Slashdot Mirror


PayPal Preparing To Address Frozen Funds Policy

First time accepted submitter skywire writes "After years of forcing innocent customers to navigate a Kafkaesque process to unfreeze their funds, PayPal has announced that they are preparing major changes to alleviate the pain. From the article: 'The company routinely freezes funds for 21 days if it thinks there's a fraud risk, and its terms give it the right to extend the freeze for up to 180 days. To get access to their money, users are often asked to provide the kind of documentation that a product seller would have, like several months' worth of sales records. But if you're running a fundraiser or selling tickets to an upcoming conference, you don't have that paperwork. Even for those with extensive paper trails, the appeals process can take months to resolve. The Web is filled with enraged blog posts, websites like paypalsucks.com, and a Tumblr called "Conferences Burned by PayPal."'"

175 comments

  1. Need I say more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    >minor changes

  2. Too Late by QuantumBeep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After over ten years of destroying businesses and hurting people while hiding behind a blank gray wall of "policy", Paypal are kidding themselves if they think that they can ever recover the goodwill that they've burned.

    1. Re:Too Late by Tanuki64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are kidding if you disregard the stupidity of the average sheeple.

    2. Re:Too Late by alexo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't need much "goodwill" when you are the biggest player in the game and have a captive user base.

    3. Re:Too Late by alen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Credit card policies are not very different

      Most of the sellers I read about we're just dumb

    4. Re:Too Late by broohaha · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > sheeple

      I'm so tired of this word....

    5. Re:Too Late by Sussurros · · Score: 2

      Emphasis on the captive user base when comes to eBay. I doubt that anything will come of these changes as long PayPal and eBay are the same company and they have no widely recognised competition.

      Does anyone know of any effective competition to the eBay/PayPal behemoth of faceless people in gray suits?

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    6. Re:Too Late by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      we're just dumb

      Speak for yourself, but don't count me in.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Too Late by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Credit card policies are not very different

      Most of the sellers I read about we're just dumb

      That's the problem, really.

      Merchant accounts aren't too different from what Paypal does in the end - except retailers are often forbidden by contracts to speak about it.

      The other thing is, the average Joe cannot get a merchant account, so accepting credit cards is impossible (they often have minimum transactions per month of minimum amount to qualify, else you get the high rate account). Paypal does, however, let the average Joe do that, so if you're running a small shop and can't qualify, Paypal is pretty much your only option.

      Especially if you want to sell online (imagine how online auctions go if you can't pay via credit card).

      The problem is, most sellers just assume that it's like a cash account and Paypal will hide al lthe fees and crap from them. But given a chargeback can occur easily 6 months from the transaction date, and by default the credit cards refund the money unless the seller can prove the transaction (at which point it's paid back), well, most people are in for a surprise.

      I suppose one could take cash or cheques sent through the mail. I'm sure that's viable in this day and age of buying stuff and getting it the next day.

    8. Re:Too Late by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But the credit card companies don't abuse their policy. Most are banks, and have some regulation. PayPal is a non-bank banking institution, and that's why they are evil (well, one reason of many).

    9. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, isn't PayPal's entire profit model based on keeping those frozen funds?

    10. Re:Too Late by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For commercial seller Amazon seems to be the vastly superior service. I know I only look at ebay if there's none listed on Amazon or none at what I consider a reasonable price. As far as payment processors for things like donations there's Google Wallet, Isis, and Amazon payments.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:Too Late by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I ran a business using PayPal almost exclusively for 4 years without any real problem. I tried to branch out to other options, but most weren't worth the time, and the only other likely alternative, Amazon, turned out to be as uncommunicative and belligerent as PayPal is rumored to be. They didn't lock any funds at least, just disabled the account, but they were a real pain about it.

    12. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Always Free! We make our money on the float!"

      Remember that?

      Pfft. Whatever.

      Bitcoin.

    13. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PayPal offers a great service, despite the circlejerk to the contrary. Their policies were oriented towards businesses, not charities or the like. The fact that people, in their infinite stupidity, would signup for a merchant account without reading the terms, nor even slightly understanding the fraud reduction procedures that would be required to allow people to accept credit card payments with virtually no verification, is not PayPal's fault.

    14. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tough shit. It perfectly fits the masses of morons that drive business today. What else but livestock continues to hear 'fuck you, pay me'. And pays every time?

    15. Re:Too Late by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      None of these has really garnered much marketshare, despite Paypal's evils. Although an interesting payments model, its customer service is an oxymoron. When you've got auction funds tied up from eBay, or there's a question to your business model, they shoot their clientele first, look for blood, and allow questions to be asked later.

      If the US banking laws were real (I know, another oxymoron), Paypal would have the teeth of a hundred US DAs in their leg, gnawing viciously. But they're seemingly exempt, as are all the big financial houses.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    16. Re:Too Late by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Most of the sellers I read about we're just dumb

      Here is the first one I read.

      http://conferencesburnedbypaypal.tumblr.com/post/9341558088/a-major-open-source-conference-in-paris

      That guy doesn't seem very dumb to me.

      Credit card policies are not very different

      Again, citing the example I linked above, "six months" seems to be going above and beyond what most credit card policies try to enforce.

      At least, I would never expect eventbrite.com to take that long to transfer funds (obviously) needed for a conference.

    17. Re:Too Late by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      True dat!

      Every contested PayPal transaction I've ever seen has been settled in the buyer's favour. No appeals allowed. Currently my personal balance is running my way but the injustice of it chafes.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    18. Re:Too Late by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      No. PayPal's business model is based on making the transaction really easy and then taking a moderately exhorbitant chunk of the money transacted. For me in Australia to get money from Armenia (for example) PayPal is brilliant and worth every penny. For me to get money from the other side of my city the cost is the same and yet becomes astronomical when the service is seen in perspective. I allow 25-30% to PayPal for every transaction. The reality is higher or lower but it averages out to that amount.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    19. Re:Too Late by Sussurros · · Score: 2

      I tried to open an Amazon account a couple of years ago and belligerent is the only way I could describe them. I never did open an account them. Is it worth the effort to try? It seems very US-centric even once you pass through their positive/negative dichotomy they call an application.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    20. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, they burned me 2 years ago and I will never go back. They actually cost me money due to their error and they wouldn't fix it, apologize or pay for the damage they caused. Fuck them.

    21. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average joe setting up a merchant account isn't difficult.

      It just takes a little research.

    22. Re:Too Late by fliptout · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I've stopped using ebay too. Haven't missed it at all.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    23. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > PayPal is a non-bank banking institutio

      Well, in Europe PayPal is actually a bank (residing in Luxembourg). That did not stop the shady business practices either.

    24. Re:Too Late by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      ...taking a moderately exhorbitant chunk of the money transacted.

      I allow 25-30% to PayPal for every transaction.

      Seriously? That seems like a hell of a "moderately exhorbitant chunk" to me...

