Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Restores Transfer Rights To Office 2013

New submitter gewalker writes "Bowing to significant unfriendly customer feedback regarding its new 'no transfer' license for Office 2013, Microsoft has reconsidered and will now allow Office 2013 licenses to be transferred between computers. Actual license language will not be reflected for a few months for shipped products, but Microsoft will allow transfer of license effective immediately. Calls to customer support will be necessary, as the activation servers won't be updated for a few months."

19 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Great by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a step in the right direction. Now if only unfriendly customer feedback would get them to retract Metro we'll really be in business.

    Seriously though, how obvious was it that there would be a huge negative reaction to the change of licensing terms for Office? As usually, the more MBA's you get involved in things the dumber the collective IQ of an organization gets.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When you have this kind of marketshare you keep pushing to the edge until consumers make you stop. Its all about trying to get away with as much as possible.

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The more I see of metro, the more I like it.

      On touchscreen devices.
      The person that suggested using it on things that do not have a touch screen should still be shot.

    3. Re:Great by Looker_Device · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, Clippy--the Jar Jar Binks of software.

      --
      Your political party doesn't care about your rights and only represents corporate interests.
    4. Re:Great by sdnoob · · Score: 5, Funny

      and it will be called..

      wait for it...

      WINDOWS RETRO

    5. Re:Great by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, I adore Metro. It's just the thing to catapult Microsoft operating systems into the kind of market share they deserve.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  2. Fucking sleazebags by NettiWelho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trying to chip away customers rights at every chance and backing away only when the blowback gets unbearable, just to wait for another chance.

  3. Hooray! Now, about the Windows 8 problem... by mschaffer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe more rational thinking is returning to the Big M.
    Now, if only they would rethink the Windows 8 mess on desktops.

  4. The car analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I bought some tires for my car and they came with locking lug-nuts. The lug-nuts are weird in that, once fastened, nobody can undo them except for the tire manufacturer. If I want to use the tires on another car, I have to call them and they will allow me to move the tires to a different vehicle.

    And I would choose to buy these tires why?

    1. Re:The car analogy? by Githaron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the only way to guarantee that your tires are 100% compatible with the roads on the way to work is to buy those tires.

    2. Re:The car analogy? by EvanED · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I would choose to buy these tires why?

      What if the tires gave you better traction on the road in your common driving conditions than the alternatives? In such a case, why wouldn't you buy those tires? Do you have two cars but only one set of tires, and you move the tires back and forth depending on what car you want to drive?

      (Just to clarify, I'm not arguing that MS Office is better than the alternatives for everyone or everything. But I do think it's better than the alternatives for some things, just like the alternatives are better than MS Office for others.)

    3. Re:The car analogy? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I bought some tires for my car and they came with locking lug-nuts. The lug-nuts are weird in that, once fastened, nobody can undo them except for the tire manufacturer. If I want to use the tires on another car, I have to call them and they will allow me to move the tires to a different vehicle.

      And I would choose to buy these tires why?

      It guarantees that your tires are "Genuine". They haven't been secretly swapped with other tires with similar names or have shoddy workmanship. They are 100% unquestionably AwesomeTires(r)(sm).

  5. Several months? by Sydin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I applaud the change itself, but stretching the timeframe to actually having a good system implemented will do Microsoft no good. I hope they're okay with rampant piracy, since it will be more convenient to just pirate a new copy of Office 2013, rather than fumble around with Microsoft's customer support for a day while they double check my name, phone number, social security number, hair color, and genome sequence to make absolutely sure I really am the same one who bought that license in the first place.

    1. Re:Several months? by BLToday · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or in my case the serial number provided by Asus on the laptop doesn't work, so you end up on the phone with Microsoft for 1/2 hour trying to convince some guy that you're just install a new hard drive. And he says the license is not transferable onto the new hard drive. Then you say it's a laptop, it's the same laptop, the drive failed so I put in a new drive. Finally, after talking to his supervisor he gives you a code. Then you're kinda of done except for the hours of updates to follow a clean install.

  6. Colin Chapman by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously though, how obvious was it that there would be a huge negative reaction to the change of licensing terms for Office?

    It's like how Colin Chapman designed car frames: keep taking out pieces until it collapses under its own weight. Put the last piece back in. Do something outrageous and walk it back just one step, getting almost all of what you wanted.

    Simple Business Sociopathy 101.

  7. "Bowing to unfriendly customer feedback"? by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No. Microsoft doesn't give a rat's ass about negative customer feedback. The only reason they changed their tune on license transfer of Office 2013, is that the EU has fined them over half a billion, reminding MS that someone is watching. Someone with a big, scary stick.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  8. I'm not a car person... by QilessQi · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...can someone explain that post using a computer analogy?

  9. Re:a good move by PRMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then the question becomes: why would i take windows 8?

    To get the free copy of Office, of course. Duh!

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  10. Companies don't get it by JasoninKS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Too many companies just refuse to "get it". Fifteen, heck even 10, years ago you could screw with customers, they'd write in, and that would be the end of it. You may or may not do anything different. But this is a vastly different world now and companies just don't understand that! It use to be that 1 happy customer might tell 3 friends. An unhappy customer would tell 10 friends. But with the internet and social media, 1 happy customer can tell 20 friends, but 1 hacked off customer can tell thousands in an instant! It was one thing if you got 10 letters back in the day, waaay different if you hear thousands of customers ripping on you in hours. And tech companies seem oblivious to the fact that when it comes to technology in today's world, customers often have free or less expensive alternatives that are, fairly often, pretty equal in quality or features.