Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Senate's Big Immigration Bill Seeks Centralized Database For H-1B Jobs

dcblogs writes "The U.S. Senate comprehensive immigration bill, due Tuesday, will allow the H-1B cap to rise from 65,000 to as high as 180,000. The bill, overall, contains some interesting provisions. It will require the U.S. Labor Dept. to create a website of H-1B job openings that employers must post to. The jobs must be posted least 30 calendar days before hiring an H-1B applicant to fill that position. The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified. One provision that will affect India, in particular, limits H-1B visa use to 50% of a firm's U.S. workforce. The provision may prompt India firms to buy U.S. companies to expand their U.S. presence."

251 comments

  1. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified.

    It's been said before that H-1B wages are already not supposed to be significantly below the host country's standard cost of living, but we've seen that's enforced about as often as corporate tax laws.

    I wonder, will this new provision fare better?

    1. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where, exactly, are these alleged companies that supposedly save millions of dollars by hiring H1B workers? I've worked for 3 very, very large corporations in the telecommunications and banking industries that hire H1B workers, and as far as anybody could tell, our H1B coworkers got paid the same amount as everyone else, and actually cost *more* for the company to hire and employ due to greater paperwork requirements.

      In most cases, the H1B employees were Indians who went to college (or grad school) in the US, found India's corporate culture to be soul-crushing and demoralizing (regardless of pay), and were denied permanent visas by our dysfunctional immigration system that's almost neurotically-obsessed with family reunification over "twenty/thirtysomething guy who'd view his family's distance and inability to come join him in the US as a perk and bonus".

      We should phase out most of the H1B program, and replace it with a policy that makes it relatively easy for single young American-educated prospective immigrants who are unencumbered by wives, kids, and extended families to become permanent residents, then citizens.

    2. Re:Hmmmm by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where, exactly, are these alleged companies that supposedly save millions of dollars by hiring H1B workers? I've worked for 3 very, very large corporations in the telecommunications and banking industries that hire H1B workers, and as far as anybody could tell, our H1B coworkers got paid the same amount as everyone else, and actually cost *more* for the company to hire and employ due to greater paperwork requirements.

      That's because you're working for legitimate companies. There are also companies full of fresh-from-college hires that pay far under going rate and lie to their employees egregiously about the immigration process and how easy it is to change jobs with an H-1B. Taking advantage of people young enough not to know any better isn't an "immigrant" thing, however. My first full time programming job paid $18k - as a US citizen in a big city! I think there's a false belief that it's somehow only the H-1B consulting shops that abuse their employees to pay them nothing - that's just not visa-specific!

      From TFS:

      One provision that will affect India, in particular, limits H-1B visa use to 50% of a firm's U.S. workforce

      That would be a huge change for the better - exactly because it would break the current model of the companies that exist just to abuse the system. Sure, in 5-10 years they'll have a new model, just as abusive, but that will be a good 5-10 years!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Hmmmm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      It's been said before that H-1B wages are already not supposed to be significantly below the host country's standard cost of living

      It's been said that most American workers' wages are not supposed to be significantly below our standard of living, too.

      The Job Creators (tm) care to differ.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you stop foreign workers, you may have to send back Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, Vinod Khosla among others.
      forward.us

    5. Re:Hmmmm by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      One provision that will affect India, in particular, limits H-1B visa use to 50% of a firm's U.S. workforce

      That would be a huge change for the better - exactly because it would break the current model of the companies that exist just to abuse the system. Sure, in 5-10 years they'll have a new model, just as abusive, but that will be a good 5-10 years!

      I doubt it will take 5-10 years. It's just corporate structure. They'll create partner relationships with other companies. The whole contracting business, and H1Bs in particular, are about having employees you pretend aren't employees. Now they'll have to join some labor intensive companies to get US head count up. Eazy peazy.

    6. Re:Hmmmm by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      There's a "prevailing wage" crap - H1Bs can't be payed less than that. Except that there are tons of ways to game it and the "prevailing" wage is not that prevailing.

      As a highly paid worker on H1B, I totally support this law. It fixes major problems with US immigration system (H1B lottery - seriously?) and institutes point-based system to sieve candidates based on real needs.

    7. Re:Hmmmm by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that "prevailing wage" ain't what it used to be. I was offered a job in the US. I laughed when they mentioned what they're willing to pay. If that's the prevailing wage and you don't even get the social package included in that, you may keep your jobs!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you stop foreign workers, you may have to send back Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, Vinod Khosla among others.
      forward.us

      And the downside is...?

    9. Re:Hmmmm by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      You mean there is a option to deport Mark Zuckerberg to his native land of New York and never let him leave?

      Where do I sign?

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    10. Re:Hmmmm by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      My first full time programming job paid $18k -

      That sounds not too far off from correct.

      What were you expecting for a first job out of school salary....$50K+???

      In general, I'd say that starting $18-$21K/yr for a first job, no experience right out of school is about right.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:Hmmmm by sycodon · · Score: 1

      unencumbered by wives, kids, and extended families

      That pretty much describes "cheaper".

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    12. Re:Hmmmm by lgw · · Score: 1

      I think you may underestimate the racism involved in companies like this (on all sides). Greed will win out in the end, of course.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  2. why? by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified.

    So they can encourage foreign outsourcing? Doesn't anyone see this as having a negative impact on domestic unemployment? (as well as a trade deficit effect as they ship their US$ off to India)

    Why is this necessary???

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:why? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Corporate America's solution to unemployment is importing cheaper labor from other countries. I watched mouth agape as Bill Gates suggested this in an interview when asked about his ideas on how to deal with the Recession. Of course, corporate media never challenges their masters when they make these ludicrous statements.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we should be trying to get these people to come here and stay instead of cross training them, and sending them back so the previous employers can just pay them their foreign offshore rates.

    3. Re:why? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified.

      So they can encourage foreign outsourcing? Doesn't anyone see this as having a negative impact on domestic unemployment? (as well as a trade deficit effect as they ship their US$ off to India)

      Why is this necessary???

      Well it might have a positive effect on domestic employment as well.

      If it makes US firms use of foreign workers very visible people (and congress) will be able to see to what
      extent these companies are using H1B workers in place of US workers laid off.

      Right now this is pretty well a hidden level of replacement that no one agency has a good handle on. Immigration may know the numbers, but Dept of Labor only knows about the unemployed.

      By making a public website where these jobs are listed, it can be used for in-country job search as well.
      Expect the H1B employers to fight this tooth and nail.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:why? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      For cultural reasons, Americans aren't willing to sanction unlimited immigration. So there is going to be some limit. How to allocate it? Currently it's first-come, first-serve. But why not allocate it by economic benefit? And how better to measure economic benefit than wages?

      If one company claims there is a shortage of domestic workers, and offers $60k to hire a foreign worker; a 2nd company claims the same and offers $90k; and a third claims the same and offers $120k; which should get the slot? I would argue clearly the third company: if the shortage of domestic labor is worth $120k to them, it's clearly a more economically important shortage than the one where the company is only willing to offer $60k to fill the position. So why not allocate by highest-salary first, in order to distribute the immigration slots to the part of the economy where they are most in demand?

      Of course, the bill does not seem to be proposing precisely that, because they are using a stupid "relative to prevailing wages" calculation instead of just a simple absolute number.

    5. Re:why? by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Corporate America's solution to unemployment is importing cheaper labor from other countries.

      Oddly enough, they have a completely different view on importing cheaper products from other countries
      See DVD region encoding, out-of-country textbooks, software, etc.

    6. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the future of the US. The rise of destitute yet overqualified workers will be matched only by the increase in the number of bombs and home grown terrorism as the minority willing to take these desperate measures increases. I wouldn't be surprised if the marathon bombs turned out to have been done by someone like a disgruntled former IT worker. And your all going to be painted with the same brush!

    7. Re:why? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

      So they can encourage foreign outsourcing?

      H1B is already all about out-sourcing. The top 10 H1B employers, accounting for roughly half of all H1B visas, are out-sourcers. They bring people in on H1B, train them up and send them back. H1B is encouraging out-sourcing, not stopping it.

      http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/04/03/176134694/Whos-Hiring-H1-B-Visa-Workers-Its-Not-Who-You-Might-Think

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      If you've got at least $1B, or regularly appear before bobbing heads on the news, you could say that 2+2=5 and have your views solemnly acknowledged and endorsed by the Very Serious People who discuss these issues.

    9. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Well we should be trying to get these people to come here and stay instead of cross training them, and sending them back so the previous employers can just pay them their foreign offshore rates.

      Better yet, just eliminate the program completely. The US did fine for years as a tech leader without it. There has never been any justification for it, and with the current job market there's even less.

    10. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      So they can encourage foreign outsourcing? Doesn't anyone see this as having a negative impact on domestic unemployment?

      No. Any job that can be offshored either has been or will be, because 3rd world countries are even cheaper than guest workers. The jobs remaining here are the ones that can't be offshored so readily.

    11. Re:why? by anubi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I honestly do not know what to make of this. I have just done my state and federal tax. I owed the feds nothing. I owed the state $57. I do contract engineering work in things like analog and microprocessor control.

      I have been working with one small company trying to build it up. I have been working there for six months now, and have been paid a little over $2000. Just yesterday the owner gave me an agreement (NDA) he wanted me to sign, which transferred any and all IP I come with to the company along with a commitment from me I will not work for any of his customers or competitors for 24 months after termination.

      I refused to sign the damned thing.

      It read like a prenup, making sure no alimony can be claimed, yet commitment not to take another partner for two years assured through legal means..

      My sentiments are that any obligation to him cease along with any obligation he has to pay me if this is indeed the case of a true "at will" legal environment. If he wants my continued obeyance of something after termination, it is my belief he should also be obligated to reimburse me for the opportunity cost I forfeited to obey his wish.


      I realize my Congress is not there to help me, even though they are there in full if I should succeed in making a taxable income. They will shut down Napster if a business claims they are violating copyright, They will shut down online pharmacies if they go around regional pricing algorithms set by the drug companies, but they will also hold lawful offshore tax havens. The wonders of a lobbied congress.

      I do not know what to do, but from all I see, it is pointless to try to do anything at this stage of the game. I have a few more years to go before I am on full social security. I feel foolish trying to invest my savings on trying to maintain employability by agreeing to every pre-nup out there, agreeing to give the businessman all of any IP I come up with, and gracefully accept "at will" termination when I have given all I have.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    12. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Informative

      Be reasonable, that affects the Great and Holy Intellectual Property that's the wealth of our nation. We're merely citizens.

    13. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This encourages domestic hiring by making H-1Bs more expensive. Firms would naturally try to pay as little as possible. This lower cap can only serve to reduce use of this labor pool. I'm confused if you are trolling, low on caffeine, or just flunked high school econ.

    14. Re:why? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think this is really the break point for the bigger guys like IBM. That's why it's discussed now.

      The horse is long out if the barn. For companies like IBM they have moved "outsourcing" in India to being just like an office across the country. IBM has basically bet the company on US sales forces selling Indian labor. You get a "US contact" for the first few months, but all the work is done by Indians.

      I guess if you can admin your server room from your bed at 3am (and still work at 8am) your company can just pay an Indian guy to be awake at 3am and don't need you. The REAL money is in Project Management... Which quite ironically is not part of the MBA track-- to BUILD NEW THINGS? Of course Project Management is the skill of making yourself replaceable.. So the fact IT has embraced it is really going to bite us in the ass.

    15. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's free trade capitalism which was always championed here.
      You don't complaint when US forces other nations to lower trader barriers and open their markets so that profits can flow from other countries to US?

    16. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. Any job that can be offshored either has been or will be, because 3rd world countries are even cheaper than guest workers. The jobs remaining here are the ones that can't be offshored so readily.

      Then why are Microsoft, Amazon, Adobe, etc. located in the US? Software writing can be done anywhere in the world. Why do those companies locate in the US with some foreign development shops?

    17. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been unlimited immigration from countries of different culture as long as color is white. Original culture of US is based on Protestant puritan work ethic. It is too different from catholic, hispanics allowed in.

    18. Re:why? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It's not "free" trade because they can get our wages and their cost of living, but we can't get their cost of living and keep our wages.

      And part of the reason why the cost of living is lower in third world countries is because they have lax regulations on pollution, safety, labor laws, etc. It would only be an even playing field if we turned the USA into an unregulated toxic 3rd-world Les Misérables dump, which business lobbyists are pushing hard for.

    19. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Then why are Microsoft, Amazon, Adobe, etc. located in the US? Software writing can be done anywhere in the world.

      Microsoft, Amazon, Adobe, etc. are located here because they were founded here, and for all their talk of the joys of globalization, the founders and C-level execs don't want to emigrate to India. The real question is why do they write software here.

      "Software writing" is not always something that can be done as well anywhere in the world. It's not like putting bolt A into hole B 400x per hour, where the task is repetitive and well defined. It's often important for people to understand what it's being used for and how. The idea of "write to this perfect spec" is utterly simplistic and unrealistic.

      Ok, that's my $0.02. Why do you think they write software here? Do you disagree that programmers are cheaper elsewhere?

    20. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate America isn't passing this legislation. Big government is.
       
      Always keep that in mind.
       
      Oh, and before some dipshit tries to offset this with talk about big money in DC? You can't buy what isn't for sale.
       
      Thanks for voting for this, suckers. See you in the bread lines.

    21. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I feel the same way, and have made my position clear many times.

      If $large mega corp$ feels it is in their best interest to outsource jobs in this "global economy" why are our DVD's still region coded?
      Please dont give me the "top releases are sent to the US first"... I think the real reason is to prevent re-importation.

      This "one way street" stuff needs to end. Either we have a global economy and you should charge $4 for a DVD and $10 for a school text book (same they often charge other regions) or we dont and you pay someone in India the same wages you would pay someone in North America.