    25. Re:Too Late by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I'm in the US, so can't say what they're like to the outside. Other than this badly failed attempt to deal with them on a business level, I do really like them. I live in a rural area and buy things from them weekly, and use Prime both for the fast free shipping and video streaming. As a customer I like them (and can't find any nearly adequate substitute). But I won't try to run a business with anything they offer in that respect.

    26. Re:Too Late by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      My guess is he is taking a lot of small payments where fixed fees drive up the overal percentage considerablly.

      There is a new "micropayments" option that purports to offer far more reasonable fees for small transactions but their website doesn't make it clear if credit card transactions are covered or not and it's only for domestic payments within the US, EU or AU.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 seconds' worth of searching produced:

      Square

      Go Payment

      Payware Mobile

      ROAMpay

    28. Re:Too Late by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      In the same way good companies can turn bad, bad can turn good. Perhaps because managers and employees keep changing, or maybe it's because they're forced to provide better service due to competition from rivals (I bet Apple et al. would still force DRMed mp3s upon their users if say Amazon MP3 didn't initiate the idea).

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    29. Re:Too Late by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      After over ten years of destroying businesses and hurting people while hiding behind a blank gray wall of "policy", Paypal are kidding themselves if they think that they can ever recover the goodwill that they've burned.

      Yeah, like everyone else I opened a Paypal account about a decade ago - but they quickly put me off with some bizarre policies, plus their incessant attempts to make me tie in my checking account to their service for no good reason whatsoever (okay, it would've benefited THEM, but not me).

      Maybe they've changed, I don't know; but I have made a point for the past decade of avoiding them and not doing business with anyone who doesn't offer a non-Paypal payment option. There's pretty much nothing they could do that'd draw me back in.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    30. Re:Too Late by Sussurros · · Score: 1

      Yes. Big payments a smaller proportion.

      --
      I said - don't look Ethel!..., but it was too late..., she'd already looked.
    31. Re:Too Late by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Here is the first one I read.

      http://conferencesburnedbypaypal.tumblr.com/post/9341558088/a-major-open-source-conference-in-paris [tumblr.com]

      That guy doesn't seem very dumb to me.

      12 paragraphs about paypal scewing him over followed by "I still do use their services from time to time".

      You have a different dumb threshold than me.

    32. Re:Too Late by Zemran · · Score: 1

      The competition can be impossible to work with in some countries. I am currently in Thailand where the banks are good. OKPay demand that I jump through certain hoops to verify, fine. So I let them pay some money into my account but it arrives without any code that they need to verify so I cannot verify. OKPay say that I need to find that code and I need to find out whom on the route from wherever to Thailand lost the code. I cannot, so I try the credit card verification. They deduct a small amount from my credit card and I have to say how much. They want to know exactly how much in Euro but my statement is in Baht and the rates vary each day. I have no idea how much the amount was in Euro and neither do my bank. So they ask for some paperwork to verify but they want paperwork that is in English which is not going to happen here as this is Thailand where they speak Thai. All my official letters are in Thai which is written in what looks like dead worms.

      Paypal, who have frozen my money before and whom I hate, allow me to say how much was deducted in Baht and the codes appear on my statements. Paypal has its faults but it works better.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    33. Re:Too Late by Dan667 · · Score: 2

      I stopped using paypal and ebay years ago, maybe even a decade, because of these predatory practices. And I am not alone.

    34. Re:Too Late by cellurl · · Score: 1

      I hate that company and always will. Please tell me an alternative.
      I setup a nonprofit (completely legit, but not 501c3).
      They let me set it up, then kept asking for crap I didn't have.
      Then they wanted a deposit which I gave.
      Then they asked for the same (never had em, never will) documents.
      I asked to re-list it as non-charity and they froze my deposit.
      I finally listed them as SPAM and wrote off the deposit.

      Pricks and I won't forget it. Help eliminate stupid speeding tickets

    35. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. PayPal's business model is based on making the transaction really easy and then taking a moderately exhorbitant chunk of the money transacted.

      Your fees go to great things like the elaborately catered tech presentations at PayPal headquarters.

      http://www.meetup.com/TechXploration/

    36. Re:Too Late by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      the eBay/PayPal behemoth of faceless people in gray suits?

      Just as a side note - having visited the eBay PayPal campus, it's actually a very colorful location full of cheerful people.

    37. Re:Too Late by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > sheeple

      I'm so tired of this word....

      I am more tired of the people who inspire it...

    38. Re:Too Late by mikes.song · · Score: 1

      The chargeback rate on PayPal is much higher than that of a standard merchant account. This is specifically because of fraud. I've done business with Google Checkout since day one, if if there's a chargeback, you can get a contact with a real person from Google, and they will not protect fraud.

    39. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, like the average libertarian sheeple of /. who think violent games and films and a gun in the pocket are a-okay?

    40. Re:Too Late by MobileC · · Score: 1

      Paypal is pretty much your only option.

      Especially if you want to sell online (imagine how online auctions go if you can't pay via credit card).

      Very few auctions here give the option of credit card and of those about 0% offer PayPal.
      Direct deposit to bank account number.

      No buggering about with chargebacks after the fact etc...

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    41. Re:Too Late by cenerentolo · · Score: 1

      the fucking parasitic company of thieves...... they kept the majority of my money for more than 2 years... and then the whores of satan charged me fees to release the money to them/ this after they opened the account and accepted money for me in ten minutes. they are a corrupt ponzi scheme waiting for people to fall through the tracks

    42. Re:Too Late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      PayPal is in an impossible situation. When I sell anything on eBay as soon as payment arrives I withdraw it to my bank account, and only ship the item after it appears in my balance (typically takes one day). Obviously I don't trust PayPal because if there is any sort of problem the first thing they do is freeze your money.

      If the seller is a fraudster and the money has already been withdrawn then the buyer will lose out. PayPal can't get the money back now. That is why they introduced a delay during which the funds are not available for withdrawal. That is unacceptable to me so if it ever happens they item won't get sent and the transaction will have to be cancelled. The law in the UK is quite clear - you pay, then you get your item. Until you pay it isn't yours.

      To make matters worse PayPal only allows claims to be made for 45 days. If your item ships from China more than half of that could be gone before it even arrives. Also, the law states you get a two year warranty on everything sold commercially in the EU. PayPal isn't interested in upholding your legal rights though.

      So basically PayPal's "protection" is worthless for both the seller and the buyer, and can't be improved unless PayPal will willing to be a real middle-man and absorb the losses due to fraud itself.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    43. Re:Too Late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's why you should never keep any money in your PayPal account. The first thing they do is raid it to pay any chargebacks or freeze it when a complaint is made. Withdraw it immediately and don't post the item until it is safely in your bank account.

      PayPal will still raid your account but the balance will just go negative. You can then sort it out without the risk of losing money, or not having access to your money.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:Too Late by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      The only reason PayPal exists is because of tie-in / lack of other choices on eBay, which I thought was basically illegal in the US.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    45. Re:Too Late by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

      From experience, If you withdraw the money into your bank account and PayPal freezes your account they will put up to 3 months of withdraws back from your bank account.

