Slashdot Mirror


Dad Hacks "Donkey Kong" - Now Pauline Rescues Mario

H_Fisher writes "What do you do when your daughter wants the girl to be the hero of your old video game? If you're Mike Mika, you hack the game ROM to reverse the roles. He even changed the 'M' at the top of the screen to a 'P.'"

56 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a great father by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I hope he also fixed the final level bug.

  2. oh, wow, he swapped the sprites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was a patch for DOOM that let you shoot Barney.
    Maybe you shouldn't be taking your morality from Donkey Kong.

  3. Re:Gender roles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He did it so his daughter could play as the character she wanted to play. Not as some feminist statement.

  4. Re:Out of the woodwork by CycleMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are other industries as bad, or is the gaming industry one of the worst?

    Everyone's this bad. Nobody RTFA's and understands that Dad took a request from his kid and decided to go all-out on it. They all think it's a political-social-economic-whatever sort of statement. Dad isn't out to make a statement. He's out to love his kid.

    My guess, with absolutely no statistics to back it up, is that many of the attackers are not parents themselves and simply do understand that such a selfless, political-message-free love exists.

  5. Re:Gender roles by kevin+lyda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not have those things? Maybe his daughter likes them? Just because they're traditionally female, doesn't mean they're inferior.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  6. Re:Gender roles by Myria · · Score: 4, Informative

    If the daughter finds them OK, what's wrong with it? Maybe she likes "girly" things.

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  7. Re:Gender roles by CycleMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let the haters hate, and the lovers love. We know who's who by their comments.

    If your daughter wanted it all princessy, and you loved her, you'd do it too. Remember (if you RTFA), she asked to play as not-Mario; we don't know what more she said beyond that. If my son asked for an elephant in the game, I'd make peanuts for him to use. And a little feather because of Dumbo.

    Got my man-card, and my dad-card, and nobody's pulling either of them.

  8. Re:Out of the woodwork by Fjandr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree. Fuck the comments about sexism. This is 100% a dad doing something because he loves his daughter and was able to do something cool because she wanted something different.

  9. Should Have Gone All The Way by guttentag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He should have switched the big monkey at the top with the poor little oil drum at the bottom while he was at it, to reflect the full scope of societal changes that have occurred since the release of Donkey Kong.

    In this new version, the girl fights to stop Big Oil at the top from throwing barrels at the cute little monkey at the bottom, while the guy just stands there watching the game. When she gets to the top, she's not rescuing Mario, she's stopping Big Oil from harming cute animals. Mario just happens to come out of his comatose state when she enters the room and feels compelled to feign excitement for her quest.

    In college I had a roommate who felt very strongly that depressed people should not give in to pressure to take Prozac. So I "hacked" (I think I used ResEdit or something... nothing fancy) a Pong clone to replace the ball with a green/yellow Prozac capsule. That way he could "fight the good fight" by trying to deflect the Prozac in response to my repeated attempts to stuff it down his side of the screen. This made him a much more animated opponent in Pong, and I told him this only proved that Prozac does improve people's behavior. Which upped the ante as the game continued, in much the same way that Tetris starts throwing bricks at you with more attitude the further you get into the game.

    1. Re:Should Have Gone All The Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your article is pretty old. I don't think the risk is as high as you state, but I don't doubt that there are risks.

      As far as the desire to cut your wrist, was it due to suicidal ideation or due to a desire for self injury? Suicidal ideation often occurs in people that self injure, but they are very different disorders. Self-injury is usually due to a desire to make a situation feel real (stop dissociation) or to counter stressful or painful thoughts. Self-injury is actually a coping mechanism, though a very bad one. Suicidal ideation is more of a problem solving type of behavior. But if you felt that you were compelled to cut your wrists to kill yourself (not as a problem solving behavior), then that would be neither self-injury nor suicidal ideation, but psychosis.

      In any case, there aren't really many great alternatives. This is partially because it costs too much to do research for new drugs and partially because ethical guidelines prevent testing on the people that actually need the drugs. If you have ever had suicidal ideation or self injured, you will be excluded from a trial. If you have a severe mental illness (which can include major depression) you will be excluded. Thus, only the least depressed patients are tested. It is sort of like being pregnant--nobody will test drugs on you due to ethical concerns. In the end, these drug companies have to get statistically significant findings when they test their drugs on the least depressed people. To say that is hard, is an understatement. So they do lots of tricks to get their drugs approved. But there really is no certainty that those drugs will help with the people that need them most because they have never been tested on those same people. Only after the drugs are prescribed en masse can scientists really determine the impact.

    2. Re:Should Have Gone All The Way by unkiereamus · · Score: 2

      I had a teenage friend who only killed himself after taking prozac.

      I always used to find that whole "may cause suicidal thoughts or actions" side-effect of anti-depressants quite odd. At one point, however, I wound up dating a psychiatrist and she explained it to me thus:

      Major depression has two effects which bear on this, first, obviously, it causes suicidal ideations, but second, it saps your energy. Suicide is a lot of work (at least for someone who is majorly depressed), which keeps most people with SI from actually carrying through on it. Once you start taking anti-depressants, however, they clear up the lack of energy first, and then there's about a 2 week window before they start making in-roads against the SI, which makes it a dangerous period. Add in to that the fact that depending on the specific neuro-chem involved, it's possible that some drugs may not ever take care of the SI, but will still give the pt energy back...

      I dunno, I thought it was interesting.

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
  10. Re:Why is this necessary? by metalmaster · · Score: 2

    Regina of Dino Crisis is a strong female role. If you dont know the game it's pretty much Resident Evil with dinosaurs

  11. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He said "that aren't sex objects"

    While things like Zero-suit Samus can certainly be considered a bit of fan service, I wouldn't consider most of her outings as putting her in the sex-object position. I don't know if the GPP would agree.

    Meanwhile, on the flip side, Lara Croft *definitely* is, except in her latest game (written by the excellent Rhianna Pratchett) where she's actually written like a real human being.

  12. Re:Pie factory in the NES version? by dosius · · Score: 5, Informative

    There was a VC release bundled with certain editions of the Wii that had a ROM of the NES version with the pie factory level grafted in.

    -uso.

    --
    What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  13. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    A little offtopic, I know, but it took me until just now to realize that she was Terry Pratchett's daughter. Apparently she will also get all the rights to Discworld and continue writing it. I certainly hope she is up to the challenge.

  14. Re:Why is this necessary? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    GP: Let's count up all the female player characters that exist in video games that aren't sex objects

    You: Lara Croft (in 9 games)

    You seriously think Lara Croft isn't a sex object? .

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  15. Re:Why is this necessary? by MurukeshM · · Score: 2

    What about gender neutral ones like Shepard from Mass Effect or the Warden from Dragon Age?

  16. Not easy to make your daughter happy by m.alessandrini · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My daughter was once playing with ktuberling, where you drag little characters on the screen and create a scene. One day I caught her rotating the mouse horizontally, because she wanted the little penguin to lay down instead of standing, and she was complaining it was not working. I'm an electronic engineer, but I have not all that spare time! :-) On the other hand, I think that Apple and others could gain millions by hiring a bunch of kids as designers...

  17. Parenting by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Parenting - you're doing it right!

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Parenting by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      I beg to differ. Parenting is about teaching, not catering.

      Parenting is both about teaching and loving your child. A child that is loved, grows up into a self-confident adult.

      Also, a child that is loved has a nice childhood. Life isn't only about preparing for the next step - sometimes you live in the here and now.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    2. Re:Parenting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If he TAUGHT her how to hack the game and she did it, then I'd be like "Parenting - you're doing it right."

      She's fucking three years old, dipshit.

      At that age, I think it's okay to just show her it's possible to get what you want if you work for it. You don't have to make her do it herself!

    3. Re:Parenting by eyenot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My parents didn't teach me programming until I was eight, and I didn't even begin to do anything really useful with it until I was a teenager. I used it to hack ATARI games (for the ATARI home computer), sure, but that's at eight years old.

      The girl in the story is three years old. So you aren't even really setting a fair standard.

      What's worse, you're completely ignoring the gender-politics and DIY lessons learned. If you think there's no difference between Shigeru Miyamoto getting the job done and "Dad" getting the job done, then maybe Shigeru Miyamoto's your dad. Well, aside from you, most children (since they learn from their parents' example) would realize the connection: the game doesn't have to be made by a toy maker, it can be modified by "Dad" -- and that means it can eventually be modified by the child.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    4. Re:Parenting by hackula · · Score: 3, Funny

      Back when I was three, I programmed Donkey Kong from scratch in Assembly. "Big Arcade" stole the source off a BBS where I posted it, and made millions off my idea! Now get off my lawn and go learn some BrainF&&ck, toddlers!

    5. Re:Parenting by Ogive17 · · Score: 2

      Yeah! You said it! Now, as a parent, I have been energized to improve my parental skills.

      I'm going to make my 5 week old son change his own damn diapers! He'll learn to stop crapping in his pants much sooner if he's the one that has to do the butt wiping!

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    6. Re:Parenting by unkiereamus · · Score: 2

      "First world problem" is a stupid expression.

      I actually disagree.

      Speaking as a native of the first world who has lived in the third world, I find that phrase to be quite apropos occasionally to mock the sense of entitlement that some people have, that's just a bad use of it.

      When you've got children starving to death, and someone is going on about the fact that they have to start brewing their own coffee because they need the money they used to spend on starbucks to fill the gas tank on their $45,000 V8 SUV as though it were the end of the world, that's an appropriate time.

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    7. Re:Parenting by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

      Do be fair, he did teach his daughter that gender reassignment is a surgical procedure, only to be done by experts.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
  18. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody looks like that in real life.

    No? I do ... look a lot like Lara Croft. Sure, it's an odd look for a man, but I think I pull it off nicely.

  19. And? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since I have no reason to hate you with a passion, I won't suggest you watch Twilight but aren't the males in that drivel just as much sex objects?

    What really is the difference between Lara Croft and Fabian? Don't know who he is? Google it and you will find he is a model who appears on countless romance novel covers and NOT because he is a novelist.

    Sex... wasn't really all that much a part of the original Tomb Raider. yes, she had big polygons, which most of the time you don't see since the camera is behind her. Meanwhile the women in Planescape: Torment had FAR bigger tits but nobody complained about that. Because part of the reason to have big tits in low-rez games was so the tits would be visible at all.

    In Israel right now there is a law banning thin models. To protect the feelings of the whales. Because the only thin women are freaks who don't eat of course, not just a normal percentage of women who just happen to not overeat and have a natural slender built. To protect one groups feelings, another group is excluded. For every a-cup girl supposedly offended by doubt D Lara, there is a double D girl offended by every small titted heroine. Can't girls with big busts be heroes or are they condemned like blondes to always be stupid whores?

    HERE IS THE SECRET

    Every personality you see in the media, is a role. Doesn't matter whether you like said role or not. It is a role. Every actor acts a role defined by the writer. Media can NEVER show reality (which is why people who take 1984 as a prophecy as such idiots) because the writer WROTE everything as if he/she was god. A personality is self-destructive or succesful because the writer made it to be like that. In Far Cry 3 and the new Tomb Raider the "hero" goes from a snivelling coward to lean mean well adjusted killing machine because that was what the writers put in the plot. A different writer could just as easily have written a plot showing how both lapse into insanity. When backdraft was made, fire departments around the world saw an increase in volunteers and Pretty Woman has been claimed to have caused an increase in girls thinking prostitution always has an happy ending... for the girl. Mind you, the postman always ring twice didn't see more people wanting to be postman. Because the writers made on proffesion seem heroic while the other... wasn't. And many movies have shown hookers in bad light. The role an actor plays is not real.

    REAL people are often WAY more complex then can be put in a 1.5 hour movie. Lara Croft breasts are often the joke of back pains... and? This is well known among women and those who live in the same world as them. Breast reduction surgery does exist and STILL women with small breasts want to be sultry big bossomed and big breasted women want to be slender and cute. And men want big cocks despite most women not particularly liking to be stretched to wide or to deep while men with actual big penisses wish that girls wouldn't run out the door when they get naked. We all want what we can't have because SURELY the grass is greener on the other side, so we all climb the fence and never wonder why so many people are climbing the other way.

    BUT it is NOT the media's fault, it is our own.

    Take publicity shots for say Star Wars. You can probably find some of Carry Fisher in her metal bikini and say "fan service". That is because all the pictures of Harrison Ford strutting it, don't appeal to YOU. But they ARE fanservice to a LOT of women. You drooled over Leia, they drooled over Han. Or Luke. Or Obi-Wan... women are weird or Jabba... my gf picked me after all.

    You might think that a Lord of the Rings does not have much fanservice but just search the net. So... does that make the characters sex symbols? YES! Just not to you, but if SOMEONE drools over it, it is a sex symbol.

    Sex sells, it always has done and both genders lap it up.

    Sexism is only seeing it in one gender. Note the Israeli law on thin models ONLY applies to females. Because everyone knows bulemia

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:And? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2

      Seeing that a reasonable amount of your rant was about the Israel-bans-thin-models story:

      Note the Israeli law on thin models ONLY applies to females.

      According to abc new, the law "targets adults in general, [but] it is clearly aimed at female models."

      (I think that law btw, while possibly well-intentioned is not thought through & impossible to enforce.)

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:And? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh god, this is the same bullshit that willfully blind sexists like bleating about over and over again.
      The problem with sexism in our nerdy community is that we think that we're above it, so we spend a lot of time trying to justify the unjustifiable, or pin the blame back on women somehow, or claim that 'both sides got it'. It's not true, and you're too smart to claim ignorance.

      The Hulk or Superman aren't FEMALE sex fantasies, they're MALE power fantasies. The reason why men look the way they do in media--including Han Solo, incidentally--is because that's what sells TO MEN. For a long time, Men were effectively the only people spending large amounts of money, and they were the only demographic that mattered. (And, in a terrible twist of irony, when women claim to like comics or video games despite the shitty way they're generally portrayed, they get called 'fake nerds' or 'attention whores'.)

      You think Tomb Raider was somehow NOT marketed to men? You think the overt sexualisation of Cortana over the progression of Halo wasn't for the hetero men? Why the fuck does an AI need tits like that anyway?

      This is a classic example of a false equivalence. You're claiming a molehill is a mountain. Here's a comic strip for you that boils it down much faster than I can: http://www.shortpacked.com/2011/comic/book-13/05-the-death-of-snkrs/falseequivalence/

      The fact that there are now emerging some shows and movies that women can go to and get a bit of a sexy fix isn't a justification for the last 30 years of sexist video games. Anita Sarkeesian (who received death and rape threats for starting a kickstarter so she could make a video series about this sort of thing) just released her first video. Go watch it.
      http://tropesversuswomen.tumblr.com/
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X6p5AZp7r_Q

      Sex sells, yes. Sex and gender are deeply ingrained in our culture, yes. It doesn't mean that a bad or stilted view of sexuality is embedded in our culture. It doesn't mean we shouldn't change it.

      Man, I'm probably wasting my breath, but I'm 100% sick of this BS. I'm a dude. I'm hetero and white and I have all the privileges afforded to me simply by being those things and I'm really irritated that I still have to see stuff like this that makes no sense and seems only to exist so you don't have to feel bad about your part in how shitty things still are for women, even just in the media (before we get to all the other feminist issues surrounding equality of pay, access to health services, work, etc., etc.)

    3. Re:And? by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Israel right now there is a law banning thin models. To protect the feelings of the whales.

      I was in Israel for a couple of weeks, and didn't notice any land whales. I'd say Israelis are rather healthy-looking, both Jews as well as Arabs.

      But I did see land whales each of the three times I visited the US. It was the first (and so far, only) time in my life that I could behold examples of morbid obesity.

      But, carry on.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    4. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Hulk or Superman aren't FEMALE sex fantasies, they're MALE power fantasies.

      Except the GP didn't mention Hulk or Superman. I also think Han Solo is markedly different than the likes of Hulk or Superman, so I think it's disingenuous for you to lump them all together.

      For a long time, Men were effectively the only people spending large amounts of money, and they were the only demographic that mattered.

      That's because men were the ones EXPECTED to spend money. Being the bread winner and provider has been the traditional male role. Gender roles affects BOTH men and women.

      (And, in a terrible twist of irony, when women claim to like comics or video games despite the shitty way they're generally portrayed, they get called 'fake nerds' or 'attention whores'.)

      That's not irony. That's pointing out the truth. Liking something that portrays you like crap makes you a battered wife, not a nerd.

      Real nerds would do the geeky thing and hack their own comics and video games (as is the case of TFS).

      Anita Sarkeesian (who received death and rape threats for starting a kickstarter so she could make a video series about this sort of thing) just released her first video. Go watch it.

      This AC did watch it, but this AC also watched responses to her videos, and I can't honestly say I'm impressed by her or her work.

      As I said above, if women want more positive portrayals of women in video games, they can start their own game companies and make their own games (and some have done just that, I applaud them for their effort)

      You know, take that power into your own hands, instead of sitting there making youtube videos complaining like some damsel in distress waiting for some (probably male) game developer to listen to your pleas and oblige you with a game that portrays women positively?

      Likewise with the death and rape threats. In case you didn't know, Anita is quite keen at disabling comments and filtering out responses. She tries to block out the threats, but that only makes the trolls more motivated. Look up Streisand effect. I don't think she's stupid to not realize that, as she's smart enough to use these threats to garner sympathy - again, much like a damsel in distress

    5. Re:And? by Aglassis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I said above, if women want more positive portrayals of women in video games, they can start their own game companies and make their own games (and some have done just that, I applaud them for their effort)

      This post is a good example of blame shifting. By shifting the blame of sexism onto women who haven't made the non-sexist games, you think you can claim your hands are clean, right? So what do you say: "let the market decide! If sexism is bad then it will be uneconomical. We don't have to worry about that annoying subject called ethics." Heck, let's apply it in general. If LGBT people don't like negative portrayals in the media, they can just form their own media companies. If African Americans don't like racism, they can make their own media.

      What a great idea...NOT!

      Here's an alternate idea: assume that women are complete human beings and that sexism is wrong. And even if you are a man, realize that you probably have a sister, daughter, or niece who will see this sexist crap and see it as a red flag to stay in her assigned gender role...or else!

      Sexism is a type of bigotry. I know our culture has made it seem less damaging than racism, but really it is just as damaging. Just because sexism is largely accepted does not make it right.

      Here is a list of bigoted statements:
      * If those n*****s want to play golf, they should just build their own golf club
      * If those f**s want equal rights, they should move to San Francisco
      * If those b*****s want to play our sexist games, they can start their own game companies

      Yeah, I know, sexist video games aren't the greatest form of bigotry that exists. But it is a type of bigotry. And it should be resisted.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    6. Re:And? by Aglassis · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I know, complain about sexism on Slashdot and your will get modded into the floor. I've been here long enough that I should have known to post as AC. Oh well, bye, bye, karma.

      As a Slashdot greybeard, I've had enough discussions to know why this occurs. There is a group of gamers who are highly introverted and who have been repeatedly rejected by women for much of their lives. They are similar to the hikikomari subculture in Japan. For them, games are an outlet to live out their fantasies. If you talk to people on 4chan, they refer to hyper-sexualized fantasy characters as being "2D" or "mai waifu". There are even discussions on 2D dating (in case you are confused, this means having an imaginary date with a fantasy character).

      Recently, Anita Sarkeesian provoked their ire by doing nothing, but scaring them that she would attack their 2D fantasies. The coordinated response was massive, and the level of paranoia skyrocketed. Even today, on sites like Slashdot, anybody who is seen as a threat to their subculture and fantasies is ruthlessly attacked. While the attacks by the hikikimori-like subculture has just been rage, ordinary misogynists have grabbed onto their coattails to spread their hate as well (like benspurr with his beat up Anita Sarkeesian game).

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    7. Re:And? by lgw · · Score: 3

      Here's a list of bigoted statements:

      * Women are frail flowers who can't look after themselves, and need to be protected from bad media.
      * Blacks are poor victims who can't look after themselves, and need to be protected from bad media.
      * Gays are wimpy effiminate types, and therefore just like women can't look after themselves, and need to be protected from bad media.

      How about we just accept that the meaning of "adult" is "able to look after oneself in the harsh worl we inhabit, and don't need your protection"? How about we stop explaining to people that they are helpless victims?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:And? by Aglassis · · Score: 2

      Do you have no problem about golf courses, housing, employment, etc., discriminating against African Americans because they are adults? And do you have no problem about people discriminating against LGBT persons because they are adults?

      At what point do you think adults should ignore discrimination and at what point do you think they should act?

      It may be a harsh world, but it is a hell of a lot less harsh when you don't have to deal with bigotry.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    9. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This post is a good example of blame shifting. By shifting the blame of sexism onto women who haven't made the non-sexist games, you think you can claim your hands are clean, right?

      My post has nothing to do with blame. My post is about responsibility and independence.

      Have you seen Sarkeesian's new video? It's about damsels in distress - women who are portrayed as powerless, waiting for some male protagonist to rescue them from their problems.

      By the same principle, I'm suggesting women to stop acting powerless and become independent (ie. their own game makers). Stop waiting for the existing male-dominated industry to address their problems.

      Heck, let's apply it in general

      No, let's not. My comment is for this specific issue, where the very complaint is that women are depicted as powerless, unable to solve their own problems.

      What would you suppose we do? Legislate and forcefully shut down sexist video games and their makers? Who's going to do that? The MALE dominated government, with MALE dominated lawyers, executed by MALE dominated police? That kinda defeats the purpose

      Here's an alternate idea: assume that women are complete human beings and that sexism is wrong.

      That IS my idea! I assume women are complete human beings, capable of handling the responsibility of solving their own problems. Stop waiting for existing male-dominated game developers to change their minds (they are, as you said, just following the free market. You'll be waiting for a long time).

      And even if you are a man, realize that you probably have a sister, daughter, or niece who will see this sexist crap and see it as a red flag to stay in her assigned gender role...or else!

      Which is precisely why I encourage women to step OUTSIDE of their assigned roles, and become game developers and company owners.

      Here is a list of bigoted statements:
      * If those n*****s want to play golf, they should just build their own golf club
      * If those f**s want equal rights, they should move to San Francisco
      * If those b*****s want to play our sexist games, they can start their own game companies

      Then it's a good thing I didn't make those statements.

      I should note that all those groups (blacks, homosexuals, women) did in fact take matters into their own hands. Heard of MLK? Rosa Parks? The Civic Rights movement? Pride parades? Women's suffrage?

      The people being oppressed themselves marched and protested. They put their own lives on the line to get their equality.

      I'm simply suggesting today's feminists follow their mothers and sisters that came before them.

      Yeah, I know, sexist video games aren't the greatest form of bigotry that exists. But it is a type of bigotry. And it should be resisted.

      Sure! Now ask yourself: so how likely is it that the existing, male-dominated, free market minded game developers will start resisting?

      Let's pretend for a moment that you are right, and I'm just blame shifting. Ok, so it's up to "me" to do something? But hey - I'm supposedly just a sexist bigot. Why would I do anything? You're leaving your (women's) fate into my hands, and you are painting me as the bad guy.

      Ask yourself: would a bad guy care about you or the women?

    10. Re:And? by Cederic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Hulk or Superman aren't FEMALE sex fantasies, they're MALE power fantasies.

      Oh, ok. That's not sexist at all then.

      Hang on - I'm a man, and I don't fantasise about being muscle-bound and powerful. Stop fucking stereotyping me you sexist cunt.

      (before we get to all the other feminist issues surrounding equality of pay, access to health services, work, etc., etc.)

      ..and life expectancy, retirement age on a state pension (in the UK), equality of childbirth time off work, custody and access to children following divorce, safety from assault, legalised workplace discrimination against me, etc., etc.

      Don't fucking pretend it's all one-way traffic.

      Trust me, I think equality's a fantastic ideal. I'd love to get some.

  20. Actually I suspect it was more a case of... by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... dad had a convenient excuse to spend some quality time hacking.

    Wife: Hey, why the fsck are you still sitting in front of that computer, its 1am! You love that thing more than me. I'm sick of it! Come to bed and treat me like a woman!

    Dad: I'm giving matriachal empowerment to the characterisation of this game for the sake of our daughters self esteem.

    Wife: Oh , well, ok then! Night!

    Dad: Heh , sucker. Now, lets see what this ISR does...

  21. Re:If you're going to defeat a 10 foot gorilla by auLucifer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you seen what women carry in their handbags? I'd rather be hit with a mallet than whatever they're hiding in there!

    --
    If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
  22. Re: What do you do? by Eraesr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah sure, blah blah blah.
    He hasn't actually released the modified game and big gaming corporations don't give a fuck about a dad hacking a 30 year old game this way to make his daughter happy. To "squash" this, a corp needs to spend more money than it's worth, so they're not going to do a thing about it. Simple as that.

  23. Re:Why is this necessary? by somersault · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guessed as soon as I saw her name mentioned as the writer for Overlord. It was a lot of the reason I even tried the game. Safe to say, I think Terry's sense of humour has rubbed off on her :)

    --
    which is totally what she said
  24. Re:Out of the woodwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This dad did what feminists can't be arsed to do, he worked long hours past midnight to change a game so it was more of her daughter's liking, instead of bitching about it for years without doing anything.

    It would have been a better story if her daughter made the hack herself instead of having to manipulate a man to get her wish, but that can be excused by her little age.

  25. Re:Why is this necessary? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They aren't buff like that to entice females or gay males to play, they're buff like that as a kind of ego fantasy for the males that buy those games. They aren't sex objects.

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  26. Re:Gender roles by nametaken · · Score: 2

    This is all anyone needed to say about this story.

  27. Who is this...Mario? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The three characters are Pauline, Donkey Kong (now Cranky Kong), and Jump Man.

  28. Re:If you're going to defeat a 10 foot gorilla by geminidomino · · Score: 2

    I have it on good authority that the Queen carries a brick in hers.

  29. In other news ... by moeinvt · · Score: 2

    Members of PETA hacked the game to make the human the villain and the monkey the hero.

    Oh, wait...

  30. Re:Out of the woodwork by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The whole point of this story is to stir up the sexism shrieker shitstorm. You take that aspect out, and there's no reason for it to be posted.

    It would just be a combination of headlines: "This dad loves his daughter" (Also not newsworthy to anyone other than the gender warriors) and "Guy does something only marginally more complicated than hex editing 'File Manager' title bar to display 'File Mangler'"

  31. Re:Out of the woodwork by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There IS sexism in games. To claim otherwise is to ignore the reality of the world.

    What is great about this story is that this is how sexism ENDS. It's about little steps that fathers take for their daughters, mothers for their sons, and people for one another.

    This is a feminist act because all it does is try to make a girl feel happy about the games that she plays, so that she doesn't feel excluded or lesser just because she's a girl. That's all that feminism is.

    The guy wants what's best for his daughter and he's willing to go to lengths to achieve it. He was able to do something, so he did. If everyone else did the same, we wouldn't need feminism--equality would already be here.

  32. Re:Out of the woodwork by hackula · · Score: 2

    Despite what Rush Limbaugh might have you believe about what "Feminazis" look like, this dad IS a feminist pretty much by definition. Yes, some feminist are the shrill morons that you might picture, but most are just people (men and women) who stand by the belief that people should not be limited by their gender.

  33. Re:Why is this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They aren't sex objects.

    Speak for yourself. Kratos can dominate me any day *purrrr*.

  34. Re:Gender roles by alva_edison · · Score: 4, Informative

    I see gender roles are still alive and well, with Pauline using pink umbrella's and pink handbags in her quest to defeat Donkey Kong...

    Has no one actually played Donkey Kong? Those were from the original game as the icons for bonus points. They were Pauline's items that she tossed for Mario to pick up. If he were going to really flip that aspect, he should change the color/style on the umbrella, and maybe make the purse a lunch pail or something. But that's more sprite editing.

    --
    He effected a bored affect.
  35. Book covers by phorm · · Score: 2

    I'm fairly sure that cheap "romance" novels aren't marketed at men... but the covers on those are fairly oversexualized as well.
    As for the big bulky superheroes... my wife was pretty happy with the scene where "Thor" went shirtless, so I'd say that's not "just for men" either.

  36. Re:Why is this necessary? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    I'm waiting for the release of "Tomb Raider: Quest for Luggage".

  37. "these guys" already have that version of DK by supervico · · Score: 2