    22. Re:why? by shentino · · Score: 1

      The companies using H1-B's are scoundrels that post impossible qualifications, whine to congress about how expensive it is to hire decent talent, and then mop up H1-B's in their place and probably not even screen them anyway.

    23. Re:why? by readin · · Score: 2

      What we need to understand is that some jobs can be exported and some can't. If the job can be exported, it makes sense to bring the foreign worker here where he'll earn an American wage and compete with Americans on an equal footing. It will lower the wage here of course, but not as much as exporting the job to the foreign country would do. Anyone know how much it costs to ship a piece of software from a factory in Poland to America?

      If the job can't be exported, like cleaning hotel rooms, gardening, picking vegetables, etc. then it makes sense to keep the competition out and reserve the jobs for Americans so that the wages can go up. (and don't say Americans won't do the work - offer them the right pay and working conditions and they will)

      So basically, bring the skilled IT workers here and keep the unskilled migrant workers out.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    24. Re:why? by readin · · Score: 1

      Good point. The tell us that we have to import workers to fix the wage disparity, but that we can't bring in cheaper products to deal with the price disparity of, for example, DVDs.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    25. Re:why? by ygtai · · Score: 1

      RTFA. I blame the summary. Raising H1B salaries is to keep them from undercutting domestic unemployment.

    26. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wages are paid in currency of the country. H1B working in US is facing US cost of living. A person working in Israel or India or Japan is getting their local rate wages and facing their cost of living. Why are you confused?

    27. Re:why? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Just yesterday the owner gave me an agreement (NDA) he wanted me to sign, which transferred any and all IP I come with to the company along with a commitment from me I will not work for any of his customers or competitors for 24 months after termination."

      I don't have a big problem with NDA, except I would want a provision to keep something for my professional portfolio.

      By the way: if it transfers all "IP" (I hate that term because it's grossly inaccurate) it's far more than just an NDA. A plain NDA is just "non disclosure", it has nothing to do with actual ownership.

      The document you were asked to sign was actually a combination of 3 agreements: a NDA, an agreement about copyright or patent, and a non-compete agreement. Generally, these will be separate agreements on separate pieces of paper. I've never heard of them all combined before. Because really, they have little to do with each other, except for an extremely broad concept.

      Anyway, as I say I might sign an NDA. I will not sign an agreement to turn over any copy or patent rights, EXCEPT those that I come up with in my normal course of work, during work hours, for which I was paid. I have a relative who got royally screwed over that kind of agreement. And I would not sign a non-compete agreement. That throws away my ability to get another decent job... or at least my ability to use anything I learned.

      Also, in some states non-compete agreements won't fly. In California, for example, they are completely illegal.

    28. Re:why? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      " H1B is encouraging out-sourcing, not stopping it."

      Not only that, but studies have shown that the companies' excuse that H1-B workers are "the best and brightest" is nothing but hogwash. On average, they do not perform up to the level of the average Americans in the same positions.

    29. Re:why? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Why do you think they write software here? Do you disagree that programmers are cheaper elsewhere?"

      They write software here because there are better programmers here. It is that simple.

      I've had this conversation many times on Slashdot. Over the last year and a half or so, I have seen a pretty drastic pull back in offshoring of software. On the international job boards I have seen more and more ads for "North America and Western Europe ONLY".

      The reason is that the "cheap offshoring" has turned out to be not so cheap. The most common complaints have been very poor quality and late- or non-delivery.

    30. Re:why? by CodeMasterBob · · Score: 0

      All about supply/demand. Keep the supply of tech workers high and keep the downward pressure on wages. The corporate overlords have had their fair share of failed outsourced projects and now prefer to depress wages in the U.S. by oversupply of tech workers.

    31. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Sounds good to me.

    32. Re:why? by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      Laws are for the peasants.

    33. Re:why? by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      If $large mega corp$ feels it is in their best interest to outsource jobs in this "global economy" why are our DVD's still region coded?

      Or why can't I buy medicine from the lowest cost worldwide provider?

      Why? Rules are of, by, and for those with control of the government.

    34. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, corporate media never challenges their masters when they make these ludicrous statements.

      That's why we need to get rid of CNN and MSNBC - Any network that the president thanks for not challenging him

    35. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For cultural reasons, Americans aren't willing to sanction unlimited immigration.

      Which countries differ from this?

    36. Re:why? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Currently it's not "first-come-first-served". It's a lottery - literally. This year USCIS received more applications than the statutory cap in the first week, so they held a lottery to select the applications for further review. That's so unbelievably fucked up...

    37. Re:why? by lightknight · · Score: 2

      So...their idea of dealing with a need for more homegrown STEM candidates (haha, try raising the salary offers a little) is to shoot a nuclear torpedo into their home country's universities' STEM programs? Increasing supply tapers off demand...duh! That's like basic economics...it'll perma-fuck anything at home...it takes like a decade to establish a CS / SE program, let alone the other kinds...less kids attending those programs because of dropping salaries (this includes kids who drop out of the program or switch out)...means less funding going back into the program...means cutbacks. So, I guess this means that in the future, STEMs will come from abroad...and US kids will major in liberal arts, business, arts...yup, this country is going to get 0wned. The next US generation will be hocking the latest diet water craze while the kids of other countries are exploring Mars...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    38. Re:why? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You can only vote for what's offered. That's the beauty of democracy. Corporations are people, but they can't vote. So they get to decide who you may vote for.

      Fair, ain't it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    39. Re:why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, most countries where you get in easily are on the other hand pretty hard to get out of.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    40. Re:why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      'cause Ballmer would look stupid in a sari?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    41. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies are bringing in H1B people at far below market salaries. This discourages US students from even bothering to get into the field since they know that they will be competing with someone in the next cubicle that's making 1/2 of what they do. When the crunch time comes and the company decides to cut workers, who gets the cut? The US citizen or the foreign H1B employee that is paid far less and is treated like an indentured servant? It's the same sort of situation in job market with a lot of illegal immigrants. Wages are driven down as low as they can go and it's not that it is a job "that Americans won't do", it is a job "that Americans won't do for that little pay". Case in point: employees at Midwestern meat packing plants earn less than 1/2 of what they used to in the 1980s due to the influx of cheap labor.

      By forcing the companies to pay the H1B people the same rates as US workers will encourage US students to consider that field of work and make H1B candidates less attractive. Then the companies will really only consider H1B employees if they really are "the best and brightest" instead of just someone that they can get at a bargain and work like a rented mule.

    42. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but studies have shown that the companies' excuse that H1-B workers are "the best and brightest" is nothing but hogwash. On average, they do not perform up to the level of the average Americans in the same positions.

      s/average Americans/average North Americans/

      I work with a lot of IT professionals in Mexico and they bitch about the low quality work done by the H1B contractors just as much as the US employees.

    43. Re:why? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Most of the money they take home or send home rather than spend in the country of work.

    44. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > You can only vote for what's offered. ...and what's offered has been pre-selected by the committees of the two-party political monopoly. As a result, the general voting public is only getting an illusion of choice.

    45. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why do you think they write software here? Do you disagree that programmers are cheaper elsewhere?"

      They write software here because there are better programmers here. It is that simple.

      I've had this conversation many times on Slashdot. Over the last year and a half or so, I have seen a pretty drastic pull back in offshoring of software. On the international job boards I have seen more and more ads for "North America and Western Europe ONLY".

      The reason is that the "cheap offshoring" has turned out to be not so cheap. The most common complaints have been very poor quality and late- or non-delivery.

      I don't know that domestic programmers are "better programmers" on the whole. True, places like India have been more about if you're a member of this social/economic class, you should go into this profession, but I've seen some real stinkers in the home-grown crowd as well. And at one time, back when IT was still called DP and the money was really good, quite a few of them were no-talents only looking for the money. Or for that matter, in the Y2K panic.

      While good talent is important, it is far from the only limiting factor on offshore work. Programmers in the USA tend to think they are "management" because programming is a job where even the most junior person spends much of the day decision making. In Asiatic countries, the culture is that ONLY the boss gets to make decisions, and if they're bad decisions, the workers still do what the boss said. Sometimes they lose that set of mental blinders when they get over here, but I know a few who cannot shake it even so and they go into an absolute panic (sometimes literally) when pressed to show initiative.

      Another fault is that the so-called "24 hour advantage" often isn't an advantage. Rather than having the US groups come up with something and hand it over at the end of the day to the Indian group, who, in turn, hand it back the next (US) morning, as often as not, the US groups come up with something that's too late in the Indian day and so instead of continuous flow, there are 36-hour breaks. I'm not picking on India, though. This problem can be even worse when people are in Europe.

      And, of course, there are the cultural differences. Not only in language, but in life. When you have people working on a product that they'll either never be able to afford themselves or the business processes are all different where they live, it can slow things down because they simply cannot relate.

      Offshoring has its uses, but like every other "silver bullet", it's not a universal solution.

    46. Re:why? by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      If one company claims there is a shortage of domestic workers, and offers $60k to hire a foreign worker; a 2nd company claims the same and offers $90k; and a third claims the same and offers $120k; which should get the slot? ...

      Unless there is way to verify that those wages are actually being paid for duration of the H1-B employment after work visa has been granted, then there is no point in competing or asking them to pay a certain wage.

      Right now there is also such a thing as prevailing wage for a particular job type, but companies have ways around it. They apply for H1-B and for Green Card using high salary/wage numbers, and later use some legal tricks to sidestep this requirement and pay less.

    47. Re:why? by sycodon · · Score: 2

      Don't think this is limited to the Corporate world.

      Immigration reform advocates talk a good game of human rights and crap like that but what the really want is cheap labor to mop their office floors and pick their vegetables.

      Bottom line is there are plenty of American Citizens that are willing to work all jobs. Anyone who says otherwise is actually saying that that there are Americans who won't work for less than minimum wage (Agricultural) so we should bring in these poor schmucks from other countries to do it in order that we can have cheap produce.

      I find it ironic that people who are usually championing higher minimum wages are more than willing to let illegals work for less than that.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    48. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why qualify that with "in a sari"? Just the statement " 'cause Ballmer looks stupid" is more than sufficient.

    49. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mexico has H1B and they called it the same name?

    50. Re:why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of a joke about the Hungarian Communist Party (ya know, back in the good ol' days when the Big Evil was sitting at the shores of the Moskva instead of some mosque), about their big "reform" where they offered you different candidates (of course, all of them members of the same party). It is trivially easy to adapt it to the US system, and it's equally valid:

      A man comes into a vase store, looking for a vase. The store clerk shows him two models, a red one and a blue one. The man looks at them, back at the clerk and complains "But they both have holes in the floor! They're both equally useless!" "Yes", says the clerk, "But you have the free choice!"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    51. Re:why? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's free trade like DVD region coding is free trade. We give China most favored nation status. Then ban their solar panels because some American company complained that they couldn't make a profit.

    52. Re:why? by anubi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice, Jane.

      You were absolutely right... this one was a "3 in 1", which addressed everything. I have no problem with non-disclosure. It was mostly the total ownership of any IP come up with coupled with my attempts to build up "sweat equity" by agreeing to work for low rates that got me. I will work for low wages ( or if any ) just for the exposure to people who may need my services. If I can make the company I am with highly profitable, and they will share, why would I want to leave? But if their idea of loyalty is legal documents, they have obviously never owned a cat. I can tell you he will not care what you signed, even if you did it with a 24 karat gold pen, the cat's not gonna hang around if he's unhappy there.

      Then I find out I can not go to work for someone else who may want me? I mean if I am to be made so aware that I am there "at-will", then it goes both ways. I feel that document is one of the best destructors of a sense of loyalty I have ever seen.

      I told him I would sign the thing as long as I put one more subject in.... that everything agreed to took place unilaterally, that is the names of the parties could be swapped and the contract would read the same. That led to a lot of vitriol.

      As far as I am concerned, this paper has destroyed my illusion that I was working to build a company, rather I now I feel I am a plumber called in to fix the toilet.

      And can I be "understanding" and work for less than going wage so money can be freed up to hire my replacement.

      He tells me he is looking for someone else for what used to be my desk. Someone who is more of a "manager". I am relegated to a workbench. I cannot do my research there. No place for my books or files. Now, I access the internet mostly at McDonalds. I could be working on lithium battery chargers for him, power converters, inductive tap switchers, refrigeration systems, and here I am whining about some lopsided loyalty document on a laptop in a fast food joint.... while businessmen go to the government saying people aren't available.

      There comes a point where its no longer work... its prostitution.

      And I feel I am just being used. I felt small companies would be immune to this kind of stuff, as it is so destructive to morale. Having to sign a document acknowledging how "at will" I am and how everything I have tried to build up with them is lost. I wonder why they call it a "loyalty pledge", to me it was only an acknowledgement of how replaceable I am and how futile it would be to try to build anything here.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  3. Why don't we put India in charge of the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't we put India in charge of the US. We wouldn't need congress any more.

    1. Re:Why don't we put India in charge of the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well considering since they probably have all intel in the US would not be surprised. Time to move.

    2. Re:Why don't we put India in charge of the US by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Why don't we put India in charge of the US. We wouldn't need congress any more.

      Or better yet remind them who they are working for. If they do not hear a peep out of the average citizen then they assume there really is a labor shortage and good old Microsoft would never lie would they?

    3. Re:Why don't we put India in charge of the US by zeroryoko1974 · · Score: 1

      Congress and the President should be Outsourced to India.

    4. Re:Why don't we put India in charge of the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congress knows who they work for. They work for those who will give them million dollar a year salary after they leave office. They work for those who give them political contributions (not bribes). The rest of us are merely the product they need to sell to.

