Slashdot Mirror


Futuristic Highway Will Glow In the Dark For Icy Conditions

Hugh Pickens writes writes "Will Oremus reports that a glow-in-the-dark highway will be installed in the Netherlands that will replace standard road markings with photoluminescent powder that charges in the daylight and glows through the night for up to 10 hours. But the new highway's most interesting feature is when the temperature drops below freezing, the road will automatically light up with snowflake indicators to warn drivers of icy conditions (video). 'One day I was sitting in my car in the Netherlands, and I was amazed by these roads we spend millions on but no one seems to care what they look like and how they behave,' says designer Daan Roosegaarde. 'I started imagining this Route 66 of the future where technology jumps out of the computer screen and becomes part of us.' The first few hundred meters of glow-in-the-dark, weather-indicating road will be installed in the province of Branbant in mid-2013, followed by priority induction lanes for electric vehicles, interactive lights that switch on as cars pass and wind-powered lights within the next five years. 'Research on smart transportation systems and smart roads has existed for over 30 years — call any transportation and infrastructure specialist and you'll find out yourself,' adds Emina Sendijarevick. 'What's lacking is the implementation of those innovations and making those innovations intuitive and valuable to the end-consumers — drivers.'"

174 comments

  1. Freezy Freakies by EmagGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had gloves that did that back in the 1970's.

    Glad to finally see a more practical use for this 50 year old technology.

    1. Re:Freezy Freakies by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 0

      This is very similar to the comments the last time this exact story was on slashdot. Also, it is a waste of money.

    2. Re:Freezy Freakies by Jetra · · Score: 2

      I think it's a great idea. You can't tell where black ice patches are, so maybe it'll help out by indicating High Risk areas.

    3. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Meh, I wouldn't say a waste. There are some roads I've been on that I actually wish the white-lines would glow in the dark. Roads without street lights with (sometimes) more dangerous conditions (curves and such). Of course, some of these roads make me wish for that, because the lines are starting to wear away so it's hard to see... and a plain re-paint might just solve that.

      As for showing when freezing conditions are in effect, I guess if they're going to go re-paint with glow-in-the-dark, this isn't a complete waste. And particularly only certain bad stretches of road.

      Not all people have an "exterior temperature" reading on their car nor do they care to check. If some roads (like bridges) are more susceptible to freezing, or are insanely dangerous when freezing such as a specific stretch that has 10x the accidents of the average iced road, then it could help a little.

      Meanwhile, it would help make the association for drivers that "something is not normal" and adjust their driving habits. Here in NJ, we have people that don't realize how bad road conditions are so they drive just as wild as when the roads are pristine. Which, I guess wouldn't be insane if you have the skills to back it up or are used to it because you live in an area where this is common-place. But they don't, so you see cars and SUVs doing the "idiot dance" across the road because they don't know any better. If you can make that visual association in their heads (ice + roads == bad) maybe it could reduce it.

      Personally, I drive fine but I also drive careful when conditions warrant it.

    4. Re:Freezy Freakies by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Not all people have an "exterior temperature" reading on their car nor do they care to check. If some roads (like bridges) are more susceptible to freezing, or are insanely dangerous when freezing such as a specific stretch that has 10x the accidents of the average iced road, then it could help a little.

      If it's only an exterior temperature indicator, it's almost useless. They light up as soon as the temperature is below 4 degrees, so I have a permanent ice warning from October to March. A calendar would serve the same purpose.

      --
      bickerdyke
    5. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My previous car, it would "ding" and take up the whole radio/gps screen whenever the temperature dipped below 35F. And it would stay there for like 30 seconds during which time I couldn't see or use the touch screen (see the map, change the station to one of my favorites, etc). Normally, this wasn't so bad.. just slightly annoying.

      EXCEPT when the temperature would be right AROUND 35F. Because between wind, my engine heat, etc. the temperature might fluxuate between 35F and 36F constantly. So thing would "ding" and take up my screen every could of minutes. And I couldn't turn the feature off.

      Sure, you might be thinking "how often is the temperature right around 35F" I thought the same thing the first time it repeated... but apparently it's more common in NJ than you'd think.

      My current car just has the exterior temperate. It does NOT warn me about the presence of ice nor does it "ding"

    6. Re:Freezy Freakies by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      The white lines do glow in the dark when your headlights hit them, that's why they're reflective.

      Unfortunately, this reflectivity is the first thing to wear off, long before the line itself becomes hard to see in daylight.

      So they issue here isn't that we need a brand-new glowing material, it's that we need bigger budgets for road maintenance.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    7. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is very similar to the comments the last time this exact story was on slashdot. Also, it is a waste of money.

      Actually the ROI is pretty short on those things.
      Road maintenance is typically the kind of thing you want to use tax money on and the benefits goes to increased productivity.
      Good road temperature indication will make it possible for drivers to drive faster in cases where the road isn't cold instead of having to assume that it is cold everywhere, if you save one minute travel time for thousands of persons thats is a pretty large boost in productivity. If you prevent just a single person from driving off the road you again save a lot of time and money.

    8. Re:Freezy Freakies by jetole · · Score: 2

      I've seen this in New York (years ago the last time I visited) and it's almost everywhere where I live now in South Florida from the Florida Keys to at least West Palm Beach and likely beyond. We have these little plastic reflective mounts spaced regularly on the road / lanes to show the lines and at the same time it creates a light thumping as you drive over them to provide tactile feedback that your changing lanes. They are about 2 inches by two inches, reflect white on one side and red on the other so you can see red on them for the oncoming traffic lanes and white on the lanes you drive in (just based on which direction they mount them on the road). They work great. They have been around forever. The glow in the dark paint seems like it would be re-inventing the wheel here. I just got back from visiting Toronto where I grew up and I wish they had them there as these really help with night driving, lane identification, etc even where there are no street lights.

    9. Re:Freezy Freakies by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a reason they are not found in Northern areas. Snowplows would tear them right off. Also they would be totally useless when snow covers them.

    10. Re:Freezy Freakies by jetole · · Score: 1

      Good point at the snow plows but wouldn't glow in the dark paint be equally useless when snow covers them?

    11. Re:Freezy Freakies by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      My dad's car did this each time he started it during winter season.

      My guess is that that behaviour only exists to add "ice warning" to the car's feature list without adding additional hardware (if temperature sensor is already factored in)

      And one of the most annoying side effects is when you just shoveled your car out of the snow (or just spent 2 minutes scratching ice from the windshield - that's enough) and THEN hear that "Ding - it MIGHT be freezing".... "I KNOW THAT FOR SURE YOU %&!#ING %#*!"

      --
      bickerdyke
    12. Re:Freezy Freakies by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 2

      We have a similar thing in Norway, and it's not a problem with the snowplows. We just make them a lot taller, about 5 feet I think. They actually serve a dual purpose, as they also show the snowplows where the road is. They are the best solution to this problem, bar none. (Yes, it has actually happened after a major snowfall that snowplows have misjudged where the road is going and gone of straight into the middle of a field.)

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    13. Re:Freezy Freakies by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      My car has a temperature reading in the console display, next to the current radio station and time of day. When the temperature is between +3 C and -3 C, the temperature reading blinks slowly. It is noticable enough that you see it, but not disturbing. Safety features such as this is one of the things that should be standardized across all cars (like child seat mounting points are) IMHO.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    14. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the point of the glow-in-the-dark "snowflake" is for when conditions are icy... without the snow on the ground. Obviously, if snow is on the ground... that's enough warning for "there may be ice"

      It happens a fair amount in certain areas: either with freezing rain, 40F rain during the day following by an evening of 28F temperatures. I imagine the mild-afternoon w/ rain followed by the freezing evening is the bigger issue as a person might think that it's still too warm for ice based on the mild temperatures during their lunch break.

      Here in NJ it happens quite a bit, which is of course "fun" when people don't realize it and skid through traffic lights into the middle of an intersection of drive into someone's lawn because they went too fast on a curve.

    15. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2

      Some places here in NJ do the same thing, though normally private property like parking lots but I've seen them on the occasional public road. Though perhaps those were just home owners doing it themselves because they were sick of plows messing up their curbs.

      Flexible orange poles get stuck near the curb so the plows no where their edges are and don't destroy a curb / sidewalk / etc.

