Slashdot Mirror


New Medal Designed To Honor Cyber Soldiers

bios10h writes "The Boston Globe writes that the Pentagon is creating a new medal to honor cyber soldiers. '[The] troops who launch the drone strikes and direct the cyber-attacks that can kill or disable an enemy may never set foot in the combat zone. Now their battlefield contributions may be recognized with the first new combat-related medal to be created in decades. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced Wednesday that the Pentagon is creating a medal that can be awarded to troops who have a direct impact on combat operations, but do it well away from any combat zone.'"

230 comments

  1. Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it start out bronze, silver, and then gold? And do you get a platinum one if you collect all of the other medals?

    1. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, it is just one medal that has a digital meter that continually updates your gamerscore.

    2. Re:Let me guess by Scoldog · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you get the platinum medal, it also unlocks new countries to fight in and new and improved drone weapons

      Not only do you have to kill a certain amount of people (civilians, enemies, womp rats, whatever), you also have to do pointless tasks like do 15 barrel rolls in a row with a drone to earn certain medals.

      Anyone else?

      --
      This space for rent
    3. Re:Let me guess by davydagger · · Score: 1

      instead of oak leaf clusters, subsequent awards are denoted by a small metalic "lulz" device, with the same order of awarding

    4. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you get a purple heart? Maybe from getting callouses on your palms from...the joystick?

    5. Re:Let me guess by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Hemorrhoids

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad it's just another Free-to-Play turned Pay-to-Win. If you want to have any chance at making the leaderboards you need to spend some money on proper kit: Faster target acquisition software, cluster munitions, engine boosters. This is not good for competitive gameplay and several influential clans are considering dropping out.

      To combat this trend, the US Army stated on their official blog that they are considering opening a marketplace with vanity items instead, like custom paint jobs and "death-tunes" you can play to your unsuspecting victims just before you bomb them (Apocalypse Now style, yeah!)

      I also heard a standalone expansion is in the works - it's called "X-51A WaveRider" and has already been postponed after a game-breaking bug has been found in the beta version.

    7. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise known as achievements :D

    8. Re:Let me guess by c0lo · · Score: 0

      No. But I reckon another medal would be required to recognize the "Exceptional Remote Assassin"(s) when killing - authorized by presidential order, how else? - US citizens. I'll let the suggestions of design to you.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    9. Re:Let me guess by lemur3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      ACTUALLY..

      the drones like the predator rely on satellites for control.. .. this actually means that if the pilot turns too sharply (which the drone allows him to do) he can lose contact with the satellite and.. therefore, control..

      doing a barrel roll is very unlikely!!

      i imagine 'losing control' of the drone because you turned its little satellite dish away from the sat probably wont get you a medal... well, perhaps some Iranian guy may get one!

    10. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From RSI.

    11. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ACTUALLY..

      the drones like the predator rely on satellites for control.. .. this actually means that if the pilot turns too sharply (which the drone allows him to do) he can lose contact with the satellite and.. therefore, control..

      doing a barrel roll is very unlikely!!

      That's why it's worth more points.

      10 pts Performed a barrel roll
      15 pts Completed a training mission
      25 pts Completed a combat mission with an all female (or male) squad
      50 pts Killed 20 enemy commanders in 20 minutes
      100 pts Completed campaign in hard mode
      200 pts Killed an enemy at the same time as chatting with them in an online chat room

    12. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite communication is not physical point-to-point. There isn't a satellite with a dedicated antenna pointed at every drone flying about and their communication cone certainly isn't measured in meters unless the quantity has more than two digits.

    13. Re:Let me guess by DFurno2003 · · Score: 0

      The funniest part of this is that it got modded over the parent.

    14. Re:Let me guess by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      My guess is crossed joysticks over a Wifi symbol

    15. Re:Let me guess by azalin · · Score: 1

      Hot coffee on lap, cafeteria food poisoning and back pain from sitting to much

    16. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its 1000 cert points if you get the auraxium medal

    17. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it is just one medal that has a digital meter that continually updates your gamerscore.

      I heard this new cyber-medal is shaped like a Twinkie with a badge on it featuring a crossed joystick and Soda bottle.

    18. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you've misunderstood. Lemur3 is referring to the dish on the drone pointing away from the satellite, not the satellite pointing away from the drone. Certainly, the satellite doesn't have a separate antenna for each drone, but each drone does have its own antenna for the satellite.

    19. Re:Let me guess by backslashdot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, the drones have built in autonomy to handle losses of communication. We'd be losing mad drones if that wasnt the case.

    20. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, its like a Strange Part then?

    21. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ACTUALLY..

      the drones like the predator rely on satellites for control.. .. this actually means that if the pilot turns too sharply (which the drone allows him to do) he can lose contact with the satellite and.. therefore, control..

      doing a barrel roll is very unlikely!!

      i imagine 'losing control' of the drone because you turned its little satellite dish away from the sat probably wont get you a medal... well, perhaps some Iranian guy may get one!

      Actually, they showed just this kind of a mistake on a recent PBS Nova episode Rise of the Drones. The pilot banked too hard and the video feed was disrupted, but he was still able to send controls to roll back out of it.

    22. Re:Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drones getting upset and going AWOL?

    23. Re:Let me guess by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      How do you get a purple heart? Maybe from getting callouses on your palms from...the joystick?

      From the exploding console, when the enemy destroys your drone and the feedback causes an overload in your plasma circuits.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

    I'm sure these drone pilots are doing a good job and all but I wonder how their life could possibly be on the line in a nice cushy bunker somewhere.

    I suspect this medal may well end up being called a Clayton's medal, the medal you get when you're not getting a medal.

    Captcha: evasion: something drone pilots don't have to worry about too much :-)

    1. Re:Err ... by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      Say what you will, but I think the recipients will consider it an Achievement.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?"

      No. The point of medals is recognition for service. The military awards plenty of medals that have nothing to do with combat.

    3. Re:Err ... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

      Not anymore.

      Now the entire military infrastructure, from cleaning the latrines to killing suspicious civilians, can be gamified.

    4. Re:Err ... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes "nice cushy bunker somewhere." with a female contractor standing behind them :)
      http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/29/world/la-fg-drones-civilians-20111230

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Err ... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Pacman Medal of Honor

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some would say that recognition of service is done with, oh, I don't know, a pay packet for instance. You get paid for your service. Medals are for going above and beyond.

      I don't get a medal for showing up for work in the morning.

    7. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the entire military infrastructure, from killing the latrines to cleaning suspicious civilians, can be gamified.

      FTFY

    8. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are putting their life on the line! Did you know that 60,000-100,000 deaths per year can be attributed to pulmonary embolism as a result of deep vein thrombosis? What about heart disease, obesity, tennis elbow, haemorrhoids... It's a high-risk job. Those boys definitely deserve a medal!

    9. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but if you do an outstanding job on a project or put in the lion's share of the effort to make a project happen, I'll bet you get at least a little nod of recognition from your boss and/or your peers. That's what meritorious service medals are for, recognition that you performed above and beyond expectations.

    10. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gives me medals for showing up at work...

      hmm I guess I'm part of the young generation which expects things like this. All I do is program at my computer.

    11. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Are you kidding? As a submariner we went into combat, that wont be declassified for a minimum of 25 years, we give up every right and are left with only responsibilities, and these douches who can go home every night and sleep in a bed that isn't 6' x 3' by 1' get medals? We don't do it for the glory or pay, but damn!!

    12. Re:Err ... by hairyfish · · Score: 2

      I thought the Purple Heart was a cop out (who gives a medal for being shot?), but a medal for putting in absolutely zero risk takes the cake. The purpose of medals is to inspire courage, bravery and loyalty, this is just devaluing the system. They may as well call it a participation medal.

    13. Re:Err ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

      Don't you know anything? Video games need achievements now. But an achievement like "blew up children with drone" only pays out 10 gamerscore, it takes "personally shot up people trying to defend their country" to get the big numbers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Err ... by jythie · · Score: 1

      The strange thing is, that this is a combat metal, the first one that does not require being in any actual danger. I doubt people would be snickering so much if it was simply a metal for achievement like other ones.

    15. Re:Err ... by caffiend666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not all awards are for risking ones life. Some, like the Army service ribbon are given simply for completing training. Some medals are given for achievements not necessarily related to heroism, like the Army Commendation Medal. Technically speaking, people are risking their lives to complete basic training, though.

      Although there are no significant physical risks in fighting remotely, these service members are still going through significant stress and risking PTSD in their jobs. Yes, 'it's like playing a video game'. But there are real lives on the line, there is no pause button, and possibly endless days doing a single task. Doesn't matter if it's just pushing buttons in an airconditioned room, they lose sleep and their sanity just the same. Not to mention watching films of people dying, the ones they just killed.

      I've read of facebook image filterers suffering from PTSD and depression. Now, imagine if those image filterers had to decide not just whether to block the image, but also whether to kill the people in the pictures.

      --
      Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
    16. Re:Err ... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but apparently it actually ranks above at least one of the existing combat metals.

    17. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep, a great job. If you count wiping out brown skinned civilian women and children.

    18. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not in the military I take it.

      Good Conduct Medal. You didn't get in trouble.
      Any Campaign or theater Medal. You showed up to work somewhere unfriendly (though even Antarctica has one)
      National Defense Service Medal. You graduated basic training more or less.
      Global war on terrorism. You how are some how connected to the war on terrorism (IE Everyone) ...
      The list goes on.
      If you basically just show up to work and do what you're told you'll probably finish your first 6 years with 4 medals for doing nothing special.

    19. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Give me enough medals, and I'll win any war."
      "A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon."
      - Napoleon

      Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

      In a way, but not exactly. Medals exist as a very cheap incentive to make people (usually soldiers, but not always) work harder than they otherwise would. It isn't about risking your life - for instance, the USSR at one point gave medals to workers who excelled at their job, and many companies use the technique (e.g. employee of the month). Ask a gamer (more than one, if possible) if they ever spent time playing a game not for fun but only to get "achievements". The so-called achievements work exactly like medals, with the difference that you'll never get laid by telling a girl at the bar you have all the achievements in Generic War FPS 4.
      tl;dr: medals are carrots.

    20. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will, but I think the recipients will consider it an Achievement.

      Maybe an achievement, but it will never be a Feat Of Strength.

    21. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The higher decorations go to officers who never risk anything greater than their reputations and other people's lives. The decorations that are awarded to soldiers are there to add the illusion of valour to their senior officers' undeserved medals. The whole system of military decorations is basically bullshit and this is just another rather curious layer of bullshit on the pile.
      Naturally decorations that recognise participation or the Purple Heart do stand above the rest.

    22. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a submariner you did get extra pay though.

      Also, even mentioning you were in a supposed battle that was somehow classified is a violation of your agreement never to acknowledge the existence of classified material. Lastly, any medal you would have gotten for said classified battle would also be classified, so even if you received a metal you wouldn't know or be able to acknowledge the medal publicly until the battle has been declassified.

    23. Re:Err ... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      Google isn't helping me: what is the significance of "Clayton's medal?" Can you show me something to read about this?

    24. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT! is a bold faced lie! Absulutely zero risk??? Hardly! You can easily get meta-carpal tunnel syndrome by flying a drone for hours at a time! Not to mention hemorrhoids! Its also a hazard to sit for long periods of time! Ask an office worker!

    25. Re:Err ... by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 2

      Military medals were created to honer a soldier without actually spending any significant portion of the King's treasury. It's so much cheaper to hand out a trinket that costs a few dollars than it is to actually give a performance bonus to those that risked their lives.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    26. Re:Err ... by deimtee · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Claytons" was a spirit style drink that didn't actually contain any alcohol. ie, you could drink "Claytons and Soda" or "Claytons on the rocks" all night and still drive home. It was targeted at designated drivers and others who couldn't drink but still wanted to socialise.
      They ran a massive ad campaign for a few years in Oz - "The drink you have when you're not having a drink" and it became a generic (mildly insulting) term that implied something wasn't real, or didn't have the content it should have.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    27. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "My gives me medals for showing up at work" - I'm guessing you don't yet have the Distinguished English Sentence Construction medal, no?

    28. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll just leave this here regarding medals for putting their life on the line: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Outstanding_Volunteer_Service_Medal

    29. Re:Err ... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Say what you will, but I think the recipients will consider it an Achievement.

      Of course they will. Whether it actually is or not is debatable.

    30. Re:Err ... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      THAT! is a bold faced lie! Absulutely zero risk??? Hardly! You can easily get meta-carpal tunnel syndrome by flying a drone for hours at a time! Not to mention hemorrhoids! Its also a hazard to sit for long periods of time! Ask an office worker!

      Then you would receive a purple heart for being wounded in the line of duty.

    31. Re:Err ... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      It think they already had the Distinguished Service Medal for non-combatants. Boh.

    32. Re:Err ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      When I google for Clayton's medal, your post is the #3 result.

    33. Re:Err ... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

      No. Many past medals were for service, length of service, or campaigns. Some were even for good driving, believe it or not. Or good conduct.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Conduct_Medal_(United_States)

      There are many medals, not all for valor.

    34. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. There are medals for just being there, like the National Defense Service Medal. This medal should also be one of this kind, considering that it's a medal for NOT being there! There are medals for training, like the Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development, granted for successful completion of PLDC (or whatever they're calling it this week), BNCOC, ANCOC, etc. I think there's for being a POW, or more to the point, for having survived being a POW... they may give you this posthumously, but I have never heard of anyone getting this one (or anything) posthumously and giving a rats ass about it. There's a medal for participating in a specific event, such as the Kuwaiti Liberation Medal, (there's actually two of these, one awarded by the US, one by Kuwait, IIRC) as well as the "Impact Awards" where you're getting a medal for actually doing something. When most civilians think of military medals, these are usually the ones they think of.

      Anyway, giving these people a fucking medal for remote piloting drones is a fucking insult to all the other people who risked as little, or DID as little as they have, sitting on their asses half-way around the planet while real warriors are out there actually fighting the goddamned fucking war. This is gayer than the Combat Action Badge, by several orders of gayitude.

      If you can get a fucking medal for remote controlling a robot airplane from the other side of the planet without jeopardizing yourself in any way, (you might risk carpal tunnel syndrome, restless leg from sitting on your ass too long, I suppose,) then the people who made the plane should get fucking medals too. The people who designed and built the missiles that our Nintendo Game-Boy pilots used to remote-murder someone should also get the same medal, the people who stamped the aluminum or poured the carbon-fiber resin that went into the parts that made the plane should also get medals, the people who refined the petroleum or who constructed the batteries the plane runs on or who mixed the explosives in the rocket should get medals, etc. ad nauseam, they should all get medals too.

      The guys who came up with the idea for the GPS should get medals, since they ALSO didn't risk their lives to kill whomever these guys are getting medals for murdering. Nikola Tesla should get a medal for this too, since he invented the progenitor of the modern radio transceiver system, (NOT FUCKING MARCONI,) let's see... who else. Oh yeah, THAG! Thag, (unsung inventor of the wheel,) without whose invention the drones would not be able to take off or land without crashing... he should get a medal. You can also give a medal to Orville and Wilbur Wright, for inventing the fucking airplane without which drones would be hot-air or hydrogen, balloons, which would be VERY hard to guide towards the target, considering.

      How about a medal for the ancient Chinese for inventing/discovering gun powder, and rocketry/jet propulsion? What about the first monkey (or ape or whatever) to realize you could use a bone to smash things with and it would give you greater smashing power and range versus whatever you were trying to smash facilitating the killing of what before would have been too big, too powerful, and too far away for you to smash over the head, facilitating the survival of smaller, weaker creatures (who therefore had to be smarter to survive) starting the primitive forebearers of the primitive forebearers of modern humans on their long, inexorable march down the path to bigger brains and smaller, frailer bodies? Don't they deserve a medal for the part they played in making these remote-murders possible?

    35. Re:Err ... by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      I received the Global War on Terrorism Medal for showing up to work in the morning. While I was in, I worked in a cubicle and did engineering work. I suppose the work I did contributed to the Navy fulfilling its mission, but to me it was basically a medal for being in the service at the right time. I can prove that with my DD214 just as well as with the medal.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    36. Re:Err ... by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      You could tell that to the Marine Sniper I know that was blown up by a grenade in Fallujah. He might take exception to you saying all he did was stand around and get blown up (he was providing cover fire for his unit when he got blown up). I don't think the purple heart devalues the medals system and there is probably a better example of what you are getting at (sure there are some folks that got it for standing on base and being shot but nothing is perfect). For example, my Global War on Terrorism Medal does devalue the medal system along with a number of others.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    37. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I get PTSD when I send in my income taxes and then realize its used to fund drones.... :-/

    38. Re:Err ... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah these are going to say "for bravery under enemy fire"...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    39. Re:Err ... by voidphoenix · · Score: 2

      Any Campaign or theater Medal. You showed up to work somewhere unfriendly (though even Antarctica has one)

      Antarctica is very unfriendly. You could die just by not dressing right or by standing in the wrong place at the wrong time. And then there's the penguins...

    40. Re:Err ... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      "Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?"

      No. The point of medals is recognition for service. The military awards plenty of medals that have nothing to do with combat.

      Are they like Girl Guide badges, you mean?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    41. Re:Err ... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

      In a word, no. There are lots medals. Some are awarded for the reasons you describe. Others, a great many others, for any number of things. 30 seconds with Google would have informed you of this.

    42. Re:Err ... by martin-boundary · · Score: 0

      Not all awards are for risking ones life.

      Yeah, we know. And these days, all kids are winners and get medals just for showing up at a sporting event. That's what's wrong with this country. It's all feel good crap and devaluing genuine excellence, because god forbid some fat loser might feel left out.

      I'll get modded down for this, but those drone pilots and keyboard cowboys _should_ feel left out. They're doing work that any 15 year old kid could do if you told them it was just a video game. That's not impressive, that's not medal worthy. If they want recognition of their peers, they should get off their ass and become real fighter pilots, or real tank commanders, or real platoon leaders and _then_ do something medal worthy. People do it every day - hell, even in real life there are cops and firefighters out there who deserve their medals.

      When you promote mediocrity, then you _encourage_ mediocrity.

    43. Re:Err ... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      In Russia, practically everybody who is alive now and who worked during WWII has some kind of official honorary recognition in the form of a medal. But Soviet Russia was very big on empty honors.

      As for the subject, the highest honor for scoundrels is a shot in the head.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    44. Re:Err ... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      And you got to ride in a submarine!

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    45. Re:Err ... by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

      Not just.

      They have medals for good conduct:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Conduct_Medal_(United_States)

      Serving during time of war:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Service_Medal

      Doing your job well inside or outside of combat:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achievement_Medal

      Wounded or killed while serving:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_Heart

      Serving in various Campaigns, wars, etc:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Service_Medal
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea_Defense_Service_Medal
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_Service_Medal
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_War_on_Terrorism_Service_Medal

      Not to mention a plethora of ribbons for sea and other service:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Service_Ribbon
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recruiting_Service_Ribbon

      You can tell a lot about what a person has done inside and outside of combat by the ribbons they wear. Obviously some medals are a lot more prestigious than others. That is why the order of wear is ranked.

    46. Re:Err ... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      I suspect this medal may well end up being called a Clayton's medal, the medal you get when you're not getting a medal.

      So you're saying it's basically a free token?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    47. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you read the post you were replying to before you went off on this entitlement rant.

      Please read and try again.

    48. Re:Err ... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Ah, along the lines of "Dutch [x]" then?
      (x being any element of a sizable array including "Wife", "Courage" and "Oven")

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    49. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is an achievement. Apparently, they have have skills you and the rest of the military do not have. I really don't give two purple &#$@'s what you think, but being at war is NOT playing *#@&'in' Call of Duty.

    50. Re:Err ... by tibman · · Score: 1

      Global war on terrorism service medal (GWOTSM), yeah. But not the Global war on terrorism expeditionary medal (GWOTEM).

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    51. Re:Err ... by tibman · · Score: 1

      If that were the case then Generals wouldn't be so stacked. There are a ton of peacetime and service medals.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    52. Re:Err ... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Then you would receive a purple heart for being wounded in the line of duty.

      Better double check the requirements - the injury has to be the direct result of enemy action. Shot, stabbed, shrapnel, or just exploded enough to get a TBI.

      Purple Heart criteria- "Enemy-related injuries which justify the award of the Purple Heart include injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile created by enemy action; injury caused by enemy placed land mine, naval mine, or trap; injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological, or nuclear agent; injury caused by vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire; concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions.

      Injuries or wounds which do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart include frostbite or trench foot injuries; heat stroke; food poisoning not caused by enemy agents; chemical, biological, or nuclear agents not released by the enemy; battle fatigue; disease not directly caused by enemy agents; accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action; self-inflicted wounds (e.g., a soldier accidentally fires their own gun and the bullet strikes his or her leg), except when in the heat of battle, and not involving gross negligence; post-traumatic stress disorders;[7] and jump injuries not caused by enemy action."

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    53. Re:Err ... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we know. And these days, all kids are winners and get medals just for showing up at a sporting event.

      The military's non-combat medals and ribbons predate WWII. Some trace their roots back to the continental army.

      Graduating basic training/boot camp = ribbon.
      Not getting in serious trouble for 3 years = good conduct medal.

      They're doing work that any 15 year old kid could do if you told them it was just a video game.

      Except that the 15 year old kids would suck at it. Seriously, tests have shown that gamers are worse drone pilots than non-gamers. Gamers can't take the long periods of boring activity between exciting parts without becoming distracted.

      Then you get into the fact that piloting a drone is NOT a game, especially to those at the other end. Sometimes the hardest thing is to know how and when to NOT pull the trigger.

      That's not impressive, that's not medal worthy. If they want recognition of their peers, they should get off their ass and become real fighter pilots, or real tank commanders, or real platoon leaders and _then_ do something medal worthy. People do it every day - hell, even in real life there are cops and firefighters out there who deserve their medals.

      The DoD is looking to recognize them to fight just this stigma. We're moving away from 'real fighter pilots', because fighter pilots are expensive(and can get killed/captured), fighter planes are expensive(and vulnerable), have limited linger time and require vast amounts of support.

      Same with tank commanders - except you can add 'relatively slow response' to the list. Same deal with 'Platoon leaders'. Though I find it interesting that in these two cases you specified 'leader'. Where's the respect for the rest of the people in these units?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    54. Re:Err ... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Some would say that recognition of service is done with, oh, I don't know, a pay packet for instance. You get paid for your service. Medals are for going above and beyond.

      Some decorations are simply for what you got assigned to do (campaign medals like those for the Iraq or Afghanistan campaign, for instance.) Its recognition of the importance of what you got assigned to do.

      Some decorations are for being part of a group that did more than expected (unit decorations.)

      Many decorations are, as you suggest, for personally going above and beyond the usual expectations -- but even those are not all relevant to combat. Some are specifically for direct involvement in combat. Some are for notable (but not necessarily heroic) non-combat service. Some are for non-combat service in combat theater. Some are specifically for heroism in a non-combat context. And now one is specifically for service directly related to combat performed from outside of the combat theater. In the broad scope of things, I don't see the last as not fitting in with the spectrum that exists for the rest.

      I don't get a medal for showing up for work in the morning.

      Most places, you don't get medals for going above and beyond, either. The military isn't like most places.

    55. Re:Err ... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      IMO, medals aren't intended so much to prove what you did, but to show you that the chain of command recognizes the significance of what you did (and, to provide a visible-in-certain-contexts reminder to others that you did something that the chain of command recognized as important.)

    56. Re:Err ... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      When you promote mediocrity, then you _encourage_ mediocrity.

      Certainly, remote warfare involves less personal danger than traditional combat (at least, as long as the US retains is overwhelming superiority in capacity to conducting remote warfare), but that hardly means that the people conducting it in general, and more specifically the people that would be awarded decorations for outstanding performance in the context of conducting it, are in any way engaging in "mediocrity".

    57. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all awards are for risking ones life.

      Yeah, we know. And these days, all kids are winners and get medals just for showing up at a sporting event.

      I have news for you kid: the military has always been like that. You get a medal simply for being in the militart during time of war (the only medal I got in the USAF 40 years ago).

    58. Re:Err ... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      People like to joke about the video game like nature of their mission - one can understand this thinking to a point.

      On the ground combat it isn't - no one disputes that.

      The drone pilots know they are killing people, and they get stressed over it like any one else would. They have to make operational decisions, and again - they know that they are ending lives. The distance matters not.

      Yeah, they deserve medals for their particular skill-set.

      --
      Huh?
    59. Re:Err ... by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      I still wonder what the joke was for that punchline, "Now we can all get some sleep"

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
    60. Re:Err ... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Since comparatively few lives are at risk in this context, then, it should all work out. To be fair, some of these guys operate downrange for four months or so at a time, because you can't reliably control takeoff and landing through a satellite link. But the operational flying happens in Nevada, and there's no physical risk involved.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    61. Re:Err ... by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      He can take exception all he likes, I still think it's stupid to have a medal for being injured. And please note I don't think the people getting shot at are stupid, just the reward system that values this type of event.

    62. Re:Err ... by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      He probably wouldn't have this conversation. I just think you are missing the point of the award. It isn't just for being injured while in the military (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_Heart#Criteria), but rather being wounded by the "enemy". Yes people receive these for standing around in Iraq when a mortar hits the base they are on, but many are obtained by being actively engaged in combat.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    63. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I noted to another veteran near me, if their drone gets shot, do they get the cyber purple heart?
      Fucking awesome!
      Honestly, I'd be one to NOT want one of those ribbons on my uniform in fear of being beat to death by those combat vets who did put their lives on the line.

    64. Re:Err ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting fact: When they played those commercials in NZ the line was "now we can all get some sheep"

    65. Re:Err ... by Dabido · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's been about that for many, many years. Like, you can get a medal for boot camp, one for five years in service, ten years in sevice etc. That's hardly putting ones life on the line.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  3. A Terrible Idea by rtb61 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A truly bad idea, no matter what they call it, it will end up being the gutless coward award for those too chicken shit to face combat, the kiddy killer award.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re:A Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "... for those too chicken shit to face combat."

      Like you?

    2. Re:A Terrible Idea by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Truith BURN!

      Seriously though, medals aren't just for combat. Many are simply for doing your job well. I guess not missing your target and killing kids by accident could be considered doing it well. This does seem to be fairly pointless though.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    3. Re:A Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you now or have you ever been an infantry grunt? For that matter, a voluntary member of the any national armed forces? If not, kindly shut your fucking mouth. The underlying truth that people forget or overlook in their rush either disparge the military or suck its collective dick is that the military requires more than just bombs and bullets and warm bodies to fire guns. The military needs logistics personnel to ensure forward personnel get the neccesary beans, bullets, and band-aids. The military needs communications and digital infrastructure personnel to ensure someone doesn't pick up a transmission with a friggin' radio scanner. That includes, gasp!, cyberwarfare and communications Soliders! Drone pilots do more than bomb places, they provide surveillance so Joe Snuffy Rambo doesn't walk into a deathtrap and get slaughtered.

      In summary, go fuck yourself you self-righteous prick.

    4. Re:A Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A truly bad idea, no matter what they call it, it will end up being the gutless coward award for those too chicken shit to face combat, the kiddy killer award.

      I know you want to vent because you dont like your life, you had a bad day, maybe bitching online from behind the safety of your computer (makes you a hypocrite really considering the comment you made) is the only way your ego gets boosted since you have no self esteem, maybe youre just really stupid, or maybe its something else but you obviously didnt think about this.

      When youre in the military you dont get a choice what you get to do. If someone shows skills in something you get stuck with it. Just like I was a damn fine shot so in the army I was put in as a sniper and trained as one. Just like if youre skilled with fixing things you might get put in the motorpool. Sure you can request or try to get a certain posistion but really you dont get to chose squat. So its not like someone goes into the recruitment office and says "Hey I want to kill people with drones" and magically they are behind a console killing people with a drone.

      Besides arent people in artillary also cowards for staying back behind the fighting miles away and bombarding them with ordance? Or what about fighter pilots dropping bombs? Or guys on a destroyer firing onto the shoreline from out in the ocean? A sniper that sits way back and kills a man from hiding? Sure they can be killed but the chances are slim to nill really.

      Lets look at the reality as well. Youre saying its better for a guy in the army to be shot on the battlefield trying to kill someone than it is to do it with a drone? So youre a gutless coward if you kill someone while being safe? Bottom line is you need to kill this guy, but youre a coward if you do it safely? Combat is combat and killing is killing, doing either of those without risking your life is the key element, to live while your enemy dies. Thats why we have wars, to kill our enemy and live to see them defeated. Do you really think its cowardly for the military to find ways to defeats its enemies and keep its soldiers as safe as possible? If a cop wears a bullet proof vest do you think him a coward?

      Youre the gutless coward ranting from behind your pc. Youre the moron who doesnt actually think before he speaks. And you have no concept of war or reality.

    5. Re:A Terrible Idea by chronokitsune3233 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, you're right. People will see it as "Thank you for playing a video game," rather than "Thank you for serving your country." I see it the latter way. After all, a soldier is a soldier. I'm not sure about how the drone remote controls are designed, but in theory someone who ended up with a permanently handicapped leg or something like that (e.g. prosthetic leg because the real one got blown off) could still handle that. They can still serve their country. They can still fight. They may be too physically impaired to be on the field, but that doesn't mean they can't do something using a remote-controlled vehicle of some sort such as the drones. I don't like the drones any more than anybody else, but I know there can be a positive side to them. I doubt they'll be used in such a manner unfortunately, but that's how they might be used.

      --
      I have been a captive in America my entire life. Everybody and everything uses customary units instead of metric.
    6. Re:A Terrible Idea by JustOK · · Score: 1

      You deserve a medal for that post.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    7. Re:A Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone said those roles weren't useful. I'm just questioning why they'd qualify for a medal when they're not within cooee of a war zone.

      By all means give medals to logistics, medical, comms, and cooks but only when they're in real danger, somewhere near the "front line".

      And seriously, profanity? You may want to look into rhetoric at some point if you're going to argue on the internets.Aristotle would be rolling in his grave.

    8. Re:A Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The drone pilots all went through boot camp still, which makes them more men than you can ever dream of being.

      It's also not necessarily that they chose to become drone pilots, they may have just tested into the position.

    9. Re:A Terrible Idea by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Having been an army volunteer I can assure, soldiers will look upon those who wear that badge with total and utter contempt. After hours in the boozer those known for that badge will likely have to face off against those that volunteered for front line combat units.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:A Terrible Idea by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Would that be like the chicken hawk award for all those politicians that assiduously avoided any form of combat and protected their own spawn with all sorts of religious and political lies but were all rah rah when it comes to sending other people to fight and die in wars, all support your military until they come back home wounded then it's cut back on medical and support services and pretend they don't end up homeless. I get it now, the setting up drone warfare positions for the spawn of politicians so they can claim combat experience when it's their turn to run for those hereditary corporate campaign dollar political positions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:A Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, and fuck your soldier-sniffing. It makes me sick. A bunch of dumb shits with double digit IQs who couldn't be Walmart greeters get to feel superior by kicking the shit out of 3rd world brown people. Start some shit with Russia or China - then you can wave your dick around for freedom, or whatever.

      The real tragedy is that morons like you don't even realize they're being sacrificed in what Kipling called "the great game". The energy and resource sectors thank you for your blind flag-waving obedience, and bumper-sticker patriotism. Here, have a cereal box medal for 'Internet Tough Guy Under Fire'.

    12. Re:A Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, despite the fact that my draft lottery number put me last in line to be drafted and I joined the USAF anyway, I always felt that "veteran" didn't really apply to me, despite that stupid little ribbon, until a few years ago when I started drinking in a bar in the rough part of town where a lot of veterans drink. One fellow was an Army ranger, one a Navy seal, several had various medals, one guy had two purple hearts and a silver star.

      One Veteran's Day there one of them asked me "were you in the service?"

      "Yeah," I said. "Air Force."

      "What did you do?"

      "I hauled ground equipment to the aircraft."

      "Where were you stationed?"

      "Utapao, Thailand."

      He stuck out his hand and said "I want to thank you. If you weren't hauling that equipment to the planes they wouldn't have flown. Those planes saved my goddamned life. You're a fucking hero!"

      I feel a lot better about my time in the service now, and I seriously doubt you have ever seen combat. Because you don't sound ANYTHING like any combat vet I've ever met.

  4. Everyone wants appreciation by FixedDice · · Score: 1

    Achievement Unlocked: Chair Power!

    1. Re:Everyone wants appreciation by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Darn it, I was going to use that for my XBL indie game, but apparently it's internally reserved.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:Everyone wants appreciation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, a contest for naming the new achievement/medal?

      Let me see: "9-to-5 soldier", "LGB whore", "Death from afar", "Push the button", "Death-dealer's cubicle"

    3. Re:Everyone wants appreciation by c0lo · · Score: 1

      "Cyber-soldier" - the presence of the "cyber" should be shame enough (I'm sick of the term).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:Everyone wants appreciation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      came for the ob chairforce slur, was not dissapointed.

    5. Re:Everyone wants appreciation by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the brass has gotten ahold of the term 'cyber' and abused it. My career field used to be the ever so expressive "Computer Operator". This translated to me being able to work basically anything computer related - help desk, system administration, servers, switches, inventory, security, etc.... Now I'm 'cyber-surety', which means I concentrate on the security aspect.

      But anyways - I'm still in uniform. I've deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait and elsewhere. I am still trained in combat arms, issued an M-16, M-4, or M-9 as appropriate. I must meet the PT standards.

      Am I any less of a soldier than the maintainer or inventory technician? They say knowledge is power - and my job is to make sure the communication lines stay open, yet secure against the enemy.

      If the intel guys can't get their info to the commander, and he can't get it to the troops, how effective are we?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  5. eMedal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think an eMedal would be very fitting ;-)

    1. Re:eMedal by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Dreaming of the eMedal, you find an evildoers site, but the whois is Whois Privacy blocked.
      Laundering the LEO request via a state agency you get the name back.
      They had a higher security clearance than your boss...
      Men in suits visit your cubicle demanding to know why their database was alerted...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:eMedal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and then you are eaten by a grue.

  6. Your tax dollars at work. by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    A nickel... (wait... this is the gov.) 10k for a medal. 90k for the party afterwards.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    1. Re:Your tax dollars at work. by tibman · · Score: 1

      The soldiers will probably just get a piece of paper and have to buy the medal themselves, lol.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  7. Achievements by dahem0n · · Score: 1

    Medal unlocked!

  8. First Award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five bucks says the first one of these will go to a "pilot" or a bomb loader a thousand (or 12000) miles from where it gets used.

    1. Re:First Award by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all depends on context. In case of a nuclear exchange those bomb loaders a thousand (or 12000) miles from where it gets used knew they were allready dead.

  9. Order of Precedence by anglico · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to give out a medal for flying a drone, fine, I don't have a huge problem with it as long as you're great at it. What really irritates me and a lot of other service members is it's ranking in the 'order of precedence'. What I've read is it ranks above some combat medals, specifically the Bronze Star, which is really pissing off the 'boots on the ground' troops and I don't blame them for being mad.

    1. Re:Order of Precedence by elucido · · Score: 2

      If you want to give out a medal for flying a drone, fine, I don't have a huge problem with it as long as you're great at it. What really irritates me and a lot of other service members is it's ranking in the 'order of precedence'. What I've read is it ranks above some combat medals, specifically the Bronze Star, which is really pissing off the 'boots on the ground' troops and I don't blame them for being mad.

      But the nature of combat is constantly changing. Ground troops are still important but their role is going to become less important over time. In the future there will be robots used in certain roles where ground troops are used now. The drone operators and cyber warriors will eventually be the main role.

    2. Re:Order of Precedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No argument, but I'd suggest the even deeper problem there is that "Bronze Star with Valor Device" is the same medal as "Bronze Star." The one, you get for doing something heroic. The other, for breathing oxygen for long enough with a certain rank.

    3. Re:Order of Precedence by anglico · · Score: 1

      But the nature of combat is constantly changing. Ground troops are still important but their role is going to become less important over time. In the future there will be robots used in certain roles where ground troops are used now. The drone operators and cyber warriors will eventually be the main role.

      But I doubt they're going to give the robots medals for it, it's not as if they can lose their life. As I stated, giving a medal to a drone pilot is one thing, ranking it higher than a medal given for having an actual presence in combat is a whole different issue.

    4. Re:Order of Precedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But medals aren't given out for who contributes the most to the war effort. If that were the case, they'd be handing out medals to engineers and farmers and factory workers and the like. Medals are given out for things like bravery and self-sacrifice, which means that soldiers who put themselves in harm's way are more deserving than those whose greatest risk is carpal tunnel.

    5. Re:Order of Precedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of medals is to reward soldiers who show exceptional and desirable behavior with increased social standing. This will encourage other soldiers to engage in similar behavior, improving the overall effectiveness of the fighting force. If the soldiers feel that a medal is undeserving, then there will be resentment, which undermines the whole program. The nature of war is changing but human nature is not: as long as you need those soldiers on the ground putting their lives at risk, they need to feel that their potential sacrifice is appreciated. When high awards are handed out to people who can't even get a Purple Heart, there will certainly be some resentment.

    6. Re:Order of Precedence by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Maybe there should be a clear distinction (in names and designs) between service and bravery medals. Both have meaning and can be used to reward actions above and beyond the ordinary, but it would be good to not confuse the two.

    7. Re:Order of Precedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get a Bronze Star for commanding a combat unit in a combat zone, even if none of you ever get within fifty miles of actual combat. At this point, the Bronze Star is the officer's equivalent of an ArCom.

    8. Re:Order of Precedence by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      This is true.
      The Bronze star while being a 'combat' medal doesn't require one to participate in combat to receive it. And in fact sets the bar pretty low with only requiring ' meritorious achievement or service'.
      This new medal's requirement of 'extraordinary achievement' would indeed seem to place it higher then the bronze star. Point of fact 'extraordinary' is the same wording found on the service crosses; the second highest award after only the medal of honor. Where as one can find meritorious achievement as a requirement on something as common as a Achievement medal (The military's "good job" awards).

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    9. Re:Order of Precedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, you can get a Bronze Star without participating in combat at all as an end of tour award, if your higher end enlisted or a warrant officer or an officer in combat zone.

    10. Re:Order of Precedence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to join a discussion, at least bring along some useful points. Stating that something is wrong without explaining why is just an argument from authority but without the actual benefit of an authority.

    11. Re:Order of Precedence by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      combat implies two(or more) factions duking it out.
      drone strikes don't seem to be used in combat. they're used for bombing strikes and surveillance. the surveilled or striked can't shoot back so it's just one way.

      and remote planes is a long way from ground terminators.. even if they're basically the same thing. but they're a very long way from being able to be used in actual capturing of people, actual manning of checkpoints etc jobs which are the main jobs of the soldiers. the flying drones have a bunch of good uses apart from killing civilians but there's no war like that to be fought(anti tank etc roles).

      you want to start giving the drone pilots medals, start with "notified friendly forces of threat"-medal and "didn't shoot a reporter"-medal.
      in fact you could just give them a bunch of medals the day they start and then start taking them away one by one. that would correctly indicate that the only thing the drone pilots stand to lose is their sanity.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:Order of Precedence by elucido · · Score: 1

      The risks change over time. The enemy is going to figure out that the US fights with drones and cyber warriors and begin targeting them.

    13. Re:Order of Precedence by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >which is really pissing off the 'boots on the ground' troops

      May be instead of looking for shortcuts they should have considered doing something good instead of being hired murderous occupants.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    14. Re:Order of Precedence by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The Bronze star while being a 'combat' medal doesn't require one to participate in combat to receive it.

      It does for an award with the "V" device.

      This new medal's requirement of 'extraordinary achievement' would indeed seem to place it higher then the bronze star. Point of fact 'extraordinary' is the same wording found on the service crosses; the second highest award after only the medal of honor.

      "Extraordinary" isn't the issue, its "acheivement" (as opposed to "heroism", "gallantry", or "valor"). The service crosses are all valor awards (like the Silver Star, the Army DFC or the other services DFC with "V" device, and the Bronze Star with "V" device, and unlike the Distinguished Warfare Medal, the non-Army DFC without "V", and Bronze Star without "V".)

    15. Re:Order of Precedence by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the Bronze Star isn't just a combat medal. It's also awarded for meritorious service, typically to company-grade or low-field-grade officers who have deployed.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    16. Re:Order of Precedence by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      Qualifier: I deployed as a battalion S1 (human resources officer) whose responsibilities included the awards program for over 300 service members in three military branches.

      There is a distinction if you know what to look for. Medals with "Star" or "Cross" in the name require action in a combat zone. Medals with "Service" in the name generally do not. Notable: The Distinguished Service Cross (Army award for valor second only to the Medal of Honor) is a combat medal that meets the first criteria, but the name is confusing because of the word "Service" in the title. Note that there are many non-combat service medals that rank above the Bronze Star Medal. Below the BSM, the service-specific Commendation Medals are also awarded in combat zones and can be affixed with 'V' devices for valor.

      To add confusion to the debate, non-combat awards, such as the Meritorious Service Medal (non-combat equivalent to the Bronze Star) and service-specific Achievement Medals, have been awarded in Iraq and Afghanistan to service members who work exclusively inside the wire. Guidance is vague enough to cause great inconsistencies in award approvals across commands, and many complaints from service members.

      Adding new awards like this adds further confusion to what many consider to be an arbitrary and subjective process, and are usually only welcomed by the few service members who were not recognized by previously existing awards.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  10. Combat isn't about guts. by elucido · · Score: 1

    Combat is about survival and winning. It doesn't matter if you use snipers, nukes, or hackers.

    That being said the concept of combat is going to change. Currently cyber soldiers aren't viewed as a combat role but that is going to drastically change in the near future when the enemy begins targeting them directly. Right now it seems like it's not a combat role but people felt that way about the Airforce at first too. The nature of war is going to change and combat will change but anyone who kills or risks being killed for the US Constitution should have our respect.

    1. Re:Combat isn't about guts. by femto · · Score: 1

      > ...when the enemy begins targeting them directly

      And at that point, the civilian population will realise what a really bad idea drone warfare is. It's all rosy whilst running an unequal contest, blowing up a bunch of Taliban with little ability to fight back. If an enemy with the ability to fight back is engaged, bombs will start falling on the drone pilots, and the civilian population will realise that drone warfare has turned them into human shields.

    2. Re:Combat isn't about guts. by ApplePy · · Score: 2

      anyone who kills or risks being killed for the US Constitution should have our respect.

      I do not think the people who will do that are the people you think they are.

      As it stands, soldiers do what they're told. Their orders come from Congress (theoretically) and the president (currently), neither of which give a flying fuck about the Constitution.

      Today's soldier is no less the gullible young testosterone-laden hellion than any soldier of the last umpteen-thousand years of history, and no less prone to penis-waving and patriotic bullshit. The only rule of history that never changes... is that we never learn from it.

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    3. Re:Combat isn't about guts. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      civilian population will realise that drone warfare has turned them into human shields.

      Uh... No more than they are anyways. It's not like we're setting up drone control centers downtown, we're setting them up on already valid target military bases. The military drone pilots still wear uniforms, except maybe the CIA ones, and I find the idea of the CIA operating armed drones a bit shady myself.

      Drones presents the enemy with interesting problems - if they go after the drones, well, they're relatively cheap to replace compared to manned aircraft. We lose no skill in the process, the pilot(s) will be back up as soon as we get another drone there. If they go after the pilots, they have the problem of reach and seperation - it's a whole different ballgame to mount a successful attack on a base within the US, and it's unlikely to do much anyways - there's multiple control centers. Again, other experienced pilots just take over the drones in the AOR while we slap additional guards and defenses over the rest of the control centers.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  11. will they play this when awarding it? by Pax681 · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:will they play this when awarding it? by Hobart · · Score: 1

      Roger Waters - The bravery of being out of range

      ... Best reply in thread. Well done, sir.

      --
      o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  12. Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all those Call of Duty players will have a reason to join the army!

  13. Award should be a Commodore 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    connected to a 25 inch Zenith analog TV housed in an imitation walnut cabinet, with lime green E X T E N D E D P L A Y letters blinking on and off.

  14. Stress by Baldrake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Christian Science Monitor had an interesting piece a while back on the stress of remotely participating in combat:

    At the end of the day, these pilots get in their cars and drive home to their families, mow the lawn and make dinner, or take their children to soccer practice.

    The result is an "existential conflict" in some UAV pilots, says Col. Hernando Ortega, surgeon for the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Agency. It is "a guilt feeling, perhaps – or a 'Did I make the right decision?' " he explains." 'Was this a friendly fire incident? Was it a good outcome? Was it a bad outcome? Could I have done it better?'"

    It's obviously not comparable to driving a LAV in convoy wondering when the next IED is going to detonate. But it appears to be a much tougher job than many of us would think.

    1. Re:Stress by AHuxley · · Score: 2
      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Stress by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... stress of remotely participating in combat

      The result is an "existential conflict" in some UAV pilots, says Col. Hernando Ortega, surgeon for the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Agency. It is "a guilt feeling, perhaps â" or a 'Did I make the right decision?'

      Mayhaps part of the problem is that some of the drone-related operations are so blatantly wrong that soldiers who are executing them must feel the inevitable guilt. Not "was it right or was it wrong?", but "why did I just kill a group of civilians on purpose?".

      For example, an attack on the funeral procession of "militants" killed earlier in the day
      (quotes around militants are added by me, since at least nowdays that is defined as "adult males")

    3. Re:Stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would think it's related to the feeling a lot of us that work from home for extended amounts of time can get. When your office is just a few feet from your main living area you feel like you never really separate yourself form that "at work" mentality. When your overseas facing these issues then come home you have that separation and can try to block the bad stress from your mind, where when you mix killing people and then loving your family every day I can see how it could affect you.

    4. Re:Stress by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Mayhaps part of the problem is that some of the drone-related operations are so blatantly wrong that soldiers who are executing them must feel the inevitable guilt. Not "was it right or was it wrong?", but "why did I just kill a group of civilians on purpose?".

      I think that is probably true. Not that I believe that deserves a medal or anything, but I am willing to believe that for a normally adjusted human, killing someone, even by remote control, is very destructive to the pysche.

      I watched a video a of person dying because I thought it was a very important event, that her death ought to be witnessed by as many people as possible. It was far more intense than I ever expected, even though it was no hollywood shoot-out or anything like the way death is portrayed in video games or movies. Even today I still get broken up any time I think about it.

      So not only do I think that it is entirely possible for drone operators to be affected by the things they do, I think it is a good thing. It means that we haven't been able to completely take the humanity out of war, not yet at least.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:Stress by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I for one salute the unsung sacrifices of these brave Rear Echelon Motherfuckers. They also serve who stare into the face of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:Stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The result is an "existential conflict" in some UAV pilots"

      Must be something like receiving the Nobel Peace Prize just prior to proving to the world you're just another war monger in sheep's clothing.

    7. Re:Stress by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      "Not "was it right or was it wrong?", but "why did I just kill a group of civilians on purpose?"."

      When cowards insist on fighting a war and using women and children as body shields, please, enlighten us what YOUR solution is?

      "Warrior culture" my ass.

      --
      -Styopa
    8. Re:Stress by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the crews of the B52's that carpet bombed large chunks of Asia? - a targeted strike is far less likely to have collateral damage - like my dad getting bombed out during ww2 as that side of the family lived a few miles from the biggest spitfire plant in the UK - luckily he wasn't at home then other wise I would not be here :-)

    9. Re:Stress by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >But it appears to be a much tougher job than many of us would think.

      boo. hoo.

      Have you ever heard of Mujahedeen having such qualms? Have you every heard of a Taliban with a PTSD syndrome?

      Screw you and your murderous mercenary invaders. May Allah destroy them. Ameen.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    10. Re:Stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A counterinsurgency war is fought in the hearts and minds of the civilians in the occupied territory. These people can pick up a gun at any time and join the resistance, just like Americans civilians joined the resistance against the British during the Revolutionary War. Victory is achieved when there are too few resisters, a condition of which is that very few civilians join the resistance.

      So, the question is how do we curtail the number of civilians joining the resistance? Unless we have an answer to this question, then we will lose.

    11. Re:Stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PTSD in the Vietnam war was a bigger issue than shell shock in the world wars. This is probably due to a lot of factors, namely diagnosing crazy-fucker-syndome got slightly better over time, and the cultural views on the wars at the time. But one of the arguments is that the soldiers over in Germany and the pacific had a easier time disassociating themselves from the horrors of war because they had to take a long ride on a slow boat home. They had time to think about what they did in the company of others that had been through the same hell. Out of Vietnam, you were home after a day on a plane. The sudden shift is a culture shock.

      And these "pilots" face that every day.

      The new ways are better. By far. But they're not the same as the old ways. We're building a new type of crazy, and we better get ready for it.

    12. Re:Stress by Applekid · · Score: 1

      A counterinsurgency war is fought in the hearts and minds of the civilians in the occupied territory. These people can pick up a gun at any time and join the resistance, just like Americans civilians joined the resistance against the British during the Revolutionary War. Victory is achieved when there are too few resisters, a condition of which is that very few civilians join the resistance.

      So, the question is how do we curtail the number of civilians joining the resistance? Unless we have an answer to this question, then we will lose.

      The answer is clear: kill all the civilians.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    13. Re:Stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "War"? Son, this isn't a war. This is Thursday. The Afghans have been in an asymmetrical fight against "the man" since the Brits showed up in the 1800's. They know just as well as we do that the USA is going to get sick of pissing away money, realize there's no reason to be there, and GTFO eventually. And then "the man" is going to be someone else for a little while.
      "Body shields"? Come on, you're demonizing the enemy. They live with their women and children, you know, like people. In Afghanistan the distinction between home-life and warfare life a lot more blurred. Now, there ARE the ones that go to camps, join warlords, and get organized. You can call them police, government authority, or evil terrorist depending on who is in charge. Those are easy to kill, which is why the remainder of the ones we don't like moved into Pakistan. Where we're still not technically supposed to be shooting.

      enlighten us what YOUR solution is?

      Well why the hell were we there to begin with? What was the goal? I believe it was to disrupt Al-Queada, capture Bin Laden, and generally swing our dick about showing the world that we do stupid things when we get hurt and they better keep their shit together. Check, Check, and Check. We did, technically, acquire Bin Laden's corpse for a time. So yeah, we nailed that requirement.
      What do we do now? LEAVE. The job is over. The plan was never to turn Kabul into Manhattan. The Taliban, while an ass-backwards religious nuthouse, isn't our enemy. At least, they weren't before we shot the holy shit out of them. Make peace, declare a Talibanistan if they want it, promise (military) aid to the local governments that helped us. Launch planes from a carrier when we want to blow shit up.

    14. Re:Stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They call that Double Tap.
      "a technique whereby a target is bombed from an aircraft, and then bombed again when relief efforts of the affected area are in effect."

  15. Interesting video by femto · · Score: 1

    The Pentagon has posted a really interesting video, about the process that they use to manufacture these medals.

  16. Personal risk != medal by atomican · · Score: 1

    Contrary to popular notion, not all medals are awarded for bravery. As a matter of fact, relatively few are. Some are rewarded for merely being present in a particular theater of war or in a particular campaign; some are rewarded for skill or adroitness in combat. This would fall in the latter category I would think.

    1. Re:Personal risk != medal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forget the medal, but I knew someone whom was retired from the Air Force. Had a medal which was awarded for a critical support role, a role that only by some far flung definition could be considered risky. Apparently the medal got him some nice retirement perks too, he was really well off, enough so to put his grandchildren through college.

  17. Purple Mouse by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

    That, sir, is un-American thinking. Those brave young men and women put their carpal tunnels on the line for you every day and they haven't even been granted a Purple Mouse in recognition.

    1. Re:Purple Mouse by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Purple Coronary?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  18. Typical Air Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this is certainly better than the Medal of Commissary Valor (with oak cluster) awarded to personnel in the 356th Tactical Lawn Mowing squadron.

  19. medal for cyber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a virtual one or a cyber one?

  20. Why soldiers? by darkfeline · · Score: 1

    Why do we have soldiers fly drones anyway? I imagine gamers would do a MUCH better job with the drones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQLIaZUOnBU

    1. Re:Why soldiers? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Why do we have soldiers fly drones anyway? I imagine gamers would do a MUCH better job with the drones

      Someone can be both a soldier and a gamer.

    2. Re:Why soldiers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because soldiers are required to follow orders.

    3. Re:Why soldiers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you may find most gamers would also follow orders if there's a soldier behind them holding a M9 to the back of their head :-)

  21. You will get one for by Cute+and+Cuddly · · Score: 0

    Exterme courage in the face of Bytes?

  22. Medals for everyone! by jcr · · Score: 2

    Coming soon: the Unquestioning Obedience Citation, awarded for not caring about legalities like declaring war.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Medals for everyone! by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      Isn't that already included by default in all medals? I've never heard of an 'acting on your conscience' medal or 'doing the right thing' medal.

    2. Re:Medals for everyone! by proslack · · Score: 1
      --


      Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    3. Re:Medals for everyone! by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Coming soon: the Unquestioning Obedience Citation, awarded for not caring about legalities like declaring war.

      I think the term you're looking for is use-of-military-force authorization. That's what Congress calls it these days, because "declaration of war" is so 1941.

      Congress passed a measure three days after 9/11 approving use of military force in Afghanistan. About a year later, they passed the measure authorizing use of force against Iraq. It's a different term but effectively has the same meaning.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    4. Re:Medals for everyone! by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that, good to know.

      In that entry only the one for the My Lai Massacre intervention strikes me as one which could be considered disobeying authority. I wonder how often disobeying authority and doing the right thing is rewarded.

  23. I think.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    a Purple Nurple would be more in order.

  24. Medal Saturation by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 2

    I served 6 years in the Air Force - no heroics, didn't dodge any bullets, but I did my job to the best of my ability. I left with a box full of of medals and citations that promptly went into the dumpster. Why? Because they were awarded every time I sneezed into a hanky and not into someone's face, for showing up to work on time sober...things that I was duty-bound to do anyway.

    The military has joined the rest of American society in giving out awards for everything, for everyone, because we are all special.

    If someone did a really good job, great - give them a pay bump or something. If someone did something truly exceptional, honor them by not giving the least competent slob in the unit the same award just because he bothered to show up two days in a row.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Medal Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are sooo fucked!...*sniff*

    2. Re:Medal Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmm... In the Army at least, they give out a lot of ribbons and medals (awards) that don't matter, but the ones that do, everyone knows which ones they are, and they don't just hand those out like candy, fortunately.

      When you look at a soldier in dress-uniform, and he/she has lots of medals, look for the one that is all stripey, in a rainbow of colors. That's the Army Service Ribbon. Any medal to the left (from the wearers' perspective) or below THAT is completely worthless and meaningless, to include the ASR, the medal you get for joining the Army. (You'll see new privates in uniform, generally with one or two ribbons, one red and yellow, the other rainbow. Neither means shit.)

      There's a chart you can find using your favorite search-engine on the precedence of military awards. The lowest one that really means dick in the army is pretty much your Army Commendation Medal. That's one step above the Army Achievement Medal, which you can get for getting a really high score on a physical training (PT) test or weapons qualification. You actually have to half-way do something significant to get an ARCOM. If you see someone with a "V" on it, that also means something significant, although those are pretty rare, due to medal inflation. Mostly, if you do something to merit an ARCOM with V device, you are probably going to end up getting either nothing, or a Bronze Star. Ask around, see if you can find ANYONE who has one of these. You might occasionally find someone but they're pretty rare.

    3. Re:Medal Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military has joined the rest of American society in giving out awards for everything, for everyone, because we are all special.

      Erm, no - it's rather the other way around.

      A certain despicable Frenchman had a nice word or two about the lengths soldiers will go to in order to get a piece of silly ribbon. Armies across the world have long been medal-crazy.

  25. Way more stressful than you think.... by craznar · · Score: 2

    When in the field, a soldier gets stressed out - sure, however they get to use much of the innate stress mechanisms humans and animals have of fight or flight.

    When sitting behind a computer screen in an air conditioned office - much of the stress is still there however there is no mechanism for management.

    Just ask an air traffic controller if they think their job is easy - now compound that by actually having to kill people.

    Personally - I think these guys probably don't need medals, they probably need lots of counselling.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
    1. Re:Way more stressful than you think.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the people that signed up for war, don't like it, then maybe they needed counseling already.

      Seriously though if your war consists of people sitting behind a remote control, killing others, then obviously the world is slated for the success of the ones at the remote, and there is no actual fight, just war (in the name of population-control?).

    2. Re:Way more stressful than you think.... by Slider451 · · Score: 1

      People sign up to serve for many reasons. I'm sure there are some who seek war, but they are rare, thankfully.

      No one prays for peace more than the soldier.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  26. There should be no medal for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Because all the families of the innocents slain fucking hate you, and your country, and all that drone killings represent. I mean seriously, congratulations: you ran some software someone else made, and you followed orders from someone else to drop a bomb on something you didn't personally go to. Thanks a lot?

    1. Re:There should be no medal for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With any luck you're next in the crosshairs. Sounds like it's a win/win for the world at large. Hate can't end until one side stops, and it sounds like you can't stop the hate.

    2. Re:There should be no medal for this! by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Because all the families of the innocents slain fucking hate you, and your country, and all that drone killings represent. I mean seriously, congratulations: you ran some software someone else made, and you followed orders from someone else to drop a bomb on something you didn't personally go to. Thanks a lot?

      That's ok.

      They were all bad.

      The government said so.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
  27. But they are heroes! Right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, they braved traffic, carpal tunnel syndrome, overtime hours, and they managed to suppress any feelings of guilt, shame, or empathy for the people they slaughtered in their push-button war.

  28. Teletroopers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remote U.S. teletroopers.

    The world needs more dead Americans.

  29. Obligatory Video Game Reference by pwnyxpress · · Score: 1

    Achievement Unlocked!

  30. In Soviet Russia by Roachie · · Score: 1

    ...cyber soldiers get a chest full of lead!!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idk if you understand how things in soviet russia work. perhaps had you said ... drones control you, that would be acceptable.

  31. More cowbell.. I mean ribbon! YO JOE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon.
    Napoleon Bonaparte

  32. Killstreak achievements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  33. thats the most pathetic thing i have ever heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    especially with all the stories about bombing childrens and such , and what honor is there anyway playing a nintendo game from far away getting kills ,

      wtf

    has to be a joke , anyway i will laugh at medals form now on.

  34. keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This gives the term "Keyboard Warrior" a completely different meaning.

  35. An achievement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say what you will, but I think the recipients will consider it an Achievement.

    Aw bless!
    In the US of A maybe.
    In my country, soldiers would undoubtedly refuse such a worthless medal. Anybody who did accept one would get the piss taken out of them.

    1. Re:An achievement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *woosh*

  36. The medal is in the shape of a giant harry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pussy. The higher your rank, the less harry the pussy medal. Until eventually, at the very top, once you make cyber-general, your medal is a platinum giant hairless pussy, because that's what you are!

  37. Purple heart is worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think the purple heart devalues the medals system

    Don't talk shite man.
    They give purple hearts for being stupid enough to get frostbite!
    Here in Finland, frostbite is what happens if you havenâ(TM)t get enough sense to turn away from the wind when taking a winter piss.

    For example, my Global War on Terrorism Medal does devalue the medal system along with a number of others.

    Granted, I'll give you that one ;-)

  38. Participation by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Everybody wins! Yaaaay!

    1. Re:Participation by PhxBlue · · Score: 1
      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  39. The problem with Military Metals by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    Okay great, another metal for the military, but if your going to give people who kill in the name of there country a metal shouldn't you also reconize the people who kill for fun? A solder is a serial killer who gets away with it.

  40. Greneda by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I recall reading that after the 'battle' for Greneda, more medals were handed out - including to military contractors - than were handed out for D-Day. Might have been BS, but it's always stuck with me.

    Funny how all this fascist behaviour and bravery of being out of range is starting after most all the WWII vets have died.

  41. A medal for cowardly murderers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It just shows how low the US can go.

    1. Re:A medal for cowardly murderers? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      It just shows how low the US can go.

      Is it that much different than "paid administrative leave" and "zero-risk desk work" rewarded to heavy handed, violent, and corrupt police officers?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
  42. Kroll Show: "DRONES" by bradgoodman · · Score: 1
  43. Cyber warriors face real risks by ark1 · · Score: 1

    Just look at the health warning at the back of your keyboard.

  44. They can call it the "Brave Sir Robin Medal"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or the Skynet Award For Meritorious Service To The Machine Hive.

  45. Joysticks right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the BS about computer games and violence, yet we have ACTUAL murder of civilians .. oh sorry... collateral damage.. through the use of drones.

  46. I know this one. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    It's the "Chair Force Medal of Honor", isn't it?

  47. Purple Wrist medals by golodh · · Score: 1

    I'd personally nominate the Purple Wrist medal for service personnel who got Carpal Wrist Syndrome in the course of duty.

  48. pentagon quintupling cybersecurity operations by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The only part of the DOD that will see much growth the next fews after the midesat war drawdowns.

  49. Gold medals are special by tchall · · Score: 1

    They typically come with a federal land grant. A six by six by three foot plot in whichever military cemetery has room.

    ze The Silver, and Bronze medals are usually a bit less costly.

    The problem with this medal is that is "outranks" the Bronze Star that the guy holding the LASER designator is probably going to deserve for being on scene in person while the "driver" and "shooter" are sitting in an air conditioned box a few thousand miles closer to safety.

    While the grunt and his LASER gun are escaping and evading back to friendly territory the heroes at home will be picking up their dry cleaning, stopping by the IGA to grab some milk and bread for the wife and spending the evening in front of the TV with the family.

    On a particular hard day them might even hoist a few at the club in celebration of a successful mission...

    Don't misunderstand me... It's great that the techies and stationary pilots are being recognized... It just seems strange to make that recognition count more for promotions than actually being IN the war zone...

    Kinda like giving achievement awards for the Very Best Video Game Ever!!!

  50. Drop them in the forge... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Drop them in the forge...but there is a semi-random chance it will fail and you will have to collect the lower medals again.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  51. Orange Juice and Gingerale by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Orange Juice and Gingerale, used to call it the designated driver's special. Good bars gave it to you free for being a designated driver.
    Bad bars charged and you sometimes wondered if the orange juice was so old it had fermented!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  52. USAF here... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Medals needing no combat or even real sacrifice:
    Good Conduct Medal - Don't get article 15'd for 3 years? You're awarded it. - You can look it up.
    Achievement medal - Do something great, or a series of good tasks. Normally for the lower enlisted/officer grades
    Accommodation medal - Supposed to be for even greater things than the achievement, in practice is simply more for senior NCOs and midrank officers.

    The purple heart at least acknowledges your sacrifice; you managed to make it into a combat zone and close enough that you experienced enemy action. Some states use it to grant extra benefits. For example, in my area you'd get a deduction on your property taxes.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  53. Rewards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess medals are one way to make soldiers feel better about killing citizens by remote control.

    At least when opposing forces are killed on the battle field they are actively engaging in hostilities, not just having a spot of tea with their evil buddies talking about evil terrorist plots.

  54. The medal by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    will have a picture of a bench in the back.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  55. And this one was for pushing a button... by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Oh yes. They need a medal. Because it is so dangerous for them sitting in front of a screen thousands of miles away from the conflict. How brave.

    There are already medals commemorating exceptional work that is not necessarily dangerous. This is unnecessary.

    And yes, I am a veteran.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  56. Point of medals by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Isn't the whole point of medals to reward someone for putting their life on the line to protect their country?

    No. The point of military medals, generally, is to recognize notable (for a wide range of definitions of "notable") service. Some medals are specifically about putting one's life on the line, some are not.

    Quite frequently, there is a distinction between those that can be awarded for combat service and those that can be awarded for non-combat service; there are two aspects that typically distingish the former: direct and immediate combat impact, and personal risk in the theater of combat. (There's also some for non-combat service in a combat theater.) Adding a reasonably high-level award specifically for service that involves direct and immediate combat impact that is performed from a location remote from combat makes perfect sense (well, inasmuch as the rest of the system of distinctions between military awards does, in any case.)

  57. Compare to existing medals outranking Bronze Star by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    What really irritates me and a lot of other service members is it's ranking in the 'order of precedence'. What I've read is it ranks above some combat medals, specifically the Bronze Star, which is really pissing off the 'boots on the ground' troops and I don't blame them for being mad.

    That's certainly understandable, though its perhaps worth noting that there are already non-valor medals that rank above the Bronze Star; the Silver Star has been, for a very long time, the lowest ranking medal for valor which has no medals above it which are not also for valor.

    If you look at the new Distinguished Warfare Medal as a step down from the Distinguished Flying Cross issued as an acheivement rather than valor award (as all services except the Army use the DFC without the "v" device), it makes some sense (and, unlike the acheivement version of the DFC which it ranks below, the DWM is restricted to award for acheivement that has a direct impact on combat or military operations.)

  58. Re:But they are heroes! Right? by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1

    And yet, here you sit. Free.

  59. MORE GONGS FOR BABYKILLERS! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Double Tap that.

    They used to give these thinks for RISK and BRAVERY.

    Now, they are scorecards, for remotely blasting ambulances.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  60. REMF by nsaspook · · Score: 1
    --
    In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
  61. a robot chicken? by doom · · Score: 1

    I suggest a medal in the shape of a robot chicken, preferably enameled with yellow.

  62. we need more real fighter pilots by r00t · · Score: 1

    In a serious war, there will be no satellites. They go bye-bye in a matter of minutes. There will be no GPS. There will be no drone video feeds. There will be no drone data links.

    It is so comforting and innocent to imagine that world wars are a thing of the past, merely a part of distant history. Those who are unprepared will be the losers.

  63. Re:But they are heroes! Right? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    I cannot think of a worthier response than - Fuck off you stupid fucking Seppo.

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.