Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How To Donate Older Computers to Charity?

yanom writes "My school gave me several circa-2006 computers with no operating system. I fixed them up, and now they run Lubuntu fairly well, making them great internet/LibreOffice/general Linux workstations. I've been wanting to donate them to local nonprofits where they'll go to good use — for example, I've already given several to a local church for them to use in their afterschool care/tutoring program. However, I'm having trouble finding other places where these machines could go to good use. How should I best conduct this search? How can I find nonprofits that could benefit from these workstations?"

170 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. 2006? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are they P4 or Core processors? If they are P4, just recycle them.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:2006? by Splat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your kind of thought process is exactly the problem. A P4 system is perfectly usable given the correct software configuration, and as timothy already stated they're working well enough running Lubuntu to be a basic word processing/information device. Just because it's not the newest technology doesn't mean it's trash. There are plenty of people out there who would be perfectly well served by a basic computer that can run a web browser to look up information, and type up emails on it.

    2. Re:2006? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An IBM 5150 is perfectly usable given the correct software configuration. Usable for what, is the question. A 3ghz P4 isn't even fast enough to play flash video smoothly these days.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:2006? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      His point was probably about power usage.

    4. Re:2006? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? I JUST replaced a 10 year old 3GHz P4 with an i7. I've been playing a lot of modern FPS games just fine on it. Problems with flash? Give me a break!

    5. Re:2006? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      P4's cost a lot to run. I measured a basic P4 machine the other day and it was drawing around 140 watts at idle. My core i5 Macbook Pro was only drawing around 11 watts. For some it would be cheaper to just buy a lower powered machine than to pay the electricity bill on a P4.

    6. Re:2006? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nothing plays flash video smoothly, and flash is proud of that.

    7. Re:2006? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Underclock, undervolt, use a non-resource-hungry distribution of Lignux?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:2006? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I did some research on this around Y2K timeframe. My company was throwing away pallets worth of computers that didn't handle the changeover properly. Perfectly functional and usable, but just didn't meet their requirements. I was amazed how many charities didn't want slightly older computers. They listed their minimum specs and

      I don't know the reasons but what would realistically be a perfect computer for low income or otherwise disadvantaged people just isn't something even charities are willing to spend the resources to deal with.

      A more extreme example would be Africa. There millions of people in Africa who live in modern cities who could use any of the US's castoff computers. But the costs of transporting them make it completely unfeasible to ship them for the worth/value.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    9. Re:2006? by Belial6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Giving a P4 to the poor is evil. The cost of running it can easily cost more than a brand new computer.

    10. Re:2006? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      "...minimum specs and they just outright wouldn't take them."

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    11. Re:2006? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's one in my house with XP, Adobe Flash, and maybe an nVidia 6800? Stutters constantly. I suppose it might have more to do with flash not liking the video driver, than the hardware itself not being fast enough. But it's got the most current versions of the drivers available, so considered as a system it's crap.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:2006? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Key word: buy.

      Many nonprofits AND even individuals and businesses DON'T have the budget to buy new computers. They might not even have the budget to buy older computers! 2006 is certainly new enough to run and benefit lots of folks. Paying a minor bit for an electric bill over time is not something they usually consider, and in a number of cases, they may not even be paying for electric in the facilities they make their offices in.

      I know nonprofits where 2006 would definitely be an upgrade over what they are currently running! (I was actually about to go solicit donations for them today..)

      If you want to buy some nonprofits new Macs, let me give you my contact info..

    13. Re:2006? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Isn't Africa where all those "recycled" computers end up anyway?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:2006? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      No, a P4 is not perfectly usable. Not unless it was one of the rare breed that came with 2 cores or one of the rarer SMP setups with two chips.

      There's a huge and noticeable difference in responsiveness between the old single-core P4s and the slightly newer (2006-onward) chips that are dual-core. Multi-core chips and multi-CPU setups age well, single-core chips never have.

      In fact, multiple core systems age so well that we immediately jumped on them (AMD X2 64bit) back in 2006 when they started dropping below $200. Those 2006-2007 era machines are still very viable, although we're in the process of refreshing them with Win7, 4GB RAM (or 6-8GB) and Intel 330 SSD series drives. We expect to keep using those 2007 era machines up through 2015-2017 unless something breaks horribly on them.

      Total cost for the refresh was $75 for the SSD, about $150 for the Win7 Pro upgrade license and $30 in RAM. Which gets us machines that can probably run another 3-6 years. Better then spending $500 or so on a new white box, and the SSDs were optional (but we got a good price on 120GB units).

      Starting around 2014-2016, we'll likely replace them with 4-8 core machines at higher clock rates, more RAM, new SSDs, etc. and go another 10 years. Which might end up just being an operating system install and motherboard / CPU / RAM swap.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    15. Re:2006? by Grisstle · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Your kind of thought process is exactly the problem. A P4 system is perfectly usable given the correct software configuration" As a person supporting a not for profit, I wouldn't touch a 7 year old computer and deal with the issues involved. Sorry, we get plenty of 3 year old computers donated or offered regularly so we don't need someones ancient crap. A 7 year old computer brings all the issues of lack of available replacement parts, lack of drivers and poor performance and to boot they usually look like shit. 5 years is the cutoff, I wouldn't touch a computer older than that if I have to support it for day to day use by people who are not me.

    16. Re:2006? by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really, there's subsidies for power in many places and rarely if ever is there a subsidy for a new computer.

      What's more, cash flow is an issue, it might cost more in the long run, but some people only have a few bucks a month and need the computer now. Getting a free or cheap computer that costs a couple bucks more a month in the long run might just be what they have to put up with.

      The people who are getting these computers are frequently in a position where they can't save money either way because they have none. Yes, it would be better for them to not spend the extra money, but they don't necessarily have the luxury of money sitting around to buy a new computer when their current one breaks either.

    17. Re:2006? by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're spoiled then. The non-profits around here gladly take any computers that they're given. Some get recycled and others get refurbished, but they aren't in the position of refusing to take a computer just because it's 5 years old.

      The thing they won't take for free though is CRTs. Those things are expensive to recylcle because of all the toxic chemicals and it's getting to the point where those old 14" LCDs are flooding the gap that cheap CRTs vacated.

    18. Re:2006? by Splat · · Score: 1

      A full, true, Raspberry pi setup that could replace a computer (including a case + power supply + sd card, etc) will run you around $85. There's not $85 of scrap value in an old P4 unfortunately.

      ExtremeTech did an article on this:
      http://www.extremetech.com/computing/148482-the-true-cost-of-a-raspberry-pi-is-more-than-you-think

      There's been many valid points made here about the long term costs of power consumption versus the short term upfront costs of new hardware investment. Unfortunately the issue with most non-profits is they don't have the upfront capital to invest in say 50 Raspberry Pi systems, but they can easily spread out the power consumption over the long term of 50 P4's (as inefficient as they are - agreed!) through operating expenses.

    19. Re:2006? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was asia myself, but either way, they don't end up there in a usable state do they? i.e. it's landfill isn't it?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    20. Re:2006? by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      With multiple machines, that electricity bill quickly goes up by hundreds... its a key difference between residential computer use and business.

    21. Re:2006? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it will play it..

      And I didn't realize you *needed* flash video to do these things for most tasks:

      - write emails
      - surf the web
      - use desktop productivity software

      which are the basic tasks that most people *need* a computer for (eg. for getting work done, and learning skills that will get them a job)

    22. Re:2006? by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      except that electricity is only 6-12 cents a kilowatt hour. So for a huge portion of users that might only need the thing to be on an hour or two per day why they check some websites, and handle e-mails; its not an issue.

      Yes if its a machine that you use all day, or is on all the time power efficiency matters on the bottom line, but its simply not the case for equipment that gets less run time, even if its one the bottom end of power efficiency (within the context of PCs and Laptops).

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    23. Re:2006? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Problem in Africa: electricity to run them. The cities are sorta modern, but in the bush...

    24. Re:2006? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      It's not bad. I have a P4 from 2005 w/ Windows XP sitting under my desk for legacy support. I use it to browse from time to time, it's fine for that.