      That information you gave them to deposit the money is enough to go both ways. CC Merchant accounts do the same thing. The only way around this is to do PayPal --> Deposit Bank Account --> Checking account and make sure your deposit account is kept at a $0 balance.

    46. Re:Too Late by ContraB · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same deal with me. No way I was going to tie my checking to them to become "verified", etc.

      eBay completely lost my business, as a buyer AND seller, when they started making PayPal mandatory. (Or if not mandatory, very difficult to go without PayPal.)

      I feel like I'm missing out a bit with the eBay thing. But then, I've probably saved at least a couple grand by not buying anything on eBay in a decade. Probably for the best...

      --

      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Much like a newborn puppy...
    47. Re:Too Late by zenetik · · Score: 1

      After over ten years of destroying businesses and hurting people while hiding behind a blank gray wall of "policy", Paypal are kidding themselves if they think that they can ever recover the goodwill that they've burned.

      Well said! But PayPal also has some stiff competition from better services with vastly superior reputations such as Dwolla, Stripe, Amazon payments, Google Checkout, Square, etc.

    48. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand the mechanism which permits people to ostracize one business in favor of another. The great thing about voluntarism is that their is no barrier. Even the dumbest sheep can simply stop using one service and choose another, if someone else in society can provide a more agreeable experience. It requires little intelligence on the part of the consumer.

      If paypal is so horrible, people will move to another service. The fact that they don't is not explained by 'people are stupid'. The hypothesis that better fits the evidence and does not have any contradiction in reasoning is that most people have no problems with paypal. Just take your own experience and those around you as a sort of sanity check; it works just fine for most people, right? Some people do get burned hard and I absolutely sympathize with their experience but that isn't representative of how the service holds up. A more accurate watch dog site would be named 'paypalSucksForAFewPeople.com'.

    49. Re:Too Late by cenerentolo · · Score: 1

      if that is the best you can come up with while being paid to shill, i would get a different job

    50. Re:Too Late by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      PayPal offers a great service, despite the circlejerk to the contrary.

      Great for themselves maybe. They have a very long history of freezing accounts for the slightest excuse and keeping the money. They have done far worse things to a lot of people including myself. The only good thing about paypal was the debt collectors they set on me. I found them to be quite reasonable after I gave them full evidence proving paypal was lying and after I politely invited them to settle the matter in court.

      So you work for paypal then do you Anonymous Coward?

    51. Re:Too Late by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen they have pissed off, and I mean seriously pissed off by stealing or attempting to steal money, about a quarter to a third of their customer base. That's based on a small sample size but it can't be too far off.

      Maybe you just got lucky. Maybe you will continue to be lucky and maybe you won't. Or then again maybe you work for Paypal.

    52. Re:Too Late by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Here is the first one I read.

      http://conferencesburnedbypaypal.tumblr.com/post/9341558088/a-major-open-source-conference-in-paris

      That guy doesn't seem very dumb to me.

      'I still do use their services from time to time'.

      What he means is he loves the abuse. I'm not sure if that counts as being dumb or not.

    53. Re:Too Late by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      the eBay/PayPal behemoth of faceless people in gray suits?

      Just as a side note - having visited the eBay PayPal campus, it's actually a very colorful location full of cheerful people.

      You might be cheerful too if you figured out how to steal money legally.

    54. Re:Too Late by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      > sheeple

      I'm so tired of this word....

      I too wish we lived in a world that didn't need that word. Sadly we don't.

  3. Won't matter by eksith · · Score: 0

    PayPal is an old granny trying hard to change her skewed view of business, but ain't getting anywhere. So she goes, "well, maybe the people who talk funny aren't out to steal money", but no. That kind of thinking won't change as it's too far ingrained. Are there people conducting funny business on PayPal? Of course! But when customer service is near non-existent and fundraisers can be a complete success or an abject failure well under the time it takes for them to turn their head either way, why would anyone use them for anything critical again?

    I don't know if Google is a better alternative, but I can't imagine it's a surprise it's taking off as much as it is.

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
  4. Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The phrase "too little, too late" comes to mind, though it's not nearly emphatic enough.

  5. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Paypal, I hope they go bankrupt (fiscally, they already have morally covered).

  6. never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever. Trust is entropy. You can't go back.

  7. Big changes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now, when they screw you over, at least you get a reach-around.

  8. Square by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe they're feeling the heat of competition from square and feel the need to do something to stop the exodus.

    Our little business finds square a lot easier to deal with.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  9. invisible hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's pretty mind-boggling that nobody has come along and eaten Paypal's lunch yet. For all the internet-era services (most?) that based their business model on merely having the most active accounts and got burned, there are a couple for which that strategy seems to be a winner. Facebook is another one. There's no reason to use either of these services other than the fact that everyone else does - and in fact, there are lots of reasons not to (i.e. the services themselves are ass, and are run in a way that's at times abusive to their userbase).

    And yet, despite the fact that there's nothing preventing competitors from springing up (unlike, say, Ticketmaster - which actively uses payola to monopolize the market) - and despite the fact that some with very deep pockets (Google) have tried - Paypal & Facebook still dominate.

    Maybe it's luck? At some point someone will set up a competing service that just happens to ensnare the particular, unmarked, and unrelated 5% group of "tastemakers" who are sufficient to catalyze a shift away to a new service?

    1. Re:invisible hand by zzyzyx · · Score: 1

      Many have tried but there is an extremely high barrier to entry. Nobody is interested in an account with a service that no seller takes, and sellers see no point in setting up a service that has no users. There is also the added complexity, and reluctance to give your credit card details to multiple companies.

    2. Re:invisible hand by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada we have a service called Interac which not only handles bill payments but allows anyone with an account in a participating bank to transfer funds to another such person by email. I don't see why systems of this type cannot replace PayPal.

  10. paypal needs more money by Nyder · · Score: 1

    since Paypal is caving in to pressure from the AA's to not do business with companies/people/websites the AA's don't like, it looks like Paypal is trying to get back the business of the other people they have screwed over.

    My guess is nothing is probably going to change, but a Press Release saying so looks good.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  11. Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're (Paypal) probably noticing the flood of payment alternatives. Stripe et al. come to mind...

    1. Re:Alternatives by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      I think the problem with most alternatives is PayPal covers the most ground. I've been looking for alternatives to PayPal for a while now and none of them have covered the kind of ground PayPal does. Even Google's offering, which you would honestly kind of expect to be pretty widely available is only usable in a few countries.

      I await the day PayPal is lost to the annals of obscurity.

  12. If PayPal wants to seem trustworthy by Dracos · · Score: 0

    They'll submit to being regulated like a bank. I used to work for Western Union, their money tranfers are subject to banking regulations, but PayPal isn't, for doing essentially the same thing.

    1. Re:If PayPal wants to seem trustworthy by TankSpanker04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed; PayPal is not a bank yet I'm betting most of its customers think they are. They don't have to follow the same set of rules and so they get to make their own. Customers only learn of this after they've been burned, unfortunately. That's why I don't use PayPal.

    2. Re:If PayPal wants to seem trustworthy by Spad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are in Europe and have been since 2007. Not that it stops them acting like dicks, of course, they are just (in principle) well-regulated dicks over here.

    3. Re:If PayPal wants to seem trustworthy by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only nice thing about PayPal being a non-bank is that someone in the US can pay someone in the UK relatively easily. I moved out of the US, and for me to send myself money from my US accounts requires I show up in my bank, in person, to order the international transfer. They don't even honor their own terms of sending based on a fax. Banks are afraid of being the next HSBC.

    4. Re:If PayPal wants to seem trustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't know what they're afraid of. 4 weeks earnings and no jail time, for making money hand over fist on criminal activity? Its a fucking license to do wrong.

    5. Re:If PayPal wants to seem trustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link your US bank account with coinbase. 1% fee to send bitcoins anywhere in the world. I assume you can get cash for bitcoins in the UK?

  13. TL;DR by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You already burned us once, PayPal.

    You will not be given another opportunity.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  14. WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by Gorshkov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until recently, I was on the board of directors for a local homeless shelter here in town. RIght now, we're in the middle of planning a major fundraiser. When it was suggested that we get a paypal account so that people could purchase tickets on-line, I went ballistic - I've heard way too many horror stories over the years. I'm not sure others on the fundraising committee quite believed everything I said, but my reaction was so strong it spooked them, and they backed off the idea completly. Paypal's changes will have to be effective, and in place for a very long, long time before they even have a *chance* of having people like me deal with them. That's a very large part of the market they've never had, and quite possibly never will.

    1. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a small fish, I used PayPal exclusively to buy things on eBay, and still I found them to be an incredible pain in the ass to use even when they weren't treating you like a criminal (why did I either need a land line installed or to provide a copy of my drivers license to buy things off of eBay?). They were such a PITA that I eventually disable my account. I wouldn't even DREAM of using them in an official, business capacity.

    2. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

      When it was suggested that we get a paypal account... I went ballistic

      You sound like a real joy to work with.

    3. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by mister_playboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You sound like you've never worked with the PayPal "dispute resolution" process.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    4. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have resolved several disputes with PayPal, both as a complainer and complainee. Yes, there is much red tape involved, but it's comparable to dealing with any other bureaucratic institution. The most difficult time I had was when I was required to fax them some documentation, since I could not find their fax number listed anywhere. Make a note of it folks - the UK fax number for PayPal is 011-44-8707-303-196.

      In my experience, if you adhere to their rules, PayPal is about as "evil" as any credit card company or bank I've dealt with. No more, no less.

      I would certainly not feel it necessary to "go ballistic" if a colleague suggested dealing with them.

    5. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by Gorshkov · · Score: 2

      In my experience, if you adhere to their rules, PayPal is about as "evil" as any credit card company or bank I've dealt with. No more, no less.

      I would certainly not feel it necessary to "go ballistic" if a colleague suggested dealing with them.

      Big difference - banks are regulated, paypal is not. What the banks can and cannot do, and WHEN they can and cannot do it, is very precicely defined by regulators. What papal can and cannot do, and when, is absolutely up to them, with no oversight whatsoever. As far as "going ballistic" is concerned - I'm guilty of hyperbole. Sue me.

    6. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by Flavio · · Score: 1

      I agree with him. Paypal has a terrible track record, and if a moderately successful fundraiser can cause them to seize funds. Since the shelter isn't a business with a track record of sales, it could take significant effort to get access to those funds. And since Paypal isn't a regulated bank, there's no recourse other than taking them to court.

      Paypal is convenient, and is only worth the risk if you can afford to lose the transaction.

    7. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until recently, I was on the board of directors for a local homeless shelter here in town.

      You should send them to PayPal headquarters for a free catered meal at Xploration.

      http://www.meetup.com/TechXploration/

    8. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      This is a capital idea! Well done.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    9. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by OolimPhon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Make a note of it folks - the UK fax number for PayPal is 011-44-8707-303-196.

      ...and that number is a premium-rate number in the UK. Okay, perhaps your fax won't take very long to transmit but I bet that you'll pay a big chunk to send it... especially from overseas.

      Bastards.

    10. Re:WAAAAAAAAAY too little, too late. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      In my experience they are not evil, they are just thevies who will keep the money unless you make one hell of a fuss and even then they might just keep it anyway. They don't eat babies or anything but they do have a very long history of stealing other peoples money.

      That fax number charges 10p a minute, I think there is a rule that says you have to state that when you post it. The London local rate number appears to be +4420 8605 3001. (verify by entering PayPal's registration number which is 226056.) That's from http://www.paypalsucks.com/faqs.shtml.

  15. Reminds me of a funny story by cualexander · · Score: 5, Interesting

    PayPal once froze my account. I didn't realize how much they take those comments seriously and several years ago I sent some money to my wife with PayPal and put "For Sexual Favors" in the memo box, just kidding around, the way people would do on checks back in the day. Well, apparently PayPal thought I was actually paying for sex with PayPal and froze the funds. After I called them and explained the situation though, they quickly released the funds.

    1. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why did your wife charge you? How much does she charge if you don't mind me asking.

    2. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My college roommate's account got frozen when I paid him my share of utilities. I wrote something like 'elephant tusks' or 'conflict diamonds' in the memo field. He was mad because this was back in the day when they were paying good interest, and he had like $10k in his account - all frozen for a month or so.

    3. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I need a script that mods -1 troll every message that has the word "idiot".

      It's worse than "sheeple."

    4. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, apparently PayPal thought I was actually paying for sex with PayPal and froze the funds. After I called them and explained the situation though, they quickly released the funds.

      The story is not funny at all, but it is indicative of problem with PayPal

      The fact that you had to explain yourself before your account is un-frozen is the very reason PayPal should cease to exist. I should be able to write whatever the hell I want on the payment -- unless they have some proof of illegal activity, I should not explain myself to PayPal to recover my account/my money.

    5. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      Let me guess; you get called an idiot and referred to as sheeple a lot?

    6. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A payment actually described in writing as being "for sexual favors" _is_ a proof of illegal activity (at least illegal in some jurisdictions, one of which very likely Paypal is under). Paypal would probably be liable themselves if their service is routinely used for payments for illegal goods or services.

    7. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by kbg · · Score: 1

      This is amazing. It means PayPal actually thinks that people who are criminals or are doing something illegal will but in the real reasons in the memo box. And they actually have a process to check the text in this field. Either they are very stupid and think this will actually work or they are evil and like to bother legitimate customers.

    8. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless they have some proof of illegal activity, I should not explain myself to PayPal to recover my account/my money

      You mean, proof like a note written by you saying "I am using PayPal to pay for for illegal services?"

    9. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sexual Favors", "Elephant Tusks".
      I think if someone saw this, and banks are not known for their humor, that this is a legitimate reason to freeze an account.
      We know it was kidding, but can a business take a risk if they actually see this on a report?

    10. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An old college friend of mine had to pay a moving violation, and thought it would be funny to put "kickback for judge" in the memo section of the check. The court was NOT amused, I think he ended up doing community service for contempt.

    11. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I put "Definitely not for anything illegal" in the box. Would that get past Paypal's filter?

    12. Re:Reminds me of a funny story by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      By that logic writing "for transport to the moon" on my paypal transaction would be proof that I have been. A memo on a paypal transaction is not proof of anything at all in any jurisdiction.

  16. Too little too late by Mephistophocles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yep, don't care. They lost me 2 years ago and short of their entire executive team kissing my bare ass on national TV, there's no way in hell I'm ever going back. Doing business with them was exactly like being raped.

    --
    Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    1. Re:Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> They lost me 2 years ago and short of their entire executive team kissing my bare ass on national TV,

      Hi! I'm with customer relations at PayPal and we're working hard to restore our name and good will to our prior customers. Our new policy is to do everything within our power to help you view the new open PayPal in a better light. As such, your request for a public ass kissing has been reviewed internally and accepted.

      Please write back with your name, number and the nearest TV or film station so that it can be broadcast.

      Disclaimer: Note: All fees and expenses related to the round-trip ticket to your home town, purchase of air time, film crew and all misc and incidental fees will be applied to your paypal account.

      Thanks!

      Joe
      Paypal Customer Service.

    2. Re:Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lost me 2 years ago and short of their entire executive team kissing my bare ass on national TV, there's no way in hell I'm ever going back. Doing business with them was exactly like being raped.

      That can't be true, or it would mean that you'd go back to a rapist if they'd get their entire family to kiss your bare ass on national TV. My guess is that if you'd ever been raped, you would describe doing business with PayPal as decidedly un-rape-like.

      I realize this was hyperbole, but some people have actually been raped, so it seems a bit insensitive to use something like that so freely. Just something to consider in the future.

    3. Re:Too little too late by terryducks · · Score: 1

      jeez go ticketmaster on him, you cheap ass ... Executive salaries, 1 day min ......
      Executive travel costs ....
      Executive makeup and wardrobe,
      Executive mouthwash and escort services (blowjob included)

      will also be applied to your paypal account(s).

  17. In Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Paypal does not get much news coverage in Germany, it is just not as useful since the bank transfer system is pretty fine. But a while ago they managed to get onto the news when they tried to force a company to stop selling Cuban cigars. The company decided to stop offering paypal transfers instead of stopping to sell the cigars.
    But really, how is that their bussiness? And why is that stupid Cuba embargo still in place? Some people said that this embargo has always been about turning Cuba into a colony.

    1. Re:In Germany by mapsjanhere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The embargo on Cuba dates back to the nationalization of US property in Cuba by Castro (think Bacardi). What's actually forbidden is the transfer of US funds to Cuba, which is why Paypal, as a US company subject to that rule, gets antsy if people use their service to pay for Cuban goods. They would have to trace every transaction involving the German cigar seller for any US based funds, and that would be a huge nightmare. Easier for them to just block the whole transaction

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    2. Re:In Germany by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      What's the name of that company? I'm going to order some cigars from them.

    3. Re:In Germany by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      That might be what the embargo dates back to but at present the embargo is continued because a politician who argues against it is guaranteed to lose Florida for his party in the next election.

    4. Re:In Germany by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      To answer my own question the company is rum & co. http://www.rumundco.de/

  18. money laundering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main problem, as with banks, the governmental have them scared of accidently money laundering, they can go to prison for quite a time if they are caught.
    Look at Standard Chartered bank they only escaped prison by giving the US a lot (billions) of dollars

  19. Too late for us by tipo159 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am involved with organizing a sporting event. This last year was our seventh running of the event. In previous years, the sanctioning body would collect the entry fee and send the events their portion. Because of some issues with the sanctioning body (not really set-up for credit card payment and slow payment to events), the system was switched to where events collected the entry fee.

    We decided to go with PayPal for most of the normal reasons folks go with PayPal. I had the PayPal-based payment system up on the event web site in a couple of hours. The first month of getting entry fee payments went fine and we could transfer the funds into the event's bank accounts (to cover pre-event costs like venue deposits and insurance).

    The trouble started at the end of the early entry period for the event (when entry fees increased). To avoid the increase in entry fees, almost everyone entered in the event who had not already done so, paid their entry fee on the same day. This triggered PayPal's fraud system and the event's PayPal account was locked. Although we had successfully run the event for the six prior years (with outside media coverage to prove it) and our paperwork was in order, PayPal decided that they would not give us access to the funds until after the event had run, "just in case the event was cancelled and the entry fees needed to be refunded".

    PayPal's actions were almost a self-fulfilling prophesy. Without access to the funds to cover pre-event costs, the event was almost cancelled. Luckily, between the entry fees collected before the PayPal account was locked, the entry fees that we collected directly after the account was locked and understanding vendors, we were able to cover the pre-event costs and the event was held.

    After successfully running the event, we contacted PayPal to get the account unlocked. At first, they wanted to make us wait six weeks. However, we pressed the point that we had bills that had to be paid and needed access to the funds ASAP. After an hour on the phone, they unlocked the funds and gave us access to the funds.

    Compared to some people that I have spoken with, we got off easy.

    I don't care what PayPal's new policy is. We are not putting our event at risk again by accepting payment via PayPal.

    1. Re:Too late for us by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just tack on a PayPal "processing fee" for anyone that wants to use that method. This is an extra charge to cover the chance that PayPal will jerk you around. For example: Check, Visa, or Mastercard = $20 entry fee, Paypal = $20 + $5 Paypal processing fee = $25. This will make most people use another method, but still leave the option open for people who have no other way to pay. The extra fee covers your risk and hassle in using PayPal.

      You can even adjust the processing fee in real time to keep your risk manageable: Assume you have reserves from last year's event equal to 20% of this year's expenses. Then adjust the fee so that no more than 20% of your registrations are through PayPal. In the worst case, you can still cover your bills, and argue unfreezing your account afterwards.

    2. Re:Too late for us by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just tack on a PayPal "processing fee" for anyone that wants to use that method.

      Paypal terms of use forbid surcharges specifically for paypal transactions. You might be able to get away with a discount for other payment methods (I don't know for sure), that is the way people traditionally got around similar rules for credit cards - a cash discount rather than a credit card fee.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Too late for us by tipo159 · · Score: 1

      Just tack on a PayPal "processing fee" for anyone that wants to use that method. This is an extra charge to cover the chance that PayPal will jerk you around. For example: Check, Visa, or Mastercard = $20 entry fee, Paypal = $20 + $5 Paypal processing fee = $25. This will make most people use another method, but still leave the option open for people who have no other way to pay. The extra fee covers your risk and hassle in using PayPal.

      I had been using PayPal as a onesy-twosy seller on eBay for a long time and never had a problem with PayPal. The guy running the event had had a eBay store and never had a problem with PayPal. It seemed like a safe, easy way to handle online entry fee payment. PayPal was our way to accept credit card payment. Based on our experiences, we had thought that people who had had problems with PayPal must have done something wrong.

      Now we know better.

      For this year's iteration of the event, with more time, we have found ways to accept credit cards (with code that we can drop into our website for online payment) that are safer for us (and less expensive) than PayPal.

    4. Re:Too late for us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the way credit card 'rules' (contracts/master agreements/etc) are written, a "cash discount" is also prohibited. a credit card customer's OOP to merchant cannot be higher than someone paying by another method, period. no exceptions. any merchant that charges credit card customers more, regardless of how they word it, is in violation.

    5. Re:Too late for us by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      the way credit card 'rules' (contracts/master agreements/etc) are written, a "cash discount" is also prohibited.

      FALSE

      Note that a cash discount is legal and permitted under all credit card companies rules. A cash discount offers a lower price for cash than credit; for example, many gasoline stations offer cash discounts. While this may merely be a loophole, it is permitted.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Too late for us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not false. Credit card companies do not allow offering discounts for using cash. They do, however, allow having a lower set price for using cash. Yes, I know it is mostly semantics, but the OP was not wrong.

  20. POLICY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nananana we have your money and you are shit out of luck. fuck you.

    So they're putting that in writing after its been used in practice for a decade now?
    Well that's mighty nice of them.

    I still wonder whos dick paypal sucked so hard to not be classed as a bank or credit card by now... That must have been one awesome blowjob.

  21. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    PayPal tried this on me. I found the solution was to be extremely nasty and aggressive towards them. I gave them a lot of bad PR over the issue. They backed down and apologized. Wonder of wonders. PayPal is a very arrogant company but they really hate bad PR.

  22. Indeed merchant accounts don't freeze the whole ac by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    Indeed. With CC merchant accounts they don't automatically freeze an account full of funds based on automated heuristics. It's possible they do it rarely, but working closely with thousands of businesses, and having my own merchant accounts, I've never heard of it happening. I've had my Paypal account frozen before and I know at least a dozen other people who have.

    The chargeback process is still slanted toward the buyer, but the buyer has to fill out and mail or fax paperwork, not just click a button on a web page. That reduces BS chargebacks. More importantly, that chargeback affects only the one transaction; they don't freeze thousands of dollars of unrelated funds. CC processors only freeze the account after MANY complaints from buyers. Partly, that's because they do the anti-fraud work upfront, when you apply to open the account. That takes a couple of weeks.

  23. Average Joe by englishstudent · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe that the average Joe can now accept credit payments using 2CO https://www.2checkout.com/

    --
    We'll never make it.......oh! we made it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM&list=FL7kKrE4eTs17mQl7eyvJIOg
  24. Blind lead the blind by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    What better word would you use for cases where people follow rather than thinking for themselves, like a sheep circle or an ant mill?

    1. Re:Blind lead the blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good corporate citizens.

    2. Re:Blind lead the blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What better word would you use for cases where people follow rather than thinking for themselves, like a sheep circle or an ant mill?

      On Slashdot, no less.

      BOOSH is teh EVILLL! (I'll take my +5 mod now, thank you!)

  25. Commission requirement by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For commercial seller Amazon seems to be the vastly superior service.

    This is true for commercial sellers. But for sellers who don't pay $40 per month for a store, Amazon hits them with a $1 per item commission in addition to the final value fee. And items without a UPC/EAN or ISBN can't be sold at all.

    1. Re:Commission requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And items without a UPC/EAN or ISBN can't be sold at all.

      This is simply not true. For many many many products you can get assigned an ASIN (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASIN).

    2. Re:Commission requirement by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

      For many many many products you can get assigned an ASIN

      And for many many many products you can't without first getting a UPC, EAN, or ISBN. The information is in a help file on Amazon, which is available only to logged-in subscribers to an Amazon seller account. I'm not at work right now and thus lack access to my employer's seller account at the moment. Do you have an Amazon seller account? If so, do you want me to look up the citation for which categories absolutely require a UPC, EAN, or ISBN?

    3. Re:Commission requirement by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      It is still a lot less than eBay's total fees when you add up the final value fee AND the paypal fees, eBay runs you close to 12% on most items, sometimes close to 15%. Then on top of that, you have to pay to ship the item. With Amazon, you get a shipping credit to offset the cost of shipping.

    4. Re:Commission requirement by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at eBay/PayPal fees lately? Amazon compares quite well.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  26. Wikileaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw what they did to Wikileaks I closed my account.

  27. Not going back by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 4, Informative

    Honestly, I've given up on Paypal. Back in 2009, I've had my account frozen due to using many credit cards. Since I didn't have a job, I (thought I) couldn't get an actual credit card, and used a service in my country that generates temporary credit card numbers, valid for a month and with a set credit limit*. Well, Paypal didn't like that I used more than (IIRC) 15 credit cards in X time, so they blocked my account. I've since learned that Paypal e-mail support is where messages go to die, and, through site revisions, has become almost impossible to find. So, to resolve my problem, I had to call an Irish number, where this lady basically told me "No credit card, no dice". So then silly me goes and gets an actual credit card and calls again. "Looks good. It should be OK, now" - someone else says. It isn't. The next call: "OK, reset the password from your main computer". a) My main computer was a laptop which died in the middle of this process, and I've told them this, and b) What's the point of being on the web if you're requiring people to do something from a set computer? I've reset the password and the account is still blocked, so I've given up. Luckily, I only lost a little money in this process, but I've been finding that living without PayPal is easier than I thought.

    * For the curious, https://www.mbnet.pt/

    1. Re:Not going back by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I've since learned that Paypal e-mail support is where messages go to die

      Why did it work fine for me?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Not going back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you replied to a nigerian prince

    3. Re:Not going back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a bit like Google support, for Enterprise they let you ask for help but never respond, for free they don't even give you the option of reporting bugs/asking for help.

    4. Re:Not going back by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't know. Maybe it's different outside of Europe? Maybe you got lucky? Maybe Paypal stopped/started caring? I'm glad you could get support.

  28. Stupid users deserve what they get. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only an idiot would use Paypal.

    Elon Musk is a piece of subhuman waste who is a parasite on
    decent people. Yes, he sold Paypal, but he also created it.

    What the fuck is it going to take before you bottom-feeders
    wake up and recognize when someone has a dick up your ass ?

  29. Ebay and paypal in cahoots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently i sold a rather expensive rc helicopter because i needed the money on ebay . After selling it for around 400 dollars i went ahead and shipped it after getting message that the payment was received. I goto get my cash from an atm to pay a much needed bill and it says insufficient funds for 200 dollars. I call them and they say that because i have not sold 15 items on ebay that they will hold the money until the buyer leaves good feedback or 90 days has passed and i show proof of delivery. "To protect the buyer" so i begged the guy to give me good feed back right away and he did and it still took them a week after the feedback. I called and they told me that even though he left good feedback i cant have the funds until a minimum of 15is days has gone by.

    I honestly think they are illegally holding money for taxes and until we stop using them it wont change. Ebay lost my business and so has paypal.

  30. fucking morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a fucking moron if you're doing business with paypal.

    I will still make purchases via paypal, but only when no other alternative is available. But I only use a credit card with zero liability, and I'm not giving those fuckers my bank account number or my debit card number.

