Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Demand for Kopi Luwak May Be Threatening Wildlife

Posted by timothy on from the perils-of-espresso dept.

Damien1972 writes "Popularization of the world's strangest coffee may be imperiling a a suite of small mammals in Indonesia, according to a new study in Small Carnivore Conservation. The coffee, known as kopi luwak (kopi for coffee and luwak for the civet), is made from whole coffee beans that have passed through the gut of the animal. The coffee is apparently noted for its distinct taste, though some have argued it is little more than novelty. Now, this burgeoning kopi luwak industry is creating 'civet farms,' whereby civets are captured from the wild and kept in cages to eat and crap out coffee beans."

80 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. Sturgeon's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Ninety percent of everything is crap."

    1. Re:Sturgeon's Law by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Yes. The Civet.

      Already farmed for centuries, for the "musk..."
      http://news.softpedia.com/news/Get-the-Best-Perfume-From-the-Cat-039-s-Ass-48517.shtml

      "It's the cats ass!"

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Sturgeon's Law by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ...in strong amounts can provoke vomiting in humans...

      "If you blow chunks and she comes back, she's yours."

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. Somebody has to say it by canadiannomad · · Score: 1

    Humans are weird.
    "Let's destroy our planet by trapping and force-feeding coffee beens to a small mammal, take it's shit, grind it, put it in boiling water and drink it as a high end novelty drink."

    --
    Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
    1. Re:Somebody has to say it by JDevers · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, it certainly doesn't help the WILD population of civet cats. Maybe when our alien overlords find that our feces is delicious when we are force fed massive quantities of sawdust you will understand.

    2. Re:Somebody has to say it by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's just another stupid food fad for people with too much money on their hands, like "truffles": horribly-expensive mushrooms that just taste like dirt.
       

    3. Re:Somebody has to say it by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well if that's what it would take to get alien overlords to eat my poop....

      and they'd keep the space dragons away too! AND FORCED MATING! SIGN ME UP FOR SOME BARK BREAD!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Somebody has to say it by plover · · Score: 2

      It may not be destroying the planet, but if you look deeper, the Internet is responsible for the domestication of the civet. I certainly never would have heard of civet shit coffee if it hadn't been for the Internet, and the same is true for about 5 billion other people. Yet now thanks to the interwebs, we have all heard of it.

      And let's say that 10% of people who hear about it want to try it, and 10% of those can afford to. That's 50 million new customers trying to consume a product that's produced slowly on a few acres of jungle. The internet also enables all those customers to order instantly, flooding this little patch of jungle with money. The locals are doing the only sane thing: trying to squeeze more beans out of this boon, while opportunity seekers flock to the new wealth. That means trapping, domestication, poaching, anything to grab a piece of the pie before their neighbor takes it all. It's just another Gold Rush, only faster.

      Really, nothing else could have happened.

      --
      John
    5. Re:Somebody has to say it by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's just another stupid food fad for people with too much money on their hands, like "truffles": horribly-expensive mushrooms that just taste like dirt.

      Truffles have been prized for hundreds of years, and so has coffee.

      Truffles taste earthy, that's true, but that doesn't mean that it is going to stop being a prized culinary item because you don't see the point. You may not like them, but many people do.

      Fugu is horribly expensive and you need a special license to prepare it, but that hasn't slowed demand for it.

      If it's food, and it's tasty, people will always want it. And, there's always going to be a certain cache to having something which is so rare and expensive.

      I've never had occasion to try kopi luac, but I know that Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee is also ridiculously expensive because of the micro climate and soil it grows in -- because you can't just grow the same coffee elsewhere and get the same results. It's entirely dependent on the soil and the climate.

      But lobster used to be considered poor people's food until people discovered how tasty it was. So were oysters, so was sushi. Then people discovered how yummy they were.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re: Somebody has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's fucking idiot hipsters in America. They don't care that it tastes awful. It's all about how they think the world perceives them for having the distinguished class and "taste" to drink coffe from beans out of an animal's asshole.

    7. Re:Somebody has to say it by jythie · · Score: 1

      Truffles, like Shark Fin, is popular because it is popular. It is 'rich guy stuff', so rich people eat it because they can and middle class people buy it because it is a 'taste of luxury'. Even when people can distinguish truffle from other mushrooms, it still pretty much comes down to 'I can detect the socially right one'

    8. Re:Somebody has to say it by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Truffle is trivially distinguishable from other mushrooms. Is it worth paying hundreds or thousands per pound to try it (more than once, at least)? Probably not. Is the taste going to agree with everyone? No. Is a large part of the price the prestige factor? Yes.

      But to assert that it is indistinguishable is just stupid. Either you've never tried them, or you've had your taste buds cauterized.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    9. Re:Somebody has to say it by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends really.

      Truffles are full of umami compounds like all fungus is.

      I know lots of people who are absolutely crazy about the taste of mushrooms and will eat anything with them in it and seek it out. I also know people who don't like the taste of them at all and won't touch them.

      I won't dispute your point, because let's face it, celebrities aren't drinking Cristal because they're wine connoiseurs, they order it because it's expensive and cool to do so. But even I can certainly tell the differences between wines of the same varietal but of differing qualities up to a certain point. That $40 bottle of wine really is better than that $5 bottle.

      There's always going to be people who want to buy the stuff that the snooty people buy. But that doesn't mean that the chefs and other people with really good palettes don't taste it and say "wow, is that awesome" are wrong.

      I suspect most people who drink Grey Goose don't have a good enough palette to tell the difference. But that doesn't mean that when the people who can tell the difference taste it they can't say "this is the best one".

      There will always be a small amount of people with really well developed sense of taste, and there will always be those who get it because it's cool. That doesn't make the people with the well developed sense of taste wrong.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Somebody has to say it by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      That $40 bottle of wine really is better than that $5 bottle.

      Maybe on that. There have been lots of blind test; even one done by the Freakonics guys that determined many people could not reliably distinguish and those who could expressed a preference for the in expensive bottle almost as frequently as the expensive one.

      So there is lot of subjectivity is what a "good wine" actually is and it may come down to personal preference, in absence of social pressure to prefer the higher priced bottle. There may be authentic quality issues as you go downward into the very bottom rot gut how the heck can fill and ship the bottles profitably at that price entries, in that those might not get much in the way of fining or control around MOTG (matter other than grape).

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    11. Re:Somebody has to say it by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      There have been lots of blind test; even one done by the Freakonics guys that determined many people could not reliably distinguish and those who could expressed a preference for the in expensive bottle almost as frequently as the expensive one.

      Well, not knowing anything about the tests, I don't know what they were made up of. Were they people who were drinkers of cheap wine, or actual oneophiles? Because the people who drink the cheap plonk might not be a good sample. But even across 'better' wines, there's differences in what people like and don't like.

      So there is lot of subjectivity is what a "good wine" actually is and it may come down to personal preference

      Absolutely there is, it's taste which is highly subjective.

      I usually don't like southern hemisphere wines for instance, because there's just something about them I'm not a fan of that I can't define. There's a few exceptions, but generally I don't enjoy them. Given a group of Chardonnay wines, some I will really like and some not so much even though they're the same varietal.

      As a general rule, I can say that Australia, South Africa, and Chile don't produce wines I am partial to -- but I've certainly found a few examples which I rather enjoy. Jacob's Creek from Australia, for instance, makes wines I've consistently found to be really nice -- and I'm sure others find them pedestrian and boring.

      On the other hand, I absolutely love grappa, which I know an awful lot of people think is utterly disgusting and tastes like paint thinner.

      There's certain dishes with eggplant I don't like, because the eggplant ends up with bluish tint, and tastes very alkaline to me. It's immediate and unpleasant to me and I can't eat it. My wife can't taste it at all, but there's things she tastes the difference between that I can't even register.

      Taste is a very subjective thing and not everybody experiences it the same.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:Somebody has to say it by excitedidiot · · Score: 1

      Also, we take those same small animals and scrape their anal glands and spray the resulting oil on ourselves to smell better.

    13. Re:Somebody has to say it by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      Well, not knowing anything about the tests, I don't know what they were made up of. Were they people who were drinkers of cheap wine, or actual oneophiles

      That actually doesn't matter. If only self-selected "wine tasters" can taste the best wines, it still only matters to them, and the rest of us can do just fine with a bottle of Ripple or whatever.

      It's the same in the world of expensive musical instruments. Blind testing by experts, virtuosos, and violin-makers all revealed that given the choice they'd take home a $100 violin that was made three days ago, over a million dollar Stradivarius, because honestly there is no difference in the quality of the sound, or the playability of the instrument. This is in fact true of just about everything.

