Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Report Super-Powered Battery Breakthrough

another random user writes with news that researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign are reporting a breakthrough in battery technology. They say: "With currently available power sources, users have had to choose between power and energy. For applications that need a lot of power, like broadcasting a radio signal over a long distance, capacitors can release energy very quickly but can only store a small amount. For applications that need a lot of energy, like playing a radio for a long time, fuel cells and batteries can hold a lot of energy but release it or recharge slowly. ... The new microbatteries offer both power and energy, and by tweaking the structure a bit, the researchers can tune them over a wide range on the power-versus-energy scale (abstract). The batteries owe their high performance to their internal three-dimensional microstructure. Batteries have two key components: the anode (minus side) and cathode (plus side). Building on a novel fast-charging cathode design by materials science and engineering professor Paul Braun’s group, King and Pikul developed a matching anode and then developed a new way to integrate the two components at the microscale to make a complete battery with superior performance. With so much power, the batteries could enable sensors or radio signals that broadcast 30 times farther, or devices 30 times smaller. The batteries are rechargeable and can charge 1,000 times faster than competing technologies – imagine juicing up a credit-card-thin phone in less than a second. In addition to consumer electronics, medical devices, lasers, sensors and other applications could see leaps forward in technology with such power sources available."

14 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. In other news... by Scutter · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Magic was discovered today and practical and affordable applications for it are now only 30 years away!

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:In other news... by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing is that 'magic' (as in your example which is 'Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.') has been discovered with practical and affordable applications so many times in our lifetimes that it isn't an absurd to believe it will happen again.

    2. Re:In other news... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

      The thing is that 'magic' (as in your example which is 'Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.') has been discovered with practical and affordable applications so many times in our lifetimes that it isn't an absurd to believe it will happen again.

      Wait. This new battery was written in Perl?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  2. That was the most worthless infomercial ever. by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That was the most worthless infomercial ever.

    1. Re:That was the most worthless infomercial ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed. The whole article is full of vague comparison like 30 times farther, 30 times smaller, 1000 times faster etc. The abstract does not even talk about energy density. It only talks about power density. Even that is blatantly exaggerated. Based on the abstract, it translated to max 74 W/cm^3. The article claims, cell phone using batteries few millimeter in size can jump start a car. How is this possible unless the definition of "few" is overstretched and use a cell phone of the size of olden days public phone.

  3. The Fine Print by Darth+Cider · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the supplemental material: "The energy densities of the microbatteries are initially superior to the supercapcitors, but lose an average 5% total energy density after each cycle."

  4. Re:Looks like no extra energy in batteries by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which if we stop sacrificing everything at the alter of thin is fine.

    A GS3 or Iphone5 could be twice the thickness and easily just as portable and easy to use. This would more than double the battery life since the extra volume could essentially be just battery and not radio or mobo.

    So you would have a smartphone that lasted 2-5 days and could be charged in minutes.

    On the car side, 100 miles is plenty of range if I can charge in 10 minutes. That would give you a nice short break every 2 hours.

  5. "imagine juicing up a credit-card-thin phone..." by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    imagine juicing up a credit-card-thin phone in less than a second

    I'd like to, but my fuses just blew, the connector in the phone melted down, there's a smell of burning plastic insulation in my room, and a small fire seems to have started burning here, so I have other things on my mind!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  6. Somewhere... by LordStormes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... Elon Musk has one hell of a rager over this. This could make electric cars that could go from Florida to New York on one charge, and recharge in similar time to a gas refill, a possibility.

    Say you got 500 miles to a charge, which is a reasonable amount if these numbers are to be believed. That's the amount of miles driven by the average US driver in 2 weeks. So if the battery needs to be replaced after 8-10 charges, you're talking once a quarter. If the battery costs $250 and is easily user-replaceable, this isn't a big deal:

    My quick, rough math says that if it lost 5% of the original maximum after every charge and the maximum charge of a brand new battery were 500 miles, 10 charges would come out to 3875 miles. If the battery can be produced for $250, that comes out to 15.5 miles to every $1 spent on the battery. Now, consider experiments are in progress to allow free/nearly free recharges, so the cost would really be reduced to just the battery. The current gas price I see out my window is $3.33/gal and my Scion xB gets about 30 MPG.

    So, my Scion costs $3.33 to go 30 miles. The Tesla with a $250 battery would cost $2, and not explode the environment.

    I'm sold. // of course these costs are pure conjecture until we know more.

    1. Re:Somewhere... by Alioth · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Recharging in the same time as a gas refill is unlikely to ever happen.

      To go NY to Florida in an electric car will take on the order of 1MWh. To recharge this in 5 minutes (gas refill time) would require a cable transferring a power of 12MW. If we used 25,000 volts to do this (the voltage of overhead electrical lines for high speed electric trains) the current would be 480 amps. It's simply not practical to do while obeying the laws of physics.

      Now think of how many people are fuelling up at a gas station at any given moment, and think about it if they are all drawing a power of 12 megawatts. There is no practical technology for the forseeable future that you can use to build a power grid capable of doing this. This is before we even get to safety issues of a power interconnect which is both high voltage and high current.

      Also think of that 12MW figure for a moment, and you may get an inkling why personal motorised transport is absolutely unsustainable.

  7. Re:Looks like no extra energy in batteries by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would carry my phone in my pocket but my dongle usually gets in the way.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  8. Yes it does by geekoid · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Here we report lithium ion microbatteries having power densities up to 7.4mWcm2m1,which equals or exceeds that of the best supercapacitors, and which is 2,000 times higher than that of other microbatteries."

    WTF more do you want? you can calculate almost everything from there.

    Sheesh.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Yes it does by fnj · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Here we report lithium ion microbatteries having power densities up to 7.4mWcm2m1,which equals or exceeds that of the best supercapacitors, and which is 2,000 times higher than that of other microbatteries."
      WTF more do you want? you can calculate almost everything from there.

      For god's sake, if you're going to quote technical math, can't you at least get it transcribed right? 7.4mWcm2m1 is utter nonsense. I realize for reasons unknown slashdot does not implement even elementary HTML markup like Greek letters, superscript and subscript. Preview shows garbage from cut and paste, so just improvise.

      The article says 7.4 mW cm^-2 micrometer^-1, which are pretty bizarre units, but readily convertinle to 74 GW/m^3, or 74 MW/liter. That gives us the power density in meaningful form, and it seems pretty damn impressive to me.

    2. Re:Yes it does by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What concerns me is how this density is going to react to being shorted out.

      Flames? Explosion? China Syndrome?

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra