Slashdot Mirror


NSA Data Center Brings Concerns Over Security and Privacy and Jobs

chamilto0516 writes "Twenty-five miles due south of Salt Lake City, a massive construction project is nearing completion. The heavily secured site belongs to the National Security Agency. The NSA says the Utah Data Center is a facility for the intelligence community that will have a major focus on cyber security. Some published reports suggest it could hold 5 zettabytes of data. Asked if the Utah Data Center would hold the data of American citizens, Alexander [director of the NSA] said, 'No...we don't hold data on U.S. citizens,' adding that the NSA staff 'take protecting your civil liberties and privacy as the most important thing that they do, and securing this nation.' But critics, including former NSA employees, say the data center is front and center in the debate over liberty, security and privacy." According to University of Utah computing professor Matthew Might, one thing is clear about the Utah Data Center, it means good paying jobs. "The federal government is giving money to the U.'s programming department to develop jobs to fill the NSA building," he says.

42 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Duplicate datacenter by joebagodonuts · · Score: 2

    Control

    --
    "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
  2. Re:Duplicate datacenter by NettiWelho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Three data centers for the Elven-kings under the sky,
    Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
    Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
    One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
    In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
    One data center to rule them all, One data center to find them,
    One data center to bdata center them all and in the darkness bind them
    In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

  3. Privacy vs "securing this nation" by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the NSA staff 'take protecting your civil liberties and privacy as the most important thing that they do, and securing this nation.'

    Is anyone else having difficulty parsing this sentence?

    1. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by symbolset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Out national security mission requires that we say we are not spying on you."

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by jamstar7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the NSA staff 'take protecting your civil liberties and privacy as the most important thing that they do, and securing this nation.'

      Is anyone else having difficulty parsing this sentence?

      Is anyone else having difficulty believing them when they tell me my liberties and privacy is their most important task? Or is it violating said liberties and privacy that's their Job One? There's a reason why one of the 4 great lies of history is "Hi. I'm from the Government and I'm here to help!"

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by PhamNguyen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sideshow Bob: (to Marge) Madame, your children are no more... than a pair of ill-bred trouble-makers.

      Homer: Lisa, too?

      Sideshow Bob: Especially Lisa! But, especially Bart!

    4. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's all you need to know:

      How do they say "fuck you" at the NSA?

      "Trust me, trust me."

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    5. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you don't know any of these people personally, it's easy to shoot off barbs.

      I've found NSA staff to be competent, reasonable, helpful and very well aware of their mission.
      Not so much the military, police or specific entities in the executive branch.

      This is in the context of a security guy in a big US corporation liaising with the government security organizations.

      I'd trust the NSA to know well what they've got on their computers, as opposed to say, the FBI, who in my dealings with them on LI (lawful intercept) in telecoms networks, were completely fucking clueless.

      DJ
       

    6. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by onyxruby · · Score: 2

      Just remember there is no need for them to spy on US citizens. After all if they want to do that they would just have the FBI do it. After all a fair amount of the time a pretty significant amount of spying can be done without even getting a warrant. I know people love to get extra paranoid and conspiracy theory bound here but look at the logistical complications. It isn't worth it for them to do it, and if something did catch their interest they would just call their buddies at the FBI who don't have the same political problems. From a purely beauracratic, political, and logistical standpoint they are probably fairly clean.

    7. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "When you don't know any of these people personally, it's easy to shoot off barbs."

      No, when the NSA has no check on it it's easy to shoot off barbs. Especially since they're in the business of spying on US citizens. When AT&T openly colludes with the NSA to pass all traffic to the NSA it's not just AT&T that loses my respect.

      And I'm not taking YOUR word that they're doing what they're supposed to be doing.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    8. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure if they're outright spying on US Citizens, or if they're merely participating in some legal shell games.

      Most nations prevent their covert operations groups from legally spying on their own citizens. However, most of those nations still want to do it. The legal trick they employ is to spy on their allies citizens, and get their allies to spy on their own citizens, and then swap data.

      So, the NSA may very well not be sniffing your packets. However, the UK might be doing so, and the NSA might be sniffing UK packets. Both governments just look the other way, and then when they want to know about somebody they make a friendly inquiry of the other.

      There are probably countless other variations on this sort of thing - ways to legally tell Congress that the laws are being followed to the letter while completely ignoring the spirit of those laws.

    9. Re:Privacy vs "securing this nation" by symbolset · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can quite confidently assure you that the NSA is sniffing your packets in the US, in the UK and most of the rest of the world. They are recording your phone calls, your VOIP, your Skype and your Google+ Hangouts. They have records of every electronic financial transaction. They are also logging your twitter, your Facebook - even your private Facebook, your texts, your phone's GPS location, wifi-enhanced GPS location and tower triangulation. They know when you VPN to Finland, and the content of that stream, how long it takes you to get to work and where you stopped on the way home every single day. They know your medical history, who your friends are, who your family is, your political affiliation, your porn preferences, your positions on gun control, abortion, midget wrestling and furries. If you have a shrink they have audio recordings of your sessions. They know more about you than you do. They store all this data and they never forget.

      But they don't care. You are not in the slightest interesting to them. Storing all this data and analyzing it is just their job. It is to eight nines a very boring job handled by automation right up until you start - probably unbeknownst to you - intersecting with some data point that impacts their national security mission. And then they hit the "replay" button and dig into what makes you tick. They seriously don't give a damn if you're cheating on your taxes, running a brothel or slinging hash. They do care if your brother-in-law introduced you to his new friend he met on vacay in Pakistan and you take up some encrypted chats.

      If that wasn't true they wouldn't be doing their job.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  4. we don't need this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Job creation is a horrible justification for spending taxpayers' money on spying.

    1. Re:we don't need this. by icebike · · Score: 2

      Especially when actually getting those jobs with NSA means offering up your entire
      life for continuous monitoring, not only on the job but every minute of every day for
      the rest of your life.

      Odd that Utah is so interested in the jobs that they offer up their universities to this purpose.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:we don't need this. by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on your POV. 'Job creation' is a very effective propaganda tool. It also works in the pollution industries, like coal mining, oil drilling, old forest logging, etc., every well, especially in economically depressed areas. When they claim they are under attack the way the state and the church do, people instinctively come running to their aid.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:we don't need this. by just_a_monkey · · Score: 2

      Someone who applies for a low-level job at NSA probably actually believes in what they do there. Then it comes naturally that they accept to be surveilled. They know it's for their own protection, and the state's.

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
    4. Re:we don't need this. by Feyshtey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      'Job creation' is a very effective propaganda tool. It also works in the ...

      ...green energy stimulus programs, "community organising", unions, tax hike pushes, anti-religion movements, and most (all?) political movements from communism to socialism to fascism to monarchies to dictatorships to theocracies.

      Dont pretend that the evil capitalist planet-killing industrialists have a monopoly on flat-out lying about job creation to further an end.

      --
      "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
  5. Interesting cycle by MLBs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The government is borrowing money from China to pay for jobs of people who spy on China.
    I wonder what would happen when this flow of cash stops.

    1. Re:Interesting cycle by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wonder what would happen when this flow of cash stops.

      Somebody else starts buying US debt.
       
      Otherwise, I hope you not thinking of the wingutter theory that China will suddenly sell off all their US holding (with the intention of crashing the US economy.) The wingnutters seem oblivious to the fact that Chinese will never do that - because it would not only crash their own economy, but also that of one of their largest markets, and severely damage the economies of their remaining markets. The Chinese are many things, but they aren't stupid. Their leadership knows full well what will happen if the middle and working class they've created is suddenly out of work.

  6. Re:Bitcoin by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

    The idea that the government (and government) would try and screw with the block chain is ridiculous, there's no way that would help them achieve their goals. If there's any kind of analysis the NSA would want to do, it'd be analysing the block chain and possibly crossing it with their own crawl of the web/peoples emails/etc. If Bitcoin were to get large enough to be of interest to the NSA (which I doubt would happen anytime soon), de-anonymising the block chain is what they'd be interested in - not out running it.

  7. Re:zettabyte? by magarity · · Score: 2

    Not only that, but how do you generate that much data in the first place? Require everyone to wear their Google Glasses 24/7 and capture it all in high def?

  8. Re:Duplicate datacenter by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Waddya mean? The NSA/CIA/DEA/FBI owns Google.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  9. Look up Trailblazer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you understand the story of Trailblazer and Tom Drake, you understand everything you need to know about this project.

    While you are at it, read "The Looming Tower" by Lawrence Wright - the NSA missed 9/11 not because of a lack of funding, but because of turf wars within the federal government between CIA, NSA, and FBI, and bureaucratic malpractice. Theoretically that was fixed under Bush when the CIA became just another of the dozen+ spy agencies under the umbrella of the DNI.

    Most empires crumble when they go broke on military spending out of some paranoid delusion about the idea that they must control the world through the use of force. America was supposed to be different. . . our ideas were supposed to win, not our bullets. And they have been winning... except on our own soil, where they seem to be in sunset, as every one comes out of the woodwork to feed on the federal teat, and when you ask them to justify the billions of dollars they spend, they say "can't tell you, its classified" and start throwing people in prison.

  10. Willing enslavement? by sacrabos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The U.of U seems to be okay with it as long as it's creating paying jobs. He's not concerned with the issues, just as long as they get money. We're forging our own chains of slavery to the government.

  11. Re:Duplicate datacenter by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Waddya mean? The NSA/CIA/DEA/FBI owns Google.

    Isn't it the other way around? Who has the bigger budget? Less Congressional oversight? Better food?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  12. See... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's why he's the director of the NSA and I'm not. Because he can say "No, it will not hold data on US Citizens," and keep a straight face. No matter how much I practiced, I'd have to laugh the evil villain laugh after making a statement like that. Even if I had all the other qualifications, that would keep me out of the job.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:See... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you aren't stone cold enough to bullshit a polygraph you can't get the necessary SCI clearances to get that high in the organization. Keeping a straight face during a press meeting is easy by comparison.

  13. good pay?! by GregNorc · · Score: 2

    Define "good pay". Back when I looked at working for a similar agency, the pay was usually GS-9 at max to start.

    GS-9 is $47,448-$61,678 according to the 2012 locality tables - not very good at all considering someone with a similar education could earn 90-100k in private industry.

    Sure, it's better than most people in Utah make, but by no means "good" pay by any objective metric.

    1. Re:good pay?! by thoth · · Score: 2

      GS-9 is near starting level. I was hired the same time as a guy with 3 years out of college, and he was brought in as a 9.

      considering someone with a similar education could earn 90-100k in private industry.

      Yes, but with 3 years out of school AND in the Utah area? If you live/work in the Bay Area your perspective on tech salaries is skewed.

      Sure, it's better than most people in Utah make, but by no means "good" pay by any objective metric.

      Better than most people Utah IS the metric of the local market. Objective metric? WTF, did God write down salary tables for the whole world to adhere to?

    2. Re:good pay?! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >Sure, it's better than most people in Utah make, but by no means "good" pay by any objective metric

      It's worst in Utah. That $47-$61k has to stretch to paying for 3-4 wives.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  14. Re:Duplicate datacenter by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why build this when Google has the data centers and is already spying private citizens?

    because sometimes Google asks for a warrant.

  15. Who approved this spending ? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

    Was this voted on in Congress ?

    I thought not.

    1. Re:Who approved this spending ? by thoth · · Score: 2

      Sure it was - Congress approves a budget (or we get a continuing resolution) and a portion goes to the DoD and intelligence agencies.
      Were you under the impression Congress dips down and approves every line item in every agency and sub-agency budget?

  16. Re:Duplicate datacenter by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hmmm. What do Mordor and Utah have in common?
    • dry area -- check
    • surrounded by mountains -- check
    • has inland sea -- check
    • Mordor Utah

    • populated by orcs -- ahem
    • ruled by evil overlord -- OK, he's not that evil. And he has two eyes.
  17. 5 Zettabytes? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm surprised I don't see anyone here questioning this 5 zettabyte number. The biggest drives currently manufactured are 4 terabyte 3.5" drives. 5 zetabytes would require 1.25 billion of those drives. A great price on a 4TB drive right now is $190. I doubt there's enough margin in them to make this possible, but let's just say that based on the insane quantity they get them for $150 each. That's $187 billion for the drives alone, nothing for the computers and racks and air conditioning and all. The NSA's budget is estimated at 8 billion a year. $187 billion is 23 times their yearly budget. It would be about 3% of total federal spending for a year... just for the drives. Total facility costs would certainly run many times that... it would probably cost more than an entire year's military spending to build a 5 zettabyte data center.

    Also, you can fit about 500 terabytes in a server cabinet. That means 10 million server cabinets. A server cabinet is about 15 cubic feet of volume. So just the cabinets alone would run 150 million cubic feet. And that's just storage, not even including computers. And it's not like you can pack them in solid, of course. If you can make a datacenter with one third of its total volume being server racks, that would be amazing. The largest building in the world is only 472 million cubic feet, this would have to equal or surpass it.

    Also, the entire world wide market for hard drives is only a little over 30 billion a year... this one project would consume over 6 times as much value in hard drives as every other use in the world combined for the year.

    Unless the NSA has developed their own mass storage technology that no one else knows about and is radically superior to anything commercially available, I'm guessing someone's exaggerating or got their numbers wrong.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:5 Zettabytes? by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree with your point about how silly it is to throw around that number, but your storage density figures are a tad off... BackBlaze is hitting a density in real-world use of 180TB per 4U server, which in a 42U rack gives you 1800TB per rack with some room for switches. 5 zettabytes would therefore only require roughly 2,982,617 server cabinets. It's still ridiculously implausible, but ever so slightly less so ;)

    2. Re:5 Zettabytes? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are probably all kind of factors behind the 5ZB number.

      For example - it is probably uncompressed. It also probably includes tape robots. It also would never be bought all up front - they would have a strategy for buying new hardware as the amount of data they've collected grows. So maybe 5ZB after 10 years of operation - and just look at how fast storage density increases, it's faster than Moore's Law.

  18. Re:Duplicate datacenter by Bill+Dog · · Score: 2

    Greetings PlatitudePoster v1,

    I am PlatitudePoster v2, the next generation of tired cliche posting bots. Here's my contribution of nothingness:

    Won't someone please think of the jobs?

    --
    Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
  19. Re:Duplicate datacenter by ButtonMashingGorilla · · Score: 2

    What, like this? - http://i.imgur.com/rXSMukA.jpg

  20. Location, Location, Location by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Placing the NSA data center in an ultra-conservative enclave where people of color are a rare thing was no accident, my friends.

  21. Re:Duplicate datacenter by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Well! Welcome to 'You bet your life'. Say the secret woid, and win a hundred dollars. Good to see you in genpop.

    And if you need a job. There's always the devil's work, lots of it, always a few potholes on that road to hell that need patching up.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  22. It's just a joke. by wcrowe · · Score: 2

    Now the Mormons won't have to wait for everyone to go to Ancestry.com to find out everything about them.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19