Slashdot Mirror


Earth Avoids Collisions With Pair of Asteroids

Hugh Pickens writes "According to NASA, a pair of asteroids — one just over three miles wide — passed Earth Tuesday and early Wednesday, avoiding a potentially cataclysmic impact with our home planet. 2012 XE5, estimated at 50-165 feet across, was discovered just days earlier, missing our planet by only 139,500 miles, or slightly more than half the distance to the moon. 4179 Toutatis, just over three miles wide, put on an amazing show for astronomers early Wednesday, missing Earth by 18 lunar lengths, while allowing scientists to observe the massive asteroid in detail. Asteroid Toutatis is well known to astronomers. It passes by Earth's orbit every four years and astronomers say its unique orbit means it is unlikely to impact Earth for at least 600 years. It is one of the largest known potentially hazardous asteroids, and its orbit is inclined less than half-a-degree from Earth's. 'We already know that Toutatis will not hit Earth for hundreds of years,' says Lance Benner of NASA's Near Earth Object Program. 'These new observations will allow us to predict the asteroid's trajectory even farther into the future.' Toutatis would inflict devastating damage if it slammed into Earth, perhaps extinguishing human civilization. The asteroid thought to have killed off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was about 6 miles wide, researchers say. The fact that 2012 XE5 was discovered only a few days before the encounter prompted Minnesota Public Radio to poll its listeners with the following question: If an asteroid were to strike Earth within an hour, would you want to know?"

67 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. What did we do, the Lambada? by mellon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know writing headlines is hard, but this one seems to imply that earth took evasive action. The less exciting "earth does not collide with pair of asteroids" would be a touch less misleading.

    1. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by mug+funky · · Score: 4, Funny

      barrel roll.

    2. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by Natales · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Whatever flashy headline was used to attract readers to the fact that there are potentially *a lot* of undetected large objects that could wipe us out was worth it. I mean, this is serious shit, and we are NOT taking it seriously enough. Believing we have it covered or it won't happen for 600 years is not good enough. Even Stephen Hawkins has brought this up before. We are seating ducks unless we "diversify our investments", meaning going out there and colonize other planets. It took millions of years and many extinction cycles to get us where we are as an intelligent species, and now we have to think big to survive. Honestly, I'd expect this crowd in Slashdot to really understand the implications. This issue needs to be at least high-er in the priority list of what we spend money in.

    3. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by RabidTimmy · · Score: 2

      While the article does initially use miles on the nearer asteroid, it does immediately translate it into lunar lengths.

    4. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      we are NOT taking it seriously enough.

      Actually, we are. A 50-165 foot asteroid can sneak up on us, but that isn't going to do much. It has less energy than the 9.0 Fukushima Earthquake, which killed ~10,000 people. If you count up all the people that die everywhere on Earth, that is about two hours worth of deaths. It just isn't worth worrying about anything that small. For big ELE asteroids, we have those tracked well enough that we would likely have years of warning, more than enough time to interdict.

      We are seating ducks unless we "diversify our investments", meaning going out there and colonize other planets.

      Once we get off this rock, the dumbest thing we could do is establish colonies in another planet's gravity well. It would be much smarter to build the colonies on ... near earth asteroids. We could even use some nukes to brake one of them enough to bring it into Earth orbit. Then we could disassemble it and use it as raw material to construct O'Neill Cylinders. An asteroid three miles in diameter could provide about 50 billion tons of iron that could be forged into structural steel using focused sunlight.

    5. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by Genda · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We'd be better off setting up a train of a couple dozen colonized asteroids shifting between Earth and Mars orbits using them and a continuous conveyor belt for people, materials and critical resources to and from a Mars Colony. Terraforming Mars then building colonies on icy moons with liquid oceans would scatter us around sufficiently that only a really nasty event might threaten us.

    6. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 2

      Sausage roll

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    7. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      Ever heard about lottery? We could win!

      This fact still does not justify wasting your money on a lottery ticket.

      What if we spent all of our efforts building an astroid shield and a GRB goes off nearby and cooks the planet? If we happen to have won that lottery you would look pretty stupid worrying about asteroids when you should have been building a gamma shield.