    5. Re:Why don't we put India in charge of the US by Opportunist · · Score: 1
      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Why don't we put India in charge of the US by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      They work for those who control the votes. As long as the majority of the population votes for the person who spends the most on TV adverts, and there are no limits on the amounts and kinds of advertising that they can do (e.g. political exemptions from do-not-call lists, from truth in advertising laws) , they will work for the people who are most able to give them the money that they need to finance this advertising.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  4. Wrong Solution by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of giving people H1B visas, why don't we just give them green cards, so they have the same employment bargaining rights that US citizens have so it becomes impossible to undercut local wages. Also, for student visa holders who finish school here with MS or PhD degrees we should just grant citizenship for an upfront fee of $8000 so we keep talented people in the US.

    1. Re:Wrong Solution by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      Instead of giving people H1B visas, why don't we just give them green cards, so they have the same employment bargaining rights that US citizens have so it becomes impossible to undercut local wages.

      I think you answered your own question :)
      In that case H1B visa holders would not be cheaper and who's going to hire them?
      A very large majority of H1B holders are brought in as cheaper labor and a tiny minority are hired as "unavailable talent".

    2. Re:Wrong Solution by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      Ph D in STEM can already do that. Science Tech Engg and Math grads can jus apply for green card based on their degree. No employer sponsorship is needed. No offer of employment is needed. They already have full bargaining power.

      STEM Masters get an additional 15 months of post completion practical training on top of 12 months of practical training period of other fields, They can work legally for any employer for 27 months. Then the employer has to sponsor them for Green card. The masters come in EB2 category. Waiting period is practically nil for all countries except for India. Chinese need to wait a little not as much as Indians

      The STEM grads with bachelors get the same 27 months. But they come in EB3 category. The one I am pushing got his job one week after 9/11. 2001. Still standing in queue. The one I hired joined first and then completed his masters thesis a month or quarter later. That put him in EB3 (bachelors) because degrees acquired after the job does not count. Poor guy.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:Wrong Solution by TWX · · Score: 1

      ...so it becomes impossible to undercut local wages.

      The more people available to do a job, the less that job can pay, as any one candidate is now competing with a larger number of other candidates for the same job.

      I'm honestly much less worried about low-paying jobs being filled by immigrant or migrant workers than I am about high-paying jobs. Low-paying jobs have an artificial floor for how much they can be paid, in the form of the Federal Minimum Wage, even for jobs that arguably aren't worth that minimum wage. By contrast, if there are only 15,000 existing domestic people trained to do a specialized engineering job, then allowing another 15,000 people in could dramatically reduce the salaries for the positions.

      I don't think that it's wise to have too many H-1B visas. I think that this database of jobs needs to exist without increasing the number of H-1B visas, as it may serve to help get unemployed engineers and other technical people hired when they're struggling to find work because of the economic conditions in recent years. My concern has always been that companies haven't had to prove real problems finding and retaining domestic workers.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Wrong Solution by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Ph D in STEM can already do that.

      Thank heavens for that, because almost half of the STEM Ph.D.'s in this country have jobs that justify their degrees. Anything else and we might actually see their pay rising! When that happened back in the 1980's the NSF wisely suggested a vast increase in student visas (with the express and stated purpose of driving down salaries).

    5. Re:Wrong Solution by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      Ph D in STEM can already do that. Science Tech Engg and Math grads can jus apply for green card based on their degree. No employer sponsorship is needed. No offer of employment is needed. They already have full bargaining power.

      No offense, but I believe you are just making shit up. Do you care to cite a reference? A number of my friends got a PhD and all they get is OPT which is good for 12 months and requires a (relevant) employment offer to match it those 12 months. My roommate is out of US now, because he had no way of staying here after graduating with a PhD.

      You cannot apply for green card based on your PhD degree (unless you come from the parallel universe where common sense prevailed -- as that would be a great idea to allow this).

    6. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very large majority of H1B holders are brought in as cheaper labor and a tiny minority are hired as "unavailable talent"

      That is the real situation, but the legal situation is nearly all of them claim to be "unavailable talent". Mainly they write a job description that so precisely matches their one person no one else can seriously hope to fill the position and they may simply throw away any resumes received without looking anyway.

    7. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Petitioning directly under National Interest Waiver and Exceptional category EB1 on your own is very difficult. Very few people succeed. It's probably less than even the diversity visa numbers of 50,000 per year who make it into US through these self sponsored categories. If the bar should be so high that only the 1% of the top 1% of masters and phd graduates make it if they want to and if they don't feel frustrated then your proposal will work. There are plenty of talented people who don't meet the national interest waiver or exceptional category requirements who are still exceptional and at least more than the 50,000 we import each year with green cards and whatever else as diversity immigrants. For example, exceptional category requires publications of x papers which are cited by others. People may be extraordinary in they business skills, stem skills without these papers. Maybe someone is an excellent engineer academically in the top 1% but has never published. How many people do I know like that? Plenty. So those solutions you listed don't work for the majority.

      H1-B IT workers are possibly creating the larget impact on job-losses. H1-B on the whole worked before it was used by corporations to outsource their IT. H1-B itself isn't want creates the problem. Until recently every single IT firm used the L visa program to import talent. They all have captive shops in the US. These captive companies can issue any numer of L1 visas. Look at the number of L1 visas by american firms like IBM. They are super-massive. So the way to regulate the market is to regulate L1 visas. In addition, H1-B IT workers need to be subjected to these rules not every single H1-B. That will make us less competitive not more competitive. This distinction is however lost and glossed over. If google, facebook, microsoft wants to hire computer code monkeys then can get lost. If they want to hire for computer research make that a different classification allowed under H1-B with the prevailing wage at 200,000. It will solve the problem without just killing every other sector.

      Will the american system deliver something like this. Unlikely. Every major corporation is posting those very good results by trimming their IT operations and has done so for the past decade. Until they hit zero savings on that and some of them crumble to dust they will still do it. They will lose money as the IT outsourcing will make them literal slaves dependent on their vendors. They will then start hiring again and outsourcing will be a memory of the past. The market will correct itself.Anyways the best IT talent from the rest of the world stopped coming to US years ago. It's just slave trade in IT now. That is the real problem.

    8. Re:Wrong Solution by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 2

      No offense, but I believe you are just making shit up. Do you care to cite a reference? A number of my friends got a PhD and all they get is OPT which is good for 12 months and requires a (relevant) employment offer to match it those 12 months. My roommate is out of US now, because he had no way of staying here after graduating with a PhD.

      You cannot apply for green card based on your PhD degree (unless you come from the parallel universe where common sense prevailed -- as that would be a great idea to allow this).

      Actually, the OP is right: Reference

      However, the process is hard - the OP made it sound easier than it is. You need to show that you are an extraordinary asset, with skills that are of national merit. You need several reference letters, a lot of top-notch publications (I have heard that you need more than most faculty positions require), and having contacts helps a lot (say, you had a famous advisor with lots of contacts during your Ph.D.).

      The process is still quite long, so you might as well get a job and let them apply for you instead. If you can qualify for this type of green card, you should have no problem getting a job with a high pay.

    9. Re:Wrong Solution by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The annual allocation of EB-1 visas is approximately 40,000. In FY 2009, approximately 40 percent of allotted EB-1s went to workers and approximately 60 percent went to spouses and children. EB visas also have a country limit of 7% per country (~2800), so China and India fill these up quickly.

      EB1 has not traditionally had a long backlog, but now it does. In FY 2013, there were 48,639 valid EB-1 applications, and the pipeline is getting more full.
       

    10. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Canadian who was on the H1B program and ultimately returned to Canada i have some thoughts.

      H1B's earn USD, and pay US taxes (Medicaid, Medicare) but are unable to ever collect the benefits they "paid" into. Its a great system for most interests.

      Promise greencard but never deliver so the H1B's stay the full 6 years.
      During these 6 years they are taxed for whatever they earn just like everyone else.
      At the end, they go home so no long term concerns.

      They have also indirectly accomplish a few negatives on the US citizens.
      - Since they ultimately know they will go home at the end most of their money is sent overseas, leaving little is to spend in the US economy.
      - They are willing to work for a lot less, and lower the wages in any field they enter.

      I agree with you though, greencards are the answer. Once they have full bargaining position equal to a citizen and not tied to sponsorship the downward pressure should be reduced.

      As a business would i rather have a relationship between me and my H1B so i can hold over their heads, or allow them to work with the gvt directly and have no leverage?

    11. Re:Wrong Solution by readin · · Score: 1

      I remember a few months ago the Republicans were offering a bill to make it easy for foreigners to earn PhDs from American universities to stay. To keep it from affecting overall immigration levels the bill would have cut the number of other people allowed in by the same number.

      The Democrats killed it.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    12. Re:Wrong Solution by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The more people available to do a job, the less that job can pay, as any one candidate is now competing with a larger number of other candidates for the same job.

      When you add more people to the system in general, they don't only take up a job, they also create new jobs by spending the money they earn on goods and services that they need. Were that not the case, all countries would have faced rapid increases in unemployment as their population grew by natural means.

    13. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur with this, having gone through the painful process of gathering up a whole bunch of documents, from employer, professors, summer internships, etc to get the EB-1 category visa. I have a PhD in CS from one of the top schools, and for more than 3 years, I kept on putting off applying for green card just because of the onerous requirements of getting all these things together. It is indeed similar to applying for a faculty job. I thought after grad school application, I would be done by such BS, but that wasn't too be. I did get my green card in about 4 months, but I'd also like it if they just stamped your green card when you get your PhD or even masters from legitimate schools in STEM fields. I do have some older acquaintances/friends who are immigrants, and got their PhDs in the 70s. They used to get their green cards stamped.

      One word of caution though is that there is also a bunch of abuse in the school visa system, where the whole schools exist on paper just to get the young kids in the country on student visa, who then never leave. These are your check out clerks at ethnic grocery stores, attendants at gas stations (in the states that have them), etc. etc.

      On a different note, the abuse of the H1B system by Indian labor shops, and indirectly by the American corps is nothing new. A bunch of friends have these body shops which exist for the sole purpose of importing any warm blooded body, if the money is right.

    14. Re:Wrong Solution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Erh... how? I mean, you take one person in, and he fills a job someone else would have filled. So instead of having one person who can create new jobs by spending the money, you now have one person who can create new jobs by spending the money AND one person sitting there that he (and we all) somehow have to feed.

      And the comparison to natural growth is bull, and I think you know it. Natural growth means that DEMAND for work increases first before the SUPPLY (i.e. an increase of workforce) happens. Or do you think newborn kids make great workers? For their 14+ years they are primarily consumers before they even attempt to join the workforce, so if anything, natural growth means that you need a bigger workforce before that increase in workforce hits you. Look around how things developed during the baby boomer years. Couples pumping out babies like there's no tomorrow and these kids needed schools, they needed homes, they needed food, they needed ... a billion things. They needed, needed, needed, providing jobs without ever taking one.

      So please don't compare having kids with pumping immigrants into a country. A child first and foremost CREATES jobs before it comes even close to ever wanting one.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low-paying jobs have an artificial floor for how much they can be paid, in the form of the Federal Minimum Wage, even for jobs that arguably aren't worth that minimum wage.

      hahahahahaha. Tell that to the guy who hires day laborers who are standing around in a parking lot waiting to be picked up and paid in cash. They don't make anything near minimum wage and that's why they're hired in the first place.

    16. Re:Wrong Solution by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And the comparison to natural growth is bull, and I think you know it. Natural growth means that DEMAND for work increases first before the SUPPLY (i.e. an increase of workforce) happens.

      Eventually your newborn grows up, and that point the situation is identical to an immigrant - an adult who "steals" someone's job by taking it, and creates new jobs by consuming products and services. That period of time when he's only a consumer and not a producer is fixed size, and newborns are always a certain percentage of the adult population, so bringing in new adults does not change that picture in any way - immigrants also have kids, you know?

      In fact, come to think of it, immigrants often have more kids. By your own logic, that's a good thing for the economy, no?

    17. Re:Wrong Solution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The problem there is cultural. No, don't worry, I won't get into the "foreign infiltration" bullcrap, it's the spending culture I'm talking about. Kids (hell, everyone) in the US (and also around here in Western Europe) are used to spending. Our culture is built on spending. Shop 'til you drop. We need the latest fashion, the latest ringtones, the latest bling and other crap. And twice so our kids. And our economy depends on that. That's also why I say we need to find a sensible way to somehow get some more money into poor people, they're the first to go on spending sprees, the dumber, the more consume oriented... but I digress.

      It's not necessarily so with many immigrants we get here (can't talk about the US, but if it's not that way there, immigrants with 10+ kids may well be a boon to the economy!). They're usually very conservative spenders. Not that they earn that much to begin with, but even then, spending is not their way of life. And somehow, it's one of the few things they don't adapt.

      Now, I don't mind cultural differences, far from it. Cultural diversity made the US as well as my country rich in heritage and allows us to see things from a different angle. But can't they at least adapt to the spendthrift? :)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP is actually wrong. Kwyj1b0 is correct: You cannot apply for green card based [solely] on your PhD degree. The categories you're referring to are for "outstanding researchers" and "people of national interest". The former requires you to prove you've "risen to the top of the field of your endeavor" - meaning that only the top few percent of PhDs can get it. The latter a) needs you to prove you are of national interest, and b) for Indians and Chinese, still puts you in a 5-9 year queue. In practice too, barely a few percent of PhDs are able to get their green card in either category. An overwhelming majority go through the same route as MS degree holders.

      It's only because you cannot apply for green card based solely on your PhD degree that bills like the STAPLE act (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr399) were introduced. This act eventually has made it into the current CIR draft (its introducer Jeff Flake is in the gang of 8 that produced the CIR draft).

    19. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. 140Mandak262Jamuna is wrong. Mitreya is correct.

    20. Re:Wrong Solution by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In that case H1B visa holders would not be cheaper and who's going to hire them?

      If the problem is really that companies are unwilling to pay the prevailing wage, but the talent is available, then H1Bs are not required. If the problem is really that (as Microsoft, IBM, Google, and so on have claimed) that the talent is not available in the USA at any price, then the companies would happily pay immigrants with full citizenship at the same price that they'd pay US citizens if they were available with the required skills.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the Bay Area. I only know 3 American programmers. Have met several hundred H1b.

