Slashdot Mirror


Death Valley Dethrones Impostor As Hottest Place On Earth

Hugh Pickens writes "Adam Nagourney reports that after a yearlong investigation a team of climate scientists announced that it is throwing out a reading of 136.4 degrees claimed by the city of Al Aziziyah, Libya on Sept. 13, 1922 making the 134-degree reading registered on July 10, 1913, at Greenland Ranch in Death Valley the official world record as the hottest place on earth. 'It's about time for science, but I think we all knew it was coming,' says Randy Banis. 'You don't underestimate Death Valley. Most of us enthusiasts are proud that the extremes that we have known about at Death Valley are indeed the most harsh on earth.' The final report by 13 climatologists appointed by the World Meteorological Organization, the climate agency of the United Nations, found five reasons to disqualify the Libya claim, including questionable instruments, an inexperienced observer who made the reading, and the fact that the reading was anomalous for that region and in the context of other temperatures reported in Libya that day. 'The more we looked at it, the more obvious it appeared to be an error,' says Christopher C. Burt, a meteorologist with Weather Underground who started the debate in a blog post in 2010."

121 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. What if... by filmorris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the temperature in Libya was in Celsius?

    --
    "Hello, IT... Have you tried turning it off and on again? Yeah... No problem."
    1. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then they'd be dead and no one would have heard about it!

    2. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not switching to celcius? Except for the US and Jamaica, the whole world has...
      http://i.imgur.com/ucOQh.jpg

    3. Re:What if... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why not switching to celcius? Except for the US and Jamaica, the whole world has... http://i.imgur.com/ucOQh.jpg

      Liberia, Myanmar, and the U.S. actually. Jamaica uses Celcius for temperature (definitely when I was there in the 1980s and 1990s).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:What if... by XaN-ASMoDi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about Celsius or even kelvin? Most of the world preferably use these units, even here in the UK, home of the imperial system. Seriously, join the 20th century!

      --
      Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
    5. Re:What if... by i_ate_god · · Score: 2

      there, in the UK, where distance is still measured in that archaic unit, the "mile".

      Get with it UK, it's called KILOMETERS.

      -- your snooty offspring, Canada

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    6. Re:What if... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      How about Celsius or even kelvin? Most of the world preferably use these units, even here in the UK, home of the imperial system. Seriously, join the 20th century!

      The only thing worse than sticking with Imperial is winding up with whatever weird mish-mash you have with over there.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    7. Re:What if... by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2

      Yes, because 136.4C (277.52F) is sooooo much more plausible.

    8. Re:What if... by NCG_Mike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, it's a bit odd here. Temperature in Celsius and distance in miles. People's height in feet & inches and weight in stones & pounds. It's even odder in a supermarket where we use both imperial and metric. You can buy cheese at the deli in either unit. Thank goodness we ditched the old coinage for a metric system. Mind you, it'd be more hip to say we used LSD as a currency :-)

    9. Re:What if... by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      It's kinda pointless to switch just temperature measurement to celsius unless you're going to switch to the metric system entirely.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    10. Re:What if... by boundary · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, they're called 'kilometres' unless you want to be associated with your southern neighbours. Depends how much of a snooty Canadian you are, I suppose.

    11. Re:What if... by boundary · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of this dual measurement in shops (including the change from gallons to litres at the petrol pumps) came about as part of 'closer European ties' back in the 90s, IIRC. There were certain things the government wouldn't budge on, such as changing road signs to miles, and getting rid of the good old British pint glass.

    12. Re:What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I usually don't comment on the moderation but, seriously? +4 Insightful for asking if the temperature scale was different when they clearly don't realize how inplausible and idiotic that idea would be? Come on...

    13. Re:What if... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Indeed. 136 C is way above the boiling point of water.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    14. Re:What if... by chronokitsune3233 · · Score: 1

      K = C + 273.15
      Ra (Rankine) = F + 459.67
      0 K = 0 Ra

      So if 0 is absolute zero, which scale should we use? Both the Kelvin and Rankine scales define 0 to be absolute zero. Should we go with the Celsius-based scale (Kelvin) in the countries using the Celsius scale currently, or should they adopt the Fahrenheit-based scale (Rankine) as the U.S. probably would, if they adopted any scale other than the Fahrenheit scale they currently use?

      As for the time, I'd rather time zones just be gone, and I feel the same about Daylight Saving Time, Summer Time and whatever other name you call it. No more B.S. about fussing with clocks that don't automatically change! Then 23h00 in France would be 11:00 P.M. in the U.S., even though technically the "P.M." part (Post Meridiem, or "after midday") would be misleading at times since midday would occur at 1200Z (what those in Hollywood call "4 A.M." when Daylight Saving Time is not in effect). Ideally this B.S. about midday happening while many people on the west coast of the U.S. are still asleep would lead to the adoption of a 24-hour clock system outside of the U.S. military.

      --
      I have been a captive in America my entire life. Everybody and everything uses customary units instead of metric.
    15. Re:What if... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK and I tend to think in terms of celsius for low temperatures and fahrenheit for high temperatures - i.e, if it's close to or below 0 it's cold (thinking in celsius), and if it's in the 80s or 90s it's hot. I think it's the appeal of zero for freezing, coupled with the still common use of fahrenheit in the media to report hot weather.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    16. Re:What if... by chrismcb · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because we are human beings. If we were water, then Celsius would be perfect. Fahrenheit is a scale based what is hot an cold to humans, not the freezing and boiling point of water

    17. Re:What if... by jalet · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm... modern democracies !

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    18. Re:What if... by meerling · · Score: 1

      Like virtually all the rest of the world?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_system

    19. Re:What if... by meerling · · Score: 4, Informative

      We are mostly water. As to "Fahrenheit is a scale based what is hot an cold to humans", what the $#@$% are you talking about?
      Try reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit
      It goes over what how and why Fahrenheit set his temperature scale the way he did, and you know what, the human feelings had nothing to do with it, though the temperature of human blood was used for part of it. I find that kind of creepy, but a lot of people were obsessed about that kind of stuff in the early 1700s.

      So again, Fahrenheit isn't based on what a human might think is hot or cold, it's based on some arbitrary points and scaling by it's creator. For that matter, so is the Celsius scale, but in a lesser extent because it based the whole thing on a consistent set of arbitrary stuff. (The Freezing and boiling of water broken into 100 degrees.)

    20. Re:What if... by TedTschopp · · Score: 2

      The reason that the old system still holds is that it makes more sense to the people who are not scientists.

      100 degrees F = HOT!
      0 degrees F = COLD!
      1 inch = thumb
      1 foot = foot
      1 yard = 1 persons stride
      1 Rod = 1 oxe in length
      1 furlong = distance a oxe could plow without resting
      1 acre = amount of land an oxe can plow in one day
      1 mile = 8
      1 cup = 1 glass of liquid
      1 pint = beer
      1 quart = 2 beers
      1 gallon = drunk
      1 lbs = 1 Rock
      1 grain = 1 grain of sand

      I could go on, but basically the reason that its hard to do away with the Imperial systems.

      Plus the Metric system was a part of revolutionary France, and some of it has still to catch on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_time

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    21. Re:What if... by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      Opps

      1 mile = 8 furlongs

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    22. Re:What if... by GreenTech11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right, I'm not a scientist, and as such I know how much land an ox can plow in a day! How could the rest of the world be so silly? The only reason that the metric system hasn't been implemented in the US is laziness masquerading as self-entitlement "How dare you take this away from me! This is our history!" Hell, I'm a well educated person, and I had to google ox to find out exactly what one is in relation to a cow. (Trained for farm work apparently, often a castrated male)

      --
      Laughter is the best medicine, except if you have a broken rib.
    23. Re:What if... by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about the United States is that HR 596 was passed by the 39th congress in 1866 which authorized its use.

      http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/laws/metric-act-bill.html

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    24. Re:What if... by davydagger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      metric makes more sense for those of us who aren't savant mathemeticians

      1 meter == fraction of the earths surface, just as much as a mans's stride as a yard, differs by 3 inches(76 mm). fuckoff.

      1 milliliter == 1 cubic centimeter

      1 gram == that same cc filled with water.

      0 Celsius - water friezes

      100 Celsius - water boils.

      as far as your beers go, you'd be much happier man drinking them liter size like they do in europe.

      no one uses oxen to plow fields anymore.

    25. Re:What if... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I don't see why you couldn't use Celsius temperature along with English units, or for that matter Fahrenheit along with Metric units. Both scales are pretty arbitrary as it is.

    26. Re: What if... by boundary · · Score: 1

      I imagine that's the reason the change wasn't resisted too strongly. The government could still use the country's xenophobia to deflect the blame onto those dirty Euro-wogs.

    27. Re:What if... by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      amount of land an oxe can plow in one day

      But where and when? Uphill we have sand - downhill mainly clay. Early in spring the ground is too wet that's why we plow in the fall. Wait until the summer and it is dry and hard as rock. Anyway we use big horses here.

    28. Re:What if... by fatphil · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about the US is that there's a spelling error in the name of one of the metric units mentioned in that bill! They were clearly never going to get it right.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    29. Re:What if... by xOneca · · Score: 1

      They are 58 and 56 degrees Celsius respectively.

    30. Re:What if... by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it takes moving overseas for an American to truly realize how dumb the country's rejection of the metric system was. Then again, that's true for more than just measurements.

    31. Re:What if... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      In our supermarkets (Canada) you will see a sign below some fruit with the $/kg price below it. The next type of fruit will have $/lb. I shit you not! Don't even get me started on mixing fruits (on the same damn shelf) with some having a $/lb label and some having a $/unit (with lb underneith) layout out in such a way that they look almost like a $/lb label.

    32. Re:What if... by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Liter sized beers? I don't know what part of Europe you're from, but most beers come in 33 cl cans or bottles. Some brews come in 50 cl (.5 l) bottles. In eastern Europe .5 l beers from the tap are more common. Western Europe has glasses of beer varying from 20 to 33 cl from the tap. In some places you can order a meter of beer, which is just a plank of a meter length with 10 to 15 beers (depending on the size of the beers) in holes.

    33. Re:What if... by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying this makes sense to -me- I was saying this is what you have to overcome. People created the imperial system after things they could visualize. Over time the system became a part of the culture. At that point its almost impossible to change, in order to hack culture, you have to overload and redefine the symbols and the rituals of that culture. This has been the chief problem with the Metric system, its hard for the common man to know if 1 Kg of a substance for $10 is a better deal that 1 Lbs of the same substance for $10.

      Now in order for the metric system to catch on we are going to need to come up with good ways to get people to think in meter, liter, or gram units.

      In the United States the Liter is the soda bottle. This is good. The gram... drug use is popular enough among certain groups and but in the states where the legalization process is underway most of the substances is not sold by the gram. As for the meter, we are already making an impact on the health nuts with the 5K/10K runs, but there needs to be something people can get their minds around. 5,000 or 10,000 doesn't work.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    34. Re:What if... by davydagger · · Score: 1

      in germany, by law, glasses have to be marked with volumes, precisely

      most common are the .5 litre glass, with the oversized 1L stien being available in many places.

      Germany, you get beer in milk crates, with .5 litre size bottles.

      there is no .33

    35. Re:What if... by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

      When you change systems you dont find a way for people to handle the transition, there isn't one. Systems change all the time, people get a bit confused, then they learn. A little metric confusion over the whole country for a decade is actually not that much more serious than the current 'different from everyone else' confusion that is a constant problem.

    36. Re:What if... by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      No beer in cans of 33 cl in germany? I remember cheap german beer in dutch Aldi supermarkets of .5 l. Tastes like piss though, but that's just the cheap beer I'm sure :)

    37. Re:What if... by davydagger · · Score: 1

      I don't remember cans at all in germany.

      all beer is sold in bottles I believe.

    38. Re:What if... by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Hm, ok. I learned something today, then. Tnx.

    39. Re:What if... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Achtung! Inn zee Gerrmanny, efferreesing hass too bee preesais!!

      Ach, bliss.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    40. Re:What if... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      You must have really big thumbs and feet... and a low tolerance for heat.

      And where does the barleycorn fit in?

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    41. Re:What if... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Depending on your elevation... go below sea-level and try to boil water at 100 C

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    42. Re:What if... by davydagger · · Score: 1

      joke all you want, thats how their country works.

      Bartenders says the deutche equiv of "weights and measures" doesn't fuck around, and mispouring a beer is a serious offense.

    43. Re:What if... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I know. That was my point. And I like that about Germany. And Finland for that matter.

      Damn sight easier to know what's what (and that it'll work) than where I live.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  2. Would it really kill the editors to put degrees F? by Alicat1194 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would it, really?

    --
    You can learn a lot about a person if you just take the time to inject them with sodium pentathol
  3. Conversion to Celsius by Twinbee · · Score: 5, Informative

    136.4 degrees is 58 degrees Celsius

    (courtesy of the program in my sig's link).

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:Conversion to Celsius by seyfarth · · Score: 2

      Indeed 58 degrees is what is published in the report. It seems likely that the Libyan report was in integer Celsius degrees.

      --
      Ray Seyfarth, ray.seyfarth@gmail.com, http://rayseyfarth.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Conversion to Celsius by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      At least. Thanks.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:Conversion to Celsius by Twinbee · · Score: 2

      I recently had a promotion where I offered cash for bugs just like the one you've pointed out. Do you have Paypal, and I'll send some to you ($15 for that one). If you find more, I'll happily pay more.

      I have over a thousand 'litmus' test sums, but I can't test every single possibility for obvious reasons.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    4. Re:Conversion to Celsius by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      136.4 degrees is 58 degrees Celsius

      Isn't it closer to one a third of a circle? .. unless you are talking about Farhrenheit and not degrees.

    5. Re:Conversion to Celsius by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Dont want your money, but I also noticed that Pascal() errors out extremely early due to it using a naive factorial method where the intermediate products overflow double precision. See the wikipedia article on Pascals Triangle in the section titled "Calculating an individual row or diagonal by itself (Gray's Theory)"

      I called the factorial method naive because the multiple recursions used to calculate the multiple factorials is also more expensive than the single recursion necessary, ie.. it has no redeeming qualities.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:Conversion to Celsius by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Would calculating very large numbers in Pascal's triangle be useful for you or others at least? If so, I might get that in for the next version too (currently it's just: row! / (index! * (row-index)! ).

      If you won't accept any reward money, then at least email me, and I'll send you a link for the full version. If you wish of course - not sure if it's gone up in your estimation since 'crappy' ;)

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  4. Dead Heat by Titus+Andronicus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There’s a short documentary film about this new (old) Death Valley record called Dead Heat: Overturning the World’s Hottest Temperature , from Wunderground in association with Mitchell Film Company.

  5. Hot is hot by BluPhenix316 · · Score: 1

    I was in Ali Al Salem, Kuwait in June of 2010 and the thermostats showed it was 138. Maybe it was because it was a Air Base and had a lot of planes? Anyway, the lack of humidity there meant the heat wasn't that bad. I've felt absolutely horrible in the Southern USA when the temperature was only in the 90s. There it was in the 130s and it was hot but not unbearably so. I guess the lack of humidity meant that your sweat actually worked better?

    1. Re:Hot is hot by loufoque · · Score: 1

      This is temperature in the shade.

    2. Re:Hot is hot by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course - but what if the only shade you can find is your own shadow? How does that affect something like trying to record the temperature? I guess we could just say "hotter than hell" and leave it at that.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:Hot is hot by loufoque · · Score: 1

      then you build something to get some shade.

    4. Re:Hot is hot by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      A sand castle! Good idea!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    5. Re:Hot is hot by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There's a standard for measuring temperature so you don't have one thermometer in full sun on a backboard made of copper painted black and another under a waterfall (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevenson_screen).
      Near where I am there is a local government park that had the trees and grass replaced with dark coloured paving, and the local newspaper found that the temperature of a thermometer placed on that paving was at around those Death Valley temperatures while the official figure measured at the airport was 36C. Just to confuse Americans I'll say those pavers were hot enough to melt thongs and cook a pastie on them :) (I think you call thongs flip-flops or some kind of sandal and a pastie is a folded vegetable pie).

    6. Re:Hot is hot by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I worked roofing for awhile, here and there. Take any metal tool, be it a framing square, a hammer, a screwdriver, and lay it on the hot asphalt shingled roof for just a few minutes. The actual temp may only be high seventies, but on a clear sunshiny day, picking that metal tool up after ten minutes can blister your hands. (Of course, I use degrees F, that would be high 20's for you?) I wasn't scientific about it, but a lighter colored roof didn't seem to cook those tools quite so quickly. Color was a trade off though. Lighter colors reflected more energy back up into your face, darker colors cooked your feet and any tools that were laid on the roof.

      I spent a whole summer doing roofing when I was 15. That was the next-to-the-last time I ran away from home. Already an underweight runt, I lost ten pounds that summer!

      A guy can learn a lot of physics, just observing the world around him. It's easy to understand the potential of solar energy, if only we could develop better photovoltaic cells.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:Hot is hot by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough the colour that absorbs close to the maximum of solar radiation after it gets through the atmosphere is very close to terracotta tile red. Oxidised copper isn't far off, then there's black, which is slightly less because it re-radiates more without absorbing any extra. Asphalt is a very good insulator so keeps the heat, but if it came in a reddish brown it would get even hotter.

    8. Re:Hot is hot by Xest · · Score: 1

      As another poster pointed out, the temperature must be in the shade, and that matters.

      To demonstrate just how much a little environmental change can adjust heat though, and hence why the standard must be that the temperature is taken in shade, even here in the UK, in my greenhouse with no fans running for better airflow, my thermometer has recorded 56.5C (133F) even with the vents open. A simple glass structure with windows open can trap drastically more heat relative to the outside temperature in the shade which was only around 26C that day when the sun is hitting it directly. I'd be intrigued to know what a greenhouse in death valley on that day may have recorded, I suspect you'd be a fair way towards being able to boil water in it by just putting it there in a bucket.

  6. W00t! by 19061969 · · Score: 4, Funny

    W00t! USA! USA!

    --
    bang goes my karma... again...
    1. Re:W00t! by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I've heard it said in the context of the 'first' computer, but it applies to almost any record: the definition of a world record is whatever makes sure it happened in the US...

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:W00t! by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      You might have an argument if was decided by a US organization rather than the World Meteorological Organization. Note the word "World".

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    3. Re:W00t! by waimate · · Score: 1

      You might have an argument if was decided by a US organization rather than the World Meteorological Organization. Note the word "World".

      What, like in World Series?

    4. Re:W00t! by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      I don't see what that has to do with weather.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    5. Re:W00t! by waimate · · Score: 1

      It has to do with use of the word "World", and the assumption that it always involves the actual world rather than an expansive term applied to a parochial event.

  7. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or even degrees C, which is what scientists use...

  8. Slashdot Quote: by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    In response to the article about Death Valley, Slashdot generated this quote:

    It'll be just like Beggars' Canyon back home. -- Luke Skywalker

    Indeed, except all the womp rats are dead, and not even a moisture farmer can make a living there. You nerf herders have it easy...

  9. "...the most harsh on earth." by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Nonsense. Compare to Dome A in Antarctica.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  10. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by blakeqd · · Score: 1

    Was thinking the same thing. It's like they intentionally left it out.

  11. America 1st again by loufoque · · Score: 1

    Good, America is first again.
    AMERICA FUCK YEAH!

    It's funny how they do not take into account the nationalist usian bias in the analysis.

    1. Re:America 1st again by boundary · · Score: 1

      Yup, harshest place in the world.

    2. Re:America 1st again by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Yup, harshest place in the world.

      Perhaps, but isn't there something good to be said of making it in a tough place?

    3. Re:America 1st again by boundary · · Score: 1

      Tough, yes. Needlessly tough, no.

    4. Re:America 1st again by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you might want to consider looking at the paper (not the article).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  12. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or even degrees C, which is what scientists use...

    Actually, the SI unit of temperature is the Kelvin.

  13. Re:Extreme! by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

    And strangely you're proud of that. Weird.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  14. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well it's easier to convert from K to C than from K to F (or C to F). Anyway, any temperature should be postfixed with the unit, especially here on /..

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  15. It was a wake up call for me by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Well, I visited some African country that lies straight on the Equautor. As an individual from the west, I arrived with my prejudices that this country would be nautrally hotter than my home land.

    I was wrong! The temperature, right at the equator was no more than 28 degrees celcius (82.4 degrees F). I was suprised. The locals told me it had to do with their altitude, which is much higher.

    When I called my family, they had sympathy for the "hot weather". My repeated advice to them that my homeland (Texas) was hotter was difficult to believe.

    Sad thing is that I am not alone. Almost everyone I have told this story still thinks, "If it's at the equator, it must be hot hot hot."

    I later found out they even have a river, whose waters come from ice...right at the equator! Amazing!

    1. Re:It was a wake up call for me by the+biologist · · Score: 1

      I had a friend in college who came from central Africa... to our school in central Texas. He really could not handle the heat that I took in stride. He expressed exactly the same misunderstanding that your family had, but the opposite polarity.

    2. Re:It was a wake up call for me by fnj · · Score: 1

      Well, of course elevation has everything to do with temperature. Proximity to the seacoast is the other big determinant.

      Quito, Ecuador is within 25 km of the equator, but is at an elevation of 2850 m. For each of the twelve months of the year, independently, the average high varies between 18 and 19 C, and the average low, 9 and 11.

      Puerto Bolivar, Ecuador is at an elevation of only 27 m, and the corresponding highs are 27-32 and the lows are 20-22. It is right on the coast, which serves to moderate the temperatures greatly. The interior is mostly mountainous.

  16. Re:Sounds like most temperature data by XaN-ASMoDi · · Score: 2

    Most temperature data collected over the years should be disqualified for those and other various reasons including the data fabrication that is done by GISS, NOAA and others.

    For a number of articles on the topic that show the data fabrication see: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/data-tampering-at-ushcngiss.

    Showing graphs without the data to support them, and claim operations have been applied without specifying the operations is quite frankly horse shit. Back up your assertions or go away.

    --
    Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
  17. Dubious pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Promotional leaflets that still boast of Death Valley as being merely the hottest place in the United States are being rewritten, and resort owners say they are girding for a crush of heat-seeking visitors come next summer. There is even talk of having an official 100-year celebration of the record-setting measurement next July.

    “It’s about time for science, but I think we all knew it was coming,” said Randy Banis, the editor of DeathValley.com, an online newsletter promoting the valley. “You don’t underestimate Death Valley. Most of us enthusiasts are proud that the extremes that we have known about at Death Valley are indeed the most harsh on earth.”

    This seems to me to be a really dumb thing to be proud of.

  18. Re:Extreme! by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 2

    I will see your Minnesota and raise you a Manitoba.

    Difference of 162F

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  19. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by RobbieCrash · · Score: 1

    This is 'Murca goddamnit.

    --
    Keep on knockin'
    https://robbiecrash.me
  20. What if Death Valley was in Kelvin? by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Maybe people on SlashDot will finally learn that scientific notation and the metric system make it easier to not make stupid mistakes while communicating measurements. Really, "136.4 degrees" ? Come on, put some scale with that, n00b.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:What if Death Valley was in Kelvin? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Maybe people on SlashDot will finally learn that scientific notation and the metric system make it easier to not make stupid mistakes while communicating measurements. Really, "136.4 degrees" ? Come on, put some scale with that, n00b.

      Even if they had specified degrees fahrenheit, it would still be wrong, since the original measurement didn't have that level of precision. It's the same mistake that has everyone thinking that normal body temperature is exactly 98.6 degrees F.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  21. Re:Sounds like most temperature data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Many of the articles show the data. What is horseshit is you not looking about to find the data associated with the graphs XaN-ASMoDi (894073).

  22. Hugh Pickens... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Hugh Pickens... The new Roland Piquepaille?

    Pimping his "blog" for page views...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  23. Re:Waste of science by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Yeah we all know governments prefer to fund bad-news-tastic climate science over nationalistic dick-waving.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  24. Re:Have the Libyans ever published by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    Oh, just call him KhaDaffy-Duck and be done with it!

  25. Re:Have the Libyans ever published by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    We should just settle this once and for all and call him "Crazy Stubble Mustache"

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  26. All I can say is... by martyb · · Score: 1

    All I can say is... Cool!!

    <grin>

  27. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why especially here on Slashdot, a US site?.

    Because even Americans might need to know what temperature scale is used on a site that takes in articles from all over the world?

  28. Re:I highly recommend Death Valley by dargaud · · Score: 1

    Same here and it didn't even feel particularly hot.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  29. Re:Sounds like most temperature data by haruchai · · Score: 1

    Time to go back under the bridge troll.
    That cherrypicked crap has been denounced and debunked time and again.

    Even Monckton doesn't resort to using it

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  30. Short-lived record? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    If global warming is bringing more extreme weather, probably that record will get defeated next year, either in southern summer or northern one.

  31. Re:Sounds like most temperature data by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Many of the articles show the data.

    BS. Missed that? Bullshit. In Canada most climate data is based on extrapolations on 30-35 year windows because there is no other data, because it doesn't exist. Any other data that existed was based on sites that weren't even close, or were from 400+KM away. Most of our weather network didn't even exist until 1977, and only cities, military bases and outposts did weather recording. Or landlocked ships.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  32. Oh for pity's sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jesus H. M. F. Christ people!

    If it were 136.4 Kelvins it would NOT be anything like the hottest temperature recorded on Earth, in the great outdoors, we, humans, would consider it bitterly fucking cold. So unless you're not a human, or you're a moron, you're just splitting hairs. Ditto on the question of whether it's Celsius/Centigrade or Fahrenheit. If the outdoor temperature hits 136.4 or even 134 degrees C, referring to the ambient atmospheric temperature, without counting anywhere or any occasion when the temperature was higher as the result of something WE did, (like when we made the weather very hot in Dresden, Germany, or Hiroshima or Nagasaki in Japan, as a few examples that come readily to mind...) it would be hotter than anyone could handle just walking around. But it has been and currently is much hotter than that in many places on Earth, as I type this... such as inside geysers, and active volcanoes, for instance, to say nothing of the Earth's core.

    When someone speaks of or writes about the "hottest place on Earth"... IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THEY'RE REFERRING TO THE TEMPERATURE AS NATURALLY OCCURS DUE TO ROUTINE NATURAL EFFECTS OF SUN AND WIND AND RAIN, ETC. IT SHOULD BE LIKEWISE UNDERSTOOD, EXCEPT PERHAPS BY A BUNCH OF SMARTASSES, that when that temperature is 134 degrees, THAT IT'S IN FUCKING FAHRENHEIT!

    Quit being a bunch of assholes, you know it's Fahrenheit, I know it's Fahrenheit, and was it lazy not to add the letter F? Yes. Was it worth all of you having an argument about? Jesus Tap Dancing, Tittiefucking Christ, NO.

    You guys will argue about literally anything, won't you!?!

    1. Re: Oh for pity's sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there are many times when a reader needs to question the temperature value because the answer IS ambiguous.
      In this instance it wasn't - but the point is that we are a global society. It takes little effort. I support the clear majority of this planet for reminding the US to add the C or F, as I did less than 12h ago at snother site.
      No titty shaking required (esp if they're man boobs)

  33. Yep it's hot there by runner_one · · Score: 1

    Yep it's hot there, photo I took in 2009 there in August... in the shade.

    http://www.coleskingdom.com/pics/racetrack/100_4070.JPG

  34. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by afgam28 · · Score: 1

    What for? It's already completely obvious that the units are degrees Fahrenheit, even to people from outside of the United States, such as myself. 136.4 degrees Celsius is 36.4 degrees above the boiling point of water; it's unlikely that good record keeping would have been done in such a climate :P

  35. Record in Death Valley is bullshit by davydagger · · Score: 1

    when I was in Iraq, in the summer time, it hit 135 on a regular basis, with 141 occationally on hot days

    its not 110 degress, which it gets in west texas either.

    1. Re:Record in Death Valley is bullshit by leuk_he · · Score: 3, Funny

      That hot temperatures are never published. It would drive all the toerists away.

    2. Re:Record in Death Valley is bullshit by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      I wonder where those measurements (of temperature) were taken. Were they "official temperatures" -- e.g. taken in the shade? Temperatures sampled using a different methodology (e.g. out in the sun, on a tarmac, etc, etc) can certainly exceed the official temperatures, and temperature records.

    3. Re:Record in Death Valley is bullshit by fnj · · Score: 1

      Is that in the sun, or in the shade.

  36. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Americans don't read, idiot

  37. Re:just like human body at 37C by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    You're foolish if you think the human body's temperature is exactly 37C. In fact it varies according to your circadian rhythm and any activity you may or may not be doing. Anything between 36 and 37.5 is completely normal, and physicians only start to talk about "fever" past 38C.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  38. "Underestimating the Death Valley" by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    When I was there is was raining. Quite disappointing.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  39. Proof by jvillain · · Score: 1

    Well here is proof enough that history is indeed written by the victor.

    Got a reading that doesn't tell the right story? Just delete it. That is how they do in the new world of climatology. First they vanish the Mideveal Warming Period and now this.

  40. Not the hottest place by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    Not, as the misleading title suggests, the hottest place, just the hottest properly recorded single temperature reading
    big emphasis on single temperature reading - one reading a day/week/year does not make.

    Properly recording temperature isn't simple or intuitive - it's also kind of hard to do in some parts of the world because it's so damn hot.

    The hottest place on the planet most years is in the Danakil Desert, which not surprisingly is a bit of a ghost town. Death Valley is about 86 metres below sea level, Danakil is a little lower (about 100m below). Nearby Dallol is the hottest average inhabited place on earth with an average mean of 34.4C and an average max of 41.1C.

    Danakil can also be a bit warmer when the volcanoes are active... like some places get warmer when bushfires are raging (51C in parts of Victoria the other year, similar temperatures in some of the Californian fires).

    Little of the planets temperatures are measured to the standards quoted in the parent article - so I'd take them with a big pinch of Danakil salt. And "apparent" (to humans) temperatures are a whole 'nuther thing. Shade temperatures don't allow for reflected heat from salt and white sand.

    Biggest temperature variations - without a doubt it'd be the Black Hills (USA). Especially considering the extremely short time period involved. Only other place I can think of that comes close to those fast, extreme variations is Charlotte Pass (Australia).

  41. Re:just like human body at 37C by mister2au · · Score: 1

    I suspect you really missed the point ...

    OP is pointing out that 37C is basically to nearest 1C accuracy, so it is pointless to call it 98.6F ie spurious accuracy

    No sure why you needed to correct that ?

  42. The Arabian Peninsula is (probably) a lot hotter ! by AndyD568 · · Score: 1

    Ha, please. Temperatures in the Rub' al Khali (Empty Quarter/desert) in the Arabian Peninsula have probably easily topped these records in the past few summers, if there were ever accurate official numbers published. I am an expat in the U.A.E. right now. Officially, the government does not broadcast temperatures over about 48 degrees C ever, even for its major cities which are cooler, since there would be justified calls for public holidays due to health concerns. My own personal thermometers as well as friends and colleagues have recorded temperatures well over 50 C several days in succession during afternoons even in coastal area where I live which are cooler than the inland desert areas. However - could my fellow slashdot users kindly advise me on the best methodology to be used so I can make my temperature measurements more 'official'. I'd like to take desert and coastal temperature measurements next summer and post these online along with my methodology and pictures of the measurement set up and display itself as well as proof of the time and location. Thanks !

  43. Re:Sounds like most temperature data by haruchai · · Score: 2

    Oh, piss off with your regurgitated denialist spew, ABC (Anonymous Batshit Coward)
    I've been following the science behind climate change for 25 yrs and it's only getting more and more solid.

    That's not to say there aren't still significant uncertainties but the groundwork has long been laid.

    We have lost so much time to the cooligans that it's just sickening.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  44. Darth Valley by PacRim+Jim · · Score: 1

    Remember what it's like when you open an oven to take out cooked food.? That blast of air is what Death Valley feels like in midsummer. Automobiles don't like it there, by the way.

  45. Five reasons, some of them stupid by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

    "The committee deemed it plausible that inaccurate determination of which end of the recording pin (choosing the higher end rather than the correct lower end) to use for temperature evaluation created substantial error in measurement as well as other potential additional reading errors (e.g., slippage of the scale). Our committee consensus is that a total error of approximately 7C in reading a Bellani-Six thermometer by an inexperienced observer is probable." Sounds good but perfectly stupid argument as it gives a starting difference of 2*7C between maximum and minimum after resetting the thermometer. Any sober observer knows witch side of the recording pin must be measured.

  46. Re:just like human body at 37C by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Except it isn't the human body temperature is 37.0 C. Of course that's an average and it varies amongst people and by about 0.5 C during the day in an individual.

    But there's a .0 there, it's three sginificant figures and so 98.6 F is not spurious accuracy.

  47. Re:Would it really kill the editors to put degrees by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

    "This sense of America, in modern usage, is used almost exclusively to refer to the United States of America" Thank you for referencing a wiki page that backs up my statement regarding CONSISTENT usage of the term America.

  48. Re:Extreme! by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

    Well, my first post was just for Winnipeg, but if we're going all in:

    Hottest: 44.4 C
    Coldest: 52.8 C
    Difference (C): 97.2C or 206.96F

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'