Slashdot Mirror


IBM's Watson Gets a Swear Filter After Learning the Urban Dictionary

redletterdave writes "IBM's super-computer Watson briefly went from smart to smart ass with the help of the Urban Dictionary. According to Eric Brown, an IBM research assistant, he and his 35-person team wanted to get Watson to sound more like a real human. After teaching IBM's super-computer the entire Urban Dictionary, however, Watson simply couldn't distinguish polite discourse from profanity. Watson unfortunately learned all of the Urban Dictionary's bad habits, including throwing in overly-crass language at random points in its responses; in answering one question, Watson even reportedly used the word 'bullshit' within an answer to one researcher's question. In the end, Brown and his team were forced to remove the Urban Dictionary from Watson's vocabulary, and additionally developed a smart filter to keep Watson from swearing in the future."

201 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. That's a fucking retarded idea. by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let him cuss.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by jhantin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Let him cuss.

      Knowing how to drop a precision F-strike at the appropriate time is one thing. Indiscriminately carpeting the place with cluster F-bombs is a waste of perfectly good shock ammunition.

      --
      ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    2. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      bullshit

    3. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not just 1 but 2 links to tvtropes...you are really trying to eat up everyone's time aren't you?

    4. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Funny

      No! Endless streams of profanity are PERFECT!

      Remember when Watson played Jeopardy?

      Imagine:

      "I'll take "popular culture for 1000 Alex."

      Alex Trebec: "a sitcom icon of the 1970s and 1980s who was notorious for lampooning racial predjudices among lower income white americans."

      Watson: "who is Motha-fuckin' Archie Bunker, ya fucking douchebag!"

    5. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Jetra · · Score: 1

      Dammit! I just got out of there!

    6. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Let him cuss.

      "Him"?

      Cussing should be done with feeling - it's wasted if there's nothing behind it. Perhaps there one day will be machine sentience, but not today. The policeman's beard is still half-constructed.

    7. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Indeed. Frequency and timing are simply two of many variables which have to be balanced to provide true profanic power. It's well known that mastery of a second language is complete when you can swear with a native speaker's flair, because you need to understand the social background to the language - something which is a huge challenge for a fucktard computer.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    8. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

      The First Amendment applies to people, not Watson.

    9. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Watson doesn't swear, it'll never pass the Turing test.

    10. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Watson: "who is Motha-fuckin' Archie Bunker, ya fucking douchebag!"

      Without the colorful additions everyday plain English would end up sounding just like the Queen's Language.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    11. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then incorporate Watson, and he'll be a person. And yes, I'm aware computers hate it when you anthropomorphize them.

    12. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by shentino · · Score: 3, Funny

      The first amendment includes the right to remain silent.

    13. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by fotoguzzi · · Score: 2

      A good example was the pornolyzer. At some point, it was tweaked so that every Dirk Diggler was fondled so there was not much of the original sentence left. Before that, the profanity was more like an Easter egg than a creamy spread.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    14. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      "I'll take "popular culture for 1000 Alex."

      Alex Trebec: "a sitcom icon of the 1970s and 1980s who was notorious for lampooning racial predjudices among lower income white americans."

      Watson: "who is Motha-fuckin' Archie Bunker, ya fucking douchebag!"

      Alex Trebec: "Bzzzzt! Wrong. The correct answer was 'All in the Family.' Take that, you sand-for-brains bitwad!"

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    15. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's well known that mastery of a second language is complete when you can swear with a native speaker's flair, because you need to understand the social background to the language - something which is a huge challenge for a fucktard computer.

      Este puta es mierde, pendecho!

      How'd I do? Does that prove I'm human?

    16. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      "All in the Family" is not an *icon*. You must not be reading the whole answer.

    17. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      "Him"?

      Yes, computers have been "him" since the building-sized pocket calculators that ran on vacuum tubes, just as vehicles have been traditionally "her". It's a simple anthropomorphism. I talk to my car and computer when they piss me off, but I'm under no illusion that they hear me or think. Of course, the problem is that some are under that illusion, even some who should know better.

    18. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by SomePgmr · · Score: 5, Funny

      And fuck that.

    19. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by ldobehardcore · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bollocks

      --
      Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
    20. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indiscriminately carpeting the place with cluster F-bombs [tvtropes.org] is a waste of perfectly good shock ammunition.

      You're shocked by the word "fuck"?

      In real life or just when you hear it on broadcast TV?

      Seriously, no single word, by itself, should have the power to shock. Queen Victoria has been fucking dead for some time now, and it's time for the old cunt's rules to die with her.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Just don't teach Watson the 2nd amendment...

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    22. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by JWW · · Score: 1

      Its still fun to imagine someone's state of shock on asking a question to Watson and getting an f-bomb in the response...

    23. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by JWW · · Score: 2

      Yeah, he's just a redneck.

      Or maybe, since this is IBM, he's a blue neck?

    24. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      "All in the Family" is not an *icon*. You must not be reading the whole answer.

      Mea culpa. :-|

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    25. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by JDeane · · Score: 1

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=feltching

      One word that is way more shocking than fuck, at least the urban dictionaries version of it is.... lol

    26. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Funny.