      Though since we don't get the "epic" snow in my area that other states or countries get, the poles are usually only 3 feet / 1 meter tall.

      If they were "everywhere" then at least that would show where the edges of the road are. Unfortunately, it wouldn't help with the middle line or with multi-lane roads.

    16. Re:Freezy Freakies by der_joachim · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please note that in the Netherlands, it rarely snows more than a few centimeters. Most of that snow is tackled by road salt. Furthermore, what does happen, is rain or sleet freezing up the roads, resulting in black ice which is almost invisible in the dark. Normally, I shun warning labels instead of prudent driving, but this idea is IMHO pretty nifty.

      --
      Geek runner, motorcyclist and professional know-it-all
    17. Re:Freezy Freakies by dnahelicase · · Score: 1

      Also, it is a waste of money.

      Of all the things that money is completely wasted on, this doesn't seem like one of them.

      Sure, it might not be necessary, but it could be useful. If roads are being rebuilt anyway, the cost can't be that much greater given the size and scope of building roads. It seems like this would be useful when going around curves and helping to see where the road is when it is not directly in front of you, as would already be illuminated by your headlights.

      I've always wished that they would spend a little money on developing some of these technologies. With little incremental cost we could do some cool things when rebuilding roads, like experimenting with power distribution, conduits for fiber runs, etc. It never makes sense to redo roads to put these in, and it's too expensive to build test roads, but if the cost isn't that great we could do a lot of experimenting when we're making new ones.

    18. Re:Freezy Freakies by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How does that work with multiple lanes? Or are they just on the sides of the roads?

    19. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't get streetlights here on most of the roads here in Georgia, even in the city of Atlanta. So I approve of anything to help drivers see and not die on the roads.

    20. Re:Freezy Freakies by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      We have a similar thing in Norway, and it's not a problem with the snowplows. We just make them a lot taller, about 5 feet I think. They actually serve a dual purpose, as they also show the snowplows where the road is. They are the best solution to this problem, bar none. (Yes, it has actually happened after a major snowfall that snowplows have misjudged where the road is going and gone of straight into the middle of a field.)

      Your confusing side-of-road reflectors (i.e. reflectors on each side of the road to mark where the pavement ends) with embedded reflectors in the pavement where the center lines are located. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raised_pavement_marker

      My thought is that the glow-in-the-dark paint will be more expensive than the standard line marking paint. It's hard enough for most communities here in the Northeast US to find the budget for the normal paint, which wears off each winter due to winter salting and sanding. I don't hold out any hope for this coming to a road near me any time soon.

    21. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Well, reflect instead of glow. But yeh, which is why I put in that bit about the ones that I think need it are the ones that are already starting to wear away and would probably be fixed with just a new coat of the regular paint.

      I agree with the maintenance bit. But the roads (by me) lack in maintenance in general. If they can't get their act together to plug in the axel-destroying pot holes for a long time... I can't see them running to repaint the lines that have started to wear away.

    22. Re:Freezy Freakies by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      They're just on the sides of the roads. But almost all multiple-lane (and by that I mean >1 lane going in each direction) roads here have good streetlights and central+side barriers.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    23. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me what kind of car that is, so that I never ever buy one by accident. If they get the simple stuff wrong in hilarious ways, there's a very good chance they get the hard stuff wrong in deadly ways. The car sounds like a death trap.

    24. Re:Freezy Freakies by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      The white lines do glow in the dark when your headlights hit them, that's why they're reflective.

      So does the water covering them when it's raining. The latest I've seen is to have a black square painted around the white stripe, and that seems to help a lot with visibility in rain. The reflective bumps jetole mentioned are most helpful, but what happens is that the stripes aren't painted where they used the bumps, and the bumps come loose after a few months of people hitting them to hear the noise.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    25. Re:Freezy Freakies by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase. All of the comments last time were that this is old tech, or a waste of money. You can read them for yourself, it was almost 30 days ago.
      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/10/30/2055259/glow-in-the-dark-smart-highways-coming-to-the-netherlands-in-2013

    26. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hypercolor shirts. I wish I still had mine.

    27. Re:Freezy Freakies by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Here the reflective markers are sunken so plows don't hurt them. They help the most when it's raining which it does a lot here.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    28. Re:Freezy Freakies by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      I live in New England and we do have them. They're either recessed into the road, or have a metal case designed to withstand snowplows. Although, they do come up every once in a while. A few years ago, a woman in Ohio was hit in the face with a 4.5 lb reflector one after a plow dislodged it

    29. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think snow on the road is a pretty good indicator that there's snow on the road.

    30. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're called Botts Dots, and as the story (never bothered to confirm it, so have at it, younguns') they were invented by a government employee named Bott in California back in the 60's who felt they were so important to public safety that he deeded the rights to the idea to the State. They're on almost every road in California now, even minor residential thoroughfares. Huh. Just motivated myself. How'd that happen? Botts' dots are named after Dr. Elbert Dysart Botts, a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) engineer credited with overseeing the research that led to the development of the markers. Botts' dots are often called turtles in Washington and Oregon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botts'_dots

    31. Re:Freezy Freakies by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the engineers that designed it suck at building in hysteresis.

    32. Re:Freezy Freakies by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      This is very similar to the comments the last time this exact story was on slashdot. Also, it is a waste of money.

      Yes, it's a dupe, but if slashdot wants to waste its money on dupes...

    33. Re:Freezy Freakies by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      EXCEPT when the temperature would be right AROUND 35F. Because between wind, my engine heat, etc. the temperature might fluxuate between 35F and 36F constantly. So thing would "ding" and take up my screen every could of minutes. And I couldn't turn the feature off.

      They should build that thing with hysteresis. I.e. switch on warning condition when it dips below 34, and switch off warning condition only when it then raises above 36. That way, if the temperature hovers around 34, it would only warn once... It would have to raise 2 degrees, and then fall back again to trigger another time.

    34. Re:Freezy Freakies by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Or the other way round: if you are lucky enough to have an indoor garage, and the car takes half the trip before the sensor's temperature drops low enough, and only warns you when you're almost at your destination... Useless...

    35. Re:Freezy Freakies by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have my car do the job. That way I'd still detect the icy patches even on non-fancy roads. But it'll probably be very expensive to have sensors capable of reliably detecting icy patches on the road 100 metres away.

      --
    36. Re:Freezy Freakies by TheLink · · Score: 1

      OP said reflective so I think they are these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat's_eye_(road)

      --
    37. Re:Freezy Freakies by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      You've obviously not done any remote night driving, when you got 75 miles to go, it's night, you're tired and the road's seemingly straight and level, some people are inclined to speed up... lose alertness, etc... so on interstates, country roads, this could save lives easily & obviously. Putting it on Main St. ... would be a waste.

    38. Re:Freezy Freakies by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase. All of the comments last time were that this is old tech, or a waste of money. You can read them for yourself, it was almost 30 days ago.
      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/10/30/2055259/glow-in-the-dark-smart-highways-coming-to-the-netherlands-in-2013

      I personally don't care how the Netherlands spends their transportation budget.

    39. Re:Freezy Freakies by xaxa · · Score: 1

      We just make them a lot taller, about 5 feet I think.

      In Britain those are called "snow poles", and the reflective dots in the road are either "cateyes" or just reflectors. The reflectors on multi-lane roads in the UK are different colours depending where they are -- red for the side of the road, yellow for the middle, white for lane boundaries, and green for a slip-road or junction. I think the front and back of snow poles are coloured, but it's far too mild round here for them to be necessary (9C at the moment).

      Here: http://www.traffictechnologytoday.com/news.php?NewsID=40952 they say there are LED studs on the M42 (somewhere near Birmingham).

      Americans may well have different words.

    40. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Well, in the end I don't know what the exact temperatures were those times as it's been a few years since I had it. But I do know at least once it would fluxuate a bunch due to whatever (saw it say both 34 and 36 a couple of times in a drive). Depending on my engine temp, if I was stuck behind a big car with a big exhaust, if I was driving fast, if I was sitting in the sun vs going in the shade. I don't recall the specifics.

      It could be that they did something like you suggest, but the margin was too narrow and thus my driving conditions kept triggering it like every 5 minutes. Like maybe it was like 35 exactly, started reading 35.7 (rounded up to 36) then started reading 34.9... etc.

      Personally, I think putting it on a timer would work best. It went off, it shouldn't be able to be triggered again for the next (say) 30 minutes or until the car restarts. Because if it went off once that should be enough to let you know.

      But, my new car doesn't do that. So that's at least one thing that my current car does that doesn't bother me. Now if only Ford would fix some other issues in their TOUCH system.

    41. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2

      My thought is that the glow-in-the-dark paint will be more expensive than the standard line marking paint. It's hard enough for most communities here in the Northeast US to find the budget for the normal paint, which wears off each winter due to winter salting and sanding.

      Which brings up another issue... how well would the glow-in-the-dark work long-term?

      Even if the paint isn't worn away immediately... most (non-toxic) glow in the dark paints are solar powered (for lack of a better phrase). As time goes on, even if not worn out, it would become dirty. Dirty would mean harder to see... but more importantly that it would absorb less light.

      So long term... it would eventually stop "powering up" during the day unless they can keep the streets clean without wearing away the paint. In which case, some motorist that has grown used to seeing the snowflakes on a particular stretch of road might see they're not lit up and think "Oh I guess there's no ice here"

    42. Re:Freezy Freakies by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I think snow on the road is a pretty good indicator that there's snow on the road.

      Funny

      But the idea is to let them know that there's ICE on the road. Ice does not require snow: a mild 40F afternoon with rain can easily be followed by a 20F evening. That moisture would still be there and thus turned to ice. And if it was just a light rain, said ice wouldn't be that obvious. Heck, you even have to worry about freezing rain and the like.

      Granted, this could have just been a snarky comment and you knew this. But, while I'm not exactly sure how to feel about this idea, I've talked to people about it before that seriously thought the paint was stupid for exactly the same reason you stated.

    43. Re:Freezy Freakies by Jetra · · Score: 1

      Would radar work on ice? If so, you might be able to do the 100m away.

    44. Re:Freezy Freakies by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      There would be very little difference signature wise from a wet road to an iced over road, that difference would be much lower then the natural variations in the road, making it impossible to distinguish.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    45. Re:Freezy Freakies by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      This is very similar to the comments the last time this exact story was on slashdot. Also, it is a waste of money.

      I guess that depends on the numbers. Not the least of which would be how much money you determine the lives lost due to accidents involving iced roads are worth. Of course that's going to be completely subjective... Then there's the cost of repairing or replacing damaged vehicles, road equipment, whatever else someone crashes into. Hey, if the value of a life is low enough it might make sense not to put guardrails on roads either!

    46. Re:Freezy Freakies by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I think it's a great idea. You can't tell where black ice patches are, so maybe it'll help out by indicating High Risk areas.

      I live in an area where we rarely see a night at freezing or below temps so I don't really know from personal experience - but I thought salt or other chems on the road could prevent icing fairly reliably?

    47. Re:Freezy Freakies by Jetra · · Score: 1

      And it also ruins the grass as well as eat out the undercarriage of your car.

    48. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just saying it doesn't matter if it gets covered by snow - If you see snow on the road, you know it's slippery. If you see glowing snowflakes, you also know it's slippery

    49. Re:Freezy Freakies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The white lines and street signs are highly visible if your car has decent headlights (HID). I can see down an unlit country road for half a mile easily on a pitch-black night if my brights are on.

    50. Re:Freezy Freakies by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Salt works to about 0 F. Below 0 F their is very little water in the air. It's too cold to snow hard at that point but water will refreeze.

      Even better is freezing rain. Supercooled water that freezes exactly where it hits. Beautiful, but damn it sucks.

      I don't miss any of it.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    51. Re:Freezy Freakies by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They are known as 'Road Braille' here in CA. They make noise when you drive over them. Red if you are going the wrong way. White otherwise.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    52. Re:Freezy Freakies by Oakey · · Score: 1

      And what do Red and White sound like?

      --
      "Dre don't get as high as me.... I'm Cheech and Chong" - Snoop Dogg
    53. Re:Freezy Freakies by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Something more like microwave radar or FLIR cameras might work.

      --
    54. Re:Freezy Freakies by sjames · · Score: 1

      Clearly it was designed by an evil genius. Wait until conditions become dangerous, THEN make the driver irritated and distracted to maximize the chances of a mishap.

    55. Re:Freezy Freakies by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile any incoming traffic can't see shit as they are dazzled by your HID headlights.

    56. Re:Freezy Freakies by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      microwave radar = radar

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    57. Re:Freezy Freakies by stoatwblr · · Score: 1
      You many not be able to tell where they are while sitting in your car, but any regular user of a road will tell you exactly where the black ice patches are most likely to form (as can the engineers).

      Indicating high risk areas can already be done with roadside signs and in extreme cases roads have been known to be fitted with heating circuits. having the indicator on the road surface itself is a nice idea but I suspect it's not likely to have wide uptake.

  2. Waste of time/money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How is this going to be more visible than the highly reflective paint that is already used?
    Many cars already notify you if icy conditions are likely to exist, snowflakes seem redundant.
    Neither will be very visible when covered with snow and ice.

    1. Re:Waste of time/money. by dintech · · Score: 1

      So you can tail people with your lights off like in the movies. Because that's not conspicuous, oh no...

    2. Re:Waste of time/money. by Tx · · Score: 1

      This idea does have that "solution looking for a problem" feel to it, doesn't it? Glow-in-the-dark road markings would be nice, but in the part of the UK where I live, they seem to have trouble managing the basics like fixing pot-holes and re-profiling dangerous bends. I'd much rather they got on top of that stuff first, pothole-free roads would be plenty futuristic enough for me.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:Waste of time/money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this isn't a solution looking for a problem. The guy is an professional artist, not an engineer. It's art pretending to be a solution, looking for a non-problem.

      The claimed location isn't too weird, though. Brabant is indeed a testlab for car & road R they even have an isolated stretch of highway (A270) set up as a medium-scale lab complete with camera coverage. Some of the other "ideas" , in particular signs that turn that turn green when you approach, are already productized. So that's why the story looks convincing: it's surrounded by reasonable details.

      BTW: Dutch roads don't have potholes. The one exception I encountered only existed because the road would be fully rebuilt within a year anyway.

    4. Re:Waste of time/money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this going to be more visible than the highly reflective paint that is already used?
      Many cars already notify you if icy conditions are likely to exist, snowflakes seem redundant.
      Neither will be very visible when covered with snow and ice.

      It will be more usefull than the highly reflective paint when the road is not straight.

    5. Re:Waste of time/money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this going to be more visible than the highly reflective paint that is already used?

      The glowing lines will be visible even when not in the cone of your headlights. For example, when you approach a sharp turn or an intersection.

    6. Re:Waste of time/money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is important here because in the dark with wet black roads almost all of the available light from your headlights is reflected uselessly away from you. Glowing markings would have the benefit of directing some light TOWARDS your eyes. The highly reflective paint isn't when it's wet and laying flat on the road. That's our paint mind you.

  3. Or.... by FarField12 · · Score: 1

    Or my car could sense tire traction, temperature and a few other sensor conditions to tell me this on the
    big display. Oh wait, it does that now!

    1. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that
      - this is available for all drivers, and not only the ones that have such sensors.
      - this is able to indicate local condition. Your car will not tell you that on a particular zone of the road (forest), the conditions are OK for icing, whereas it was not 200 meters before. Or it will tell you when its traction sensor are indicating that you are slidding.

    2. Re:Or.... by bmajik · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your car actually doesn't do this in a sufficient sense.

      When a road surface is rainy or icy, braking and steering response suffer the most. Acceleration is impacted somewhat.

      A common scenario here in North Dakota is that you set your cruise control and are moving along. Everything "feels fine". You go to change lanes or hit the brakes and you realize you are on a low-grip surface. If you know how to handle it you can sometimes make it ok. If you don't, you're in the ditch.

      Your car can tell if a wheel starts to spin when under acceleration. But acceleration is the least impacted vehicle input in poor road conditions.

      Your car can tell if the motion vector exceeds a certain threshhold and isn't lining up with the steering angle sensor (e.g. a slide is happening)

      What your car cannot tell you is that the road conditions have degraded to the point that you need to slow down, and to what speed, to have proper turning and braking capability. All your car can do is respond to loss-of-grip situations that have already happened.

      When I drive in unknown conditions I will frequently oscillate the steering wheel and feel how much resistance there is. Less resistance suggests less grip. I'll also ease on to the brake pedal to see if I can induce ABS, to help me understand where the braking limit is.

      (Remember, this is north dakota, so there's no one else around for me to upset or scare when I do this stuff :))

      I run snow tires on all my winter-driven vehicles. I cannot tell you the number of times I've been driving along the interstate, everything has been fine, and I come over a crest, and there are vehicles in the ditch everywhere. I provide test brake/steering inputs and there is _very little_ grip to be had. Anything other than the slightest/slowest input provokes loss-of-grip. And this is on proper snow tires. The people with bald all-seasons are in the ditch for a reason..

      A current car simply can't detect that until you're already sliding/skidding/spinning tires. At which point, it may be too late for the car to recover on a low-grip surface.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    3. Re:Or.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Except that this will also not do that. It only tells you the road is below 0C. It does tell you if it is covered with ice.
      AKA yea it is bloody cold out and now I have cute glow in the dark snowflakes to remind me.
      It will be ignored soon enough because it is an indication of data you already have.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But acceleration is the least impacted vehicle input in poor road conditions.

      Acceleration is no different from any other application of wheel friction to change the velocity or direction. Most people tend to brake harder than they accelerate, and all vehicles can brake much harder than they can accelerate, but that doesn't mean an icy surface affects acceleration any differently than it affects braking, just that the latter often attempts to apply greater force than the former. Same force == same result, regardless of whether it's being applied for acceleration or braking.

    5. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People forget that cars in the US (and everywhere else by extension) are required to be manufactured such that full brake is able to slow the car even at the particular setting of gears and engine power that puts maximum energy on the wheels. Therefore depressing a brake pedal an inch has a much larger effect than depressing the accelerator an inch, or even three in most circumstances.

    6. Re:Or.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all vehicles can brake much harder than they can accelerate

      Until the wheels lock and you lose rolling friction. Then you no longer have the "same force" or "same result".

    7. Re:Or.... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      When I drive in unknown conditions I will frequently oscillate the steering wheel and feel how much resistance there is. Less resistance suggests less grip. I'll also ease on to the brake pedal to see if I can induce ABS, to help me understand where the braking limit is.

      It scares the hell out of me to be a passenger in a car in poor conditions where the driver is not constantly verifying control and conditions. I respect your driving methods deeply.

      I might add that when you are driving a car that you are not familiar with, take it to an empty space and make yourself lose control and recover it a few times so you know how the car behaves in out of control conditions. Test out the various inputs (brake, gas, steering wheel) in various combinations while out of control. This should help to prevent losing control in an emergency situation. As an added bonus, it is VERY fun to do. :)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    8. Re:Or.... by bmajik · · Score: 1

      Actually, you are wrong. In theory, you might expect that what you wrote is correct.

      In practice, you're wrong :)

      Go take some high performance driving courses. Study the material carefully.

      The physics of tire adhesion are quite complicated. In the simulation world, there are a variety of models in use, depending on who you are and what you're doing.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  4. Repost by p0p0 · · Score: 1

    You're absolutely useless, aren't you Slashdot?
    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/10/30/2055259/glow-in-the-dark-smart-highways-coming-to-the-netherlands-in-2013

    You even link to articles on the same site, just one is .com and the first is .co.uk. They were even published on the same day.
    That day being October 30th. Over 2 months ago. I think that would be considered "old" by any standard.

    1. Re:Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you writing to ? You really think there are humans at Slashdot to read this ? Ha !

    2. Re:Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you writing to ? You really think there are humans at Slashdot to read this ? Ha !

      I don't think it was a computer that decided to misspell "Brabant" in the summary this time around although it was correct the first time. Not that there is a province by that name in the Netherlands anyway; presumably "North Brabant" (Noord Brabant) was meant--Brabant is in Belgium.

    3. Re:Repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      People *from* North Brabant call it Brabant.

      "Het leven is goed in het Braaaabantse land
      dat land waar mijn wieg
      heeft gestaaaaaan...."
      </off-topic>

  5. And the cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much will it cost? How long will it last? Can you see the difference with your headlights on?

  6. Very little incentive to innovate by jimmy_dean · · Score: 0

    I'm not trying to insert a discussion of the pros and cons of the government making and maintaining roads, but simply trying to state that governments have very little, if any, incentive to improve roads, improve the safety of roads or use new innovative techniques. It usually takes a crisis before new things get implemented. Under normal circumstances they have very little incentive to continually raise the bar and wow the user (all of us) of the roads.

    --
    -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    1. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm going to guess you're in the U.S. ... road management in the Netherlands is done a bit differently.

    2. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TFA claims that government is not involved and the " Heijmans" company would build the road. That said, the Dutch road authority is actually quite innovative. They probably beat even then Germans when it comes to quality, e.g. see their use of low-noise/high drainage "ZOAB" road surfaces. Now, if only they'd actually bother with quantity...

    3. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to insert a discussion of the pros and cons of the government making and maintaining roads, but simply trying to state that governments have very little, if any, incentive to improve roads, improve the safety of roads...

      Emergency responders (police, fire rescue, etc.) for an accident cost county and state governments a lot. As does rebuilding damaged signs, light poles, and other road structures. Road closures due to accidents and constructions impact the local economy; if they're frequent enough, they'll generate political pressure. Particularly in rural areas, the state of the roads is one of the primary things that drives voters to choose one lizard over the other.

      or use new innovative techniques. It usually takes a crisis before new things get implemented. Under normal circumstances they have very little incentive to continually raise the bar and wow the user (all of us) of the roads.

      As well it should be. My first thought was, "Interesting, but sounds kind of half-baked." I'm glad the Netherlands is taking the lead on studying this, and I'm sure the rest of the world will gladly watch to see if the results justify the cost.

    4. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While this might hold true in the USA, it is not universal.

      This is why Americans should travel more. For one I think all Americans should try driving on some nice German roads. Maybe we could start building them here.

    5. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The German sign system is amazing. The German road system, less so. One doesn't so much drive on the roads around Stuttgart as wait for the traffic to clear.

    6. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard a story that a new type of pavement was designed with a little bit of rubber in it so it lasts longer. However, road paving unions rejected it because that means they'd do less work.

    7. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by zmooc · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands, highways are more than cost-effective; taxes on cars generate more income than the highways cost. On top of that, their economic benefits far outweigh their costs as well. Traffic jams cost about 1% of the total budget of the dutch government in productivity losses. Add to that the prevented medical costs due to safe, modern, well maintained roads and I see more than enough incentive to properly maintain roads. Which is exactly what happens.

      However, the Netherlands is one of the more densely populated western countries with relatively little highway per capitae; the US has more than 3 times as much kilometers of highway per capita as the Netherlands does. Therefore possibly the current level of maintenance on US highways actually is the most cost effective. The more roads you have, the less well maintained they will be.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    8. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Reemi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some governments consider roads as critical for their competitive position. Without a good road-network, the Netherlands would loose their position as transport country and the work generated by the Rotterdam Harbor would dry up.

      Accidents cause road-blocks which cause traffic jams. Hundreds of people in traffic jams idling costs enormous amounts of lost productivity and is bad for GDP.

      With a social system ensuring everybody for health-case and a decent life standard when not able to work, avoiding accidents becomes an economical question.

      I'm not stating the government does take all this into account, but at least the importance of a good and safe road-network for the whole country is understood.

      Note, roads are not only there for those driving a car. Even if you do your groceries walking, ask yourself how your food ended up at the store. Ask yourself how the Ambulance managed to come to you when you need it.

    9. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Get outside the city, the roads are nearly flat as glass compared to my usual haunts.

    10. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by drainbramage · · Score: 3, Funny

      We could build German roads in the U.S. but the cost to then ship those roads to Germany would be prohibitive.
      YMMV

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    11. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by heypete · · Score: 1

      I've found the autobahns outside of Munich to be comparable to most US Interstates, though I actually preferred the Interstates in regards to maintenance and road quality. The autobahn had a bunch of patches to fill potholes and obviously hadn't been repaved in years, though that may well have been an exception rather than the norm.

    12. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I would say that is better than the roads I normally travel on. They have just a bunch of potholes. When they do repave they just scrape up the old and lay new down. Never fixing the underlying problems that caused the potholes so they can do it all again very soon.

    13. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by swillden · · Score: 1

      Is autobahn maintenance done by the states or the federal government? I haven't driven around Germany a great deal, but I've noticed some variation in the road quality which seems regional. It wouldn't be surprising if, say, Bavaria and Schwabia, took different approaches to road maintenance.

      That is what happens in the US, so in some states the Interstates are much better-maintained than in others. The US federal government provides some funding for Interstate maintenance, but much of it comes from the states, and the states do all of the actual work (or contract it out).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    14. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      I would say a government has more incentive than any private entity in maintaining roads. What incentive would a private contractor have in maintining it right? If it gets paid a fixed rate for "operation" then the more skimping on quality means more profit. If it gets paid per "calls" to fix things then the more it gets called the better ensuring poor quality worksmanship. Only government has any incentive in proper maintenance as a well maintained road means less costs in the long term to fix it, and less liability is someone is injured because of improper maintenance.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    15. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they scraped up the old, our local city streets they just chunk a new layer on top of whatever is crumbling until the asphalt start to go over the curb in some places. (and some of the curbs were 1' from the road)

      Years ago two of our main roads (which doubles as 2 one way streets for a state highway) were so bad after doing the same repeat steps for 30+ years they finally decided to hire someone professional and rip it down to the original concrete pour (and in some cases even ripping that up) even exposed some of the brick streets and old rail lines that used to run through the street until the depression.

      Those roads are still 10 years later 1000x better than what they were and aren't cracked up all the time, Except the city decided to put in new water lines right after and the same "just patch over city worker crew" screwed it up (although enough complaints were heard that they hired someone professional to come fix their handy-work)

      30+ of years of cheap patching and they finally figured out that if you pay a little more up front you won't need road-fixing money so often

    16. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by houghi · · Score: 2

      Well, if you want the same kind of roads, just vote the guy into office who promises to build you those roads like they did in Germany.

      (what? Too soon? And yes, he was elected.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      "I would say a government has more incentive than any private entity in maintaining roads. What incentive would a private contractor have in maintining it right? If it gets paid a fixed rate for "operation" then the more skimping on quality means more profit."

      I wasn't necessarily comparing to private road operators, but you clearly don't understand the concept of competition. Of course a company who would have zero other competition would be horrible at road maintenance (just like the government operator). But that scenario does not and would not exist. If private road operators were able to properly pay for and acquire the right of way to build new parallel roads, people could choose the best route to get somewhere. So of course it's a bit more complex than that, but you get my point. Also, different modes of transportation provide incentives to maintain the roads well by private entities. This is not true of a government. If people prefer the local trains because the roads have too many potholes and feel dangerous, it won't just go fix the roads. There are so many political wills to take into account, plus lobbying, labor unions, regulations, and the personal feelings of the legislators. It's much simpler and more straightforward for a private company compared to a government.

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    18. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why Americans should travel more. For one I think all Americans should try driving on some nice German roads. Maybe we could start building them here.

      I couldn't agree more. We should put all our roads in Germany.

    19. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw something about this a while back also. Arizona has used it -
      "During the 1990s, the city resurfaced more than 200 miles of streets with 450,000 tons of rubberized asphalt, which used about 1.1 million old tires. The city reported that rubberized asphalt place on Dobbins Road in 1989 has performed without maintenance for 14 years and has an estimated life span of up to 18 years"

      http://www.azdot.gov/quietroads/what_is_rubberized_asphalt.asp

    20. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I for one support building our own NeurburgRing like race track out of formerly public roads.

      And like the Italians building a race track in a 'Royal Park' (Monza IIRC) I support building a 'Yosemite Ring' inside the valley. We might have to move and/or blow up the river and half-dome a little to get the corners to work, but that's the price you pay for progress.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    21. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What you describe is normal road maintenance. They do it that way everywhere they use asphalt.

      They will re-asphalt that stretch of road or 30 years until it is again up to the top of the curbs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    22. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      governments have very little, if any, incentive to improve roads, improve the safety of roads or use new innovative techniques.

      The only motivation needed to want that is for the voters to want it. If the voters don't care about potholes and missing guard rails, the politicians have no reason to.

      It depends on where you are. Some US stares have shitty roads, some have good roads, some EU countries have excellent roads.

    23. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      Yes of course road quality varies, and who knows exactly why some jurisdictions have much better roads than others. It's definitely not as simple as "the voters to want it." In an ideal world, that would be true. But like I replied to another comment, there are all kinds of things standing in the way of true representation like that such as corruption, lobbying, lust for power, the legislators personally disagreeing, etc.

      Take a look at this from economist Walter Block, it's pretty good: The privatization of roads

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    24. Re:Very little incentive to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you clearly don't understand the concept of a natural monopoly. Nobody in their right mind is going to build a bridge or a road right next to another bridge or road because it would cost sooooo much and the payoff would take a really long time, you would also need to get the right to hook up the new road to where the old road is and assume the old road wouldn't just price you out of the market and then jack up their prices again. Infrastructure is best done by governments. If the roads suck then the people need to contact their representative.

  7. I-64 has had something like this for years by drcln · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the U.S. state of Virginia, Interstate 64 runs east–west through the middle of the state from West Virginia to the Hampton Roads region, a total of 298 miles (480 km). It is notable for crossing the mouth of the harbor of Hampton Roads on the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel, the first bridge-tunnel to incorporate man-made islands. Also noteworthy is a section through Rockfish Gap, a wind gap in the Blue Ridge Mountains, which was equipped with an innovative system of airport-style runway lighting embedded into the pavement to aid motorists during periods of poor visibility due to fog or other conditions.
    source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_64_in_Virginia

    A lighting system within the pavement to help designate lanes automatically activated by fog sensors was installed by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to improve safety during such weather conditions.
    source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockfish_Gap

    --
    your gravity fails and negativity don't pull you through
  8. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The snowflake part is stupid. I can tell when it's below freezing out. But lines that glow? Awesome. Ever driven a Ford Ranger? I have a better headlight on my bicycle.

    1. Re:yes by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      So, get better headlights, stupid. If you're lucky, the bulbs are just growing dim, and you can replace them easily and cheaply. If you're unlucky, the reflective layer inside the bulb housings are oxidized and flaking. You can replace those for ~$75 to ~$125 each. If it were just YOUR life at risk, I wouldn't care. But, when you crash due to poor visibility, you're likely to take a pedestrian out.

      I just double checked with my son. A set of Depo Performance Lights for a Camry runs right at $200. He also bought a pair of newfangled reflector bulbs to put into those light housings - his total bill was ~$300.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:yes by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 1

      For $300 you should get this instead. They give A LOT more light than any stock lights, no matter how shiny your reflector is. Of course, you should have decent low beams for when you meet traffic, but when you're talking high beams, go for some nice leds that you'll never have to replace. (I'm not affiliated with linked product, I just like them.)

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    3. Re:yes by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      LED lights are great for a lot of uses, but headlights aren't yet on of the best uses. It's best to use LED's as a supplement to your headlights, not as a replacement. Maybe in a few more years, they'll be up to snuff. Complaints I've heard are that they just don't reach down the road.

      Auxiliary lights, like these AngelEyes http://www.superbrightleds.com/cat/led-headlight-accent-lights/ make you a lot more visible to other drivers, they tend to light up unlit areas close to you, but they do almost nothing to illuminate the road more than 30 feet in front of you.

      At present, HID lights are the best you can do - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headlamp

      And, I'm not solely voicing my own opinion here - as a member of a couple of motorcycle forums, I've found this to be the consensus. As I say, two, five, maybe ten years from now, LED will be ready to replace all of our halogen and xenon lights. They are not ready today.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  9. 3 months old story, yet far from record by majorme · · Score: 1

    Guys, I am disappoint .I know you can do better. I've seen articles that are years old posted as news on Slashdot over the years http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-10/30/smart-highway-glows-in-the-dark

  10. I wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens to a wind powered system when the wind goes to doldrums? How about multipower systems. You know, battery, solar, fossil fuel, coal, all working together to energize the future. Putting all your eggs in one basket leads to failure. Eventually, the sky will be cloudy, the wind will die for a week, and the storm will knock down the power lines. And the poor will have to pay thru the nose for your product.

  11. Silly question... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

    ... but wouldn't honking great images of snowflakes on the ground rushing towards you (and then underneath your car) not be rather distracting?

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  12. Why the ice indicators? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    I have a great ice indicator at home; They're called eyes. If I have to defrost my car in the morning, the roads could be icy. If there was recently slow or heavy rain, the roads could be very icy. In both conditions, I will drive slower and in a higher gear than normal, will use the brakes very sparingly and start decelerating earlier, and will leave a much longer gap between my car and the car in front.

    Queue cries of "The ice indicator didn't show that there was ice on the road, so I did 60MPH around that blind bend. I'm not liable!" and a hefty hike in insurance premiums.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Why the ice indicators? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yet all of those indicators could fail and still I will see ice on my commute. I should also mention my commute is under 10 miles. All it takes is a little snow melt during the middle of the day and there can be ice on the road but none on my car, not any rain. Your eyes are also quite useless when dealing this refrozen dirty slush.

    2. Re:Why the ice indicators? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I perhaps could have been clearer. " If there was recently slow or heavy rain, the roads could be very icy." By this I mean that, regardless of whether I can see snow, ice, or melt water, I will treat the road as icy. Having ridden over wet manhole covers on a scooter in my youth, and been involved in a rear-end collision due to "black ice" on the road, I have much respect for slippery road conditions and am well aware of how invisible a hazard it can be.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Why the ice indicators? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Then you would have to treat the roads as icy for 4-6 months in many places. Which is not a bad thing, just a bit much for us to expect everyone to do without fail.

  13. Coors Light - been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This highway is "Cold Certified"

    1. Re:Coors Light - been there, done that by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 1
      I wonder if the light is strong enough to be seen through snow, when real winter comes... this is one of the main highways in Northern Finland right now: http://www2.liikennevirasto.fi/alk/kelikamerat/C1452301071554.jpg

      More real-time webcams of roads there, they're all similar, with entire road surface covered in snow: http://www2.liikennevirasto.fi/alk/english/kelikamerat/kelikamerat_5.html

    2. Re:Coors Light - been there, done that by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Looks like much of the USA in winter. Maybe not everyday, but at least several times a week.

    3. Re:Coors Light - been there, done that by Njovich · · Score: 2

      Surely not. In such conditions they will neither collect enough light nor shine *that* brightly. Then again, you don't need an indicator to tell you it's cold when there is snow on the road. In Netherlands the problem is usually with temperatures that keep jumping up and down just over and under melting/freezing temperature, sometimes making roads treacherous. Winter temperatures here are a bit higher than in northern Finland of course.

      As for the lanes, it's an improvement over normal paint... but nothing magic.

    4. Re:Coors Light - been there, done that by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 1

      Looks like much of the USA in winter. Maybe not everyday, but at least several times a week.

      I'm sure there're places in the USA where you have such conditions for months on end just like in Lappland, in Wyoming or Minnesota, say, and Alaska is of course even worse. Looks like USA has lots more sunshine though:

      http://imgur.com/vYpbh

    5. Re:Coors Light - been there, done that by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      In a unrelated story. I was ordering parts from Minnesota last week and complained about how cold the northern California winter was. We had frost!

      They didn't find it amusing at all. Poor bastards.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  14. Re:Inductive field by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

    What potential health impacts?

    This is not ionizing, nor are you going to generate a lethal current in a human body. Go away nutter.

  15. We cannot have nice things by Korruptionen · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately... if they had this feature in the US on any roadway... instantly, I could see people crashing their cars... and suing the state because they "couldn't see the snow flakes." :-|

  16. Experement by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    It looks like all that has been approved is a short experimental section. If the paint has not been proven to be able to hold up under real conditions I doubt very much that anyone would approve a full scale implementation on all roads. How do the markings hold up to wear, salt, plows, etc? It appears that this testing is what is approved.

    It would also seem that one would get many false positives. From the article the markings glow when the roads are cold. Slippery roads are not necessarily caused by cold alone. It needs to be cold and wet or humid to get slippery conditions. Cold and dry conditions do not cause slippery roads. Another point is that if the temperature is always below the threshold the road will always glow and people will ignore it.

  17. Sounds extremely expensive for little gain by LWATCDR · · Score: 2

    1. The wind powered lights will require power lines for backup for when the wind isn't enough. You could add batteries into the mix but you will have still need the power lines and then have to maintain the batteries.
    2. The glow in the dark road markings will wear off. Is the safe for the eviroment?
    3.The glow in the dark road markings will be more expensive than the paint we use now. BTW current paint reflect a lot of light. Since cars have lights why make the roads markings glow?
    4. Inductive charging roads? How much copper will that take?

    All that money would be better spent on making sure all roads have reflective markings and maybe an AM radio based system of road condition warnings, digital data of course.

    I have become convinced people come up with engineering scams. You come up with some really cool sounding or looking idea that has a lot of issues and extremely high costs. You then make nice presentations, you then get people saying, "this is cool", and then you get money to study the "problems" and build nothing or a small useless test system. Kind of like a cool picture of a bridge that had windmills under the roadway. It would have been expensive, a bad bridge, and a bad windmill.
     

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Sounds extremely expensive for little gain by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I can see some limited use for point one in disaster situations - if the hurricane/earthquake has knocked out power, it'd be very useful for the road lights to stay lit for a couple of days so people can still travel safely while repairs are made. I don't see any advantage in glow-in-the-dark over the current retroreflector tech, and inductive charging on roads anywhere beside parking bays is just silly.

  18. Not the best by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Let's look at this simply. New system in road = new system cost * miles of road. Paid by government. Smarter cars and driver education work regardless of whether the road is smart and the cost (and as mentioned above the liability) rest on the car owner not the government.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Not the best by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If you are speaking of the USA, we can't possibly to do that. We cannot even get a real license test and requirements. Step 1 to improve road safety in the USA would be stringent testing and education requirements. Step 2 would be to bring our roads up to a first world standard instead of the third world asphalt over stone only a couple feet deep we do now.

  19. Article errors *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The province of "Branbant" does not exist.

    It's called "Noord Brabant" (note the lack of 'n').

  20. Great, even more light pollution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I so miss seeing stars...

  21. hand-holding idiocy by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live in Wisconsin. We have a nickname for anyone whose car goes in the ditch on the highway during a big snowstorm: morons. It's always some piece of crap minivan or Saturn Ion or Pontiac of some sort. The driver is always in a hurry or forgot that 4 wheel drive doesn't do anything for stopping and tada, ditch. Last major snowstorm there was approx 1 car in the ditch every 1.5 miles. No amount of sparkly snowflakes on the road will keep people that stupid from driving that stupidly, trust me. They're just idiots who will never learn their lesson. They're all Wisconsin plates too so don't go thinking it's someone from Texas or something who's never seen snow because those people are smart enough to stay home.
    This idea would be a giant waste of time and money and not benefit anyone.

    1. Re:hand-holding idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always some piece of crap minivan or Saturn Ion or Pontiac of some sort. ... Last major snowstorm there was approx 1 car in the ditch every 1.5 miles

      I had to drive through that same storm. The vehicles in the ditch on the interstate I drove through were an even mix of cars, SUVs and semis. But everyone was already driving kind of slow anyway, as it was pretty obvious conditions were bad, and I don't think anyone is claiming road markings are need to help tell you there is a blizzard.

      What was much worse than driving through that mess was getting to the edge of the storm where the roads were much clearer, people were driving nearly full speed making it less safe to drive slower, yet there was still the occasional spot of hard to see ice. This solution probably won't fix that, although a better version of it might be something to keep in mind. Whether it is worth it or not comes down to what it actually costs to add and some quantitative tests of effectiveness like as done for all sorts of other road improvements, yet few seem to both asking for that before denouncing it with some crap about "real drivers don't need it."

    2. Re:hand-holding idiocy by hackertourist · · Score: 2

      You may have noticed that this test will be run in the Netherlands. For those of you not familiar with the place: our winter temperatures mostly hover around the 0 deg C mark. At night, the air cools to below 0 and the roads freeze over, in the morning the temperature rises above 0 but it takes hours for the roads to thaw. Combine that with local variations, spots that are more susceptible to frost like bridges and overpasses, etc. and you have conditions where slippery roads are not necessarily signaled by a big, obvious blizzard.

      As someone who's been caught out by this to the extent of rear-ending someone when the road went from normal to invisibly iced over in the space of 50 m, I appreciate my government putting effort into mitigating the problem.

    3. Re:hand-holding idiocy by swillden · · Score: 1

      I live in Colorado, and have lived for most of my life in Utah. What I notice is that the first big snowstorm of every winter season causes a large number of slide-offs. After that, not so much. I think lots of people forget how to drive on snow and ice during the warm season. That and the real morons can't drive after the first snowstorm because their car is in the shop.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:hand-holding idiocy by kbolino · · Score: 1

      I think many people wait until after the first snow before they put snow tires on their car. Changing tires is a nuisance, especially if you only have one set of rims, and snow tires run rough and get crappy mileage on dry roads.

    5. Re:hand-holding idiocy by swillden · · Score: 1

      Maybe. I don't think most people in Utah and Colorado use snow tires, though. Some do, certainly, especially those who live in the mountains and have to drive daily on steep roads that aren't well-traveled. The rest (including me) just drive carefully the ~20 days per year that it's bad. The Mountain West doesn't tend to have lots of persistent snow and ice -- it snows hard for a few days, then the sun is out for two or three weeks, usually. Not enough sun to melt all the snow, but enough to melt it off of roads that have been cleared by plows. By 3-4 days after a storm all of the roads are clear and dry, except for occasional patches of ice where snowmelt during the day freezes at night (and on colder days). Those patches are rare on highways because they're on raised roadbeds. They're common on residential streets, but you don't drive fast there anyway.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:hand-holding idiocy by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Same thing happens everywhere I've lived.

      In CA they forget how to drive in the rain.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:hand-holding idiocy by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Much of the northern U.S. has repeated freeze/thaw conditions during the winter, thus "black ice" (transparent, often not visible against the pavement) is a routine winter hazard... and it is NOT signaled by a big, obvious blizzard either. (In fact, blizzard conditions tend to be far less slippery; your main hazard is getting stuck, or having a wheel get "grabbed" by the deeper snow along the edge of the road.)

      What I wonder about, tho, is whether this road-based lighting might create its own hazard. In densely-falling snow, light shining into the snow reflects, sometimes so badly that you literally can't see a damn thing outside your windshield but a bright white mass of snow. Turn off your headlights, and you can see a LOT better. Might road-level lighting create a similarly hazardous visual "fog" in falling or blowing snow?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  22. Say "No Way" to this highway. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    This is insane bait and switch. We had been sold a bill of goods for the last five decades. Personal jetplanes that takes off from the drive way vertically and land wherever we want, flying at hypersonic speeds in between. There was no talk of this stupid glow in the dark highway. We were told highways will be obsolete, and so would be the cars. We have been waiting for personal VTOL jet planes for so long, and now suddenly we are back to the stupid cars, with four real round wheels I suppose. No crystallic fusion yet, just the same fossil fuels. What? "Got double As" jeez! Thats for toys.

    It is the mechanical engineers who have fallen so short of their assigned task. The other things they talked about constantly, video-phone and TV that hangs like a picture on the wall have been delivered by the electronic engineers. Even the hand held communicator that will put all the knowledge of the human race at the finger tips have been delivered. Though it is a big let down to realize that a huge percentage of knowledge of human race consists of cat videos and spoofed sub-titles of the Hitler movie.

    Come on, Mech engineers. Step up to the plate. I am putting "Violate the Second law of thermodynamics" on the Kanban board. Deliverable as a beta feature for the preview release this quarter. And quantum mechanics. You are next. When are we getting the worm-hole to Andremeda? You guys keep going in circles. Just like your particles in that superconducting super-collider ring.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  23. Road Lights by PPH · · Score: 1

    My car has this rather advanced system. Once it becomes dark outside, I simply pull a little knob on the dashboard and an integral lighting system is activated, illuminating the road, pedestrians and other obstacles ahead of me.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Road Lights by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Just ahead of you. What is visibility really like on headlamps? It's actually terrible on near-horizontal things like road markings, ice, potholes, mud, curbs, etc - the angle of illumination and of viewing is just too shallow.

    2. Re:Road Lights by PPH · · Score: 1

      Get decent headlights. Dump the NHTSA standards and adopt European lighting. I can see just fine with my H4 headlamps (30+ year old technology, still better than US headlamps).

      If you can't see without overhead lighting, you need a restricted license (daytime only). We can't light every square foot of road, so eventually you'll be in the dark anyway.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Road Lights by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I am not so sure the glow-in-the-dark is a terrific idea, but you have a good point. The headlamps also have trouble illuminating the road around a curve. So it could be useful out on country roads in the dark where there are no lights.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  24. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of posters obviously didn't read the article, so here we go.

    They are using a paint that absorbs light in the daytime and releases it in the nighttime. 25 years ago I had some glow in the dark toys that worked on the same principle. It's not magick, nor a violation of thermodynamics. This can be reapplied when they would be repainting the lines, anyways.

    The wind-powered lights use the wind of passing automobiles to light up.

    Not sure how the temperature ones work, but again, we've had toy cars that changed colour by temperature for years.

  25. Don't get too excited about the video by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    the road will automatically light up with snowflake indicators to warn drivers of icy conditions (computer-generated video)

    FTFY.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  26. 10 hours, ehh? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Well, the problem is that on average, it's dark for about 12 hours. And in the season when it becomes cold enough for it to trigger, it's dark even longer.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  27. "Route 66 of the future" by relikx · · Score: 1

    I get what he's saying but that phrase isn't really apt since Route 66 was replaced by the modern Interstate 40 decades ago. Ironically there are sections of Route 66 that are impassable by most vehicles when it snows due to steep hill grades (in Oklahoma at least where I lived off it years ago).

  28. yea by juenger1701 · · Score: 1

    that will do a lot of good when the road is covered in hard-pack snow (non northerners think ice but opaque white)

  29. repair costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will repair costs and repair time go up to fix the roads when pot holes show up? Don't get me wrong I think it's a neat idea but the cost of up keep is the question. And will the road workers have to have a graphic designer on staff to draw the snowflakes correctly?

  30. I beat them to it by hb253 · · Score: 1

    I proposed this technology way back in 3rd grade in response to an assignment about saving energy. Note that the year was 1973. I expect royalty checks.

    --
    Self awareness - try it!
  31. Wont happen in the uk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drivers paying £1.30+ a litre fuel and £200+ tax discs to make up for Google, Amazon and Starbucks tax evasion so no money left for innovation on government.

  32. Wonderful by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

    Another way to pander to idiot drivers, teaching them nothing except that they don't need to be observant or thoughtful drivers.

    Back up cameras, back up sensors, blind-spot detectors, cruise control all help to create a less aware driver. Now they'll learn that they don't need to pay attention to the road condition. (Slippery slope argument? Maybe)

    I almost ran over my 2 year old nephew one time in my truck (Dodge Ram). I didn't see him, he was behind me where there is NO visibility, sure a back up camera or sensor would have worked, but instead he has a responsible mother who saw and came out screaming and waving her hands to get me to stop (I drive an older diesel so it's a bit noisy). That's all it takes, responsibility. So there goes anyone's "what-if" argument; yes, it did happen to me.

    Pay attention to what's around you, if you can't, have others do it. Turn your head to look in your blind spot. Lean to maintain your own steady speed. Learn to identify road conditions, and be able to control your vehicle if it slides that the speed you are going. If you can't control that slide, slow down to a speed that you can control the slide; then, if you do slide, you're OK.

    Why do we keep pandering to mediocrity?

    Now of course, this is all in general, I'm sure there's some with disabilities that don't allow them to turn their head properly, or maintain even pressure with their foot and whathaveyou.

