Python Trademark At Risk In Europe

Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 03:14 · Score: 3, Funny

"And now for something completely old and similar."

Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by CajunArson · 2013-02-15 03:14 · Score: 4, Interesting

At least in the U.S., trademarks come into existence by use in commerce. Registering a trademark is a good idea, but not even a requirement (which is why you see (TM) for non-registered trademarks and (R) for registered marks).

Assuming that the Python programming language and other related marks have been used in commerce *before* this other Python outfit showed up, then they don't have to worry about losing their rights to the name. Unless Europe allows for hijacking of marks simply through registration, I don't see what the Python guys should have to worry about (unless the other "python" company was using that mark in commerce before the real Python guys were).

Notice how confusing it is to name things above because of the conflicting "Python" mark? That's why there are trademarks, because if you have these name collisions it becomes difficult to accurately identify the source of the good or service.

--
AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.

Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by HappyPsycho · 2013-02-15 03:33 · Score: 1

I don't see what the Python guys should have to worry about (unless the other "python" company was using that mark in commerce before the real Python guys were).
Question: How much will it cost to oppose the mark? You have to remember this is a non-profit org, this situation is still in the early stages so it may be possible to prevent this from reaching the courts. This assumes someone reasonable at the trademark office....... *thinks about what goes on in the US patent & trademark office*. Oh god they are screwed...
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by Threni · 2013-02-15 03:37 · Score: 1

What if they ignore this problem and get sued but have no money so don't pay anything and then contiune to ignore the problem?
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by Jason+Levine · 2013-02-15 03:54 · Score: 4, Informative

If you get sued and ignore the lawsuit, you will have a judgement issued against you. It won't be a fair one, either, because the other side will give their side of the story and you'll be seen as the type of person/group that ignores lawsuits. (Not looked favorably upon by judges.)
If you ignore the judgement and just continue on, you risk further injunction by the court including jail time for contempt.
Ignoring lawsuits is bad. Ignoring judgments from lawsuits is even worse.

--
My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by ShanghaiBill · 2013-02-15 04:24 · Score: 2

Assuming that the Python programming language and other related marks have been used in commerce *before* this other Python outfit showed up, then they don't have to worry about losing their rights to the name.
This is generally, but not alway, true. There have been instances of trademarks issued despite widespread prior use. The most egregious example was when Microsoft was given a trademark on "Windows" despite the fact that many others, including The X Window System and W, had used it years before, and it was a common term in the industry to refer to a retangular region of a computer display as a "window".
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by Kupfernigk · 2013-02-15 04:28 · Score: 1

It cost as much as gathering together a sheaf of prior usage examples, preferably original documents or photocopies of dead tree press, details of registration of any companies using the mark, a few letters from organisations already legitimately using the mark, sticking them in a big envelope along with a letter saying which application you are objecting to and why, and sending it to the right place. The last time I did this, it was free. You don't even need a lawyer: IT people can usually figure out forms pretty well.

--
From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by IndustrialComplex · 2013-02-15 05:16 · Score: 5, Insightful

Ignoring unjust laws and lawsuits based upon them is good.
NO NO NO NO. No one in the US should ever follow this advice because it will very likely destroy you and whatever cause you seek to promote.
You don't do civil disobedience by ignoring lawsuits because the judge is going to consider a lack of rebuttal on your part as an acceptance of the claims made by the plaintiff. In essence, by ignoring the lawsuit (assuming it was properly served) you are saying "Yeah, just accept whatever that guy says, and make it fact from the perspective of the law"
The concept of civil disobedience against an unjust law is that when you ignore the law, you sure as hell DO SHOW UP IN COURT and explain exactly why you did not follow that law. Appearing before a judge is the EXACT THING YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO DO because that is your first best chance to get someone to literally judge your case. The judge could very well say "Yes, that law is unjust and you are free to go." Or he might not, but the point is you must accept the penalty for your actions and work your way though the judicial system.
Ignoring a lawsuit is the worst possible legal advice I have ever seen on the internet. Perhaps the only thing you could have given which was worse advice is to ignore the lawsuit, and then threaten the judge and the judge's family... Very bad advice.
I'll say it again, never never never never ignore a lawsuit. If someone files a lawsuit against you, go get a lawyer, and be prepared to present your case to a judge.