      It's better than nothing: a homeless shelter could probably use a couple just so they can search for jobs and such, or send emails to their relatives. A P4 with Windows XP or some flavor of Linux can do that just fine.

      As a gift to a relative or something, it's probably worthless unless they don't have a PC or they decide to give their teenager a PC for homework (and no gaming).

      But as a true donation, it has its uses.

    25. Re:2006? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      The difference being that the cost to run the older equipment is spread out over time (at no interest). How many poor people can afford $500 (a modest computer price) in one go (and still eat and pay the bills). What's the monthly cost in electricity of a free but inefficient computer?

      Options for the original poster:
      Look for charities that don't get a lot of government funding. Those are the ones that are probably hurting the most. Battered women's shelters are probably funded better than a food bank. An HIV clinic is probably funded better than a private animal rescue. Etc.

    26. Re:2006? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Which is why I *only* mentioned the people living in the cities...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    27. Re:2006? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're a fool.

      I volunteer at a local recycling center. We regularly get in P4 systems. We refurbish(read test and make sure they meet a minimum hardware spec) the systems and install Ubuntu on them before handing them out to folks. Not had one machine come back for being slow.

    28. Re:2006? by Looker_Device · · Score: 1

      There millions of people in Africa who live in modern cities who could use any of the US's castoff computers

      My understanding is that the big problem is Africa is electricity. Even in the big cities, it's pretty unreliable. That's why cells and tablets are so much more popular there. Even if a desktop were much cheaper up front, it wouldn't be of much use in a place where the power is constantly going out.

      --
      Your political party doesn't care about your rights and only represents corporate interests.
    29. Re:2006? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      With multiple machines, that electricity bill quickly goes up by hundreds... its a key difference between residential computer use and business.

      I don't think it's as bad as you suggest. The amount of energy, and thus cost, does increase with the number of machines you're running. But the amount of money you don't spend by getting an older donated machine vs. buying a new one also goes up by the number of machines you're running.

      My QaD estimate of energy costs per older machine using the 140W figure above would be around $30/year/machine with electricity at $0.11/kWh, assuming the machines are only turned on during the work day. If you wanted to leave them on full time, then multiply that by about 4.

      Average power consumption might be a little above the "idle" power draw, this would be an interesting experiment for someone with a kill-a-watt and an old P4 to measure that.

      So if you had to spend $1000 to buy a more efficient computer, your payback time could be 4 - 12 years -- assuming your not-for-profit had the capital lying around in the first place to buy new.

      But no matter what I say -- or any of us here -- you've got to run the numbers for the exact situation you're considering to make a good judgement.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    30. Re:2006? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      Giving a P4 to the poor is evil. The cost of running it can easily cost more than a brand new computer.

      If you run the numbers, you might be surprised.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    31. Re:2006? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Then my point stands. If they're being destructed for scrap, they are 'landfill' and not useable.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    32. Re:2006? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      A fair point. But with necessity being the mother of invention, many people in such situations have lots of macgyvered solutions to variable mains power.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    33. Re:2006? by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Yeah, there's one in my house with XP, Adobe Flash, and maybe an nVidia 6800? Stutters constantly. I suppose it might have more to do with flash not liking the video driver, than the hardware itself not being fast enough. But it's got the most current versions of the drivers available, so considered as a system it's crap.

      Try IE and the ActiveX Flash Plugin. It's usually a nudge faster than other browsers.

    34. Re:2006? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Try the YouTube+ app for Windows 8 Modern UI. It uses video overlay to play the videos (just like MPlayer) and thus is much faster than Flash plugin. Has very smooth UI too.

    35. Re:2006? by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      You can't compare a laptop to a desktop.

      Laptops are designed from the ground up to be as cool-running, quiet, and energy efficient as possible (usually to the point of being underpowered) in order to have a decent amount of on-battery running time. Desktops don't have this limitation and tend to focus more on raw performance and price, with much less consideration for heat output and energy efficiency.

      Go measure a P4 laptop, and you will get a much more reasonable comparison (granted, the macbook pro will still probably beat it by 15-30 watts, but it's a lot better than the 129 watt difference you got before).

      Alternately, go test a G4 tower (if you can find one that still works) and compare THAT to the 140 watt P4 desktop

    36. Re:2006? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      My office was junking what turned out to be Core 2 Duos, and so were many other companies like us in our town, so a non profit called Free IT came into existence specifically to process donated/recycled computers into something usable and then give them away. We pull the hard drives from most of ours, however, so I expect most of ours are eventually being pried apart for the processors and RAM. (The policy of pulling hard drives came after an incident in which the company's donation warehouse was broken into and one of our donated computers ended up on someone's lawn. We had DBAN'd the hard drive but it once held medical data and that was very bad juju at that point.)

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    37. Re:2006? by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      It's not bad. I have a P4 from 2005 w/ Windows XP sitting under my desk for legacy support. I use it to browse from time to time, it's fine for that.

      Huh. The one I'm typing this on is an AMD64 from 2005. I use it for anything from programming to image editing to ... well, anything except running Windows. It's low-power and silent; around 2005 the manufacturers finally realized that people wanted those things. What possible reasons could I have to spend money (and scarce natural resources) on a new one?

    38. Re:2006? by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      My neice registered for the SATs online a week or so ago.

      Requirements include Flash, to upload a file (picture of yourself... dosn't use a webcam, just for the file selection dialog...)
      and a treekiller (printer) because you need to bring the printout to the test with you.

    39. Re:2006? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Your average homeless shelter could make good use of these machines- if only to use them as resume and internet job search machines.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    40. Re:2006? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      XP is your issue, not flash. Upgrade to a linux distro.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    41. Re:2006? by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      > A 3ghz P4 isn't even fast enough to play flash video smoothly these days.

      It most certainly is. Maybe not at HD resolutions, but SD works fine. My mom uses an old 2.6GHz P4 that was my main machine for a while. Runs XP home and Chrome - does everything she wants.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    42. Re:2006? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If you run the numbers, you might be surprised.

      I had a P4 2.6 GHz SOHO server (1 hard drive) that cost $50/mo to run. My total household electric bill was typically $95-$115 before and after that machine.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    43. Re:2006? by westlake · · Score: 1

      The non-profits around here gladly take any computers that they're given. Some get recycled and others get refurbished, but they aren't in the position of refusing to take a computer just because it's 5 years old.

      That may be true where you stand, but the NPO I know best had to put the brakes on --- gently but firmly reminding would-be donors that it was not a trash heap and not in the recycling business.

    44. Re:2006? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why do you need to play video? If it's for charitable purposes there can be all sorts of things it is useful for. Ie, for a day care center you could use it for some educational games, email client, tracking expenses, etc.

      Now most schools don't like to get this sort of charity unless it's a brand new computer. They don't like the additional work and expense to maintain stuff. But some charitable institutions might be interested as long as the machine is properly refurbished. Putting Linux on it is iffy, since that means if something breaks the donater is on the hook for support, kind of sad but that's how it is.

    45. Re:2006? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      XP is your issue, not flash. Upgrade to a linux distro.

      Indeed. This post is written on a 2004 laptop with a 1.7GHz Celeron processor. It has a Mobility Radeon 9600 with WUXGA display and 1GB of RAM (does not support more), but the HD was upgraded a few years ago. It's almost 9 years old, but runs fine with Xubuntu 12.04, and has had different flavors of Ubuntu/Xubuntu since the beta of Breezy. Oh, and flash works fine here. So does Libre Office, and Gimp, and Geeqie, and Inkscape, and Thunderbird, and Handbrake, and Xcas, and various browsers and so on.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    46. Re:2006? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Because it is an expense to the charity. Someone has to maintain and support them. The employees have to use them as well. Now some charities may have a volunteer geek setting up some servers who's willing to integrate these machines, but that would be rare. Instead what you've got is either Linux which will not be well received (their employees won't know how to use it) or will run some older version of Windows (also not well received). If nothing else is wrong, there's still a big question about how long the used/discarded computer going to actually last, and whether it's going to break down or require support during a critical moment.

      Imagine if you had some old office chairs and work, mostly pretty good but with some rips in the fabric or it doesn't roll or in some other way unsuitable for a modern office environment. Give it to a charity and the first thing they'll think is that it's barely suitable for their office environment either. They don't want to greet the new paid employee and say "here's your broken chair and Windows XP computer, welcome to the team".