      One way people sucker each other out of lots of money is by making you think you're getting the elite, cream of the crop product. See also expensive stereo equipment where people blow $10,000 on a turntable because it's got vacuum-sealed rotary overhead cams and a fucking flux capacitor built in, but it still turns the record at 33 and 1/3 rpm, no more, no less. There's a lot of money in prestige, and perception is more important than reality.

      If you are comfortable with your perceptions that's great, but please don't kid yourself. You are paying many times the needed price for a difference that is proven to not be real.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    14. Re:Somebody has to say it by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      That actually doesn't matter. If only self-selected "wine tasters" can taste the best wines, it still only matters to them, and the rest of us can do just fine with a bottle of Ripple or whatever.

      That doesn't mean the good wines aren't of a better quality, it might just mean that people don't have enough knowledge to know the difference. But I've certainly seen that you can educate someone a little about wine and actually see their perception of wines change. I'm not talking about going from $5 bottles to $500, but I've definitely seen people go up one price point after they learned a little and got walked through some tasting.

      See also expensive stereo equipment where people blow $10,000 on a turntable because it's got vacuum-sealed rotary overhead cams and a fucking flux capacitor built in

      Well, if it actually had a flux capacitor in it, someone would definitely give you $10K for it. :-P

      There's a lot of money in prestige, and perception is more important than reality.

      I won't dispute you there. Diamonds are expensive and desired for wedding rings because DeBoers tells us so. We can make diamonds in the lab.

      Some things are just more expensive because they're more rare. Kopi Luwac for sure because it's not produced on a huge scale -- I've never tried it, so I couldn't say anything about it.

      In the example of truffles which came up earlier in this thread -- truffles are rare, hard to find, and not something you can cultivate. You need a dog or a pig to help you find them by smell.

      So in large part, scarcity is what makes them expensive. And in most of those cases, I fall firmly into the camp of not being able to tell the difference.

      But I also know there are things I can tell the difference between a $10 example and a $20 one. So I won't concede that in all cases it's without any benefit.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:Somebody has to say it by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      "Let's destroy our planet by trapping and force-feeding coffee beens [sic] to a small mammal, take it's [sic] shit, grind it, put it in boiling water and drink it as a high end novelty drink."

      To be picky, it's only the beans that they grind.

    16. Re:Somebody has to say it by Nocturna81 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to read about this "violin test", as someone who plays multiple instruments there's certainly a quality difference in the sound a cheap 60 dollar acoustic guitar produces versus it's more expensive brother I bought last year. Even using the same strings it has a different sound to it. Same with the stereo equipment I have, it's not in the $10.000 category but at least I can pick out the difference between the cheap stuff and the bit more expensive stuff.

      Isn't this really just about diminishing returns? Because I have to agree that someone who pays 10.000 for the turntable is overdoing it.

    17. Re:Somebody has to say it by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      How does this destroy our planet? Or, for that matter, the civet cats?

      You may need to research about the word ecosystem. Even though it may not guarantee that this action would destroy the world, the current ecosystem would be distorted by human and could impact other system directly and indirectly.

      Seems to me the #1 way for an animal to prevent extinction is to be commercially useful alive.

      You seem to be too optimistic in the issue. You need to think further outside the optimistic box. On the flip side, what would happen when there is an abuse of the system? Would the abuse cause worse effect than leaving these civets alone in their wild?

      To me, attempt to make money off something you don't own in the first place is abusive and selfish. Also, many people who do not understand people from the 3rd world country would not understand how they think. There are a lot more of those who do not have, and these people may take advantage of whatever they have a hand on. In this case, there could be more people capturing all these wild animals; as a result, the local ecosystem (and could impact global in a different way) is changed by humans (and usually toward the worse). I would rather prepare for the worst than expect only good outcome of this change.

