Slashdot Mirror


Happy World Backup Day

An anonymous reader writes "Easter isn't the only thing some people are celebrating today. Today is also World Backup Day. What steps have you taken to be able to resurrect your data, instead of having it go to eternal oblivion?"

154 comments

  1. Done it the hard way by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

    I've committed every one and zero to memory.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:Done it the hard way by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've committed every one and zero to memory.

      Me too, however, recalling the order of them is something I'm still working on.

    2. Re:Done it the hard way by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      speaking of which time to run mine.. * logins to cssh to all my systems and runs the script for daily backup.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    3. Re:Done it the hard way by PNutts · · Score: 1

      I've committed every one and zero to memory.

      That's too much work when I can just read them off Fry's ass.

    4. Re:Done it the hard way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would you save the zeros?

    5. Re:Done it the hard way by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Done it the hard way by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      It's all a waste of time, anyway. The world has already been backed up, don't worry about your own little bits and pieces of it.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te6qG4yn-Ps

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:Done it the hard way by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      I can resurrect my data, but I know that if it lasts more than 4 hours, I'm supposed to call a doctor...

  2. Wonder when is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    World Restore Day?

    1. Re:Wonder when is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The day before World Backup Day.

    2. Re:Wonder when is by kmoser · · Score: 1

      After World Verify Day.

    3. Re:Wonder when is by slater86 · · Score: 1

      I think that's 3 days later?

      --
      When people ask if I'm an optimist, I say "I hope so". --Bill Bailey
  3. Easter is Backup Day? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait a sec. I should think it would be "Restore" day. At least for those of the various Christian persuasions.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, really. Backup Day should be on the Thursday preceding Good Friday.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

      No, Backup Day would make more sense if it falls on Easter... Easter was when Jesus went Backup to heaven!

      **da dum ta**

      --
      No sig for you! Come back one year!
    3. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. A backup is little good if one can't restore from it.

    4. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can't be restored if you haven't been saved.

    5. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually no, that was 40 days after His resurrection. nice try tho.

    6. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Friday will next occur on "All Fools Day" in 2067, it last occurred on April 1 in 1994. Obviously, that was the association you wanted.

    7. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by OfficeSupplySamurai · · Score: 1

      You're probably making a joke, but to be clear Backup Day is March 31, the day before April Fools' Day (don't be a fool with your data, etc. etc.). It just happens to fall on the same day as Easter this year.

    8. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, this is something we all probably don't do enough. How good are the backups if you can't restore from them? Do you really want the first time you verify your backups to be after a disaster?

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    9. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by CODiNE · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily.
      Acts 24:15 "There will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous"

      So it's more like an offsite whole-disk backup. That let's the operator later restore files they may not have originally planned to.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    10. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by fa2k · · Score: 2

      Wait a sec. I should think it would be "Restore" day. At least for those of the various Christian persuasions.

      Ignoring the joke for a second, Restore Day is a great idea! The only thing worse than not having backups is to have faulty backups, believing they are OK.

    11. Re:Easter is Backup Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really. Backup Day should be on the Thursday preceding Good Friday.

      Actually I think "Back Up" day is surprisingly appropriate.

  4. Wait, backup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World Backup Day?

    Wait, backup...

  5. Two for one by Murdoch5 · · Score: 2

    I always buy hard disks in Pairs and Raid them, each disk has a back up.

    1. Re:Two for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if serious...

    2. Re:Two for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raid is NOT backup, it is redundancy... Clue is kinda in the name.

      A backup must handle situations such as deletion(by accident or by 3rd party) all raid gives you is two disks without the data that has just been deleted.

    3. Re:Two for one by poity · · Score: 2

      What if a surge takes both of them out? Wouldn't it be safer to leave one drive completely disconnected and only turned on for syncing to the other?

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    4. Re:Two for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have a RAID array of Dropbox and Amazon S3 drives... I don't give a shit about anything.

    5. Re:Two for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a backup bro...

    6. Re:Two for one by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Oh I have high quality power surpression on all the wall outlets that I connect computers or AV equipment to. So well a surge could happen it would have to make it through a very high quality surve power bar and a UPS. So I'm not actually worried about it. The PSU's in all my computers are also super high quality, so if they did every blow ( which hasn't happened to me ) I would jsut prosue the manufacture because they're covered. For me none of the data is really so important that I'm going to take additional steps to be safe.

    7. Re:Two for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if a surge takes both of them out? Wouldn't it be safer to leave one drive completely disconnected and only turned on for syncing to the other?

      And while we're at it, what about offsite? How offsite you need depends on how important the data...

      Somewhere in NYC on 9/11, someone must have had a conversation like this:

      *boom*

      "Well, at least we don't have to worry about the data. Even if the whole building falls down, we have hot failover in the form of a duplicate set of servers and mirrored drives over there in WTC 2..."

      *boom*

      "Shit."

    8. Re:Two for one by danomac · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a RAID 6 and I just noticed the other day that one disk dropped out. Waiting for WD to ship me a replacement.

      Talk about alarm/monitoring fail: the monitoring tools nor the card gave any hint of a problem. Wonder how long it's been like that.

      Most of the stuff I have on my computer I could care less if I lost it. Pictures? Meh. The ones I cared about I actually had developed. Music? Meh. I'll re-rip all my CDs. That's a pain, but I wouldn't technically lose anything. Other miscellaneous (taxes, etc.)? Have hard copies.

    9. Re:Two for one by rgmoore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What if a surge takes both of them out?

      Or user stupidity erases the vital data? Or malware starts corrupting your files? Or a disaster destroys the whole computer?

      RAID is a great solution to hard drive failure, but it doesn't cover all of the other things that might go wrong. For that, you need a proper off-line backup that can protect you against user or OS problems, ideally one that's located far enough away to recover your data in the event of a disaster. RAID is best in addition to, not as a replacement for, true backups.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    10. Re:Two for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still too soon.