      It is sad because these computers aren't useless. However practically speaking they are useless if you give them to someone who isn't going to be able to use or maintain them. Cash to buy an inexpensive new computer that comes with warranty will always be far more appreciated. However if the donater is willing to provide maintenance and support for these computers as well, then maybe the picture changes.

    47. Re:2006? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      > Average power consumption might be a little above the "idle" power draw, this would be an interesting experiment for someone with a kill-a-watt and an old P4 to measure that.

      The things I do for people.:) I've got a gizmo similar to a kill-a-watt and a P4 (1 HDD, 1 gig of DDR RAM, GeForce 4 MX 440 vidcard - so it was something of a gaming rig in its day). Booting it peaked at 150W (and I can make it hit 130-140W JUST by running a Malwarebytes scan) but idling at the XP desktop it's sitting steady at 95W.

      Copying a benchmark program off LAN and installing it: 115W
      Cussing because I grabbed a benchmarker that needs C++ redistributables I don't have handy: 0W
      Burn in test V6: CPU, RAM, HDD, 2D and 3D Video @75%: 150W steady with spikes of 165W
      Shutdown: About 140W from time desktop vanished to power-off.

      OS, at least within Microsoft, doesn't make much difference: My P4 is dual boot, and Windows 98 looked to be within 5W of XP's numbers all the way through. Though I skipped the benchmarking as I'm not filled with quite that much self-loathing.

    48. Re:2006? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Tell them to turn them off when they aren't using them. It's a charity so it's not like they are going to turn them into Minecraft servers (most likely). If it's not running 24/7 the payoff of a free P4 versus buying something that might use less power is going to be measured in years.

    49. Re:2006? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Presumably that computer was on 24/7. Even so, at the rates I pay that's about a 500W server, which is a lot for a single CPU, since drive server. Assuming the computers are only on a few hours a day on average, the cost of the electricity isn't going to be a huge factor even over several years. Which will likely be longer than the useful life of a computer that's already seven years old.

    50. Re:2006? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Those P4's almost certainly have hyperthreading. While hyperthreading is no substitute for a second core for things like encoding video and playing games, it'll do just fine on a machine used for browsing the internet and office work. For that reason, I don't really consider a P4 "slow" unless it's one of the earlier chips without hyperthreading. If they are LGA775 there is always the possibility of throwing in a modern, cheap PCI-E graphics card which can help with things too.

    51. Re:2006? by robertinventor · · Score: 1

      Computers for Africa accept P4s according to their website: http://www.computers4africa.org.uk/give/index.php?page=Accepted%20Equipment

    52. Re:2006? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? I JUST replaced a 10 year old 3GHz P4 with an i7. I've been playing a lot of modern FPS games just fine on it. Problems with flash? Give me a break!

      This. The computer on my desk at work is an Athlon 64 3700 that I built eight or nine years ago as a MythTV box. It's now running WinXP SP3, VS 2008 SP1, and other such things. Video has been provided by a succession of nVidia cards—a 5200, a 7300, and now a 9500GT.

      On the rare occasions I've needed it to play Flash, it's handled it just fine. I also have an old notebook with a Core Solo T1300 and integrated Intel graphics...definitely not a powerhouse, yet it has no issues with Flash either. (It runs Gentoo Linux, FWIW.) If you can't get Flash running right on a 3-GHz P4, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  2. Install Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't care if this looks like a troll. I am a professional Linux developer, but I'm under no delusion that the general public is comfortable using Linux for general purpose stuff. The kind of people using computers at non-profits will just lost interest in a state of WTF if you put them in front of a Lubuntu machine. They'll just want Windows or Apple.

    1. Re:Install Windows XP by Nimey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fuck that. In about a year WinXP will no longer get security updates, so you'd be handing the recipients a ticking bomb unless they're kept off the Internet.

      Install a distro with an easy UI like Mint-MATE and they'll do just fine, really.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Install Windows XP by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are right that the general public isn't comfortable using Linux. Unfortunately, you falsely imply that they are comfortable using Windows. The vast majority of people who would be in a position to go to a library or Non-Profit don't know the difference. Point them to the little icon that launches firefox and/or chromium and not only is it true that they couldn't care less if it is Linux or Windows, it is also true that they have no idea that it isn't Windows.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Install Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Download Xange. They'll swear it's Vista. Look at this.

    4. Re:Install Windows XP by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are right that the general public isn't comfortable using Linux.

      Just tell them it's "Android for PCs".

    5. Re:Install Windows XP by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      not only is it true that they couldn't care less if it is Linux or Windows, it is also true that they have no idea that it isn't Windows.

      ... until someone sends them a Word document and it doesn't display correctly; or they want to print something and can't get their printer to work and the support people can't figure out why the Windows printer driver won't install. :^(

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    6. Re:Install Windows XP by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      They have that now, you know.

      Not sure how well it would run on an old P4, tho...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Install Windows XP by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      "... until someone sends them a Word document and it doesn't display correctly;"

      That problem already exists in Windows. Word does not render consistently across multiple versions of Word. Open Office display them just as accurately (The content is all there, but it isn't rendered identically as the composing system)

      " or they want to print something and can't get their printer to work and the support people can't figure out why the Windows printer driver won't install"

      I don't think you quite understand how this works. People don't bring in their own printers. They use the one that is already set up and configured.

      If you put a decent distribution like Mandriva or Magiea on the system there is a wonderful little GUI tool for a system administrator to use in the unlikely event they need to replace the one they are using, and the drivers all get installed automagically in most cases as well.

      Finally, just as they have to call a competent person when all else fails in a Windows environment, they simply need to do the same with Linux. Your assumption that they don't have the same issues with Windows is mistaken. I have a system in the building right now (Windows 7) that tries and fails to install HP Pinter software every time you boot it. Your belief that Windows "just works" and Linux "is hard" is based on your ignorance, not experience and a solid grasp on reality.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re:Install Windows XP by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They have that now, you know.

      Yes, I did know. But if If they knew the difference between Ubuntu and Android, you wouldn't need to dumb it down.

      We got an old Dell laptop for my daughter, it came with a locked-down corporate install of Vista. After a few hours wrestling with trying to configure it I said fuck it and just put Ubuntu on it and it "just worked" immediately. Predictably, she complained about the funny looking apps but has learnt to use it. Even Libre Office for schoolwork. And now she has an Android phone, she has rooted it so she can install some of the same utilities she has on the laptop... So there is crossover.

    9. Re:Install Windows XP by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Anecdote == awesome, dude.

      Dig the "trial by fire" method of introducing your progeny to Linux. Sink or swim, amirite?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:Install Windows XP by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      But if If they knew the difference between Ubuntu and Android, you wouldn't need to dumb it down.

      One OS comes from a company professing to not be evil, but wants to monitor your search and purchasing habits in order to serve you ads and the other company is ... um ... Wait, what?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:Install Windows XP by taz346 · · Score: 1

      Ah, another AC who feels a compulsion to comment despite an obvious lack of knowledge. "Say whatever you want about Windows and security?" OK, using an old obsolete OS like XP will give you a crippled computer that won't work very well, will rapidly become even more useless, and will likely result in any data you put on it ending up lost or corrupted. And it will cost you a small fortune to buy all the software you'll need to make your "free" donated computer usable. I'm not a geek, but I've used only Linux for years, exchange documents and files with Mac and Windows users constantly, haven't had anything "break," don't worry about security and viruses, and enjoy regularly updated software. Oh, and it's cost me nothing.

    12. Re:Install Windows XP by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yes. Really. Your link to a quote from Miguel de Icaza would be an off-topic troll even if it wasn't about moving to Mac OS X when the discussion was about Windows and if it "just works" better than Linux.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:Install Windows XP by taz346 · · Score: 1

      Well, I know that about a year from now MS will stop providing security and software updates for XP. And I know that just putting XP ($46), MS Office ($150) and anti-virus software ($44) on an old computer will cost $240. And that's if you don't want a decent graphics editor or things like publishing software, which will cost you more. Not really a "free" donation then, is it? It's like giving someone a car that's going to immediately cost them a bunch of money for repairs and insurance and then will quit running entirely in the near future and won't be resellable for anything but scrap. Um, no thanks.

