Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Easiest Way To Consolidate Household Media?

First time accepted submitter Lordfly writes "The wife and I have started looking to buy a house. In the spirit of that, I've been giving away books, CDs, and DVDs to 'downsize' the pile of crap I'll have to lug around when we do find the right place. That got me thinking about digital files. I'm perfectly okay with giving up (most) books, CDs, and DVD cases. The only music I buy are MP3s anyway, and we stream most everything else if we wanted to watch a show or movie. That being said, I have a desktop, my wife has an old Macbook, we both have tablets, and I also have an Android smartphone. I'd like to set up something on an extra Windows box shoved in a closet that lets me dump every digital file we have (photos, music, ebooks, movies) and then doles it out as necessary to all of our devices. Unfortunately my best computer geek days are likely behind me (photography and cooking have consumed me since), so while I CAN schlep around a command line, I've lost most of my knowledge, so go easy on the 'just apt-get FubarPackageInstaller.gzip and rd -m Arglebargle' stuff. Something easy enough for my wife to use would be a major plus. So: What's the best way to make your own personal 'cloud'?"

272 comments

  1. An ultimately simple concept... by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...you just have a fileshare. Create two if you want to be fancy. One is read only and is a media horde and the other is a scratch and play area that everyone in the house can use.

    Use any tech you want. Use any OS you want.

    Just create two samba shares and have at it.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    1. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by epp_b · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this is exactly what I do as well. Desktop running Ubuntu with a big hard drive or multiple external drives (make symlinks to all the drives, the share the parent folder of the symlinks).

      Plus, this way, you can setup any number of cool uses, like dynamic DNS for a web server, SSH for remote access to get around pesky filters at hotels or what-have-you, maybe even remote streaming of your media, if your connection can handle it.

    2. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by Psicopatico · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed.

      Basically set up a BIG container where to put the digital stuff, plus number of network shares and you're done.

      BUT

      In any case do not forget about redundancy and back-up.
      Even in the tinyest case, that would mean a single HD, with its twin in RAID-1, plus another as offline backup. Total: 3HDs.

      Going up with sizes will add complexity.
      Let's say you target a 10TB container, made of 2TB drives. That translates into 5+5 drives for a RAID-0+1, or 7 drives for a RAID-6 (which one is more suited, is another discussion). Plus the back-up (another minimum 5 drives).

      For any choice but the absolute minimal one (the three drives example), be absofuckinglutely sure about airflow.
      Cramming a lot of drives in a box probably not engineered for this task and putting it into a closet is the perfect recipe for a disaster.

      --
      Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
    3. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      I have this.

      In addition, I use a DLNA streaming server to stream content anywhere in my home - the TVs in the bedrooms, living room or kitchen. MediaTomb on my Ubuntu box works very well. Very simple with a web based admin page.

    4. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by jcoy42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. And in the spirit of K.I.S.S., I'd suggest you use external storage like a drobo. You can grow the disk as you see fit, no technical expertise needed. Just add/swap drives as you go. Braindead simple.

      No, I don't work for them, but for simple self-maintaining medium sized storage they work pretty well. I've got 4 (3 at work, one at home), and the only problem I've had was when I put a bad WD drive in a unit and it fried the slot.

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    5. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND back the whole thing up. Twice if you can afford the extra drives.

    6. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by krovisser · · Score: 1

      This is what I've done too. Plus, ssh server and it's my router as well. Even more, drop torrent files in a specified folder, and they are automagically downloaded and available for streaming. assuming it isn't some stupid multi-rar download.

    7. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would probably just ignore RAID for a home backup solution. Just have a job run nightly ( or ever couple of hours) to copy off the files to a backup drive. Once in a while purge files off the backup that no longer exist on the first drive. For home purposes, it's probably not terribly important that every file is mirrored instantly, and the added cost and complexity of RAID probably isn't worth it for most people.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      For this, is an Unraid server the best option?

      Obviously, everything could be set up on a linux box manually, but unraid is designed for this. You've got to pay a small amount for it if you want to use a ton of hard drives (I think you have to pay if you want more than 3 HDDs or if you want fancy features like Active Directory), but it seems like a pretty slick system.

      Everything just works and it is perfectly designed for media consolidation and storage (the writes are slow but the reads are fast and it doesn't require matched drives or anything...). I've been looking in to making one for myself to stream media to xbmc and keep my music and photo collections in one place (and then you only have to back up one device). In the past I would have tried to roll my own, but now I kind of want something that just works, and I have a job so paying for it isn't a problem if I exceed 3 drives.

      --
      Bottles.
    9. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Decend mediaplayers do unrar on the fly. If these aren't an options you might want to take a look at the unrar fuse filesystem (rar2fs).

    10. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by fa2k · · Score: 2

      The problem with NFS and SMB is that they are not safe to use on the public internet. You can set up IPSec for Windows and Linux to protect the traffic, and firewall off anything that's not on IPSec. Getting something like that up on Linux will require some serious quality time with the CLI and a text editor. On Windows you may need some enterprise license.

      It is completely transparent once you've set it up, and it's a neat solution to make a "virtual private network" that's not actually a VPN tunnel. The downside is that things like SMB are not tuned to work great on both the internet (~10Mbit, high latency) and on the LAN (1000Mbit, low latency). Its probably better to use protocols not designed for LAN, like SFTP, but you'd be missing out on some features.

    11. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by zugmeister · · Score: 2

      I've run the gamut of various linux distros and am currently transitioning off an OS X server for home. I've come to realize that just because I CAN do something doesn't mean that's the best solution. I've hooked up external drives to a Mac Mini (win7 / Media Browser) that drives our main TV. Shared my media folders to the network and mapped those to libraries on Windows, shares in the dock on the Mac. Why windows for a file server?
      1) I own the TV machine already. Broken down by cost, it takes a LOT of electricity to equal the cost of a NAS+drives.
      2) it never turns off and
      3) windows clients get all bitchy when they can't find the windows indexing service on the share and you try to mount to a library.
      Setup is as easy as right click on the folder and choose "share with...specific people...". Backups done via SyncToy to an external disk give you fair redundancy (backup) and let you take your entire movie/music/picture store with you off the network. I don't have an android but for IOS I'd strongly recommend filebrowser to stream movies and music over your local network.

    12. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unraid and plex work exceptionally well for this

    13. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      I'm a Synology user myself, but this is definitely the right idea. If you want an appliance, buy one. Setting up my DS412+ involved inserting the drives, plugging it into power and ethernet, and running the Synology Assistant on my computer. Dead simple. Bonus: the DS412+ is an Intel Linux machine, so if you don't want to use their (very handy) software, you can just compile and run anything you like.

    14. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty cool to live a world where anyone can set up a 10 tb raid just for home media sharing.

    15. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      So an iPad can mount a SMB share and play videos etc from it no problem? (I get the impression this requires 3rd party software at least?)

    16. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's several apps that will do that (File Navigator, FileBrowser or FileExplorer for example) as long as the media type is supported.

    17. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      use Plex as an IOS client. Run it on say unRAID as a plug-in or on a separate computer (I run it on a VM). Plex handles the DHCP issue and the piercing of your firewall, it can also sample down the media to allow it to stream on low bandwidth connections. For storage I do unRAID for many of the reasons posted elsewhere here and it's been working great or quite a few years for me.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    18. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes and large USB works for a good while. Until you run out of room.

      E.g. On master, hang drive. Set up iTunes to maintain library on this drive, turn on all sharing you can find, make sure ripping set to mp3 g(non-protected format)

      Can access directly, or let iTunes share, portable junk can use directly (eg wife friendly, mine uses apple devices fine)

      Backup critical, once a month or so use robocopy with full mirror (big issue with nas-it WILL crash someday, mine sure did, have you tried to get over a gig off a flakey nas drive?)

      Evidence- take a picture of the source disks,or video, put a current paper in it maybe. Don't be an idiot and share. Then let the lawyers fight it out, main argument is fair use, personal copies. Evidence shows you had the media, and they must show bad behavior, legal field day here (INAL though!)

      Don't sell used discs, think destruction likely legal, ESP if you video (enhances fair use argument, if pure transform)

    19. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by scottbomb · · Score: 1

      MS Sync does this very well.

    20. Re:An ultimately simple concept... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I just set up a scheduled task with Robocopy. Works well enough for me. I'll check out MS Sync to see if it has a few more options.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  2. freenas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    freenas, and a couple 2tb drives. done.

  3. Just buy a NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just buy a NAS box and start copying files. It's easier, less time consuming and less likely to break. Toms hardware has reviews. Get a decent one and it'll stream media to your digital devices without configuration. Suggest a static IP on your router if you have the inclination, but I've not gotten around to it. Similarly, suggest registering it with merge so you get software updates, but probably unnecessary. Other slashdot terms will give a lot more specific advice, but the best buy level NASs already have the compatibility you think you want froma windows box.

    1. Re:Just buy a NAS by rawket.scientist · · Score: 4, Informative

      This! I Asked Slashdot about cloud storage for our small office a while back, and we ended up getting a four-bay QNAP NAS. That's probably overkill for home use, but we've been completely satisfied, and I'm seriously considering a lighter-weight edition for personal use.

      --
      John Hancock wuz here.
    2. Re:Just buy a NAS by StillAnonymous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I picked up a Synology DS1812+ earlier this year. It's expensive (~$1000 without drives), but I couldn't build anything in as small a form factor as they could. It's got an Intel Atom CPU, so it uses very little power. It's been reliable so far and the GUI is excellent.

      It's just a Linux-based system that uses mdRAID/ext4 under the hood, but I got tired of maintaining so many systems and just wanted something simple that was small and worked. If you'd rather roll your own, you can obtain the same functionality and reliablity as any of the commercial offerings. Form factor, simplicity, and GUI are really what they are providing.

    3. Re:Just buy a NAS by nabsltd · · Score: 2

      Get a decent one and it'll stream media to your digital devices without configuration.

      As long as you don't care about least common denominator quality, this is true. But, if you have Blu-Ray quality media as the source, it's unlikely that you can get full quality at devices that support it while also getting something that works on lesser devices. Transcoding on the fly sounds like a good idea, but decoding full HD video and audio and then re-encoding it (even at a much reduced resolution) requires a lot more processor than in the typical off-the-shelf NAS.

      If you don't want to watch video on cell phones or tablets, just store it at full quality that works with your hardware media streamers, and PCs will be able to handle it (as will some tablets). For audio, store two copies...lossless (FLAC is best) and whatever MP3 quality you want. This doesn't waste much space, as the MP3s won't take up much room when you are talking about a multi-terabyte server. Then, just read files directly through shares, or configure your DLNA server to never transcode anything.

    4. Re:Just buy a NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also bought a Synology DS1812+. Also bought 2 of their DX512 units for expansion. This is for work purposes. We only use it to store our backups.

      Years ago, people use to like http://www.freenas.org
      I have not used it lately, but it may be what you are looking for.

      Weather or not you go with a purpose built NAS or a computer, Please raid it with anything ABOVE 0, and please keep a backup.
      RAID is not a backup.

    5. Re:Just buy a NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My NAS is a Thecus unit. Affordable and reliable so far. The interface is kind lame, but it's just a UI...
      Two 1TB drives in RAID1 (mirrored) with nightly Rsync to a 1TB drive on the in-home Windows AD server. I need off-site backup...
      Drives contain 'movies', 'tunes', and 'pictures' shares.
      As others said, a simple file-share does fine. Two media boxes (AppleTV and Xbox) and a few computers all have access to it. No performance issues...but I also doubt more than two devices have really hit it at the same time so far.
      Nice to have it sync to my AD accounts for access/permissions.
      Only stinker device is the ATV since it can't access the NAS share directly. I have a Mac Mini in between running iTunes, pointing to the NAS library, which then syncs with the ATV. Kinda silly. On the other hand, it is needed for the ripping/converting of home DVDs anyway...
      Works well, not too expensive, etc.

    6. Re:Just buy a NAS by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      This is what I got too, but I got just the RS812 and that runs about $600. It has a very easy to use web interface and has the kitchen sink in what it supports (samba, nfs, ftp, and all kinds of other services). It is the easiest array I have ever setup and used.

    7. Re:Just buy a NAS by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you don't need the rack-mount form factor, you can get a DS412+ for not much more money that has twice the RAM and a dual-core processor.

    8. Re:Just buy a NAS by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      We've got about 500 of our DVDs ripped so far and about another 200 to go. I'm ripping them as MKVs and storing them across a few drives on a win7 box. They're being streamed wirelessly by the same box to our iPads, Xbox, laptops and two Roku devices (not all at once. I think we've had two or three devices at once.) We use Plex as the streaming server and so far I've been ok with it. I think more than half the time it pulls down the wrong metadata for the movies so I've been using a third-party app to populate the data. We use Netflix, amazon streaming and pandora via the built-in functionality. One thing: we're using PlayOn to view content from some sites but in general it sucks. Waaaay too slow to load video, it's My Media function (which I thought might have been an alternative to Plex is crap, with one of the worst UI's I've ever seen.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    9. Re:Just buy a NAS by synthespian · · Score: 2

      I don't know why, but something tells me /. has been invaded by a whole bunch of Synology marketing people.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    10. Re:Just buy a NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. I work at NetApp and a lot of eng folks there have Synology boxes for their home NAS solution. I have 5 1TBs on a DS1511 and just got a newer DS1812 with 8 3TB disks; giving the DS1511 to my sister. Synology just works, and has been a pleasure to use.

    11. Re:Just buy a NAS by alostpacket · · Score: 2

      Synology is just the most successful of the SOHO NAS boxes. QNAP, Netgear, DLink fall behind (in popularity), but the DIY crowd is the largest, slightly bigger than Synology. This is according to a lifehacker poll (take with grain of salt).

      http://lifehacker.com/5968677/five-best-nas-enclosures

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    12. Re:Just buy a NAS by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't care about least common denominator quality

      I use a NAS and this has not been a big issue. My video is almost all 720p and 1080p and the audio mostly flac with a few mp3. BSPlayer on Android handles all of this fine (with the exception of 1080p on my wife's older Galaxy S), including connecting to the SMB share.

      The only annoyance I ran into was streaming to the tv. It's a Samsung smart tv, and although it understands dlna, it inexplicably has no support for smb or nfs. I had no desire to set up a dlna server on my NAS box, so I instead installed in on my Tomato-based AP. This works fine once you realize you have to configure USB-based swap on a USB drive (that's a tutorial in itself), but for some reason it doesn't auto-add new media, so you have to rescan your file share every time you add something, which is a 3+-hour excercise.

      That got old, so I finally put together an old ionitx machine with xbmcbuntu and now all seems to be right in the media streaming world. In the end, I would have no trouble recommending NAS for the backend with xbmc or a capable HD app for mobile devices on the front end. dlna complicates life unnecessarily in my experience.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    13. Re:Just buy a NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe just happy customers? I bought one at home last year it works great, has great features, painless.
      That lead me to get two bigger ones at work. They work great, has great features, painless.
      That lead me to get another one this year at home. It works great, has great features, painless, remote apps for files, music, photos, etc.

      See a pattern?

    14. Re:Just buy a NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. I pinky swear I am not one, but my ds411j (yes, the cheapo version) is one of the best purchases I have made. Wish I had shelled out for the slightly more expensive version so it could support transcoding mkv files to my xbox, but beyond that I am incredibly satisfied. Zero config headache, everything just works and it is rock solid.

    15. Re:Just buy a NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup! NAS is the way to go. The QNAP is dead simple and hella reliable.

    16. Re:Just buy a NAS by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      My video is almost all 720p and 1080p and the audio mostly flac with a few mp3. BSPlayer on Android handles all of this fine (with the exception of 1080p on my wife's older Galaxy S), including connecting to the SMB share.

      If you are connecting to the share, you aren't using any streaming server, and thus eliminate most of the issues. But, you still aren't using HD audio formats, and likely aren't using high bitrates for video.

      Likewise, the sibling post mentioned ripped DVDs, which aren't a big deal today even if you keep the full DVD and don't recode. But, keeping HD quality that looks good on a 60" or larger TV and sounds good on a 7.1 speaker system while also being able to play the same file on a phone or tablet is not easy to do.

  4. Try unraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unraid can turn an old Pc into a network storage device. It can use plugins for pyTivo, as well as use plugins for tv, movie, and music management software like sickbeard. Plus if a HD dies it can rebuild the array.

  5. Router and HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lots of routers are now coming with USB3 connections that let you mount an external hard disk. It's cheaper than a file server and faster than cloud storage. At a $200 price point for an external hard disk and router I think this is a solid bonus. In addition, most external hard disks will sleep after a few minutes when they aren't being used, which is a 'greener' option than a server. You can also have multiple computers adding media to the hard disk at the same time via network to aid in your archival efforts.

    1. Re:Router and HDD by evilad · · Score: 1

      Do you have model numbers? I've never seen one.

    2. Re:Router and HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are generally terrible file servers. However, it's a great way to plug in your offline backup and copy from your NAS to the backup.

    3. Re:Router and HDD by mikael · · Score: 1

      Cisco E4200 does. Though there seems to be restrictions on the file system format (NTFS) and that only a single partition would work:

      Appendix B: How to Connect and Access USB Storage
      http://www.manualowl.com/m/Cisco/E4200/Manual/242917

      This was the router that Cisco attempted to grant access through a centralised cloud computing service. If you allowed them to automatically update the firmware, you would find that the only way to enable and disable features such as VPN's, IPsec, user account and passwords was through Cisco's website.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Router and HDD by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I enthusiastically second this. I have an older Drobo 4-bay unit plugged into our Airport Extreme router. Wired access is pretty snappy. Wireless access is easily fast enough to stream video in realtime to far ends of the house.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Router and HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These have been out a while I had a USB 2 one and it worked ok for my needs just art files but dont even think of it without USB 3 for anything else.

    6. Re:Router and HDD by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I'd say it depends on your use case. From what I've seen they typically have poor bandwidth, especially when transferring to/from multiple clients simultaneously. But if you mostly just access personal files of a few megabytes, or stream video (even raw DVD ISOs) then they're probably more than enough for many people, and have the advantage that for the occasional bandwidth-intensive applications (say uploading all those ISOs) you can temporarily plug the hard drive directly into your PC to get bandwidth easily exceeding all but the best NAS systems (purpose-built or DIY server). Convenience may be a factor though - seems like some only provide sFTP access, which can make it difficult to directly access files from within windows programs.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:Router and HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem here that I've had is that the external hard drives I've used go apeshit when they lose power without being properly shut down, and when your drive is plugged into the router it is always on (never shut down). My roommate has lost tons of data several times before we gave up on making use of that feature on the router.

    8. Re:Router and HDD by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      It really bothers me that everyone here is propping up all these new proprietary system for something like a backup solution whenever there are so many open alternatives.

      Almost anything is better than buying some black box solution that will sure to be outdated and out of the users control in a year.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    9. Re:Router and HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a good/fast router though. I had a WNR3500L that I attempted to use in this fashion- it was limited to around 5Mb/s, or perhaps it was MB/s, point is it was slow. I was told this is because the CPU was not fast enough for better speeds, and CPU speed tends to trend with router price.

    10. Re:Router and HDD by davecb · · Score: 1

      You may have to wait a while before they get reliable enough: a colleague just bought one for Christmas and hat to take it back because it was unreliably buggy. I'll send him a link and invite his comments.

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    11. Re:Router and HDD by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      But Cisco's USB storage is pretty slow - it's much faster to unplug it from the router and connect it to a computer to copy onto the drive. Even something like a WD MyBook Live would be much better.

    12. Re:Router and HDD by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Haven't had any problems with a WD Elements drive, despite multiple power failures. It also sleeps normally (and starts up again when accessed) on a Cisco router. The problem is that the USB feature is a fraction of the speed of even USB2.

    13. Re:Router and HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. Cloud storage presently is not as fast as a local network. (And likely will not be for another 5-10 years). If you haven't put a wireless n router in your house yet, consider purchasing one with a USB option.

    14. Re:Router and HDD by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      I have an E4200

      1) fat32 drives work.

      2) multiple shares also work.

      A warning, this isn't a true NAS, this is an SMB share on a router. No hard core robustness, especially with FAT. (something corrupted one of my drives) My suggestion would be to not export this as a read/write share.

  6. egroupware by graphius · · Score: 2

    I have a small computer set up as a NAS (yes it is running ubuntu server, but any distro would probably work) I run egroupware server on it so I can get email, access files, and have a consolidated calendar (among other things) on all my devices. I tried owncloud, but it was a bit resource intensive.
    works for me...

    1. Re:egroupware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      egroupware seems to be 25 euros /mth.

      What was the machine you were running owncloud as?

  7. Plex will do exactly what you need by rickatnight11 · · Score: 2

    Store your digital media on a server in any way you wish. Set up Plex Media Server, associate it with a MyPlex account, and point it at your media. Share your server with your family member's own MyPlex account, and they'll be able to stream everything from wherever (including using a snazzy new Web Client.) Make sure you set up some offsite backup solution, like Carbonite.

    1. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by Vectronic · · Score: 2

      +1 for *NOT* using Plex.

      It's a horrible piece of "software"... easy? yes... fine for a couple hundred videos, absolutely... start getting into MP3's or images of any substantial number... >1000 you're going to be in progress pain.

      Also, it doesn't do back-ups... so the "dumping" part is still open for debate... and since there are apps that do both, alternatives highly suggested... but I have no suggestion.

    2. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2

      +1 for *NOT* using Plex.

      It's a horrible piece of "software"... easy? yes... fine for a couple hundred videos, absolutely... start getting into MP3's or images of any substantial number... >1000 you're going to be in progress pain.

      Also, it doesn't do back-ups... so the "dumping" part is still open for debate... and since there are apps that do both, alternatives highly suggested... but I have no suggestion.

      I'm using Plex to manage a very large library and it's working fine. With the addition of PlexWeb I've been watching movies via web browser while visiting with relatives. I still prefer the OpenELEC (XBMC) interface for my main TV, though.

      As far as storage goes, I recommend either NAS4Free or FreeNAS for DIY (I prefer FreeNAS's interface). I did this on a hypervisor system a couple months ago, details are at http://pcpartpicker.com/b/yxP.

      Everything is backed up to the cloud using http://www.crashplan.com./ I can't recommend them highly enough.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    3. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Very large library of...? It's good at videos, as long as you don't dump/add a bunch all at once and expect to have everything functioning within a coffee break. DLNA, or direct connections without all the tagging/info/images/etc might work quicker... can't say I've tested that.

      I tried adding about 16,000+ MP3's... after an hour and a half, I gave up, killed the app, proceeded to uninstall and remove the zillions of left-over XML files (side note: do not suggest installing on an SSD unless your ok burning them out), and then re-installed... tried the same with I'm not sure, about 8,000 or so images... not happening... remove, clean, re-install... (ok I'm a bit OCD there, but even with a couple hundred videos, there's thousands and thousands of XML files generated... that shit annoys me)

      3570K OC to 4.2... 8GB DDR3 @ 1800 CL8... SATA3 SSD...roughly 500/500M/s for installation drive, SATA3 1TB 64MB 7200 mechanical for the data being accessed.

      If yours is working well for you, great... but I wouldn't consider it a primary choice, I'm forced to use it for my (LG) TV... otherwise I wouldn't even touch it ever again.

    4. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      I scanned in a library of about 700 videos and 20,000 audio files. I just let it sit there and run, probably took a few hours but I really wasn't paying attention. The speed of building your library has nothing to do with your hardware and everything to do with how fast it can access the media info scrapers on the 'net.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    5. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by rueger · · Score: 1

      Just yesterday on another ./ thread someone suggested to me: I also messed around with Servio, Plex and some other open source DLNA servers. I found that the best DLNA option was Wild Media Server which will run fine in Wine on your Ubuntu box. That shit just worked with my Sony Bravia without a lot of hassle and the license for WMS is only 15 bucks.

      Gotta say that WMS installed under wine with no hassle whatsoever, and it feeds my Sony BluRay with ease - something that neither Plex nor Serviio did.

      Not free, but is cheap, although rather bizarre licencing terms.

    6. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I have a library of 7000+ videos. Plex doesn't handle that so well.

      It's a pretty bloated program. Although it's pretty good for dealing with those mobile devices that can't fend for themselves. It's not something I would use for real HTPCs.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had absolutely not problem with Plex serving up a monstrous library of movies, music, and tv shows. As I already mentioned, just set up an automatic off-site backup of the same data. Why would lack of a backup feature be a con for a streaming app?

    8. Re:Plex will do exactly what you need by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

      Take a look at unRAID. I'm currently running it and have been for years but am now also looking at NAS4Free and wow is it waaay more complicated to setup! It's going to be faster mind you and I can use it's NFS shares for VM storage but no way would I ask someone who wasn't willing to spend a few hours to set it up to try it out. I am considering trying FreeNAS too, especially since you seem to like it's interface better, but it's going to be VERY hard to beat unRAID for simplicity IMO...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  8. Subsonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.subsonic.org/pages/index.jsp

    Streams music, video, pictures, whatever. Easy to install, dead simple to use (through a web browser). Has plugins for XBMC and apps for your phone/tablet.

  9. Synology NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a big fan of Synology NAS's. They come in a wide variety of form factors, simple to use, but they're very hackable if you're interested.

    1. Re:Synology NAS by aix+tom · · Score: 2

      I'm too since last week. ;-P

      I especially like that the management fronted and packages seem to be pretty much identical from the cheapest 1-bay home user thing to the biggest 36-bay enterprise rack.

      Want to set up iSCSI Targets on the cheapest consumer thing? No problem. Want to use the little consumer Photo Album thing on the most expensive enterprise thing? No problem.

      The only thing to look for when you want to run "more" than just simple file sharing is to get the ones with a little more RAM and CPU power.

  10. owncloud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    seems ready for what you ask ...
    http://owncloud.org/

    tom

    1. Re:owncloud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Finally. The question was "Which software" and most answers seem to be "buy hardware"...

      Owncloud seems to come close. Take any box, even a NAS like a Sybology box, install WAMP/LAMP/MAMP and Owncloud and you're set up for scheduling, file sharing, music and photo libraries... Even mail if you 'd like.

  11. Many options by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Many options by HarryWhite · · Score: 1

      The carriers ought to do more for consolidation, like AT&T could get me to consolidate everything my family has on its 4G LTe network; I'd welcome a discount. As a real estate agent I use my phone ALL the time -- even more than my teen-age kids do! I upload and download property photos and brochures constantly.

  12. Legality? by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you going to keep the receipts of purchase around? If not, how are you going to prove all your digital copies are legal? Particularly the ones from physical media that you no longer possess.

    --
    1. Re:Legality? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even with a receipt, if he gives or sells a DVD then he gives up the license for that movie. He could give/sell the boxes away and simply keep the original discs inside a tower like you get when buying 100's of blank discs. That way he would still be legal and still own the licenses but cut on the space required for them.

      Another idea: apart from those stupid printed-directly-on-cardboard boxes, most DVDs come in plastic boxes so he could keep the printed sleeves in a binder and the discs in a tower.

    2. Re:Legality? by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should he have to? "Innocent until proven guilty" should still apply until the copyright mafias completely buy out the government.

    3. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD's CD's and other physical items are owned, not licensed.

