    ...or the military will get involved so it is far more likely to happen. Although I have to say I am somewhat worried about letting them develop a device can destroy planets especially since it would also let them leave this one.

  26. Not a problem. by raehl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Build it, and if the environmentalists don't want you to use it, volunteer to meet at their place to discuss their concerns.