    18. Re:Somebody has to say it by retchdog · · Score: 1

      if the "self-selected" wine tasters can taste the difference, then it is real.

      it might not matter to you, but it is real.

      you're mostly right, though. high prices are based on prestige as well as quality. i'm not an oenophile myself but as i've had it explained to me, you can get wines in the 90th percentile of quality for $20-30/btl if you research diligently and have a well-stocked friendly neighborhood wine store.

      of course, if you don't have the time, or if you shop exclusively at whole foods, yeah, they'll happily charge you $100 for the convenience of maintaining your ignorance.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  3. Re:Distinct taste? by Cito · · Score: 1

    I buy some twice a year, it's really expensive but it tastes amazing

    here's a kid that does a "Bizarre Foods" show on youtube trying Kopi Luwak coffee

    http://youtu.be/28PRETajHks

    really good stuff

  4. Not the same product. by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is most likely to create an inferior product. Not that I think semi-digested pooped out coffee beans is particularly desirable product, but when you try to take some biological process and move it up to an industrial scale, something in the product is lost. It's like the fact that industrial scale cheese never has the same flavour of a cheese made in small batches on a small farm. The kind of grass that the sheep/cows eat, the water they drink, and a lot of other factors play into how the cheese tastes.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Not the same product. by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agree completely, and the problem with a civet battery-farm is that an element of why the coffee tastes good is lost.
      It's not just that they eat and poop out the beans. It's also the fact they are picky about which beans they eat in the wild.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    2. Re:Not the same product. by sFurbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One explanation that has been proposed for why Kopi Luwak is different is that the civets choose the most ripe berries. This effect could easily be lost with captivity.

    3. Re:Not the same product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh lord, first we get "I could care less" now we're completely losing any difference between "could" and "could not" whcih is contracted as "couldn't"

    4. Re:Not the same product. by S.O.B. · · Score: 2

      I buy my coffee direct from a Canadian company that has partnered with a coffee grower in Thailand to provide a high quality, shade grown, organic coffee. Although I've never tried it (due to the price and the obvious ick factor), they offer Kopi Lewak but it is from wild civets not caged, domesticated civets for this exact reason.

      It's not only the digestive process that is important but that the civets are particular and only eat the ripest, sweetest berries and theoretically the best berries contain the best beans. Since this company's coffee is already a high quality coffee I imagine their Kopi Lewak is also better than the rest due to their use of wild civets.

      This is analogous to the difference between commercially raised and free range chickens.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  5. phew by ssam · · Score: 3, Funny

    now i have a good reason not to drink it without seeming squeamish.

    1. Re:phew by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      1/2 pound Kopi Luwak coffee: $60

      1/2 pound Caribou coffee: $7.40


      Getting coffee which is not literally shitty: priceless

    2. Re:phew by JDevers · · Score: 2

      Even better, buy high quality green coffee beans from around the world and roast your own coffee. Mediocre beans roasted and consumed after a short wait of a few days taste better than the best beans that are months post roast, now high quality beans consumed fresh are tremendously better than any large scale commercial venture...home roasting or local fresh roasting is the only way to go if you actually crave good coffee. It is also pretty economical and fun.

    3. Re:phew by serbanp · · Score: 2

      Amen to that. The only downside to that is that you either get a powerful hood to remove all the smoke or you remove the batteries from the smoke alarms...

    4. Re:phew by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Since I started roasting my own coffee, I'll never go back to buying coffee roasted by somebody else. The difference is like daylight and dark.

      It doesn't take long (about 15 minutes in my case) and you always have the freshest coffee imaginable.

      Sweet Maria's is usually my go-to source.

  6. Is there anything on this planet by fredrated · · Score: 2

    that humans can't suck the complete life out of?

    1. Re:Is there anything on this planet by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      I've been saying it for years...there are too many humans on this planet. Sure, we're advancing at an astounding rate, but we just don't need eight billion people. We'd likely be better off with closer to 1% of that.

      But, hey, in order to "grow" commerce and markets we need more consumers, so damn reality and keep on fuckin'.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Is there anything on this planet by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      The cockroaches still seem to be doing OK, but I'm not aware of any cockroach delicacies.

    3. Re:Is there anything on this planet by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

      https://www.google.ca/search?q=cockroach+recipes&aq=f&oq=cockroach+recipes&aqs=chrome.0.57j0l3.7062j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

      One of the top page result is recipes for cockroach pesticides. The rest are... not. Enjoy.

      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Is there anything on this planet by twosat · · Score: 1

      Instead of eating food that's been in animal shit, how about eating animals that have been using shit as food?

      http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/there-is-a-staggering-amount-of-feces-in-our-food

    5. Re:Is there anything on this planet by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I am, thankyouverymuch. 50% reduction in one generation.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  7. It's time for "The Replicator" by Covalent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Years ago I went to a lecture given by a food chemist. His research had produced excellent "synthetic coffee" in the 80s and 90s. He said that they had tested the coffee with groups of drinkers who generally found it delicious. So why don't we have synthetic coffee today? Government regulations required that they not use the term "coffee". Essentially, they were forced to call it "coffee substitute" or "synthetic coffee drink" or other such drivel. The result? People thought they were drinking "chemicals", and not coffee. In reality, it was made from organic sources (chickory root, spices, etc.)

