Slashdot Mirror


Roadkill Forcing Cliff Swallows To Evolve

sciencehabit writes "Cliff swallows that build nests that dangle precariously from highway overpasses have a lower chance of becoming roadkill than in years past thanks to a shorter wingspan that lets them dodge oncoming traffic. That's the conclusion of a new study based on 3 decades of data collected on one population of the birds. The results suggest that shorter wingspan has been selected for over this time period because of the evolutionary pressure put on the population by cars."

19 of 387 comments (clear)

  1. Re:first by pecosdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That will be the downfall of your species. Those who march in front are merely the meat-shields for the warriors that follow, the first torn down by the musket balls and horse mounted cavalry while those behind remain to actually fight.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  2. excellent! by arekin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if only humans would evolve that fast...

    --
    Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll.
  3. Does this mean by NEDHead · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I keep on smacking my kids, their arms will get shorter?

    1. Re:Does this mean by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their skulls may become thicker.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  4. You're Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...And this is yet another proof that God exists. My prayer circle has spent the last 10 years asking for Divine intervention to halt the senseless deaths of road-adjacent animals. Thanks to our unceasing intervention, He knew to trim a wee bit off the tip of every bird's wings (gradually, of course, so that mommy birds would still recognize their babies - and left longer wings on the sinner birds so that they would die and serve as a warning to others). Praise Jesus!

  5. lies, all lies by spongman · · Score: 4, Funny

    these evolutionists are just trying to force these lies down your throats.

    how can the birds be changed by the overpasses? the bible tells us that the overpasses have existed since the creation of the universe, 3 decades ago.

    1. Re:lies, all lies by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The funny thing, at least to me as a Christian, is that none of the other Christians I know would take issue with anything said in the summary, other than the use of "evolution" to describe natural selection and adaptation: principles with which they have no problems.

    2. Re:lies, all lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://www.gallup.com/poll/155003/hold-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx

      "Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the creationist view that God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. The prevalence of this creationist view of the origin of humans is essentially unchanged from 30 years ago, when Gallup first asked the question. About a third of Americans believe that humans evolved, but with God's guidance; 15% say humans evolved, but that God had no part in the process."

    3. Re:lies, all lies by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Evolution and abiogenesis are frequently conflated. Many Christians have no problem with the former, but do not agree with the latter.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:lies, all lies by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm...yes and no. When people talk about "evolution", they're generally talking about the creation of new species via the combined mechanics of random mutation and natural selection. Natural selection is something that everyone I know is fine with. Random mutation is something that everyone I know is fine with. But the creation of new species? Not so much. And in this case, we're merely seeing natural selection at play, which is not evolution, in and of itself, any more than a motor by itself should be considered a car.

  6. Bridgekeeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is the new air speed velocity of an unladen cliff swallow?

    1. Re:Bridgekeeper by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      The one impaled on the antenna of a passing vehicle or not?

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    2. Re:Bridgekeeper by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Funny

      The one impaled on the antenna of a passing vehicle or not?

      I don't know but the little fucker dropped his coconut and cracked my windshield.

  7. Maybe birds with shorter wings don't fly as much by Leuf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article says it's because they are more maneuverable, but what if they just sit on their asses a lot unlike their easier flying longer winged relatives? Fly less, get hit less.

  8. Saw a Chipmunk Up In the Mountains by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was driving up in the mountains a year or so ago and saw a chipmunk run out into the road between me and the car coming the other way. Now normally this is pretty much certain doom for the chipmunk, but this one stopped calmly on the yellow line, stood up and waited for us to pass before continuing. I've always wondered if the evolutionary pressure of traffic combined with their short generation cycles would lead to critters less likely to become roadkill. Guess I have my answer.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Saw a Chipmunk Up In the Mountains by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Squirrels. They used to zig-zag back and forth (can't make up their mind) and get crushed. Now, they either wait patiently or bolt across the road when everything looked all in the clear.

      But yes, it would seem the indecisive critters got weeded out.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  9. Evolution? Maybe... by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, this may be due to evolution, not of the birds, but the automobile.

    To generate increased fuel economy, today's automobile is a lot more streamlined than ones of the past. So there is less air disturbance. It may be that the birds with smaller wings are not affected by the turbulence as much as the larger winged birds are now, and can thus survive an encounter, whereas in the past, there was enough turbulence to affect the birds regardless of wingspan. Also, changes in traffic patterns and vehicle types changes the exhaust, which changes the local plant life, which changes the insect life, which ultimately changes the birds.

    While it is simple to observe that long winged birds are being disproportionately killed and that the population's wingspan is growing shorter, and conclude that some sort of selection (Is it natural selection when birds are hit by cars?) is taking place, the reality may be quite different.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  10. Kinda Related... by SuperCharlie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had to go through a set of lights by a couple truck stops back in the day more than once a week. I noticed grackles (crowish kinda birds) that would wait on the posts or nearby for the lights to turn red. Then they would jump down and pick the grasshoppers and bugs out of the 18 wheeler grills. When the light turned green, they all flew back up and waited. They were quite well fed.

  11. Re:How come no animals have evolved 4D by gsslay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A "day" might be 1 billion years.

    And "seed" might be asteroids, "fowl" might be spaceships, "creeping thing" might be nanotech bots and "blessed" may be "provided a 1 billion year support contract". If you like to provide your own translation of every word and concept in the Bible, you can make it anything you want it to be, prove anything you like and be infinitely update-able.

    If we were to accept this, it must be very comforting that Genesis can seem to be more than simplistic myth. But it doesn't stop it being fiction.