Slashdot Mirror


Google Reportedly Making a Smartwatch, Too

judgecorp writes "With Samsung and (reportedly) Apple already making smartwatches, Google has now joined the party, according to a (paywalled) report in the Financial Times. The Google Watch is apparently being made by the Android group, and could have some synergy with Google's other wearable tech — the Glass spectacles. The distinctive thing in Google's patent seems to be having two displays — one for public data and a flip-up one for more private stuff."

32 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. The average Slashdotter . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Smartwatches are idiotic! Who would buy a smartwatch except some gullible Apple hipster?

    Smartwatches are idiotic! Who would buy a smartwatch except some gullible Apple hipster?

    Smartwatches are idiotic! Who would buy a smartwatch except some gullible Apple hipster?

    (An Android-based smartwatch comes out)

    ZOMG smartwatches are teh roXorz! (Buys and wears one)

    1. Re:The average Slashdotter . . . by Cenan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fanbois are abundant in every camp. Smartwatches remains idiotic.

      --
      ... whatever ...
    2. Re:The average Slashdotter . . . by cusco · · Score: 2

      But Dick Tracy wore one!

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    3. Re:The average Slashdotter . . . by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm trying to grok the distinction between a phone and a watch that makes a phone a legitimate tool and a watch idiotic. Obviously, if the weight or battery life is sufficiently poor, there's a real problem for a watch, but other than that, what's the difference?

  2. Tyranny of Age by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    The idea of a smart watch when you already have a smart phone sounds to my old man ears like sneakers that blink lights when you walk. Maybe you have to be young to want blinky sneakers.

    1. Re:Tyranny of Age by irreverentdiscourse · · Score: 2

      Or maybe you just want to see who is calling you and accept/reject calls or quickly read text messages without having to take your phone out of your pocket? Or get it off your desk or out of your jacket... I don't understand the fuss, old man... I've wanted and envisioned something like this since the first cell phone I owned in the 90's.

    2. Re:Tyranny of Age by alen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      imagine the watch is a bike computer, the nike fuelband or fitbit thingy where it tracks how much you walk, your heart rate, pulse, maybe even add blood sugar

      its for people who like to go outside and breath fresh air and not the basement dwellers who are always rooting or ROMing their phones

    3. Re:Tyranny of Age by jovius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't really think so. Satellite devices like watches and glasses are the next layer of abstraction for smart phones, which have become so big and powerful. Basically you could just carry the cpu or a connectivity component (cpu power can too be shared), and wear yourself with various screens and other paraphernalia to make the device whole. The ubiquitous computing is steadily moving forward.

    4. Re:Tyranny of Age by alen · · Score: 2, Informative

      if you bike say 20 miles on a good day you want to know exactly how far you went, how fast, how much calories, heart rate, etc

    5. Re:Tyranny of Age by Slyfox696 · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you bike say 20 miles on a good day you want to know exactly how far you went...

      My guess would be 20 miles.

    6. Re:Tyranny of Age by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      if you bike say 20 miles on a good day you want to know exactly how far you went, how fast, how much calories, heart rate, etc

      I'm well aware of what a cycle computer does and I used to have one before it fell off, years ago. But you still don't need those things to have a good bike ride. A map and watch will tell you how far you went and how long it took.

      Not wanting sports tech gadgets does not imply that you are a basement dwelling nerd. In fact wanting tham makes you a pavement pounding nerd instead...

      I, like the old guy prefer to get my dose of nerdiness through other means.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Tyranny of Age by cusco · · Score: 2

      Nah, I'd just want to know that I went from Point A to Point B, had a nice picnic lunch with my wife, and then rode back to Point A. IMONSHO, exercise is for having fun, not accumulating statistics.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    8. Re:Tyranny of Age by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...exercise is for having fun, not accumulating statistics.

      But, but....how do you know if you're winning?

      ;)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Tyranny of Age by quacking+duck · · Score: 2

      ...exercise is for having fun, not accumulating statistics.

      But, but....how do you know if you're winning?

      ;)

      Whoever bites first. Biting's excellent. It's like kissing, only there's a winner.

  3. How is this news? by Tarmas · · Score: 2
    --
    Signature has left the building.
  4. I guess tomorrow's headline has to be... by AdamStarks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft Reportedly Making a Smartwatch, Too, Kinda, Okay-So-It's-Really-Just-A-Surface-Pro-Ducktaped-To-Ballmer's-Forearm

  5. Re:This just in, Google reportedly makes everythin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What doesn't Google make these days?

    Tools for protecting our privacy?

  6. Why should they make a watch? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

    How about using Google Glass and machine vision to overlay the time on your wrist?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  7. Re:This just in, Google reportedly makes everythin by jandersen · · Score: 2

    What doesn't Google make these days?

    Testicular implants.

  8. Re:creepshot by Quakeulf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know there is a lot of energy to be harnessed kinetically by rapid repeated forearm motions caused by the creepshots and the virtual naked filter...

  9. is there just NO originality anymore? by v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Look, someone's making a touchscreen phone, quick, lets make one too!"

    "Look, someone's making a touch tablet, quick, lets make one too!"

    "Look, someone's making a smart watch, quick, lets make one too!"