      Resources are finite. We must all choose our battles carefully based on evidence rather than arbitrary fears or hopes.

    8. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by Coisiche · · Score: 2

      Fair point, but O'Neill cylinders have artificial gravity via centrifugal force on their inner surfaces. Research point for someone there to see how much that changes things, but even setting up a workable environment for, say mice, to investigate the effects will probably cost quite a bit.

    9. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      It's a common use of the word avoid. Why would you even bring it up? Nothing implies the Earth did anything.

      Because the common use of the word avoid implies it WAS going to collide, but then something changed and it did not. While mixing units is MUCH more commonly done, and not technically wrong just a pain to do the conversions.

      Not really. If you say "the child ran out into the road without looking and narrowly avoided being run down by an eighteen wheel truck" it doesn't imply that the child or the truck did anything to avoid the collision, it was just lucky their paths didn't cross, as here with Earth and the asteroids.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Funny

      We are seating ducks

      Not quite as good as "escape goat" but still amusing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by terjeber · · Score: 2

      Well, since the chance of getting killed by an asteroid is higher than getting killed by a terrorist, why not spend the same amount of money on preventing each? Also, the technology gains from investing in the prevention of asteroid attacks could also further the technologies needed to mitigate (not prevent) a GRB attack (seeding with arks for example).

    12. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whatever flashy headline was used to attract readers to the fact that there are potentially *a lot* of undetected large objects that could wipe us out was worth it.

      Well, no. We've been looking pretty closely at the skies for a while now, and the odds that there is an undetected object large enough to threaten extinction are now pretty low. It's the one's in the "oh, crap, we hope this doesn't hit a populated area" that are a problem, but they're pretty rare objects and even rarer events. Such flashy headlines mostly serve to excite the excitable and panic those easily panicked and those who really don't understand the situation at all. The popular press has significantly overstated the threat.
       

      I mean, this is serious shit, and we are NOT taking it seriously enough. We are seating ducks unless we "diversify our investments", meaning going out there and colonize other planets.

      We, as a species, are taking in about as seriously as we can. We're looking for and cataloging the objects and predicting their tracks, and that's about the best we can do for the near future.
       
      Absent a Manhattan or Apollo level project, we simply can't usefully colonize other planets. With such "waste anything but time"/"near blank check" level projects, we're a century or more away from being able to do so - there's simply too many "unknown unknowns" in creating a colony or system of colonies that can survive if the Earth is wiped out. The odds are far too low to justify to cost.
       

      Honestly, I'd expect this crowd in Slashdot to really understand the implications.

      Understanding the implications is one thing - objectively understanding the overall issues is another.

    13. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      It's called a Mars Cycler. More generally a "free return trajectory".

      AND the trajectory is sufficiently short that people would tolerate travelling in such a fashion

      You can tunnel out a pair of rings inside the asteroid, each a couple of hundred metres across, create a ring of habitats and counter-spin them for gravity. A bit of maglev to stabilise the spins. Gravity from the habs, radiation and thermal shielding from the asteroid. Pick the right asteroid and you've also got fuel, air and water. Add sunlight and you've got fresh food. People could live comfortably for years, gradually expanding through the asteroid; as Mars crews visit, refuel, depart, visit, refuel, depart...

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    14. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by terjeber · · Score: 2

      Incorrect

      No, it isn't really. It is in fact quite correct. The chance of getting hit by an asteroid is infinitesimally small. Chances of getting killed by one is a lot higher. According to Alan Harris, any persons lifetime odds of being killed by an asteroid is about 1:700 000. Not high, but higher than getting killed by a terrorist.

      History doesn't really matter. What is relevant is future. Remember, if a big one hits, that is about 6 billion people dead. So, that drives the odds up quite significantly.

      http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/10/13/death-by-meteorite/#.UMotd2_BGSo

    15. Re:What did we do, the Lambada? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      "As I said before"? Whoever you are, log in or get an account.

  2. would I want to know? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course! Time for a quick trip to the whorehouse, then a quicker trip to church to get saved.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:would I want to know? by gagol · · Score: 2

      Time to go to sleep for me... I read "trip to the warehouse", it was very confusing for a moment... I would do something very similar.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    2. Re:would I want to know? by drkim · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course! Time for a quick trip to the whorehouse, then a quicker trip to church to get saved.

      After what that priest did to me, I'm gonna have to pray with the hooker...

    3. Re:would I want to know? by Genda · · Score: 2

      For the love of Pete! Where's your towel? You can't go anywhere without a bloody towel.

    4. Re:would I want to know? by Genda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually knowing could be very useful, depending on the size of the object and the impact site. You might be able to get to high ground to avoid a tsunami. You might be able to hang out in a cavern to avoid debris fall. You could even renting a plane or catching a quick flight if any were still available. This all presumes an impact significantly smaller than an ELE.

    5. Re:would I want to know? by adolf · · Score: 2

      Actually knowing could be very useful, depending on the size of the object and the impact site. You might be able to get to high ground to avoid a tsunami. You might be able to hang out in a cavern to avoid debris fall. You could even renting a plane or catching a quick flight if any were still available. This all presumes an impact significantly smaller than an ELE.

      Or, you know: Just use the opportunity to finally call up Dude to buy some smack, bang it with whatever filthy apparatus is available, and then go drive downtown and pay however-much cash the ATM will dish out to facefuck a crackwhore as the fireballs rain down.

      In an end-of-your-world scenario, nothing is sacred.

  3. If an asteroid were to strike Earth within an hour by gagol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would definitely want to know. I would leave work, buy booze and party like there is no tomorrow.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  4. It is our kill switch by louzer · · Score: 2

    Just in case human beings go psycho, somebody in the intergalactic union will press a red button to slightly nudge the asteroid.

    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
  5. Re:If an asteroid were to strike Earth within an h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    And that is diffrent than any other friday, how?

  6. Obligatory Mayan apocalypse by blagfast · · Score: 2

    And all the while everyone here thought the good Mayan folks were full of BS!

  7. Fearmongering much? by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess "Asteroid Misses Earth, Just Like It's Done Every 4 Years For Millennia" just wasn't catchy enough

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    1. Re:Fearmongering much? by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      I guess "Asteroid Misses Earth, Just Like It's Done Every 4 Years For Millennia" just wasn't catchy enough.

      What I find interesting is the helpful picture of what an asteroid "50-165 feet across" might look like hitting the Earth. Boy, the size of a foot sure has changed since I last checked...

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  8. Surprising number by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the last 20 years there have been quite a few of these objects passing within the orbit of the moon, prior to that there were few announcements and it's debatable how many were actually tracked. A disturbing number have been found within days as passing and a few were found after they passed. Just looking at the numbers I'd place the odds at high of an impact. We're coming up on a hundred year anniversary of Tunguska so I'd say we're due for a similar impact any day now. It could be tomorrow or a hundred years from now but statistically we're due now. We aren't talking end of the world because most of the world was only affected by the dust of the last major impact and the odds of one hitting a major city are similar to winning the lottery. Unfortunately the odds are high of an ocean impact and that could be worse than a land impact. Very few of these objects are being tracked in the northern hemisphere and virtually none in the lower hemisphere, I can't remember but I think it's a few percent for the south. We spend trillions on defending against Arab rednecks and a few million a year on tracking near Earth Objects. Our priorities are sadly are on the wrong threats.

    1. Re:Surprising number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just looking at the numbers I'd place the odds at high of an impact. We're coming up on a hundred year anniversary of Tunguska so I'd say we're due for a similar impact any day now. It could be tomorrow or a hundred years from now but statistically we're due now.

      We're not 'due' for anything. The fact that a devastating impact didn't happen yesterday does not increase the odds that it will happen today, it's not as if somebody decides to send an astroid in our direction because he looks on his impact calendar and decides it's been quiet for too long. If every day has an equal likelyhood of a devastating impact happening the average outcome will reflect that likelyhood without days or impacts infuencing each other.

    2. Re:Surprising number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seriously dude, learn how statistics and probability work.

      Consider this a jar problem with black and white marbles.