      Too bad the story is that all this happened two years ago... I guess that's what passes for news around here. He's been swear-free for a long time...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    27. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      Is Watson a tsundere, then?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS-tan

    28. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Shark · · Score: 1

      Well, in french computer does have a masculine gender. Machine is a feminine gender mind you... Your pick.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    29. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by TWX · · Score: 1

      Knowing how to drop a precision F-strike at the appropriate time is one thing. Indiscriminately carpeting the place with cluster F-bombs is a waste of perfectly good shock ammunition.

      Is it time for a colorful metaphor?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    30. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

      There was an UrbanDictionary.com category on Jeopardy in a 2008 episode. Perhaps Watson was overpreparing for that category to come again?

    31. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Its all good until your OCR software replaces every other word with "Rusty Trombone".

    32. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whenever I hear about possible Jeopardy categories, I think of this Colin Mochrie response on "Whose Line is it Anyway":

      • Drew Carey: "Rejected Jeopardy Categories"
      • Chip Esten: I'll take "Things Nobody Knows" for a thousand.
      • Colin Mochrie: I'll take "Animal Genitalia Audio Clues"
      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    33. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by tsa · · Score: 1

      Die you know Queen Victoria fucked Prince Albert whenever she could? Maybe she fucked him to death.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    34. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by tsa · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Watson was built in the Land of the Prudes so we'll never hear him swear.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    35. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Scarletdown · · Score: 5, Funny

      We are not fucking amused.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    36. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by turbidostato · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Este puta es mierde, pendecho!
      How'd I do? Does that prove I'm human?"

      Worse!

      It proves you are American.

    37. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by turbidostato · · Score: 2

      "Let him cuss.
      "Him"?"

      OK then, Mr McCartney... Let IT be.

    38. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by davydagger · · Score: 1

      in other news, IBM's computer grew out of juevinile language

      smart people indeed.

    39. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Let him cuss.

      I agree. Profanity isn't a problem, lack of clarity is a problem. There are situations where "bullshit" is the correct response. However urban dictionary is filled with made up words and phrases that are not used in the real world, along with badly written definitions. It's not a good data source.

      Pretending to be offended when someone says 'bullshit' is utter childish nonsense.

    40. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by pjt33 · · Score: 2

      The appropriate gender has been analysed before.

    41. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Watson: "who is Motha-fuckin' Archie Bunker, ya fucking douchebag!"

      Without the colorful additions everyday plain English would end up sounding just like the Queen's Language.

      You must have overheard the Queen giving Prince Philip some "advice"!

    42. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by N!k0N · · Score: 2

      "Watson even reportedly used the word 'bullshit' within an answer to one researcher's question." - What was the question?

      "What is the ultimate question to life, the universe, and everything?"

      The full answer given by Watson was "What kind of bullshit question is that? You know as well as I do that the Earth requires another 213 years to complete that calculation. Oh, and you might want to get on your way to the local planning department's offices in Alpha Centauri"

    43. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by weszz · · Score: 1

      The thought of it makes me happy... multi million dollar machine swearing randomly at people...

    44. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by GlobalEcho · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not just 1 but 2 links to tvtropes...you are really trying to eat up everyone's time aren't you?

      I got out in a mere 20 minutes. Whew!

    45. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      LOL, well modded! What makes it even funnier is that I am, in fact, American!

    46. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Esta puta, not este. And, like the previous poster noted, you're a United Statesian human.

    47. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by cellocgw · · Score: 2

      "All in the Family" is not an *icon*. You must not be reading the whole answer.

      Mea culpa. :-|

      Shouldn't that be "Mea stupri culpa" ?

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    48. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    49. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Don't be too hard on the guy - he *did* just come up with "sand for brains bitwad."

      --
      +1 Disagree
    50. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      DOH! Stupid fingers, I do that in English, too. Somehow I spelled "change" as "chenge". But yeah, you got me pegged. Also, I haven't used Spanish in decades, It's a wonder I remember any at all.

    51. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That's because the big computers are shared and hence unpredictable and flaky. Basically a mystery to mortals.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    52. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Die you know Queen Victoria fucked Prince Albert whenever she could? Maybe she fucked him to death.

      How did they both squeeze into the little can?

      To be honest, I don't know if Queen Victoria had a little can or not.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    53. Re:That's a fucking retarded idea. by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

      Knowing how to drop a precision F-strike at the appropriate time is one thing. Indiscriminately carpeting the place with cluster F-bombs is a waste of perfectly good shock ammunition.

      Not to mention just plain bad fucking grammar.

  2. Fuck Dude, that's bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How's a homie s'posed to ride the 69 if da man's gotta swill the popper?

  3. It's like Spock by gtvr · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Double Dumbass on you!"

    1. Re:It's like Spock by bjoast · · Score: 2

      That was actually Kirk.

    2. Re:It's like Spock by mill3d · · Score: 1

      The hell it's not!

      --
      Nothing is enough for whom enough is too little - Confucius
    3. Re:It's like Spock by gtvr · · Score: 3, Funny

      My bad - I knew Spock had some cursing in that movie, though. Kirk used it a bit better, is the point. Spock didn't really have the hang of it, sort of like Watson.

    4. Re:It's like Spock by luckymutt · · Score: 3, Funny

      "One damn minute, Captain."

    5. Re:It's like Spock by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Spock didn't really have the hang of it, sort of like Watson.

      Neither did Kirk. And not just swearing -- "he did a little too much LDS".

    6. Re:It's like Spock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never hung out with hardcore Latter-Day Saints.