    And for people who say: "I don't have a credit card" etc...

    I say: "Get a skill and get a fucking job."

    1. Re:fucking morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say: "Get a skill and get a fucking job."

      Are you hiring skilled workers?

  31. I'm Confused? by rueger · · Score: 1

    There are people who still use PayPal? Merchants or sites that encourage it? I can't recall the last time I came within spitting distance of PayPal for anything.

    Then again, it's been several years since I went near e-Bay either.....

  32. Too little, too late. by ikea5 · · Score: 1

    Screwing legitimate users on regular basis is not a good way of doing business. eBay/PayPal.

    1. Re:Too little, too late. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Screwing legitimate users on regular basis is not a good way of doing business. eBay/PayPal.

      You would think not but paypal have been doing it for years. There are always more mugs willing to give away their money.

  33. 2007 Transfer to Wife in Europe by retroworks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I transferred a good bit of money to my wife in Paris in 2007. It had worked twice previously. On the third time, Paypal "froze" the funds, IE took them out of our joint account in the USA, but not putting them into our account in France. Several weeks went by, I was calling constantly. One particular guy taking my calls will live in my memory forever. I learned to just say "escalate" "escalate" "escalate", as we reached a point when my wife in France's internet account would be cut off for non-payment. We had to keep faxing documents all showing both our names on both the accounts. It was an absolute horror show. I don't understand why there is not a class action suit against them for the interest Paypal earned from all of the people like me who had all of their money in Paypal limbo. I'm way too busy to worry about this now, but if I had time to, I'd hate their guts.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:2007 Transfer to Wife in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why there is not a class action suit against them for the interest Paypal earned from all of the people like me who had all of their money in Paypal limbo.

      It's because Paypal removed their users' ability to do so, effective November 1, 2012.

    2. Re:2007 Transfer to Wife in Europe by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I transferred a good bit of money to my wife in Paris in 2007. It had worked twice previously. On the third time, Paypal "froze" the funds,

      Paypal steal money, it's their business model.

      But.. What the hell were you doing? Paypal isn't an international transfer service. You would be killed on fees and conversion charges by using them. A normal bank transfer would get the job done or even better a transfer service like xetrade.com charges about 2% off mid market rates. Even western union would be better than paypal for sending money abroad.

    3. Re:2007 Transfer to Wife in Europe by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      And in any country with decent consumer protection laws (e.g. Australia), that term is void.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  34. It backfired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I used to leave cash for my purchases in my paypal account and since I got 0% interest I presume Paypal made quite for themselves. Never mind: I got fast access to my cash for purchase, but the news about accounts being frozen spooked me. Not just the news, but a family member had a fake paypal transaction on his credit card and they gave him a really hard time. After that, I keep nothing in my Paypal account and pay by "instant bank transfer" which PayPal offers. If they didn't, I wouldn't use their service at all.

    1. Re:It backfired by etudiant · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, Paypal can freeze the bank account that you provide them in case of a dispute as well as your Paypal deposits.
      This capability might cause prudent people to link only a petty cash bank account to their Paypal account.

    2. Re:It backfired by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      They have been known to empty connected bank accounts and credit cards too. They tried both with me but luckily failed.

      They also did a nice line in forced currency conversions in order to increase pretend debts they made up into bigger pretend debts.

  35. Re:Indeed merchant accounts don't freeze the whole by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    Indeed. With CC merchant accounts they don't automatically freeze an account full of funds based on automated heuristics. It's possible they do it rarely, but working closely with thousands of businesses, and having my own merchant accounts, I've never heard of it happening. I've had my Paypal account frozen before and I know at least a dozen other people who have.

    You are obviously a merchant, not buyer, but buyer accounts are frozen quite often by automated heuristics. An international traveler would be silly to rely on a single credit card for a trip without at least looking up the local toll-free number for when the "unusual" activity locks their card (the consumer equivalent of freezing an account).

    The chargeback process is still slanted toward the buyer, but the buyer has to fill out and mail or fax paperwork, not just click a button on a web page.

    It's how it should be. I had an argument with a seller on eBay once. He said he sent it. I never got it. I did a chargeback. He complained that I didn't buy insurance.

    Legally, the transaction is not completed until the item is delivered. The item was never delivered. I was due my money back. My options are to go to court and prove I never got it, or just do a chargeback. Chargeback done. Insurance protects me, delivery receipt protects him. I don't buy insurance. If you can't pack it right, you get a chargeback. If you don't ship it, you get a chargeback. And no, I don't pay your insurance for you (like mortgage insurance, where it's default insurance you pay that covers the bank, not you). If you don't want to buy insurance to cover yourself, then you deserve the chargeback. Most eBay sellers take that into account. $0.01 items with $15 delivery weren't uncommon for a while, but I heard eBay was cracking down on it, but I haven't been back in a while to see.

  36. more paypals by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    None of this would be a problem if PayPal had serious competition. There should have been half a dozen companies doing exactly what PayPal was doing which were started in the past five years.

    Recently, the local bank where we keep our family's and our business accounts has started offering a QuickPay service which apparently hooks into Chase Bank and allows for sending and receiving money to and from email accounts. It's still in its infancy compared to PayPal, but I've been using it more and more because of how much I loathe PayPal. It works just as well and hopefully it will become more widely used. I'd switch away from PayPal in a minute if there were good alternatives (I'm in the US).

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  37. PayPal is now filled with competitiors by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now about time for someone to actually challenge eBay. eBid, uBid etc. never gain steam. We need an auction site that takes all sorts of payment methods, including enabling established sellers to accept non-recoursable payment methods like Western Union, Bitcoins etc. to increase liquidity.

    1. Re:PayPal is now filled with competitiors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bidStart is doing pretty well as a specialty collectables auction/selling site. Mostly coins and stamps, with movie memorabilia gaining more items as well. Now PayPal is one of their payment options, but buyers can choose others (Google Account and Moneybookers seem to be frequent alternatives).

      Since eBay is already there as the "sell anything you want (unless it's body parts or Nazis)" auction site, competitors are more likely to find success being the auction sites that focus on niche areas. bidStart has additional search and sort options that make sense for stamp collectors, that eBay will never implement.

  38. Exception: Wikileaks by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

    Well, when there is the weight of the government squeaking about, both Mastercard/Mastercharge and Visa/Bankamericard will do something "without even being asked": they cut off all transaction processing for wikileaks.
    .
    This was combined with a response from the financial industry world-wide which was the equivalent of a global financial blockade. How do you like them apples?

  39. Re:Indeed merchant accounts don't freeze the whole by Fjandr · · Score: 2

    eBay only cracked down on high delivery charges when shipping and handling were exempt from their final value fees. Now that final value fees are charged on the total payment price including all attendant s&h charges, they don't enforce their excessive s&h policy anymore. It was only ever put into place to protect eBay's bottom line, not to protect buyers.

  40. I quit once they wanted my SSN by Morpeth · · Score: 1

    Given their security doesn't reassure me, I was done with them once they started requiring my SSN. I was nervous enough they had my bank info, but SSN? Given I've used them for non-essential purchases (games, hobby related items, etc), I said, no thanks. I tried to contact them to get a legit explanation about why they claim to need my SSN, especially since I'm ONLY a buyer, never a seller, so tax issues are not relevant.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  41. Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it, if Paypal was subject to regular bank regulations, the kind that make it pretty hard for them to pull off stunts like this, they would be a much better service.

    This is an example of an industry that just needs some good old fashioned regulation.

    1. Re:Regulation by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Let's face it, if Paypal was subject to regular bank regulations, the kind that make it pretty hard for them to pull off stunts like this, they would be a much better service.

      This is an example of an industry that just needs some good old fashioned regulation.

      Paypal does not need 'regulation'. What paypal needs is criminal theft charges against everyone above middle management.

  42. How to fix the system: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article38581.html

    The “experts” in the corporate media ridicule the idea of the coin (government printing its own debt free money) and say that nothing like this has ever been done before. That would not be accurate either.

    In fact during our colonial days, our government did fund its operations by issuing colonial scrip. Our colonies were flourishing at this time and because the government was printing its own money, there was no need for income taxes. (By the way, it is not a coincidence that the Federal Income tax was instituted just before the Federal Reserve Act because the bankers know that the government would need the revenue to pay for the interest on its money supply and debt.) The colonial governments would issue this colonial scrip to pay their debts. There were some colonies that printed too many and suffered inflation, but most were judicious in their creation. Once the British bankers became aware of this colonial prosperity and how their debt based money system was being bypassed, they petitioned King George to forbid the colonies to issue their own currency. Since the bankers controlled the monarchy then, much as they control our government today, their wishes were granted. This quickly resulted in not enough circulating money to facilitate economic activity and the colonies quickly entered into a deep depression. It was this economic depression that was the driving force for the American Revolution.

    Another time that the U.S. government printed its own money was during the civil war. The bankers tried to extort interest rates from Lincoln of 24% to 36% to finance the war.

    “I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe.”

    Abraham Lincoln

    Instead of acquiescing to the bankers, Lincoln courageously started printing Greenbacks to finance the war saving the nation huge future interest payments. In fact the Greenbacks were so popular with the people that a political party formed called the Greenback Party. In the end, we all know what happened to Lincoln.

  43. Start with Wikileaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You thieving scumbags!

  44. Only on eBay by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    I don't recall having to use Paypal when I sold my last 5 things from around the house on Amazon.

    Experienced sellers are leaving eBay in droves. We're tired of paying 12%-15% total to sell our items when we can do it on Amazon for less than 1/2 that commission and reach just as large an audience. eBay needs to seriously change the way it does business because Amazon is going to drive them into irrelevance if they don't clean up their act. It's really a shame because they used to be a market leader and innovator, nowadays the only way they innovate is how to charge you more money.

    1. Re:Only on eBay by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      I never remember amazon innovating in any way. They only beat the many other auction websites because they were the biggest and no-one wants to use the second best. They grabbed a natural monopoly by chance, not by skill.

  45. Impossible to avoid Paypal in the UK on ebay? by jago25_98 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem with Paypal is that they are heavily linked into ebay, certainly in France and the UK where Paypal has to be accepted and is very hard to avoid using.

    I've looked hard at ways to use ebay without Paypal but can see no way even for someone such as myself who would sacrifice 50% less sales in order to use a competitor to Paypal. Ebay in turn is very dominant for goods in the UK, a first port of call for any cheap goods from HongKong or used goods especially.

    1. Re:Impossible to avoid Paypal in the UK on ebay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried this?

      http://www.btc4amazon.com/

    2. Re:Impossible to avoid Paypal in the UK on ebay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a seller, then how about bitmit?

      https://www.bitmit.net/

  46. A 15% final value fee either way by tepples · · Score: 1

    Have you looked at eBay/PayPal fees lately? Amazon compares quite well.

    For the categories that my employer sells in, both Amazon and eBay plus PayPal charge a final value fee of about 15 percent. (Current Selling on Amazon subscribers can view the fee schedule.) Amazon also has a price parity policy, meaning a seller who also sells on his own web site can't raise its prices on Amazon to cover these fees unless the seller raises the prices on its own web site in parallel.

  47. Amazon Brand Registry by tepples · · Score: 1

    My sources are Overview of Category UPC Requirements (available to Selling on Amazon subscribers only) and Help: Adding UPCs and How to Obtain a Product Code (which I think are public).

    I just checked, and it appears Amazon's requirement for a GTIN (UPC, EAN, ISBN) in order to get an ASIN has loosened since the last time I checked. Manufacturers of private-label products in certain categories who sell those products on Amazon as a Pro Merchant are now eligible for the Amazon Brand Registry, which provides Global Catalog Identifier (GCID) for their products, linked to the manufacturer's part number. Media items (such as books, music, and DVD) and a few other categories are not eligible for GCIDs, nor are individuals who sell fewer than 40 items per month (Pro seller subscription required). In some categories, such as consumer electronics, product bundles need their own GTINs. Did your "many many many products" refer to categories eligible for GCIDs?

  48. Yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When i stopped using paypal, i also had to stop using ebay.

    It was hard, but thank god for craigslist!

    1. Re:Yea by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      When i stopped using paypal, i also had to stop using ebay.

      It was hard, but thank god for craigslist!

      Other than cars I don't really see the point of buying second hand stuff at all. If I want it I'll buy new or I won't buy it at all.

      Everything I want in life is cheap enough.

  49. What makes Paypal work for a lot of us... by helios17 · · Score: 1

    Paypal issues a debit card, funds that can be drawn on just like your bank account. A lot of folks who want to stay off the major grid or have bad credit and who have less than 5K earnings a year find that having a debit card is important. My youngest daughter is a college student and when she needs money, I transfer money from my Paypal account to hers and she can draw that money via her debit card the instant I make the transfer. I think that if anyone else offered a competitive service without all the bloodsucking, they would probably do well. The debit card for many, is often worth the risk of Paypal losing their fucking minds and locking your money up for 180 days.

    --
    Windows assumes you are an idiot...Linux demands proof.
  50. Too long by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    After all these years and all these warnings I can't believe paypal still has any customers.

    Paypal take other peoples money and keep it, that always was their business model. Deal with them only if you want to lose your money. Deal with them only if you want them to empty all linked accounts too.

  51. Rape by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    I pretty much agree with you that he used the wrong word but feel the need to point out rape isn't always a sexual crime.

    From dictionary.com:
    noun
    1. the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse.
    2. any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person.
    3. statutory rape.
    4. an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the rape of the countryside.
    5. Archaic. the act of seizing and carrying off by force.
    verb (used with object)
    6. to force to have sexual intercourse.
    7. to plunder (a place); despoil.
    8. to seize, take, or carry off by force.

    What paypal do is plunder, abuse, and seize, but not violently.

  52. I don't care what Paypal changes... by mgcarley · · Score: 1

    They can shove it up their arse. Fuck Paypal. That is all.

    --
    Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley