I am content to have some doubt that they don't understand the impact of wiping them out, but I am not convinced as these things are rarely as simple as they look. There are many examples where well-meaning fiddling with ecosystems has resulted in unintended negative consequences.
Mosquitoes are important pollinators of plants and a source of food for other animals. I hope they understand the impact of wiping them out, but I suspect they don't.
Hear, hear. And with organisations like Google and Facebook backing it, it's clear which way it will end up. We need a proper digital bill of rights. This ain't it.
You are aware that the Australian Border Force can confiscate your "e-devices" at will, without a warrant and hold them for up to 14 days? The only difference, it would seem, is that NZ is fining people too.
Recent news from sites like foursquare suggested travel to the US has already dropped (https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/24/foursquare-data-shows-international-tourism-to-the-u-s-is-down/). I can only imagine this latest stunt will drive visitor numbers even further down. Tsk.
Most of that Irish stuff happened before The Internet posed a significant threat to government control of the population. They didn't need to control anything but roadblocks back then. Today's a different story.
Are you aware of the Reagan administration's well-documented involvement in supplying Iraq with precursor substances for chemical and biological weapons?
Slashdot Mirror
I am content to have some doubt that they don't understand the impact of wiping them out, but I am not convinced as these things are rarely as simple as they look. There are many examples where well-meaning fiddling with ecosystems has resulted in unintended negative consequences.
Mosquitoes are important pollinators of plants and a source of food for other animals. I hope they understand the impact of wiping them out, but I suspect they don't.
Hear, hear. And with organisations like Google and Facebook backing it, it's clear which way it will end up. We need a proper digital bill of rights. This ain't it.
Really hoping they're being taught a lesson in censorship by third parties.
You are aware that the Australian Border Force can confiscate your "e-devices" at will, without a warrant and hold them for up to 14 days? The only difference, it would seem, is that NZ is fining people too.
How dare you assume their species!
They didn't take the mansion. He was renting it.
Worse, they want you to eat KFC. Monsters.
Clearly they failed to proofread.
Recent news from sites like foursquare suggested travel to the US has already dropped (https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/24/foursquare-data-shows-international-tourism-to-the-u-s-is-down/). I can only imagine this latest stunt will drive visitor numbers even further down. Tsk.
I'll state the obvious, as you seem to have missed it. Internet = broadcast. Telephone = point to point. Therefore different story.
Most of that Irish stuff happened before The Internet posed a significant threat to government control of the population. They didn't need to control anything but roadblocks back then. Today's a different story.
I think I found the vegan.
It wasn't Justin Bieber's scheduled flight.
Proof that wi-fi, or coca-cola, or both, gives you cancer.
No - something much worse - it's run by Americans.
Are you aware of the Reagan administration's well-documented involvement in supplying Iraq with precursor substances for chemical and biological weapons?
"Society would be better off if he were a garbageman." Some might say he is.
Something appearing in the New Zealand media usually means it's trivial, or some rugby happened. Don't read too much into it.
And punctuation. If his CV reads like his original post, I'm amazed he got as far as the phone call.
"My facial hair makes me look interesting and makes up for my lack of social graces."
It's OK - he was from New Zealand. Your constitution is safe.
With typing like that I'd be surprised if their code ran.
NW is fun. Give it a spin!
Sadly the child rapists still elude technology.