Slashdot Mirror


Hockey Sticks Among Carry-On Items TSA Has Cleared For Planes

coondoggie writes "As of April 25th the Transportation Security Administration will let a bunch of previously prohibited items such as small pocket knives and what it calls 'novelty' or toy bats to be taken on aircraft as carry-ons. The idea the agency said was to let Transportation Security Officers better focus their efforts on spotting higher-threat items such as explosives and guns."

276 comments

  1. about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Experience teaches what common-sense does not.

    1. Re:about time by SourceFrog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh please, it will be "about time" when they scrap the TSA or replace with it something much smaller, leaner, less expensive, and more effective at what it's supposed to do.

      This amounts to little more than a PR move, throwing a few scraps to the plebs to make us somehow feel like 'common sense is breaking out', and it's pathetic that our standards are so low now, that we actually respond like dogs with tails wagging at this incredibly negligibly small change in the grand scheme of the TSA's operations. Will this in any significant way change the fact that they will continue to suck $8 billion a year of taxpayer money to violate the 4th amendment rights and dignity of American travellers? No? Then what is the "about time" that you refer to?

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    2. Re:about time by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're on the right track.

      Just disband the whole frigging Homeland Security. Put Customs back as a separate and distinct agency, ditto with Border Patrol. Screw the whole Homeland Security thing. It was bullshit when they thought it up, it's bullshit today. Janet Napolitano spends less time worrying about security, than about how to stop "piracy" and increasing corporate profits. She has her TSA agents stopping traffic on Interstate 40, in Tennessee, and shaking them down. Anyone with a thousand dollars cash is a "suspect". Anyone with an expensive car is a "suspect". Anyone who doesn't kiss the TSA agent's ass is a "suspect". I guess this an alternative for TSA agents who don't prefer fondling little children and old ladies in airports.

      Disband Homeland Security, send Napolitano packing, and we can save the fifty million dollars she just wasted on uniforms.

      Odd that most cops have to purchase their own uniforms, but TSA has a contract to buy uniforms for their degenerate agents.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:about time by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Damn straight.

      Idiotic airport logic used by the TSA goons ...
      http://iwantsomefun.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/airport-logic-liquids-3oz-dangerous.jpg

    4. Re:about time by raehl · · Score: 1

      I got a kick out of the rule that you can have one golf club, or two clubs, but the golf clubs is right out.

      Cause, you know, more than one club per hand is just too dangerous.

    5. Re:about time by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, that's below par logic.

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    6. Re:about time by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      This amounts to little more than a PR move, throwing a few scraps to the plebs to make us somehow feel like 'common sense is breaking out',

      Keep the ban on toothpaste and water while re-allowing things that could obviously used as weapon is the exact opposite of 'common sense'

      All chemists I've asked confirmed that this harmless liquid 1 + harmless liquid 2 = explosive does not work outside "Die Hard 3" or a well equipped laboratory or chemical plant.

      --
      bickerdyke
    7. Re:about time by Trilkin · · Score: 1

      It didn't really work in Die Hard 3 either. It was pancake syrup.

      --
      Nobody cares what the CAPTCHA for your post was.
    8. Re:about time by dywolf · · Score: 2
      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    9. Re:about time by dywolf · · Score: 1

      edit: they can be mixed into liquid form.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    10. Re:about time by dywolf · · Score: 1

      also almost forgot PLX: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLX

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    11. Re:about time by Ed_Pinkley · · Score: 1

      "She has her TSA agents stopping traffic on Interstate 40, in Tennessee, and shaking them down" I like what you are saying and I like your enthusiasm, but, citation, please?

      --
      "Long time listener, first time caller."
    12. Re:about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have an exit bus waiting for them all as they get their pink slips, or chartreuse if you prefer - the bus will be taking them to Gitmo for being the terrorists that they are.

      Terroristic
      Security
      Administration

      The bus driver will be the only person that is allowed scuba gear for the underwater portion of the drive.

    13. Re:about time by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2011/10/24/tsa-releases-vipr-venom-on-tennessee-highways/

      http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/10/20/2212225/tsa-doing-random-truck-searches-on-tennessee-highway

      http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/10/25/ron-paul-calls-tsa-jack-booted-thugs-in-response-to-highway-checkpoints/

      The story was carried on a local television news segment, and in the segment, they were stopping automobiles, at random, as opposed to checking the trucks at the weigh stations. Those three links were among the first hits on a google search - there are lots more.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always seem to me (from an outsiders perspective) that HomeLand Security, with the constant chiming about how scary the world was, (Can we please stop taking our shoes off) was always just a Propoganda and Fear Mongering tool to allow the government more access to private information, and to reduce rights and privileges, all the while getting the political support to continue their action(s) against our governments. Please.. Thank good we don't have to go through all that getting on a bus or a subway.. If it wasn't for some of the fiscal problems, Homeland Security might have continued, hopefully saner heads realized that since the need to support actions foreign actions has been reduced, maybe the purpose of it is no longer there. No matter how much effort you put into, you are going to stop the crazies in the world, they will always find new ways. I say, just open it up.. Encourage a concept of trust again, instead of trying to 'cow' the entire population with the pervasive air of fear. PS. Hopefully, Venezuelans will now be able to do that as well, terrible to see a whole culture living with fear over their heads every day.

  2. we're nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let us know when they change their policy on light sabers.

    1. Re:we're nerds by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you can't tell them "This is not the lightsaber you are looking for." and make it it stick... you don't deserve to carry a lightsaber.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:we're nerds by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Forget light sabers, I want to know where the "Hockey Stick" is on the list of my favorite polearm?

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  3. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Game On Eh!

    1. Re:Sweet by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 2

      Sky marshal's going to have you in the penalty box tout de suite for cracking jokes about security, hoser. Or is it "Atmosphere mounty" up your way?

    2. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sky marshal's going to have you in the penalty box tout de suite for cracking jokes about security, hoser.

      2:00 minutes for boarding.

    3. Re:Sweet by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      And a check into the fuselage.

    4. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sheesh...that's rough, especially when the flight attendants get away with a cross check just before leaving the gate.

    5. Re:Sweet by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      2:00 minutes for boarding.
      Must be a double minor here...boarding always takes twice as long as it should these days...

    6. Re:Sweet by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Sky marshal's going to have you in the penalty box tout de suite for cracking jokes about security, hoser.

      2:00 minutes for boarding.

      Once the plane is in the air its going to be high sticking. Very high sticking.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  4. Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In addition to screaming brats we will now have hockey games in the aisles. Can't wait to fly with that for four hours.

    1. Re:Oh good by tattood · · Score: 2

      I find it funny that they allow golf clubs, but a maximum of 2.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    2. Re:Oh good by edjs · · Score: 1

      I suppose that way when they lose your checked golf bag, you'll still have almost enough clubs for pitch & put.

    3. Re:Oh good by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Any good golfer can drive with a putter.

      And putt with a pool cue.

    4. Re:Oh good by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      And through an odd technicality, English Cricket Bats were never banned.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    5. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorists hate cricket

    6. Re:Oh good by PRMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bin Laden was found in Pakistan and I can assure you that Pakistanis love cricket.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    7. Re:Oh good by mjwx · · Score: 4, Funny

      And through an odd technicality, English Cricket Bats were never banned.

      Overheard on a recent BA flight into JFK.

      English guy 1: I say old bean, what do you say to hijacking this plane before stumps.
      English guy 2: Oooh yes, and we can fly it into the pavilion.
      English guy 1: Smashing.
      English guy 2: Jolly good.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Oh good by mjwx · · Score: 1

      And through an odd technicality, English Cricket Bats were never banned.

      I'd be more concerned about the Cricket stumps rather than the bat.

      Stumps are basically large wooden sticks slightly less than 1 metre long and tapered to a point at one end so they can be driven into the ground. Basically they are a long stake (or a short spear).

      I dare say, it seems the TSA was bowled for six.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Oh good by sjames · · Score: 1

      If they banned those, the planes would have been at the mercy of English crickets.

    10. Re:Oh good by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Well you know how dangerous a person can be when they have access to THREE golf clubs. I mean I guess you could throw them at someone, but might as well just get a bunch of rocks which I don't think are currently limited.

    11. Re:Oh good by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not all Pakistanis are terrorists, just the ones who hate cricket.

    12. Re:Oh good by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that they allow golf clubs, but a maximum of 2.

      Wouldn't 2 clubs be enough for whatever golf-like game you can play in the aisles?

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    13. Re:Oh good by ryzvonusef · · Score: 2

      Just a pedantic note, but you can either be *hit* for a six, or bowled *out*, not both.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    14. Re:Oh good by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      The stumps were banned, the bat wasn't.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    15. Re:Oh good by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      A well-placed slapshot is not only entertaining - it solves the issue of the screaming brat.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  5. Transportation Stupidity Administration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Box cutters !!!!

  6. What a puck up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forgive me, I had to.

  7. where do you store it? by lseltzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It won't fit under the seat in front of you or the overhead bin.

    1. Re:where do you store it? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would get checked at the gate, just like any other large item. So it still wouldn't be brought onboard a plane. All this is is an attempt to deflect some of the criticism of the TSA as security theater

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:where do you store it? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It won't fit under the seat in front of you or the overhead bin.

      A hockey stick certainly would fit in an overhead bin, at least on any aircraft larger than the Embraer/CRJ types used by commuter and express operators.

    3. Re:where do you store it? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      It won't fit under the seat in front of you or the overhead bin.

      A hockey stick certainly would fit in an overhead bin, at least on any aircraft larger than the Embraer/CRJ types used by commuter and express operators.

      Yes, but it doesn't meet the dimensions required to qualify as carry on. According to the FAA website:

      The maximum size carry-on bag for most airlines is 45 linear inches (the total of the height, width, and depth of the bag). Anything larger should be checked. No oversize packages or luggage can be stowed onboard.

      So while the TSA may allow it through the checkpoint, the airline should not allow it as carry-on and it should be gate checked. Unless a hockey stick is less than 45 inches. I can't say I really know for sure. But this This site indicates the smallest Junior size is 46 inches.

