Slashdot Mirror


Timothy Lord Discovers the Good Night Lamp at CES (Video)

Many reporters go to the CES, AKA Consumer Electronic Show (warning - link landing page plays annoying sound) in Las Vegas to see the newest 42.001" LCD TVs, which are 0.001" bigger than last year's 42" models. And there are many boring Windows 8 devices, many of which both run Windows and can display the number 8. These items, along with keynotes from tech gurus like Bill Clinton (We're not making this up!) may be amazing to some news outlets, but not to Slashdot or to Our Man Timothy, who seeks out the new, the bizarre, and the unusual and -- without taking a dime from them -- lets their instigators talk to him about their wares. But it's got to be good stuff, not run of the mill incremental advances. Like the Good Night Lamp(tm), which was invented by Alexandra Deschamps-Sonsino, whose "work has been exhibited," says the goodnightlamp.com/team page, "at the Milan Furniture Fair, London Design Festival, The Victoria & Albert Museum and the Museum of Modern Art in New York." Now the Good Night Lamp people are showing off their product and trying to raise money through Kickstarter. But that's enough from us. We will now hand the microphone to Ms. Deschamps-Sonsino and let her tell you the rest.

33 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He was a keynote in Chicago in the late 90's on the digital divide.
    (granted he was president then)

    1. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the only tech that people take seriously if it were promoted/introduced by Billy C, would be computer controlled sex toys.

      They would take interest, and immediately not want one.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      "That's about all you need to know about Clinton and the Internet."
      Sure, if you are a biased moron and got all your information from /. headlines.

      The Clipper CHip was about creating secure communications. In 1993 he talked about it, and it's a good idea. Then the flaws of it were presented, and concerns rolled in and he stopped prompting. It was dead by 1996.

      And a president singed an Veto proof bill? shocking. I like how you overlook his pressure to add, what became, section 230.

      If you boil any presidency down to a few out of context things, you are being stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by MrLizard · · Score: 2

      "Sure, if you are a biased moron and got all your information from /. headlines."

      A base insult! I ALSO get my information from Fark headlines! So there!

      Anyway;
      a)Clinton tried to get the clipper chip, or its equivalent, through three times, at least accoding to Slashdot headlines. I'd normally use Fark headlines, but I don't think it existed back then.

      b)While the Communications Act, as a whole, was pretty much a done deal, Clinton actually called out the portion of it that contained the CDA during the signing ceremony, taking special pride in that part of it. Granted, the DoJs defense of it was so pathetic that he could have given them orders to throw it -- but as Obama showed with DOMA, the Executive branch is not actually obliged to defend a law it considers unconstitutional at all, and he could have chosen to do that.

    4. Re:Bill Clinton has done tech shows before by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      You just have different taste, some men would greatly enjoy the Simu-Cankle!

      XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  2. !good by stokessd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just what I need to have a blissful night sleep is a lamp that is controlled by someone else. Next up, let's put control of the toilet flush lever in someone else's hands while I'm showering.

    1. Re:!good by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      That could be fun...

      Your toilet/urinal flush mechanism works... just for a different toilet urinal!

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:!good by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      Yes, it can be.

      I've had houses where it was that bad, and others where it wasn't.

      Comparing it to the plumbing from my stay in Russia.
      In Russia, apartments were set up so the whole building had one hot/old water supply, and a lot of pipes going around to each area. Meaning opening a couple faucets (or flushing toilets) of one type wouldn't drastically reduce that type's pressure. It's cheaper, no toilet flush issue (usually minor anyway), however, if others use up all the hot water, there's none left until the much larger tank reheats (so you have less control over your hot water access).

      In some American style houses/apartments, they solve the issue by having larger cold-water intake pipes that feed the separate fixtures.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:!good by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that some people don't have pressure balancing valves in their shower, especially in older homes and are too cheep or lazy to get them put in. My house had that problem and it wasn't that hard to fix if you know how to solder copper pipe.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  3. My favorite CES item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the android-powered butt plug. No shit. It's got wifi and a web server so you can browse your ass and control the vibrations. There's also a web cam but I don't know why... there's no light and the camera will probably be covered with lube. (Hmm... sounds like a new instagram filter).

  4. It's nice and everything, but... by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

    That is a *lot* of money for something that pretty limited in its usage.

  5. Glad to see a product like this by ddd0004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's like the spirit of the "Jump to Conclusions" mat lives on

  6. "Timothy Lord discovers shrooms at CES" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging from the tone and content of the "article" above, I'd guess that Timothy Lord discovered magic mushrooms at CES.

  7. Re:Wow by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kickstarter seems to be getting seriously diluted. Everybody is using it.

    That's like saying the internet is diluted. The word you're looking for is *popular*.

    Not that this is a particularly worthy project, though...

  8. Re:Wow by OakDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nobody uses it anymore - too crowded!

  9. Dear Muggles, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe implementing the wizard's clock from Harry Potter would be a better, very similar, idea.

  10. A descriptive summary would be nice by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really give a shit whether or not you're not Bill Clinton, tell me what the lamp does. I'm not going to click a video and turn my sound up at work.

    The hell does this do?

    1. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Internet connected lamp. When someone turns the big lamp on, little lamps turn on too. So to answer your question, it does nothing useful.

    2. Re:A descriptive summary would be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can click on the Show/Hide Transcript link and it will bypass the video and give you a transcript. Was it really easier to write a post complaining about it?

  11. Re:(tm)? we have to mention (tm) every time? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good Night Lamp? Go The F*ck To Sleep!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  12. Handy for elderly relatives? by miowpurr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This may be good for elderly relatives living on their own. When they turn their lamp on in the morning, you know they are ok. If it doesn't turn on by a certain time, have the police (or a trusted neighbor) run a "welfare check" on them.

    1. Re:Handy for elderly relatives? by sandytaru · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Give them a call first - they'll appreciate that more than the police barging on their door if there's nothing actually wrong.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Handy for elderly relatives? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Actually, take that idea and put it into elderly care facility. So people in the front office know whose light is on or not, and then check on them.

      Add it to a motion detector.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Handy for elderly relatives? by chispito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This may be good for elderly relatives living on their own. When they turn their lamp on in the morning, you know they are ok. If it doesn't turn on by a certain time, have the police (or a trusted neighbor) run a "welfare check" on them.

      Good point, unless your elderly relative is a little forgetful and doesn't see the point in turning a lamp on while the sun is up.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  13. CES request by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please stop producing useless garbage in fancy plastic and metal coverings and give us high speed internet. And when I say high speed, I don't mean that watered down swill your ISP sells you. I mean "set my harddrive on fire downloading torrents" speed. I mean multiple 1080p streams of video over one pipe. I do not need an iWhatever, or a remote-controlled lamp... I need a network connection that doesn't suck so hard it's in danger of forming its own event horizon.

    I don't care if it's wireless, or runs over copper or fiber, or if you have to shoot lasers through the sky. Get it done, people. We're about ten years late to the party as it is right now -- our infrastructure is rotten. Shannon's Law is kicking our butts, and we can only re-arrange bits of metal and plastic and input devices in clever new ways for so long before it's just old and busted.

    The future is bandwidth. Get on it.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  14. Oh good by ddd0004 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone invented the precursor to the IP phone. It's the IP telegraph. Now I just need to polish up on my Morse code.

  15. Re:Clinton by ddd0004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That may be true, but I bet he really went for the booth babes.

  16. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by KermodeBear · · Score: 2

    In addition, why on earth do I need to know someone's status all the time? This seems like a product for helicopter parents and stalkers.

    --
    Love sees no species.
  17. Improvement Suggestions... by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Instead of selling/producing the large lamp. they should develop a module with embedded WiFi that goes between any lamp and the power circuit. That way you could use any lamp with the system.
    2. Instead of selling separate little home lamps and, presumably, having multiple lamps, what they should do is develop a "Christmas Village" type product with multiple houses, street, etc. Each miniature house would then light up based on the status of the paired module.
    3. Create virtual "Christmas Village" software/web page

    For the "Christmas Village" piece, it could have different scenes: Winter, Suburbs, Big City, Summer cottages, etc. In fact, if they did it right, they could develop the village layout that allows for skins for each of the houses, landscape, etc. which could be changed based on the season, etc... For example, this would allow the user to set up a village with an office building, cottage, house, etc. You could add grass, asphalt, water, snow landscape skins, etc.

    Personally, I think that it would be cool to see a miniature village light up when my sisters, parents, nephews, etc. are home. At least I would then know when to call them to wish them a happy birthday, etc.

  18. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by Pope · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In addition, why on earth do I need to know someone's status all the time? This seems like a product for helicopter parents and stalkers.

    No kidding: http://goodnightlamp.com/who/

    Off to college
    It’s hard when your children leave the nest, so give them a Big Lamp and you won’t have to feel like you’re nagging them for news. They’ll want to keep in touch with their school friends too.

    Ugh. When I moved out of the country to go to university, my folks just called me if they wanted to talk, usually on Sunday afternoon. Sometimes we'd talk for a couple of minutes, sometimes for an hour.

    This is a product for people who can't be arsed to make an effort to communicate with people they allegedly love.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  19. Some uses... by MrLizard · · Score: 3

    While it's not exactly the must-have tech toy of the century, I don't think its completely useless. Some suggestions:

    a)Set up bomb triggered by photoelectric sensor.
    b)Place lamp next to bomb.
    c)Press button.

    Someone's already mentioned the morse code use. Sure, the FBI is monitoring your tweets, but are they monitoring your, uhm, blinks?

    It is worth noting that not everyone is always watching their IM, etc. A signal to people who are NOT online that your status has changed is not without its uses.

    Add in some kind of color changing mechanism, so that you can sync colors, and you can send a large number of message. "Two blue blinks means the cops are on their way, clear out!", for example.

    Heck, I HATE it when I am summoned from my home office for dinner by someone shouting down the stairs at me. It breaks my concentration hideously. Having a signaling device like this with no annoying vocal component would actually be useful to me. Others in my family aren't online all the time; they can't/won't just send me an email to let me know dinner is ready.

    We live in the dying days of a great empire. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that can change this -- not by individual or collective action. Thus, we should eat the bread and attend the circuses. Our descendants (well, your descendants, I'm not spawning) will envy us for having the kind of surplus resources that allows the creation of things like this. Enjoy it while you can; refusing to enjoy it won't change anything, except your happiness level.

  20. Re:Wow by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "Not that this is a particularly worthy project, though..."

    I beg to differ.

    Terrorist of the world are waiting for this. Just make bombs out of the sub-lamps and install them where you want the kaboom to happen.

    Then fly home and switch on the master lamp and bathe in the soft, soothing light.

  21. Re:Use Instant Messaging instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like it's aimed at empty nest parents who want to feel connected to their kids without constantly bugging them. You spend 18 years seeing someone every day, sitting down to meals and talking with them... when they move out it can be hard. You miss them and want to talk to them, but you know that they need their own space in order to move on and grow. I think this is a good way of being psychologically connected in a minimally obtrusive way. Certainly doesn't replace talking to people, but does make it easier to bear living in a suddenly very empty house.

    Captcha: serene