      Fuck this place and fuck this "liberal" shithole.

    22. Re:Wrong Solution by anup_at_mac · · Score: 0

      140Mandak262Jamuna : "Ph D in STEM can already do that. Science Tech Engg and Math grads can jus apply for green card based on their degree. No employer sponsorship is needed. No offer of employment is needed."

      Your display name suggests that you attended IIT-Madras and you must be familiar with US immigration rules. The only conclusion I can draw is that the above sentence was employed to exhibit your skills at sarcasm. For other folks reading this, the OP is referring in particular to two categories of EB-1 green card application:
      1. "Outstanding professor/researcher": I got my green card in this category and the whole process took a grand total of 1 year and 4 months. You need an employer to sponsor your green card in this category. Other people have correctly pointed out how painful it can be collecting all the reference letters. Ironically, a fucking cock-sucker ..err.. I mean .. lawyer got paid while I went around doing the leg work.
      2."national interest waiver": If "outstanding researcher" was hard, I can only imagine how much more difficult this can be. This category does not need a sponsor. Anyone who even suggests that this is a viable route for anyone with a STEM PhD is either smoking something really good or is a liberal-art major flipping burgers at MacDonalds.

  5. This is total rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been in IT for 15 years and never have I seen a more anti-American approach to hiring than the H-1B visa debacle. I've seen firms literally taken over by foreigners and every American basically leave because it became uncomfortable to work there.

    The law should be hire Americans first. If no one in the city or state can be found, create a jobs database like the one proposed and people in other states can apply. Once the company has shown they cannot find a qualified applicant in CONUS, Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and all American islands, then, and only then will they be allowed to look elsewhere. If a qualified applicant is found, they must be hired.

    Disagree all you wish. We have gave the farm away. All of these people come over here, work for American companies, go home, start companies, and then compete with American companies. It happens all the time.

    The US needs to regain complete control of the IT sector and maintain it. Coming to work here should be by lottery with, say, only, 10,000 a year allowed. Maximum stay 3 years with caveats.

    1. Re:This is total rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could hire autralians and English people who speak English but they don't , the Australian visas are free

    2. Re:This is total rubbish by afgam28 · · Score: 2

      Disagree all you wish. We have gave the farm away. All of these people come over here, work for American companies, go home, start companies, and then compete with American companies. It happens all the time.

      OK, I disagree. I'd like to see you name a big non-American tech company that was started by a former H-1B holder.

      I'm not talking about tiny littles ones that employ a few people; I'm talking about foreign multinational tech companies. These are the only companies that will ever "compete with American companies" like Google, Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Microsoft.

      Can't think of any? That's probably because it never happens.

    3. Re:This is total rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the idea. It will give established Americans (like me) a boot in the ass to increase our health and education/skills. Also has the ability to give a brand new class of people to walk on - providing a boost to the middle class again.

    4. Re:This is total rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close, but no.

      The how laws should be written is that "best person for the job" first. Not "cheapest"

      If the best person for the job is someone in Canada who has 20 years experience, and all the Americans who apply for the job have 3 years experience, the Canadian is therefor the best person for the job. However the number of people that are going to be like that are slim. Even in Canada with this debacle about RBC bringing in people from India via an outsourcing firm to train/replace employees who are still working there, this is clearly not "the best person for the job" if you have to train them to do everything. The best person for the job is in fact the people ALREADY WORKING THERE.

      That would put the death knell in outsourcing.

      One thing, as seen in other replies, padded requirements. Familiarity with proprietary software that only people they trained to via outsourcing, this kind of stupidity needs to stop. We can limit this damage by requiring named software to be available, otherwise it can not be a requirement. eg "20 years experience with CompanyB - spreadsheet Macro system" would require that the company link in the job description where the software can be purchased/downloaded. If the software is (obviously) no longer the latest version or better yet... the company went out of business, then that can -not- be a requirement to the job.

    5. Re:This is total rubbish by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Ehm, remember that the "Americans" you refer to are descendants of people from all over the world who came to the US to make a life for themselves. Your solution is the opposite of what is required. Instead of trying to exclude talented foreigners so that they won't compete with "Americans", why don't you instead give the good ones an incentive to stay? E.g. give them a visa that does not make their spouse ineligible for work. Set up an easier process for those who have MS/PhD from good US universities - you provided them the best education in the world (for many disciplines), why not try to hang on to them?
      My company was looking for a software engineer in NY. Trust me, there are no US software engineers left unemployed that are worth anything - actually even incompetent ones were usually not without a job.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    6. Re:This is total rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah man ... if only the Native Indians had applied your theory on the Europeans!

  6. Get off your butts! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Instead of whining in a slashdot post go email, call, tweet, or whatever to your senator! The link I provided is all 100 of them.

    If your senator is a democrat tell them how much wages have not went up and how job ads actually state "H1B1 rates in salary and how employers are abusing the system as it was designed to only allow an employer to hire someone at a comparative rate. Never as a way to lower costs.

    If your senator is a republican tell them it is an assault on the free market as employers get to choose where to hire, but you do not have the choice to do the same. Mention government interference and tax dollars wasted, then close with the same line I had above in your own words how it is not going as intended.

    Also, mention one of the organizations was a fraudalent fake one by Microsoft looking for cheaper workers. Not an actualy organization of I.T. professionals who are lobbying for this as this is self centered and not in the will of your constitutions. Call them too as the staff checks the amount of calls everday and a spike is certainly noticed by the senator.

    Remember the DMCA 2.0 law requiring DRM TCPA chips in every computer sold? It was thrown out after we at slashdot put down such links. Senators got so much of an earfull that was cancelled. Slashdot generates 10,000 if not 100,000 of views for stories. So spend 3 minutes and do your part.

    1. Re:Get off your butts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a conservative Republican and I wonder about removing the cap on H1B's. Eventually, they'll exhaust the competent and hire people that will cost more than they are worth which would be quite entertaining.

    2. Re:Get off your butts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... are you in favor of this or against it?

    3. Re:Get off your butts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a conservative Republican and I wonder about removing the cap on H1B's. Eventually, they'll exhaust the competent and hire people that will cost more than they are worth which would be quite entertaining.

      You make that sound like it hasn't already happened.

      Why do you think we have so much crap software taking down businesses and services on an almost daily basis? True, "perfect" software is impossible, but the prevailing business mantra isn't "get it right", it's "Git 'er Dun!". Do it fast, and most especially do it cheap. Which is what incompetent H1-Bs are good for.

  7. Simple solution by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not just mandate a H1B be paid at least $100,000 a year, no exceptions. If they're really so good, they deserve the money and $100k would be a bargain.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, none of the arguments that people use to justify the H-1B visa apply to people earning less than 100K.

      I will be starting my H-1B at around $200K assuming I get a visa. While I probably drive down wages more than someone earning $50K, I will be contributing a lot more to the economy too.

    2. Re:Simple solution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That isn't already the case? Hell, even my country has something like that in place!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Simple solution by a_osiris · · Score: 1

      I agree. I was offered job as Automation Engineer on H1B Visa with annual pay of 150K. I still didn't take it but thats my choice. Normally employers apply well known methods like include relocation, visa expenses, flight tickets and lawyer fees in total renum. package. That brings the total way above comparable salary. The salary should be gross received by the employee in his bank account and not extra expenses bu**s**t. But the companies are not interested in doing that. They want cheap labour and will go to the ends of earth for the same.

    4. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then we can make half of the 100K a tax to educate American workers.
            That ought to make sure that local jobs move offshore instead of smart offshore folks moving here.

      Publishing the job needs and letting local folks apply seems the right compromise.
            If local folks are willing to work for offshore wages, then there is no pressure to move jobs offshore.
       

  8. So this H1B database of job openings... by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    Can us Americans apply for those jobs?

    Won't that be the irony. H1B visas because there are not enough qualified Americans to work those jobs. But I wager, they'll make it so that Americans can't use the site to apply for those very same jobs.

    *fumes*

    1. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can us Americans apply for those jobs?

      Won't that be the irony. H1B visas because there are not enough qualified Americans to work those jobs. But I wager, they'll make it so that Americans can't use the site to apply for those very same jobs.

      *fumes*

      Read the article. It strongly implies that the "H-1B database" is where the employers are required to post job listings for AMERICAN workers for 30 days before hiring an H-1B candidate for the same position.

    2. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, but it won't do you any good. Any self-respecting company has legal staff that's seen the "How to not hire an American" video.

      Interestingly, you can get links to that video from either DailyKos or Free Republic (actually the first two sites in a search) so you can see that the outrage covers a pretty broad part of the political spectrum. Not that our congress cares - we're just the @#%#^! voters and citizens of this country.

    3. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      There are very strict rules about advertising in USA and demonstrate that there are no qualified Americans for the job before the employer gets an H1B. The pay should be in par with smiliar skill levels, You can not tailor the requirement to fit a candidate you have in mind or the candidate who is already working for you (in practical training).

      Having said that, many companies find ways to work around this and there are lawyers who specilize in crafting the requirements that pass the muster with the government while still filtering out American applicants. Some Indian companies are notorious for this.

      The main problem is skill fragmentation. The supply and demand fluctuates a lot. While there is an oversupply of C++ and Chem engg one year, the next year it would be Java and UI design etc etc. So at any given time there is always an excess of Americans with some skills and excess of jobs with a different skill set. Places like India have such a large and hungry population they have the capacity to fill any shortage quickly. Add to it some less than honest interviews, resume padding, American applicants get the short end of the stick. If H1B is not available the companies will hire all smart guys and train them for the job. But with H1B available it is always tempting for the companies to go for instant appeasement. They would be better off to hire smart locals and train them. But the corporate America somehow finds that an unappealing solution.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The main problem is skill fragmentation.

      No, you had it right with "companies find ways to work around this". The job requirements are a scam.

    5. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by byuu · · Score: 2

      They don't have to care. When both parties are doing the same thing, and everyone votes for one or the other (with amazing vitriol about how evil the other party is), why should they?

    6. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main problem is that the ads are bullshit to claim there are no american's capable of the job.

    7. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      "There are very strict rules about advertising in USA and demonstrate that there are no qualified Americans for the job before the employer gets an H1B."

      These rules are not that hard to work around:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TCbFEgFajGU

    8. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by wezelboy · · Score: 1

      Just like the current system, this one will be wide open for abuse. They can just list a plethora of impossible qualifications that no available american worker will be able to meet. Once the 30 days have gone by, they will open the job up to foreign workers with the implicit agreement that nothing on the applicants CV or resume will actually be checked for veracity.

      Nothing will change. It will only make things worse.

    9. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Those...Demrepublicraticans!!!!

  9. Mistake or bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive

    Either the typist intended to say "less competitive", or is revealing a bias towards US people.

    Since idiots will jump to conclusions, I will say that I am not commenting on the nature of a possible bias, but just its existence.

  10. Window Dressing for the Gullible by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

    It will require the U.S. Labor Dept. to create a website of H-1B job openings that employers must post to. The jobs must be posted least 30 calendar days before hiring an H-1B applicant to fill that position. The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified.

    Pure window dressing. Is there anyone dumb enough to think this will make a difference? The H-1B has had various "comparable wages" and "no American worker available" provisions for years. It's meaningless because it's never enforced, and I don't expect any magic pixie dust in this bill to change that.

    One provision that will affect India, in particular, limits H-1B visa use to 50% of a firm's U.S. workforce.

    This may actually have some effect, but it's frightening to say that. A crackdown means limiting it to 50% of a company's U.S. workforce? U.S. does mean United States, right?

    1. Re:Window Dressing for the Gullible by lgw · · Score: 1

      crackdown means limiting it to 50% of a company's U.S. workforce? U.S. does mean United States, right?

      That will break the model of the current evil consulting firms that exist only to abuse H-1B workers, and have no US citizens employed at all (at the coder level), while having little effect on legitimate firms supplanting their workforce with a few H-1Bs. It's a very cool idea IMO.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Window Dressing for the Gullible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Depending on the actual arrangement, limiting the H-1B percentage to 50% may not be enough to stop the hemorrhaging of American jobs offshore. In too many cases the H-1B's onsite in the U.S. are only the tip of the iceberg. For example in the company I worked for until 2 years ago the H-1Bs were *onsite coordinators* for offshore teams; each of them worked with an offshore team of 4- 6 six coders or testers. With a 50% maximum H-1B presence we were still outnumbered by 5 to 1 or more, without that discrepancy being immediately obvious to most observers within the company, and probably not trackable as displacing American workers because the offshore people were't actually H-1Bs.

      And this was in the context of a business - health insurance - that has NO significant market outside of the U.S. So one couldn't even make the argument for "global employees" to support a "global market"...

    3. Re:Window Dressing for the Gullible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is enacted and enforced, I would hope there's no grandfathering allowed so that companies like Qualcomm are forced to hire American workers. I suspect, though, they'll just hire in-house for typically outsourced positions like janitorial staff and window cleaners to skirt the requirement.

  11. Free agents by Skapare · · Score: 2

    What should be added is to allow H-1B holders to be free agents in the market.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  12. need to get rid of fake / bloated qualified lists by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    need to get rid of fake / bloated qualified lists where they can make so that no one will be qualified.

  13. also force them to give HB1 full benefits at a by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    also force them to give HB1 full benefits at a level that is same or better then what most of there us workers get.

    1. Re:also force them to give HB1 full benefits at a by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      They usually get the same benefits, if you are talking in terms of 401k and insurance. However, the benefit of being able to say "I quit" to your boss is not quite there, since they have to go home right away if they do it. If they are allowed to have freedom to switch jobs and be unemployed (w/o the unemployment benefits), then they might start applying for jobs with higher pay, thus pulling the average pay rate up for all.