      This isn't a jar problem where you're taking out a white marble everyday (no asteroid impact) and tossing it away which increases the chance you'll eventually pull the one black marble in the jar (doomsday).

      This is a replacement problem. That white marble you pulled goes right back in and the probability you draw the one black one is equally likely on any given day.

    3. Re:Surprising number by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Informative

      No he's not wrong. You don't understand statistics and probability.

      An ordinary coin has a 50% chance of landing heads.

      If I toss it, and it lands tails. The next time it is no more likely to land heads. It's still 50%.

      If I toss it 3 times and it lands on tails each time, the next time it's still 50% chance it'll land on heads.

      If I toss it 100 times and every single time it lands on tails, guess what the probability of it landing on heads the next time is? Yup, it's still 50%.

      They are independent events. The coin has no memory.

      Likewise if there is an X% chance of a asteroid hitting the earth on and particular day, the fact that one has not hit the earth today does not in any way affect the chances of it hitting tomorrow.

      They are independent events. One asteroid doesn't know what another asteroid did or did not do yesterday.

      Likewise similar myths about choosing lottery numbers based on previous numbers are all wrong. Despite this, the mathematically ignorant nearly all think they are right.

      This bears on your pro-gun arguments. You don't understand statistics. You just google and copy from pro-gun sites, anything you think sounds like it supports guns, ignoring the ones that don't sound like they support guns. You have no basis on which to judge their veracity.

      You honestly think copying and pasting data for which you don't understand the stats will somehow progress your particular passion. It doesn't.

      And you don't even have the manners to attribute the source of your copy and pasting. Which lowers to point of engaging with you even more.

    4. Re:Surprising number by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're just digging yourself deeper.

      On Sunday you receive the following information: Uncle Bob will be dropping by this week.

      Unlike the coin or the asteroids or the lottery, Uncle Bob DOES have a memory, and he has specified a window in which he will appear. (dependent events vs independent events, and time constrained rather than probabilistic.)

      That you don't realise this isn't even the same class of problem shows you have even less understanding of prob and stats than was clear before.

      You use statistics the same way Creationists use it, not understanding the simple process of "selection".

      Selection? Related to the problem of asteroid hit probability? You *are* a moron.

      The game show/door problem is the classic Monty Hall problem. It DOES involve selection. Unlike asteroid hits. Again showing you don't understand the class of problem.

      If there is an event that is inevitable within a certain time frame, each day it doesn't happen chances are it will increase the following day.

      Repeating again, because you are a moron, asteroid strikes are not that kind of problem. There is no particular time frame in which a strike is inevitable. (And furthermore, unlike the problems you brought up, there is no limit to the number of strikes in any particular time frame.) Asteroid strikes are a pure probability per unit time problem.

      Again, this reflects on your pro-gun arguments, in that for example you are unable to differentiate between stiffness of gun control legislation stats, and guns per person stats.

      You try to pretend you are more intelligent than you are by googling and copy/pasting. It doesn't work. You have to actually understand the stuff Google finds.

      Have you never heard the maxim it's better for people to think you;re stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt? You're parading your ignorance like you were walking around with your pants round your ankles.

    5. Re:Surprising number by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are essentially claiming that asteroid hits are random events in the same way that coin tosses are.

      They are. You're probably confused because it occurs to you that the asteroids and planets are in particular points in space, with particular velocities, and follow the rules of physics.

      What you're missing is that this also applies to the coins.

      The date for the impact is well known and pre determined. It is just not known by us.

      Then who is it "well known" by? The aliens that have been abducting you?

  9. Wow! by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 5, Funny

    Earth's cat-like reflexes never fail to impress.

  10. Pretty remarkable how many there are by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    I figured objects getting so close would be a very infrequent occurrence and at that range gravity would surely pull the object into us. I'm not sure if it's good news that objects have to get much closer to get sucked in or bad news that we're seeing so many near misses.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:Pretty remarkable how many there are by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2

      Gravity is a very weak force, it also gets weaker in an inverse square relationship with distance.