--
Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by EasyTarget · 2013-02-15 05:43 · Score: 2

The judge could very well say "Yes, that law is unjust and you are free to go."
yeah... happens all the time.
You can only deal with unjust laws in this way if the legal system is decent, honest and just.
But unjust laws are, by implication, associated with unjust processes; and it is a safe bet that any Judge who is willing to hear a case based on an unjust law will not be interested in justice. In that circumstance the correct response is to say 'I will not acknowledge you.' The state will then attempt to use coercive force on you; what happens next really depends on your strength of will, your tolerance to pain, and how deep the injustice is.

--
"Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by morgauxo · 2013-02-15 07:19 · Score: 1

What? Since when do judges even have the authority to declare a law unjust? They are there to judge wether or not you broke it and/or determine the apropriate punishment. It doesn't matter if the judge agrees with the law or not he/she is there to uphold it. the judge might be able to lessen the impact of a bad law by handing out minimum sentences but that's about it. It's the legislature's job to actually make the law.
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by morgauxo · 2013-02-15 07:28 · Score: 1

How just the legal system is has nothing to do with it! Their job is to uphold the law! If the law is really bad and the judge is a good person then he/she might try to lessen the impact by selecting a less harsh punishment but that is about the best you can hope for. It's called "Separation of Powers". It's not within the judge's responsibility or even authority to make the law. He/She is there to uphold the law. At the upper levels this may involve some interperetation where the written law is unclear but it does not involve changing it!
If you want to get a law change petition the legislative branch, not the judicial! Sure, protest. Do that to get others on your side. You need support when your legislators are elected. Show them they will get more votes in the next election by seeing things your way. Yes, protesting may land you in jail for a bit. Sometimes that's the price to be paid for getting change. Don't expect the judge to take pitty and change the law for you though!
Spend some time in jail for protesting the law you dislike if you have to but don't go for breaking it!
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by K.+S.+Kyosuke · 2013-02-15 08:11 · Score: 1

Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First

Actually, in the area of programming languages, Python the language was second. Before Python the language, Python was an implementation of Common Lisp. (It's still around, inside CMUCL and SBCL and their derivatives.)

--
Ezekiel 23:20
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by Zamphatta · 2013-02-15 08:19 · Score: 1

I was thinking the same thing. It's like the concept of 'prior art', the legal system should just laugh at these clowns for trying to register something that's been used by someone else for the past 22 years worldwide. The way I see it, this company trying to do this to PSF, is akin to a patent troll.
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by dwye · 2013-02-15 16:22 · Score: 1

Minor nitpick: Ignoring unjust laws and lawsuits based upon them is good. It's necessary to ignore laws to function in a police state. Ignoring (or even inviting) unjust judgments is a cornerstone of protesting unjust rule of law. Civil disobedience isn't always bad.
Um, we are discussing trademark laws (in countries that are usually viewed as democratic, for that matter), not some Godwin-Effect triggering law. Civil Disobedience should not apply, should not have even been brought up.
Also, when the GP wrote "Ignoring lawsuits is bad. Ignoring judgments from lawsuits is even worse." I am fairly certain that the GP meant that it is a bad idea, as the result will be a major fail, in any jurisdiction but the Heaven of an always-just and all-knowing deity.
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by kdemetter · 2013-02-16 03:46 · Score: 1

Reading the article, it seems that the other company did use the name 'python' before, but didn't enforce it, and now suddenly wants to make us of it ( after not caring for it for years ).
If I understand trademark law correctly ( maybe I don't ) , if you do not enforce a trademark, you forfeit your exclusive use of it.
The company didn't enforce their trademark ( they didn't contact the creators of Python back then to tell them they violated their trademark ).
They should contact EFF, I'm sure they would be more than willing to help out.

--
Slipping shoelaces ?
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by MikeBabcock · 2013-02-19 16:54 · Score: 1

Your history lessons obviously missed all the law-breaking events that have made America what it is today.

--
- Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by MikeBabcock · 2013-02-19 16:55 · Score: 1

... which makes no point other than to support that of the GP.