    11. Re:Two for one by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      What if a surge takes both of them out?

      Or user stupidity erases the vital data? Or malware starts corrupting your files? Or a disaster destroys the whole computer?

      RAID is a great solution to hard drive failure, but it doesn't cover all of the other things that might go wrong. For that, you need a proper off-line backup that can protect you against user or OS problems, ideally one that's located far enough away to recover your data in the event of a disaster. RAID is best in addition to, not as a replacement for, true backups.

      I've been wondering about this.

      What if I have a RAID1 array and a bunch of spare drives. I pull a drive from the array and plug one of the spares in. Now the pulled drive is a backup and the array is syncing onto the new disk.

      So long as the array does the right thing when I put one of the old disks in (ie it syncs over the old data and doesn't sync from it (ouch)) I should be able to carry on like this and maintain a backup set. Right?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    12. Re:Two for one by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Nice subtle troll there. As everyone knows RAID is not a backup.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Two for one by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Raid is a backup, if you have drive mirroring going on then you have an active backup at all times.

    14. Re:Two for one by Peter+Bortas · · Score: 1

      A bit controller dependant, but yes, many sysadms keep a copy of the OS this way when they do risky upgrades.

    15. Re:Two for one by Peter+Bortas · · Score: 1

      If it's one thing you take from backup this, please let it be this: Redundancy is not backup. Many tears have been shed from misunderstanding this.

    16. Re:Two for one by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      The formal definition might not be correct but logically if you have all the information being mirrored then you do have a backup! Well many people wont agree and I'm not saying they're wrong, having a Raid setup does give you a "copy" of your data and therefore means you have a backup. A backup good enough for what I need, well it might not suit the business world, it does suit my house perfectly.

    17. Re:Two for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if your house burns down?

    18. Re:Two for one by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Works fine as long as the controller / RAID software syncs the remaining good disk to the newly installed disk and not the other way around.

      If you plan on doing something like that regularly, you should consider doing a 3-way mirror (3 disks, RAID-1) so that you're left with two good disks after pulling one. Easily done in Linux software RAID or the better (real hardware) RAID controllers.

      (My feeling is that if you are going to dedicate a spare disk to a RAID-1 array, you may as well make use of it by making it the 3rd mirror. Depending on the controller, you lose no write speed but you gain more security and possibly slightly better read performance.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    19. Re:Two for one by Peter+Bortas · · Score: 1

      It not a backup if you can not restore a deleted file from it. A backup saves you from mistakes, redundancy saves you from broken hardware.

    20. Re:Two for one by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree, a backup is an N > 1 version of any data.

  6. The traditional way by Solid+StaTe_1 · · Score: 2

    I've made sure the phone number for the local data recovery services is taped to the side of the server.

    --
    Build a man a fire and you warm him for a day. Set a man on fire and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:The traditional way by brickmack · · Score: 1

      If that's your only backup system (and this is a server you say?) you're gonna have a problem. What if the data can't be recovered? And those places usually charge a LOT more than it would cost to just buy a few backup drives and back it up yourself

  7. I use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use ZFS. 100% safe, right? I'll backup to the cloud when amazon ec2 or equivelant service starts accepting drives for putting online in australia.

    1. Re:I use... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      ZFS can implement some backup on top of it's reliability - in that the snapshots can allow you to recover recently-deleted files, but it's not really a true replacement for a real backup - something that you can pull the files off of if your entire server goes down.

      My home server has ZFS (with hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly snapshots that get cleaned up on a regular basis), but I also use tarsnap for regular backups. It stores encrypted (and deduped) incrementals of your data on an Amazon store.

      My desktop mounts some of it's files (including a couple of whole users) from the home server, for the rest I use OS X's Time Machine - not quite as good as a remote backup scheme, but cheaper, and easy to set up.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  8. Time machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I had to use it last week after my drive died.

  9. Automated backup by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

    Automated incremental backup of the headless servers at home, every two days (and I check the backup logs regularly). The backup disks are cycled every 4 weeks: the existing set goes to an insulated box in the garage (a separate heated building), while the previous disks come in and start with a full backup. Our 4 workstations at home all get backed up to local USB disks, but these are merely for convenience - important files are always kept on the servers, where they belong.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Automated backup by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Automated incremental backup of the headless servers at home, every two days (and I check the backup logs regularly). The backup disks are cycled every 4 weeks: the existing set goes to an insulated box in the garage (a separate heated building), while the previous disks come in and start with a full backup. Our 4 workstations at home all get backed up to local USB disks, but these are merely for convenience - important files are always kept on the servers, where they belong.

      You don't belong on this planet.

      Seriously, I run RAID, cross-machine mirroring, then do daily backups, with the logs emailed to me each morning. Periodic external media copies to DVD and USB devices. In my case, I have incentive, though. I used to work for a big-name backup software company and knew of design flaws that meant that a certain percentage of backups would write out defective data. And got burned in later years when I was compelled to use the product for my later employer. Because the RAID arrays would blow a disk the minute I'd leave on vacation, then blow a second one before I got back to replace it. And the restore would fail.

      For a long time I used TAR scripts, because unlike the fancy expensive commercial products, I could always count on being able to use a tarball as long as the media itself was undamaged.

      Ironically, this is the weekend I started learning Bacula. Tar is reliable, but it doesn't manage media catalogs.

    2. Re:Automated backup by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Automated incremental backup of the headless servers at home, every two days (and I check the backup logs regularly). The backup disks are cycled every 4 weeks: the existing set goes to an insulated box in the garage (a separate heated building), while the previous disks come in and start with a full backup. Our 4 workstations at home all get backed up to local USB disks, but these are merely for convenience - important files are always kept on the servers, where they belong.

      You don't belong on this planet.

      Well, maybe just on this tiny little fragment of the planet. Among other wierdnesses, we're linux-only at home - servers, laptops, desktops - which helps a lot with automating stuff. BTW, the kids picked up Linux quite easily, and are now proficient in using xfce as much as in using Windows XP or 7 (their schools endure both).

      Seriously, I run RAID, cross-machine mirroring, then do daily backups, with the logs emailed to me each morning. Periodic external media copies to DVD and USB devices. In my case, I have incentive, though. I used to work for a big-name backup software company and knew of design flaws that meant that a certain percentage of backups would write out defective data. And got burned in later years when I was compelled to use the product for my later employer. Because the RAID arrays would blow a disk the minute I'd leave on vacation, then blow a second one before I got back to replace it. And the restore would fail.

      I dread the day I'll have to restore from backups; this is a major motivation for being ready for it. The instant I'm unready, Murphy will surely smite us...

      Restoring should go easily on replacement servers, and I had a dry-run of restoring a backup when we added the second server, since it was pretty much empty at the time. All of our media are on the backup schedule, because I figured that it would just take too long to re-rip all the CDs and DVDs. Similarly, although all our photos have raw files dumped to DVD-R, I don't test those DVD-R disks for error-free readability often enough (a handful are tested maybe once per year, and so far, no issues), so all of the photo directories are backed up. Also, regenerating the jpegs from raw files would take a huge amount of time and DVD-R swapping. And then there are the home movies, most of which exist only on the media server, with a few duplicated on the web server. It really is remarkable how much we've shifted to digital formats, which could all get wiped out in a single incident.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    3. Re:Automated backup by PNutts · · Score: 1

      The backup disks are cycled every 4 weeks: the existing set goes to an insulated box in the garage (a separate heated building), while the previous disks come in and start with a full backup.

      That's a bad strategy: Conflagration, flood, tornado, hurricane, theft, landslide, sinkhole, etc. Pretty much anything catastrophic wipes them out.

  10. Foolproof backups by cwebster · · Score: 1

    I catalog all of my 1s and 0s in a series of sequentially numbered composition notebooks. College ruled, 100 pages each.

    And then I photocopy them for redundancy.

    1. Re:Foolproof backups by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

      I don't like the mess, so I group the ones and zeros sequentially.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    2. Re:Foolproof backups by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      and a heck of a fire risk...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    3. Re:Foolproof backups by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Aha, the trick is, only the ones actually carry information - that's when the bit is actually holding a voltage. So, you can compress out all the zeros and get a roughly 2:1 saving on space!

      The only downside is that for decompressing, the codebook is necessarily rather large, in fact the same size as your original data. But the compression works well and it's fast!

    4. Re:Foolproof backups by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      my one's and zero's are just like my women.

      I have binders full of 'em!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Tapes / LTO-5 / Cheap / offsite storage / no text by burni2 · · Score: 1

    damn I was forced to write text.

  13. The manly backup by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    "Only wimps use tape backup: real men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it." - Linus Torvalds, 1996

    1. Re:The manly backup by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Unless they've got the mirrors set up to automatically replicate your mistakes, in which case it's possible to accidentally delete every copy of it in existence everywhere... (This nearly happened to one OSS project recently.)

      Mirrors are not backup. They are uptime reliability.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    2. Re:The manly backup by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Only wimps use tape backup: real men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it." - Linus Torvalds, 1996

      Alternatively, send it to Wikileaks.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  14. You know, I really should backup my important crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, right now now.

    There is a considerable amount of stuff that is trial and error, pure grunt work and research.
    All that stuff is valuable, if I were to lose it I'd just headbutt my desk till I have no head any more, or become some Saw-like vigilante.
    Screw doing all that stuff again, even if some of it is holding me back and rewriting from scratch would be better overall, the time it would take to do it all again would be murderously time-consuming.

    Most of it fits within several GBs, and I have been considering doing loads of flash drive backups rather than use hard drives since they are more brittle and prone to damage.
    Using 10 flash drives would be better than the size you can afford with a hard drive if your data is small enough and in this case very important.
    Now to just write some scripts to make file-difference checks and only backup what is needed.
    USB RAID here I come. Too much effort, going to sleep instead. Night.

  15. I've done nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My data is all in the clouds, with Jesus!

  16. What is the best online backup service? by zyzko · · Score: 1

    So...I'll shoot:

    What is the best online backup service? It doesn't have to be the cheapest (but it helps) - I have used Crashplan and tested Livedrive - they both offer unlimited option and a hassle-free client which works at least quite good, but as Crashplan had a price-hike I'm looking for something else, or is there maybe even superior service I should look into (I'm thinking a scenario where my main OS hard drive just quits with no warning, are there simple online solutions to fully restore you from disaster - I understand this is quite a difficult problem but hey, I'm allowed to ask?)

    1. Re:What is the best online backup service? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I swear by MegaUpload... ...said one of the world's most OCD document packrats in December 2011.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    2. Re:What is the best online backup service? by LRAD · · Score: 2

      Amazon Glacier is supposed to be pretty cool for long term archival. It's cheap per gigabyte, but the caveat is that there is a wait time to pull your data out of their archives, so it's not suitable for something that needs to be online immediately. Haven't tried it quite yet, but the idea makes sense to me. https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/

    3. Re:What is the best online backup service? by alen · · Score: 1

      how much do you really need to back up?

      i have about 80GB of family photos that i really care about. they are on separate hard drives
      porn, who cares. its all in the cloud and all the same
      pirated movies? if you have to spend money to backup and manage pirated content you might as well buy DVD's or legit digital content like itunes
      important documents? i use dropbox for that

    4. Re:What is the best online backup service? by zyzko · · Score: 1

      I don't need necessarily an unlimited solution. My photos and music (which I have also on CDs but it is a great frigging pain to re-rip them) are the ones I need. And yeah, separate hard drives do a fine job, but if the price is right I'd like to outsource it (and there is the plus side that if for some reason those both hard drives are fried I have an off-site backup). A huge bonus would be if I could have an off-site disaster recovery backup of my OS disk (Windows here...) but I guess that is something that is not done yet.

    5. Re:What is the best online backup service? by Skater · · Score: 2

      I've been using it for a few months, using CloudGates.net to transfer data to it (the SimpleAmazonGlacierUploader java applet had a bug in it that affects larger files - not sure if it's been fixed yet). It's pretty great - I have 136 gigabytes of data at the moment, so I get a bill for $1.36 each month. For the money, the hassle of building a server to put at a friend's place isn't worth it, and I couldn't find any other backup solutions that are as cheap. Yes, directory listings and downloads take a few hours, but... if my house burns down and I'm recovering this data, I'm not going to mind a few hours' wait.

    6. Re:What is the best online backup service? by SpzToid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks a lot for writing up this suggestion. I had no idea Amazon Glacier was only a penny per gigabyte, and thus a realistic way for me to backup virtual machines offsite, finally, (using only my available slow home upload bandwidth). Which got me to Searching on the net...

      CloudGates.net does indeed look like a useful service.

      A Search engine lead me to a free Windows client called FastGlacier http://fastglacier.com/faq.aspx

      This technote from 'AWS Blog' explains how to use the more standard and better documented Amazon S3 Data buckets to automatically offload data after a specified time to Amazon Glacier storage. The trick is to create a lifecycle rule. I'm inclined to try this, once I get myself better organized, although CloudGates also looks very worthy. Kudos! http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2012/11/archive-s3-to-glacier.html

      Happy World Backup Day!

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  17. I just run DBAN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I want a backup? It's better to just purge and start fresh every year.

    Anything you don't remember to reinstall, you never needed.

    Do the same thing with your possessions.

    1. Re:I just run DBAN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you didn't throw away your sega cd.

  18. Failed method by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I put all my data in a cave and sealed the entrance with a big rock -- but three days later it was all gone.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Failed method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's okay, your data just went to the cloud.

    2. Re:Failed method by sootman · · Score: 1

      Not a big deal. It was a long time ago.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  19. Time machine and SVN by Jeremi · · Score: 2

    Time machine requires about zero maintenance and will help me recover quickly if my main hard drive dies. Of course, if a fire or theft results in the simultaneous loss of the backup drive as well, I'm out of luck. So for data that's worth spending a little extra time securing, checking it in to an SVN server works for me.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:Time machine and SVN by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Time machine requires about zero maintenance and will help me recover quickly if my main hard drive dies. Of course, if a fire or theft results in the simultaneous loss of the backup drive as well, I'm out of luck. So for data that's worth spending a little extra time securing, checking it in to an SVN server works for me.

      I wonder if an arrangement with the neighbours would help: "I put my Time Capsule in your loft, and you put yours in my loft". Now you would need a fire that destroys two houses for permanent data loss, and at that point you won't cry about the data loss, but celebrate that you are both still alive.

    2. Re:Time machine and SVN by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I wonder if an arrangement with the neighbours would help: "I put my Time Capsule in your loft, and you put yours in my loft".

      Sure, that could work. Of course take this idea to its logical extreme and you have BuddyBackup (not meant as an endorsement, just as an example; I'm sure there are other similar services out there that are just as good)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  20. The First Three by meerling · · Score: 3, Funny

    The First Three Rules of Computing

    1 - Backup
    2 - Backup
    3 - See Rules 1 & 2

    Of course, I have no idea how to backup a world. What kind of media would you use, cosmic string recorders?

    1. Re:The First Three by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      1 - Backup often
      2 - Verify that you can restore from your backup often
      3 - See Rules 1 & 2, often


      Most people and businesses don't do Rule 2. Just because the the log didn't report any errors for the backup doesn't mean that you can restore from the backups.

    2. Re:The First Three by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you know what they say. Jesus saves.

    3. Re:The First Three by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      1 - Backup often

      2 - Verify that you can restore from your backup often

      3 - See Rules 1 & 2, often

      Most people and businesses don't do Rule 2. Just because the the log didn't report any errors for the backup doesn't mean that you can restore from the backups.

      If you don't do backups you may as well not do business. If you don't do restore tests you may as well not do backups.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  21. Re:Tapes / LTO-5 / Cheap / offsite storage / no te by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For values of "cheap" that make me wonder if I really care about my vacation photos that much.

  22. Who needs backups when you have faith? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that when when my hard drive dies, on the third day it will live again in fulfillment of scripture.

  23. Manual Encrypted Backups by LRAD · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a 3TB drive and filled up my case entirely. I took out my old 750 and 640GB drives and got an Orico 2 Bay Drive dock. One will consist of an encrypted volume filled with all my non-video media backups and virtual machine disk images, and the other will contain my system image via windows backup. I'll probably update the backups ever month or so. Plus I can pull the drives out of this thing and store them in a cool dry place in static bags in case my computer gets struck by lightning.

  24. Done it the easy way by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've committed one and zero to memory.

    I'll be able to regenerate all the data using just those two numbers.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    1. Re:Done it the easy way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should memorize another 1 (for parity)

  25. Backblaze. by RealGene · · Score: 2

    That is all.

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
  26. Crashplan free by bbqpope · · Score: 2

    I use crashplan's client and all my pcs backup to my home server. All my photos get backed up to a second disk that I keep off site. Their software works pretty flawlessly. I was going to use their cloud service but photo and video data would take months to seed.

    1. Re:Crashplan free by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I use their hosted backups in addition to local and offsite. The price is just too good to pass up (~6$/month for 10 machines when I signed up). They do security right, have no space limit or speed throttling. Take the hit and start backing stuff up. It will eventually finish and at some point you may be glad you did it. Of course, you could also back up using their client to a friends machine, and vice-versa, but I figure their hosting is less trouble (and you could always do both).

    2. Re:Crashplan free by bbqpope · · Score: 1

      I had thought about just asking one of my folks if i could hook up an old netbook and an external drive at their house and have it do my backups. Maybe I should do it. The software itself is just so easy and flexible.

  27. Relaaaaax by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Funny

    You guys are just a bunch of paranoid sons of b ~ '[ &z ( j ` NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Relaaaaax by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      At least we've gotten off of dialup.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  28. dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by vinn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I managed to go 16 years in the IT world, first as a sys admin and now up through an awesome mid-level management position, without any serious data management scares. (And by 'awesome', I mean I work for demoralizing leadership and I've hit a glass ceiling which will force me to go find another company to work for if I want any shot at career advancement.) I've always made sure there's many, many layers of redundancy and good processes in place.

    That was until three weeks ago.

    We use Microsoft DFS to sync data between two sites. Because of some other things going on, we had to turn DFS off for 3 weeks. We thought we had everyone transitioned to using the "master" file repository, the one that gets backed up every night, etc, etc. The day we turned on DFS back on, all hell broke loose.

    Oh - and this is fairly important stuff: 10 years worth of CAD, design, and legal paperwork. It's a few terabytes worth. For our medium-size company, this is basically everything that we hold near and dear.

    The first thing that happened is DFS completely puked and completely trashed BOTH filesystems. Fantastic, Microsoft - what a wonderful piece of shit DFS is. Fairly quickly we had to face some data integrity issues. First, we discovered apparently there was a fella at the remote site that was using the copy of files there. Great.. through a fairly manual process we were able to retrieve most of his changes to the dataset. Next, we fairly quickly gave up on trying to fix the DFS - on the advice of Microsoft it seemed to be fairly hopeless.

    This is where shit gets real.

    Our head sys admin had been troubleshooting an issue with a drive in a RAID'ed NAS backup device had failed. All the other backups had been shifted to other NAS devices, but that backup was so large that it apparently had just been failing. While looking for that, we also discovered the quarterly backup from December had failed (that's the point where I wanted to put on my manager hat and go rip someone a new one, but decided that probably wouldn't be the most productive thing at the moment and could save that little teachable moment asskicking until after we were out of the woods.) Now, the sys admin hadn't been completely foolish, before turning DFS back on he had run some full backups using a different NAS device.

    In a f*cking brilliant stroke of disastrous luck, when we went to perform the recovery we discovered that RAID array on the backup NAS device also had corruption.

    Now, how bad the corruption was and what exactly that meant remained to be seen. The backups had completed without error, it was the NAS filesystem itself that was throwing the errors. The NAS was still running and our backup software seemed to recognize the backup catalogs on it. Ok, other than what seemed to one potentially corrupt backup, it was seeming like the next best case scenario was a quarterly backup from September, and I was also staring a complete set of disks from 2010 dreading the thought of bringing them back online. Well, with nothing to do other than try a restore, we pressed the button.

    That's when I went home mid-morning, chainsmoked four cigarettes on my porch and wondered what would happened if everything went south. In other words, I was contemplating my next job.

    'Lo and behold, and restore worked. We had to merge all kinds of things back together to get a complete copy reassembled, then we still had to get DFS working (which took four days of syncing over the WAN.) When it was all said and done, it looked like there were just two files from one set of changes that we couldn't recover.

    I think I'll go double check on the backup jobs now.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      So, you did co-ordinate with other groups, run a trial to see what would happen when DFS gets shut down, don't verify that your backups actually work (instead you just check to see if any errors happen in the logs), and you aren't checking your hardware for errors (or at least your hardware group isn't if it's a different group). I really don't think you can say that can say that you have made sure that there are many good processes in place. I mean you didn't even realize your backups were failing because they were too large!
      At a minimum you want someone to try to restore a couple of random files from a weekly backup. Your monthly backup should be tested more thoroughly as in a full restore on a test machine.
      A backup that you can't restore from is NOT a backup!
      If this happened in my company not only would ass be kicked but jobs would be lost.

    2. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      _quarterly_ backups? o.O

      In all honesty, a few TB shouldn't be so painful you had to resort to quarterly backups. There's a better way.

      This is where we can't tell you to fire your backup admin because you didn't have one.

      My employer runs things similarly, not really judging yours :\ Just saying, this is what happens when data protection is not taken seriously.

    3. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that it sounds like the GP's company is pretty small, if I had to hazard a guess, I'd say the only higher paying positions are filled by existing senior IT staff so the GP's choices are switch companies or wait for the more senior people to leave.

    4. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is: you didn't make sure as to who was using which repository, you didn't make sure that your quarterly backup worked, or that your latest backups worked, you decided to turn the DFS back on while knowing your head sys admin was working on a problem affecting your backup solution, and you still claim to have "many layers of redundancy and good processes in place"?

      Sounds to me like you should be getting on your knees and giving the guy who - according to your account - autonomously decided to make another backup a blowjob. You know, just as a thank you for saving your job.

      Can't help but wonder what the story would sound like from his perspective.

    5. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Learn to do a test restore. A backup is useful, a proven working backup is priceless

    6. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      Bosses discriminate against other traits -- disability (even if "in the closet" they're often just perceptible enough), not finishing college, majoring in a non-STEM discipline, being unmarried, being childless or childfree, not being openly religious, age, and a strongly introverted or shy personality are the ones I've heard of, offhand.

      That said, plenty of women are mistaken for men online (often deliberately) because they have a unisex username, act confident, and/or have preferences/interests associated with guys. It has happened here on /. at least once even to women that had a username containing a female epithet like "chick" or "girl."

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    7. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Glass ceiling specifically refers to discrimination against women in the workplace. You're using the term wrong. Stop it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/lp0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most commonly != exclusively. He used the term correctly. And you agree completely, you're just trying to pretend you don't because you can't face the fact that you fucked up as you always do.

  29. Amazon Glacier for cheap offsite. by phase_9 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Amazon Glacier has really changed my backup strategy since this time last year - I now push all my own, generated content (ie: pictures, documents, things I could never get back if I lost everything) up to Glacier using the free Windows client, Fast Glacier. In February I was charged $0.13 by Amazon for storing ~8Gb of data. I tend to push new content up as and when I create it (for example, after I process holiday snaps, or get back from a day out).

    Day to day file changes are now handled by Windows 8's File History feature where my changes are pushed to a small NAS (Dlink DNS-320) in my shed (technically off site?) over a Homeplug AV ethernet link. For added security I use the legacy Windows Backup application (still present in Windows 8) to create ~ monthly snapshots of the system which I store on a 320Gb external HDD. This drive is one of two which go back and forth between my parents house each time I got and visit. These disks are encrypted using Microsoft Bitlocker drive encryption.

    I should get around to properly encrypting my NAS in the shed, I've been looking at encfs.

    1. Re:Amazon Glacier for cheap offsite. by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      While on the surface your backup suggestion seems valid, in reality one must also assess how realistic a successful recovery will be, for you, and at what cost to you.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  30. Re:Tapes / LTO-5 / Cheap / offsite storage / no te by burni2 · · Score: 2

    LTO5 Drive - 500€ (these are getting cheaper on ebay)
    LTO5 tape - 35€ (shipping included, buy more / lower per unit price)

    1.5TB per 35€ (23€ per TB)

    4TB Drive 200€ (50€ per TB)

    but to do backup with HDDs you need two so
    4TB == 400€ (100€ per TB)

    when hitting the I will need 8TB storage space soon, you do the math and will realize that tapes are better.

    vacation photos -> it's part of your identity

  31. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RAID 1

    1. Re:Obviously by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

      RAID!=Backup.
      RAID=REDUNDANCY. Clue is in the name.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  32. Just wait three days. by julian67 · · Score: 3, Funny

    No need to do anything. When disaster strikes just wait three days and it simply restores itself. Shortly afterwards the data ascends into The Cloud and becomes available forever and ever. Halleluiah!

    1. Re:Just wait three days. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      No need to do anything. When disaster strikes just wait three days and it simply restores itself. Shortly afterwards the data ascends into The Cloud and becomes available forever and ever. Halleluiah!

      I dunno. From what I hear, you can plead with it all you like after that, but it will only answer you if it feels like it.

  33. Videos to MP4 by microcars · · Score: 1

    finally started digitizing all my home videos (that include work documentation over the years too) to MP4 format. I have at least 100 tapes (8mm and miniDV). I import about 3-4 a day and then let FCP batch process them while I sleep. I can still edit them if I want, but I've already done that with the ones I want. Right now I just want to be able to skim through a 2hr video to find something without sticking the tape into the machine.

    --
    I like microcars
  34. Re:Tapes / LTO-5 / Cheap / offsite storage / no te by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn I was forced to write text.

    What happens when you drop that LTO tape?

    Good luck with that!

  35. amdump fulldump by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

    Wait ... so you read /. and you thought a Microsoft tool would avoid disasters? I think rapid reading classes are needed - quickly followed by an LTO drive and some tapes.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  36. QuickPar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're worried about the quality of your backup media (or about your own DEX) you can use QuickPar to add redundancy. It has saved my backups from oblivion on multiple occasions.

  37. Amazon Glacier by kubajz · · Score: 2

    I never trusted "cloud" backups but recently I looked into Amazon Glacier - and now my personal backups are stored with "eleven nines" reliability, encrypted, and with price roughly 10 times lower than services such as Dropbox or Google Drive. No affiliation with Amazon... but the question was "how do you do it" so this is my answer.

  38. March 31st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    March 31st so that an April Fools day joke of deleting all your data won't have much of an impact to you.

    1. Re:March 31st by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      and lower your blood pressure to go with when the joke comes around.

  39. Quick, backup Youtube ! by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ... we only have a few hours left before they will delete everything !
    (grabs 3.5" floppy drive and starts downloading...)

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  40. Oops... by wanfuse123 · · Score: 1

    When is data recovery day? Have to wait till then for discounts on getting my _________(inject your whatever here, looking for some ideas). http://rawcell.com

  41. Deja Dup and Duplicity by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

    I ran a backup to my local external HD yesterday, and today decided to do it again, this time with all my music and moving pictures. I'm also investigating how to use Duplicity on its own to backup my personal material to online places (such as Ubuntu One).

    Unfortunately the Deja Dup developers decided that profiles or similar, where you could define different types of backups, where too complicated for the program. I mean, they said it would complicate the program too much for end users.

    Ideally I want to backup everything to my external HD. I also want to backup my material (stuff I created) to Ubuntu One etc. It's a lot easier to replace music than it is to replace a six thousand word essay on the future of /. (rocks fall; everyone dies).

    Duplicity duplicity.nongnu.org/ is backup done correctly. That is, encrypted, hopefully off-site, and hopefully regularly.

    --
    HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    1. Re:Deja Dup and Duplicity by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it will work with brand-name services rather than just servers, but you might look into LuckyBackup, as it does allow the creation & scheduling of multiple backup profiles. Combining it with SpiderOak (the best free online live-versioning backup I can find) set to constantly back up select crucial files & associated autosave directories works extremely well for me.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    2. Re:Deja Dup and Duplicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done correctly, unless you care about preserving hard links.

  42. Nothing complicated for my home system by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    I use a file server that uses RAID-Z2 to cover disk failures and daily backups to another partition to cover user failures. I snapshot the ZFS file systems and copy the snapshots to removable hard drives which are stored in a safe-deposit box at my bank to cover a site failure. I only offsite quarterly, but it is good enough for a home system. If my house burns down I will have more to worry about than 3 months of lost data.

    My physical and virtual machines use the file server for storage of important user data. Local directories are also backed up to the file server (in case I forget to consider something "important"). Windows machines get system state backups to the file server and Linux machines have important paths backed up as well.

    Backups are done with Bacula and the Windows system state backups are scheduled tasks so other then the manual process of taking the snapshots and delivering the hard drives the bank, it is all automated.

  43. Everything is in the cloud. by andyn · · Score: 1

    Had a head crash on my work laptop on Thursday. There was no need for restoring backups in the traditional sense since all company data was on SparkleShare (company internal git repo) and the few personal documents were in Dropbox. I pulled out a new laptop, installed SparkleShare and Dropbox and was good to go.

    1. Re:Everything is in the cloud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know it was a head crash how? You are full of crap to know why it failed.

