Slashdot Mirror


Massive Data Leak Reveals How the Ultra Rich Hide Their Wealth

bshell writes "According to the CBC, there was a massive leak of 'files containing information on over 120,000 offshore entities — including shell corporations and legal structures known as trusts — involving people in over 170 countries. The leak amounts to 260 gigabytes of data, or 162 times larger than the U.S. State Department cables published by WikiLeaks in 2010...In many cases, the leaked documents expose insider details of how agents would incorporate companies in Caribbean and South Pacific micro-states on behalf of wealthy clients, then assign front people called "nominees" to serve, on paper, as directors and shareholders for the corporations — disguising the companies' true owners.' Makes a good read and there are some good interactive components. Perhaps Slashdot readers can figure out how the source of the leak, the D.C.-based International Consortium of Investigative Journalists got their hands on this data."

38 of 893 comments (clear)

  1. It is as if there is no law by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this cannot end well.

    1. Re:It is as if there is no law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure it can! If anything, it will end far, far worse.

      You forget, laws don't apply to the upper caste the same way as with us proles. With this many upper caste members looking bad, this will either get swept under a rug and never spoken of again (this is the outcome you WANT to happen), or new laws will be written making what they're doing perfectly legal.

      But don't worry, we will MAYBE see one or two people who take the fall, so that all of us peons can think that "the system works", and that justice is being done. Whichever of the 1% is the least in favour with the rest of the 1% will likely be the ones who 'take a bullet for the team'. Those few who go down will naturally live in the cushiest, most opulent of conditions for their "prison", if they even get that. After that's over, we will hear nothing more of this, and the system will not change even slightly.

      Safe bet that there WILL be laws written in the future to protect the upper caste against problems occuring again though. So you're right... this cannot end well. For the 99%. Bad things don't happen to the vast, vast, vast majority of the upper caste, unless they need a sacraficial lamb (such as the few who will take the fall above). Bad things are for the peasants.

    2. Re:It is as if there is no law by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      this. The wealthy have freedom to keep their money and generally do with it as they wish. Same as they have school choice, can avoid the TSA, stay out of prison, etc. Different rules for them.

      The middle and lower classes live under an oppressive regime that largely keeps them this way, to the benefit of the wealthy. Both the wealthy and the politcal classes are quite satisfied with this state of affairs.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:It is as if there is no law by s.petry · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Absolute rubbish, and here is why. People like you are complacent, and believe yourself to be a tool for the people abusing you. Not only do you have that belief, but you are advocating this belief to others. That complacency, and willingness is normal, but sad behavior.

      The answer to the dilemma does come in time. Every so often, citizens behead the king and redistribute the wealth. Historically this is true, and the founding of the USA was an extreme example of this happening.

      The USA was built to have peaceful mechanisms in place to make this transition. What it could not do however, is make people become active in forcing changes. Fifty years of brain washing has people like you believing that you have no power, no voice, and no choices. We still have the power in the Constitution to make changes peacefully, but people like you have to stop being complacent and advocating complacency.

      Fortunately, there are people demanding changes and they will come eventually. I'm sure that you will be riding their coat tails when it happens to try and get a slice of the pie. Until that time you will sit on the coat tails of those currently abusing society happy to get their crumbs.

      Study "The Republic" and learn some history and you will realize that I'm correct on all accounts.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  2. Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have no problem asking service men and women to sacrifice time with their families, their personal well being and their lives...all under the banner of patriotism. Yet when we ask the wealthy to sacrifice for their country in the form of simply paying their taxes they hide it in off shore accounts and attack those who question this as "redistributors".

    Blow the whistle and blow it loud on these cringing cowards.

    http://www.ted.com/talks/lawrence_lessig_we_the_people_and_the_republic_we_must_reclaim.html

  3. Who cares how they got their hands on it? by JayPee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In this case I'd have to say, "who care how they got their hands on this data" and hope they do more work like this.

    Eat the rich.

    1. Re:Who cares how they got their hands on it? by jxander · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd even take it a step farther : I hope that we never find out how they got their hands on this data, whoever they are.

      Just so long as they keep doing good works, I for one hope they stay anonym- ... *ahem* under the radar

      --
      This signature is false.
  4. Oh, No, Don't Look Behind that Curtain! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The files contain information on over 120,000 offshore entities — including shell corporations and legal structures known as trusts — involving people in over 170 countries.

    Oh, no no no, tax evasion for the ultra rich that can play international games isn't the reason the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. No! From Forbes' response to the viral video "Wealth Inequality in America" they say:

    Look — we’re moving into the opening years of an economic revolution. The floods of Big Data pouring from the Internet and related technologies are washing away the foundational reasons for the existence of several of our most critical – and comforting – societal structures, potentially changing forever the very notion of what a company is, what a job is, what a brand is, what an educational degree means, and how we’ll work and govern and care for ourselves while attempting to live long and prosper. Almost every part of our existence is being restructured, and quickly, by the stunning power of nearly infinite information.

    Don't you see? It's not tax evasion or unfair taxation, it's just the magical power of the internet. Stop asking questions and demanding an equal opportunity to skirt income laws! It's "Big Data" that's changing things rapidly and excitingly. Stop fighting the Economic Revolution!

    What an absolute crock of shit.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  5. Take it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free society is incompatible with individuals wielding thousands or millions of times more unchecked power than others.

    1. Re:Take it by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I saw a blurb somewhere that summed it up for me:
      "Which is more likely: that 150 million Americans are lazy or that 400 Americans are greedy?"

      The context being that the top 400 have wealth equivalent to the bottom 50%.
      Income and wealth inequality is not some abstract concept.
      It is real and it is not about how whether the bottom 50% own TVs or a microwave.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  6. Nice to know but... by AngelFrog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nice and all to see the info come out but seriously, with that much money and that many wealthy, influential people involved, what is going to happen with this information? Nothing. A couple of hippies are going to protest against the 1% thingy while texting from their iPhone 5, be discredited, a couple of journalists are going to get vanished, the whole thing will get swept under the rug of the media coverage of an imminent war with North Korea. Problem solved. Damned i'm too young to be this jadded

  7. How the ICIJ got the data by bcore · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps Slashdot readers can figure out how the source of the leak, the D.C.-based International Consortium of Investigative Journalists got their hands on this data.

    The story on the CBC national news last night suggested that it was snail-mailed anonymously on a portable hard drive to a DC based journalist. This doesn't explain where the data ultimately came from, but does explain how the ICIJ came to have it.

  8. Re:SHOCKING by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well yes, we've always known that they do, but now we have some of their names, along with where the money is and how it got there, and in some cases, at least, it's pretty clear that some nations' domestic taxation and monetary laws were violated in the process of moving money to offshore accounts. With that information, the taxation authorities of a number of sovereign states can either a. swoop in and seize the money from offshore accounts or b. simply seize domestic assets to make up for the taxes owed.

    Of course, few if any taxation authorities will do that, because, at the end of the day, most of them probably already had the information, but are either complicit or too cowed to move in.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. Re:That's a lot of records but not a lot of shells by khallow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This story indicates that the companies in question seem to cluster on the British Virgin Islands.

    The data seen by the Guardian shows that their secret companies are based mainly in the British Virgin Islands.

    But this might be a quirk of how the data was released (apparently, news organizations have access to the data from their country, meaning that the British Virgin Islands may be the preferred destination for UK money).

  10. Re:Political aftermath by WGFCrafty · · Score: 5, Funny

    The biggest question I have, now that the general public is also aware of how the ultra rich "hide" their money (and oftentimes to avoid taxation):

    What are the politicians going to do to address these loopholes?

    Move their money elsewhere.

  11. Re:Translation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of the strategies outlined in TFS are illegal, so your point is moot. Plus there are plenty of people like me who pay ~$30,000 in federal taxes (on top of other state and local taxes), but could never afford the legal and accounting team necessary to create such elaborate tax-evasion schemes. In short, it's yet again the middle class that gets fucked.

  12. Re:Note this is not the "top 1%" by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Imagined class warfare?

    As Warren Buffet stated âoeThereâ(TM)s class warfare, all right, but itâ(TM)s my class, the rich class, thatâ(TM)s making war, and weâ(TM)re winning.â

    You know who pits Americans against each other? The richest few. They want you feeling superior to those who make a little less than you, lest you both realize you should fight together to improve your station in life.

  13. Re:SHOCKING by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shakespeare had a solution for that.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  14. Re:Sounds great! by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 4, Informative

    www.MtGOX.com

  15. Re:Political aftermath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The biggest question I have, now that the general public is also aware of how the ultra rich "hide" their money (and oftentimes to avoid taxation):

    What are the politicians going to do to address these loopholes?

    Oh you mean the politicians who are likely using said loopholes? What the fuck do you think will happen?

    We'll be reading about this in much the same way we read about justice and change after the financial meltdown of 2008. Not a fucking thing will change, and not a single greedy corrupt bastard will be punished.

    Not. One.

  16. 32 Trillion Dollars by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the report I just heard on the BBC World News, estimates place the total value of these hidden assets around $32 trillion.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  17. Re:SHOCKING by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As I said, they are cowed. If they accepted the cases could drag on for years, and pursued them against a substantial fraction of super-rich tax evaders, the ultimate effect would to chill the desire to evade taxes. It would cost significant amounts of money to begin with, but we're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars apparently nestled in offshore accounts here, so I think the prize is worth the effort. That some crimes are tough to prosecute doesn't mean they shouldn't be prosecuted.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  18. Re:Classification? by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure that the US Government will find grounds to classify private banking documents.

    Probably under the "embarrassing to someone important" clause.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  19. Re:Translation ... by Ibiwan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He also seems to think there is a dichotomy between "Intelligent" and "poor"...

    --
    -- //no comment
  20. Re:Tax evasion is good for some of us by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More importantly, who keeps the tens of thousands of employees from stealing from your companies. Who keeps all those employees safely returning to work each day??

    That was the KEY vision Henry Ford had... That you couldn't run a company off the least cost labor and have everybody AROUND your employees live in shit. His high wages were to keep more productive employees... And force them to pull up the other people around them... Very Victorian values.

  21. Re:Remember by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people just don't want to pay taxes.

    Most people want to pay only the minimum amount of taxes that they are legally required to pay. Jackson/Hewitt and HR Block base their entire businesses on this.

    Most people talk a good talk about how taxes do so much for everyone and are such a wonderful thing, but they are usually referring to taxes paid by other people and not themselves. Very few of these people add a few hundred dollars to their tax payments just to help promote the general welfare, etc.

  22. More succinctly by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Call them simply what they are: Leeches. Taking everything civilized society has to offer (such as no roving hordes stringing up the filthy rich), but give nothing back but excrement.

  23. Was this the Wikileaks leak we heard about? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recall long ago when the US State Department cables thing was going on that Wikileaks said they had something MUCH MUCH bigger. I wonder if this is what they had to offer. They said it would embarass and damage a lot of people and it kind of sounds like this. It would seem like enough to keep honest law enforcement and tax offices business for a decade. (Note that I said "honest" because we generally know how it will play out in the U.S. We'll hear things like "too big to prosecute" and massive offers like 10 cents to the dollar or less.)

  24. Re:Translation ... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's almost as if there's an enormous amount of the population between the super rich and the poor. It might even be an important group. Maybe the middle class or something?

    I hear they're working on that problem, and it should be taken care of in the next few years.

  25. Total Story with More to Come! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Problem is, you'll need to get money into your account somehow. To do so will take a wire transfer that the IRS will be notified about. Going the other direction would also take a wire transfer, that the IRS will be notified about.

    Your "non-story" assertion is a bit short sighted from what I know ... if you divert all your income to Ireland or the Netherlands you can get it there nearly tax free. What you perceive as a hard time getting your money to the states is trivial if you find someone who will accept those accounts as collateral for you to borrow against. Oftentimes, the rate of the loan is lower than what you would lose getting hit with capital gains taxes in the US. On top of that, you can put that money in Ireland into a highly rated international fund to cut that loan rate down. Just because you had enough money, you get to skirt tax law enacted by our democratically elected politicians. Congratulations, you're a dick and I'm sure you can blame the socialists and "the system" for forcing you to do this and I'm sure you'll ask me if I donate extra money when I'm doing my taxes -- I don't. But I sure the hell don't tell my employer that I actually have accounts in Grand Cayman and they'll be moving 75% of my paycheck there for me and I'll take 25% of it here so I get a huge rebate for living below the poverty line while building bigger assets in the Caribbean.

    These offshore accounts? This is just one piece of a very large puzzle ... I can't wait for the bean counters to poor over all this data and find some of the other pieces. Either give me and every other equal citizen the same rights to avoid taxes or shut this crap down.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  26. Re:Not Illegal in Canada (Unless) by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 5, Funny

    I put all my money in an offshore account in Cyprus. I am pretty sure it is all tucked away and safe there.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  27. Re:Remember by SlippyToad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most people want to pay only the minimum amount of taxes that they are legally required to pay.

    And many would like to pay next to nothing and still enjoy all the benefits of a functioning democracy.

    We call those people freeloaders.

    --
    One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  28. Re:Translation ... by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're using the same roads, bridges, schools and hospitals.

    No, I'm not:
    - A lot of the very rich people don't use roads and bridges very much. For example, Paul Krugman relates driving in for a meeting in New York with some banker types, and making small talk commented on how bad the traffic was. The bankers were confused, because they'd gotten to the meeting by helicopter. If they do use the road, it's a good guess that they have a chauffeur doing the driving.

    - They absolutely don't use the public school system. Their kids are likely to attend exclusive and expensive boarding schools.

    - They may be in the same hospital building, but they get very different treatment from what you or I get. That's because your average Joe is as valuable to a hospital as his insurance policy, but a rich guy is worth far more.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  29. Re:Translation ... by orthancstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who took risks generally prefer to be rewarded when those risks pay off.

    And if they are a bank circa 2008, they prefer to push the losses on the taxpayer when the risks don't pay off.

  30. Re:Translation ... by operagost · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you pay over $30K in federal taxes a year, the current ruling party says you are "rich" and not paying your "fair share".

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  31. Re:Ever watch CNBC hosts talk about this? by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course it is. They are avoiding theft of their property.

    Oh, please. You do realize that without the "theft" of taxes, the only property you could own is that which could personally defend, which in the case of civilization's truly wealthy means virtually all of it. I don't like taxation any more than the next guy, but the idea that the uber-wealthy are "avoiding theft" by evading the taxes that ultimately enable and protect their ability to accumulate disproportionate wealth is pure nonsense.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  32. Re:Translation ... by PraiseBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Explain to me how hiding your money in offshore accounts so it can't be seen by the govt, for the express purpose of dodging the legally required taxation of that money, is legal?

  33. Ah but by mikefocke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I report my income, do I really report all my income or is much of the real income available to me hidden in deferrals, tax free municipals, etc? I'm not rich, but I can assure you even my reported income is very different from the real income with the difference mostly in the ability to defer income on investments (iBonds, IRA, 401K, etc.)

    Every businessman I know writes off things which personally benefit him be it the yacht (qualifies as a second home), the vacation place, the golf club, the charity deduction (designed to provide positive exposure for his business), the gas for his truck, the company car he commutes in, etc.

    The poor have no such investments or write-offs. So their reported matches the real.

    I filed my taxes the other day, I was shocked at the low % amount of tax relative to even reported income.

    So I question the stats of tax paid versus income percentages because if one of those figures isn't the same (real) for all the strata being compared, you get a very false picture.