    14. Re:Install Windows XP by westlake · · Score: 1

      You are right that the general public isn't comfortable using Linux. Unfortunately, you falsely imply that they are comfortable using Windows. The vast majority of people who would be in a position to go to a library or Non-Profit don't know the difference....

      This --- to put it charitably --- is fantasy.

      The MSDOS and Windows eco-system is 31 years old.

      The software used in-house by the library or NPO will almost certainly have been built within that system.

      MS Office is a given --- but there are countless other examples, some of them very arcane and unexpected --- and you are not employable even as a senior volunteer unless you are comfortable with the Windows OS and Windows software.

      There isn't a public school, library, community college, state employment service or senior center within 75 miles of here that hasn't offered introductory courses or more advanced training in Windows and MS Office, and some of these programs are twenty years old now.

      The message --- and it comes across loud and clear to anyone listening --- is that employers demand and expect that you will have these skills.

      If you looking at something for home use, the refurbished Windows 7 desktop with free in-store pickup starts at $160 at Walmart.com. Machines in the class will run Office 365 and pretty much everything available in FOSS for Windows without the least bit of trouble, along with 500 or so dirt-cheap games from Gog,com.

    15. Re:Install Windows XP by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "This --- to put it charitably --- is fantasy ... The MSDOS and Windows eco-system is 31 years old."

      I work with several Non-Profits and know hundreds of people who use the Library computers, and get questioned by one or more daily. I assure you it is not "fantasy". If you ask people what Windows is, they can't tell you. When you explain to them it is an operating system, they will look at you with a dull questioning demeanor. .... and the Linux eco-system is more than 15 years old, so what is your point. Are you really telling me that Windows 8 is in some way similar to MS-DOS, or even Windows 7 for that matter?

      "The message --- and it comes across loud and clear to anyone listening --- is that employers demand and expect that you will have these skills."

      As an expert in the field with a very solid Windows and Linux background who deals with such people every day, I can assure you that those employers, while loudly proclaiming the need for said skills, do not posses them themselves, and lack the ability to differentiate between someone who is an expert in the Windows world and one who merely knows how to start up Word, Excel, and Internet Exploder.

      "If you looking at something for home use, the refurbished Windows 7 desktop with free in-store pickup starts at $160 at Walmart.com. "

      Yes, I'll put Windows 7 on the Circa 2006 machines the OP is asking about right away and let you know how that works out ... ROTFLMAO.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re:Install Windows XP by Nimey · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but I've got some 2006 machines in production with 32- and 64-bit Win7 and they perform adequately.

      A typical example is a Dell Optiplex GX620 with a 3GHz Pentium-D, 2GB of RAM, and the onboard 945 chipset graphics. Not a speed demon by any means but it'll run Office and a web browser, which is what most of my users have anyway.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    17. Re:Install Windows XP by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Many of these computers just end up in a corner unused. My father was a school teacher, and back before computers were household items, they'd get some computers donated. Sometimes they'd get computers as part of a budget too. Inevitably though they'd end up unused. Maybe one was broken and no one knew how to fix it, or there was no real plan on how to actually use the computers (still a problem even today).

      The best bet I think is that if it targets a really small charity or a home business (day care) that doesn't have a computer. Give them a computer and offer to maintain it. Then where they used to have no email access at all, now they've got something useful.

    18. Re:Install Windows XP by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      People don't bring in their own printers. They use the one that is already set up and configured.

      Of course people bring in their own printers. They go to the store, find a cheap computer for sale (no printer included), and they buy it and figure they'll get a printer when they see one for sale cheap. Or they already have a printer at home they want to use, so they don't want to buy a new one. Or the printer breaks, and they need to replace it.

      Finally, just as they have to call a competent person when all else fails in a Windows environment, they simply need to do the same with Linux. Your assumption that they don't have the same issues with Windows is mistaken.

      I never assumed that -- you assumed I assumed that. Of course Windows has its problems also. However, when a newbie has problem with Windows, they can call the printer manufacturer's tech support line and get led through the necessary troubleshooting. If they try that with a Linux machine, the tech support people aren't going to be able to help them.

      Your belief that Windows "just works" and Linux "is hard" is based on your ignorance, not experience and a solid grasp on reality.

      I never said anything remotely like "Windows just works" or "Linux is hard", so I don't know why you are pretending to quote me.

      But your post does bring up another issue -- when someone tries to get help with Linux, often the only help available is online from some condescending prick, who thinks being rude is a good way to demonstrate Linux's superiority. Bravo.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    19. Re:Install Windows XP by crutchy · · Score: 1

      until someone sends them a Word document and it doesn't display correctly; or they want to print something and can't get their printer to work and the support people can't figure out why the Windows printer driver won't install. :^(

      holy shit i can't believe there are still people that think this

      haha what a poor ignorant douchebag

      i feel sorry for you dude

    20. Re:Install Windows XP by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Of course people bring in their own printers."

      Go back and read the Article Summary and this thread over again. Pay special attention to this line in this thread:

      "The vast majority of people who would be in a position to go to a library or Non-Profit don't know the difference."

      As you can see, you have been unable to follow the topic of the thread, and this is why you are confused. You seem to believe that we were suddenly talking about a person at his home or something, since you cannot possibly believe that people bring their own printers to the Library or Non-profit, or even that the Library would allow access with the admin rights necessary for the user to add his or her own drivers.

      "But your post does bring up another issue -- when someone tries to get help with Linux, often the only help available is online from some condescending prick, who thinks being rude is a good way to demonstrate Linux's superiority. Bravo."

      I received a great deal of very friendly help as I was learning Linux. Of course, I didn't post completely off topic and ludicrous claims and then call the person a prick, so YMMV.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    21. Re:Install Windows XP by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      ... says the Anonymous Coward. ROTLMAO

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  3. used computers cost too much and slow by alen · · Score: 2

    new PC can be bought for a few hundred $$$. comes with MS Windows and you can run office on it. very easy to set up out of the box

    used PC you have to pay someone $50 or more per hour to configure them one by one and pay the software licenses

    and even 2006 computers without 4GB of RAM are SLOW. try running Chrome with a few tabs open. there are $279 best buy specials with 4GB of RAM

    destroy the hard drives if you're paranoid and just junk the PC's

  4. But what are they really worth? by nweaver · · Score: 1

    A circa 2006 computer is in the only ~5x-10x faster than a Raspberry Pi, and has a power cost on the order of 100-200W/hr. So a 2006-era computer, even free, costs ~$90/yr just in power if its left on.

    Similarly, for a non-profit trying to be uber-cheap, why not just go with ChromeBooks? If you are in a position where you can have a network (e.g. like an office environment), they are cheap, and the office and so-on that are needed for productivity.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
  5. Re:Difficult by Splat · · Score: 1

    They're doing it wrong then. There's money in scrap boards, memory, CPUs, and the metal itself. I can understand turning the things away however if there's not a support structure in place for them.

  6. Here is an idea if you are not picky... by Vexler · · Score: 1

    Alan Ralsky.

    Like I said, if you are not picky.

    1. Re:Here is an idea if you are not picky... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Alan Ralsky.

      Like I said, if you are not picky.

      Well, I suppose you could bludgeon him to death with it...

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  7. Goodwill by cod3r_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    just take them to goodwill and let them figure it out.

    1. Re:Goodwill by Desler · · Score: 1

      Yes make Goodwill have to lose money recycling your junk computers. Grand idea.

    2. Re:Goodwill by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Yes make Goodwill have to lose money recycling your junk computers. Grand idea.

      Not in my experience. Goodwill sells plenty of working used computers for $15-$50 each.

      Now if the computers were non-working, that would be another story.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:Goodwill by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Actually Goodwill does computer recycling now, and at least in CA they make money at it.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    4. Re:Goodwill by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      I've done this in the Chicago area, and the Goodwill staff told me they only attempt to resell LCD monitors and the rest will be recycled. They partner here with Dell for the recycling.

    5. Re:Goodwill by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      Goodwill is in partnership with Dell to recycle old computer equipment: http://dell.com/reconnect. I've donated both working and non-working machines. They'll resell working machines if they can or recycle them.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    6. Re:Goodwill by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Goodwill has a place rebuilding computers here in Nebraska. Goodwill computer center or some such.

  8. Recycling a better option by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    With the current state of things, computers and electronics are ubiquitous, cheap, and rapidly evolving. At this point, I consider machines from the era to be essentially trash, even when they can function well enough using your favorite distro. They take up too much space and use too much power, and they struggle to handle the world's new common platform: HTML+CSS+js. They will also accelerate down the slide to obsolescence much faster than newer equipment over an equal period of time.

    I feel like dumping those things on charities is just giving them a burden. They may have to spend money to put the machines to use, and they will have to take care of throwing them away soon enough. I say use your energy to find a good recycler so that the metals in those old junkers might be reclaimed for tomorrow's tech.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:Recycling a better option by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Anything multi-core from 2006 onward is probably fine. That means the Athlon64 X2s, the Core Duos, etc. I know I was purchasing 45W and 65W AMD CPUs around 2006-2007 which run cool and quiet.

      The multi-core machines also age well because they have at least 2 physical cores to handle both processing and the UI. In fact, my primary laptop is still a T61p Core2 Duo @ 2.2GHz. It has a SSD and was upgraded to Win7 Pro and 8GB last summer. So we purchased that laptop in 2007 and I plan on using it for at least another year or two.

      Sure, an Intel i5 or i7 would be nice, but it still handles everything I throw at it for systems administration, programming and other tasks.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  9. Donate your time or recycle them by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Unless you're willing to donate your time to administer them and keep them running (including replacing hardware when it fails), just recycle the computers, non profits don't have the staff to keep old hardware running, and though they may have someone that understands some Windows basics, they aren't going to have anyone that knows anything about Linux.

    My wife works for a non-profit and when well meaning people donate old computers, they thank them, then hand them off to an eWaste recycler (who fortunately takes them for free)

  10. Remember: No good deed goes unpunished by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I applaud your altruism; but I've done the same kind of thing in the past, and regretted it.

    Not to be too paranoid, but please make sure you've got all your paperwork in order, (you have to right to pass on the PCs etc.), and explicitly state 'no warranty' etc. What if one of the PCs catches fire, and burns down the old folks home you donated it to? Yeah, I know I sound nuts, be we live in a crazy world.

    Oh yes, and regarding support. They'll drive you nuts. Really.

    Junk the things and just give some cash to a worthy cause.

  11. I hope you plan on donating your tech support by a_big_favor · · Score: 1

    Find some charitable organization to distribute them, like your church. Or possibly a store like goodwill.

    1. Re:I hope you plan on donating your tech support by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      A church will turn their nose up at it. Over the last 5 or so years, Churches have hopped on the Apple bandwagon big time. From the Audio/Video department to the pastors, everybody is using Macs Ipads, and Iphones.
      I play piano at my Church and for awhile they made me use some program on a Mac to play sounds instead of the built-in sounds on the keyboard which was purpose built to play those sounds. The user interface was much more difficult to use on the Mac, and I had to use two hands to change sounds, which I often had to do between songs. Also, after playing for awhile, it would start to not hold notes out even when you were holding the notes down on the keyboard. Only rebooting the Mac would fix it. I have still never in my life had to reboot a keyboard.
      I have become a very vocal detractor of using technology for the sake of technology. Old process X works. New process Y works, but not as well, but it uses the latest Technology! No thanks.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:I hope you plan on donating your tech support by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      A church will turn their nose up at it. Over the last 5 or so years, Churches have hopped on the Apple bandwagon big time. From the Audio/Video department to the pastors, everybody is using Macs Ipads, and Iphones.

      Churches with money have jumped on the Apple Bandwagon.

      Churches without money continue to languish on old, outdated crap.

      FYI, not every church in the country is one of those modern, 'rock-n-roll show' megachurches making serious, untaxed bank off of tithes.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:I hope you plan on donating your tech support by Soluzar · · Score: 1

      The church my parents attend is pretty small, but they get enough in tithes and gifts to be able to afford brand new computers better than I can have for myself. As well as some other extremely fancy electronic toys.

    4. Re:I hope you plan on donating your tech support by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Whereas the church my grandmother attends is small, and the average age of the congregation is around 70. Suffice to say, there's not a lot of room in the church budget for new toys, when the entire populace is on SSI and fixed incomes.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:I hope you plan on donating your tech support by xski · · Score: 1

      I would hazard to say that if it has an Audio/Video Department it long ago made the transition from what I would call a Church into what I would call a Marketing Department.

    6. Re:I hope you plan on donating your tech support by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      ... Except the fact that commercial marketing firms have to pay taxes.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  12. Re:Difficult by Desler · · Score: 1

    There's money in scrap boards, memory, CPUs, and the metal itself.

    No, there's not. The "money" that one gets is a pittance next to the effort spent salvaging the junk in the first place.

  13. United Way by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The United Way distributes cash donations to local non-profits, so they may well know who would need the computers.

  14. Re:Difficult by Nimey · · Score: 1

    But then they have to deal with finding a recycling center that will take them, and that takes time and effort away from their charitable mission, and storage is not free. My local recycling center charges money for computers because they're such a pain in the ass to deal with.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  15. Charities are not a waste disposal service by xelah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Charities are not a waste disposal service. Have them disposed of properly and safely, and the useful materials extracted and recycled. Even if you find a charity who'll take them, you're just dumpling that problem on them a year or two from now - and, as several other commenters have said, they probably use enough power the charities would be better of buying something newer.

    1. Re:Charities are not a waste disposal service by undeadbill · · Score: 1

      I've been supporting non-profits in my area for over a decade now. One of the things I've learned is that non-profits also want to get their jobs done as well as anyone else. Most of them don't have the capacity for downtime due to dodgy hardware. They want to spend their time and effort either raising funds or fulfilling their mission, kind of how a regular business wants to spend their time making money or selling their stuff. The same goes for poor communities in developing nations.

      If I were to take a bunch of much older boxes, the only reason I would give them to a place would be as part of a learning lab on how to build and maintain computers. Just part the boxes out, and have students put them together and install an OS. If something fails, no big deal- plenty of parts.

      If I wanted to help a charity directly, I would build all of these hosts up, and then sell them at a flea market for $50-$100 bucks each, no warranty. Have a wifi hotspot handy so people can test drive them right there. Take the money and donate it, or use connections to buy exactly what the favored non-profit needs.

    2. Re:Charities are not a waste disposal service by robertinventor · · Score: 1

      Try computers for africa http://www.computers4africa.org.uk/

    3. Re:Charities are not a waste disposal service by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Their front page says that they'll take PCs up to 8 years old, but if you click on the 'Donate' button, you'll find that they will only accept machines that are under five years old.

  16. Thrift stores by whizbang77045 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You might donate them to a local thrift store, along with a printout of how to use Linux (although it seems obvious to me, it may not be to others). For a while, I was checking out and repairing computers for a thrift store associated with our church.

    Some came it with a usable operating system; some had to have one installed. I'd always stick Ubuntu on.

    None of them ever failed to sell. After all, the price was right, and the people usually needed whatever they could get. I felt good about it, because a computer that would have seen the scrap heap got reused. Let's face it: for word processing and simple spreadsheets, it doesn't take that much computer. You can also browse the web, if you stay away from overbloated sites. Email is a no brainer.

    And, if they didn't like Linux, they were free to install Windows or whatever they chose. Given the financial state of a lot of these people, I doubt they could have afforded Microsoft's price. But Linux at least let them see the machine was funcitonal.

    1. Re:Thrift stores by whizbang77045 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I checked a bunch of those out, also. Some went with a printer; some didn't.

    2. Re:Thrift stores by whizbang77045 · · Score: 2

      Nope, wasn't me. I don't think I've ever even tried Gentoo. There are just so many Linux variants these days, that I just don't get around to trying them all.

  17. Re:Difficult by Splat · · Score: 1

    Pittance? I helped a local non-profit earn $3000 last year by salvaging their "junk" through my volunteer work.

  18. I volunteer as an IT guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I volunteer in the IT department at a free clinic. If you're in Georgia - Georgia Free Clinic Network. We could use those machines.

    If you're in another state, check out the free clinics there. I'm sure they could use them too.

    On another note, if you have old hardware, unless asked, I suggest you don't bother installing an OS or any other software. Your heart is in the right place but to be frank, we'd wipe the machine and put XP Pro and then set them up to suit our network - which is Microsoft based, obviously.

    1. Re:I volunteer as an IT guy. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why is it obvious that your network is Microsoft based? Why is a charity spending money on Microsoft licenses?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:I volunteer as an IT guy. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      well if they already have a corporate install key for windows xp it does not cost them anything to install it.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  19. Re:Difficult by Looker_Device · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even charities have minimum needs/standars for computers.

    Nonsense. Those Goodwill boxes will take anything. I regularly put my old broken appliances, worn out VHS tapes, empty soda cans, used toilet paper, etc. in them late at night and I've never once heard them complain about it.

    --
    Your political party doesn't care about your rights and only represents corporate interests.
  20. Recycle by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

    Donate them to your local electronic recycling facility.

  21. I end up giving old PCs to neighbours and friends by gQuigs · · Score: 1

    who otherwise don't have PCs. They usually use them to just browse the web and other basic tasks. Firefox is better on older hardware than Chrome in my opinion. Especially if you are memory limited or if you want to watch Flash videos. Chrome is actually laggy in those situations.

    It's slow going giving them away, though. Most people think that a newer PC will work better for them, but usually because of crapware it never does. And for a novice user re-installing Windows is hugely more difficult then installing Ubuntu (or Fedora, or OpenSuse, Mint, etc). I should note, I have no direct experience with Windows 8 yet.. so maybe it's much better...

  22. Many don't know/care which OS is behind Firefox by raymorris · · Score: 2
    My experience is that a great many users, especially the non-techie types, don't know or care what the OS is - they see the Firefox icon and click it. They have no idea that their smart phone or tablet doesn't run Windows, because they have no reason to care. If there's a browser and perhaps an office suite, it's a computer like any other to them.

    They'll just want Windows or Apple.

    What's that, is that on Google or Facebook?

    Firefox OS and Chromebooks kind of prove the point. The browser IS the computer, to most people. It used to be nobody cared about the process scheduler, anything below the level of the desktop didn't concern 99% of users. These days the browser is the desktop and few care what's beneath. (But some of those who care do care a lot.)

    1. Re:Many don't know/care which OS is behind Firefox by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Firefox OS and Chromebooks kind of prove the point.

      They will prove the point IF people buy them. Otherwise, they'll be thrown onto the Great Internet Appliance Slag Heap next to the iOpeners and 3Com Audreys.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  23. Criagslist by NewWorldDan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Post them for free on Criagslist. It's possible someone might want them, but I wouldn't count on it. If no one claims them in a week, take them in for recycling. Right now, there's a glut of crappy old single core CPUs out there that no one wants. I've got a few in my basement that I haven't recycled yet.

  24. Freecycle them by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 2

    Join a local Freecycle group (www.freecycle.org) and post an offer. Someone in your community might have a use for them.

    --
    No sig? Sigh...
    1. Re:Freecycle them by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      www.Craigslist.org also has a 'Free' section.

    2. Re:Freecycle them by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      yeah, a freeloader that doesn't actually need them (just wants something free). How do I know, I work with several people that take free stuff, even though they hardly need it. I would advise against it.

      If your goal is to rid yourself of it, then as long as they don't bring it back, you got rid of it and someone who wants it has it. Maybe their motives are stupid, but who cares? Crazy/stupid people will find a way with our without us.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Freecycle them by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      Well, then we're doing these people a public service, by helping the hoarders build their hoards (what good is a hoardless hoarder?).

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    4. Re:Freecycle them by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Join a local Freecycle group (www.freecycle.org) and post an offer. Someone in your community might have a use for them.

      At my old house, the recycling program was: leave it in the alley, and someone will be by to pick it up.

      And ultimately, if no one else did, the trash truck would come buy and they'd drop it at the municipal e-waste facility (which turned a profit, BTW).

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:Freecycle them by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Wherein you are also announcing the location of some nice new computers that replaced the old ones...

  25. A 2006 processor is 400X faster than a 2013 drive by raymorris · · Score: 1

    As for the hardware, a 2006 processor could be a Intel Core 2 running at 2.6 Ghz - 2.6 TRILLION operations per second. I sure did a lot of productive work on with a 500 MHz machine, so one five times as fast seems fine to me, for office work.

    If it wasn't waiting on IO, a new processor might be 50% "faster" for a single threaded application, but in reality they are both sitting idle waiting for a disk drive that peaks at 38 MB/s. A new green drive does about 38 MB/s. The 2006 processor does 10,000 MBs / second. Assuming both have SATA drives, then, an old computer and a new computer will both take the same number of seconds to load the word processor from disk and launch it. For that type of thing, there's practically zero difference in new vs. 2006 - computers were already "fast enough" in 2006. (Except for hard drives, if they are switched for SSD.)

  26. Re:I end up giving old PCs to neighbours and frien by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Yup, our county dump stations have sheds with tables for "i don't want this anymore, it isn't junk, it shouldn't just be tossed, if you can use it please take it" stuff. I've taken old computers, wiped drives, put Linux on 'em, and put a sheet of instructions along with a re-install disk with them. They last about 10 minutes before being taken by someone.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  27. A Use for Everything by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    Look for non-profit schools in your area and offer these systems for teaching keyboarding and intro to programming. These functions don't require much horse power or graphics and free (as in Beer) software and courseware is readily available.

    Ask your local clubs (e.g, Lions, Rotary, Exchange, Optimists) whether they have a need for free office automation.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  28. Don't. by sidragon.net · · Score: 1

    Recycle your old junk, then donate cash and let the charity decide what hardware suits their needs.

  29. Here's a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Find a charity you despise

    2) Throw computer through window

    1. Re:Here's a thought by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      WBC is technically a non-profit, right?

  30. Literacy Connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Literacy Connection has a computer tutor program. Maybe some of the students could use them since only about half own computers when they start classes.

  31. Wounded Warrior Project and Craigslist by timholman · · Score: 1

    Contact the Wounded Warrior Project. They have taken several donated P4 Dell boxes off my hands.

    Like the OP, I have found it very difficult to find donors for older desktops. Craigslist may be useful in that respect, as individuals and small nonprofits sometimes ask for computer donations.

    Personally, I have given up on reconditioning and donating desktops. Very few people want them. As others have mentioned, it really is better to recycle them, even if it goes against your grain to toss out a working piece of hardware.

  32. Don't overthink it. See who needs help and ask how by Media_Scumbag · · Score: 1

    As others have mentioned, there are a number of local entities that recycle/ refurbish / re-purpose old computers. All you have to do is a little looking. In Arizona, a very popular program is Arizona StRUT ( Students Recycling Used Technology) - http://www.azstrut.org/ - look at their website, it might be able to point you in a direction that applies to those in need in your area.

    Other ideas: Church-affiliated thrift stores are popular in rural areas. Homeless shelters need computers so their customers can look for jobs / housing resources and stay in contact with family. Boys and Girls Clubs and YMCAs still exist in many urban areas, and may be in need of some equipment. Retirement housing and elderly care facilities may be interested. Look around and ask how you can help.

  33. FreeGeek Makes it Work by headphones54321 · · Score: 2

    There is a non-profit company in many North American cities that takes old computers, puts them through a testing cycle, recycles all the parts that can't be used, and then builds workstations running linux for either donation to non-profits or cheap resale. They are great and always looking for help. http://www.freegeek.org/ According to the Wikipedia site, they have locations in: Portland, OR; Fayetteville, AR; Central FL; Chicago, IL; Columbus, OH; South Bend, IN (Michiana); Vancouver, BC (Canada); Seattle, WA; Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN (Twin Cities); Toronto, ON (Canada); Providence, RI; Ferndale, MI (Greater Detroit area); Ephrata, PA (South East Pennsylvania); Athens, GA (Free I.T. Athens)

  34. Re:A 2006 processor is 400X faster than a 2013 dri by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    As for the hardware, a 2006 processor could be a Intel Core 2 running at 2.6 Ghz - 2.6 TRILLION operations per second. ...