--
- Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by morgauxo · 2013-02-21 03:28 · Score: 1

That's like saying good thing nobody ever wins the lottery or good thing nobody ever gets hit by lighting.
Laws are declared unconstitutional only at the Supreme Court level. The percentage of cases that even make it that high is tiny. Even if you get that far (statistics say you will not), right or wrong the judges may not interperet the constitution the same way you do.
If you are already in trouble for breaking a law which may be unconstitutional anyway, then yeah, try your best to get it taken care of in the courts. If you just want to change a bad law... there are much better ways than intentionaly breaking it just to go fight it in court.
Re:Just oppose the mark.. and Python was First by morgauxo · 2013-02-21 03:42 · Score: 1

If we were talking about civil rights, prohibition or some other popular cause you might have a point there. If anybody believes thay are going to make a difference in trademark law by simply disobeying a court they are only going to cause pain for themselves. If you want change in this area you need to convince the public, both that you are right AND that this is actually an issue worth fighting for. Then... if lawmakers still don't get the message maybe somebody simply disobeying the law will get some media attention followed by public outrage and some change.
Until that day comes (and it isn't coming, not for this kind of issue) simply disobeying is only going to leave you bankrupt and possibly in jail. It will not help to bring about change. Writing your congressmen (a lot), not voting back in the ones who created this mess (which probably means voting third party) and informing others about the issues are the only ways you can help bring change. Sacrificing your livelihood and freedom by ignoring the judge isn't going to do it. As they lock you away your friends and family will be the only ones to know your story or care.

Simple: Change name of the programming language by Phrogman · 2013-02-15 03:20 · Score: 4, Funny

(In Europe only mind you) to NameRippedOffByTheFuckingCocksuckersAtPythonComputerServices or whatever :P

--
"The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid

Re:Simple: Change name of the programming language by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 03:34 · Score: 1

What a bunch of snakes
Re:Simple: Change name of the programming language by pr0nbot · 2013-02-15 03:36 · Score: 4, Insightful

Rename to Monty!
Re:Simple: Change name of the programming language by unixisc · 2013-02-15 04:10 · Score: 1

Or 'Anaconda' or 'Boa Constrictor'
Re:Simple: Change name of the programming language by Half-pint+HAL · 2013-02-15 05:49 · Score: 1

Or 'Anaconda' or 'Boa Constrictor'
"Not that big of a deal."

--
Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
Re:Simple: Change name of the programming language by Zaatxe · 2013-02-15 07:06 · Score: 2

Or "TheProgrammingLanguageFormelyKnownAsPython".

--
So say we all

Easily resolved by Shemmie · 2013-02-15 03:21 · Score: 4, Insightful

Everyone hits social media, hard - their name won't be worth toffee in the tech world. Which is ironically who they are trying to sell to.

Make it clear you wouldn't do business with them - and wait until they relent.

Re:Easily resolved by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 03:38 · Score: 1

They are not trying to sell to you or me. They are trying to sell to our bosses & our bosses bosses. How often do they consult with us prior to purchase? Other than MAYBE to casually ask our opinion about "Python"
Re:Easily resolved by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 05:01 · Score: 1

They consult with us all the time. You should find a new job.

Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long ago by optikos · 2013-02-15 03:26 · Score: 5, Insightful

Why did the Python community drag its feet for so long on officially registering its brand-name? For the cost of approximately one hour's of lawyer's time, the low trade-mark fees 8 years ago would have been the cheapest solution to this situation. Now many many hours of lawyers' time will need to be expended to rectify the situation.

call up this company by lkcl · 2013-02-15 03:32 · Score: 4, Insightful

how about all of us calling this company up, several times a day, and *politely* telling them what we think? the sheer number of calls would, just from them having to answer the phone, cause them to lose money, as well as make it clear that we're not impressed.

Re:call up this company by gl4ss · 2013-02-15 07:24 · Score: 1

how about all of us calling this company up, several times a day, and *politely* telling them what we think? the sheer number of calls would, just from them having to answer the phone, cause them to lose money, as well as make it clear that we're not impressed.
just ask them if they offer django on their cheap ass virtual servers... and if they do, ask them about python version.

--
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.

So who is the company ? by Alain+Williams · 2013-02-15 03:35 · Score: 4, Insightful

Name & shame them!