  44. Prepare for interwebs cleaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is because backups need to be done in advance of the annual Internet spring cleaning.

  45. Every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every day is backup day if you're doing it right.

  46. Well, not quite, but .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I would have picked practically anything but a Microsoft branded solution for syncing the data between sites.

    I sure don't claim to have all the best answers for I.T. backup, but I'm in charge of redesigning an aging backup system for the office I work in -- and I'm finding you really need to choose your backup tools carefully.

    For example, the company purchased Symantec Backup Exec 2012 and wanted me to do the nightly backups with it, and a couple of LTO drives attached to one of the servers. I pretty quickly scrapped that plan, because among other things, I've never really been able to get that arrangement to keep running reliably without some babysitting. The software itself likes to crap out after 1-3 weeks or so of operation, reporting nonsense like "out of memory" errors during backups. Only a server reboot seems to get it working properly again. The tapes are, of course, also a source of some manual involvement. If nobody changes a tape when it's time for the next rotation, a backup gets missed. And as the existing drives were attached via 68-pin SCSI, it makes the hardware nearly obsolete. None of our newer servers had SCSI ports on them -- so I couldn't even move the backup software to a different physical machine if I wanted to.

    What's making much more sense for me, so far, is using the Veeam software on a dedicated "backup server" with a lot of disk space in it. Use it to do nightly backups of the virtual machines running on a VMWare box. Then back up shared folders of important data from the file server using that copy of Backup Exec on the backup server, but have it back up to disk instead of tape. Don't try to do anything "fancy" like backups of a server's "system state" -- and the software isn't nearly as likely to bomb out.

    THEN, use a freeware rsync utility to keep the backed-up data folders (from both Veeam and Backup Exec) synchronized with storage available at a remote site via a NAS, to serve as a secondary off-site backup.

    On the workstation side, your mobile users who save a lot of data to their machine's C: drives and don't xfer it all that regularly to the corporate servers are served well with subscriptions to CrashPlan. After testing several competitors, it was by far the most reliable and fastest at restoring data we needed. Very highly recommended. Just make sure they know to leave their computers on overnight once in a while so all the data gets backed up to the cloud without interruption.

  47. what steps? by zrbyte · · Score: 1

    Spideroak for my most essential work related things, home backup for everything else.

    1. Re:what steps? by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      Spideroak for my crucial working files along with local backup here, too; I find it's also helpful at times to have it back up the autosave/temp directories used when I work on them. I just wish that they'd come to their senses and offer a more reasonable pricing scheme -- a lot of users could use a few more GB for breathing room and would pay a few dollars each month (like ~$1/GB) for it, but will never come *close* to 100GB, let alone pay $100-120/year for the useless space, especially if our connection is too slow for large-scale backup/restore situations...

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
  48. Obligatory Bitcoin by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

    I embed the most important data in Bitcoin transactions, and let the geek world mirror the blockchain.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  49. My backup setup by rmstar · · Score: 2

    I use rdiff-backup on each of the machines I administer (my machines and those of my wife, at home and at work, plus laptops). rdiff-backup is nice because it saves the current snapshot as a directory that looks exactly like the one being backed up, so restoring stuff is really very trivial.

    The backup scripts run daily, backing up to the home directory of the user (a /home/$user/backups directory) so that casual deletion means at most a day of work lost. I rsync all those backup dirs weekly to one of three 1TB drives. They are about 60% full each.

    The three of them are rotated arround. One is next to me, one in the basement, and another in a drawer at my office. They get rotated every week.

    Seems pretty solid to me. A lot has to happen to leave me with a serious data loss.

  50. Multitrack masters by tepples · · Score: 1

    Music? Meh. I'll re-rip all my CDs. That's a pain, but I wouldn't technically lose anything.

    You'd still lose the multitrack masters if it's music that you wrote and recorded unless you burned a backup of the multitrack masters.

  51. GIT for backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently I started using GIT to create weekly backups of all important bits and bytes we have in our household. After commiting the changed files, I push it to a Linux box and a Windows file server (both configured with RAID volumes) with a few clicks on a button. Benefits:
    1) GIT is very fast
    2) History of the files is preserved
    3) With GIT clone and Beyond Compare it is easy the check if all files can be restored correctly
    4) It is not much work to encrypt & burn the GIT repos on DVDs, or push to Google Drive or something similar
    5) The whole procedure can easily be scripted and run a scheduled basis

  52. It works.. by fa2k · · Score: 1

    I've never had a data disaster, but I still have a somewhat complex setup:
    1. Automatic filesystem (ZFS) snapshots every 15 min on my desktop (home, also used for work from home) and RAID to protect against HW failures.
    2. Unison (http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/) sync between laptop and desktop keeps my home dir in two places (the important bits)
    3. Work files are synced to the organisation's system, and that's probably enough
    4. Rsync backup to external hard drive every ~3 days, drive is otherwise kept off line
    5. Data integrity scan (ZFS scrub) ~every month
    6. Rsync with checksums to backup drive to verify integrity, infrequently
    7. Off site backup on another HDD, every ~6 months
    The snapshots are perhaps the most useful, because they protect against user error. They do not protect against admin errors though, such as running "zfs" commands. I am lacking a bit on the off site backups, and would lose a lot of days of data if there was a fire or a burglary, but I don't produce that much personal data. There should also be an "8. Complete system restore on VM" to see that the backups are good, but as they are only standard Truecrypt volumes with an ext4 filesystem I can inspect them manually and be reasonably sure they are OK.

  53. Oddly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough, I backed up my data today, before I knew it was World Backup Day. I have a pair of 40gb hard drives in external USB cases (one black, one silver) that I use for backups. One drive is always off-site, and I exchange them every week.

    Thus I have a backup a week (or less) old here, and a backup 2 weeks old at most off-site. I started doing this shortly after some good friends had a fire, and lost everything. Like many folks today, they had about 6 months worth of family pictures that they had not downloaded from their digital camera.

    Fortunately for them, the were eventually able to pick apart the melted camera, and its memory card still worked. However, all of their computers were damaged beyond repair, along with all of their backups on CD-R and DVD-R.

    This incident shows how devestating a fire can be. The fire was contained in the kitchen at the back of the house, yet between the heat, smoke, and water dammage, their house and almost everything in it was damaged beyond repair or recovery. They tried to recover some clothes and other things from a bedroom at the front of the house, but the smoke smell would not come out of the clothes, and a laptop was internally dammaged by smoke and heat and was non-functional, its hard drive and motherboard un-recoverable. The smoke smell seemed to be sort of baked into everything they tried to recover.

    My research indicates that the best long term storage media are hard drives. Computers etc can be replaced. family photos, documents etc... cannot.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Forget Backup, We need world restore day by meatspray · · Score: 1

    If you don't back up, you'll have to start backing up to restore. If you do backup, you need to test your backups today. For the love of god don't just assume your stuff comes back out ok.

  56. So the world is back up, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When was it ever down?

    I must have missed it.

  57. Two complete backups by Demena · · Score: 1

    One local USB, one Network disk placed right by the exit in case I need to abandon ship in a hurry (Bushfire area). Backing up 1.3 terabytes twice consumes backup day. For the rest of the year I do incremental backups. Even if both backups were lost data could be recovered from the cloud.

  58. SpiderOak (and the cursed novel) by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

    I've had two data disasters over the years:

    1) In the early 90s, I was a teenager using a trusty Apple IIgs to write & edit my first full-length novel, first on 3.5" floppies and then a 20mb Seagate external hard drive. Two or three years into the project, when a summer of 6-8 hour days working on it had the first full rough draft 99% finished and partway into heavy restructuring/editing, I turned the IIgs on only to have it inform me there was no bootable disk. (I later learned that my mother had just vacuumed the drive, including running the brush along the grill.) I tried everything I could think of -- letting the drive warm up longer before turning the computer on, re-seating/moving/replacing the SCSI card -- with no luck. I *had* made floppy backups of the drive, but they turned out to be unreadable. I rewrote most of the missing chapters from memory, but the final two gave me enough trouble that I ultimately gave up.

    2) A few years ago, I got back into writing after a decade-long hiatus and eventually decided to try my hand at editing & finishing up the above-mentioned novel. Another year or so of work went by, this time with verified backups made both locally & with an online service that kept multiple versions of each file. I bought an old IBM T20 to work on away from my desk, but it couldn't handle both the online backup and OpenOffice, so I saved my files on a flash drive to transfer to the main system every night or two.

    After working intensely all weekend on a couple of chapters, I returned to my office plugged in the flash drive, and was informed that it was unformatted. I refrained from panic, and booted up the old IBM, since I'd set OpenOffice to auto-save every few minutes...only to discover that the autosave directory was empty & the temp folders lacked any relevant files. Using testdisk to investigate made it clear that even though the program had shown the little autosaving bar periodically while I worked, it had never actually done anything, so I was SOL there.

    I had dd copy the flash disk to an .img file, which required multiple passes as the drive evidently had some kind of very serious problem, made a copy of the .img, then ran testdisk on the copy to search for the most crucial files. The good news is that it found them; the bad news is that they were corrupt... The worse news, I soon learned, is that a single modern Open Document file is actually multiple files crammed together into a zipfile, and since a tiny problem can render a zipfile unopenable, the contents were lost. Frustrating & severely disheartening for me, but not half as bad as for the people showing up that lost a major work project or doctoral thesis and begged for help only to be smugly told they should've made backups more often.

    --
    Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    1. Re:SpiderOak (and the cursed novel) by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

      When I wrote my book http://dictatorshandbook.net/ I was using LaTeX on a Linux box, so in addition to regular (less-periodic) backups of the entire computer I put in place a system for backing up just the manuscript directory, as often as I wanted (usually at the end of a night of editing and writing). A USB key, a WebDAV directory, and an email account were all I needed, and here's the little Bash script I wrote to make it all work: http://www.therandymon.com/content/view/236/98/ This is one of the things I love about Linux as a writing environment.

      I use SpiderOak for my config and dot files, but still rely on burning the occasional DVD or CD-R for my other stuff, and I store the disks offsite. I know that's old-fashioned in the new, hip world of cloud storage, but I live in a place with slow internet and don't have the bandwidth for fancier stuff. And the DVD burning works, boo-yah.

      --
      If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
    2. Re:SpiderOak (and the cursed novel) by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

      I tell openOffice to use .fodt format. It's uncompressed.

  59. Disaster recovery by jandersen · · Score: 1

    I have spent quite some time last year, working on a disaster recovery plan for my company, and one thing I realised was, that of all the important things you have to do to be able to recover after a total wipe-out, back ups are actually the smallest. This is my list of priorities:

    1. People: we develop software, and it takes something like a whole year before a new developer is fully on top of their game. The sudden loss of even one of them would seriously hurt our ability to perform. How many could we survive losing in one go?

    2. Hardware: it can take anything from a few weeks to several months to replace a server, depending on the specs. Intel x64 based systems are easy to replace, but Itanium, SPARC and POWER less so. No HW = no production; how long could we survive that?

    3. Data: restoring data from an off-site backup takes a few days if it isn't urgent, so there isn't all that much of a loss involved, really, as long as you adhere rigidly to a sensible backup scheme.

    All of these problems can be addressed, of course, but the point is that one has to be prepared. And backups are likely to be the least part.

  60. The website is just for business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The website worldbackupday.com tells you that "World Backup Day and the Globe and Arrow are registered trademarks of 614a ltd. Any use of the trademarks and associated intellectual property must be under a license from 614a ltd.". They intend to make money by charging those who put the logo on their websites. This is not an iniciative of a data administrators community - it is just a company trying to make profit.-Ignacio Agulló

  61. 14 days too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just had a disk crash which caused 33% of my data stores to go to icing (as is a common phrase over here).