    4. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, my friend, are naive.
      Corporations have no interest in right/wrong or innocent/guilty. They are only interested in profit. Having everyone re-purchase digitial media is pure profit.

    5. Re:Legality? by ankhank · · Score: 2

      Innocence doesn't exempt you from the cost of defending against a lawsuit.

      "I was never ruined but twice; once when I lost a lawsuit and once when I won one."
      -- Voltaire.

    6. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that this level of paranoia is largely relegated to geeks who have either some form of dementia, or OCD combined with anxiety disorder where they worry about roving gangs of digital Gestapo agents who consider you guilty until proven innocent.

      In the real world the RIAA simply sues you if they find you torrenting their songs. The idea that you need to prove that you own all your music is as ridiculous as needing prove you own everything else in your house.

    7. Re:Legality? by swalve · · Score: 2

      The object is owned, the content is licensed.

    8. Re:Legality? by StuffMaster · · Score: 1

      how are you going to prove all your digital copies are legal?

      Prove to who? He didn't mention anything about defending a lawsuit.

    9. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some geeks have this disease where when doing anything they think that they have to stop everything bad that's "possible". "Possible" is defined as running your imagination wild and without regard to reality. The extreme cases worry about things like all the molecules of air in the room suddenly appearing on one side of the room and not the other due to quantum mechanical effects.

    10. Re:Legality? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Are you going to keep the receipts of purchase around? If not, how are you going to prove all your digital copies are legal? Particularly the ones from physical media that you no longer possess.

      Frankly, I don't think it would be terribly unethical even if he sold the collection and still kept copies on a HDD. There are bigger problems to worry about. He's not running organized piracy or anything, it's just some joe's media collection.

    11. Re:Legality? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Legality? Why should we care about that anymore? The law is nothing but a massive witch hunt, a dysfunctional game of roulette. Those with the most money win. Why should anybody show any respect for that?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    12. Re: Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that's called an anxiety disorder. :)

    13. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how are you going to prove all your digital copies are legal?

      In which country do you live that has the Digital Inquisition going around persecuting people that harbor digital media?

      One of the reasons I, as a citizen of the United States of America, own guns is to protect myself from illegal search and seizures at the hands of the Federal Tyrants^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Government. If the Digital Inquisition shows up at my home with the assumption I'm guilty until proven innocent, they should be expect a bullet filled reception.

      Meaning, if I don't get to use the first three boxes (soap, ballot, and jury), you bet your sweet ass I will use the fourth box (ammo).

    14. Re:Legality? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Mostly to avoid being repeatedly kicked in the crotch by a pack of rabid lawyers. Moral considerations aside you're far less likely to be detected making personal copies of DVDs than, say, beating someone senseless. But if the lawyers do get a hold of you you'll likely be wishing for the assault charges. Such is the insanity of modern law.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    15. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the content is licensed then why is it that when I "lease" a console game i don't also get access to it on my PC or another console? If companies opted for a 'buy once, use everywhere' type of licensing that would make me less likely to pirate their shit. Like things on Steam, i don't ever pirate Steam games, they offer too many great deals and I can play/install anywhere (if I'm allowed to).

    16. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did this troll get modded insightful?

      Do you carry all your receipts around for your clothes everywhere you go? How do I know you didn't steal them? Do you have the dealers agreement or bill of sale in your car? How do I know you didn't steal it? Do you have the invoices ans relevant signed contracts in your pocket for your laptop, tablet and smartphone at all times? How do I know you didn't steal them?

      See? You can take a stupid argument like that to ridiculous levels.

      Physical containers for digital media are a relic of the 90's and early 2000's. They have been obsolete for years and the media industry just can't seem to wrap their head around this newfangled internet thing. In the mean time, what are we supposed do? Relegate technology to uselessness until some corporate serpents can figure out how to snort every last penny out of us? Fuck that.

      How did we get to the point where mere accusation of something as dainty and quasi-unethical as copyright infringement is burdened a harsher stigma than real, actual, tangible, provable *theft*? It's pathetic.

    17. Re:Legality? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Somehow that is not considered an issue related to music people buy on-line. Or do iTunes, Amazon, etc. issue paper receipts for your purchases? I very much doubt it.

      By the way if you buy a CD, make a copy of it for personal use, and then give away or sell the original disk, you should destroy the copy you made. As soon as the original CD leaves your possession, you lose the right to that copy. So even if you have the purchase receipt but not the CD, you're still in trouble if they were to knock on your door to check your drives. Which is not going to happen, unless you put those files on a public share or so.

    18. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it would be terribly unethical even if he sold the collection and still kept copies on a HDD

      I disagree and even so the question is about legality. If you sold or gave your collection to someone else why should it still be legal for you to use what now belongs to someone else?

    19. Re:Legality? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Agreed that it would not be legal.

    20. Re:Legality? by hab136 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Innocent until proven guilty" and "reasonable doubt" is for criminal cases.

      "Preponderance of evidence" is the standard in civil cases (lawsuits), which basically means whichever story is more likely.

    21. Re:Legality? by Immerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Does it really matter? If you're ripping DVDs or Blu-rays you're already violating the DMCA, even if you keep the original discs in spindles/binders/etc. in the attic. Whether you face legal ramifications depends entirely on whether anyone notices and cares, and as long as you're not publicly sharing the media online that's pretty unlikely.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    22. Re:Legality? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Would it matter? Even if he still has the original media, copying a DVD is only possible by illegally breaking the encryption. If you're going to be doing something illegal anyway, you might as well go all the way and skip buying the DVD entirely, just download a torrent.

      Full-on piracy is actually better, legally. It's just nice simple civil copyright infringement. Ripping your (legally-purchased) DVD is not just civil copyright infringement, but a criminal offence too: Trafficking in a tool for circumventing a 'technological protection measure', a crime under the DMCA section 1201 punishable by five years in jail, fine and civil liability.

      Obviously no court is going to impose the maximum five (ten, for a second offence) year sentence for a home DVD collection, the the point remains: Legally, it's much less serious to download a torrent and not pay for a legal copy at all than it would be to buy a DVD and rip it. Only civil, rather than civil *and* criminal.

    23. Re:Legality? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      THERE IS NO LICENSE.

      This is just pro-corporate bullshit propaganda for the unwary.

      You own a copy. You have a right to use it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:Legality? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Geeks tend to view the law as some sort of digital code that says what is and what is not permitted clearly in all circumstances, enforced by a police and court system dedicated to upholding that law in every specific. As there are rules, those who play within them can be considered law-abiding.

      The real world bears little resemblence to this view. It's much more subjective, and often comes down to the enforcers (be they police forces or civil lawyers) balancing the cost of enforcement and resource constraints against the estimated severity of the crime, while taking into account political pressure they may face to be particually harsh or lenient on specific circumstances, individuals or offences.

    25. Re:Legality? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      People don't consider it an issue because they lack imagination.

      If you have "some file" that happens to be someone else's intellectual property then all it takes is one lone jerk to decide to accuse you of pirating that "some file".

      All it takes is one abusive or ambitious beaurocrat at any level.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:Legality? by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      Legally, there is a license I think. It's an implied license that comes from ownership of the disc that allows you the basic rights (e.g. you can view the content privately and give the license, i.e. disc, to someone else, but not reproduce it or display the content publically. Basically everything that used to be on those FBI notices on VCR tapes back in the day). In theory you can rip the content off and give/sell the disc to someone else, but then you would no longer own the license to use it.

      Now, of course, you could say the law is bullshit, and I would have to agree with you, but the fact is legally there is a license, so please don't mislead your fellow /.ers into commiting illegal activities.

    27. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you want encryption for everything - and preferably with a hidden partition where the digital media is stored. While I think the present situation is ridiculous - I opted for this approach. Of course, then one could ask, why not download from Pirate Sites? The answer is - there is no reason NOT TO since they will treat you like a criminal even if you own the DVD's or CD's - and if they were stolen in a burglary - you are now the criminal.

      So encrypt, encrypt, encrypt - then do what you want. When the laws are sane, maybe I'll rethink my position...

    28. Re:Legality? by ABZB · · Score: 1

      In both cases a heuristic probability measure is being applied by the jury. The difference is more of where one draws the line between 'not guilty' and 'guilty' or 'liable for payment' and 'not liable for payment'.

    29. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right result, wrong reasoning. There is no enforceable "license" for physical copies of media (DVDs/CDS). Making a digital copy of a piece of media you own is arguably fair use, a defense to infringement. You will likely lose that shield if you no longer own the physical media, however.

      Digital copies are all licensed. I know of no service that provides major digital content that you "own" a copy of.

      And yes, I am a lawyer.

    30. Re:Legality? by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      It's not that you can't reproduce it because that would violate a license agreement; you can't reproduce it because that would violate copyright law.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    31. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Innocent until proven guilty" and "reasonable doubt" is for criminal cases.

      "Preponderance of evidence" is the standard in civil cases (lawsuits), which basically means whichever story is more likely.

      You're confusing burden of proof with standard of proof. "Innocent until proven guilty/liable" speaks to the burden of proof, and applies to both criminal and civil matters -- I'm innocent/not liable until the government/plaintiff proves I'm guilty/liable. Beyond a reasonable doubt/preponderance of the evidence/clear and convincing evidence/etc. are standards of proof that the party with the burden of proof [government/plaintiff] must ultimately employ to show that I'm guilty/liable.

    32. Re:Legality? by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      Technically, if you sell your physical media, you probably also have to delete the digital copies that you created from that media. Realistically, no one will ever come after you unless you're sharing them online, so you probably don't have to worry about this.

    33. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, with music or movie purchase, you don't yet agree to allow unannounced license audits in your home.

    34. Re:Legality? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That "lone jerk" could single-handedly take down the complete online music industry. Not likely they will get far if they were to try.

    35. Re:Legality? by cbope · · Score: 1

      You have a LICENSE to use software, you do not have a "right" and there is no ownership of the software, except by the company/persons who wrote it. You merely own the media the software is distributed on. It has been this way for decades, no matter your personal opinions on the matter.

      Last time I checked, using software is not a right, anywhere. Please check your facts before spouting this bullshit.

    36. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a tedious but simple way to copy a DVD. The free Real Player version will ask you if you want to copy the music when you put in a DVD. Say "Yes", and then you will have the music on your main drive. After that you can simply copy it to your wireless router's USB hard drive (or whatever). The obvious drawback is the time to copy all of those DVDs.

      By the way, do not be deterred from using a USB2 drive. The USB3 port on the two wireless routers that I know of will not be noticably better because the limiting speed is the Megabit/Sec of the Wireless-N or G signal that the router puts out. If you test, you will notice that listening to music takes up only 1 to 2mbps of your bandwith. Even the old wireless standards would work for that.

      On the other hand, while listening to music might take miniscule bandwidth, but playing games with software on a share will really slow you down. Get a really good router if you want to do that. I do not have an expensive router so I cannot advise you on that.

    37. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't think it would be terribly unethical.
      You apparently are not depending on sales of music to feed your family.

      How about if I convinced all my friends, and they convinced their friends, that it was okay to sneak into your house at night and steal just a little from your wallet while you were sleeping? An author cannot see the people who keep or pass around his music for free. That does not make it ethical. Any way you look at it, if an additional person winds up with music without the author getting some money, the author has been stolen from.

    38. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being charged for stealing used clothes doesn't cause you as much trouble as for copying music.

    39. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you do not own a copy, you own a licence which is not to be redistributed. Copyright is very tricky. Because you bought an object does not mean you own it. Just like software it is intellectual property do you not have the right to modify that licence. Its not pro corporate anything it made a lot of sense when it was crafted but it is about as out of date today as stone hammers.

    40. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that is the term of the license, that is why you do not also get access. The copyright holder has the last word on what license you are able to purchase.

    41. Re:Legality? by boggin4fun · · Score: 0

      Just throwing something out there that may help.

      Statute of limitations for Copyright Infringement (or as content owners like to call it... "The practice of attacking and robbing ships at sea."):

      http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01860.htm

  13. unraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For something scalable try unraid: http://lime-technology.com/

    There is a license cost, but I find that it's well worth it.

    1. Re:unraid by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      This. This. This.

      If you're not Linux savvy, you may need a second machine for serving up content and backup to a cloud service. I have an unRaid machine I've been running for nearly 10 years now. It's software RAID, so if one drive goes toes up you can just pop in a new drive and rebuild the old one from parity. It's easy to upgrade...I doubt if I even have a single one of my original drives.

        Because this is a piece of mission critical hardware (includes both work files and the wife's TV shows), and because I'm not well versed in Linux, I don't run anything else on it. I have a second Windows machine which backs up personal/unrecoverable files to SpiderOak and to a local USB drive. That second machine also runs a Plex server (for feeding the 3 AppleTVs) as well as Sickbeard (TV show downloader) and Couch Potato (movie downloader).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  14. Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plex is pretty nice for streaming the media from the file share. You'll need the server installed on a box somewhere. They have client apps for just about all major desktop and mobile OS's.

  15. Dropbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It sounds like Dropbox might be able to help you out (and is probably the easiest solution).

    A lot of people I know do a similar thing through their service. If you gotta have it local, and have a good wireless connection, there are Remote Desktop clients for all of the devices you describe. That would at least prevent the data from being redundant on multiple devices. I think you can find good Android clients for ~15$.

    Just some ideas, you'll have to Google around for setup instructions.

    1. Re:Dropbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That a pretty complicated and not very useful way just to share some media in house

    2. Re:Dropbox by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      He's asking about storing his digital media... not just a bunch of photographs, but music and movies as well.

      I have no idea what's in your collection, but when I converted my CD collection to FLAC for storage on the NAS (and streaming to the stereo), I ended up with over 300GB of files. When I converted my DVD collection to MKV/h.264, I ended up with over a terabyte.