      Consider that on the very surface of Earth, the entire planet is pulling on you with... what? 150-200 lbs of force? Jump into the air, and you have literally applied more force as you jumped than the entire planet pulled back on you due to gravity. Of course, you came back down, but that's because gravity was pulling on you the whole time, but you still could outpace it during the time when you were in contact with the ground.

      Now consider that this asteroid was something like 18 times the distance from the Earth to the Moon, and it was moving very very very fast. We generally don't capture objects due to gravity, we capture objects due to our paths intersecting with the path of the object.

      To capture an object like this due to gravity, would be like trying to alter the trajectory of a baseball just after it was pitched using nothing more than a drinking straw and the power of your lungs.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  11. Re:If an asteroid were to strike Earth within an h by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would definitely want to know. I would leave work, buy booze and party like there is no tomorrow.

    But there would almost certainly be a tomorrow. The asteroid was only 50-165 feet in diameter. That is about the estimated size of the Tunguska asteroid/comet, which killed zero people. Even if an asteroid that size hit the ocean or a major city, 99.9% of the people on Earth would survive.

    If we were hit by the bigger (three mile diameter) asteroid, it would only have 1/8th the energy of the Yucatan asteroid that killed the dinosaurs. Unlike the dinos, we have the ability to eat canned food and stored grain, so many if not most people would likely survive.

  12. 8 Days Early by wadeal · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not the 21st yet...

    1. Re:8 Days Early by Githaron · · Score: 2

      And they were off by 139,500 miles!

    2. Re:8 Days Early by mrbester · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be thankful for the rounding error.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  13. WWIII by Githaron · · Score: 2

    It sounds like if there is a World War 3 and any humanity manages to survive, we will be extinct in 600 years since WWIII will probably set us back far enough that we will not have the means to stop the 4179 Toutatis when it comes around for the last time.

  14. Asterix and Obelix by chthon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know that the Gauls in Asterix are only afraid of the sky falling on their head. And their favorite exclamation is 'By Toutatis!'.

    1. Re:Asterix and Obelix by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know that the Gauls in Asterix are only afraid of the sky falling on their head. And their favorite exclamation is 'By Toutatis!'.

      That's because Toutatis was a major Celtic god . The naming of the asteroid happened in 1989 i.e. after the Asterix books had been using it for a while.

      So the naming was presumably a deliberate reference to the Asterix books, or at the very least it used the same god as its basis.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Asterix and Obelix by abigsmurf · · Score: 2

      It's surprising just how much much history I learnt from Asterix.

      And I learnt about Orgies, very messy orgies.

  15. Re:Thank god... by mrbester · · Score: 2

    Prior art: Footfall by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  16. Re:I'd want to know... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would dare say that I don't think there are very many extinction-level type events could plausibly happen anytime in the foreseeable future which could also wipe out the human race unless the incident were also actually detrimental to the entire physiology of the planet. I do not think that a collision of the magnitude that led to the wiping out the dinosaurs, for instance, would have the same effect on us. Certainly no small number of people would die, but I do believe humanity itself would endure.

    My reasoning is simply this. We have intellect. Dinosaurs did not.

  17. Re:Arbitrary Rule of Thumb by Narnie · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm worried that if you tell Republicans there's oil in asteroids, they'd try to have them delivered to Texas.

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
  18. Re:If an asteroid were to strike Earth within an h by thej1nx · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I suppose unlike the dinosaurs, we can also survive for a long long time without needing to breathe? Cretaceous atmosphere is supposed to have been much more oxygen rich(50% more apparently) based on QMS analysis of ancient air bubbles trapped in amber. The higher oxygen content plausibly explains the huge sizes attained by many species too(since the related metabolism could be supported back then). I suppose the said 99.9% of the people of earth will all evolve overnight to make do with 50% less oxygen again? How about no sunlight for years? Stored grains and canned food will support you for years, with crop failures?

    Also keep in mind, that all the dried dead plants from lack of sunlight will give rise to plenty of inflammable carbon fuel lying around. We are talking about a world wide wildfire. It is interesting how some people think of meteorite as something like a huge nuke, that will kill everything directly/instantly.

    Close calls like these do need to be made as sensational as possible, to remind people how important it is to not put all your eggs in one basket, and why cutting NASA's budget is like deciding to do away with life jackets on a ship, so as to "not waste money".

  19. We need an urban Tunguska to wake us up by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obviously over your city, not mine.

    Sadly, it's essentially career ending for a politician to support funding for "crazy stuff" like asteroid detection or diversion. Perhaps if they claimed they'd received it as a revelation from their favourite brand of Invisible Sky Giant it might be considered rational though.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:We need an urban Tunguska to wake us up by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't work: The US has had several major cities completely wrecked by hurricanes and flooding in the past decade, and still doesn't seem to think that this might be a problem we should look into addressing more thoroughly.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  20. How is this news? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Earth Avoids Collisions With Pair of Asteroids

    This has been happening every day for years.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  21. Re:I'd want to know... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it was known that an Extinction Level Event was headed our way and had a fair to high chance of actually happening, I'd want to know... however, I fully understand WHY we wouldn't be told.

    It wasn't. It's crappy journalism, that's all. There was a small asteroid that we didn't know about that got pretty close and that wouldn't have done anything serious had it hit us, and then there was Toutatis with its horse-shoe orbit that gets it close to Earth, but nowhere near enough to hit us, and we know that at least for several centuries, it shouldn't. You know, celestial mechanics is, after all, one of the exactest sciences that we've ever had. Someone simply mixed these two things in their mind, and many readers still do, it seems. Even here, which is a shame.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  22. Re:"Lunar Length" ?! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    It means the mean distance between Earth and Moon. In this case, it "missed" us by seven million km. Hardly worth mentioning, if you ask me. It's already been much closer to Earth than that, and for quite some time, it's not going to approach us nowhere nearly that close.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  23. Satellite fly-by to asteroid 4179 Toutatis by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    There will be a human-made satellite that will engage in a fly-by to asteroid 4179 Toutatis

    The satellite is China's Chang'e 2 and it will rendezvous with 4179 Toutatis.

    There are two conflicting reports of the rendezvous date -

    According to wikipedia the rendezvous date will be 13th December 2012 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4179_Toutatis

    According to another source - http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2012/20120614-change-2-toutatis.html - the rendezvous date will fall on 6th, January, 2013.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  24. Re:I'd want to know... by LMahesa · · Score: 2

    Perhaps I was too vague; I wasn't saying that THIS was an ELE, just that I would prefer to be told in such a case.

    --
    Look, no SIG!
  25. Re:If an asteroid were to strike Earth within an h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, a small remainder of civilisation could probably survive even if the sun got blotted out for years. There would be massive starvation and conflict, but bear in mind we have the technology to generate our own sunlight. It wouldn't be too hard to rig up some floodlights that provide crop-friendly wavelengths and shine them over some fields. Obviously not enough to feed the entire world, or even an entire country (hence starvation and conflict) but almost certainly enough to keep a sizeable population alive until the not-so-metaphorical dust settles.

  26. Re:I'd want to know... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 2

    I would dare say that I don't think there are very many extinction-level type events could plausibly happen anytime in the foreseeable future which could also wipe out the human race unless the incident were also actually detrimental to the entire physiology of the planet. I do not think that a collision of the magnitude that led to the wiping out the dinosaurs, for instance, would have the same effect on us. Certainly no small number of people would die, but I do believe humanity itself would endure.

    My reasoning is simply this. We have intellect. Dinosaurs did not.

    That's only worth something if you can apply it. We're not so good at that when our civilization support structures become non-functional. You might note that for most of our history, our intellect was enormously repressed because our civilization was primitive.

  27. Tunguska? by abies · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, we are. A 50-165 foot asteroid can sneak up on us, but that isn't going to do much. It has less energy than the 9.0 Fukushima Earthquake, which killed ~10,000 people.

    And how much energy from earthquake goes into actual surface damage? I was under impression that vast majority of it is used to shake rocks up and down, which is quite different from releasing same energy in something similar to surface nuclear strike.

    I think we should be comparing it to Tunguska event rather than earthquakes. Imagine Tunguska happening over one of densly populated areas. I don't think that it would end up being 2-hours news.

  28. Correction: "We already HOPE that Toutatis ... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2

    We already know that Toutatis will not hit Earth for hundreds of year

    Neglecting to consider that Toutatis could easily hit another (or pass very near another) reasonably sized object, thereby modifying it's course enough to hit us on its next pass.

  29. Our "Nemesis" will get us. by SternisheFan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One theory is that another sun named 'Nemesis' is the cause of major extinctions every 26 million years. It's thought that Nemesis alters asteroid orbits enough to bombard the Earth.

    "This hypothetical "death star" or "death companion" of the Sun has received a name: Nemesis. In the Greek mythology Nemesis was the spirit of divine retribution against those who succumb to hubris, vengeful fate personified as a remorseless goddess. According to the hypothesis, Nemesis periodically (approximately every 26 million years) passes through a denser region of the Oort cloud, disrupting the orbits of comets, and sending millions of comets into the inner solar system and potential collision with the Earth. But, many geologists are convinced that mass extinctions on Earth are not periodic, so they see no need for such a star. Nless, Richard Muller and his colleagues have embarked on the difficult search for a possible, dim companion to the Sun." :

    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_nemesis07.htm

  30. Re:Correction: "We already HOPE that Toutatis ... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2

    You make me laugh...Do you suppose the totality of objects in our solar system is known ?

    Jeezus, NASA (and others) find new objects of Toutatis's size nearly on a daily basis, how many smaller objects do you think there are , most of which are uncharted - for the obvious reason that they haven't been detected yet?

    But, you're confident that some guy at NASA (trying to sound important) "knows" that none of them are going to affect Toutatis's path without telegraphing that information to him first.

  31. Re:Correction: "We already HOPE that Toutatis ... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    But, you're confident that some guy at NASA (trying to sound important)

    (doing his job)

    "knows" that none of them are going to affect Toutatis's path

    I'm confident that the guys at NASA know better than any of us how large and how close an asteroid would have to be to have such an effect, and the probability of such an asteroid remaining undetected at this time. If they're doing their jobs properly, they probably have a very good handle on those numbers, and it seems reasonable to assume that such an event is too improbable to mention.

    Or do you want p-values to be specified whenever someone abuses the word "know" in such a heinous fashion?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  32. Re:I'd want to know... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Who said anything about civilization?

    I was talking about humanity, not civilization. Evolution has gifted us with an unrivaled (on this planet) ability to adapt to all kinds of circumstances through judicious application of intellect alone far faster than physiological evolution could hope to achieve. This ability is entirely orthogonal to the support structures that you are referring to which are largely derived from technology.

    Humanity would survive. Civilization? Maybe, maybe not.

  33. Re:I'd want to know... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 2

    Which is my point: you're overvaluing human intelligence as a survival trait sans civilization.

    There's nothing humans can do to survive a global event, much like there's nothing the dinosaurs were able to do. An asteroid impact of that scale ignites a global firestorm - a whole region of the Earth catches fire over the next 24 hours as the superheated air is rolled over the landscape. There isn't a way to think your way out of that problem - you either get out of the way (which you can only do if you have satellite networks, communications etc. and even then - it's impractical to move millions of people that quickly) - or you die.

  34. And we missed it again by whitroth · · Score: 2

    Early in slashdot's life, at a previous passage of toutitis, I tried to get people interested in forming a group to push a mission to it, to shove it into orbit around Earth, say, around geosync, so we'd have something for a *real* space station, but noooo, you guys blew me off. Just wait till it hits, then you'll be sorry....

                          mark

  35. Re:I'd want to know... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Humanity was able to *develop* a civilization in the first place because of that intellect.... and we can utilize that intellect to adapt more quickly to a changing environment than evolution can otherwise manage with physiological changes. I'm not overvaluing it... I'm presenting it as a simple fact that it is unmatched by anything else evolution has been able drum up, and you have yet to offer any evidence that suggests that mankind would actually not any incident which does not, at the same time, utterly destroy the viability of the planet as a sustainable biosphere, or otherwise require that evolution start over practically from scratch.