Re:So who is the company ? by SilenceBE · 2013-02-15 03:42 · Score: 4, Informative

http://www.veber.co.uk/ & pobox.co.uk

This hasn't been an issue since then because the python.co.uk domain has, for most of its life, just forwarded its traffic on to the parent companies, veber.co.uk and pobox.co.uk. Unfortunately, Veber has decided that they want to start using the name "Python" for their server products.

Seems like a cheap way to abuse the popularity of python to try to sell their own products. This is a company that I surely will ignore if they come in my path, don't like that kind of shenanigans.
Re:So who is the company ? by 93+Escort+Wagon · 2013-02-15 03:42 · Score: 1

From TFA (ignore my sig this time around...):
"Specifically, it is the company that got a hold on the python.co.uk domain 13 years ago. At that time we weren't looking a lot at trademark issues, and so we didn't get that domain."

--
#DeleteChrome
Re:So who is the company ? by Khyber · 2013-02-15 03:49 · Score: 1

veber.co.uk
pobox.co.uk
If you couldn't be bothered to RTFA just two fucking paragraphs in, I have serious doubts whether posting this information will get you to do anything or not. You seem too lazy to be much more than a REMF armchair quarterback.

--
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
Re:So who is the company ? by happy_place · 2013-02-15 04:26 · Score: 3, Funny

This company sounds absolutely reptillian in their nature. Like some massive hungry slithering bottom-dwelling reptile that strikes out at any warm-blooded thing that's good, and wraps itself around it for its own selfish enrichment, squeezing the life out of its prey. Dunno why they'd want to be named Python, it's a lovely language... and friendly... unless you don't like indenting.

--
http://www.beanleafpress.com
Re:So who is the company ? by jrumney · 2013-02-15 20:54 · Score: 1

Which as of now is redirecting to www.python.org. So does that make posting to slashdot the cheapest and quickest route to solving trademark disputes. Can we try something similar for patents?

Re:Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long by tuffy · 2013-02-15 03:38 · Score: 1

The Python trademark was registered some time ago in the US but it's unclear why the Python Software Foundation didn't do the same in the EU.

--

Ita erat quando hic adveni.

It's protected in the UK under Common Law by tlambert · 2013-02-15 03:40 · Score: 3, Interesting

It's protected in the UK under Common Law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passing_off , and therefore in the entire EU, due to treaty: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_mark_law_of_the_European_Union

Is this "story" to try and get money for an hour worth of lawyer time, or just publicity for Python itself, since people are starting to not care about it that much, and they want more developers?

Re:It's protected in the UK under Common Law by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 03:56 · Score: 1

The 'passing off' tort doesn't apply in this situation, unfortunately. Now, if the European crowd were pushing their own Python programming language, or in some way trying to trade off PSF's brand, then yes, it would.
However, no 'passing off' is occurring in this situation - that the European company is attempting to register the name for its own use means that tort does not apply.
captcha: communal
Re:It's protected in the UK under Common Law by tlambert · 2013-02-15 04:59 · Score: 1

The 'passing off' tort doesn't apply in this situation, unfortunately. Now, if the European crowd were pushing their own Python programming language, or in some way trying to trade off PSF's brand, then yes, it would.
However, no 'passing off' is occurring in this situation - that the European company is attempting to register the name for its own use means that tort does not apply.
captcha: communal
I believe the broad scope of the application would also apply to a computer language named 'Python' by the company. This makes it appear that 'Python' the language is their own.
So basically they would be "passing off" the Open Source project as their work. According to my reading of the PDF of the law, this appears to meant it applies.

what IS the PROBLEM here? by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 03:40 · Score: 1, Insightful

What did the company do that is wrong? They had the domain registered for years, why shouldn't they be allowed to make python servers? It's not like anyone who isn't an idiot would confuse python-server-hardware with python-programming-language.

Is there some back story somewhere that show the company acting dickish? When I saw the headline I was ready to grab my pitchfork (even though I'm a Ruby guy), but the "plea for help" doesn't justify any anger.