      While I appreciate the suggestion and the point you're trying to make, I have a hard time believing that Dropbox would be feasible for nearly 1.5TB of data.

    3. Re:Dropbox by synthespian · · Score: 1

      I think Rapidshare has the best deal (infinite storage).
      However, I would encrypt files first.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  16. Similar Thinking by Ganty · · Score: 1

    I am going through a similar exercise right now, all of my music CDs have been ripped to flac format and I'm 3/4 of the way through my DVD collection. In my case I have a server in the basement running Linux Mint fitted with two 3TB hard drives. Linux Mint is the secret as all of the audio and visual codecs are pre-loaded and so far I haven't found a single file that I can't play.

    Ganty

    1. Re:Similar Thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is pretty close to what I did. I put an old tiny computer to work doing just that. Its a Via Epia EX10000EG motherboard in a mini-itx form factor. It uses nearly zero power and is fanless. It is in a tiny Travla C138 aluminum case. I can also remotely log into my Linux Mint PC while it is quietly sitting in the closet with VNC. So it doesn't need a keyboard, mouse or monitor. It's not nearly as difficult to do as you think. I recommeded this to a friend who did the same and found the stuff used on eBay for cheap too.

    2. Re:Similar Thinking by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      This. Add in xmbc on top of it, and you can be off and running.

      I'd get back into the geek thing a little for setting it up - all a fairly well documented and straight forward process. I'd also look into using multiple physical disks and setting up a RAID array - hate to consolidate your stuff and then loose it to a hardware failure.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  17. take a look at GCD of all your devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to take a look at all your consuming devices and take the greatest common denominator of what they accept.

    Maybe you have a TV which accepts streaming from a specific library format like DNLA. Maybe you're a mac addict who needs itunes everywhere (although your contemplation of using Windows seems to end that train of thought).
    There are plenty of NAS setups possible to stream data. But where will the player be? Will it be your TV, your laptop, do you want to go for wireless speakers?

     

  18. Synology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got another Synology DS212J this year. It has a lot of click-to-add packages like photo, audio, media shares. Works with Win/Mac/Lin/I/And (everything I have is Linux/Android).
    Great browser based setup/admin, built in RAID, Network Attached Storage. Best home NAS I have used.

    Here is their live demo page:
    http://www.synology.com/products/dsm_livedemo.php?lang=us

    1. Re:Synology by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How is your CPU usage? I added a bunch of packages and once i did that my CPU was pegged at 100% for months, limiting transfer speed to 15 MB/s. I finally wiped it and went with the standard packages and it works great now.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Synology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friend of mine just went with a Synology and is very happy. I looked at this for myself, but outside the US the price gets a bit out of hand to say the least. I'm printing this whole thread off to read later and glean some ideas.

    3. Re:Synology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been a happy Synology user for several years. I use it as primary storage (not backup) for all media in the household. I've had a drive failure, and loved being able to fix it at a leisurely pace with no down time or file loss. It's quite scriptable, too, with an exposed Linux OS, Perl, and many useful modules for dealing with media files.

      One quirk -- to save power, I used to have Synology hibernate the drives when inactive. However, network devices often don't react well to the spin-up lag time. E.g., sometimes Sonos would play music with just a 3 second lag, but other times it displays an error message. Sometimes a WD media player starts a video after 5 seconds, but sometimes it takes 10-15 seconds. Mac TimeMachine was the final straw -- it has no patience, and simply refused to work. So now I let the drives spin all the time...

  19. pcpartpicker and freenas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can part up a cheap JBOD and install some nas software (I like freenas) or just run some linux you like with samba.

    http://pcpartpicker.com/

    Built my last system for under 200 shipped. 8 gigs of ram, g540 celeron, 10 bay case. The mobo is no longer available, but they're under 40. Drives are where you rack up the $'s

    http://pcpartpicker.com/p/p5md

  20. cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just use dropbox, it works on linux win and mac, android and ios. If 2 gb free are not enough just buy more space.
    If u know someone who has it get an invite, it's 250mb extra free.

  21. I am you from the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, not really, but... my wife and I recently purchased and moved into our first house. We downsized a lot of crap. While I couldn't find it in me to part with my CD collection (too much love and effort went into it), it IS sitting in basement storage.

    I ended up buying a Synology NAS. My uses are more hardcore, but if one of my non-technical siblings came to me, this is what I would recommend. I can dump tons of data on it and make sure that it's redundant. It's crazy easy to set up as well - if you can still fart around a windowed environment, you'll get this set up easily. And it's one of the cheapest and well-supported consumer NAS solutions out there.

    Yeah, I could have gone with a PC hanging out file shares, but I didn't want something that bulky and that noisy, and the Synology uses less electricity too.

    Also, good luck with finding a place, closing on it, prepping it, and moving in. I'm glad we did it, but man - I never want to have to do that ever again.

  22. Simplest - network capable external HD, best XBMC by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Probably the very simplest is a network capable external drive like the Western Digital World Edition. Just plug it in and you have network storage. That just gives you a folder full of media files visible to the network, though. A much nicer, searchable interface with playlists etc. can be had with XMBC, a media center for Windows, Linux, Mac and others (including some Android support).

  23. PogoPlug Solution by NoHandleBars · · Score: 1

    Check out the PogoPlug Solution which combines a hardware device for storage with cloud accessibility for all the devices you listed. It's extremely easy to use. You don't have to use their cloud solution if you purchase the cheap hardware device. You simply plug in an external hard drive/thumb drive and use their Internet interface on all your devices not just for file storage, but also for streaming.

    --
    +-+-+-+-+-+-+ "I don't know what's wrong with you, but I'm quite sure it's hard to pronounce."
    1. Re:PogoPlug Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setting something up is easy. Setting up something that lasts is harder. The big gotcha is when the family starts to use it, starts to depend on it, and the storage fails. "I lost all my pictures!"

      I've been disappointed with commercial solutions. In the end, I usually tell my friends to set up a folder or two of critical info and use a cloud solution and keep copies of important stuff on more than one usb drive. Even a non-techie can copy to a usb disk.

      -------

      Personally, I like the random collection of drives with some syncing. Multiple standalone copies of the data. Started out with a linksys NSLU years ago, then a pogoplug, and now some little arm nas. Very low power, all of them.

      In my case, I aimed for a keep it simple solution:
      * low power (ARM) linux server
      * a boot/OS disk (thumb drive), and replace/add USB drives for data here and there. Very replaceable.
      * USB data drives and samba/etc. I sync a folder across the drives. I have shares for media and backups.
              - One drives fails, no biggy. I have X-1 copies remaining.
              - Any drive can be pulled off and plugged in somewhere to get at all the data (no dependencies)
              - Add redundancy? Plug in another drive (I used to automate this, but my current setup needs me to format and mount the drive - it was safer)
      * Only issue I had at one point was multiple disk failures between checks (lightning zap - 3 year old disks). Oops. Was actually down to 1 good disk (from 4). Now have a little UPS too.

      It wasn't *hard* to set up, but did require some technical knowledge, unfortunately. Really, I'm not sure why this isn't a cheap, quicky solution already. Or maybe I haven't come across it.

      I had one small folder that synced to a friends house, and later to cloud storage. I should set up the cloud one again.

  24. Parity RAID based NAS + Secondcopy works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been a big fan of FlexRAID (http://www.flexraid.com/). It is a parity based "smart storage" system that essentially lets you pool in N+1 hard drives while giving you access to storage space on N hard drives (enables recovery from a single HDD failing). Based on your desired redundancy, you can also set it up to be resilient for M simultaneous hard drive crashes...which allows you access to storage space on N+1-M hard drives. It is a paid solution but I've been using it since it was a free Beta. It has a very neat drive extender solution that pools in all the folders across all hard drives in the FlexRAID and makes all the storage accessible under a single drive. It makes accessing and storing data on your FlexRAID exceedingly simple as every software simply sees it as just another drive letter. Also provides you with very slick web based administrative controls (running on local host, not the cloud) that let you monitor your FlexRAID and schedule daily/hourly/weekly sync operations to keep the parity RAID system up to date. It does take a bit of effort to read up on it to understand how it works (if you care) but there is also a fool proof setup option that does all the configuring for you.

    Of course, FlexRAID is only part of the solution. It lets you store your important data locally on a NAS or across several hard drives while giving you some redundancy and enabling simple access to the entire storage pool via a single drive letter. The other part of the solution for me is to use a very simple but awesome piece of software called SecondCopy (http://www.secondcopy.com/). It has a lot of options, but you can configure it on each of your computers to automatically watch certain folders and upload any changes, additions, etc to your NAS to keep it up to date with what is on your hard drive. You can also set it to only add or edit changed files but not delete files of the NAS when you delete something locally. That's just scratching the surface. You can even have it zip all the files being archived if they are purely for backup purposes and you care about the space savings.

    I've found that the combination of FlexRAID and SecondCopy works really well for me. The only problem is that SecondCopy only runs on Windows, so you might have to look for something similar on the Mac.

    Finally, since you are a photographer, you probably already know about services like SmugMug. I'd highly recommend paying the $60 a year for such a service. They have a plugin that integrates into Lightroom allowing you to publish photos on your SmugMug website as soon as you are done processing them. It serves as an off-site backup for all my photographs (which I care about a lot) and gives you unlimited uploads and lets you store images at their original resolution. Smugmug also lets you request a zip file containing all pictures of any given album that makes it easy to redownload any albums of images that you might have misplaced or lost. Not only does it serve as a backup, it also makes it very easy to share all your pictures with friends and families and also allows them to easily download any of the images they like (if you enable downloads) and/or order prints straight from the website.

    For me, FlexRAID + Second Copy + Smugmug works well enough with zero hassles once I have everything set up.

  25. ownCloud or NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would strongly suggest either A) looking into ownCloud. The set up for a local in-house box is fairly inexpensive and I believe ownCloud will let you rent space on their server if you want file sync on the road. Alternatively I would suggest looking into FreeNAS. Basically you install it on a spare box and FreeNAS will manage pretty much everything for you. You can set up shares through an easy point-n-click web GUI.

    The whole set up process for FreeNAS or for a local ownCloud install is probably less than an hour, even if you haven't used them before. Plus they are pretty much set up and forget solutions, which is ideal for most people.

  26. Software side... by singularity · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are talking about NAS devices and so on, but they all come back to "filesharing" as the software portion of their solution.

    I use Plex to serve out media and love it. Transcodes a Blue-Ray rip to my iPad. I hit pause and bring the movie up on my television and start where I left off. You can run the server on a Windows machine, a Mac, or even some NAS devices.

    I can be on the road and bring up any movie I have.

    Client-wise they have iOS, OS X, Windows, and Android.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    1. Re:Software side... by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Costs money, phones home, and they are desperately trying to monetize it. Avoid Plex.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Software side... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Transcodes a Blue-Ray rip to my iPad.

      How does it decode DTS-HD and Dolby TrueHD? How does it handle multiple audio streams? Does it support subtitles (especially Blu-Ray PGS)?

      My Blu-Ray rips only have video re-coded for reduced size...everything else is as it appeared on the disc, so without support for these things, it wouldn't work for me. As I said in another post, most on-the-fly transcoding solutions are fine as long as you only care about least common denominator quality. If you want high quality for your 60" HDTV and 7.1 surround system, then most of the DLNA solutions won't work.

    3. Re:Software side... by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I don't really use Plex, but I feel like you are missing the point.

      You don't need on the fly transcoding to stream to your 60" TV and 7.1 surround system. You need an xbmc box or something that can handle full uncompressed video output to your giant tv. If your hardware can handle the raw files, there is no need to transcode

      You need on the fly transcoding when you are sending content to a device that can't handle it. That way you can still keep your uncompressed bluray rips for use on your TV, but also be able to watch them on your phone or across an internet connection.

      --
      Bottles.
    4. Re:Software side... by root_42 · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reference for the phoning home stuff? I am using Plex on the Mac and like it very much. However, if there were serious problems like unwantedly transmitting data, I'd really like to know.

      --
      [--- PGP key and more on http://www.root42.de ---]
    5. Re:Software side... by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      The player supports HDMI out for the raw audio stream, at least on windows. It does handle ,multiple audio streams. It also handles multiple subtitle streams either in the file, in the same folder, or grabbed from online on the fly if it can find them (YMMV, but it sometimes works).

      It does transcode for certain portable devices (obviously you do then lose the multichannel audio and some quality) but I believe it can also serve up the file raw. O haven't tested it with my TV's dlna. I have my gaming / mpc computer plugged directly into the amp and tv so it's using the plex client, which it does not transcode for. I personally love Plex. It matches all my rips out of ~3TB of data, even TV downloads... Hardly any errors, and those are easy to fix. I have no problems playing back 1080p with DTS / DD. I haven't tested any remuxes with master audio, but I would be very surprised if it didn't work.

    6. Re:Software side... by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Plex is an xbmc fork. The frontend is open source. It only transcodes for portable devices, which is a nice feature. The main client handles uncompressed blue ray quite well.

    7. Re:Software side... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The existence of myPlex is all i need to know if its phoning home or not. Any 'service' like that exists to keep you in their garden and to report what you do.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:Software side... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Plex is an xbmc fork. The frontend is open source. It only transcodes for portable devices, which is a nice feature.

      Which means it can't handle any of the HD audio formats without using the alpha that isn't quite ready for prime time.

      Even so, it will take a lot of CPU power to transcode when the source is uncompressed Blu-Ray.

    9. Re:Software side... by thempstead · · Score: 1

      ... and myPlex is completely optional to use. you don't need to have an account on it nor log an installed Plex server into it (I set up Plex for my Dad over the Christmas holidays and his system is not configured talk to myPlex at all).

      Works fine for him (and for my own slightly more sophisticated setup) despite some of the rants against it in this thread ...

  27. Skip the old computer by berchca · · Score: 1

    You'll just be adding another system to maintain. Just buy a network attached drive, much simpler to maintain and smaller to book.

    I know that Western Digital (my book) has software to share with iOS devices at least. Maybe Android, too.

    1. Re:Skip the old computer by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except that network attached drive will fail sooner or later and when it does the remaining pieces will be more difficult to deal with. If you have a solution based on standard parts and a normal OS, it's a lot easier to put the pieces back together when things go sideways.

      You're far better off just adding a drive to an existing PC.

      It will be no more complicated to maintain.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Skip the old computer by mypalmike · · Score: 1

      The Netgear ReadyNAS hardware is Linux-based, with a debian repo, you can ssh into it, apt get, etc. Tiny, uses very little power, and I get much faster data transfers than I had with a hand-built Linux box.

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    3. Re:Skip the old computer by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      +1 for the ReadyNAS. Thing just works. I have a ReadyNAS duo. I can set up all that stuff myself (NFS, CIFS, etc), but the ReadyNAS just does it. Most of the time I forget it's there. Plus, it can serve via DLNA.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
  28. but how much IO can they do?? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    but how much IO can they do??

    And most external hard drives do not have backup / raid.

    You can get a cheap pc with software raid 1 and 2 HDD's.

    1. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Raid is not your backup. Backup is something that is external to the device itself, and preferably housed offsite and offline.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      I've just started playing with SymForm for backup. Upto 10GB free storage. After that you can pay either with Bytes (bandwidth, power and disk space) or dollars.

    3. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by fa2k · · Score: 2

      Raid is not backup, but sometimes you don't need a backup. I suspect that the OP woudn't be devastated if all the media was lost, and maybe it's not worth it to set up a second set of drives.

      By using a filesystem with RAID and snapshot supprt like Btrfs or ZFS, one is protected against disk failure by RAID and most user errors by snapshots.

    4. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That's great for personal files, assuming you don't mind them being read by anyone who wants to, or do your own client-side encryption before using it. Kinda useless for backing up media collections though - even your typical DVD .iso is 6-7GB apiece if you don't want to throw away detail and menus by transcoding to a more efficient format.

      As an aside, does anyone know if there exists a software package that lets you perform securely encrypted incremental remote backups? It seems like it shouldn't be too technically difficult to implement using even a simple sFTP server as the remote system, but it seems like every service that claims to offer such capability has later proven to have back doors, if they don't just outright keep a copy of the encryption key themselves.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The thing about backups is that this means that you need to have least 2 of everything you are doing. At that point, things that are expensive become REALLY expensive and some of the more advanced features of the more expensive solutions become moot.

      1 Drobo becomes 2 Drobos or just 2 software arrays for far less money. Each array may have less sophisticated features but since you have two of them, it doesn't matter so much.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by Old+Grey+Beard · · Score: 1

      As an aside, does anyone know if there exists a software package that lets you perform securely encrypted incremental remote backups?

      I have EaseUS Todo Backup and it looks like it can do all that, but it costs money (~$30) and probably only runs on Windows. I've got a Linksys Slug with 3TB storage and use EaseUS for weekly full and nightly differential backups. But I don't use encryption...hmm, I wonder why?

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it."
      - H. L. Mencken
    7. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Backups for media don't have to be up to the minute. All he has to do is backup to a cheap external drive when he rips some stuff. Presumably he still has the originals stored away, anyway.

    8. Re:but how much IO can they do?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an aside, does anyone know if there exists a software package that lets you perform securely encrypted incremental remote backups?

      I believe what you're looking for is duplicity.

  29. How about just using the cloud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like you are trying to downsize, and have less stress/crap in your life. You are also buying a house, which for the next few years is going to increase the stress level by a bazillion.

    I recommend just using the real cloud. I went to Apple icloud. So. Damn. Easy. If you despise Apple, Amazon also offers cloud services. To badly paraphrase Larry Ellison, circa 1995: "You don't keep all of your money at home, under your bed, you keep it in a bank; so why keep all of your data at home?"

    I don't know much about DIY servers if you share Mac and Linux and PC devices, so I'm eager to read the user responses. However, If you do go DIY, I would recommend that you at least backup your pictures, vids, and important legal docs/financial docs up to Carbonite or some online backup service (iron mountain "Connected", etc.) THose services are worth their weight in gold, so to speak.

    My $0.01 (I'm not savvy enough to offer $0.02)...

    1. Re:How about just using the cloud? by mikael · · Score: 1

      "You don't keep all of your money at home, under your bed, you keep it in a bank; so why keep all of your data at home?"

      You keep your money in a bank, because the bank provides a safe storage medium in exchange for a commission from making more money by lending it out to other people.

      You don't keep all of your furniture in your home because you want to use it when you need it, not when some store is open business hours.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:How about just using the cloud? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Is this /.? Buying a house and downsizing? I assumed he lived in a smaller place right now than the house he is going to buy.

      So time to start collecting and piling up old computer junk from relatives and friends for the big move and plan the lab he is going to build in his new house. I am sure he can fit some file storage in there...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  30. Media server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I use Plex. It is free and it runs on any platform as the server and any platform as a client. It is a painless and quick way to setup your own Amazon or Netflix type media server with very little work.

  31. File Share by StuffMaster · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a file share to me...

  32. Vortexbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run the vortexbox software on a HP microserver.

    Vortexbox is a modified linux distribution based on Fedora, that has a straightforward web interface that minimizes any administration, and is designed for your use case.

    It includes:
    Automatic CD ripping (just insert the disk, and it will be ripped and tagged, with album art)
    Automatic DVD ripping (as above)
    Plex media server integration
    Squeezebox server integration

    All music is streamed via Squeezebox hardware and software. There are cheap/free ipod/android players for Squeezebox audio, and remote controls, so you don't need a Squeezebox device. It also supports spotify,

    TV / movie / photo streaming is via Plex. There are clients for Android / iThings.

    Just run a disk share for the remaining ebooks etc.

     

  33. Usually one buys a house so that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have enough space so that they DON'T have to give away all of their stuff.
    If you give away all of your physical media, why do you need a house?

  34. Share + XBMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create a Samba share, then use the various flavours of XBMC to access movies, pictures, and music. If anything, I found since I started using XBMC that it has forced me to keep all my digital files better organized to ensure they show up correctly.

  35. cheap mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a used Mac Cube for short money on craigslist and attached a Firewire drive to it. It runs silently, headless and keyboard less without configuration, consumes little electricity and it's beautiful to look at so no need to hide it. Just remember to check wake on LAN and you are good to go and install a VNC. I use it to feed everything from Apple TV to PS3.

  36. BACKUPS!! by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    If you plan on centralizing all your data, that will greatly simplify your media management and space. There are tons of perfectly good ways of doing it, from buying a NAS to setting up a dedicated computer using Windows/Linux/BeOS/C64 or whatever. If you don't want to take the time to set up a good linux based solution, then I would actually recommend buying a used mac mini and either replacing the HDD with a bigger one or getting a USB3 (if the mac is new enough to support it) or a firewire external enclosure. You said you have access to an old macbook. That would probably do you perfectly. Depending on which version of OSX is on it, you could even hook it up to your TV and use it as your main media centre because it will have Front Row. (I'm dissappointed Apple got rid of it in later releases... I guess not enough people used it to justify maintaining it?)

    BUT.... Getting everything together is still a fair amount of work. Not just setting up the initial system but the time spent having to rip all your media. And if that machine dies, or get stolen in a burglary, your stuff will be gone and (unless you kept all the originals in a storage locker or something) unreplaceable.

    It is imperative that you get a backup solution in place, even if it's just an external HD connected via USB to the main unit. Make sure it's a nice big drive. This goes nicely with the Mac solution because Macs come with Time Machine, which is the single best backup solution I've ever seen for a personal system. It will backup your entire system to your chosen external drive, and continue to perform hourly incrementals as long as the machine is turned on, without any effort at all on your part. Better yet, you could have your backup drive in a completely different and protected location of the house and have your data backed up to it over the network.

    Best of all, you could then use this setup as the basis for setting up a central encrypted repository for other more critical data like copies of your household finances, photos of everything you own to show the insurance company in case there's a fire, etc etc.

    1. Re:BACKUPS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * A+ on the backups. With large media, online backups are not viable. 3 HDDs all the same size to hold the media (2TB+), 2 in a RAID1 set and the 3rd as a USB3 backup.

      For each type of media
      * music
      * videos/movies
      * photos
      * important documents (finanial statements and bills)

      For music and videos, almost any organization that you have is fine, provided no more than 100 files end up in a single directory. Directory corruption is real and if you place all your files into a few directories, it is possible to loose all those files.

      for photos and documents, I use a yyyy/mm/ directory structure. This little bit of extra information helps in the future. At least the year should be used. It provided invaluable metadata.

      Never trust the timestamps provided by the OS file system. When you outgrow it, you'll need to move/copy the files over to larger file storage later and sometimes file timestamps are lost.

      As to "how" to accomplish all this - an old PC running Linux with samba and/or a nice media server app will fit the needs for client access. There are lots of media server apps that support DLNA or whatever Apple uses.

      For the photos, a nice photo gallery can be used or just let your clients access all the photos through samba shares.

      Be certain that your backups are working and are automatic. Not having a backup when all your media and files are at risk is just crazy. I like rdiff-backup for UNIX-like OSes. It is trivial to use and when setup in a crontab, yuo can basically forget about it.

  37. A DLNA server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several choices, but I'm new to them. So far Serviio seems decent enough.

  38. FIleserver and dvdbackup by hawguy · · Score: 1

    I just went through a similar exercise with our 200 disk DVD collection - copied the DVD images to a RAID fileserver (I used ubuntu + ZFS, you could buy something like a Drobo or a ReadyNAS if you don't want to set up your own fileserver - don't skimp on the hardware, you want something solid and reliable). DIsk space is so cheap I didn't even bother compressing the DVD images on the initial copy.

    3 or 4 of the DVD's had some copy protection that dvdcopy couldn't handle - I almost got some WIndows software that's supposed to be able to bypass the copy protection, but then I found bittorrent images of the missing movies. I wonder if my ISP is going to report me to the MPAA for pirating movies I already own?

      I also keep another offsite backup on a pair of 3TB hard drives that I shuttle back and forth to the office, one is always at home, one is always at the office. I've debated sending a hard drive to Amazon to import into Glacier storage - after paying the transfer fee, for less than $20 month, Amazon will store the movies for me (and all of the rest of my data too - pictures, mp3's, etc).

    I took all of the physical DVD's out of their cases as I copied them, and put the DVD's, slipcovers and booklets into some excellent DVD storage binders so I have proof of ownership.

    We buy a lot of used DVD's (for what I used to pay for Netflix's DVD by mail subscription, we can buy 2 or 3 used DVD's/month at Amazon - most cost between $3 - $9), so I set up a simple script that my wife can use to copy new DVD's, she just puts in the DVD, and types in the name.

    After copying everything I set up a script to use Handbrake to compress the DVD images into smaller files suitable for putting on a tablet, smartphone or laptop. It was nice to have 200 movies to choose from on the plane while traveling over the holidays.

    I did the same with my CD's ages ago - back when it took longer to encode an MP3 on my computer than it does to play it back. I haven't bought a physical CD in a long time, so I don't know how long it takes to encode them these days.

  39. Don't DSL/fiber boxes already do this? by loufoque · · Score: 1

    Don't DSL/fiber boxes already do this?

  40. How about streaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently set up a media server and had a pleasant experience with Serviio (http://www.serviio.org/).
    Although I believe it's intended for smart TVs the UPnP will allow you to browse and stream to other devices (I'm currently using VLC for computers, PS3 in living room and UPnPlay for my andoid phone).
    I used an atom netbook with ubuntu but it appearst to support windows and osx.
    Then a simply sharing the folders will allow you to add and maintain your media.

  41. Eureka! I found the source of Background Radiation by VortexCortex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to set up something on an extra Windows box shoved in a closet that lets me dump every digital file we have (photos, music, ebooks, movies) and then doles it out as necessary to all of our devices.

    It's folks like THIS guy. Their unpatched infected Windows machines sit forgotten in closets all over the world, spraying the malicious packets of Code Red, Nimda, Sober, Blaster, Sasser, etc. despite modern OSs being invulnerable. We call this Internet Background Radiation; This is the reason your modem's "activity" light blinks even if you've just turned it on -- We're being scanned! This is why an unpatched machine connected to the net becomes infected in mere minutes just sitting there... From a raw sampling of unsolicited data coming into an Internet connection I can determine the date at which the sample was taken by the Internet Background Radiation collected, I can "carbon date" the age of the network traffic. Now think: Your ISP bills you for traffic... Are they billing you for all those packets that are dropped at your firewall / router? In a way we are all funding the malicious behavior, we are at least feeding the machines electrons...

    The Internet is much like a primordial soup, configurations of malware self assemble from the fertile components of energized silicon. Code Red is infected by Nimda, which alerts modern bot-nets of vulnerable systems ripe for the picking. The cascade of malware produces patterns in the network similar to a neural network, still untrained, not yet aware of itself, so you assume... Yet, as another fertile machine is attached to the net its connection is immediately flooded with enticing electrons, and soon a new infection has formed, as if a neural cell forming a fresh synapse compatible with the type of nodes at the end points.

    The malware authors each supply a simple cascading self propagating pattern that grows in complexity over time, but it is YOU and your Windows Media Servers who provided the core components -- the amino acids, so to speak -- that enabled the Sentient Machine Intelligence to emerge! It's YOU I blame for the DEATH OF ALL MANKIND!

  42. ownCloud by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

    It's like Dropbox, but everything resides on the server of your choice. Ridiculously easy to set up, literally copy a directory into the web root, set permissions, and done.