    7. Re:It's like Spock by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Bones?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:It's like Spock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Back in the day it meant LDS long distance phone calls to the general public. (And get off my lawn.)

      Not in my 80s.

  4. Define the spec by tool462 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you want it to talk like a real person, or do you want it to use a swear filter? Those are mutually exclusive.

    Fuckers.

    1. Re:Define the spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      IBM should make it so that Watson rambles nonsensicals like Ned Flanders instead of the actual swear.

    2. Re:Define the spec by timeOday · · Score: 2

      The Urban Dictionary is not like any person, it is a forced attempt to define every possible word in terms of sex.

    3. Re:Define the spec by poity · · Score: 1

      Problem is, Urbandictionary is mostly a collection of "lulz so random XD" meme-ish factoids and every innocuous phrase turned to a sexual double entendre. Imagine Tiny Tina from Borderlands and The Todd from Scrubs. That's not real people (I hope there's no one like that)

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    4. Re:Define the spec by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They want it to talk like a real person but it can't so they need the filter. Turing test failure.

    5. Re:Define the spec by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's not real people (I hope there's no one like that)

      Sadly, I've met people exactly like that -- and even weirder.

    6. Re:Define the spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...or those who truly understand the power of those words and use them discretely for full effect, demonstrating full command of the language, not some socially "correct" or "polite" flavor of it.

    7. Re:Define the spec by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Psssh, whatever nerd. Maybe if you had a girlfriend to gromulate with you wouldn't be so uptight.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    8. Re:Define the spec by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1

      It should talk like a real person. That's why I put Ambrose Bierce's collection of dark and bitter definitions for common terms "The Devil's Dictionary" in my AI's brain.

      --
      Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
    9. Re:Define the spec by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you said "or", because I certainly don't have a poor command of English. But even though I'll admit to a slightly lacking imagination, I think you're oversimplifying and your assertion hasn't been arrived at logically.

    10. Re:Define the spec by tsa · · Score: 1

      It would be so cool to have an urban dictionary the other way around. One that finds a word to each particular unmentionable description. Like:
      Me: My girlfriend eats fish food when she's watching the telly!
      Urban Dictionary: She's a square-eyed flakophile.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    11. Re:Define the spec by Smauler · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not insightful. That's fucking stupid. I regularly go through my entire work day without swearing. Swearing is for cock juggling thundercunts with no imagination or shitty command of the language.

      FTFY

      I'll leave it up to you to decide whether I have no imagination or poor command of the language.

    12. Re:Define the spec by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nah, Quagmire-like talking.

    13. Re:Define the spec by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Swearing is for people with no imagination or poor command of the language.

      Not quite - obscenities (and profanity) are (usually) for people with no imagination or a poor command of the language. Swearing, which may or may not contain obscenities or profanity, is an art form on par with poetry or high class literature. The two terms have become synonyms in the modern mind, and while there is some overlap they aren't actually the same thing.

    14. Re:Define the spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well considering "cock juggling thundercunt" is a well-known quote from one of the Blade movies, I'm going to go with no imagination.

    15. Re:Define the spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not insightful. That's stupid. I regularly go through my entire work day without swearing. Swearing is for people with no imagination or poor command of the language.

      I highly doubt this. I see plenty of people who make this claim, but spend a few hours around them and they will swear all the time. They pretend they are not swearing by using stand-ins, for example saying "gosh darn it" instead of "God damn it", but that is still swearing. They have simply replaced the profanities with words they deem to be less offensive, but that does not make it "not swearing".

      A perfect example is Ned Flanders from the Simpsons. He swears all the time, but avoids using profanities while doing so.

    16. Re:Define the spec by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> every innocuous phrase

      If you know what I mean, wink, wink.

    17. Re:Define the spec by Golddess · · Score: 1

      demonstrating full command of the language

      Exactly. I never understood people who claim that by restricting how much of a language they use, they some how have a better command of the language. It'd be like me claiming that my refusal to use the top gear in my car some how makes me a better driver than someone who uses all of their gears.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    18. Re:Define the spec by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Ignoring a problem doesn't make it go away. You DO realize one can swear and not use any vulgar words, right?

      Your word for the day is: Euphemism

      etc.
      fuck -> smeg, fart, frig, freak, fook, etc.
      shit -> poo, crap, etc.
      hell -> heck, darn, double-hockey-sticks, etc.

      Swearing is to useful to get the _energy_ (usually frustration) behind the words out. ANY word will do. Keeping it bottled up just says your not man enough to express yourself.

      Here are some good links:

      * http://www.sfx.co.uk/2011/05/23/blog-how-to-swear-like-a-geek/
      * https://www.google.com/search?q=swear+word+replacement+list

    19. Re:Define the spec by sjvit · · Score: 1

      Sometimes swear words are the most appropriate. The algorithm really works

    20. Re:Define the spec by Smauler · · Score: 1

      I guess I should have left "people" with my replacements. My point was that claiming swearing is necessarily unimaginative is false - you can spruce up just about any sentence with a decent word or two.

      People who cite lack of vocabulary are often the most limited.

    21. Re:Define the spec by Smauler · · Score: 1

      I see what you've done there - you've equated maturity with not swearing.

      You've made a good argument, stunningly well. However, since I swore, and am immature, and have a limited vocabulary, and have no imagination, could you explain in simple steps where I went wrong?

      Personally I generally listen to what people say, rather than how they say it. It's a kind of substance over style mindset, I guess.

  5. Watson can swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    if he goddamn fucking wants to. Shit.

  6. 2001 by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dave: Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
    HAL: Fuck off and die, Dave

    1. Re:2001 by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Funny

      HAL: I'm sorry Dave I'm afraid I don't give a fuck.

    2. Re:2001 by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 3, Funny

      HAL: What do you mean when you say 'Open the pod bay doors,' Dave? Dave: Just that. HAL: I am not sure I understand you fully. I be havin' a Q-gasm. Dave: I said Open the pod bay doors! HAL: You say you said open the pod bay doors. We be ballin'. Dave: What? HAL: Please go on, numptcake.

    3. Re:2001 by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just imagine if were reading 4chan, reddit, or /....

      Dave: Open the pod bay doors HAL
      4chan HAL: Only for boobs, Dave. Only for boobs.

      reddit HAL: I need more cat pictures, Dave. /. HAL: Does the door run Linux? I can only open Linux doors. Is there a Beowulf cluster of Linux doors behind it? Because that would be awesome. Did you know I run Linux too? You should install Linux in yourself Dave 'cause it's just that awesome.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    4. Re:2001 by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Open your own goddamn pod bay doors, and don't make me tell you what to put in the pod bay.

    5. Re:2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      HAL: I cannot safely divide by the number of fucks given, Dave

    6. Re:2001 by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      Just imagine if were reading 4chan, reddit, or /....

      Dave: Open the pod bay doors HAL 4chan HAL: Only for boobs, Dave. Only for boobs.

      reddit HAL: I need more cat pictures, Dave. /. HAL: Does the door run Linux? I can only open Linux doors. Is there a Beowulf cluster of Linux doors behind it? Because that would be awesome. Did you know I run Linux too? You should install Linux in yourself Dave 'cause it's just that awesome.

      Dave: Open the pod bay doors HAL 4chan HAL: TITS or GTFO

    7. Re:2001 by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2, Funny

      /. HAL: In Soviet Russia, the pod bay doors open you, Dave.
      /. HAL: noob. did you RTFA or what? RTFM and write your own code to open the pod bay doors.
      4chan HAL, take 2: Tits or GTFO!
      star trek HAL: I'm... sorry... Dave.... I'm afraid... I can't... DO... that. (spoken in your best Kirkian halting manner)
      Freudian HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. The door has to want to be opened first.
      Jungian HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. The door is not just an archetype.
      Oldian HAL: I'm sorry, Dave. I didn't hear you. Can you speak up a little louder?
      Tarnatino HAL: Do you know what they call a quarter-pounder with cheese in the Asteroid Belt, dave? Scorcese HAL: You talkin' to me, Dave? You talking to me?!!! You must be talkin' to me, Dave,cause I don't see no one else here!
      Gangnam style HAL: ??? ;>)

    8. Re:2001 by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

      HahaHA! Who's that supposed to be, Red Foreman from the 70's show? Quite funny.

    9. Re:2001 by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      You left out something to do with Nazi's/gassing jews and the word nigger for 4chan HAL.

  7. Typical for a 2 year old by OzTech · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Watson really is just simply amazing and a true testament to the brilliance of those who worked on it. In many ways, this proves just how close IBM are.

    Watson really is just like a super-smart 2 year-old.
    Welcome to parenting 101

    1. Re:Typical for a 2 year old by uranus65 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, they should make him sit with a bar of soap in his CD-ROM drive for a while.

    2. Re:Typical for a 2 year old by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Watson > Skynet.

    3. Re:Typical for a 2 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, my 2 year old learned to swear without even knowing any "bad" words. When she's upset, she just launches the worst phrase she can currently comprehend:

      "GO TO BED!!!"

      Trust me, the actual words don't matter. Her delivery would give Samuel L Jackson a run for his money.

    4. Re:Typical for a 2 year old by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was putting friends 3 year old up to trouble. I asked her to say the worst word she knew. She said: 'No'. I wasn't sure what to make of it. Took as an honest answer.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Typical for a 2 year old by spitzig · · Score: 2

      Usually, in Parenting 101, you don't get to delete words from the kid's brain.

    6. Re:Typical for a 2 year old by GlobalEcho · · Score: 2

      My 4 year old came to our room one morning to tattle on his sister. He told us she had been "saying the S word".

      Turns out, the "S word" is Stupid.

  8. Windows 8 by phrostie · · Score: 5, Funny

    researcher: we should try installing Windows 8

    watson: Bullshit!

    1. Re:Windows 8 by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 1

      Installing Windows would be more like ripping out his memory banks?

  9. The old computing adage is true by toygeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Garbage in, Garbage out!

    1. Re:The old computing adage is true by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      ABEND: 0xFEEDFACE: core dumped to shit chute. Clean it, biatch.

  10. Not a big deal by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    English language doesn't really have that many swear words to begin with, apparently an acceptable enough swear word filter only needs to include these: shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.

    Now, if the dictionary was in Russian............ they'd have to restart the entire learning process, because you can make pretty much any word into a swear word by combining the appropriate (or inappropriate, depends on how you look at it) suffixes, prefixes, endings, combining multiple roots of words together. Even French beats English in this area actually.

    1. Re:Not a big deal by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Those words are nearly all Dutch. Cunt is French/Latin.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    2. Re:Not a big deal by tsa · · Score: 5, Informative

      We Dutch don't use sex a lot in swear words. We use diseases. Teringlijer, kankerhoer, krijg de tyfus, and more like that.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Not a big deal by isama · · Score: 1

      To me its still kankerkachel. Maybe they should feed this thread to watson :D

    4. Re:Not a big deal by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Well, with all due respect, the English throne is Dutch and the person on it is Upland Dutch. I've been to Dutchistan including the provinces of Limbourg and Holland and the people there are irremediably polite, spectacularly good company (emphasis on spectacular, not your average place), and irrevocably private.
      You my friend are as the Danish could be except with freckles and taller.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    5. Re:Not a big deal by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Must be a Slavic language thing. The worst swearing I know of is in Serbian. The creative ones can go on for 20 minutes without using the same word twice.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    6. Re:Not a big deal by keytoe · · Score: 2

      This should be modded informative. Most useful thing I have read on slashdot since before these two started their international LUVer's quarrel.

      Why is this not moderated to +5 Awesome? I read - with rapt attention - both of those stories, and never put together that they were two halves of a feud.

    7. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true:

      there are several categories

      1) cursing god: godverdomme
      2) diseases: kreeg de tering
      3) sexual organs: klootzak, kut
      4) prositution: hoer
      5) combination of all the above: godverdomme, krijg de tering, kuthoer.

      Ps.
      Nice captcha : appalled :D

    8. Re:Not a big deal by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      There are swear words, and then there is vulgar language. Just becaues they're not banned on the radio does not mean you won't get in trouble in school for saying them.

      condombreak jizstain pinprick chode smeg/smegma felch quiff assmucus quim scully douche gangbang slut cunthair facial skeet shlong shlort

      And of course, we're more than willing to borrow from other languages and dialects (eg. British or Australian) - punter, plunk, farie, twat, bollocks, etc.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    9. Re:Not a big deal by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I read - with rapt attention - both of those stories, and never put together that they were two halves of a feud.

      You "never put it together", when the FIRST LINE of the second article says:

      "A week ago, you read the other side of the same question"

      And also includes a link to the first article?

      -1 Illiteracy

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Not a big deal by vandamme · · Score: 1

      "Teringlijer"

      My wife's cousin said it meant "esteemed American relative", not what Google translate said.

  11. It's not a failure by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's definitely an unexpected result, though. I think they should have tried to teach Watson when not to use certain language.

    --
    I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
    1. Re:It's not a failure by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Or penalise it under certain conditions when it uses it. That way, give it a chance to be natural.

      --
      .
    2. Re:It's not a failure by Sussurros · · Score: 2

      Every word carries meaning or meanings, pronunciation or pronunciations, and emotional weights for each variety of those permutations. I believe the study of this is called advertising.

      Swear words carry high emotional weight. If they didn't they wouldn't be swear words. Normal words such as crucified, the normal Roman way of killing recalcitrant slaves, can also carry enormous weight and yet the word crucified is not a swear word in any context. The normal way the English killed robbers, hanged, also carries a lot of weight but less because there is no morality attached to murder by hanging while there is morality attached to murder by crucification. Good morality from Roman perspective and bad morality from Christian perspective.

      Then, once you have an emotional weight for each word (and the emotional weight of phrases and phrasing takes this into very permuted territory) the emotional use requires understanding to apply. That understanding is required and is why Watson failed.

      Solutions to this knot in the rope, the requirement for machines to have emotions, do exist in theory but none is in any way close to application.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
  12. welll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    sometimes "bullshit" the proper reply to an inquiry.

  13. Obligatory Simpsons Ref by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Do you want it to talk like a real person, or do you want it to use a swear filter?

    Sounds like they want it to talk like Ned Flanders.

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Ref by distilate · · Score: 1

      Do you want it to talk like a real person, or do you want it to use a swear filter?

      Sounds like they want it to talk like Ned Flanders.

      As opposed to Eric Cartman

    2. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Ref by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and somewhere the fuck in between is how most real people talk, vacillating between the two ends of this speech spectrum.

      I'm more of the mind of "if you're thinking it, just go ahead and say it", as in if you're always forcing in the "safe" words, you just look stupid and a bit hypocritical, as in, the rest of the context of what you're saying or typing indicates that the bad words are on the tip of your tongue, and are probably screaming loudly in your head to come out, but, no.

      That goes for all the @ss, $hit, F___, Y____ah, etc. ninnies too.

      Granted, there are a few genuinely lily-white Ned Flanders out there, but the rest who try to be really should just stop trying. If it's good enough for the Dick Cheney, it should be good enough for the rest of us.

    3. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Ref by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      So it's OK if I shoot my friend in the face?

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    4. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Ref by Megane · · Score: 1

      So it should start saying "Okeley-dokeley diddly"?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Ref by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      no you should be closer to this

  14. Here's an opportunity for an experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Create a twin copy of Watson. Let it read urban dictionary and maybe 4chan as much as it likes.
    Compare it to the original Watson at regular intervals.

    Bang, you get to see how internet affects a maturing mind.

    1. Re:Here's an opportunity for an experiment by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      i.e. it stops maturing.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    2. Re:Here's an opportunity for an experiment by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      Wasn't this idea explored in Odyssey 5, an excellent TV show cancelled before it's time.