Re:what IS the PROBLEM here? by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 04:40 · Score: 2, Insightful

> exclusive right to use "Python" for software, servers, and web services
There's at least two idiots who couldn't even read TFS, you and someone who modded you up. Really, you don't see how Python-programming-language and any Python-based project with Pythonin the name can infringe on Python-software or Python-web-services trademark?
Re:what IS the PROBLEM here? by Half-pint+HAL · 2013-02-15 05:53 · Score: 3, Insightful

They had the domain registered for years, why shouldn't they be allowed to make python servers? It's not like anyone who isn't an idiot would confuse python-server-hardware with python-programming-language.
Google Python webserver. Then think about what you've just said....

--
Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'

Re:Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 03:43 · Score: 1

In other words, if they would have just paid the protection fee, they wouldn't have to have their fingers broken. Now its too late.

Bone-headed Decision by Veber/Pobox (Parent Comp.) by mrpacmanjel · 2013-02-15 03:45 · Score: 4, Insightful

So let me get this straight:

A UK-based ISP/Cloud services company offers Linux/Windows based Cloud Servers and they think it's a good idea to name the product range after a well-known programming language?

It's a nice way to "gain the trust" of potential customers - "Yeah we're the guys that screwed over the Python community (we totally stressed them out and cost them major $ too) - buy our stuff you can trust us!"

"btw, we off Linux installed on our servers too. Ironic don't you think?"

No doubt this will gain a lot of negative publicity especially on sites like slashdot.org - you know the very people that know a lot about ISP/cloudy services!!!!!

I'm getting some popcorn.

Riding off the name of free software..... by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 03:47 · Score: 1

....while using free software. From the footer on the front page of the pobox.co.uk website (operated by the company concerned, according to the article):

Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.

Nice....

Re:Great justice system as usual by dmbasso · 2013-02-15 03:52 · Score: 4, Insightful

The company is *trying* to trademark it, no misdeeds by the justice system yet. Only the regular human stupidity and greed so far.

--
`echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com

Is it really a good choice? by Coisiche · 2013-02-15 03:52 · Score: 2

I live in UK and the first association I make when encountering the word "python" is with Monty Python's Flying Circus. That would also be true of many people I know. Why would anyone want to use that as a trademark in this country when so many people will immediately think of a comedy team?

Re:Is it really a good choice? by tuffy · 2013-02-15 04:04 · Score: 4, Informative

The language is named after Monty Python's Flying Circus, but the trademark only applies to software.

--
Ita erat quando hic adveni.
Re:Is it really a good choice? by Daniel+Dvorkin · 2013-02-15 04:07 · Score: 3, Interesting

The language was named after Monty Python. Whether that was a good idea or not (take it up with Guido van Rossum) is irrrelevant at this point.

--
The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
Re:Is it really a good choice? by CrazyBusError · 2013-02-15 04:35 · Score: 4, Funny

Maybe they're run by the Ministry of silly awks.

--
-Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid_system by optikos · 2013-02-15 04:04 · Score: 1

Years ago, the Python community should have paid the fees for the Madrid-System extension of the U.S. trademark registration to various other nations.

Re:Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long by lxs · 2013-02-15 04:09 · Score: 1

I'm guessing that they'd have to register it separately in all member states.

Re:Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long by unixisc · 2013-02-15 04:11 · Score: 1

Couldn't they have done it in the WTO and made it applicable worldwide?

Trademark registration must be done nationally... by gwolf · 2013-02-15 04:16 · Score: 1

Or with the still relatively few supranational bodies that do this, such as the EU. But a trademark must still be registered dozens of times all over the world, and that makes the process way messier. Of course, there are many Pythonists in the EU, and it would have had sense, but then again... It is most probably not registered in my country, or anywhere else in Latin America. Is it worth, as a previous post mentions, to pay for "an hour worth of lawyer fees" (plus the registration fee) over and over? How often must the trademark be revalidated?

Not every user of free software... by gwolf · 2013-02-15 04:18 · Score: 1

...agrees or cares about its ideology!

So get a new name! by Greyfox · 2013-02-15 04:22 · Score: 1

I never liked "Python" anyway. It's a great opportunity to find a new name. A better name! May I propose: Bieberconda?

--

I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

Re:So get a new name! by Stele · 2013-02-15 04:45 · Score: 1, Funny

How about "GimPy"?

