Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Senate's Big Immigration Bill Seeks Centralized Database For H-1B Jobs

dcblogs writes "The U.S. Senate comprehensive immigration bill, due Tuesday, will allow the H-1B cap to rise from 65,000 to as high as 180,000. The bill, overall, contains some interesting provisions. It will require the U.S. Labor Dept. to create a website of H-1B job openings that employers must post to. The jobs must be posted least 30 calendar days before hiring an H-1B applicant to fill that position. The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified. One provision that will affect India, in particular, limits H-1B visa use to 50% of a firm's U.S. workforce. The provision may prompt India firms to buy U.S. companies to expand their U.S. presence."

56 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. why? by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified.

    So they can encourage foreign outsourcing? Doesn't anyone see this as having a negative impact on domestic unemployment? (as well as a trade deficit effect as they ship their US$ off to India)

    Why is this necessary???

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:why? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Corporate America's solution to unemployment is importing cheaper labor from other countries. I watched mouth agape as Bill Gates suggested this in an interview when asked about his ideas on how to deal with the Recession. Of course, corporate media never challenges their masters when they make these ludicrous statements.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:why? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified.

      So they can encourage foreign outsourcing? Doesn't anyone see this as having a negative impact on domestic unemployment? (as well as a trade deficit effect as they ship their US$ off to India)

      Why is this necessary???

      Well it might have a positive effect on domestic employment as well.

      If it makes US firms use of foreign workers very visible people (and congress) will be able to see to what
      extent these companies are using H1B workers in place of US workers laid off.

      Right now this is pretty well a hidden level of replacement that no one agency has a good handle on. Immigration may know the numbers, but Dept of Labor only knows about the unemployed.

      By making a public website where these jobs are listed, it can be used for in-country job search as well.
      Expect the H1B employers to fight this tooth and nail.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:why? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      For cultural reasons, Americans aren't willing to sanction unlimited immigration. So there is going to be some limit. How to allocate it? Currently it's first-come, first-serve. But why not allocate it by economic benefit? And how better to measure economic benefit than wages?

      If one company claims there is a shortage of domestic workers, and offers $60k to hire a foreign worker; a 2nd company claims the same and offers $90k; and a third claims the same and offers $120k; which should get the slot? I would argue clearly the third company: if the shortage of domestic labor is worth $120k to them, it's clearly a more economically important shortage than the one where the company is only willing to offer $60k to fill the position. So why not allocate by highest-salary first, in order to distribute the immigration slots to the part of the economy where they are most in demand?

      Of course, the bill does not seem to be proposing precisely that, because they are using a stupid "relative to prevailing wages" calculation instead of just a simple absolute number.

    4. Re:why? by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Corporate America's solution to unemployment is importing cheaper labor from other countries.

      Oddly enough, they have a completely different view on importing cheaper products from other countries
      See DVD region encoding, out-of-country textbooks, software, etc.

    5. Re:why? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

      So they can encourage foreign outsourcing?

      H1B is already all about out-sourcing. The top 10 H1B employers, accounting for roughly half of all H1B visas, are out-sourcers. They bring people in on H1B, train them up and send them back. H1B is encouraging out-sourcing, not stopping it.

      http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/04/03/176134694/Whos-Hiring-H1-B-Visa-Workers-Its-Not-Who-You-Might-Think

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      If you've got at least $1B, or regularly appear before bobbing heads on the news, you could say that 2+2=5 and have your views solemnly acknowledged and endorsed by the Very Serious People who discuss these issues.

    7. Re:why? by anubi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I honestly do not know what to make of this. I have just done my state and federal tax. I owed the feds nothing. I owed the state $57. I do contract engineering work in things like analog and microprocessor control.

      I have been working with one small company trying to build it up. I have been working there for six months now, and have been paid a little over $2000. Just yesterday the owner gave me an agreement (NDA) he wanted me to sign, which transferred any and all IP I come with to the company along with a commitment from me I will not work for any of his customers or competitors for 24 months after termination.

      I refused to sign the damned thing.

      It read like a prenup, making sure no alimony can be claimed, yet commitment not to take another partner for two years assured through legal means..

      My sentiments are that any obligation to him cease along with any obligation he has to pay me if this is indeed the case of a true "at will" legal environment. If he wants my continued obeyance of something after termination, it is my belief he should also be obligated to reimburse me for the opportunity cost I forfeited to obey his wish.


      I realize my Congress is not there to help me, even though they are there in full if I should succeed in making a taxable income. They will shut down Napster if a business claims they are violating copyright, They will shut down online pharmacies if they go around regional pricing algorithms set by the drug companies, but they will also hold lawful offshore tax havens. The wonders of a lobbied congress.

      I do not know what to do, but from all I see, it is pointless to try to do anything at this stage of the game. I have a few more years to go before I am on full social security. I feel foolish trying to invest my savings on trying to maintain employability by agreeing to every pre-nup out there, agreeing to give the businessman all of any IP I come up with, and gracefully accept "at will" termination when I have given all I have.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    8. Re:why? by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Informative

      Be reasonable, that affects the Great and Holy Intellectual Property that's the wealth of our nation. We're merely citizens.

    9. Re:why? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think this is really the break point for the bigger guys like IBM. That's why it's discussed now.

      The horse is long out if the barn. For companies like IBM they have moved "outsourcing" in India to being just like an office across the country. IBM has basically bet the company on US sales forces selling Indian labor. You get a "US contact" for the first few months, but all the work is done by Indians.

      I guess if you can admin your server room from your bed at 3am (and still work at 8am) your company can just pay an Indian guy to be awake at 3am and don't need you. The REAL money is in Project Management... Which quite ironically is not part of the MBA track-- to BUILD NEW THINGS? Of course Project Management is the skill of making yourself replaceable.. So the fact IT has embraced it is really going to bite us in the ass.

    10. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I feel the same way, and have made my position clear many times.

      If $large mega corp$ feels it is in their best interest to outsource jobs in this "global economy" why are our DVD's still region coded?
      Please dont give me the "top releases are sent to the US first"... I think the real reason is to prevent re-importation.

      This "one way street" stuff needs to end. Either we have a global economy and you should charge $4 for a DVD and $10 for a school text book (same they often charge other regions) or we dont and you pay someone in India the same wages you would pay someone in North America.

    11. Re:why? by readin · · Score: 2

      What we need to understand is that some jobs can be exported and some can't. If the job can be exported, it makes sense to bring the foreign worker here where he'll earn an American wage and compete with Americans on an equal footing. It will lower the wage here of course, but not as much as exporting the job to the foreign country would do. Anyone know how much it costs to ship a piece of software from a factory in Poland to America?

      If the job can't be exported, like cleaning hotel rooms, gardening, picking vegetables, etc. then it makes sense to keep the competition out and reserve the jobs for Americans so that the wages can go up. (and don't say Americans won't do the work - offer them the right pay and working conditions and they will)

      So basically, bring the skilled IT workers here and keep the unskilled migrant workers out.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    12. Re:why? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      " H1B is encouraging out-sourcing, not stopping it."

      Not only that, but studies have shown that the companies' excuse that H1-B workers are "the best and brightest" is nothing but hogwash. On average, they do not perform up to the level of the average Americans in the same positions.

    13. Re:why? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Why do you think they write software here? Do you disagree that programmers are cheaper elsewhere?"

      They write software here because there are better programmers here. It is that simple.

      I've had this conversation many times on Slashdot. Over the last year and a half or so, I have seen a pretty drastic pull back in offshoring of software. On the international job boards I have seen more and more ads for "North America and Western Europe ONLY".

      The reason is that the "cheap offshoring" has turned out to be not so cheap. The most common complaints have been very poor quality and late- or non-delivery.

    14. Re:why? by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      Laws are for the peasants.

    15. Re:why? by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      If $large mega corp$ feels it is in their best interest to outsource jobs in this "global economy" why are our DVD's still region coded?

      Or why can't I buy medicine from the lowest cost worldwide provider?

      Why? Rules are of, by, and for those with control of the government.

    16. Re:why? by lightknight · · Score: 2

      So...their idea of dealing with a need for more homegrown STEM candidates (haha, try raising the salary offers a little) is to shoot a nuclear torpedo into their home country's universities' STEM programs? Increasing supply tapers off demand...duh! That's like basic economics...it'll perma-fuck anything at home...it takes like a decade to establish a CS / SE program, let alone the other kinds...less kids attending those programs because of dropping salaries (this includes kids who drop out of the program or switch out)...means less funding going back into the program...means cutbacks. So, I guess this means that in the future, STEMs will come from abroad...and US kids will major in liberal arts, business, arts...yup, this country is going to get 0wned. The next US generation will be hocking the latest diet water craze while the kids of other countries are exploring Mars...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    17. Re:why? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      You can only vote for what's offered. That's the beauty of democracy. Corporations are people, but they can't vote. So they get to decide who you may vote for.

      Fair, ain't it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:why? by sycodon · · Score: 2

      Don't think this is limited to the Corporate world.

      Immigration reform advocates talk a good game of human rights and crap like that but what the really want is cheap labor to mop their office floors and pick their vegetables.

      Bottom line is there are plenty of American Citizens that are willing to work all jobs. Anyone who says otherwise is actually saying that that there are Americans who won't work for less than minimum wage (Agricultural) so we should bring in these poor schmucks from other countries to do it in order that we can have cheap produce.

      I find it ironic that people who are usually championing higher minimum wages are more than willing to let illegals work for less than that.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  2. Wrong Solution by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of giving people H1B visas, why don't we just give them green cards, so they have the same employment bargaining rights that US citizens have so it becomes impossible to undercut local wages. Also, for student visa holders who finish school here with MS or PhD degrees we should just grant citizenship for an upfront fee of $8000 so we keep talented people in the US.

    1. Re:Wrong Solution by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      Instead of giving people H1B visas, why don't we just give them green cards, so they have the same employment bargaining rights that US citizens have so it becomes impossible to undercut local wages.

      I think you answered your own question :)
      In that case H1B visa holders would not be cheaper and who's going to hire them?
      A very large majority of H1B holders are brought in as cheaper labor and a tiny minority are hired as "unavailable talent".

    2. Re:Wrong Solution by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 2

      No offense, but I believe you are just making shit up. Do you care to cite a reference? A number of my friends got a PhD and all they get is OPT which is good for 12 months and requires a (relevant) employment offer to match it those 12 months. My roommate is out of US now, because he had no way of staying here after graduating with a PhD.

      You cannot apply for green card based on your PhD degree (unless you come from the parallel universe where common sense prevailed -- as that would be a great idea to allow this).

      Actually, the OP is right: Reference

      However, the process is hard - the OP made it sound easier than it is. You need to show that you are an extraordinary asset, with skills that are of national merit. You need several reference letters, a lot of top-notch publications (I have heard that you need more than most faculty positions require), and having contacts helps a lot (say, you had a famous advisor with lots of contacts during your Ph.D.).

      The process is still quite long, so you might as well get a job and let them apply for you instead. If you can qualify for this type of green card, you should have no problem getting a job with a high pay.

  3. This is total rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been in IT for 15 years and never have I seen a more anti-American approach to hiring than the H-1B visa debacle. I've seen firms literally taken over by foreigners and every American basically leave because it became uncomfortable to work there.

    The law should be hire Americans first. If no one in the city or state can be found, create a jobs database like the one proposed and people in other states can apply. Once the company has shown they cannot find a qualified applicant in CONUS, Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and all American islands, then, and only then will they be allowed to look elsewhere. If a qualified applicant is found, they must be hired.