    1. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By letting the idiot drivers influence what is put into vehicles, aren't you the one trying to pander to idiots? What about those us that are responsible and want to have every reasonable cost tool at our disposal? If we are going to let people take responsibility, then responsible people would be able to use tools properly without becoming overly dependent on it. It would be nice to have more than one way to check I am not going to hit a child, besides just assuming children have responsible parents (or besides the worse interpretation, that it is ok to hit children that don't have responsible parents...)

  33. Better solution by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Round here they solved the problem by making the surface of the road rough enough so that even when its icy you still get some traction.
    The best thing is it doesn't cost anything, you just don't resurface the road during the road construction season.
    And the rough roads encourage slower driving all year round.

  34. Would be great on I-70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I regularly drive on I-70 over the mountains, usually in the dark. Lane markings is pretty much the only way to navigate. There's just not enough light (w/o high beams) to see the upcoming turns. When lane markings are worn out or invisible due to slush or wet road it's next to impossible to drive.

    Another hazard is the ice on overpasses and bridges, which ice up before the rest of the road. Yet another is the first appearance of icy road as you gain altitude going up a mountain passes. Some sort of indication of ice on the road would have been super helpful.

  35. Alaska by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not exactly sure how much snow they get or how it matches up to snow in Canada/Alaska/Northern US but at least up here in Alaska the plows tend to scrape off the paint as they go about their routes, causing us to need to repaint our roads quite often. Depending on the cost difference between traditional paint and this new stuff this could either be a great idea or massively expensive to upkeep.

  36. Extremely bad idea by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    "interactive lights that switch on as cars pass"

    The wild life crossing the road would suddenly become blind and wouldn't be able to get out of the way when hearing a car approaching. Don't think small critters, think deers or bigger. You really don't want to crash into one of these.

  37. Disney's "Magic Highway" in 1958 by guttentag · · Score: 1
    Watching the video reminded me of Disney's Magic Highway from 1958.

    Better visibility will be featured in new highway designs. As day dims into night, electric eyes automatically illuminate the road ahead.

    The 1958 video doesn't show anything I would call an "electric eye," but the highway appears to glow in the dark. We have had "electric eyes" on streetlights for a while, with sensors that turn the lights on when it gets dark, but it always stuck with me that they didn't show any street lights in the video... the road itself seemed to be the light source.

  38. Neat idea by lbates_35476 · · Score: 1

    This is a neat idea but maybe overkill. It amazes me how much easier it is to drive when the painted lines and reflectors are maintained on a road (especially on a dark night when it is raining). I would be willing to bet that allowing the painted lines to wear away and not replacing the reflectors causes a LOT of traffic accidents (and fatalities). I don't think we have to go crazy with the markings, just install them and maintain them properly. I now travel roads that lack reflectors (they have broken off and haven't been replaced) and lack proper painted lines (worn off) that I now consider dangerous.

  39. What a wonderful idea - NOT by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Let's see, glare from the ice blinding you and everyone else, can't see the lanes, oh, that's right: all of this needs power... and when the power's out, it's useless. Let's see, when does power go out... oh, right, in bad weather!

    reflectors in the road, in the lines, as they have in some states, are a far better and cheaper solution, and they're "powered" by your headlights (unless you're one of those idiots with misaligned headlights, in states that don't have a safety inspection which includes that, every year).

                mark

    1. Re:What a wonderful idea - NOT by PPH · · Score: 1

      Headlights, plural??

      Do you mean to say that we're supposed to have two of them working?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  40. Temperature bellow freezing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An outside thermometer in a car says nothing about the temperature of the road. Just because the road isn't slick where you are currently driving does not mean there is not a slick patch in the bend on the bridge ahead. The temperature of any given spot on the road will change base on the geography beneath it. The snow flakes are a very good idea. Once the surface temperature drops bellow freezing, ice is possible, and likely.

    1. Re:Temperature bellow freezing by PPH · · Score: 1

      FLIR for vehicles. You don't actually need the image. Just a processor that looks at the data and recognizes a cold patch on the road ahead. Turn on a warning light, throttle back automatically, select an optimized anti-lock traction control algorithm, etc.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  41. Glows for up to 10 hours, huh? by REggert · · Score: 1

    And what are they going to do for the remaining 6 hours of the night during winter?

    --

    cp /dev/zero ~/signature.txt

    1. Re:Glows for up to 10 hours, huh? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I gotta admit, that's one thing that kind of struck me.

      Here in southern California, in the dead of Winter, we get about 14 hours of night and about 10 hours of daylight. So even in our southern latitude, it appears that we'd come up four hours short.

  42. biggest worry is consistency by MarkH · · Score: 1

    you are on a glow I dark, ice warning, lots of warning for bends road and get used to it; then you hit one without expecting then to be there.

  43. Not the Netherlands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's clearly not the Netherlands. See all the mountains in the background?

  44. Zeer Open Asfalt Beton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ZOAB wiki article (in Dutch).
    I didn't know it was so innovative. It's very good if it rains a lot in your country, or if the large roads are close to lived-in areas (like in the Netherlands). But it's not a panacea and it wears down more quickly than concrete road.

  45. Active Traction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just prefer a system which detects when the wheels are slipping, and then immediately sprays a traction agent onto the tire treads.
    So it would work similar to anti-lock brakes or stability control.

    The added benefit is that the traction agent would then also be smeared onto the road at the spot where the slipperiness was, so that other vehicles later passing over the same spot would also benefit, even if they didn't have the same active traction system onboard.

  46. Better yet, fully "Solar Roadways" by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://solarroadways.com/intro.shtml
    "Suppose we made a section of road out of this material and housed solar cells to collect energy, which could pay for the cost of the panel, thereby creating a road that would pay for itself over time. What if we added LEDs to "paint" the road lines from beneath, lighting up the road for safer night time driving? What if we added a heating element in the surface (like the defrosting wire in the rear window of our cars) to prevent snow/ice accumulation in northern climates? The ideas and possibilities just continued to roll in and the Solar Roadway project was born.
        In 2009, we received a contract from the Federal Highway Administration to build the first ever Solar Road Panel prototype. During the course of its construction, we learned many lessons and discovered new and better ways to approach this project. These methods and discoveries are discussed throughout this website. Please enjoy and send us any questions that you may have. ...
        The Solar Roadway is a series of structurally-engineered solar panels that are driven upon. The idea is to replace all current petroleum-based asphalt roads, parking lots, and driveways with Solar Road Panels that collect energy to be used by our homes and businesses. Our ultimate goal is to be able to store excess energy in or alongside the Solar Roadways. This renewable energy replaces the need for the current fossil fuels used for the generation of electricity. This, in turn, cuts greenhouse gases literally in half....
        Each individual panel consists of three basic layers:
        Road Surface Layer - translucent and high-strength, it is rough enough to provide great traction, yet still passes sunlight through to the solar collector cells embedded within, along with LEDs and a heating element. It is capable of handling today's heaviest loads under the worst of conditions. Weatherproof, it protects the electronics layer beneath it.
        Electronics Layer - Contains a microprocessor board with support circuitry for sensing loads on the surface and controlling a heating element. No more snow/ice removal and no more school/business closings due to inclement weather. The on-board microprocessor controls lighting, communications, monitoring, etc. With a communications device every 12 feet, the Solar Roadway is an intelligent highway system.
        Base Plate Layer - While the electronics layer collects energy from the sun, it is the base plate layer that distributes power (collected from the electronics layer) and data signals (phone, TV, internet, etc.) "downline" to all homes and businesses connected to the Solar Roadway. Weatherproof, it protects the electronics layer above it. ...
        When multiple Solar Road Panels are interconnected, the intelligent Solar Roadway is formed. These panels replace current driveways, parking lots, and all road systems, be they interstate highways, state routes, downtown streets, residential streets, or even plain dirt or gravel country roads. Panels can also be used in amusement parks, raceways, bike paths, parking garage rooftops, remote military locations, etc. Any home or business connected to the Solar Roadway (via a Solar Road Panel driveway or parking lot) receives the power and data signals that the Solar Roadway provides. The Solar Roadway becomes an intelligent, self-healing, decentralized (secure) power grid. "

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.