Re:Great justice system as usual by Kupfernigk · 2013-02-15 04:24 · Score: 4, Informative

Yes, why are they not simply filing an objection? That's what you do. Someone applies, you object. You do not write to the EU Council of Ministers, you write to the European Trademarks and Patents Office.

Just like you do in the US. It isn't hard. Someone tries to file a trademark using your established name, you send them a batch of stuff, application gets rejected.

--
From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."

http://www.python.co.uk/ by optikos · 2013-02-15 04:28 · Score: 1

does in fact access a portion of Veber's and PoBox's affiliated websites.

Re:Trouser Snakes by hoboroadie · 2013-02-15 04:32 · Score: 1

Is their CEO named Darl?

--
They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.

Welcome to the UK! by EdgePenguin · 2013-02-15 04:33 · Score: 1

We have based our economy on financial services rent seeking for years, its about the time we got international recognition in the IP trolling sector!

Re:Trouser Snakes by Sponge+Bath · 2013-02-15 04:41 · Score: 1

Is their CEO named Darl?

No, it's Derl McBrood.

Re:Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 04:52 · Score: 3, Informative

That is not entirely correct:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux#Copyright.2C_trademark.2C_and_naming

"In the United States, the name Linux is a trademark registered to Linus Torvalds.[5] Initially, nobody registered it, but on 15 August 1994, William R. Della Croce, Jr. filed for the trademark Linux, and then demanded royalties from Linux distributors. In 1996, Torvalds and some affected organizations sued him to have the trademark assigned to Torvalds, and in 1997 the case was settled.[114]"

In fact, the above is the first thing that came to my mind when I read the summary.

I wrote a letter as requested, but... by CaptainOfSpray · 2013-02-15 05:19 · Score: 1

Unable to deliver your message. 553 Contact your postmaster/admin for assistance. Perhaps the PSF's Inbox is a little undersized...

--
"Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders

Re:Great justice system as usual by Em+Adespoton · 2013-02-15 05:26 · Score: 2

Beyond this, why not get companies like ActiveState to weigh in? I'm sure they don't want ActivePython (MSRP $999) to suddenly be infringing.

Since I know some of the guys from ActiveState read Slashdot, I think the issue should be resolved within the day (after they sic their lawyers on the issue).

Re:Not entirely true... by Half-pint+HAL · 2013-02-15 05:47 · Score: 1

True. If "Python", being free, isn't considered as "trading" by the appropriate authorities, it can't be a prior mark. However, they could always argue genericity -- Google has 60 million hits for the search Python language, so it's definitely in active use as computer terminology...

--
Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'

Re:Bone-headed Decision by Veber/Pobox (Parent Com by Half-pint+HAL · 2013-02-15 06:00 · Score: 3, Funny

It's also a good way to screw over your buyers.

Yes, we promised you Python webservers, and we delivered your Python webservers as promised.

No, of course you can't program them in Python. Python is an optional extra, not a standard component of a Python webserver. What you want is our PyPy webserver a totally unique and new trademarked name for our Python webserver running a Python webserver.

No, Pypy doesn't run Pypy, just standard Python. If you want Pypy, you'll need to get PyPyPyPy, a Python webserver running the PyPy Python interpreter virtualised inside a Python session.

--
Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'

Re:An easy battle by Half-pint+HAL · 2013-02-15 06:09 · Score: 1

Sorry, you can't bundle Europe that way. The legal systems of the UK were the foundations for the legal systems in all the colonised countries. The distinction is more "Common law" and "Roman law". Common law can be thought of more-or-less as "English-speaking law". (Inasmuchas any lawyer speaks English.)

--
Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'

Re:Great justice system as usual by s1d3track3D · 2013-02-15 06:27 · Score: 2

if you happen to work on a company that uses the Python programming language

Yeah and get google involved and you wont need much more help

PSF started the fight by Anonymous Coward · 2013-02-15 07:04 · Score: 1

For the love of God, read the article!

Veber were planning on naming their servers Python, and PSF CONTACTED THEM to make them stop. Veber RESPONDED by taking out the Trademark claim t DEFEND themselves.

If PSF hadn't been so pissy about it, Veber wouldn't have had to lawyer up.