    Disagree all you wish. We have gave the farm away. All of these people come over here, work for American companies, go home, start companies, and then compete with American companies. It happens all the time.

    The US needs to regain complete control of the IT sector and maintain it. Coming to work here should be by lottery with, say, only, 10,000 a year allowed. Maximum stay 3 years with caveats.

    1. Re:This is total rubbish by afgam28 · · Score: 2

      Disagree all you wish. We have gave the farm away. All of these people come over here, work for American companies, go home, start companies, and then compete with American companies. It happens all the time.

      OK, I disagree. I'd like to see you name a big non-American tech company that was started by a former H-1B holder.

      I'm not talking about tiny littles ones that employ a few people; I'm talking about foreign multinational tech companies. These are the only companies that will ever "compete with American companies" like Google, Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Microsoft.

      Can't think of any? That's probably because it never happens.

  4. Get off your butts! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Instead of whining in a slashdot post go email, call, tweet, or whatever to your senator! The link I provided is all 100 of them.

    If your senator is a democrat tell them how much wages have not went up and how job ads actually state "H1B1 rates in salary and how employers are abusing the system as it was designed to only allow an employer to hire someone at a comparative rate. Never as a way to lower costs.

    If your senator is a republican tell them it is an assault on the free market as employers get to choose where to hire, but you do not have the choice to do the same. Mention government interference and tax dollars wasted, then close with the same line I had above in your own words how it is not going as intended.

    Also, mention one of the organizations was a fraudalent fake one by Microsoft looking for cheaper workers. Not an actualy organization of I.T. professionals who are lobbying for this as this is self centered and not in the will of your constitutions. Call them too as the staff checks the amount of calls everday and a spike is certainly noticed by the senator.

    Remember the DMCA 2.0 law requiring DRM TCPA chips in every computer sold? It was thrown out after we at slashdot put down such links. Senators got so much of an earfull that was cancelled. Slashdot generates 10,000 if not 100,000 of views for stories. So spend 3 minutes and do your part.

  5. Simple solution by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not just mandate a H1B be paid at least $100,000 a year, no exceptions. If they're really so good, they deserve the money and $100k would be a bargain.

  6. So this H1B database of job openings... by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    Can us Americans apply for those jobs?

    Won't that be the irony. H1B visas because there are not enough qualified Americans to work those jobs. But I wager, they'll make it so that Americans can't use the site to apply for those very same jobs.

    *fumes*

    1. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, but it won't do you any good. Any self-respecting company has legal staff that's seen the "How to not hire an American" video.

      Interestingly, you can get links to that video from either DailyKos or Free Republic (actually the first two sites in a search) so you can see that the outrage covers a pretty broad part of the political spectrum. Not that our congress cares - we're just the @#%#^! voters and citizens of this country.

    2. Re:So this H1B database of job openings... by byuu · · Score: 2

      They don't have to care. When both parties are doing the same thing, and everyone votes for one or the other (with amazing vitriol about how evil the other party is), why should they?

  7. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Where, exactly, are these alleged companies that supposedly save millions of dollars by hiring H1B workers? I've worked for 3 very, very large corporations in the telecommunications and banking industries that hire H1B workers, and as far as anybody could tell, our H1B coworkers got paid the same amount as everyone else, and actually cost *more* for the company to hire and employ due to greater paperwork requirements.

    In most cases, the H1B employees were Indians who went to college (or grad school) in the US, found India's corporate culture to be soul-crushing and demoralizing (regardless of pay), and were denied permanent visas by our dysfunctional immigration system that's almost neurotically-obsessed with family reunification over "twenty/thirtysomething guy who'd view his family's distance and inability to come join him in the US as a perk and bonus".

    We should phase out most of the H1B program, and replace it with a policy that makes it relatively easy for single young American-educated prospective immigrants who are unencumbered by wives, kids, and extended families to become permanent residents, then citizens.

  8. Window Dressing for the Gullible by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

    It will require the U.S. Labor Dept. to create a website of H-1B job openings that employers must post to. The jobs must be posted least 30 calendar days before hiring an H-1B applicant to fill that position. The bill also raises wages for H-1B workers to make them more competitive, although the amount wasn't specified.

    Pure window dressing. Is there anyone dumb enough to think this will make a difference? The H-1B has had various "comparable wages" and "no American worker available" provisions for years. It's meaningless because it's never enforced, and I don't expect any magic pixie dust in this bill to change that.

    One provision that will affect India, in particular, limits H-1B visa use to 50% of a firm's U.S. workforce.

    This may actually have some effect, but it's frightening to say that. A crackdown means limiting it to 50% of a company's U.S. workforce? U.S. does mean United States, right?

  9. Free agents by Skapare · · Score: 2

    What should be added is to allow H-1B holders to be free agents in the market.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  10. Re:Hmmmm by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where, exactly, are these alleged companies that supposedly save millions of dollars by hiring H1B workers? I've worked for 3 very, very large corporations in the telecommunications and banking industries that hire H1B workers, and as far as anybody could tell, our H1B coworkers got paid the same amount as everyone else, and actually cost *more* for the company to hire and employ due to greater paperwork requirements.

    That's because you're working for legitimate companies. There are also companies full of fresh-from-college hires that pay far under going rate and lie to their employees egregiously about the immigration process and how easy it is to change jobs with an H-1B. Taking advantage of people young enough not to know any better isn't an "immigrant" thing, however. My first full time programming job paid $18k - as a US citizen in a big city! I think there's a false belief that it's somehow only the H-1B consulting shops that abuse their employees to pay them nothing - that's just not visa-specific!

    From TFS:

    One provision that will affect India, in particular, limits H-1B visa use to 50% of a firm's U.S. workforce

    That would be a huge change for the better - exactly because it would break the current model of the companies that exist just to abuse the system. Sure, in 5-10 years they'll have a new model, just as abusive, but that will be a good 5-10 years!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  11. Not all H1 Bs are bad by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    I came in as F1, got a H1B, got green card and got citizenship just in time to vote against Rick Santorum. Hip hip hurrey! But not all H1Bs are good like me. Some of them, gasp, become Republicans.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I came in as F1, got a H1B, got green card and got citizenship just in time to vote against Rick Santorum. Hip hip hurrey!

      But how did your salary compare to that of your American colleagues while you were an H1B employee?
      H1Bs are not bad because on one ever stays in US, but because it allows for worker exploitation/underpayment (while on H1B).

    2. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I compared my pay with the median reported in IEEE and concluded I got the top dollar. I was lucky, the company was run by really kind and gentle folks.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:Not all H1 Bs are bad by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

      H1Bs get paid good salaries in tech firms, actually, on par with what the native employees are paid - at least based on my anecdotal evidence (as an H1B with plenty of friends on the same). Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Facebook all do that, and they also start green card applications for their H1Bs as soon as they become eligible - which wouldn't really make much sense if the purpose was to exploit the dependent status. Most people which do this see it as an immigration track towards eventual citizenship, and start settling down almost right away - some don't even wait for a green card to get a home mortgage etc.

      The places that are really abusing the program hard seem to be the "business consulting" sweatshops like Tata, for whom outsourcing is, essentially, the entire business model and their raison d'etre. Those tend to have predominantly Indian employees, who are not sponsored for green cards, and who are considerably underpaid. Also, since those employees know that they won't remain in the country in the end, they tend to spend money less and save it more, since it will have more purchasing power for them once they return to their home country (so they aren't as invested in US economy, further exacerbating the effects).

      Consequently, the obvious solution to this problem would be to ditch H1B as a temp. worker visa, and remake it as a work-towards-citizenship program. This would imply that any person coming to the country on such a visa would has to apply for a green card; and make this process easier and reduce the current (5.5 years and growing!) backlog. It would also be nice to make it easier to switch jobs while still on H1B (I'd say get rid of it entirely, except that you want to ensure that new job has the necessary qualifications - i.e. above prevailing wage, local applicants prioritized etc); most importantly, make it so that changing jobs doesn't reset the green card process, so that employers can't use it as a stick.

  12. Wow more anti-immigration sentiment from slashdot by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time we had this talk, I made this comment
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3620197&cid=43374569
    One AC response to my comment was sort of scary...

    Yeah, I see a white guy standing in a crowd of filth which probably means now you stink as bad they do. Congrats on being a traitor to your country. It was good of you to post that photo so we know exactly what you look like. After the day the people decide wipe the shit stains off our land, we'll turn their attention to those like you who betrayed their race, for special treatment.

    What the fuck? I thought this was a site of thinkers, geeks, not of xenophobic extremists.

    Rather than waste time on a lengthy post (I am at work) let me just make one simple point...

    100% of H1-B workers that I know wish they could live, work, and pay taxes here. The only issue I take with H1-b is the treatment of said workers. This is a country that once prided itself on harboring the best and brightest from around the world, giving them shelter and refuge in exchange for their knowledge and experience. Now we give them nothing for that.

  13. Same pattern, same BS by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    First the plutocrats #@&$'d farm workers by claiming "shortage" so they can pay sh$t wages and get slaves, and now they are #@&$ing tech workers using the same pattern.

  14. The truth is by thammoud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We are trying to hire Java developers in Chicago for a salary range of 80k-120k and NOTHING. H1-B or not. The market is very tight.

    1. Re:The truth is by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Check your hiring process. I've run into times when we can't find anyone because all the candidates HR sent us were unsuitable (the ones we interviewed flunked on the basic C/C++ skills test despite claiming a minimum of 5 years experience coding in C/C++), and yet I knew there were at least 2 highly-qualified candidates that HR hadn't sent to us to review because I handed their resumes to HR myself. That right there tells me that the problem might be not that there aren't any candidates but that HR's throwing them out before they ever get looked at. Ditto for recruiters, who probably use the same process HR does to screen candidates.

      I've thought it might be amusing to bypass the HR process entirely, task some of the developers with attending the various techie get-togethers around town and collect qualified candidates that way, then give the hiring manager their resumes directly in addition to sending them to HR. Then if their resumes don't show up, the hiring manager can send them up from his side asking "This candidate looks qualified and we'd like to interview them but they weren't in the stack you sent down. I know it should be there, I had one of my devs run it over to you personally. Can you get back to me about what happened to it?".

    2. Re:The truth is by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We are trying to hire Java developers in Chicago for a salary range of 80k-120k and NOTHING. H1-B or not. The market is very tight.

      Maybe the problem is that you're trying to hire "Java developers" instead of good programmers. That's a mentality that seems to have become pervasive. There was a time when people would be embarrassed to say they were looking for a "language X developer". I once interviewed at a place where the interviewer started to ask me about a specific language. Then he stopped himself right in the middle and said "sorry, stupid question".

      Can't find somebody who knows your language du jour? Hire any decent programmer on a probationary basis. If they're not up to speed on the flavor-of-the-year in a month or two, then get rid of them. If you're not willing to invest or chance a month or two then you're not in serious need.

    3. Re:The truth is by fatalwall · · Score: 2

      Thammoud,

      For those of us who are currently looking would you care to share where these positions are posted?

      The big issue I've noticed is that getting past HR is impossible because they are looking for key words to filter based on. You could literally replace them with a computer and get better results. The person filtering needs to understand that if you have one year in Java and 6 years with C++ and another 3 with C# that you are have significantly more value then the two or three years of java that they are looking for.

      Thanks,

      FatalWall

    4. Re:The truth is by readin · · Score: 2

      I've been doing Java for quite a few years and would like to do something different. I'm finding that employers are looking for specific languages and I'm having trouble getting considered for any job that isn't Java. The differences between object-oriented procedural languages aren't that great and my resume shows that I've learned quite a few different languages. It's pretty frustrating not being considered for jobs that look interesting just because they use a different language.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    5. Re:The truth is by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      I've gathered that language specific crap has gotten popular, judging from the number of "Java developer" or "C# developer" ads I see. It's ridiculous. No programmer worth his salt should have any trouble learning a new language. Pardon the old fart story, but I actually go back to a time before C was the programmer's lingua franca. I'd just learned the language, and was involved in hiring about a half dozen people for a new project that was going to use it. Not a one of our new hires knew it, and we really didn't care. Everybody came up to speed quickly, and it didn't impede the project at all.

    6. Re:The truth is by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      They want somebody who knows all the frameworks and related stuff? Good luck. More likely they need someone to work with one or two that they use in house. Yes, it raises the learning curve, but if you're serious about needing people, you'll live with that.

  15. What America needs ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What America needs is not what this bill is providing

    I am saying this as an American, as one who have funded many startups in America, and as one who have providing jobs to many of my fellow Americans

    What America needs are people who are entrepreneurial, who are risk takers, who provide jobs for others

    What this bill intends to do is to import even more tech-grunts under the H1-B visas, and to open up the gate for MILLIONS of undocumented aliens, most of them unskilled/low-skilled, lacking in enthusiasm to compete, and they will end up burdening the already over-burdened social welfare system that we have in our country

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:What America needs ... by Flentil · · Score: 2

      Care to explain how allowing up to 180k documented workers translates into MILLIONS of undocumented workers? They all have papers. They're also not going to multiply like tribbles, so what are you talking about?

    2. Re:What America needs ... by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      If you read through the 1,500 page immigration bill, you'll understand. Tip: He's not talking about India, he's talking about Mexico and the rest of Central America. Look at the rhetoric and the results of the 60s era immigration reform and the 86 era amnesty.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:What America needs ... by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      1) There's already an entrepreneur green card category (I'm planning to use it).

      2) This bill actually provides separate category of visas for investors. That's also doubleplusgood because of the way the current green card system works.

    4. Re:What America needs ... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What America, no, the world simply needs is that work has to pay. Simple as that. The good ol' American Dream has to work again. Get a job, work your way up, take a risk or two, work some more and you'll have the chance to play up in the heavens as well.

      As long as it's more profitable to push money around and play the stock roulette (where, unlike entrepreneurial minded people who HAVE to risk it all, you play with a bailout net below you), this country (as any country, don't feel left out, Europe!) will never get back on its feet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:What America needs ... by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      But that has nothing to do with H1B. H1B foreigners are actually exactly the opposite of those illegal immigrants. They have papers, they have a usable skill set and immigration knows pretty well where they sit around.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Re:Hmmmm by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    It's been said before that H-1B wages are already not supposed to be significantly below the host country's standard cost of living

    It's been said that most American workers' wages are not supposed to be significantly below our standard of living, too.

    The Job Creators (tm) care to differ.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  17. Re:Hmmmm by Cyberax · · Score: 2

    There's a "prevailing wage" crap - H1Bs can't be payed less than that. Except that there are tons of ways to game it and the "prevailing" wage is not that prevailing.

    As a highly paid worker on H1B, I totally support this law. It fixes major problems with US immigration system (H1B lottery - seriously?) and institutes point-based system to sieve candidates based on real needs.

  18. Re:Hmmmm by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Not to mention that "prevailing wage" ain't what it used to be. I was offered a job in the US. I laughed when they mentioned what they're willing to pay. If that's the prevailing wage and you don't even get the social package included in that, you may keep your jobs!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Re:Hmmmm by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

    You mean there is a option to deport Mark Zuckerberg to his native land of New York and never let him leave?

    Where do I sign?

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."