    4. Re:where do you store it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would get checked at the gate, just like any other large item. So it still wouldn't be brought onboard a plane. All this is is an attempt to deflect some of the criticism of the TSA as security theater

      Perhaps, BUT consider this. If they do allow items such as "small pocket knives" etc. I think this is just a prelude to another (likely staged) "incident" that they will parade throughout the media proclaiming "See, we are needed. See, there is danger. See, you need to increase our budget and take more citizen rights away. Do it. Do it NOW!"

      You know you want to.

    5. Re:where do you store it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't enforce that for certain items. For example, poster tubes. We have to travel all the time with posters rolled up into tubes. They don't make you check them.

    6. Re:where do you store it? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      It won't fit under the seat in front of you or the overhead bin.

      The flight attendants would take it and store it with the suits. They'd hand it back as you disembarked.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:where do you store it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once travelled with a walking stick on the airplane. I'm not sure offhand where I managed to fit it, but it worked fine.

      That was before 9/11. It took them twelve years after 9/11 to make their carry-on policies slightly more reasonable...

    8. Re:where do you store it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I play guitar, there was a time (pre 9/11) when I could bring a guitar on the plane with me, and the FA's would stow it in with the suits and such (since my acoustic wouldn't fit in an overhead compartment). I'd travel to see family, this is not 3 days, its 3 weeks...

      Now, I have to have a $200 case (certified for air travel), I have to leave it *unlocked* (I plastic tie wrap it and put spares in the case) so they can decide to search it, and hopefully not scratch/destroy it in the process, and check it in baggage. I would be more than happy to leave it unlocked and let them inspect it (in my presence), if I could take it on the plane with me, knowing where it is and that it is safe. Instead I have to hope it doesn't get crushed under other baggage, and makes it on the right plane and doesn't get sent to Timbuktu.

    9. Re:where do you store it? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Use those "twist ties" that hold electronics and consumer goods to the package. They are easier to work, re usable, and won't piss of the TSA guy cuz he has to go get a cutting tool. There are some real nice ones with clear plastic coating on toys with an open face cardboard box, go look in the toy isle to find them. Zip ties are actually not as strong. Plus, you have an excuse to pick up a Nerf gun!

    10. Re:where do you store it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By using more theater...

    11. Re:where do you store it? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      The US Postal Service has similar rules, except their limit is 108 inches, IIRC. I once exploited that fact to ship a 10m X-Beam antenna to an island in the harbor of Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, USVI. It consisted of a bundle of 1/2 inch PVC pipes with 1/2 inch copper pipes inside. The thing was _just_ under the combined 108 inches. The clerk saw me in line with that and yelled out, "Nuh uh!" - I looked at her and said, "Uh uh!". Sure enough, it arrived in one piece after being shipped there and brought across to the island on a little USPS dinghy.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    12. Re:where do you store it? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You could just get a lock with the little TSA identifier on it. They have keys for those.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:where do you store it? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it doesn't meet the dimensions required to qualify as carry on.

      I have yet to see any airline prohibit someone from carrying something on that would fit somewhere, even if it doesn't fit inside the cage they have showing allowable dimensions. Most of the bags I see marketed as carryon are larger than the limits. I don't recall any of them ever actually enforcing the "one carryon and one personal item" rule, either.

      I haven't even seen many cases of them enforcing a limit on truly oversize (larger than the overhead height in every dimension so it absolutely won't fit in the overhead no matter how much you push) bags. Mostly they let you try if you want, and then force you to gate check it after you fail.

      If you are nice to the waitresses, they'll even sometimes allow you to stow long things (like garment bags or hockey sticks) in the closet instead of the overhead.

    14. Re:where do you store it? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      You could just get a lock with the little TSA identifier on it. They have keys for those.

      The last time I used one of those TSA locks the "key" was a pair of pliers and they took the zipper pulls off with it.

  8. I guess that's OK by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 5, Funny

    as long as people still aren't allowed to carry on enough liquid to make an ice rink.

    1. Re:I guess that's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The international organization for flight standards (ICAO), that the TSA is now coming into alignment with, is based in Montreal. The hockey stick thing makes sense now, eh?

      Of course, I'm now afraid that if a couple of passengers got into a fight, a hockey game might break out.

    2. Re:I guess that's OK by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm all for the ban on large bottles of liquid in the cabin. It's bad enough when the muppet net to you spills their wine on your leg, without having waterfalls of sticky carbonated soft drinks and hair gel gushing from the overhead bins as well.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:I guess that's OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious. Party on like it's 1975, joke man.

  9. Why not actually secure airports? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, so that a woman can't park in an airline employee lot (which requires going through 2 security gates, one that looks at a badge and one that actually has to scan the airport-issued badge before you can park there), board an employee bus, and get dropped off on the ramp. As someone who works at an airport (actually the same one where all this happened), actual airport security is a joke. It is handled by minimum-wage contractors. I know plenty of other stores of people I've worked with that are even worse than this, but for the protection of them and myself I won't bring them up.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Why not actually secure airports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that would require actual effort and competent employees who don't feel the need to leap on an 85 year old woman in a wheelchair and wrestle her to the ground to prove how big their manhood is.

    2. Re:Why not actually secure airports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't allow women as airline employees? So, only male stewards from now on?

      It doesn't matter whether the person in question is a man or a woman. It only matters whether he or she is an airline employee.

    3. Re:Why not actually secure airports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You really suck at writing.

  10. Too big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can a set of golf clubs be a permissible carryon - they exceed the dimensions of a carryon published by the airlines.

    1. Re:Too big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing plane-side-checked.

    2. Re:Too big? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      You don't buy an extra ticket for your golf clubs? On second thought, anybody who throws around money like that would probably fly a charter/private plane and avoid all the TSA security restrictions.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Too big? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      How can a set of golf clubs be a permissible carryon - they exceed the dimensions of a carryon published by the airlines.
      You've seen through their ruse. They're going to allow you to have all these exciting carry-ons, but then the smart people realize that those are too big anyway and can't be allowed on the plane. They will have to be gate checked. So the change in ruling has no effect, other than PR.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:Too big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only allowed to bring 2 golf clubs, they can store them in the utility closet during flight.

  11. Let me get this straight by CncRobot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TSA is now allowing the actual types of things used on 9/11, but still banning shampoo and bottled water?

    If there is ONE THING the TSA should ban is small knives (not that I agree with that), since they are now allowing those shouldn't they just admit they shouldn't need to exist?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 3

      If you take a look they still ban small knives, just not super tiny toy swiss army knife style ones that people forget are on their keychains.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Not to mention my double edged razor blades.

      I mean, come on, terrorist don't shave!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Let me get this straight by drunk_punk · · Score: 1

      Shampoo in the eyeball is no laughing matter... The water thing never made sense to me though, all that needs to be done is to have the passenger drink some. If they pass out- Ha, pioson. If not, carry on good citizen. Until next time...

    4. Re:Let me get this straight by Technician · · Score: 2

      Bummer, my Letherman is still banned. I feel naked without it. I cant open most small electronics packaging without tools.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Let me get this straight by Amouth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I still remember them making me put an empty clear plastic bottle through the x-ray machine. I love having a water bottle, and my solution is to finish it and then go through the line with it and refill on the other side and not have to pay 2-3$ for a drink on the other side. I was in line, had it in my hand and din't think about it and the lady stopped me at the medal detector and told me i had to put it through the x-ray. Again, they made me x-ray an empty, clear plastic bottle. I was just a bit perplexed.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    6. Re:Let me get this straight by CncRobot · · Score: 1

      Didn't Johnson and Johnson no tears baby shampoo just get banned for causing cancer? I guess shampoo to the eye either makes you cry or get cancer.

    7. Re:Let me get this straight by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      The way people are plainly stupid never ceases to amaze me!

    8. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, no.

      The real threat isn't another 9/11-type event. They can no longer hijack an airplane with a box cutter, even if the plane is filled with nothing but girl scouts and smurfs. They will be dead before you reach the ground, mission unaccomplished. At worst, one or two people will be stabbed. No one is going to cooperate with these guys for fear of their own lives, because in they will be dead anyway.

      But there is still the threat of someone sneaking a bomb on board to kill all passengers and destroy the aircraft when it is over a city so the debris hurts people and buildings on the ground, etc.

    9. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For any short trip where I don't have checked bags I bring my DE in my carry-on, and I haven't yet been flagged for it. I don't bring extras though, just the one blade in the safety razor. Are you bringing the extra blades in carry-on?

    10. Re:Let me get this straight by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If you take a look they still ban small knives, just not super tiny toy swiss army knife style ones that people forget are on their keychains.

      The other day I was digging around in my coat pocket and came across a matchbook that I had gotten at Papadeaux in Dallas probably 4 years ago. That got me to wondering how many airplanes I have been on since then with that in my coat pocket. I should count myself lucky not to have a TSA agent permanently lodged in my rectum at this point.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    11. Re:Let me get this straight by akh · · Score: 1

      Ditto. 64mm > 6cm :^(

      --
      Accept Eris as your Fnord and personally sate her
    12. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Matches are allowed, Lighters are not.

      From my time in the Army.:
      On the charter plane my unit was taking all of us had our issued weapons. M4, M249, 240B, etc. They took our lighters away from us because it was against federal flight regulations.

    13. Re:Let me get this straight by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That was funny. China pulled US products off the shelf for being unsafe. But that part didn't hit the US media hard.

    14. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Matches are allowed, Lighters are not.

      From my time in the Army.:
      On the charter plane my unit was taking all of us had our issued weapons. M4, M249, 240B, etc. They took our lighters away from us because it was against federal flight regulations.

      This happened to me too. The TSA guy says "take off your shoes" and i replied "Dude im holding an M16". Then... took off my damn shoes 0.o

    15. Re:Let me get this straight by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Lighters are not

      Incorrect.

      Lighters are permitted, just not torch-style, which makes lighting my cigars a little more tricky.

    16. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighters are permitted, just not torch-style, which makes lighting my cigars a little more tricky.

      Mark Cuban, is that you?

    17. Re:Let me get this straight by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

      I doubt most of them are stupid. I believe they're just not _allowed_ to use their brains and discretion in those circumstances, or at least strongly discouraged to do so.

      --
    18. Re:Let me get this straight by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I've had a torch-style lighter in my backpack for years. I've flown all over the place with it, until I flew out of Winnipeg last month. The X-Ray tech pointed it out, and I wound up relinquishing it. Apparently torch-style lighters can't even be in the checked baggage.

      I just want to carry some survival gear with me. Is that too much to ask?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    19. Re:Let me get this straight by serialband · · Score: 1

      You can carry 4 matchbooks of safety (not strike anywhere) matches.

      http://safetravel.dot.gov/which_fly.html

      I remember getting on an airplane where one flight attendant freaked out because someone held a lit lighter over a birthday cake and sang happy birthday inside the airplane just after boarding. She confiscated it and after several minutes, returned the lighter after checking with the TSA. I looked around and saw all the other flight attendants move away during the commotion to avoid the scene. She was obviously high strung.

      Before the TSA, the only airport to ever freak out on me over the pocket knife and tools I carried with me was Chicago's Midway airport. I even told them I traveled all over and they were the first to ever freak out about it. They made me check my carry on bag. I had taken them as carry on from various other airports when I was sent out to install servers all across the country. That was the first time I had to wait for baggage claim on my return business trip.

    20. Re:Let me get this straight by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Ditto. 64mm > 6cm :^(

      A Leatherman Squirt seems to have a 57mm blade. The squirt is a surprisingly capable tool.

    21. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Matches are allowed, Lighters are not.

      From my time in the Army.: On the charter plane my unit was taking all of us had our issued weapons. M4, M249, 240B, etc. They took our lighters away from us because it was against federal flight regulations.

      Unless you had ammo you are just carrying a club.

    22. Re:Let me get this straight by cffrost · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lighters are not

      Incorrect.

      Lighters are permitted, just not torch-style, which makes lighting my cigars a little more tricky.

      Tricky? My dear fellow, either type of lighter is perfectly adequate for setting a hundred dollar bill alight, from which all proper gentlemen light their cigars.

      Berkshire Hathaway stock certificates also work well, though I've heard that the uncouth 99.99%er rabble find the practice "obscene." Jeeves is quite adept at tossing them off the clubhouse grounds in short order, so I couldn't say for certain.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    23. Re:Let me get this straight by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      If you take a look they still ban small knives, just not super tiny toy swiss army knife style ones that people forget are on their keychains.

      My Spyderco Ladybug could saw the cockpit door in half.

      --
      No sig today...
    24. Re:Let me get this straight by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I think the leatherman blade is only just over 6cm.

      After you've sharpened it a few times, it should fit within the rules.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    25. Re:Let me get this straight by LazyBoot · · Score: 1

      According to the website, the Squirt has a 4.06cm blade.

    26. Re:Let me get this straight by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Definitly. It's perfectly save for them to follow the rules - stupid as they are. But deviating from them after using your brains is more likely to get them fired than promoted.

      --
      bickerdyke
    27. Re:Let me get this straight by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      Funny, but wrong. The elite know better than to use money, paper, matches, or petrol lighters to light their cigars and pipes. Anything other than a smokeless flame will taint the tobacco.

      Anyone who burns money to light their cigar is just demonstrating they still belong in the 99%.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    28. Re:Let me get this straight by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I was in line, had it in my hand and din't think about it and the lady stopped me at the medal detector and told me i had to put it through the x-ray. Again, they made me x-ray an empty, clear plastic bottle. I was just a bit perplexed.

      It makes sense if you remember that she was just a minimum wage unskilled worker and not in any position to be deciding what is okay and what isn't. Better to tell her to just make sure everything goes through the x-ray machine than relying on her good judgement.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:Let me get this straight by buxomspacefish · · Score: 1

      I believe you can carry torch style lighters in checked baggage but only in an approved container. I had to get such a case for my zippo as well.

    30. Re:Let me get this straight by buxomspacefish · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they didn't make you open the empty clear bottle thereby releasing the virus contained inside like in 12 Monkeys.

    31. Re:Let me get this straight by Builder · · Score: 1

      Leatherman blade locks. No matter how short it is, it won't be allowed.

    32. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, they sung Happy Birthday? And they didn't get arrested for public performance of a copyrighted song?

      What's this world coming to...?

    33. Re:Let me get this straight by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Up to 2.36 inches is ok. Thats not really THAT small of a knife. My keychain knife's blade is only 1.65" (Spyderco Honeybee) and I still find plenty of uses for it. My everyday carry knife that I carry is 2.75" (that's not because of a law or regulation - that's just a good practical length for daily chores). Honestly 2.36" is still enough for a workable and useful knife.

      Not that I think they need to be banned from carry on a flight though. You could probably do as much damage with a fork. Being able to carry it on just means I have a knife when I need it (which is pretty often - I end up using mine at most meals).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    34. Re:Let me get this straight by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't buy a lottery ticket, you're not lucky really.

      October of 2002 I took a flight. While passing through security, they sent my laptop bag through the scanner several times as they saw something but couldn't figure out what it was. A 5" lock back knife had fallen into the bottom of the bag under some padding. They tossed it into a box with all the other pocket knives they found and told me to enjoy my flight, not caring one bit. Maybe you would have had a problem the day after Richard Reid was caught, but I doubt it would have been much of an issue.

    35. Re:Let me get this straight by Culture20 · · Score: 1
    36. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe that was so much worth a chuckle, I'm going to waste one of my 10 posts a day on this.

    37. Re:Let me get this straight by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's especially funny considering that China has some of the highest cancer rates in the world, and rather than address the problem they've spent years hiding 'cancer villages' from the world and the villagers themselves (wherever possible, and jail those who raise concerns). But pay no attention to the elephant of state-sponsored pollution and the abuse of state power to suppress backlash, check out this awesome scapegoat we arbitrarily dug up! It causes cancer like 0.0001% more than usual! Booooo gweilos, amirite?!

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    38. Re:Let me get this straight by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      What I find most amusing is that they're allowing knives that are too small to be useful, but not allowing any real pocketknives. That Leatherman multi-tool that all you geeks carry around? The blade is almost certainly too long by about half an inch.

      It is almost as though the TSA deliberately designed this program to eliminate any sort of knife that has any useful purpose beyond cutting through the clear tape on shipping boxes.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    39. Re:Let me get this straight by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Wait, so knives that are safer to handle are disallowed? What?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    40. Re:Let me get this straight by perpenso · · Score: 1

      According to the website, the Squirt has a 4.06cm blade.

      My bad. I converted from the overall length of 2.25", not blade length of 1.6".

    41. Re:Let me get this straight by Bigby · · Score: 1

      And yet they have people who strip down naked arrested. What is the difference between the empty bottle and a man's underpants?

    42. Re:Let me get this straight by Ed_Pinkley · · Score: 1

      Hello. Fellow Spyderco carrier here. You mention the Honeybee and the sibling post before you mentions the ladybug. However, both of those are fixed or locking blades. Those are two things that are not allowed. Plus, the blade can't have a molded grip which removes most (all?) of the Spyderco catalog. *Then* the thing can only be 1 half inch wide. This is a stat I do not see on the Spyderco website but I bet that also removes most / all of their brand. *sigh*

      I'm going to get some cheap knives and ship them to each hotel I fly to.

      --
      "Long time listener, first time caller."
    43. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they are obscenely stupid people as well as being rapists and pedophiles.

      They think they can get away with anything as if they were actual law enforcement officials instead of hired thugs.

      The fact that they stood in front of the millimeter wave scanners for so long clearly indicates the depths of their stupidity.

    44. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone held a lit lighter over a birthday cake and sang happy birthday inside the airplane just after boarding.

      Some things just can't wait until later, apparently.

    45. Re:Let me get this straight by aztrailerpunk · · Score: 1

      Is it weird that I read that comment with a super rich pompous accent?

      --
      Foot placed squarely in mouth since 1983.
    46. Re:Let me get this straight by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Is it weird that I read that comment with a super rich pompous accent?

      I must say, that is quite uncanny... You got my accent spot on, old chap. ;o)

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    47. Re:Let me get this straight by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Actually the Honeybee is a slipjoint with a non-locking blade. The blade is also exactly 0.5" wide at its largest point. Admittedly though, the handle does have finger grooves which might end up disallowing it under the molded grip condition.

      I would find something to carry though. A Case Toothpick would work fine - its a traditional (non-molded body) slipjoint folder with a blade length of right at 2.25" (the entire knife is 3" when closed).

      http://www.casexx.com/DisplayDetailPage.asp?ProductCode=792

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    48. Re:Let me get this straight by Builder · · Score: 1

      You didn't really think this was about making things better? It's all part of the theater.

      Hell, in the UK, we can't even carry a leatherman legally without having good reason to do so.

    49. Re:Let me get this straight by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if after going through the gate you'd handed off the M16 to another passenger who was not authorized to board with it, this would have been noticed and traced back to you.

      (I'm not saying the shoe scanning makes sense. It doesn't. I'm just saying the M16 is irrelevant.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    50. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... brandy it is then.

  12. That's great... by evil_aaronm · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I play lacrosse, you insensitive clods!

    1. Re:That's great... by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

      If you read about it you would know they've got you covered and you can bring those sticks too.

    2. Re:That's great... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lacrosse sticks are seriously deadly weapons, but that is mostly becasue they are carried by lacrosse players. Those guys are crazy.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  13. Canada! by Mullen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn it, now Canadians will be hijacking our planes.

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
    1. Re:Canada! by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      Or worse, Harry Dresden.

      (the TV version, not the book version)

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Canada! by gman003 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, just ask them nicely and I'm sure they'll apologize and give them right back.

    3. Re:Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's right: blame Canada!

    4. Re:Canada! by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      I wasn't the only one who thought this. I feel less alone.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  14. Better Luggage Handling by lazarus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's face it. The reason people drag all of their worldly possessions with them as carry-on is because we don't trust the baggage handlers to not destroy/steal/lose our stuff. I see this every time I fly. People don't actually want to lug a 49.9 lb wheeled bag onto the plane and then try to find/lift/get help to put it in an overhead compartment.

    The carry-on problem is being caused by the baggage problem. If you solve the baggage problem, TSA security would be checking small handbags or pocket change not hockey sticks, LAN party servers, thirty pairs of shoes, etc.

    Oh, and charging people for checked bags is making the problem worse, not better. What is it about the airline industry that has made every decision maker involved utterly stupid? The only aspect of air travel I can think of that doesn't operate in a wrong-headed way are the mechanics who keep the planes from falling out of the sky.

    {rant/}

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Amouth · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only aspect of air travel I can think of that doesn't operate in a wrong-headed way are the mechanics who keep the planes from falling out of the sky.

      {rant/}

      Do your self a favor and don't look into that one too much.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:Better Luggage Handling by jbwolfe · · Score: 1

      What is it about the airline industry that has made every decision maker involved utterly stupid?

      I suppose, the desire to eke out a profit in what is now a highly competitive pricing environment. But I agree the nickle and dime-ing is annoying. They never ask me what I think of their ideas when they come up with stupid shit. They tell me to shut up and fly the plane.

      The only aspect of air travel I can think of that doesn't operate in a wrong-headed way are the mechanics who keep the planes from falling out of the sky.

      From my perspective (and the view is terrific), I always thought I did a pretty good job of keeping the plane from falling out of the sky, though I must admit I've had a few hard landings.

      --
      Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
    3. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Thomasje · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just lucky, but I never had anything stolen or destroyed from my checked luggage. Even so, I try to travel light and cram everything into my carry-on... So I won't have to wait for half an hour or an hour at the carrousel, and so I won't have to pay the $25 or more per checked bag.

    4. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally the reason for me is the baggage fees.

    5. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Luggage fees. In Europe flying is not such a zoo as in US.

    6. Re:Better Luggage Handling by lazarus · · Score: 1

      Totally correct, and thanks for replying. I was thinking of the airline industry exclusive of the actual flying of the plane. I have nothing but praise for the pilots and for that matter the air traffic controllers. I can remember a time when it wasn't uncommon to circle an airport for 20 minutes before landing. That just never happens now.

      Re: Hard landings. Landed in Las Vegas on Sunday and actually bounced. First time for me. No complains though, no way in hell I could do it...

      --
      I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    7. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I fly carry-on only it's to get the hell off the plane and to a taxi/limo/friend's car/whatever as quickly as possible.

    8. Re:Better Luggage Handling by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Let's face it. The reason people drag all of their worldly possessions with them as carry-on is because we don't trust the baggage handlers to not destroy/steal/lose our stuff. I see this every time I fly.

      Nope. Until airlines starting charging for baggage a few years back, finding room in the overhead bins was generally pretty easy outside of major business travel routes or high travel volume destinations/times.
       

      Oh, and charging people for checked bags is making the problem worse, not better. What is it about the airline industry that has made every decision maker involved utterly stupid?

      Expedia, Travelocity, Kayak... all the tools that let people chose to fly United instead of Delta because tickets on United are $2 cheaper. Airlines have been in an ongoing price war ever since deregulation in the 70's....and people insist on getting 60's level service at 2013 level prices.
       
      One of the problems with running a business in the US is that Americans, in general, are cheap bastards. Nor is this new... the chain discount places have been exploiting this since the early 20th century.

    9. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      I think it's just baggage fees in the US that are the problem. People carrying insane amounts of carry on baggage and the whole "get on the plane early so you can get a spot for all your stuff in the overhead lockers" rigmarole is unique to the US - I'd never seen anything like it before I travelled in the US.

      Here in Australia airlines still include at least one checked bag as part of the ticket price. It's always been that way. Not for the discount airlines admittedly (Tiger, Jetstar), but they only have a small part of the market. I'm talking about the mainline airlines that account for the majority of flights (i.e. Qantas, Virgin). So most people check most of their stuff and carry on merely a small laptop bag or purse or something. In fact for short flights (2 hours) I don't carry anything on at all (except for my wallet and phone).

      You don't appreciate how good air travel is in Australia (small to non-existent security lines, RFID check-in and baggage tagging so no check-in lines (on Qantas at least), no need to take your shoes off, no liquids restrictions on domestic flights etc.) until you've compared it to the US. Flying in the US is a chaotic, stressful experience ... here it's a breeze 9 times out of 10.

    10. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Luggage fees. In Europe flying is not such a zoo as in US.

      Are you kidding? When we flew in Europe (Ryan Air for one), it was like a cattle car. Luggage allowance was much lighter than internal USA flights and the flight attendants kept me awake by hawking crap through the whole flight.

    11. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Soluzar · · Score: 1

      RyanAir is suitable only for those who don't value their lives or their peace of mind.

    12. Re:Better Luggage Handling by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Expedia, Travelocity, Kayak... all the tools that let people chose to fly United instead of Delta because tickets on United are $2 cheaper. Airlines have been in an ongoing price war ever since deregulation in the 70's....and people insist on getting 60's level service at 2013 level prices.

      I've often wondered why those price comparison sites can't include some of those additional fees when doing comparisons. If I tell it I plan to check in 2 bags and I prefer an exit row seat they could show those additional costs and give a better comparison.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    13. Re:Better Luggage Handling by cffrost · · Score: 1

      RyanAir is suitable only for those who don't value their lives or their peace of mind.

      Though I stopped flying*, I like what I've heard about RyanAir for purely satirical value... It seems to me that RyanAir is to other airlines as The Onion is to mainstream media.

      * TSA boycott, 2006 - ????

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    14. Re:Better Luggage Handling by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Let's face it, the reason people drag all their worldly possessions with them as carry-ons is because they are sick and tired of paying the stupid baggage fees.

    15. Re:Better Luggage Handling by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      or why the Airlines can't build up a reputation that their service is worth those 2$! Oh wait, for that their service would have to be worth 2$.

      It has been the same here after the deregulation of the phone market. I wouldn't mind paying a bit above the bottom line if that would get be better customer support. But even the "premium brands" cut back their service to nonexistant. So if *every* company wants to screw me, I'll choose the one that does it the cheapest.

      --
      bickerdyke
    16. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's face it. The reason people drag all of their worldly possessions with them as carry-on is because we don't trust the baggage handlers to not destroy/steal/lose our stuff. I see this every time I fly. People don't actually want to lug a 49.9 lb wheeled bag onto the plane and then try to find/lift/get help to put it in an overhead compartment.

      This problem has only gotten worse as airlines have started charging money for checking baggage. People are cheap and they will carry-on the biggest bag they can jam in to an overhead bin. Checking bags should be free and people should be allowed to carry-on whatever they can fit under the seat in front of them. Get rid of the overhead storage and boarding/deboarding time will decrease dramatically.

    17. Re:Better Luggage Handling by Soluzar · · Score: 1

      Only if The Onion actually meant what they write, though. Scary thing about RyanAir is that the bad things you've heard can be reliably sourced.

    18. Re:Better Luggage Handling by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      $2 cheaper? Try $200 cheaper.

      I fly delta when I can, but when there's THAT much of a difference... Christ!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  15. This works great until Canadian terrorist hijack.. by davydagger · · Score: 1

    This is going to be great until a bunch of canadian terrorist hi-jack an airliner.

  16. Typical way of taking away freedom by loganljb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a fairly typical way to permanently take away freedom. Take away a LOT of freedom during an 'emergency', then later give back a small portion of that freedom. People will be so relieved by the small concessions that they forget the larger liberties that they no longer enjoy.

    1. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by loganljb · · Score: 2

      Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of the liberty to take a real bottle of shampoo on an airplane, or the liberty of not having to arrive at the airport an hour or more early only to be subjected to demonstrably ineffective (and possibly, over the long term, dangerous -- although that hasn't been demonstrated because of the refusal of the TSA to perform actual testing) security theater, or the liberty of not having your toddler groped by an underpaid, undertrained, overzealous, security goon.

      One of the few truly effective security changes since 9/11 was the very simple expedient of adding always locked, reinforced cabin doors.

      While we're on the subject of liberty, someone who had a personal hand in the founding of our country had something very relevant to say about this situation... They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

    2. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah! Like the liberty to be killed by well armed suicidal terrorists who've hijacked my airplane...

      And anyone with basic knowledge of the mechanics of folding card stock could kill you by way of the little boxes of snacks they sell on the flights that used to offer meals.

      Life is dangerous. Deal with it. Or not, I guess - if you're that concerned about a false sense of safety, surely you're for in-flight anesthesiologists? Passengers who are knocked out surely can't hurt anybody. Sure, you'll have to sign a disclaimer because of the risk of death - but hey, my life shouldn't be in danger because you supposedly want to look out the window.

      Keep living on your knees, but please do so on a plastic sheet - the piss running down your legs is getting everywhere.

    3. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Even if the rules returned to 1980s level, nobody will ever take an airplane in the same way. The passengers will kill them. The rules didn't change a thing. And a few short knives is "well armed"?

    4. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm....

      Random terrorist event
      Take many freedoms away!
      Return but a few inconsequential freedoms
      Repeat

      It's a goddamn authoritarian Brownian ratchet! I'll be in charge in no time.

    5. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by Yoda222 · · Score: 1

      The liberty to be drown by the terrorist travelling with a bottle of water.

    6. Re:Typical way of taking away freedom by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      And anyone with basic knowledge of the mechanics of folding card stock could kill you by way of the little boxes of snacks they sell on the flights that used to offer meals.

      Mac Guyver, is that you?

      Or did you just read about this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millwall_brick

      --
      bickerdyke
  17. Does it really exist? by Slicebo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Michael Mann hasn't convinced them that the hockey stick actually exists?

  18. My question is... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    My question is... will passengers be allowed to carry one of these on board.

  19. The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Xanthvar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ban on knives was cosmetic at best, so the lifting of this ban will not result in any decrease in safety.
    Q: "But wait, didn't the terrorists on 9/11 use box cutters to hijack the plane? Couldn't they do it again?"
    A: No. The reason that they were able to hijack the plane before, is the "rulebook" basically said to go along with the hijackers, you fly off to some other destination, there is a negotiation that drags things out, and eventually everyone leaves alive, with stories to tell their grandchildren... Only, on 9/11 they changed the "rules".

    Today, it doesn't matter what kind of weapon is used to hijack the plane, the bulk of the passengers will use whatever is at hand to beat down the hijackers, because they know they are fighting for their lives now, and if you are going to die, you might as well go down swinging. Coupling this with the _1_ security measure that actually improved airline safety, putting locks on the cockpit doors (which does nothing if they don't actually lock them of course), the chance of hijacking a passenger airliner successfully is almost nil. Maybe a small puddle jumper commuter craft composed of all terrorists would be successful, but in that circumstance, they wouldn't need weapons either.

    Yes, someone can still get hurt, and even killed, but you could do that with a pen/pencil or some other pointy object stabbed into the appropriate place. Now maybe someone from the UK will have a different take on this, as they seemed to fear bladed objects, as they appear to be the primary homicide weapon of choice since the general populace doesn't have access to firearms. As an American male, with military training I am not terribly afraid of knives being used to subdue a a plane full of passengers, whoever foolhardy that may be, as I believe that sheer weight of numbers would incapacitate or kill any would be hijacker in this. For most Americans, a knife is a tool, and not a weapon, and while it can be used as such, so can just about anything else, to include bricks, shoes, rocks, sharp sticks, and harsh language.

    Just my $.02 worth.

    1. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for being so damn insightful. Now they'll outlaw my knitting needles again.

    2. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Ecuador · · Score: 2

      You are right. Apparently there are a lot of people fooled by the post 9/11 security theater and are complaining about this change http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/06/travel/tsa-carry-on-changes/. These people (air marshals, flight attendants) should know better, but I guess the US government has managed to drop the average citizen IQ by about 20 units in recent years.

      What is interesting is that while I have lost numerous swiss army knives and pocket screwdrivers (I always have a multi-tool with me and I often forget to leave it home or check it in when flying), I have had the added insult of being given metal cutlery (fork & knife) in the flight! The TSA yelled at me "THIS IS A KNIFE!" for a tiny 1-inch blade and then they give me a 4+ inch knife to eat my lunch... I don't remember the airlines with the metal knives, but I think it was Lufthansa once that had these flags nailed on the head-rests. The flag-poles where about 20inches long with an extremely sharp point (that could actually nail the head-rest) and were, sadly, a much better weapon than my foldable screwdriver the TSA had confiscated a few minutes earlier...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    3. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by jbwolfe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Coupling this with the _1_ security measure that actually improved airline safety, putting locks on the cockpit doors (which does nothing if they don't actually lock them of course)

      While I prefer hiding behind the locked Kevlar door (it's on the pushback checklist), don't forget some of us are armed with Heckler & Koch's and instructions to shoot to kill...

      --
      Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
    4. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by mutube · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure where the comment about the UK and knives came from, or the relevance of being an American male. Your military training might help (assuming you were trained for the situation) but it's not neccessary. In Glasgow, Scotland (UK) an attempted truck-bombing of an airport ended with a baggage handler and other members of the public confronting the terrorists and kicking the crap out of them (to be fair, they were on fire at the time).

      As you say, the game has changed. I don't think terrorists have a hope in hell anywhere in the Western world anymore. If I saw someone pull a knife, gun, bomb-vest in a crowded area I'd run right at them. And that's from a yellow-bellied, knife-fearing subject of her Hajesty.

    5. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You are correct sir. We would be safer on the plane if everyone were ISSUED a knife rather than forbidden to carry one.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Interesting point about the way Americans mostly perceive knives as tools. Makes a lot of sense - I had to admit when I visit the US I notice a LOT of guys carry knives of some description. You would almost never see that here (Australia). Most people see them as weapons. In fact in many (if not all?) States you are simply not permitted to carry knives. For instance, in Queensland:

      Weapons Act 1990 (Qld):

      A person must not physically possess a knife in a public place or a school, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. A reasonable excuse is includes:

      to perform a lawful activity, duty or employment; or
      to participate in a lawful entertainment, recreation or sport

      So if you are a farmer or hiker or circus performer who juggles knives, or doing something else that would reasonably require a knife, it's OK. But if you're just walking down the road to buy some milk, it's an offence. Each State's law varies a bit but you get the picture. In practice you'd have to be incredibly unlucky for a cop to issue you a fine for having a Swiss Army Knife or something on you ... but it's something they can add to the charge sheet if they catch you doing something else, I guess.

      Whereas, in the US I'd be talking to someone, just a regular, nice guy ... and then he'd pull out some pocketknife to open a package or something (including some varieties that would be classed as prohibited weapons in ~any~ situation here). Makes me do a bit of a 'WTF' double-take. Just a different cultural attitude I guess. Only place here you'll find a knife around here is in a tool box or a kitchen drawer.

    7. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can really depend on which state in the US you are in, and a lot of cities have their own rules about knives. Some are not well written, and have large loopholes. I've been in a city where the law allowed any sized knife as long as it folded up (and wasn't spring loaded when opening). So a friend who lived there managed to find a foot long folding knife that was then technically legal. Most other places though have some sort of size limit of the blade, and a bunch of limits of how they can be opened to make switchblades and butterfly knives illegal. Many of the cities I've lived had limits of knives to things shorter than 2 to 3 inches in length, unless used for a job or packaged, etc. Others go overboard in the opposite direction, such as a high school student near some place I used to live that got into a mess for having a steak knife in their locked car because they happened to have a box of kitchen stuff in the car from helping their family move.

    8. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by cffrost · · Score: 1

      What is interesting is that while I have lost numerous swiss army knives and pocket screwdrivers (I always have a multi-tool with me and I often forget to leave it home or check it in when flying), I have had the added insult of being given metal cutlery (fork & knife) in the flight! The TSA yelled at me "THIS IS A KNIFE!" for a tiny 1-inch blade and then they give me a 4+ inch knife to eat my lunch...

      That's because the airlines' security policies are somewhat sane, and the TSA's policies aren't. Wouldn't it be more insulting if the airline also treated you like a mentally-handicapped toddler, and provided you with a flexible rubber spork instead of functional steel grown-up utensils?

      I think your ire should be directed at the idiotic rule makers, not those thoughtful enough to ignore them.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    9. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Interesting point about the way Americans mostly perceive knives as tools. Makes a lot of sense - I had to admit when I visit the US I notice a LOT of guys carry knives of some description. You would almost never see that here (Australia). Most people see them as weapons.

      I carry a Swiss Army knife all the time, by SO usually carries a leatherman. They're just really useful tools to have around. You can't do a whole lot with the swiss army knife and the blade blunts quite fast, but you can do a lot more than not having it. People seem to want to borrow it quite a lot.

      Thankfully, in the UK, you don't need a reason to carry round a short bladed non locking knife.

      Yet.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      I thought it was clear from my post (it was in agreement to parent after all) that I do believe the ban is useless, so the airline policy was more sane. My ire was directed to the TSA rules that were depriving me of small (and usually expensive) tools when I would be provided with much more "dangerous" objects a few minutes later inside the plane. I know their rules are there just for a laugh (or scare), but it is even worse when they are laughing in your face.
      I guess with the rule change I can start carrying multi-tools again, although I had found at least one useful tool that was never taken from the side pocket of my pouch: http://dx.com/p/ultrafire-stainless-steel-bottle-opener-with-screw-driver-and-wrench-tools-4642

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    11. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by lxs · · Score: 2

      Good. Knitting is an evil activity for evil people, only crochet is worse.
      The forces of good should stick to noble activities like sewing and embroidery.

    12. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Interesting point about the way Americans mostly perceive knives as tools. Makes a lot of sense - I had to admit when I visit the US I notice a LOT of guys carry knives of some description. You would almost never see that here (Australia). Most people see them as weapons. In fact in many (if not all?) States you are simply not permitted to carry knives. For instance, in Queensland:

      Hmm... I learned that different from watching "Crocodile Dundee"

      --
      bickerdyke
    13. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      News article with details

      The bit used in a lot of comedy sketches around the time: "Mr Clarkson punched one of the suspects to the ground before using his bodyweight to restrain him until he was handcuffed."

      Hadrian's Wall was built to keep the English out, for their safety.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    14. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Inda · · Score: 1

      We're not so afraid of knives in the UK.

      I know two people who've been stabbed. The one who was stabbed in the leg nearly lost it, but didn't after successful treatment. The one who was stabbed in the arse cheek lost a lot of blood but walked out of hospital the next day with nothing more than a limp (and a comically sore arse). Just like the 'mericans and their gun shots, we're pretty good at treating stab victims.

      Weapons at hand are used more than anything else. Pint glasses are making a comeback after all teh ashtrays disapeared due to the smoking ban.

      Although, saying all that, we're not as violent as everyone makes out. I've not witnessed any in years. Most people never witness any violence throughout their whole lives.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    15. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      That's pretty interesting. In some places in my state (US) the knife is a "I probably have a gun, too" signalling. In other places in the same state, the guys without the knives are the ones with the bigger weapons. I use a moderate sized folder as my "pocket clip" knife and pretty much every day use it for "tool" use. I find that any guy that gets the "fix this for me" crap all the time will be much more likely to have the tools on them. (WTF is it with people thinking an IT guy can get their car started? Do you go to your carpenter for Windows 8 advice?)

    16. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I accidentally had a best-man's present in my carry-on, which included (thankfully empty) a stainless steel cigar tube, flask tube, and cigar cutter ****GASP****.

      Naturally, the assholes thought that the cigar cutter was FAR too dangerous for me to take on the plane. And this was in Canada. To somewhere else in Canada (not that it matters much, the USA essentially owns Canada now with that retard Harper at the helm).

      Like seriously, what the fuck was I supposed to do with that? "Hey, pilot. Could you please stick out your finger, and put it into this cigar cutter? Ok, now hold it there, and do as I say, or I'll clamp it shut on you!" Seriously, it'd be far more dangerous to ME than to anyone else. And honestly, I could have done far more damage by holding the cigar tube or flask in my hand like a roll of nickles to punch someone.

      THANKFULLY, after a few months I happened to notice what place he bought those kits from (one of those key-man type stores with lots of groomsman type presents... can't remember the specific store), and was able to replace the cigar cutter.

      But seriously, I'd be able to do a thousand times more damage with my car key.

    17. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's bizarre... I'd feel naked without my knife. And it's not some tiny 1" thing, it's a 4" serrated, folding bear-claw style knife. And 95% of the time, I pull it out at work (I work in an office). You wouldn't BELIEVE how useful that thing is! Those stupid plastic ties that are around boxes of paper? Yeah, I could slice up my fingers attempting to pull them off by tugging on the 'loose' end, or I could whip out my knife and have them off all the boxes in 5 seconds. Box sealed with packaging tape? Not for long! Need some string/rope/any other arbitrary thing that needs to be cut cut? Done! Need that flathead screw screwed in? *BAM*, back of the blade.

      Seriously, a knife is arguably one of the most useful tools you could ever carry with you. I'd hate to live in a place where I woudln't be allowed to have one on me. And I'd NEVER pull it out if someone came up to rob me. Why? Because odds are THEY have a knife, and probably have no qualms about sticking it inside of me. Why escalate a situation that I might be able to get away from either unscathed, or with only bruises? I'd rather have a black eye or maybe a broken arm than a sucking chest wound and hole in my lung.

    18. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh they have the cutlery thing figured out. You get a metal fork and a plastic knife!

      AC

    19. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knife_legislation#United_Kingdom

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4581871.stm

    20. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      WTF is it with people thinking an IT guy can get their car started?

      Most folks in IT are very good at working with complicated systems. Cars are complicated systems, it just takes a bit of mental flexibility to attack the problem.

      The difference is primarily between abstract and physical, but it's really not that much of a stretch if you approach it from a systems perspective.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    21. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Most people never witness any violence throughout their whole lives.

      That's not specific to the UK, either. Plenty of folks here in the US never see violence outside of TV and the like.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    22. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never underestimate the human behaviour that as soon as a person has become a marked target that anyone can hurt and or kill without worrying about consequence, that even the mildest mannered salesman or cosmetics counter girl will stomp said target into the ground.

      because inside every overglorified plains ape is a killer waiting to get out.

    23. Re:The ban on knives was cosmetic at best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as long as they don't permit knives AND use of cellphones on planes.

      That will not end well.

  20. Higher threat items by simonbp · · Score: 1

    Higher threat items, like explosives and guns and 4 ounce liquid containers and shoes.

  21. Thank goodness by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I don't think I've ever seen a hockey stick used in a violent act. I'm surprised they banned them in the first place.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Thank goodness by drunk_punk · · Score: 2

      Can I assume you're not Canadien and didn't grow up playing hockey?

    2. Re:Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

    3. Re:Thank goodness by lxs · · Score: 1

      I think that they are talking about the game with ugly guys on skates, not the one with hot girls in short skirts.

  22. We got bigger problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter what they ban or do not ban. The fact is that the most "devastating" attack in recent American history was done by some dudes with box cutters. Not a suicide vest, not machine guns, or machetes, or a big bomb. We lost to box cutters. I think we have bigger problems.

    1. Re:We got bigger problems by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I may be wrong, but I think that problem was partially solved.

      Remember, for at least 20 years, passengers had been instructed over and over to just cooperate with hijackers. The plane that went down in Pennsylvania, diverted from it's intended target, is proof that the conditioning can be broken.

      All we need to do, is to stop being victims. Fight back, and win or lose, you won't be a hostage.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:We got bigger problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, for at least 20 years, passengers had been instructed over and over to just cooperate with hijackers.,

      instructed by whom? When and where? I used to fly a lot in previous decades and don't remember that being something said at all, let alone repeated frequently. Without that, how would it be conditioning? I know it was a general policy, but that is different than having conditioned passengers, or even flight attendants.

    3. Re:We got bigger problems by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Only because by then, they've already been checking for explosives and guns. After the "Landshut" in Mogadishu, Lockerbie (PA103), and lots of other hijacking cases during the 70s/80s.

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:We got bigger problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that narrative is dangerous to government and control freak types. People who will fight back against hijackers might fight back against other things. In our society, the "other things" in question are largely government and corporate controlled. So having a population without a victim mentality is inherently dangerous to those in power.

      What, some of you think the TSA is incompetent? They're not. Their job is to promote the fearful victim mentality and to train people to be obedient. Actual security is not required.

    5. Re:We got bigger problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may not have been explicit "conditioning" to that effect, no -- but up until 9/11, at least in the USA, the "pop culture" idea of what a hijacking was (to most people, anyway) was some wild-haired Che Guevera-wannabe demanding "Take this plane to Cuba!" or some such. So the rational thing to do was to just take the crazy guy where he wanted to go, then let the local authorities deal with him. Sure, you'd be inconvenienced, and probably have to spend a day or two while the local consulate straightens things out, but at least you'd have an interesting story to tell when you got home. So when the 9/11 hijackers took over the planes, most passengers' initial assumption was that the wild-eyed guys waving the boxcutters around wanted to be *taken* somewhere.

      *Now*, of course, we know that an attempted hijacking is much more likely to be wild-eyed jihadist suicide-bombers demanding "Crash this plane into a building and send all these infidels to hell so I can get my 72 virgins!", and that the rational thing to do is to beat them to death with any objects you can get your hands on. :D

    6. Re:We got bigger problems by Ed_Pinkley · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, they also now reenforce / lock the cabin door. It helps that the hijackers can no longer control the plane.

      www.schneier.com

      --
      "Long time listener, first time caller."
  23. What will this prevent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The TSA has not prevented any attacks. Most people use the fallacious argument that because there haven't been any major terrorist attacks carried out, that the TSA is doing its job.

    Logically, one can conclude that the TSA is not only not doing its job, but no terrorists have attempted to perform any attacks, therefore the TSA is a fraud and totally worthless. We should eliminate the TSA and go back to how things were pre-9/11. Things were fine before the TSA, and they will continue to be fine after we get rid of the TSA.

    The fact there have been no major terrorist attacks since the WTC thing is proof of this. Once we get rid of the TSA, and all airport security, we will have nothing to worry about. Especially if every passenger is carrying guns and/or knives.

    1. Re:What will this prevent? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      As long as I'm holding my rock, there will be no terrorist attacks.

  24. added something to the prohibited list by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    NO HARLEM SHUFFLE!

  25. Re:This works great until Canadian terrorist hijac by ShogunTux · · Score: 2

    And then, like maple syrup, Canada's evil would ooze all over the United States.

    Which would then lead to our children pledging allegiance to the maple leaf, pouring mayonnaise over everything, winter 11 months of the year, and having Anne Murray on the radio all day, every day.

    Won't somebody think of the children?

  26. Hmmm... by Qubit · · Score: 1

    I think you mean the Harlem Shake, not The Harlem Shuffle...

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Whoops! :)

    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a maroon!

      Which is a Bugs-Bunny-kid-friendly way of saying, you're a fucking retard!

  27. So wife can finally bring her nail clippers? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Every time we go through, they take wife's clippers from her. And every time she makes a big deal about it. And after the first couple of times, daughter and I sidle away from her, whistling tunelessly and staring at the ceiling...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:So wife can finally bring her nail clippers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She could, as an option, clip her nails before going to the airport.

      A dumb idea, but one she should consider. Is she blonde, or just a tard?

    2. Re:So wife can finally bring her nail clippers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time we go through, they take wife's clippers from her. And every time she makes a big deal about it. And after the first couple of times, daughter and I sidle away from her, whistling tunelessly and staring at the ceiling...

      It's good your wife doesn't let people walk all over her. Don't complain.

    3. Re:So wife can finally bring her nail clippers? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that it's the principle of the thing, with her. I admire her for that, and at the same time I really don't want to piss off TSA officials. They're probably bored and just itching for someone to screw with.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:So wife can finally bring her nail clippers? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Every time we go through, they take wife's clippers from her. And every time she makes a big deal about it. And after the first couple of times, daughter and I sidle away from her, whistling tunelessly and staring at the ceiling...

      It's good your wife doesn't let people walk all over her. Don't complain.

      I understand. It is the principle, with her. On the other hand, I really don't want to piss off people who can force an anal exam.

      I swear this is true... The second time it happened, I waited for the drama to play out, and it continued to escalate, and then I noticed that daughter was nonchalantly shuffling away. And I'm ashamed to say, at the time that sounded like a good idea, so I started shuffling away, and we both ended up at the first slideway several yards away, and looked at each other... "Do we leave her?" "Well," pause... "Well," ... "How much time before our flight?"

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:So wife can finally bring her nail clippers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not TSA but Immigration (which are both part of DHS I believe):

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=u4Ku17CqdZg

    6. Re:So wife can finally bring her nail clippers? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've seen that, and it's absolutely brilliant.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  28. Rocket launchers okay'd but toothpaste banned by Grayhand · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's about as much commonsense as they've used to date. Can we at least agree little old ladies and infants represent a small enough threat that we don't have to give them pat downs or full body scans? People don't realize it but the TSA haven't found a single potential terrorist, not one. So far billions spent and we get a goose egg for all the inconvenient and money.

    1. Re:Rocket launchers okay'd but toothpaste banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the psychos will attach bombs or weapons to old ladies and infants?

      Seriously the fuckers poison schools.

      Also the threat of being found out is also a determent

      Lastly, if the smurfs are getting off on old ladies and infants, they have much bigger problems than the old ladies and infants do.

      Shit the puritan influence on this country stinks to high hell, get over it, its the human body I've taken enough figure drawing classes to not be enticed every time I see a nipple, dick or pussy. Or even give a fuck what entices somebody else.

    2. Re:Rocket launchers okay'd but toothpaste banned by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Can we at least agree little old ladies and infants represent a small enough threat that we don't have to give them pat downs or full body scans?

      No, we can't agree. Because they represent just as much of a threat as anyone else. Of course I agree NO ONE should be patted down. But once you stop patting one group of people down, you may as well stop patting EVERYONE down.

  29. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

    And why are people dragging all of their worldly possessions on a 3-day trip to Ft. Lauderdale? Pack better, and you will see a lot of these problems disappear. I've worked on the ramp several years, and most of the times that I've seen bags damaged/lost (lost as in won't make your flight) is because they are so overpacked or packed lopsided that they fall off a tug, get stuck under other bags weighing 65lbs, or just burst open. It seems like in most cases the bags that are the most overpacked are also bags that are 10 years old, ripped, and have one or both handles broken off. If people didn't overpack as much as they do, things would not be as bad as they are. Also, it seems like most people like to buy these bags that have all these unnecessary buckles, straps, and knobs that get caught on literally everything. The doors and floors of the cargoholds are in most cases not smooth. There are screws sticking up, edges of panels are raised up, and the door designs of MD-88/90/DC-9s are so poorly designed that zippers and other random parts are bound to get stuck and snap off. The best suitcase to buy is one of the harder, plastic 4 wheel spinners, as they are the least likely to get caught, and I don't think I've ever seen broken handles on them. But all of these cheap, flimsy cloth bags with little to no structural support? Of course they're going to get broken, they are made as cheap as possible. And steal stuff? We're lucky if we have 40 minutes to offload 100 bags and put 100 bags back on to a plane. Ignoring the fact that most baggage handlers would never steal stuff, they wouldn't even have the time to steal stuff if they wanted to. Purchase suitcases wisely, use common sense when packing (you dont need 7 outfits and 5 pairs of shoes for a weekend trip ladies, sorry), and your bags will last longer and all your stuff will be waiting for you when you land.

    Oh, and for the love of god, if you buy a puppy from an out of state breeder, drive over there and pick your dog up yourself. Those things get terrified when they get stuck in a cargo hold for 5 hours.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  30. Speed skate blades by GSloop · · Score: 2

    Speed skate blades have never been banned for Carry-on air travel.
    [At least as far as I know - they were legal before this change.]

    And if you know anything about speed-skate blades, you know they're literally RAZOR sharp 17 inch mini-swords.
    They might not be as dangerous as a full-on machete, but pretty damn close.

    When I heard about ice blades being fine for carry-on - I was astonished. You can't bring a razor-blade or a small knife, but 17" clap blades you could shave with? Just peachy!

    The whole BS around airline security is insane.

    1. Re:Speed skate blades by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      So the plan should now be to take "safe" metallic items with edges and points that can be honed, hone them to fine (and sharp) finishes, and carry them on planes!

      --
      That is all.
  31. My pocket knife and Leatherman have blades ~ 2.5" by Qubit · · Score: 1

    I shouldn't have to check a whole suitcase just so I can have my pocket knife or Leatherman with me when I travel. That's just silly.

    The old rule was something like 3 inches, or "diagonally across the guard's badge" (convenient measuring tool, that :-). Most ordinary pocket knives fall into that category.

    (and folding knives with locks are safer tools to use, resulting in fewer self-inflicted user injuries... *le sigh*)

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  32. Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Jethro · · Score: 1

    Or any liquid in a larger than super-tiny container?

    I still remember going through airport security with a leatherman on my belt and not even setting off the metal detector.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      Or any liquid in a larger than super-tiny container?

      No, the water ban is beneficial to all parties (except the traveler. Oh, and the environment). Due to not being able to bring in water from outside, and most people not wanting to pay $5 for a thimble of water inside, the airlines are able to keep the weight down on their flights, resulting in a fuel savings of perhaps as much as 25 cents per flight.Over an entire year and an entire flight, this probably adds up to a small amount of folding money.
      And then there are the people who do pay the $5 per thimbleful of water in the airport proper. To the airport vendors, the new regulation was a license to steal. This extra income probably enabled them to buy a whole fleet of congressmen to make sure the rule is never changed.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      The sad thing here is I've actually been bringing an empty water bottle and filling it up past security. From the free water fountains. Sure, that's where they put the mind-control drugs, but hey.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem I'm having is freezing water cold enough so that it stays solid long enough to say that I'm not bringing on board a liquid ;)

    4. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Jethro · · Score: 2

      You know, I would kinda love to have someone who's not me try that.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    5. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Green+Salad · · Score: 1

      You can take water on the plane. But, the water needs to be obtained from a vendor or faucet after passing through security. My routine is to buy a bottle (or fill one) right after locating the gate.

    6. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Jethro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I do, too, but you know. Still ridiculous.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    7. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      An endothermic cold pack applied to a partially melted bottle just before the checkpoint should take care of any insidious liquids.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    8. Re:Am I allowed to take water on yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget that the human body is a walking container filled with multiple quarts of fluids.... Many of which are poisonous or harmful if used the wrong way.
      So go for the ultimate flight, leave your body behind to be reclaimed when your trip is over.

  33. The better focus of the TSA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As of April 25th the Transportation Security Administration will let a bunch of previously prohibited items such as small pocket knives and what it calls 'novelty' or toy bats to be taken on aircraft as carry-ons. The idea the agency said was to let Transportation Security Officers better focus their efforts on spot higher threat items such as explosives and guns".

    With all this airport security, makes me wonder how then can never find all that cocaine that's being smuggled into the USA.

  34. bear patrol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    must be working!

  35. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never had anything stolen and I've flown several times a year for many years leaving fairly valuable things in my luggage. So IF the GP is correct, it's the perception of theft and not the theft itself that is the problem. But it's not the baggage handlers stealing it, it's the inspectors.

    However, your rant about how people should buy luggage is totally backwards. People buy the luggage they want for the reasons that are important to them. If the airlines' systems don't work, that's a problem with the airlines/airports, not with the customer. Period. Those harder plastic ones? I think they suck and I'm not going to buy one just to guarantee you don't break it.

    And for the record, my GF DOES need 7 outfits and 5 pairs of shoes for a weekend trip and god help you if you ever suggest otherwise to her face. (I speak from experience.)

  36. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    way to miss the entire context of the article!

  37. Re:Better Luggage Packing by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    It sounds like airplane baggage holds are a horrible place to put luggage in general. That is not a problem of the luggage. And it is quite evident that SOMEONE is stealing stuff from luggage. It's probably the TSA agents, not the ramp personnel. The ramp people are too busy. The TSA feel like they are the Gestapo and entitled to steal whatever they want from whomever they want.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  38. No RC cars by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    and yet they STILL won't let you carry on RC cars. Fascists.

    1. Re:No RC cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an RC HELICOPTER at San Francisco last week. That's a machine that has spinning bladesd and emits radio waves!

      The TSA checked my belt very thoroughly as I watched the guy with the helicopter walk through.

      AC

  39. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    And for the record, my GF DOES need 7 outfits and 5 pairs of shoes for a weekend trip and god help you if you ever suggest otherwise to her face. (I speak from experience.)

    Let me know the next time you fly, and I'll steal your gf's whip for you ;)

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  40. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Way to miss that I was replying to the GP, and not the article

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  41. Re:Better Luggage Packing by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    And why are people dragging all of their worldly possessions on a 3-day trip to Ft. Lauderdale?

    Because you can't go out without having a full makeup case. And what do you do if the weather changes? Are you beaching in the day, and going out at night? Changing clothes every day? 6 sets of clothes (means 12 pair of shoes for women), full bathroom case, and whatever "extras" someone feels comfortable with.

    Oh, and for the love of god, if you buy a puppy from an out of state breeder, drive over there and pick your dog up yourself. Those things get terrified when they get stuck in a cargo hold for 5 hours.

    But they love the trunk for 16 hours?

    And steal stuff? We're lucky if we have 40 minutes to offload 100 bags and put 100 bags back on to a plane. Ignoring the fact that most baggage handlers would never steal stuff, they wouldn't even have the time to steal stuff if they wanted to.

    Funny, between dropping my bags off and the plane opening for the 100 bags in 10 minutes, they sit somewhere for 2+ hours, often coming home with a "you've been TSA'd" pamphlet in them. Someone has the time to open them, look in them, and leave a note. And you imply it's impossible to steal. Everything stolen is stolen from check-in to take-off. Another good reason to carry your bags with you 100% of the time.

  42. Are calipers (engineering tool) still confiscated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will calipers (Image) still get confiscated? They cost +$100 for a good one.

  43. rules change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems they had to change the rules to "conform with international rules", not because they came to their senses.

  44. So with these changes.... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    ... Does that mean that we are in a safer place now? I have to wonder if that's the case or not.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  45. Airline security is a joke by jonwil · · Score: 1

    There are any number of items that are allowed on an airplane (or already exist on an airplane or can be obtained airside or whatever) that could easily be used to cause serious injury if not death.

    Like the situation with knitting needles where knitting needles are (or were) banned but if you add a graphite center to it and make it a pencil its magically ok even though its just as long and just as sharp (if not sharper)

    Or the situation where you have soldiers or law enforcement in full uniform with full gear and weapons (which could easily be used to take over the plane if they wanted to) being forced to surrender pairs of nail clippers or other little items.

    Or the situation where razor-sharp ice skates (sharp enough to take someones head off) are allowed but little Swiss Army knives and multi-tools are banned even though they are far less dangerous.

  46. I remember when you took guns on planes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all so silly to me.

    When I was a kid my father went on a business trip and came back I with my mother met him at the gate and he walked down the delta ramp carrying a rifle and a pistol. He bought them from the client he went to visit and the stewardess put them in the closet near the exit during the flight. No one cared, no one tried to kill anyone and we walked out of the airport carrying a rifle and a pistol and the only person who said anything was a older fella who asked my dad about the rifle and reminisced about having one like it when was a boy (was a level action 3030)

  47. Duty-free vodka by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    Not only is it a flammable liquid, but it takes a single second to turn the empty bottle into a deadly edged weapon.

    They took a tiny pair of pliers that I'd forgotten about, but they're still fine with me bringing the vodka.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:Duty-free vodka by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      AFAIK you can't carry full bottles of alcohol onto the plane, either. I know several people who bought booze/wine and were refused, and when I put some in my checked luggage they made my buy padded wine carriers AND plastic bags around that. Of course, if you buy your booze post-security you have to be dumb enough to tell the flight attendant or unlucky enough to get a random search. So it's a pretty absurd rule.

    2. Re:Duty-free vodka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of buying alcohol after check-in and security is to bring it on the plane. What elese are you supposed to do with it? Your baggage is already being loaded and you have no reason to be in the gate area other than fly. So yes you can carry alcohol (say 10 litres of 160 proof Strohrum, if you're travelling inside EU).
       

    3. Re:Duty-free vodka by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      You just don't fly at all, do you?

    4. Re:Duty-free vodka by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The whole point of buying alcohol after check-in and security is to bring it on the plane. What elese are you supposed to do with it?

      Exactly! It's a total scam that they don't warn you about this when you buy it.

      Your baggage is already being loaded and you have no reason to be in the gate area other than fly. So yes you can carry alcohol (say 10 litres of 160 proof Strohrum, if you're travelling inside EU).

      I have no idea what EU security requirements are, but at a couple US airports I have seen people first hand who were not allowed to board with bottles of alcohol. They of course said the same thing you did, but talking sense into airport security or airline employees is definitely a futile exercise...

    5. Re:Duty-free vodka by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Why would you say that? Just to be a dick? Or do you have a point?

      I'm not guessing here, it's a FACT I have seen first hand people have their bottles taken from them, with the choice of surrendering them or having them checked or shipped (and yes, they were bought post-security checkpoint from duty free). And I was forced to check mine while paying about $30 for "airline approved wine carriers". Is it an official security policy? Who knows. But it happens.

    6. Re:Duty-free vodka by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

      Whenever I buy duty-free alcohol, I tell them my flight, and they deliver it right to the plane's door. I pick it up when I board the aircraft itself, and thus security checkpoints etc are completely bypassed. Airlines will not allow any old bottles on board, but DO let you bring bottles that are sealed in a duty-free bag with receipt and delivered to the gate, as they come from a trusted source.

      You're assuming it's a scam that nobody else seems to know about, but isn't it more likely you just did something wrong?

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  48. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But they love the trunk for 16 hours?

    The puppy should travel in the cabin of the vehicle, Mitt.

  49. Re:Better Luggage Handling- Mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father died in an airline crash because a mechanic signed off on a job he "knew he'd finish by the shift end" but didn't quite get to. The next mechanic saw it had been signed off and so didn't chech and sent the plane off. The mechanics aren't blameless either.
    I'm glad I can carry my knife again.

  50. TSA, dimensions of a crayon by Green+Salad · · Score: 1

    I mis-read and interpreted "exceed the dimensions of a carryon" as "exceed the dimensions of a crayon." I guess it's because I associate the experience of commercial flight with "small, cramped and barely tolerable stupidity." "Crayon" seemed credible, because I had also just read that the head of the Justice Department said the Executive had legal authority to use drones to kill citizens on U.S. soil without trial. When confronting a ridiculous society, I'm learning to suspend my disbelief.

    Bottom line, I have loved-ones to feed and projects I need to get done. I can't stop flying due to thugs...whether the thugs wear a head-scarf or a uniform. In my mind, TSA actually make planes more secure, because their antics make the observant realize they cannot rely on a bureaucracy for protection... Ultimately, it's up to us to defend ourselves and our fellow travelers.

    I understand the principles of mass, density, force and concentration. I've too easily broken the bones of fellow humans. I know what common airplane objects I can use as weapons. No one is going to hijack *my* plane because I will risk much to defend it, knowing the alternative is much worse.

    YELL and POINT. Make me aware. That's all I ask of my fellow travelers. Any additional help will earn you much gratitude.

    1. Re:TSA, dimensions of a crayon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's funny, because i read "Crayon" seemed credible as "Crayon" seemed edible, because airline food, amirite?

  51. Makes perfect sense by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    The rightwingers who love the TSA never really believed Hockey sticks were real anyway right ?
      ***
    Yeah, but whose afraid of Canadians anyway ? The last time a Canadian broke the law it was smuggling Whisky to the USA during prohibition.

    Okay, okay, I'm done.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  52. Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kevin Smith might enjoy flying again?

  53. Really everyone should now just go about their by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Business as usual the fucking door to the cockpit are locked and the pilot has a gun.
    Everything else TSA related is over reach by government and should me withdrawn.

  54. Too late! by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    If they count on stopping terrorists by security (theater) checks and the airports and similar, it's too late - way too late. If a terrorist actually gets to the security check at the airport it's a major fail. As no terrorist is ready to do his evil deed in just a few days. the intelligence services have plenty of time to spot and verify each potential terrorist and stop his activities a long time before he even plans to go to the airport. Sure, the security check at the airport might prevent a specific attack, but if you focus on the persons instead of the tools, you might catch all of the terrorists and their leader instead of just the one at the airport.

    I recommend dropping almost everything at the airport and use all the resources out in the country, keeping close tabs on the terrorist nests, i.e. meetings/events relating to right- or left wing extremists, militias, religious cults including Islamist mosques and so on. I cannot think of any terrorist not affiliated with an organization already known to be suspect at the time of discovery. Use the resources to identify those people most likely to become 'active' and then stop them. I know the FBI has had a lot of success providing these people with fake explosives and so on, thus both identifying them and their intentions with certainty and prevent any risk to the general public.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  55. I used to be able to CHECK my guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be able to go to the airport and check my guns.
    Now what? Your going to store this data?
    So you can confiscate later (read the memo)
    From people that lied about bodyscanners and Mr Haskel
    From people that steal
    From people that aren't "officers"
    From people that oh nevermind...

    No bailouts for the airlines again. Fuck that.

  56. Re:This works great until Canadian terrorist hijac by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Not a problem. All a flight attendant needs to do call a penalty and send them to the lavatory.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  57. I want my 8 keychain knives back, dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I want my 8 keychain knives back, dammit!

    I used to fly weekly. Most of the time, it was on the company plane between 2 cities, but a few times a year, it was for a day trip to a meeting on a commercial flight.

    On the company plane, I'd show up 3 minutes before the flight, show my badge and get on the plane. No checks. The created a habit. I never worried that my tiny pocket knife was an issue.

    Next commercial flight, I'm running late - always a little late, get to the airport screening line and the TSA person starts asking me questions about sharp objects. Dam - another tiny pocket knife gone. They needed a leave-a-knife pick-a-knife program at both ends of the airport.

    I can think of 1,000 good uses for a tiny pocket knife and just as many negative uses, but most of the negative uses are not really too bad. We're talking about little knives here, not the larger hunting knives sold on late-night shopping TV.

    I want my 8 tiny pocket knives back. These never should have been taken. Also, why do we need to wait until late April? I'm on a flight tomorrow. They need a month to formalize training? 2.4" blade - less or more? How hard is that? Just look at the length of the knife. Close enough.

  58. Re:My pocket knife and Leatherman have blades ~ 2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Safer tools for complete retards, or when stabbing someone, yes.

  59. Liquids? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't mention them, so I guess drinks are still banned.

    How fortunate. Because if you're worried about terrorists taking over the plane with a small pen knife, think about how much damage they could do with a plastic water bottle.

  60. hockey stick = polearm by Werrismys · · Score: 2

    What if you attach pocket knives to a hockey stick? The polearm poll yesterday lacked this option.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  61. Look out, Shredder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great news for Casey Jones.

  62. Family by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Your family likely moved far away from you because of your guitar playing. Why do you want to take your guitar with you when you go to meet them.

  63. I won't be happy till.. by Krojack · · Score: 1

    I can carry my Hattori Hanz sword on with me and have it sitting right next to me the entire time...

  64. Re:This works great until Canadian terrorist hijac by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our hockey playing and curling overlords?

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  65. the "pocket knife ok" fraud in this by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Folks, pull out your Swiss Army knife, and open the only or largest blade, and measure it with a ruler.

    I was just in a thread on a mailing list yesterday, and suddenly thought of doing this. Measure from the tip to the hilt, *NOT* to the end of the sharp edge.

    Mine's 2.5", and it's not one of the big ones. In fact, I think the only ones that would have a blade that short are the "executive" models, suitable for trimming your cuticles....

    Like the TSA: sounds good, all security theater in practice.

                      mark

  66. About time they catch up to the airlines by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2
    For the last several years, when I've gotten bumped up to business or first class (frequently), I've been supplied with real metal silverware. On an Asiana flight last August, I received a steak knife with a 5" serrated blade - and a matching butter knife, salad fork and dinner fork. All metal, all great weapons, all better than the 9/11 hijackers had.

    .
    No need to actually bring your own weapon with you - just book first-class and have the airlines hand them to you!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  67. Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the Hanson Brothers are on any flights I take. No one will mess with them.

  68. Obvious problem by meerling · · Score: 1

    I don't care about the small pocket knives either way.
    I haven't seen any news about them allowing shampoo, water, soda, or other liquids in normal sizes.
    But they allow a limited number of Golf Clubs and Hockey Sticks ?!?!
    WTF?!
    Can you imagine those things in the average plane cabin?
    They won't fit under the seat. Putting them in the overhead compartment will be difficult if not impossible, and is going to be interfering with people using the other sections of it even if you do wedge it in. (Honey, I can't get the asprin, the asshat two rows up stuck a fucking hockey stick in here and it's got everything wedged in.)
    Can you imagine them trying to hold it? They'll keep dropping it after an hour or three. Do you want to get wacked by on of those falling on you? Just imagine rough flight conditions.

    Long objects like Golf Clubs, Hockey Sticks, Fishing Poles, and Boar Spears (among many others) NEED TO BE CHECKED INTO BAGGAGE !

    I'm still hoping some moron at the TSA screwed up on the calendar and thinks it's April.

  69. Re:Better Luggage Packing by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Just leave the crop, that's not for punitive uses :P

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  70. Re:Better Luggage Packing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use a hard rolling suitcase with integrated locks into the frame. Nothing short of a circle saw or a blow torch will open those up. Bonus points if it has a gps tracker built into it with no way to power it down while it is closed short of a faraday cage. make a thief's life as hard as possible.

  71. Canada and Hockey Sticks... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    It's not Canadians with hockey sticks you have to worry about, it's Canadians *without* hockey gloves you might want to look out for...

    If you see a Canadian not wearing hockey gloves, it means they have already dropped them... approach cautiously.

  72. Billiard cues?? by cundare · · Score: 1

    Who is old enough to remember that a group of Hell's Angel killed Meredith Hunter at Altamont using sharpened cue sticks (and chains, but the sawn-off sticks were primary) as the club's weapon of choice. "Under My Thumb," indeed.

  73. Shortened Hockey Season, TSA allows hockey sticks by Linuxmagic · · Score: 1

    Because the hockey season is so short, teams now have to carry on their luggage in order to make the schedule. Only problem is, that with the carry on limits, goalies can't take their pads anymore.