    You must be on the other side of the Pond. Over here in the USA, a 2.6GHz machine can only do 2.6 Billion OPS.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  35. do not donate old computers by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    it will only burden them with work and clunky things taking up space. ***every*** used computer I got had something missing (memory board, DLL files, or whatever) which rendered the system basically useless and a huge timepit. Except for a couple old computers I got, one from non-techie friend abandoned their XP for a Mac. And the other (Mac G3 and it still works great and has lots of programs) from a flea market which was a good seller of used computers but he no longer can be found. So these other useless old computers I had to dispose which can be a real pain. Unless you are the kind that always does recycling, such places can be hard to find. No, no, no... don't give me the suggestion 'google' to find sites because such usually charge you recycle fees or they are on other side of the city. Since then I only buy new computers because used systems there is always something missing from them (I don't know why they delete all the programs, remove memory boards, and also delete js, DLL and other such files in the system folder).

    Therefore, giving old computers to charities is like dropping them a "time" bomb that will cause them to waste resources.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  36. Freecycle by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

    You can also try freecycle. While not a "charity" it's a good way to pass on stuff you don't want/need to someone who will actually use it. Of course you don't get a write off...

  37. In my town.... by Slugster · · Score: 1

    It isn't worth bothering trying to give away an old PC.

    The local Salvation Army store doesn't want it unless it is 100% working condition, flat screen (no CRTs), Windows OS CD & Windows serial number sticker still intact. Since most off-the-shelf systems don't even have the CD now, they don't take many these days. (they don't take CRT TV's anymore either; any TV donated must be a newer/digital-broadcast one)

    If you go to the trouble of wiping and reinstalling it just to offer it for free on Craigslist or whatever the only replies you get is kids wanting to play games on it, that it won't do very well.

    "It would run a stripped-down Linux distro pretty well..." -yea, if you knew anyone who wanted to run Linux. Nobody who knows nothing about PCs wants Linux, not even a tiny bit. You might as well brag about how fast it can run Win95.

    The concept seems odd (especially knowing what you paid for it :P ) but after a few years, its disposable. Wipe the HD while its still alive and put the thing out with the trash.

    1. Re:In my town.... by LandGator · · Score: 1

      > Nobody who knows nothing about PCs wants Linux, not even a tiny bit. Wrong . 30+ years experience in PC support & system administration here. Have an A+, too. My Win 7 laptop (Lenovo SL400 upgraded w/ faster HD & more RAM) sits 3 weeks idle while I use my Xubuntu-12.04 R60 lappie daily.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  38. Computer Merit Badge for Boy Scouts by popocatapetl · · Score: 1

    Here's what I have done a few times with old computers. After installing Linux on them, I have used them to teach the Computer Merit Badge to boy scouts at the summer science camp run by our local council. At the end of it, scouts who did not have their own PCs took the machines home. By the end, scouts did not just have machines they knew how to use - they had machines they knew how to program - even though the programming requirements for the Computer Merit Badge are rudimentary, the longest journey is the one that's never begun and the badge took them the first few steps down the path.

  39. Find someone connected by bbcisdabomb · · Score: 1

    You said you gave a couple to the church? Ask the pastor. Church pastors, even if they don't know anything about technology, are very connected to the community and will know who needs them the most. In my hometown the computer giveaway charity is run through the Methodist church and the rest of the pastors know to ask there if they have a family in need. Alternatively, if you're in Eastern WA I'll take them for the above charity.

    --
    Please put some pants on before you post again.
  40. Circa 2006 is old? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    My PC's are both from 2006 and they seem like new to me!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  41. The local mental health department maybe? by ravenswood1000 · · Score: 1

    I've always given cars and computers to the local Mental Health department. They have found folks that really needed them.

  42. Not worth it by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I will echo what others have said about it not being worth while, but let me also explain why. It is an economic problem:

    There is a point where the replacement cost of a piece of electronics exceeds the cost of refurbishing them. Even if you do it yourself, you have to think about what other things you could have done with that time. If it took you 2 hours per PC, then you are obviously a capable PC repair tech. At $25/hr that's $50 you could have made. That's half way toward a cheap tablet which is probably more useful than the PC you refurbished.

    Similarly, the cost to maintain them often exceeds the total value gained. Those old machines are likely to be flaky or fail entirely. The lost productivity spent working around unreliable hardware. And then people aren't using the current OSs so there are limitations to what you can do with it anyway.

  43. Geeks Without Borders by maotsan · · Score: 1

    Geeks Without Borders in Eugene, OR rebuilds and redistributes old computers to those who need them. Maintains them too. They operate mostly in North America.

    The web site seems to be down at the moment.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geeks_Without_Borders

  44. every charity is different by themib · · Score: 1

    Every charity is different and has different guidelines for donations. Your best bet is to find a local non-profit [501(c)3] agency that does work in your community that you support and contact them directly. They often have minimum specs much lower then most people would consider usable as many non-profits do not even have technology budgets. Some of the smaller non-profits would be thrilled for receiving a donation of even single core 2+ Ghz machines. This is especially true of organizations that deal with the homeless populations in any area. I work for a medium to large non-profit in NH that provides services to the homeless, mentally ill, as well as provide transitional housing for veterans and we routinely donate our older machines that we take out of circulation to our clients. Lastly if you donate them to a 501(c)3 you will receive a receipt that you can use for tax purposes, because your donation tax deductible.

    --
    The Man in Black
  45. Step 1) Drive to Charity
    Step 2) Give.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  46. Oops. Actually 48 billion by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Ah yeah. On the other hand, a Core 2 can run up to 18 instructions per clock, so it's 48 billion instructions per second. Anyway, it's friggin fast. Further, a 2.6 GHz processor running a lightweight environment like LXDE could well be more responsive than a 3.2 GHz machine running WIndows 8.

  47. Re:A 2006 processor is 400X faster than a 2013 dri by kesuki · · Score: 1

    i can think of a thousand things that can be done without needing to exceed the max speed of a hdd. for instance your computer can check every letter you type and offer a list of possible words. my phone does that everywhere i type. windows and linux both can do that too, and a dictionary isn't a huge set and it's the RAM throughput that limits the operations that can be done. since the dictionary library is loaded into ram on boot up.
    the nice thing about modern computers is you can buy one that theoretically would require 1000 watts of pull, and yet by not powering everything and underclocking the cpu can idle at as low as 13 to 200 watts, depending which speed you chose. mine idles at 125 watts which also happens to be the voltage draw of the cpu at maximum power. only real math problems and bitcoin mining really push this machine to it's limits, and i don't bitcoin mine and am not a seti at home user. i do video game, but i find that only a certain subset of games are truly worth playing. so i don't push the system to it's limits gaming either. i mainly bought the fast computer because i don't trust cheaply built machines, and the price/performance angle was just right for me.

  48. Office Location by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Big white building in Washington. It's got a sign identifying it as "U.S. Capital." I think "Capital" might be the technical term for "cross."

    No need to thank me.

    PS -- you'll need several computers.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  49. P4s not obsolete for many people. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    In the real, non-geek world there are many folks with almost no money who benefit greatly from having a usable computer. Filing unemployment claims and mandatory job searches are some examples of tasks you can do using a slow 'puter on a dialup connection. Driving to use a public computer is expensive, especially in rural areas.

    I have several friends who still use P4s for their primary and "kidsputer" needs. There is not money for anything else, which is also why working XP machines promptly disappear from thrift stores.

    Hand a thrift store a turnkey system and someone will put it to use.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  50. Re: Why is a charity spending money on Microsoft l by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    Non-profits can get Microsoft software relatively inexpensively. Something like $8 for an OS license and $24 for office. There are restrictions on the licenses though.

  51. Re:Laptops are better than desktops by blobbe · · Score: 1

    They are also much more difficult (or at least time consuming) to maintain, cost more for the same specs, and have shorter lifespans. Once the motherboard or screen is gone, the laptop is as good as gone. Not the case with a desktop.

  52. i know ppl who commit to OSS on a p4 by decora · · Score: 1

    i mean i hate to say this, but i know people who have been using a p4 to write open sores software for the past two years and have had dozens of patches accepted to a pretty mainstream project. the project has tens of thousands of downloads so... uhm. yeah.

    the only problem they have is lack of RAM , but the clang compiler has helped fix that .

  53. GNU compile farm by decora · · Score: 1

    The GNU compile farm provides free build machines for a lot of open source projects. They might be interested.

    http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm

  54. Great example , 800 MHz does that, with MB RAM by raymorris · · Score: 1

    your computer can check every letter you type and offer a list of possible words. my phone does that

    Perfect example. Phones with 800 MHz processors do that. I'm using one now that does that. It has 128 MB of RAM, I think. That suggests that 2.6 GHz is overkill for mundane office tasks.

    In your example, the person typing does maybe four operations per second while the CPU can do billions. Most office tasks are like that - human-bound or network-bound, not CPU bound.

  55. Yeah I did 10 broken P4s on craigslist by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Yeah I just gave away ten half-computers, mostly P4s, on craigslist. They were gone within a hours.

  56. Food Bank by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    I donate older computers I have refurbished to the local food bank, because at least in my town, they are most in-tune with who would a computer the most.

  57. Salaries of charities by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 1

    It's perfectly reasonable for charity workers to be paid reasonable salaries. It's unreasonable for them to be paid unreasonable ones. The American Red Cross got a lot of flack a few years ago because of the high salary it paid Marsha Evans. Other charities were unfairly accused of doing the same thing but it turned out those claims were exaggerated.
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/charities.asp
    http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_charities_salaries.htm

    If you do donate to a charity, make sure it's an efficient one that serves the cause and not the office holders:
    http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/23/charities-most-efficient-personal-finance-charity-09-efficiency_slide_2.html

    My 2c on old PCs: Yes, I have lots, but really they are practically worthless. Recipients would do better with a cheap modern netbook than they would a hulking power-guzzling iron monster. Like a story I read about how people donating their old books to libraries: "People can't bare to throw out their old books, so they donate them to us (libraries), and we throw them out for them."

  58. Small town by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    A small town library can often use an additional computer. Put office software on it, photo processing and drawing software, good browsers, and make sure it can work on a network where all the other computers run a Microsoft OS. Also make sure it can talk to networked printers. A page of instructions on how to use the computer would be helpful.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  59. speaking as someone with non-profit experience... by novium · · Score: 1

    There are a couple of different things to do, but one of the challenges you're going to run into is that most non-profits are kind of too short handed (or short of time) to be able to go, "yes, of course, that'd be awesome!" (That's how many volunteers get turned away as well, actually). A lot of time when volunteers (or donations) turn up, the random employee being offered them is going to be searching their brain for a way to put them to good use, and if one doesn't immediately come to mind, there more likely to turn it down, because they've got more than enough on their plate with everything else. I've been in this position myself. I was working for a collaboration of 60ish non-profits, and someone wanted to donate an old copy machine to a non-profit. They didn't care which, just any one that needed a copier. And it was a pretty good copier, but still. The actually collaboration office couldn't use it, didn't have the room for it, certainly didn't have the money to get rid of it or move it if that became necessary. I sent out many, many calls to every agency I could think of, seeing if they needed a printer. And I'm sure, somewhere, one of them did. But if they had the need, they hadn't yet realized it, or weren't talking about it. And few of the newer ones, that were more desperate for resources, were willing to take the risk of it needing repair work or finding a way to move it from the donor's place to their office.

    So here's what I'd suggest. If you have a few good non-profits in mind, ones that you know something about their operations, and there's something *specific* they could use those computers to address....I would offer it to them like that. "Hey, I know you were looking for a way to get the kids in the shelter a way to get on the internet for their homework, I've got some computers for you..." Especially if you can volunteer to provide support. That will actually probably be pretty welcomed.

    Second, if you don't have any specific charities in mind, you could see if there's a local non-profit dedicated to fixing up old computers and giving them away. There's usually one in every county, and they'll have the relationships and connections to know who could use it and how to get it to them. I'm sure they wouldn't complain about having the work already done for them.

    Third, you could try just contacting various groups and seeing if any are looking for computers. Good groups to start with would be shelters, churches that run shelters/food kitchens/that sort of thing, *domestic* shelters (especially if they have a safe house, but don't be offended if they turn down an offer to help set them up. They guard the locations fiercely, because they must). You could also try the local Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts groups (though I'd recommend avoiding the nearest council, and just seeing about getting in touch with the local volunteers in charge). After school programs might be good, as well as any programs dedicated to helping the elderly and disabled be more self-sufficient. Start by explaining that you've refurbished them (so they're not just "old" computers that need repair) and also, if you're willing to help set them up etc. And there you go.

    You probably won't read this, as it'll be at the very bottom, but if you do, I hope it helps.

  60. Time to get religion by macraig · · Score: 1

    Even the new Pope wants to sanction Prenda's lawyers. Oh wait....

  61. Make them into Chrome Browser boxes by gozar · · Score: 1
    I just put the final touches on taking older machines and making them into Chrome only browser boxes, the GozBrowserBox.

    You can run it stand alone (I have it on some old 512MB Thinkpads) or in a client/server configuration (I have iBooks and eMacs using this running Chrome with Flash and sound). All it does is boot into a full screen Chrome session, so it depends on what you want to do on how useful it is.

    In our public school system this has allowed us to repurpose any machine that comes our way. The limiting factor now is space.

    (BTW, there are several security issues with it since the private key for the user browser is publically available in the Github project. It also downloads the configuration from Github everytime the machine is started, which means you have to trust me... Or fork the project and trust yourself!)

    --
    What, me worry?
  62. Find a computer nonprofit by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    Find a nonprofit org to donate to that will rebuild them and give them away to needy skoolkids. That's what I help out with on a weekly basis. The high-end machines are rebuilt and sold to help with costs of rebuilding the older models. People saying a 2006 era machine is useless obviously don't know what they are talking about. This nonprofit is still giving single-core computers away. They will take anything except CRTs and what cannot or will not be used is disassembled and sold to scrappers so nothing goes to waste. A PC does NOT have to be less than a year old to be useful!

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  63. Lazy by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

    You see i have this old 286 machine i found in the loft. I can't be bothered to take it down the tip so i thought a charity might like it. ;)
    Certainly where I live, the charity shops (of which there are a lot) won't touch hardware. Full stop. They are mostly run by old ladies who wouldn't know a top end PC from a hole in the ground. If they started accepting PCs, old printers, scanners (remember them), etc their shops would soon be full of them.

    --
    I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  64. Local Chamber by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Talk to someone in your local chamber of commerce, or a non-profit like United Way. They can probably put you in touch with the right people.

  65. E-RAD by ralphw441 · · Score: 1

    www.bakermountain.org would welcome used machines to use for educational initiatives.

  66. Recycling older computers by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    You may wish to contact some senior homes and explain your situation. You have working machines, circa 20xx and you would like to donate them for a cause. They have xxxx and the only requirement would be to provide an internet connection.

    Some churches know of senior homes where these boxes could be welcome

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  67. Re:Most common recycling programs by Splat · · Score: 1

    The point is - you have to be dirt poor to not be able to save up $250 to buy a desktop computer or used laptop from the pawn shop. If you can't afford that, then you can't afford internet access or electricity or backup storage media to use a computer, of any kind, and you would get more done by simply getting a smartphone. If the donation thing just makes you feel good about yourself, buy a new computer and donate that.

    You... don't really understand poverty much, do you? There are discount Internet connectivity programs (Comcast Internet Essentials) that can get you online for $10 if you are below certain income criteria. Even if you're having trouble paying your electric bill, you can get help with that too from most utility companies.

  68. For education? by apexwm · · Score: 1

    I've found that GNU/Linux can save educational institutions a LOT of money. Especially when they are able to obtain computers that businesses are throwing out because they can no longer run Windows. GNU/Linux has a huge array of education software, and a lot of schools are using the online games which makes it a very good platform for all of the above. It is amazing at the waste from corporate America where the thought process is to "upgrade the PC to support the new version of Windows", where they should instead be saying "install GNU/Linux to allow us to continue using these PCs and give us freedom".