Re:PSF started the fight by MikeBabcock · 2013-02-19 17:16 · Score: 1

Except Intel does own the letter 'i'

--
- Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)

Re:Bone-headed Decision by Veber/Pobox (Parent Com by gl4ss · 2013-02-15 07:11 · Score: 1

maybe the thought they'll get points from ms for doing this. though fat chance since ms has it's own cloud to sell.
btw one thing they think that cloud isn't good for is "high volume data transfer scenarios.". they're selling people shit.

you know what's REALLY shitty? you have to sign up(free, sort of, they'll want your cc number) to see what os's /configurations they offer! and I'll bet you ten bucks one of them includes something with a python interpreter!

--
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.

Re:TradeMark of Copyrighted stuff is a bad idea by seeker_1us · 2013-02-15 08:08 · Score: 1

Right, because trademarking Linux was a terrible idea. Moron.

Re:Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long by Scarletdown · 2013-02-15 08:09 · Score: 2

That is not entirely correct:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux#Copyright.2C_trademark.2C_and_naming

"In the United States, the name Linux is a trademark registered to Linus Torvalds.[5] Initially, nobody registered it, but on 15 August 1994, William R. Della Croce, Jr. filed for the trademark Linux, and then demanded royalties from Linux distributors. In 1996, Torvalds and some affected organizations sued him to have the trademark assigned to Torvalds, and in 1997 the case was settled.[114]"

In fact, the above is the first thing that came to my mind when I read the summary.

I hope that the settlement afterward included representatives from the likes of Redhat, Debian, SuSe, Slackware, and whatever other distros existed back then holding an ass kicking party with Croce as the guest of honor.

--
This space unintentionally left blank.

Re:Apparently you can't read. Normal for a 'merkin by Scarletdown · 2013-02-15 08:21 · Score: 1

You can have trademarks with the same name as long as they are different areas.

Just like in 'merkinland.

Considering that they are both in the IT arena where one is software for a programming language and the other is trying to get protection for web servers, software, and other stuff, then there is a conflict and possibility of confusion here.

The correct course of events that should happen is that the group that develops the Python language should protest the trademark application and present their evidence. Then whoever oversees the issuance of trademarks should look at said evidence and tell the ones trying to get the trademark to either piss off or bugger off (their choice.)

--
This space unintentionally left blank.

Re:Bone-headed Decision by Veber/Pobox (Parent Com by Scarletdown · 2013-02-15 08:25 · Score: 1

Just like Microsoft trademarked Microsoft Windows instead of just Windows, perhaps this company should add a descriptive word before the Python name and trademark that instead. Porcelain Python perhaps?

--
This space unintentionally left blank.

Re:Even Linus registered the Linux trademark long by zapyon · 2013-02-15 09:29 · Score: 1

No, it is possible to register a trademark for the whole European Community. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Trade_Mark

--
I like my spaghetti with source.

Re:Trademark registration must be done nationally. by Darinbob · 2013-02-15 10:09 · Score: 1

And who does it? Who "owns" Python and who would spend the actual time and money to do so? Without a corporate backer a lot of this gets overlooked or is too time consuming to handle. People working on open source projects prefer to work on the code usually.

Re:no way this will go down by Freshly+Exhumed · 2013-02-15 10:32 · Score: 1

I take it this British firm has never heard of the LOIC.

--
I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.

Re:Great justice system as usual by dwye · 2013-02-15 15:21 · Score: 1

if you happen to work on a company that uses the Python programming language

Yeah and get google involved and you wont need much more help

By that logic, Google should own the Gmail trademark in Germany rather than the company which had been using it years before (only in Germany), which it does not, as has been discussed here and on other web sites.

OTOH, if the Python language and its use, or the publication or sale of any books about the Python language, in whichever countries that the other company is trying to register, occurred before that company started using ITS Python product, then they have no right to trademark that name, probably no right to even use it, themselves. The trick is getting the evidence. Documentation trumps personal testimony, so get your old charge slips ready.

Re:Great justice system as usual by MikeBabcock · 2013-02-19 16:52 · Score: 1

Python's been published since 1991 ... his hosting company bought python.co.uk in 1997.

--
- Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)

Slashdot Mirror

Python Trademark At Risk In Europe

83 of 122 comments (clear)