    OK this is getting sickening, you can stop now.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:is there just NO originality anymore? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Apple "announces" a new product coming out in three months, and the following week Samsung and Google announce that they have a competing product coming out in three months, do people really believe that they are all just trying to copy Apple? Product development just doesn't happen that quickly.

    2. Re:is there just NO originality anymore? by guspasho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > (and the Prada's original UI was vastly inferior).

      And isn't that kind of part of the point? There were smartphones around for years before the iPhone came out, but they all sucked horribly. I struggled to do any kind of Internet browsing with my Blackberry Pearl to do the kinds of things that I can do on my iPhone just by talking to it. I had a geek friend who was so proud of his Windows phone that had a stylus. I remember another had an iPaq that could play movies. There were also tablets before the iPad, but no one wanted to use them either. And in both cases, any competition lagged well behind Apple in terms of being able to come up with a product that anyone actually wanted to use.

      Apple knows how to make products that people want to actually use. No one else can seem to figure that out without waiting to see what Apple does and copying that.

  10. Re:Barbra Streisand Effect? by c · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once that happened, no one wanted to let Apple get the upper hand and so started making their own watch, to which Apple said, hey, we need an iWatch too!

    It's not exactly rocket science.

    The interest in the Pebble shows there's a market. Sony's had a smartwatch out for quite a while, although apparently while it's great when it works, their software is buggy as hell. Too bad, because they jumped in early enough that they could have owned the market.

    The trend towards larger and larger phones means that the whip-out-ability of the average smartphone has been rapidly dropping, to the point where pulling out your phone to check the time isn't even close to handy or discrete. On top of that, with always-on connectivity and a boatload of online services, the notification/interruption rates are increasing.

    So there's arguably a place for a small, always visible "front end" that allows the phablet to live in a pocket or purse until the larger display is needed.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  11. Re:Watch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When the rumor mill said Apple was making one, I thought it was really stupid. Now I think it's really cool.

  12. Re:Watch! by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realize I thought the same thing about smartphones, then tablets. "I have a computer and a flip phone that makes calls. What do I want with a portable computer with no mouse?" My reaction just a few seconds ago was "What do I need a smartwatch for? I have a smartphone that tells me the time!"

    Sigh. Time to raid the kid's college fund again.

  13. Re:This just in, Google reportedly makes everythin by fluffman86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An RSS reader?

  14. Imagining the possibilities by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can think of lots of applications for a device attached to your body, and telling time is far down on that list.

    (Since I work mostly within view of computers I haven't worn a watch in my professional life ever. Nowadays with smartphones, the need is even less.)

    Can bone conduction work with a watch-like device? You could hear your phone ring without disturbing anyone else, and if you could identify the ringtone you could tell how important the call is.

    Would body measurements be useful? Heartbeat, temperature and blood oxygenation seem obvious. Would it help your doctor rule out certain diseases to know the characteristics of the fever - spiky/continuous, low/high level, exact date of onset?

    Could the device make fitness measurements? Tell how much exercise you're getting per week, let you know when to get out more and which type of exercise best meets your goals?

    If there's an embedded accelerometer, can the instrument detect tossing/turning at night? With the blood oxygenation, could it detect sleep apnea? Snoring? Other sleep disorders?

    Could the device detect dust levels in the manner of a [non-radioactive] smoke detector? Would this be useful for people to monitor their allergies?

    I once worked with a scientist at Berman Gund laboratories (Boston) who was amazed [at the time] that you could put a microprocessor on a lanyard connected to a light sensor mounted on the patient's eyeglasses. He wanted to see if the progression of Retinitis Pigmentosa correlated with the amount of light entering the patient's eyes.

    Light sensors are now cheap and tiny.

    Does the amount of light in a user's environment correlate with depression? With SAD? Does fluorescent light correlate with depression? Does brightness matter or total daily duration?

    Will it have a GPS receiver? Could it display an arrow and distance information?

    Lots of applications here. Telling time is almost an afterthought.

  15. MotoActv by jfinke · · Score: 2

    Google already owns a smart watch. It is called the Motorola MotoActv. It is a smart GPS watch running android and can interface with some android phones. It has Wifi, BT, ANT+, FM, with GPS, Touchscreen, music player, etc. I believe that someone has jailbroken it already. Unfortunately, Moto was slipping on their support and since Google has bought them it has just gotten worse.

  16. Re:Watch! by turp182 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My "smart watch" performs basic watch features (the time, stopwatch, alarms) as well as altitude, relative atmospheric pressure, temperature (can't be on the wrist for that), and a compass.

    Smart enough, and it basically lasts forever as it is solar powered enough.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  17. Re:Watch! by Kelbear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Until recently I had no tablet because I had no need for one. But recently I bought a refurb. Nexus 7 for $162, because since having a baby, I need to be where the baby is. For the 3 months after he was born I had pretty much no access to electronics outside of work. If I want to consume some content, the phone is too small, laptop too clunky, and desktop is somewhere else in the house.

    Thus the tablet is a perfect fit, it serves up the content at an ideal screen size as I walk around the house, and is held in one hand (especially important!), and serves as the video baby monitor I can take with me around the house.

    Tablets had no purpose in my home...until they did.

    Watches are probably going to be a harder sell. Possibly useful as a hands-free extension for smartphones, but I'm not a heavy phone user (living on a 150mb per month data cap), so it'll take a long time for me to find a use for a smart watch. But I'm sure there are plenty of people who can make use of them.