    The minute people realize that the "chemicals" in kopi luwak are just that - chemicals - the sooner we could just synthesize these in the lab and allow people to have the shit-coffee and leave the civets to romp in their truffula trees.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:It's time for "The Replicator" by lxs · · Score: 1

      If it's not coffee it shouldn't be labeled as such, and roasted chicory root has been used as a coffee surrogate for centuries. A quick Google search shows that it's being sold today as a healthy organic alternative to coffee.

      Your food chemist should blame his marketing department for the cock up, not the government.

    2. Re:It's time for "The Replicator" by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So he should have called it something else entirely.
      He had no right to label it coffee, that would be misleading. He should have called it "Doc Brown's Organic Breakfast Beverage". It sounds like it lacked caffeine, which means it was probably doomed to failure anyway.

      The ignorance of the public is a separate problem that should not be handled by making them even more ignorant about their breakfast drinks. Everything is chemicals, some of them are delicious some not, some dangerous some not. This is like the whole GMO labeling and even worse the irradiation labeling. I want irradiated ground beef, I like to eat burgers far too rare for good sense. If you remove that labeling I will have to grind my own or start taking bigger risks.

    3. Re:It's time for "The Replicator" by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

      And they still won't want it. I think part of the appeal is that this is a novelty that's really hard to produce, and therefore expensive. It's another way to show how much better you are then everyone else because you have money. And it tastes better because it's expensive (or so your mind tells you).

      Conspicuous consumption sucks.

    4. Re:It's time for "The Replicator" by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Checklist:
      is it coffee? No
      is it meant to replace coffee? Yes

      Then coffee substitute is the proper terminology. If it didnt come from coffee beans, then its not coffee. that shouldnt be a difficult concept for you to grasp. You just failed to apply the proper marketing technique to open up a market for it.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    5. Re:It's time for "The Replicator" by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      If you read the list of ingredients in many herbal/green tea blends, there's usually a "Nature identical flavour" listed. That's the marketing spun name for synthetic flavours that are chemically identical to the natural extract version of a flavour.

      People still have the same aversion to synthetic versions of natural things, even if they are chemically identical. I take great pleasure in pointing out the nature identical flavour component to ignorant unaware tea drinkers who think natural is better.

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  8. Re:This is some bad shit. by FuzzNugget · · Score: 2

    I thought, by definition, it was supposed to be good shit.

  9. this coffee by cynop · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...tastes like crap

  10. Re:This is some bad shit. by dyingtolive · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a crappy idea at any rate. I think it's simply offal.

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  11. Obligatory by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

    Rectum? Damn near killed them.

    --
    "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
  12. Any reason it can't be sustainable and humane? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Are civets endangered? Are they being force fed as in "forced to eat more than they want" or force fed as in "they would never eat coffee beans on their own free will?"

    Sounds like a good business opportunity, get your ethically-made civet shit coffee here!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Any reason it can't be sustainable and humane? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Once the demand causes prices to reach the level of moral depravity, there will be a class of "entrepreneurs" who will realize that the market is worth any moral failure to provide. Torture, murder, environmental destruction - all a small price to pay to become rich (for someone's personal value of rich). The drug trade is similar.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  13. History of this way of treating coffee beans by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do not know if this is true, but I could see it. I came across a story some time back that claimed to explain the origins of Kopi Luwak coffee. The story was that during colonial times the natives were not allowed to have any of the coffee beans for their own use. They wanted to drink coffee. When they discovered the undigested beans in civet feces, they collected them and made coffee from them. At some later point, Europeans saw the natives drinking this coffee and decided it must be something special, since the natives drank it (never considering that it was the only coffee the natives had access to).
    All reports I have seen about blind taste tests suggest that the flavor is thin and inferior to other quality coffees.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  14. Re:This is anymal cruelty by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trapping and force-feeding something that the animal would not normally eat is just wrong.

    They didn't discover this coffee by feeding something to the civets they wouldn't eat normally.

    The civets already eat the fruit and crap out the seed. The civets clearly already liked eating it.

    Now, as to how someone made the leap of taking the seeds which have passed through the civet and decided to make coffee out of it ... I couldn't even begin to guess at.

    But they are NOT force feeding them something they wouldn't eat normally.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  15. So all it takes... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    ...is a trip through some animal's gut? I think we've discovered a new industry for the labor forces in "emerging nations". Not suprisingly, it's the raw material "production" positions that will be highly prized, whereas the refining and packaging jobs, not so much.

    1. Re:So all it takes... by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

      This is the course almost all manufacturing and industry seems to be taking. Turn their product into SHIT, charge a ridiculous amount of money for it, and then scream at us the public that we don't appreciate them properly.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
  16. Re:Distinct taste? by Dishevel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people who know coffee say that in blind tests this "Shit" coffee is indistinguishable from cheap ("Shit") coffee.
    People are for the most part incredibly stupid.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  17. Re:This is some bad shit. by dywolf · · Score: 1

    it certainly tastes like crap

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  18. Re:This is anymal cruelty by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

    Now, as to how someone made the leap of taking the seeds which have passed through the civet and decided to make coffee out of it ... I couldn't even begin to guess at.

    Wikipedia is your friend...

    History:

    The origin of kopi luwak is closely connected with the history of coffee production in Indonesia. In the early 18th century the Dutch established the cash-crop coffee plantations in their colony in the Dutch East Indies islands of Java and Sumatra, including Arabica coffee introduced from Yemen. During the era of Cultuurstelsel (1830—1870), the Dutch prohibited the native farmers and plantation workers from picking coffee fruits for their own use. Still, the native farmers wanted to have a taste of the famed coffee beverage. Soon, the natives learned that certain species of musang or luwak (Asian Palm Civet) consumed the coffee fruits, yet they left the coffee seeds undigested in their droppings. The natives collected these luwaks' coffee seed droppings, then cleaned, roasted and ground them to make their own coffee beverage. The fame of aromatic civet coffee spread from locals to Dutch plantation owners and soon became their favorite, yet because of its rarity and unusual process, the civet coffee was expensive even in colonial times.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopi_Luwak

  19. Re:Distinct taste? by TheP4st · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a big coffee drinker and a very fuzzy one at that. A couple of months ago my brother in law knowing my love for coffee bought me some Kopi Luwak from in Malaysia. I cannot even begin to explain how disappointed I were in the experience of drinking this supposedly fantastic brew. I would not compare it with a cheap coffee as it do have a unique and distinct flavor and aroma that is far from unpleasant that set it apart from any other coffee I have ever had, but it certainly does not live up to the reputation it have and it is in my opinion ridiculously overrated.

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  20. env hypocrisy is legion by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    At the star supermarket on austin street in Newton, MA, there is a sign - enter our Earth Day contest and win a trip for two to costa rica
    Is there anything more emblamatic of anti-environmentalism then flying to another country to help destroy the jungle iwth your tourism ?

    A few months ago at star maker, there were for sale bundles of firewood, wrapped in plastic, from Lithuania (!) advertised as "green"
    so you have you open pit or woodstove, in-efficient combustion, wood that was transported across the ocean....

    but nothing can beat the slimyness of Poland Springs, a division of Nestle the people who kill babies with formula: the bottles say new green cap - it is smaller and uses less plastic !!
    (alhtough i suppose transporting water from Fiji or Iceland, and selling it in plastic bottles is really the ultimate environmental insult)

    1. Re:env hypocrisy is legion by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      "Green" + "Capitalist" = "Capitalist"

    2. Re:env hypocrisy is legion by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      there were for sale bundles of firewood, wrapped in plastic, from Lithuania (!) advertised as "green"
      so you have you open pit or woodstove, in-efficient combustion, wood that was transported across the ocean....

      Well wood burning could be considered green in that its at least a renewable resource. It could arguably be considered carbon neutral as well; if we got to the point were we re-planted as much acreage of forest as we harvest.

      The transporting it across the ocean part though is pretty messed up.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  21. Re:This is anymal cruelty by dywolf · · Score: 1

    you ignorant twit. it was discovered precisely because it IS something the civets eat, and eat regularly.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  22. Re:This is some bad shit. by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    I thought, by definition, it was supposed to be good shit.

    I don't know about that, but it is expensive shit...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  23. Re:This is anymal cruelty by SternisheFan · · Score: 3, Informative
    Animal welfare:

    Initially civet coffee beans were picked from from wild civet excrement that was to be found around coffee plantations. This unusual process contributed to its rarity and subsequently, its high price. More recently, growing numbers of intensive civet "farms" have been established and operated across Southeast Asia, confining tens of thousands of animals to live in tiny cages and be force-fed.

    '"The conditions are awful, much like battery chickens", said Chris Shepherd, deputy regional director of the conservation NGO Traffic south-east Asia. "The civets are taken from the wild and have to endure horrific conditions. They fight to stay together but they are separated and have to bear a very poor diet in very small cages. There is a high mortality rate and for some species of civet, there's a real conservation risk. It's spiralling out of control. But there's not much public awareness of how it's actually made. People need to be aware that tens of thousands of civets are being kept in these conditions. It would put people off their coffee if they knew"'.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopi_Luwak

  24. Re:This is anymal cruelty by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    Humans are indigenous to this planet, thus we are part of "nature."

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  25. Best way to brew Kopi Luwak by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    It's a little know fact that Starbucks allows you to bring your Civet in for that fresh-brewed taste. Best way to do it is feed Civet and entire box of prunes about 30 minutes before heading out.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  26. Destroy all the Hipsters by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2

    before they destroy us all!

    Anybody that wants to drink coffee that was crapped out of an animal has jumped the shark as a human being.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:Destroy all the Hipsters by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Though, to be fair, some animal crap is delicious, I rather like honey

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    2. Re:Destroy all the Hipsters by Wookact · · Score: 2
      Honey is puke.

      Honey bees transform nectar into honey by a process of regurgitation and evaporation. They store it as a primary food source in wax honeycombs inside the beehive.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey

  27. Re:Distinct taste? by jythie · · Score: 1

    People tend to rationalize expensive and trendy things. Chances are in a blind taste test the same people would lament how low brow it tastes.

  28. Still? by jythie · · Score: 1

    I thought this novelty peaked years ago.

    1. Re:Still? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I thought this novelty peaked years ago.

      Addicting drug + scat fetish + Internet + high-profit margins - don't get caught selling it short.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  29. Re:Distinct taste? by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

    Classic obligatory column on Kopi Luwak. Definitely a memorable description of his experience with it.

  30. Just pay me $1000/lb and... by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

    I'll be more than happy to eat a bunch of coffee cherries and shit them out for you. Heck, I'll even ship them to you for no additional charge.

    1. Re:Just pay me $1000/lb and... by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      This may not be quite as pleasantly easy money as you think, if you want to reach high enough production levels to retain paying customers. Each pound of roasted beans starts from 15-20lbs of coffee cherries, which you will need to force feed yourself and hold down for a couple days of fermentation. So, I'm guessing it would take you at minimum two weeks of "processing time" (seven 2-day batches), in which you force-feed yourself ~2lb of coffee cherries and constipation-inducing medication, wait 2 days without eating other foods while your gut churns on fermenting pulp. Then you get to crap out the lumpy slurry, and start the process again (probably with a few day recuperation time). So, you'd be "more than happy" with two weeks of forced gorging, indigestion, constipation, fasting, and diarrhea for $1000? Your day job must be pretty awful.

    2. Re:Just pay me $1000/lb and... by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

      Who's to say the fermentation would take 2 weeks? I have developed a patent-pending process whereby I'm able to drop the fermentation time down to 1.5 days without affecting the taste of the final product. It is true, though, that the volume of ingestion might be a small issue, but it's worth a shit, err.. shot.

    3. Re:Just pay me $1000/lb and... by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Good luck with your patent. However, I have the suspicion that a business plan based on "use my own body in direct competition against the digestive and excretory systems of maltreated caged animals" may not work out so well as you hope --- that's a race to the bottom I wouldn't want to contest.

  31. Re:This is anymal cruelty by Artifex · · Score: 2

    Well, I'm convinced: it's our civet doodie not to support this animal cruelty.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  32. I had a civet by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid, I lived in Jakarta, and my parents bought me a civet as a pet. BAD idea. It was a captured wild civet. We only had it about 3 months before it having bitten and scratched me so much, we ended up taking it out to the jungle where there were a bunch of wild civets and releasing it. I hope it did ok, and never blamed it for being wild and attacking me occasionally. I think it's terrible to "farm" animals in this fashion for something that we don't actually need really. It's one thing to milk cows, quite another to force feed civets coffee.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse