Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Radio Station In Florida Jams Automotive Electronics

New submitter titanium93 writes "For months, dozens of people could not use their keyless entry systems to unlock or start their cars when parked in the vicinity of the eight-story Regents bank building in Hollywood, FL. Once the cars were towed to the dealership for repair, the problem went away. The problem resolved itself when police found equipment on the bank's roof that was broadcasting a bootleg radio station. A detective and an FCC agent found the equipment hidden underneath an air conditioning chiller. The man who set up the station has not been found, but he faces felony charges and fines of at least $10,000 if he is caught. The radio station was broadcasting Caribbean music around the clock on 104.7 FM."

315 comments

  1. RTFM by subanark · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    Most drivers were forced to read their owner's manual to learn how to access their manual key, Camara said.

    1. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But it's locked in the glove box!

    2. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a bank, odds are this was the Manual start:

      Car Owner(shouting): Manuel, arrancar el coche!
      Manuel: Si, Jefe!

    3. Re:RTFM by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's amazing how many people forget to use their key if the remote stops working for any reason, including a dead battery. And from my experience, it's mostly middle-aged people who were driving for decades before remote entry became common.

    4. Re:RTFM by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's amazing how many people forget to use their key if the remote stops working for any reason

      Could that be because the remote also dis-arms the alarm system? Using the key alone will set off the alarm on many cars.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:RTFM by krovisser · · Score: 5, Informative

      Negative. Unlocking the car from the inside sets off the alarm. Using your key on any OEM system will disarm the alarm.

    6. Re:RTFM by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Yep, that happens with my car. Had the fob battery die while I was out at band practice, and when I unlocked it the alarm went off.

      Of course, I couldn't turn it off so I just drove it home like that. I stopped off at the pub on the way.

      (I had a club soda.)

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    7. Re:RTFM by Golddess · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My Ford Escort proves you wrong. If I lock it with the remote, and then stick the physical key into the lock on the door and unlock it, the alarm goes off.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    8. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS. After market alarms maybe, but not the stock ones.
      If you unlock the door, either by fob or by key, it disabled the alarm.

    9. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG. I have an OEM alarm system on my Honda and if I use the key to unlock the doors instead of the remote, it sets off the alarm. Of course there's a hidden button below the dash that I can push will disable the alarm.

    10. Re:RTFM by AaronLS · · Score: 1

      Many FOBs can only unlock the door with the manual key, but won't start the car, so you're dead in the water.

    11. Re:RTFM by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Informative

      And putting said key in the ignition will turn it off.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:RTFM by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Some of the car makes mentioned in the article have push to start, meaning the user never needs to use a physical key if it all works properly. I can't say what those cars are equipped with definitively, but my push to start key fob has a manual key hidden inside the key fob. It's somewhat physically difficult to get it out of the fob, and it only works on the doors, there is no cylinder to insert a key into to start the car.

      The article mentions keyless entry systems specifically, and I'm not sure if they are using that term to cover cars with push button start ignitions.

    13. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't use your key much, do you? The alarm is disarmed when the key is used to unlock the car, whether you push the unlock button or not.

    14. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they havent made an escort in a decade, and none that I am aware of have an OEM alarm, you have some shitty audiovox thing half assed onto your old beater

    15. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not have an OEM system -- Honda doesn't ship with anything like that. What you have may be dealer-installed, but it didn't come from the factory like that.

    16. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you unlock the doors, get your Faraday cage out of the trunk (you may think of it as that Space Blanket you keep in the back in case you blindly follow your GPS into the snow), place that over your car, start your engine, grab your blanket, and drive away. Not so hard for a true Geek.

    17. Re:RTFM by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Negative. Unlocking the car from the inside sets off the alarm. Using your key on any OEM system will disarm the alarm.

      Depends entirely on the car.

      My owner's manual specifically states:

      The driver’s door key cylinder cannot arm or disarm the Vehicle
      Security Alarm.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    18. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've never known any car alarm that does that.

      In fact, in every car alarm I've ever looked at prior to and including the one I currently have, the car alarm has a "starter kill", which means that when the car is armed (or going off, because y'know, if it's going that means the car alarm is still turned on), the starter is disabled, and you cannot start the car.

      What the hell is the point of a car alarm if someone can just bump-key the ignition immediately after breaking a window?

    19. Re:RTFM by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Yea, I had this problem with my mazda as my wife didn't have a remote and was always setting it off. You need to put your manual key in and turn the car off and on 3 times to reset it. Might be different for your ford. Then I read that there was an alarm "reset" button in the fusebox. So I found it, and taped it down... no more alarm. So I ripped out the stupid button and soldered the leads together so I'd never have to bother with it again. You want to steel my car? I'll give you my friggen address.

    20. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try it when your fob isn't dead. With a working fob in proximity to the car, it should not trigger an OEM alarm. Most of the newer cars have switched to RFID inside the ignition key, but some of the older models had the challenge/response built into the fob.

    21. Re:RTFM by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Assuming it's working properly.

      My VW's system is supposed to do that, but because it doesn't sense the door unlocking or opening properly, the alarm stays armed, and you then get the alarm going off when you try to start the car.

    22. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some push-to-start vehicles have a hidden ignition beneath the button. Some of them pop off but ymmv.

    23. Re:RTFM by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Yea, I had this problem with my mazda as my wife didn't have a remote and was always setting it off. You need to put your manual key in and turn the car off and on 3 times to reset it. Might be different for your ford. Then I read that there was an alarm "reset" button in the fusebox. So I found it, and taped it down... no more alarm. So I ripped out the stupid button and soldered the leads together so I'd never have to bother with it again. You want to steel my car? I'll give you my friggen address.

      Was there a happy dance to do too? I know the need for security, but that borders on the ridiculous. All that is missing is the ctrl-alt-delete key.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    24. Re:RTFM by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 4, Informative

      My new(er) Ford Fusion has a factory alarm, it also has a transponder key.

      If I open the door with the manual key, it will count down ~15 seconds before sounding the alarm. The idea is that in that time, you can insert a registered transponder key in the ignition, and turn it to on to disable. This is in addition to disarming if you hit unlock on the fob. And of course the transponder key keeps you from starting the car unless you have a registered key(as has been the case for about 10 years across almost all models)

      I would like to think that any FACTORY alarm would be smart enough to detect a registered transponder key in the ignition.

    25. Re:RTFM by Applekid · · Score: 2

      From the article:

      Most drivers were forced to read their owner's manual to learn how to access their manual key, Camara said.

      Well, this IS in Florida

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    26. Re:RTFM by lightknight · · Score: 1

      "Huh, this thing says I am supposed to replace the oil every 5,000 miles...learn something new every day!"

      So, do we count this as a double win, or what?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    27. Re:RTFM by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I've heard an owner of a new Ford Focus talk about the back up systems. In addition to the manual key for the door, if the battery in the fob is dead, you can hold the fob where the ignition key cylinders on cheap models would be, and the PATS transponder system would recognize the key, and pressing the start button would start the car.

      The transponder key systems on cars are passive systems, so the key needs no battery for it to work.

    28. Re:RTFM by alen · · Score: 1

      for the last 5 years or so Honda cars won't start without the keyless entry. you can get into the car but you need the keyless system to activate the chip in the steering column to start the car. key alone won't do it

    29. Re:RTFM by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      With my Sonata w/ factory alarm, the only way to turn off the alarm without the remote is to put the key in the door and turn it. However, if I'm inside the car and lock it with the remote, then open the door, the alarm goes off.

      My last car was a an older Chrysler and worked the exact same way - had to put the key in the door to turn it off. Found that out the hard way when the alarm went off because I started the car while it was armed and the remote battery was dead... took me five minutes to discover and pissed off the neighbors (fortunately it wasn't at my house).

    30. Re:RTFM by cusco · · Score: 4, Funny

      My Ford Escort

      Well, there's your problem . . .

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    31. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world calls BS on your BS.

      It happens. A lot. Like when the fob is dead.

    32. Re:RTFM by tibit · · Score: 1

      It may be a bug or even a problem with your car only.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    33. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But an AC said that's not true!

      They HAVE to be right!!

    34. Re:RTFM by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how differently people think, since my first reaction, when I first got a Volvo with an alarm that went off, was to turn the door key back and forth -- and it did turn the alarm off.

      Of course it makes sense that if you're inside the car and unlock the door when the alarm is armed, it's supposed to go off. That's the whole point. The car doesn't know if you're inside or outside when locking the door with the remote, duh. For all the alarm knows, there's a burglar curled on the seat, waiting to drive off as soon as the owner walks away.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    35. Re:RTFM by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      My 2 year old Honda begs to differ. There's a passive chip in the key, and you have to go through the registration process to teach your car about a new key that you cut, but it has nothing to do with the remote fob.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    36. Re:RTFM by tibit · · Score: 1

      When was that thing made? 90s?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    37. Re:RTFM by tibit · · Score: 1

      The fob's only function is to be a remote radio transmitter. The key proper has an immobilizer transponder, possibly also used for keyless entry. It's not a common design at all for a dead remote battery will cause any problems other than having to use the physical key. I'd rather call it a malfunction.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    38. Re:RTFM by icebike · · Score: 1

      2012.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    39. Re:RTFM by tibit · · Score: 1

      The "keyless system" is the passive transponder in your key assembly at large. You don't need a battery, or even a functioning remote, for it to do its job. All Volvos made since 2000 (at least) won't start if the transponder is not present -- that's otherwise known as the immobilizer function. I'd have hoped that all 2000 and newer U.S. model year cars were like that, it's such a basic security feature...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    40. Re:RTFM by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      WRONG. I have an OEM alarm system on my Honda and if I use the key to unlock the doors instead of the remote, it sets off the alarm. Of course there's a hidden button below the dash that I can push will disable the alarm.

      Where do you live? [picking up lockout tool on the way out the door]

    41. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If ever a post that missed how something works, that one sure and truly did.

    42. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: smartcar?

    43. Re:RTFM by icebike · · Score: 1

      Chrysler 300.
      Same as any high end Dodge Chrysler product.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    44. Re:RTFM by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work on my '98 Ford Taurus. Keyfob needed 100% to disarm.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    45. Re:RTFM by skids · · Score: 1

      The fob doesn't work sans battery when plugged into the dash receptacle? Or is there not a dash receptacle?

    46. Re:RTFM by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      My Ford Escort proves you wrong. If I lock it with the remote, and then stick the physical key into the lock on the door and unlock it, the alarm goes off.

      Well there's your problem right there!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    47. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Middle aged people remember when cars were logical and not the stupendous clusterfucks they are today. The ignorant cunts who are designing this modern shit should be taken out and shot.

    48. Re:RTFM by Fierlo · · Score: 1

      However, the alarm will be turned off when you use the key in the ignition (even if you set the alarm off by using the key in the door). Not sure if that was what the other poster was trying to get at.

    49. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not OEM.

      Dealer-installed perhaps, but if there's a valet button it's an aftermarket alarm.

    50. Re:RTFM by icebike · · Score: 2

      Well, no ignition key slot in the car. Its pushbutton start, as long as a fob is in the car.

      But again, if the radio transmitter interfered with that, the fall back is to press the fob against the start button. (probably RFID or something, the Chrysler manual is unclear on this). In this case, the alarm would still be armed.

      If the radio transmitter interfered with that method as well, I'd be screwed. The actual physical key only unlocks the doors and locks the glove box. There is no keyed engine start option in many (dare I say most?) Keyless entry and Start systems.

      Key-less is wonderful. Until it isn't.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    51. Re:RTFM by v1 · · Score: 1

      You don't use your key much, do you? The alarm is disarmed when the key is used to unlock the car, whether you push the unlock button or not.

      Depends on the alarm. ALL aftermarket plus the majority of factory alarms won't disarm with the door key alone. A slim-jim does basically the same physical thing as the door key, and you don't want that disarming your alarm. Installing a chipped key detector in the door is expensive, they save that for the ignition on factory alarms.

      In most cases you will set off the alarm when using a key instead of your remote. From there it depends on your alarm. Most aftermarket have a hidden button somewhere you have to press a user-defined pattern into to disarm the alarm. (you don't just press or hold the button unless it's a very cheap alarm) Mine's that way. The older factory ones you just have to put up with the noise till you drive home and disconnect the battery. Newer factory alarms have a chip in the key that the ignition lock will read, which disarms the alarm and enables the ECU so it will start. For the newer key/fob combos, the key's chip is read directly with electrical contacts, without need for good batteries in the fob, so you can use your car if the battery is dead.

      Most of the more "polite" newer cars give you a short grace to get in the car and turn the ignition before setting off the alarm when you unlock the door.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    52. Re:RTFM by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      Incorrect.. sticking the key in the door cylinder will disarm the alarm (a few.. VERY few.. require you to insert the key into the ignition and turn it on to disable the alarm).

      I worked in that field for over 12 years doing alarms, remote starts, etc so I had very hands on experience and knowledge with this stuff

    53. Re:RTFM by Wookact · · Score: 1

      You need more then a bump to disable the alarm. The key has a rf chip in it, the key needs to be in the ignition to disable the alarm. It needs to be in the ignition to be read. Once the alarm verifies the key it disables the alarm. It has been this way for years actually. My 98 exploder was this way. AFAIK it has been this way since they started putting chips in the keys. You can tell if your key has a chip, because it usually has a large plastic housing for the grip. All metal, or small plastic housing and there is probably no chip.

    54. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15 seconds with the doors opened is enough time to open the lid and rip the factory alarm horn wires. How safe is that?

    55. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.
      The immobilizer function works also if 315 MHz RKE is jammed, or if the fob's battery is dead.
      But yes, you have to physically put the fob in the slot if it's a passive start vehicle.

    56. Re:RTFM by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      My Jetta does not but it does disarm the alarm if you unlock the door with the key.

      Annoying when the unlock sensor stopped working.

    57. Re:RTFM by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      It's probably dry-solder joints in the lock mechanism. I fixed mine a couple of weeks back. Fairly straight-forward if a little time consuming.

    58. Re:RTFM by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      With the Chrysler, I opened the door (it was unlocked), got inside, closed the door and turned the key in the ignition. That's when the alarm when off, so I don't think it would be natural to get back out of the car to turn the alarm off.

    59. Re:RTFM by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Not so. On my car, the alarm disarm is triggered by a microswitch activated when the end of the key enters a plastic receptacle and is turned. Something like a slim-jim could conceivably be used to snag the wire going from the inside handle to the lock (wrong side of the glass though I think) but that would not disarm the alarm.

      I do think I may have just thought of a way that it would be possible to get into the car without the right key though. Surely there must be a guard against that though...

    60. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as a high end Dodge Chrysler product.

    61. Re:RTFM by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      Most drivers were forced to read their owner's manual to learn how to access their manual key, Camara said.

      Is it possible the problem was not simply unlocking the door, but starting the car? My car has a physical key. That physical key contains an RFID or something. I have a duplicate of the metal portion of the key. This duplicate can unlock the door just fine, but when placed in the ignition, the car refuses to start. If the RFID portion of my key were to fail, I would have no idea how to start my car.

    62. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. My car has an after-market alarm that doesn't play nice with the ignition system. It can only be armed/disarmed with the remote.

    63. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, car alarms, how droll and passe. I never could understand why people enjoyed annoying others with their car alarms that constantly go off because a speck of dust settled onto the car. It's not like anybody is going stop someone from breaking into your car because they hear the alarm and most thieves don't care either because they can smash and grab in two seconds, so why annoy other people? Why not have a silent alarm that rings up your phone?

    64. Re:RTFM by zwede · · Score: 1

      The Viper is not high end? What do you have? A Ferrari?

    65. Re:RTFM by v1 · · Score: 1

      I was referring to alarms that use a remote to disarm. Yours is just the basic car key?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    66. Re:RTFM by tibit · · Score: 1

      The initial part of the alarm going off is reasonable, but why it didn't turn off when the engine was started I wouldn't know -- at that point you're proven to be in possession of the key with the transponder, after all. Weird.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    67. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this demonstrates is that you just aren't very aware.

    68. Re:RTFM by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      My '99 Escort has an OEM alarm and, much like Golddess says, it can only be turned on by the remote, and only turned off by the remote OR by key in the ignition.

      On a roadtrip with my ex, we had one remote and two keys. It was very annoying when she kept locking it using the remote, leaving me to either find her set of keys or set off the alarm if I needed to get into the car in the middle of the night.

    69. Re:RTFM by penix1 · · Score: 1

      The car doesn't know if you're inside or outside when locking the door with the remote, duh. For all the alarm knows, there's a burglar curled on the seat, waiting to drive off as soon as the owner walks away.

      Actually, my Lincoln Town Car does know if you are in the seat when you hit the remote lock. It uses the same sensors used for seatbelt detection. Hit the lock on the remote while you are in the seat and the driver's side door will immediately unlock and the car will beep at you in an annoying way. It wants you out of the car before you can hit that button.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    70. Re:RTFM by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      My 1997 Infiniti I30 starter has an alarm kill. I found this out last summer when I unlocked my door through the open window like I had gotten into the habit of doing over the last fifteen years of driving alarm-free cars, and had to turn it off by starting the car.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    71. Re:RTFM by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      My 98 exploder

      I love it! Where can i buy one of those?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    72. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only an hour and a half late, numb nuts.

    73. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steel your car? I've got iron. Would that work?

    74. Re:RTFM by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      No. The key is built into the remote (switchblade style). The remote locks and unlocks the car (and has trunk and panic functions). unlocking the car with the remote or the key disarms the alarm. This is a good thing as the remote is battery powered and not 100% waterproof so failure can happen (and has to me).

      They key also has a RFID chip for the immobilizer which acts as a separate function.

    75. Re:RTFM by krovisser · · Score: 1

      The vast majority have logical implements. Chrysler made the PT cruiser (and other cars, I imagine) honk when the lock button is pressed. Even if the doors fail to lock (door ajar, etc.). All Japanese makes (AFAICT), for example, use the honk (or light flash, or whatever) to signal confirmation that doors are, in fact, locked.

      Chrysler's engineers like to copy, but do even that poorly some times.

    76. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooden work.

      Car born steel.

    77. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When my darling stepdaughter broke the ignition key off in her ignition switch, she managed to use a pair of tweezers to get the broken key bit out. I took that to a locksmith and he made a new key, and he was able to clone the key so it would start the car. But what I did was have him make a couple extra copies of the key, but WITHOUT the transponder in it. Her stepmother has one. My wife has one. I have one. We can all go unlock the doors and let her in if she locks the key in the car. And hanging on my keyring is the old ignition key's head. I can take any key that fits that ignition switch, turn the tumbler to ON, touch the metal part of the old key to the head of the new one, and then start the car. After a second or two the amber SECURITY light goes out, and I can remove the old key from the vicinity and the car is operable until she locates the correct key.

      Those damned chipped keys are $50 each. Regular keys are $2 each. Keeping the old key head around? Priceless. The car is almost to 200K and it's time to get that girl something else. Part of the deal before I cosign a damn thing will be several sets of keys, especially if they're some expensive sort of shock and awe tomfoolery.

    78. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gets much worse when you go to keyless fobs and push-button start.
      Then "keys" (fobs) can be $150 to $250.

    79. Re:RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I moved to Australia in 2006 I got a ride from a guy who at the time was a slave to his girlfriend and he was complaining that he cell phone was about to die and didnt know how to get ahold of his girlfriend, my response use a pay phone his response "oh yea." dumbing down of the populous seems to be working.

    80. Re:RTFM by starblazer · · Score: 1

      My 05 Sonata isn't like that. It has the factory alarm... if you use the fob, you must use the fob to disarm, otherwise you will set it off and it will kill the ignition. You have to let it calm down and then pull a couple of fuses to get it to start.

    81. Re:RTFM by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      My 98 exploder

      I love it! Where can i buy one of those?

      Not sure if you still want it, but you can find it (you can find almost anything) on YouTube:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gqePmO_w1A

    82. Re:RTFM by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      15 seconds with the doors opened is enough time to open the lid and rip the factory alarm horn wires. How safe is that?

      In truth no one cares if your car is being stolen. The alarm can be going off for 10 minutes and no one will do shit because no one cares about you, your car or anything else that doesn't involve them.

    83. Re:RTFM by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      There is probably a different system for every manufacturer. There is probably a different system for every manufacturer's different year and model and trim level. Part of which may be deliberate design by the manufacturers, but mostly I suspect it is that capabilities of equipment (at a price point) keep on changing. And with things changing so fast, there hasn't been time for consumers to really work out for themselves what they really want, and for that information to get back to the manufacturers.

      So ... solutions? I guess the only real solution would be for more stuff to be implemented in software, so that people can configure it for themselves. But that would require people to RTFM. Impasse.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. towed to the dealer? by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keyless entry systems might be handy (although yet another security risk), but having a keyless system with no key backup is insane. Do these people also get their car towed when the keyless entry battery dies? Or if the car battery dies? I would never accept a system that didn't have some form of alternate entry and starting.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:towed to the dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      entry? sure its silly no to have a mechanical entry method, but starting? If you have a newer car you probably have a key with a chip in it. If the car cant read that chip then it wont start. I had the wireless modue go back in my car last year. the effect was the remote door unlock stoped working, tire presure sensors stoped working, and the car wouldnt start. Jamming/interfearance could produce the same effect even with the key itself in working order.

    2. Re:towed to the dealer? by cvtan · · Score: 2

      Keyless entry fob for my Prius has a physical key built into it. They can't be the only manufacturer that does this.

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    3. Re:towed to the dealer? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      On our Hyundai Santa Fe, the keyless fob is attached to the physical key similarly to yours. But you need the physical key to start the car, so it's not quite the same situation being described in the story (I think).

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:towed to the dealer? by ev1lcanuck · · Score: 2

      My Prius was the same way, and when I got my Nissan LEAF I was concerned that there was no slot in the dashboard to insert the key in the event of the fob battery running out. There is a metal key in the fob but only to open the doors. For the LEAF the procedure is to hold the key over the power button on the dashboard for 3 seconds then push the power button, so there must be some sort of NFC style chip in there as well. I could imagine that illegal interference could mess that up and the car companies would generally not design a failsafe around an use case that is unlawful and reasonably well controlled, whereas a dead battery is not illegal.

    5. Re:towed to the dealer? by icebike · · Score: 0

      entry? sure its silly no to have a mechanical entry method, but starting? If you have a newer car you probably have a key with a chip in it. If the car cant read that chip then it wont start. I had the wireless modue go back in my car last year. the effect was the remote door unlock stoped working, tire presure sensors stoped working, and the car wouldnt start. Jamming/interfearance could produce the same effect even with the key itself in working order.

      Not only that, but your spelling "stoped" working as well.
      Please get that wireless "modue" fixed as soon as possible, mKay?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:towed to the dealer? by swb · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's different kinds of "keyless" systems.

      Most "keyless entry" systems are remotes that unlock the doors and disarm any security system the car might have. Otherwise, the car is as normal and has physical keys, physical locks on the doors and requires a mechanical key to operate the ignition.

      My Volvo has what Volvo calls "Personal Car Communicator" -- a wireless proximity key that allows the doors to be opened and car started without any button press other than the starter button. The key can stay in your pocket.

      Now in the case of my Volvo, the "normal" starting process for non-PCC cars, the same keyfob fits a slot on the dash. There's no mechanical bypass, although I assume starting would work without any battery in the keyfob.

      The door locks are all electronic and unless you've read the manual, you might not realize that the keyfob's "key ring" is actually a slim metal key that can be removed from the keyfob and used to mechanically unlock the door.

      With a system like this, common to many high end luxury cars, I can see nontechnical people freaking out and saying their car doesn't work, either not letting them in because they don't know the bypass exists or not starting because they don't know the non-wireless starting method (ie, fob in slot or similar).

      Or they may just be really high strung people who figure that anything that doesn't work is Mercedes' problem and they need to get the car and give them a loaner.

    7. Re:towed to the dealer? by girlintraining · · Score: 0

      Keyless entry systems might be handy (although yet another security risk), but having a keyless system with no key backup is insane. Do these people also get their car towed when the keyless entry battery dies? Or if the car battery dies? I would never accept a system that didn't have some form of alternate entry and starting.

      You have no idea just how insecure keyless entry systems are. Let's just say you're about an hour, a soldering gun, and some arduino project parts away from being able to steal luxury cars en masse. Anyway, the kind of people who plop down $80 grand for a car are not the kind of people who want to fuck around with jumper cables and risk having to ask... one of the unwashed masses... for help. They'll call for a tow, every single time. Which, in a twisted kind of social justice, makes me happy. These people spent a small fortune on a brand new top of the line car... and they can't drive it because it lacks a standard feature found in that beater car with black smoke pouring out the back of it: A metal key.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    8. Re:towed to the dealer? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      There's a difference between keyless "entry" and keyless "starting". I am unaware of any manufacturer that has keyless "entry" that does not provide for manual entry. Most keyless entry fobs have the mechanical key built into the fob and a traditional mechanical lock on at least the driver-side door. As for keyless "start" otherwise known as keyless-go, there is normally a fallback, reader slot that you can put your fob into. This works off of a different, passive technology such that even if the fob battery is dead and unable to transmit its own radio pulse (the signal being interfered with), the fob will bounce back the reader's signal. I suppose it's possible to technically "jam" the reader, but it would be from a purposed, deliberate attack not a pirate radio station.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    9. Re:towed to the dealer? by AaronLS · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks for that. The world is a better place now. Please follow his next 3 posts to ensure grammar compliance.

    10. Re:towed to the dealer? by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I have an economy car from Hyundai and I can open the doors to my car with an app on my phone.

      I have the base model, but the tech package allows you to also start your car with the phone app.

      This would not be effected by the pirate station since those signals are sent via the Bluelink system.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    11. Re:towed to the dealer? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Reprogramming the car to read the chip takes all of about 30 minutes, most of it waiting with the key just sitting in the ignition.

      The 'chip' is a resistor in most cases, the car just has to learn its value and that its acceptable, there is a simple key turning sequence to get it to do so but its designed to take time rather than be instant, hence the 30 minute wait. You aren't jamming it unless you're talking about a keyless ignition, in which case, you're stupid for buying the car with keyless ignition.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:towed to the dealer? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So the radio station operator, also operates a tow truck business, I'd assume . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    13. Re:towed to the dealer? by ChumpusRex2003 · · Score: 5, Informative

      A number of the Japanese manufacturers use a similar system.

      Toyota use a dual NFC (RFID) / "far-field" radio system. The same transponder in the fob is connected to both an NFC antenna, and a battery powered MCU and RF power amp.

      With a working battery, a button push on the fob will cause it to transmit an appropriate radio signal to the car. When key-less starting, the battery will provide power to the RFID transponder, and power the RF amplifier to allow a successful authentication whenever the fob is in the interior of the vehicle.

      In the event of a discharged or removed fob battery, there is a mechanical key concealed in the fob which can open the vehicle doors. By placing the fob directly on top of the "push-to-start" button, then transponder will be sufficiently energized by the car's antenna (which is concealed in the button) to complete an authentication transaction.

    14. Re:towed to the dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now in the case of my Volvo, the "normal" starting process for non-PCC cars, the same keyfob fits a slot on the dash. There's no mechanical bypass, although I assume starting would work without any battery in the keyfob.

      I assume yours Volvo is much like mine ie. your's came with three key-fobs. Now single one of those is with master key and two others are slave keys. Volvo has at least previously (haven't checked it lately) recommened that you use in ordinary day to day life the slave key and keep the master key at home. If you need more day to day keys in your family they ask you to order few more as those easily available as spare parts and programmable via laptop connected to ODB which is running Volvo provided maintenance software for authorized dealers.

      In case you have to enter car manually opening door with physical lock you can't start the car right away but have to wait protection system to fully deactivate after certain period which is in my car 30 minutes ... that's quite long time actually to wait ... incase you try to start before protection timer has expired all you get is helluva alarm about 120 db and which resets the timer back to 30 minutes. Also the slave physical keys don't let you open immediately glove box and especially boot of your car as the that's where you could possibly interfere protection system wiring. Because the tilting of the back seats release knobs are also in the boot it's quite well protected. To Incase you need to use the physical locking and start immediately you need to use the master key.

      I'm not sure if your's Volvo is like mine, I do remember that those measures were not very common at the time I bought it and it was some security plus package that I purchased in addition, it also has glasses you could throw a quite heavy brick and it won't break. But assuming you have newer Volvo than mine is, it might be that at least some of those have been standard features quite many years already.

      Cheers,

      ac

    15. Re:towed to the dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keyless entry systems might be handy (although yet another security risk), but having a keyless system with no key backup is insane. Do these people also get their car towed when the keyless entry battery dies? Or if the car battery dies? I would never accept a system that didn't have some form of alternate entry and starting.

      You have no idea just how insecure keyless entry systems are. Let's just say you're about an hour, a soldering gun, and some arduino project parts away from being able to steal luxury cars en masse.

      Do you have a reference for this? I know BMW had an easily exploited vulnerability (which they fixed), but I hadn't heard of widespread vulnerabilities that would make it trivial to steal a luxury car.

      I assume that if there is a real vulnerability and money to be made, there are plenty of technology experts available to create the device -- the same guys that create the hard to detect credit card skimmers.

    16. Re:towed to the dealer? by turtleAJ · · Score: 1

      I am unaware of any manufacturer that has keyless "entry" that does not provide for manual entry.

      I reply as a car afficionado:
      C6 Corvettes and I believe Tesla Model S.
      =)

    17. Re:towed to the dealer? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Of course, by the same logic, a metal key is easily defeated with a small (but strong) highly adhesive sticker over the keyhole (or just some crap shoved into the lock if you're feeling really mean), whereas a remote entry device has no such limitation. Or a minor physical imperfection in the key itself, of course. Silly arguments work both ways, you know. This isn't a problem in the real world because most people are good most of the time.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    18. Re:towed to the dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finding out the manual override is written in the owner's manual. Which is now locked inside the car.

      AC

    19. Re:towed to the dealer? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying it isn't stupid, but the engineers did provide a way for the Corvette. Refer to 2-11 and 2-14 of the owner's manual

      For Teslas should your battery pack ever completely discharge, gaining entry to your vehicle is the least of your problems. Your car is "bricked" until you replace your very expensive battery pack. Fortunately, a dead battery pack for a Tesla isn't as easy to achieve as a dead battery in other cars. e.g. parking your car for a few months while not connected to a charger.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    20. Re:towed to the dealer? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Li-ion batteries are killed by a complete discharge. A problem solved by simply putting a circuit in the battery that detects when it is dangerously low, and disconnects the battery. Coincidentialy I'm designing one myself right now for a project. It's still possible to kill a li-ion that way, but only via self-discharge. Which, as you point out, is achieved by parking the car for a few months without charging.

      I wonder if it'd be possible for manufacturers to build a small solar panel into the roof. It wouldn't provide any significant contribution to running the car, but it would probably be enough to avert death-by-self-discharge. At least so long as the car were not stored indoors.

    21. Re:towed to the dealer? by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      Of course, by the same logic, a metal key is easily defeated with a small (but strong) highly adhesive sticker over the keyhole (or just some crap shoved into the lock if you're feeling really mean), whereas a remote entry device has no such limitation. Or a minor physical imperfection in the key itself, of course. Silly arguments work both ways, you know. This isn't a problem in the real world because most people are good most of the time.

      My current car has one physical external keyhole. I find this very annoying. Sure, it's quite rare I need to use the key in an keyhole besides the driver's side door, but it's nice to have a backup just in case.

      In my previous car, in the winter, my driver's side lock would sometimes freeze up. So I'd just walk over to the passenger side door, and unlock that. Once both locks were frozen, but I still managed to get in thanks to the hatchback.

    22. Re:towed to the dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's been a number of vulnerable cars. Videos were all over YouTube for a while showing how it works, and it wasn't just for BMWs.

    23. Re:towed to the dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Volvo ...

      *wince* You poor human.

      ... my Volvo ...

      *wince* OMG, your life must suck.

      ... high end luxury cars ...

      LOL! P.O.N.T.I.A.C.!

    24. Re:towed to the dealer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The radio operator probably set up the equipment badly.
      I wouldn't be surprised if the next incident is deliberate now we've had a(n accidental) proof of concept.

  3. I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand. 104.7 FM is a part of the spectrum allocated for radio broadcast. Why was that interfering with keyless entry systems? Is this just an issue of too much power?

    1. Re:I'm confused by Urban+Nightmare · · Score: 5, Informative

      If the keyless entry is in the 314mhz (thrid harmonic) range then it could possibly be interference. A poorly controlled oscillator can cause this.

    2. Re:I'm confused by meekg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      low-quality transmitters emit more on side-bands, IIUC

    3. Re:I'm confused by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Informative

      low-quality transmitters emit more on side-bands, IIUC

      "side bands" carry the information in the radio signal. They are created by the modulation of the carrier, and are what make the signal have "bandwidth". While a low quality transmitter may have some noise in the oscillator that appears as side-band information, it is probably not as much "in the side-bands" as a full power FCC licensed FM stereo radio station that has Muzak or other extended signals, also known as "SCA".

      It is the poor filtering of the low-quality transmitter that results in the emission of harmonics (third, fifth, etc.) from a non-linearity in the oscillator or the amplifiers. In this case, a third harmonic around 312 MHz, which is a common unlicensed control device frequency.

    4. Re:I'm confused by mpe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand. 104.7 FM is a part of the spectrum allocated for radio broadcast. Why was that interfering with keyless entry systems? Is this just an issue of too much power?

      Such pirate transmitters are typically built as cheap as possible. Such things as filtering carrier harmonics don't tend to feature in the design. Pirates with two brain cells to rub together tend to assume that their hardware will be quickly found and confiscated. Thus are more likely to spend money on having multiple "hot spare" transmitters than having one half decent one.

    5. Re:I'm confused by Urban+Nightmare · · Score: 1

      Yes sorry I posted before having my first coffee of the day. I said oscillator but really it would be the low/high pass filters that keep everything that shouldn't be transmitted away from the antenna. Thanks for the correction.

    6. Re:I'm confused by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. 104.7 FM is a part of the spectrum allocated for radio broadcast. Why was that interfering with keyless entry systems? Is this just an issue of too much power?

      Such pirate transmitters are typically built as cheap as possible. Such things as filtering carrier harmonics don't tend to feature in the design. Pirates with two brain cells to rub together tend to assume that their hardware will be quickly found and confiscated. Thus are more likely to spend money on having multiple "hot spare" transmitters than having one half decent one.

      Radio transmitters tend to be pretty good on emitted frequency.. The things that are cheaply made are cars. I'd bet the filter on the door lock receiver is not blocking enough of the radio signal to prevent interference. Keyless entry is in the 300-400 MHz range so only 3-4 times the frequency.

    7. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the keyless entry is in the 314mhz (thrid harmonic) range then it could possibly be interference. A poorly controlled oscillator can cause this.

      That is around the same band as keyless entry systems typically use.

    8. Re:I'm confused by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Nope: American cars can't stand reggae, much the same way Martians can't stand country music.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    9. Re:I'm confused by sco08y · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nope: American cars can't stand reggae, much the same way Martians can't stand country music.

      On the contrary, the American cars were jammin, jammin, jammin, jammin right straight from yah.

    10. Re:I'm confused by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the OEM's, but I know after market brands use the 434Mhz band for some of their remotes, I believe mostly in AM mode though.. but 315Mhz is an option as well (maybe that's where those OEM remotes used?)

    11. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a poorly filtered PA stage will generate harmonics.

    12. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said the pirate's transmitter was any good though? Maybe it really was spewing harmonics.

    13. Re:I'm confused by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Which is interesting and important to understand. As I worked on satellite communications, we had to, sometimes, track down stations where cabling was going bad and IF transmitters would pick a radio station which would end up interfering with another satellite frequency. The station would have to be moved down to base band and decoded to find out an estimated location by listening to the station for a while. Then check the frequency map (if the information was available from the frequency allocation people) and send someone to fix the cabling.

    14. Re:I'm confused by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Radio transmitters tend to be pretty good on emitted frequency.

      Not the kind of transmitters that a pirate operator would install on the roof of a building for unattended operation. Even those that aren't bad can be misused -- such as installing an RF amp and overdriving it.

      so only 3-4 times the frequency.

      Filtering out something that is 1/3 to 1/4 the frequency of your device, especially at 300 MHz, is pretty easy and cheap. If it was the car end of the system that was the problem, then nobody could park anywhere near any transmitter, and there are an awful lot of transmitters around these days.

      What is hard to keep from interfering is a signal that is at the same frequency as your remote, and that's the harmonics. You can design in all the filtering you want in a receiver, if there is a harmonic from an unlicensed transmitter at the same frequency you cannot filter it out.

    15. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Such pirate transmitters are typically built as cheap as possible. Such things as filtering carrier harmonics don't tend to feature in the design. Pirates with two brain cells to rub together tend to assume that their hardware will be quickly found and confiscated. Thus are more likely to spend money on having multiple "hot spare" transmitters than having one half decent one.

      You make it sound like they're actually making money.

    16. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not too much power or the pirate station would have been found. It was possibly a filtering problem causing too wide a signal and/or harmonics (multiple transmissions from the center frequency of 104.7 FM) that were interfering with the locking systems. Interesting note, the FCC has been using volunteering ham radio operators more and more to find problem signals like these pirate radio stations. It allows hams to practice their DF (direction finding) skills and saves the FCC a bundle of money. A few years back, there was a signal heard in Texas that was giving some radio services a fit, so they called on the hams to locate it. It was beastly to find because it turned out to be a data signal coming from an off shore oil well platform whose transmitter was creating harmonics. In the San Fransisco area, a ham with DFing equipment was called upon by the police to locate 2 youths who had stolen a forest service radio and were call help, claiming that they were lost in a nearby national forest or park. The forest service and police had made an exhaustive search for them. The ham DFed the signal down to two houses in the SF area, and after the police checked both homes, they found the youths and the radio.

  4. Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

    I get you not supposed to run an illegal radio, but why was the signal causing problems for cars? Was it too strong or was there an underlying signal being sent out?

    For me, the funny part, "people had to get their manuals out how to manually open their car doors"

    1. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by big_e_1977 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The third harmonic of 104.7 is 314.1 Mhz. Keyless entry systems operate at 314.93 Mhz. The bootleg transmitter/antenna likely didn't have any filtering to reduce spurious emisions or harmonics.

    2. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

      Having been in the industry (broadcast) the issue was not with the FM band transmission. The illegal transmitter was most likely home built, improperly adjusted, and lacking harmonic filters and a narrow band tuned antenna. Most transmitters do not run class A or Class AB amplification like a low distrotion audio amplifier, but in Class C a clipped mode transmission rich in harmonics for high energy effeciency (like a switched mode power supply) and the output is filtered with a resonant tuned tank circuit. If the bootleg transmitter was not tuned, or lacked the tuned tank and tuned resonant antenna, then he was not only broadcasting in the FM band but also providing lots of energy on harmonics of the fundemental.

      Fundimental is 104.7
      2nd harmonic is 209.4
      3rd harmonic is 314.1

      My car remote is in the 315 MHZ range and would be impacted by this. The FM signal is not a narrow band frequency as it is Frequency Modulated. It could easily overlap the range used by car remotes. Not getting into the car is only one issue. The second issue is the problem with the chip in the key for anti theft immobolization.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A lot of keyless entry systems work in the ISM frequencies around 433.920MHz - which is annoyingly close to one of the commonly-used 70cm channels around here.

      It's possible that he was using a UHF link to his TX site to avoid detection, somewhere around 433.9MHz.

    4. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

      And he would've gotten away with it too, if it weren't for those meddling keys.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The illegal transmitter was most likely home built, improperly adjusted, and lacking harmonic filters and a narrow band tuned antenna. Most transmitters do not run class A or Class AB amplification like a low distrotion audio amplifier, but in Class C a clipped mode transmission rich in harmonics for high energy effeciency (like a switched mode power supply) and the output is filtered with a resonant tuned tank circuit. If the bootleg transmitter was not tuned, or lacked the tuned tank and tuned resonant antenna, then he was not only broadcasting in the FM band but also providing lots of energy on harmonics of the fundemental.

      Yes, but couldn't we just reverse the phase-charge polarity of the main deflector array, route the backup thermoquantum buffers through the primary energy manifold, and use a timed tachyon-gamma pulse to cancel out the interference?

    6. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by aevan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Four days after they removed the equipment, a man identifying himself as "Jay" left a message for a maintenance worker at the bank building, police say. When the worker returned the call, "Jay" asked if he'd taken his equipment. The answer: No, but the cops did. "

      ~From article

    7. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original article indicates "The man..." and "he"... it's possible the police have narrowed it down to men due to DNA, photos, or Magic (or they're just sexist). Not the parent's fault, though, blame the original article.

    8. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Stiletto · · Score: 0

      My car remote is in the 315 MHZ range and would be impacted by this.

      Impacted? Like a tooth? I think you meant "affected". /Sorry, my pet peeve.

    9. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Informative

      And we know its a "HE" because?

      As someone else pointed out, because TFA said so.

      But lacking that, "he" is still the correct word because in the English language "he" is both a third-person pronoun referring to "a particular person who is a man" and a third-person pronoun referring to "a person of unknown gender". This is why people who use the pronoun "she" to demonstrate their "cultural sensitivity" are just confusing, because they have forced a gender specificity on the antecedent when none really exists. How do they know it was a woman? Those who understand the language are left trying to figure out why there is something specific to women involved, or why it matters.

      And those who use "he or she" are really saying "any person or a woman..."

    10. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like most people with grammatical "pet peeves" you have no ground to stand on. He used it as a verb form of impact, not as the adjective impacted, so please troll elsewhere.

    11. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "he" is a pronoun. if "she" were used, it would be equally incorrect. I'd much rather type one less letter than start to give a damn about being gender neutral and typing out "the suspect" every single time I wanted to refer to him.

      trollface.jpg

    12. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impacted? Like a tooth? I think you meant "affected". /Sorry, my pet peeve.

      No, "impacted" as in "to have an effect or impact on." Read the usage note on the definition of the word, you lousy pedant. It means exactly what he meant and exactly as you interpreted it. Language -- it's what we use every day to communicate ideas. If you don't like it, consider his usage "poetic".*

      *See the period outside the quote at the end of the sentence? I'm sure that drives you crazy as well.

    13. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are forgetting about the ambient background radiation! You'll light the sector up and burn off the plasma!

    14. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/impact

      Refer to definitions 9 and 11 as well as the usage note at the end of the entry. I apologize but the language has changed without your consent.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    15. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Bravo whoever modded you Insightful

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    16. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could they get their manuals out if they were locked outside of their car and many people keep their car manuals IN THE GLOVE BOX?!?!

    17. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I actually appreciate that it's come into common usage. It makes it very easy to detect those who cannot use affect/effect correctly as those are the people who have a strong preference to use the word "impact" when the negative aspect to the comparison is minimal.

      Correct usage: Heavy use of bittorrent will impact HD video.
      "Warning light" usage: He impacted the user addition.

      Oh, trust me, at first I hated it. But it's become a great tool in the arsenal of "just walk up and talk to the person rather than try to have a written conversation with them".

    18. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      No where in the article did it say he was in Texas???

      --
      careful this post may contain sarcasm

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    19. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Hmm, looking at the definition for impacted tooth there is this "It may be that the area is just overcrowded and there's no room for the teeth to emerge." so yes, very similar to an impacted tooth.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    20. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There have been two attempts to introduce gender-neutral pronouns, but neither caught on outside of hardcore feminists.

      Amusingly, Greek (At least ancient, I don't know about modern) does have a gender-neutral pronoun. It's used many times in the new testament. Translators into english have long converted this into the male pronouns for simple readability. There was an announcement earlier this year that the newest edition of the NIV is going to switch these into the 'he or she' form in order to remain more accurate to the original text*. This resulted in a serious backlash from Christians, with many denouncing the 'changes' as either a corruption of God's message or a sign that liberal feminists had infiltrated the NIV translation committee.

      *Itsself a translation. Jesus spoke in Hebrew, but the words were translated into Greek before being written down.

    21. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because the modern cars were designed by morons. All cars built between 1908 and 2000 are immune to this bullshit.

    22. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not, if we reroute lifesupport through the main deflector array we may be able to create a warp bubble that will allow us to ride out the wave from the tachyon-gamma pulse.

    23. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      But lacking that, "he" is still the correct word because in the English language "he" is both a third-person pronoun referring to "a particular person who is a man" and a third-person pronoun referring to "a person of unknown gender". This is why people who use the pronoun "she" to demonstrate their "cultural sensitivity" are just confusing, because they have forced a gender specificity on the antecedent when none really exists.

      I suspect we have this problem because of how gender-neutral English is. Only our pronouns express gender, and then, only when talking about people. In many languages, all nouns have (arbitrary) gender. And pronouns tend to take the gender of the noun they replace. In some languages, even the verb conjugation changes, depending upon the gender of the subject. I suspect that a speaker of a highly-gendered language would take less concern over which gender-pronoun is used when describing an indeterminate person.

    24. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      Not getting into the car is only one issue. The second issue is the problem with the chip in the key for anti theft immobolization.

      It would be hilarious if the tow trucks used to remove the stranded cars had the same type of anti-theft system.

    25. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get on it.

    26. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was a dude named Jesus, he spoke Galilean Aramaic. Hebrew is fairly closely related, but had faded as a common language by that time.

    27. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus spoke in Hebrew

      It's generally accepted by scholars that Jesus spoke in Aramaic, which was the commonly spoken language in Israel during the Second Temple Period. The Hebrew language is in the same Northern Semitic family of languages and was used for liturgical purposes whereas Aramaic was the everyday vernacular.

    28. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Translators into english have long converted this into the male pronouns for simple readability.

      Actually, they translated it into "he" the genderless version because that was proper English.

      There was an announcement earlier this year that the newest edition of the NIV is going to switch these into the 'he or she' form in order to remain more accurate to the original text*.

      And yet, that moves it further away from what the original said. "Any person or any woman..." just isn't the same as just "any person". It also tries to attach a gender to the antecedent that wasn't in the original. The true reason for the change isn't to be "more accurate", because clearly it won't be, but to placate those who cannot accept that "he" has two meanings.

      *Itsself a translation. Jesus spoke in Hebrew,

      Actually, while Jesus certainly knew Hebrew as a requirement to know the Old Testament, the language he most often used was Aramaic, simply because that was the language in use at the time.

    29. Re:Illegal Radio Frequency jamming car locks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love this comment! People are just way too freakin' sensitive. Your explanation is perfect and well justified, too. I like to think of it another way as well - the letters "h" and "e" are in both "he" and "she", so "he" is more all-encompassing of both words! :)

  5. No thanks! by DarthBling · · Score: 1

    So people were actually stranded because they couldn't get into their cars because their keyless fobs wouldn't work? The driver's door should at least have a keyed lock.

    The article said people actually had their cars towed to the dealership because they couldn't unlock them, so I'm disinclined to this this is operator error, but a really bad design by asshat engineers. At least the article gives us a clue as to which car companies to avoid in the future: "Cars made by Ford, Lexus, Toyota, BMW and Mercedes were reportedly affected."

    1. Re:No thanks! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      My BMW has a good old fashioned mechanical key inside the fob, with a good old fashioned lock cylinder inside the drivers door handle. This sounds like clueless South Florida douchebaggery to me.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if trolling, but all major manufacturers who offer remote entry/keyless ignition include physical keys with their fobs for backup, and a port in the car into which the non-functioning fob can be inserted for ignition unlock. People are just dumb, believe it.

    3. Re:No thanks! by egranlund · · Score: 2

      I initially thought this while reading the article, but then I realized that the people interviewed were people who lived in the apartments and thus parked in that lot every night.

      I too would have my car towed to a dealership after this happened more than a few times - especially with a new car. A pirate radio station is so far outside of the realm of everyday possibilities of your car malfunctioning that even some basic troubleshooting would have completely missed this issue.

    4. Re:No thanks! by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if my keyless entry is not working correctly but I could still get in and start the car manually, I think that I would DRIVE my car to the dealership instead of getting it towed.

    5. Re:No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you have it towed if you knew you could start it and drive it to the dealership?

    6. Re:No thanks! by icebike · · Score: 1

      And perhaps equally douchebaggery corrupt towing services, all of which should have known about the physical keys.

      On the other hand...
      Its entirely possible that the interference was so strong that even getting in the car your fob would not allow it to start.
      There is no physical key slot for starting the engine in my car, but holding the but of the fob against the start button is
      supposed to work.
      If that was being DOSed as well, towing might be the only option.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:No thanks! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      They probably do have a physical lock and key that opens it but with many cars there has been a bad decision with the on board anti theft and security systems that the car alarm will go off if the key is used to unlock the vehicle after it has been locked the the remote. If that weren't bad enough when the car alarm goes off the ignition locks and won't let you start the car until you lock and unlock it with the remote.

      It is also becoming more and more common to have sport and luxury cars with no key only the key fob with a rf chip similar to the ones in credit cards. I saw that in one of my friends cars it seems ridiculous to me considering that any one with the right equipment could listen in on the key exchange.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    8. Re:No thanks! by bws111 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And as soon as you drive it to the dealer, it starts working normally again, thereby becoming a wasted trip. Better to have the dealer/towing service come and see the problem while it is failing instead of being put into the 'idiot who does not know how to use keyless entry' file.

    9. Re:No thanks! by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm afraid this is just a case of stupid/ignorant people. Keyless entry systems have a mechanical key--which is normally built into the fob--that will fit a nice little mechanical lock on at least the driver-side door. Keyless-go (start) systems normally have an RFID reader slot--which is unlikely to be affected by the pirate radio station--that you can insert your fob into. Could the engineers have made their keyless systems less susceptible to interference? Probably. Could the car owners have still have unlocked and driven off in spite of the pirate radio? Almost certainly. Are the towing companies going to tell save their customers the expense of a tow by telling them this? Doubt it.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    10. Re:No thanks! by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Funny, the doors on my car can be unlocked by my phone and it is an economy car from Hyundai.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    11. Re:No thanks! by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      People being dumb would be them not figuring out to put the key in the hole and turn it. Something they've been accustomed to doing for decades.

      I think it's fair to say that a new user interface (emergency key fob ports that may be well hidden and keys hidden in the fob) could confuse people without them being dumb.

    12. Re:No thanks! by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Funny, the doors on my car can be unlocked by my phone and it is an economy car from Hyundai.

      Isn't it great? I just wish it wouldn't do it every time my phone got a call.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    13. Re:No thanks! by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      Are you sure? My wife's 2012 Kia Soul is keyless entry (with a physical key inside the fob) and doesn't have a visible key slot, but does apparently have one in the glove box for such situations.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    14. Re:No thanks! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Funny

      The majority of faults in all technology disappear when exposed to an engineer. Engineers exude technology friendly vibes. (And dont try to dance to Carribean music while putting the key in the slot, unless they are Jamaican, in which case no problem, man!)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    15. Re:No thanks! by gtbritishskull · · Score: 2

      Yes, you could have your mechanic come to the car and see the problem as it is occurring, and that would probably be a good idea, but that is not what the OP said. And, it would still be stupid for them to tow the car back (they should just drive it).

      When I have had my car towed, the person driving the tow truck has not been there to diagnose problems with my car. He only want to move my car from where it was to where I wanted it to be.

      And honestly, if I worked at a dealership and someone had a car towed in for a malfunctioning key fob when the car could easily have been driven then I would go ahead and open the 'idiot who ...' filing drawer and then figure out where to file it. Because it is going in there somewhere.

    16. Re:No thanks! by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Is that an actual issue you are having or just snark?

      If an actual issue I am very interested in it, have any links?

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    17. Re:No thanks! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It mentioned owners manuals. I gather from comments higher up that all cars do have some sort of backup means of operation, but that it isn't always obvious. You happened to know that you have a short-range transponder system located behind the ignition button - but how many owners of your model are completely unaware of that feature? It isn't something you'd guess.

    18. Re:No thanks! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I saw that in one of my friends cars it seems ridiculous to me considering that any one with the right equipment could listen in on the key exchange.

      That's the thing, they use rolling codes, much like what garage door openers have used for decades, same with key fobs. You can't determine the next key sequence simply by recording the signal.

      While there are weaknesses, you have to remember that door locks aren't exactly without their own weaknesses. In reality, key fobs are, at least on average, more secure than physical locks, requiring both more time and additional equipment at substantial cost over a lockpick set.

      Ultimately though, I've heard that most really high end cars are stolen the same way a relative of mine once stole a cop car with. Pull up with a tow truck and cart it away. Of course, my relative did it decades and decades ago as a joke* - he parked it on the far end of the police parking lot. Nobody batted an eye, and it took weeks for them to figure out where it went to. Cop cars break down as well, nobody sees anything wrong with a marked tow truck neatly dropping a car into the lot.

      *A rather mean one on a cop he had a serious dislike for. I wonder how successful 'theft' charges would be given that it was parked, out in the open, right in the appropriate department's lot?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    19. Re:No thanks! by icebike · · Score: 1

      True, but then I'm THAT guy that read the manual.

      It was also pointed out to me when I took delivery, because that's how you start it when the key fob battery dies.
      Apparently enough users have the dead fob problem that dealers point this out.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    20. Re:No thanks! by ignavus · · Score: 1

      The majority of faults in all technology disappear when exposed to an engineer. Engineers exude technology friendly vibes.

      I have often noticed this with user complaints about IT equipment. The PC or printer works fine as long as IT staff are looking at it, but plays up the minute they go away.

      I reckon the device knows who is watching it - it only plays up if it knows you can't fix it.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    21. Re:No thanks! by v1 · · Score: 1

      Its entirely possible that the interference was so strong that even getting in the car your fob would not allow it to start.

      That would be an interesting thing to investigate, as there are arguments in both directions.

      1. power rises and drops with the square of the distance. If you are double the distance, the received power is 25%. So if your fob is transmitting 100 milliwatts, if you're standing 5 feet from the antenna and the pirate station is a block away, (say 500ft) you'd beat a transmitter with a fundamental power of over 400 watts. An incredibly crappy transmitter may have 3rd order at 10% of fundamental. I doubt very much a pirate station hidden in an air conditioner is putting out 4kw on VHF.

      2. the car antenna is probably optimized for receiving from the fob from a distance outside the car, so fob reception is probably worse inside the car than certain places outside the car.

      3. I didn't see anything about range complaints. This problem would obviously be occurring in a very specific area of town centered around that building. Probably within a block or less, and was likely more of a nuisance for people, not able to unlock their car until they got closer to it. (I'm used to being able to hit my autostart a block away, and a lot of people unlock their car as soon as they're within visual sight of it)

      4. 104.7 x 3 = 314.1, which is actually just below and outside one of the unlicensed low power bands in use by some car remotes. In theory it shouldn't interfere even on 3rd, unless again the transmitter was quite crappy and spraying out unwanted splatter or sideband.

      5. again lacking information, would be interesting to have more data on the kit confiscated. Some of those units are actually very high quality. There's a market for it, and people that are doing it not for money (this was music 24/7, no commercials) typically have a larger amount of pride in their work. I would actually expect fairly high quality gear. Although it may simply have been out of alignment. Nearby large metal objects (like air conditioners) can really screw up transmitters. I will assume though that the transmitter itself was in the AC unit and that there was a proper aerial antenna mounted to it.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  6. I'd bet on corroded antenna leads by ka9dgx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd bet it was corroded feedline or antenna connection not protected against the salt air. If it formed a diode, it would set up a strong 3rd harmonic right next to the 315 Mhz band used by keyless remotes according to Wikipedia. Without that, they may have been able to stay on the air much longer.

    I love how Wikipedia makes it easy to give a lot more context for these type of explanations. 8)

    1. Re:I'd bet on corroded antenna leads by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

      Corrosion or a Class C power amplifier without an output resonant narrow band antenna or tuned tank. My bet would be home built transmitter with a Class C amplifier and lack of harmonic filtering.

      The rusty bolt can give some harmonic power but not nearly as much as an unfilterd power amplifier.

      Rusty bolt tends to be problems near a receiver such as a rusty downspout on a builting making a clean transmitter look bad to locals within a building. This is most often seen with Ham radio complaints where the ham is clean, but the TV in the apartment a block away is due to rusty guy wires or downspout on the apartment. IE the harmonic is generated in close proximity of the TV viewer a block away.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_C_amplifier#Class_C

      Class-C amplifiers conduct less than 50% of the input signal and the distortion at the output is high, but high efficiencies (up to 90%) are possible. The usual application for class-C amplifiers is in RF transmitters operating at a single fixed carrier frequency, where the distortion is controlled by a tuned load on the amplifier. The input signal is used to switch the active device causing pulses of current to flow through a tuned circuit forming part of the load.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:I'd bet on corroded antenna leads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is why you have illegal immigrants set up your illegal pirate radio...

    3. Re:I'd bet on corroded antenna leads by gmarsh · · Score: 1

      Definitely. 3rd harmonic of the broadcast carrier lands right on top of the 315MHz band.

      3rd harmonic is very easy to generate - unless you've spent a *ton* of money on your FM exciter, made every amplifier stage seriously overbiased and underdriven, etc.. you'll have a significant amount of 3rd harmonic coming out of your final amplifier. And it's hard to get rid of, requiring a sharp lowpass or notch on the transmitter output.

      And dipole antennas work perfectly fine at odd order harmonics.

      I used to design AM/FM broadcast equipment for a living, and making the output of a FM transmitter pass spectrum requirements takes an enormous amount of design effort and testing. "Making a filter to take the harmonics out" is easy to say - but at VHF L's look like C's, C's look like L's and R is never exactly 0 or 50.

    4. Re:I'd bet on corroded antenna leads by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I think that unless the antenna has built-in lumped component resonant traps, it's going to radiate third harmonic almost as well as the fundamental.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:I'd bet on corroded antenna leads by Technician · · Score: 1

      Most FM broadcast antennas are tuned dipole arrays with a tuned gama match to the element. They are not resonant on the 3rd harmonic. Often a 3rd harmonic cavity is used to notch out the harmonic.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  7. wow by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    " "We were blaming it on the police. The police were blaming it on the courthouse. We didn't know what was going on.""
    Maybe you should stop blaming people for things when you don't know what's going on?

    ""Something mystical was going on,""
    And there it is. people ascribe something as mystical and then they stop using their brain. This is why SCAMs* are dangerous. "It's energy and mysterious? well then I guess we can't find a real answer."
    This thing happens, and it's always in the same area. Clearly Aliens.

    "Most drivers were forced to read their owner's manual to learn how to access their manual key, Camara said."
    Sigh.

    *Supplements and Complementary and Alternative Medicines

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:wow by ankhank · · Score: 1

      > "Most drivers were forced to read their owner's manual
      > to learn how to access their manual key, Camara said."

      Regrettably, as the owner's manual was usually inside the vehicle ....

    2. Re:wow by Jeng · · Score: 2

      And also available online.

      One can also usually call for customer support, even with cars.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:wow by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should stop blaming people for things when you don't know what's going on?

      One could think that it was a hypothesis; 'Cops installed a new radio/antenna that's interfering with our system'. It's reasonable, logical, and testable. The problem is only if they don't test it. Given that they seem to have relatively quickly figured it out, it's likely they contacted the cops about it, the cops said 'we didn't do anything' and contacted the FCC, the FCC sent somebody out with a frequency analyzer that found the interference and triangulated it's source as the pirate station on the bank roof.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  8. My Solution by Westwood0720 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Drive a shitty car with the doors unlocked and the key in the ignition. Worked for me for over a decade now!

    1. Re:My Solution by berashith · · Score: 1

      I left the keys to my first car on top of the car everywhere i went. Never lost them.

    2. Re:My Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some "shitty" cars top stolen car lists, such as ooold Dodge Caravans (which are prone to flipping over at high speeds unless you turn it slower than an 18 wheeler, and other nasty things).

    3. Re:My Solution by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      I dunno... thieves aren't always the brightest bulbs in the box. I had one break into my beater of a Ford Pinto to steal my crappy $10 speakers, back when I was a teenager.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:My Solution by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno... thieves aren't always the brightest bulbs in the box..

      Well, he was smart enough to leave the Pinto, wasn't he?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:My Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drive a shitty car with the doors unlocked and the key in the ignition. Worked for me for over a decade now!

      I did that and the car got stolen. Then they brought it back and slapped me.

    6. Re:My Solution by CodeReign · · Score: 1

      The Dodge Caravans can be popped open with little to no effort using a flat head screwdriver.

    7. Re:My Solution by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Some "shitty" cars top stolen car lists, such as ooold Dodge Caravans (which are prone to flipping over at high speeds unless you turn it slower than an 18 wheeler, and other nasty things).

      What some people don't understand is that vehicles aren't always stolen for parts / resale. Frequenlty they're stolen for joyride / crime getaway cars. Early '90s Chryslers, and Hondas were very easy to steal, and popular for this purpose. This is one of the reasons transponder keys became popular, as it reduces this type of theft.

      Nothing can completely eliminate theft, as a car can always be towed away.

    8. Re:My Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother always left his convertible (VW) unlocked, because otherwise they'll knife the top, and that's expensive to fix. Someone climbed in once, missed the pullout radio (it was under the seat), swiped his tollbooth and parking meter money (at the time, spare change), then on the way out, locked the door.

      Brother came back to find his car locked. He was stunned...

      AC

    9. Re:My Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoiler: He never went anywhere....much.

    10. Re:My Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably weren't interested in the car or the speakers, just annoying a pinto driver.

    11. Re:My Solution by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I dunno... thieves aren't always the brightest bulbs in the box..

      Well, he was smart enough to leave the Pinto, wasn't he?

      You're giving him too much credit. Unless he could pick it up and put it in his pocket, that thing wasn't going anywhere more often than not.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    12. Re:My Solution by luther349 · · Score: 1

      your telling me i had a auto lot at one time. i had them brake glass on unlocked cars and steal stock shitty radios and one of them didn't even work. and they stole plastic Walmart spinner off a Bonneville i had there. so to fix that i just removed the stock radios off any new cars i got tagged them and put them back when the buyer would pick up the car.

  9. I guess it's true what they say.. by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    104.7 FM brings you the best jams~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  10. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This happened in NYC this summer but it was faulty wiring rather than a pirate radio station.

    1. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was the same cause, stupid car design. Real cars don't use any electronic controls. They haven't built a good car since the early 70s. Jap and German cars are the worst.

  11. Ballsy pirate... by guyniraxn · · Score: 2

    Not only was he broadcasting pirate radio but he did it in the commerical frequency range, more likely to interfere with a licensed operator (who wants that ad money) and get the FCC called to investigate.

    1. Re:Ballsy pirate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Umm, if he didn't do it on a commercial frequency range, how else would people have heard it?

    2. Re:Ballsy pirate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio doesn't stop at the ends of the commercial frequency range. I could build a receiver for 1.8MHz to 30 MHz and here some pretty cool chatter.

    3. Re:Ballsy pirate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant that frequencies from the bottom of the FM band up to 91 or so are reserved for noncommercial operators (public radio, universities, etc.). They don't have as direct an incentive to care if their reception is poor in certain areas as someone who sells ads.

    4. Re:Ballsy pirate... by mpe · · Score: 2

      Not only was he broadcasting pirate radio but he did it in the commerical frequency range, more likely to interfere with a licensed operator (who wants that ad money) and get the FCC called to investigate.

      You wouldn't expect that this would have operated for months if it was interfering with a regular station (at least not one which had any listeners.)

    5. Re:Ballsy pirate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you run a pirate station you specifically would want stay away from the licensed operators frequencies, unless the licensed operator is a really small low powered station, and even doing that would get you caught as someone (who is a regular listener) might call the licensed owner and complain about signal issues.

      Most of the commercial stations run very high power levels with a very big antenna and will overpower low wattage station (even pretty close to the low wattage station), at best if the pirate is sneaking power from inside some piece of equipment on the roof one probably cannot run very much wattage at all so to maximize the pirate stations coverage would want to avoid being close to high wattage station's frequencies to maximize range and reduce the chances of being caught from complaints to the licensed operator.

    6. Re:Ballsy pirate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was funny he did it on 104.7, since there's WRBQ; a 100kw station in Tampa that should hit there. I heard that station on Long Island on my way out to fix the 104.7 in Montauk, NY a few years back

    7. Re:Ballsy pirate... by avman86 · · Score: 1

      Bah, forgot to log in

    8. Re:Ballsy pirate... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      IMHO, all the soca music on 1.8 MHz is crap, and the 30MHz stuff is undanceable. Where is Calypso Rose when you need her?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    9. Re:Ballsy pirate... by Applekid · · Score: 2

      According to Radio-Locator.com, the nearest licensed 104.7 MHz broadcaster is nearly 100 miles away from Hollywood, FL, which means it was effectively unoccupied.

      The only two Carribean themed radio stations in the service area are AM, so, most likely is that some kid thought it might be cool to set up his own radio station with higher fidelity and play what he wanted to, fancying himself a DJ. His network of friends probably really liked it.

      I'm sure it's cheaper than handing out smartphones and running a shoutcast server.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    10. Re:Ballsy pirate... by skids · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In our area we have someone who's spliced a radio stations into the ground circuit for an entire city block. Makes it impossible to tone out wires at a few of our network racks -- we can't hear the trace tone over the salsa music.

    11. Re:Ballsy pirate... by ffflala · · Score: 1

      In our area we have someone who's spliced a radio stations into the ground circuit for an entire city block. Makes it impossible to tone out wires at a few of our network racks -- we can't hear the trace tone over the salsa music.

      That's an amusing problem. I'm not familiar with trace tones, but can you adjust the frequency of the tone to match a specific key? If you can set it to a telltale tone that is very dissonant to the common keys of salsa tunes (I believe they're usually in horn-friendly keys, like F, b-flat, and e-flat), a dissonant interval that rarely appears --such as a minor ninth-- it might make the song sound "out of tune" enough to hear the trace tone.

      Sort of like adding a trace of toothpaste flavor into the gallons of orange juice. If it tastes/sounds "off", you've got a trace.

    12. Re:Ballsy pirate... by skids · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of volume really -- our ears are saturated. We bought a toner with a better filter. It helped a tiny bit.

  12. Jammin by PaddyM · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...

    We're jammin', we're jammin', we're jammin', we're jammin';
    Hope you like jammin', too.

    ...
    Credits to Bob Marley

    1. Re:Jammin by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      The radio station was broadcasting Caribbean music around the clock

      Maybe that's where they should start looking for the operator....

    2. Re:Jammin by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Funny stuff. It's coincidences like this that make we want to anthropomorphise Irony.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    3. Re:Jammin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick, to the clock tower!

  13. Pirate Caribbean radio? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else finding this amusing?

    1. Re:Pirate Caribbean radio? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      I thought Christian Slater would have more work by now.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    2. Re:Pirate Caribbean radio? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Anyone else finding this amusing?

      I was surprised to learn that cars have tastes in music. What do cars do if they hear rap or Justin Bieber?

      . . . and does my auto insurance cover it . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Pirate Caribbean radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell us why you were down moderated as troll here erroneus http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3339513&cid=42390715

    4. Re:Pirate Caribbean radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lardbody erroneus trolls and now tries to play innocent http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3339513&cid=42390715 you're a joke fatboy and it's amusing seeing you run when you were challenged fairly by the guy you libeled. you sure talk big but when it comes down to it you're nothing but a fat pig who has done nothing but eat too much.

    5. Re:Pirate Caribbean radio? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that I snickered.

      Of course, going by the AC stalking you, you're apparently an epic troll; with one post you managed to get dozens of replies over multiple threads! ;)

      I find it interesting that the nut seems to be keeping a log of everyone's posts in order to keep digging up the past. Not that I've seen you post anything really controversial.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    6. Re:Pirate Caribbean radio? by erroneus · · Score: 0

      Google "Alexander P. Kowalski slashdot". There's quite a bit of history and a well established pattern of behavior. He is an embarassment to himself.

  14. You're not seeing the big picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a badass.

  15. Say a prayer for me now by ischorr · · Score: 4, Funny

    '"At first I thought it was me," said Jacobson, who started to say a little prayer every time she tried to use her electronic key.'

    God: Messing with people's vehicles since 4000BC.

    1. Re:Say a prayer for me now by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      God: Messing with people's vehicles since 4000BC.

      Well, at least He didn't make the wheels fall off this time around. But maybe if these had been Segways...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  16. Clear warning given by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    We be jammin'

    It's right there in the lyrics!

  17. Very Impressive by codewarren · · Score: 1

    Sherlock Holmes, is that you?

    1. Re:Very Impressive by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that the KA9DGX combination of characters and numbers that is the GP's screen name should ring a bell to any self-respecting /.ter.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Very Impressive by codewarren · · Score: 2

      Yes, but Sherlock Holmes is also a master of disguise.

  18. Class C, no filters-- by sillivalley · · Score: 2

    Yep, 3rd harmonic, probably from an unfiltered Class C power amp -- and it will desense those silly little receivers if it doesn't block them completely. The more modern ones have some front-end filtering, but not a lot.

    A lot of automotive stuff in that frequency range -- keyless entry, TPM (tire pressure monitoring), and garage door openers.

    I'm surprised nobody has gone after the protocols to see how many low tire pressure warnings they can set off at once...

    1. Re:Class C, no filters-- by Animats · · Score: 2

      Yep, 3rd harmonic, probably from an unfiltered Class C power amp.

      Probably. Definitely emissions way out of band. Most US keyless entry devices are at 315MHz. An FM transmitter at 104.7 MHz would have a third harmonic up there. That's a really crappy transmitter. Normally, a keyless entry system will work even when you're parked next to a high power FM station transmitter tower. Sutro Tower in San Francisco has an 8KW FM station at 104.5, and doesn't cause this problem in nearby areas. That tower used to have 10 analog TV stations with a total power of about 18 megawatts.

      This isn't rocket science. Any radio ham (well, anybody with an older or a higher level ticket) should know how to deal with this.

    2. Re:Class C, no filters-- by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised nobody has gone after the protocols to see how many low tire pressure warnings they can set off at once...

      Probably because:
      1. It takes something like 15-30 minutes without signal to set one off. So you jam the signal for a couple minutes before they're outside the jamming range and the light never turns on.
      2. Most people would still ignore the light even if your jam range is high enough to set it off.
      3. Even if they pay attention to the light, the odds of getting satisfyingly outrageous behavior out of them is unlikely. All but the most paranoid would simply drive to a gas station and check their tire pressure there, assuming they know what the light is for. I'd simply drive home and use my compressor there.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  19. Same problem near Sutro Tower in SF by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Upside though is that cars start without a battery as well :)

  20. Tempting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My work is right by the casino up here in cold Canada... This is oh so tempting to do now. Just for a laugh. I'm a horrible person >_

  21. I'm a bit confused by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    On TV, the pirate radio stations are always broadcast from little ships sitting 12 miles offshore - so this guy was obviously doing it wrong.

    The only other option is to use an old motor home as your base of operations... if you're 20 minutes into the future, anyway.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I'm a bit confused by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Old motor homes are what you put mobile meth labs in, not pirate radio stations... at least in the TV shows I watch.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  22. How dare they! by admiralh · · Score: 1

    How dare the Evil Government abridge my Rights to Disable said other Persons keyless entry systems!

    This was Obviously not the Intent of the Founders when they Wrote the Constitution!

    WOLVERINES!

    --
    Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    1. Re:How dare they! by ogar572 · · Score: 1

      HACK THE PLANET!

    2. Re:How dare they! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn fine use of capital letters. Its the little things that make a difference.

    3. Re:How dare they! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare car makers sell such vulnerable pieces of shit. New cars suck.

    4. Re:How dare they! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well remember that law enforcement has now expended more time and resources tracking down a pirate radio station than they have in prosecuting banksters who caused the economic collapse. Just saying.

  23. Just check janitors and maintenance by ugen · · Score: 1

    Relatively few people will have access to building roof. Radio station would need constant maintenance, and (assuming it is running autonomously) a way to change music selection (although perhaps they were feeding data wirelessly?).

    Just check janitors and maintenance personnel, and there you'll have it.

    Also, it's Regions bank, not that anyone cares.

    1. Re:Just check janitors and maintenance by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      He's probably using a UHF link (see Technician's posts above). Most repeater transmitters can be left alone for a long time. There are thousands of similar radios on mountaintops all over the world, visited perhaps once or twice a year - usually to service the batteries. If it's hooked up to the grid, even less reason to visit it.

      And getting into the maintenance area of a low security building isn't all that hard. Didn't you watch all of those Mission Impossible series on TV?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Just check janitors and maintenance by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Radio station would need constant maintenance,

      Not really. Not an unlicensed operation that doesn't have the mandatory FCC maintenance requirements. I have a repeater that I haven't had to do anything to for more than two years. The only reason I had to visit it in the last year was because some idiot smacked it with a board and flipped a switch on it.

      and (assuming it is running autonomously) a way to change music selection (although perhaps they were feeding data wirelessly?).

      A Raspberry Pi can have a 32Gb or 64Gb SD card installed. The 52Gb of audio I have online would play for 74 days without repeating.

    3. Re:Just check janitors and maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what your saying is you live in FL and are now missing a spare unlicensed transmitter?

  24. I bet it was...... by ogar572 · · Score: 1

    Hard Harry. Pump up the volume people!!!

  25. The bright side by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    At least with the jamming effect in place, nobody would walk by with a laptop and steal your car by hacking the doors and keyless ignition. So that's a plus.
    Seriously, all this wireless proximity bullshit it ridiculous. It's jammable, hackable, and breaks often. What exactly is so bad about laser side-cut keys, huh?

    1. Re:The bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly is so bad about laser side-cut keys, huh?

      They're jammable, hackable, and break often.

    2. Re:The bright side by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      What are you going to jam a metal key with, your finger? Hack it? It doesn't have USB connectivity, sorry. Unpickable too if you were wondering. And they break...hmmm, never had anyone break a metal key made out of that material.

    3. Re:The bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gum in the lock works surprisingly well, and is a hell of a lot cheaper than a bad FM transmitter.
      A slim jim works surprisingly well, and is a hell of a lot cheaper than the equipment needed to sniff 315MHz traffic.
      Ok, fine, they don't break often. But they're exactly as vulnerable to loss and theft.

    4. Re:The bright side by Technician · · Score: 1

      Pretend to be a repo man and use the VIN to get the key code. Repo men use it all the time. The RF immobilization portion will prevent the driving of the car. It does not prevent obtaining the key code to cut a blank from the dealer.

      Repo Rich shows how this is done on one of his videos showing the Repo Industry tricks.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LZjYN3i7sM The chip prevents a drive away as the chip isn't copied.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  26. Re:Why man? by bws111 · · Score: 2

    Instead spending time writing your little PC rant, you could have just read TFA.

    Four days after they removed the equipment, a man identifying himself as "Jay" left a message for a maintenance worker at the bank building, police say. When the worker returned the call, "Jay" asked if he'd taken his equipment. The answer: No, but the cops did.

  27. Re:Why man? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    The man who set up the station has not been found, but he faces felony charges and fines of at least $10,000 if he is caught.

    Why not:
    The man or woman who set up the station has not been found, but they faces felony charges and fines of at least $10,000 if they are caught.
    Or:
    The person who set up the station has not been found, but faces felony charges and fines of at least $10,000 if caught.
    Or:
    The being or person (assumed human) who set up the station has not been found, but faces felony charges and fines of at least $10,000 if caught.

    Why not RTFA?

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  28. Same problem around Empire State building... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want responsible parties arrested.

  29. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by erroneus · · Score: 1

    *sigh*

    Public behavior is not blackmail. Your behavior in public paints you as an obsessive, delusional and unstable person. I am not this Jorge Bastida. The last time I went through this, you ended it with "you're not worth it." What changed? Your more recent insane flood of harassing taunts adds to the long, long list of examples of your stalker-like behavior. The first go around, it kinda bothered me. But now I realize you're pretty harmless to anyone but yourself or anyone who actually knows you. I pity them.

    I'll go back to ignoring your nonsense now. But we're in the holidays, approaching a new year. It's your chance to get ahold of yourself and go in a new direction. This is your opportunity. Take it.

  30. GET A HARMONICS FILTER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems to me that carib and hispanic pirate radio operators do 2 things. fail to build/install a low pass harmonics filter, and crank the audio to the point of their radio station sounding like garbage. 433 mhz is where keyless/wireless devices like this operate. thats slightly more than 4 octaves away form 104.7 mhz.

  31. Re:Why man? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
    Why not RTFA?

    You must be new here!

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  32. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're obsessed with pizza ya fat disgusting troll. Hahahaha.

  33. Ha ha ha by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    3rd order harmonic of 104.7 is 1MHz from the main center frequency or automotive remotes. That's why the remotes weren't working. Ha ha ha ha ha!

  34. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your public behavior paints you as a troll, lardbody, + blackmailing libeler erroneus.

  35. "Run, Forrest: RUN!" (you need to to lose fat) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    erroneus did you run from this to lose weight? http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3339513&cid=42393023

    1. Re:"Run, Forrest: RUN!" (you need to to lose fat) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new direction erroneus spoke of's running away from challenges he can't meet it seems, lol!

  36. insensitive clods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man who set up the station has not been found, but he faces felony charges and fines of at least $10,000 if he is caught

    How presumptuous to assume its a man!

  37. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lardbody erroneus trolled here and tries to play innocent now http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3339513&cid=42390715 you're a joke fatass.

  38. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's what the Fat Fucktard is going by now? That Fat Fucktard also gives out "Advice" and even shills for M$. That Fat Fucktard should have all of his accounts modded down into oblivion. Remember when he posts to remind everyone just how much of a Fat Fucktard he is. Eventually the Fat Fucktard will be so fucking depressed he will kill himself which will drastically reduce the drain on the food supply.

  39. Complexity is failure by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Solution: don't use radio to start cars. Subject to jamming, hacking, and multiple failure points.

    Car engineering is ass backwards. We should be simplifying, not growing the complexity. Elegance is better than more tech. Minimal number of components to do a task.

    Mechanical mechanisms for opening windows and doors, for instance. The Aptera, before the auto exec took over and ruined it, went one step farther and didn't let the windows open at all - it was a door. Zero failure.

    Engines should be electric, have as few moving parts as possible, and efficiency should be much better than the 17% or so gas engines provide. And so on and on.

    Cheaper, too!

    1. Re:Complexity is failure by WhatAreYouDoingHere · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I know this is completely off-subject...

      ...before the auto exec took over and ruined it...

      If you think the auto exec is bad, wait until you see the config sys!

      --
      "What are you doing here, Elijah?"
  40. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    erroneus your posts show you troll http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3339513&cid=42390715 and here too http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3319303&cid=42306539 so there's no arguing with those facts. You noted you're fat publicly. It's statement of fact. Quit crying. You bring it on yourself.

  41. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that's erroneus, he's what was said here. An obese monstrosity and from what I've seen of his posts he likes to troll also. Good riddance to him if he dies since he is obviously mentally troubled. Your appearance shows what you are like inside as well as outside.

  42. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being publicly obese fat like you is embarassing. Erroneus ya corpulent bastard: When you eat, is your dish a wheelbarrow, your fork a pitchfork, and spoon a shovel or what http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3345911&cid=42414637 ? Hahahaha. No wonder you said this "Oh... to eat pizza again..." by erroneus (253617) on Saturday December 22, @05:20PM (#42371769) from http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3335159&cid=42371769 you disgusting fatboy!

  43. only $10,000?? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    now that's tempting, operate an FM station with that legal cost-of-doing-business of $1600/month. should be able to recoup that with modest ad revenue.....

  44. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're probably right. There's not enough food on the planet to feed erroneous. Look at him!

  45. Re:erroneus (Jorge Bastida) = blackmailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone that groans for pizza this way has issues "Oh... to eat pizza again..." by erroneus (253617) on Saturday December 22, @05:20PM (#42371769) from http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3335159&cid=42371769

  46. Months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell does it take the FCC "months" to locate and shut down an illegal continuous broadcast?

  47. Fines? by Cyfun · · Score: 0

    I find it hard to believe that someone was running a pirate radio station in violation of FCC laws. As I recall, one can legally get a low-power transmitter of a maximum wattage and maximum of a 6 foot antenna, and that will easily broadcast a few miles, especially if at a good height. In all likelihood, something broke or became corroded, but it's hard to see why they'd just outright fine someone so much money for an honest mistake. Sadly, the story doesn't elaborate on anything remotely technical.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
    1. Re:Fines? by cheros · · Score: 1

      There is a trick to using high power transmittors, it's called a low pass filter.

      You will *always* have harmonics, and they can screw up lots of things. I had friends at the local airport where I lived, so I know just how dangerous a pirate radio station could be and some of the ones we had in our area weren't happy with 6W, they pushed out 400W over 4 aerials..

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    2. Re:Fines? by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      There are low pass filters and there are low pass filters. A first order filter would at best filter the 2nd harmonic by 6 dB. If your output frequency is relatively constant, the proper way to do it is to use a highly resonant band pass filter.

    3. Re:Fines? by cheros · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're right. Shows you how long ago it was since I looked at this.

      I can recall that it took a lot of careful work for the guys who built this stuff to get it right so they didn't get too much reflection. I was only a curious observer (I know the general principles) - I designed studios. My main worry was to make sure that the earthing was 100% correct or none of it would work - the mast was less than 50 meters away.

      Come to think of it, given how much noise everyone now makes about mobile phone masts we must have been almost glowing in the dark - we were so close to the thing..

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  48. TPMS / auto wireless security is a safety issue by xtal · · Score: 1

    If you set off a TPMS warning, traction and stability control disengage on most vehicles. Combined with dangerous weather and/or people who are used to these systems, all manner of problems can be imagined.

    The TPMS systems are very basic and there is information floating around on how to disrupt them..

    Interesting times.

    --
    ..don't panic
  49. I call shenannigans by rot26 · · Score: 1

    I don't believe a piece of crap FM transmitter could make enough noise or QRM to disable a real car alarm system. I suspect something else going on here.

    And NOT unrelated:
    I used to work aboard a naval air station and every GREAT once-in-a-while one of the EW aircraft would return to base and the EW officer would forget to disable something or other... now that WOULD intefere with auto electronics (USUALLY temporarily) and set off a few hundred car alarms all over the base. Pretty hilarious for the most part, imagining some JG getting a serious ass-chewing (or worse.)

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
  50. This is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fucking beautiful.

  51. Everyone is missing the major point! by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

    Now how are my buddies and I going to tantalize our ear drums with the soft sounds of illegal Caribbean music!? Sure, we could load up an iPod or our smartphones with beats, but we won't be able to get as much variety. Each song was carefully hand-picked by Caribou Carl! It felt like I was on an island mon with that warm sun and green/blue sea spraying on my face! Mon!

    --
    The G
  52. Similar situation in Yonkers, NY by scottcp36 · · Score: 1

    Here's a similar situation in Yonkers, NY that happened last year that I remember reading about... http://yonkers.dailyvoice.com/news/mystery-yonkers-failing-keyless-remotes-solved