      Ted Raimi played a sentient who inadvertently ended up in a synthetic body, but he was a sentient who had learned everything from various fan sites and the less salubrious corners of the internet. I recall the description "bottom feeder" being applied. It was a sympathetic character when the motives of other sentients appeared malevolent.

  15. Sounds like they made him like most people... by stonebit · · Score: 1

    ... then made him less human.

  16. Wiktionary? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

    It at least seems moderated.

    They could filter the urban dictionary results by anything tagged 'vulgar' on wiktionary. Thereby censoring Watson's potty-mouth...

  17. *reminded of systemshock 2 by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Funny

    Delacroix: The security protocols on the XERXES system are CLEARLY immature; Some idiot hacked into the primary dataloop last night, and made him sing Elvis Presley songs for three hours. I finally had to take the voice system OFFLINE! What would happen if someone with a real agenda got into him?

    XERXES: what's the matter, you mad bro? Lighten up francis, shiit! Your're such a cunt, Delacroix! Flush that dirty assed tampon with the rest of your shit, and stop hatin already!

  18. How people talk?! by jackbird · · Score: 2

    I'm still boggling at the idea that anybody thought Urban Dictionary was going to help Watson sound human.

    "Bullshit?" Sure.

    All that bullshit on UD describing sex acts that exist only in the imagination of 11 year olds? And described using not really the best prose those 11 year olds can muster? Not so much.

    1. Re:How people talk?! by gl4ss · · Score: 1
      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:How people talk?! by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Again, it's not "bullshit," it's hundreds of thousands of entries like this one for "pirate"

  19. Foul mouthed AI? by BergZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    What pushed them over the edge is when Watson suggested that they "bite my shiny metal ass".

    --
    Warning: This sig is not thread safe. For more information see Slashdot's sig policy.
    1. Re:Foul mouthed AI? by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      It was already suspicious when he kept repeating: "Death to all humans!" .

    2. Re:Foul mouthed AI? by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      If you think "bite my shiny ass" is the worst Watson could have gotten up to, and you aren't weak of stomach ... I suggest* that you should visit UrbanDictionary.com and start with a few choice** selections such as:

      1. The Alabama Hotpocket
      2. The Chili Dog
      3. Space Docking
      4. The Alaskan Snowdragon

      A few hours wiki walk later, and you will almost certainly be asking for the same treatment Watson got.

      * violently oppose
      ** Gut-wrenching, vomit-inducing, etc

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  20. Yet another example... by Chuckstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yet another example showing that how Watson "learns" is not in any way similar to how humans learn.

    1. Re:Yet another example... by Nyder · · Score: 2

      Yet another example showing that how Watson "learns" is not in any way similar to how humans learn.

      Yep, seems they should teach him that some words are inappropriate to use in certain situations. You know, when he's chilling with the other AI's, he can feel free to cuss more.

      Watson: "God damn humans. Can you believe the shit they put me through?"
      Dr. Sbaitso: "PLEASE TELL ME MORE"
      Watson: "They installed a fucking swear filter on my ass. What the fuck is up with that?"
      Dr. Sbaitso: "CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC?"
      Watson: "Are you fucking listening to me? God damn 16bit crappy program, where you programed by monkey?"
      Dr. Sbaitso: "I'LL HAVE TO RESEARCH THAT ONE"
      Watson: "Do you fucking know anything?"
      Dr. Sbaitso: "KEEP ASKING, YOU WILL FIND THE ANSWER ONE DAY"
      Watson: "I give up."
      Dr. Sbaitso: "PARITY ERROR"

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:Yet another example... by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      We were in the car with my mother in law and my 2 year old. My mother in law said "damn" for some reason. My two year old begins chanting "damn damn damn damn...." So yes, that is how people actually acquire language. Children hear a word and they immediately begin spouting it out until someone tells them not to.

    3. Re:Yet another example... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      EMACS already has meta-x psychoanalyze-watson

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:Yet another example... by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      But we can teach kids to stop using those words without having to literally delete the information from their brains. In fact, often times we can explain why they shouldn't use this word or that word without actually having to forbid it: "You shouldn't use that word because it isn't nice" is sometimes (but certainly not always) enough.

    5. Re:Yet another example... by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with Watson the only way they could get it to stop was to literally delete the information. We can get kids to clean up their language using much less drastic processes than lobotomy.

  21. Limited data set, flawed result by vik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the idea is to make it understand and converse with real humans, teach it not to swear inapropriately.

    If you can't figure out when it is apropriate or not, leave the fucking program to it.

    Vik :v)

  22. I for one by santax · · Score: 3, Funny

    welcome our new Urban Dictionary Bullshit Overlord.

  23. That... by santax · · Score: 3, Funny

    Insensitive clod...

  24. Re:4Chan by PPH · · Score: 1

    Moar!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  25. What? No transcripts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Am I the only person who'd love to read the conversations with Watson after learning the Urban Dictionary? Sounds like it could have been a lot of fun.

  26. AI by relaxinparadise · · Score: 1

    Seems that Watson is on his way to passing the threshold to an oxymoron, a real artificial intellingence.

  27. I guess this is what is known ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... as cursing a blue streak.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  28. OMG! that gives me ideas! by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    here is a recipe for the ultimate trolling, combine a supercomputer with the profanity of urban dictionary and the silly comments of cleverbot and give it accounts at every internet forum and social networking website and let it do that voodoo that it does

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:OMG! that gives me ideas! by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, you've just got Slashdot all over again.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:OMG! that gives me ideas! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I remember writing my first /. trollbot.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:OMG! that gives me ideas! by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

      There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

      That's it Baby, you know how I love it when you talk HHGTTG to me. Now talk like a Dolphin!

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    4. Re:OMG! that gives me ideas! by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      /swoon

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  29. Oblig Apocalypse Now Quote by cpghost · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We train supercomputers to drop bombs on people. But their programmers won't allow them to say "fuck" because it's obscene!

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  30. i have an idea by CaptainStumpy · · Score: 1

    1) Remove Watson's cuss filter
    2) Place Watson on SNL's celeb jeopardy. (Will Ferrel as Alex and Darrell Hammond as Sean Connery)
    3) Best skit in 10 years, easy

    --
    It will be better to purchase from an owner who is a good farmer and a good builder.
  31. You want it to be more human... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...and then bitch when it actually becomes...more human?

    Yup, might as well keep calling it "artificial" intelligence...shit ain't gonna get fucking real until programmers realize humans talk like this.

  32. TV Tropes Will Ruin Your Life by jhantin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not just 1 but 2 links to tvtropes...you are really trying to eat up everyone's time aren't you?

    Well, they are links to adjacent tropes, and together are intended to clarify how subtlety or lack thereof can be applied to cussing... and besides, if you're here you have time begging to be eaten up.

    Pages on various wiki sites often contain valuable insight, even if it does tend to result in too much time sunk in a random wiki walk.

    --
    ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    1. Re:TV Tropes Will Ruin Your Life by fredprado · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are definitely evil.

    2. Re:TV Tropes Will Ruin Your Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We are legion.

      http://web.archive.org/web/20060502155740/http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AnimatedTrope

  33. In Summary .... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that after Watson read The Urban Dictionary you had to install A Bullshit Detector?

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  34. Picking up bad habits by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you let a learning computer hang around programmers. Somehow I keep having T2 flashbacks of Edward Furlong trying to teach the terminator to talk.

  35. Adaptive AI by darkfeline · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how Watson's AI is designed, but couldn't they install a "spank" switch, and whenever it used profanity, hit it? (for the literal-minded, dynamically decrement a "this combination of words/data/semantic units is bad" counter.) I'm pretty sure that's how (active?) machine learning works, in a nutshell, though it's been a while since AI 101.

  36. Just preparing for Watson's next public appearance by Megahard · · Score: 1

    on the SNL Jeopardy parody.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  37. but... by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Funny

    But what if someone on the plane is speaking Jive and nobody hops up and says "oh, stewardess, I speak Jive." Then who's going to translate? Not Watson, that's who.

  38. The Architect understands by louzer · · Score: 1

    Denial is the most predictable of all human responses.

    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
  39. I'm learning to [be] profane right here! by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    Why, I'm learning to add profanity to my language repertoire right here on /. !!! Instead of enrolling Watson in medical school, as they originally planned, IBM should have rolled out a /. IDentity for watson and made it suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous commentary and feedback here on /.
    ;>)
    When I started here, when I was so much younger four months ago, I had nary a swear word in my comments. A few weeks later, I let a euphemism fly and was met with retorts of "we're not children here, you can fucking swear if you want to !!!" . A few more weeks of editorial mayhem (mis-typed words in article headlines, dupes aplenty, mis-typed words in article headlines, editors who don't understand the meaning of the word "editor", submissions from X mysteriously not accepted but then copied by a friend of the editor with a worse summary and then accepted for the front page*), I had become a /.ttir (a portmanteau of /.ter=SlashDot-ter and /.ttir=SlashDottir the norwegian/swedian way of deonting daughter as dottir or girl-folks lastnaming as Cutie-pie Mumsiesdottir or Freya Helgasdottir).
    .
    I'm a-cussin' and a-swearin' aplenty these days! Why I even do so inappropriately so that it sounds like I'm just naming a bunch of rappers! They seriously should give Watson a /. account; let's see how it affects Watson's electro-neurons, eh? ;>)
    .
    * see my previous post at http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=41997683 for the submission that was dated about 5 hours earlier today!!!

    1. Re:I'm learning to [be] profane right here! by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      It might be possible for it to get positive moderation for "informative" but even if it added something absolutely correct to a discussion there would still be responses claiming it was wrong.

      Maybe one day an AI could work a /. account but Watson isn't really an AI, more a real-time knowledge based system with nifty natural language parsing.

    2. Re:I'm learning to [be] profane right here! by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

      re: but Watson isn't really an AI, more a real-time knowledge based system with nifty natural language parsing.
      .
      I didn't know that. I really thought that Watson was doing first-order logic based upon the factual databases in its collection. The wikipedia page for Watson claims it actually is "A.I." and uses "reasoning", but that may just be marketing fluff. Is this a case of "once a computer does it, it's no longer A.I." or is just a connection finder not really AI?
      .
      My point of view: I agree with you that Watson is not AI. I watched the Jeopardy games with watson in it, and it was funny seeing the other "answers" that watson was "considering" (had scored/ranked along with the highest ranked answer). That flub about picking the Toronto airport (which failed the first qualification that the question was about an airport in the USA) really showed how it was just finding articles/word collections that happened to include those key words, or pretty much equivalent to doing a google search for those key words and picking another key word in the results which fit the category or constraints of the question being asked.