  14. THANK GOODNESS! by desertfool · · Score: 1

    This is a HUGE blessing. I have been working for a company that uses an offshore outsourcer for quite a few years. They suck the brains of the "re-badged" US employees, then let them go, then bring in kids from offshore to perform their jobs. This needs to stop. /sorry, but bitter. //seen too many good people lose their jobs then be replaced by people with no experience. ///this isn't enough.

    --
    Just a dude. Stuck in IT.
  15. Re:need to get rid of fake / bloated qualified lis by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    It is illegal to pad the requirements or to tailor it for a pre selected individual. But the companies don't ask for general things like degree in computational physics or chemical engineering. It is always, "Masters in Aerospace engg or equivalent + C++ and/or Java + computational fluid dynamics + navier stokes equation + k-epsilon turbuence modeling + unstructured tetrahedral mesh + time marching" At this point, people who know know it is a tailored requirement. But the dept of labor bureaucrat does not know.

    We have been denigrating, insulting and making fun of civil servants for some 30 years now. "Govt is the problem" "Most dangerous seven words in english". Now we have a completely demoralized and underqualified unmotivated civil service tackling unwieldy rules and regulations.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  16. The Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No amount of requiring a job to be posted for 30 days before an H1B candidate is hired will keep them from posting things like, "Required ten years of experience in 15 different unrelated fields for minimum wage. No takers? We'll hire this guy from India that totally said he was qualified!" or a company saying, "Sorry, Americans want too much pay. If we go overseas, we'll be able to create more jobs here in America and the wealth will just trickle down! Trust us!"

  17. Not all H1 Bs are bad by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    I came in as F1, got a H1B, got green card and got citizenship just in time to vote against Rick Santorum. Hip hip hurrey! But not all H1Bs are good like me. Some of them, gasp, become Republicans.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I came in as F1, got a H1B, got green card and got citizenship just in time to vote against Rick Santorum. Hip hip hurrey!

      But how did your salary compare to that of your American colleagues while you were an H1B employee?
      H1Bs are not bad because on one ever stays in US, but because it allows for worker exploitation/underpayment (while on H1B).

    2. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      That's good for you.

      One of the big things this should allow is more people following your path to citizenship. I think one of the things Americans dislike about the H1B visa program are the number of people who don't stay, or have companies that make it difficult to obtain citizenship without having the companies boot on there necks.

      Just look at the GAO report on the issue. The largest employers of H1B visa workers are staffing firms. Quite a few of which use the H1B as a job training visa. Then they can outsource the job back to India.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    3. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by csumpi · · Score: 0

      Then one day you'll grow up, have kids, maybe even stop smoking drugs (that will help you remember the name of the Republican candidate), and realize that the guys you voted for spent all your kids' and grandkids' money (in the name of your children, nonetheless).

    4. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One improvement would be to fix the PERM process for the EB2 green cards. EB1 is very hard to get, and while it is true that the country needs the top people whom EB1 is meant to cover, EB2 candidates are valuable too in industries that are really finding it hard to find good staff. Yet in that situation the PERM process ties an employee so strictly to a particular role in a particular company it removes bargaining power completely. Make the H1B a *short* transition to an EB2 green card and that will help a lot.

    5. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I compared my pay with the median reported in IEEE and concluded I got the top dollar. I was lucky, the company was run by really kind and gentle folks.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

      H1Bs get paid good salaries in tech firms, actually, on par with what the native employees are paid - at least based on my anecdotal evidence (as an H1B with plenty of friends on the same). Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Facebook all do that, and they also start green card applications for their H1Bs as soon as they become eligible - which wouldn't really make much sense if the purpose was to exploit the dependent status. Most people which do this see it as an immigration track towards eventual citizenship, and start settling down almost right away - some don't even wait for a green card to get a home mortgage etc.

      The places that are really abusing the program hard seem to be the "business consulting" sweatshops like Tata, for whom outsourcing is, essentially, the entire business model and their raison d'etre. Those tend to have predominantly Indian employees, who are not sponsored for green cards, and who are considerably underpaid. Also, since those employees know that they won't remain in the country in the end, they tend to spend money less and save it more, since it will have more purchasing power for them once they return to their home country (so they aren't as invested in US economy, further exacerbating the effects).

      Consequently, the obvious solution to this problem would be to ditch H1B as a temp. worker visa, and remake it as a work-towards-citizenship program. This would imply that any person coming to the country on such a visa would has to apply for a green card; and make this process easier and reduce the current (5.5 years and growing!) backlog. It would also be nice to make it easier to switch jobs while still on H1B (I'd say get rid of it entirely, except that you want to ensure that new job has the necessary qualifications - i.e. above prevailing wage, local applicants prioritized etc); most importantly, make it so that changing jobs doesn't reset the green card process, so that employers can't use it as a stick.

    7. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of my objection to the H1B is, besides screwing the US worker, is that the immigrants now holding H1Bs now deserve better. Really, ever seen an H1B that realizes they're getting screwed? I have. They might as well try to change their employment by passing a law through Congress itself. Oh yeah, if you don't like your working conditions? Well then, we'll just ship you and your family back pronto.

      Ah but I don't support the H1B program, ergo I must be racist...

    8. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! Aside from a handful of H-1B visas (20,000?) H1Bs should be reserved for F1 holders. So many times I've worked with "fresh off the boat" H1Bs without a .clue in their ~ dir. On the other hand, the F1s to H1Bs are great to work with and know their stuff. F1s should always be first in line for H1Bs & citizenship - while in college they "assimilated" and got an equivalent degree. -T

    9. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Actually, since the fiction is that H1-Bs are only for jobs that domestic talent cannot fill, the Law of Supply and Demand would imply that you shouldn't get an H1-B salary "on par" with native employees, it should be better.

      While the outsourcing companies are certainly big abusers of H1-B, some of the larger local companies in my town abuse them as well. Actually, they do several other things designed to keep natives cowed and desperate as well. Helps drag down the "median wage" that the H1-Bs should be paid.

  18. Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashdot by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time we had this talk, I made this comment
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3620197&cid=43374569
    One AC response to my comment was sort of scary...

    Yeah, I see a white guy standing in a crowd of filth which probably means now you stink as bad they do. Congrats on being a traitor to your country. It was good of you to post that photo so we know exactly what you look like. After the day the people decide wipe the shit stains off our land, we'll turn their attention to those like you who betrayed their race, for special treatment.

    What the fuck? I thought this was a site of thinkers, geeks, not of xenophobic extremists.

    Rather than waste time on a lengthy post (I am at work) let me just make one simple point...

    100% of H1-B workers that I know wish they could live, work, and pay taxes here. The only issue I take with H1-b is the treatment of said workers. This is a country that once prided itself on harboring the best and brightest from around the world, giving them shelter and refuge in exchange for their knowledge and experience. Now we give them nothing for that.

  19. Re:need to get rid of fake / bloated qualified lis by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    We have been denigrating, insulting and making fun of civil servants for some 30 years now.

    30 years? More like forever. I don't think that's the problem. TPTB make sure that government employees turn a blind eye to this. Any attempt to seriously cut through this garbage would lead to some very nasty phone calls from some very generous "campaign contributors".

  20. Money talks... by houbou · · Score: 1

    Although from a US citizen perspective, they view the extra VIsas as a negative, truth to be told, In the field of programming and application architecture, you must go where the job is.

    The reason for more Visas, to me, stems from our own US talent not marketing and/or exposing themselves efficiently and more than likely a reluctance to relocate where the work is..

    However, that's not the full truth, it's more often a question of saving money.

    For the most part. Also, foreign talent can either be very expensive or very very cheap..

    On the Cheap Department, for example, some banking institution(s) will hire a lot of programmers from India, importing them at 15$ per hour..

    Well you pay for what you get.. just remember that.

    But still, These banking institution don't care about quality code, just make it happen.

    So, obviously 15$ an hour for a Java programmer is dirt cheap for sure.

    The entire consulting firm/banking institution relationship is based on kickbacks to the hiring managers. But that's another story.. :)

  21. Indeed by happyhamster · · Score: 1

    The whole H1B idea has been perverted by greedy companies looking for cheap and obedient labor so much that it should be cancelled. There is already O-1 visa for "Individuals with Extraordinary Ability or Achievement" that is intended for geniuses that can be hard to find in the U.S. Any other needs can and should be filled within the country.

  22. Same pattern, same BS by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    First the plutocrats #@&$'d farm workers by claiming "shortage" so they can pay sh$t wages and get slaves, and now they are #@&$ing tech workers using the same pattern.

  23. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is the odd bigot hanging around but the main problem isn't that people are against immigration but instead against giving American jobs on American soil to people who aren't American citizens. And claiming all the while there isn't enough talent in a country of 100 million+ workers. But getting someone from thousands of miles away who doesn't speak the language and paying them crappy wadges is how to solve an fictitious labor shortage.

  24. Raise the fees, drop the job posting requirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea of charging fees to "job shops" that have 15 percent or more H1B's is good, but $5000 is little more than a speed bump. It should be $15,000.

    Get rid of the provision that companies have to advertise job openings to US workers, for crissakes. This is nothing more than the tech industry's equivalent of the Rozelle Rule, where teams with a NFL head coaching vacancy are required to interview at least one minority candidate. And they do, and it's a big waste of everyone's time.

  25. Petitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any petitions to sign to get H1B's drastically lowered or outright removed.

  26. The truth is by thammoud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We are trying to hire Java developers in Chicago for a salary range of 80k-120k and NOTHING. H1-B or not. The market is very tight.

    1. Re:The truth is by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Check your hiring process. I've run into times when we can't find anyone because all the candidates HR sent us were unsuitable (the ones we interviewed flunked on the basic C/C++ skills test despite claiming a minimum of 5 years experience coding in C/C++), and yet I knew there were at least 2 highly-qualified candidates that HR hadn't sent to us to review because I handed their resumes to HR myself. That right there tells me that the problem might be not that there aren't any candidates but that HR's throwing them out before they ever get looked at. Ditto for recruiters, who probably use the same process HR does to screen candidates.

      I've thought it might be amusing to bypass the HR process entirely, task some of the developers with attending the various techie get-togethers around town and collect qualified candidates that way, then give the hiring manager their resumes directly in addition to sending them to HR. Then if their resumes don't show up, the hiring manager can send them up from his side asking "This candidate looks qualified and we'd like to interview them but they weren't in the stack you sent down. I know it should be there, I had one of my devs run it over to you personally. Can you get back to me about what happened to it?".

    2. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes it look like the salary ceiling for your company is 120k, and i so, of course nobody is going to move to Chicago for that.

    3. Re:The truth is by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We are trying to hire Java developers in Chicago for a salary range of 80k-120k and NOTHING. H1-B or not. The market is very tight.

      Maybe the problem is that you're trying to hire "Java developers" instead of good programmers. That's a mentality that seems to have become pervasive. There was a time when people would be embarrassed to say they were looking for a "language X developer". I once interviewed at a place where the interviewer started to ask me about a specific language. Then he stopped himself right in the middle and said "sorry, stupid question".

      Can't find somebody who knows your language du jour? Hire any decent programmer on a probationary basis. If they're not up to speed on the flavor-of-the-year in a month or two, then get rid of them. If you're not willing to invest or chance a month or two then you're not in serious need.

    4. Re:The truth is by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'd lay a lot of the blame for unemployed developers and companies that can't find people on the desks of HR departments around the country. They're very good at finding people who are good at gaming their system by loading their resumes up with buzz words. When you go to interview those candidates, they can never answer even the most basic questions about anything they put on their resume. Meanwhile, people whose resumes you hand to HR yourself tell you they never heard from your company. If you want to solve your problem finding talented developers, fire your HR department.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the jobs I've worked bypassed HR for me to get the job. The last company I was at the hiring manager had me in for an interview within a week of seeing my resume. Had an offer in my hands a week later and I started two weeks later. As it was the end of the calendar year and company wide vacations. I had planned a two week vacation across country to visit my sister for the holidays so my vacation was litterally the two weeks between one job ending as the position was going away and the next one starting.

    6. Re:The truth is by chad_r · · Score: 1

      I've thought it might be amusing to bypass the HR process entirely, task some of the developers with attending the various techie get-togethers around town and collect qualified candidates that way, then give the hiring manager their resumes directly in addition to sending them to HR.

      I thought this was normal practice in a job search. The best chance of getting past HR is to send it to an employee at the company, no matter how vaguely you know them. There is sometimes a finder's fee to the employee if you get in, which gives them more of an incentive to follow through.

      HR is crap. I think the chances have been low for a while that a human actually sees it before a keyword matching process rejects it, no matter how closely the resume matches the job description.

    7. Re:The truth is by fatalwall · · Score: 2

      Thammoud,

      For those of us who are currently looking would you care to share where these positions are posted?

      The big issue I've noticed is that getting past HR is impossible because they are looking for key words to filter based on. You could literally replace them with a computer and get better results. The person filtering needs to understand that if you have one year in Java and 6 years with C++ and another 3 with C# that you are have significantly more value then the two or three years of java that they are looking for.

      Thanks,

      FatalWall

    8. Re:The truth is by readin · · Score: 2

      I've been doing Java for quite a few years and would like to do something different. I'm finding that employers are looking for specific languages and I'm having trouble getting considered for any job that isn't Java. The differences between object-oriented procedural languages aren't that great and my resume shows that I've learned quite a few different languages. It's pretty frustrating not being considered for jobs that look interesting just because they use a different language.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    9. Re:The truth is by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      I've gathered that language specific crap has gotten popular, judging from the number of "Java developer" or "C# developer" ads I see. It's ridiculous. No programmer worth his salt should have any trouble learning a new language. Pardon the old fart story, but I actually go back to a time before C was the programmer's lingua franca. I'd just learned the language, and was involved in hiring about a half dozen people for a new project that was going to use it. Not a one of our new hires knew it, and we really didn't care. Everybody came up to speed quickly, and it didn't impede the project at all.

    10. Re:The truth is by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      PAY MORE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Companies have no problem paying sales assholes a lot of money. Maybe pay the people who do the actual work actual money.

    11. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are trying to hire Java developers in Chicago for a salary range of 80k-120k and NOTHING. H1-B or not. The market is very tight.

      ... ever considering hiring capable proven developers, regardless of their past experience in the language you are looking for, and investing in a couple months of training and ramp up time to get them up to speed in the language/framework/platform du jour at your company?

    12. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in hearing as well, especially since Chicago isn't that far of a move for me.

      I've gotten creative with my resumes after failing to find a programming job for awhile. Really took the cake when I applied for an embedded systems position by submitting a bootable OS that presented my resume written in assembly for the boot loader and C for everything else. Crazy that I was told I'm unqualified.

    13. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the market is tight. I've been trying to hire a good Linux admin for months. I've gone through dozens of resumes and most are crap. Many times the recruiters just put up fake resumes. The person may look good on paper but flops completely on the interview.

      Unfortunately, the H1B external contractors are pretty ridiculous. I spent fifteen minutes trying to explain to one why x86_64 binaries won't run on some PowerPC hardware (IBM 795). He insisted that it was Java and therefore would work fine. One didn't know how to expand a filesystem.

      But it's bullshit that they pay the H1Bs the same rate as green card or citizens. The cost is substantially less through some accounting tricks (outsourced workers for example). I'm being pressured to hire admins through a system that pegs the rate at $65/hr. Sounds high, but after the contractor company takes out their chunk, the engineer gets about half that and that's a lot lower than they pay regular employees. The $65/hr, all told, is less than my compensation package. So yes, there is a huge savings.

    14. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sysadmin here, haven't made less than 180k year working remote for the past 5 years. u mad bro?

    15. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the role is a Java developer in Chicago, then 95% of the time it will be for a second rate market maker, trying to avoid trading and rebate taxes.

      And no you wont be working on writing fancy trading algorithms, you'll instead be doing grunt work like doing simple order entry and market data gateways (FIX et al) to the 100 or so exchanges your company will need to connect to in order to scrap together some earnings so as to pay your measly wages.

      To add to that, you'll be expected to work at 12-15hr days, deal with obnoxious traders, and in the case of some MMs even have to sit through religious (catholic) counseling sessions (infinium, eladian).

      Traders, managers and the like will always be entitled to bonuses and salary increases regardless of the market, but if the market takes even the slightest dive, forget yours (virtu).

    16. Re:The truth is by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

      I think the issue isn't that they're seeking "Java developers' as in someone who knows basic Java, but more in that they're seeking someone who knows basic Java plus all the frameworks and related stuff (EJBs, JSPs, Spring, Struts, Hibernate, Ant, JUnit, GWT, etc.). It will take more than a few months to get fluent in all of these.

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    17. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCKING OPEN A COMPANY YOU ASSHOLE!!!!

      If you think every company is having an easy time paying everybody $120k+, then why don't you just open a company yourself, NOT hire the 100 employees or what have you, and pay yourself $12M instead?

      It's all so easy, right?

    18. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The differences between object-oriented procedural languages aren't that great

      Yes, they are. Learn your OO and design patterns for real and you'll get job offers.

    19. Re:The truth is by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I've gathered that language specific crap has gotten popular, judging from the number of "Java developer" or "C# developer" ads I see. It's ridiculous. No programmer worth his salt should have any trouble learning a new language. Pardon the old fart story, but I actually go back to a time before C was the programmer's lingua franca. I'd just learned the language, and was involved in hiring about a half dozen people for a new project that was going to use it. Not a one of our new hires knew it, and we really didn't care. Everybody came up to speed quickly, and it didn't impede the project at all.

      It has never been true that a good programmer only needs to know just the programming language. Well, almost never, but the shop I know of that kept their programmers at that level did so by providing a very unnatural environment, and relied a lot on turnover. Even in the dinosaur era, you not only needed to know programming languages, you needed to know how to work with JCL, the linkage editor, various crochety utility programs and the like.

      In Java, you have probably thousands of classes in the extended library set that goes into an industrial-grade web application. UI frameworks, ORMs, web services frameworks, messaging systems, etc., etc., etc. The Java language is pretty easy to learn, but to work effectively, you need to know much more than the language. I provide support for one of the popular Java web frameworks that was specifically designed to make the programmer's job simpler and easier and it's truly horrible what some of the work samples that people who are new to the platform have tried to do before they came for help.

    20. Re:The truth is by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Thammoud,

      For those of us who are currently looking would you care to share where these positions are posted?

      The big issue I've noticed is that getting past HR is impossible because they are looking for key words to filter based on. You could literally replace them with a computer and get better results.

      If you think they haven't, then I have news for you.

      What's why they insist on machine-readable documents.

    21. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While HR could certainly be part of the problem, a good portion of it also lays squarely with the engineers/management doing the interviews. Some of these people seem intent on making the candidate uncomfortable, showing off their own knowledge, finding what the employee doesn't know vs. what they do, etc. Interviewing isn't really that difficult, yet I have accounts of numerous failures in the interviewing process. Everything from using those stupid puzzles from the back of text books and not knowing how to evaluate the answers to interviewers being aggressive and telling people they're wrong in the interview.

      I've witnessed numerous development teams that were understaffed and NEEDED to hire, but couldn't find anyone because they had no idea how to evaluate talent nor how to interview. Whenever they did manage to hire, the person was worthless but they passed all the stupid games in the interview process.

    22. Re:The truth is by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      It will take more than a few months to get fluent in all of these.

      It will still take less time that finding an H1B worker and getting his paperwork approved.

    23. Re:The truth is by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      PAY MORE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      I wish I had mod points to vote you higher.

      It seems like 80-120k is a decent salary range; however, it is not high enough to pull someone from another company who's got a decent job that they like. Part of CEOs' high pay is a "talent retention" bonus, since companies are worried that skilled CEOs will go somewhere else. In IT, on the other hand, very few companies pay "talent retention" bonus, because nobody is worried about IT workers leaving for another company. It all must be due to good market conditions for employers, which is directly opposite of their need for more qualified IT workers.

    24. Re:The truth is by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The differences between object-oriented procedural languages aren't that great

      Yes, they are. Learn your OO and design patterns for real and you'll get job offers.

      People who are obsessed with OO purity, "design patterns", and other low level issues, rather than worrying about the application area, and the appropriate overall structure, algorithms and data structures, are buzzword fetishists who write code that's beautiful in their own mind, and sucks in the real world.

      Linus Torvalds thinks OO means obfuscation squared. That probably explains why he can't get a job.

      P.S. OO is sooo 90's. All the cool kids are talking about functional languages.

    25. Re:The truth is by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      They want somebody who knows all the frameworks and related stuff? Good luck. More likely they need someone to work with one or two that they use in house. Yes, it raises the learning curve, but if you're serious about needing people, you'll live with that.

    26. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago / Illinois is also less than an ideal place to live. Any house is $300k + 7 grand a year in property tax. State tax is 6 percent. Most places are around Chicago, sales tax is 9-10%.......and it is only getting worse. Hmmm, can't understand why someone would live there versus Austin or Denver.

    27. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The listed ones aren't such a hard list. 3/6 devs on my team would be fine with that list, and 2 of the other 3 are fresh-out-of-college hires we brought on this year.

    28. Re:The truth is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      = 120k in Chicago is NOTHING. Is this a joke?

  27. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    I thought this was a site of thinkers, geeks, not of xenophobic extremists.

    Unfortunately you can find those idiots anywhere.

    The only issue I take with H1-b is the treatment of said workers. This is a country that once prided itself on harboring the best and brightest from around the world, giving them shelter and refuge in exchange for their knowledge and experience. Now we give them nothing for that.

    If we give them nothing, then why do they come here?

    As far as your other points, you're going too far in playing up the myth of American immigration. First, the vast majority of H-1B's are not the "best and brightest". They may be competent, and reasonably well educated, but that doesn't put one in the "best and brightest" category. I'm good at what I do, but I'm not in that category.

    Moreover, "shelter and refuge" are what you give refugees, not hi-tech guest workers. We're not talking about people who would be oppressed if they couldn't come here. As for "knowledge and experience", the experience part doesn't cut it, as many H-1B's come here (or stay here) fresh out of school. They do have knowledge, but unfortunately it's not of the kind that we don't already have plenty of. Unfortunately, and especially at a time like this when unemployment is still high, very few H-1B's have any skills or knowledge that can't be found amongst unemployed Americans.

  28. What America needs ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What America needs is not what this bill is providing

    I am saying this as an American, as one who have funded many startups in America, and as one who have providing jobs to many of my fellow Americans

    What America needs are people who are entrepreneurial, who are risk takers, who provide jobs for others

    What this bill intends to do is to import even more tech-grunts under the H1-B visas, and to open up the gate for MILLIONS of undocumented aliens, most of them unskilled/low-skilled, lacking in enthusiasm to compete, and they will end up burdening the already over-burdened social welfare system that we have in our country

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:What America needs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What America needs is not what this bill is providing

      I am saying this as an American, as one who have funded many startups in America, and as one who have providing jobs to many of my fellow Americans

      What America needs are people who are entrepreneurial, who are risk takers, who provide jobs for others

      What this bill intends to do is to import even more tech-grunts under the H1-B visas, and to open up the gate for MILLIONS of undocumented aliens, most of them unskilled/low-skilled, lacking in enthusiasm to compete, and they will end up burdening the already over-burdened social welfare system that we have in our country

      'twould be nice to have a few periods, too.

    2. Re:What America needs ... by Flentil · · Score: 2

      Care to explain how allowing up to 180k documented workers translates into MILLIONS of undocumented workers? They all have papers. They're also not going to multiply like tribbles, so what are you talking about?

    3. Re:What America needs ... by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      If you read through the 1,500 page immigration bill, you'll understand. Tip: He's not talking about India, he's talking about Mexico and the rest of Central America. Look at the rhetoric and the results of the 60s era immigration reform and the 86 era amnesty.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:What America needs ... by bayankaran · · Score: 1

      What this bill intends to do is to import even more tech-grunts under the H1-B visas, and to open up the gate for MILLIONS of undocumented aliens, most of them unskilled/low-skilled, lacking in enthusiasm to compete, and they will end up burdening the already over-burdened social welfare system that we have in our country

      What nonsense? Agreed H1 B employees are evil - but how are they 'undocumented aliens' and burden your social welfare system?

      --
      Tat Tvam Asi
    5. Re:What America needs ... by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      1) There's already an entrepreneur green card category (I'm planning to use it).

      2) This bill actually provides separate category of visas for investors. That's also doubleplusgood because of the way the current green card system works.

    6. Re:What America needs ... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What America, no, the world simply needs is that work has to pay. Simple as that. The good ol' American Dream has to work again. Get a job, work your way up, take a risk or two, work some more and you'll have the chance to play up in the heavens as well.

      As long as it's more profitable to push money around and play the stock roulette (where, unlike entrepreneurial minded people who HAVE to risk it all, you play with a bailout net below you), this country (as any country, don't feel left out, Europe!) will never get back on its feet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:What America needs ... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      But that has nothing to do with H1B. H1B foreigners are actually exactly the opposite of those illegal immigrants. They have papers, they have a usable skill set and immigration knows pretty well where they sit around.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:What America needs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's going to build this website that you all have to use? Hmm... H1Bs, perhaps? There aren't any spare ones lying around, so it's obvious they need more, or else the site won't get built.

      I do find it interesting though how the "free market" America wants to make a single, government run website the central tenet of a private sector hiring process. Damn those hippie commies with their centralised services mentality trying to get a bit of competition going in the H1B market!

      (This post may contain irony - be careful you don't trip up on it)

    9. Re:What America needs ... by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      There is already a green card category for investors. I believe, it currently requires you to invest about half a million into struggling US businesses, or one million in businesses of your choice.

    10. Re:What America needs ... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Jobs requiring needed skills do pay well. Low-skill jobs have largely been replayed by automation, and that trend isn't going to stop. Eventually, there just won't be any manufacturing or clerical worker jobs. The march of technology has always caused turmoil, but always raised standards of living thus far, so I'm not too worried about it.

      The bailout thing is horrible, of course, but has been the norm for at least a couple of centuries. While that's depressing in terms of ever stopping it, it's also a sign that good times can happen despite it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:What America needs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am saying this as an American, as one who have funded many startups in America, and as one who have providing jobs to many of my fellow Americans

      And obviously as one who have enjoyed the outstanding educational system in this country...

    12. Re:What America needs ... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      open up the gate for MILLIONS of undocumented aliens

      How does this bill open up the gate for the illegal aliens? I've not read it, but the coverage of it doesn't seem to indicate that.

  29. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the statement you are referencing is simply hateful and most likely a troll so that unimportant.

    "100% of H1-B workers that I know wish they could live, work, and pay taxes here."

    That's great and all, but they shouldn't be here in the first place, at all. There are actual citizens that need jobs now and have for decades. The h1b's fill a problem that doesn't exist.

  30. Supply and demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the supply is low, and the demand is high, then the price you pay must rise to accommodate should you be in need.

    How anyone gets into a position to hire someone without knowing this is truly an enigma.

  31. If you are a U.S. citizen write your politicians by echtertyp · · Score: 1

    Look, I am very sympathetic to the guys in California I worked with. It is wrong that the middle class is being gutted in the United States. Posting here won't help you if you are in the U.S. A lot of paper mail to the senators and representatives might be noticed. You must write!

  32. or you are to picky by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    or you are to picky about any number of things

    Some of the big ones are a BIG list of skills

    no contractors / temps aka we don't want job hoppers (even when they may of been on a X month contract and when it ended they moved to a different place / contract due to no fault of there own)

    Need X degree (even when out of place AKA CS for IT / desktop jobs) (and some times picky about what school) over experience or even a some kind of more hands on / apprenticeship system.

    X years in version X of X tech.

    resume bot software that does not work.

  33. Let's look at the math... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The H1b visa is for 3 years - extensible by a further 3 years.
    6x180k = 1080k. Allowing for slippage say 1m H1b's steady state after 6 years of ramp up.
    There are currently about 2m developers (analysts/programmers) in the US - which probably includes 500k H1bs under the current rules.
    Are native programmers (you) happy to go from 1.5m/2m to 1m/2m (assuming no growth in the job market)?

  34. Common sense solutions by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    Tie H1B visas to the local tech unemployment rate and average salary rate for a given field. Don't allow any more H1B visas into a given metropolitan area until average salaries have gone up and average unemployment has gone down. If there is really a shortage than the market will respond by increasing salaries and decreasing unemployment, let the market do it's work. That would get rid of the bogus job ads that are placed for the explicit purpose of not hiring an American.

    In other words you can't get H1B visas unless the local area actually has a demonstrable need for people with those skills. This would do wonders for unemployed and underpaid Americans that have been devastated by the H1B visa program. Create a progressive payroll tax that goes up by the percentage of H1B visas that are on your payroll either directly or through contract companies.

    Now to address some of the needs of the employers. Get rid of limits for H1B visas altogether, and allow anyone who attends University in the United States to get a similar visa automatically upon graduation. This would allow for true labor shortages to be met and for companies to grow as claimed. Allow the best and brightest to stay in America and contribute to our economy. Company after company has been founded by hard working immigrants that have made significant contributions to our society. These are the people that we want working for us, not for the competition.

    Society is the key word here though, make the H1B visa program a fast track to citizenship for America. In four years you earn your citizenship and become a contributing member of society or your out. Allow those that would contribute to our society to immigrate and have a legitimate path to citizenship, it's the American way.

    1. Re:Common sense solutions by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Tie H1B visas to the local tech unemployment rate and average salary rate for a given field.

      Better yet, just get rid of it. We did fine as the world's tech leader without it for decades. For truly exceptional people there are always things like the 'O' series visas. People have become so brainwashed by the long existence of this program and the constant cries of "shortage" that they seem to think it serves some reasonable purpose. It doesn't.

      Now to address some of the needs of the employers.

      The employers have no special needs in this regard. Again, they did fine without it for decades. Amazing, isn't it?

      "Shortages" are a normal part of a market system, if by shortage you mean the price goes up. It's the only way that salaries ever gain. Why is it ok for them to drop, but not rise? Besides, by the "rising price" standard there is no shortage.

      It's also amazing how creative employers become in the case of a shortage, putting aside their prejudices because it was bad for business. Maybe they'd consider hiring someone over the age of 30, or who'd switched to another line of work for a few years, and need a couple of weeks to learn whatever language the company uses. Maybe they'd even consider not laying off everybody at the drop of a hat, because they'd realize that when business turned back up they'd be left short-handed. Hard for many people to believe these days, but once upon a time that was a standard and sensible business consideration. Any business person would have been considered incompetent for ignoring it.

      The classic examples of "shortages overcome prejudices" are the world wars. With so many guys being drafted and such high war production needs, they got creative. In WWI northern manufacturers actually hired black people, and even sent agents down south to recruit them. In WWII it was women. Gosh golly, you mean somebody who pees sitting down can work in a factory? Who'd a thunk.

      In the case of a real shortage, as indicated by, for example, programmer and engineer pay rising as fast as CEO pay, we can always temporarily bring back a guest worker program.

      make the H1B visa program a fast track to citizenship for America. In four years you earn your citizenship and become a contributing member of society or your out.

      Or you're out? We have never done that with LPR (legal permanent residents, aka green card holders). As long as you weren't convicted of a felony, you could stay the rest of your life (regardless of whether you became a citizen). Why do you want to change that now?

      And as for the H-1B, it's a guest worker visa, not an immigration visa. Ditch the program entirely - historically we've had immigrants instead of "guest workers". As an LPR you can get your citizenship in five years. That's worked just fine since the first immigration law was passed by the first congress. Why do we suddenly need to change it? I like the American ideal of immigration.

      Another historical aspect of immigration is that, with very few exceptions, employers were not allowed to make job offers to anyone who hadn't already immigrated. That's because people in the past weren't gullible enough to believe neo-liberal garbage about "shortages" and how it impeded business. They understood full well that a system that allowed employers to influence immigration would be abused by businesses looking for cheap labor. Looks like they were right.

    2. Re:Common sense solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh golly, you mean somebody who pees sitting down can work in a factory? Who'd a thunk.

      You sir, are a fucking moron.

  35. The US would be smart to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    import as many top foreigners as possible. Fire B or C level americans and replace them with A-level foreigners and convince them to stay in the US and become citizens.

    A large chunk of silicon valley companies were founded by foreigners, and we need to keep sucking up all the best talent in the world to maintain our edge and deny our competitors the same edge.

    As soon as we become satisfied with ourselves and start looking inward, we will decline. It's happened many times in history, and we need to relearn the lesson that being welcoming to immigrants is the key to fighting stagnation.

  36. Here's the fix.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Law #1 - Abolish all H1-B visas.. you want a job in America, be an American Citizen, or start the naturalization process - end of story.
    Law #2 - If you are not a US citizen, you get zero benefits - this includes your children - leave the country unless you start the naturalization process.
    Law #3 - If you start the naturalization process, then try to leave the country before being naturalized (and start paying taxes), you will be held, and set to work until you pay off any benefits collected while in the United States.
    Law #4 - No products sold by American Companies can be made from parts or by labor outside of the United States.
    Law #5 - No data regarding citizens of the United States can be accessed in any way shape or form by anyone not a United States Citizen.
    Law #6 - All sales of a Company with an American Headquarters, regardless of where they are funnelled through shall be taxed by the US government, failure to pay the taxes will result in the Company's assets being nationalized.
    Law #7 - Any business leaders making choices to improve stock holders options at the risk of hurting the company's long term success will now be prosecuted for fraud.
    Law #8 - All sales of stocks and bonds will be taxed at time of purchase at a rate of no less than 8%. There will be no personal gains or loss taxes/credits.
    Law #9 - There will be no tax breaks allowed in any state for any corporation - any state found giving tax breaks to any corporation will lose all federal funding.
    Law #10 - All congressmen / government employees past/present/future will be switched over to social security, medicaid/medicare as their sole retirement plan - all funds / assets in place for current government retirement and healthcare plans will be liquidated and placed into the Social Security fund.
    Law #11 - Any congressman/senator proposing to pull Social Security back into the general fund shall be shot for treason on site.
    Law #12 - All funds *borrowed* from Social Security - will be paid back in full, with a minimum of 18% interest, compounded daily (credit card finance charge style).
    Law #13 - Senators / Congressmen will live in Military style barracks while they serve out their terms. They will work a minimum of 330 days in Washington D.C. per year, any travel is paid out of their salaries, not by the citizens of the United States.
    Law #14 - All government personnel will be scrutinized - sent through the millimeter wave scanners, and given full pat-down inspections every time they travel, at every airport they stop at - no exceptions - ever.
    Law #15 - Any attempt to revoke any of the previous 14 laws will result with Treason charges and immediate execution without need for trial.

  37. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    If we give them nothing, then why do they come here?

    For an opportunity to earn more money, and use said money to pay for a better living, and raise the family in a safer society (while also paying for that with taxes)?

    You know, that whole "pursuit of happiness" thing...

  38. Same thing is happening in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of our largest banks, RBC was basically 'caught' out- sourcing aout 45 jobs to India. They issued a pulic apology, which was nice of them.

  39. H1Bs are still at an advantage. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Some employers prefer them because they don't have to put any effort into keeping them happy. H1Bs aren't free to leave like US citizens are. If everything were equal: education, experience, job performance and salary, the H1B is often more attractive because they're not able to shop around if working for you sucks.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:H1Bs are still at an advantage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get what you pay for - except in the case of outsourced jobs - there you get fail at over 10 times the cost (having to hire 5 to 8 people to do the job of 1, most don't bother to learn anything as they have no stake in the job, they don't care about the code, they just put in the hours, doing as little as possible, while the company that hired them gets shafted)

      I've typically seen about 1 in 50 actually worth being hired, the rest were built up with phony resumes, having others do phone interviews, etc...

      No company has actually saved any money by outsourcing... The head honchos like it because of the kickbacks they get for each outsourced position hired.

  40. Took em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THEY TOOK OUR JERBS!!!

  41. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as your other points, you're going too far in playing up the myth of American immigration. First, the vast majority of H-1B's are not the "best and brightest". They may be competent, and reasonably well educated, but that doesn't put one in the "best and brightest" category. I'm good at what I do, but I'm not in that category.

    Fair point. But from a economic contribution point of view, skilled migrants contributes higher than average. Even those who had suppressed wages compared to local talents. I was a H1-B with 30% less than citizens, doing the same work, at the same competency in technology. Even then the taxes I pay are in the middle class. A fair amount.

    Moreover, "shelter and refuge" are what you give refugees, not hi-tech guest workers. We're not talking about people who would be oppressed if they couldn't come here. As for "knowledge and experience", the experience part doesn't cut it, as many H-1B's come here (or stay here) fresh out of school. They do have knowledge, but unfortunately it's not of the kind that we don't already have plenty of. Unfortunately, and especially at a time like this when unemployment is still high, very few H-1B's have any skills or knowledge that can't be found amongst unemployed Americans.

    You're generalizing. Not a good thing, same mistake as the GP you're replying to. I can say I'm definitely oppressed in my home country. Same with any H1-B that comes from my country who is not of a particular religious background, which comprises of 40% of the population. A lot of other H1-B I've worked with or know are oppressed to some degree, especially those in 3rd world countries. Oppression comes in many forms.

    If we give them nothing, then why do they come here?

    My personal comment on this is I'm trading a set of oppression for another. In this case I'm going for the much lesser of the 2, which is suppressed pay as a H1-B.

  42. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An H-1B is a non-immigrant visa, so "anti-immigration sentiment" doesn't apply. It's a guest worker program, so if H-1B workers "wish they could live, work, and pay taxes here," then they're doing it wrong.

    The point of H-1B isn't to be a path to citizenship.

  43. Better Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be a FELONY for a firm to import a worker on an H-1B if there is an unemployed American capable of doing the job (without regard to "qualifications" listed by the employer which are usually tailored to fit the guy they are importing and NOT actually required by the job). An unemployed American (or a worker in a lesser role at the same firm) should be able to challenge any H1B holder at any time and if he/she can do the job as well as the holder, the holder goes home, the challenger gets the slot and the person/persons involved in hiring the H1B go to prison for federal immigration fraud with total forfeiture of all pay/benefits/stock options/ etc

    Remember: H1B is not normal and is not part of the American marketplace... it's an escape hatch business wants because it lies to the government about worker availability. There is no reason not to go medieval on any business using H1B visas if they are caught padding the job "requirements" or pretending that some kid from India/China/Pakistan/etc is better qualified for a job than an American worker. The thing is an abuse of the American workforce, created by fraudulent arguments to corrupt politicians. Fraud atop fraud, lies and more lies.

    1. Re:Better Solution by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      There's ALWAYS an unemployed American capable of any job. Except that you need to find them and it's not trivial for really highly qualified professionals.

  44. BULL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are an enormous number of unemployed programmers and engineers around the nation, I personally know some in the Chicago area. You should fire your HR people if they claim they cannot fill the slots OR review the "required experience" for the jobs... if you are not doing something incredibly specialized and you cannot fill a spot at a normal wage with normal work conditions then you are probably requiring something that's not truly required or you have people screening out qualified applicants for other reasons.

    Right after the original "dot com bubble" burst, California was awash in unemployed programmers, but CA firms were going hat-in-hand to Washington for foreign worker visas and claiming they had a shortage of qualified people. In the immediate aftermath of the post-coldwar defense contractor massacre there were many thousands of freshly-unemployed highly-skilled and experienced aerospace workers... and yet the few big firms that remained were telling congress they were having a hard time finding qualified American workers and they were seeking permission to outsource work to places like Russia and import workers from the former soviet union. Different times and different companies.... same big lie

  45. Brother vs. Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother believes in H1B1 visa's workers rights to immigration. I do not. My brother is in the tech industry. I do not, but I have a familiarity with it because of his exposure, as well as where I grew up in Silicon Valley, so I'm no novice in the tech department. However the tech industry, as a focal point is really only one facet of the immigration problem. You see while my brother learned tech, I pursued the culinary arts which has it's own layers of technology and chemistry too but I digress.
    The fact is I used to think like him. I would opine "oh I have friends in this industry, they're good people, they're hard working" and they were. But as I grew older, more skilled in my chosen profession, the competition increased. The fact is the hostile work environment that some posters here mentioned exists in all industries regardless if the foreigners are here legally, or illegally. They operate with impunity, and feel free to bully and rally against workers they don't like which is typically a worker who doesn't like being bullied and defends himself. More often than not these foreign employees force their employers hand i.e. the employer will side with the employee who is a victim of harassment and refuse to work, or threaten to leave, and at the end of the day the employer has a family to feed thus asks the victim to acquiesce to the abuse or face termination under the guise that it he that is the sole provocateur against a horde of other staff members.
    This is complete nonsense, sure there are some cases of individuals like this but most people just want to go to work and enjoy their day and go home happy to have made money. Most people are not fatalistic suicidal morons that would risk their livelihood in a suicide mission in the workplace and purposefully alienate themselves from the majority. Does my brother really expect me to believe that all these reports are coming from malcontents. I got called "Gringo, Werro" and a slough of other names in my field daily. I didn't like it. The Latino's on staff would say oh it's not bad it isn't a bad word in Mexico, and justify their behavior. So am I to believe that I must assimilate this part of Mexican culture into my own, to accept this seemingly harmless word, and the subsequent justification that it just means white person, and you are white and thus it is just a literal observation; am I to believe it is not demeaning or derogatory or dehumanizing? I don't buy it.

    Am I also to believe that this attitude does not exist among tech workers in from India? Sure not all. I know some great people from that region of the world, but to say it doesn't exist is just wishful thinking. Colonialism taught them how to save face and bite their tongues and understand that people get offended and it's best not to offend people. I admittedly don't know all the odds and ends about that particular visa, but I do know something about living in a foreign country because I do currently. All of these countries where we are farming workers from in Asia, have the most xenophobic policies on work and immigration themselves, with little to no reciprocal rights as a foreigner. The U.S. outstrips these countries on rights and justice hand over fist time and time again. So when you here people on the right say they envy our way of life, they're right. Not necessarily for the the reasons the right states but rest assured they want what we have, yet they are not willing to go back to their own countries and work for it there, and they are not willing to change their own immigration policies and standards of justice and rights for foreigners in their country so why should we bend over backwards for them? The answer is we shouldn't.

    My brother is wrong. When Bill Gates sent a billion dollars to India everyone lauded him, not me. I said WTF Bill, aren't their kids here in America that need education? Couldn't you invest a billion dollars into Detroit schools and literally create a Tech industry there? Real Property prices are cheap. They call us xen

  46. Investment in US citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know the US government isn't supposed to care about it's citizens.. But why doesn't US corporations and/or the government invest money in computer science and other scholarships for US citizens? There is very little money and effort put into this. As a nation, we dump billions on football scholarships, then import foreign labor for the good careers. It's wrong. You hear about paid scholarships for athletics but very little for programmers.

  47. Grammar Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the grammar nazi's when we need them ? They mentioned "India firms" rather than "Indian firms". Slashdot just doesn't feel same without grammar nazi's.

  48. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xenophobic that's right that's why we don't have Australians or English and have exclusively Indians so who is really racest? The Indians dont treat the white Americans or blacks the same way as they treat each other so who is being racist
    Australian visas are cheaper and they speak English so it's not money it's racism

  49. Two options by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    They essentially have two options here. One is to import people that are actually skilled enough to do the work, since the US education system doesn't seem to provide them but focuses on burger flippers and waitresses instead. The other option is to let the companies either offshore the work completely, or go bankrupt because some foreign company comes up with a competing product and takes over the market. The short term solution is to import people, the long term solution is to put government money in education. Since government spending money on things like education and health care is generally frowned upon and politicians are only graded for their short term success, guess what happens.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:Two options by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      since the US education system doesn't seem to provide them but focuses on burger flippers and waitresses instead.

      So that's why the rest of the world sends their students to the U.S., to get an education in burger flipping or waitressing.

      The issue, for the most part, isn't that the educational system doesn't teach, it's that employers think someone straight out of college should magically have 10 years experience in coding in five different languages and know all the intimate details of their systems without ever having worked there.

      This same narrow-minded idea applies to other fields as well. Employers think people absorb experience through osmosis rather than actually doing and so never bother training someone. Which means, of course, that the person can't get the experience they want/need to progress and are stuck because they can't go out and buy a $10K piece of software to work on at home or a multi-million dollar piece of equipment to practice on.

      It is not the responsibility of the educational system to give someone the exact skills necessary that an employer is looking for. The goal is to provide someone with a rounded education so they can apply knowledge from various areas to complete their job. Once the person goes to the college, then they concentrate in their chosen field though again, they may not get the exact skills an employer is looking for but something close.

      If you think someone should be trained to do a specific job, that's call a technical school and they do exist, but that is not where the majority of people get their education. If you want to go down that route, then we can abandon the entire educational system and have the employers dictate what someone needs to learn to get a job.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  50. The only thing that is going to fix this... by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    Is an IT union.

    1. Re:The only thing that is going to fix this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started one just last week. Fees are 5% of your gross salary, please send your check now!

  51. Switzerland does exactly this by Weezul · · Score: 1

    They've no fixed value like $100k, but must prove they're paying more than the average pay for that job. It works extremely well, a shockingly huge proportion of Swiss residents are foreigners. In effect, if a Swiss company wants anybody in the world they know exactly what they need to do to hire them, no bullshit, just prove you want them by paying them more.

    Amusingly, the Swiss immigration law exists at three levels, federal, canton, and local, so theoretically you might encounter really messy local immigration laws, but the Swiss are sensible about it.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Switzerland does exactly this by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      They've no fixed value like $100k, but must prove they're paying more than the average pay for that job.....

      Right now companies just have to prove that they are capable of paying it. They don't have to prove that they intent to pay it. They don't have to prove later in the future that they are paying it. You don't have to be a highly paid lawyer to see ways around this requirement.

    2. Re:Switzerland does exactly this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, put a politically acceptable cap on immigration, say 1% of the workforce a year, and companies must bid on that pool with salaries they must maintain inflation adjusted for at least 5 years. This will naturally attract the most skillful and well paid professionals from around the world, and allow the market to allocate the migrants where they are most needed in the economy.

      Since the average paycheck in the pool would be high, there isn't really any reason to go there if you can hire locally. And if migrants depress top tier compensations for IT workers or surgeons, that actually good for the rest of society and economy.

  52. Weed out the bad apples, that's a better start by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    There are exactly two kinds of people who hire people from abroad. No, I'm not from the US (I worked there for a few months, but by far not enough for a green card and no, I'm not interested), but come from a country that suffers from pretty much the same problems.

    There's the "good" ones. Companies that really have a hard time finding enough qualified workers here. I eventually had to turn my eye abroad, and I make sure that the one guy I finally go through our immigration nightmare gets exactly the same treatment and conditions as everyone else here. Also, I have to say that he fits greatly into the team and while communication is still mostly in English, he's learning the language too. I would have hired domestic, no doubt about that, less for any "nationalist", "my country first" bull, but simply to avoid the horrible hoop-jumping, but there was simply and plainly nobody available that I could possibly have hired. It was a veritable nightmare, but I guess it's much easier to pull off when you do it on a routine base.

    Because there's also the "bad" ones. Companies whose sole existence seems to be to funnel cheap labour into the country. They really abuse two people for the price of one, first the person they bring in here, and of course the person who IS here already who could have gotten the job instead. They pretty much make sure they "own" them. Finally after a report on TV came through something's done against at least one of those locusts, but that cures the symptom at best, the sickness continues.

    I think one good point to start would be to limit the people per company that you can bring in via H1Bs. Of course, compared to company size, but I highly doubt that there's really a company in the US or around here that cannot find at least 90% of its employee needs locally. If they cannot, they're probably in the wrong business and should move their whole business over there.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  53. Whatever by buss_error · · Score: 1

    From the really crap work I've seen by "ThoughtWorks" developers, this can only be a Bad Thing.
    I mean, when a developer can't even properly craft a curl statement to correctly test his own work... well, ---FACEPALM---

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  54. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there should be free movement of people. Let the developed countries re-open their borders. We'll quickly see the developing countries doing the same, as all their talented people leave, but they make it hard for others to come and replace them (lower cost of living, I'm up for that!).

    Without open borders we can't have a true free market. People complain about jobs going, but don't complain about capital going. Well, you should restrict capital, and let people move, or not restrict capital, and let people. But you shouldn't restrict people but not capital. That's just silly.

  55. 24 months he's takingthe piss by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    Unless he pays you for those 24 months this is unenforceable on that ground alone

  56. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    And you call that nothing? What's your point?

  57. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    from a economic contribution point of view, skilled migrants contributes higher than average

    That's true, if you look at one person in isolation. But what is the overall effect of hundreds of thousands of guest workers concentrated in a few fields? Despite the loud protestations of the billionaires who benefit from cheaper labor, there is no actual evidence of a shortage of Americans with the required skills. In other words, economic activity in these fields is limited by demand, not supply. Americans displaced by guest workers generally make less money than they would have, and wind up throwing away their investment in education. It does not increase the GDP per capita, and it exacerbates the gulf between billionaires and everyone else.

    I can say I'm definitely oppressed in my home country. Same with any H1-B that comes from my country who is not of a particular religious background, which comprises of 40% of the population.

    That's unfortunate, and I am aware of it. However, it doesn't generally rise to the level that would justify refugee status.

  58. Give them all green cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If the goal is to bring over the best and the brightest, why make them identured servants? Give them greencards. Then they can quit as soon as they get here if there pay is not up to market and work somewhere else. The fake regulation to ensure that h1b pay is 'more competitive' is total garbage. Just google immigration forums. The H1Bs are routinely paid far less than what is disclosed in the VISA application. TATA was taking their tax returns (google it they lost a law suit).

    then throw in if they are fired, they get deported and that amounts to more hours and a willingness to move around the country at your own expense. Then throw in the 'if you quit or get fired for any reason you pay us $100,000 and really broad non-compete agreements where they will threaten their next employer to get them fired' and you get a captive workforce. I have worked with alot of guys on visas and they tell me about these contracts that they have to sign. They also get stunned when they find out that I am making double what they make.

    if all h1bs and l-2 visa holders were immediately given greencards, then you will see there real value. If they can quit, then their employers would have to pay them well enough to get them to stay. If they are better than Americans than they should make more money than us.

    if you gave them all greencards then we will see the true demand.

  59. Nation of Immigrants has to look at Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Switzerland is all so gold, why do so many swiss people seek US residencies ? Since when is USA, a nation of immigrants, looking at other closed societies and static, non immigrant ones such as Swiss or Sweden. Do you know the population and cultural differences between the two?

    Years ago I left slashdot for this very reason. Lots of people just barking around, some lame folks coming off as nerds or geeks or seemingly proposing some intelligent hypothesis. Swiss pay highly, their expenses are higher too and a lot of immigrants are starting to show up since similar amount of Swiss immigrated elsewhere. I cant get the anti immigrant attitude of some in this forums. Maybe it is their latent insecurity. I thought tech was one of the more open minded advanced sectors.

    1. Re:Nation of Immigrants has to look at Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Few points:
      1. This hoopla is nothing new. Everytime there is a change, whole of US makes lots of noise and this and that. This has been going on for the past two decades or so. Every country has native who are anti-.
      2. There are lot of US jobs which only citizens can fill go unfilled or lack of interest ensures it go to private sector. So much for some people crying wolf.
      3. There does exist issues related to abuse, that exists everywhere and not limited to H1b employers. Many folks get underpaid, some overpaid and some genuinely good coders go back to academia or some different industry altogether.
      4. People who oppose just shut up if see some really rich or good looking female getting visas - it is really superficial at the end.
      5. People need something to b*tich and whi*e about, no matter what and in democracies such as US there is always need to write to senator and congressmen and what not - basically ensure resources for self, let others go to hell. To feel fair, maybe spend some money in tax deductible charity as you go on in the unbridled path of evolution.
      6. Past history shows that lots of local coders did not die off... many got re-invented into higher positions and better ones. It is a grow and let grow mechanism. Coders from India, china, Russia etc. do not take any kind of pleasure in taking american coders jobs. Agreed there has to be provision so that net coders dont face abuse. One way is to ensure faster green cards regardless of country of origin. That way all will be in the same boat and then fight it out. Americans get so much privileges and benefits - unemployment benefits and so on. Since employment is anyway an equalizer and decides who gets the job, why not normalize everything. Chances are some of you (and some smart americans already do) end up getting a great job in a foreign country - much better than you could ever hope for in US.
      7. Laws are just manifestations for human laziness and bureacracy. What about India/China providing jobs for USA Boeing by buying their planes. Maybe they should move those jobs inshore and not offshore all of this to Lockheed martin and the likes?
      I can go on and on. But I guess the average slashdotter is a programmer who has the logic to understand this context and make up the rest.

  60. Stop Being Pussies by sycodon · · Score: 1

    If you are going to outsource, do it and call it what it is.

    Don't bring the outsourced workers here and pretend you are employing the domestic workforce.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  61. Just checked out the database.... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Every single job posting listed "Ability to speak Hindi" as a job requirement. In order to facilitate communication with out-sourced workers.

    =(

  62. Caste system in USA. by NewYork · · Score: 1
  63. Re:Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time we had this talk, I made this comment
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3620197&cid=43374569
    One AC response to my comment was sort of scary...

    Yeah, I see a white guy standing in a crowd of filth which probably means now you stink as bad they do. Congrats on being a traitor to your country. It was good of you to post that photo so we know exactly what you look like. After the day the people decide wipe the shit stains off our land, we'll turn their attention to those like you who betrayed their race, for special treatment.

    What the fuck? I thought this was a site of thinkers, geeks, not of xenophobic extremists.

    Rather than waste time on a lengthy post (I am at work) let me just make one simple point...

    100% of H1-B workers that I know wish they could live, work, and pay taxes here. The only issue I take with H1-b is the treatment of said workers. This is a country that once prided itself on harboring the best and brightest from around the world, giving them shelter and refuge in exchange for their knowledge and experience. Now we give them nothing for that.

    I'm currently working for a big tech company under an H1B visa in the San Francisco bay area. My salary is 125K and I believe my company is not lowering wages because of me.

    I'm happy to pay my taxes. I work hard every day, and in general I do my best to be a good "non-citizen": I drive carefully, I recycle, etc. But I'm so scared of the thinking you describe... It makes me feel I'm not really welcomed here, no matter what I do or how I contribute. I've been reading H1B related articles on Slashdot and I find that more and more people share those anti-H1B thoughts. Sometimes I really wish I could go back to my country, but I can't do that until one more year.

    It's sad, because this great country was built by people that believed in freedom and in the merit of hard work. Many of those Americans were immigrants.

  64. Still embarassing yourself Jeremiah Cornelius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Still embarassing yourself Jeremiah Cornelius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, Paul.

  65. This has been around for 10+ years by sapped · · Score: 1

    This isn't anything new. More than 10 years ago when I was in the labor certification part of the green card process my employer had to post the job description to this website.