    Has MOST features Dropbox does, sharing files, access from anywhere...photo gallery, you can open files in the browser with native internal apps..

    It gives you the drag-and-drop simplicity of Dropbox with its syncing with nearly the same simplicity to set up.

    1. Re:ownCloud by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Owncloud is really great. I'd put it on a webhoster so you can reach it from everywhere.
      For my home I use a NAS, an old one actually (Siemens AMS150). If you have already decent hardware (lots of drives and a PC) you could try FreeNAS, it does everything a dedicated NAS does and more but of course you won't get the great powersavings of the custom built ones. Setup is trivial and it comes with a HTML-based GUI.
       

  43. In France they do by Lorens · · Score: 1

    The box provided by French provider "Free" has a 250 GB HD that is CIFS exported:

    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebox#Quatri.C3.A8me_g.C3.A9n.C3.A9ration_:_version_6_.C2.AB_R.C3.A9volution_.C2.BB

    1. Re:In France they do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it's buggy as all fuck and breaks with every firmware update. In my experience it only works properly with the free player. Third party dlna clients do not browse the free box server properly.

  44. Wrong priorities by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Real estate is the slimiest, vilest industry there is, based on lies, deceit and willful holding back of information. Who cares if you have to lug three boxes of junk instead of one? You're moving! Who cares?

    What you NEED to be spending your time on is finding out exactly how much this will cost! How much in welcome tax, municipal tax, school tax, water tax, insurance, inspectors and whatever other creative ways we invent to suck money out of people's wallets.

    If you are renting, what's wring with your place? Don't you realize that home "ownership" makes little sense these days? What if you lose your job? What if you want to move on a moment's notice? What if repairs need to be done?

    You are on your own when you "own", and you probably have no real idea of the real costs of that.

    Real estate hasn't made sense for the individual for a long time. The whole idea of "owning" was based on the idea of life-long commitment to one career at one employer in one place. That was true for my Dad's generation in the 1960s.

    Are you buying a new house? You realize how utterly cheaply they are made these days? Particle board and glue instead of real wood, etc.

    Some things are better these days, but structurally? No way.

    So forget your "household media" and concentrate on the HOUSEHOLD itself.

    Let me know after you buy if what I said makes sense or not.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:Wrong priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that...

      However, I was restless until I have filled an AMD (CPU/GPU) populated ITX board with four 2/3TB green SATA drives.
      After some time XMBC (on linux) solved most of my needs after I have connected it to plasma screen. It just works.

    2. Re:Wrong priorities by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Using your wealth to buy ownership of a piece of property is a much more sound investment than throwing your money away into the "rental black hole". Now, if you want to argue the merits of the whole "get mortgage that you can barely pay off over 30 years" kind of property owning, then yeah, you're spot on. The latter is just another way for the banks to suck out even more money from the plebs.

    3. Re:Wrong priorities by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      This entirely depends on which country he's living in. Here in Norway, ja, the economy favours home owners, and buying in a growing city will make you money, save you taxes and provide "panic insurance" (if or when you can't afford the mortgage you sell at a profit).

      Yes, it's a bubble, but the economic model of Norway assumes that you own a house and a mortgage.

  45. windows home server enough said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look up the rating of windows home server on amazon and all your troubles are done for. It even will backup images of any windows machines on the network automatically. Best solution Microsoft ever made for home based backups.

  46. Buy a NAS by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    Network Attached Storage appliances are cheap and quite reliable. Get one that can a couple 2tb drives and set them in a mirror mode. The NAS will have a simple web interface for management and expose your drive(s) as a Samba share on your network.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  47. openfiler or simialr by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    You really just need a NAS box take whatever hardware you have install and be done with it.Few things need more than cifs or http access to work.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  48. Cheaper too. Eventually. by Immerman · · Score: 3, Informative

    And more environmentally friendly as well. Any halfway decent home NAS will spin down the drives when not in use, and probably use only a few watts while in standby (which will be most of the time, assuming you sleep, go to work, etc.). A desktop may well consume a hundred watts or more in standby. That's a MWh a year, about ~$100 at $0.10/kWh. As such an entry-level home NAS could pay for itself in the first year, a higher-quality one would take a few more.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  49. Get Plex Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plex server will do everything you want except books. Keep your books for when the power goes out. Google plex server and get plex!

    1. Re:Get Plex Dude by rjr162 · · Score: 1

      I second this!

  50. Plex is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you want to watch/listen to all of that media from any device on your network, just use plex. It's really pretty great software and it's free!

  51. My recommendation for a storage solution by maever4u · · Score: 2

    Hello Lordfly!
    I understand you're basically trying to digitalize your library and allow some streaming features to all your digital devices (mac, windows, tablet, phone, etc).
    Now there are various options available to you, there are some factors to consider:

    * How much data are you looking to store?
    * How much time do you want to spend tinkering around with it (looking for a hobby or a solution)?
    * Are you looking to stream this data outside of your home and if so, do you have the bandwidth to support the stream?
    * How bad would it be to lose your data due to harddisk failure, or a fire?


    With all points to consider, based on what you said my guess is that you would be okay to spend a little extra and have the "full solution" in place.
    A "NAS" (network attached storage) device sounds like the thing you need here, you can build those yourself, but is rarely much cheaper then grabbing a NAS device from a manufacturer (we're talking maybe 10~50 dollars you'd save here, not counting the hours you'd have to invest to get the software running). A NAS generally is a suite of different solutions and connection methods allowing you to make your storage widely available throughout your home.
    Most come prepacked with nice proprietary software packages that offer you all the features right out of the box!
    My personal favorite brand on NAS devices is Synology, relatively new but make very nice devices which they frequently update, even on older models.
    I have a DS212j at home, with 2 x Western Digital Red 2TB disks in it running in a redundant RAID-1 setting.
    http://www.synology.com/products/product.php?product_name=DS212j&lang=enu

    Offering a wide selection of connection methods I managed to hook this device up to my PC, media center running XBMC, TV, Home cinema system, laptops and tablet.

    Its icing on the cake is its webbased management interface which looks like a windows environment on it's own, very easy with all kinds of navigation windows, external software packages you can click&install and separate interface when using mobile devices or tablets. I can for example now stream my library using the integrated audio-player at work without even having to install any software there. there is also a download tool integrated, All in all it is a lot more then i'd get with a software package as FreeNas for example.

    Some are suggesting a XBMC setup which is more of a media-center solution, not as much a storage solution.
    I prefer to keep those separate as playing entertainment media and storing data are 2 different purposes each with their own requirements.

    I hope this helped you with your choice!

    PS. when getting disks, you'd want to go for the more durable series, desktop drives aren't really made for NAS devices and might give issues, my 2 cents, stick with western digital REDs, which are specially made for NAS devices, both cheap and pretty durable.

  52. I just did this. by log0n · · Score: 1

    Plex - http://www.plexapp.com/ ($free$)

    I reused an old Acer w/ an amd 4050E and 4GB ram. Installed a simple Newegg/Rosewill SATA card and added 2 WD green drives. I then stream all of my audio/video/photos to everything (android phone/tablets, tv via roku, itunes music, xbox, etc). I use standard windows file sharing along with FreeFileSync (http://alternativeto.net/software/freefilesync/) to use the server as a backup for everything else in the house.

    1. Re:I just did this. by log0n · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention.. the UPS reports the system usually hovers between 60-65w and is configured to shut the system down at 11pm (12am weekends), start back up at 8am. Almost negligible effect on the monthly power bill (~$1.75 iirc). Well worth it.

  53. Re:Eureka! I found the source of Background Radiat by arth1 · · Score: 2

    The tl;dr version:

    If you can't admin it, you shouldn't run it. There's a real risk your negligence will cause problems for others.

    That said, my advice is: Go buy a NAS that isn't Windows based (most of them aren't). The risks are much lower, and it's easy enough to do basic admin on through a web interface.
    They're made for people who aren't interested in all the important details of setting up and maintaining a secure internet-facing file share.

  54. Plex Media Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your goal is to be able to access all this media from every device a Plex media server is your best option.
    Server is free, iOS is ~ $5, allows you to stream any media to your iPad/iPhone and access it from mac and windows computers.

  55. git-annex assistant by jefurii · · Score: 1

    "go easy on the 'just apt-get FubarPackageInstaller.gzip and rd -m Arglebargle' stuff"...

    So why is he asking Slashdot?

    Seriously, git-annex assistant might be the solution for part of his problem. assistant is a pretty front end to git-annex which uses git to sync repositories of file metadata and several other means (rsync, etc) to schlep the files between repositories. It won't run on his Windows box but does run on OS X and might be easy enough for his wife to use.

  56. Retard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timothy? The editor is Timmah? From South Park?

    What a fucking retarded question to ask slashdot. Seriously. This is a very low standard of question. Perhaps slashdot really has gone downhill after all these years.

  57. itunes by um...+Lucas · · Score: 3, Informative

    For myself, I've got a computer running iTunes with a big external drive attached for all the media. A couple of Apple TV's scattered around the house make streaming movies shows music and audiobooks a synch. The "Automatically add to itunes" directory is shared, so any other computer can add media to the library for everyone to watch. On top of that, I'd recommend Handbrake for ripping your old DVD's to your library.

    The reason i'm pointing out the apple solution is because of the Apple TV's. Admittedly, once I came upon this, I stopped looking for other solutions, so I don't know if there is anything else comparable for streaming media to multiple TV's from a single repository at home, with a simple remote (as opposed to a wireless keyboard or what not... been there, done that, not at all preferable).

    If you use any idevices, you can stream from your phone or ipad back up to your TV as well, using the Apple TV. Or from your wifes macbook, supposing she updated to the latest OS.

    Commence the Apple bashing now... No, I don't work for them. I'm just pleased with the experience.

    1. Re:itunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For myself, I've got a computer running iTunes with a big external drive attached for all the media. A couple of Apple TV's scattered around the house make streaming movies shows music and audiobooks a synch.

      Heh...

    2. Re:itunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in the apple ecosystem this is a great way to go. I have a couple Apple TV's and in the kitchen have an Airport Express hooked up to some speakers. I can push audio to any of them from my phone as well as access my entire library. Very cool setup, though again only if you're on Apple and don't mind staying that way/maybe getting a little more locked into iTunes.

  58. Simplest Solution is not to roll your own by tweir · · Score: 1

    Personally, given how cheap online storage is these days, I'd just outsource to dropbox or another vendor.

    If you want to do IT as a hobby, then by all means buy a NAS, etc, But then you need to worry about hardware failure, offsite backups, updating NAS firmware, etc.

    Unless you have an epic amount of data, I'd just pay dropbox the $10/mo necessary to get 100GB of storage. A decent NAS setup would end up costing around $200-$300.

    1. Re:Simplest Solution is not to roll your own by synthespian · · Score: 2

      100GB is too small for today's average computer user, IHMO.

      With Dropbox, at 500GB you're looking at $499.00/yr which is outrageous. Unlimited storage is $795.00/yr. Now, that's one heavy, yearly "cloud tax", if you ask me.
      Is it cheaper to run a home NAS with ZFS support, if you're doing it for 4 years? Yes.OTOH, the problem is, home solutions require security maintenance. You might wanna factor that in, but I still think they have outrageous prices.

      Rapidshare is much cheaper, but they create an md5 hash for each of your files. They say they don't check the user's files, but if they get a court injunction, all they have to do is hunt down all the files with the same md5 hash, if they're looking for pirated material, and then it's goodbye your account. And I pretty much doubt there is a human out there who hasn't at least one pirated file (even unknowingly possessing it). So that single file might jeopardize your whole back-up plan. At least they come clean on their policies. Others, I'm not sure what they'll do (e.g., Google Drive).

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  59. SuperSync by bhlowe · · Score: 1

    One master computer.. running SuperSync, Plex Server, iTunes, FileZilla, with as much storage as you need (4T USB drive at Costco for $179). Use a remote backup service. Then have remote clients throughout the house, at the office, etc. that can log in and upload/download/add playlists, sync ratings, etc. http://supersync.com/

    1. Re:SuperSync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $179 for 4TB. I just priced that here - down under and a bit to one side (NZ). WD 4TB external drive lies North of the $500 mark.

      captcha: blasted (yes, I agree)

  60. What I currently have running by rjr162 · · Score: 1

    I'm using an old Acer Aspire T100 or something another along those lines I put Lubuntu onto. I have Twonky and Plex Media Server running on it (started with Twonky, but I love the Plex interface on devices and never bothered to remove the Twonky).

    It streams to my Dish Hopper/Joey setup, as well as the Android and iOS devices and Rokus. The client application looks, works, and feels like the Netflix app. It's pretty damn sweet. (Granted I think it may cost a nominal amount for the mobile devices to purchase the app).

    I know on the mobile devices and Roku it allows you to set a streaming bandwidth should you need to say cut down the speed for over wireless links etc. I've only had to do this for the one access point I have way down at our "camp ground" because that AP is in a client bridge to another wireless router, that then plugs into another wireless router that does a WDS link to the main wireless router that has the internet connection (don't ask, long story and involves two house holds lol).

    As for the Dish Hopper/Joey, the setup there plays MKV's fine but for whatever reason doesn't play MP4's. I know older versions of Plex would transcode, and I think the newer version can be made to do so although I haven't got that figured out yet (nor bothered with it much as I just use handbrake to convert the videos).

    Also, both Twonky and Plex will stream music, and if you use Plex on a Windows box you can add in other "plug-ins" to do such options as Netflix and what not (I believe it only plays the movies you add to your instant queue though). Again, since mine is on a Linux box and doesn't support SilverLight, I can't utilize this feature... and no MoonLight doesn't work as it doesn't support the special features Netflix uses. Pretty much if you can play it natively, then the Plex plugins will work as well.

    All in all I have to give both a good thumbs up as free (or mostly free) options to do most of what you're looking to do.

  61. This works for me by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 2

    Here is what works for me, as well as a few things to keep in mind.

    If all your client devices support samba (i.e. they're all computers) then by all means just install Windows on an extra box and set up shared folders and dump your media in there.

    You mentioned tablets and smartphones. Those likely do not support samba, so I'd suggest a DLNA server such as Tversity. It works pretty well, but there are some rough edges. What about accessing data to present on TVs, etc?

    Another concern is the ongoing cost of powering a system sitting in the closet serving only as a file server. Assuming your old computer will suck 100W 24x7x365, do you really want to pay $100 a year to your electric utility to run it?

    If I were you, I would look at some of the appliance solutions such as a USB NAS device that lets you plug Cat5 into one end and multiple USB devices (such as USB HDDs) in the other end to create networked storage. Such devices only use a fraction of the power, plus they're silent and generate no heat. A device like that will pay for itself in power savings in under a year.

    Another option would be something like a Boxee Box. That will also let you share two USB hard drives to the network, plus it lets you play just about any file format and stream Netflix, etc to a connected TV. The Boxee Box was recently discontinued in favor of the Boxee TV, so you ought to be able to find one on clearance somewhere for $140-150. Just get a couple 2TB USB drives and connect them. If you need more than 4TB of storage, you're probably better off looking at one of the network hard drive appliances that let you put 4 or 8 drives in anyway.

    As far as backup, I wouldn't bother messing with RAID, just buy double the storage you need and make a nightly or weekly differential backup between the two storage sets.

    But the REAL question is...with Netflix, Hulu Plus, Amazon Prime, Vudu, Pandora, SoundCloud, Spotify, etc, do you really need to keep all that media anymore? Why not just pick one or two services to pay a small subscription fee to and let it all live in the cloud? That'll save you from spending money on a computer, storage, software and electricity, and will probably give you a wider variety of media.

    1. Re:This works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But the REAL question is...with Netflix, Hulu Plus, Amazon Prime, Vudu, Pandora, SoundCloud, Spotify, etc, do you really need to keep all that media anymore?

      Yes.

      If you want to ensure that your purchased entertainment will never go away, you can't rely on any subscription service. And even geeks can live in areas with limited or expensive broadband, so Cloudy McClouderson isn't always the best man for the job.

    2. Re:This works for me by Simulant · · Score: 1

      "Assuming your old computer will suck 100W 24x7x365"

      100W is a bit high I think. My last home built dual-core AMD server, with 8 hard drives, idled at < 50 watts.
      My current 8 core beast running two (sometimes more) VMs idles at between 70-80. Headless of course.

  62. Cloud: overused buzzword that means nothing by kimvette · · Score: 2

    "Cloud" is a marketing buzzword, nothing more. People are using the term to describe all kinds of fileservers and appservers now. "Cloud" started out describing the sort of apps that already existed: fileservers like dropbox and what is now iCloud, VPSes with secured CIFS/SMB shares, and appservers like Google Apps and SugarCRM subscriptions . It has since been expanded to include local fileservers, proving how the term really means nothing.

    What you want ideally is a fileserver, possibly one running Plex or XBMC to serve up media streams and catalog your media, preferably one built on RAID5 or RAID6 on a hardware-based controller, with a separate array to serve as a backup.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  63. Easy media solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download your favorite media to computer folder or encode with handbrake in H.264 format to a media folder. Buy a cheap Roku for each TV then download free Plex PC/Mac/Linux media server easy and done. Next question.

  64. Backing up data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both get a free 2TB dropbox account.
    'Share' with either.
    Move or copy files into the Dropbox directory (folder)
    Viola! they are in Dropbox and on your wife's computer.

  65. Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Plex media server on your storage server
    Plex client for windows and a new one for metro
    Plex client for OS X
    Plex client for iOS, android and windows mobile
    For everything else, use a browser to get to plex web service on the media server.

    Plex will index and fetch metadata for the files, play anything anywhere.

  66. Network is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    I believe the right answer is the combination of various cloud and streaming services + NAS box(es) for local content. I love NASes. You can buy a two-bay DNS-323 for about a hundred bucks. With the current price of the hard drives you can get a 3TB drive for about $150. Thus, for about $250 you can get 3TB of network storage accessible via SMB/AFP/NFS/UPnP/whatever. And then later you can add the second drive. Or get two drives and have a RAID if you are concerned about the data safety.

  67. Synology box by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Get a Synology box like the DS-113 or DS-213 or some similar home NAS. It will do automated backups (to web storage or other NAS or external USB drives), and supports RAID if you get a multi-disk version. They also will provide your own "private cloud" services as well as web server, media server, and various other features which you may or may not find useful.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Synology box by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      The Synology boxes tend to be more expensive than most folks are willing to spend. I've had good results with a Buffalo LinkStation Duo, which was a lot cheaper than the Synology. Buy the one with no hard drives in it, and put your own drives in it for even cheaper (if you happen to have the drive lying around).

      Other than that, though, I totally agree with you. Get a consumer NAS device rather than trying to roll your own. It'll use less electricity, and for somebody who admits openly that he's not comfortable with the techie side of things, it'll be a lot less headache.

  68. He asked for Windows... Try WHS by Bomarc · · Score: 2

    Windows Home Server is a viable option. You can choose the power of the server... from a Dell PE 1900 class to a Atom processor.... or more or less. In addition to homing all of your media (MP3, Vid etc) it can allow remote access to your system(s), perform nightly backups of (windows) based systems. It is expandable (add another multi-TB drive whenever you want to). It can be headless (depending on the home layout, find a nice 'cool' place in the basement). There are also many 3rd party add-on's to enhance your network.

    1. Re:He asked for Windows... Try WHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. WHS2011 is actually probably one of the most cost effective and manageable ways of doing this if you've got a 'windows box' to use. A vibrant add-on scene too if you want to add particular features.

  69. Windows home server 2011 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I realize Slashdot is a big time open source community, and I'm risking the internet equivalent of a wedgie by suggesting this, but I accomplish this task using windows home server 2011. All my shares are accessible to everyone on my network and all media is displayable on anything with a screen. I could do the same thing with linux (and I have used Linux based servers in the past), but I find those implementations to be difficult to manage, challenging to upgrade and almost impossible to recover. My home server hosts an Infinitv card and provedes live TV to my two other media center PC's. It automatically archives all my TV recordings, and it hosts all my music, movies and family pictures & videos. I also store all our important documents, run weekly backups of my PC's and media centers, host a network printer and run nightly backups onto an external drive. I've gone through two motherboards on my server. Both times, I swapped out the board, powered back up and resumed all operations with no loss of data.

    A license for windows home server 2011 ran me ~ $50.00. Not bad for everything does for me. Highly recommended.

  70. use a router with an USB port and multiple USB dri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Checkout dd-wrt and buy a good supported router with an USB 3.0 port and replacel
    Cthe stock firmware with dd-wrt.
    Connect multiple large USB drives to it using a USB port multiplier.
    This setup seems messy, and it is, but it is cost effective because:
    1) it is cheap when it comes to power because most of the newer routers although being fast and having fast processors are still energy effective
    2) as dd-wrt is Linux based you get support for multiple file systems and can set up the several independent file systems in the several independent external USB drives in an hierarchical way as if they were just one
    3) several independent USB hard drives means that you can disperse the information in such a way that you can physically turn off most of them and leave on only those who make a difference.
    4) you can actually use a lot of open source applications on those routers including set up VPN access, etc
    5) you can still set up raid 1 or whatever level you like between some of those disks.

    Take it from someone that set up a cool gig using esxi4, running a Solaris Vm (nexenta) and having the Solaris vm serve 4 1gb drives as SMBs shares and iscsi targets and then keeps it off most of the time because of cost: electrical consumption must be your primary concern, especially if power is very expensive, like in my country.

  71. Idiot -- too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were worried about "lugging stuff around" you should have done it when you were moving from apartment to apartment.

    This is a bunch of pointless effort for moving into a more permanent location.

  72. Microserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want to buy a prebuilt NAS like the QNAP or Synology boxes, I hear good things about HP's microserver w/ Windows home server.

  73. keep it simple by MarkH · · Score: 1

    a 2tbytes attached to router costs about $200. I then mount desktop and my documents on pc we have to it.

    the Mac can also mount drive but sadly not as fluidly as above.

    for pads and phones use ' es file explorer' folk can decide which video ,music files they want offline.

    I have separate 2tbyte attached to nas via usb so backup using rsync every month ( then pop into loft ).

    in home use cabling around house so heavy duty editing of video and raw photos don' t suffer lag.

    key principal is everything on nas is ' safe' ( but see loft thing) everything local is copy.

    figured out how to share music playlists between devices with a partial view of all content available. cannot recommend vlc for desktop and poweramp for android enough.

  74. The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by synthespian · · Score: 0, Troll

    C'mon! Anyone who's promoting some shitty Linux-based tech with no ZFS is actually NOT HELPING the OP!

    This is Linux-based old tech because there's no support for ZFS (Zettabyte File System), which is today's standard for this type of thing. How lame. the OP doesn't know it, but he wants a ZFS filesystem because, in the long haul, it can counterweight - amongst other things - silent data corruption (it's going on, but your hardware diagnostics says everything's OK).

    Besides, the OP said he and his wife had Macs, and since Snow Leopard (10.6), Macs support ZFS. The old Mac just needs a memory upgrade to support Snow Leopard, probably.

    Get a NAS box with FreeBSD inside (check out: www.freenas.org)

    Since the OP is not one of the typical /. nerds, here's a nice You Tube video, by the nice msknight5, that explains why you need ZFS: ZFS - Home server - Why? (NB: she goes on a little rant about DVD, DRM, etc., but just bear with it).

    Don't settle for less. Too bad for users of the lame Linux that their beloved GPL does not allow it on their kernel.

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    1. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Informative
      except you can't simply expand a ZFS system by adding more disks or swapping in larger HDDs into an existing array.

      For a home user who is probably going to grow the system (rather than just add new systems or depreciate and replace like a company might) this seems like a pretty key feature.

      Unraid is also pretty great about managing data and shares--makes it super easy for someone who doesn't want ot worry about it. A single parity disk and no striping means you can eat a single disk loss, and since the drives don't have to match, you can build it with a bunch of different brand drives from different systems which makes a multiple disk loss in a short time span less likely. Also, it fully supports spinning down the individual disks in an array that are not in use. Streaming a movie will only require a single disk to be spinning in a 5 drive array.

      And really...if you are not a typical /. nerd...you are not going to watch that video.

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by adrianhensler · · Score: 1

      except you can't simply expand a ZFS system by adding more disks or swapping in larger HDDs into an existing array.

      You can increase the size of a zpool. Just replace the drives one at a time, wait for the rebuild to complete between each swap, then export / import your pool and it will now reflect the larger size. I understand there may be an autoexpand property on newer versions, but I have not used that personally.

    3. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you can't add a new disk to the array though which would be the easiest for a home user. Initial setup would be a big case with a bunch of empty bays and 2-3 HDDs. As your storage needs grow with unraid, you can just stick a new drive in the case instead of having to replace all of the drives with a size larger.

      --
      Bottles.
    4. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      except you can't simply expand a ZFS system by adding more disks or swapping in larger HDDs into an existing array.

      For a home user who is probably going to grow the system (rather than just add new systems or depreciate and replace like a company might) this seems like a pretty key feature.

      Unraid is also pretty great about managing data and shares--makes it super easy for someone who doesn't want ot worry about it. A single parity disk and no striping means you can eat a single disk loss, and since the drives don't have to match, you can build it with a bunch of different brand drives from different systems which makes a multiple disk loss in a short time span less likely. Also, it fully supports spinning down the individual disks in an array that are not in use. Streaming a movie will only require a single disk to be spinning in a 5 drive array.

      And really...if you are not a typical /. nerd...you are not going to watch that video.

      I am running 10 hard drives 8x 1tb drives for data, 1tb for parity and 1tb cache drive on unraid for a few years now and not had any problems. Once you are up and running it just keeps on working just stick with 4.7 stable unless you need a feature in the 5.0 beta mine is currently running the latest beta on Esxi with 2x IBM m1015 sas controllers passed through to it.

      The main reasons I went with unraid over anything else was-
      1. Data protection via a parity drive rather than replication in WHS
      2. Almost universal hardware compatibility from p3 to i7 ( I have ran it on 5 motherboards and dozens of Sara controllers it just works with them all sil, jmb, via, lsi)
      3. Upgrade and add drives at will without worrying about backing up the array. Just power down add the drive then rebuild the parity and you can still use the array while its building.
      4. Even if the worst happens and I lose 2 drives I only lose what's on the 2 drives everything else on the rest of them will be fine as it keep whole files on a single disk.

    5. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

      I too have been running this for years and years now for pretty much all of the reasons mentioned. Recently I've begun having some REAL fun and have virtualized unRAID on an ESX host and am now able to run a bunch of other VMs too. I'm fiddling around with NAS4Free as a second NAS package to store the VMs and to create a cache drive for unRAID. Let me tell you, the software setup for unRAID is child's play compared to some of the fun I'm having trying to setup this other package. It's certainly doable and it can do ZFS, ISCSI, and other things but no way in hell would I recommend it for someone who just wanted to load up some software and quickly go. unRAID really does make things very easy and while I'm having a blast with my more complex setup it's overkill for most folks even geeks like myself.

      I wouldn't just do a share on a Windows or Linux machine for sure, I wouldn't do a complex ZFS thing with even more complex expansion, but unRAID? Oh heck yes - I have even given away a couple of these boxes as Christmas gifts they're so easy to maintain!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    6. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except ... you can expand a ZFS system by adding more disks via a striped RAIDZ configuration.

    7. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except you can't simply expand a ZFS system by adding more disks or swapping in larger HDDs into an existing array.

      Wrong. Totally, unequivically, wrong.

    8. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except you can't simply expand a ZFS system by adding more disks or swapping in larger HDDs into an existing array.

      Um. Yes, yes you can. You've been able to do this since ZFS was introduced more than a decade ago. There's even a zpool parameter called "autoexpand"...
      You may be confused by the fact that in a raidz, you have to replace _all_ the component drives before you can use the new space.

    9. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except with unraid you lose and read benefit from spanning multiple drives. A key feature for most hardware geeks out there.

    10. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "except you can't simply expand a ZFS system by adding more disks or swapping in larger HDDs into an existing array."

      Yes, you can.

      If I take a ZFS server with 3 x 1TB RAID-Z (total 2TB), and replace each 1TB disk with a 2TB disk, resilvering after each replacement, I end up with a 3 x 2TB (total 4TB) volume containing all the original data plus an extra two terabytes of free space.

      If I now stick three more disks in that server (making it 6 x 2TB) and add them to the pool- a 40 second job- I now have a single 8 TB volume. This process scales indefinitely; if you were to turn all the metal on Earth into HDDs, you could not come close to maxing out ZFS.

      (Posting AC because I'm on a quick break at work)

    11. Re:The OP needs a NAS with ZFS! by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      ZFS pools can expand by swapping in larger disks or adding disks. http://forums.nas4free.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=1528

      I do agree with your description of it not being simple though. You have to learn a bit about ZFS vs simply buying something like a ReadyNAS which is hot swappable out of the box.

  75. Re:Eureka! I found the source of Background Radiat by synthespian · · Score: 1, Troll

    Also, a NAS that isn't Linux-based, because that sucks too, since it doesn't have support for ZFS. Which is crazy and lame, just lame.

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  76. Re:Cheaper too. Eventually. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    100 Watts in standby?!
    What the heck do you use for desktops? Hairdryers?
    Virtually *any* computer, regardless of age, shouldn't be using mpre than 10 Watts in standby. If it's using more than that, either its standby mode is broken by design, or it's just a broken computer.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  77. "Cloud" means "we'll tax your computer illiteracy" by synthespian · · Score: 1

    "Cloud" is a marketing term that means: "We'll keep all your data, and we'll tax you too. We'll make you depend on us, just like you depend on your healthcare provider. This is because you've chosen to remain computer-illiterate, and now you must pay us."

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  78. Giving away CDs and DVDs ?? ..... by ex01 · · Score: 1

    ... the RIAA are coming for you ...

  79. Re:Cheaper too. Eventually. by Immerman · · Score: 1

    There's a big difference between "shouldn't" and "doesn't". I'll admit it's been many years since I actually put a power meter on one though, the situation may have finally improved, especially on a system with no external peripherals.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  80. drobo by mckwant · · Score: 2

    I have an FS, which I think is similar to the 5N.

    http://www.drobo.com/products/professionals/drobo-5n/index.php

    That initial cost is quite the leap of faith, but dually redundant mismatched drives that I can upgrade seamlessly at my leisure (and if drives ever get cheap again)? Done.

    And yes, you could build your own network of rsync shares more cheaply, and performance is frankly unspectacular (may be my crusty 100M network.) But it's a ten minute setup for a virtually inexhaustible file share that you don't ever have to worry about. Sounds about right for our tech-wary OP.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  81. Aren't they the same price? by alostpacket · · Score: 1

    That's the same price as the Synology 2-disk NAS. Well, the Buffalo is about $190 and Synology $200. I'm not sure that $10 is enough of a difference to be out of reach for some but not others.

    --
    PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    1. Re:Aren't they the same price? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think he's right on the relative pricing. A diskless Buffalo Linkstation Duo is about $130 while a diskless Synology DS-213j is about $210. However, that's comparing apples and pomegranates, as the Synology has a much better reputation and more features than the Buffalo (which has inflexible options for power management, and does not even support UPS input).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:Aren't they the same price? by alostpacket · · Score: 1

      Ah yer right, one had drives and the other did not when I checked prices, mea culpa.

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
  82. Plex, file server, and Roku by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

    I've tried many different schemes in the past, but this is by far the best and easiest that I've come up with: Roku + Plex + Plex media server. Then Samba shares for everything else.

  83. USB 3.0 hard disk with Samba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find an old used computer for a couple of bucks. Attach a brand new USB 3.0 hard disk through the USB port. Install Samba, and bingo, you have a ready made file server.

  84. for my parents:simple media player +2TB USB drives by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    my solution: for my parents:simple media player +2TB USB drives
    :>)
    Warning: do NOT buy the Roku. You can't even start it up without an internet connection and giving out a credit card number, even if all you want to do is look at your own media files over the usb connection.
    .
    Okay. So my parents are not as techy as me. (anyone/everyone on here can probably say that). So I'm the one who ends up converting media formats for backup and later viewing and they have a tough time with playing things back...
    :>(
    I had been burning things on DVD for them transcoded down to lower yet acceptable resolutions, but they were having trouble with the dvd libraries. So this year, I got them a philips media viewer thingy with usb input and hdmi output and a simple (meaning few options and buttons) remote control.
    :>)
    I then created two large USB drives for them, each of them is 2 TB in size. One is the "personal family drive" upon which I've been backing up the video-camera files and the camera files (both video and pictures) appropriately sorted into foldersm along with one copy of the music collections transcoded into mp3.
    The second drive is the one upon which I put the CD music and the DVD files as our own personal backup of our media, after which the original disks are safely put away (i.e. hidden from the parent-volken, so that they don't decide to discard/give away/sell/throw/gift the original disks, just in case the magnetic media backups don't work or last long enough).
    Now, they can plug/unplug the drives into the HDMI/USB box which they can handle doing and use the remote with the large screen TV, instead of crowding people around the 21" imac to watch videos and photos.
    .
    The phillips thing cost $45 at Target, and I got two more to gift to my brother and to my sister (also not as tech-y as moi). It can also do netflix and vudu, but does NOT require an internet connection if you don't want to do netflix and vudu. The only files it has burped on are some AVIs that appear to hold quicktime (wtf? from some obscure 5 yr old canon or olympus 5 megapixel camera). I can always use the USB drive that's not plugged into the device to back up and save media files. And in quick circumstances, I can also burn files onto USB sticks that can be played from directly and then save those USB backups onto the 2TB magnetic media for permanent backup.
    .
    The parents really like the unit. It's easier to navigate than the linux box. I have to admit that I have not yet tried a knoppmyth or mythTV setup yet. But I find this to be a good to go solution.

  85. Re:for my parents:simple media player +2TB USB dri by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    Also, if anyone knows about reflashing the software on the philips thing to black out the netflix/vudu option and make it easier for my parents, please let me know!!!!! Thanks!!!!

  86. I set up a WD MyBook Live for my parents by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    2TB holds a lot of ripped DVDs and CDs, and it just works.

  87. NAS by cbope · · Score: 1

    I use a 4-drive QNAP NAS at home. I have 2.68TB of RAID-5 storage (3x1.5TB drives), with a hot spare in case a drive fails. The NAS shares out NFS and Samba, which are accessed by all computers/devices in my home over a wired gigabit and N-wireless network, so speed is not an issue.

    I backup my main workstation to the NAS, so I have a full backup of my most important files. Although I am now considering cloud storage as an offsite copy for extra redundancy.

    After years of using home-built NAS boxes running NASlite or freeNAS, I decided to go for a commercial box. It was not the cheapest option, but I sleep a lot better knowing that my data is relatively safe from hardware failure. I currently have ~1.5TB data on the NAS. QNAP supports a lot of different services like web, ftp and SQL servers, as well as media servers. There is also a package system that lets you download and install specific services, but I am not using this. There are dual gigabit interfaces so you can even have redundant links to the device or team them up for more bandwidth, although even a single gigabit interface is not a bottleneck... it's hard drive transfer rates.

    QNAP has also been really good at releasing new firmwares on a regular basis, with each one typically adding new features. Although, I have not had a single issue over the past ~2 years. It's been one of the best hardware purchases I ever made.

  88. unraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easy to setup for the average /. reader, extendable, active peer community, easy to upgrade or recover.. free (as in beer) for testing or small implementations (up to three hdd), not terribly expensive to buy for larger ones.

  89. Re:Cheaper too. Eventually. by Melkman · · Score: 1

    I use a HP Microserver N40L as a NAS. It's way cheaper to purchase than decent 4 drive dedicated NAS appliance. It's more powerfull and does not use much energy. I bought mine for about €200,- without disks . It uses about 14 Watt without disks booting from USB. With the high electricity prices here (€0.23 per kWh) I expect to spend in 4 years 4x365x24x0.014x0.23= €112,- on energy on the system. So in total that is €312,-. That total is still less than the purchase price alone of a decent 4 bay NAS which will still not give me the same performance. Installing OpenMediaVault or FreeNAS is about as much work as configuring a dedicated NAS (Next, next, finnish).

    I installed 4 WD20EARX disks for €84,- per piece. This increases the power usage to about 40 Watts active. So the disks are the biggest component in price and energy usage and that will be the same with a NAS. Performance is great I can saturate a 1Gbps ethernet link nicely if the device requesting the data is fast enough.

  90. AWS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How often do you access the data?

    I wonder what cheap client solutions there are today based on Amazon's S3 service - for the storage it'd be pennies a month and you would have real cloud based storage where the maintenance hardware issues are taken care of? It'd take you many years to spend the cost of your own hardware with an Amazon hosted solution.

  91. Do NOT get rid of your media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Horrible idea, exactly what corporate America wants you to do.

  92. PLEX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at PLEX -- http://www.plexapp.com/

    I ran the PMS on a NAS box, but it was a bit choppy. Installed onto a windows 7 quad with 8 gig ram and it runs perfect. I access video, pictures, and a number of free stations such as CBS, HGTV, etc...There are a large number of clients available as well. Looks like it has good support and releases.

  93. I had the same scenario 5 years ago by mkw87 · · Score: 1

    I had this same dilemma five years ago. I've done the linux and windows server route, and the best I have found in terms of making it wife-friendly is to stick with windows. This holds true for a couple other things as well. If you're familiar with linux and know the software you need to rip DVD's, Music, etc then you'd be find going that route. But if you want to get this up and running with minimal effort you're going to find a lot more help on Google for windows software when it comes to ripping your media. As for what interface to use, this is up to you. I have done everything from having the PC hooked straight to the TV, to then using my XBOX to access it, to now using a Smart TV (one with PLEX, one with the built in DLNA app) to view my media. Hard drives are cheap, go buy a 1, or 2, or whatever TB hard drive fits your needs and stick it in an old computer and start throwing your media on it. If you want to hook the computer straight to the TV, XBMC is a great interface (the Android beta is now out but I haven't tried it yet). If you have an XBOX or PS3 or DLNA capable TV, just put the files into appropriate folders and share them and you'll be able to browse them from the device.

    --
    Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  94. LinuxMCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out http://www.linuxmce.com/, no command line needed (AFAIK)

  95. Openfiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just recently set up an openfiler NAS for this exact reason, and I love it granted my collection is larger than most and I did the typical nerd thing and did extreame over kill and just put all my pc's in a rack and went for an "old" rack NAS I found on Craig's list. But I would recommend using Open Filer. the write speeds are about 2 or 3 times better than Free NAS.

    My NAS is currently Supporting 14 Tb. Just give it a few weeks to sync all the drives if going that big.

  96. Drobo Fan Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question is Nas vs Computer. The one thing that always leans me towards a computer is you need to back it up to the cloud which means you need to find a nas capable of running crashplan or build your own system. The drop dead easiest setup is a drobo and a mac mini. Its a thousand bucks but will serve all your needs with very little setup.

  97. Re:Cheaper too. Eventually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 Watts in standby?!
    Virtually *any* computer, regardless of age, shouldn't be using mpre than 10 Watts in standby.

    In regards to a file server, it never goes into full standby mode entirely. The grandparent is only refering to the drives themselves going into standby mode.

    Unless you're running specialised hardware (Intel Atom or ARM with a low power graphics card) a basic white box build can easily use 100W of power when idle. It just depends on what you're running.

  98. If you buy MP3's, you haven't bought music.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With MP3's, you only got a sad , pathetic ghost of the music you wanted. Unless, of course, you're happy with an old 45rpm single record player with a 3 inch speaker and a stack of cheap, shitty vinyl. To those of us who are actual musicians, and/or truly appreciate the good sound of 'real' music, MP3 is simply shit. Stick with FLAC, or just buy discs. "MP3" and "music" should never appear in the same sentence, it's just plain wrong.

  99. Downmods to hide your "FAIL", cbiltcliffe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3348385&cid=42428889

    LMAO!

    APK

    P.S.=> Is "that the BEST you got", boy? Apparently so... lol, thanks for making ME, look good!

    ... apk

    1. Re:Downmods to hide your "FAIL", cbiltcliffe? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      You can't mod and post in the same thread, moron.

      It's other people that also think you're an irrational fuckhead that are modding you down, not me.

      "My name's APK!!. I'm a compUTER GOD!!!
      I lost AN ARGUMENT really Badly over a YEAR AND A HALF AGO,
      and now I FEEL the need to troll and POST OFFTOPIC shit to current threads referencing
      WHAT HAPPENED in a thread from 2010, --> changing BITS TO
      suit my WARPED WORLDVIEW, and pReTeNd I didn't ---> LOSE .
      ---> but YOU SHOULD ALL MOD ME UP because I'm a compUTER GOD!!!"

      Of course you're going to get modded down by everybody with more brainpower than you.
      (But I repeat myself...)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......