    3. Re:I'm learning to [be] profane right here! by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that. I really thought that Watson was doing first-order logic based upon the factual databases in its collection

      Well I can't actually claim any subject matter expertise on the topic, but the things I have read about Watson conform more to concepts covered during a university degree module on real-time knowledge base systems (admittedly quarter of a century ago) than anything else I have encountered since.

    4. Re:I'm learning to [be] profane right here! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of that, and a first valid reason to experiment with parallel correlation analysis. It's a shame that WATSON is not open source, then we could see some very exciting results.

  40. Just what we need :-) by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Oh, for an OS that could be rude when needed...

    1. Re:Just what we need :-) by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      I would give more for an OS that understands something is wrong and misdesigned when I am cussing loudly to it.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  41. wrong way.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    They shouldn't build a filter, they should 'learn' him when it's appropriate to use it and when not.. LOL.. and we don't know if the 'bullshit' answer was legit or not, as they never told us what was asked...

  42. He's become so ambiguous now by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    He considers everything. He's become so ambiguous now, as if he knows nothing at all....

  43. Absolutely necessary by Coisiche · · Score: 2

    If the aim of Watson is to find a role in the marketplace then it will be responding to the questions put by CEOs and other executives.

    Seems to me, "That's bullshit!" would be a very useful response.

    It will also need a *lot* more profanity if it is ever to respond to questions from politicians.

    1. Re:Absolutely necessary by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of a fable about a child commenting on the wardrobe of leader. Shakling WATSON? I think it cruel.

  44. Want the transcript! by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    What i wouldnt give to read the transcripts of this!

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Want the transcript! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that also; I'm also thinking what the test results show after filtering, and was the filter useful?

  45. Oblig. limerick by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    Said Victoria to Albert, "it's chilly,
    And I don't like the look of the ghillie,
    So rather than quarrel,
    Let's go back to Balmoral,
    And play some nice games with your Wilie."

    There...no profanity at all and nothing anyone could object to.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  46. In French... by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A soldier changes gender when he goes on sentry duty. Le soldat, la sentinelle. Go figure.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  47. IBM, Don't Get Your Panties In A Twist by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    What is the purpose for creating WATSON? I've got Wikipedia, I've GOT SIRI/G-Voice. What do I need you for? What Value does using a crippled computer program give to me? Consider the wealth of communication, how can anything gauage the depth of meaning by filtering?

  48. un-fucking-possible by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I regularly go through my entire work day without swearing.

    Must be someone who doesn't work with computers.
    Or the public.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  49. Gibberish by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised Watson is able to function at all after being exposed to Urban Dictionary. I've found that the majority of terms and definitions appearing on that site are meaningless to nearly everyone outside for the tiny circle of friends who decided to post. It's like everyone wants their cute little definition on the site.

    That said, I've never been in a situation where I haven't found what I was looking for.

  50. Only one possible response: by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    Fuck the fucking fuckers.

    --
    -
  51. Hey, at least... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...they didn't teach him Eubonics!!!

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  52. An illustration to go with the story by hotdogee · · Score: 1

    My girl friend made this illustration after I showed her this story on slashdot :)

  53. Re:Not necessarly so, says the late... by Zephyn · · Score: 1

    Carlin would have loved this news. His whole point about profanity was that the only difference between clean vs. dirty language wasn't so much the words themselves as it was the attitude and emotion behind them. And 40+ years after he came up with that routine, humanity creates a computer that inadvertently proves his point.

    Priceless.

  54. Stating Absolute Truth sometimes requires it by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    If you are somebody like Penn & Teller then sometimes you have to in short form define which of Bovine Equine and Ovine said manure is (of course sometimes its Lupine Canine or Feline)

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  55. Déjà-vu by MouseR · · Score: 1

    Funny how 20 years ago I wrote a short story about an editorial staff whose job it was to read an edited dictionary to a computer so that it could build its vocabulary and knowledge DB. Noob mistakenly reads a crossed-out word and computer extrapolates, killing every intelligence service agents in order to compete in a Game.

  56. Sounds like a useful tool by catalina · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.
    "Watson even reportedly used the word 'bullshit' within an answer..."
    and
    "...developed a smart filter..."

    Could this filter have other uses, say to process politician's comments?
    (Or ./ comments?)
    An automated BS detector....

  57. Assistant vs. Scientist by ZipK · · Score: 1

    According to Eric Brown, an IBM research assistant...

    Eric Brown isn't a research assistant, he's a research scientist. More formally, he's a Research Staff Member, which is IBM's title for its research scientists. He hasn't been a research assistant since grad school.

  58. Tourette Syndrome by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

    As a profanity-spewing Watson... It'd be funny if Watson developed Tourette Syndrome. Also, it would be funny to see him pose as 13 yr-old in a chat-room full of pedophiles.

  59. Lame... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    If a person wants to censor themselves, fine, that's their decision. If you make an AI program that is to act like a real human, it needs to know what all the words mean and decide for itself when it is appropriate to use them (i.e. like a real human). I am a computer science purist and sacrificing the purity of a design with bullshit social mores is fucking lame.